[Bug 1165868] Re: kazam crashed with IndexError in cb_volume2_changed(): list index out of range
** Also affects: kazam Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165868 Title: kazam crashed with IndexError in cb_volume2_changed(): list index out of range To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kazam/+bug/1165868/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1135345] Re: kazam crashed with AttributeError in setup_pipeline(): 'Screencast' object has no attribute 'videosrc'
** Also affects: kazam Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135345 Title: kazam crashed with AttributeError in setup_pipeline(): 'Screencast' object has no attribute 'videosrc' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kazam/+bug/1135345/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1094097] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGSEGV in mieqMoveToNewScreen()
Sorry Bryce, but I could not provide. I have switch some weeks ago with the affected system back to quantal, because one think I want to do was not pssible with raring. I have had known that it works with quantal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094097 Title: Xorg crashed with SIGSEGV in mieqMoveToNewScreen() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1094097/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1094097] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGSEGV in mieqMoveToNewScreen()
Could anybody else answer the question from comment #11 ? Thnaks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094097 Title: Xorg crashed with SIGSEGV in mieqMoveToNewScreen() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1094097/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1170322] [NEW] firefox is not able to zoom on a specific single website
Public bug reported: I have accessed tohe following website: http://www.bonnerbueroservice.de/ and tried to zoom in. It does not do. Neiter STRG + + nor a zoom with the capabilities from the menu - View- Zoom give a success. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: firefox 20.0+build1-0ubuntu0.12.10.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-28.47-generic 3.5.7.9 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-28-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC1: user 2166 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC0: user 2166 F pulseaudio BuildID: 20130329030352 Channel: Unavailable Date: Thu Apr 18 13:52:51 2013 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/firefox/firefox ForcedLayersAccel: False IfupdownConfig: # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8) auto lo iface lo inet loopback InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-13 (94 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) IpRoute: default via 192.168.1.1 dev wlan0 proto static 169.254.0.0/16 dev wlan0 scope link metric 1000 192.168.1.0/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.12 metric 9 MarkForUpload: True PrefSources: prefs.js [Profile]/extensions/https-everywh...@eff.org/defaults/preferences/preferences.js Profiles: Profile0 (Default) - LastVersion=20.0/20130329030352 (In use) RelatedPackageVersions: rhythmbox-mozilla 2.97-1ubuntu6.1 totem-mozilla 3.4.3-0ubuntu5 RunningIncompatibleAddons: False SourcePackage: firefox UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 04/27/2012 dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde dmi.bios.version: F.02 dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag dmi.board.name: 1885 dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.board.version: 66.11 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Chassis Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnInsyde:bvrF.02:bd04/27/2012:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHP655NotebookPC:pvr07981000521000260:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn1885:rvr66.11:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: HP 655 Notebook PC dmi.product.version: 07981000521000260 dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard ** Affects: firefox Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal running-unity ** Also affects: firefox Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1170322 Title: firefox is not able to zoom on a specific single website To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1170322/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1082109] Re: In 12.10 autodocktools doesn't start
** Tags added: quantal ** Tags added: natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082109 Title: In 12.10 autodocktools doesn't start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autodocktools/+bug/1082109/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 839691] Re: autodocktools are not able to start
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1082109 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082109 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1082109 In 12.10 autodocktools doesn't start -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839691 Title: autodocktools are not able to start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null-and-void/+bug/839691/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1025237] Re: software center is not able to find many server packages
** Tags added: precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025237 Title: software center is not able to find many server packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1025237/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1168307] Re: cannot upgrade to v13.04
In VarLogDistupgradeMainLog.txt: 2013-04-12 02:01:36,097 ERROR openCache() failed: 'E:Could not open file /var/lib/apt/lists/dl.google .com_linux_talkplugin_deb_dists_stable_main_binary-amd64_Packages - open (24: Too many open files), E:Could not open file /var/lib/apt/lists/dl.google .com_linux_chrome_deb_dists_stable_main_binary-i386_Packages - open (24: Too many open files), E:Could not open file /var/lib/apt/lists . .. .. may more of this and finally the line 2013-04-12 02:01:36,097 ERROR self.prepared() failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168307 Title: cannot upgrade to v13.04 - ERROR openCache() failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1168307/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1168307] Re: cannot upgrade to v13.04
Hi grumpycat and apologiese for this issue. It is neasty when such a deep system operation fail. I have looked into the logs the bugreporting system apport has automatically attached here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168307 Title: cannot upgrade to v13.04 - ERROR openCache() failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1168307/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1168307] Re: cannot upgrade to v13.04
I know I have seen such issue a short time ago from a other user. I will give this a search on launchpad during today. ** Summary changed: - cannot upgrade to v13.04 + cannot upgrade to v13.04 - ERROR openCache() failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168307 Title: cannot upgrade to v13.04 - ERROR openCache() failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1168307/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1168307] Re: cannot upgrade to v13.04 - ERROR openCache() failed
grumpycat, are you willing to spend some time on this for hunting down the issue? It may be take some time and may be it will be discontinious. greetings malchiaros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168307 Title: cannot upgrade to v13.04 - ERROR openCache() failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1168307/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1168307] Re: cannot upgrade to v13.04 - ERROR openCache() failed
Aha, I have found the other report. I close the older as dublicate of this here, because there was no user response. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168307 Title: cannot upgrade to v13.04 - ERROR openCache() failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1168307/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159502] Re: Not Able to upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 - cache not open
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1168307 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168307 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1168307 cannot upgrade to v13.04 - ERROR openCache() failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159502 Title: Not Able to upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 - cache not open To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1159502/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1125630] Re: kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer_Size mismatch on upgrade
In main.log 2013-02-15 01:23:56,704 ERROR IOError in cache.commit(): 'Failed to fetch http://sg.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/k/kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer/kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer_4.9.2-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb Size mismatch '. Retrying (currentTry: 0) 2013-02-15 01:23:57,280 ERROR IOError in cache.commit(): 'Failed to fetch http://sg.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/k/kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer/kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer_4.9.2-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb Size mismatch '. Retrying (currentTry: 1) 2013-02-15 01:23:57,852 ERROR IOError in cache.commit(): 'Failed to fetch http://sg.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/k/kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer/kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer_4.9.2-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb Size mismatch '. Retrying (currentTry: 2) 2013-02-15 01:23:57,853 ERROR giving up on fetching after maximum retries 2013-02-15 06:43:58,034 DEBUG enabling apt cron job 2013-02-15 06:43:58,035 DEBUG abort called -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125630 Title: kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer_Size mismatch on upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1125630/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1125630] Re: kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer_Size mismatch on upgrade
With this the upgrade-process simple fails(properly) on a missing package on a sg server or discontinious internaet connection, or server downtime, or... there are many possibilities. A workarround is to switch in software-sources to the main servers. Fromthere the dist-upgrade should work. greetings melchiaros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125630 Title: kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer_Size mismatch on upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1125630/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1099257] Re: fail to update ubuntu-one indicator
Could you disable your ppa 's and restest? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099257 Title: fail to update ubuntu-one indicator To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1099257/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1084854] Re: upgrade crashes on code 1.
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084854 Title: upgrade crashes on code 1. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1084854/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1084854] Re: upgrade crashes on code 1.
Sorry, Sanjay, but it must be always the whole files. There is no shortening allowed. ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084854 Title: upgrade crashes on code 1. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1084854/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1073739] Re: swap not mounted after upgrade to 12.10
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073739 Title: swap not mounted after upgrade to 12.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1073739/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1070684] Re: Fatal error during do-dist-upgrade 12.04 - 12.10
It is not best practice to attach the logs as archive, but acceptable. ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070684 Title: Fatal error during do-dist-upgrade 12.04 - 12.10 - cron apt-get upgrade disturbes dist-upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1070684/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1070684] Re: Fatal error during do-dist-upgrade 12.04 - 12.10
@ Jon Your suggestion is verry helpfull. I adapt the summary to your intentnion. Could you copy out the specific lines(polease keep the ammout small for readability) from the logs out here to the comments, so that I am able to follow completely. best melchiaros ** Summary changed: - Fatal error during do-dist-upgrade 12.04 - 12.10 + Fatal error during do-dist-upgrade 12.04 - 12.10 - cron apt-get upgrade disturbes dist-upgrade ** Tags added: dist-upgrade precise precise2quantal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070684 Title: Fatal error during do-dist-upgrade 12.04 - 12.10 - cron apt-get upgrade disturbes dist-upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1070684/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1070675] Re: install error kubuntu 10.12
The attachments made seems not to be from the dist-upgrade folder. But may be that is because the report is for lucid(I don't know which files are to expect fromthere). @Brian In commet '10 you seems to be satisfied with the logs Morgan has provided. In respect to this I set the status of the report back to confirmed, because it affects multiple users. ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070675 Title: install error kubuntu 10.12 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1070675/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1070675] Re: install error kubuntu 10.12
Is this report really on lucid, or is there a typo in the summary? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070675 Title: install error kubuntu 10.12 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1070675/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1168390] [NEW] requestsync crashed with PasswordSetError in save(): cancelled by username
Public bug reported: I have runned requestsync without giving acces to the gnupg keyring. On this requestsync crashed. To sign a sync request seems not really needed, becaue a launchpad token is used in parallel for identification and launchpad access. Steps to reproduce: - 1.Give to command line requestsync conservation-code -d sid -s -e 2.See a gnupg-keyring authenification popup occure. 3. Abort the authentificaiton to the keyring. 4.See the launchpad quthentification token website come up in firefox. 5, Give a unlimited authentificaiton token from launchpad 6. See the gnupg- keyring authentificaiton popup occure again. 7.Denie the access to the keyring again without providing any passphrase and use the abort button of the authentication dialog. 8. See the crash. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: ubuntu-dev-tools 0.143ubuntu0.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-28.47-generic 3.5.7.9 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-28-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 CrashCounter: 1 Date: Fri Apr 12 14:30:12 2013 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/requestsync InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-13 (88 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7 MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/requestsync conservation-code -d sid -s -e PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/requestsync', 'conservation-code', '-d', 'sid', '-s', '-e'] SourcePackage: ubuntu-dev-tools Title: requestsync crashed with PasswordSetError in save(): cancelled by username UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo vboxusers ** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-crash need-duplicate-check quantal running-unity ** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168390 Title: requestsync crashed with PasswordSetError in save(): cancelled by username To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1168390/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1031753] Re: tracker-miner-fs crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash()
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #676489 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=676489 ** Changed in: tracker Importance: Critical = Unknown ** Changed in: tracker Status: Invalid = Unknown ** Changed in: tracker Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker #687108 = GNOME Bug Tracker #676489 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031753 Title: tracker-miner-fs crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tracker/+bug/1031753/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1168404] Re: during dist upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 b2... got the errore messagge essential package 'ubuntu-minimal' can not be found anymore
Have you used a cd to do the distribuntion upgrade? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168404 Title: during dist upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 b2... got the errore messagge essential package 'ubuntu-minimal' can not be found anymore To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1168404/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1168404] Re: during dist upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 b2... got the errore messagge essential package 'ubuntu-minimal' can not be found anymore
In VarLogDistupgradeAptLog.txt there could be found: Investigating (0) linux-generic [ i386 ] 3.5.0.28.44 - 3.8.0.18.34 ( kernel ) Broken linux-generic:i386 Depends on linux-image-generic [ i386 ] 3.5.0.28.44 - 3.8.0.18.34 ( kernel ) (= 3.8.0.18.34) at the end of the log. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168404 Title: during dist upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 b2... got the errore messagge essential package 'ubuntu-minimal' can not be found anymore - affects kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1168404/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1168404] Re: during dist upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 b2... got the errore messagge essential package 'ubuntu-minimal' can not be found anymore
This corresponds with the first enty for the kernel in VarLogDistupgradeAptLog.txt: linux-headers-generic:i386 Depends on linux-headers-3.8.0-18-generic [ i386 ] none ( none ) can't be satisfied! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168404 Title: during dist upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 b2... got the errore messagge essential package 'ubuntu-minimal' can not be found anymore - affects kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1168404/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1168404] Re: during dist upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 b2... got the errore messagge essential package 'ubuntu-minimal' can not be found anymore
This corresponds further with the end that can be found in VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.txt: 2013-04-12 15:35:02,609 DEBUG openCache() 2013-04-12 15:35:02,610 DEBUG failed to SystemUnLock() (E:Not locked) 2013-04-12 15:35:09,731 DEBUG /openCache(), new cache size 41732 2013-04-12 15:35:09,731 DEBUG need_server_mode(): run in 'desktop' mode, (because of pkg 'ubuntu-desktop') 2013-04-12 15:35:13,089 DEBUG Running KeepInstalledSection rules 2013-04-12 15:35:14,371 DEBUG Kernel uname: '3.5.0-28-generic' 2013-04-12 15:35:14,433 DEBUG ./get_kernel_list.sh returns: ['linux-generic', 'linux-image-generic', 'linux-virtual', 'linux-image-virtual', 'linux-rt', 'linux-image-rt'] 2013-04-12 15:35:14,434 DEBUG linux-generic kernel already installed 2013-04-12 15:35:14,434 DEBUG Upgrading 'linux-generic' (Upgrading kernel from base-installer) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168404 Title: during dist upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 b2... got the errore messagge essential package 'ubuntu-minimal' can not be found anymore - affects kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1168404/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1168404] Re: during dist upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 b2... got the errore messagge essential package 'ubuntu-minimal' can not be found anymore
I do not know the content of the package ubuntu-minimal, but the logs show that the generic kernel is affected, which makes this here a serious thing. A adapt the summary to this. ** Summary changed: - during dist upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 b2... got the errore messagge essential package 'ubuntu-minimal' can not be found anymore + during dist upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 b2... got the errore messagge essential package 'ubuntu-minimal' can not be found anymore - affects kernel -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168404 Title: during dist upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 b2... got the errore messagge essential package 'ubuntu-minimal' can not be found anymore - affects kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1168404/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1070675] Re: install error kubuntu 10.12
So, than... ** Summary changed: - install error kubuntu 10.12 + upgrade error kubuntu 12.04 - 12.10 ** Tags added: dist-upgrade kubuntu precise precise2quantal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070675 Title: upgrade error kubuntu 12.04 - 12.10 - failed on libdrm2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1070675/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1070675] Re: upgrade error kubuntu 12.04 - 12.10
@ Morgan If we do here something that you know is not correct, please bring up a correction to us. That really helps. greetings melchiaros ** Summary changed: - upgrade error kubuntu 12.04 - 12.10 + upgrade error kubuntu 12.04 - 12.10 - failed on libdrm2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070675 Title: upgrade error kubuntu 12.04 - 12.10 - failed on libdrm2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1070675/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1168404] Re: during dist upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 b2... got the errore messagge essential package 'ubuntu-minimal' can not be found anymore - affects kernel
Thank you for the workarround. Can you provide the excatly command or commands workflow you have used. That may be helpfull to user users that might run in this issue. At best in a style that they could more or less directly copy and paste. Thank you in advance melchiaros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168404 Title: during dist upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 b2... got the errore messagge essential package 'ubuntu-minimal' can not be found anymore - affects kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1168404/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1156194] Re: update-manager still informs that Ubuntu12.10 is beta(5 month after final)
I have set to notify about every release, but I have done this through software-sources. I have done this just before running update-manager -d --- I have just hurried through a (new)vm. I have set again to notify about every new release and runned this time: update-manager you see, without the -d switch This brings up update-manger with the notification about Quantal. Using the upgrade button brings up a normal text that not point to any developmet/beta whatever not ready think. So,... it might be seen as enough. On the other hand: Do you know what the server people see if the use a pure command line system?! - AFAIR the -d switch is recommend in the wiki pages to use for server systems. To prevent: I do not watn test this(little small laptop in moment - a little bit overloaded with vm's). greetings melchiaros ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1156194 Title: update-manager still informs that Ubuntu12.10 is beta(5 month after final) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1156194/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165011] Re: Please backport concavity 0.1-2 (universe) from raring
Refering to the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports the status for the Precise backport will be set to confirmed. ** Changed in: precise-backports Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165011 Title: Please backport concavity 0.1-2 (universe) from raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1165011/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1165011] Re: Please backport concavity 0.1-2 (universe) from raring
A testinstallation of the binary and debug packages builded in pbuilder for Ubuntu12.04 is now also performed on Ubuntu12.04. A function test was also successfull. The summary of this report will be adapted to this. ** Description changed: Please backport concavity 0.1-2 (universe) from raring to quantal and precise. Reason for the backport: One of the major issues for drug development in any way is to have a clue what kind of substances could bound to a protein. For in silico prediction on this(e.g. with AutoDock) it is helpfull to reduce the protein surface to just that parts where an interaction is possible at all. This are the ligand binding sides of a protein. That is where concavity fits. It arises a precision up to 80%, which is remarkable more that other programs/algorithms archive. The most establisched ones are arround 60% precision is ligand binding side prediction. So, concavity makes a remarkable advance in this area and should be brought to those parts of the community who reside on stable release Quantal and LTS Precise. Testing: Mark off items in the checklist [X] as you test them, but please leave the checklist so that backporters can quickly evaluate the state of testing. You can test-build the backport in your PPA with backportpackage: $ backportpackage -u ppa:lp username/ppa name -s raring -d quantal concavity * quantal: [x] Package builds without modification [x] concavity installs cleanly and runs [x] concavity-dbg installs cleanly and runs *precise: [x] Package builds without notification - [] concavity installs cleanly and runs - [] concavity-dbg installs cleanly and runs + [x] concavity installs cleanly and runs + [x] concavity-dbg installs cleanly and runs No reverse dependencies -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165011 Title: Please backport concavity 0.1-2 (universe) from raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1165011/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1168423] [NEW] Please backport conservation-code 20110309.0-1 (universe) from raring
Public bug reported: Please backport conservation-code 20110309.0-1 (universe) from raring to precise, quantal. The builds run with succes, performed by backportpackage over pbuilder. The installation of the packages were done in precise and quantal over gdebi with success. A function test was performed in precise and quantal with utilisation of the score_conservation script which is in conservation_code package. The example 1 from man score_conservation runned with success. Reason for the backport: The package concavity which is bending approval for backporting to quantal and precise is signifiacant enhanced with the capabilities of conservation-code. concavity uses protein 3D information to calculate ligand binding sides, which is the first stage in in silico pharmaceutical resarch(followed by docking e.g with autodock-vina). For enhancing the precision of the ligand binding side calculations concavity needs informations about conserved chains in proteins. This calculation are done by conservation-code. Testing: * precise: [x] Package builds without modification [x] conservation-code installs cleanly and runs * quantal: [x] Package builds without modification [x] conservation-code installs cleanly and runs No reverse dependencies ** Affects: precise-backports Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Affects: quantal-backports Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: precise-backports Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: quantal-backports Status: New = Confirmed ** Description changed: Please backport conservation-code 20110309.0-1 (universe) from raring to precise, quantal. - The builds run with succes, performed by backportpackage over pbuilder. The installation of the packages were done in precise and quantal over gdebi with success. A functio test was performed in precise and quantal with utilisation of the score_conservation script which is in conservation_code package. The example 1 from + The builds run with succes, performed by backportpackage over pbuilder. The installation of the packages were done in precise and quantal over gdebi with success. A function test was performed in precise and quantal with utilisation of the score_conservation script which is in conservation_code package. The example 1 from man score_conservation runned with success. - Reason for the backport: The package concavity which is bending approval for backporting to quantal and precise is signifiacant enhanced with the capabilities of conservation-code. - concavity uses protein 3D information to calculate ligand binding sides, which is the first stage in in silico pharmaceutical resarch(followed by docking e.g with autodock-vina). - For enhancing the precision of the ligand binding side calculations concavity needs informations about conserved chains in proteins. This calculation are done by conservation-code. + concavity uses protein 3D information to calculate ligand binding sides, which is the first stage in in silico pharmaceutical resarch(followed by docking e.g with autodock-vina). + For enhancing the precision of the ligand binding side calculations concavity needs informations about conserved chains in proteins. This calculation are done by conservation-code. Testing: * precise: [x] Package builds without modification [x] conservation-code installs cleanly and runs * quantal: [x] Package builds without modification [x] conservation-code installs cleanly and runs No reverse dependencies -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168423 Title: Please backport conservation-code 20110309.0-1 (universe) from raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1168423/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1168423] Re: Please backport conservation-code 20110309.0-1 (universe) from raring
The backport request for concavity can be found here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantal-backports/+bug/1165011 The debian alioth (tasks) point on the enhancement connection between concavity and conservation-code. The manpages of concavity point also to this. My own experiments gives this too. Let us belive. melchiaros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168423 Title: Please backport conservation-code 20110309.0-1 (universe) from raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1168423/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1119581] Re: display divided into 1 - 2 - 3 and showing as 3 - 2- 1
Pava, would you please give a good description as requested in comment #2 The status will not change until you have done this. And there will be no handling without the information requested. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1119581 Title: display divided into 1 - 2 - 3 and showing as 3 - 2- 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1119581/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1094914] Re: nautilus is not able to change owner of a selection of files
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 123684 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123684 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 123684 can't change owner of multiple files in nautilus -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094914 Title: nautilus is not able to change owner of a selection of files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/1094914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123684] Re: can't change owner of multiple files in nautilus
Still actual for raring. ** Tags added: amd64 raring ** Tags added: hardy ** Tags added: karmic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123684 Title: can't change owner of multiple files in nautilus To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/123684/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165011] Re: Please backport concavity 0.1-2 (universe) from raring
I have figured out how to handle with backporting script and pbuilder. The build for quantal and precise run with success to the end. The binary packages for Quantal and Precise are now there, and also the -dbg packages for Quantal and Precise. A testinstallation on Quantal is already performed and Precise is pendig, but should be tested until the evening. I adapt the bug desription to this. ** Description changed: Please backport concavity 0.1-2 (universe) from raring to quantal and precise. Reason for the backport: One of the major issues for drug development in any way is to have a clue what kind of substances could bound to a protein. For in silico prediction on this(e.g. with AutoDock) it is helpfull to reduce the protein surface to just that parts where an interaction is possible at all. This are the ligand binding sides of a protein. That is where concavity fits. It arises a precision up to 80%, which is remarkable more that other programs/algorithms archive. The most establisched ones are arround 60% precision is ligand binding side prediction. So, concavity makes a remarkable advance in this area and should be brought to those parts of the community who reside on stable release Quantal and LTS Precise. Testing: Mark off items in the checklist [X] as you test them, but please leave the checklist so that backporters can quickly evaluate the state of testing. You can test-build the backport in your PPA with backportpackage: $ backportpackage -u ppa:lp username/ppa name -s raring -d quantal concavity * quantal: [x] Package builds without modification [x] concavity installs cleanly and runs - [ ] concavity-dbg installs cleanly and runs + [x] concavity-dbg installs cleanly and runs *precise: [x] Package builds without notification - [x] concavity installs cleanly and runs - [] concavity-dbg installs cleanly and runs + [] concavity installs cleanly and runs + [] concavity-dbg installs cleanly and runs No reverse dependencies - - - Additional: - - This here is not done in the common way. - - I am a little bit overwhelmed by the possibilities of backporting script - and pbuild. - - I have done both builds in quantal and precise in pbuild and both - running with success. At the end is a signing error, but that was to - expect, because I have not provided any key for signing(Sorry, but to - get this all on at the same time is behond my skills). - - The testinstallation of concavity in quantal and precise was also not - performed fully correct. I have just done an installation of the - original raring package trough gdebi. - - Both insatllations are working for the examples in the manpage of - concavity and produces valid results(.pdb files which are able to be - visualized in Jmol or RasMol). - - - Soory, for the figuring arround, but in near futhur I am not able to provide better. ** Changed in: precise-backports Status: Confirmed = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165011 Title: Please backport concavity 0.1-2 (universe) from raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1165011/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1166048] Re: update error
In VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.txt: ERROR:root:failed to mark 'ubuntu-desktop' for install (E:Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.) ERROR:root:Dist-upgrade failed: 'The package 'ubuntu-release-upgrader-gtk' is marked for rem ** Summary changed: - update error + dist-upgrade12.10 - 13.04 failed on ubuntu-desktop package ** Summary changed: - dist-upgrade12.10 - 13.04 failed on ubuntu-desktop package + dist-upgrade12.10 - 13.04 failed on ubuntu-desktop, and ubuntu-release-upgrader package itself -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166048 Title: dist-upgrade12.10 - 13.04 failed on ubuntu-desktop, and ubuntu- release-upgrader package itself To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1166048/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1166048] Re: dist-upgrade12.10 - 13.04 failed on ubuntu-desktop, and ubuntu-release-upgrader package itself
This here happends with ubuntu-release-upgrader 1:0.190.5. Actual in quantal-updates is 1:0.190.6 , but refering to the changelog ubuntu-release-upgrader (1:0.190.6) quantal-proposed; urgency=low * Fix a couple path joins and bugs that prevented check-new-release-gtk from working. (LP: #1094777) -- Michael Terry mte...@ubuntu.com Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:21:27 -0500 this should have no effect here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166048 Title: dist-upgrade12.10 - 13.04 failed on ubuntu-desktop, and ubuntu- release-upgrader package itself To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1166048/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1166048] Re: dist-upgrade12.10 - 13.04 failed on ubuntu-desktop, and ubuntu-release-upgrader package itself
A retest with ubuntu-release-upgrader 1:0.190.6 should be obsolote with refering to the changelog entry. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166048 Title: dist-upgrade12.10 - 13.04 failed on ubuntu-desktop, and ubuntu- release-upgrader package itself To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1166048/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1166048] Re: dist-upgrade12.10 - 13.04 failed on ubuntu-desktop, and ubuntu-release-upgrader package itself
@Sanan As I have shown above it is not neccesary to do, but well, it could be helpul. Havwe you time to upgrade your system to the latest ubuntu-release upgrader a retest? If you want: Please enable the proposed repositories and run from command lilne sudo apt-cache update and after this sudo apt-get dist-upgrade With this you will have for sure the latest packages for Quantal. After this start your system new(recommend, because of kernel upgrades) and than retry with the distribution upgrade. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166048 Title: dist-upgrade12.10 - 13.04 failed on ubuntu-desktop, and ubuntu- release-upgrader package itself To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1166048/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1166048] Re: dist-upgrade12.10 - 13.04 failed on ubuntu-desktop, and ubuntu-release-upgrader package itself
I let the status of the report to new. Expanation above. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166048 Title: dist-upgrade12.10 - 13.04 failed on ubuntu-desktop, and ubuntu- release-upgrader package itself To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1166048/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1166346] Re: do-release-upgrade 12.04 to 12.10 gives fatal error
@fisharebest Hi, thank you for reporting. One hint to accelerate a handling: It ishelpfull to set the status of the report back from incomplete if a requested information is provided. Oh, well, let me do it for you this time. greetings melchiaros ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166346 Title: do-release-upgrade 12.04 to 12.10 gives fatal error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1166346/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1164955] [NEW] backportpackage crashed with IOError in _download_file(): [Errno 2] No such file or directory: u'/home/user/Downloads/concavity_0.1.orig.tar.xz'
Public bug reported: I have called from terminal: :~/Downloads$ backportpackage -b -s raring -d quantal -w . concavity_0.1-2.dsc As can be seen the actual directory is /home/user/Downloads/ The concavity_0.1-2.dsc file from Raring is stored there. After this the following stacktrace occures: :~/Downloads$ backportpackage -b -s raring -d quantal -w . concavity_0.1-2.dsc backportpackage: Downloading concavity_0.1.orig.tar.xz from None (0.307 MiB) Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/backportpackage, line 399, in module sys.exit(main(sys.argv)) File /usr/bin/backportpackage, line 377, in main pkg.pull() File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ubuntutools/archive.py, line 362, in pull if self._download_file(url, name): File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ubuntutools/archive.py, line 322, in _download_file in_ = open(parsed.path, 'r') IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: u'/home/user/Downloads/concavity_0.1.orig.tar.xz' -- This is one of my first experiments with the backportpackage script. So, may be it is a case of user misbehaviour. - Steps to reproduce: 1. Downlaod http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/c/concavity/concavity_0.1-2.dsc into your download folder 2. Call a terminal 3. Use the command cd Downloads 4. Use the command backportpackage -b -s raring -d quantal -w . concavity_0.1-2.dsc 5.See the crash --- Additional: The are two points I want to bring attention on: backportpackage is a bit unhappy(with other command) if a package resides in Universe and not in main security restricted proposed. This may be one cause. The second is a special in the .dsc file: concavity_0.1.orig.tar.xz from None (0.307 MiB) the number 0.1 for concavity is obfuscating me a little bit. The version number is more 0.1-2. Just this two hints. May be it is one of them(I just digging a bit). ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: ubuntu-dev-tools 0.143ubuntu0.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-27.46-generic 3.5.7.7 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-27-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Apr 5 13:26:16 2013 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/backportpackage ExecutableTimestamp: 1352840357 InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-13 (81 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7 MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/backportpackage -b -s raring -d quantal -w . concavity_0.1-2.dsc ProcCwd: /home/user/Downloads ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/backportpackage', '-b', '-s', 'raring', '-d', 'quantal', '-w', '.', 'concavity_0.1-2.dsc'] SourcePackage: ubuntu-dev-tools Title: backportpackage crashed with IOError in _download_file(): [Errno 2] No such file or directory: u'/home/user/Downloads/concavity_0.1.orig.tar.xz' UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo ** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-crash need-duplicate-check quantal running-unity ** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1164955 Title: backportpackage crashed with IOError in _download_file(): [Errno 2] No such file or directory: u'/home/user/Downloads/concavity_0.1.orig.tar.xz' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1164955/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1164300] Re: Fix a couple path joins and bugs that prevented check-new-release-gtk from working. (LP: #1094777)
Hi Satya, Sampo is unfortunately absolut correct. You have choosen old style reporting. The past has shown that this makes a lot of work to both sides. Yours and developers. Your system is logging the errors for distribution upgrades automatically. We need them here. Please call a terminal and run: apport-collect 1164300 If it ask for additional libraries than please install them. Thnak you in advance melchiaros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1164300 Title: Fix a couple path joins and bugs that prevented check-new-release-gtk from working. (LP: #1094777) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1164300/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165011] [NEW] Please backport concavity 0.1-2 (universe) from raring
Public bug reported: Please backport concavity 0.1-2 (universe) from raring to quantal and precise. Reason for the backport: One of the major issues for drug development in any way is to have a clue what kind of substances could bound to a protein. For in silico prediction on this(e.g. with AutoDock) it is helpfull to reduce the protein surface to just that parts where an interaction is possible at all. This are the ligand binding sides of a protein. That is where concavity fits. It arises a precision up to 80%, which is remarkable more that other programs/algorithms archive. The most establisched ones are arround 60% precision is ligand binding side prediction. So, concavity makes a remarkable advance in this area and should be brought to those parts of the community who reside on stable release Quantal and LTS Precise. Testing: Mark off items in the checklist [X] as you test them, but please leave the checklist so that backporters can quickly evaluate the state of testing. You can test-build the backport in your PPA with backportpackage: $ backportpackage -u ppa:lp username/ppa name -s raring -d quantal concavity * quantal: [x] Package builds without modification [x] concavity installs cleanly and runs [ ] concavity-dbg installs cleanly and runs *precise: [x] Package builds without notification [x] concavity installs cleanly and runs [] concavity-dbg installs cleanly and runs No reverse dependencies Additional: This here is not done in the common way. I am a little bit overwhelmed by the possibilities of backporting script and pbuild. I have done both builds in quantal and precise in pbuild and both running with success. At the end is a signing error, but that was to expect, because I have not provided any key for signing(Sorry, but to get this all on at the same time is behond my skills). The testinstallation of concavity in quantal and precise was also not performed fully correct. I have just done an installation of the original raring package trough gdebi. Both insatllations are working for the examples in the manpage of concavity and produces valid results(.pdb files which are able to be visualized in Jmol or RasMol). Soory, for the figuring arround, but in near futhur I am not able to provide better. ** Affects: precise-backports Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Affects: quantal-backports Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to Quantal Backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165011 Title: Please backport concavity 0.1-2 (universe) from raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1165011/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1165011] Re: Please backport concavity 0.1-2 (universe) from raring
** Also affects: precise-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: precise-backports Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: quantal-backports Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165011 Title: Please backport concavity 0.1-2 (universe) from raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1165011/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 1098732] Re: menu-cached crashed with SIGSEGV in malloc()
In respect that b00507031 has used a pure Lubuntu, the crash is definitivly not caused by the Unity desktop system in any way. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098732 Title: menu-cached crashed with SIGSEGV in malloc() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lxde/+bug/1098732/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1098732] Re: menu-cached crashed with SIGSEGV in malloc()
It is a little bit evil behave, but for those who comes new here, it might help more to get to the upstream report at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=3603920group_id=180858atid=894869 and give it a ping or +1 or whatever. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098732 Title: menu-cached crashed with SIGSEGV in malloc() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lxde/+bug/1098732/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159492] Re: science PDB file is not processed correctly after extraction
** Also affects: file-roller Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Project changed: file-roller = rasmol (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: rasmol Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Project changed: rasmol = jmol (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159492 Title: science PDB file is not processed correctly after extraction To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1159492/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930598] Re: rasmol-classic command crashes, only gtk version works, is impossibile to use in a real scientific contest
Reproduced with Ubuntu12.10. Setting the status of the report to confirmed. ** Changed in: rasmol (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Tags added: amd64 quantal ** Tags added: natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930598 Title: rasmol-classic command crashes, only gtk version works, is impossibile to use in a real scientific contest To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rasmol/+bug/930598/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159502] Re: Not Able to upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04
Hi Op4Mox, I have just looked into the logs. There is documented an error in VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.txt: 2013-03-24 21:32:42,333 ERROR openCache() failed: 'E:Tiedostoa /var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_quantal- backports_multiverse_binary-amd64_Packages ei voitu avata - . .. ... and so on -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159502 Title: Not Able to upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1159502/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159502] Re: Not Able to upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04
Sorry Joeri, there is no cause to set the status of the report to incomplete. When there are reasons it is common to write them down, for the next who comes here. ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159502 Title: Not Able to upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1159502/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159502] Re: Not Able to upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04
This closes with: 2013-03-24 21:32:42,333 ERROR self.prepared() failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159502 Title: Not Able to upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1159502/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159502] Re: Not Able to upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04
So, this could be caused by a other application with apt access that runs at the same time(like automatik security packages installation, update packes list through update-manager, a other terminal with a running apt task, something more) Could you agree with this? If the written above is correct, than y simple retest would make sense here. It is unlikely that a second time a second apt process is runnig while you start the relase upgrade. I give it a 99% that it works on a retest. In meantime I set this back to incomplete. If you have done, please set the status back to new. Thank you so far and sorry for the unconvinience. melchiaros ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Summary changed: - Not Able to upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 + Not Able to upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 - cache not open -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159502 Title: Not Able to upgrade from 12.10 to 13.04 - cache not open To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1159502/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1155648] Re: update to 12-10 crashes
o.K here. You have clearly a traceback of the ubuntu-release upgrader. And a following one of appor(the crash reporter itself). Whuu, a double one. ** Summary changed: - update to 12-10 crashes + update to 12-10 crashes- File /tmp/update-manager-9JqPjZ/quantal, line 10, in module -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155648 Title: update to 12-10 crashes- File /tmp/update-manager-9JqPjZ/quantal, line 10, in module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1155648/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1155648] Re: update to 12-10 crashes- File /tmp/update-manager-9JqPjZ/quantal, line 10, in module
I set this back to new for now, bnecause Pierre has provided the logs. ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155648 Title: update to 12-10 crashes- File /tmp/update-manager-9JqPjZ/quantal, line 10, in module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1155648/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1155648] Re: update to 12-10 crashes- File /tmp/update-manager-9JqPjZ/quantal, line 10, in module
Pierre, I know time is low, but could you attach from your archive the apt and the main log seperately? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155648 Title: update to 12-10 crashes- File /tmp/update-manager-9JqPjZ/quantal, line 10, in module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1155648/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1155648] Re: update to 12-10 crashes- File /tmp/update-manager-9JqPjZ/quantal, line 10, in module
The apt_clone file is in the tar.gz archive, if someone whant to play arround. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155648 Title: update to 12-10 crashes- File /tmp/update-manager-9JqPjZ/quantal, line 10, in module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1155648/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1155648] Re: update to 12-10 crashes- File /tmp/update-manager-9JqPjZ/quantal, line 10, in module
(smile) o.K my fault. Ment was without compressing. But it is o.K like it is. Let it in this style. A little bit more clicking for those who whant to handle(I am only on preparation). Thank you for bear on this. melchiaros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155648 Title: update to 12-10 crashes- File /tmp/update-manager-9JqPjZ/quantal, line 10, in module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1155648/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1155648] Re: update to 12-10 crashes- File /tmp/update-manager-9JqPjZ/quantal, line 10, in module
Jup, clearly in the main log: Traceback (most recent call last): File /tmp/update-manager-9JqPjZ/quantal, line 10, in module File /tmp/update-manager-9JqPjZ/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeMain.py, line 240, in main File /tmp/update-manager- 9JqPjZ/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeController.py, line 1764, in run File /tmp/update-manager- 9JqPjZ/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeController.py, line 1681, in fullUpgrade File /tmp/update-manager- 9JqPjZ/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeController.py, line 207, in openCache -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155648 Title: update to 12-10 crashes- File /tmp/update-manager-9JqPjZ/quantal, line 10, in module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1155648/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1155648] Re: update to 12-10 crashes- File /tmp/update-manager-9JqPjZ/quantal, line 10, in module
Interestingly there is just before a problem to lock the cache: 2013-03-15 10:45:24,464 DEBUG openCache() 2013-03-15 10:45:24,464 DEBUG failed to SystemUnLock() (E:Not locked) 2013-03-15 10:45:35,026 DEBUG failed to lock the cache, retrying (1) 2013-03-15 10:45:44,726 DEBUG failed to lock the cache, retrying (2) . .. ... and so on. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155648 Title: update to 12-10 crashes- File /tmp/update-manager-9JqPjZ/quantal, line 10, in module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1155648/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1155648] Re: update to 12-10 crashes- File /tmp/update-manager-9JqPjZ/quantal, line 10, in module
I have seen just something similiar here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release- upgrader/+bug/1159502 , but this is on quantal to raring and without stacktrace. ** Tags added: dist-upgrade precise precise2quantal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155648 Title: update to 12-10 crashes- File /tmp/update-manager-9JqPjZ/quantal, line 10, in module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1155648/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 915228] Re: rasmol.32 crashed with SIGSEGV in XCopyArea()
Seen on quantal. I add the tag for. ** Tags added: quantal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915228 Title: rasmol.32 crashed with SIGSEGV in XCopyArea() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rasmol/+bug/915228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 914919] Re: rasmol.32 crashed with SIGSEGV in XCopyArea()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915228 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 915228 rasmol.32 crashed with SIGSEGV in XCopyArea() -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914919 Title: rasmol.32 crashed with SIGSEGV in XCopyArea() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rasmol/+bug/914919/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1162850] [NEW] rasmol-gtk crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
Public bug reported: Afer loading a .pdb file in RasMol a print attemped failed with this crash. The affected .pdb file will be attached. Steps to reproduce: 1.Open the .pdb file with RasMol gtk 2.Use the menu point File-Print 3.See the crash. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: rasmol 2.7.5.2-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-27.46-generic 3.5.7.7 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-27-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Apr 1 17:12:59 2013 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/rasmol-gtk ExecutableTimestamp: 1349103392 InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-13 (78 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MarkForUpload: True ProcCmdline: rasmol-gtk /tmp/mustang/1sp1.pdb ProcCwd: /home/user ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash Signal: 6 SourcePackage: rasmol StacktraceTop: raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 g_assertion_message () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 g_assertion_message_expr () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 ?? () Title: rasmol-gtk crashed with SIGABRT in raise() UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo ** Affects: rasmol (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-crash need-amd64-retrace quantal running-unity ** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162850 Title: rasmol-gtk crashed with SIGABRT in raise() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rasmol/+bug/1162850/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1162850] Re: rasmol-gtk crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
** Attachment added: 1sp1.pdb https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rasmol/+bug/1162850/+attachment/3612134/+files/1sp1.pdb -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162850 Title: rasmol-gtk crashed with SIGABRT in raise() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rasmol/+bug/1162850/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 915228] Re: rasmol.32 crashed with SIGSEGV in XCopyArea()
This also happends with the gtk version ** Also affects: rasmol Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915228 Title: rasmol.32 crashed with SIGSEGV in XCopyArea() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/rasmol/+bug/915228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 915228] Re: rasmol.32 crashed with SIGSEGV in XCopyArea()
The upstream report could be found at: https://sourceforge.net/p/openrasmol/bugs/10/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915228 Title: rasmol.32 crashed with SIGSEGV in XCopyArea() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/rasmol/+bug/915228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 915228] Re: rasmol.32 crashed with SIGSEGV in XCopyArea()
hjd, may be it makes sense to leafe a comment on the upstream tracker. You know more noise generate sometimes more attention(not the nice style). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915228 Title: rasmol.32 crashed with SIGSEGV in XCopyArea() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/rasmol/+bug/915228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 975887] Re: gschem initial start brings on malformed information window
Than please use the also affects me button in the left upper corner. Also check on which Ubuntu version you are. If it is quantal please at this tag. If it is raring do the same. If you also on precise, do nothing on the tags. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975887 Title: gschem initial start brings on malformed information window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/975887/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1089041] Re: package emacsen-common 2.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück
Encounter this problem on dist-upgrade from Ubuntu12.04 to Ubuntu 12.10. Tags for this will be added. and logs attached. ** Tags added: dist-upgrade precise2quantal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089041 Title: package emacsen-common 2.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacsen-common/+bug/1089041/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1089041] Re: package emacsen-common 2.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück
** Attachment added: apt.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacsen-common/+bug/1089041/+attachment/3593705/+files/apt.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089041 Title: package emacsen-common 2.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacsen-common/+bug/1089041/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1089041] Re: package emacsen-common 2.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück
** Attachment added: apt-term.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacsen-common/+bug/1089041/+attachment/3593707/+files/apt-term.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089041 Title: package emacsen-common 2.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacsen-common/+bug/1089041/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1089041] Re: package emacsen-common 2.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück
** Attachment added: history.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacsen-common/+bug/1089041/+attachment/3593714/+files/history.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089041 Title: package emacsen-common 2.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacsen-common/+bug/1089041/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1089041] Re: package emacsen-common 2.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück
** Attachment added: lspci.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacsen-common/+bug/1089041/+attachment/3593715/+files/lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089041 Title: package emacsen-common 2.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacsen-common/+bug/1089041/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1089041] Re: package emacsen-common 2.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück
** Attachment added: main.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacsen-common/+bug/1089041/+attachment/3593716/+files/main.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089041 Title: package emacsen-common 2.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacsen-common/+bug/1089041/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1089041] Re: package emacsen-common 2.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück
** Attachment added: apt-clone_system_state.tar.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacsen-common/+bug/1089041/+attachment/3593717/+files/apt-clone_system_state.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089041 Title: package emacsen-common 2.0.3 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacsen-common/+bug/1089041/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1069733] Re: Release upgrade 12.10 - kubuntu-netbook could not be installed - Unicode error u'\xbb'
With respect to the circumstances that 3 people has encounterd the problem and that we have a stacktrace I set this to confirmed. ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069733 Title: Release upgrade 12.10 - kubuntu-netbook could not be installed - Unicode error u'\xbb' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1069733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1069733] Re: Release upgrade 12.10 - kubuntu-netbook could not be installed
In apt.log there is a traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/__init__.py, line 846, in emit msg = self.format(record) File /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/__init__.py, line 723, in format return fmt.format(record) File /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/__init__.py, line 464, in format record.message = record.getMessage() File /usr/lib/python2.7/logging/__init__.py, line 328, in getMessage msg = msg % self.args UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\xbb' in position 10: ordinal not in range(128) Logged from file DistUpgradeCache.py, line 715 ** Tags added: dist-upgrade precise precise2quantal ** Summary changed: - Release upgrade 12.10 - kubuntu-netbook could not be installed + Release upgrade 12.10 - kubuntu-netbook could not be installed - Unicode error u'\xbb' -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069733 Title: Release upgrade 12.10 - kubuntu-netbook could not be installed - Unicode error u'\xbb' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1069733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159492] Re: science PDB file is not processed correctly after extraction
** Attachment added: the affected archiv https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1159492/+attachment/3594390/+files/pdb163d.ent.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159492 Title: science PDB file is not processed correctly after extraction To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1159492/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159492] [NEW] science PDB file is not processed correctly after extraction
Public bug reported: The affected archiv will be attached. When I open the archiv pdb163d.ent.gz with file roller, I get the compressed file shown in file-roller GUI, When I open it within the file-roller GUI with rasmol or jmol all works correct and the protein structure is shown. So, far so good. When I extract the compressed file to the filesystem, close file-roller, because it is no longer needed. When I ttry then to open the file pdb163d.ent with rasmol or jmol it is not possible. The file is not anymore a appopriate format for those programs. Steps to reproduce: 1.Install rasmol and jmol (oneof them may be enough) 2.Donwlaod the file pdb163d.ent.gz from here, 3.Extract the file to the filesytem with file-roller 4.Try to open the file with right mouse click - open with... - choose rasmol or jmol as your choice 5.See only a black visualisation or in jmol an error message(file not found exception) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: file-roller 3.6.1.1-0ubuntu1.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-27.45-generic 3.5.7.7 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-27-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Mar 24 19:33:18 2013 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/file-roller InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-13 (70 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MarkForUpload: True ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no username) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: file-roller UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159492 Title: science PDB file is not processed correctly after extraction To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1159492/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1069133] Re: Get upgrade error 12.04 - 12.10 Could not determine upgrade - xorg from ppa
o.K this was just for information. I see this not as essential to handle this report. ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069133 Title: Get upgrade error 12.04 - 12.10 Could not determine upgrade - xorg from ppa To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1069133/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1068297] Re: error when upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10
Yes, I know. It was not to expect that you still have the logs. But I have had to ask. Sorry, but bug triaging is mostly community driven(I am not paied by canonical), so the delays are more often huge than it is good for the distribution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068297 Title: error when upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1068297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1068297] Re: error when upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10
Anyway, that above where the standard questions. I would like to invest some of my time to investigate this a bit further. Can you try to help me. What have you done with your system. Are there some specific Software that you have installed that you expect not to much other users have too. So some hints would be enough. greetings melchiaros (Sorry, when I have blamed you) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068297 Title: error when upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1068297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1078653] Re: upgrade Ubuntu 12.04 - 12.10 has several problems: grub-pc, apport, older linux versions
** Tags added: dist-upgrade precise precise2quantal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078653 Title: upgrade Ubuntu 12.04 - 12.10 has several problems: grub-pc, apport, older linux versions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1078653/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
What we have learned so far on ubuntu-release upgrader hugday
We have done the hugday on ubuntu-release-upgrader yesterday and there are still tickets open, especially for the triaging step - so you can still come up, e.g with recreation with apt-clone.tar.gz in a VM: http://linuxundich.de/de/ubuntu/mit-apt-clone-die-installation-eines-rechners-auf-andere-ubertragen/ (Sorry, the website is written in german; please use e.g chromium translation popup on entering the website) ). The question arises: What we have seen from the bunch of reports there so far? I start this with one of my observations. A good part of the problems are caused by ppa's that users have nincorporated in their system. Especially the logs shown often to me xorg problems. They have ppa's integrated that provides xorg components for resolving their graphical problems that they have with xorg from the main repositorie. So far we could not say that they do nonsense to their system. Dysfunctional graphics are good reasons for incroporationg not official software. The problem is that the ubuntu-release-upgrader is able to disable ppa's from source.list, but not able to handle the xorg move back to main with success. This makes the upgrade process failing. Is the user the problem? Likely not. I have seen a comment from Sampo555 that points to the policy to deactivate xorg ppa's before upgrading(thank you that you give the people a workarround Sampo). Let us switch for the moment the perspective to that of a user(not anymore a newbie, but also not down to the shoulders in Ubuntu). - S/he could not see that policy from the front of the computer. The only thing what they see is that without ppa the graphic is a mess. I have read cases on Ubuntu question section where the graphical system was completely not useable. It would affect a good part of the release upgrade problems (may be arround 20%-30%- just a guess on what I have seen in the logs) when it would be possible to teach ubuntu-release-upgrader to handle this. What do you think about? greetings melchiaros -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
[Bug 1106081] Re: TypeError from do-release-upgrade when LANG=C
Hi Martin, In VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.txt you have a woanderfull stacktrace: Traceback (most recent call last): File /tmp/ubuntu-release-upgrader-406zz2/raring, line 10, in module sys.exit(main()) File /tmp/ubuntu-release-upgrader-406zz2/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeMain.py, line 240, in main if app.run(): File /tmp/ubuntu-release-upgrader-406zz2/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeController.py, line 1769, in run return self.fullUpgrade() File /tmp/ubuntu-release-upgrader-406zz2/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeController.py, line 1668, in fullUpgrade if not self.updateSourcesList(): File /tmp/ubuntu-release-upgrader-406zz2/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeController.py, line 818, in updateSourcesList _(Some third party entries in your sources.list File /tmp/ubuntu-release-upgrader-406zz2/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeViewText.py, line 138, in information sys.stdin.readline().decode(ENCODING, backslashreplace) TypeError: decode() argument 1 must be string, not None ** Tags added: quantal2raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1106081 Title: TypeError from do-release-upgrade when LANG=C To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1106081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1106081] Re: TypeError from do-release-upgrade when LANG=C
This is properly caused by _(Some third party entries in your sources.list and with this it imay be http://ppa.launchpad.net/hrw/my-own-packages/ubuntu your own ppa that makes trouble. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1106081 Title: TypeError from do-release-upgrade when LANG=C To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1106081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1106081] Re: TypeError from do-release-upgrade when LANG=C
We are glad over every hint what could be improved. Can you provide a good algorithmic description, that is complete and can guide a beginner to the point where the problem happends. (step1, step2, . . . finished) After that set the status of this report back to new. Thanks ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1106081 Title: TypeError from do-release-upgrade when LANG=C To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1106081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1068297] Re: error when upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10
Hi turul69, that are bad news. The ubuntu-release-upgrader should be one of the most reliable programs we have here. Sorry, for the inconvenience. Could you help us on further handling here. I am a bit in doubt that this report is on the correct package. ubuntu-release-upgrader is first indroduced with Ubuntu12.04. Before that it was just the update-manager that must do all the job. I changed the package for this. ** Package changed: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) = update-manager (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068297 Title: error when upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1068297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1068297] Re: error when upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10
Mhh, yes we need some logs here. Can you provide? You may want to run apport-collect 1068297 from termianl(if there are any missed libraries for the process, please install them). There should also be a folder /var/log/dist-upgrade could you compress that folder and attach it here? In fact that folder might be more important than the apoort procedure. You might be forced to call gksu nautilus because the folder is owned by root(may be also the same for firefox to upload). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068297 Title: error when upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1068297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1068297] Re: error when upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10
One more step it is there I have to request. Please give a step by step description like pushing this button, choosing that, waiting for, and so on). Give a good algorithmic description, that is complete and can guide a beginner. (step1, step2, . . . finished) After that set the status of this report back to new. Thanks ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068297 Title: error when upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1068297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1069133] Re: Get upgrade error 12.04 - 12.10 Could not determine upgrade
Hi npp, we have today a hugday and we go to all ubuntu-release-upgrader bugreports we have on launchpad. Can you give us a answer if the workarround to switch off the ppa for xorg files is working(see the comments above)? We need that info to decide what further on this problem. ** Summary changed: - Get upgrade error 12.04 - 12.10 Could not determine upgrade + Get upgrade error 12.04 - 12.10 Could not determine upgrade - xorg from ppa -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069133 Title: Get upgrade error 12.04 - 12.10 Could not determine upgrade - xorg from ppa To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1069133/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
