Re: wxMaxima
John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > wxmaxima approved for backporting to Breezy (New Universe addition) Done -- James -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: clamav
John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > clamav 0.87.1 from Dapper approved for Breezy -- security update... Done -- James -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: trac
John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > trac approved for breezy-backports. Done -- James -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: bzflag
John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > bzflag of dapper may be backported to breezy. Done -- James -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: screem
John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > screem approved for breezy-backports. Done -- James -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: rkhunter
John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > rkhunter approved for breezy-backports. Done -- James -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: meld
John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > meld approved for backporting to Breezy. Done -- James -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: ksplash-engine-moodin
John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ksplash-engine-moodin approved for breezy-backports (new Universe addition) Done -- James -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: gstreamer0.8-wavpack
John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > gstreamer0.8-wavpack approved for backporting to Breezy. This isn't a source package. -- James -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
gstreamer0.8-wavpack
gstreamer0.8-wavpack approved for backporting to Breezy. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
ksplash-engine-moodin
ksplash-engine-moodin approved for breezy-backports (new Universe addition) -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: re-push a bunch of Backports through
alright, got them to push it through. Thanks to infinity for fixing it.all went through with the exception of gnome-power-manager, whose buildlogs haven't been uploaded yet... I'll investigate on that; may be error on my part. On 11/22/05, James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> It seemed like the first time the Backports were sent through, some of them> had issues with the build-dep step (something about dbConfig being locked) > when installing build dependencies.Please talk to LaMont Jones or Adam Conrad, they maintain the buildds.--James -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: re-push a bunch of Backports through
John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It seemed like the first time the Backports were sent through, some of them > had issues with the build-dep step (something about dbConfig being locked) > when installing build dependencies. Please talk to LaMont Jones or Adam Conrad, they maintain the buildds. -- James -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
re-push a bunch of Backports through
It seemed like the first time the Backports were sent through, some of them had issues with the build-dep step (something about dbConfig being locked) when installing build dependencies.Later through the night, when we got to ppc/amd64, the packages pushed through. So there seems to be some kind of issue with the i386 chroot. I'm hoping it's a temporary fluke and would like for you to try rebuilding the following packages, that lack i386 binary packages: gnome-peercastgnome-power-managergnomebakerk3blilypondlmmsmail-notificationmftracerhythmboxsensors-applet -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
meld
meld approved for backporting to Breezy. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: question
Hello. Marc Wiriadisastra: > Also on another point trac-0.9 has been requested it builds fine. > However installation. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/packages/trac$ sudo dpkg -i *deb > Selecting previously deselected package trac. > (Reading database ... 128847 files and directories currently installed.) > Unpacking trac (from trac_0.9-1ubuntu1_all.deb) ... > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of trac: > trac depends on python-clearsilver (>= 0.9.3); however: > Package python-clearsilver is not installed. dpkg won't by itself download the missing dependencies. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy python-clearsilver python-clearsilver: Installed: (none) Candidate: 0.9.13-3.2ubuntu1 Version table: 0.9.13-3.2ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com breezy/universe Packages python-clearsilver is in Breezy's universe and in version higher than required by Trac, so when you fulfill Trac's dependencies it should be fully installable. Cheers, -- Shot -- With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion. -- Steven Weinberg == http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ === http://shot.pl/1/125/ === signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
us.archive.ubuntu.com and no backports
To archive admin of us.archive.ubuntu.com (devs, forward appropriately), please add breezy-backports and sync with the archive.ubuntu.com mirror Thanks! -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: question
On 11/22/05, Marc Wiriadisastra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a couple of questions.that ubp-build.py I remember someone saying it was updated however Ican't find that link can someone point it to me. google for ubp-build.py, and that is the latest version. Also on another point trac-0.9 has been requested it builds fine.However installation. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/packages/trac$ sudo dpkg -i *debSelecting previously deselected package trac.(Reading database ... 128847 files and directories currently installed.)Unpacking trac (from trac_0.9-1ubuntu1_all.deb) ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of trac: trac depends on python-clearsilver (>= 0.9.3); however: Package python-clearsilver is not installed. trac depends on python2.4-subversion (>= 0.37); however: Package python2.4-subversion is not installed. trac depends on subversion (>= 1.0.1); however: Package subversion is not installed.dpkg: error processing trac (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: trac That's normal, it just means some dependencies for it are not installed... dpkg does NOT do dependency resolution. Run apt-get -f install to fix that. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/packages/trac$ sudo apt-cache show python-clearsilverpython2.4-subversion Package: python-clearsilverPriority: optionalSection: universe/pythonInstalled-Size: 36Maintainer: Jesus Climent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: allSource: clearsilverVersion: 0.9.13-3.2ubuntu1Depends: python2.4-clearsilverhowever as you can python-clearsilver seems to be the culprit. Shouldthat be backported as well? I'm not sure whether backports wants to go down that path. No, it doesn't need to be backported. Only version 0.9.3 is needed, and the last time I checked 13 is bigger than 3. Regards,Marc-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)iD8DBQBDgy3ROTR/Y2USyNgRAl2NAJ4iXXZoq6ClDYMh8UafhI09UmEY1QCghXAw+OxmMaXBbz4pCCKYA9TPEa4==nDVD-END PGP SIGNATURE---ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.comhttp://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
question
I have a couple of questions. that ubp-build.py I remember someone saying it was updated however I can't find that link can someone point it to me. Also on another point trac-0.9 has been requested it builds fine. However installation. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/packages/trac$ sudo dpkg -i *deb Selecting previously deselected package trac. (Reading database ... 128847 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking trac (from trac_0.9-1ubuntu1_all.deb) ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of trac: trac depends on python-clearsilver (>= 0.9.3); however: Package python-clearsilver is not installed. trac depends on python2.4-subversion (>= 0.37); however: Package python2.4-subversion is not installed. trac depends on subversion (>= 1.0.1); however: Package subversion is not installed. dpkg: error processing trac (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: trac [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/packages/trac$ sudo apt-cache show python-clearsilver python2.4-subversion Package: python-clearsilver Priority: optional Section: universe/python Installed-Size: 36 Maintainer: Jesus Climent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: all Source: clearsilver Version: 0.9.13-3.2ubuntu1 Depends: python2.4-clearsilver however as you can python-clearsilver seems to be the culprit. Should that be backported as well? I'm not sure whether backports wants to go down that path. Regards, Marc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
