[Bug 1152788] [NEW] CVE-2013-1792
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: There is a race condition in install_user_keyrings() routine, leading to a NULL pointer dereference. It occurs during parallel invocation of the install_user_keyrings lookup_user_key routines, for the same user, if `uid' and `uid-session' keyrings are not yet created. An unprivileged user could use this flaw to crash the system, resulting in DoS. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: New ** Affects: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: New ** Affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: New ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Medium Status: New ** Affects: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Medium Status: New ** Affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Medium Status: New ** Affects: linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Medium Status: New ** Affects: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Medium Status: New ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Medium Status: New ** Affects: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Medium Status: New ** Affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Medium Status: New ** Affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Medium Status: New ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Medium Status: New ** Affects: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Medium Status: New ** Affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Medium Status: Invalid
[Bug 1152788] Re: CVE-2013-1792
CVE-2013-1792 ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Raring) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Raring) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Raring) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Raring) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Raring) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Raring) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Raring) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Raring) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Raring) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Quantal) Status:
[Bug 1145560] Re: OpenAFS Security Advisories 2013-001 and 2013-002
Thanks for your patches! Unfortunately, I can't process them at this time due to the following: - the quantal debdiff patches the files inline which it is a source format v3 (quilt) package. When redoing this patch, be sure to include DEP-3 comments (the information that would have been in these is missing from debian/changelog) - the quantal debdiff does not use the correct version. It should be 1.6.1-2ubuntu2.1 - the quantal debdiff does not use the format as prescribed by https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Packaging - the precise debdiff is based on a package in precise-proposed. This should be based on what is currently in -security or -updates (see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Packaging) - the precise debdiff patches debian/patches/debian-changes. This is a source format v3 (quilt) package so the security updates should be in their own patches. When redoing this patch, be sure to include DEP-3 comments (the information that would have been in these is missing from debian/changelog) - the precise debdiff has the wrong version-- it should have been 1.6.1-1ubuntu0.2 with precise-proposed as 1.6.1-1ubuntu0.1, but precise-proposed' version of 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.1 was mistakenly accepted. Unfortunately, if we are basing on the precise-proposed package, we have to use 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2 - the precise debdiff does not use the format as prescribed by https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Packaging - the precise debdiff is based on a package in precise-proposed. This should be based on what is currently in -security or -updates (see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Packaging) - the oneiric debdiff patches debian/patches/debian-changes. This is a source format v3 (quilt) package so the security updates should be in their own patches. When redoing this patch, be sure to include DEP-3 comments (the information that would have been in these is missing from debian/changelog) - the oneiric debdiff has the wrong version-- it should be 1.6.0-1ubuntu0.1 - the oneiric debdiff does not use the format as prescribed by https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Packaging The Lucid package is patchless, so the inline patches are fine. The debdiff didn't have the correct debian/changelog formatting, but I adjusted it. It would have been nice to have commit URLs (ie, what would have been in the DEP-3 comments), but I've uploaded it after verify the commits against upstream. Unsubscribing ubuntu-security-sponsors for now. Please resubscribe after updating the oneiric-quantal debdiffs. Thanks! ** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed ** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) = Luke Faraone (lfaraone) ** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Precise) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: (unassigned) = Luke Faraone (lfaraone) ** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Quantal) Assignee: (unassigned) = Luke Faraone (lfaraone) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1145560 Title: OpenAFS Security Advisories 2013-001 and 2013-002 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/1145560/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1126378] Re: SchedulerHostFilterNotFound: Scheduler Host Filter AvailabilityZoneFilter, CapacityFilter, CapabilitiesFilter could not be found.
This is 100% reproducable for me on Ubuntu 12.10. Start from a blank environment. git clone devstack cd devstack ./stack.sh cd /opt/stack/tempest ./run_tests.sh tempest/tests/compute/volumes/test_volumes_list.py -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1126378 Title: SchedulerHostFilterNotFound: Scheduler Host Filter AvailabilityZoneFilter, CapacityFilter, CapabilitiesFilter could not be found. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1126378/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1014262] Re: When moving files, thunar sometimes performs a cp and rm instead of a mv
** Summary changed: - When moving files, thunar sometimesperforms a cp and rm instead of a mv + When moving files, thunar sometimes performs a cp and rm instead of a mv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014262 Title: When moving files, thunar sometimes performs a cp and rm instead of a mv To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunar/+bug/1014262/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152793] [NEW] Segfault preloading jemalloc with apache on Ubuntu 12.04
Public bug reported: I had read good things about jemalloc so I decided to try it out on an Ubuntu 12.04 system. apt-get install libjemalloc1 set /etc/ld.so.preload to /usr/lib/libjemalloc.so.1 restart apache Apache crashed quickly and this was in the logs: [477629.499581] show_signal_msg: 2 callbacks suppressed [477629.499586] apache2[20748]: segfault at 7fa39940 ip 7fa3979e6e01 sp 7fff142a63d0 error 4 in libjemalloc.so.1[7fa3979e3000+18000] ** Affects: jemalloc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152793 Title: Segfault preloading jemalloc with apache on Ubuntu 12.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jemalloc/+bug/1152793/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152791] [NEW] CVE-2013-1828
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: A local user could use the missing size check in sctp_getsockopt_assoc_stats() function to escalate their privileges. On x86 this might be mitigated by destination object size check as the destination size is known at compile time. Break-Fix: 196d67593439b03088913227093e374235596e33 726bc6b092da4c093eb74d13c07184b18c1af0f1 ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: High Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: linux
[Bug 1152791] Re: CVE-2013-1828
CVE-2013-1828 ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Raring) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Raring) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Raring) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Raring) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Raring) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Raring) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Raring) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-fsl-imx51 (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-maverick (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-backport-natty (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Raring) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-ec2 (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Raring) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-lts-backport-oneiric (Ubuntu Quantal) Status:
[Bug 1152228] Re: linux: 3.8.0-12.21 -proposed tracker
** Changed in: kernel-development-workflow/prepare-package Status: Fix Released = In Progress ** Description changed: This bug is for tracking the 3.8.0-11.21 upload package. This bug will contain status and testing results related to that upload. For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow kernel-Prepare-package-start:Thursday, 07. March 2013 15:59 UTC kernel-phase-changed:Thursday, 07. March 2013 15:59 UTC kernel-phase:Prepare - kernel-main-build-unavailable:Friday, 08. March 2013 22:00 UTC -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152228 Title: linux: 3.8.0-12.21 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-development-workflow/+bug/1152228/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1132584] Re: cedarview-drm kernel module fails to build on kernel 3.5.x [error: implicit declaration of function 'do_mmap']
Installing xserver-xorg-lts-precise will put you back on the 12.04 X stack for it to work (alternately installing xserver-xorg-lts-quantal will go back to 12.04.2), you'll want to purge the linux-lts-quantal packages as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132584 Title: cedarview-drm kernel module fails to build on kernel 3.5.x [error: implicit declaration of function 'do_mmap'] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cedarview-drm-drivers/+bug/1132584/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1130419] Re: apt resolver doesn't do sensible things when satisfying a cross-dependency on a virtual package (steam, wine)
Just tested with the new proposed version, ia32-libs will still be removed. sudo apt-get -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=1 install xserver-xorg-lts- quantal Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Starting Starting 2 Investigating (0) libvisual-0.4-plugins [ i386 ] 0.4.0.dfsg.1-7 ( sound ) Broken libvisual-0.4-plugins:i386 Depends on libgl1-mesa-glx [ i386 ] 8.0.4-0ubuntu0.4 ( libs ) Considering libgl1-mesa-glx:i386 4 as a solution to libvisual-0.4-plugins:i386 3 Broken libvisual-0.4-plugins:i386 Depends on libgl1 [ i386 ] none ( none ) Considering libgl1-mesa-swx11:i386 0 as a solution to libvisual-0.4-plugins:i386 3 Added libgl1-mesa-swx11:i386 to the remove list Fixing libvisual-0.4-plugins:i386 via keep of libgl1-mesa-swx11:i386 Investigating (0) libglu1-mesa [ i386 ] 8.0.4-0ubuntu0.4 ( libs ) Broken libglu1-mesa:i386 Depends on libgl1-mesa-glx [ i386 ] 8.0.4-0ubuntu0.4 ( libs ) Considering libgl1-mesa-glx:i386 4 as a solution to libglu1-mesa:i386 3 Broken libglu1-mesa:i386 Depends on libgl1 [ i386 ] none ( none ) Considering libgl1-mesa-swx11:i386 0 as a solution to libglu1-mesa:i386 3 Added libgl1-mesa-swx11:i386 to the remove list Fixing libglu1-mesa:i386 via keep of libgl1-mesa-swx11:i386 Investigating (0) libqt4-opengl [ i386 ] 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.4 ( libs ) Broken libqt4-opengl:i386 Depends on libgl1-mesa-glx [ i386 ] 8.0.4-0ubuntu0.4 ( libs ) Considering libgl1-mesa-glx:i386 4 as a solution to libqt4-opengl:i386 2 Broken libqt4-opengl:i386 Depends on libgl1 [ i386 ] none ( none ) Considering libgl1-mesa-swx11:i386 0 as a solution to libqt4-opengl:i386 2 Added libgl1-mesa-swx11:i386 to the remove list Fixing libqt4-opengl:i386 via keep of libgl1-mesa-swx11:i386 Investigating (0) xserver-xorg-video-qxl [ amd64 ] 0.0.16-2ubuntu0.1 ( x11 ) Broken xserver-xorg-video-qxl:amd64 Depends on xorg-video-abi-11 [ amd64 ] none ( none ) Considering xserver-xorg-core:amd64 1 as a solution to xserver-xorg-video-qxl:amd64 0 Removing xserver-xorg-video-qxl:amd64 rather than change xorg-video-abi-11:amd64 Investigating (0) ia32-libs-multiarch [ i386 ] 20090808ubuntu36 ( universe/libs ) Broken ia32-libs-multiarch:i386 Depends on libglapi-mesa [ i386 ] 8.0.4-0ubuntu0.4 ( libs ) Considering libglapi-mesa:i386 1 as a solution to ia32-libs-multiarch:i386 -1 Removing ia32-libs-multiarch:i386 rather than change libglapi-mesa:i386 Investigating (1) libvisual-0.4-plugins [ i386 ] 0.4.0.dfsg.1-7 ( sound ) Broken libvisual-0.4-plugins:i386 Depends on libgl1-mesa-glx [ i386 ] 8.0.4-0ubuntu0.4 ( libs ) Considering libgl1-mesa-glx:i386 4 as a solution to libvisual-0.4-plugins:i386 3 Broken libvisual-0.4-plugins:i386 Depends on libgl1 [ i386 ] none ( none ) Considering libgl1-mesa-swx11:i386 0 as a solution to libvisual-0.4-plugins:i386 3 Added libgl1-mesa-swx11:i386 to the remove list Fixing libvisual-0.4-plugins:i386 via keep of libgl1-mesa-swx11:i386 Investigating (1) libglu1-mesa [ i386 ] 8.0.4-0ubuntu0.4 ( libs ) Broken libglu1-mesa:i386 Depends on libgl1-mesa-glx [ i386 ] 8.0.4-0ubuntu0.4 ( libs ) Considering libgl1-mesa-glx:i386 4 as a solution to libglu1-mesa:i386 3 Broken libglu1-mesa:i386 Depends on libgl1 [ i386 ] none ( none ) Considering libgl1-mesa-swx11:i386 0 as a solution to libglu1-mesa:i386 3 Added libgl1-mesa-swx11:i386 to the remove list Fixing libglu1-mesa:i386 via keep of libgl1-mesa-swx11:i386 Investigating (1) ia32-libs [ amd64 ] 20090808ubuntu36 ( universe/libs ) Broken ia32-libs:amd64 Depends on ia32-libs-multiarch [ amd64 ] none ( none ) Considering ia32-libs-multiarch:i386 -1 as a solution to ia32-libs:amd64 2 Added ia32-libs-multiarch:i386 to the remove list Fixing ia32-libs:amd64 via keep of ia32-libs-multiarch:i386 Investigating (1) libqt4-opengl [ i386 ] 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.4 ( libs ) Broken libqt4-opengl:i386 Depends on libgl1-mesa-glx [ i386 ] 8.0.4-0ubuntu0.4 ( libs ) Considering libgl1-mesa-glx:i386 4 as a solution to libqt4-opengl:i386 2 Broken libqt4-opengl:i386 Depends on libgl1 [ i386 ] none ( none ) Considering libgl1-mesa-swx11:i386 0 as a solution to libqt4-opengl:i386 2 Added libgl1-mesa-swx11:i386 to the remove list Fixing libqt4-opengl:i386 via keep of libgl1-mesa-swx11:i386 Investigating (1) ia32-libs-multiarch [ i386 ] 20090808ubuntu36 ( universe/libs ) Broken ia32-libs-multiarch:i386 Depends on libglapi-mesa [ i386 ] 8.0.4-0ubuntu0.4 ( libs ) Considering libglapi-mesa:i386 1 as a solution to ia32-libs-multiarch:i386 -1 Removing ia32-libs-multiarch:i386 rather than change libglapi-mesa:i386 Investigating (2) libvisual-0.4-plugins [ i386 ] 0.4.0.dfsg.1-7 ( sound ) Broken libvisual-0.4-plugins:i386 Depends on libgl1-mesa-glx [ i386 ] 8.0.4-0ubuntu0.4 ( libs ) Considering libgl1-mesa-glx:i386 4 as a solution to libvisual-0.4-plugins:i386 3 Broken libvisual-0.4-plugins:i386 Depends on libgl1 [
[Bug 1152800] [NEW] Wine will not install on 12.04.02
Public bug reported: Problem: Wine wine1.4 1.4-0ubuntu4.1 refuses to install on Ubuntu 12.04.02 fully updated. How to trigger: Install 12.04.02. Update Ubuntu via Update Manager. Attempt to install wine1.4 1.4-0ubuntu4.1 from Ubuntu Software Center. Huge error message saying it must remove free implementation of x, etc x.org etc. I tried to post this to a similar sounding kb article https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/apt/+bug/1130419, but it took me here. Workaround: Install Ubuntu 12.04.01, install Wine wine1.4 1.4-0ubuntu4.1 from software sources, then update. ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: wine -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152800 Title: Wine will not install on 12.04.02 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1152800/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 993187] Re: ubuntu 12.04 completely freezes frequently.
I think a second monitor increases the probability of freezes. Maybe because of more GPU Memory usage. When I have connected a monitor to my laptop I have more often a freeze. And if I work only with the laptop display I have seemingly no freeze since using kernel version 3.8.2. I agree with cemc that its not the monitor but more about the memory usage of a system which is different when working with one or more monitors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993187 Title: ubuntu 12.04 completely freezes frequently. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/993187/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152787] Re: i dont know
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read How to report bugs effectively http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem. We have instructions on debugging some types of problems at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures At a minimum, we need: 1. the specific steps or actions you took that caused you to encounter the problem, 2. the behavior you expected, and 3. the behavior you actually encountered (in as much detail as possible). Thanks! ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152787 Title: i dont know To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1152787/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1145560] Re: OpenAFS Security Advisories 2013-001 and 2013-002
Jamie, Thanks for your review. On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:43:51PM -, Jamie Strandboge wrote: Thanks for your patches! Unfortunately, I can't process them at this time due to the following: - the oneiric debdiff does not use the format as prescribed by https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Packaging - the precise debdiff does not use the format as prescribed by https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Packaging - the quantal debdiff does not use the format as prescribed by https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Packaging - the oneiric debdiff patches debian/patches/debian-changes. This is a source format v3 (quilt) package so the security updates should be in their own patches. When redoing this patch, be sure to include DEP-3 comments (the information that would have been in these is missing from debian/changelog) - the precise debdiff patches debian/patches/debian-changes. This is a source format v3 (quilt) package so the security updates should be in their own patches. When redoing this patch, be sure to include DEP-3 comments (the information that would have been in these is missing from debian/changelog) - the quantal debdiff patches the files inline which it is a source format v3 (quilt) package. When redoing this patch, be sure to include DEP-3 comments (the information that would have been in these is missing from debian/changelog) I'll address these concerns in a reupload. - the oneiric debdiff has the wrong version-- it should be 1.6.0-1ubuntu0.1 - the quantal debdiff does not use the correct version. It should be 1.6.1-2ubuntu2.1 - the precise debdiff has the wrong version-- it should have been 1.6.1-1ubuntu0.2 with precise-proposed as 1.6.1-1ubuntu0.1, but precise-proposed' version of 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.1 was mistakenly accepted. Unfortunately, if we are basing on the precise-proposed package, we have to use 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2 I'll increment the precise version, but it wasn't mistakingly accepted, see below: In https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/356861/comments/1, ~broder wrote: Be careful choosing version numbers for this. The normal mechanism for an Ubuntu security version number will result in kernel modules with a lower version than the current modules. - the precise debdiff is based on a package in precise-proposed. This should be based on what is currently in -security or -updates (see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Packaging) I had previously gotten approval to base off of what is in -proposed. In any case, -proposed will move to -updates on Monday. The Lucid package is patchless, so the inline patches are fine. The debdiff didn't have the correct debian/changelog formatting, but I adjusted it. It would have been nice to have commit URLs (ie, what would have been in the DEP-3 comments), but I've uploaded it after verify the commits against upstream. Unsubscribing ubuntu-security-sponsors for now. Please resubscribe after updating the oneiric-quantal debdiffs. Thanks! Thanks, Luke -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1145560 Title: OpenAFS Security Advisories 2013-001 and 2013-002 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/1145560/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152805] [NEW] problem when update
Public bug reported: Hello here is what I got when I tried to update Kubuntu 11.0.04 with VMWare 9 The message is : W:Impossible de récupérer http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/natty/main/source/Sources.gz 404 Not Found , W:Impossible de récupérer http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/natty/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz 404 Not Found , E:Le téléchargement de quelques fichiers d'index a échoué, ils ont été ignorés, ou les anciens ont été utilisés à la place. Thank you ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152805 Title: problem when update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1152805/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152803] [NEW] [Sony Corporation VPCCW1FFX] suspend/resume failure
Public bug reported: Keep getting this on every boot. ProblemType: KernelOops DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: linux-image-3.8.0-11-generic 3.8.0-11.20 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-11.20-generic 3.8.2 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-11-generic x86_64 Annotation: This occured during a previous suspend and prevented it from resuming properly. ApportVersion: 2.9.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC1: alex 1968 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC0: alex 1968 F pulseaudio Date: Fri Mar 8 17:08:15 2013 ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apportcheckresume Failure: suspend/resume HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=3f1b2717-7ae0-47f6-bf55-e49ac2841224 InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-01 (66 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python3.3 MachineType: Sony Corporation VPCCW1FFX MarkForUpload: True ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python3 /usr/share/apport/apportcheckresume ProcEnviron: TERM=linux PATH=(custom, no user) ProcFB: 0 nouveaufb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.8.0-11-generic root=UUID=b42f093d-7eba-4e2b-9df4-7e0a29917796 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon. RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.8.0-11-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-3.8.0-11-generic N/A linux-firmware1.103 SourcePackage: linux Title: [Sony Corporation VPCCW1FFX] suspend/resume failure UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-03-04 (4 days ago) UserGroups: dmi.bios.date: 10/28/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: R0210Y5 dmi.board.asset.tag: N/A dmi.board.name: VAIO dmi.board.vendor: Sony Corporation dmi.board.version: N/A dmi.chassis.asset.tag: N/A dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Sony Corporation dmi.chassis.version: N/A dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrR0210Y5:bd10/28/2009:svnSonyCorporation:pnVPCCW1FFX:pvrR5785054:rvnSonyCorporation:rnVAIO:rvrN/A:cvnSonyCorporation:ct10:cvrN/A: dmi.product.name: VPCCW1FFX dmi.product.version: R5785054 dmi.sys.vendor: Sony Corporation ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-kerneloops raring resume suspend -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152803 Title: [Sony Corporation VPCCW1FFX] suspend/resume failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1152803/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152793] Re: Segfault preloading jemalloc with apache on Ubuntu 12.04
By set /etc/ld.so.preload to /usr/lib/libjemalloc.so.1 I mean set the contents of /etc/ld.so.preload to /usr/lib/libjemalloc.so.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152793 Title: Segfault preloading jemalloc with apache on Ubuntu 12.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jemalloc/+bug/1152793/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1122768] Re: package capiutils 1:3.12.20071127-0ubuntu11 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 32 zurück
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: isdnutils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1122768 Title: package capiutils 1:3.12.20071127-0ubuntu11 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 32 zurück To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isdnutils/+bug/1122768/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1120704] Re: Xubuntu does not open OpenDocument and MSOffice files in LibreOffice if installed
@fhimpe: Would you coinsider submitted a patch that is per-user versus global... We understand the issue but think the big hammer approach would be undesirable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1120704 Title: Xubuntu does not open OpenDocument and MSOffice files in LibreOffice if installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xubuntu-default-settings/+bug/1120704/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1020807] Re: [USB-Audio - USB Sound Blaster HD, playback] fails after a while
6310.373495] 8:1:1: usb_set_interface failed [ 6310.374137] 8:1:1: usb_set_interface failed [ 6310.374369] 8:1:1: usb_set_interface failed ** Also affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020807 Title: [USB-Audio - USB Sound Blaster HD, playback] fails after a while To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1020807/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555209] Re: hp deskjet, photosmart crashes on interaction during scanning
Similar problem, if I delete a previously scanned page then scan or save simple scan crashes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555209 Title: hp deskjet, photosmart crashes on interaction during scanning To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/simple-scan/+bug/555209/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152797] Re: update-notifier crashed with SIGSEGV in free()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1106210 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1106210 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1106210, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** Attachment removed: CoreDump.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152797/+attachment/3564393/+files/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment removed: Disassembly.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152797/+attachment/3564395/+files/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment removed: ProcMaps.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152797/+attachment/3564396/+files/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment removed: ProcStatus.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152797/+attachment/3564397/+files/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment removed: Registers.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152797/+attachment/3564398/+files/Registers.txt ** Attachment removed: Stacktrace.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152797/+attachment/3564399/+files/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment removed: ThreadStacktrace.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152797/+attachment/3564400/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of private bug 1106210 ** Information type changed from Private to Public ** Tags removed: need-i386-retrace -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152797 Title: update-notifier crashed with SIGSEGV in free() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/1152797/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1146865] Re: glance-api fails to start
I was able to resolve my last issue to get glance working. I needed to change the owner of the certificates. In particular, I executed the following command on my machine: chown -R keystone:keystone /etc/keystone/ssl -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1146865 Title: glance-api fails to start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1146865/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1145560] Re: OpenAFS Security Advisories 2013-001 and 2013-002
As far as basing the debdiffs on -proposed, I requested that to avoid having to redo the SRU. It's verified and will be released on Monday. With my ubuntu- sru hat on, I'd ask you to take security fixes with the pending SRU included. If it's needed, I'll release the SRU over the weekend, but we prefer to avoid doing that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1145560 Title: OpenAFS Security Advisories 2013-001 and 2013-002 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/1145560/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 887793] Re: Kworker constantly taking about 100% CPU
Same problem on Lenovo Y560p. grep enabled /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/* indicates problem is gpe17 and gpe18. echo disable /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpe17 echo disable /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpe18 Disabling gpe18 works and alleviates some of the CPU load. Disabling gpe17 alleviates the remainder of the CPU load *but* CPU load jumps back up in less than a minute (often within 5 seconds). grep enabled /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/* indicates that gpe17 is enabled! Disable again, CPU load goes down, but gpe17 reenables shortly thereafter. Adding the above commands to /etc/rc.local doesn't seem to work, or maybe it does but only temporarily. I know this thread goes back to 2011, but this problem only manifested a month or two ago. Not sure what update triggered it (assuming it was some update). Running Linux Mint 13 with kernel 3.2.0-23-generic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887793 Title: Kworker constantly taking about 100% CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/887793/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1127404] Re: conflict between libqt5multimediaquick5 and libqt5multimediaquick-p5
** Information type changed from Public Security to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1127404 Title: conflict between libqt5multimediaquick5 and libqt5multimediaquick-p5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtmultimedia-opensource-src/+bug/1127404/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152730] Re: Wrong (source) version in pakage plasmate 1.0?
** Changed in: plasmate (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Benjamin Kerensa (bkerensa) ** Changed in: plasmate (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152730 Title: Wrong (source) version in pakage plasmate 1.0? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasmate/+bug/1152730/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1109283] Re: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise
** Branch linked: lp:~andreserl/maas/precise_packaging_sru -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1109283 Title: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1109283/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1022033] Re: [Aspire 5935, Realtek ALC889, Black Digital Out, HDMI] No sound at all
seem missing device 1 for spdif List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: ALC889 Analog [ALC889 Analog] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 3: ALC889 Digital [ALC889 Digital] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 Node 0x11 [Pin Complex] wcaps 0x400300: Mono Digital Pincap 0x0010: OUT Pin Default 0x18561130: [Jack] Digital Out at Int HDMI Conn = Digital, Color = Black DefAssociation = 0x3, Sequence = 0x0 Misc = NO_PRESENCE Pin-ctls: 0x40: OUT Connection: 1 0x10 Node 0x1e [Pin Complex] wcaps 0x400300: Mono Digital Pincap 0x0010: OUT Pin Default 0x03451120: [Jack] SPDIF Out at Ext Left Conn = Optical, Color = Black DefAssociation = 0x2, Sequence = 0x0 Misc = NO_PRESENCE Pin-ctls: 0x40: OUT Connection: 1 0x06 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022033 Title: [Aspire 5935, Realtek ALC889, Black Digital Out, HDMI] No sound at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1022033/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152803] Status changed to Confirmed
This change was made by a bot. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152803 Title: [Sony Corporation VPCCW1FFX] suspend/resume failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1152803/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1092623] Re: touchpad multipoint touching opens Unity Dash
Hopefully someone from ~canonical-hwe-team (the guys that made the sputnik kernel with Sputnik's touchpad driver) will notice this bug (and maybe reassign it, because it's not a bug in synaptics). Palm detection in CyPS/2 Cypress Trackpad's driver doesn't seem to work (maybe it's not implemented yet), because I tried turning it on via xinput set-prop CyPS/2 Cypress Trackpad Synaptics Palm Detection 1, but it didn't help (I can always open the dash by pressing my thumb(print) against the trackpad) . I added ~kamalmostafa (I think he worked on the Cypress touchpad driver) as a subscriber to this bug (I appologize if this isn't the correct way to ping Ubuntu devs). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1092623 Title: touchpad multipoint touching opens Unity Dash To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-synaptics/+bug/1092623/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152807] [NEW] lmms packge asks for older lmms-common, but new lmms-common is installed
Public bug reported: upgrade from lmms 0.4.13 to 0.4.14 fails because it depends on lmms- common (= 0.4.13-0ubuntu1) but lmms-common is already upgraded to 0.4.14-0ubuntu2. Apt-get upgrade gives this error: The following packages have unmet dependencies: lmms : Depends: lmms-common (= 0.4.13-0ubuntu1) but 0.4.14-0ubuntu2 is installed ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: lmms 0.4.14-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-9.7-lowlatency 3.8.1 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-9-lowlatency i686 ApportVersion: 2.9.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Mar 8 15:26:34 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-02-25 (11 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Studio 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Alpha i386 (20130224) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: lmms UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: lmms (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152807 Title: lmms packge asks for older lmms-common, but new lmms-common is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lmms/+bug/1152807/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1145560] Re: OpenAFS Security Advisories 2013-001 and 2013-002
ScottK did ask me, and I agreed, that these updates could be based on -proposed. My apologies for not communicating that fact. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1145560 Title: OpenAFS Security Advisories 2013-001 and 2013-002 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/1145560/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152730] Re: Wrong (source) version in pakage plasmate 1.0?
Thanks for reporting this bug and any supporting documentation. Since this bug has enough information provided for a developer to begin work, I'm going to mark it as confirmed and let them handle it from here. Thanks for taking the time to make Ubuntu better! ** Branch linked: lp:~bkerensa/ubuntu/raring/plasmate/fix-for-1152730 ** Description changed: - Hi there. - I just want to try plasmate. after a little reserche i noticed that plasmate 1.0 is now in raring. - so i apt-get install'ed plasmate - now is startet plasmate and it crashed after project creation. so i tried to report a bug, in this moment i saw in Help about plasmare - - Version 0.1alpha3. now i tried via terminal: - - plasmate --version + What happened: + When running plasmate --version I see Qt: 4.8.4 KDE Development Platform: 4.10.1 Plasmate: 0.1alpha3 - this was strange, so i checked the package source and the changelog ends with - --March 20,2010-- - - Added a stub runner previewer + What I expected: + Plasmate: 1.0 - which is 3years ago. - Is it possible that this version of plasmate in the package plasmate 1.0 is wrong? - ProblemType: Bug - DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 + ProblemType: BugDistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: plasmate 1.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-9.7-lowlatency 3.8.1 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-9-lowlatency x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.9.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Mar 8 20:00:21 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-11-12 (115 days ago) InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.1) - MarkForUpload: True - SourcePackage: plasmate + MarkForUpload: TrueSourcePackage: plasmate UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-02-04 (31 days ago) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152730 Title: Wrong (source) version in pakage plasmate 1.0? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasmate/+bug/1152730/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152809] [NEW] Suggests tftpd-hpa instead of Recommends
Public bug reported: [impact] maas-provision will soon become an obsolete package and no longer a dependency of MAAS, once the new MAAS SRU is released. However, in order for the upgrade to the new package goes smoothly, the tftpd-hpa Recommends should become a Suggets. This way we ensure that 'maas' the upgrade won't fail. [test case] 1. Add ppa:maas-maintainers/stable (maas SRU package candidate) 2. sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get dist-upgrade: You will see that 'maas' will be removed instead of upgraded. 3. When the fix is in place, do the same as step 2, and upgrade will continue successfully, removing tftpd-hpa. ** Affects: maas-provision (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: maas-provision (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: High Status: New ** Also affects: maas-provision (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: maas-provision (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided = High ** Description changed: - maas-provision will soon become an obsolete package and no longer a - dependency of MAAS, once the new MAAS SRU is released. However, in order - for the upgrade to the new package goes smoothly, the tftpd-hpa - Recommends should become a Suggets. This way we ensure that 'maas' the - upgrade won't fail. + [impact] + maas-provision will soon become an obsolete package and no longer a dependency of MAAS, once the new MAAS SRU is released. However, in order for the upgrade to the new package goes smoothly, the tftpd-hpa Recommends should become a Suggets. This way we ensure that 'maas' the upgrade won't fail. + + [test case] + 1. Add ppa:maas-maintainers/stable (maas SRU package candidate) + 2. sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get dist-upgrade: You will see that 'maas' will be removed instead of upgraded. + 3. When the fix is in place, do the same as step 2, and upgrade will continue successfully, removing tftpd-hpa. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152809 Title: Suggests tftpd-hpa instead of Recommends To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas-provision/+bug/1152809/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1131905] Re: Links to U1 web site not working
** Tags added: u1-by-dev u1-on-production u1-ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1131905 Title: Links to U1 web site not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntuone-control-panel/+bug/1131905/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152812] [NEW] FFE: UbuntuKylin image builds
Public bug reported: The Technical Board approved a new UbuntuKylin flavour (intended to succeed the existing Ubuntu Chinese Edition) a little while back, and I took responsibility for implementing image builds, but didn't quite find time to do so before feature freeze. I'd like to get this done now, and it doesn't look difficult. The UbuntuKylin team said that they were otherwise pretty much feature-complete for 13.04 when they came to the TB, so I don't expect this to be a source of major problems. I'm currently testing this, but the livecd-rootfs diff should look something like http://paste.ubuntu.com/5597453/, and I expect there'll be more or less the obvious changes in cdimage too. ** Affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Assignee: Colin Watson (cjwatson) Status: Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152812 Title: FFE: UbuntuKylin image builds To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1152812/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1140597] Re: New version is available notification should be disabled
We should continue this via mail (either personal or through a list). I just spend some time trying to find the problem for the freeze if there are images in notices which I could debug locally finding the bug for this GPU not initialized will be even trickier. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1140597 Title: New version is available notification should be disabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1140597/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1109283] Re: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise
** Branch linked: lp:~maas-maintainers/maas/packaging.precise.sru -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1109283 Title: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1109283/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152812] Re: FFE: UbuntuKylin image builds
To the extent it's actually needed: FFe approved. ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Triaged ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Colin Watson (cjwatson) ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Milestone: None = ubuntu-13.04-beta-2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152812 Title: FFE: UbuntuKylin image builds To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1152812/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 966779] Re: X resource leak with plasma-desktop and workrave
I'm having the same problem with Kubuntu 12.04 and workrave 1.9.4 :-( I've filed http://issues.workrave.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1106 ** Bug watch added: issues.workrave.org/ #1106 http://issues.workrave.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1106 ** Package changed: kde-workspace (Ubuntu) = workrave (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/966779 Title: X resource leak with plasma-desktop and workrave To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/workrave/+bug/966779/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052883] Re: dbus-daemon eats 100 % of one core of the PC on 12.10
lightdm 2169 1 99 00:44 ?00:06:46 /bin/dbus-daemon --config-file=/etc/at-spi2/accessibility.conf --nofork --print-address 3 BUMP. Could someone take this bug seriously? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052883 Title: dbus-daemon eats 100 % of one core of the PC on 12.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/1052883/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152595] Re: maximized windows are not really maximized
Yeah, I've just noticed this too, seems like a recent regression in Compiz? ** Also affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152595 Title: maximized windows are not really maximized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1152595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64
** Changed in: fonts-droid (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1123710 Title: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1123710/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 966779] Re: X resource leak with plasma-desktop and workrave
I've just installed workrave 1.10 from https://launchpad.net/~rob- caelers/+archive/workrave and unfortunately the leak seems to have gotten worse. The 'misc' field for plasma-desktop goes up by 5 on every refresh :-( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/966779 Title: X resource leak with plasma-desktop and workrave To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/workrave/+bug/966779/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152814] Re: [needs-packaging] librocket
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) = Harald Sitter (apachelogger) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152814 Title: [needs-packaging] librocket To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1152814/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152814] [NEW] [needs-packaging] librocket
Public bug reported: Please package librocket 1.2.1 Reported by kubotu for IRC user apachelogger ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Assignee: Harald Sitter (apachelogger) Status: In Progress ** Tags: kubuntu kubuntu-packaging needs-packaging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152814 Title: [needs-packaging] librocket To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1152814/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152755] Re: package gnome-control-center-data 1:3.2.0-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package gnome-control-center-data is already installed and configured
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that there was an error on your system when trying to install a particular package. Please execute the following command, as it will clear your package cache, in a terminal: sudo apt-get clean Then try performing the update again. This will likely resolve your issue, but the failure could be caused by filesystem or memory corruption. So please also run a fsck on your filesystem(s) and a memory test. Thanks in advance! [This is an automated message. I apologize if it reached you inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.] ** Tags added: corrupted-package ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152755 Title: package gnome-control-center-data 1:3.2.0-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package gnome-control-center-data is already installed and configured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1152755/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152715] Re: linux: 3.5.0-26.41 -proposed tracker
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package Status: In Progress = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152715 Title: linux: 3.5.0-26.41 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/1152715/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1123710 Title: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1123710/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 957641] Re: unity does not display authentication window for pkexec, making gnome-system-log unusable from the Dash
** Also affects: unity Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/957641 Title: unity does not display authentication window for pkexec, making gnome- system-log unusable from the Dash To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/957641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152754] Re: kwin fails to resize to fit to the NX window with this version of libxfixes3
The attachment 01_fixesproto-v6.diff of this bug report has been identified as being a patch. The ubuntu-reviewers team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review the patch. In the event that this is in fact not a patch you can resolve this situation by removing the tag 'patch' from the bug report and editing the attachment so that it is not flagged as a patch. Additionally, if you are member of the ubuntu-reviewers team please also unsubscribe the team from this bug report. [This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by Brian Murray. Please contact him regarding any issues with the action taken in this bug report.] ** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152754 Title: kwin fails to resize to fit to the NX window with this version of libxfixes3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxfixes/+bug/1152754/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1139188] Re: Unsatisfiable dependency on powerpc
** Changed in: anerd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1139188 Title: Unsatisfiable dependency on powerpc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/anerd/+bug/1139188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152817] [NEW] no software is installing on my laptop.. i install it fron ubuntu software center but error occurs.
Public bug reported: this staement comes over The action would require the installation of packages from not authenticated sources. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: software-center 3.0.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-27.48-generic 2.6.35.11 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-27-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Mar 9 05:15:56 2013 DistributionChannelDescriptor: # This is a distribution channel descriptor # For more information see http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributionChannelDescriptor canonical-oem-dell-maverick-une-20101010-0 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick - Build i386 LIVE Binary 20101010-01:50 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: software-center ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick ubuntu-une -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152817 Title: no software is installing on my laptop.. i install it fron ubuntu software center but error occurs. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1152817/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152816] [NEW] ndiswrapper-dkms 1.57-1ubuntu1: ndiswrapper kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: when running this command sudo apt-get install ndiswrapper* error is displayed. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: ndiswrapper-dkms 1.57-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-25.39-generic 3.5.7.4 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-25-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 DKMSKernelVersion: 3.5.0-25-generic Date: Sat Mar 9 01:20:49 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-10-19 (140 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all PackageVersion: 1.57-1ubuntu1 SourcePackage: ndiswrapper Title: ndiswrapper-dkms 1.57-1ubuntu1: ndiswrapper kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ndiswrapper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package quantal running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152816 Title: ndiswrapper-dkms 1.57-1ubuntu1: ndiswrapper kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ndiswrapper/+bug/1152816/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1145231] Re: plugging in usb device launches usb creator
** Changed in: usb-creator (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dmitrijs Ledkovs (xnox) ** Changed in: usb-creator (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1145231 Title: plugging in usb device launches usb creator To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/1145231/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1098561] Re: Unsupported hardware watermark appears when FGLRX is installed on 13.04
** Description changed:
On the latest daily release of Raring, a watermark/overlay shows in the
bottom-right corner of the screen when fglrx or fglrx-updates is
installed. It reads Unsupported hardware and has the AMD logo above it
on top of a semi-transparent black background.
This watermark is essentially equivalent to the Testing use only that
appears when the proprietary beta drivers from AMD's website are
installed. Therefore, the same workaround applies:
[Workaround]
Step 1) Create and save shell script with the following contents:
#!/bin/sh
DRIVER=/usr/lib/fglrx/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so
for x in $(objdump -d $DRIVER|awk '/call//EnableLogo/{print
\\x$2\\x$3\\x$4\\x$5\\x$6}'); do
sed -i s/$x/\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90/g $DRIVER
done
Step 2) Make the script executable
Step 3) Run the script
Step 4) Log out and log back in
+
+
+ If the above workaround doesn't work for you, an alternative is to try
+ the version of /etc/ati/control from the fglrx that shipped with
+ Quantal.
+
+ Step 1) Save a backup of the old control file, just in case -- sudo cp
+ /etc/ati/control /etc/ati/control.watermark
+
+ Step 2) Download the Quantal fglrx source package from
+ https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/quantal/+source/fglrx-
+ installer/2:9.000-0ubuntu3/+files/fglrx-installer_9.000.orig.tar.gz --
+ you will NOT need to build or install it.
+
+ Step 3) Open that tar file with Archive Manager. Find etc/ati/control
+ and extract it.
+
+ Step 4) Copy the freshly extracted version of control to
+ /etc/ati/control then restart your system.
+
[Original Description]
After upgrading to raring and installing the latest fglrx package from the
archive I get a AMD branded overlay in the bottom RHS of the screen with the
message 'Unsupported hardware'.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: fglrx-updates 2:9.010-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.7.0-7.15-generic 3.7.0
Uname: Linux 3.7.0-7-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.8-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Jan 11 13:27:06 2013
MarkForUpload: True
SourcePackage: fglrx-installer-updates
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-01-07 (3 days ago)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098561
Title:
Unsupported hardware watermark appears when FGLRX is installed on
13.04
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer-updates/+bug/1098561/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152816] Re: ndiswrapper-dkms 1.57-1ubuntu1: ndiswrapper kernel module failed to build
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152816 Title: ndiswrapper-dkms 1.57-1ubuntu1: ndiswrapper kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ndiswrapper/+bug/1152816/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152222] Re: pycurl fails with TypeError: string argument expected, got 'bytes'
** Tags added: regression-release ** Tags added: raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115 Title: pycurl fails with TypeError: string argument expected, got 'bytes' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pycurl/+bug/115/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1038093] Re: [regression] Fedora17 and ArchLinux dont appear in GRUB menu
Nine months later, and this is still an open issue :( Could anyone point out how to remove Ubunut's OS Prober and flavor of GRUB? I recently re-installer Fedora 18, and I don't want to los it again. I also need to ensure earlier versions of Ubuntu (for example 11.10) don't fiddle with things either (I still have to support 11.10 in the field for others, so I need it for testing). Everything I've found online is related to removing GRUB entirely in favor of Windows. This is not my situation - I need Fedora's Prober and Grub because it works with all OSes. Thanks in advance for help on the Ubuntu Prober/GRUB removal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038093 Title: [regression] Fedora17 and ArchLinux dont appear in GRUB menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/os-prober/+bug/1038093/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 957641] Re: unity does not display authentication window for pkexec, making gnome-system-log unusable from the Dash
It happens on Arch Linux also under Unity with all .desktop files that use pkexec in their Exec= line. It's probably related to this: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=675789 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #675789 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=675789 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/957641 Title: unity does not display authentication window for pkexec, making gnome- system-log unusable from the Dash To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/957641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152819] [NEW] Couldn't install 'Beef'
Public bug reported: ... ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152819 Title: Couldn't install 'Beef' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1152819/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152818] [NEW] [FFe]: Start building Ubuntu GNOME images
Public bug reported: Now that the Tech Board has approved Ubuntu GNOME as an official Ubuntu flavor, we'd like to start building images for Raring. http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2013/ubuntu- meeting.2013-03-04-21.00.html ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: livecd-rootfs (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-9.18-generic 3.8.1 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-9-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.9.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Mar 8 19:26:10 2013 MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: livecd-rootfs UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152818 Title: [FFe]: Start building Ubuntu GNOME images To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1152818/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152222] Re: pycurl fails with TypeError: string argument expected, got 'bytes'
** Changed in: pycurl (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: pycurl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115 Title: pycurl fails with TypeError: string argument expected, got 'bytes' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pycurl/+bug/115/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152771] Re: fails to install grub
You can't install grub to an ntfs partition. You must install it to the MBR ( /dev/sda ). ** Changed in: grub-installer (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152771 Title: fails to install grub To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1152771/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152821] Re: indicator-datetime-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECTv()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1132174 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132174 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1132174, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** Attachment removed: CoreDump.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152821/+attachment/3564443/+files/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment removed: Disassembly.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152821/+attachment/3564445/+files/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment removed: ProcMaps.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152821/+attachment/3564446/+files/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment removed: ProcStatus.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152821/+attachment/3564447/+files/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment removed: Registers.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152821/+attachment/3564448/+files/Registers.txt ** Attachment removed: Stacktrace.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152821/+attachment/3564449/+files/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment removed: ThreadStacktrace.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152821/+attachment/3564450/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of private bug 1132174 ** Information type changed from Private to Public ** Tags removed: need-i386-retrace -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152821 Title: indicator-datetime-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECTv() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/1152821/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1012866] Re: [Z68AP-D3, Realtek ALC889, SPDIF Out, Internal] No sound at all
Node 0x06 [Audio Output] wcaps 0x211: Stereo Digital Converter: stream=8, channel=0 Digital: Enabled Digital category: 0x0 PCM: rates [0x5f0]: 32000 44100 48000 88200 96000 192000 bits [0xe]: 16 20 24 formats [0x1]: PCM Node 0x1e [Pin Complex] wcaps 0x400300: Mono Digital Pincap 0x0010: OUT Pin Default 0x01452130: [Jack] SPDIF Out at Ext Rear Conn = Optical, Color = Grey DefAssociation = 0x3, Sequence = 0x0 Misc = NO_PRESENCE Pin-ctls: 0x40: OUT Connection: 1 0x06 Node 0x10 [Audio Output] wcaps 0x211: Stereo Digital Control: name=IEC958 Playback Con Mask, index=0, device=0 Control: name=IEC958 Playback Pro Mask, index=0, device=0 Control: name=IEC958 Playback Default, index=0, device=0 Control: name=IEC958 Playback Switch, index=0, device=0 Control: name=IEC958 Default PCM Playback Switch, index=0, device=0 Device: name=ALC889 Digital, type=SPDIF, device=1 Converter: stream=8, channel=0 Digital: Enabled Digital category: 0x0 PCM: rates [0x5f0]: 32000 44100 48000 88200 96000 192000 bits [0xe]: 16 20 24 formats [0x1]: PCM Node 0x11 [Pin Complex] wcaps 0x400300: Mono Digital Pincap 0x0010: OUT Pin Default 0x99430140: [Fixed] SPDIF Out at Int ATAPI Conn = ATAPI, Color = Unknown DefAssociation = 0x4, Sequence = 0x0 Misc = NO_PRESENCE Pin-ctls: 0x40: OUT Connection: 1 0x10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012866 Title: [Z68AP-D3, Realtek ALC889, SPDIF Out, Internal] No sound at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1012866/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1092422] Re: Synaptic crashes when trying to remove residual config files for packages without the fields: Lastest Version and Description
This is happening with my Precise Pangolin, my Quantal Quetzal and my Raring Ringtale. In all the 12.x Ubuntus I use, Synaptic crashes when I try to remove residual configurations from removed packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1092422 Title: Synaptic crashes when trying to remove residual config files for packages without the fields: Lastest Version and Description To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/1092422/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152812] Re: FFE: UbuntuKylin image builds
Thanks for the quick response. I indeed wasn't entirely sure whether it was needed or not but figured I'd err on the side of caution. ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152812 Title: FFE: UbuntuKylin image builds To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1152812/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1084849] Re: package postgres-xc 1.0.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
Hi A work around that is fine to remove postgres-xc is: sudo vim /var/lib/dpkg/info/postgres-xc.prerm Add exit 0 after first line (#/bin/sh -e) It works! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084849 Title: package postgres-xc 1.0.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgres-xc/+bug/1084849/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152831] [NEW] printer-driver-foo2zjs Recommends: foomatic-db-engine while foomatic-db-compressed-ppds Conflicts: it
Public bug reported: As of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627770, foomatic- db-compressed-ppds Conflicts: foomatic-db-engine, but printer-driver- foo2zjs Recommends: it. The effect of this is to cause our daily image builds to fail, as they're trying to co-install two packages which aren't co-installable, hence the Critical priority as our daily builds must stay working at all times. The change in foomatic-db-compressed-ppds sounds quite deliberate from the above bug report, so I'm filing this on foo2zjs. The package description says The foomatic-db-engine package is recommended to simplify configuring this printer driver, but as far as I can tell it's only used for the getweb script when called with the 'ppd' argument, which is undocumented and only used by 'make oldppd'. If I'm right, isn't this sufficiently esoteric that it could be lowered to Suggests or dropped altogether? ** Affects: foo2zjs (Ubuntu) Importance: Critical Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152831 Title: printer-driver-foo2zjs Recommends: foomatic-db-engine while foomatic- db-compressed-ppds Conflicts: it To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/foo2zjs/+bug/1152831/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152818] Re: [FFe]: Start building Ubuntu GNOME images
As with Kylin, to the extent it's needed, FFe approved. ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Milestone: None = ubuntu-13.04-beta-2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152818 Title: [FFe]: Start building Ubuntu GNOME images To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1152818/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1110138] Re: Unity: wrong window dimensions / location in Java applications
The issue in my post appears to have been resolved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110138 Title: Unity: wrong window dimensions / location in Java applications To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/1110138/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152836] [NEW] [LENOVO IdeaPad U410] suspend/resume failure
Public bug reported: suspend/resume failure ProblemType: KernelOops DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: linux-image-3.8.0-11-generic 3.8.0-11.20 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-11.20-generic 3.8.2 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-11-generic i686 Annotation: This occured during a previous suspend and prevented it from resuming properly. ApportVersion: 2.9.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: indexer2564 F pulseaudio Date: Sat Mar 9 08:28:47 2013 ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apportcheckresume Failure: suspend/resume HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=435e112a-ca24-4314-a704-bd4a719e1878 InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-27 (40 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release i386 (20120423) InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python3.3 MachineType: LENOVO IdeaPad U410 MarkForUpload: True ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python3 /usr/share/apport/apportcheckresume ProcEnviron: TERM=linux PATH=(custom, no user) ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.8.0-11-generic root=UUID=208cd864-cf82-4777-a9a1-0ce02d71da88 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon. RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.8.0-11-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-3.8.0-11-generic N/A linux-firmware1.103 SourcePackage: linux Title: [LENOVO IdeaPad U410] suspend/resume failure UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-02-02 (34 days ago) UserGroups: dmi.bios.date: 06/05/2012 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: 65CN15WW dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag dmi.board.name: Lenovo dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: Lenovo U410 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 9 dmi.chassis.vendor: Intel Corporation dmi.chassis.version: 0.1 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr65CN15WW:bd06/05/2012:svnLENOVO:pnIdeaPadU410:pvrLenovoU410:rvnLENOVO:rnLenovo:rvrLenovoU410:cvnIntelCorporation:ct9:cvr0.1: dmi.product.name: IdeaPad U410 dmi.product.version: Lenovo U410 dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-kerneloops i386 raring resume suspend -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152836 Title: [LENOVO IdeaPad U410] suspend/resume failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1152836/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152839] [NEW] ubiquity with BTRFS
Public bug reported: Slight annoyance - during boot, an error shows up about sparse file systems. Boot completes successfully. Boot medium is an SDHC card formatted BTRFS. ** Affects: cheese (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152839 Title: ubiquity with BTRFS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cheese/+bug/1152839/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152837] [NEW] package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 126
Public bug reported: typed samba from root command line said to apt-get install samba4 did that got this error while installing (I'm trying to figure out how to network this pc with a Win 7 PC, over home hub) ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-25.39~precise1-generic 3.5.7.4 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-25-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Mar 8 20:19:21 2013 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 126 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release i386 (20130213) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: samba4 Title: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 126 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: samba4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152837 Title: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 126 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/1152837/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152837] Re: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 126
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152837 Title: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 126 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/1152837/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152836] Status changed to Confirmed
This change was made by a bot. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152836 Title: [LENOVO IdeaPad U410] suspend/resume failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1152836/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152818] Re: [FFe]: Start building Ubuntu GNOME images
https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/launchpad/add-ubuntu- gnome/+merge/152548 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152818 Title: [FFe]: Start building Ubuntu GNOME images To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1152818/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152839] Re: ubiquity with BTRFS
** Package changed: cheese (Ubuntu) = ubiquity (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152839 Title: ubiquity with BTRFS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1152839/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152812] Re: FFE: UbuntuKylin image builds
** Also affects: ubuntu-cdimage Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed ** Changed in: ubuntu-cdimage Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: ubuntu-cdimage Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: ubuntu-cdimage Assignee: (unassigned) = Colin Watson (cjwatson) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152812 Title: FFE: UbuntuKylin image builds To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/1152812/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1044002] Re: evince crashed with SIGSEGV
64-bit D07-1304 3.8.0-11-generic #20-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 5 20:32:48 UTC 2013 Open a PDF. Prepare to search for text by pressing Control F CRASH! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044002 Title: evince crashed with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cairo/+bug/1044002/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152843] Re: kmod assert failure: modprobe: ../tools/modprobe.c:550: print_action: Assertion `kmod_module_get_initstate(m) == KMOD_MODULE_BUILTIN' failed.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1133476 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133476 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1133476, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** Attachment removed: CoreDump.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152843/+attachment/3564520/+files/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment removed: Disassembly.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152843/+attachment/3564522/+files/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment removed: ProcMaps.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152843/+attachment/3564523/+files/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment removed: ProcStatus.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152843/+attachment/3564524/+files/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment removed: Registers.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152843/+attachment/3564525/+files/Registers.txt ** Attachment removed: Stacktrace.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152843/+attachment/3564526/+files/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment removed: ThreadStacktrace.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152843/+attachment/3564527/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1133476 kmod crashed with SIGABRT in __assert_fail_base() ** Information type changed from Private to Public ** Tags removed: need-i386-retrace -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152843 Title: kmod assert failure: modprobe: ../tools/modprobe.c:550: print_action: Assertion `kmod_module_get_initstate(m) == KMOD_MODULE_BUILTIN' failed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kmod/+bug/1152843/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1145560] Re: OpenAFS Security Advisories 2013-001 and 2013-002
I understand the bit about precise-proposed; Scott contacted me. I meant to simply say that even if the rest were right, I couldn't process it until -proposed was went to -updates. As for the versioning, to be clear, precise has to be what you have now cause of what is in -proposed. However, what is in -proposed did not need that version. Oneiric and Quantal also do not need the '+' - it is non-standard. I wouldn't have NAK'd on the versions alone-- I would have just fixed them and uploaded, but the quilt patching needed to be redone, so I mentioned it all. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1145560 Title: OpenAFS Security Advisories 2013-001 and 2013-002 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/+bug/1145560/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1038093] Re: [regression] Fedora17 and ArchLinux dont appear in GRUB menu
@Jefrey Walton I agree: it is amazing that this is not fixed. Especially when the status is Fix Released. But there is an easy manual work-around: before running update-grub, mount the non-Ubuntu Linux boot partitions. Then os-prober finds them! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038093 Title: [regression] Fedora17 and ArchLinux dont appear in GRUB menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/os-prober/+bug/1038093/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152846] Re: package libsane 1.0.22-7ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: './lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules' is different from the same file on the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 952544 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/952544 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #952544, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 952544 package libsane 1.0.22-7ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: './lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules' is different from the same file on the system -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152846 Title: package libsane 1.0.22-7ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: './lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules' is different from the same file on the system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1152846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152846] [NEW] package libsane 1.0.22-7ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: './lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules' is different from the same file on th
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 952544 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/952544 Public bug reported: message raised on sudo apt-get install ia32-libs package libsane 1.0.22-7ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: './lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules' is different from the same file on the system $ apt-cache policy ia32-libs ia32-libs: Installed: 20090808ubuntu36 Candidate: 20090808ubuntu36 Version table: *** 20090808ubuntu36 0 500 http://ph.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 20090808ubuntu35 0 500 http://ph.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/universe amd64 Packages $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS Release:12.04 expected to install the package with no error raised an error though the installation went thru, no idea if this will impated the use adt-bundle-linux ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libsane 1.0.22-7ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-38.61-generic 3.2.37 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-38-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Mar 9 10:32:52 2013 DuplicateSignature: Unpacking libsane:i386 (from .../libsane_1.0.22-7ubuntu1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libsane_1.0.22-7ubuntu1_i386.deb (--unpack): './lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules' is different from the same file on the system ErrorMessage: './lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules' is different from the same file on the system InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 (20120425) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: sane-backends Title: package libsane 1.0.22-7ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: './lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules' is different from the same file on the system UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) mtime.conffile..etc.sane.d.dll.conf: 2013-03-05T05:52:07.469499 ** Affects: sane-backends (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152846 Title: package libsane 1.0.22-7ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: './lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules' is different from the same file on the system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1152846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1014901] Re: Ambience theme doesn't indicate focused widget
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: light-themes (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014901 Title: Ambience theme doesn't indicate focused widget To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/light-themes/+bug/1014901/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152848] Re: package cups 1.5.3-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152848 Title: package cups 1.5.3-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1152848/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152848] [NEW] package cups 1.5.3-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Cups crashed. Automatic bug reporting filled this out for me. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: cups 1.5.3-0ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-38.61-generic 3.2.37 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-38-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu15.1 AptOrdering: libavcodec-extra-53: Install libavutil-extra-51: Install cups: Configure libavutil-extra-51: Configure libavcodec-extra-53: Configure Architecture: amd64 CupsErrorLog: Date: Sat Mar 9 13:25:09 2013 DpkgHistoryLog: Start-Date: 2013-03-09 13:24:42 Commandline: apt-get install libavcodec-extra-53 libavutil-extra-51 Upgrade: libavutil-extra-51:amd64 (0.8.5ubuntu0.12.04.1, 0.8.5ubuntu0.12.04.1+medibuntu1), libavcodec-extra-53:amd64 (0.8.5ubuntu0.12.04.1, 0.8.5ubuntu0.12.04.1+medibuntu1) DuplicateSignature: Setting up cups (1.5.3-0ubuntu6) ... start: Job failed to start invoke-rc.d: initscript cups, action start failed. dpkg: error processing cups (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 (20120425) Lpstat: Error: command ['lpstat', '-v'] failed with exit code 1: lpstat: Connection refused MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. N53Jq MarkForUpload: True Papersize: letter ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-38-generic root=UUID=4430146D301467E6 loop=/hostname/disks/root.disk ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: cups Title: package cups 1.5.3-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 01/25/2011 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: N53Jq.211 dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.board.name: N53Jq dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.board.version: 1.0 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.chassis.version: 1.0 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrN53Jq.211:bd01/25/2011:svnASUSTeKComputerInc.:pnN53Jq:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:rnN53Jq:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:ct10:cvr1.0: dmi.product.name: N53Jq dmi.product.version: 1.0 dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. modified.conffile..etc.cups.cupsd.conf: [deleted] ** Affects: cups (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152848 Title: package cups 1.5.3-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1152848/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152443] Re: [VIA8237 - VIA 8237, playback] No sound at all - Ubuntu 12.04
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1033299 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033299 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1033299 Ubuntu 12.04 - no sound with VT8237A/VT8251 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152443 Title: [VIA8237 - VIA 8237, playback] No sound at all - Ubuntu 12.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1152443/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1132297] Re: In Ubuntu Raring Daily Build, Module ivtv Crashes Kernel
I tested the v3.8.2 kernel after a full upgrade of all installed packages. The issue does no longer occur. I can boot, log into Ubuntu, and lsmod shows that ivtv is loaded: erwin@armadillo:~$ lsmod | grep ivtv ivtv_alsa 13768 1 snd_pcm 102477 5 snd_usb_audio,snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_codec,snd_hda_intel,ivtv_alsa ivtv 164908 1 ivtv_alsa snd69533 31 snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_usb_audio,snd_hwdep,snd_timer,snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_pcm,snd_seq,snd_rawmidi,snd_usbmidi_lib,snd_hda_codec,snd_hda_intel,snd_seq_device,ivtv_alsa tveeprom 21249 1 ivtv cx2341x28331 1 ivtv v4l2_common21428 5 ivtv,cx2341x,tuner,saa7115,msp3400 videodev 130053 9 ivtv,cx2341x,tuner,saa7115,uvcvideo,msp3400,v4l2_common,videobuf2_core,ivtv_alsa i2c_algo_bit 13564 2 ivtv,nouveau Also, ivtv actually works with my PVR250 hardware: 10:09.0 Multimedia video controller: Internext Compression Inc iTVC16 (CX23416) Video Decoder (rev 01) Subsystem: Hauppauge computer works Inc. WinTV PVR 250 Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 64 (32000ns min, 2000ns max), Cache Line Size: 64 bytes Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 21 Region 0: Memory at f800 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=64M] Capabilities: access denied Kernel driver in use: ivtv Thanks for the fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132297 Title: In Ubuntu Raring Daily Build, Module ivtv Crashes Kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1132297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1132297] Re: In Ubuntu Raring Daily Build, Module ivtv Crashes Kernel
and this was with: Linux armadillo 3.8.2-030802-generic #201303031906 SMP Mon Mar 4 00:07:09 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132297 Title: In Ubuntu Raring Daily Build, Module ivtv Crashes Kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1132297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1105604] Re: Brightness control stopped working
Now on Raring, the backlight is off after resuming from suspend. I have to run the following (blind type) after resuming each time: echo 978 | sudo tee /sys/class/backlight/intel_backlight/brightness Also, the function keys to control the brightness setting still don't work. They do on Quantal. ** Tags added: regression -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1105604 Title: Brightness control stopped working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1105604/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1033299] Re: Ubuntu 12.04 - no sound with VT8237A/VT8251
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: alsa-driver-1.0.25-dkms (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033299 Title: Ubuntu 12.04 - no sound with VT8237A/VT8251 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/alsa-driver/+bug/1033299/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017278] Re: High contrast theme is unusable in nautilus
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017278 Title: High contrast theme is unusable in nautilus To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1017278/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1152851] [NEW] xubuntu deletes workspaces
Public bug reported: i've always had three workspaces. today i turn on the computer and only one workspace is visible. i hit preferences and see that the number of workspaces is displayed as three, but there is only one workspace listed. this is one of many new problems i discovered today after updates yesterday for xubuntu 12.04. i also cannot resize windows nor access menus nor right click. i will file these as separate bugs. ** Affects: pidgin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152851 Title: xubuntu deletes workspaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/1152851/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1132297] Re: In Ubuntu Raring Daily Build, Module ivtv Crashes Kernel
I also tested the current baseline kernel: Linux 3.8.0-11-generic #20-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 5 20:32:48 UTC 2013 and it works too. I hope this makes sense ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132297 Title: In Ubuntu Raring Daily Build, Module ivtv Crashes Kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1132297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1038093] Re: [regression] Fedora17 and ArchLinux dont appear in GRUB menu
@D. Hugh Redelmeier (hugh-mimosa) Yeah, I can get the OS Prober to recognize the Fedora volumes by first mounting. However, the GRUB menu will not display them as an option during boot. I've tried the following, and they do not produce expected results (i.e., no menu entry for Fedora during boot): # First mount Fedora volume $ sudo update-grub and $ sudo grub-mkconfig $ sudo grub-install -o /dev/sda I'm working from memory because I don't want to boot into Ubuntu right now. I've tried the commands above on Ubuntu with grub and grub2 (don't recall which grub works for which command). Apparently I'm too dumb to figure out how to fix things in Fedora given the exiting documentation. There's nothing special about me, so I imagine there are other folks experiencing the same pain. All of this could be avoided if (1) Ubuntu fixed the problem; (2) GRUB allowed me to boot to a device (i.e., simply specify /dev/sda6); or (3) or Fedora provided a boot repair disk. As far as I know, we have none of them. I've literally wasted hours on this. I'm ready to cut my losses and simply let Fedora manage GRUB and booting. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038093 Title: [regression] Fedora17 and ArchLinux dont appear in GRUB menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/os-prober/+bug/1038093/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
