[Bug 1676164] Re: REQ: firefox-esr package needed

[Adam Porter]

Unbelievable: Canonical has released Firefox 57, which no longer
supports XUL extensions (i.e. the ones in use since Firefox was created,
and when Trusty was released), in 14.04 Trusty.  This is breaking users'
Firefox installations in a "Long Term Support" release.  And still no
official ESR package.

This is absolutely unacceptable.  Ubuntu LTS releases can no longer be
taken seriously.  Back to Debian for me (a long time coming, but this is
like the last straw).  10 years ago, Ubuntu was doing good work, making
up for many of Debian's desktop weaknesses, but now Ubuntu isn't even
trustworthy.  Debian would never do something like this.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1676164

Title:
  REQ: firefox-esr package needed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1676164/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1629607] [NEW] Privacy settings reset to default on upgrade

[Adam Porter]

Public bug reported:

Ubuntu Trusty 14.04
Firefox 49.0

For some time now I have noticed that every time I upgrade Firefox, my
profile's privacy settings are reset to default.  For a while I didn't
know why they were being reset, so I put a script in a cron job (see
attachment) to monitor them and alert me when they changed.  Since doing
that I have realized that they are reset when I upgrade Firefox.

This is a serious violation of user trust and privacy.  Users may have
their preferences set to not save history, to not save cookies, to
delete them upon exit, etc, but after installing a routine upgrade to
Firefox (which happens every few weeks), their privacy settings will be
reset to "Firefox will: Remember history", and the user will not be
informed of this.

I don't know if the cause lies in Firefox itself or in the Ubuntu
packaging, but this needs to be fixed.

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: privacy

** Attachment added: "Fish script suitable for a cron job to alert the user 
when cookie settings change from the desired settings (see $lines variable)"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1629607/+attachment/4752589/+files/check-firefox-cookie-settings

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1629607

Title:
  Privacy settings reset to default on upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1629607/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1425691] [NEW] Should depend on libdbd-sqlite3, not merely suggest it

[Adam Porter]

Public bug reported:

I installed gnucash on a different computer and copied my gnucash config
and data files to it.  When I tried to open my data file, it said, "no
suitable backend was found for file."  The only file type available to
choose from in the Open dialog was "file."  I had to google the error to
find a page on a Fedora forum where a user explained that he had to
install a package for gnucash to work with its own SQLite-format files.

In Ubuntu the package is libdbd-sqlite3.  The gnucash package "Suggests"
it, but it should Depend on it.  It's required to use GnuCash's own file
format.  And if it's not installed, and the user tries to open such a
file, the user is left with little clue as to the solution.

** Affects: gnucash (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1425691

Title:
  Should depend on libdbd-sqlite3, not merely suggest it

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnucash/+bug/1425691/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1378789] Re: [SRU] Set the default IO scheduler to CFQ in Kubuntu Trusty

[Adam Porter]

Thank you for making this change, finally.

I'd just like to point out that Baloo is far from the only thing that
uses ionice.  mlocate even uses it by default when it's available.  I
also use it extensively in backup scripts and other long-running
background operations.  I even use it for Dropbox (which does a lot of
I/O on startup).

Frankly, I consider it a bug that deadline doesn't support ionice.
Desktop systems commonly have background I/O operations running
nowadays, and ionice is crucial for preventing such operations from
harming interactive responsiveness.  It's my understanding that deadline
was only intended for servers and SSDs in the first place, so perhaps
its use in other Ubuntu variants on HDDs should be revisited

Or we could use BFQ on desktops and kiss all these problems goodbye...if
only the kernel team would build it...  (I've tried applying the patches
to a current Ubuntu kernel, but it's a real mess since they aren't kept
in sync.  If the kernel team would build it with the kernel--not
necessarily set it as default, just build it--then people could use it,
experiment with it, and gather data about it.  Just watch the videos
made by the BFQ devs on YouTube--they clearly show that it's worth it!)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1378789

Title:
  [SRU] Set the default IO scheduler to CFQ in Kubuntu Trusty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-settings/+bug/1378789/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1371274] Re: Unable to use the widevine plugin with chromium

[Adam Porter]

> Because Chromium developers want their browser to be free from digital
restrictions, this bug will stay unfixed for Ubuntu too.

What difference does that make?  It's not "their browser."  Chromium is
free software, and Ubuntu can patch it however it pleases.

What would serve users better: to be able to use this plugin in
Chromium, or to have no choice but to use the Google-built Chrome
package and its proprietary code?

The answer to that question is clear, and therefore the right thing to
do is also clear: apply a patch to Chromium in Ubuntu when a patch
becomes available.  It makes no sense to WONTFIX this bug.  WONTFIX is
an anti-user attitude that doesn't belong in Ubuntu or any other free
software Linux distro.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371274

Title:
  Unable to use the widevine plugin with chromium

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1371274/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1272338] Re: Xorg memory leak on trusty

[Adam Porter]

Chris, which KDE systray applet were you referring to?  I'd like to
know, in case it's one I have loaded.  :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1272338

Title:
  Xorg memory leak on trusty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1272338/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1323624] [NEW] Unresponsive CIFS mounts block unrelated I/O

[Adam Porter]

Public bug reported:

If I have a CIFS mount, and then that mount's server goes down, other
file operations on my client system block until the Samba server comes
back up.  This causes extremely weird behavior, things like right-click
menus not disappearing, mouse clicks in X not working at all while
keyboard input does work, plasma-desktop fails to finish loading its
configuration, resulting in half-empty panels and no wallpaper, etc.

I will try to illustrate:

$ grep cifs /etc/fstab
//server/Downloads /mnt/downloads   cifsuser,guest,noauto

$ mount /mnt/downloads

$ dolphin /mnt/downloads

$ ssh root@server "service smbd stop"

$ lsof | grep downloads
lsof: WARNING: can't stat() cifs file system /mnt/downloads
  Output information may be incomplete. 
[lsof blocks here]

At this point, the weird bugs begin happening: Dolphin blocks when I
right-click in its window.  This leaves a blocked right-click menu
(which is sometimes invisible, sometimes visible but empty, and
sometimes a solid gray rectangle), and this blocked right-click menu
grabs mouse clicks in X, preventing me from clicking anything else in X,
while the keyboard continues working.  At this point I kill Dolphin from
a terminal using the keyboard, but plasma-desktop is still not
responding to mouse clicks.  So I kill and restart plasma-desktop from a
terminal, but when it loads, it doesn't load completely, leaving a half-
empty panel with missing applets, and no wallpaper--and still no
response to mouse clicks.

But it's not all about X apps.  Even /bin/df blocks.  At one point, I
wondered if my system had somehow run out of disk space, which can cause
weird behavior, so I ran df.  But df just sat there, with no output
whatsoever.

And after all this, when I do:

$ ssh root@server "service smbd start"

Everything suddenly unblocks and works fine again.

It seems to me that having kernel CIFS mounts cause blocking in
unrelated I/O is a major bug, potentially a security bug due to the
denial-of-service issue.  The way it causes an apparently inexplicable
chain of weird behavior in all sorts of programs makes it very difficult
to debug.

CIFS mounts are LAN mounts.  It seems like a simple solution would be to
have a very short timeout, 1-2 seconds or so.  If it times out, just
return an error and let the apps blocking on that I/O get on with what
they're doing.  The current behavior means that using kernel CIFS mounts
is a recipe for disaster.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: linux-image-generic 3.13.0.24.29
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.47-generic 3.13.9
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.2
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC1:  me11691 F pulseaudio
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  me11691 F pulseaudio
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Tue May 27 06:44:22 2014
InstallationDate: Installed on 2010-05-20 (1467 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100427)
IwConfig:
 eth0  no wireless extensions.
 
 lono wireless extensions.
MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name
ProcFB: 0 VESA VGA
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-24-generic 
root=UUID=e3d95eec-f6ce-426f-b110-6633ff6f62c3 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
RelatedPackageVersions:
 linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-24-generic N/A
 linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-24-generic  N/A
 linux-firmware 1.127.2
RfKill:
 
SourcePackage: linux
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-05-07 (20 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 08/04/2009
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 0602
dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: P5Q PRO TURBO
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0602:bd08/04/2009:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP5QPROTURBO:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion:
dmi.product.name: System Product Name
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty

** Summary changed:

- Unresponsive CIFS mounts blocks unrelated I/O
+ Unresponsive CIFS mounts block unrelated I/O

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1323624

Title:
  Unresponsive CIFS mounts block unrelated I/O

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1323624/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1317449] Re: Please update to a version > 3.8.2

[Adam Porter]

By the way, since this is a bug, causing crashes, I don't think it's
appropriate for this to be marked Wishlist.  If the fix happens to be
upgrading the minor version, so be it.  It's still a bug.

** Changed in: sqlite3 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1317449

Title:
  Please update to a version > 3.8.2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sqlite/+bug/1317449/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1317449] Re: Please update to a version > 3.8.2

[Adam Porter]

Please fix this in Trusty.  It's extremely frustrating to have Digikam
crash when I'm in the middle of organizing photos, especially since it's
not a bug in Digikam itself.  Trusty is going to be around for years, so
this really needs to be fixed.  And Digikam is probably not the only
software crashing because of this issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1317449

Title:
  Please update to a version > 3.8.2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sqlite/+bug/1317449/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1306991] Re: pip stops with ImportError for request-Modul

[Adam Porter]

$ sudo apt-get install python-pip
$ pip
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/pip", line 9, in 
load_entry_point('pip==1.5.4', 'console_scripts', 'pip')()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 351, in 
load_entry_point
return get_distribution(dist).load_entry_point(group, name)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 2363, in 
load_entry_point
return ep.load()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 2088, in load
entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(), ['__name__'])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pip/__init__.py", line 11, in 
from pip.vcs import git, mercurial, subversion, bazaar  # noqa
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pip/vcs/mercurial.py", line 9, in 

from pip.download import path_to_url
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pip/download.py", line 25, in 
from requests.compat import IncompleteRead
ImportError: cannot import name IncompleteRead

PIP is broken out-of-the-box on Trusty.  :/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1306991

Title:
  pip stops with ImportError for request-Modul

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pip/+bug/1306991/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1320403] [NEW] update-mime-database thrashes hard disk

[Adam Porter]

Public bug reported:

After upgrading my machines to Trusty, I have noticed that when I
install packages, the disk thrashes very hard while the command "update-
mime-database.real /usr/share/mime" is running.  Watching the disk
activity with atop, I see that the process is reading from the disk at a
rate of about 200 KB/sec, and writing at about half that rate.  I can
hear the disk head jumping back and forth as fast as possible.

This didn't happen in the past.  Something has changed, and it's not
good.

** Affects: shared-mime-info (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1320403

Title:
  update-mime-database thrashes hard disk

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shared-mime-info/+bug/1320403/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1163501] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT in soup_session_feature_detach()

[Adam Porter]

P.S.  Launchpad "helpfully" wrapped the command onto a new line.  The
option should be without any spaces, like this:

-Dorg.eclipse.swt.browser.DefaultType=mozilla

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1163501

Title:
  java crashed with SIGABRT in soup_session_feature_detach()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/eclipse/+bug/1163501/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1163501] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT in soup_session_feature_detach()

[Adam Porter]

After upgrading my machines to Trusty, I can no longer run
CrashPlanDesktop, the UI for the CrashPlan backup service.

war59312's workaround does seem to work.  It's not necessary to stop and
restart the service, because it's completely separate from the UI app.
Simply run this command to add the workaround to the config file, and
then run CrashPlanDesktop:

$ sed -i
's/GUI_JAVA_OPTS="/GUI_JAVA_OPTS="-Dorg.eclipse.swt.browser.DefaultType=mozilla
/' /usr/local/crashplan/bin/run.conf

I just submitted a support ticket to Code42 (Request #471934) detailing
the bug and providing links to this and other bug reports.  Hopefully
they will fix it soon, and then the workaround can be removed.

Very disappointing to encounter this unfixed bug more than a year after
it was first reported.  But thankfully, open bug trackers like this make
it easy to collaborate on fixes.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1163501

Title:
  java crashed with SIGABRT in soup_session_feature_detach()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/eclipse/+bug/1163501/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1008395] Re: Shouldn't put entry in /etc/xdg/autostart

[Adam Porter]

Here is a patch to remove the autostarting.

** Patch added: "0001-Remove-autostart.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/psensor/+bug/1008395/+attachment/4095681/+files/0001-Remove-autostart.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008395

Title:
  Shouldn't put entry in /etc/xdg/autostart

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/psensor/+bug/1008395/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 774643] Re: sched-powersave is outdated

[Adam Porter]

$ cat /etc/lsb-release 
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=13.10
DISTRIB_CODENAME=saucy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 13.10"

$ cat /usr/lib/pm-utils/power.d/sched-powersave
sched_powersave() {
for pool in mc smp smt; do
dev="/sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_${pool}_power_savings"
[ -w "$dev" ] || continue
echo $1 > "$dev"
done
}

$ ls /sys/devices/system/cpu/
cpu0  cpu1  cpu2  cpu3  cpufreq  cpuidle  kernel_max  microcode  modalias  
offline  online  possible  power  present  probe  release  uevent

Please do not mark bugs invalid without using the given shell commands
to see for yourself that it's still an issue on a supported release.

This happens over and over on Ubuntu bug reports: they languish for
years, then someone comes along and marks them invalid for the sake of
tidying up the bug tracker.  But said someone doesn't even put forth
minimal effort to check the bug's status; instead they whack everything
over a certain age with their "invalid stick."  This is insulting to the
reporter who spent his valuable time contributing a detailed bug report
to the project.

As a result, people like myself, who have reported hundreds of bugs,
decide to no longer do so, because it is ultimately a waste of their
time.  As a result, Ubuntu and its community suffer.

"First, do no harm."

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774643

Title:
  sched-powersave is outdated

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pm-utils/+bug/774643/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 774643] Re: sched-powersave is outdated

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774643

Title:
  sched-powersave is outdated

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pm-utils/+bug/774643/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 742889] Re: DigiCert certificates should be included in Ubuntu

[Adam Porter]

This still exists in Saucy!  I can't even clone a repo from GitHub!

$ gnutls-cli -p 443 github.com
Resolving 'github.com'...
Connecting to '192.30.252.128:443'...
- Certificate type: X.509
 - Got a certificate list of 2 certificates.
 - Certificate[0] info:
  - subject `businessCategory=Private 
Organization,jurisdictionOfIncorporationCountryName=US,jurisdictionOfIncorporationStateOrProvinceName=Delaware,serialNumber=5157550,STREET=548
 4th Street,postalCode=94107,C=US,ST=California,L=San Francisco,O=GitHub\, 
Inc.,CN=github.com', issuer `C=US,O=DigiCert 
Inc,OU=www.digicert.com,CN=DigiCert High Assurance EV CA-1', RSA key 2048 bits, 
signed using RSA-SHA1, activated `2013-06-10 00:00:00 UTC', expires `2015-09-02 
12:00:00 UTC', SHA-1 fingerprint `d712e96965dcf236c874c7037dc0b224a93bd233'
 - Certificate[1] info:
  - subject `C=US,O=DigiCert Inc,OU=www.digicert.com,CN=DigiCert High Assurance 
EV CA-1', issuer `C=US,O=DigiCert Inc,OU=www.digicert.com,CN=DigiCert High 
Assurance EV Root CA', RSA key 2048 bits, signed using RSA-SHA1, activated 
`2007-11-09 12:00:00 UTC', expires `2021-11-10 00:00:00 UTC', SHA-1 fingerprint 
`dbc7e90b0da5d88a5535430eeb665d077859e8e8'
- The hostname in the certificate matches 'github.com'.
- Peer's certificate issuer is unknown
- Peer's certificate is NOT trusted
- Version: TLS1.2
- Key Exchange: RSA
- Cipher: AES-128-CBC
- MAC: SHA256
- Compression: NULL
- Handshake was completed

- Simple Client Mode:

HTTP/1.0 408 Request Time-out
Cache-Control: no-cache
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html

408 Request Time-out
Your browser didn't send a complete request in time.

- Peer has closed the GnuTLS connection

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742889

Title:
  DigiCert certificates should be included in Ubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates/+bug/742889/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 575749] Re: umount buffer overflow

[Adam Porter]

I don't know.  It's been three years, and I haven't burned a DVD in a
long time.  The kernel has changed a lot since then, too.  I honestly
don't have time to test it right now, so I guess you might as well
expire the bug.

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Phillip Susi  wrote:
> This looks like it was a bug in hal, which has been killed off.  Are you
> still able to reproduce this today?
>
>
> ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575749
>
> Title:
>   umount buffer overflow
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/575749/+subscriptions

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575749

Title:
  umount buffer overflow

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/575749/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1184663] Re: Incorrect margins when printing to a laser printer using CUPS 1.6.x

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1184663

Title:
  Incorrect margins when printing to a laser printer using CUPS 1.6.x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1184663/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1232161] [NEW] LibreOffice, Okular print offset high and right; Acroread prints correctly

[Adam Porter]

Public bug reported:

I've been using this printer on Ubuntu for several years.  It's always
worked great.

Since upgrading to Raring, every document I print with LibreOffice or
Okular prints offset high and to the right.  But if I save the same ODT
document to a PDF from LibreOffice, and then print it with Adobe Acrobat
Reader in Ubuntu, it prints correctly.

I have tried deleting the printer in CUPS and readding it, and I have
tried purging and reinstalling the Brother printer driver packages, but
neither made any difference.

I have three Ubuntu Raring systems printing to this printer, and all
three exhibit this bug.

This is very frustrating, because it used to work perfectly, and now I
have to jump through extra hoops just to print like I used to.

Please help me debug and fix this.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: cups 1.6.2-1ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-30.44-generic 3.8.13.6
Uname: Linux 3.8.0-30-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8.3
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Sep 27 12:26:14 2013
InstallationDate: Installed on 2010-05-20 (1226 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100427)
Lpstat: device for Brother_HL2270DW: lpd://brotherhl2270dw/BINARY_P1
MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name
MarkForUpload: True
Papersize: letter
PpdFiles: Brother_HL2270DW: Brother HL2270DW for CUPS
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.8.0-30-generic 
root=UUID=e3d95eec-f6ce-426f-b110-6633ff6f62c3 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: cups
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-07-06 (82 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 08/04/2009
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 0602
dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: P5Q PRO TURBO
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0602:bd08/04/2009:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP5QPROTURBO:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion:
dmi.product.name: System Product Name
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer

** Affects: cups (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug raring

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232161

Title:
  LibreOffice, Okular print offset high and right; Acroread prints
  correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1232161/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1035755] Re: [firefox] Extension causes context/drop down menus to disappear

[Adam Porter]

On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Joseph Yasi  wrote:
> I've been using this fix for months with no problems. Are you running
> into this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libdbusmenu-qt/+bug/779344 ?

Yes, I experience that bug.  But I still have this bug too.  I had to
disable the globalmenu in Firefox.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035755

Title:
  [firefox] Extension causes context/drop down menus to disappear

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libdbusmenu-qt/+bug/1035755/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1221520] Re: Blank pages inserted in duplex print job

[Adam Porter]

Tobias,

Thanks for pointing that out.  I don't know how I managed to confuse red
with green.  I think it was late.  :)

Till,

I understand what you're saying.  It would definitely not be helpful for
two copies of a 3 page document to be printed on only 3 sheets of paper
if you wanted to hand out two copies of it.

What I've been doing for some time now is printing custom graph paper
templates.  It was a tremendous help to have a duplex printer so it
would print on both sides of the paper without requiring me to take the
printed paper and put it back into the printer for a second print job.
I've been doing this for so long that it never occurred to me that, if I
wanted to print two copies of a one-page document for distribution to
two people, this would require me to submit two print jobs instead of
submitting one job for two copies.

However, for my needs, the "buggy" behavior is what I actually need.  Is
there any way I can preserve this behavior?  Do I need to maintain a
patch and build the package for myself?  Maybe I can find a way to turn
the PDFs into two-page documents with both pages identical, but this
would have to be done for every new template, so it would be much less
convenient.

Thanks to both of you for your help.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1221520

Title:
  Blank pages inserted in duplex print job

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-filters/+bug/1221520/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1098011] Re: atop unusable in Quantal: trap divide error

[Adam Porter]

This bug no longer occurs in Raring.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098011

Title:
  atop unusable in Quantal: trap divide error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/atop/+bug/1098011/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1221520] Re: Blank pages inserted in duplex print job

[Adam Porter]

Upon further investigation, this appears to be a regression.  Rev 7036
 added a
single line: "outputno++;":

  if (param.mirror) {
curpage->mirror();
  }
  outputno++;  // line added
  proc.add_page(curpage,param.reverse); // reverse -> insert at beginning
}
  }

 However, looking at the latest revision
, that
line appears to have moved:

  if (param.mirror) {
 curpage->mirror();
// TODO? update rect? --- not needed any more
  }
  proc.add_page(curpage,param.reverse); // reverse -> insert at 
beginning
}
outputno++;
curpage=proc.new_page(param.page.width,param.page.height);  
  }

Interestingly, rev 7036 is not listed anywhere on that page.  I'm no
expert, so maybe I'm misinterpreting it, but it suggests to me that
r7036 was effectively lost in a later merge, resulting in the crucial
line moving to the wrong place.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1221520

Title:
  Blank pages inserted in duplex print job

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-filters/+bug/1221520/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1221520] [NEW] Blank pages inserted in duplex print job

[Adam Porter]

Public bug reported:

I have a Brother HL2270DW printer.  I've been using it in Ubuntu since I
got it a few years ago.  It's always worked fine.

Lately, however, it has been inserting a blank page between pages in
duplex jobs.  For example, if I print two copies of a one-page document
with duplex on, it used to print on both sides of one sheet of paper;
but now it prints on one side, takes the paper back in as if to print on
the back side, spits it out with the back side blank, and then does the
same routine on a second sheet of paper.  I think it started happening
when I upgraded from Quantal to Raring.  I haven't been printing a lot
lately, so I haven't noticed it until now.

I found Bug #292, which seems like the same bug, however 1) I have
no "scale to fit" option checked or even available in any of the print
dialogs I've been using, both in CUPS itself, in LibreOffice, and in
Okular; and 2) I am having this problem with Raring, even though that
bug indicates it should be fixed in Raring.

On a hunch, I downgraded the cups-filters package (not the cups package)
to the version from Quantal, then restarted CUPS, and the problem went
away.  I also had to install libqpdf8 from Quantal to fulfill the
dependencies of that version of cups-filters.

cups-filters:
  Installed: 1.0.24-2
  Candidate: 1.0.34-0ubuntu1.1
  Version table:
 1.0.34-0ubuntu1.1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ raring-updates/main i386 
Packages
 1.0.34-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ raring/main i386 Packages
 *** 1.0.24-2 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

libqpdf8:
  Installed: 3.0.2-1
  Candidate: 3.0.2-1
  Version table:
 *** 3.0.2-1 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

According to Bug #292, the problem should have been fixed in cups-
filters 1.0.30.  I'm guessing that either a) somehow the fix didn't make
it into 1.0.30 after all; or b) Ubuntu's package somehow missed the fix,
despite the newer upstream version; or c) it's regressed since 1.0.30;
or d) this is a similar but unrelated bug.

Thankfully I've been able to work around it by using the old version of
the package, but who knows if that will work in Saucy.  Please let me
know how I can help fix this bug.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: cups-filters 1.0.24-2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-27.40-generic 3.8.13.4
Uname: Linux 3.8.0-27-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8.3
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Sep  5 23:19:59 2013
Lpstat:
 device for DormNet: socket://10.1.23.45:9100
 device for HL2270DW: lpd://192.168.0.102/binary_p1
 device for laserdad: smb://OFFICE/DAD/LaserDad
 device for ML-1210: usb://Samsung/ML-1210
MachineType: Dell Inc. XPS M1330
MarkForUpload: True
Papersize: letter
PpdFiles:
 HL2270DW: Brother HL2270DW for CUPS
 ML-1210: Samsung ML-1210 Foomatic/gdi (recommended)
 DormNet: Lexmark Optra E321 Foomatic/hpijs-pcl5e (recommended)
 laserdad: Brother HL-5240 BR-Script3
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.8.0-27-generic 
root=/dev/mapper/vg-root ro
SourcePackage: cups-filters
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-06-13 (84 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 12/26/2008
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: A15
dmi.board.name: 0PU073
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.chassis.type: 8
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA15:bd12/26/2008:svnDellInc.:pnXPSM1330:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0PU073:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr:
dmi.product.name: XPS M1330
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.

** Affects: cups-filters (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 raring third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1221520

Title:
  Blank pages inserted in duplex print job

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-filters/+bug/1221520/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1035755] Re: [firefox] Extension causes context/drop down menus to disappear

[Adam Porter]

Thank you, Joseph.  This should be made the default for all package
upgrades and new installs until this bug is conclusively fixed.

By the way, using libdbusmenu-qt2 0.9.2+13.10.20130826-0ubuntu1 (version
number bloat, anyone?) from Saucy has NOT fixed the bug.  After a few
hours, the menus have stopped working again, immediately after I opened
a menu from the add-on bar.  The menu's outline is visible for a split
second longer than it was when it was failing before, but it still
fails, and I still have to restart Firefox.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035755

Title:
  [firefox] Extension causes context/drop down menus to disappear

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libdbusmenu-qt/+bug/1035755/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1035755] Re: [firefox] Extension causes context/drop down menus to disappear

[Adam Porter]

I'm on Raring, and I had this bug many months ago, but I turned off the
global menu extension and was able to keep using Firefox.

Recently Firefox began having the same bug again, and I couldn't figure
out why.  I even removed firefox-globalmenu, but it kept happening.
Then I noticed that there is no longer an extension listed for it in
Firefox, and then I noticed that firefox-globalmenu suddenly became a
transitional package--i.e. it's built into the Firefox package, and
there's no way to disable it anymore.

So that leaves me with two choices:

a.  Restart Firefox many times per day.
b.  Turn off global menu for all applications.

Neither of these are good choices.

Thankfully, the libdbusmenu-qt2 package for Saucy works in Raring and
seems to solve this bug.

Now I'm left with two questions:

1.  When is the Raring package going to be upgraded?  It's essential
that it is upgraded: this is a major regression that popped up without
warning in the middle of Raring's lifecycle.

2.  Why was the globalmenu package merged into the main Firefox package?
Why is there no way to disable the global menu for Firefox?  This
resulted in Firefox's context menus suddenly failing to work at all,
with no apparent explanation.  On top of that, I had explicitly disabled
the global menu for Firefox, but this merge caused it to return without
my consent and without any way to disable it!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035755

Title:
  [firefox] Extension causes context/drop down menus to disappear

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libdbusmenu-qt/+bug/1035755/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 273742] Re: Pulseaudio over wifi stutters horribly

[Adam Porter]

I figured out that Network Manager is what causes the scanning, and that
can be stopped by setting the BSSID of the connection in the Network
Manager settings.  (In KDE there's a "Select" button next to the BSSID
field that fills this in automatically if you're already connected to
your AP.)  Since the BSSID is set, you won't be roaming from one AP to
another, so NM doesn't scan for other APs with the same SSID.

So I set my BSSID and that has stopped the scans, which I think happened
every 120 seconds (according to the NM source).  That has nearly
completely fixed the stuttering.  Any stuttering that remains is much
less frequent and less severe; I'm not sure if it's network-related.

Here are some relevant bug reports:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/373680
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490493
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=513820
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490493

This could also help if you need to disable it but forcing the BSSID
isn't an option:

http://nilvec.com/disable-scanning-in-networkmanager-when-connected.html

** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #490493
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490493

** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #513820
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=513820

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273742

Title:
  Pulseaudio over wifi stutters horribly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pulseaudio/+bug/273742/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 273742] Re: Pulseaudio over wifi stutters horribly

[Adam Porter]

For a few weeks I've been using PulseAudio network tunneling over wifi.
I've noticed that on a very regular interval the audio stutters for a
few seconds.  I've been watching network traffic in KSysGuard, and I
noticed that the transmit rate is usually about 200 KB/sec, but when the
audio stutters, the transfer rate drops slightly.  When that's the only
thing going on on my network, I can observe this happening at a
completely regular interval.

I finally figured out that it's caused by my laptop's wireless card
scanning for other networks.  I can make it stutter in exactly the same
way on command by running "iwlist scan".

My laptop has an "Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 4965 AG" network card,
and it uses the iwl4965 driver.  Now my laptop very rarely moves
anywhere, and it is always on my home wifi network, so I don't need it
to scan for other networks.  If I could simply disable scanning on my
laptop, it wouldn't stutter anymore.

Of course, more buffering in PulseAudio would help a little, but I think
all it would do is cause it to stutter a bit less often.  Eventually the
stuttering would cause the buffer to empty, because it can't fill faster
than audio is being played.  So it could stutter less often, for a
longer period of time, but it would still end up stuttering.

I've been googling around, trying to find a way to adjust the scan
interval, but I haven't found anything yet.  I'm not sure if it's
controlled by wpa_supplicant or the driver.  I've also seen that some
cards seem to support "background scanning" and others "progressive
scanning", and I don't know if one of those would mitigate it, or if my
card already does one of them.

Anyway, for anyone else who is having stuttering, if you're on wireless,
one cause of it is almost surely the scan interval.  Find a way to fix
that and you may solve it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273742

Title:
  Pulseaudio over wifi stutters horribly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pulseaudio/+bug/273742/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1128428] Re: linkhard option disappeared again

[Adam Porter]

It could cause dataloss across filesystems.  The reporter in question
used it across chroots and symlinks and filesystems and it caused
problems with /lib on his main fs.  For an average use case, like
deduplicating photos or music on a single filesystem, this is not an
issue, and hardlinks are very desirable.

A newer hardlinks patch set was posted at
, but it has sat
there for almost two years.  It'd be very nice to have this feature
back.

There's another Debian bug about this feature's being re-added:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=284274

** Bug watch added: code.google.com/p/fdupes/issues #8
   http://code.google.com/p/fdupes/issues/detail?id=8

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #284274
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=284274

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1128428

Title:
  linkhard option disappeared again

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fdupes/+bug/1128428/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 913860] Re: ext4 on mmcblk card causes major kernel problems

[Adam Porter]

Please explain why this was marked wontfix.  I'm having this problem on
Raring.  I put an ext4 partition on an SDHC card I'm testing using for
backup purposes, and I'm having kernel bugs preventing access to the
filesystem, preventing unmounting, and even causing unrelated I/O to
fail, forcing a hard reset of the system.  This needs to be fixed.

** Summary changed:

- Suepend/resume causes problems with mounted and active mmcblk device
+ ext4 on mmcblk card causes major kernel problems

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913860

Title:
  ext4 on mmcblk card causes major kernel problems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/913860/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1160471] Re: BCM4313 wl driver 6.20.155.1 not working in raring, but 5.100.82.112 does

[Adam Porter]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097519 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097519

Hi Poru,

That's interesting, because the brcmsmac driver works perfectly for
me, and I have exactly the same network controller you have.  What
system is it running on?  Mine is an Acer Aspire One AO722.  I wonder
if there's more to these problems than just the card itself.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1160471

Title:
  BCM4313 wl driver 6.20.155.1 not working in raring, but 5.100.82.112
  does

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1160471/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1191228] Re: bcmwl-kernel-source 6.20.155.1+bdcom-0ubuntu6: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

[Adam Porter]

I don't think using a Saucy kernel on Precise is supported.  But
anyway, I think this is a duplicate of one of the many build failure
bugs that have been recently submitted.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191228

Title:
  bcmwl-kernel-source 6.20.155.1+bdcom-0ubuntu6: bcmwl kernel module
  failed to build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1191228/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 655831] Re: update-apt-xapian-index bogs down system

[Adam Porter]

Still affecting Raring.

We've yet to receive an explanation of the rationale for this package
being installed by default (or even for its very existence).  It's been
causing major usability problems for almost 3 years now.  It's
unfathomable that it's installed on Ubuntu server VM images!

This is exactly the kind of problem that puts people off using Ubuntu
and drives them, bewildered, back to Windows, knowing nothing except
that "Linux is slow as molasses compared to Windows; randomly it will
get so slow I can't even watch a video on YouTube!"

Here are the packages that depend on or recommend apt-xapian-index:

$ apt-cache rdepends apt-xapian-index
apt-xapian-index
Reverse Depends:
  software-center
  muon-installer
  muon-discover
  muon
  synaptic
  packagesearch
  packagekit-backend-aptcc
  muon-installer
  muon-discover
  muon
  goplay
  fuss-launcher
  ept-cache
  software-center
  python-apt
  aptitude

What does it take to get something done about this?  Should I upload
patches to these packages that removes it from their dependencies?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655831

Title:
  update-apt-xapian-index bogs down system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ac100/+bug/655831/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 131094] Re: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness

[Adam Porter]

It's very true that years ago I/O latency was much less of a problem
with Linux.  When I first started using Debian full-time about ten
years ago, I never had problems with music skipping or anything like
that.  I guess in the kernel development since then, throughput has
been prioritized over latency.  Nowadays with 3.8 kernels and the same
hardware, it's trivial to make my music player skip under load, even
when its buffer is set to 3 ms.

I haven't thought of trying the lowlatency kernel, so thanks for that
idea.  I will be trying that!

Besides that, I wish Ubuntu would make BFQ the default I/O scheduler
(or at least build it in by default so we can easily switch to it,
instead of having to build kernels or install from third-party repos).
 Check out this video from a year ago:

http://youtu.be/J-e7LnJblm8

Seems obvious to me that BFQ is the way to go for desktops.

I have noticed lately that Deadline seems to result in less music
skipping than CFQ, so I can see why Deadline is the default now.  But
Deadline doesn't support ionice, so I can't do things like run backups
or upgrades in the background at minimum I/O priority.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094

Title:
  Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/131094/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1180728] Re: kernel crash

[Adam Porter]

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Daniel Moyne
<1180...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> no my system is still usable as this problem appears once in a while. But as 
> I keep updating the kernel through the normal updates it may disappear. For 
> me the main question is :
> - When this bug shows up as I have a complete freeze of my computer how to 
> collect the information for a complete report?

You might be able to use the SAK keys to sync the hard disk, then
reboot and see if anything was logged.  e.g. when the system freezes,
press:

Alt + SysRq + S U S B (hold down Alt+SysRq and press S U S B in order)

That should reboot the system.  If not, use the reset button or
power-cycle it.  Then:

$ cd /var/log
$ ls -ltr

And see if anything useful was logged.

Hope this helps.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180728

Title:
  kernel crash

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1180728/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1190741] Re: bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu6: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

[Adam Porter]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 994255 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994255

You're using an old version of the package.  The current version is
6.20.155.1+bdcom-0ubuntu0.0.1.  You need to install updates.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 994255
   bcmwl-kernel-source / broadcom-sta failed to build [fatal error: 
asm/system.h: No such file or directory]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1190741

Title:
  bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu6: bcmwl kernel module
  failed to build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1190741/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1160471] Re: BCM4313 wl driver 6.20.155.1 not working in raring, but 5.100.82.112 does

[Adam Porter]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097519 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097519

Poru,

I don't know which card you have (I have BCM4313), but there's a good
chance you can uninstall bcmwl altogether and use the in-kernel brcmsmac
driver.  I recommend trying it.  If it doesn't work, just reinstall the
bcmwl package from Quantal.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1160471

Title:
  BCM4313 wl driver 6.20.155.1 not working in raring, but 5.100.82.112
  does

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1160471/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1111956] Re: BCM4313 ignores ARP broadcast packets

[Adam Porter]

Bernardo,

Yes, as I've said in other reports we've discussed, I verified that
brcmsmac works with the BCM4313 card.

Unless there are other problems with brcmsmac and BCM4313 cards, users
should uninstall bcmwl and use brcmsmac.  If there are other problems,
we need to get those bugs filed.  Our goal needs to be to move to the
Free driver wherever possible.  Staying on bcmwl is just asking for
trouble, as we've seen with all these recent regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956

Title:
  BCM4313 ignores ARP broadcast packets

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/956/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1189611] Re: bcmwl-kernel-source 6.30.223.30+bdcom-0ubuntu1 fails to see 5GHz networks and is unstable on 2.5GHz

[Adam Porter]

Michael,

"The standard wl driver does recognize the card (only b/g), but does not
connect at all."

My understanding is that bcmwl is the wl.ko driver, and you later say
that bcmwl 6.20.x works.  What do you mean by, "the standard wl driver"?

Bernardo,

Now read my post.  I said, "Assuming that the description is
incomplete..." which Michael confirmed in his last message.

I marked the bug Incomplete because it was waiting on Michael to reply
to my questions.  He did, and reset it to New.

It seems that it is another regression.  This whole bcmwl situation
keeps getting more confusing: some cards have regressions from
5.100->6.20 which may be fixed in 6.30, and other cards have regressions
from 6.20->6.30.

That's why I asked Michael to test the other drivers: if brcmsmac (the
in-tree, Free, non-binary driver) can be used with his card, he can dump
the restricted driver and its regressions.

Michael, can you please test brcmsmac with your card?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1189611

Title:
  bcmwl-kernel-source 6.30.223.30+bdcom-0ubuntu1 fails to see 5GHz
  networks and is unstable on 2.5GHz

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1189611/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1180728] Re: kernel crash

[Adam Porter]

Daniel, you still didn't answer my questions: Is your system unusable?
 Has this happened again?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180728

Title:
  kernel crash

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1180728/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1154823] Re: Will not boot into raring following latest grub update

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1154823

Title:
  Will not boot into raring following latest grub update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1154823/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1173199] Re: Hanging after login after upgrade to Raring

[Adam Porter]

Please upload /var/log/Xorg.0.log and /var/log/lightdm/*

If you're unable to get lightdm working, you might try kdm instead.

** Changed in: kubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173199

Title:
  Hanging after login after upgrade to Raring

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-meta/+bug/1173199/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1107155] Re: wl continuously spams syslog

[Adam Porter]

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Brian Murray  wrote:

> As such it'd be great if Adam Porter could
> submit a new bug report regarding his issue of the incorrect driver
> being used.  Once a new bug report has been created I'll personally
> ensure that someone looks at it.

Again, it's bug 1097519.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107155

Title:
  wl continuously spams syslog

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1107155/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 281526] Re: Flash uses 100% CPU after resuming from suspend

[Adam Porter]

Ma Xiaojun (damage3025):

You are now harassing me by looking up and interfering with bugs that I
have reported which are completely unrelated to the bug you disagree
with me about (https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107155).  May I remind
you that you have signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct which prohibits such
behavior.

As it so happens, this bug is no longer a problem on current kernels and
Flash versions, therefore I will mark this bug Fix Released.  However,
your harassment and personal attacks are unacceptable.

** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Released

** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281526

Title:
  Flash uses 100% CPU after resuming from suspend

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/281526/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1107155] Re: wl continuously spams syslog

[Adam Porter]

http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/brcm80211#Supported_Chips

"BCM43224"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107155

Title:
  wl continuously spams syslog

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1107155/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1107155] Re: wl continuously spams syslog

[Adam Porter]

hggdh2,

Wow, instead of just posting the output of $(lspci | grep Broadcom),
you're refusing and arguing.

Again: If one of the other drivers works, then this bug report is moot.
If brcmsmac (the in-tree driver, which is "Completely open source host
drivers, no binary object files.") works, the solution to this bug is
not to fix bcmwl (the out-of-tree, non-free, restricted driver), the
solution is to use the driver that works.

Therefore you should test the other drivers.  Here, I will help you test
the in-tree one:

$ sudo apt-get remove bcmwl-kernel-source
$ sudo stop network-manager
$ sudo modprobe -r wl
$ sudo modprobe brcmsmac
$ sudo start network-manager
$ firefox

If the other drivers don't work, then fixing this driver might be the
best solution, or fixing the free driver might be the best solution.

If you disagree and refuse to cooperate, okay; good luck getting a
developer to work on this bug.

Ma Xiaojun,

If you don't understand the concept that there is no point in fixing
non-free driver X if free driver Y works, then I probably can't convince
you.  Maybe someone else can.  Good luck to you.

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107155

Title:
  wl continuously spams syslog

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1107155/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1107155] Re: wl continuously spams syslog

[Adam Porter]

hggdh2,

> This did not need reporting the hardware at the time, and I am not
sure it needs it now. The issue is quite simple: wl spams the log.

Are you kidding me?  You think reporting a driver bug doesn't require
reporting which of the 9+ different hardware it supports?

I will reiterate: I had this exact problem.  I removed the wl driver
(the bcmwl-kernel-source package), causing the in-tree driver to be
used, and the problem was solved.  Therefore it is a duplicate of bug
1097519, which states that the correct driver needs to be used.

If you disagree, you are going to have to prove that this bug exists by:

1.  Reporting your hardware.  Otherwise no one can take this report seriously.
2.  Testing all the other drivers (b43, broadcom-sta, and brcmsmac) and proving 
they all have the same problem.  If one of the other drivers works, then this 
bug report is moot.

Alternatively, you are going to have to explain why a driver developer
needs to fix bcmwl-kernel-source when other existing drivers work fine,
e.g. if one of the other three drivers doesn't work for you.  But if
that were the case, the solution might be to fix the other driver, not
to fix this one.  We need fewer redundant drivers, not more.

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107155

Title:
  wl continuously spams syslog

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1107155/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1054964] Re: BCM43225: Horrible ping with Broadcom sta driver

[Adam Porter]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097519 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097519

Bernardo, there are at least 4 possible drivers to use: bcmwl*, b43*,
broadcom-sta*, and the in-tree driver.  Users in this report have
reported that using the correct driver fixes the problem, therefore this
bug is a duplicate of bug 1097519.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097519
   Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054964

Title:
  BCM43225: Horrible ping with Broadcom sta driver

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1054964/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1107314] Re: Slow wireless with BCM4313 until "wl" reloaded.

[Adam Porter]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097519 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097519

Bernardo,

The last response to this bug says, "So it seems that it is just a
matter of not installing the closed drivers and using the open ones."
Therefore this bug is a duplicate of bug 1097519.  Do not remove my
duplicate marking without explaining why.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097519
   Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107314

Title:
  Slow wireless with BCM4313 until "wl" reloaded.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1107314/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1111956] Re: BCM4313 ignores ARP broadcast packets

[Adam Porter]

Bernardo,

You should not undo my marking of the bug without explaining your
reasoning.  Your own report suggests that most likely this bug has been
fixed on Precise with current versions of the kernel package and bcmwl
package.  It may also be fixed on Precise with the in-tree driver, which
may be used by removing bcmwl-*.

Therefore I am marking this bug as Incomplete.  If you disagree, explain
why.

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956

Title:
  BCM4313 ignores ARP broadcast packets

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/956/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1114281] Re: ERROR @wl_cfg80211_get_station : Could not get rate (-1)

[Adam Porter]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097519 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097519

Bernardo,

According to responses from this bug report, choosing the right driver
fixes the problem.  Therefore this bug is indeed a duplicate of bug
1097519.  If you disagree, please explain your reasoning before
unmarking it as a duplicate.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097519
   Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1114281

Title:
  ERROR @wl_cfg80211_get_station : Could not get rate (-1)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1114281/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1189611] Re: bcmwl-kernel-source 6.30.223.30+bdcom-0ubuntu1 fails to see 5GHz networks and is unstable on 2.5GHz

[Adam Porter]

According to the package description, it doesn't even support the
BCM4331 card:

"This package contains Broadcom 802.11 Linux STA wireless driver  for
use with Broadcom's BCM4311-, BCM4312-, BCM4313-, BCM4321-, BCM4322-,
BCM43224-, and BCM43225-, BCM43227- and BCM43228-based hardware."

Assuming that the description is incomplete, do the other drivers work,
like the b43 packages, the broadcom-sta packages, or the in-tree driver
(which requires uninstalling all the packages)?

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1189611

Title:
  bcmwl-kernel-source 6.30.223.30+bdcom-0ubuntu1 fails to see 5GHz
  networks and is unstable on 2.5GHz

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1189611/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 732677] Re: bcmwl 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu2 not work on BCM4311/4312

[Adam Porter]

Chris, ok, I'm glad we're on the same page now.

My question now is whether this bug is obsolete.  This bug was filed
about version 5.100.82.38 of the driver.  That's no longer the current
version of the driver.

In Saucy we have:
bcmwl = 6.30.223.30+bdcom-0ubuntu1 
broadcom-sta = 5.100.82.112-11 

In Raring we have:
bcmwl =  6.20.155.1+bdcom-0ubuntu6
broadcom-sta = 5.100.82.112-9

And in Precise we have:
bcmwl =  6.20.155.1+bdcom-0ubuntu0.0.1 
broadcom-sta = 5.100.82.112-4 

And then there's the in-tree driver, which for at least some cards makes
those packages obsolete, at least on some kernel versions.

It seems to me that it still boils down to Ubuntu needing to install the
proper driver.  For example, if broadcom-sta_ 5.100.82.112-9 said it
supported BCM4313, but BCM4313 worked with the in-tree driver, broadcom-
sta shouldn't even be installed, regardless of whether BCM4313 worked
with broadcom-sta.  Or if a 5.100.82.38 of some package didn't work, but
the newer version did, that should be fixed by the newer version.

Now if there are some versions of some driver packages that don't
properly work with some cards, that could result in two problems:

1.  Users upgrading distro versions with a package could end up with a
version of the package that doesn't work anymore (that happened to me).
That's still a matter of Ubuntu choosing the correct package.

2.  Users trying to manually choose a package, searching package
descriptions, and choosing a package that happens to not work with their
card.  That's unfortunate and frustrating.  But the only way to solve
this is to comprehensively test all these different versions of all
these different packages with all the different cards they claim to
support, some of which might have subtle bugs with certain cards, and
some of which seem to have regressions in newer versions.

So if you want this bug to be #2...well, ok, I guess I can't argue with
that.  But I'm not sure it's practical to really solve it.  I think the
best we can realistically hope for is to get Ubuntu automatically
choosing the right package on first install and hopefully on distro
upgrade.  And probably the only way we can do that is to act on specific
reports of specific cards failing with specific versions of specific
driver packages.

Maybe the best thing for now would be to make a note in all driver
packages that there are multiple driver packages that support the same
cards, and if one package doesn't work, the user should try the others
(including the in-tree one, which requires uninstalling the driver
packages).  I think that there are just too many combinations to be
proactively comprehensive.  With all the versions and packages and
claimed-supported cards, there ends up being something like 432
combinations.

I think all of this came about because Broadcom broke support for older
cards when they released the 6.20.x drivers.  Maybe it was an accident,
or maybe they forgot to note that older cards were no longer supported
by newer releases.  Whatever happened, it sure has made a mess!

Anyway, I feel like I may be more confused now than I was before.  I'm
going to mark this bug as Incomplete in the Ubuntu project and let you
take this bug from here.  :)  My only suggestion is to try to give it a
more helpful title; what it has now may be either too specific or not
specific enough.

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732677

Title:
  bcmwl 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu2 not work on BCM4311/4312

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/broadcom-sta/+bug/732677/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1097519] Re: Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets

[Adam Porter]

Sam, thanks for your encouraging words.  I'm simply a user who ran
into a bug and had some free time to mess with the bug reports I
found.  I expected a little random pushback, but I get too defensive
sometimes.  Sometimes people (including myself) forget that we're all
working toward the same goal here: stuff that just works.  :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097519

Title:
  Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1097519/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1107155] Re: wl continuously spams syslog

[Adam Porter]

Bernardo,

The problem for some users seems to be that the wrong driver is being
used.  For myself and some others who commented here, using a different
driver made the the card work and didn't print the messages.  Those
messages may be indicating a problem; if so, hiding them might not be
the right thing to do.

This is all complicated by the fact that some people on this report use
Raring and others use Precise.  This is confusing because:

1.  Raring uses 3.8, but Precise recently had 3.8 backported to it.
2.  Precise had bcmwl 5.100.x but now has 6.20.x.
3.  IIRC there were some problems building bcmwl on Precise that have since 
been fixed.

And it's also complicated by the facts that:

1.  The reporter of this bug didn't report his hardware.
2.  Not everyone on this report is using the same hardware.
3.  Not everyone on this report is using the same version of Ubuntu.

>From reading over 100 bug reports on bcmwl yesterday, my best
understanding is that this bug is either:

a) a dupe of bug 1097519, meaning that if the best driver is selected by
Ubuntu, the messages will not be printed and the card will work
properly; or

b) a bug in which a newer driver was imperfectly backported to a
backported kernel, leaving it in a state in which it performs correctly
but prints useless errors.

Since we don't know everyone's hardware here, and since some are talking
about Precise and some about Raring, and since the bug was originally
filed against Raring, I don't think this bug is about option B.  If that
bug exists, I think it should be filed separately.  But I'm not sure if
that bug really exists, because it appears to me that when the right
driver is used, the messages stop.  From my understanding, the reporter
of this bug probably can solve his problem by using the proper driver.

So my best understanding is that this is still a dupe of bug 1097519.
If my reasoning is wrong, please explain.

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107155

Title:
  wl continuously spams syslog

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1107155/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 732677] Re: bcmwl 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu2 not work on BCM4311/4312

[Adam Porter]

Well, silly me, I can't mark it as a duplicate in only one project.  So
I'll mark it as Invalid in the Ubuntu project and these comments can
point people to bug 1097519.

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732677

Title:
  bcmwl 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu2 not work on BCM4311/4312

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/broadcom-sta/+bug/732677/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 732677] Re: bcmwl 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu2 not work on BCM4311/4312

[Adam Porter]

Chris, I'm not sure I understand what you mean.  I only marked it
invalid in that one context. If the b43 driver works, then Ubuntu should
select that driver.  That would make this a dupe of bug 1097519, which
states that the wrong driver is used for some chipsets.  In one of the
comments I made on that bug yesterday, I mentioned that some users have
found success using broadcom-sta*, and some by using b43, and others by
using brcmsmac.

As I understand it now there are possibly two issues:

1.  Ubuntu selecting the wrong driver upon install, as you mentioned.  That's 
covered by bug 1097519.
2.  A certain driver (e.g. broadcom-sta) not working with a chipset it claims 
to support.  That would be a separate issue.

So what I'm going to do now is:

1.  In the Ubuntu project, mark this as a dupe of bug 1097519, because the 
working driver needs to be selected by Ubuntu.
2.  In the Broadcom 802.11 Linux STA driver project, mark this as incomplete.  
If I understand you to mean that the broadcom-sta driver doesn't work with some 
chipsets it claims to, then I guess you should mark this bug as New there.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.  :)

** Changed in: broadcom-sta
   Status: Invalid => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732677

Title:
  bcmwl 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu2 not work on BCM4311/4312

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/broadcom-sta/+bug/732677/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1097519] Re: Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets

[Adam Porter]

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Bernardo Reino
<1097...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> @Adam Porter,
>
> Please relax. You're making a whole mess of the entire bcmwl situation
> because *you* think that the in-tree driver works OK for BCM4313, which
> is (unfortunately) simply not true.

I know it works on my system because I verified it myself.  I have a
BCM4313 and it works perfectly for me.  If this is not the case for
you, explain.  I did not claim that it's the best solution for
everyone.

> I'm astonished at how easy it is for ONE person to make such a mess of a
> linux distribution.

Really?  So I've made a mess of the entire Ubuntu distro?  By spending
several hours cleaning up over 100 stale and duplicate bug reports on
the bcmwl package?  I cleaned up a major mess in one area but get
blamed for making a mess of everything, everywhere.  I guess I should
have known better.  No good deed goes unpunished.  You're welcome.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097519

Title:
  Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1097519/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 749583] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build [make: Makefile: No such file or directory]

[Adam Porter]

This bug is over two years old and is filed against 11.04, which is no
longer supported.  It is also a duplicate.  I spent several hours today
closing over 100 old and duplicate bug reports on the bcmwl package.
Forgive me for not typing "X is no longer supported" every single time.

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749583

Title:
  package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu2 failed to
  install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build [make: Makefile:
  No such file or directory]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/749583/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 830282] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build (In function ... error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘m

[Adam Porter]

This bug is over two years old and is filed against 11.10, which is no
longer supported. It is also a duplicate. I spent several hours today
closing over 100 old and duplicate bug reports on the bcmwl package.
Forgive me for not typing "X is no longer supported" every single time.

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/830282

Title:
  package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu5 failed to
  install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build (In function ...
  error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘mc_list’)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/830282/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1173349] Re: plasma-desktop crashes repeatedly

[Adam Porter]

fsando, if you can post the traces with the versions you have installed
of all the relevant packages, go ahead.  Also if you can post your
~/.kde/share/config/plasma*rc files, that might at least help figure
workarounds.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kde-workspace in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173349

Title:
  plasma-desktop crashes repeatedly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kdebase-workspace/+bug/1173349/+subscriptions

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs

[Bug 944942] Re: Whenever I use the super key or ctrl the quicksynergy client loses connection with the synergy server running on Windows 7

[Adam Porter]

That's an old version of synergy.  Wrong package, too.

** Changed in: quicksynergy (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/944942

Title:
  Whenever I use the super key or ctrl the quicksynergy client loses
  connection with the synergy server running on Windows 7

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quicksynergy/+bug/944942/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 974706] Re: Rolling Over Non-Setup Edge Wrongly Switches Machines / Dual-Head Setup

[Adam Porter]

I think this is an issue with synergy, not quicksynergy.  Also, it would
be helpful if you provided a diagram of your setup.  Also, this bug may
be obsolete.

** Changed in: quicksynergy (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974706

Title:
  Rolling Over Non-Setup Edge Wrongly Switches Machines / Dual-Head
  Setup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quicksynergy/+bug/974706/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1189231] [NEW] quicksynergy obsoleted?

[Adam Porter]

Public bug reported:

http://code.google.com/p/quicksynergy/

"So QuickSynergy is a graphical user interface for Mac OS X (Leopard
only) and Linux systems, since the official website presents only a
Windows version."

This is no longer the case: synergy has a built-in GUI that works fine
on Ubuntu.  I didn't realize this until after I had started using it
through quicksynergy.

Perhaps quicksynergy should be removed from Ubuntu now that synergy has
its own working GUI, which seems more capable.  If nothing else, it
would reduce confusion and redundancy.

** Affects: quicksynergy (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1189231

Title:
  quicksynergy obsoleted?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quicksynergy/+bug/1189231/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 944700] Re: Communication stops between server and client

[Adam Porter]

That's a very old version of synergy.

** Changed in: quicksynergy (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/944700

Title:
  Communication stops between server and client

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quicksynergy/+bug/944700/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1097519] Re: Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets

[Adam Porter]

And to confirm: removing bcmwl-kernel-source and broadcom-sta-source and
using the in-tree brcmsmac driver is working on my Acer Aspire One AO722
with BCM4313 chipset on Raring with the 3.8.0-23 kernel.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097519

Title:
  Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1097519/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1157136] Re: [patch] wlan device interface name should be wlanX instead of ethX

[Adam Porter]

** Summary changed:

- wlan device interface name should be wlanX instead of ethX
+ [patch] wlan device interface name should be wlanX instead of ethX

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1157136

Title:
  [patch] wlan device interface name should be wlanX instead of ethX

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1157136/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1097519] Re: Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets

[Adam Porter]

Finally, bug 1134477 seems relevant.  If that had been fixed, this might
have been too.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097519

Title:
  Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1097519/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1031831] Re: 3.5.0-7.7~precise1-generic works except for broadcom bcmwl-kernel-source failure

[Adam Porter]

Since 3.8 is in Precise now, this is probably irrelevant.

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031831

Title:
  3.5.0-7.7~precise1-generic works except for broadcom bcmwl-kernel-
  source failure

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1031831/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1023145] Re: bcmwl-kernel-source doesn't install with mainline kernels

[Adam Porter]

This is probably now obsolete due to newer packages and kernels.

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023145

Title:
  bcmwl-kernel-source doesn't install with mainline kernels

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1023145/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 993443] Re: Wireless takes a lot longer to come up (BCM4313) since kernel update

[Adam Porter]

There is a much newer kernel out now for Precise.  It probably fixes
this bug.

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993443

Title:
  Wireless takes a lot longer to come up (BCM4313) since kernel update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/993443/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1163401] Re: [11125.005426] ERROR @wl_cfg80211_get_station : Wrong Mac address

[Adam Porter]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097519 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097519

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097519
   Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1163401

Title:
  [11125.005426] ERROR @wl_cfg80211_get_station : Wrong Mac address

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1163401/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 358654] Re: udevadm trigger is not permitted while udev is unconfigured

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358654

Title:
  udevadm trigger is not permitted while udev is unconfigured

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/358654/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 732677] Re: bcmwl 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu2 not work on BCM4311/4312

[Adam Porter]

** Package changed: bcmwl (CentOS) => centos

** Changed in: centos
   Status: New => Invalid

** Package changed: bcmwl (Arch Linux) => archlinux

** Changed in: archlinux
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732677

Title:
  bcmwl 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu2 not work on BCM4311/4312

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/broadcom-sta/+bug/732677/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777

Title:
  NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/572777/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 616538] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616538

Title:
  package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/616538/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1113870] Re: Wifi broken after kernel update

[Adam Porter]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097519 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097519

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097519
   Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1113870

Title:
  Wifi broken after kernel update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1113870/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1134477] Re: jockey fails to install new bcmwl in some cases

[Adam Porter]

Bug 1023145 may be relevant here.  bcmwl-kernel-source may be the wrong
package altogether.  In any case, many people are suffering from the
wrong driver being installed, and it's causing serious problems.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1134477

Title:
  jockey fails to install new bcmwl in some cases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1134477/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 462466] Re: Broadcom BCM4322 STA & brcm80211 can't see wifi channels >11 (2.462GHz)

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: mactel-support
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462466

Title:
  Broadcom BCM4322 STA & brcm80211 can't see wifi channels >11
  (2.462GHz)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mactel-support/+bug/462466/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 427115] Re: broadcom wireless card causes hard system crash

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427115

Title:
  broadcom wireless card causes hard system crash

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/427115/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 441492] Re: bcmwl kernel source needs to be reinstalled for Broadcom 4312 to work

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: jockey
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441492

Title:
  bcmwl kernel source needs to be reinstalled for Broadcom 4312 to work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/jockey/+bug/441492/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 560434] Re: In Lucid BCM4322 wireless adapter will not connect to WPA encrypted networks using any driver option available

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560434

Title:
  In Lucid BCM4322 wireless adapter will not connect to WPA encrypted
  networks using any driver option available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/560434/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 416010] Re: wl module doesn't work well with iwconfig

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416010

Title:
  wl module doesn't work well with iwconfig

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/416010/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 488340] Re: Broadcom STA Wireless driver for bcm4322 silently disconnects frequently

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488340

Title:
  Broadcom STA Wireless driver for bcm4322 silently disconnects
  frequently

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/488340/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 427261] Re: "nm-applet" doesn't display the wifi access it's connected to with driver "broadcom-sta" for BCM4312, 4322

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427261

Title:
  "nm-applet" doesn't display the wifi access it's connected to with
  driver "broadcom-sta" for BCM4312, 4322

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/427261/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 830282] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build (In function ... error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘m

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/830282

Title:
  package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu5 failed to
  install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build (In function ...
  error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘mc_list’)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/830282/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 754825] Re: Kernel panic while using my system [brcm80211] [assertion "scb->magic == SCB_MAGIC"]

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754825

Title:
  Kernel panic while using my system [brcm80211] [assertion "scb->magic
  == SCB_MAGIC"]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/754825/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 749583] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build [make: Makefile: No such file or directory]

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749583

Title:
  package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu2 failed to
  install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build [make: Makefile:
  No such file or directory]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/749583/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 651585] Re: Broadcom Corporation Device 4353 high pitch noise when CPU is idle

[Adam Porter]

1.  10.10 is no longer supported, nor 10.04.
2.  This is surely a hardware bug.  Some systems poorly isolate their 
electrical components, so leakage into the sound system is common.

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651585

Title:
  Broadcom Corporation Device 4353 high pitch noise when CPU is idle

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/651585/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 794488] Re: BCM4313 wireless doesn't switch on, if it is off when booting the system

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/794488

Title:
  BCM4313 wireless doesn't switch on, if it is off when booting the
  system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/794488/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 905388] Re: do not wirk wi-fi on HP Pavilion g7

[Adam Porter]

Sorry, 11.10 is no longer supported.  Upgrade if you can.

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905388

Title:
  do not wirk wi-fi on HP Pavilion g7

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/905388/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 859070] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38 bdcom-0ubuntu3.2 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build (gcc: Command not found)

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859070

Title:
  package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38 bdcom-0ubuntu3.2 failed to
  install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build (gcc: Command not
  found)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/859070/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 604835] Re: Broadcom STA Wireless driver for bcm4322 disconnects frequently on certain networks

[Adam Porter]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097519 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097519

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097519
   Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604835

Title:
  Broadcom STA Wireless driver for bcm4322 disconnects frequently on
  certain networks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/604835/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 576502] Re: "wl" module missing symbol lib80211_get_crypto_ops in -pae kernels

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576502

Title:
  "wl" module missing symbol lib80211_get_crypto_ops in -pae kernels

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/576502/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 980336] Re: No Functionality at all

[Adam Porter]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097519 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097519

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097519
   Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980336

Title:
  No Functionality at all

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/980336/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1054964] Re: BCM43225: Horrible ping with Broadcom sta driver

[Adam Porter]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097519 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097519

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097519
   Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054964

Title:
  BCM43225: Horrible ping with Broadcom sta driver

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1054964/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 977550] Re: Wifi Broadcom BCM4311 is not working on precise

[Adam Porter]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097519 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097519

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097519
   Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/977550

Title:
  Wifi Broadcom BCM4311 is not working on precise

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/977550/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 991090] Re: bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu6.1: bcmwl kernel module failed to build [execvp: make: Too many levels of symbolic links]

[Adam Porter]

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991090

Title:
  bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu6.1: bcmwl kernel module
  failed to build [execvp: make: Too many levels of symbolic links]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/991090/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1075407] Re: BCM4322 Wireless Stopped Working after 3.5.0-18.29-generic Kernel Update

[Adam Porter]

The most descriptive explanation I've seen so far is, "It's not
working."  It's not possible to investigate this bug any further without
more information.  You need to post basic info like system make/model,
chipset model, driver package versions, dmesg logs, syslog logs, etc.
And you need to explain the symptom more accurately than, "It doesn't
work."

Besides all that, this bug is probably either fixed in Raring, or some
people may be seeing bug 1097519.

Marking this as incomplete because nothing more can be done now.

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075407

Title:
  BCM4322 Wireless Stopped Working after 3.5.0-18.29-generic Kernel
  Update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/broadcom-sta/+bug/1075407/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs