Re: [ubuntu-art] Re: (Yet another) new logout dialog

2006-04-05 Thread Julian Oliver

just to catch up, what was the agreed issue with the existing logout
dialog? i ask more in the sense of it's layout and relative size than the 
icons themselves..

julian

-- 
 __  _
 ___ ___| |___ __| |_ _ __  __ _ _ _| |__ ___
(_-http://selectparks.net/~julian


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Re: (Yet another) new logout dialog

2006-04-05 Thread Eric Feliksik

Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
A better use of our time would be figuring out how to disable options 
that don't work on specific hardware! Perhaps some sort of "oops I 
failed to hibernate" tracking could be used to hint the system that it 
really, really does not want to offer the hibernate option any more. 
This needs to be robust in the face of minor errors.




Seems relevant to me, my computer often crashes when recovering from a 
hibernation.


(I discussed this with some dev's, and the bug is being triaged, but the 
reality is that we can't guarantee anything yet).


--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Re: (Yet another) new logout dialog

2006-04-04 Thread Victoria Greeven

moin moin ;-)

I am such an user, who doesn't know the difference - and I tell you - I 
am confused about that really big Logout-"picture" with so many options. 
In Germany we sometimes say "weniger ist mehr" (less is more) and so I 
agree with Henrik. Those users, who want to use "hibernate" will find it 
- the others will be glad, not to be confronted with another option.

Greetings from the noobs
 Victoria

Henrik Nilsen Omma schrieb:
Well, some users want both options, but those who don't know the 
difference (which we have established is most people) don't. If 
Hibernate tends to fail, then it might be wise to leave that one 
hidden by default and let those who know that a) they want it and b) 
that it works with their hardware can find it and enable it.


 - Henrik

--
http://www.ubuntu.com
http://www.theopencd.org




--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Re: (Yet another) new logout dialog

2006-04-04 Thread Jean-Denis Vauguet
Mark Shuttleworth a écrit :
> Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
>> IMO it would be best to only show one of these options to the average
>> user. (It would be useful to have some real-world data on which of
>> these people use most often -- sleep I guess -- and how many people
>> regularly use both options.
> Except there's a darn good reason why on some occasions you want one
> option, and on others, you want the other.
> 
> A better use of our time would be figuring out how to disable options
> that don't work on specific hardware! Perhaps some sort of "oops I
> failed to hibernate" tracking could be used to hint the system that it
> really, really does not want to offer the hibernate option any more.
> This needs to be robust in the face of minor errors.

(Hello, I'm new on the list although I've been reading/lurking for a
long time now). Yes, smart idea. And there is also the case of
"software": for example, when there is only one user (and sudo/root),
the Switch user option is not relevant, is it?

Anyway, as an average joe, I'd rather prefer useless/removable options
to hidden ones, especially regarding the most important part of the GUI,
since it may be destabilizing.

(Sorry Mark for the private mail, I missed the Answer *all* button *shame*).




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Re: (Yet another) new logout dialog

2006-04-04 Thread Henrik Nilsen Omma

Mark Shuttleworth wrote:

Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
IMO it would be best to only show one of these options to the average 
user. (It would be useful to have some real-world data on which of 
these people use most often -- sleep I guess -- and how many people 
regularly use both options.
Except there's a darn good reason why on some occasions you want one 
option, and on others, you want the other.


Well, some users want both options, but those who don't know the 
difference (which we have established is most people) don't. If 
Hibernate tends to fail, then it might be wise to leave that one hidden 
by default and let those who know that a) they want it and b) that it 
works with their hardware can find it and enable it.


 - Henrik

--
http://www.ubuntu.com
http://www.theopencd.org

--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Re: (Yet another) new logout dialog

2006-04-04 Thread Mark Shuttleworth




Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
IMO it
would be best to only show one of these options to the average user.
(It would be useful to have some real-world data on which of these
people use most often -- sleep I guess -- and how many people regularly
use both options.
  

Except there's a darn good reason why on some occasions you want one
option, and on others, you want the other.

A better use of our time would be figuring out how to disable options
that don't work on specific hardware! Perhaps some sort of "oops I
failed to hibernate" tracking could be used to hint the system that it
really, really does not want to offer the hibernate option any more.
This needs to be robust in the face of minor errors.

Mark


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Re: (Yet another) new logout dialog

2006-04-04 Thread Henrik Nilsen Omma

Andy Somerville wrote:

I think theres hardly anyone (who doesnt know beforehand) who thinks
the hibernate/sleep functionality is clear. Maybe its been suggested
before, but should we consider renaming these? (regardless of what
other changes are made)


IMO it would be best to only show one of these options to the average 
user. (It would be useful to have some real-world data on which of these 
people use most often -- sleep I guess -- and how many people regularly 
use both options.


We could add a tab to the System -> Preferences -> Power Management 
settings that let you configure the log out dialogue. The dialogue would 
only have 'Sleep' by default, making it less confusing to new users, but 
you could add the 'Hibernate' button via a check box under Power 
Management, where you could also uncheck the 'Sleep' option if you 
wanted. The power management dialogue could contain a more detailed 
explanation of the difference between the two so we don't have to put 
that on the log out screen.


This would be fairly discoverable since someone with the question 'How 
can I get my computer to Hibernate' would be likely to look under Power 
Management after a bit of searching.


 - Henrik

--
http://www.ubuntu.com
http://www.theopencd.org

--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Re: (Yet another) new logout dialog

2006-04-04 Thread Mark Shuttleworth




Manu Cornet wrote:

  As a matter of fact, I seldom do mere mockups, most of the time I also
write actual patches (and I sent this one to Seb by email along with
those captures) :) Seems like it is on its way to be uploaded soon.
  

Rock star :-)

  Huh, did I misunderstand the meaning of "factor in" ? :)
  

No, you got it SPOT ON!

Mark


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Re: (Yet another) new logout dialog

2006-04-04 Thread Mark Shuttleworth




Eric Feliksik wrote:
Matthew East
wrote:
  
  Just to stick in two more cents, I agree with
mpt: a logout dialogue

that needs explanatory text is _really_ doing something wrong. The

labels and the icons should be clear enough.


Matt


  
  
Ok, but then the real question is, then: Do you think it's clear, now?
Do you think Aunt Tilly understands the difference between hibernation,
shutdown and sleep? Logout and switch user?
  


It's fantasy to think that icons alone will convey the difference
between hibernation and suspension. I enjoy that sort of commentary,
but I also know we have to stay focused on the reality of user
knowledge and insight. *I* was not even clear on this till recently.

So, +1 to the mockup with explanatory text, and let's see if there's
time to get that added.

Mark



-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Re: (Yet another) new logout dialog

2006-04-04 Thread Manu Cornet

Hi !

> > http://www.manucornet.net/ubuntu/dev/dialog.png
> > http://www.manucornet.net/ubuntu/dev/logout.png
> > http://www.manucornet.net/ubuntu/dev/hibernate.png
> Interesting!
>   
> I quite like the explanatory text. Daniel, is that easy to factor in?

As a matter of fact, I seldom do mere mockups, most of the time I also
write actual patches (and I sent this one to Seb by email along with
those captures) :) Seems like it is on its way to be uploaded soon.

Huh, did I misunderstand the meaning of "factor in" ? :)

Cheers,
Manu


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Re: (Yet another) new logout dialog

2006-04-04 Thread Who
On 4/4/06, Petr Tomeš <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006/4/4, Sandis Neilands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I agree with you. So far i haven't seen any advantage in using
> > ubuntu's custom logout instead of gnome's default. I know this is
> > unpopular but
> > 1) If the new logout doesn't solve more (or more important) problems
> > than it creates or
> > 2) we are victims of NIH syndrome
> > then we should ditch it and revert to default.
>
> I fully support your idea.

I think that the new logout dialog (I.E the one with the description)

1. Is very professional (especially the way it appears when the power
button is pressed)
2. Very clearly describes what each option does, which is important
for new users and the kind of 'average joe' users Ubuntu wishes to
attract and keep.
3. Doesn't add any more clicks than it took to shut down with the old
dialog in order to shutdown

And if I were to improve it I would change the following - which make
life quicker and easier for regular/power users.

1. When the power button is pushed _twice_ the computer shuts down
2. On start-up (of the dialog) one icon should be selected so that
pushing Enter does that action. This should be either: always 'Shut
Down', or the option the use rlast used
3. (going too far and overcomplicating things) Icons should be
drag/dropable on to the desktop/panel so that you can
logout/shutdown/hibernate etc without using that dialog.

All I would change is the name in the system menu - and make it 'Leave
the Computer'

--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Re: (Yet another) new logout dialog

2006-04-04 Thread Petr Tomeš
2006/4/4, Sandis Neilands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I agree with you. So far i haven't seen any advantage in using
> ubuntu's custom logout instead of gnome's default. I know this is
> unpopular but
> 1) If the new logout doesn't solve more (or more important) problems
> than it creates or
> 2) we are victims of NIH syndrome
> then we should ditch it and revert to default.

I fully support your idea.

Petr Tomeš,
Ubuntu CZ - http://www.ubuntu.cz/
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Re: (Yet another) new logout dialog

2006-04-04 Thread Sandis Neilands
Hello!

On 4/4/06, Eric Feliksik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, but then the real question is, then: Do you think it's clear, now?
> Do you think Aunt Tilly understands the difference between hibernation,
> shutdown and sleep? Logout and switch user?
>
> I personally don't think so. So we either have to come up with a way to
> make it logical, which is inherently difficult because the differences
> in the options are both subtle but complex at the same time.

I agree with you. So far i haven't seen any advantage in using
ubuntu's custom logout instead of gnome's default. I know this is
unpopular but
1) If the new logout doesn't solve more (or more important) problems
than it creates or
2) we are victims of NIH syndrome
then we should ditch it and revert to default.

--
Sandis
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Re: (Yet another) new logout dialog

2006-04-04 Thread Eric Feliksik

Matthew East wrote:

Just to stick in two more cents, I agree with mpt: a logout dialogue
that needs explanatory text is _really_ doing something wrong. The
labels and the icons should be clear enough.

Matt



Ok, but then the real question is, then: Do you think it's clear, now? 
Do you think Aunt Tilly understands the difference between hibernation, 
shutdown and sleep? Logout and switch user?


I personally don't think so. So we either have to come up with a way to 
make it logical, which is inherently difficult because the differences 
in the options are both subtle but complex at the same time.


If we can't make an icon describe that hibernate will turn off the 
computer and not log you out, then a help text is better then nothing... 
 I think?



--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Re: (Yet another) new logout dialog

2006-04-04 Thread Mark Shuttleworth




Manu Cornet wrote:

  Here's a new version of the dialog :

	http://www.manucornet.net/ubuntu/dev/dialog.png
	http://www.manucornet.net/ubuntu/dev/logout.png
	http://www.manucornet.net/ubuntu/dev/hibernate.png

Interesting!

  Many people found that the dialog was too large ; therefore, I stacked
the help messages next to the "Cancel" button and reduced the spacing a
bit. This also solves a few layout problems (expanding window). Comments
welcome.
  

I quite like the explanatory text. Daniel, is that easy to factor in?


Mark


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art