[Bug 232096] [NEW] libnotify bubble background color incompletely changed
Public bug reported: Changing the tooltip background color and text color (customize theme in appearance preferences) changes the color in libnotify notification bubbles, but only on the right side. This can lead to some ugly notifications in the case of themes like the one I'm using. It seems the best thing to do would be to change the entire background color to the selected tooltip color. If is this isnt desirable for some reason, changing tooltip color settings should just have no effect, so the default appearance always appears. Screenshot attached. ** Affects: libnotify (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- libnotify bubble background color incompletely changed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 232096] Re: libnotify bubble background color incompletely changed
** Attachment added: libnotify_bgcolor_bug.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14613380/libnotify_bgcolor_bug.png -- libnotify bubble background color incompletely changed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119730] Re: Slow SATA performance
I have this same problem, though it definitely seems to be complicated. Copying large files (2GB) from one SATA drive to another, or to another location on the same drive pretty much seems to always cause slow speeds (and i mean like 3Mb/sec, it can take 20-30 mins to copy a 4gig file, its seriously faster to burn the same file). Copying a say, 700MB file between the same two drives is reasonably fast (~30mb/sec). I have a mix of NTFS and reiserfs drives, but it doesnt seem to matter which are the source and target drives. For what its worth, I had the same problem in gentoo, and 32 vs 64-bit doesnt seem to matter either. I'm fairly sure this is a kernel bug, possibly related to specific motherboards or chipset (i'm using the onboard SATA of my nforce4 board). I dont have any of the obvious problems mentioned earlier like disabled write cache or no DMA modes enabled, hdparm gives me a 72MB/s reads (is there a way to test writes?). It's frustrating to know that I have drives capable of 50+MB/sec, and dont seem to have a problem getting those speeds in windows, and can only get half that in linux at best. Anyone with any insight would be much appreciated. -- Slow SATA performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119730 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85513] Re: [apport] vlc crashed with SIGSEGV
If you can run vlc in GL mode with no problems on your intel graphics laptop, it sounds like maybe this is a nvidia specific issue. Not sure about your direct rendering issue, my glxinfo shows I have direct rendering. -- [apport] vlc crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202468] Re: FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6
Yes, this will need a sponsor. This will be my first upload, someone will need to let me know how to go about doing it. -- FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202468] Re: FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6
I made no real changes to libswfdec compared to debian experimental, it would be fine (and probably preferable?) to sync it directly from there. ** Attachment added: debdiff_swfdec0.6.0debian-swfdec0.6.0ubuntu http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12794572/debdiff_swfdec0.6.0debian-swfdec0.6.0ubuntu -- FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202468] Re: FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6
There were more significant changes in swfdec-mozilla, to support firefox 3 and use the alternative system. (Note: there was an errant output file of a debuild run in my last build, i removed it for this debdiff) ** Attachment added: debdiff_swfdecmozilla0.6.0debian-swfdecmozilla0.6.0ubuntu http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12794779/debdiff_swfdecmozilla0.6.0debian-swfdecmozilla0.6.0ubuntu -- FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202468] Re: FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6
I made no changes to swfdec-gnome as compared to debian experimental (there was no 2.22.0 available at the time) -- there is a 2.22.0 in debian unstable now, that is essentially the same so it would make sense to directly sync that as well. ** Attachment added: debdiff_swfdecgnome2.22.0debian-swfdecgnome2.22.0ubuntu http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12794908/debdiff_swfdecgnome2.22.0debian-swfdecgnome2.22.0ubuntu -- FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202468] Re: FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6
Here's a debdiff for swfdec-mozilla-0.5.4 as shipped vs my swfdec- mozilla-0.6.0. ** Attachment added: debdiff_swfdecmozilla0.5.4ubuntu-swfdecmozilla0.6.0ubuntu http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12794991/debdiff_swfdecmozilla0.5.4ubuntu-swfdecmozilla0.6.0ubuntu -- FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195422] Re: hardy heron 8.04 alpha 5 - flash not installed correctly
Eh, scratch my last comment, its update-alternatives that should be installing the plugin but doesnt seem to want to install to xulrunner- addons, for some reason. Here's a workaround that should work for all firefox 3 versions: sudo ln -s /var/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so /usr/lib/xulrunner-addons/plugins/ -- hardy heron 8.04 alpha 5 - flash not installed correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195422 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202468] Re: FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6
I updated the packages in my PPA based on your suggestions. The alternative system is now used, based on the prerm and postinst scripts in Stéphane's 0.5.4 build. The packages have also been uploaded in .orig.tar.gz and diff.gz format. -- FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202468] Re: FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6
Added. Should be done building in my ppa soon. -- FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202468] Re: FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6
I uploaded swfdec-gnome 2.22.0 to my ppa as well, so we wont be left with an outdated version if the other two packages get into hardy. It compiles, installs, and launches fine for me -- however, I dont have any swf files to test it with. I based it on the 2.21.91 version found in debian experimental, with no changes other than the version bump. -- FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200600] Re: ogmrip needs ocrad for subititle support but the package doesn't depend on it
I was able to reproduce this problem, but it occurs for me using gocr or ocrad. The --with-ocr config option does work, however there seems to be a bug in one or both of the ocr programs, or maybe something else. I've posted on the ogmrip forums in an attempt to get it straightened out. If i find a fix for this, i'll update this bug and the ogmrip in my ppa. -- ogmrip needs ocrad for subititle support but the package doesn't depend on it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200600 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195422] Re: hardy heron 8.04 alpha 5 - flash not installed correctly
This is actually a problem with nspluginwrapper as far as I can tell (at least for those of us on 64bit). The flash plugin postinstall script correctly installs to the xulrunner-plugins directory, unless it detects you are using nspluginwrapper. Unfortunatly, nspluginwrapper only seems to install to /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins and /usr/lib/firefox/plugins/ and not /usr/lib/xulrunner-addons/plugins/ which is where plugins need to be for firefox 3. I'm trying to wrap my head around how to get it to do the right thing, but I'm not a developer, so its a little over my head. ** Also affects: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- hardy heron 8.04 alpha 5 - flash not installed correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195422 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202468] Re: FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6
** Summary changed: - update swfdec-* to 0.6 + FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6 ** Attachment added: diffstat.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12692678/diffstat.txt -- FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202468] Re: FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6
** Attachment added: diff of changes from NEWS file http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12692680/changelog.diff -- FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202468] Re: FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6
I've compiled, installed, and (briefly) tested this on x86_64, seems to be working fine. I don't really have any experience packaging, but I'm willing to take a stab at it if needed. ** Attachment added: swfdec-mozilla 0.6.0, YouTube screenshot http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12692871/swfdec-0.6.0.png -- FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 179901] Re: sync new upstream release swfdec 0.5.5. from debian unstable (main)
FFe bug request here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/202468/ -- sync new upstream release swfdec 0.5.5. from debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202468] Re: FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6
adding motu-release. Please consider the first API/ABI-stable release of Swfdec (per release notes) for inclusion in hardy, lots of bug fixes over current 0.5.4 version. -- FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202468] Re: FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6
For anyone who's interested in testing this, there's some packages in my PPA based on the debian experimental version. https://launchpad.net/~adam-caldwell/+archive/ It's my first attempt at packaging, but it works for me. -- FFe: update swfdec-* to 0.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200600] Re: ogmrip needs ocrad for subititle support but the package doesn't depend on it
Hi, I've packaged the new upstream version (0.11.2) in my PPA. I also included a small fix that should fix your subtitle problem, and it seems to work for me. Can you test my package and see if it resolves your issue? https://launchpad.net/~adam-caldwell/+archive We'll see about getting into hardy if it resolves your bug. -- ogmrip needs ocrad for subititle support but the package doesn't depend on it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200600 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194191] Re: [Hardy/Firefox 3.0b3] cannot drag and drop bookmark to desktop
Fixed in firefox 3.0b4 ** Changed in: mozilla-firefox (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- [Hardy/Firefox 3.0b3] cannot drag and drop bookmark to desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194191] Re: [Hardy/Firefox 3.0b3] cannot drag and drop bookmark to desktop
Scratch that, it does still occur. But it seems to only occur with the original reported link, not sure why. ** Changed in: mozilla-firefox (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- [Hardy/Firefox 3.0b3] cannot drag and drop bookmark to desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 184382] Re: ehci_hcd: usb disk detection requires un/loading
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 88746 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 88746 ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices -- ehci_hcd: usb disk detection requires un/loading https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 199648] Re: no repeat the current track checkbox for rythmbox
This bugged me a little too. It was reported upstream a while back: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455711 ** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- no repeat the current track checkbox for rythmbox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199648 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194174] Re: The 'Show Mouse' plugin for Compiz does not work
On further inspection, this may actually be a problem with our compiz- fusion plugins packaging. According to this page http://wiki.compiz- fusion.org/Plugins/Mousepoll the mousepoll plugin is required for showmouse to work. However, mousepoll is not installed by either compiz- fusion-plugins-main or compiz-fusion-plugins-extra. So, even when enabling the plugin via gconf editor as i noted above, it still doesnt work. compizconfig-settings-manager may be refusing to enable the plugin because it cant find mousepoll. -- The 'Show Mouse' plugin for Compiz does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187329] Re: Epiphany doesn't show JavaScript dialogs anymore
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 192710 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192710 Confirmed still occurs in epiphany-browser-2.21.90-0ubuntu4. Similar problem is seen when trying to Delete all spam messages now in gmail, instead of popping up a confirming dialog, nothing happens. ** Changed in: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Epiphany doesn't show JavaScript dialogs anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187329 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189292] Re: audacious skins do not appear in preferences until refreshed
To clarify this bug: when the appearance section of audacious preferences is opened, the list of skins appears empty (even though there are skins in /usr/share/audacious/Skins). Clicking the reload button loads them, but this is counter-intuitive and initially confusing. I changed the title to reflect the issue more accurately. ** Summary changed: - audacious 1.4.6 does not see Skins + audacious skins do not appear in preferences until refreshed -- audacious skins do not appear in preferences until refreshed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189292] Re: audacious 1.4.6 does not see Skins
Works as expected for me in audacious-1.4.6-2ubuntu1. Try clicking the refresh skin list button (upper right hand corner of appearance section of preferences, looks like a reload button). -- audacious skins do not appear in preferences until refreshed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194174] Re: The 'Show Mouse' plugin for Compiz does not work
Confirmed occurs as reported. The problem is in compizconfig-settings- manager, not compiz (the plugin can be enabled with the gconf editor), editing bug as such. ** Changed in: compizconfig-settings-manager (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: compiz = compizconfig-settings-manager Status: New = Confirmed -- The 'Show Mouse' plugin for Compiz does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193875] [NEW] Transmission shows incorrect date added
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: transmission-gtk If the details are brought up on a torrent (right click - details), the added field under dates shows the time transmission was launched as opposed to the time the torrent was actually added. Steps to reproduce: 1) Add torrent to transmission 2) Quit transmission and relaunch 3) Open details window for torrent 4) Note that date added does not reflect the original time of adding Version information: Hardy 8.04 transmission-gtk 1.05-0ubuntu1 ** Affects: transmission (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: charles (charles-rebelbase) Status: Fix Committed -- Transmission shows incorrect date added https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193875 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193075] Re: (Hardy Heron) splix V 1.1 and PPD problem (No print on Samsung 2010 PR)
I had this problem too, open printer config (system - administration - printing), click your printer (ML-2010 for me) under make and model click change, select samsung, select printer (again ML-2010 for me), then select Samsung ML-2010, 1.1.0 [en], and hit ok. This should have the system use the installed driver. -- [hardy] upgrade issue Splix V. 1.1.0 but the PPD file is designed for SpliX V. 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193075 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193075] Re: (Hardy Heron) splix V 1.1 and PPD problem (No print on Samsung 2010 PR)
Printing from firefox, openoffice, and abiword all worked fine. -- [hardy] upgrade issue Splix V. 1.1.0 but the PPD file is designed for SpliX V. 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193075 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194191] Re: [Hardy/Firefox 3.0b3] cannot drag and drop bookmark to desktop
Confirmed occurs as reported. ** Changed in: mozilla-firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [Hardy/Firefox 3.0b3] cannot drag and drop bookmark to desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194094] Re: tracker-applet: KP_Enter does not work
Confirmed occurs as reported. ** Changed in: tracker (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- tracker-applet: KP_Enter does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 199619] Re: many broken emblem icons in Backgrounds and Emblems dialog
Confirmed occurs as reported. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- many broken emblem icons in Backgrounds and Emblems dialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85513] Re: [apport] vlc crashed with SIGSEGV
Same issue occurring for me, vlc crashes when trying to play any video when opengl is selected as video output. Terminal output is: [0338] a52 decoder: A/52 channels:6 samplerate:48000 bitrate:64 No accelerated IMDCT transform found [0342] main private error: option glx-shm does not exist X Error of failed request: GLXBadDrawable Major opcode of failed request: 143 (GLX) Minor opcode of failed request: 26 () Serial number of failed request: 65 Current serial number in output stream: 65 Locking assertion failure. Backtrace: #0 /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0 [0xb4838767] #1 /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0(xcb_xlib_lock+0x2e) [0xb483881e] #2 /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 [0xb4a145f8] #3 /usr/lib/libX11.so.6(XESetCloseDisplay+0x31) [0xb49f79b1] #4 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 [0xaf3d9b69] vlc: xcb_xlib.c:73: xcb_xlib_lock: Assertion `!c-xlib.lock' failed. Aborted (core dumped) Tested in Hardy (current as of report), vlc 0.8.6.release.d-0ubuntu3, with Nvidia 8600GT, nvidia-glx-new-169.09+2.6.24.9-8.25. Let me know if any more info is needed. ** Changed in: vlc (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [apport] vlc crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178887] Re: Audacious crashes on loading an m3u file
No problem loading m3u files for me in audacious 1.4.6-2ubuntu1. Can this be confirmed so bug can be closed? -- Audacious crashes on loading an m3u file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178887 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190844] Re: tracker search tool never finds anything
Works as expected for me with tracker 0.6.4-1ubuntu1. Can you confirm if this still occurs for you with all updates applied? -- tracker search tool never finds anything https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190844 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190844] Re: tracker search tool never finds anything
Using your test case above, it still works as expected for me finding test.txt with no problem. Possibly an arch specific bug? I tested on i386, which arch are you using? -- tracker search tool never finds anything https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190844 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190848] Re: font in terminal does not resemble font in preview
Interesting, I'm running a fresh install from hardy alpha 4. What arch are you on, amd64? i386? -- font in terminal does not resemble font in preview https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190848] Re: font in terminal does not resemble font in preview
Works as expected for me in gnome-terminal 2.21.91.1-0ubuntu1. Can original reporter confirm if this bug still occurs for them with all updates applied? -- font in terminal does not resemble font in preview https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197894] Re: menu color does not match panel color in human-murrine
This has been fixed in the most recent version. ** Changed in: human-theme (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- menu color does not match panel color in human-murrine https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197894 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 198225] Re: nvidia graphics don't work on hardy alpha 5
Could you post your /etc/X11/xorg.conf and /var/log/Xorg.0.log ? The chipset is supported, and it should work with the nvidia-glx-new driver. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- nvidia graphics don't work on hardy alpha 5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198225 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 198225] Re: nvidia graphics don't work on hardy alpha 5
I know you said neither open nor proprietary drivers work, but have you tried manually changing the driver in the xorg.conf to nvidia? Change both lines that say Driver nv to Driver nvidia. (There are two, because i'm guessing you have two monitors). -- nvidia graphics don't work on hardy alpha 5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198225 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182300] Re: Automatic codec installation for MPEG-4 AAC audio doesn't occur
I'm having the same problem with rhythmbox. Everytime I launch it says codecs are needed to play back some file, but upon launching gnome- codec-install, it says there is no suitable plugin available. Rythmbox terminal output as follows: Rhythmbox-Message: Missing plugin: gstreamer|0.10|rhythmbox-metadata|MPEG-4 AAC decoder|decoder-audio/mpeg, mpegversion=(int)4, framed=(boolean)true (ignoring) Rhythmbox-Message: All missing plugins are blacklisted, doing nothing This is pretty annoying, though as original reporter noted, installing gstreamer-0.10-plugins-bad manually fixes the problem. Bug seen in hardy, rhythmbox-0.11.4-0ubuntu6, gnome-app- install-0.5.2.4-0ubuntu1. ** Changed in: gnome-app-install (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Automatic codec installation for MPEG-4 AAC audio doesn't occur https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197894] Re: menu color does not match panel color in human-murrine
** Attachment added: human-murrine_menu.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12360328/human-murrine_menu.png -- menu color does not match panel color in human-murrine https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197894 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197894] [NEW] menu color does not match panel color in human-murrine
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: human-theme With the new human-murrine theme engine enabled, the color behind the main menus is different than the rest of the panel, which looks very odd. See attached screenshot. ** Affects: human-theme (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- menu color does not match panel color in human-murrine https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197894 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195072] Re: [Hardy alpha 5] Firefox 3 beta 3 go back UI is wrong
Not a bug. This is the new design, combining back and forward histories into one single history. See http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/a-deep-look-to-firefox-3-beta-3/ The back and forward buttons have been combined in a single keyhole-shaped widget featuring a single history menu. ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- [Hardy alpha 5] Firefox 3 beta 3 go back UI is wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194985] Re: Restricted Driver Manager does not display fglrx after installation
** Changed in: jockey (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = jockey -- Restricted Driver Manager does not display fglrx after installation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194985 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194915] Re: Stardict's scan not compatible with Firefox 3 Beta 3
** Changed in: stardict (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = stardict -- Stardict's scan not compatible with Firefox 3 Beta 3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194915 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195228] Re: [hardy alpha 5] Totem YouTube browser can't be activated
The youtube totem plugin requires python-gdata, which is not installed by default. Installing the package resolves this problem. It seems either python-gdata should be installed with totem, or the youtube plugin should not be included with totem by default. ** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [hardy alpha 5] Totem YouTube browser can't be activated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195228 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195294] Re: amazing effect in FF3b3 window
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 186186 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186186 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 186186 web page background render errors -- amazing effect in FF3b3 window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195238] Re: Firefox 3.3 renders websites very poorly
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 186186 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186186 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 186186 web page background render errors -- Firefox 3.3 renders websites very poorly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195238 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
