[Bug 1555904] Re: opal-prd not installed by default on ppc64el systems
I've filed that bug as https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian- installer/+bug/1737661 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555904 Title: opal-prd not installed by default on ppc64el systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1555904/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1737661] [NEW] Bionic net installer on ppc64el fails, can't chroot to target
Public bug reported: When attempting a netboot install on bionic, it fails during base system install, with the message: . │ │ Debootstrap warning│ │ . │ │ Warning: Failure trying to run: chroot /target dpkg-deb -f │ │ . │ │ /var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg_1.19.0.4ubuntu1_ppc64el.deb Version │ │ Trying to run anything in the chroot at /target/ fails: ~ # chroot /target /bin/bash chroot: can't execute '/bin/bash': No such file or directory ~ # ls -l /target/bin/bash -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1544376 May 17 2017 /target/bin/bash ... which looks like a missing dynamic linker: $ readelf -l bash | grep interpreter [Requesting program interpreter: /lib64/ld64.so.2] ~ # ls -l /target/lib64/ld64.so.2 ls: /target/lib64/ld64.so.2: No such file or directory ~ # ls -la /target/lib64/ drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 Oct 11 20:21 . drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 4096 May 23 2017 .. The syslog seems to indicate that the installer failed to untar a symlink: Dec 12 05:17:36 debootstrap: tar: skipping unsafe symlink to '/lib /powerpc64le-linux-gnu/ld-2.26.so' in archive, set EXTRACT_UNSAFE_SYMLINKS=1 to extract I've attached a script to reproduce the issue in qemu. I can provide the full syslog if you need it. ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ppc64el ** Attachment added: "Test script to reproduce installer failure" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737661/+attachment/5021540/+files/test-installer-ppc64le.sh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737661 Title: Bionic net installer on ppc64el fails, can't chroot to target To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1737661/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1555904] Re: opal-prd not installed by default on ppc64el systems
I see this earlier in the installer syslog: Dec 11 08:58:45 debootstrap: tar: skipping unsafe symlink to '/lib /powerpc64le-linux-gnu/ld-2.26.so' in archive, set EXTRACT_UNSAFE_SYMLINKS=1 to extract (along with another bunch of the same error for different symlinks). I can provide the full syslog if required. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555904 Title: opal-prd not installed by default on ppc64el systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1555904/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1555904] Re: opal-prd not installed by default on ppc64el systems
Just attempted with bionic 20101020ubuntu525 netboot installer. However, this build fails to install on my machine: │ │ Debootstrap warning│ │ │ │ Warning: Failure trying to run: chroot /target dpkg-deb -f │ │ │ │ /var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg_1.19.0.4ubuntu1_ppc64el.deb Version │ │ syslog tells me: Dec 11 08:58:46 debootstrap: chroot: can't execute 'dpkg-deb': No such file or directory I can't run anything under /target: ~ # chroot /target /bin/bash chroot: can't execute '/bin/bash': No such file or directory ~ # ls -l /target/bin/bash -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1544376 May 17 2017 /target/bin/bash Looks like that build has an invalid dynamic linker path, or the installer hasn't provided the requested linker yet: bash: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, 64-bit PowerPC or cisco 7500, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 3.2.0, BuildID[sha1]=8b1909e1534e08ac77ea8f8f1c8a120c6d02d631, stripped ~ # ls -al /target/lib64/ drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 Oct 11 20:21 . drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 4096 May 23 2017 .. (I do see a suitable linker under /target/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/ though) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555904 Title: opal-prd not installed by default on ppc64el systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/1555904/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1512188] Re: Update request: skiboot 5.1.9 for OpenPower machines
Wait, wily has EOLed now. So, I am removing the verification-needed tag, and adding verification-done. If you need me to test on any particular version, please let me know which. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512188 Title: Update request: skiboot 5.1.9 for OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1512188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1512188] Re: Update request: skiboot 5.1.9 for OpenPower machines
OK, all fine on trusty! Now checking wily. ** Tags removed: removal-candidate verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512188 Title: Update request: skiboot 5.1.9 for OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1512188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1512188] Re: Update request: skiboot 5.1.9 for OpenPower machines
Sorry - missed this one. The update is fine for xenial, testing with trusty now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512188 Title: Update request: skiboot 5.1.9 for OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1512188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1572712] Re: console hung during Ubuntu 16.04 netboot install 4.4.0-12-generic [soft lockup]
Tim: will do; there's still some discussion on the patch, so it's likely that there will be some changes before merging upstream. Looks like I had an old initrd there; the ast.ko module is indeed present in the current xenial installer. Sorry for the noise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572712 Title: console hung during Ubuntu 16.04 netboot install 4.4.0-12-generic [soft lockup] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1572712/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1549098] Re: Systemd init script does not pass --pnor
Any updates here? = -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549098 Title: Systemd init script does not pass --pnor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1549098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1512188] Re: Update request: skiboot 5.1.9 for OpenPower machines
For testing, a suitable check would be to ensure that the opal-prd daemon is running; just a successful boot, then `service opal-prd status` would be fine (and that also covers the --pnor argument too). We can certainly test this on trusty and wily here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512188 Title: Update request: skiboot 5.1.9 for OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1512188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1555904] Re: opal-prd not installed by default on ppc64el systems
** Tags added: taco-screen-team -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555904 Title: opal-prd not installed by default on ppc64el systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1555904/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1555904] [NEW] opal-prd not installed by default on ppc64el systems
Public bug reported: Just tried an install with current 16.04 network media, using standard server package selections, and it looks like opal-prd isn't installed by default: [jk@fstn ~]$ dpkg -l opal-prd dpkg-query: no packages found matching opal-prd This is required for RAS-type functions on OpenPOWER machines; and has a similar role to something like acpid, on x86. I'm not sure whether filing this against the skiboot package is best, or whether this should be moved to something installer-related. Happy to shift if necessary. ** Affects: skiboot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555904 Title: opal-prd not installed by default on ppc64el systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1555904/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1318317] Re: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules
Looks good on 16.04 too: $ sudo modprobe ipmi_devintf $ sudo service openipmi start Job for openipmi.service failed because the control process exited with error code. See "systemctl status openipmi.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details. $ lsmod | grep ipmi ipmi_devintf 13691 0 ipmi_powernv6489 0 ipmi_msghandler50947 2 ipmi_powernv,ipmi_devintf Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318317 Title: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/1318317/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1318317] Re: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules
(That's with your fixed package installed. Without, we see the ipmi_devintf module being removed) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318317 Title: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/1318317/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1318317] Re: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules
Looks good on 16.04 too: $ sudo modprobe ipmi_devintf $ sudo service openipmi start Job for openipmi.service failed because the control process exited with error code. See "systemctl status openipmi.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details. $ lsmod | grep ipmi ipmi_devintf 13691 0 ipmi_powernv6489 0 ipmi_msghandler50947 2 ipmi_powernv,ipmi_devintf Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318317 Title: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/1318317/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1318317] Re: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules
(That's with your fixed package installed. Without, we see the ipmi_devintf module being removed) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318317 Title: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/1318317/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1318317] Re: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules
@Nish: I tested against 14.04. We can take a look at 16.04 too, if you like. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318317 Title: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/1318317/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1318317] Re: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules
@Nish: I tested against 14.04. We can take a look at 16.04 too, if you like. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318317 Title: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/1318317/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1549098] Re: Systemd init script does not pass --pnor
Or even better, (somehow) use the value from /etc/default/opal-prd. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549098 Title: Systemd init script does not pass --pnor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1549098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1318317] Re: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules
Nish: looks good to me: [jk@hab2 ~]$ sudo service openipmi stop [jk@hab2 ~]$ sudo modprobe ipmi_devintf [jk@hab2 ~]$ lsmod | grep ipmi ipmi_devintf 13227 0 ipmi_powernv5657 0 ipmi_msghandler51494 2 ipmi_powernv,ipmi_devintf [jk@hab2 ~]$ sudo service openipmi start Job for openipmi.service failed. See "systemctl status openipmi.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details. [jk@hab2 ~]$ lsmod | grep ipmi ipmi_devintf 13227 0 ipmi_powernv5657 0 ipmi_msghandler51494 2 ipmi_powernv,ipmi_devintf [jk@hab2 ~]$ - even though the openipmi service itelf fails, it doesn't take down everyone else's access to /dev/ipmiX -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318317 Title: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/1318317/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1318317] Re: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules
Nish: looks good to me: [jk@hab2 ~]$ sudo service openipmi stop [jk@hab2 ~]$ sudo modprobe ipmi_devintf [jk@hab2 ~]$ lsmod | grep ipmi ipmi_devintf 13227 0 ipmi_powernv5657 0 ipmi_msghandler51494 2 ipmi_powernv,ipmi_devintf [jk@hab2 ~]$ sudo service openipmi start Job for openipmi.service failed. See "systemctl status openipmi.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details. [jk@hab2 ~]$ lsmod | grep ipmi ipmi_devintf 13227 0 ipmi_powernv5657 0 ipmi_msghandler51494 2 ipmi_powernv,ipmi_devintf [jk@hab2 ~]$ - even though the openipmi service itelf fails, it doesn't take down everyone else's access to /dev/ipmiX -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318317 Title: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/1318317/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1549098] Re: Systemd init script does not pass --pnor
** Tags added: taco-screen-team -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549098 Title: Systemd init script does not pass --pnor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1549098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1549098] [NEW] Systemd init script does not pass --pnor
Public bug reported: We have a --pnor option that almost all opal-prd invocations will need. In the debian packaging, we have an /etc/defaults file that controls this: [jk@pudge skiboot-5.1.1]$ grep PNOR debian/opal-prd.default PNOR_DEVICE=/dev/mtd0 This is consumed by the sysv init script for opal-prd: if [ "$PNOR_DEVICE" ] then PNOR_OPTS="--pnor $PNOR_DEVICE" fi However, the systemd init script has no way of handing this: [Service] StandardInput=socket ExecStart=/usr/sbin/opal-prd So it ends up starting opal-prd without --pnor, which means the diagnostics daemon has no access to flash. ** Affects: skiboot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1549098 Title: Systemd init script does not pass --pnor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1549098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1318317] Re: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules
Hi Nish, I'll give it a try, thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318317 Title: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/1318317/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1318317] Re: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules
Hi Nish, I'll give it a try, thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318317 Title: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/1318317/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1512188] Re: Update request: skiboot 5.1.9 for OpenPower machines
Also, for completeness: running the PRD daemon is only required on machines that have the "diagnostics" OPAL firmware feature. At present (and this is unlikely to change), the set of these machines is equivalent to the set of OpenPOWER machines. To be exact, this is indicated on a running system by the presence of a "diagnostics" device-tree node under the firmware one, which has a compatible value of "ibm,opal-prd". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512188 Title: Update request: skiboot 5.1.9 for OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1512188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1512188] Re: Update request: skiboot 5.1.9 for OpenPower machines
Hi Steve, > I also don't know > which systems are already supported by the version of opal-prd in trusty; > are the openpower systems the only ones we need to watch for regressions on, > or are there others? The former: opal-prd is only used on OpenPOWER machines, so that's all we'll need to watch for regressions on here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512188 Title: Update request: skiboot 5.1.9 for OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1512188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1514711] Re: Installer doesn't include ast GPU driver for OpenPower machines
@henrix: I'll need some help with testing this; it's not like we can just boot into the new kernel directlyb. We'll chase this up with #ubuntu-devel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1514711 Title: Installer doesn't include ast GPU driver for OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1514711/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1514711] Re: Installer doesn't include ast GPU driver for OpenPower machines
hi Tim, Yep, that looks like it'll sort it. Is there any reference around for building an installer image with this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1514711 Title: Installer doesn't include ast GPU driver for OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1514711/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1514711] Re: Installer doesn't include ast GPU driver for OpenPower machines
Any news on this one? It's preventing folks from installing on OpenPOWER machines if they're relying on VGA. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1514711 Title: Installer doesn't include ast GPU driver for OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1514711/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1318317] Re: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules
thanks Nish! I just installed that package: [jk@fstn2-p1 sources.list.d]$ sudo apt-get remove --purge openipmi Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: openipmi* 0 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 1 to remove and 0 not to upgrade. After this operation, 441 kB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] (Reading database ... 167006 files and directories currently installed.) Removing openipmi (2.0.18-0ubuntu8) ... Purging configuration files for openipmi (2.0.18-0ubuntu8) ... Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.0.2-5) ... [jk@fstn2-p1 sources.list.d]$ sudo apt-get install openipmi=2.0.18-0ubuntu7.2 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following NEW packages will be installed: openipmi 0 to upgrade, 1 to newly install, 0 to remove and 0 not to upgrade. Need to get 189 kB of archives. After this operation, 727 kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net/nacc/lp1318317/ubuntu/ trusty/main openipmi ppc64el 2.0.18-0ubuntu7.2 [189 kB] Fetched 189 kB in 2s (79.3 kB/s) Selecting previously unselected package openipmi. (Reading database ... 166978 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../openipmi_2.0.18-0ubuntu7.2_ppc64el.deb ... Unpacking openipmi (2.0.18-0ubuntu7.2) ... Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.0.2-5) ... Processing triggers for systemd (219-7ubuntu6) ... Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-19) ... Setting up openipmi (2.0.18-0ubuntu7.2) ... Processing triggers for systemd (219-7ubuntu6) ... Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-19) ... Now I get: [jk@fstn2-p1 sources.list.d]$ sudo service openipmi start Job for openipmi.service failed. See "systemctl status openipmi.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details. [jk@fstn2-p1 sources.list.d]$ systemctl status openipmi.service ● openipmi.service - LSB: OpenIPMI Driver init script Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/openipmi) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Tue 2016-01-05 23:49:12 UTC; 5s ago Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8) Process: 4600 ExecStart=/etc/init.d/openipmi start (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) Jan 05 23:49:12 fstn2-p1 systemd[1]: Starting LSB: OpenIPMI Driver init script... Jan 05 23:49:12 fstn2-p1 openipmi[4600]: * Starting ipmi drivers Jan 05 23:49:12 fstn2-p1 openipmi[4600]: ...fail! Jan 05 23:49:12 fstn2-p1 openipmi[4600]: ...done. Jan 05 23:49:12 fstn2-p1 systemd[1]: openipmi.service: control process exited, code=exited status=1 Jan 05 23:49:12 fstn2-p1 systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: OpenIPMI Driver init script. Jan 05 23:49:12 fstn2-p1 systemd[1]: Unit openipmi.service entered failed state. Jan 05 23:49:12 fstn2-p1 systemd[1]: openipmi.service failed. But at least my modules are still loaded: [jk@fstn2-p1 sources.list.d]$ lsmod | grep ipmi ipmi_devintf 13227 0 ipmi_powernv5657 0 ipmi_msghandler51494 2 ipmi_powernv,ipmi_devintf [jk@fstn2-p1 sources.list.d]$ .. which is a net improvement :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318317 Title: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/1318317/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1318317] Re: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules
thanks Nish! I just installed that package: [jk@fstn2-p1 sources.list.d]$ sudo apt-get remove --purge openipmi Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: openipmi* 0 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 1 to remove and 0 not to upgrade. After this operation, 441 kB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] (Reading database ... 167006 files and directories currently installed.) Removing openipmi (2.0.18-0ubuntu8) ... Purging configuration files for openipmi (2.0.18-0ubuntu8) ... Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.0.2-5) ... [jk@fstn2-p1 sources.list.d]$ sudo apt-get install openipmi=2.0.18-0ubuntu7.2 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following NEW packages will be installed: openipmi 0 to upgrade, 1 to newly install, 0 to remove and 0 not to upgrade. Need to get 189 kB of archives. After this operation, 727 kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net/nacc/lp1318317/ubuntu/ trusty/main openipmi ppc64el 2.0.18-0ubuntu7.2 [189 kB] Fetched 189 kB in 2s (79.3 kB/s) Selecting previously unselected package openipmi. (Reading database ... 166978 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../openipmi_2.0.18-0ubuntu7.2_ppc64el.deb ... Unpacking openipmi (2.0.18-0ubuntu7.2) ... Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.0.2-5) ... Processing triggers for systemd (219-7ubuntu6) ... Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-19) ... Setting up openipmi (2.0.18-0ubuntu7.2) ... Processing triggers for systemd (219-7ubuntu6) ... Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-19) ... Now I get: [jk@fstn2-p1 sources.list.d]$ sudo service openipmi start Job for openipmi.service failed. See "systemctl status openipmi.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details. [jk@fstn2-p1 sources.list.d]$ systemctl status openipmi.service ● openipmi.service - LSB: OpenIPMI Driver init script Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/openipmi) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Tue 2016-01-05 23:49:12 UTC; 5s ago Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8) Process: 4600 ExecStart=/etc/init.d/openipmi start (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) Jan 05 23:49:12 fstn2-p1 systemd[1]: Starting LSB: OpenIPMI Driver init script... Jan 05 23:49:12 fstn2-p1 openipmi[4600]: * Starting ipmi drivers Jan 05 23:49:12 fstn2-p1 openipmi[4600]: ...fail! Jan 05 23:49:12 fstn2-p1 openipmi[4600]: ...done. Jan 05 23:49:12 fstn2-p1 systemd[1]: openipmi.service: control process exited, code=exited status=1 Jan 05 23:49:12 fstn2-p1 systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: OpenIPMI Driver init script. Jan 05 23:49:12 fstn2-p1 systemd[1]: Unit openipmi.service entered failed state. Jan 05 23:49:12 fstn2-p1 systemd[1]: openipmi.service failed. But at least my modules are still loaded: [jk@fstn2-p1 sources.list.d]$ lsmod | grep ipmi ipmi_devintf 13227 0 ipmi_powernv5657 0 ipmi_msghandler51494 2 ipmi_powernv,ipmi_devintf [jk@fstn2-p1 sources.list.d]$ .. which is a net improvement :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318317 Title: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/1318317/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1318317] Re: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules
>From comment #3: > This breaks any system daemon that requires in-band IPMI. To provide a little more detail here: the opal-prd daemon, necessary for runtime system management on OpenPOWER machines, may communicate with the BMC using IPMI. As part of that daemon's initialisation, it ensures that the IPMI device interface is loaded (ie, the ipmi_devintf module), to ensure that the /dev/ipmiN interface is working. However, after that daemon is started, the openipmi init script then *unloads* the ipmi_devintf module. The same would happen if the user has added ipmi_devintf to /etc/modules, to get it loaded on boot. At best, this unload means that the user will always need to issue a 'modprobe ipmi_devintf', on every reboot, before running any 'ipmitool' command using the in-band BT interface. Since this also disabled communication between the opal-prd daemon and the BMC, it means that errors detected by opal-prd may not be reported to the BMC. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318317 Title: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/1318317/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1318317] Re: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules
>From comment #3: > This breaks any system daemon that requires in-band IPMI. To provide a little more detail here: the opal-prd daemon, necessary for runtime system management on OpenPOWER machines, may communicate with the BMC using IPMI. As part of that daemon's initialisation, it ensures that the IPMI device interface is loaded (ie, the ipmi_devintf module), to ensure that the /dev/ipmiN interface is working. However, after that daemon is started, the openipmi init script then *unloads* the ipmi_devintf module. The same would happen if the user has added ipmi_devintf to /etc/modules, to get it loaded on boot. At best, this unload means that the user will always need to issue a 'modprobe ipmi_devintf', on every reboot, before running any 'ipmitool' command using the in-band BT interface. Since this also disabled communication between the opal-prd daemon and the BMC, it means that errors detected by opal-prd may not be reported to the BMC. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openipmi in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318317 Title: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/1318317/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1318317] Re: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules
We see the same on OpenPower machines. Since we don't use the ipmi_si interface, the openipmi init script fails, which removes modules which we do need. root@g43L:~# grep -B2 IPMI_SI /etc/default/openipmi # Enable standard hardware interfaces (KCS, BT, SMIC) # You probably want this enabled. IPMI_SI=yes root@g43L:~# modprobe ipmi_devintf root@g43L:~# lsmod | grep ipmi ipmi_devintf 13355 0 ipmi_powernv5657 0 ipmi_msghandler51374 2 ipmi_powernv,ipmi_devintf root@g43L:~# service openipmi start * Starting ipmi drivers ...fail! ...done. root@g43L:~# lsmod | grep ipmi ipmi_powernv5657 0 ipmi_msghandler51374 1 ipmi_powernv root@g43L:~# This breaks any system daemon that requires in-band IPMI. Workaround is to set IPMI_SI="no" in /etc/default/openipmi. ** Tags added: taco-screen-team -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openipmi in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318317 Title: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/1318317/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1318317] Re: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules
We see the same on OpenPower machines. Since we don't use the ipmi_si interface, the openipmi init script fails, which removes modules which we do need. root@g43L:~# grep -B2 IPMI_SI /etc/default/openipmi # Enable standard hardware interfaces (KCS, BT, SMIC) # You probably want this enabled. IPMI_SI=yes root@g43L:~# modprobe ipmi_devintf root@g43L:~# lsmod | grep ipmi ipmi_devintf 13355 0 ipmi_powernv5657 0 ipmi_msghandler51374 2 ipmi_powernv,ipmi_devintf root@g43L:~# service openipmi start * Starting ipmi drivers ...fail! ...done. root@g43L:~# lsmod | grep ipmi ipmi_powernv5657 0 ipmi_msghandler51374 1 ipmi_powernv root@g43L:~# This breaks any system daemon that requires in-band IPMI. Workaround is to set IPMI_SI="no" in /etc/default/openipmi. ** Tags added: taco-screen-team -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318317 Title: openipmi startup script removes kernel modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openipmi/+bug/1318317/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1509896] Re: IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines
Pavaman - thanks for verifying. The latter issue sounds like a BMC problem, which we're following-up separately. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509896 Title: IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmitool/+bug/1509896/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1509896] Re: IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines
Pavaman - thanks for verifying. The latter issue sounds like a BMC problem, which we're following-up separately. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ipmitool in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509896 Title: IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmitool/+bug/1509896/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1514711] Re: Installer doesn't include ast GPU driver for OpenPower machines
Assigning to linux package, as per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage. ** Package changed: ubuntu => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1514711 Title: Installer doesn't include ast GPU driver for OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1514711/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1463112] Re: Cat sitting on keyboard crashes lightdm
Funnily enough, I saw the same issue last night. Also caused by a cat. The system seemed to be completely unresponsive, but I don't think it had locked completely; after a few minutes of holding down backspace (with no indication in the UI that characters are actually being deleted), I managed to eventually clear the password entry box. Hitting enter (ie, to clear the password box by performing an invalid login) didn't seem to do anything either. It seemed like the excessive chars in the password box was slowing the UI down. Changing to tty1 and doing a ps didn't show lightdm to be in any unusual state. I have no idea how long the cat was sitting on the keyboard. My system details: Ubuntu version : 15.10 Lightdm version: 1.16.4-0ubuntu1 Cat: black, domestic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1463112 Title: Cat sitting on keyboard crashes lightdm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1463112/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1514711] [NEW] Installer doesn't include ast GPU driver for OpenPower machines
Public bug reported: When booting the Ubuntu 14.03.4 installer on an OpenPower machine with a VGA monitor attached, we see no output - the only installer output is over the physical UART (or SOL session). Petitboot is displayed over both VGA and UART, but not the installer UI. It seems like the ast GPU driver isn't present on the installer image (but is present for the non-installer kernels), which is required for graphics output on these machines. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: taco-screen-team -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1514711 Title: Installer doesn't include ast GPU driver for OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1514711/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447500] Re: Ubuntu creates cluttered Petitboot menu entries
** Tags added: taco-screen-team -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447500 Title: Ubuntu creates cluttered Petitboot menu entries To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1447500/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1509896] Re: IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines
@mathieu-tl: ok, super. Sorry, I didn't mean to be badgering you there, just wanted to make sure it's tracked somewhere! :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ipmitool in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509896 Title: IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmitool/+bug/1509896/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1509896] Re: IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines
@mathieu-tl: ok, super. Sorry, I didn't mean to be badgering you there, just wanted to make sure it's tracked somewhere! :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509896 Title: IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmitool/+bug/1509896/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1509896] Re: IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines
Is it possible to do the same for trusty too? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ipmitool in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509896 Title: IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmitool/+bug/1509896/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1509896] Re: IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines
Is it possible to do the same for trusty too? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509896 Title: IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmitool/+bug/1509896/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1512188] [NEW] Update request: skiboot 5.1.9 for OpenPower machines
Public bug reported: Trusty through xenial currently have version 5.1.1 of the skiboot source package (producing opal-prd and opal-utils binary packages), while we've had a number of updates since, which introduce compatibility for newer hardware & firmware facilities. Can we have this updated to a more recent skiboot version? ** Affects: skiboot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: taco-screen-team ** Tags added: taco-screen-team -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512188 Title: Update request: skiboot 5.1.9 for OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1512188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1509896] [NEW] IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines
Public bug reported: The current ipmitool code can fail to find an IPMI device on my OpenPower machine, due to bug in the USB SCSI device discovery process. This will only happen if the user has adjusted the number of virtual USB devices that the BMC exports. However, the failure mode isn't obvious, and it prevents the user from using the 'USB' IPMI channel, which is required for firmware upgrades. This is fixed in upstream commit 607cfe6f4, can we backport this to the Ubuntu ipmitool for versions at 1.8.15 or earlier? ** Affects: ipmitool (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ipmitool in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509896 Title: IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmitool/+bug/1509896/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1509896] [NEW] IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines
Public bug reported: The current ipmitool code can fail to find an IPMI device on my OpenPower machine, due to bug in the USB SCSI device discovery process. This will only happen if the user has adjusted the number of virtual USB devices that the BMC exports. However, the failure mode isn't obvious, and it prevents the user from using the 'USB' IPMI channel, which is required for firmware upgrades. This is fixed in upstream commit 607cfe6f4, can we backport this to the Ubuntu ipmitool for versions at 1.8.15 or earlier? ** Affects: ipmitool (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509896 Title: IPMI USB SCSI endpoint discovery can fail on OpenPower machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmitool/+bug/1509896/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447500] Re: Ubuntu creates cluttered Petitboot menu entries
@mathieu-tl: yes, if we can disable the OS prober when we're installing onto a petitboot-based machine, that'd be great. Since petitboot will parse the other OS' config files independently, we don't need to include them in Ubuntu's list. Is there a current mechanism to detect the machine type? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447500 Title: Ubuntu creates cluttered Petitboot menu entries To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1447500/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1467542] Re: [FFE] ship skiboot (opal-prd) 5.1.1
> Jeremy, I know that there are some needs on the kernel side, but there is a > 4.2 > in experimental, would it be enough ? Yes, that has the headers required. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542 Title: [FFE] ship skiboot (opal-prd) 5.1.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1467542] Re: [FFE] ship skiboot (opal-prd) 5.1.1
there's no package in any That is not true. Wily (15.10) has the inital 5.0.4 version. You trimmed off the part where it said Ubuntu release - wily isn't released yet. :) @mathieu-tl: looks good! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542 Title: [FFE] ship skiboot (opal-prd) 5.1.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skiboot/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1467542] Re: Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'
Hi Frédéric, The upgrade gives us Firestone platform support, and will mean we'll be using code that has gone through IBM's own testing procedures. Including 5.1.1 would mean fewer changes - there's no package in any Ubuntu release yet, so there should be no trouble starting from this version, and it means that we don't need an update for Firestone support. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542 Title: Add new userspace package 'opal-prd' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1467542] Re: Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'
OK, 5.1.1 has just been tagged, that would be a great place to base this on, as it has added support for future OpenPower platforms. Ubuntu folks: do you need anything from IBM for this package? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542 Title: Add new userspace package 'opal-prd' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1467542] Re: Add new userspace package 'opal-prd'
We've had a couple of bugfix changes go into upstream recently; I'd suggest picking up the current stable branch, at or beyond commit 14d4ffa7. This should get a tag for 5.0.6 any day now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467542 Title: Add new userspace package 'opal-prd' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1467542/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1482343] Re: Trigger a checkstop on unrecoverable MCE/HMI errors to inform BMC/OCC about the error.
** Package changed: ubuntu = linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1482343 Title: Trigger a checkstop on unrecoverable MCE/HMI errors to inform BMC/OCC about the error. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1482343/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1464560] Re: Backport request: include PRD support for OpenPower kernels
Just booted 3.19.0-26-generic, all looks good! ** Tags removed: verification-needed-vivid ** Tags added: verification-done-vivid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1464560 Title: Backport request: include PRD support for OpenPower kernels To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1464560/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1464560] Re: Backport request: include PRD support for OpenPower kernels
Hi Chris,
The following commits should bring the PRD support into the current
vivid branch, using only pristine upstream changes:
d800ba1 powerpc/powernv: Move OPAL API definitions to opal-api.h
d7cf83f powerpc/powernv: Move opal-api.h closer to the Skiboot version
ed59190 powerpc/powernv: Add interfaces for flash device access
1cbb4a1 mtd: powernv: Add powernv flash MTD abstraction driver
48c0615 powerpc/powernv: Merge common platform device initialisation
594fcb9 powerpc/powernv: Expose OPAL APIs required by PRD interface
646b54f powerpc/powernv: Remove powernv RTAS support
0d7cd85 powerpc/powernv: Add opal-prd channel
7185795 powerpc/powernv: fix construction of opal PRD messages
cdf2bc1 powerpc/include: Add opal-prd to installed uapi headers
(the last two are fixes that have hit mainline since the original merge)
However, we'll also need the changes in the actual merge commit to
mainline:
commit df60f57684529a1dde4461cf84354453b440806a
Merge: 605f302 b921e90
Author: Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au
Date: Thu Mar 26 20:03:16 2015 +1100
Merge branch 'next-misc' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/benh/powerpc into test
Merge miscellaneous bits from benh. Fix a minor conflict with
OpalMessageType changing names to opal_msg_type.
diff --cc arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h
index 0ef0fd6,4ea21ea..c08de77
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h
@@@ -208,8 -946,10 +208,10 @@@ extern void hvc_opal_init_early(void)
extern int opal_notifier_register(struct notifier_block *nb);
extern int opal_notifier_unregister(struct notifier_block *nb);
-extern int opal_message_notifier_register(enum OpalMessageType msg_type,
+extern int opal_message_notifier_register(enum opal_msg_type msg_type,
struct notifier_block *nb);
-extern int opal_message_notifier_unregister(enum OpalMessageType msg_type,
++extern int opal_message_notifier_unregister(enum opal_msg_type msg_type,
+ struct notifier_block *nb);
extern void opal_notifier_enable(void);
extern void opal_notifier_disable(void);
extern void opal_notifier_update_evt(uint64_t evt_mask, uint64_t evt_val);
diff --cc arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
index 142a08a,8b3834a..d403b2b
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
@@@ -302,16 -305,11 +305,11 @@@ void opal_notifier_disable(void
* Opal message notifier based on message type. Allow subscribers to get
* notified for specific messgae type.
*/
-int opal_message_notifier_register(enum OpalMessageType msg_type,
+int opal_message_notifier_register(enum opal_msg_type msg_type,
struct notifier_block *nb)
{
- if (!nb) {
- pr_warning(%s: Invalid argument (%p)\n,
- __func__, nb);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- if (msg_type OPAL_MSG_TYPE_MAX) {
- pr_warning(%s: Invalid message type argument (%d)\n,
+ if (!nb || msg_type = OPAL_MSG_TYPE_MAX) {
+ pr_warning(%s: Invalid arguments, msg_type:%d\n,
__func__, msg_type);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@@ -319,6 -318,13 +318,13 @@@
opal_msg_notifier_head[msg_type], nb);
}
-int opal_message_notifier_unregister(enum OpalMessageType msg_type,
++int opal_message_notifier_unregister(enum opal_msg_type msg_type,
+struct notifier_block *nb)
+ {
+ return atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(
+ opal_msg_notifier_head[msg_type], nb);
+ }
+
static void opal_message_do_notify(uint32_t msg_type, void *msg)
{
/* notify subscribers */
- but I'm not sure how you'd prefer to apply this diff from a merge.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1464560
Title:
Backport request: include PRD support for OpenPower kernels
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1464560/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1464560] Re: Backport request: include PRD support for OpenPower kernels
And we've just had a couple of fixes hit linux-next too: 7185795 powerpc/powernv: fix construction of opal PRD messages cdf2bc1 powerpc/include: Add opal-prd to installed uapi headers Yes, as Breno has mentioned, we're looking at 3.19 and (if possible) 3.16. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1464560 Title: Backport request: include PRD support for OpenPower kernels To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1464560/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1464560] Re: Backport request: include PRD support for OpenPower kernels
We've just had the last of our feature-enablement patches hit linux- next: 1cbb4a1 mtd: powernv: Add powernv flash MTD abstraction driver The MTD driver is required for full PRD functionality, but I can open a separate issue if you prefer. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1464560 Title: Backport request: include PRD support for OpenPower kernels To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1464560/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1464560] [NEW] Backport request: include PRD support for OpenPower kernels
Public bug reported: Following up on patches that were skipped in bug 1439562, this request is for the PRD (Processor Runtime Diagnostics) support in the ppc64le kernel. Patches have recently hit linux-next: 0d7cd85 powerpc/powernv: Add opal-prd channel 594fcb9 powerpc/powernv: Expose OPAL APIs required by PRD interface 48c0615 powerpc/powernv: Merge common platform device initialisation Let me know if you need any info (or dependencies) for these. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1464560 Title: Backport request: include PRD support for OpenPower kernels To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1464560/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1439562] Re: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware
OK, the prd changes have hit linux-next: 48c0615 powerpc/powernv: Merge common platform device initialisation 594fcb9 powerpc/powernv: Expose OPAL APIs required by PRD interface 0d7cd85 powerpc/powernv: Add opal-prd channel Would you prefer me to open a separate LP issue for these? Once these are included, we just the the MTD change to go. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439562 Title: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1439562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1439562] Re: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware
Hi Chris, Yes, 6a11e5c6 adds the IPMI driver. Is that not already in the vivid tree? The PRD and MTD changes are headed upstream, I was just sending to you for an indication of what to expect. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439562 Title: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1439562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1439562] Re: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware
Hi Chris, Thanks for taking this on for a utopic backport. Instead of using that ubuntu/utopic branch in the openpower tree, I'd suggest using the upstream commits that we have listed in this bug (and Tim has applied); that way, you'll be getting the latest changes, and have less merging to do later. We also have some patches that are on their way upstream (mentioned above, making their way to vivid as a SRU). Those are at: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/jk/prd/ For config changes, we'll want: CONFIG_IPMI_POWERNV CONFIG_MTD_POWERNV_FLASH CONFIG_OPAL_PRD -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439562 Title: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1439562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1439562] Re: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware
OK, we have a new set of patches merged. Would you like these in a separate bug? [the first does change a powerpc-specific syscall number, if that affects your preference of SRU vs. freeze] The following patches have been merged to linux-next: 1d9d9bd powerpc: Add a proper syscall for switching endianness - merged to linux-next/master: 529d235a0e190ded1d21ccc80a73e625ebcad09b 37889e2 powerpc/powernv: Add OPAL message notifier unregister function - merged to linux-next/master: b921e90260cec1e04988bb3763491de885b67b51 2f0190b powerpc/powernv: Support OPAL requested heartbeat - merged to linux-next/master: 3bf57561d4dbd36ba45ce05656b0469bfdcc7ef2 e1c8954 device: Add dev_of_node() accessor - merged to linux-next/master: e8a51e1b51ee5730ad3913f3962e3099a5e19359 2c242b3 drivers/core/of: Add symlink to device-tree from devices with an OF node - merged to linux-next/master: 5590f3196b293574a12be58d06d5e1120d8856ec Leaving the following patches pending: 3525984 powerpc/powernv: Add interfaces for flash device access 1acd5dd drivers/mtd: add powernv flash MTD abstraction driver - pending mtd review 8589e12 powerpc/powernv: Add opal-prd channel - pending powerpc review. - Ensure we have the DPO member of enum opal_msg_type present -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439562 Title: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1439562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1439562] Re: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware
Sure thing. The patch in my ubuntu-vivid git tree is slightly modified from the upstream commit - just so we don't need to include those prerequisites. However, if you're after pristine upstream commits, the following will work on top of the vivid tree (as at 83f803a6): commit 4c3b21686111e0ac6018469dacbc5549f9915cf8 Author: Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au Date: Fri Dec 5 21:16:59 2014 +1100 powerpc/kernel: Make syscall_exit a local label Currently when we back trace something that is in a syscall we see something like this: [c000] [c000] SyS_read+0x6c/0x110 [c000] [c000] syscall_exit+0x0/0x98 Although it's entirely correct, seeing syscall_exit at the bottom can be confusing - we were exiting from a syscall and then called SyS_read() ? If we instead change syscall_exit to be a local label we get something more intuitive: [c001fa46fde0] [c026719c] SyS_read+0x6c/0x110 [c001fa46fe30] [c0009264] system_call+0x38/0xd0 ie. we were handling a system call, and it was SyS_read(). Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au commit a4bcbe6a41adcaa5e7f1830a7c1da8691d9d2b1d Author: Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au Date: Wed Jan 14 14:47:56 2015 +1100 powerpc: Remove old compile time disabled syscall tracing code We have code to do syscall tracing which is disabled at compile time by default. It's not been touched since the dawn of time (ie. v2.6.12). There are now better ways to do syscall tracing, ie. using the raw_syscall, or syscall tracepoints. For the specific case of tracing syscalls at boot on a system that doesn't get to userspace, you can boot with: trace_event=syscalls tp_printk=on Which will trace syscalls from boot, and echo all output to the console. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439562 Title: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1439562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1439562] Re: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware
Also, the 'powerpc/powernv: Support OPAL requested heartbeat' change requires a couple of prereqs if you're looking to use the pristine upstream version too: commit 08135139430fabdeaa990da8a9e0d436aad0672b Author: Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au Date: Wed Jan 28 15:10:33 2015 +1100 powerpc/powernv: Remove opal prefix from pr_xxx()s In commit c8742f85125d powerpc/powernv: Expose OPAL firmware symbol map I added pr_fmt() to opal.c. This left some existing pr_xxx()s with duplicate opal prefixes, eg: opal: opal: Found 0 interrupts reserved for OPAL Fix them all up. Also make the Not not found message a bit more verbose. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au commit c1c3a526bb4ddbec7639a9fb3b84fede25b201d9 Author: Gavin Shan gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com Date: Fri Jan 23 14:25:05 2015 +1100 powerpc/powernv: Separate function for OPAL IRQ setup The patch put the OPAL interrupt setup logic in opal_init() into seperate function opal_irq_init() for easier code maintaining. The patch doesn't introduce logic changes except: * Rename variable names. * Release virtual IRQ upon error from request_irq(). * Don't cache the virtual IRQ to opal_irqs[] upon error from request_irq(). Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439562 Title: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1439562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1439562] Re: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware
This should do the trick: git cherry-pick 4c3b2168 a4bcbe6a 529d235a \ 08135139 c1c3a526 b921e902 \ 3bf57561 e8a51e1b 5590f319 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439562 Title: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1439562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1439562] Re: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware
OK, I'll keep this bug updated as the patches are merged. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439562 Title: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1439562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1439562] Re: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware
Also: 744b976 powerpc/powernv: Add OPAL soft-poweroff routine - in linus/master: 7f43e71e8c538356efd5b33a183e6d9ace4739a5 - this is a prerequisite for: 63df164 powerpc/powernv: reboot when requested by firmware -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439562 Title: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1439562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1439562] Re: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware
We've had a few patches merged to linux-next: 6f4b0f5 drivers/sbus/char/envctrl.c: ignore orderly_poweroff return value - merged to linux-next/master: dc4f016cb8b67128c42f165802794f0b6d70405c 53cffb5 kernel/reboot.c: add orderly_reboot for graceful reboot - merged to linux-next/master: c162cd23253587741207fcb08c20c56922dd5fdb 63df164 powerpc/powernv: reboot when requested by firmware - merged to linux-next/master: 62a68d4f51accd3ffa3f38d4a85f41b031ff13b7 Leaving the following pending patches: 2f0190b powerpc/powernv: Support OPAL requested heartbeat e1c8954 device: Add dev_of_node() accessor 2c242b3 drivers/core/of: Add symlink to device-tree from devices with an OF node 1d9d9bd powerpc: Add a proper syscall for switching endianness 3525984 powerpc/powernv: Add interfaces for flash device access 1acd5dd drivers/mtd: add powernv flash MTD abstraction driver 37889e2 powerpc/powernv: Add OPAL message notifier unregister function 744b976 powerpc/powernv: Add OPAL soft-poweroff routine 8589e12 powerpc/powernv: Add opal-prd channel -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439562 Title: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1439562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1439562] Re: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware
Tim - yes, they're both related to OpenPower hardware, and aren't required for guest VMs. Sounds fine then. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439562 Title: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1439562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1439562] [NEW] backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware
Public bug reported: We've prepared a series of patches (ported to Ubuntu-3.19.0-11.11), which add OpenPower support to the Ubuntu kernel. The changes are available in the ubuntu/vivid branch of: https://github.com/open-power/linux.git (or I can attach them separately). Changelogs are as follows: commit 2f0190bd43764559b250a5bd11aca050f909aa21 Author: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org Date: Fri Nov 14 16:13:50 2014 +1100 powerpc/powernv: Support OPAL requested heartbeat If OPAL requests it, call it back via opal_poll_events() at a regular interval. Some versions of OPAL on some machines require this to operate some internal timeouts properly. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org Backport notes: cherry-picked from mpe-next, 3bf57561d4dbd36ba45ce05656b0469bfdcc7ef2 minor conflicts resolved Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr j...@ozlabs.org commit e1c89541e7163494ad091f3c2622649d91ac7597 Author: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org Date: Mon Feb 16 14:59:08 2015 +1100 device: Add dev_of_node() accessor Suggested by Arnd Bergmann, this gives a practical accessor for the of_node field of struct device while instructing the compiler that it will be NULL if CONFIG_OF is not set. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org Acked-by: Rob Herring r...@kernel.org Backport notes: Submission to LKML at: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5831161/ Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr j...@ozlabs.org commit 2c242b30756f77528516a4e9e986818ac4e90490 Author: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org Date: Wed Feb 18 11:25:18 2015 +1100 drivers/core/of: Add symlink to device-tree from devices with an OF node So I've been annoyed lately with having a bunch of devices such as i2c eeproms (for use by VPDs, server world !) and other bits and pieces that I want to be able to identify from userspace, and possibly provide additional data about from FW. Basically, it boils down to correlating the sysfs device with the OF tree device node, so that user space can use device-tree info such as additional location or label (or whatever else we can come up with) propreties to identify a given device, or get some attributes of use about it, etc... Now, so far, we've done that in some subsystem in a fairly ad-hoc basis using devspec properties. For example, PCI creates them if it can correlate the probed device with a DT node. Some powerpc specific busses do that too. However, i2c doesn't and it would be nice to have something more generic since technically any device can have a corresponding device tree node. This patch adds an of_node symlink to devices that have a non-NULL dev-of_node pointer, the patch is pretty trivial and seems to work just fine for me. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org Acked-by: Rob Herring r...@kernel.org Backport notes: Submission to LKML at: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5842241/ Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr j...@ozlabs.org commit 1d9d9bdad2553f39de92eba40f8663eb45819e8c Author: Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au Date: Sat Mar 28 21:35:16 2015 +1100 powerpc: Add a proper syscall for switching endianness We currently have a special syscall for switching endianness. This is syscall number 0x1ebe, which is handled explicitly in the 64-bit syscall exception entry. That has a few problems, firstly the syscall number is outside of the usual range, which confuses various tools. For example strace doesn't recognise the syscall at all. Secondly it's handled explicitly as a special case in the syscall exception entry, which is complicated enough without it. As a first step toward removing the special syscall, we need to add a regular syscall that implements the same functionality. The logic is simple, it simply toggles the MSR_LE bit in the userspace MSR. This is the same as the special syscall, with the caveat that the special syscall clobbers fewer registers. This version clobbers r9-r12, XER, CTR, and CR0-1,5-7. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au Backport notes: Cherry-picked (with conflicts resolved) from mpe-next, commit 529d235a0e190ded1d21ccc80a73e625ebcad09b Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr j...@ozlabs.org commit 352598493e72d80fcf136b5c30add7f9dd32b30a Author: Cyril Bur cyril...@gmail.com Date: Tue Feb 17 18:27:34 2015 +1100 powerpc/powernv: Add interfaces for flash device access This change adds the OPAL interface definitions to allow Linux to read, write and erase from system flash devices. We register platform devices for the flash devices exported by firmware. We clash with the existing opal_flash_init
[Bug 1439562] Re: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware
Also: these changes add a config var: CONFIG_MTD_POWERNV_FLASH, for the presence of the powernv mtd driver. Will the new ipmi_powernv and powernv_flash modules appear in the linux-image package (rather than linux-image extras)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439562 Title: backport request: include support for OpenPower hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1439562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1088778] [NEW] Evince menu items do not appear in HUD
Public bug reported: I'd like to switch to/from 'Continuous' (View → Continuous) mode through the HUD, but it seems like none of Evince's menu items are appearing in the HUD. Steps to reproduce: 1) Open a file with evince 2) Note that there is a Continuous option in the View menu 3) Hit Alt to bring up the HUD 4) Type Continuous 5) No items appear in the HUD to activate/deactivate continuous mode Expected behaviour: 5) Continuous option appears in the HUD Additional info: The continuous option is missing, in addition to *all* of Evince's menu items --- ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu6 Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-02-01 (313 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 (2029.1) MarkForUpload: True Package: evince 3.6.0-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcCmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-19-generic root=UUID=3922d973-1dbd-4bf1-8964-d78226361c5a ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-19.30-generic 3.5.7 Tags: quantal running-unity Uname: Linux 3.5.0-19-generic x86_64 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-10-10 (62 days ago) UserGroups: adm cdrom dialout dip fuse libvirtd lpadmin mythtv plugdev sambashare sbuild sudo ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-collected quantal running-unity ** Tags added: apport-collected quantal running-unity ** Description changed: I'd like to switch to/from 'Continuous' (View → Continuous) mode through the HUD, but it seems like none of Evince's menu items are appearing in the HUD. Steps to reproduce: 1) Open a file with evince 2) Note that there is a Continuous option in the View menu 3) Hit Alt to bring up the HUD 4) Type Continuous 5) No items appear in the HUD to activate/deactivate continuous mode Expected behaviour: 5) Continuous option appears in the HUD Additional info: - The continuous option is missing, in addition to *all* of Evince's - menu items + The continuous option is missing, in addition to *all* of Evince's menu items + --- + ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu6 + Architecture: amd64 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 + EcryptfsInUse: Yes + InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-02-01 (313 days ago) + InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 (2029.1) + MarkForUpload: True + Package: evince 3.6.0-0ubuntu2 + PackageArchitecture: amd64 + ProcCmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-19-generic root=UUID=3922d973-1dbd-4bf1-8964-d78226361c5a ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-19.30-generic 3.5.7 + Tags: quantal running-unity + Uname: Linux 3.5.0-19-generic x86_64 + UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-10-10 (62 days ago) + UserGroups: adm cdrom dialout dip fuse libvirtd lpadmin mythtv plugdev sambashare sbuild sudo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088778 Title: Evince menu items do not appear in HUD To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1088778/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1088778] Dependencies.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088778/+attachment/3456960/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088778 Title: Evince menu items do not appear in HUD To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1088778/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1088778] KernLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: KernLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088778/+attachment/3456961/+files/KernLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088778 Title: Evince menu items do not appear in HUD To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1088778/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1088778] ProcEnviron.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcEnviron.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088778/+attachment/3456962/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088778 Title: Evince menu items do not appear in HUD To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1088778/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1088778] RelatedPackageVersions.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088778/+attachment/3456963/+files/RelatedPackageVersions.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088778 Title: Evince menu items do not appear in HUD To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1088778/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1063061] Re: please backport support for EFI vars 1KB
Just committed this to sbsigntool, to use the updated mountpoint. v0.5 has this (and only this) change. commit ab63e31bb8ba8ef4b51b8698cc5e89466e003989 Author: Jeremy Kerr jeremy.k...@canonical.com Date: Mon Oct 8 12:07:43 2012 +0800 sbkeysync: change default efivarfs mountpoint to /sys/.../efivars/ Proposed changes to the kernel will establish /sys/firmware/efi/efivars as the canonical mountpoint for the efivars filesystem. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr jeremy.k...@canonical.com diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index b62c90a..786145f 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@ -1,2 +1,12 @@ +v0.5: + sbkeysync's default efivars mountpoint has been moved to + /sys/firmware/efi/efivars/. This is to match the proposed Linux kernel + patch for efivarfs, which provides this sysfs node for the purpose of + mounting efivarfs, and leaving the older ../vars/ interface for legacy + applications. + + This default can be overridden using the --efivars-path option to + sbkeysync. + v0.1: Initial version diff --git a/src/sbkeysync.c b/src/sbkeysync.c index d68f675..011004a 100644 --- a/src/sbkeysync.c +++ b/src/sbkeysync.c @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ #include fileio.h #include efivars.h -#define EFIVARS_MOUNTPOINT /sys/firmware/efi/vars +#define EFIVARS_MOUNTPOINT /sys/firmware/efi/efivars #define EFIVARS_FSTYPE 0x6165676C #define EFI_IMAGE_SECURITY_DATABASE_GUID \ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063061 Title: please backport support for EFI vars 1KB To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1063061/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1063061] Re: please backport support for EFI vars 1KB
These patches, plus a documentation patch for efivars (91a8a30), are now in Matt Fleming's next tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfleming/efi.git -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063061 Title: please backport support for EFI vars 1KB To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1063061/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1063061] Re: please backport support for EFI vars 1KB
Also, that original link (to lkml.org) seems to be a superseded series. The patchwork link has the most recent code. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063061 Title: please backport support for EFI vars 1KB To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1063061/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1063061] Re: please backport support for EFI vars 1KB
Sorry, I stand corrected, it's the same. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063061 Title: please backport support for EFI vars 1KB To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1063061/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1063061] Re: please backport support for EFI vars 1KB
We'd need all three patches in that series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/jk/efivarfs/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063061 Title: please backport support for EFI vars 1KB To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1063061/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1003945] Re: Toggle Audio Transmission does not mute SIP audio transmission
Have upgraded to 3.4.2.1-0ubuntu1; the mute button seems to work now, and mutes its pulse source rather than a (incorrect) sink. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003945 Title: Toggle Audio Transmission does not mute SIP audio transmission To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/1003945/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1003945] Re: Toggle Audio Transmission does not mute SIP audio transmission
It sure does. However, shouldn't it be muting its own pulse sink, rather than muting a pulse source? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003945 Title: Toggle Audio Transmission does not mute SIP audio transmission To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/1003945/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1003945] Re: Toggle Audio Transmission does not mute SIP audio transmission
I'm happy to arrange a call if you need a hand with testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003945 Title: Toggle Audio Transmission does not mute SIP audio transmission To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/1003945/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1003945] Re: Toggle Audio Transmission does not mute SIP audio transmission
If I toggle empathy's mute button while having the 'Input devices' tab of pavucontrol visible, I can see that the level sliders for my built-in audio device are reduced to zero when mute is enabled. However, I'm not using that device for input to empathy; I'm using a second sound device, a pair of USB headphones. The levels of the USB headphone device is not changed by empathy's mute control. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003945 Title: Toggle Audio Transmission does not mute SIP audio transmission To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/1003945/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1003945] [NEW] Toggle Audio Transmission does not mute SIP audio transmission
Public bug reported: During a SIP call, empathy provides a button to mute audio transmission. However, it looks like this does not work: audio is still transmitted to the other party. To reproduce: 1) Start a SIP call with colleagues 2) Talk to colleagues 3) Click 'Toggle Audio Transmission' button to mute audio 4) Talk to the cat Expected result: colleagues on the conference call do not hear conversation with the cat. Actual result: colleagues on the conference call hear conversation with the cat, embarassment ensues. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: empathy 3.4.1-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.38-generic 3.2.16 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu May 24 21:28:09 2012 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 (2029.1) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_AU:en TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_AU.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: empathy UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: empathy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003945 Title: Toggle Audio Transmission does not mute SIP audio transmission To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/1003945/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1003945] Re: Toggle Audio Transmission does not mute SIP audio transmission
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003945 Title: Toggle Audio Transmission does not mute SIP audio transmission To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/1003945/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 959959] [NEW] powerpc-smp kernel flavour does not boot on OldWorld G3
Public bug reported: Reported by Adam Conrad: * which kernel version (precise) that you're trying to boot linux-image-3.2.0-19-powerpc-smp (3.2.0-19.30) won't boot. linux-image-3.2.0-18-powerpc (3.2.0-18.29) works just fine. * more details about the machine It's an OldWorld Beige G3 with one of the many 1GHz upgrade boards that were popular long ago, sadly, I don't recall which brand/model, though I suspect I'd have the same problem booting if I dug up the original CPU and stuck it back in. I'm not entirely sure what more info you might want than OldWorld G3 Tower, but if there's something specific you'd like me digging for, I'm all ears. Any more data about where it stops booting ? Can you try making sure you have udbg btext enabled in config and boot with udb-immortal debug initcall_debug on the command line ? Unfortunately, it boots from BootX, because I could never make quik run on my broken OF (granted, I never tried that hard, so I'm sure it can be done, but if it ain't broke?). The problem with booting from BootX, though, is that there's no chance for debug output, because I just get a slightly corrupt MacOS desktop, and then the machine hangs. It's not getting far enough to init a framebuffer or anything shiny. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Jeremy Kerr (jk-ozlabs) Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959959 Title: powerpc-smp kernel flavour does not boot on OldWorld G3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/959959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 959959] [PATCH precise] powerpc/pmac: Fix SMP kernels on pre-core99 UP machines
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959959
The code for powersurge SMP would kick in and cause a crash
at boot due to the lack of a NULL test.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr jeremy.k...@canonical.com
Reported-By: Adam Conrad adcon...@ubuntu.com
Tested-By: Adam Conrad adcon...@ubuntu.com
Cherry-picked from upstream commit
78c5c68a4cf4329d17abfa469345ddf323d4fd62
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c
index 9b6a820..3394254 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static struct irqaction psurge_irqaction = {
static void __init smp_psurge_setup_cpu(int cpu_nr)
{
- if (cpu_nr != 0)
+ if (cpu_nr != 0 || !psurge_start)
return;
/* reset the entry point so if we get another intr we won't
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959959
Title:
powerpc-smp kernel flavour does not boot on OldWorld G3
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/959959/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 959959] Re: powerpc-smp kernel flavour does not boot on OldWorld G3
Not possible to run apport-collect in this situation, confirming manually. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959959 Title: powerpc-smp kernel flavour does not boot on OldWorld G3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/959959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 959959] Re: powerpc-smp kernel flavour does not boot on OldWorld G3
Adam reports that this patch fixes the issue. Builds are at http://people.canonical.com/~jk/powerpc-oldworld-smp/ , if anyone else would like to test. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959959 Title: powerpc-smp kernel flavour does not boot on OldWorld G3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/959959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 959959] Re: [PATCH precise] powerpc/pmac: Fix SMP kernels on pre-core99 UP machines
Hi Anca, Why not CC: lkml ? Because it's already in mainline. Refer: Cherry-picked from upstream commit 78c5c68a4cf4329d17abfa469345ddf323d4fd62 Cheers, Jeremy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959959 Title: powerpc-smp kernel flavour does not boot on OldWorld G3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/959959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [RFC] Drop Non-smp PowerPC Kernel Flavor
Hi Benh, Any ideas about this? SMP kernel is not booting on an OldWorld G3, while UP works fine; only major difference is CONFIG_SMP, but here is the delta between the split configs: --- debian.master/config/powerpc/config.flavour.powerpc +++ debian.master/config/powerpc/config.flavour.powerpc-smp @@ -8 +8 @@ -# CONFIG_CFG80211_REG_DEBUG is not set +CONFIG_CFG80211_REG_DEBUG=y @@ -15 +15 @@ -# CONFIG_GENERIC_TBSYNC is not set +CONFIG_GENERIC_TBSYNC=y @@ -19,2 +19,2 @@ -CONFIG_KGDB=y -CONFIG_LATENCYTOP=y +# CONFIG_KGDB is not set +# CONFIG_LATENCYTOP is not set @@ -24 +24 @@ -# CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER is not set +CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER=y @@ -26,0 +27 @@ +CONFIG_NR_CPUS=4 @@ -40 +41,2 @@ -CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS=y +CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=32 +# CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS is not set @@ -42,2 +44,2 @@ -# CONFIG_SMP is not set -CONFIG_TPS65010=m +CONFIG_SMP=y +# CONFIG_TPS65010 is not set [I can send the full generated configs if it helps] It should boot - there's nothing specific that excludes pre-G4 machines in this configuration. Could you let me know: I appreciate your optimism, but it most certainly doesn't boot. Andy and I have been going over it, and we're wondering if perhaps it's the CONFIG_NEED_PER_CPU_KM bit, which is mutually exclusive with CONFIG_SMP. * which kernel version (precise) that you're trying to boot linux-image-3.2.0-19-powerpc-smp (3.2.0-19.30) won't boot. linux-image-3.2.0-18-powerpc (3.2.0-18.29) works just fine. * more details about the machine It's an OldWorld Beige G3 with one of the many 1GHz upgrade boards that were popular long ago, sadly, I don't recall which brand/model, though I suspect I'd have the same problem booting if I dug up the original CPU and stuck it back in. I'm not entirely sure what more info you might want than OldWorld G3 Tower, but if there's something specific you'd like me digging for, I'm all ears. Cheers, Jeremy -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: [RFC] Drop Non-smp PowerPC Kernel Flavor
Hi Adam, For the record, the powerpc-smp kernel doesn't boot AT ALL on my G3 PowerMac. Doesn't even get far enough to init video of any sort, so I can't tell you what the problem is. I'm downloading the source right now, but I have a sneaking suspicion that, perhaps, our powerpc-smp kernel is built for= G4 (since that was the first PPC32 SMP hardware anyone cared about), and thus won't boot on any older CPUs. It should boot - there's nothing specific that excludes pre-G4 machines in this configuration. Could you let me know: * which kernel version (precise) that you're trying to boot * more details about the machine ? Cheers, Jeremy -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: [RFC] Drop Non-smp PowerPC Kernel Flavor
Hi Patrick, Plus the PS3. ... and a host of other 64-bit platforms: CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S=y CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64=y CONFIG_PPC_MAPLE=y CONFIG_PPC_PASEMI=y CONFIG_PPC_PMAC64=y CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV=y CONFIG_PPC_PS3=y CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES=y CONFIG_PPC_CELL=y Cheers, Jeremy -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: [RFC] Drop Non-smp PowerPC Kernel Flavor
Hi Ben, I'll dig the wallstreet tomorrow, in the meantime, pls shoot me the .config, also do you have a git tree or tarball to get the exact source tree you're using just in case .. ? Git tree is at: git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-precise.git/ To build the .configs: debian/rules genconfigs Check /tmp/tmp.X/powerpc-config.flavour.powerpc-smp-full for the full config file. Cheers, Jeremy -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: [RFC] Drop Non-smp PowerPC Kernel Flavor
Hi all, We consulted Jeremy Kerr about this. He says that an SMP kernel will run on all 32 bit powerpc platforms, including non-SMP. To clarify: the hardware supported by the powerpc and powerpc-smp flavours is almost identical. The differences probably don't matter Ubuntu users, as it'll be obscure hardware. I've CC-ed benh in case he wants to correct me on this one. However, the SMP kernel supports (surprise!) bringing up 1 CPU on machines that have 1 CPU. With a UP kernel on these machines, the other CPUs are left doing nothing. The main class of 32-bit SMP powerpc machines are the Apple dual-G4s. So, since the hardware coverage is essentially the same, but we get SMP support on SMP machines, I'd say that we would prefer the powerpc-smp kernel over the powerpc flavour. The drawback is that UP machines have a little overhead for things like spinlocks, which are compiled-out on the UP kernel. I don't recall discussing if the 64 bit SMP kernel would run on all SMP capable hardware. No, there's 32-bit SMP hardware that will not run a 64-bit kernel. Cheers, Jeremy -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
