[Bug 1928888] Re: test_utils_testsuite from ubuntu_qrt_apparmor linux ADT test failure with linux/5.11.0-18.19
Observed in H/KVM (ADT), cycle sru-20210510 . ** Tags added: kvm linux-kvm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192 Title: test_utils_testsuite from ubuntu_qrt_apparmor linux ADT test failure with linux/5.11.0-18.19 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qa-regression-testing/+bug/192/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1906877] Re: diagnostics panel can leave automatic crash reporting enabled
I installed the version of gnome-control-center from focal-proposed and can confirm that the only setting "Automatic" creates the file /var/lib/apport/autoreport and switching the option to anything but "Automatic" removes the /var/lib/apport/autoreport file. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906877 Title: diagnostics panel can leave automatic crash reporting enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1906877/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1867092] Re: Failed to set MokListRT: Invalid Parameter
> I am getting the same error after an update to Ubuntu 18.04 After updating from what to what? There have not been any updates to the shim-signed package in 18.04 since September of last year. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867092 Title: Failed to set MokListRT: Invalid Parameter To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1867092/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929232] Re: Nautilus does not find the correct mime icons with Bitwig Studio
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929232 Title: Nautilus does not find the correct mime icons with Bitwig Studio To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1929232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1922342] Re: HIrsute live session takes ages to boot on BIOS systems
Hi, José Marinho wrote: > Marking the first partition as bootable legacy BIOS: > - Plymouth --> 54 seconds. > - Desktop environment --> 1 minute 45 seconds Without converting to GPT ? That would be really strange and surely no solution for the gerneral public. (It is not allowed by GPT specs to set the "bootable" flag on the "protective MBR partition" of type 0xEE, which serves as indication that GPT is valid and also shall protect the data range of the GPT partitions. Tests with grub-mkrescue ISOs on EFI systems failed. This led to the introduction of the second partition of type 0x00 with boot flag.) > Without marking any partition as bootable but changing the partition table > from GPT to MBR: > - Plymouth --> 25 seconds. > - Desktop environment --> 1 minute 20 seconds. So the BIOS or GRUB on that BIOS get deceived by a boot flag at the second (dummy) partition, but the BIOS does not demand the boot flag on MBR partition table. > would it be too inconvenient to release 2 isos: a main iso > for most computers and a legacy iso with an MBR partition table for use if > somebody has problems with the main iso? Debian does something similar for its "netinst" ISOs. The BIOS-only ISO with no GPT and no EFI partition is deceivingly named "mac", because the machines which need it are old x86 Apple machines. Those machines are said to take offense from the presence of the EFI partition or of the invald GPT in mjg's partition layout. Normal BIOS+EFI ISO: https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-10.9.0-amd64-netinst.iso The BIOS-only "mac" ISO is at: https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-mac-10.9.0-amd64-netinst.iso Each has about 330 MB. The version number may change in a few weeks or days. Look by a web browser at https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/ for debian-*.*.*-amd64-netinst.iso debian-mac-*.*.*-amd64-netinst.iso Have a nice day :) Thomas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922342 Title: HIrsute live session takes ages to boot on BIOS systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/1922342/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1909005] Re: Ubuntu does not resume (wake up) from suspend
Same problem on Dell Inspiron 5558 with - latest bios - Ubuntu 5.8.0-53-generic #60~20.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu May 6 09:52:46 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909005 Title: Ubuntu does not resume (wake up) from suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1909005/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-kvm/5.8.0.1028.30)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-kvm (5.8.0.1028.30) for groovy have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server/460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 (amd64) nvidia-graphics-drivers-460/460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 (amd64) nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/340.108-0ubuntu5.20.10.2 (amd64) nvidia-graphics-drivers-390/390.143-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 (amd64) nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server/450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 (amd64) virtualbox-hwe/6.1.16-dfsg-6ubuntu1.20.10.1 (amd64) nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server/418.197.02-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 (amd64) nvidia-graphics-drivers-450/450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/groovy/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-kvm [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1926547] Re: Add Dell Privacy Mic Mute Key mapping
sorry for the delay. It's queued up for f/g/h and will be in the next uploads. ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Medium => Critical ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andy Chi (andch) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Groovy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andy Chi (andch) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andy Chi (andch) ** Description changed: [Impact] * Dell introduces new function called Dell Privacy, it utilizes hardware mute to control audio and camera. The commit map the reported key event to mic mute for making userspace can work as before, "Mic Mute" dialog pop-up while the mic mute button is pressed. [Test Plan] * Use a Dell machine, which has Dell privacy function, and press mic mute key. GUI will pop up "Mic Mute" icon. [Where problems could occur] * This change adds key event mapping in hwdb, which won't impact other hardware. + any regression would likely cause problems with key(s) from the + specific dell kb matching the modified listing in the hw db. + [Other Info] * The change can only work with kernel commit on some specific hardware, ex. Latitude 9520. The commit series is "hardware-privacy-implementation-for-dell-laptop" in alsa-devel kernel tree. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/alsa-devel/list/?series=465445 * This change has been verified on Dell machine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926547 Title: Add Dell Privacy Mic Mute Key mapping To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1926547/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1928734] Re: Upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 failed
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1928397 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928397 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1928397 ensure python is marked for removal when upgrading from 18.04 to 20.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928734 Title: Upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1928734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-raspi/5.4.0.1036.71)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-raspi (5.4.0.1036.71) for focal have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: systemd/unknown (arm64) virtualbox-hwe/6.1.16-dfsg-6ubuntu1.20.04.2 (armhf, arm64) west-chamber/unknown (arm64) v4l2loopback/unknown (arm64) zfs-linux/unknown (arm64) wireguard-linux-compat/unknown (arm64) xtables-addons/unknown (arm64) fwts/unknown (arm64) wireguard/unknown (arm64) evdi/unknown (arm64) dm-writeboost/unknown (arm64) gost-crypto/unknown (arm64) jool/unknown (arm64) dpdk/unknown (arm64) langford/unknown (arm64) r8168/unknown (arm64) lime-forensics/unknown (arm64) mali-midgard/unknown (arm64) rtl8812au/unknown (arm64) rtl8821ce/unknown (arm64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-raspi [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1928734] Re: Upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 failed
Thank you, Brian. The new version of the release upgrader resolved the problem. I am happily on 20.04 now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928734 Title: Upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1928734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929241] [NEW] [feature request] add a proxy CLI option to debootstrap
Public bug reported:
debootstrap connects to the Internet but provides no proxy option, and
the man page makes no mention of whether the http_proxy environment
variable is honored. Ideally, Tor users would benefit most from SOCKS4a
support. I suggest modeling after cURL ("--socks4a 127.0.0.1:9050").
** Affects: debootstrap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929241
Title:
[feature request] add a proxy CLI option to debootstrap
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debootstrap/+bug/1929241/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1810183] Re: numpad on touchpad doesn't work in ASUS Zenbook 14
Unfortunately it's not showing me the grid - back-light is not turning on. My laptop is UX393UA. Can it be fixed somehow? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1810183 Title: numpad on touchpad doesn't work in ASUS Zenbook 14 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1810183/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1928380] Re: wish: switch to package names
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Summary changed: - wish: switch to package names + option to switch to package names instead of descriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928380 Title: option to switch to package names instead of descriptions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1928380/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929135] Re: will not upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04.02 "Cannot calculate the upgrade"
Thanks for responding. I found the link below, deleted python2 as shown and we are currently, finally, upgrading to 20.04. https://deeptalk.lambdalabs.com/t/cannot-upgrade-to-ubuntu-20-due-to- broken-packages/1980/2 "Removing python2 allowed the update scripts to work: sudo apt purge python2.7-minimal" I will use the -p on our next unit to be upgraded in the next day or so. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929135 Title: will not upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04.02 "Cannot calculate the upgrade" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1929135/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1451286] Re: crontab -r deletes cron entries without asking for confirmation
Hasn't this been fixed and pushed into repos yet? I thought it was a confirmed bug with an easy fix? I'd like to see this fix backported to LTS and even previous ubuntu versions, like 14.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1451286 Title: crontab -r deletes cron entries without asking for confirmation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cron/+bug/1451286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1928815] Re: Please merge with 1.2.3-1
Here's a second version, adding Libera to the config and updating the user support suggestion to point to #ubuntu on there. ** Patch added: "irssi-2-1.2.3-1-1.2.3-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irssi/+bug/1928815/+attachment/5499285/+files/irssi-2-1.2.3-1-1.2.3-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928815 Title: Please merge with 1.2.3-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irssi/+bug/1928815/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929239] [NEW] debootstrap documentation bug
Public bug reported: The documentation for debootstrap is broken and also needs reorganization. It lives here: https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/arm64/apds03.en.html To put this in "Appendix D: Random Bits" is a bit unsettling. It should have a chapter of its own sitting in parallel to the installer guides. The main bug is telling users to run commands inside chroot that must run outside of chroot. The first paragraph says: "$ symbolizes a command to be entered in the user's current system, while # refers to a command entered in the Debian chroot." Then every command given on that page follows a hash. E.g. "# mke2fs -j /dev/sda6". That's impossible. You can't chroot before you have a filesystem. Normally the best place to report this would be the "www.debian.org" /project/ in the Debian bug tracker, but the Debian bug tracker only function by email and last time I checked the mail server did not accept email from me. If someone would mirror this upstream it would be appreciated. ** Affects: debootstrap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929239 Title: debootstrap documentation bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debootstrap/+bug/1929239/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1922342] Re: HIrsute live session takes ages to boot on BIOS systems
Well, I'm only came here again firstly to say thanks to Michael and Thomas for taking into account this problem. Specially, knowing that this bug probably is quite exceptional and affects at only few cases. Today I was trying on some old computers on my job and it booted fairly well on all of this so, I had bad luck with this issue. Secondly, I don't know what is the best approach for fixing this problem. If it would be easy to insert a message when the boot process gets stuck or what. I think it is normal that, if the USB does not reach the desktop environment after more than 5 or 6 minutes and if you listen the cpu fan working at full speed, it is normal to think that the usb it's not going to boot. I was timing how long it takes to reach plymouth and the full desktop environment with a Lubuntu daily build iso and this was the results (the start point was grub in all cases): With the iso without any change: - Plymouth --> 7 minutes - Desktop environment --> 7 minutes 50 seconds Marking the first partition as bootable legacy BIOS: - Plymouth --> 54 seconds. - Desktop environment --> 1 minute 45 seconds Without marking any partition as bootable but changing the partition table from GPT to MBR: - Plymouth --> 25 seconds. - Desktop environment --> 1 minute 20 seconds. With this results is clear that the last is the best so, a naive question for my part is: would it be too inconvenient to release 2 isos: a main iso for most computers and a legacy iso with an MBR partition table for use if somebody has problems with the main iso? And finaly, other possible solution might be to include on the release notes or somewhere more suitable that, on some systems, this problem could be present and the possible workarounds. And nothing more on my part. It's time for the people on charge of this decide what is better. If something more is needed from me let me know. Thanks and have a nice day. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922342 Title: HIrsute live session takes ages to boot on BIOS systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/1922342/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929125] Re: lib32z1 cannot be installed on ubuntu 20.04 LTS
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929125 Title: lib32z1 cannot be installed on ubuntu 20.04 LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zlib/+bug/1929125/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929110] Re: Please merge sudo 1.9.5p2-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Edit
** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => William Wilson (jawn-smith) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929110 Title: Please merge sudo 1.9.5p2-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Edit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/1929110/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929229] Re: Please merge gnutls28 3.7.1-4 (main) from Debian unstable
** Patch added: "Diff from 3.7.1-3ubuntu1" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/+bug/1929229/+attachment/5499284/+files/gnutls28-ubuntu-ubuntu.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929229 Title: Please merge gnutls28 3.7.1-4 (main) from Debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/+bug/1929229/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929229] Re: Please merge gnutls28 3.7.1-4 (main) from Debian unstable
** Changed in: gnutls28 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: gnutls28 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => William Wilson (jawn-smith) ** Patch added: "Diff from Debian" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/+bug/1929229/+attachment/5499282/+files/gnutls28-debian-ubuntu.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929229 Title: Please merge gnutls28 3.7.1-4 (main) from Debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/+bug/1929229/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929229] Re: Please merge gnutls28 3.7.1-4 (main) from Debian unstable
** Patch added: "Diff from 3.7.1-3ubuntu1" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/+bug/1929229/+attachment/5499283/+files/gnutls28-debian-ubuntu.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929229 Title: Please merge gnutls28 3.7.1-4 (main) from Debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/+bug/1929229/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-bluefield/5.4.0.1012.13)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-bluefield (5.4.0.1012.13) for focal have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: wireguard-linux-compat/unknown (arm64) openafs/unknown (arm64) ddcci-driver-linux/unknown (arm64) dpdk/unknown (arm64) jool/unknown (arm64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-bluefield [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-azure/5.4.0.1048.46)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-azure (5.4.0.1048.46) for focal have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: v4l2loopback/0.12.3-1ubuntu0.3 (amd64) dahdi-linux/1:2.11.1~dfsg-1ubuntu6.1 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-azure [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929237] [NEW] Wierd stutter (buffer underrun problems?)
Public bug reported: Hello! Having some wierd audio problems http://irssi.marisa.nu/audioproblem.wav http://irssi.marisa.nu/audioproblem2.wav Anything i can start exploring, had these wierd microstutterings and other audio defects since i switched to pipewire yesterday afternoon ** Affects: pipewire (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929237 Title: Wierd stutter (buffer underrun problems?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pipewire/+bug/1929237/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 310999]
(In reply to Nelson Bolyard (seldom reads bugmail) from comment #0) > Today, in https://blog.startcom.org/?p=145 and in > http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.tech.crypto/browse_frm/thread/ > 9c0cc829204487bf > https://blog.startcom.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/screenshot-certificate- > viewerwwwmozillacom.png > https://blog.startcom.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/screenshot-certificate- > viewerwwwmozillacom-1.png > Eddy Nigg reported that he had obtained an SSL server certificate for the > domain www.mozilla.com. The certificate was said to appear valid in the > current Firefox browser, for a time. According to the screen shots > provided, > the certificate said on its face that it was "Domain Control Validated". > However, since Eddy is not known to control the mozilla.com domain, such a > claim seems dubious. > > I filed this bug so there would be a place for the investigation and any > subsequent actions (if any) to be recorded. dd(In reply to Eddy Nigg (StartCom) from comment #3) > I hold the corresponding private key of this CSR. what is this ? can i use it in my website (https://sakhtemooon24.ir/)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310999 Title: comodo seen issuing certificates unwisely To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nss/+bug/310999/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 310999]
For whatever reason this bug seems to attract spam, so I'm going to restrict comments to attempt to help with that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310999 Title: comodo seen issuing certificates unwisely To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nss/+bug/310999/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1926265] Re: slapd enter in infinite loop on sched_yield syscall
Thanks for all ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926265 Title: slapd enter in infinite loop on sched_yield syscall To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1926265/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1926265] Re: slapd enter in infinite loop on sched_yield syscall
OK the patch fix the issue for me too in my test env. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926265 Title: slapd enter in infinite loop on sched_yield syscall To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1926265/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929006] Re: package tftpd-hpa 5.2+20150808-1ubuntu1.16.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: 子进程 已安装 post-installation 脚本 返回错误状态 1
Hello, Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report. I tried to reproduce this but couldn't, further: > InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-12-29 (141 days ago) > InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 > (20170215.2) This makes me wonder if it's actually a local issue? Since it seems likely to me that this is a local problem, rather than a bug in Ubuntu, I am marking this bug as 'Incomplete'. However, if you believe that this is really a bug in Ubuntu, then we would be grateful if you would provide a more complete description of the problem with steps to reproduce, explain why you believe this is a bug in Ubuntu rather than a problem specific to your system, and then change the bug status back to "New". For local configuration issues, you can find assistance here: http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community ** Changed in: tftp-hpa (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929006 Title: package tftpd-hpa 5.2+20150808-1ubuntu1.16.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: 子进程 已安装 post-installation 脚本 返回错误状态 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tftp-hpa/+bug/1929006/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929125] Re: lib32z1 cannot be installed on ubuntu 20.04 LTS
Thanks for the response. My mind somehow converted 2.33 into 2.3.3 so I thought 2.3.3 < 2.4, thanks for helping me identify that mistake. I see now that this is the real problem: $ sudo apt install libc6-i386 The following packages have unmet dependencies: libc6-i386 : Depends: libc6 (= 2.31-0ubuntu9.2) but 2.31-0ubuntu9.3 is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. And I can see that version 2.31-0ubuntu9.2 is available for me to install: $ sudo apt list -a libc6 libc6/now 2.31-0ubuntu9.3 amd64 [installed,local] libc6/focal-updates 2.31-0ubuntu9.2 amd64 libc6/focal 2.31-0ubuntu9 amd64 libc6/now 2.31-0ubuntu9.3 i386 [installed,local] libc6/focal-updates 2.31-0ubuntu9.2 i386 libc6/focal 2.31-0ubuntu9 i386 So I guess the solution is to install this previous version of libc6: $ sudo apt install libc6=2.31-0ubuntu9.2 Will this cause my system to become unstable? I don't feel quite safe running this command blindly. Thanks in advance! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929125 Title: lib32z1 cannot be installed on ubuntu 20.04 LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zlib/+bug/1929125/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-hwe-5.8/5.8.0.54.61~20.04.38)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-hwe-5.8 (5.8.0.54.61~20.04.38) for focal have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: linux-hwe-5.8/5.8.0-54.61~20.04.1 (arm64, amd64, ppc64el, s390x) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-hwe-5.8 [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-kvm/5.4.0.1040.38)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-kvm (5.4.0.1040.38) for focal have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460/460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 (amd64) virtualbox/6.1.16-dfsg-6~ubuntu1.20.04.1 (amd64) nvidia-graphics-drivers-450/450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 (amd64) backport-iwlwifi-dkms/8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.2 (amd64) nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server/450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 (amd64) rtl8812au/4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu13~20.04.1 (amd64) dahdi-linux/1:2.11.1~dfsg-1ubuntu6.1 (amd64) v4l2loopback/0.12.3-1ubuntu0.3 (amd64) nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server/460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 (amd64) lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.1 (amd64) virtualbox-hwe/6.1.16-dfsg-6ubuntu1.20.04.1 (amd64) glibc/2.31-0ubuntu9.2 (amd64) oss4/4.2-build2010-5ubuntu6~20.04.1 (amd64) rtl8821ce/5.5.2.1-0ubuntu4~20.04.3 (amd64) evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 (amd64) sl-modem/2.9.11~20110321-16ubuntu1 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-kvm [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-raspi/5.11.0.1009.7)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-raspi (5.11.0.1009.7) for hirsute have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: rtl8812au/unknown (arm64) openafs/unknown (arm64) xtables-addons/unknown (arm64) systemd/unknown (arm64) snapd/unknown (arm64) digimend-dkms/unknown (arm64) evdi/unknown (arm64) gost-crypto/unknown (arm64) wireguard-linux-compat/unknown (arm64) ddcci-driver-linux/unknown (arm64) openrazer/unknown (arm64) r8168/unknown (arm64) jool/unknown (arm64) xtrx-dkms/unknown (arm64) fwts/unknown (arm64) wireguard/unknown (arm64) rtl8821ce/unknown (arm64) libvpoll-eventfd/unknown (arm64) v4l2loopback/unknown (arm64) nat-rtsp/unknown (arm64) west-chamber/unknown (arm64) langford/unknown (arm64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/hirsute/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-raspi [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-aws/5.4.0.1049.50)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-aws (5.4.0.1049.50) for focal have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: v4l2loopback/0.12.3-1ubuntu0.3 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-aws [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta/5.4.0.74.77)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta (5.4.0.74.77) for focal have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: virtualbox-hwe/6.1.16-dfsg-6ubuntu1.20.04.2 (armhf, ppc64el, s390x) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-meta [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-oem-5.10/5.10.0.1027.28)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-oem-5.10 (5.10.0.1027.28) for focal have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271-12 (amd64) nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/340.108-0ubuntu5.20.04.1 (amd64) virtualbox/6.1.16-dfsg-6~ubuntu1.20.04.1 (amd64) dm-writeboost/2.2.9-1ubuntu1.1 (amd64) lime-forensics/1.9-1ubuntu0.1 (amd64) systemd/245.4-4ubuntu3.6 (amd64) xtables-addons/3.9-1ubuntu0.2~20.04.1 (amd64) rtl8812au/4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu13~20.04.1 (amd64) dahdi-linux/1:2.11.1~dfsg-1ubuntu6.1 (amd64) backport-iwlwifi-dkms/8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.2 (amd64) virtualbox-hwe/6.1.16-dfsg-6ubuntu1.20.04.1 (amd64) bcmwl/6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.1 (amd64) openafs/1.8.4~pre1-1ubuntu2.1 (amd64) evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 (amd64) lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.1 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-oem-5.10 [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1925843] Re: Linux 5.8.0-49+ fails to resume from suspend
Thank you for your suggestion to test the latest kernel. Unfortunately, I am having trouble booting using the suggested kernel (5.13-rc2). I have downloaded the appropriate (I think) kernel packages from the link you provided: linux-modules-5.13.0-051300rc2-generic_5.13.0-051300rc2.202105162330_amd64.deb linux-image-unsigned-5.13.0-051300rc2-generic_5.13.0-051300rc2.202105162330_amd64.deb linux-headers-5.13.0-051300rc2-generic_5.13.0-051300rc2.202105162330_amd64.deb linux-headers-5.13.0-051300rc2_5.13.0-051300rc2.202105162330_all.deb I have verified the checksums, installed the packages, and configured them using dpkg --configure -a. When I try to boot using kernel 5.13-rc2, I receive the following errors: error: /boot/vmlinuz-5.13.0-051300rc2-generic has invalid signature. error: you need to load the kernel first Please advise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925843 Title: Linux 5.8.0-49+ fails to resume from suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1925843/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929232] Re: Nautilus does not find the correct mime icons with Bitwig Studio
I've tested and Thunar can show the correct icon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929232 Title: Nautilus does not find the correct mime icons with Bitwig Studio To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1929232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929232] Re: Nautilus does not find the correct mime icons with Bitwig Studio
I've reported this issue to nautilus as well: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues/1873 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929232 Title: Nautilus does not find the correct mime icons with Bitwig Studio To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1929232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929232] Re: Nautilus does not find the correct mime icons with Bitwig Studio
** Attachment added: "Screenshot_20210521_175052.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1929232/+attachment/5499281/+files/Screenshot_20210521_175052.png ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues #1873 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues/1873 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929232 Title: Nautilus does not find the correct mime icons with Bitwig Studio To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1929232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1925522] Please test proposed package
Hello Alberto, or anyone else affected, Accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 into groovy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source /nvidia-graphics-drivers-460/460.80-0ubuntu0.20.10.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- groovy to verification-done-groovy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-groovy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925522 Title: Introduce the 465 driver series, fabric-manager, and libnvidia-nscq To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/1925522/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1925522] Please test proposed package
Hello Alberto, or anyone else affected, Accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics- drivers-450-server/450.119.04-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925522 Title: Introduce the 465 driver series, fabric-manager, and libnvidia-nscq To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/1925522/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1925522] Please test proposed package
Hello Alberto, or anyone else affected, Accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics- drivers-450-server/450.119.04-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925522 Title: Introduce the 465 driver series, fabric-manager, and libnvidia-nscq To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/1925522/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1925522] Please test proposed package
Hello Alberto, or anyone else affected, Accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server into groovy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics- drivers-450-server/450.119.04-0ubuntu0.20.10.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- groovy to verification-done-groovy. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-groovy. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925522 Title: Introduce the 465 driver series, fabric-manager, and libnvidia-nscq To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/1925522/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1925522] Please test proposed package
Hello Alberto, or anyone else affected, Accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics- drivers-450-server/450.119.04-0ubuntu0.21.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925522 Title: Introduce the 465 driver series, fabric-manager, and libnvidia-nscq To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/1925522/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1925522] Please test proposed package
Hello Alberto, or anyone else affected, Accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source /nvidia-graphics-drivers-460/460.80-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925522 Title: Introduce the 465 driver series, fabric-manager, and libnvidia-nscq To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/1925522/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1925522] Please test proposed package
Hello Alberto, or anyone else affected, Accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source /nvidia-graphics-drivers-460/460.80-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925522 Title: Introduce the 465 driver series, fabric-manager, and libnvidia-nscq To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/1925522/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1926165] Re: Bass speakers not enabled on Lenovo Yoga 9i
@Hui Wang if you will have time to make the same script for Lenovo C930 i'll be glad to help with testing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926165 Title: Bass speakers not enabled on Lenovo Yoga 9i To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1926165/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1925522] Please test proposed package
Hello Alberto, or anyone else affected, Accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source /nvidia-graphics-drivers-460/460.80-0ubuntu0.21.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925522 Title: Introduce the 465 driver series, fabric-manager, and libnvidia-nscq To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/1925522/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1926265] Re: slapd enter in infinite loop on sched_yield syscall
My bad.. You're right, in my test, the second write() is performed on stdout cause my ldapsearch command is wrong. I missed the '-H' arg to properly set the LDAP URI (but you too :-p ). Consequently, the connection was in LDAP not LDAPS, and "ldaps://..." was the requested attributs :-s So since I learnt to make a good ldapsearch and opened my eyes to read gdb output, I can fully reproducible the issue . Thanks. I'll test the patched version on my test machine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926265 Title: slapd enter in infinite loop on sched_yield syscall To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1926265/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929123] Re: segfault in apt-esm-hook
Update from UA customer: " thanks for the updates. I confirm that "test-apt-esm-hook" runs successfully with no segfault. Looks like you found it! " ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Also affects: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929123 Title: segfault in apt-esm-hook To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1929123/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929212] Re: package initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Was getting similar errors on on subsequent `sudo apt upgrade`s - worked around by freeing boot space as suggested in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1899907 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929212 Title: package initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1929212/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-hwe-5.4/5.4.0.74.83~18.04.67)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-hwe-5.4 (5.4.0.74.83~18.04.67) for bionic have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: zfs-linux/0.7.5-1ubuntu16.11 (s390x, ppc64el, amd64) virtualbox-hwe/5.2.42-dfsg-0~ubuntu1.18.04.1 (i386, amd64) lxc/3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 (s390x, ppc64el, i386, amd64) virtualbox/5.2.42-dfsg-0~ubuntu1.18.04.1 (i386, amd64) acpi-call/1.1.0-4 (s390x, ppc64el) asic0x/1.0.1-1 (s390x) v4l2loopback/0.10.0-1ubuntu1.2 (s390x) kpatch/0.5.0-0ubuntu1.1 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-hwe-5.4 [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-gke-5.4/5.4.0.1044.46~18.04.10)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-gke-5.4 (5.4.0.1044.46~18.04.10) for bionic have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: zfs-linux/0.7.5-1ubuntu16.11 (amd64) virtualbox/5.2.42-dfsg-0~ubuntu1.18.04.1 (amd64) virtualbox-hwe/5.2.42-dfsg-0~ubuntu1.18.04.1 (amd64) lxc/3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 (amd64) kpatch/0.5.0-0ubuntu1.1 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-gke-5.4 [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-azure-5.4/5.4.0.1048.27)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-azure-5.4 (5.4.0.1048.27) for bionic have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: zfs-linux/0.7.5-1ubuntu16.11 (amd64) kpatch/0.5.0-0ubuntu1.1 (amd64) asic0x/1.0.1-1 (amd64) lxc/3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 (amd64) dahdi-linux/1:2.11.1~dfsg-1ubuntu4.2 (amd64) v4l2loopback/0.10.0-1ubuntu1.2 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-azure-5.4 [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-kvm/5.11.0.1008.8)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-kvm (5.11.0.1008.8) for hirsute have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: oss4/4.2-build2010-5ubuntu8 (amd64) systemd/247.3-3ubuntu3 (amd64) rtl8812au/4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu14 (amd64) dahdi-linux/1:2.11.1~dfsg-1ubuntu8 (amd64) lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu3 (amd64) virtualbox/6.1.18-dfsg-5 (amd64) v4l2loopback/0.12.5-1ubuntu1 (amd64) backport-iwlwifi-dkms/8613-0ubuntu2 (amd64) sl-modem/2.9.11~20110321-16ubuntu1 (amd64) rtl8821ce/5.5.2.1-0ubuntu6 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/hirsute/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-kvm [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta/4.15.0.144.131)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta (4.15.0.144.131) for bionic have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: linux/4.15.0-144.148 (s390x, arm64, i386) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#linux-meta [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-aws-5.4/5.4.0.1049.31)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-aws-5.4 (5.4.0.1049.31) for bionic have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: zfs-linux/0.7.5-1ubuntu16.11 (amd64) v4l2loopback/0.10.0-1ubuntu1.2 (amd64) lxc/3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 (amd64) kpatch/0.5.0-0ubuntu1.1 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-aws-5.4 [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-kvm/4.15.0.1092.88)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-kvm (4.15.0.1092.88) for bionic have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server/460.73.01-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 (amd64) nvidia-graphics-drivers-460/460.73.01-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 (amd64) ddcci-driver-linux/0.3.1-2ubuntu0.1 (amd64) glibc/2.27-3ubuntu1.4 (amd64) lttng-modules/2.10.8-1ubuntu2~18.04.3 (amd64) kpatch/0.5.0-0ubuntu1.1 (amd64) nvidia-graphics-drivers-450/450.119.03-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 (amd64) dahdi-linux/1:2.11.1~dfsg-1ubuntu4.2 (amd64) nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server/450.119.03-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-kvm [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929224] Re: Scanning issue with Ubuntu 18.04 and HPLIP version 3.21.2
** Project changed: canonical-identity-provider => hplip (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929224 Title: Scanning issue with Ubuntu 18.04 and HPLIP version 3.21.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hplip/+bug/1929224/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929232] [NEW] Nautilus does not find the correct mime icons with Bitwig Studio
Public bug reported: Hi, If you install Bitwig Studio 3.3.9 or later you'll find out that the mime icon association is broken with Ubuntu. I think this problem is specific to ubuntu + nautilus because: - on fedora it works - on archlinux it works - with dolphin on ubuntu it works Here is a download link: https://downloads-eu.bitwig.com/stable/3.3.9 /bitwig-studio-3.3.9.deb Here is a link to Bitwig Studio website: https://www.bitwig.com Regards, Alexandre ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04 Package: nautilus 1:3.38.2-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-17.18-generic 5.11.12 Uname: Linux 5.11.0-17-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Fri May 21 17:26:21 2021 GsettingsChanges: b'org.gnome.nautilus.window-state' b'initial-size' b'(1352, 695)' InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-05-20 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.04 "Hirsute Hippo" - Release amd64 (20210420) SourcePackage: nautilus UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) usr_lib_nautilus: evince40.1-1 file-roller 3.38.1-1 nautilus-extension-gnome-terminal 3.38.1-1ubuntu1 nautilus-share0.7.3-2ubuntu3 ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug hirsute wayland-session -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929232 Title: Nautilus does not find the correct mime icons with Bitwig Studio To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1929232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929224] [NEW] Scanning issue with Ubuntu 18.04 and HPLIP version 3.21.2
You have been subscribed to a public bug: Hello HPLIP team, Since some days I have an HP Smart Tank Plus 555 printer connected to Ubuntu 18.04 with HPLIP installed. Everything works fine so far, but I have an issue with scanning. The images are not scanned correctly with highest resolution 1200 dpi (lower resolutions are working fine) My system configuration is Ubuntu 18.04 with most recent updates HPLIP version 3.21.2, scan utility version 2.2 HP Smart Tank Plus 555 firmware version POSPPWPP1N001.2051B.00 The HP printer/scanner is connected via USB I scan the image with: scanimage --mode color --resolution 1200 --format jpeg -l 0 -t 0 -x 88 -y 129 > image.jpeg scanimage terminates with the error message „Application transfered too few scanlines“ The scanned image has indeed missing pixels at the end of the file/image. The issue occures only with 1200 dpi, not with 600 dpi or 300 dpi. Since I hade no issue in the past with my former HP printer/scanner or lower resolutions I believe this issue is very likely related to HPLIP and/or the HP Smart Tank Plus 555 device. Would be great if one of the developers could take care of this issue and hopefully provide a bug fix. Best regards, Helmut ** Affects: hplip (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Scanning issue with Ubuntu 18.04 and HPLIP version 3.21.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929224 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929229] [NEW] Please merge gnutls28 3.7.1-4 (main) from Debian unstable
Public bug reported: This requires a merge because there are changes in the Ubuntu version not present in the Debian version. ** Affects: gnutls28 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929229 Title: Please merge gnutls28 3.7.1-4 (main) from Debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/+bug/1929229/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929038] Re: [SRU] Backport to 20.04 LTS
** Changed in: golang-1.16 (Ubuntu Focal) Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.3 ** Changed in: adsys (Ubuntu Focal) Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929038 Title: [SRU] Backport to 20.04 LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/1929038/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929227] [NEW] Sync python-louvain 0.0+20181013git3fc1f575-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync python-louvain 0.0+20181013git3fc1f575-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: * Build-depend on python3-networkx to fix FTBFS. * Build-depend on python3-networkx to fix FTBFS. * Build-depend on python3-networkx to fix FTBFS. * Build-depend on python3-networkx to fix FTBFS. * Build-depend on python3-networkx to fix FTBFS. * Build-depend on python3-networkx to fix FTBFS. Extra build dependency is now included in the Debian package. Changelog entries since current impish version 0.0+20181013git3fc1f575-1ubuntu1: python-louvain (0.0+20181013git3fc1f575-2) unstable; urgency=medium [ Ondřej Nový ] * d/control: Fix wrong Vcs-*. * Use debhelper-compat instead of debian/compat. * d/control: Update Vcs-* fields with new Debian Python Team Salsa layout. [ Steffen Moeller ] * Bumped policy to 4.5.1 * Removed d/watch (upstream does not issue tags) * Added missing build dependency (Closes: #913377) * Decided against renaming binary to python3-community to match the imported module since upstream is confused about it, too. Instead, the package is now also providing that package name (Closes: #982424) [ Nilesh Patra ] * Use right import name * Add d/salsa-ci.yml * Move the egg to suitable location as well * Bump debhelper-compat version to 13 * Add "Rules-Requires-Root: no" * Add upstream/metadata * d/control: change section to python * d/rules: Rename /usr/bin/commmunity to /usr/bin/louvain-community to prevent generic names -- Steffen Moeller Tue, 18 May 2021 16:33:43 +0530 ** Affects: python-louvain (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929227 Title: Sync python-louvain 0.0+20181013git3fc1f575-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-louvain/+bug/1929227/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1778073] Re: dnsmasq and resolvconf hangs on start
Hello Ciaby, Thanks for your debugging, I am sure that'd be helpful! I've forwarded this to the Debian bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871958. Simon should hopefully have some time to take a look at this. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778073 Title: dnsmasq and resolvconf hangs on start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1778073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1880645] Re: icmp_redirect.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests failed on F-OEM-5.6 / G / H
Observed on G/KVM, cycle sru-20210510 . ** Tags added: kvm linux-kvm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1880645 Title: icmp_redirect.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests failed on F-OEM-5.6 / G / H To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1880645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1921374] Re: [SRU] New feature: Active Directory support
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => New ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => New ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Lallement (jibel) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Lallement (jibel) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Focal) Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921374 Title: [SRU] New feature: Active Directory support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1921374/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1927272] Re: Some kernel selftests fail on linux-kvm
Observed on G/KVM, cycle sru-20210510 . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927272 Title: Some kernel selftests fail on linux-kvm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1927272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1905203] Re: selftests: net: fib_nexthops.sh in linux from Groovy/linux 5.8.0-30.32 ADT test failure
Observed on G/KVM, cycle sru-20210510 . ** Tags added: kvm linux-kvm sru-20210510 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905203 Title: selftests: net: fib_nexthops.sh in linux from Groovy/linux 5.8.0-30.32 ADT test failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1905203/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929110] Re: Please merge sudo 1.9.5p2-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Edit
** Tags added: needs-debian-merge -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929110 Title: Please merge sudo 1.9.5p2-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Edit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/1929110/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1812194] Re: rtnetlink.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests failed on KVM kernels (config not enabled)
Observed on G/KVM, cycle sru-20210510 . ** Tags added: groovy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812194 Title: rtnetlink.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests failed on KVM kernels (config not enabled) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1812194/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1856010] Re: xfrm_policy.sh / pmtu.sh / udpgso_bench.sh from net in ubuntu_kernel_selftests will fail if running the whole suite
Observed on G/KVM, cycle sru-20210510 . ** Tags added: groovy kvm linux-kvm sru-20210510 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1856010 Title: xfrm_policy.sh / pmtu.sh / udpgso_bench.sh from net in ubuntu_kernel_selftests will fail if running the whole suite To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1856010/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1887661] Re: pmtu.sh from net in ubuntu_kernel_selftests failed with no error message
Observed on G/KVM, cycle sru-20210510 . ** Tags added: groovy linux-kvm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887661 Title: pmtu.sh from net in ubuntu_kernel_selftests failed with no error message To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1887661/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1892213] Re: psock_snd.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests ADT failure with focal/linux
Observed on G/KVM, cycle sru-20210510 . ** Tags added: linux-kvm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892213 Title: psock_snd.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests ADT failure with focal/linux To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1892213/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904242] Re: DeprecationWarning: isAlive() is deprecated, use is_alive() instead
With the issue resolved in Debian and the newer version synced to Ubuntu 21.04, the deprecation warnings are gone in debdelta 0.67. ** Changed in: debdelta (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904242 Title: DeprecationWarning: isAlive() is deprecated, use is_alive() instead To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debdelta/+bug/1904242/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1899159] Autopkgtest regression report (python3.9/3.9.5-3~20.04.1)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted python3.9 (3.9.5-3~20.04.1) for focal have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: python3.9/3.9.5-3~20.04.1 (arm64, amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/focal/update_excuses.html#python3.9 [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899159 Title: SRU: backport Python 3.9.5 to 20.04 LTS, 20.10 and 21.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-stdlib-extensions/+bug/1899159/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929125] Re: lib32z1 cannot be installed on ubuntu 20.04 LTS
Thanks for taking your time to report this issue and help making Ubuntu better. I was unable to reproduce this issue, in fact I could install lib32z1 without problems on my 20.04 system. I have a couple of comments though. >lib32z1 (https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/lib32z1) depends on libc6-i386 (>= 2.4) Indeed. >but the latest version of libc6-i386 I can find for Ubuntu is (..) impish So the first thing is that when installing packages on 20.04 it will look in its archives, not other releases. So it will find version 2.31-0ubuntu9.2 from focal-updates without looking at what is available in newer releases. Also, keep in mind that the second number in (>= 2.4) is 4 not 40. So 2.31-0ubuntu9.2 should be more that enough to satisfy this requirement because 31 > 4 :) Despite all this I see that you still get an error message. Based on the output from `apt policy` I thought this should work. What you can try is `sudo apt update` to refresh the package list. If the problem still persists, try to see if you can install libc6-i386 directly. You may get either a more detailed error message or it will suggest to remove other packages due to conflicts. Sometimes with unmet dependencies the problem can be further down the dependency tree so it might take some drilling to discover what the problem is, for instance if it is due to conflicts with other installed packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929125 Title: lib32z1 cannot be installed on ubuntu 20.04 LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zlib/+bug/1929125/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929158] Re: upgrade of libvpx6 crashes ffmpeg
The version of libvpx6 you have referenced is not one from the official archive of Ubuntu and subsequently I'm setting this bug report to Invalid. $ rmadison libvpx6 libvpx6 | 1.8.2-1build1 | focal | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x libvpx6 | 1.8.2-1build1 | groovy | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x libvpx6 | 1.9.0-1 | hirsute | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x libvpx6 | 1.9.0-1 | impish | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929158 Title: upgrade of libvpx6 crashes ffmpeg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1929158/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1927948] Re: Windows switch monitor after resuming from sleep
First time posting on this forum; apologize in advance if I am not doing
this right.
I have the same problem. I have three monitors (1 4k, 2 1080p [1 16:10
and 1 16:9]). 1080p 16:10 monitor is set as primary display, but is
Monitor 2 in the physical connections.
Stuff on primary monitor (16:10) stays put; stuff on the 4k monitor and
the secondary 16:9 monitor move around.
$ sudo lshw -class display
*-display
description: VGA compatible controller
product: Ellesmere [Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590]
vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@:01:00.0
version: e7
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pm pciexpress msi vga_controller bus_master cap_list rom
configuration: driver=amdgpu latency=0
resources: irq:209 memory:a000-afff memory:b000-b01f
ioport:5000(size=256) memory:b090-b093 memory:c-d
Attachment:
1. output of dbus-send --session --print-reply
--dest=org.gnome.Mutter.DisplayConfig /org/gnome/Mutter/DisplayConfig
org.gnome.Mutter.DisplayConfig.GetCurrentState
2. output of ls /sys/class/drm/*/edid | xargs -i{} sh -c "echo {};
parse-edid < {}"
** Attachment added: "Output of debus-send and edid commands"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1927948/+attachment/5499276/+files/monitor-output.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927948
Title:
Windows switch monitor after resuming from sleep
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1927948/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1778073] Re: dnsmasq and resolvconf hangs on start
** Tags added: server-next -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778073 Title: dnsmasq and resolvconf hangs on start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1778073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1925209] Re: No iwilwifi driver in Linux 5.4.0-1034-raspi
Hello, Is it possible to test the -proposed kernel in Ubuntu Core 20 ? If yes, can you please let me know how can I test it ? Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925209 Title: No iwilwifi driver in Linux 5.4.0-1034-raspi To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1925209/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1921374] Re: [SRU] New feature: Active Directory support
** Also affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Description changed: - TODO - [Impact] This feature allows to join a machine to an Active Directory domain at installation time. It adds a check box in the user info stage, which once selected displays a page to enter the credentials to join the domain. It installs the required packages on the target filesystem and configures SSSD and Kerberos so it works on first boot. - This feature also required a change to the seed to include additional packages for AD connectivity. + This feature also required: + 1. a change to the seed to include additional packages for AD connectivity. https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/commit/?id=a83c543f5fb98d4a539815b89b43cf9076c00283 - and to the dependencies of Ubiquity to workaround bug 1921862 in Focal. + 2. A change to livecd-rootfs to add the required dependencies via a + chroot hook for the project ubuntu to workaround bug 1921862 in Focal. [Test Plan] Prerequisites: A network with an up and running AD controller, DHCP and DNS. 1. Start the installer either from a live session or ubiquity-dm 2. Proceed to the step "Who are you?" 3. Enter the user and computer information. For the computer name, you must use the FQDN. 4. Check box "Use Active Directory" and press continue. 5. Enter the address of the Active Directory controller and credentials of the user allowed to add machines to the domain. 6. Verify that the server is reachable by pressing "Test Connection". 7. Once all the information has been entered and is valid, press "Continue" to proceed with the remaining usual steps of the installation. 8. At the end of the installation you can reboot the machine and you are ready to log in as a user of the domain on first boot More information about initial installation on the ADSys' Wiki: https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/wiki/2.-Prerequisites *Verification* - - Log in as a user of the domain must succeed. - - The home directory of the user must be created dynamically. - + - Log in as a user of the domain must succeed. + - The home directory of the user must be created dynamically. [Where problems could occur] If the python code and debconf templates, Ubiquity won't start at all or the user info page will not be displayed. So it will highly visible and easy to diagnose. Otherwise, SSSD and Kerberos may not be configured correctly and will prevent login as an AD user. In this case, we still keep the local user and it is possible to log in and diagnose and fix the issue. [Other Info] Built and tested on latest focal daily image. ** Description changed: [Impact] This feature allows to join a machine to an Active Directory domain at installation time. It adds a check box in the user info stage, which once selected displays a page to enter the credentials to join the domain. It installs the required packages on the target filesystem and configures SSSD and Kerberos so it works on first boot. This feature also required: - 1. a change to the seed to include additional packages for AD connectivity. + 1. A change to the seed to include additional packages for AD connectivity. https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/commit/?id=a83c543f5fb98d4a539815b89b43cf9076c00283 2. A change to livecd-rootfs to add the required dependencies via a chroot hook for the project ubuntu to workaround bug 1921862 in Focal. [Test Plan] Prerequisites: A network with an up and running AD controller, DHCP and DNS. 1. Start the installer either from a live session or ubiquity-dm 2. Proceed to the step "Who are you?" 3. Enter the user and computer information. For the computer name, you must use the FQDN. 4. Check box "Use Active Directory" and press continue. 5. Enter the address of the Active Directory controller and credentials of the user allowed to add machines to the domain. 6. Verify that the server is reachable by pressing "Test Connection". 7. Once all the information has been entered and is valid, press "Continue" to proceed with the remaining usual steps of the installation. 8. At the end of the installation you can reboot the machine and you are ready to log in as a user of the domain on first boot More information about initial installation on the ADSys' Wiki: https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/wiki/2.-Prerequisites *Verification* - Log in as a user of the domain must succeed. - The home directory of the user must be created dynamically. [Where
[Bug 1926299] Re: incorrect sensor is read on Lenovo server BMC
uploaded to b/f/g/h/i thanks! ** Description changed: [impact] ipmi-sensors reads the wrong sensor on a Lenovo BMC (although the problem may happen on other BMCs as well) [test case] run ipmi-sensors over the network using ipmi 1.5 or 2 protocol, and check the sensor output. Specifically for this case, the server is a Lenovo SR665 with only 1 cpu socket populated, and dimms 1-16 are connected to cpu 1 while dimms 17-32 are connected to cpu2, so dimms 17-32 should not return any values. $ ipmi-sensors -u $USERNAME -p $PASSWD -D LAN_2_0 -l USER -h $BMCADDR | grep DIMM | grep Temp 110 | DIMM 1 Temp | Temperature | N/A | C | N/A 113 | DIMM 2 Temp | Temperature | N/A | C | N/A 116 | DIMM 3 Temp | Temperature | N/A | C | N/A 119 | DIMM 4 Temp | Temperature | N/A | C | N/A 122 | DIMM 5 Temp | Temperature | N/A | C | N/A 125 | DIMM 6 Temp | Temperature | N/A | C | N/A 128 | DIMM 7 Temp | Temperature | N/A | C | N/A 131 | DIMM 8 Temp | Temperature | N/A | C | N/A 134 | DIMM 9 Temp | Temperature | 52.00 | C | 'OK' 137 | DIMM 10 Temp | Temperature | 42.00 | C | 'OK' 140 | DIMM 11 Temp | Temperature | N/A | C | N/A 143 | DIMM 12 Temp | Temperature | N/A | C | N/A 146 | DIMM 13 Temp | Temperature | 27.00 | C | 'OK' 149 | DIMM 14 Temp | Temperature | 26.00 | C | 'OK' 152 | DIMM 15 Temp | Temperature | 24.00 | C | 'OK' 155 | DIMM 16 Temp | Temperature | 24.00 | C | 'OK' 158 | DIMM 17 Temp | Temperature | 218.00 | C | 'OK' 161 | DIMM 18 Temp | Temperature | 212.00 | C | 'OK' 165 | DIMM 19 Temp | Temperature | 212.00 | C | 'OK' 173 | DIMM 20 Temp | Temperature | N/A | C | N/A 176 | DIMM 21 Temp | Temperature | N/A | C | N/A 179 | DIMM 22 Temp | Temperature | N/A | C | N/A 182 | DIMM 23 Temp | Temperature | N/A | C | N/A 185 | DIMM 24 Temp | Temperature | N/A | C | N/A 188 | DIMM 25 Temp | Temperature | 0.00 | C | 'At or Below (<=) Lower Non-Critical Threshold' 191 | DIMM 26 Temp | Temperature | 0.00 | C | 'At or Below (<=) Lower Non-Critical Threshold' 194 | DIMM 27 Temp | Temperature | 0.00 | C | 'At or Below (<=) Lower Non-Critical Threshold' 197 | DIMM 28 Temp | Temperature | 0.00 | C | 'At or Below (<=) Lower Non-Critical Threshold' 200 | DIMM 29 Temp | Temperature | 0.00 | C | 'At or Below (<=) Lower Non-Critical Threshold' 203 | DIMM 30 Temp | Temperature | 0.00 | C | 'At or Below (<=) Lower Non-Critical Threshold' 206 | DIMM 31 Temp | Temperature | 0.00 | C | 'At or Below (<=) Lower Non-Critical Threshold' 209 | DIMM 32 Temp | Temperature | N/A | C | N/A [regression potential] any regression would likely result in incorrect values shown for some/all sensor readings [scope] - this is not fixed upstream, so it needed in all releases + this was recently fixed upstream, so it needed in all releases + https://github.com/chu11/freeipmi-mirror/pull/43 + + a new upstream release was made including the fix, so debian will pick + it up in their next devel cycle [other info] the problem is that this particular BMC has chosen to use a non-zero 'LUN' number for these sensors; almost all BMCs use the standard LUN number 0, as the spec does state in section 19.3: "Unless otherwise specified, commands that are listed as mandatory must be accessed via LUN 00b" However the spec does allow for implementations to use alternate LUN numbers, specifically section 5.4 describes how the BMC would report the LUN number to the requesting software, and section 7.2 clarifies that while LUN 00b is reserved for devices beloning to the BMC itself and 10b is reserved for SMS messages, LUN numbers 01b and 11b are reserved for 'OEM' use. So it does appear valid for the BMC implementation to place sensor(s) under LUN 01b instead of the default 00b. The cause of the invalid sensor readings in this particular case is because the BMC also defines sensors with the exact same sensor id number, but with LUN 00b. So when freeipmi attempts to read e.g. 'DIMM 17 Temp' sensor, it actually reads the current value for a completely different sensor, which (in this case) isn't even a temperature sensor, resulting in invalid temperature reading shown for the sensor, instead of showing it as N/A (since the DIMM slot isn't populated). Note that ipmitool correctly uses the alternate LUN number so this bug does not exist with that tool, this affects only freeipmi tooling. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926299 Title: incorrect sensor is read on Lenovo server BMC To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeipmi/+bug/1926299/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929043] Re: Setup of socket: '/var/run/mysqld/mysqlx.sock' failed, can't create lock file /var/run/mysqld/mysqlx.sock.lock
Hello, Thanks for filing a bug. However, I am worried that this is a duplicate of LP: #1899248. Since you've already reported this separately, I'd like to know if you can help me reproduce this issue? Can you please provide some way of reproducing this bug so that I/we can fix this? Thanks! ** Summary changed: - package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.25-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 + Setup of socket: '/var/run/mysqld/mysqlx.sock' failed, can't create lock file /var/run/mysqld/mysqlx.sock.lock ** Changed in: mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929043 Title: Setup of socket: '/var/run/mysqld/mysqlx.sock' failed, can't create lock file /var/run/mysqld/mysqlx.sock.lock To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/1929043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1927948] Re: Windows switch monitor after resuming from sleep
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927948 Title: Windows switch monitor after resuming from sleep To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1927948/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929213] Re: Ubuntu server fails to install if boot is not on sda1
Im thinkering with ubuntu server 20.10 from live USB. I tried single drive install and it worked. Once it went live I tried minimal setup on two SSDs( /boot, /boot/efi and encrypted LVM with rest on both). Not sure if its relevant but I can see in crash report: "adding partition 'partition-3' to disk "disk-sdb" (ptable: 'gpt') partnum: 1 offset_Sectrors: 2048 length_sectors 500113407 Preparing partition location on disk /dev/sda This fails with exist code: 4 For some reason Im not able to authorize apport. I will try to tinker with single drive install and two. Will crash report be sufficient ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929213 Title: Ubuntu server fails to install if boot is not on sda1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1929213/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1926265] Re: slapd enter in infinite loop on sched_yield syscall
Thanks. I notice your first write() is on fd 3 while the 2nd is on stdout (while for me the first 2 are on fd 3, which in my case is the LDAPS socket). For the issue to be reproduced, we need the client to be paused after having send the TLS "client hello". The first time the breakpoint is hit, you should be seeing something like: ``` #0 __GI___libc_write (fd=3, buf=0x55ace4ab, nbytes=75) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/write.c:27 #1 0x7797b408 in sb_debug_write (sbiod=0x55ab4810, buf=0x55ace4ab, len=75) at ../../../../libraries/liblber/sockbuf.c:854 #2 0x76bd5a0a in _gnutls_writev_emu (fd=fd@entry=0x5578f240, giovec=giovec@entry=0x7fff9b90, giovec_cnt=giovec_cnt@entry=3, vec=0, session=, session=) at buffers.c:447 #3 0x76bd608c in _gnutls_writev (total=126, giovec_cnt=3, giovec=0x7fff9b90, session=0x5578d3d0) at buffers.c:504 #4 _gnutls_io_write_flush (session=session@entry=0x5578d3d0) at buffers.c:698 #5 0x76bd7200 in _gnutls_handshake_io_write_flush (session=session@entry=0x5578d3d0) at buffers.c:820 #6 0x76bd9348 in _gnutls_send_handshake (session=session@entry=0x5578d3d0, bufel=bufel@entry=0x55acd620, type=type@entry=GNUTLS_HANDSHAKE_FINISHED) at handshake.c:1335 #7 0x76bda4ed in _gnutls_send_finished (again=, session=0x5578d3d0) at handshake.c:763 #8 send_handshake_final (session=session@entry=0x5578d3d0, init=init@entry=1) at handshake.c:3098 #9 0x76bdcd29 in handshake_client (session=0x5578d3d0) at handshake.c:2946 #10 gnutls_handshake (session=0x5578d3d0) at handshake.c:2626 #11 0x77bbb183 in tlsg_session_accept (session=0x55abb070) at tls_g.c:361 #12 0x77bb8751 in ldap_int_tls_connect (ld=ld@entry=0x557890d0, conn=) at tls2.c:362 #13 0x77bb9466 in ldap_int_tls_start (ld=ld@entry=0x557890d0, conn=conn@entry=0x55789500, srv=srv@entry=0x55789440) at tls2.c:860 #14 0x77b912b6 in ldap_int_open_connection (ld=ld@entry=0x557890d0, conn=conn@entry=0x55789500, srv=0x55789440, async=async@entry=0) at open.c:448 #15 0x77ba634d in ldap_new_connection (ld=ld@entry=0x557890d0, srvlist=srvlist@entry=0x55789198, use_ldsb=use_ldsb@entry=1, connect=connect@entry=1, bind=bind@entry=0x0, m_req=m_req@entry=0, m_res=0) at request.c:487 #16 0x77b9074a in ldap_open_defconn (ld=ld@entry=0x557890d0) at open.c:41 #17 0x77ba7908 in ldap_send_initial_request (ld=ld@entry=0x557890d0, msgtype=msgtype@entry=96, dn=dn@entry=0x0, ber=0x557894a0, msgid=1) at request.c:130 #18 0x77b9ab8f in ldap_sasl_bind (ld=0x557890d0, dn=0x0, mechanism=, cred=0x557692e0 , sctrls=0x0, cctrls=0x0, msgidp=0x7fffa2dc) at sasl.c:164 #19 0xd33b in ?? () #20 0x844f in ?? () #21 0x77388bf7 in __libc_start_main (main=0x81b0, argc=4, argv=0x7fffe638, init=, fini=, rtld_fini=, stack_end=0x7fffe628) at ../csu/libc-start.c:310 #22 0x966a in ?? () ``` And we need to make sure the server or client doesn't reject that connection outright. It would worth running "tshark -i any -f 'port 636'" in the mean time to verify the "client hello" is sent and that the server is willing to carry on the connection. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926265 Title: slapd enter in infinite loop on sched_yield syscall To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1926265/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1922342] Re: HIrsute live session takes ages to boot on BIOS systems
Hi,
Chris Guiver wrote:
> Delay occurs regardless of ISO being written using mkusb, dd, or gnome-
> disks..
Hmm. IIRC mkusb offers to unpack the ISO into a filesystem of the USB stick.
If the problem survives that conversion, then it is far inside the GRUB
equipment.
It should be possible to make experimental changes with the .cfg files of
such an USB stick.
(I can propose xorriso runs which repack an ISO to bear new .cfg content
and the same boot entry points as the original ISO. But directly editing
in a FAT filesystem would be much more straightforward.)
Being curious i looked into ubuntu-20.10-desktop-amd64.iso for occurences
of grub_platform and found in /boot/grub/grub.cfg
grub_platform
if [ "$grub_platform" = "efi" ]; then
menuentry 'Boot from next volume' {
exit
}
It could be that the complaint of GRUB is about the command grub_platform,
not about the use of $grub_platform.
I fail to find the implementation of the command in a freshly pulled GRUB git.
(Other known commands have a call to grub_register_command() with their
name as argument. grub_platform has not.)
A first experiment would be to remove above snippet from grub.cfg and
to check whether its presence caused the long delay.
--
Red herring warning:
The documentation about "normal" mode and grub_platform might be not helpful
for understanding our special problem. Possibly its text describes not the
work of the command but only the situation when it is _not_ needed.
Maybe GRUB is not running in "normal" mode, or maybe grub_platform updates the
variable, which is set at initialization time in grub-core/normal/main.c
from macro GRUB_PLATFORM:
GRUB_MOD_INIT(normal)
{
...
grub_env_set ("grub_platform", GRUB_PLATFORM);
...
That macro seems to be set by the compile time configuration of GRUB in
./configure which is supposed to stem from configure.ac
GRUB_PLATFORM="${platform}"
...
AC_SUBST(GRUB_PLATFORM)
The variable platform is set in the same file, either from option
--with-platform or from automatic detection
# Guess the platform if not specified.
if test "x$with_platform" = x; then
case "$target_cpu"-"$target_vendor" in
...
x86_64-apple) platform=efi ;;
x86_64-*) platform=pc ;;
...
So i'd assume that if /boot/grub/grub.cfg expects the possibility to see
"efi", then GRUB would have to be compiled with --with-platform=efi .
Meanwhile the GRUB in Ubuntu ISOs serves both, EFI and legacy BIOS.
I wonder how this is supposed to play with the compile time setting.
There is a compile time variable GRUB_PLATFORMS:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GRUB2_Quick_Start#Installing_GRUB2_software
"To install GRUB2, first set the GRUB_PLATFORMS variable with one or more
appropriate values in the system's make.conf. If unset, GRUB2 will guess
which platform to use on the system. It guesses pc (which is the MBR
style of installation) for x86/amd64 architectures."
But the relation of the single value GRUB_PLATFORM and the value list in
GRUB_PLATFORMS is not clear to me.
The GRUB manual talks in singular, not in plural:
https://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub/grub.html#grub_005fplatform
"In normal mode (see normal), GRUB sets the ‘grub_platform’ variable to
the platform for which GRUB was built (e.g. ‘pc’ or ‘efi’).
So this could want to say that each GRUB can serve in normal mode only one
platform. But the ISO wants to serve two of them. That would be a reason
not to run GRUB in normal mode.
In 2012 Vladimir Serbinko, then maintainer of GRUB, surely expected that
the ISO produced by grub-mkrescue can boot on "efi" and "pc" alike.
We discussed how xorriso should combine MBR boot code and GPT in one ISO.
:End of red herring warning.
--
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922342
Title:
HIrsute live session takes ages to boot on BIOS systems
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/1922342/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1898593] Re: Fix sphinx doc building
Hello, Thanks, Athos. I've removed G/H tasks atm and Impish is marked as "Fix Released", which appropriately represents the current situation. Yeah, I agree that it might not be worth SRU'ing and at least, adding to the already-long team backlog. As for lintian errors, I think it's worth forwarding the bug to Debian instead since this is a sync now. In case you feel differently, please let me know. Thanks. ** No longer affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Groovy) ** No longer affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Hirsute) ** No longer affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Impish) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898593 Title: Fix sphinx doc building To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1898593/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1897545] Re: Bind9: man file for rndc utility mentions wrong config file location
** Changed in: bind9 (Debian) Status: Unknown => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897545 Title: Bind9: man file for rndc utility mentions wrong config file location To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1897545/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1898593] Re: Fix sphinx doc building
The lintian fixes are not fixed. We'd need to add a dependency on that JS lib. Should we split the bug or just reopen it? About the sphinx documentation, pre-built manpages are still being shipped, so I am not really sure if this would be a good candidate for an SRU. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898593 Title: Fix sphinx doc building To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1898593/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1927219] Re: context deadline exceeded: unknown in containerd with latest runc version
** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Groovy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Hirsute) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927219 Title: context deadline exceeded: unknown in containerd with latest runc version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/runc/+bug/1927219/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929106] Re: runc -v empty output
Eeks, looks like I missed Lucas Kanashiro's comment. Since this is in- progress already, marking so and assigning it to Lucas for posterity. Thanks, Lucas! ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Groovy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Hirsute) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929106 Title: runc -v empty output To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/runc/+bug/1929106/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929106] Re: runc -v empty output
Hello Kir, Thanks for taking out time to file this bug and help make Ubuntu server better. I can very easily reproduce the problem and indeed this is weird. This bug is present since Bionic, at the very least. I'm marking this as "Confirmed" and tagging "server-next" for someone from our team to work on this. Subsequently, I am also marking this as of "low" importance. Thanks! ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Confirmed ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929106 Title: runc -v empty output To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/runc/+bug/1929106/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1926299] Re: incorrect sensor is read on Lenovo server BMC
bionic debdiff ** Patch added: "bionic-1926299.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeipmi/+bug/1926299/+attachment/5499275/+files/bionic-1926299.debdiff ** Tags added: sts-sponsor verification-needed-bionic verification- needed-focal verification-needed-groovy verification-needed-hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926299 Title: incorrect sensor is read on Lenovo server BMC To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeipmi/+bug/1926299/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929025] Re: upgrade from 18.04.5 LTS to 20.4 LTS failed: Could not calculate the upgrade
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1928397 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928397 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1928397 ensure python is marked for removal when upgrading from 18.04 to 20.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929025 Title: upgrade from 18.04.5 LTS to 20.4 LTS failed: Could not calculate the upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1929025/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
