from:"Colin Watson"

[Bug 2055402] Re: Though lintian call: error: troff: Segmentation fault

2024-07-04 Thread Colin Watson

** Changed in: groff (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055402

Title:
  Though lintian call: error: troff: Segmentation fault

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/groff/+bug/2055402/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2055402] Re: Though lintian call: error: troff: Segmentation fault

2024-07-04 Thread Colin Watson

Adding a groff task to fix the segfault even in the face of whatever we
decide to do about the profile (see
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?65427).

** Also affects: groff (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Bug watch added: GNU Savannah Bug Tracker #65427
   http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65427

** Changed in: groff (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: groff (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Watson (cjwatson)

** Changed in: groff (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055402

Title:
  Though lintian call: error: troff: Segmentation fault

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/groff/+bug/2055402/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2055402] Re: Though lintian call: error: troff: Segmentation fault

2024-07-04 Thread Colin Watson

I would like to add a small correction here regarding the intent of man-
db's AppArmor policy.  The intent is _not_ to confine where the man
program itself can write, as is noted in the policy itself:

  # Allow basically anything in terms of file system access, subject to DAC.
  # The purpose of this profile isn't to confine man itself (that might be
  # nice in the future, but is tricky since it's quite configurable), but to
  # confine the processes it calls that parse untrusted data.
  /** mrixwlk,

However, the man_groff sub-profile is more constrained, and that's used
for the groff-related subprocesses that man forks.  That's what's
triggering denials here.

In some ways I wonder if that means that the problem is a leaky
abstraction of sorts.  We're trying to confine man's groff-related
subprocesses, but we pass through FDs to them.  One possibility might be
to have groff write to a pipe instead in this situation and stream it
through man to the output file.  Slightly less efficient, but it might
not be too unreasonable.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055402

Title:
  Though lintian call: error: troff: Segmentation fault

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/2055402/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2049369] Re: autopkg tests ignored for migration of python3-defaults adding 3.12

2024-07-02 Thread Colin Watson

ipykernel was fixed in 6.29.3-1, which is in noble.

** Changed in: ipykernel (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049369

Title:
  autopkg tests ignored for migration of python3-defaults adding 3.12

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cython/+bug/2049369/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2043939] Re: Should depend on python3-httpx

2024-06-24 Thread Colin Watson

dnsdiag 2.5.0 now requires httpx itself, so I'll add a dependency when
packaging that version.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043939

Title:
  Should depend on python3-httpx

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsdiag/+bug/2043939/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1938836] Re: lava-server-gunicorn fails to start with python-eventlet > 0.30.3

2024-05-27 Thread Colin Watson

This patch was applied in Debian some time ago:

gunicorn (20.1.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Team upload
  * Add upstream patch with fix for change in eventlet 0.30.3+

 -- Antonio Terceiro   Tue, 18 Oct 2022 18:13:54
-0300

Ubuntu 23.10 and above have this fix.

** Changed in: gunicorn (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938836

Title:
  lava-server-gunicorn fails to start with python-eventlet > 0.30.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gunicorn/+bug/1938836/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064089] Re: python-gssapi 1.8.2-1ubuntu2 regression: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'gssapi.raw'

2024-05-17 Thread Colin Watson

Indeed, upstream 1.8.3 fixes this.  I'll get that into Debian and it can
auto-sync to oracular from there.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064089

Title:
  python-gssapi 1.8.2-1ubuntu2 regression: ModuleNotFoundError: No
  module named 'gssapi.raw'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-gssapi/+bug/2064089/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064089] Re: python-gssapi 1.8.2-1ubuntu2 regression: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'gssapi.raw'

2024-05-17 Thread Colin Watson

Looks like https://github.com/pythongssapi/python-
gssapi/commit/d9200d1018ac916b30433da23898c8c5fbde0f28, I think?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064089

Title:
  python-gssapi 1.8.2-1ubuntu2 regression: ModuleNotFoundError: No
  module named 'gssapi.raw'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-gssapi/+bug/2064089/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2043939] Re: Should depend on python3-httpx

2024-04-30 Thread Colin Watson

Recommends seems like the right thing to use for an optional feature -
but python3-dnspython already Recommends: python3-httpx, and that's
where the code that's directly using the httpx library lives.  So I
wonder if it really makes sense to change dnsdiag for this?  A
Recommends there rather than in one of its dependencies wouldn't really
change anything, and it would be harder to maintain since the code that
directly uses httpx isn't in dnsdiag.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043939

Title:
  Should depend on python3-httpx

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsdiag/+bug/2043939/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: pastebinit default target on Ubuntu

2024-04-15 Thread Colin Watson

On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 04:42:37PM -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 4:14 PM Steve Langasek
>  wrote:
> > And if there are issues with the usability of paste.ubuntu.com, uh, we own
> > that service?  So let's work with our IS team to make it fit for purpose.
> > (I don't know why it currently requires a login to *view* paste contents;
> > that seems straightforwardly a bug that we should just get sorted.)
> 
> That's because pastebin servers are frequently abused as a way to get
> free mass storage.
> 
> It's not very practical to require login to post to a pastebin as the
> whole point is for a tool like "pastebinit" to work without needing
> user configuration as it's commonly used as a debug tool on cloud
> instances and other random servers random than a user's personal
> system.
> 
> With that in mind, a bunch of folks noticed that you could abuse a
> service like paste.ubuntu.com by pushing large files (base64 encoded
> or the like) and then retrieve them with a very trivial amount of html
> parsing (if no raw option is offered directly).

I'll add that (from memory) it wasn't just being abused as free mass
storage in general, it was very very dodgy stuff that required urgent
takedown enforcement.  We talked IS down from making it require a login
to use the service at all and this was the compromise.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

[Bug 2061476] Re: nfs-ganesha 4.3-8build1 fails to build on armhf

2024-04-15 Thread Colin Watson

$ remove-package -s noble -a armhf -b -m 'Broken with 64-bit time_t on armhf; 
see bug 2061476' nfs-ganesha nfs-ganesha-gpfs nfs-ganesha-mem 
nfs-ganesha-nullfs nfs-ganesha-proxy-v4 nfs-ganesha-vfs
Removing packages from noble:
nfs-ganesha 4.3-8 in noble armhf
nfs-ganesha-gpfs 4.3-8 in noble armhf
nfs-ganesha-mem 4.3-8 in noble armhf
nfs-ganesha-nullfs 4.3-8 in noble armhf
nfs-ganesha-proxy-v4 4.3-8 in noble armhf
nfs-ganesha-vfs 4.3-8 in noble armhf
Comment: Broken with 64-bit time_t on armhf; see bug 2061476
Remove [y|N]? y
6 packages successfully removed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061476

Title:
  nfs-ganesha 4.3-8build1 fails to build on armhf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-ganesha/+bug/2061476/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2052618] Re: Missing sftp-server argument -m force_file_perms

2024-03-30 Thread Colin Watson

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1922130 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922130

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1922130
   Request addition of Fedora / Redhat "sftp-force-permissions" patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052618

Title:
  Missing sftp-server argument -m force_file_perms

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2052618/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059274] Re: dgit time_t regression

2024-03-27 Thread Colin Watson

This uses faketime, so I would bet that it's pointing out issues there
similar to bug 2059037 / bug 2059078.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059274

Title:
  dgit time_t regression

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dgit/+bug/2059274/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2053146] Re: openssh 8.9p1 for Jammy auth2-gss patch for gssapi-keyex method is slightly wrong

2024-03-14 Thread Colin Watson

I fixed this in Debian today in https://salsa.debian.org/ssh-
team/openssh/-/commit/0947dd466d64cabfb527d8326e2507f473373a32, uploaded
as part of 1:9.7p1-1.  You could possibly just merge 1:9.7p1-1 into
noble since it's mostly a bug-fix release, but failing that you could
cherry-pick the relevant change easily enough.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053146

Title:
  openssh 8.9p1 for Jammy auth2-gss patch for gssapi-keyex method is
  slightly wrong

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2053146/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1858777] Re: Processing triggers for man-db lasting extremely long

2024-03-13 Thread Colin Watson

Fred, in that case it is unlikely to be related to this bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858777

Title:
  Processing triggers for man-db lasting extremely long

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1858777/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: +1 maintenance report

2024-02-27 Thread Colin Watson

On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 06:31:39PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> * celery
>   - Spent a long time investigating the Python 3.12 segfault that
> happens when running dh_auto_test.  I was able to obtain a usable
> stacktrace.
>   - I'll file an upstream bug.

I don't know if you ever did this, but in case it's still on your to-do
list, this is https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/115874; I
suggested a cherry-pick of the proposed patch there in
https://bugs.debian.org/1063345.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: systemd-timesyncd depends on systemd?

2024-01-16 Thread Colin Watson

On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 05:58:47PM +, David Crespi wrote:
> We're having a problem getting systemd to load.  Yesterday the system updated 
> the kernel, and everything went crazy.
> It looks like systemd is only getting partially loaded now because 
> systemd-timesyncd is not being loaded.  It looks like
> timesyncd isn't being loaded because of a dependency on systemd.

What's the output of "sudo dpkg --configure -a"?  (This may fix it and
return success, or it may return a bunch of errors.  In the latter case
the output will likely be interesting.)

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: Turning on phased update support in chroots in 24.10 (24.04?)

2023-07-13 Thread Colin Watson

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 12:47:40PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 11:42, Julian Andres Klode
>  wrote:
> > Phasing is not affected by pinning you need to set:
> >
> > APT::Get::Always-Include-Phased-Updates "true";
> 
> Given this option already exists, we should just start setting it
> explicitly in launchpad-buildd & mk-sbuild.

launchpad-buildd has set this option since 2021.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: breezy behavior wrt lp: [Was Re: git-ubuntu build]

2023-06-14 Thread Colin Watson

On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 08:54:23AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 03:29:11PM +0200, Paride Legovini wrote:
> > What happens is that Breezy finds the lp: shorthand and resolves it to a
> > Git URL, then fails if we were actually pointing it to a Bazaar repo.
> 
> > For example this fails on my Mantic system if I use lp: for Git:
> 
> >   bzr branch lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/meta-release/ubuntu
> 
> > I now use lpad: as a shorthand for Launchpad Git repos:
> 
> > [url "ssh://par...@git.launchpad.net/"]
> > insteadOf = lpad:
> 
> I had encountered this behavior, but hadn't realized it was on account of my
> own git config!
> 
> For my part, I dug through the code and discovered that lp+bzr:
> (undocumented AFAIK) works to force the use of bzr.  Since I do a lot more
> git checkouts that bzr from Launchpad these days (a trend that is only
> likely to continue), this is what I'm sticking with, reserving the shorter
> shortcut for git.

My hero!  I also mostly use git these days, but I still need to use bzr
often enough that having to type out the full URL had become a
noticeable annoyance.  lp+bzr: definitely helps.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: NBS kernel removals: round two

2023-06-14 Thread Colin Watson

On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 09:45:56PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 12:55:36PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Consequently, I will be removing all kernel packages older than linux
> > 3.13.0-170.220 from trusty-{updates,security} next week.
> 
> > I will leave xenial as-is for the moment, and send further mail before
> > making any changes to NBS packages there.
> 
> Update: this has been done now.
> 
> No reports have reached me of any users adversely affected by the removals
> of these old kernel binaries from trusty.

Entertainingly, while this may not have affected end users, from
circumstantial evidence we think this did manage to tickle a Launchpad
bug which has existed since May 2016:

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/2023698

Good to have the excuse to investigate that, since it's probably bitten
us occasionally in the past without quite causing enough problems to
make it worth tracking down!

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: unixodbc-dev 2.3.11 seems broken

2023-02-11 Thread Colin Watson

On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 10:13:13AM -0800, Robert Ayrapetyan wrote:
> # lsb_release -a
> No LSB modules are available.
> Distributor ID: Ubuntu
> Description:Ubuntu 20.04.5 LTS
> Release:20.04
> Codename:   focal
> 
> 
> # apt show unixodbc-dev
> Package: unixodbc-dev
> Version: 2.3.11

This is not a package that comes from Ubuntu 20.04, and in fact it
doesn't appear to have come from any version of Ubuntu at all (versions
of unixodbc-dev provided by Ubuntu have some kind of suffix after the
upstream version number - for example, the version in Ubuntu 22.10 is
2.3.11-2).  Where did you get it from?  The package is clearly broken,
but that isn't an Ubuntu problem - perhaps you should reinstall the
working version from Ubuntu.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Auto syncs from Debian fixed

2023-01-24 Thread Colin Watson

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 05:34:20PM +0100, Paride Legovini wrote:
> Just a quick warning on the fact that Launchpad auto-syncs from Debian
> to Lunar are currently not happening.
> 
> There's an issue with debmirror is crashing [1], but the underlying
> cause is on the Debian side [2].
> 
> The debian-ftp team is aware, hopefully that's going to be sorted out soon.

The Debian ftpmasters have fixed the dak bug that caused this, and
Launchpad's Debian import is running again now; auto-sync should catch
up shortly after that.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: move to deb822 sources in ubuntu:lunar docker image

2023-01-17 Thread Colin Watson

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 05:30:27PM +0100, Thomas Bechtold wrote:
> So my understanding is, that we would need to adjust live-build and/or
> livecd-rootfs to use the deb822 format. And if we do that, would
> we also need to adjust launchpad-buildd to handle the new format, too?

I don't think we can reasonably switch to writing out the new format
from launchpad-buildd in the short term; it would require some
not-quite-trivial changes to Launchpad as well, and we're short-staffed
at the moment with a lot of other stuff going on, so taking on more
refactoring work doesn't really appeal.  We've also recently dispatched
builds for trusty (though I didn't check exactly why), and I believe its
apt is too old to support the deb822 format, so we need to retain
compatibility with it for a while longer.

The simplest change might be to make launchpad-buildd ensure that the
new default sources.list path (/etc/apt/sources.list.d/ubuntu.sources?)
doesn't exist, and then just write out the old format to sources.list as
before.

I definitely anticipate lots of breakage from this change!  I hope all
the effort will be worth it.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: Getting Invalid version exception during apt update

2023-01-03 Thread Colin Watson

On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 12:04:34PM +0530, probal basak wrote:
> I am getting the below exception while trying to issue apt update:
> Getting this issue since last week. Previously the same thing used to work
> perfectly fine.

This is a bug in appimage-builder.  As you can see from the fact that
it's installed in /usr/local, it's not supplied by Ubuntu.

The bug is that it's apparently trying to use the Python
packaging.version library to parse and compare the version numbers of
Ubuntu packages.  Ubuntu package versions are not compatible with Python
package versions, and it is incorrect to use Python's packaging.version
library to do this job.

It looks like this bug was fixed in
https://github.com/AppImageCrafters/appimage-builder/pull/281, although
it doesn't seem that there's been a release since that fix landed.  I
don't know how best to advise you to apply that fix to your system, but
presumably you installed this program yourself and so have some idea of
how best to upgrade it.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: Setting NotAutomatic for hirsute+1-proposed

2022-11-04 Thread Colin Watson

On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 12:22:00PM +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Unfortunately this discussion foundered on lack of consensus about whether
> to make this change after the fact for stable series; which resulted in both
> jammy and kinetic going out without this being set.
> 
> I have set the flag now for lunar as it came up in discussion with
> Foundations.  The question of whether to change this for stable series is
> still open (now with some further series that are stable) but can be
> discussed separately.

Cool, thanks.

> Colin, will this flag be inherited in the future at series opening?

Yes.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

[Bug 1992163] Re: [BPO] man-db/2.10.2-1 from jammy

2022-10-15 Thread Colin Watson

As the upstream maintainer, my advice when asked has been that
attempting to cherry-pick this particular set of fixes for an SRU would
be very difficult to get right.  I think it's likely that the GitLab
merge request linked above depends on a number of other preparatory
commits.  I'm not going to stop people trying, but I think it would be
difficult for somebody unfamiliar with the code.

It's been a while since I was involved in this, but when I was last on
the team that reviewed SRUs I don't think I'd have let pure performance
fixes through unless they were very trivial and obvious.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992163

Title:
  [BPO] man-db/2.10.2-1 from jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1992163/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

[Bug 1976475] Re: Installer crash when try to enable disk encryption

2022-06-01 Thread Colin Watson

** Project changed: launchpad => ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976475

Title:
  Installer crash when try to enable disk encryption

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1976475/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1971214] Re: archive is missing dsc index

2022-05-03 Thread Colin Watson

I fear doing this is likely to involve a substantial rewrite.  Debian
generates its Contents files directly from the dak database, but
Launchpad still uses apt-ftparchive to do this job, and I think (though
I could be wrong) that apt-ftparchive only supports generating Contents
files for binary packages.

** Package changed: ubuntu => launchpad

** Tags added: lp-soyuz soyuz-publish

** Changed in: launchpad
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: launchpad
   Importance: Undecided => Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971214

Title:
  archive is missing dsc index

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1971214/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1969342] Re: running dpdk-testpmd shows "Failed to execute command of OP_SET_RSS_HENA" in vm with intree driver on ubuntu-22.04

2022-04-19 Thread Colin Watson

** Package changed: ubuntu => dpdk (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969342

Title:
  running dpdk-testpmd shows "Failed to execute command of
  OP_SET_RSS_HENA" in vm with intree driver on ubuntu-22.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/+bug/1969342/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1969263] Re: crashed file manager

2022-04-16 Thread Colin Watson

** Project changed: launchpad => nautilus (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969263

Title:
  crashed file manager

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1969263/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: Second Jammy Jellyfish test rebuild

2022-03-24 Thread Colin Watson

On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 07:44:11AM -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
> I'm seeing a lot of failed arm64 builds without build logs. In the
> past when I've seen this, I've merely retried the build and it has
> succeeded. This shows a pattern in that it's likely we've got a buggy
> build server.

Yeah, this has been reported to us (Launchpad), but for the record we
have no handle on a fix at present.  The basic symptom is that
buildd-manager timed out trying to poll the builder (probably over
several attempts).  This is either because the builder crashed or hung
or something like that (possible under load, and sometimes particular
builds will repeatedly OOM a builder or similar), or because of a
network failure that meant we lost contact for too long, or because of a
buildd-manager bug.  Unfortunately it's extremely difficult even for us
to tell which at present.  Ubuntu test rebuilds tend to exacerbate this
sort of thing, because the whole system is under significantly more load
than usual.

It's something that we'll keep trying to debug, but it's not as simple
as a single buggy build machine, and so I want to set expectations that
this may not be something we can fix quickly.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

[Bug 1964615] Re: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR set to a non-existing directory in sbuild

2022-03-18 Thread Colin Watson

We've deployed a cherry-pick of the schroot fix to focal.

** Changed in: launchpad-buildd
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964615

Title:
  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR set to a non-existing directory in sbuild

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-buildd/+bug/1964615/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964615] Re: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR set to a non-existing directory in sbuild

2022-03-16 Thread Colin Watson

This turns out to be an schroot bug.  See
https://bugs.debian.org/898949.

** Also affects: schroot (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #898949
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898949

** Also affects: schroot (Debian) via
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898949
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964615

Title:
  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR set to a non-existing directory in sbuild

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-buildd/+bug/1964615/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964519] Re: [SRU] enable signing riscv64 binaries in focal

2022-03-10 Thread Colin Watson

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964510 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964510

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964510
   [SRU] enable signing riscv64 binaries in bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964519

Title:
  [SRU] enable signing riscv64 binaries in focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbsigntool/+bug/1964519/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964510] Re: [SRU] enable signing riscv64 binaries in bionic

2022-03-10 Thread Colin Watson

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbsigntool/+bug/1964519 has
the corresponding debdiff for focal; I've consolidated these into a
single bug with two open tasks.
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbsigntool/+bug/1938438 added
the support to impish.)

** Also affects: sbsigntool (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: sbsigntool (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: sbsigntool (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: sbsigntool (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: sbsigntool (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: sbsigntool (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: sbsigntool (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
  The Ubuntu signing box is running Ubuntu Bionic. The riscv64
  architecture is expanding. We expect development boards using EDK II to
  appear in 2022. We should be able to support secure boot then.
  
  A patch for enabling this has been accepted upstream:
  
  
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/sbsigntools.git/commit/?h=next=25af2eb5e39b5d54703d4489182a6b9d0af58b76
  
  [Test Plan]
  
  * Signatures produced by sbsign in bionic, must be verifiable with
  sbverify from jammy.
  
  * Test instructions:
-   - create as new certificate RSA2048) for signing EFI binaries
- openssl req -x509 -sha256 -newkey rsa:2048 -subj /CN=TEST_$*/ \
- -keyout db.key -out db.crt -nodes -days 3650
-   - sign amd64, arm64 and riscv64 EFI binaries with Bionic's sbsign
- sbsign --key db.key --cert db.crt test.efi
-   - check the signature with Jammy's sbverify
-   - check the signature with Bionics's sbverify
+   - create as new certificate RSA2048) for signing EFI binaries
+ openssl req -x509 -sha256 -newkey rsa:2048 -subj /CN=TEST_$*/ \
+ -keyout db.key -out db.crt -nodes -days 3650
+   - sign amd64, arm64 and riscv64 EFI binaries with Bionic's sbsign
+ sbsign --key db.key --cert db.crt test.efi
+   - check the signature with Jammy's sbverify
+   - check the signature with Bionics's sbverify
  
  * Testing should be executed before landing the update.
  
  [Where problems could occur]
  
  * The upstream patch is trivial and should have no effect on any non-
  riscv64 architecture. It only changes the architecture test that is made
  before signing.
  
  * With the test procedure above we ensure that we still can sign on the
  same architectures as before.
  
  [Other Info]
  
- * A separate SRU should be done for Focal so that we don't loose
- functionality in case of an upgraded from Bionic to Focal.
+ * The Focal task is so that we don't loose functionality in case of an
+ upgrade from Bionic to Focal.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964510

Title:
  [SRU] enable signing riscv64 binaries in bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbsigntool/+bug/1964510/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 283316] Re: CD-ROM tray closes automatically after eject

2022-03-04 Thread Colin Watson

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-notes
 Assignee: Colin Watson (cjwatson) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283316

Title:
  CD-ROM tray closes automatically after eject

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/283316/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1962165] Re: [REMOVE PACKAGE] libslurm36

2022-02-24 Thread Colin Watson

Removed.  (For future reference, removals of binaries that are no longer
built by their source package is a routine operation and doesn't
normally need a bug report.)

** Changed in: slurm-wlm (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962165

Title:
  [REMOVE PACKAGE] libslurm36

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/slurm-wlm/+bug/1962165/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: Bash Command "mkcd"

2022-02-24 Thread Colin Watson

On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 02:39:28PM +, Pixelbog Pixi wrote:
> I have a question:
> Is it possible to add the command mkcd?
> It stands for make & change directory and I think it will be super usefull.
> 
> It happened already way too often that I typed "mk foo && cd foo" and
> with mkcd it will save 8 keystrokes for the example "foo".
> 
> I wrote a little script that gets every directory on my computer and found 
> out that the average
> size of a directory 7.879865977982097 is. That means I would save on average 
> 12-13 keystorkes
> for creating a dir and changing into it.
> 
> Ofcourse I know you can write a function in .bashrc, but isn't it the same.

Any such command would have to be a shell builtin; "cd" can't be
implemented as a subprocess, because it needs to change a property (the
current working directory) of the shell process calling it.  It's also
the sort of thing that would tend to attract requests for options, such
as "-p" passed through to "mkdir -p".

I'm not the bash maintainer, but the bar for new shell builtins is
rightly high since any additions would affect all systems, and I would
expect this to be refused since it's easy to implement it as a local
shell function with whatever behaviour and spelling you want.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

[Bug 1961833] Re: openssh 8.8 breaks login to Canonical servers

2022-02-22 Thread Colin Watson

Also, regarding the "without a deprecation notice" claim, this has been
advertised under "Future deprecation notice" in the OpenSSH release
notes since 8.2.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961833

Title:
  openssh 8.8 breaks login to Canonical servers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1961833/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961833] Re: openssh 8.8 breaks login to Canonical servers

2022-02-22 Thread Colin Watson

No, I'm not going to undo this.  IS shouldn't be running a pre-xenial
OpenSSH on xenial machines in the first place, and it's good to fix
that; and anything older than that is well out of support anyway.

** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961833

Title:
  openssh 8.8 breaks login to Canonical servers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1961833/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961455] [NEW] twisted.python.log.PythonLoggingObserver is broken on Ubuntu 20.04

2022-02-18 Thread Colin Watson

Public bug reported:

On up-to-date focal with python3-twisted 18.9.0-11ubuntu0.20.04.1,
following
https://twistedmatrix.com/documents/current/core/howto/logging.html#using-
the-standard-library-logging-module:

  $ python3
  Python 3.8.10 (default, Nov 26 2021, 20:14:08)
  [GCC 9.3.0] on linux
  Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
  >>> import logging
  >>> from twisted.python import log
  >>> logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO)
  >>> observer = log.PythonLoggingObserver()
  >>> observer.start()
  >>> log.msg('test')
  Temporarily disabling observer LegacyLogObserverWrapper(>) due to exception: [Failure instance: Traceback: : _findCaller() takes from 1 to 2 positional arguments but 3 were 
given
  :1:
  /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/python/threadable.py:53:sync
  /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/python/log.py:286:msg
  
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/logger/_legacy.py:154:publishToNewObserver
  ---  ---
  /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/logger/_observer.py:131:__call__
  /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/logger/_legacy.py:93:__call__
  /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/python/log.py:595:emit
  
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/logger/_legacy.py:154:publishToNewObserver
  /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/logger/_stdlib.py:115:__call__
  /usr/lib/python3.8/logging/__init__.py:1512:log
  /usr/lib/python3.8/logging/__init__.py:1577:_log
  ]
  Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in 
  
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/python/threadable.py", line 
53, in sync
  return function(self, *args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/python/log.py", line 286, in 
msg
  _publishNew(self._publishPublisher, actualEventDict, textFromEventDict)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/logger/_legacy.py", line 154, 
in publishToNewObserver
  observer(eventDict)
  ---  ---
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/logger/_observer.py", line 
131, in __call__
  observer(event)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/logger/_legacy.py", line 93, 
in __call__
  self.legacyObserver(event)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/python/log.py", line 595, in 
emit
  _publishNew(self._newObserver, eventDict, textFromEventDict)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/logger/_legacy.py", line 154, 
in publishToNewObserver
  observer(eventDict)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/logger/_stdlib.py", line 115, 
in __call__
  self.logger.log(
File "/usr/lib/python3.8/logging/__init__.py", line 1512, in log
  self._log(level, msg, args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python3.8/logging/__init__.py", line 1577, in _log
  fn, lno, func, sinfo = self.findCaller(stack_info, stacklevel)
  builtins.TypeError: _findCaller() takes from 1 to 2 positional arguments but 
3 were given

This is https://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/9668; the fix should be a
trivial backport.

This caused test failures in launchpad-buildd on focal (though I may
look for a workaround).

** Affects: twisted (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Fix Released

** Affects: twisted (Ubuntu Focal)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: twisted (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: twisted (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961455

Title:
  twisted.python.log.PythonLoggingObserver is broken on Ubuntu 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/twisted/+bug/1961455/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1790860] Re: ethernet driver update issue

2022-02-08 Thread Colin Watson

In my opinion, this was a bug in the e1000e installation scripts.  "man"
intentionally doesn't support redirections inside its -P argument like
this; implementing that without going via a shell (which is a practice
that routinely leads to security bugs, so we avoid it) would add a
reasonably significant amount of complexity, and it isn't worth it here
because just redirecting the output of "man" to /dev/null would do just
as well.

Furthermore, this installation script seems to have been written for a
much older "man" implementation, because it appears to be deliberately
trying to create a plain-text cat page, which is an obsolescent
practice.

Fortunately, it seems that the maintainers of the e1000e driver noticed
this, because they fixed their scripts in version 3.6.0, released on
2019-09-22.  As such, I think you should just be able to update to a
newer version of the driver and this should work better.

** Changed in: man-db (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790860

Title:
  ethernet driver update issue

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1790860/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958929] Re: man-db trigger hanging

2022-02-07 Thread Colin Watson

I think it's probably worth looking again with man-db 2.10.0.  Although
I didn't specifically do anything to fix this, things are sufficiently
different now that it's worth trying again and seeing whether it's still
a problem.

Failing that, the output of "mandb -pd" is likely to be useful.  If that
stubbornly refuses to hang when you're looking at it, then you might try
"mandb -cd".

** Changed in: man-db (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958929

Title:
  man-db trigger hanging

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1958929/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959711] Re: Can't run software updater

2022-02-01 Thread Colin Watson

** Project changed: ubuntu-cdimage => ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959711

Title:
  Can't run software updater

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1959711/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1932084] Re: MANPAGER="grep -F {" man systemd.exec leads to man: command exited with status 1: sed -e ...

2022-01-30 Thread Colin Watson

** Changed in: man-db (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: man-db (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932084

Title:
  MANPAGER="grep -F {" man systemd.exec leads to man: command exited
  with status 1: sed -e ...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1932084/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1411633] Re: man-db's manipulation of index.db mtime timestamp interferes with incremental backups

2022-01-29 Thread Colin Watson

** Changed in: man-db (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Watson (cjwatson)

** Changed in: man-db (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => In Progress

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1004355
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004355

** Also affects: man-db (Debian) via
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004355
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1411633

Title:
  man-db's manipulation of index.db mtime timestamp interferes with
  incremental backups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1411633/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959347] Re: Inconsistent Device Name (/dev/sdX) on every few reboots in Ubuntu 20.04

2022-01-27 Thread Colin Watson

** Project changed: launchpad => ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959347

Title:
  Inconsistent Device Name (/dev/sdX) on every  few reboots in Ubuntu
  20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1959347/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959015] Re: Switch to new HTTPS-capable domains for PPAs

2022-01-25 Thread Colin Watson

** Summary changed:

- Switch to new HTTPS-capable domain for PPAs
+ Switch to new HTTPS-capable domains for PPAs

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959015

Title:
  Switch to new HTTPS-capable domains for PPAs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1959015/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959015] [NEW] Switch to new HTTPS-capable domains for PPAs

2022-01-25 Thread Colin Watson

Public bug reported:

As described in bug 1473091, PPAs are now being served from new domains
that aren't under launchpad.net and so can safely serve HTTPS without
risk of compromising Launchpad session cookies.  The old domains will
keep working indefinitely, but nevertheless it would be good if we could
arrange for add-apt-repository to use the new domains as of 22.04.

The changes are:

 * http://ppa.launchpad.net/ → https://ppa.launchpadcontent.net/ (or http:// 
works too, but we should prefer https://)
 * https://private-ppa.launchpad.net/ → 
https://private-ppa.launchpadcontent.net/

** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959015

Title:
  Switch to new HTTPS-capable domains for PPAs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1959015/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Launchpad-users] Proposed decommissioning of 32-bit powerpc builders in Launchpad

2022-01-25 Thread Colin Watson

On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 12:59:34PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> The old 32-bit powerpc architecture was removed from Ubuntu in Ubuntu
> 17.04 [1].  This means that all releases that still supported it are now
> in ESM, and ESM doesn't include powerpc support.  We're therefore
> considering decommissioning Launchpad's powerpc builders.  Note that the
> 64-bit ppc64el architecture would be *unaffected* by this change.

We've now disabled the powerpc architecture in xenial (which should
cause no further builds to be created) and deactivated the powerpc
builders.  I plan to leave things in this state for a little while to
confirm that no further powerpc builds are being created and that
nothing else comes up, but after that we'll start tearing down the
builders permanently.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

[Bug 1932084] Re: MANPAGER="grep -F {" man systemd.exec leads to man: command exited with status 1: sed -e ...

2022-01-23 Thread Colin Watson

The problem with fixing this as you describe ("no output at all") is
that it would make it difficult to understand what's going on in the
more common case where your configured pager is accidentally not
installed.  Would you accept a less ugly error message (somehow)?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932084

Title:
  MANPAGER="grep -F {" man systemd.exec leads to man: command exited
  with status 1: sed -e ...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1932084/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958675] Re: The application (xdg-open)

2022-01-21 Thread Colin Watson

** Project changed: launchpad => ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958675

Title:
  The application (xdg-open)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1958675/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958389] Re: Jammy builds of xen segfault, but only on launchpad x86 builders

2022-01-19 Thread Colin Watson

It probably isn't useful, but the backtrace without extra debug symbols
looks like this:

buildd@dogfood-lgw01-amd64-001:/build/xen-jT2uET/xen-4.16.0/xen/arch/x86$ gdb 
--args x86_64-linux-gnu-ld -mi386pep --subsystem=10 
--image-base=0x82d04000 --stack=0,0 --heap=0,0 
--section-alignment=0x20 --file-alignment=0x20 --major-image-version=4 
--minor-image-version=16 --major-os-version=2 --minor-os-version=0 
--major-subsystem-version=2 --minor-subsystem-version=0 --no-insert-timestamp 
--build-id=sha1 -T efi.lds -N prelink.o  
/build/xen-jT2uET/xen-4.16.0/xen/common/symbols-dummy.o -b pe-x86-64 
efi/buildid.o -o /build/xen-jT2uET/xen-4.16.0/xen/.xen.efi.0x82d04000.0
GNU gdb (Ubuntu 11.2-0ubuntu1) 11.2
Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later 
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu".
Type "show configuration" for configuration details.
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
.
Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:
.

For help, type "help".
Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"...
Reading symbols from x86_64-linux-gnu-ld...
(No debugging symbols found in x86_64-linux-gnu-ld)
(gdb) r
Starting program: /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld -mi386pep --subsystem=10 
--image-base=0x82d04000 --stack=0,0 --heap=0,0 
--section-alignment=0x20 --file-alignment=0x20 --major-image-version=4 
--minor-image-version=16 --major-os-version=2 --minor-os-version=0 
--major-subsystem-version=2 --minor-subsystem-version=0 --no-insert-timestamp 
--build-id=sha1 -T efi.lds -N prelink.o 
/build/xen-jT2uET/xen-4.16.0/xen/common/symbols-dummy.o -b pe-x86-64 
efi/buildid.o -o /build/xen-jT2uET/xen-4.16.0/xen/.xen.efi.0x82d04000.0
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x77ca3b4a in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0  0x77ca3b4a in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#1  0x77f672d0 in ?? () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.37.50-system.20220106.so
#2  0x77f2d1e8 in ?? () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.37.50-system.20220106.so
#3  0x77f2d509 in coff_write_alien_symbol ()
   from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.37.50-system.20220106.so
#4  0x77f2e3bd in _bfd_coff_final_link ()
   from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.37.50-system.20220106.so
#5  0x5559d3bf in ?? ()
#6  0x77c13fd0 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#7  0x77c1407d in __libc_start_main () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#8  0x5559c515 in ?? ()

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958389

Title:
  Jammy builds of xen segfault, but only on launchpad x86 builders

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-buildd/+bug/1958389/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958389] Re: Jammy builds of xen segfault, but only on launchpad x86 builders

2022-01-19 Thread Colin Watson

I've tested manually on a staging lcy02 builder and it works fine there,
so worst case you should be able to retry until it happens to land on
lcy02.

I've reproduced the problem on a staging lgw01 builder.  I need ddebs to
get a useful backtrace, so I've filed
https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/canonical-is-
firewalls/+git/firewall-configs/+merge/414372 to get access to those
from the relevant builder - I should be able to pick this up again once
that's merged.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958389

Title:
  Jammy builds of xen segfault, but only on launchpad x86 builders

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-buildd/+bug/1958389/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958389] Re: Jammy builds of xen segfault, but only on launchpad x86 builders

2022-01-19 Thread Colin Watson

Both the failures linked here were on lgw01.  Have you seen this on
lcy02 as well, or only lgw01?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958389

Title:
  Jammy builds of xen segfault, but only on launchpad x86 builders

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-buildd/+bug/1958389/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1858777] Re: Processing triggers for man-db lasting extremely long

2022-01-17 Thread Colin Watson

I'm working on this in https://gitlab.com/cjwatson/man-
db/-/merge_requests/2.

** Changed in: man-db (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

** Changed in: man-db (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: man-db (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Watson (cjwatson)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858777

Title:
  Processing triggers for man-db lasting extremely long

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1858777/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1956949] Re: CPC AWS jammy builds fail with: "fuse3 : Breaks: fuse"

2022-01-10 Thread Colin Watson

That installation by launchpad-buildd happens in the container that
livecd-rootfs runs in, not in the chroot that livecd-rootfs is busy
building.  If you look more closely at the build log you can see it
succeeding earlier on.  We may indeed have to update launchpad-buildd to
use fuse3, but it's not what's breaking the build here.

The more immediate problem is:

  Package: fuse
  Task: standard, server-minimal

  Package: fuse3
  Task: cloud-image, server, ubuntu-server-raspi

This in turn is because open-vm-tools 2:11.3.5-1 switched to fuse3, so
fuse3 ends up in the expanded server seed
(https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-
output/ubuntu.jammy/rdepends/ALL/fuse3), while loads of other things
still depend on fuse and so fuse ends up in the expanded server-minimal
seed (https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-
output/ubuntu.jammy/rdepends/ALL/fuse).

This is a distribution inconsistency problem, not a launchpad-buildd
problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956949

Title:
  CPC AWS jammy builds fail with: "fuse3 : Breaks: fuse"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-buildd/+bug/1956949/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1956247] Re: fwupd-efi fails to upload

2022-01-03 Thread Colin Watson

Epochs are not supposed to end up in the file name - see e.g. the remark
in https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#uniqueness-
of-version-numbers.  fwupd-efi needs to remove the epoch part of
deb_version from tar_name in its Ubuntu mode.

** Project changed: launchpad => fwupd-efi (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956247

Title:
  fwupd-efi fails to upload

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd-efi/+bug/1956247/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1956132] Re: Year doesn't change in notification panel at New Years

2022-01-01 Thread Colin Watson

** Project changed: launchpad => ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956132

Title:
  Year doesn't change in notification panel at New Years

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1956132/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1955944] [NEW] Missing Breaks/Replaces on network-manager-gnome

2021-12-28 Thread Colin Watson

Public bug reported:

Upgrading from focal to jammy failed with:

Unpacking libnma-common (1.8.32-1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive 
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-eCL6UN/011-libnma-common_1.8.32-1_all.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite 
'/usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/org.gnome.nm-applet.gschema.xml', which is also in 
package network-manager-gnome 1.8.24-1ubuntu3

It looks like a file has moved, so assuming that's correct there should
be a corresponding Breaks/Replaces to tell dpkg that it's OK.

** Affects: libnma (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955944

Title:
  Missing Breaks/Replaces on network-manager-gnome

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnma/+bug/1955944/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1920248] Re: Anker Soundcore Life Q10 microphone not working

2021-12-26 Thread Colin Watson

I have a Soundcore Life Q30 headset and had a similar issue; I also
tried going down the ofono route and found it too much of a confusing
nightmare.

I ended up using the pulseaudio backport from
https://launchpad.net/~smoser/+archive/ubuntu/bluetooth/+packages and
also doing a local backport of bluez from impish, as well as the
/etc/pulse/system.pa and group membership changes from
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PulseAudio/Documentation/User/Bluetooth/#usingbluetoothwhenrunningpulseaudiointhesystemmode
(but not the rest of that page).  I haven't tried carefully rolling bits
of this back to find out exactly whether all four of those changes are
really needed; I'm sure that at least the pulseaudio backport is needed,
though, since you definitely need the changes from
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/pulseaudio/-/merge_requests/491.

With this, my headset mostly works for me, although I still sometimes
find that pulseaudio crashes when my phone is also connected to the same
headset, which results in everything confusingly switching back to the
internal speaker/microphone until I figure out what's going on and
disconnect my phone.  Not ideal - from the crash, I think
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/pulseaudio/-/merge_requests/617
may be related, though I haven't tried backporting that patch yet to see
if it helps.

Installing random backports is not for the faint of heart, so a more
sensible approach might be to try Ubuntu 21.10 (perhaps from a live USB
stick to start with, before committing to the upgrade).  Everything I
had to backport to get things working was from there, so there's a good
chance it will work better.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920248

Title:
  Anker Soundcore Life Q10 microphone not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1920248/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928858] Re: grub-install error: "efibootmgr: not found"

2021-12-26 Thread Colin Watson

** Package changed: grub (Ubuntu) => grub2 (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928858

Title:
  grub-install error: "efibootmgr: not found"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1928858/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: os-prober is disabled in grub 2.06 and where to go from here

2021-12-17 Thread Colin Watson

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 05:01:59PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>We could run os-prober during install time, store the
>output somewhere and then reuse the cached output in
>grub-mkconfig.

d-i at least used to have code to do exactly this (in grub-installer).
I don't know/recall about our other installers.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: Setting NotAutomatic for hirsute+1-proposed

2021-12-13 Thread Colin Watson

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 08:32:53AM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
> Just to clarify, people won't need to manually specify all
> dependencies, right? For example, if testing the 'systemd' package
> from -proposed, simply doing 'apt install systemd/jammy-proposed'
> would install the proposed version of systemd *and also* the proposed
> version of libsystemd0?

That's how it behaves in my tests, yes - if a dependency imposes a
version constraint requiring a lower-priority version, then apt tries to
satisfy it.

> Also, is this really needed? Is it really so hard for people to just do:
> 
> $ sudo add-apt-repository -p proposed
> 
> ...install proposed package(s) normally and do tests...
> 
> $ sudo add-apt-repository -r -p proposed

This has been an issue on and off for at least a decade, so my
impression is that we have solid empirical evidence that this is indeed
too hard for many testers in practice.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: Setting NotAutomatic for hirsute+1-proposed

2021-12-09 Thread Colin Watson

On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 11:12:57AM +, Iain Lane wrote:
> I think the Launchpad support is still missing, although we started on 
> this several years ago. That will need to be picked up and finished off:
> 
>   https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1016776
> 
> That bug report talks about doing it pre-release (for devel only) but I 
> think I'm now in favour of doing it always, and the proposed 
> implementation in there would allow that. For devel, the main reason is 
> that I frequently come across users who have misunderstood what proposed 
> is for and manually enabled it themsleves, resulting in various degrees 
> of brokenness on their systems and bug reports that take developers' 
> time to triage and eventually close. These are not (always) people who 
> have updated from a previous release, where we could have had tools 
> disable -proposed for them, but also people who have explicitly turned 
> it on after installing a daily out of an attempt to help test the 
> upcoming release.
> 
> On the client side, as Robie says, we will at least need to update 
> documentation. I'm also not sure what update-manager will do if there 
> are NotAutomatic updates present. It might need some tweaking to show 
> them differently. This could be checked by looking at something in 
> -backports, which is already present with these flags set.
> 
> And finally, there's some implication for package builds; both Launchpad 
> buildds and other builders would need to ignore this. Launchpad does  
> this for -backports currently, i.e. -backports builds get Build-Depends 
> from -backports wholesale; hoepfully that means the buildd side isn't 
> too hard because we can reuse that.

This is now ready to use from the Launchpad point of view.  There's a
"proposed_not_automatic" flag on distro series exported over the API; if
this is set to True, Launchpad writes "NotAutomatic: yes" and
"ButAutomaticUpgrades: yes" to the Release file.  We've also arranged
for *-proposed to be pinned to 500 in launchpad-buildd, so Launchpad
builds will ignore this; I can't speak for other build environments.

Thus, from the Launchpad point of view this is ready to use, although
somebody may want to check the behaviour of things like sbuild and
pbuilder first.

Somebody in ~techboard would need to make the actual change, if you
think it's appropriate.  For example, the following in "lp-shell
production devel" would do it for all supported Ubuntu series:

  for name in ("bionic", "focal", "hirsute", "impish", "jammy"):
  series = lp.distributions["ubuntu"].getSeries(name_or_version=name)
  series.proposed_not_automatic = True
  series.lp_save()

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

[Bug 1869218] Re: FOOTER.html does not work on cdimage.ubuntu.com ppa.launchpad.net

2021-12-09 Thread Colin Watson

** Tags added: lp-soyuz soyuz-publish

** Changed in: launchpad
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: launchpad
   Importance: Undecided => Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869218

Title:
  FOOTER.html does not work on cdimage.ubuntu.com ppa.launchpad.net

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1869218/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Proposed decommissioning of 32-bit powerpc builders in Launchpad

2021-12-03 Thread Colin Watson

The old 32-bit powerpc architecture was removed from Ubuntu in Ubuntu
17.04 [1].  This means that all releases that still supported it are now
in ESM, and ESM doesn't include powerpc support.  We're therefore
considering decommissioning Launchpad's powerpc builders.  Note that the
64-bit ppc64el architecture would be *unaffected* by this change.

There are some positive reasons for us to do this as well as simple
cleanup.  For a complicated chain of reasons, retaining powerpc support
requires us to retain support for running launchpad-buildd on Python 2,
which we could otherwise remove.  There are also currently some problems
with getting 32-bit powerpc VMs working on our latest POWER compute
nodes; those may be fixable, but perhaps if we decommission the
architecture then we wouldn't have to bother figuring out what the
problem is.

However, if we do this it will make it permanently impossible to run any
powerpc builds (.deb packages, snaps, etc.) on Launchpad, and it's
unlikely to be possible to undo this change.  It therefore seems prudent
to ask around: does anyone know of any reason why we might need to add
powerpc support to Ubuntu 16.04 ESM, or otherwise retain any powerpc
build capability in Launchpad?

[1] 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2016-December/001199.html

Thanks,

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

[Bug 610962] Re: SSH server gives unhelpful message when XMLRPC server unavailable

2021-11-17 Thread Colin Watson

** No longer affects: ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610962

Title:
  SSH server gives unhelpful message when XMLRPC server unavailable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lazr.sshserver/+bug/610962/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: Jammy missing CNF data

2021-11-16 Thread Colin Watson

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:47:45AM -0800, Brian Murray wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 11:48:15PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Looks like it's in the archive now.  Thanks for tracking that down.
> > Does anything need to be added to NewReleaseCycleProcess for this, or
> > was it a one-off bug?
> 
> It was a one-off bug because the prod-cnf-extractor machine was not up
> to date, but I've now enabled unattended-upgrades so this specific type
> of issue should not happen again. Having said that is there a mechanism
> we could use to ensure the Commands files on the archive were generated
> recently?

Not at the moment.  We could possibly throw ages of some files at
Prometheus and then have an alert based on that, or something, but it
might be easier to implement it in a Foundations-owned KPI somewhere?
Anything we do would end up alerting either IS or Launchpad and we'd
then have to hand it off to Foundations, which seems a bit indirect.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: Jammy missing CNF data

2021-11-10 Thread Colin Watson

On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 10:39:04AM -0800, Brian Murray wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 08:11:19AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 02:22:34PM -0800, Brian Murray wrote:
> > > I was looking at some Foundations bug reports[1] today and discovered that
> > > there is no command-not-found information for Jammy as of yet. Looking
> > > at the archive there is no cnf folder for any jammy components. Adding
> > > the new release to the list of releases for the cnf-extractor was
> > > done[2] (by me) so I'm at a loss for what is missing. Does anybody else
> > > have an idea?
> > 
> > Is cnf-extractor.internal still the current prod-cnf-extractor machine?
> > It's not publishing any data for jammy either:
> 
> I believe I've found the source of the problem and the system is
> currently working on producing updated data for impish and after that
> jammy will get done.

Looks like it's in the archive now.  Thanks for tracking that down.
Does anything need to be added to NewReleaseCycleProcess for this, or
was it a one-off bug?

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: Jammy missing CNF data

2021-11-10 Thread Colin Watson

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 02:22:34PM -0800, Brian Murray wrote:
> I was looking at some Foundations bug reports[1] today and discovered that
> there is no command-not-found information for Jammy as of yet. Looking
> at the archive there is no cnf folder for any jammy components. Adding
> the new release to the list of releases for the cnf-extractor was
> done[2] (by me) so I'm at a loss for what is missing. Does anybody else
> have an idea?

Is cnf-extractor.internal still the current prod-cnf-extractor machine?
It's not publishing any data for jammy either:

  cjwatson@anonster:~$ rsync -v cnf-extractor.internal::cnf-data/
  receiving file list ... done
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2021/04/27 14:10:33 .
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2018/11/21 10:10:50 disco-backports
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2018/11/21 12:06:43 disco-proposed
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2018/11/21 12:12:56 disco-security
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2018/11/21 12:11:54 disco-updates
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2018/11/22 03:55:27 disco
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2019/04/24 07:30:01 eoan-backports
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2019/04/24 07:51:49 eoan-proposed
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2019/04/24 07:52:28 eoan-security
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2019/04/24 07:52:09 eoan-updates
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2019/04/24 12:03:02 eoan
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2019/10/25 05:23:49 focal-backports
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2019/10/25 05:29:33 focal-proposed
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2019/10/25 05:29:50 focal-security
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2019/10/25 05:29:42 focal-updates
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2019/10/25 07:57:25 focal
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2020/04/27 08:37:56 groovy-backports
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2020/04/27 08:45:58 groovy-proposed
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2020/04/27 08:46:18 groovy-security
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2020/04/27 08:46:08 groovy-updates
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2020/04/27 08:55:40 groovy
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2020/10/23 17:44:19 hirsute-backports
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2020/10/23 17:44:34 hirsute-proposed
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2020/10/23 17:44:57 hirsute-security
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2020/10/23 17:44:45 hirsute-updates
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2020/10/23 17:56:13 hirsute
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2021/04/27 12:48:08 impish-backports
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2021/04/27 14:10:03 impish-proposed
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2021/04/27 14:10:26 impish-security
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2021/04/27 14:10:15 impish-updates
  drwxr-xr-x  4,096 2021/04/27 14:24:09 impish
  
  sent 24 bytes  received 843 bytes  1,734.00 bytes/sec
  total size is 0  speedup is 0.00

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

[Bug 8526] Re: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

2021-11-07 Thread Colin Watson

** Changed in: debconf (Unity Linux)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8526

Title:
  After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debconf/+bug/8526/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946286] Re: Merge openssh from Debian unstable for 22.04

2021-11-07 Thread Colin Watson

I've just synced 1:8.7p1-1.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946286

Title:
  Merge openssh from Debian unstable for 22.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1946286/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1949441] Re: 'MSI GS66 11UH' 2K display locked at 60Hz while it supports 240Hz

2021-11-02 Thread Colin Watson

** Project changed: launchpad => ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949441

Title:
  'MSI GS66 11UH' 2K display locked at 60Hz while it supports 240Hz

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1949441/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1019700] Re: Declares that it depends on testresources at the python level, but the package doesn't depend on it

2021-10-27 Thread Colin Watson

1.10.15 (2021-10-27)

- Move dependencies of launchpadlib.testing to a new ``testing`` extra.
  [bug=1019700]
- Stop excluding MANIFEST.in from the sdist.
- Declare support for Python 3.9 and 3.10.
- Move code hosting to git (https://code.launchpad.net/launchpadlib).

** Changed in: launchpadlib
Milestone: None => 1.10.15

** Changed in: launchpadlib
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1019700

Title:
  Declares that it depends on testresources at the python level, but the
  package doesn't depend on it

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpadlib/+bug/1019700/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1019700] Re: Declares that it depends on testresources at the python level, but the package doesn't depend on it

2021-10-15 Thread Colin Watson

** Changed in: launchpadlib
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Changed in: launchpadlib
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Watson (cjwatson)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1019700

Title:
  Declares that it depends on testresources at the python level, but the
  package doesn't depend on it

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpadlib/+bug/1019700/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1947390] Re: Schweres UEFI bzw. Firmware Problem nach der Installation von Ubuntu 64 bit

2021-10-15 Thread Colin Watson

** Project changed: launchpad => ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947390

Title:
  Schweres UEFI bzw. Firmware Problem nach der Installation von Ubuntu
  64 bit

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1947390/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 336067] Re: python-httplib2 needs a patch for Python2.6 support

2021-10-15 Thread Colin Watson

I don't think there was ever anything for launchpadlib to do here; it
was just an httplib2 bug that affected launchpadlib.  Deleting the
launchpadlib task.

** No longer affects: launchpadlib

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336067

Title:
  python-httplib2 needs a patch for Python2.6 support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-httplib2/+bug/336067/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946347] Re: Translations are missing

2021-10-11 Thread Colin Watson

FYI @seb128 asked on #launchpad about this, and I checked that the base
language pack exported by Launchpad does contain .po files for fwupd, so
it looks like this may be something that needs to be fixed in langpack-
o-matic.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946347

Title:
  Translations are missing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1946347/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946286] Re: Merge openssh from Debian unstable for 22.04

2021-10-09 Thread Colin Watson

I intend to merge all the Ubuntu changes for my next Debian upload and
then sync it, so there's probably no need to pay attention to this.

I'm preparing packaging of OpenSSH 8.8p1, but the current blocker is
that this drops the ssh-rsa signature algorithm by default (*not* the
public key type), and that needs changes to Twisted and probably
lazr.sshserver in order for Launchpad's SSH endpoints to support it; I'd
rather not upload a package that would break connectivity to
git.launchpad.net etc. out of the box.  I'm working on this but don't
yet have an ETA.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946286

Title:
  Merge openssh from Debian unstable for 22.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1946286/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 907675] Re: Add support for Ed25519 SSH keys

2021-10-09 Thread Colin Watson

** Package changed: ubuntu => txpkgupload

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907675

Title:
  Add support for Ed25519 SSH keys

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/907675/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1922130] Re: Request addition of Fedora / Redhat "sftp-force-permissions" patch

2021-10-03 Thread Colin Watson

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #841237
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841237

** Also affects: openssh (Debian) via
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841237
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922130

Title:
  Request addition of Fedora / Redhat "sftp-force-permissions" patch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1922130/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: Wget failures connecting to GitHub on Ubuntu 20

2021-09-18 Thread Colin Watson

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 09:15:12PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> This caught me by surprise today:
> 
> $ lsb_release -a
> No LSB modules are available.
> Distributor ID: Ubuntu
> Description:Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS
> Release:20.04
> Codename:   focal
> 
> $ wget -O main.cxx
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/austin-clifton/cryptopp-chacha-asm-test/main/src/main.cpp

This works fine for me on 20.04; perhaps the relevant DigiCert CA is
disabled on your system.  Try "sudo dpkg-reconfigure ca-certificates"
and make sure it's enabled.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: Submitting a request

2021-09-16 Thread Colin Watson

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 11:42:02AM +0200, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
> On 2021-09-16 01:02, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Thanks for this insight!  Based on the original post, it seems to me that we
> > SHOULD retain ibus-m17n for Sinhala.  Is this table in gnome-settings-daemon
> > what ensures that it's retained?  It's unclear to me how that works,
> > gnome-settings-daemon is not what drives the installation and there are no
> > references to 'm17n' in the ubiquity source.
> 
> I think it is, without being able to point at the relevant code. At least it
> works like that with the CJK languages, and it ought to work in the same way
> with input languages supported by ibus-m17n.

It has been a while, but I thought that this was controlled by
/usr/share/language-selector/data/pkg_depends (in
language-selector-common).  ubiquity calls check-language-support to
query for the packages it needs to keep.

I don't see an "im:si::ibus-m17n" line in
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/language-selector/tree/data/pkg_depends.

-- 
Colin Watson (he/him)  [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

[Bug 1942974] Re: troff crashed with SIGSEGV

2021-09-10 Thread Colin Watson

** Changed in: groff (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: groff (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Watson (cjwatson)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942974

Title:
  troff crashed with SIGSEGV

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/groff/+bug/1942974/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1942974] Re: troff crashed with SIGSEGV

2021-09-09 Thread Colin Watson

The stack trace looks very much like it would be the effect of
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?59202, fixed in
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.git/commit/?id=c788cf8c6bbe939fa11f7ec032e525a7e33f41b6.

** Bug watch added: GNU Savannah Bug Tracker #59202
   http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59202

** Also affects: groff via
   http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59202
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942974

Title:
  troff crashed with SIGSEGV

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/groff/+bug/1942974/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1756547] Re: LP refuses to import plural strings where e.g. msgstr[0] entries in PO file miss %d

2021-09-03 Thread Colin Watson

Launchpad intentionally imports even obsolete messages, although they're
tagged internally as obsolete and filtered out for various purposes.  I
think this is so that they can be used as suggestions in some cases (for
example, a similar message might still be used in another context).  For
that sort of purpose it can still be useful to know that the messages
don't parse correctly, because they couldn't be used directly as
suggestions without fixing the mistakes.

This is likely part of some work that was never completed, e.g.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/281165 and
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/launchpad/+spec/rosetta-fuzzy-merge.

(Note that I'm reverse-engineering this from the code and from my
general understanding of translations, rather than with direct
information from the people who wrote the code.)

I can see that it might be useful to at least exclude errors about
obsolete messages like this from translation import failure emails.  If
you agree, could you file a separate bug about that?

** Changed in: ubuntu-translations
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

** Changed in: gettext (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756547

Title:
  LP refuses to import plural strings where e.g. msgstr[0] entries in PO
  file miss %d

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1756547/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1756547] Re: LP refuses to import plural strings where e.g. msgstr[0] entries in PO file miss %d

2021-09-02 Thread Colin Watson

I'm not sure I'm really following the exact question here.  Could you
attach the message you got with the complaints?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756547

Title:
  LP refuses to import plural strings where e.g. msgstr[0] entries in PO
  file miss %d

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1756547/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1756547] Re: LP refuses to import plural strings where e.g. msgstr[0] entries in PO file miss %d

2021-09-01 Thread Colin Watson

This should now be fixed on Launchpad's end: we're running the gettext
backport that you can see in https://launchpad.net/~canonical-is-
sa/+archive/ubuntu/launchpad/+packages.  Could you please try reverting
the workaround and make sure that things work properly now?

** Changed in: launchpad
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756547

Title:
  LP refuses to import plural strings where e.g. msgstr[0] entries in PO
  file miss %d

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1756547/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1942139] Re: Debug symbols not available for 237-3ubuntu10.51

2021-08-31 Thread Colin Watson

The correct Launchpad project for this is ddeb-retriever - reassigning
there.

** Package changed: systemd (Ubuntu) => ddeb-retriever

** Changed in: ddeb-retriever
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: ddeb-retriever
   Status: Invalid => In Progress

** Changed in: ddeb-retriever
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Watson (cjwatson)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942139

Title:
  Debug symbols not available for 237-3ubuntu10.51

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ddeb-retriever/+bug/1942139/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1756547] Re: LP refuses to import plural strings where e.g. msgstr[0] entries in PO file miss %d

2021-08-31 Thread Colin Watson

https://portal.admin.canonical.com/C132790 (internal ticket)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756547

Title:
  LP refuses to import plural strings where e.g. msgstr[0] entries in PO
  file miss %d

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1756547/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1942063] Re: /usr/man symlink breaks apropos man -k due to fsstnd

2021-08-31 Thread Colin Watson

This is a bit perplexing, because the transition to /usr/share/man
completed before Ubuntu even existed; I think it even predates my taking
over maintainership of man-db 20 years ago or so.  Is it really easier
to go through all of this mess with symlinks rather than just updating a
few extremely old scripts?  I know reflexes can be harder, but still,
it's been 20 years.

We can perhaps improve some documentation, but I don't currently think
it's going to be worth the development effort to improve handling of the
case where somebody has manually inserted a /usr/man symlink.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942063

Title:
  /usr/man symlink breaks apropos man -k due to fsstnd

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1942063/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1756547] Re: LP refuses to import plural strings where e.g. msgstr[0] entries in PO file miss %d

2021-08-31 Thread Colin Watson

Sorry for taking so long to get round to this; it had entirely fallen
off my list.  We haven't upgraded gettext from xenial's version yet, but
I've started preparing a backport in
https://launchpad.net/~cjwatson/+archive/ubuntu/launchpad/+packages.

** Changed in: launchpad
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: launchpad
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

** Changed in: launchpad
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Watson (cjwatson)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756547

Title:
  LP refuses to import plural strings where e.g. msgstr[0] entries in PO
  file miss %d

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1756547/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940984] Re: 5.11.0-1017 fails to boot on qemu builders

2021-08-24 Thread Colin Watson

OK, this is actually due to the changes between u-boot-menu
4.0.1ubuntu0.1 and 4.0.2ubuntu5~20.04.1.  The relevant difference is
that the menu entry now has `fdtdir
/lib/firmware/5.8.0-29-generic/device-tree/` (or similar) when it
previously didn't load a device tree at all.

I successfully worked around this by adding the following to
`/etc/default/u-boot`:

# XXX cjwatson 2021-08-24: Revert to old (nonexistent) default, since using
# the device tree in /lib/firmware/ results in an image that fails to boot.
# See https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940984.
U_BOOT_FDT_DIR="/usr/lib/linux-image-"

** Package changed: linux-riscv-5.11 (Ubuntu) => u-boot-menu (Ubuntu)

** Summary changed:

- 5.11.0-1017 fails to boot on qemu builders
+ u-boot fails to load FDT from linux-firmware on qemu builders

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940984

Title:
  u-boot fails to load FDT from linux-firmware on qemu builders

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot-menu/+bug/1940984/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940984] [NEW] 5.11.0-1017 fails to boot on qemu builders

2021-08-24 Thread Colin Watson

Public bug reported:

I tried to do a routine upgrade and reflash of the Launchpad riscv64
builders, which pulled in linux-image-5.11.0-1017-generic
5.11.0-1017.18~20.04.1.  The resulting image failed to boot with the
following (complete) console output:

Device 0: QEMU VirtIO Block Device
Type: Hard Disk
Capacity: 71680.0 MB = 70.0 GB (146800640 x 512)
... is now current device
Scanning virtio 0:1...
Found /boot/extlinux/extlinux.conf
Retrieving file: /boot/extlinux/extlinux.conf
1391 bytes read in 1 ms (1.3 MiB/s)
U-Boot menu
1:  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS 5.11.0-1017-generic
2:  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS 5.11.0-1017-generic (rescue target)
3:  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS 5.8.0-29-generic
4:  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS 5.8.0-29-generic (rescue target)
Enter choice: 1:Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS 5.11.0-1017-generic
Retrieving file: /boot/initrd.img-5.11.0-1017-generic
18962 bytes read in 509 ms (355.3 MiB/s)
Retrieving file: /boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-1017-generic
25258496 bytes read in 70 ms (344.1 MiB/s)
append: root=UUID=b797e480-278b-4efc-ae1a-bb1634c8cbcf rw noquiet 
root=/dev/vda1
Unhandled exception: Load access fault
EPC: fffb642c RA: fff73bc4 TVAL: 
EPC: 8024a42c RA: 80207bc4 reloc adjusted

### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ###

For the time being I've set `U_BOOT_DEFAULT="l1"` in
`/etc/default/u-boot` to force it back to the 5.8 kernel, although
that's obviously not very robust.  Let me know if there's anything else
useful I can provide.  The full image is kind of massive (70G, though
sparse so with only 13G of actual data), so I hope you can reproduce it
with something more stripped-down.

I've attached the libvirt domain definition.

** Affects: linux-riscv-5.11 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "riscv64-qemu-lcy01-002.xml"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940984/+attachment/5520278/+files/riscv64-qemu-lcy01-002.xml

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940984

Title:
  5.11.0-1017 fails to boot on qemu builders

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-riscv-5.11/+bug/1940984/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940984] Re: 5.11.0-1017 fails to boot on qemu builders

2021-08-24 Thread Colin Watson

Hm, I actually get similar results when I revert to 5.8.0-29:

Device 0: QEMU VirtIO Block Device
Type: Hard Disk
Capacity: 71680.0 MB = 70.0 GB (146800640 x 512)
... is now current device
Scanning virtio 0:1...
Found /boot/extlinux/extlinux.conf
Retrieving file: /boot/extlinux/extlinux.conf
1391 bytes read in 2 ms (678.7 KiB/s)
U-Boot menu
1:  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS 5.11.0-1017-generic
2:  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS 5.11.0-1017-generic (rescue target)
3:  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS 5.8.0-29-generic
4:  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS 5.8.0-29-generic (rescue target)
Enter choice: 3:Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS 5.8.0-29-generic
Retrieving file: /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-29-generic
181049573 bytes read in 461 ms (374.5 MiB/s)
Retrieving file: /boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-29-generic
20059580 bytes read in 80 ms (239.1 MiB/s)
append: root=UUID=b797e480-278b-4efc-ae1a-bb1634c8cbcf rw noquiet 
root=/dev/vda1
Unhandled exception: Load access fault
EPC: fffb642c RA: fff73bc4 TVAL: 
EPC: 8024a42c RA: 80207bc4 reloc adjusted

### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ###

I'll investigate further.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940984

Title:
  5.11.0-1017 fails to boot on qemu builders

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-riscv-5.11/+bug/1940984/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1939289] Re: wayland activated, Filezilla, gFTP and FireFTP not working

2021-08-09 Thread Colin Watson

** Project changed: launchpad => ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939289

Title:
  wayland activated, Filezilla, gFTP and FireFTP not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1939289/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1938934] Re: Can't to unistall Forefox Browser

2021-08-04 Thread Colin Watson

** Project changed: launchpad => firefox (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938934

Title:
  Can't to unistall Forefox Browser

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1938934/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1381713] Re: Support policy query interface for file

2021-07-29 Thread Colin Watson

** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Michael (pinky999) => (unassigned)

** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu RTM)
 Assignee: Michael (pinky999) => (unassigned)

** Changed in: media-hub (Ubuntu RTM)
 Assignee: Michael (pinky999) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1381713

Title:
  Support policy query interface for file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1381713/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 907675] Re: Add support for Ed25519 SSH keys

2021-07-18 Thread Colin Watson

** Package changed: ubuntu => lazr.sshserver

** Changed in: lazr.sshserver
 Assignee: christian oppong (chris5644) => Colin Watson (cjwatson)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907675

Title:
  Add support for Ed25519 SSH keys

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/907675/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

1 - 100 of 29321 matches

Mail list logo