Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science (orange vs. green)
This case is very simple, if you want to maintain the human style, seen in the rest of the icon set, has to be orange, Otherwise, wear green. Personally I am inclined to orange. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science (orange vs. green)
Ryan Prior wrote: > Yann Dìnendal wrote: > >> Nice, but imo, the previous preferences-desktop-personal with the >> transparent pen looked nicer. And I also prefer Milan's green, it looks more >> like real liquid. >> > > > I am having trouble explaining what I perceive as the difference between > Sebastian's green and the modification by Milan's, but the I definitely > agree with Yann's conclusion that Milan's looks more like real fluid. The > way the outline of the meniscus looks, the way that some light plays into > the rear of the bottle a little bit, the softening of the white overlay, the > variety of shades used ranging from light yellows to dark greens; the effect > of Milan's fluid is much more appealing than the original. > Ok ok. Let's not get /too/ carried away here. While I do see what you mean remember the size at which these are going to be used. Even if they pop up somewhere at the default 48px I *still* think that you'll miss this difference between the 2 versions. Now, this is not to say I won't upload a revision if anyone would like to make it but for now I will upload Sebastien's current revision. -Cory K. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science (orange vs. green)
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Yann Dìnendal < yanndinen...@universfantastiques.org> wrote: > Nice, but imo, the previous preferences-desktop-personal with the > transparent pen looked nicer. And I also prefer Milan's green, it looks more > like real liquid. I am having trouble explaining what I perceive as the difference between Sebastian's green and the modification by Milan's, but the I definitely agree with Yann's conclusion that Milan's looks more like real fluid. The way the outline of the meniscus looks, the way that some light plays into the rear of the bottle a little bit, the softening of the white overlay, the variety of shades used ranging from light yellows to dark greens; the effect of Milan's fluid is much more appealing than the original. For what it's worth, I loved the original orange colors. There is very little green in the set, and I believe that there is much to say for color continuity. The red color still says "science" in a way that's less comic-book and cliché, as well as fitting better with the rest of the icon set. Please reconsider the fluid color! -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science (orange vs. green)
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 21:46, spg76 wrote: > I updated the wiki with a new green version for applications-science. > Also I refine a little the preferences-desktop-personal icon and made the > small sizes. > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions > > -- > Seba (AKA spg76) > http://www.ubuntu-ar.org > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > > Nice, but imo, the previous preferences-desktop-personal with the transparent pen looked nicer. And I also prefer Milan's green, it looks more like real liquid. Yann Dìnendal -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science (orange vs. green)
I updated the wiki with a new green version for applications-science. Also I refine a little the preferences-desktop-personal icon and made the small sizes. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions -- Seba (AKA spg76) http://www.ubuntu-ar.org -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science (orange vs. green)
spg76 wrote: > 2009/3/12 Cory K. > >> Ok. I think Sebastien's "applications-science2" is the way to go. But, I >> gotta say, I'm kinda diggin' Milan's green color on his variant. >> >> Sebastien: How strongly do you feel about the orange? :) In the end, >> I'll be uploading "applications-science2" (whatever color) very soon. >> >> > > I can go either way. If everyone prefer the green one I have to edit > applications-science2 because Milan's it's based on the first version. > > >> PS: Sebastien: "preferences-desktop-personal" is fine. Finish off the >> smaller ones and I'll upload. >> > > Ok. I'm not quite happy with it but I'll try to refine it and make the small > sizes. We can always change it in the future. > Sounds like a plan. :) I'll make a new upload when you're ready. Thorsten Wilms wrote: > Damn, now I'm writing an one-liner ... almost ;) > > We still love you. ;) -Cory K. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science (orange vs. green)
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 14:25 -0200, spg76 wrote: > I can go either way. If everyone prefer the green one I have to edit > applications-science2 because Milan's it's based on the first version. Green for me, seems more fitting. Damn, now I'm writing an one-liner ... almost ;) -- Thorsten Wilms thorwil's design for free software: http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science (orange vs. green)
2009/3/12 Cory K. > Ok. I think Sebastien's "applications-science2" is the way to go. But, I > gotta say, I'm kinda diggin' Milan's green color on his variant. > > Sebastien: How strongly do you feel about the orange? :) In the end, > I'll be uploading "applications-science2" (whatever color) very soon. > I can go either way. If everyone prefer the green one I have to edit applications-science2 because Milan's it's based on the first version. -Cory K. > > PS: Sebastien: "preferences-desktop-personal" is fine. Finish off the > smaller ones and I'll upload. Ok. I'm not quite happy with it but I'll try to refine it and make the small sizes. We can always change it in the future. -- Seba (AKA spg76) http://www.ubuntu-ar.org -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
[ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science (orange vs. green)
Ok. I think Sebastien's "applications-science2" is the way to go. But, I gotta say, I'm kinda diggin' Milan's green color on his variant. Sebastien: How strongly do you feel about the orange? :) In the end, I'll be uploading "applications-science2" (whatever color) very soon. -Cory K. PS: Sebastien: "preferences-desktop-personal" is fine. Finish off the smaller ones and I'll upload. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science
Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2009, 15:03 -0200 schrieb spg76: > I uploaded to the wiki a new icon for applications-science. > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions > -- > Seba (AKA spg76) > http://www.ubuntu-ar.org What about some bubbles? It's nice and beatiful, but a little bit boring. ;) This coulour is danger, with bubbles more ... :) I don't think it would be too overloaded with some bubbles more ... Sincerly Oliver Scholtz -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:41 PM, spg76 wrote: > I updated the wiki with a new version for applications-science. > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions > -- > Seba (AKA spg76) > http://www.ubuntu-ar.org > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > > Looks much better! Nice job on the slight tilt to the top of the flask. :) Smartboy -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science
I updated the wiki with a new version for applications-science. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions -- Seba (AKA spg76) http://www.ubuntu-ar.org -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:35 AM, spg76 wrote: > I'll refine the one without the cork then, and announce here when I'm done. > Thank you all for the feedback. > -- > Seba (AKA spg76) > http://www.ubuntu-ar.org > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > > The problem I have with the bottle is that the top is at eye level, but the liquid is tilted too far to your eye, so it makes the icon look weird. Perhaps make the top of the jar tilted a bit? Smartboy -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science
I'll refine the one without the cork then, and announce here when I'm done. Thank you all for the feedback. -- Seba (AKA spg76) http://www.ubuntu-ar.org -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Thorsten Wilms wrote: > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 13:26 -0200, spg76 wrote: > > > > I uploaded a new version with a cork to the wiki. > > Better or worse? > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions > > Nice cork, but such a jar would be closed with a rubber plug, if it all. > I think it's a superfluous detail with a risk to make people think of > wine rather than science. Actually, we often cover those with a specialized type of plastic wrap called parafilm which is waxy and elastic so that when we stretch it tight over the top, it contracts and forms an airtight seal around the top. It is much easier to put on and take off than corks, less expensive to replace, lower risk of contamination... so it's pretty much industry standard these days. So, if you want to make it say "science", you could definitely show the top of the bottle covered in parafilm. (image attached) > > > > -- > Thorsten Wilms > > thorwil's design for free software: > http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ > > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > <>-- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science
Thorsten Wilms wrote: > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 13:26 -0200, spg76 wrote: > >> I uploaded a new version with a cork to the wiki. >> Better or worse? >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions >> > > Nice cork, but such a jar would be closed with a rubber plug, if it all. > I think it's a superfluous detail. Agreed. I'd either use the rubber stopper or drop the detail. If I had to pick, I'd drop the stopper. -Cory K. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 13:26 -0200, spg76 wrote: > I uploaded a new version with a cork to the wiki. > Better or worse? > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions Nice cork, but such a jar would be closed with a rubber plug, if it all. I think it's a superfluous detail with a risk to make people think of wine rather than science. -- Thorsten Wilms thorwil's design for free software: http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science
2009/3/3 Thorsten Wilms > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 15:03 -0200, spg76 wrote: > > I uploaded to the wiki a new icon for applications-science. > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions > > Hmm, the opening suggests that it is exactly on eye level, so everything > below we look down on. Maybe eye-level somewhere in the middle or above > the whole thing would work better? > I see what you mean. If I have time I'll try to make another version. > Maybe green would look more "scientific" and less dangerous? > I used the Ubuntu colors but I can use another one. Opinions? I uploaded a new version with a cork to the wiki. Better or worse? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions -- Seba (AKA spg76) http://www.ubuntu-ar.org -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science+new uploads.
Milan Krivda wrote: >> * accessories-calculator "updated"(with a revision to happen when >> Milan is happy) >> > Sorry, but i dont understand that upper replied part. May you explain? > > It means that I can put what's there into the set for now, but update later because I know you still have work left to do. -Cory K. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science+new uploads.
> * accessories-calculator "updated"(with a revision to happen when > Milan is happy) Sorry, but i dont understand that upper replied part. May you explain? Bye -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science+new uploads.
Thorsten Wilms wrote: > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 15:03 -0200, spg76 wrote: > >> I uploaded to the wiki a new icon for applications-science. >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions >> > > Hmm, the opening suggests that it is exactly on eye level, so everything > below we look down on. Maybe eye-level somewhere in the middle or above > the whole thing would work better? > I think this works just fine on the whole. > Maybe green would look more "scientific" and less dangerous? > Ok wait. Who the *hell* wants science without danger?!! Where's the fun in that? :P Generally I think this is fine Sebastien. Tinker if you like. What else on the wiki do you think is ready to upload? My votes are: * start-here (as long as the lighting is fixed later) * accessories-calculator "updated"(with a revision to happen when Milan is happy) * help-about (change "i" once overall font is chosen) * preferences-system-network * network-workgroup -Cory K. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 15:03 -0200, spg76 wrote: > I uploaded to the wiki a new icon for applications-science. > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions Hmm, the opening suggests that it is exactly on eye level, so everything below we look down on. Maybe eye-level somewhere in the middle or above the whole thing would work better? Maybe green would look more "scientific" and less dangerous? -- Thorsten Wilms thorwil's design for free software: http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
[ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science
I uploaded to the wiki a new icon for applications-science. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions -- Seba (AKA spg76) http://www.ubuntu-ar.org -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
