Re: allowing backports into non-LTS releases
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 3:10 PM Thomas Ward wrote: > > The only thing in Lunar's backports are the `cockpit` package, I forget > did we give that an exception? well that's what I meant, should we continue with the 'exception only' policy for backports to non-LTS releases? Or should we allow optional backports to non-LTS releases? Personally I think it makes sense to allow backports to non-LTS releases without needing to get specific exception approval... > > > Thomas > > > On 10/30/23 10:58, Thomas Ward wrote: > > I'll take a look at Lunar (didn't that just release though...?) as I have a > > server related task for that to work on. > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: ubuntu-backports On > > Behalf Of Dan Streetman > > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 10:55 AM > > To: Backports Discussion > > Subject: allowing backports into non-LTS releases > > > > I'd like to propose changing our rules to allow - but not require - > > backports into non-LTS releases. I think it makes sense to allow this, so > > the benefit of backports can be provided in non-LTS releases as well. > > > > As we currently do have backports in the non-LTS lunar and mantic queues, > > and we've rescheduled our next meeting until the end of next month, if you > > have time @teward and @mapreri I'd like to discuss over the ML, so we can > > accept (or reject) the non-LTS uploads. > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > ubuntu-backports mailing list > > ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports > > -- > ubuntu-backports mailing list > ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: allowing backports into non-LTS releases
Same with Mantic. On 10/30/23 15:09, Thomas Ward wrote: The only thing in Lunar's backports are the `cockpit` package, I forget did we give that an exception? Thomas On 10/30/23 10:58, Thomas Ward wrote: I'll take a look at Lunar (didn't that just release though...?) as I have a server related task for that to work on. Thomas -Original Message- From: ubuntu-backports On Behalf Of Dan Streetman Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 10:55 AM To: Backports Discussion Subject: allowing backports into non-LTS releases I'd like to propose changing our rules to allow - but not require - backports into non-LTS releases. I think it makes sense to allow this, so the benefit of backports can be provided in non-LTS releases as well. As we currently do have backports in the non-LTS lunar and mantic queues, and we've rescheduled our next meeting until the end of next month, if you have time @teward and @mapreri I'd like to discuss over the ML, so we can accept (or reject) the non-LTS uploads. Thanks! -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: allowing backports into non-LTS releases
The only thing in Lunar's backports are the `cockpit` package, I forget did we give that an exception? Thomas On 10/30/23 10:58, Thomas Ward wrote: I'll take a look at Lunar (didn't that just release though...?) as I have a server related task for that to work on. Thomas -Original Message- From: ubuntu-backports On Behalf Of Dan Streetman Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 10:55 AM To: Backports Discussion Subject: allowing backports into non-LTS releases I'd like to propose changing our rules to allow - but not require - backports into non-LTS releases. I think it makes sense to allow this, so the benefit of backports can be provided in non-LTS releases as well. As we currently do have backports in the non-LTS lunar and mantic queues, and we've rescheduled our next meeting until the end of next month, if you have time @teward and @mapreri I'd like to discuss over the ML, so we can accept (or reject) the non-LTS uploads. Thanks! -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
RE: allowing backports into non-LTS releases
I'll take a look at Lunar (didn't that just release though...?) as I have a server related task for that to work on. Thomas -Original Message- From: ubuntu-backports On Behalf Of Dan Streetman Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 10:55 AM To: Backports Discussion Subject: allowing backports into non-LTS releases I'd like to propose changing our rules to allow - but not require - backports into non-LTS releases. I think it makes sense to allow this, so the benefit of backports can be provided in non-LTS releases as well. As we currently do have backports in the non-LTS lunar and mantic queues, and we've rescheduled our next meeting until the end of next month, if you have time @teward and @mapreri I'd like to discuss over the ML, so we can accept (or reject) the non-LTS uploads. Thanks! -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
