Re: [ubuntu-art] Metacity Button Order Changed

2010-03-05 Thread Dana Goyette
Not only are the buttons on the left, but they're not even correct for 
buttons on the left!

What OS X has:close, minimize, maximize : menu
What we have: maximize, minimize, close : menu
What Windows has: menu : minimize, maximize, close

As it is right now, the theme will break muscle memory for everyone 
coming from Windows, OS X, and even all other Linux distros (including 
previous versions of Ubuntu)!

also a few other notes:
* the Plymouth progress bar seems to go from 0% to 100% over and over, 
instead of actually throbbing; this is misleading and confusing.
* the superscript logo makes the name look like ubuntuĀ® (with the logo 
as the registered-trademark symbol).

On 03/05/2010 07:58 AM, Merk wrote:

 That's still relearning behavior for no obvious benefit

 hotice wrote:

 It's because the buttons will be on the left, not right side afterall:
 http://www.webupd8.org/2010/03/almost-official-ubuntu-1004-lucid-will.html

 On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 16:21, Saleel Velankarsvela...@gmail.com  wrote:

 Yeah doesn't this force user to relearn behavior, for no obvious benefit?

 On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Mark Curtismerkin...@hotmail.com
 wrote:

   Just curious, what is the thought behind the change?
 As in, why is it deemed better to change the order?

 From: kw...@ubuntu.com
 To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:17:05 +
 CC: bae...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Metacity Button Order Changed


 On Friday 05 March 2010 01:43:43 am John Baer wrote:
 I noticed in today's upgrade (03/04) the order of the metacity's
 minimize and maximized buttons changed.

 In the old metacity the order was; minimize, maximize, close

 In the new metacity the order is: maximize, minimize, close

 Is this the desired effect or is this a bug?

 This is the desired effect.

 --
 Ken

 --
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

 --
 Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it
 now.http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/

 --

 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art




 --
 Saleel


 --
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art



 --
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art






-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] ibex idea

2008-06-03 Thread Dana Goyette
Hmm, I couldn't see the circles in the background until I tipped my 
laptop LCD downward.  That's a bit of an odd effect.
In addition, is it just me, or does the curvature on the spiral seem a 
bit... off?  It seems to change sharpness, rather oddly; ideally, it'd 
be a smooth spiral.


Dylan McCall wrote:
 On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 01:12 +0200, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
 Not sure what it is supposed to represent. The wallpaper would not include 
 the 
 logo in the middle. I just put it together quickly to show the idea.

 http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Intrepid/SimpleDarkIbex

 I have a couple of other versions as well...I'll post something else 
 tomorrow.
 
 That's pretty cool, Kenneth! An issue I find with a lot of the ibex
 wallpapers is that they look like decapitated animals, which Will Not go
 over well. (Stuffed animal heads pinned on walls. ...Anyone remember
 that scene in Ace Ventura?).
 
 This one cleverly avoids that by showing the distinctive part of an Ibex
 people actually notice and leaving out the bland bits that people can't
 figure out what to do with. Also, while there is no Ubuntu logo, the
 palette and shape hints at Ubuntu's branding pretty well, which is how
 things should be. As for the background, I am not a fan of the
 additional circles. Now that my screen brightness is higher, I see that
 it kind of repeats the same pattern in the background as in the center,
 which hurts your otherwise very striking effect. Perhaps it would be
 useful to look at an Ibex's environment for some inspiration as to what
 can be done with the background. Alas, just rocky probably doesn't
 help much... Straight lines, small amounts of vegetation and sharp edges
 may get somewhere.
 For some reason my rather hopeless imagination is now being invaded by
 the Ford tough logo. I'd better get out of here before I say something
 dumb :)
 
 Bye,
 -Dylan
 


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Intrepid Ibex (Wallpaper Slideshow)

2008-04-28 Thread Dana Goyette
Cory K. wrote:
 
 ATM, this feature doesn't work well at all. It's totally CPU driven and
 on every box I've tried it on the transition is bad. Usually ticky. Like
 a *real* low frame-rate. Various resolutions, right up to a dual-core box.
 
 Also there's some issue where the fade or transition time can't be set
 below 15seconds or so.
 
 To be done by default I think the feature needs work.
 
 -Cory \m/
 

I dug around in the source of the libgnome-desktop-2 package, and found 
this:
 From gnome-bg.c, line 1065-1066:
 /* Maybe the number of steps should be configurable? */
 timeout = slide-duration / 255.0;

For a 2 hour transition, that works out to about 28 seconds.  For a 
5-hour transition, as in the Fedora Infinity wallpaper, it is roughly 71 
seconds.

I would love this feature, but it definitely does need improvement. The 
feature also needs to become 'discoverable' before being included by 
default.
It'd be even better if we could make it respond to local conditions, as 
in this idea: 
http://www.tranism.com/weblog/archives/2006/11/os_x_atmosphere.html


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art