Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[Troy James Sobotka]

xl cheese wrote:
> In gutsy:
> System -> Preferences -> Appearance

We need more people like you around this group, xl.

People who actually produce the hard nuts and bolts work are
a rare breed.  Kudos to you.

Sincerely,
TJS



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[xl cheese]

In gutsy:
System -> Preferences -> Appearance

Click the customize button then select the color tab.  

If you want green instead of orange you'll get this:
http://img120.imageshack.us/img120/8401/greenshotzk8.jpg

> Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 10:02:50 -0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union 
> GTK theme.
> 
> I meant the window borders to be color-customizable.
> 
> 
> -- 
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

_
Put your friends on the big screen with Windows Vista® + Windows Live™.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/shop/specialoffers.mspx?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_CPC_MediaCtr_bigscreen_012008
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[shadowh511]

I meant the window borders to be color-customizable.


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[shadowh511]

How might i do this?


xl cheese wrote:
> yes.  The Unionish gtk I emailed the group mostly does this too.  It uses the 
> smooth engine for the menubar and toolbar which doesn't support color 
> customization.  The orange, however, can be changed to anything you want.
> 
>   
>> Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 11:09:21 +
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
>> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union  
>> GTK theme.
>>
>> A well designed GTK theme using Clearlooks or some of the other modern
>> engines can already do this :)
>>
>> On Jan 5, 2008 3:58 AM, shadowh511  wrote:
>> 
>>> I really like the union theme, how about a dialog to change the color?
>>> it would be like what Vista has and osx needs
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ubuntu-art mailing list
>>> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>>>
>>>   
>> -- 
>> ubuntu-art mailing list
>> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>> 
>
> _
> Share life as it happens with the new Windows Live.
> http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_sharelife_012008
>   


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[xl cheese]

yes.  The Unionish gtk I emailed the group mostly does this too.  It uses the 
smooth engine for the menubar and toolbar which doesn't support color 
customization.  The orange, however, can be changed to anything you want.

> Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 11:09:21 +
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union   
> GTK theme.
> 
> A well designed GTK theme using Clearlooks or some of the other modern
> engines can already do this :)
> 
> On Jan 5, 2008 3:58 AM, shadowh511  wrote:
>> I really like the union theme, how about a dialog to change the color?
>> it would be like what Vista has and osx needs
>>
>>
>> --
>> ubuntu-art mailing list
>> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>>
> 
> -- 
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

_
Share life as it happens with the new Windows Live.
http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_sharelife_012008
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[Who]

A well designed GTK theme using Clearlooks or some of the other modern
engines can already do this :)

On Jan 5, 2008 3:58 AM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really like the union theme, how about a dialog to change the color?
> it would be like what Vista has and osx needs
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[shadowh511]

Ken Vermette wrote:
> I think if something like that would be implemented as a general 
> feature, it would be perfect. Probably something running a selective 
> hue rotation system would give users the most control, and doing it 
> would instantly give all themes colour selection to a limited degree. 
> For now even basic hue/saturation/colorization would be good.
>
> -- 
> -Ken Vermette
>
> On Jan 4, 2008 10:58 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > wrote:
>
> I really like the union theme, how about a dialog to change the color?
> it would be like what Vista has and osx needs
>
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com 
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>
>
Ken,
One of the selling points of windows vista is the ability to change the 
color of the window frames (i'll be removing vista from my laptop in the 
next week) which is nice, because i hate the default colors of windows 
vista.  simply put, color is personal, you should be allowed to change 
the color of the window frames to whatever color you want, whether its 
pink, blue, puce, or brown, we need color-customization, if we do this, 
we will have the title of the only linux distro with color-customization 
for the window borders.  I gimpped around, and found that union would 
work best for this.  So i vote for union.

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[Ken Vermette]

Probably not a good idea, in my opinion.

It would require an additional dialog/prompt during interrupting our
well-streamlined installation process, and possibly confuse some users. It
could additionally kill the ability to easily troubleshoot without needing
to ask how the user has their computer configured.

In terms of branding, Ubuntu would also lose it's brand awareness, and risk
potential suits for stealing another systems look & feel. Plus we would need
to maintain several themes at once, and risk needing to program new features
specifically for imitation...

Apologies, just not so hot on the idea.

-Ken Vermette

On Jan 4, 2008 10:24 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> You know what,
> lets not create an official theme and have the user choose a theme from
> a list when the account is created
> or have a dialog to ask which OS they used in the past and have it open
> themes to make it look like that os
> Hey, its an idea
>
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[Ken Vermette]

I think if something like that would be implemented as a general feature, it
would be perfect. Probably something running a selective hue rotation system
would give users the most control, and doing it would instantly give all
themes colour selection to a limited degree. For now even basic
hue/saturation/colorization would be good.

-- 
-Ken Vermette

On Jan 4, 2008 10:58 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I really like the union theme, how about a dialog to change the color?
> it would be like what Vista has and osx needs
>
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[shadowh511]

I really like the union theme, how about a dialog to change the color?  
it would be like what Vista has and osx needs

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[shadowh511]

You know what,
lets not create an official theme and have the user choose a theme from 
a list when the account is created
or have a dialog to ask which OS they used in the past and have it open 
themes to make it look like that os
Hey, its an idea

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[Ken Vermette]

On Jan 4, 2008 8:17 PM, Troy James Sobotka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Nemes Ioan Sorin wrote:
> > Blue OR blue + green, well combined will give you a Peace of Mind
> > feeling [don't think a second that $MS designers are stupid].
>
> Once again, colour psychology has been debunked 100 times
> in 10 different environments.  Don't even think about going
> there.  Look no further than the most extreme cases of light -
> black and white.  Black is sometimes associated with death in
> some cultures, white in others.
>
> We have been over this rubbish 1000 times before.  Don't peddle
> it here without getting a swift bout of recourse.  It is utter
> tripe, utterly misleading, and a complete distraction from the
> point at hand.


This is a nature vs nurture argument, and nobody will ever be right. Colours
do affect people, but it will affect people differently. There's no point
going into a bloodcurdling rage over colour theory, because despite being a
theory, it still has merit. I know that bright yellow is a much happier
colour than a dark gray. When you see bluish green you're going to think of
water. You might even associate water with being clean or hydrated, but red
kool-aid would do that for red.

The only problem with colour theory is when you read too far into things. I
won't say any particular colour represents fear, or sadness. I just agree
that you associate colours with objects, and those materials will determine
how you associate with those colours. So if we wanted to choose colours we
should really look at why they represent what. Why is brown a clean/dirty
colour? Some people say brown is delicious, but it's not the colour they
like, it's the chocolate. When we know why a colour feels what way, then we
can design the hue, tone, lightness and texture of the colour around the
analog. Delicious brown might be chocolaty or coffee-like, sturdy brown
might look more like wood with a grain. Dry brown might look like sand, or
avoid dirty brown that might look like waste.

Nemes Ioan Sorin wrote:
> > First functionality, then the candy - that's the rule in Design.
>
> And you are aware that our now ubiquitous 'form versus function'
> was a general byproduct of the "Swiss Style" movement?  It is also
> a dated approach from a contemporary standpoint.


> You are also aware that movements change?  You just barfed up some
> fictional "fact" that once again is rooted in contextual relationship
> to society and artistic / design tends.
>

Functionality first. We didn't get to where we are now because as cavemen we
decided we wanted a round spear instead of a pointy one. You need to design
the functionality of your system before you polish it. You could design a
perfectly flat phone but at one point you had to carry the things in a bag -
but we did manage to make the bag look decent.

If you don't build the functionality of the system first, you have nowhere
to start, that's all. If we didn't have the functionality known as "buttons"
and "windows" you'd probably fight that the font of your command-line
interface needs to be serif because sans fonts are made for functionality.

Fact is, you need to design functionality first, with what you have. When
that's over with, you can polish with the room you have remaining. There's
so much leeway now that you might have the illusion that there's no need for
function - but you're still working with _functional_ elements. Even new
designs, like a round contextual menu, still first must have a functional
design. Design for arts sake might look good, but cripple the experience.

Sorry, but I have been reading this list too long to put up
> with yet-another-fictional-fact regarding art and design.  You
> just said something close to "Disco is the only musical style
> out there.  It will always be the way to create music." or
> "Food that is always built with no spice or herbs will always
> be successful to every audience that tastes them."
>

The main thing is that I do, partially agree with you. There's common sense
and then there's extreme Freudian theory. Common sense says I like milk
because I find it delicious. Freud might say I like milk because it
subconsciously reminds me of milk from my mother in after birth and I want
to feel young - so on. I was never breastfed.

The main thing about your comment I disagree with, was the attitude taken.
I'm sorry to point to call you out on it, but you should focus on the
contributing instead of attacking. Slogging through several paragraphs and
not one of them actually had real input. You can be a little more civil in
your argument - and get more done in the process.

Sincerely,
> TJS
>

-- 
-Ken Vermette
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[Who]

If you want to make a Blue/Green theme for Ubuntu using aurora then a
Theme Team is a good way...

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate/ThemeTeams

You could get the guy that develops aurora to do it if he wanted?

On Jan 5, 2008 12:55 AM, Nemes Ioan Sorin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> shadowh511 wrote:
> > Thanks for the GTK theme, Ken.
> > I think that it could use one thing to make it perfect.
> > The color, it needs to be brown.e
> > When I think of Ubuntu, I think of a clean, simple OS.  the color brown
> > represents cleanliness and simplicity, while blue represents sadness and
> > fear.  If we want to have people download hardy, why not give them a
> > nice theme such as union and give them the desktop cube and the wobble
> > windows and all of that eye candy.
> > Hey, its an idea
> >
>
> Hey shadowh511
>
> ;) Blue is not FEAR - Blue is freedom - You can believe a designer. And
> an UI designer.
>
> Blue OR blue + green, well combined will give you a Peace of Mind
> feeling [don't think a second that $MS designers are stupid].
>
> Brown will give you after a while a sensation of sadness.
> Red Derived colors accelerate beat of your heart.
> There is no way to use Porto / Brown themes and to have millions of lovers.
>
> Blue (warm blue) is a healthy color associated with peace.
> Cold blue ( or cold blue + cold green ) generally mean Fresh.
>
> $MS for example combined (in their logo's) all 4 base colors - which
> combined - will obtain the best influence for the eye of mases. Blue,
> Green (Sky and Grass, Peace, Silence, Free Space) and Orange + Brown (
> which are comestibles colors [= colors used in Food's industry for
> advertising especially - because human eye association { bread, burgers,
> etc }])
>
> So Ubuntu want to use comestible colors in general. That's not bad but
> in intention (is working for commercials).
>
> But an OS must use neutral colors for UI - like colored grays (that's
> what Solaris do now with Nimbus theme) - which must have a minimal
> influence to your mind on long term [that's why they use gray + a bit of
> blue in their colored gray]. Any other stories are speculations. Those
> thinks are known.
>
> Human Eye and Hyman Brain - they have some rules which we can not change
>   by our own pleasure even we are Bill Gates or Bil Laden - because this
> is from Nature and this rule will rule until the end.
>
> Those rules are known - and I asking myself why that fact does not count
> here.
>
> Also Clearlooks (Gummy) are a pretty nice theme. What's wrong with
> Clearlooks ? - can be colored at your desire - base colors are customizable.
>
> Also please take a look at the AURORA gtk engine, theme and proposals at:
> http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Aurora+Unified+Suite+(Preview)?content=70138
> AND
> http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Aurora+Gtk+Engine?content=56438
> OR take a look to my screenshoot to see Aurora in action on my desktop :
> http://www.leclubyahmala.ro/aurora.html
>
> SO why not ask / invite the author to design for Ubuntu Artwork a theme
> based on Aurora if we desperately need something "of our own". This is a
> nice concept and metaphor and is almost perfect. The author is an
> experienced designer and programmer hhttp://www.nanolx.org/
>
>
> Wait for a response from the community side about Aurora.
>
> Yours,
>
> Nemes Ioan Sorin
>
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[Troy James Sobotka]

Nemes Ioan Sorin wrote:
> Blue OR blue + green, well combined will give you a Peace of Mind
> feeling [don't think a second that $MS designers are stupid].

Once again, colour psychology has been debunked 100 times
in 10 different environments.  Don't even think about going
there.  Look no further than the most extreme cases of light -
black and white.  Black is sometimes associated with death in
some cultures, white in others.

We have been over this rubbish 1000 times before.  Don't peddle
it here without getting a swift bout of recourse.  It is utter
tripe, utterly misleading, and a complete distraction from the
point at hand.

Nemes Ioan Sorin wrote:
> First functionality, then the candy - that's the rule in Design.

And you are aware that our now ubiquitous 'form versus function'
was a general byproduct of the "Swiss Style" movement?  It is also
a dated approach from a contemporary standpoint.

You are also aware that movements change?  You just barfed up some
fictional "fact" that once again is rooted in contextual relationship
to society and artistic / design tends.

Sorry, but I have been reading this list too long to put up
with yet-another-fictional-fact regarding art and design.  You
just said something close to "Disco is the only musical style
out there.  It will always be the way to create music." or
"Food that is always built with no spice or herbs will always
be successful to every audience that tastes them."

Sincerely,
TJS



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[Nemes Ioan Sorin]

shadowh511 wrote:
> Thanks for the GTK theme, Ken.
> I think that it could use one thing to make it perfect.
> The color, it needs to be brown.e
> When I think of Ubuntu, I think of a clean, simple OS.  the color brown 
> represents cleanliness and simplicity, while blue represents sadness and 
> fear.  If we want to have people download hardy, why not give them a 
> nice theme such as union and give them the desktop cube and the wobble 
> windows and all of that eye candy.
> Hey, its an idea
> 

Hey shadowh511

;) Blue is not FEAR - Blue is freedom - You can believe a designer. And
an UI designer.

Blue OR blue + green, well combined will give you a Peace of Mind
feeling [don't think a second that $MS designers are stupid].

Brown will give you after a while a sensation of sadness.
Red Derived colors accelerate beat of your heart.
There is no way to use Porto / Brown themes and to have millions of lovers.

Blue (warm blue) is a healthy color associated with peace.
Cold blue ( or cold blue + cold green ) generally mean Fresh.

$MS for example combined (in their logo's) all 4 base colors - which
combined - will obtain the best influence for the eye of mases. Blue,
Green (Sky and Grass, Peace, Silence, Free Space) and Orange + Brown (
which are comestibles colors [= colors used in Food's industry for
advertising especially - because human eye association { bread, burgers,
etc }])

So Ubuntu want to use comestible colors in general. That's not bad but
in intention (is working for commercials).

But an OS must use neutral colors for UI - like colored grays (that's
what Solaris do now with Nimbus theme) - which must have a minimal
influence to your mind on long term [that's why they use gray + a bit of
blue in their colored gray]. Any other stories are speculations. Those
thinks are known.

Human Eye and Hyman Brain - they have some rules which we can not change
  by our own pleasure even we are Bill Gates or Bil Laden - because this
is from Nature and this rule will rule until the end.

Those rules are known - and I asking myself why that fact does not count
here.

Also Clearlooks (Gummy) are a pretty nice theme. What's wrong with
Clearlooks ? - can be colored at your desire - base colors are customizable.

Also please take a look at the AURORA gtk engine, theme and proposals at:
http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Aurora+Unified+Suite+(Preview)?content=70138
AND
http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Aurora+Gtk+Engine?content=56438
OR take a look to my screenshoot to see Aurora in action on my desktop :
http://www.leclubyahmala.ro/aurora.html

SO why not ask / invite the author to design for Ubuntu Artwork a theme 
based on Aurora if we desperately need something "of our own". This is a 
nice concept and metaphor and is almost perfect. The author is an 
experienced designer and programmer hhttp://www.nanolx.org/


Wait for a response from the community side about Aurora.

Yours,

Nemes Ioan Sorin


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[Ken Vermette]

I just updated the wiki to include some buttons and tabs, so there's a rough
idea of the direction widgets could be going. I pushed it out as quickly as
I could, but I didn't have my regular machine so I couldn't build it as
quickly as I would have liked. I'll have an update later today with multiple
desktop wallpapers and the like, with more widgets as well. I'll also polish
existing widgets.

I'm still trying to wrap my head around the GTK, so I'll see if I can get
some contributions into the GTK as well, but for now I'll focus on Emerald,
and an opaque version of Union.

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate/Union

Also, I'm leaving on the 13th of this month, so my last updates will be on
the night of the 12th before I go into a 3-month blackout. It could
potentially be over a year I'm disconnected, but I believe it will only be 3
months. Either way, I'll probably gone until the LTS of Ubuntu comes out -
so if there's anything anybody needs/wants, tell me so I can get it done.

On Jan 3, 2008 11:49 PM, xl cheese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> I'm thinking we can go ahead and get as close as we can to his mockup with
> what is currently available.  Then tackle the nitty gritty stuff possibly
> hacking some engines.
>
> Attached a slightly updated gtk.
> 
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> > Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:07:42 +0100
> > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full
> Union GTK theme.
> >
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > I think one of the problems creating a theme like Kens mockup could be,
> that (AFAIK) there is no gtk-engine supporting things like rounded corners
> for menus, because the only transparency we can get there comes from
> compiz/beryl/xcompmgr.
> > I think we would need to hack an engine...
> >
> > cheers Sebastian Billaudelle
> > Am Mittwoch, den 02.01.2008, 23:32 -0500 schrieb Ken Vermette:
> > I've tackled Emerald, I'll be honest and say "I suck" when it comes to
> the live conversion, so it could probably be done better. I'll post what I
> have done tomorrow the moment I get at my regular development machine
> (traveling). I'll also make a variation with an opaque content arera in case
> Cimis' GTK mod is a beast, and to help get things rolling. We might need it
> anyway for low-end machines using Metacity.
> >
> > Should I post the Emerald theme I have in the Wiki? Or is there anywhere
> you would prefer to keep the files?
> >
> > (Also, thank you! Been fighting this stuff tooth and nail, I'm still
> very new to the theme formats)
> >
> > --Ken Vermette
> >
> > On Jan 2, 2008 11:07 PM, xl cheese < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm going to try to mimick Ken's mockups as close as I can with a true
> gtk theme.  If anyone here would like to help out with it email and we can
> take it offline.  I'll start using the pixmap engine for things I can't get
> any current themes to make then attempt to alter some other engines to do it
> and replace the pixmap parts.
> > 
> >> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:52:09 -0500
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> >> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Moving things forwards.
> >>
> >> "Ooh, what's that one?"
> >>
> >> OSX is long held as one of the boldest and most unique designs in the
> industry, when Windows was just toying with XP - Apple made the ultra-shiny,
> over-glossed look and threw in every effect they could think of and paired
> it with a pinstripe. If you look at OSX now, compared to when it was first
> demonstrated, it has toned down dramatically; no pinstripes, for example.
> >>
> >> That being said, I'm a firm believer in designs that are both bold and
> unique. If it's unique, people will remember it. If it's bold, people will
> talk about it. When you see a desktop screen-shot of Vista, you know it's
> Vista. Vista is bold, unique. When you see OSX, you can see the dock - the
> signature - Unique to OSX. Apple has always been bold, and the big "X" on
> the box shouts at you. "Ooh, what's that one?"
> >>
> >> If you want to make an argument for just being Unique - that bold
> should be beyond our users, then I would be tempted to present Amiga.
> There's an operating unique to itself, but there's no oomph in the design.
> I've only ever -heard- of these Amiga users, and I only hear that the Amiga
> users out there 

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[shadowh511]

Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
> > the color brown represents cleanliness
>
> i don't think so
its my opinion

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[Jan Niklas Hasse]

> the color brown represents cleanliness

i don't think so
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[shadowh511]

Thanks for the GTK theme, Ken.
I think that it could use one thing to make it perfect.
The color, it needs to be brown.e
When I think of Ubuntu, I think of a clean, simple OS.  the color brown 
represents cleanliness and simplicity, while blue represents sadness and 
fear.  If we want to have people download hardy, why not give them a 
nice theme such as union and give them the desktop cube and the wobble 
windows and all of that eye candy.
Hey, its an idea

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[xl cheese]

I'm thinking we can go ahead and get as close as we can to his mockup with what 
is currently available.  Then tackle the nitty gritty stuff possibly hacking 
some engines.

Attached a slightly updated gtk.

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:07:42 +0100
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union 
> GTK theme.
>
> Hi folks!
>
> I think one of the problems creating a theme like Kens mockup could be, that 
> (AFAIK) there is no gtk-engine supporting things like rounded corners for 
> menus, because the only transparency we can get there comes from 
> compiz/beryl/xcompmgr.
> I think we would need to hack an engine...
>
> cheers Sebastian Billaudelle
> Am Mittwoch, den 02.01.2008, 23:32 -0500 schrieb Ken Vermette:
> I've tackled Emerald, I'll be honest and say "I suck" when it comes to the 
> live conversion, so it could probably be done better. I'll post what I have 
> done tomorrow the moment I get at my regular development machine (traveling). 
> I'll also make a variation with an opaque content arera in case Cimis' GTK 
> mod is a beast, and to help get things rolling. We might need it anyway for 
> low-end machines using Metacity.
>
> Should I post the Emerald theme I have in the Wiki? Or is there anywhere you 
> would prefer to keep the files?
>
> (Also, thank you! Been fighting this stuff tooth and nail, I'm still very new 
> to the theme formats)
>
> --Ken Vermette
>
> On Jan 2, 2008 11:07 PM, xl cheese < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm going to try to mimick Ken's mockups as close as I can with a true gtk 
> theme.  If anyone here would like to help out with it email and we can take 
> it offline.  I'll start using the pixmap engine for things I can't get any 
> current themes to make then attempt to alter some other engines to do it and 
> replace the pixmap parts.
> 
>> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:52:09 -0500
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
>> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Moving things forwards.
>>
>> "Ooh, what's that one?"
>>
>> OSX is long held as one of the boldest and most unique designs in the 
>> industry, when Windows was just toying with XP - Apple made the ultra-shiny, 
>> over-glossed look and threw in every effect they could think of and paired 
>> it with a pinstripe. If you look at OSX now, compared to when it was first 
>> demonstrated, it has toned down dramatically; no pinstripes, for example.
>>
>> That being said, I'm a firm believer in designs that are both bold and 
>> unique. If it's unique, people will remember it. If it's bold, people will 
>> talk about it. When you see a desktop screen-shot of Vista, you know it's 
>> Vista. Vista is bold, unique. When you see OSX, you can see the dock - the 
>> signature - Unique to OSX. Apple has always been bold, and the big "X" on 
>> the box shouts at you. "Ooh, what's that one?"
>>
>> If you want to make an argument for just being Unique - that bold should be 
>> beyond our users, then I would be tempted to present Amiga. There's an 
>> operating unique to itself, but there's no oomph in the design. I've only 
>> ever -heard- of these Amiga users, and I only hear that the Amiga users out 
>> there are the ones unwilling to let it go. I doubt anyone will walk by an 
>> Amiga in a store and be captured by it. It's unique, and users of Amiga 
>> reminisce about it - but it's not being talked about in anything other than 
>> fond memories.
>>
>> Linux users have posted pictures of Vista-clone desktops, or OSX-like 
>> machines. You forget them, because it's not unique or ever as polished as 
>> the original. Linux/Ubuntu is not Vista, it's not OSX, it's not Amiga: 
>> Ubuntu needs to be Unique and bold - Capturing - Ubuntu. Ubuntu can be that, 
>> and be user-friendly at the same time. It doesn't need to be jet-black to be 
>> bold, bold isn't a colour or a specific design. It doesn't need to have 
>> patterns and pinstripes - it needs to stand out; "Ooh, what's that one?"
>>
>> When 3 computers are lined up at computer store X - you don't want Ubuntu to 
>> be passed. If it makes the stand, people will notice it and be drawn to it 
>> for it's beauty - and stay for the amazing operating system it is. You want 
>> whoever passes that computer to say...
>>
>> "Ooh, what&#x

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[Sebastian Billaudelle]

Hi folks!

I think one of the problems creating a theme like Kens mockup could be,
that (AFAIK) there is no gtk-engine supporting things like rounded
corners for menus, because the only transparency we can get there comes
from compiz/beryl/xcompmgr.
I think we would need to hack an engine...

cheers Sebastian Billaudelle
Am Mittwoch, den 02.01.2008, 23:32 -0500 schrieb Ken Vermette:

> I've tackled Emerald, I'll be honest and say "I suck" when it comes to
> the live conversion, so it could probably be done better. I'll post
> what I have done tomorrow the moment I get at my regular development
> machine (traveling). I'll also make a variation with an opaque content
> arera in case Cimis' GTK mod is a beast, and to help get things
> rolling. We might need it anyway for low-end machines using Metacity.
> 
> Should I post the Emerald theme I have in the Wiki? Or is there
> anywhere you would prefer to keep the files? 
> 
> (Also, thank you! Been fighting this stuff tooth and nail, I'm still
> very new to the theme formats)
> 
> --Ken Vermette
> 
> On Jan 2, 2008 11:07 PM, xl cheese < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> I'm going to try to mimick Ken's mockups as close as I can
> with a true gtk theme.  If anyone here would like to help out
> with it email and we can take it offline.  I'll start using
> the pixmap engine for things I can't get any current themes to
> make then attempt to alter some other engines to do it and
> replace the pixmap parts. 
> 
> > Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:52:09 -0500
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Moving things forwards.
> >
> > "Ooh, what's that one?"
> >
> > OSX is long held as one of the boldest and most unique
> designs in the industry, when Windows was just toying with XP
> - Apple made the ultra-shiny, over-glossed look and threw in
> every effect they could think of and paired it with a
> pinstripe. If you look at OSX now, compared to when it was
> first demonstrated, it has toned down dramatically; no
> pinstripes, for example. 
> >
> > That being said, I'm a firm believer in designs that are
> both bold and unique. If it's unique, people will remember it.
> If it's bold, people will talk about it. When you see a
> desktop screen-shot of Vista, you know it's Vista. Vista is
> bold, unique. When you see OSX, you can see the dock - the
> signature - Unique to OSX. Apple has always been bold, and the
> big "X" on the box shouts at you. "Ooh, what's that one?" 
> >
> > If you want to make an argument for just being Unique - that
> bold should be beyond our users, then I would be tempted to
> present Amiga. There's an operating unique to itself, but
> there's no oomph in the design. I've only ever -heard- of
> these Amiga users, and I only hear that the Amiga users out
> there are the ones unwilling to let it go. I doubt anyone will
> walk by an Amiga in a store and be captured by it. It's
> unique, and users of Amiga reminisce about it - but it's not
> being talked about in anything other than fond memories. 
> >
> > Linux users have posted pictures of Vista-clone desktops, or
> OSX-like machines. You forget them, because it's not unique or
> ever as polished as the original. Linux/Ubuntu is not Vista,
> it's not OSX, it's not Amiga: Ubuntu needs to be Unique and
> bold - Capturing - Ubuntu. Ubuntu can be that, and be
> user-friendly at the same time. It doesn't need to be
> jet-black to be bold, bold isn't a colour or a specific
> design. It doesn't need to have patterns and pinstripes - it
> needs to stand out; "Ooh, what's that one?" 
> >
> > When 3 computers are lined up at computer store X - you
> don't want Ubuntu to be passed. If it makes the stand, people
> will notice it and be drawn to it for it's beauty - and stay
> for the amazing operating system it is. You want whoever
> passes that computer to say... 
> >
> > "Ooh, what's that one?"
> >
> > On Jan 2, 2008 9:43 PM, Andrew Laignel
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Who wrote: 
> >> How does a conventional 'vote for the one you like' allow
> us to see this? 
> >>
> > Maybe you could vote 1...5 on each entry then look at the
> tally graphs
> > for distribution?
> >>> into love it/hate it camps which should be avoided at all
> cost.  Ideally
> >>> a default theme should not be even noticed by the public -
> being neutral 
> >>> and innofensive as possible

Re: [ubuntu-art] Stop kickin' the dead horse - Create a full Union GTK theme.

[Ken Vermette]

I've tackled Emerald, I'll be honest and say "I suck" when it comes to the
live conversion, so it could probably be done better. I'll post what I have
done tomorrow the moment I get at my regular development machine
(traveling). I'll also make a variation with an opaque content arera in case
Cimis' GTK mod is a beast, and to help get things rolling. We might need it
anyway for low-end machines using Metacity.

Should I post the Emerald theme I have in the Wiki? Or is there anywhere you
would prefer to keep the files?

(Also, thank you! Been fighting this stuff tooth and nail, I'm still very
new to the theme formats)

--Ken Vermette

On Jan 2, 2008 11:07 PM, xl cheese < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> I'm going to try to mimick Ken's mockups as close as I can with a true gtk
> theme.  If anyone here would like to help out with it email and we can take
> it offline.  I'll start using the pixmap engine for things I can't get any
> current themes to make then attempt to alter some other engines to do it and
> replace the pixmap parts.
> 
> > Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:52:09 -0500
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Moving things forwards.
> >
> > "Ooh, what's that one?"
> >
> > OSX is long held as one of the boldest and most unique designs in the
> industry, when Windows was just toying with XP - Apple made the ultra-shiny,
> over-glossed look and threw in every effect they could think of and paired
> it with a pinstripe. If you look at OSX now, compared to when it was first
> demonstrated, it has toned down dramatically; no pinstripes, for example.
> >
> > That being said, I'm a firm believer in designs that are both bold and
> unique. If it's unique, people will remember it. If it's bold, people will
> talk about it. When you see a desktop screen-shot of Vista, you know it's
> Vista. Vista is bold, unique. When you see OSX, you can see the dock - the
> signature - Unique to OSX. Apple has always been bold, and the big "X" on
> the box shouts at you. "Ooh, what's that one?"
> >
> > If you want to make an argument for just being Unique - that bold should
> be beyond our users, then I would be tempted to present Amiga. There's an
> operating unique to itself, but there's no oomph in the design. I've only
> ever -heard- of these Amiga users, and I only hear that the Amiga users out
> there are the ones unwilling to let it go. I doubt anyone will walk by an
> Amiga in a store and be captured by it. It's unique, and users of Amiga
> reminisce about it - but it's not being talked about in anything other than
> fond memories.
> >
> > Linux users have posted pictures of Vista-clone desktops, or OSX-like
> machines. You forget them, because it's not unique or ever as polished as
> the original. Linux/Ubuntu is not Vista, it's not OSX, it's not Amiga:
> Ubuntu needs to be Unique and bold - Capturing - Ubuntu. Ubuntu can be that,
> and be user-friendly at the same time. It doesn't need to be jet-black to be
> bold, bold isn't a colour or a specific design. It doesn't need to have
> patterns and pinstripes - it needs to stand out; "Ooh, what's that one?"
> >
> > When 3 computers are lined up at computer store X - you don't want
> Ubuntu to be passed. If it makes the stand, people will notice it and be
> drawn to it for it's beauty - and stay for the amazing operating system it
> is. You want whoever passes that computer to say...
> >
> > "Ooh, what's that one?"
> >
> > On Jan 2, 2008 9:43 PM, Andrew Laignel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Who wrote:
> >> How does a conventional 'vote for the one you like' allow us to see
> this?
> >>
> > Maybe you could vote 1...5 on each entry then look at the tally graphs
> > for distribution?
> >>> into love it/hate it camps which should be avoided at all cost.
>  Ideally
> >>> a default theme should not be even noticed by the public - being
> neutral
> >>> and innofensive as possible should be the goal.  A perfect
> demonstration
> >>> of this is Apple, where the current theme for OSX is crips, clean,
> >>> stylish and probably as neutral as you can get - no loud colours,
> >>> drastic layouts or hard edges.
> >>>
> >>
> >> AFAIK, this has never been the aim for the Ubuntu default theme - and
> >> I don't think it ever will be. Sometimes going for love it or hate it
> >> beats going for bland. At least then people see it!
> >>
> >> As long as I can remember the Ubuntu Theme has been part of the
> >> branding, something that helps make Ubuntu known, something for people
> >> to talk about. From this point of view, it has worked very well - if
> >> you see a screenshot of linux and it is brown, you _know_ it is ubuntu
> >> - if you see a blue distro who knows...
> > I'm not saying don't be brown, or to lose the Ubuntu theme, but to avoid
> > anything overly stylized.  Most people using a computer will never touch
> > the default theme settings, and the less likely that a sizable
> > percentage wil