[Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 (8.x) a.k.a pcre (without the 3) in favor of pcre2 (10.x)
Exim upstream has switched, 4.96~RC0 and later use pcre2. ** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1792544 Title: demotion of pcre3 (8.x) a.k.a pcre (without the 3) in favor of pcre2 (10.x) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aide/+bug/1792544/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1776270] Re: byacc package does not have support for %destructor
Fixed in Debian's latest (26 Jan 2022) upload 1:2.0.20220114-1 cu Andreas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1776270 Title: byacc package does not have support for %destructor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/byacc/+bug/1776270/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1797810] Re: Upgrade to gnutls 3.6.x breaks Lynx's ability to view a large number of ssl enabled sites.
Looks like a duplicate of https://bugs.debian.org/918934 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #918934 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=918934 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797810 Title: Upgrade to gnutls 3.6.x breaks Lynx's ability to view a large number of ssl enabled sites. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lynx/+bug/1797810/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1877731] Re: "Evolution will not display emails from Yahoo or AOL. It gives a "Memory allocation error." Other mailboxes work fine (hotmail, gmail, etc...)
Looks like a duplicate of #1876286 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877731 Title: "Evolution will not display emails from Yahoo or AOL. It gives a "Memory allocation error." Other mailboxes work fine (hotmail, gmail, etc...) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1877731/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1842133] Re: findutils shows wrong version number
> I could submit a bug report against the upstream findutils component. Should I do so? No please don't, there is no point. As noted above less old versions in Debian (and Ubuntu) already report a more helpful version string. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842133 Title: findutils shows wrong version number To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/findutils/+bug/1842133/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1842133] Re: findutils shows wrong version number
First off: Ubuntu/Debian do not ship "patched version of the GNU findutils package [...] based on release 4.6.0". The ship a GIT snapshot. e.g. 4.6.0+git+20170828-2 is upstream GIT as of 2017-08-28. /usr/share/doc/findutils/changelog.Debian.gz even has the full respective GIT revision. (febde26dd0e66dda5d4060fa29b85443ddc6a865.). To clearly show that we are *not* shipping a upstream /release/ we are using a +git version. The version number upstream GIT snapshots report depends a little bit on the way they are built (git present or not when make dist is invoked, et.al), they might show 4.7.0-git or 4.6.0.235-f254 (That is 4.6.0+git+20190510-2). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842133 Title: findutils shows wrong version number To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/findutils/+bug/1842133/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1456602] Re: enblend symbol lookup error with gsl
** Changed in: enblend-enfuse (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1456602 Title: enblend symbol lookup error with gsl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/enblend-enfuse/+bug/1456602/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1748310] Re: [SRU][xenial]boot stalls looking for entropy in FIPS mode
Just for reference: "libgcrypt20 is not a FIPS certified library" was quite unclear to me. Both Red Hat and Suse have finished FIPS certifications for libgcrypt (for specific versions included in their respective enterprise distributions). Afaict Ubuntu has not run through this process at all, and therefore afaiui nothing on Ubuntu is "FIPS certified". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1748310 Title: [SRU][xenial]boot stalls looking for entropy in FIPS mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgcrypt20/+bug/1748310/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786625] Re: "find" command throws nonsense error message
Hello,
If you run "find . -name *.txt" in a directory containing foo.txt and
bar.txt then the shell expands *.txt before executing find, i.e. you
would be running "find . -name foo.txt bar.txt" which produces a syntax
error. Either quote ('*.txt') or escape (\*.txt) the argument.
Closing.
** Changed in: findutils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786625
Title:
"find" command throws nonsense error message
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/findutils/+bug/1786625/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1793668] Re: xargs gives "[: err: unexpected operator" on Ubuntu but not Centos
Hello, tst is a shell script that does specify which interpreter should be used and therefore the system falls back to try /bin/sh. However the script is using bash extensions ([ "$1" == "" ]) which won't work with *any* sh-type shell. Debian is using dash as /bin/sh and there an error is thrown, Centos is probably using bash. So this is not a bug but a user error. If you want to use bash-extension you'll need to take care that the script runs under bash by using a correct #!-line. Closing. ** Changed in: findutils (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1793668 Title: xargs gives "[: err: unexpected operator" on Ubuntu but not Centos To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/findutils/+bug/1793668/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1742842] Re: Wprefs will not open
Doug Torrance (profzoom) wrote on 2018-01-12: > When the package is built, WPrefs is installed in /usr/share/lib/GNUstep and > the menu points there. > But then for some reason, the Debian/Ubuntu package > *moves* WPrefs to /usr/lib/GNUstep. > I'll upload a new version soon that fixes this and *doesn't* move WPrefs. It > will be uploaded to > Debian and should migrate over to Ubuntu in time for Doug, there is a very good reason for moving WPrefs. It is a compiled binary and not arch-indepent. Therefore it *must* not be installed to /usr/share -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1742842 Title: Wprefs will not open To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wmaker/+bug/1742842/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1751196] Re: Package Version is 2 Years Old
Cosmic Cuttlefish has 1.2.1. ** Changed in: terminology (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1751196 Title: Package Version is 2 Years Old To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/terminology/+bug/1751196/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1648634] Re: opencryptoki breaks p11-kit
This is Debian's https://bugs.debian.org/860903 which will hopefully be fixed by changing opencryptoki https://bugs.debian.org/864052 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #860903 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860903 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #864052 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864052 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648634 Title: opencryptoki breaks p11-kit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/+bug/1648634/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1681103] Re: /etc/cron.daily/locate script runs as wrong user
> "updatedb" script runs as nobody a lot of files can't be indexed because > nobody hasn't the right > to view all system files. And that is a good thing. The locate-database is public. It must not contain data that is not public, i.e. contents of directories that cannot be listed by non-privileged users. ** Changed in: findutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1681103 Title: /etc/cron.daily/locate script runs as wrong user To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/findutils/+bug/1681103/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1680019] Re: randint string expansion causes syslog error message
This bug only applies to Ubuntu up to trusty (14.04LTS). xenial (16.04LTS) and later releases use GnuTLS 3.x with nettle as crypto backend. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1680019 Title: randint string expansion causes syslog error message To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/1680019/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1660915] Re: gnutls.pc should not directly link to libz.so in Libs.private
Now also reported as https://bugs.debian.org/857943 and forwarded upstream. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #857943 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857943 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1660915 Title: gnutls.pc should not directly link to libz.so in Libs.private To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/+bug/1660915/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1364492] Re: findutils uses nearly 100% CPU and memory resources
Fixed in Debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1364492 Title: findutils uses nearly 100% CPU and memory resources To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/findutils/+bug/1364492/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1654750] [NEW] Please update to 4.88, fix CVE-2016-9963
Public bug reported: Please sync from Debian, upgrading to 4.88. 4.87 is vulnerable to CVE-2016-9963. ** Affects: exim4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2016-9963 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654750 Title: Please update to 4.88, fix CVE-2016-9963 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/1654750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1606320] Re: /usr/bin/autogen:6:read:__GI__IO_file_xsgetn:__GI___fread_unlocked:fread_unlocked:read_defs
errors.ubuntu.com is inaccessible without an Ubuntu account. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1606320 Title: /usr/bin/autogen:6:read:__GI__IO_file_xsgetn:__GI___fread_unlocked:fread_unlocked:read_defs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autogen/+bug/1606320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1456602] Re: enblend symbol lookup error with gsl
Gregor Heiming (heimgreg) wrote on 2016-01-26: > Andreas Metzler (k-launchpad-downhill-at-eu-org) wrote on 2016-01-03: > #1 >> Sounds like you have got some locally build librariaries around. ldd >> /usr/bin/enblend might be helpful. > ldd /usr/bin/enblend [...] > libgsl.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgsl.so.0 (0x7f542fa6d000) Suspicion confirmed. libgsl is locally built (/usr/local/lib/libgsl.so.0), drop it and use Ubuntu's version. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1456602 Title: enblend symbol lookup error with gsl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/enblend-enfuse/+bug/1456602/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1347788] Re: find crashed when current working directory is not readable and -exec or -execdir used
Dave Chiluk (chiluk) wrote on 2016-01-07: #11 > Findutils just released a new blessed stable version 4.6.0 [...] > What are the chances of getting this included into xenial? Xenial is now at > 4.6. (4.6.0+git+20160126-2 ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1347788 Title: find crashed when current working directory is not readable and -exec or -execdir used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/findutils/+bug/1347788/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1456602] Re: enblend symbol lookup error with gsl
Sounds like you have got some locally build librariaries around. ldd /usr/bin/enblend might be helpful. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1456602 Title: enblend symbol lookup error with gsl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/enblend-enfuse/+bug/1456602/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1518730] Re: transitional package libgnutls28-dev cannot be removed unless libgnutls-dev provides it
It might be less painful to simply follow Debian and let libgnutls28-dev be a non-migration package and drop llibgnutls-dev. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1518730 Title: transitional package libgnutls28-dev cannot be removed unless libgnutls-dev provides it To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/+bug/1518730/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1473839] Re: using deleted file /var/log/exim4/mainlog.1
Looks like a duplicate of https://bugs.debian.org/476958 and https://bugs.debian.org/796524, Fixed in 4.86-3. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #476958 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476958 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #796524 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796524 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1473839 Title: using deleted file /var/log/exim4/mainlog.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/1473839/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1473839] Re: using deleted file /var/log/exim4/mainlog.1
Looks like a duplicate of https://bugs.debian.org/476958 and https://bugs.debian.org/796524, Fixed in 4.86-3. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #476958 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476958 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #796524 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796524 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1473839 Title: using deleted file /var/log/exim4/mainlog.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/1473839/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1166671] Re: exim4: get in sync with Debian
FWIW I have added the dpkg-vendor and substitute provides in 4.86~RC3-1. The Ubuntu specific patch and build-dependency (Show Ubuntu distribution in SMTP banner.) is not included and I do not intend to pull it into Debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166671 Title: exim4: get in sync with Debian To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/1166671/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1166671] Re: exim4: get in sync with Debian
FWIW I have added the dpkg-vendor and substitute provides in 4.86~RC3-1. The Ubuntu specific patch and build-dependency (Show Ubuntu distribution in SMTP banner.) is not included and I do not intend to pull it into Debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166671 Title: exim4: get in sync with Debian To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/1166671/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1384232] Re: Certificate hostname verification fix
This seems to be enabled by default in 4.86RC. http://git.exim.org/exim.git/commit/01a4a5c5cbaa40ca618d3e233991ce183b551477 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1384232 Title: Certificate hostname verification fix To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/1384232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1385813] Re: find -size -Nk seems to be off by 1
The -size -nX check works like this: How many units sized one X each is the file using, a) less than n or b) at least n Therefore -size -1M or -size -1k or -size -1c all match only empty files. A 1025 byte sized file uses two 1K-units (it has to, there is only space for 1024 bytes in a single 1K unit) and will therefore not match -size -2k. cu Andreas ** Changed in: findutils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385813 Title: find -size -Nk seems to be off by 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/findutils/+bug/1385813/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1463147] Re: gnutls_dh_params_generate2 generates short primes
This was discussed upstream in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.gnutls.general/3667 and according to http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.gnutls.general/3669 should not be an issue in 3.3.x: Quoting Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos: || On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 11:48 -1000, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: | After some debugging it turns out that the failing criteria is that | multiple of 64 bits requirement[1]. For some reason I've gotten a 1023 | bit prime, even though I called gnutls_dh_params_generate2() with 1024 | as the argument. | ugh. Java is at fault here -- there's no sense in this particular | severe limitation. if they're willing to use 512-bit DHE parameters and | 1024-bit DHE parameters, they should be willing to use 1023-bit DHE | parameters. | | That's indeed quite some arbitrary limitation. | | That said, i suppose it's possible that gnutls could always ensure that | the high bit is set when generating a prime of a given size. | | That should be the case in gnutls 3.3.x. That version delegates to | nettle the DH parameter generation and nettle seems to be more precise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1463147 Title: gnutls_dh_params_generate2 generates short primes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/+bug/1463147/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1338030] Re: https support missing in lynx-cur 2.8.9dev1-1
You could also simply pull 2.8.9dev4-1 from debian/experimental, the newer upstream has dropped the direct gcrypt dependency. cu Andreas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1338030 Title: https support missing in lynx-cur 2.8.9dev1-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lynx-cur/+bug/1338030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1348074] [NEW] sync with Debian - minor security fix
Public bug reported: Ubuntu's exim4 packages are based on Debian 4.82-8 and therefore missing these two fixes: exim4 (4.82.1-1) unstable; urgency=high . * New upstream security release, fixing CVE-2014-2957. This is a remote code execution flaw in Exim version 4.82 (only) when built with DMARC support. Debian's binary packages are not built with DMARC support and therefore not vulnerable. However we want to fix this for people building their own binaries based on Debian's packaging. exim4 (4.82.1-2) unstable; urgency=high . * [87_double_expansion.diff] from upstream. Stop unwanted double expansion of arguments to mathematical comparison operations. CVE-2014-2972 Please sync with Debian unstable (or experimental). thanks, cu Andreas ** Affects: exim4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2014-2972 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1348074 Title: sync with Debian - minor security fix To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/1348074/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1348074] [NEW] sync with Debian - minor security fix
Public bug reported: Ubuntu's exim4 packages are based on Debian 4.82-8 and therefore missing these two fixes: exim4 (4.82.1-1) unstable; urgency=high . * New upstream security release, fixing CVE-2014-2957. This is a remote code execution flaw in Exim version 4.82 (only) when built with DMARC support. Debian's binary packages are not built with DMARC support and therefore not vulnerable. However we want to fix this for people building their own binaries based on Debian's packaging. exim4 (4.82.1-2) unstable; urgency=high . * [87_double_expansion.diff] from upstream. Stop unwanted double expansion of arguments to mathematical comparison operations. CVE-2014-2972 Please sync with Debian unstable (or experimental). thanks, cu Andreas ** Affects: exim4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2014-2972 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1348074 Title: sync with Debian - minor security fix To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/1348074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1309852] [NEW] Please upgrade to relicensed version 6
Public bug reported: Hello, gmp 6.0.0 has ben relicensed to LGPLv3+/GPLv2+ (from LGPLv3+). gmp is an indirect reverse dependency of gnutls v3, and the fact that LGPLv3 is incompatible with GPLv2 has prevented upgrading to gnutls v3 for many packages. gmp 6 is already available in debian. cu Andreas ** Affects: gmp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1309852 Title: Please upgrade to relicensed version 6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gmp/+bug/1309852/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1247912] Re: exim4 4.80-7ubuntu3 init script bug
This should already be fixed in 4.80-9ubuntu2, since it includes this change: * In initscript invoke pidofproc with a pathname argument as it is documented in LSB and required by lsb-base (= 4.1+Debian9). Closes: #693696, #718871 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1247912 Title: exim4 4.80-7ubuntu3 init script bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/1247912/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1247912] Re: exim4 4.80-7ubuntu3 init script bug
This should already be fixed in 4.80-9ubuntu2, since it includes this change: * In initscript invoke pidofproc with a pathname argument as it is documented in LSB and required by lsb-base (= 4.1+Debian9). Closes: #693696, #718871 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1247912 Title: exim4 4.80-7ubuntu3 init script bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/1247912/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1166634] Re: gnutls26 crashes on particularly malformed crypt stream
See upstream commit https://gitorious.org/gnutls/gnutls/commit/5164d5a1d57cd0372a5dd074382ca960ca18b27d -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166634 Title: gnutls26 crashes on particularly malformed crypt stream To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls26/+bug/1166634/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1105758] Re: On my PC, gcry_cipher_encrypt() doesn't release all x87 FPU data registers .
This included in Debian's 1.5.0-5. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1105758 Title: On my PC, gcry_cipher_encrypt() doesn't release all x87 FPU data registers . To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgcrypt11/+bug/1105758/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 880296] Re: Webkit-gtk crash on some https website
This looks like a http://bugs.debian.org/699034 which should be fixed in 1.5.0-4. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #699034 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699034 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880296 Title: Webkit-gtk crash on some https website To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgcrypt11/+bug/880296/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1057012] Re: cpfind always fail on photos with long path
Forwarded to http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=1b0ts9-269.ln1%40argenau.downhill.at.eu.orgforum_name =panotools-devel -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057012 Title: cpfind always fail on photos with long path To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/panotools/+bug/1057012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 585648] Re: find regex does not work properly
Hello, 1) I cannot reproduce this on current Debian. 2) The respective code is not located in find, re_match() is part of libc. 3) The fact that regex are locale dependent is expected behavior, e.g. in the Estonian alphabet Z is not the last letter and therefore e.g Y is not in 'A-Z'. 4) To matching upper case letters you should use the respect collation sequence ([[:upper:]] instead of [A-Z]) or reset LC_COLLATE to C. Given all that, afaict from Google it looks like some in some versions of libc '[A-Z]' includes lower case letters in en_US.UTF-8 locale while in others it does not. See also #120687 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585648 Title: find regex does not work properly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/findutils/+bug/585648/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885324] Re: Completely replace lcms1 by lcms2 in Ubuntu
This is fixed upstream in enblend-enfuse 4.1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885324 Title: Completely replace lcms1 by lcms2 in Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/885324/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1006293] Re: exiqgrep fails to parse output of exim4 -bp if the mail message is less than 1k
Just to be crystal-clear: This was fixed upstream in 4.77. 196f5966a092d873df256956f6f88d4b5d3cb803 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006293 Title: exiqgrep fails to parse output of exim4 -bp if the mail message is less than 1k To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/1006293/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1006293] Re: exiqgrep fails to parse output of exim4 -bp if the mail message is less than 1k
Just to be crystal-clear: This was fixed upstream in 4.77. 196f5966a092d873df256956f6f88d4b5d3cb803 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006293 Title: exiqgrep fails to parse output of exim4 -bp if the mail message is less than 1k To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/1006293/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 859600] Re: Please convert gnome-keyring to multiarch
Please be sure to doublecheck compatibilty with p11-kit 0.14 which requires a .module extension for PKCS#11 autoloading while you are making large changes to this package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859600 Title: Please convert gnome-keyring to multiarch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-keyring/+bug/859600/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1082135] Re: Hugin libboost installation dependencie issue
Hello, This looks like you are triying to install a version of hugin that was not targeted/built for the version of Ubuntu you are running. What version of ubuntu are you running? Where are you trying to install hugin from? Check /etc/apt/sources.list and the output apt-cache policy hugin. cu andreas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082135 Title: Hugin libboost installation dependencie issue To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hugin/+bug/1082135/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1013798] Re: Blink SIP client segfaults with libgcrypt11 1.5.0-3ubuntu0.1
Afaict this bug should not be marked as fixed released anymore because 1.5.0-3ubuntu2.1 reverted 1.5.0-3ubuntu2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013798 Title: Blink SIP client segfaults with libgcrypt11 1.5.0-3ubuntu0.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgcrypt11/+bug/1013798/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1013798] Re: Blink SIP client segfaults with libgcrypt11 1.5.0-3ubuntu0.1
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/sudo/+bug/423252/comments/166 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013798 Title: Blink SIP client segfaults with libgcrypt11 1.5.0-3ubuntu0.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgcrypt11/+bug/1013798/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1020755] Re: pto_gen does not get packaged
@Logan: This bug has nothing to do with the Ubuntu packaging. Any (semi-)official Debian/Ubuntu package of a newly enough hugin version already ships pto_gen. Please note that this binary is not present in latest hugin release 2011.4, which is what Ubuntu ships. Only Debian/experimental and hugin- next ppa have packages of 2011.0.0~rc2. ** Changed in: hugin (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020755 Title: pto_gen does not get packaged To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/1020755/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1001982] Re: 'actions' menu missing due to wrong API code in plugins
This is fixed in 2011.4.0+dfsg-4, just uploaded to Debian/unstable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001982 Title: 'actions' menu missing due to wrong API code in plugins To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hugin/+bug/1001982/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1003841] Re: (regression) cannot contact ldaps server
Thorsten Glaser (mirabilos) wrote: gnutls-bin is built from src:gnutls28 in wheezy/sid, which is not affected, so I cannot test there. Best to assume it’s probably also affected. I will upload fixed packages to sid soonish. FWIW libgnutls26-dbg contains gnutls-cli linked against gnutls26. cu andreas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003841 Title: (regression) cannot contact ldaps server To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls13/+bug/1003841/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989915] Re: Unable to start murmurd..
@Gallomimia: You could simply install the libicu48 package to silence the warnings. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989915 Title: Unable to start murmurd.. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qt4-x11/+bug/989915/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 325620] Re: qtpfsgui should depend on dcraw
-- 1.9.3-1 Superseded in lucid-release on 2010-01-05 Published in karmic-release on 2009-06-08 qtpfsgui (1.9.3-1) unstable; urgency=low [...] * Add dcraw to Depends, since this tool is needed, although not mentioned as a dependency in the upstream docs. Thanks to fabo again. -- ** Changed in: qtpfsgui (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325620 Title: qtpfsgui should depend on dcraw To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtpfsgui/+bug/325620/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 911436] Re: https crashed with SIGSEGV in lookup_or_create_bucket()
FWIW I have fwded this upstream to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48154 ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #48154 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48154 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/911436 Title: https crashed with SIGSEGV in lookup_or_create_bucket() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/911436/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885324] Re: Completely replace lcms1 by lcms2 in Ubuntu
** Also affects: enblend Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885324 Title: Completely replace lcms1 by lcms2 in Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/enblend/+bug/885324/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 877872] Re: Sync p11-kit 0.7-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) for multiarch support
See thread starting on http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/p11-glue/2011-October/75.html For the time being the problem of diverging module path seems to be limited to gnome-keyring. i.e. if gnome-keyring moved the module the problem would be solved. As a workaround it might make sense to points p11-kit to to the old directory until that happens. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877872 Title: Sync p11-kit 0.7-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) for multiarch support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/p11-kit/+bug/877872/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 819939] Re: Pushing p11-kit to Debian
** Changed in: p11-kit (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819939 Title: Pushing p11-kit to Debian To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/p11-kit/+bug/819939/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874307] Re: many applications fail, general protection with LDAPS in libgcrypt on 11.10
Do you have a rather modern CPU with support for AES-NI? (grep -i aes /proc/cpuinfo) If that was the case this might be the same issue as http://bugs.debian.org/643336 (Which is still unresolved.) ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #643336 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643336 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874307 Title: many applications fail, general protection with LDAPS in libgcrypt on 11.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgcrypt11/+bug/874307/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 838187] Re: libgcrypt-config provides an inconsistent result
This is fixed in libgcrypt11 (1.5.0-1) . Just out of interest, does /this/ really break compilation in any project using libgcrypt-config or AM_PATH_LIBGCRYPT()? Both /lib/x86_64 -linux-gnu and /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu are in the standard gcc search path, the -L argument is superfluous. (The libtoool related breakage is a different bug - LP #751142 ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838187 Title: libgcrypt-config provides an inconsistent result To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgcrypt11/+bug/838187/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 819939] Re: Pushing p11-kit to Debian
On 2011-08-10 Chris Coulson chris.coul...@canonical.com wrote: Excellent, thanks. Do you want to update to 0.3, and then I will sync this in to Ubuntu? Hello, afaiu that would be the right thing, the version I uploaded was 0.3. cu andreas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819939 Title: Pushing p11-kit to Debian To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/p11-kit/+bug/819939/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 819939] Re: Pushing p11-kit to Debian
Uploaded to Debian NEW. http://bugs.debian.org/636938 http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-gnutls/packages/p11-kit/trunk/ ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #636938 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636938 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819939 Title: Pushing p11-kit to Debian To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/p11-kit/+bug/819939/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 819939] [NEW] Pushing p11-kit to Debian
Public bug reported: gnutls has recently switched from a patched version of pakchois to p11-kit (both git HEAD and git gnutls_2_12_x branch). Assuming this ends up in a stable release I will be interested to get p11-kit included in Debian. This is basically a heads-up. If there is anything to stream-line the process I will try to be of assistance. (Otherwise I might end up maintaining it in Debian.) I do hope submitting this as a bug report (severity wishlist implied) is not the completely wrong thing to do. cu Andreas ** Affects: p11-kit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819939 Title: Pushing p11-kit to Debian To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/p11-kit/+bug/819939/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 789967] Re: Hugin 2011.0.0 in Oneiric
FWIW I have uploaded to Debian/unstable yesterday (June 1st) evening. I guess Ubuntu will automatically pick up the new version. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789967 Title: Hugin 2011.0.0 in Oneiric -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 779365] Re: package libpano13-2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/lib/libpano13.so.2.0.0« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket libpano13-1 2.9.17-stable-0ubuntu1~maveri
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 761760 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761760 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 761760 package libpano13-2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libpano13.so.2.0.0', which is also in package libpano13-1 2.9.17-stable-0ubuntu1~maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779365 Title: package libpano13-2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/lib/libpano13.so.2.0.0« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket libpano13-1 2.9.17-stable-0ubuntu1~maverick ist -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773017] Re: package libpano13-2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tentata sovrascrittura di /usr/lib/libpano13.so.2.0.0 presente anche nel pacchetto libpano13-1 2.9.17-stable-0ubuntu1~
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 761760 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761760 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 761760 package libpano13-2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libpano13.so.2.0.0', which is also in package libpano13-1 2.9.17-stable-0ubuntu1~maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773017 Title: package libpano13-2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tentata sovrascrittura di /usr/lib/libpano13.so.2.0.0 presente anche nel pacchetto libpano13-1 2.9.17-stable-0ubuntu1~maverick -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 761760] Re: package libpano13-2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libpano13.so.2.0.0', which is also in package libpano13-1 2.9.17-stable-0ubuntu1~maverick
This is not a bug in the Ubuntu/Debian packages. The submitter(s) are switching from broken inofficial packages, whose packagename does not match the soname. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761760 Title: package libpano13-2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libpano13.so.2.0.0', which is also in package libpano13-1 2.9.17-stable-0ubuntu1~maverick -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 761760] Re: package libpano13-2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libpano13.so.2.0.0', which is also in package libpano13-1 2.9.17-stable-0ubuntu1~maverick
Hello, I have added a workaround in the latest upload to the Debian/sid. -- Version: 2.9.18+dfsg-2 Distribution: unstable [...] Changes: libpano13 (2.9.18+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low . * libpano13-2 now Breaks/Replaces: libpano13-1 (= 2.9.15~beta2-1). This fixes cross-upgrades from the (slightly broken) packages in hugin PPA. (LP: #761760) -- -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761760 Title: package libpano13-2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libpano13.so.2.0.0', which is also in package libpano13-1 2.9.17-stable-0ubuntu1~maverick -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 778206] Re: i don't konw
There is no information on a bug in this report. Looks like spam. Closing ** Changed in: findutils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778206 Title: i don't konw -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 659771] Re: find does not handle -size parameter 1 correctly
This is not a bug. Quoting the documentation: -- -size n[bckwMG] True if the file uses N units of space, rounding up. [...] The number can be prefixed with a `+' or a `-'. A plus sign indicates that the test should succeed if the file uses at least N units of storage (a common use of this test) and a minus sign indicates that the test should succeed if the file uses less than N units of storage. -- Therefore -size -1k matches all empty files. Any nonempty files uses at least 1KB (units of space,) if you you round up. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659771 Title: find does not handle -size parameter 1 correctly -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 779391] Re: CVE-2011-1764: format string vulnerability
Kees, are you sure about compiler flags helping? Exim's string_vformat is a separate builtin implementation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779391 Title: CVE-2011-1764: format string vulnerability -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770802] Re: hugin version 2010.4.0+dfsg-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric
I have just uploaded 2010.4.0+dfsg-2 to Debian/unstable which only adds the one-line patch to fix this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770802 Title: hugin version 2010.4.0+dfsg-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770802] Re: hugin version 2010.4.0+dfsg-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric
Yuv: This is already fixed in 2011.x. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770802 Title: hugin version 2010.4.0+dfsg-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429907] Re: md4 should be deprecated
I am wondering whether checking the acceptance of *self-signed* md4-using certificates is a useful testcase at all? If you used separate CA and server certificates, with the CA-signature on the server-cert using md4 the outcome is different. - GnuTLS will not successfully verify the server cert against the CA. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429907 Title: md4 should be deprecated -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 721320] Re: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log
This was fixed upstream in 4.73. (Debian: 4.72-2). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721320 Title: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 721320] Re: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log
This was fixed upstream in 4.73. (Debian: 4.72-2). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721320 Title: DKIM-related failures should not end up in the panic log -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 310675] Re: failure to trust login.launchpad.net, while openssl does
Works with 2.10.4 and later. * Version 2.10.4 (released 2010-12-06) [...] ** libgnutls: Reverted default behavior for verification and introduced GNUTLS_VERIFY_DO_NOT_ALLOW_X509_V1_CA_CRT. Thus by default V1 trusted CAs are allowed, unless the new flag is specified. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310675 Title: failure to trust login.launchpad.net, while openssl does -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 708023] Re: exim 4.74 released fixes CVE-2011-0017
FWIW this is now fixed in Debian stable, testing, sid and experimental. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/708023 Title: exim 4.74 released fixes CVE-2011-0017 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697934] Re: Merge exim4 4.73~rc1-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main)
4.74 in experimental. Compared to 4.74rc2 there are just some build fixes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697934 Title: Merge exim4 4.73~rc1-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697934] Re: Merge exim4 4.73~rc1-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main)
I have just uploaded 4.74rc2 to experimental. Worthwile upstream fixes relative to 4.73rc1 If a non-debug daemon was invoked with a non-whitelisted macro, then logs from after attempting delivery would be silently lost, including for successful delivery. This log-loss bug was introduced in 4.73 as part of the security lockdown. -C /dev/null works again. CVE-2011-0017 ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2011-0017 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697934 Title: Merge exim4 4.73~rc1-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697934] Re: Merge exim4 4.73~rc1-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main)
I will definitely try to upload the final 4.73 release to Debian/experimental soon after its release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697934 Title: Merge exim4 4.73~rc1-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 696576] Re: [needs packaging] Latest Hugin 2010.4.0
On 2011-01-08 Yuv 696...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Not sure I understand the difference between a merge and a straight sync, AFAIUI: The former merges the changes of the /current/ ubuntu package compared to Debian package it was based on, the latter copies over the Debian package dropping any previous Ubuntu specific changes. but yes the package is exactly the same as the package in Debian/experimental with the version number difference. [...] How do we subscribe sponsors? There is the nice [Subscribe someone else] button on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hugin/+bug/696576. And the follwing search dialogue offers good matches on ubuntu-sponsors. And what spammy consequences will it have? [...] According to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess it discloses your launchpad e-mail address. cu andreas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696576 Title: [needs packaging] Latest Hugin 2010.4.0 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 696576] [needs packaging] Latest Hugin 2010.4.0
On 2011-01-05 Fabrice Coutadeur coutade...@gmail.com wrote: A merge is what is needed in that case. Hello Fabrice, thank you for the handholding. so the process would be : - generate a debdiff between the current Debian package and the package you want to see in Ubuntu (it may be the case that no changes are required anymore). If no changes are required anymore, just states here that it's a sync from Debian experimental (or you may use requestsync for that) IMHO a straight sync is sufficient. I will upload hugin 2010.4.0+dfsg today to experimental (changes over rc3: bumped version, updated list of Uploaders.). This way Ubuntu can have a proper version number. Package: hugin Version: 2010.4.0+dfsg-1 Sync-from: Debian/experimental Current Ubuntu changes: * Add a dependency on autopano-sift-c | autopano-sift * Change hugin control point defaults to work with autopano-sift (mono version) instead of autopano-sift-c Rationale for dropping Ubuntu changes: While the newer hugin could still be patched to support autopano-sift by default I do not think it is necessary anymore, since the new hugin version includes a cp-detector. autopano-sift is dead upstream and patent encumbered. - subscribe sponsors (I won't be able to have a look before Sunday) I would appreciate if somebody else could do this, my lp-address is spam-free yet. (523093) If that is not possible I could do it anyway. thanks, cu andreas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696576 Title: [needs packaging] Latest Hugin 2010.4.0 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697934] Re: Merge exim4 4.73~rc1-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main)
FWIW the final 4.73 release is probably going to appear soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697934 Title: Merge exim4 4.73~rc1-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 696576] [needs packaging] Latest Hugin 2010.4.0
On 2011-01-04 Fabrice Coutadeur coutade...@gmail.com wrote: I think it's better to work on a merge with the current Debian version (http://packages.debian.org/source/experimental/hugin). What do you think about it? Fabrice, there is small misunderstanding, they are identical: md5sum hugin_2010.4.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz hugin_2010.4.0+dfsg~rc3.orig.tar.gz 76fdf8f97eeb1f6685b636828b38 hugin_2010.4.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz 76fdf8f97eeb1f6685b636828b38 hugin_2010.4.0+dfsg~rc3.orig.tar.gz The final 2010.4.0 release in unchanged from the last release candidate. ametz...@argenau:/tmp/HUGIN$ debdiff hugin_2010.4.0+dfsg~rc3-1.dsc hugin_2010.4.0+dfsg-natty1.dsc | lsdiff hugin-2010.4.0+dfsg/debian/changelog hugin-2010.4.0+dfsg/debian/control Yuval's packages have a new changelog entry and Maintainer/Uploader. That's it. I guess I am partly to blame for the misunderstanding. I should have coordinated with Yuval before sending you the direct mail. This would have made it clear that both us were talking about _exactly_ the same thing. Sorry. cu andreas -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696576 Title: [needs packaging] Latest Hugin 2010.4.0 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 412774] Re: GnuTLS subjectAltName parsing is broken
** Changed in: gnutls26 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: gnutls Status: New = Fix Released -- GnuTLS subjectAltName parsing is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 418935] Re: gnutls can't negotiate tls connection to webex connect (empathy vs pidgin regression)
This was fixed upstream in 2.8.4: ChangeLog- * NEWS: Version 2.8.4. [...] 2009-08-31 Simon Josefsson si...@josefsson.org * lib/x509/x509.c: Handle XMPP SANs properly. Reported by Howard Chu h...@symas.com in https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?106975. ChangeLog- -- gnutls can't negotiate tls connection to webex connect (empathy vs pidgin regression) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 418935] Re: gnutls can't negotiate tls connection to webex connect (empathy vs pidgin regression)
Nevermind, paste error in wrong window. -- gnutls can't negotiate tls connection to webex connect (empathy vs pidgin regression) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 412774] Re: GnuTLS subjectAltName parsing is broken
This was fixed upstream in 2.8.4: ChangeLog- * NEWS: Version 2.8.4. [...] 2009-08-31 Simon Josefsson si...@josefsson.org * lib/x509/x509.c: Handle XMPP SANs properly. Reported by Howard Chu h...@symas.com in https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?106975. ChangeLog- -- GnuTLS subjectAltName parsing is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218202] Re: numlockx does not turn num lock keyboard light on.
See http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #16145 http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145 -- numlockx does not turn num lock keyboard light on. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218202 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 422488] Re: package enfuse 3.2+dfsg-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Changed in: enblend-enfuse (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- package enfuse 3.2+dfsg-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422488 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350970] Re: hugin crashed with SIGSEGV in CPImageCtrl::drawPoint()
** Changed in: hugin (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- hugin crashed with SIGSEGV in CPImageCtrl::drawPoint() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350970 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450383] Re: hugin crashed with SIGSEGV in wxWindow::DoSetSize()
Paul, are you using multiple monitors? -- hugin crashed with SIGSEGV in wxWindow::DoSetSize() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450383 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 422488] Re: package enfuse 3.2+dfsg-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Should be fixed in 3.2+dfsg-3 * Update addinfosection.dpatch to also add info directory entries. -- package enfuse 3.2+dfsg-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422488 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 449641] Re: Problem in info file
This bug should be fixed in 3.2+dfsg-3. enblend-enfuse (3.2+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=medium [...] * Update addinfosection.dpatch to also add info directory entries. -- Problem in info file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501657] Re: Merge exim4 4.71-2 from Debian testing
I have just uploaded 4.71-3 to Debian/unstable. The main difference to 4.71-2 is going from bdb4.6 to bdb4.8. -- Merge exim4 4.71-2 from Debian testing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501657 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450383] Re: hugin crashed with SIGSEGV in wxWindow::DoSetSize()
See http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=550441aid=2889596group_id=77506 ** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #2889596 http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2889596 -- hugin crashed with SIGSEGV in wxWindow::DoSetSize() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450383 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450383] Re: hugin crashed with SIGSEGV in wxWindow::DoSetSize()
This looks identical to http://bugs.debian.org/551006. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #551006 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551006 -- hugin crashed with SIGSEGV in wxWindow::DoSetSize() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450383 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 323836] Re: [needs packaging] Package and use autopano-sift-c
It might be a good idea to use 2.5.1~rc2: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.misc.ptx/19040 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.misc.ptx/19152 -- [needs packaging] Package and use autopano-sift-c https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350970] Re: hugin crashed with SIGSEGV in CPImageCtrl::drawPoint()
This is fixed in 2009.2.0 rc1. -- hugin crashed with SIGSEGV in CPImageCtrl::drawPoint() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350970 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363903] Re: Hugin gives an error when stitching..
With 2009.2.0 rc1 I still get caught exception: std::bad_alloc -- Hugin gives an error when stitching.. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363903 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
