[Bug 805906] Re: using virtual box system kubuntu desktop environment won't shutdown
Well, updating with xorg-edgers (as a last resort), fixed the installed system problem on this hardware. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805906 Title: using virtual box system kubuntu desktop environment won't shutdown To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/805906/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 805906] Re: using virtual box system kubuntu desktop environment won't shutdown
Has anyone yet found the cause? I'm having a hard time figuring out how this problem is only of Medium importance. Maybe it hasn't been reported enough, and if there is another bug report on this issue, I cannot find it. I am using the latest daily build live-cd, and every time I have to put in my user password, be it to install a piece of software in Muon Package Manager, or open a folder as root, there is a very good chance I will not be able to shut down. My guess is that this is the only common factor preceding a hang on shutdown. Just as Dave Gilbert wrote: I select shutdown, the screen greys out a bit - but all the apps are still running and it doesn't get any further; I can still type in a konsole and do a sudo shutdown -h now. In my opinion, this is a huge problem for ordinary users. I was able to reproduce this on a laptop, a Toshiba Satellite L305-S5937, with and without Plymouth enabled, so the problem still occurs even when there is no shutdown splash screen or animated progress bar. I hope this is addressed before release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805906 Title: using virtual box system kubuntu desktop environment won't shutdown To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/805906/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 805906] Re: using virtual box system kubuntu desktop environment won't shutdown
Also, I am not using virtual box. I am talking about an installed system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805906 Title: using virtual box system kubuntu desktop environment won't shutdown To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/805906/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 846709] Re: amarok crash after 4sec of play
And they just fixed the mp3 seeking problem with GStreamer... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846709 Title: amarok crash after 4sec of play To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/846709/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty
There won't be a fix per se for Oneiric. This is a permanent condition because it is a new setting of the Linux kernel, and nobody in power considers it a bug, nor a very important issue. Sorry. There isn't any easy 'solution' to improve this situation beyond affected users forcing the PCI-E Active-State Power Management using the pcie_aspm=force kernel command line option. Jesse thinks that more Linux drivers will end up needing to set the ASPM bits directly as a long-term solution. There's just too many hardware devices that don't properly support the ASPM power-saving modes. The only alternative would be to create a big white-list of supported devices, but that comes down to being effectively the same large task as just having the driver set the appropriate bit. So there won't be any magic fix in the Linux 3.0 kernel nor will there likely be any major change in the Linux 3.1 kernel without suddenly a bunch of drivers handling the Active-State Power Management bit. For now, mobile users just need to know to force the PCI-E ASPM support if needed to maximize the Linux battery life. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131 Title: Power consumption raised significantly in natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/760131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 777930] Re: High power consumption and general overheat in ubuntu 11.04.
What a shame. This is definitely a problem that should be taken more seriously. Check the bug report I linked to above. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777930 Title: High power consumption and general overheat in ubuntu 11.04. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/777930/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty
Adding 'pcie_aspm=force' to stock Natty install on a Toshiba L305-S5937 decreased the heat significantly. This laptop is now usable in Natty without literally burning. Battery consumption has also increased from one to about two hours. I have observed no freezing after the latest stable updates. I have not yet tested hard 3d performance, like a game or something. However, the 2.6.35 regression remains, and it looks like Michael Larabel is the only one telling users what's going on, so we'll have to wait for him. Even though it is claimed by some this is not a regression, but a feature, obviously a lot of portable computers were devastated by it, so it's absolutely a regression. @felixcorrales: You have not been told everything. You can 'pcie_aspm=force' to ALT-F2 'gksu nautilus', press enter open File System /etc/default/grub file GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=”quiet splash” GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=” You can add 'pcie_aspm=force' to GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT after splash within the quotes or GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX within the quotes. Save, then ***open Terminal and type 'sudo update-grub' without quotes, press enter, wait for it to finish, then reboot the computer. Only then will the command apply to the kernel.*** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131 Title: Power consumption raised significantly in natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/760131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty
Any updates at all? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131 Title: Power consumption raised significantly in natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/760131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 312709] Re: Pendrive boot disk works only once
I know this is closed, but since 10.10, I have experienced the same problem. Subsequent boots (after the first successful boot) off the USB fail everytime. There are no special steps to reproduce this bug. I have to reinstall the ISO every time I want to boot off the USB. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312709 Title: Pendrive boot disk works only once To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/312709/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 312709] Re: Pendrive boot disk works only once
But I suppose it's irrelevant now... http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=OTU3NA -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312709 Title: Pendrive boot disk works only once To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/312709/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty
*Grar*. The conservative regulator only saves power on really ancient hardware. On current hardware it *loses* you battery life. Good to know, Mr. Jenkins. I suppose this information ought to be widely proliferated, as many Linux kernel manuals (as Google readily shows), published as recently as this year, still say that Conservative is better for all battery devices, and makes no distinction between old and new hardware. At any rate, it was just an experiment, since I'd guess the main issue for most is the excessive heat. At least, most people I've talked to with this problem thought that was the most immediately noticeable change on their laptops, and discovered the decreased battery life and found out about the increased power consumption regression later. Believe it or not, Linux distributions aren't _quite_ so incompetent as to leave massive battery life/heat wins on the table for years, by not bothering to simply set an existing configuration option when running on a laptop. As far I understand what's been going on here, people are just trying to discover short-term treatments, not a cure, so to speak, while they patiently wait for a true fix from the Kernel Team. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131 Title: Power consumption raised significantly in natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/760131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty
@ Mr. Kalinowski: Yeah, sorry to go off-topic. I have no idea why the Powertop results seem so bizarre, but it looks like everyone here got high wakeup-from-idle totals. I'll just note that after testing many kernels and different patches from 2.6.34 to 2.6.39.1, the latest Maverick 2.6.35-28-generic kernel performs the best on my hardware. I have no idea why. I also installed and activated cpufrequtils, as Mr. Hessel suggested, and ran 'sudo cpufreq-set -g conservative'. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131 Title: Power consumption raised significantly in natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/760131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty
@z06gal: Thank you for the suggestion, but unfortunately, 2.6.39.1 shows little improvement on this hardware (Toshiba laptop L305-S5937, Core 2 Duo Intel processors, integrated Intel GM45, etc.). I would add, however, that I am using Kubuntu now, and have the same issue in Ubuntu. Even without compositing in each, the problem is still manifest. Here is a summary of Powertop using kernel 2.6.37 and Kwin effects: Wakeups-from-idle per second : 1122.8 interval: 15.0s no ACPI power usage estimate available Top causes for wakeups: 22.6% ( 77.1) [i915] interrupt 19.8% ( 67.5) USB device 5-1 : USB OPTICAL MOUSE (PIXART) 15.0% ( 51.0) [ehci_hcd:usb2, uhci_hcd:usb5] interrupt 5.9% ( 20.0) knotify4 5.0% ( 17.0) kworker/0:0 4.4% ( 15.0) USB device 1-4 : USB2.0-CRW (Generic) 4.2% ( 14.4) [ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb6] interrupt 3.4% ( 11.7) [ath9k] interrupt 0.1% ( 0.4)D plasma-desktop 2.8% ( 9.5) kworker/u:0 2.8% ( 9.4) [kernel scheduler] Load balancing tick Now, i915 is the top cause here, though the Load balancing tick often tops at different intervals. Disabling desktop effects doesn't change the results much. So, disabling desktop effects and reverting to the 2.6.34 kernel results in the following: Wakeups-from-idle per second : 1182.8 interval: 3.0s no ACPI power usage estimate available Top causes for wakeups: 21.1% ( 44.3) [kernel scheduler] Load balancing tick 10.5% ( 22.0) [ehci_hcd:usb2, uhci_hcd:usb5] interrupt 9.5% ( 20.0) knotify4 8.7% ( 18.3) USB device 5-1 : USB OPTICAL MOUSE (PIXART) 8.6% ( 18.0) [ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb6] interrupt 7.9% ( 16.7) USB device 1-4 : USB2.0-CRW (Generic) 4.8% ( 10.0) [kernel core] ath_ani_calibrate (ath_ani_calibrate) 4.6% ( 9.7) [ath9k] interrupt 4.3% ( 9.0) [kernel core] hrtimer_start (tick_sched_timer) 2.9% ( 6.0) [ahci] interrupt 2.1% ( 4.3) phy0 1.9% ( 4.0) [kernel core] usb_hcd_poll_rh_status (rh_timer_func) 1.9% ( 4.0) kwin 1.3% ( 2.7) [hda_intel] interrupt 1.3% ( 2.7) alsa-sink 1.3% ( 2.7) threaded-ml 1.3% ( 2.7) USB device 2-3 : My Passport 070A (Western Digital) So I found this other bug report about [kernel scheduler] Load balancing tick on Core 2 Duo. I wonder, as Mr. Hessel mentioned back in May, could this be a contributing factor? https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/linux-2.6/+bug/524281 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131 Title: Power consumption raised significantly in natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/760131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty
No, I wasn't doing anything at all with the mouse when I recorded the information from Powertop. Also, the other USB device was just an empty flash card that I left plugged in. I closed out of everything before refreshing Powertop, including all file manager windows. Perhaps not surprisingly, leaving any browser open brings the wakeups far above 2000 per second, consistently. Out of curiosity, I unplugged the flash drive and mouse, and the results are the same. i915 and Load balancing tick are, as usual, at the top of the list, but why PS/2 keyboard/mouse/touchpad (or more often USB device 1-4 : USB2.0-CRW (Generic) at about the same value) should, consistently, especially when I'm not using them, seems weird. I don't know. PowerTOP version 1.13 (C) 2007 Intel Corporation CnAvg residency P-states (frequencies) C0 (cpu running)( 1.8%) 2.17 Ghz 0.0% polling 0.0ms ( 0.0%) 1.67 Ghz 0.0% C1 mwait 10.0ms (49.0%) 1333 Mhz 0.0% C3 mwait 0.5ms (49.3%) 1000 Mhz 100.0% Wakeups-from-idle per second : 1141.2 interval: 3.0s no ACPI power usage estimate available Top causes for wakeups: 19.7% ( 33.7) [kernel scheduler] Load balancing tick 16.8% ( 28.7) [i915] interrupt 16.2% ( 27.7) PS/2 keyboard/mouse/touchpad interrupt 8.4% ( 14.3) phy0 I'll try the stuff you mentioned. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131 Title: Power consumption raised significantly in natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/760131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty
Not fixed for this laptop (a Toshiba Satellite L305-S5937, Intel GM45). It certainly runs just as hot with this patched 2.6.38-9 as it did with the stock 2.6.38, sadly, and the battery still discharges at an alarming rate. Only reverting to the 2.6.34 kernel returns this computer to normalcy so far. Reverting to 2.6.37 is not enough. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131 Title: Power consumption raised significantly in natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/760131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty
I would just remind the curious, however, that installing any vanilla kernel will render Remastersys useless, as it depends on Ubuntu kernel patches like Aufs. As such, LiveCDs made with the 2.6.39.1 kernel, for example, will not be able to boot. Since remasters are so popular in these situations, it is necessary to either wait for an official fix, or downgrade to an Ubuntu patched kernel that doesn't have the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131 Title: Power consumption raised significantly in natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 777930] Re: High power consumption and general overheat in ubuntu 11.04.
emmsarris, It is a problem with the kernel, which is why it occurs in Fedora as well - anything that uses the 2.6.38 release. It has been reported on Phoronix: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=linux_kernel_regress2num=1 This bug report is a duplicate of the link below, where all the activity to solve this problem has taken place. You should have been redirected. This is why you have not received a suitable response here. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/natty/+source/linux/+bug/760131 Essentially, the kernel team is working on a fix. Until then, for those who are still affected by this bug i recommend trying 2.6.34 from here: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.34.7-maverick/ this takes care of both major power regressions noted by michael larabel. my netbook battery (6 cell) life increased from ~3.7 hrs on mainline 2.6.38 to 6.5 hrs on 2.6.34! Others say you need only revert to kernel version 2.6.37 from Maverick. I myself am using 2.6.34 now (from the link above), and it solves the problem for me completely. Before, my Toshiba laptop burned so much I could not touch it; now it stays very cool. Thus, the power consumption regression is not present in 2.6.34. Good luck. CJ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777930 Title: High power consumption and general overheat in ubuntu 11.04. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty
I can confirm that using kernel 2.6.34, as suggested, solves the problem on my hardware. I have not tried 2.6.37 yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131 Title: Power consumption raised significantly in natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty
^ Thanks for the suggestion, nanog. @Scott: Salih wasn't ranting. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131 Title: Power consumption raised significantly in natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty
And many common laptops are still plagued by the lack of workable default fan controls, of which most newcomers are completely unaware. What a double whammy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131 Title: Power consumption raised significantly in natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 776772] Re: Fatal Error: No screens found in xorg.o.log
Hi Eric. In regard to using Classic or Unity, you can probably rule out that possibility, since I am using Kubuntu at the moment on the same Intel grpahics laptop. I still experience this show-stopping crash. I don't know if the probability of getting the error is higher when using compositing, I've experienced this problem with and without Compiz or Kwin. It's probably the same problem in both cases. I hope so, anyway. Right now, from a suggestion on another Launchpad bug report about this (I wish someone would combine them, as there are at least three separate bug reports on this) I installed the latest daily kernel from http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/ and the latest Intel Driver from Stefan Glasenhardt's ppa at https://launchpad.net/~glasen/+archive/intel-driver this morning. So far, I have not experienced an X crash, but it's only been a few hours. At least one person in another bug report said that it happens more often when he uses Chromium. I might try that. As for the network problem, I can't reproduce the crash, and it hasn't happened enough for me to know how the network behaves. All I know is that everytime it has happened (maybe five times since moving to 11.04), I lost my nework connection completely after I login, and I have to reboot. This is, I'd think, probably because of the crash, not a contributing factor. If my system crashes again, I'll try your standby suggestion. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776772 Title: Fatal Error: No screens found in xorg.o.log -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 776772] Re: Fatal Error: No screens found in xorg.o.log
Well, I can say I've been using 11.04 with the new daily kernel as well as the latest Intel drivers, and I have not yet experienced a crash, and everything seems to be working perfectly. Better than ever, in fact, since, while 10.10 didn't kick me to login, it did have major issues with plasmoids in Kubuntu, leaving graphical artifacts and such. Hope I didn't just jinx it, but for me, at least, it seems to have been the kernel and driver. If it was just one or the other, I cannot say. Good luck! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776772 Title: Fatal Error: No screens found in xorg.o.log -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 776772] Re: Fatal Error: No screens found in xorg.o.log
I'm having the exact same problem on a laptop with an Intel Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller. Random X crashes all the time with 11.04, and I cannot discern a cause. Whatever was changed in the new Update driver, it had no effect. After logging back in (after it kicks me the login screen) I can no longer connect to any network until I reboot. It's a very serious problem, as it makes 11.04 unstable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776772 Title: Fatal Error: No screens found in xorg.o.log -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773063] Re: [Natty] gnome-about-me box doesn't remember contents
Yeah, you're right. This is a pretty basic feature accessible from the default desktop. It simply should not be broken for a final release, so I don't think the importance should be Low. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773063 Title: [Natty] gnome-about-me box doesn't remember contents -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773063] Re: [Natty] gnome-about-me box doesn't remember contents
I don't understand. Why wasn't this an issue before Natty? My About Me has worked in the past whether I used Evolution or not. Also, I cannot confirm Holger63's report on this fresh Natty install. There is no Evolution folder in .local/share/, so there is nothing to delete. If I do what he says, I get an Unable to open address book error every time I open About Me, and then it still doesn't save whatever you input into it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773063 Title: [Natty] gnome-about-me box doesn't remember contents -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 525520] Re: gnome-about-me lost all information
Well, gnome-control-center 1:2.32.1 has the bug again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525520 Title: gnome-about-me lost all information -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 580300] Re: IMAP not able to fetch messages
^ Yes. That fixed it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580300 Title: IMAP not able to fetch messages -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 241736] Re: support EPUB format
For some reason, there has been marked resistance in Brainstorm for supporting the epub format for reasons I cannot discern. Epub is a very popular free and open digital book format. It makes no sense for Ubuntu not to support it by default. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241736 Title: support EPUB format -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 544962] Re: show desktop icon has white bar on its right side
Yes, this problem still regularly occurs in Maverick. It seems random; I cannot replicate it, but if you move or reload the icon it goes away. Obvious visual discrepancies like this are as puzzling as they are annoying. -- show desktop icon has white bar on its right side https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544962 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 627134] Re: Cursor position markers are not cleared from rulers
Interestingly enough, a similar problem now occurs in Xara that did not before 10.10. If you scroll in any direction, outlines of the shapes remain in place and do not refresh until you scroll back again. Perhaps there is a relationship. Someone mentioned that Rhythmbox has a similar issue. OpenOffice Drawing does not. -- Cursor position markers are not cleared from rulers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
