[ubuntu-art] unsuscribe

2009-04-06 Thread patrice.vallade Vallade
Patrice Vallade
13 grande allée de la Faisanderie
77185 Lognes
01.60.05.38.63
http://www.blog-lognes.com
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Fwd: Any release party poster proposals?

2009-04-06 Thread rancor
Ah, thanks! I opened it in Gimp and only saw one layer but I will try Inkscape.

Regards rancor

On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Mads Rosendahl mad...@gmail.com wrote:
 rancor wrote:
 They both seems interesting. Will you release it in multi layer so we
 can alter the text to our loco?

 Regards rancor

 Not sure if that was meant for me, but you can edit the .SVG file in
 Inkscape. It looks like one layer, but you can edit everything (just
 double click).

 Remember this is still work in progress - I'll try to make a new
 version available next week.

 //MadsRH
 http://anotherubuntu.blogspot.com

 --
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


[ubuntu-art] Fwd: Any release party poster proposals?

2009-04-06 Thread Mads Rosendahl
rancor wrote:
 They both seems interesting. Will you release it in multi layer so we
 can alter the text to our loco?

 Regards rancor

Not sure if that was meant for me, but you can edit the .SVG file in
Inkscape. It looks like one layer, but you can edit everything (just
double click).

Remember this is still work in progress - I'll try to make a new
version available next week.

//MadsRH
http://anotherubuntu.blogspot.com

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Incoming

2009-04-06 Thread Thorsten Wilms
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 21:22 +0100, Who wrote:

 The effort has, shall we say, paused. I have some more work for
 Blubuntu sitting on my machine somewhere that needs to go up and that
 might turn it in to a newly releasable version.
 
 If it isn't doing any harm in Incoming then I would prefer it stayed,
 just to avoid breaking links. Otherwise, move it, but perhaps leave a
 landing/redirect page (which I think defeats the purpose of moving it
 and explains its bouncing into and out of attic...)

Indeed.

Good to know it's not dead, so it shall stay, provided Incoming stays
where and what it is.

Same for Alex's Nine.


-- 
Thorsten Wilms

thorwil's design for free software:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] New Wave 0.8.0 - Now Official

2009-04-06 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
2009/4/5 Anton Kerezov ank...@gmail.com:
 Hello everybody,

 I would like to announce the release of New Wave 0.8.0 (although some of
 you are already using it via Ubuntu 9.04). If you still don't have it
 you could download it for test from here:

 1) https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/New_Wave
 2) http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php/New+Wave?content=87134

 P.S. I hope you enjoy using the theme.


Great work Anton. You perseverance and energy in working on New Wave
has been an inspiration!

I love new wave. It makes me feel sexy when I use my desktop. And when
it all breaks down, this is how everybody wants to feel. I am not
inserting a smiley face here (as I would have done) because I actually
mean this.

-- 
Cheers,
Mikkel

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Organizing Artwork Wiki

2009-04-06 Thread Thorsten Wilms
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 21:44 -0400, John Baer wrote:

  So far I made an exception for Breathe, though, as one might argue it
  should be in Incoming. I don't dare to touch it without asking Cory
  because he's Cory and think it deserves a little extra emphasis :)
  
 
 I believe Cory will agree to changes that add value to Breathe.

Cory, are you listening?


   * Artwork   (CategoryArt)
 
 1st level
 
   * Artwork/Archives  (CategoryArtArchives)
   * Artwork/Banners   (CategoryArtBanners)
   * Artwork/Releases  (CategoryArtReleases)
   * Artwork/Documentation (CategoryArtDocumentation)
   * Artwork/Governance(CategoryArtGovernance)
   * Artwork/GtkThemes (CategoryArtGtkThemes)
   * Artwork/GdmTheme  (CategoryArtGdmTheme)
   * Artwork/IconThemes(CategoryArtIconThemes)
   * Artwork/AudioThemes   (CategoryArtAudioThemes)
   * Artwork/Meetings  (CategoryArtMeetings)
   * Artwork/Guidelines(CategoryArtGuidelines)

Banners:
Maybe the countdown banners should be added to the pages in Archives.
I don't see much need for such a Category, currently.

Governance:
I doubt there's enough to say on Governance

Documentation/Guidelines:
I intent to collect both technical documentation and guidelines in
Documentation and will only consider creating a separate Guidelines if
it gets too crowded.


Interesting proposal to get rid of Incoming. But you will have the same
problem as we have now, with a theme starting on a release-specific
page, later needing a page elsewhere if the development spans across
several releases.

There's a whole lot of stuff in Incoming, so it would be a lot of work.
I'll let other chime in here.


   * Artwork/Documentation/OfficalArtwork

OfficialArtwork doesn't belong in Documentation, because it just
isn't ;)
It's kinda the counter-part to Incoming.



 2nd level (release example)
 
   * Artwork/Releases/Intrepid/TooHuman  (CategoryArtReleases)
   * Artwork/Releases/Jaunty/photo_wallpaper (CategoryArtReleases)


 2nd level (IRC meetings example)
 
   * Artwork/Meetings/Calendar   (CategoryArtMeetings)
   * Artwork/Meetings/2008May13  (CategoryArtMeetings)

If we pick up meetings again, date and agenda of the next one should be
 directly on the Meetings page. Previous can go to a single or several
 sub-pages, but it's moot to discuss this as long as no meetings happen.



 To support Launchpad/bazzar, the desire is to link back to a home URL.
 Using Breathe as an example, this project has and will span multiple
 Ubuntu releases so the home page shouldn't reside under the current
 incoming or proposed releases branch. IMO these projects should have
 a home URL under a branch which describes the effort (e.g. IconThemes).

Not worth it as long there isn't even a 2nd icon theme and it should be
a minimum of 3 to not look silly.


I see you keep editing 
   https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/WikiDesign
so people should have a look.


-- 
Thorsten Wilms

thorwil's design for free software:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Organizing Artwork Wiki

2009-04-06 Thread Kenneth Wimer
On Monday 06 April 2009 14:44:09 Thorsten Wilms wrote:
 On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 21:44 -0400, John Baer wrote:
   So far I made an exception for Breathe, though, as one might argue it
   should be in Incoming. I don't dare to touch it without asking Cory
   because he's Cory and think it deserves a little extra emphasis :)
 
  I believe Cory will agree to changes that add value to Breathe.

 Cory, are you listening?

* Artwork   (CategoryArt)
 
  1st level
 
* Artwork/Archives  (CategoryArtArchives)
* Artwork/Banners   (CategoryArtBanners)
* Artwork/Releases  (CategoryArtReleases)
* Artwork/Documentation (CategoryArtDocumentation)
* Artwork/Governance(CategoryArtGovernance)
* Artwork/GtkThemes (CategoryArtGtkThemes)
* Artwork/GdmTheme  (CategoryArtGdmTheme)
* Artwork/IconThemes(CategoryArtIconThemes)
* Artwork/AudioThemes   (CategoryArtAudioThemes)
* Artwork/Meetings  (CategoryArtMeetings)
* Artwork/Guidelines(CategoryArtGuidelines)

 Banners:
 Maybe the countdown banners should be added to the pages in Archives.
 I don't see much need for such a Category, currently.

 Governance:
 I doubt there's enough to say on Governance

 Documentation/Guidelines:
 I intent to collect both technical documentation and guidelines in
 Documentation and will only consider creating a separate Guidelines if
 it gets too crowded.

I agree completely with Thorsten on all 3 of these.

 Interesting proposal to get rid of Incoming. But you will have the same
 problem as we have now, with a theme starting on a release-specific
 page, later needing a page elsewhere if the development spans across
 several releases.

 There's a whole lot of stuff in Incoming, so it would be a lot of work.
 I'll let other chime in here.

Again, I agree with Thorsten. There needs to be a place to do current work 
which may or may not even be finished. I don't have an opinion as to what that 
should be named, but it's always been incoming and that has worked fine so far. 
Maybe there is a good reason to rename it?

* Artwork/Documentation/OfficalArtwork

 OfficialArtwork doesn't belong in Documentation, because it just
 isn't ;)
 It's kinda the counter-part to Incoming.

  2nd level (release example)
 
* Artwork/Releases/Intrepid/TooHuman  (CategoryArtReleases)
* Artwork/Releases/Jaunty/photo_wallpaper (CategoryArtReleases)
 
 
  2nd level (IRC meetings example)
 
* Artwork/Meetings/Calendar   (CategoryArtMeetings)
* Artwork/Meetings/2008May13  (CategoryArtMeetings)

 If we pick up meetings again, date and agenda of the next one should be
  directly on the Meetings page. Previous can go to a single or several
  sub-pages, but it's moot to discuss this as long as no meetings happen.

Actually, the way we notify people of meetings and where the minutes and such 
go is not completely up to us. The reporting pages and such were defined by
Jono and team quite some time ago. Maybe in the meantime things have changed 
or perhaps there is some flexibility that I am not aware of though.

  To support Launchpad/bazzar, the desire is to link back to a home URL.
  Using Breathe as an example, this project has and will span multiple
  Ubuntu releases so the home page shouldn't reside under the current
  incoming or proposed releases branch. IMO these projects should have
  a home URL under a branch which describes the effort (e.g. IconThemes).

 Not worth it as long there isn't even a 2nd icon theme and it should be
 a minimum of 3 to not look silly.

Right.


 I see you keep editing

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/WikiDesign

 so people should have a look.

Getting quite complicated. It seems you have defined your ideas well but 
perhaps there is a way to make this information more understandable? In 
addition, this seems very final to me whereas I understood the purpose of this 
page to be a place for everyone to put their ideas for how the wiki should be 
structured. If we intend to use this page as the final structure we should 
discuss any changes before editing the page.

--
Ken
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


[ubuntu-art] Organizing Artwork Wiki (Breathe)

2009-04-06 Thread Cory K.
Thorsten Wilms wrote:
 On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 21:44 -0400, John Baer wrote:
   
 So far I made an exception for Breathe, though, as one might argue it
 should be in Incoming. I don't dare to touch it without asking Cory
 because he's Cory and think it deserves a little extra emphasis :)

   
 I believe Cory will agree to changes that add value to Breathe.
 

 Cory, are you listening?

Yeah. Just been takin' a break this weekend. ;)

Well, I put Breathe where I did because it's a major project directly
under the Artwork team. Not aimed for any particular cycle/release.
Which is what I always felt Incoming/ was for. (or minor projects)

So with that, I personally would move Blubuntu (if it were more active),
Kyūdō and the new Powder effort would go there as well. (directly
under Artwork/) Basically any *major*, long-term projects would go under
Artwork/.

-Cory K.


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Organizing Artwork Wiki (Breathe)

2009-04-06 Thread Thorsten Wilms
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 09:34 -0400, Cory K. wrote:

 Well, I put Breathe where I did because it's a major project directly
 under the Artwork team. Not aimed for any particular cycle/release.
 Which is what I always felt Incoming/ was for. (or minor projects)

Well, Incoming happens to contain per-release and long term since a
while now. I wouldn't move all the long term projects up. It's good to
have continued themes very close to the release-specific pages, I think.

 So with that, I personally would move Blubuntu (if it were more active),
 Kyūdō and the new Powder effort would go there as well. (directly
 under Artwork/) Basically any *major*, long-term projects would go under
 Artwork/.

Kyūdō will be split up inside Documentation and any effort based on it
will live elsewhere, most likely starting in Incoming/SomeRelease.
That's at least the current state of my plans :)

-- 
Thorsten Wilms

thorwil's design for free software:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] Submissions page formatting change.

2009-04-06 Thread Cory K.
I ran into some oddness today. Apparently you can have too many
attachments displayed and it will cause an error. So I removed some
items that have either been added to the set or as they were will not be
added. This is something I will keep an eye on for the future. You guys
need not worry.

Also, I've added Contents to the top of the page to help with getting
to particular sections. Though, the page should not grow much larger
than it is now.


-Cory K.

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] audio-card

2009-04-06 Thread Cory K.
Will there be any new work to this or should I remove the submission?

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions#Devices

-Cory K.

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] gtk-media

2009-04-06 Thread Cory K.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions#Media%20Controls

Ok. So we are slowly coming along on these and they look good to me. I'd
like to hear Sebastien's opinion on these as to how they fit the current
feel of the set.

I do notice that there looks to me a slight hard line where the 2 arrows
hit each other on the current media-skip-forward. Some kinda visible
overlap? Maybe this is the unfinished part. :) But good so far.

Actually, wouldn't the double arrow design be better for the seek icons?


-Cory K.

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] New Wave 0.8.0 - Now Official

2009-04-06 Thread Anton Kerezov
В 14:06 +0200 на 06.04.2009 (пн), Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen написа:
 Great work Anton. You perseverance and energy in working on New Wave
 has been an inspiration!

I'm glad to hear it! I just want to make Linux beautiful.


 I love new wave. It makes me feel sexy when I use my desktop. And when
 it all breaks down, this is how everybody wants to feel. I am not
 inserting a smiley face here (as I would have done) because I actually
 mean this.

Thanks, but remember that in order to achieve this result I have
listened to the opinions of many people on this list. So we are all
contributors to the theme.


Anton


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] New Wave 0.8.0 - Now Official

2009-04-06 Thread Alex Armstrong
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 14:06 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
 2009/4/5 Anton Kerezov ank...@gmail.com:
  Hello everybody,
 
  I would like to announce the release of New Wave 0.8.0 (although some of
  you are already using it via Ubuntu 9.04). If you still don't have it
  you could download it for test from here:
 
  1) https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/New_Wave
  2) http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php/New+Wave?content=87134
 
  P.S. I hope you enjoy using the theme.
 
 
 Great work Anton. You perseverance and energy in working on New Wave
 has been an inspiration!
 
 I love new wave. It makes me feel sexy when I use my desktop. And when
 it all breaks down, this is how everybody wants to feel. I am not
 inserting a smiley face here (as I would have done) because I actually
 mean this.
 
 -- 
 Cheers,
 Mikkel

This is a very interesting approach to the interface: that it should
look good in times of crisis. The verity of your comment would not have
registered if not for the following coincidence: I've decided to play
around with fluxbox and I still haven't gotten the gnome-settings-daemon
up, which means I am writing this in the ugly default GTK+ theme.
Although I am getting things done, my desktop's present ugliness is an
overwhelming nuisance.

Alex


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Organizing Artwork Wiki

2009-04-06 Thread John Baer
Thorsten,

You are doing a good job of sorting through the content and defining the
issues.

I added a disclaimer to the WikiDesign page to notify folks the content
of the page is exploratory and is not intended to be official. An over
site on my part. :(

If desired, this page can serve to document the outcome when the effort
is complete.

John


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art