[Bug 748340] Re: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot
I think the LZO compressions may be a red herring, I have 2 disks, and the one with LZO is giving the error, the other, with LZO and SSD is not. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748340 Title: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 777478] Re: fsck fails on btrfs using lzo
I have the same problem, but it is only on one of my disks. I have an internal disk that is an SSD, and is mounted with SSD, and LZO compression, it does not flag an error. My external disk (USB 3.0, spinning disk), is mounted with LZO compression, and does flag the error. ** Changed in: btrfs-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777478 Title: fsck fails on btrfs using lzo -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748340] Re: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot
I appear to have this problem too. Something locked up hard, and I held the power button to turn off. I have successfully made an archive of the entire partition since then, so I can read fine. Sometimes the system locks up and I cannot shutdown (don't know if it's related though). root@user-desktop:/# btrfsck /dev/sdb1 couldn't open because of unsupported option features (8). btrfsck: disk-io.c:683: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(1)' failed. Aborted And I click I during boot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748340 Title: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748340] Re: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot
I'm actually wondering if mine started happening when I enabled LZO compression. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748340 Title: btrfsck fails with unsupported option features, must [ignore] to boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 131094] Re: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness
Is ubuntu going to throw out upstart? On Mar 15, 2011 8:47 AM, MSU 131...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Are there plans to enable CONFIG_SCHED_AUTOGROUP for ubuntu kernels in some ppa? At least until ubuntu switch to systemd initialization? -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 Title: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/131094/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 Title: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 131094] Re: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness
That's what I assumed, but the previous post tricked me. On Mar 15, 2011 12:34 PM, Omer Akram om2...@ubuntu.com wrote: Is ubuntu going to throw out upstart? Simple answer: no. -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 Title: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/131094/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 Title: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131094] Re: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness
I just had to restore some data from a bad HD (read errors on my laptop). When copying from the NTFS partition to my new NTFS partition (files, not image, and in Linux), I got about 7-8 MB/sec of throughput, and a responsive system. When doing from EXT4 to EXT4, I was getting about 20MB/sec and terrible responsiveness. I will say that overall it is less problematic than it has been though, no total lock, and I can run my updates and surf the web fairly effectively. This is using 10.10, so it looks like the bug is still around. -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131094] Re: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness
I have been looking at this and running informal (read sloppy) tests today. For the people upgrading from older systems perhaps the problem is with relatime in the fstab being missing. I was testing by running vi 123 while dd if=/dev/zero of=~/test2 bs=2M count=2048 I tried all 4 schedulers and all took a long while (30 secs+) to an active vi screen. Now it is below 10. I tried different schedulers and they were all slow. Now CFQ (default?) is what I am using (have not compared if less than 10 seconds will drop to less than 5). The system-cleaner (Applications -- System Tools -- System Cleaner) identified the lack of relatime for me. It could also simply be rebooting that caused the speed up too though. It is only speculation that the upgrade missed that, but I may have removed it myself by accident at some point. To change schedulers without rebooting: as root (run sudo bash, or someone correct how to redirect while using sudo) echo scheduler name /sys/block/sdx/queue/scheduler (where x is the drive e.g. /sda). for a list of schedulers and what is selected run cat on the same file example: $cat /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler noop anticipatory deadline [cfq] I am not at my desktop, so I can't confirm weather this is simply for command line and I will see similar problems to Jamie above. In a few days I can follow-up if long uptime (for a desktop) is the problem. -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131094] Re: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness
I don't know how to redirect with sudo. I had to run: sudo bash this gave a root prompt, then I could run: echo deadline /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler without running sudo again (running bash with sudo makes the prompt root until you type exit). I am curious about your fstab though, that was what really changed things for me. Also, to you have lots of small files or a few big ones? I can try testing. It was primarily running updates, and the daily file indexing that killed me. -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283762] [NEW] Does not recognize unstripped video packages
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openmovieeditor 1) Description:Ubuntu intrepid (development branch) Release:8.10 2) 0.0.20080102-2.1build1 (intrepid) 3) Successful install 4) Requires removal of: libavcodec-unstripped-51 libavformat-unstripped-52 libavutil-unstripped-49 to replace with the same libs, but without unstripped in the title. I expect the dependencies should look something like they do in aqualung. ** Affects: openmovieeditor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Does not recognize unstripped video packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 264183] Re: tooltips are black on dark grey
I apologize, I eventually found bug 243957, which recommends all NewHuman problems be discussed here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/NewHumanTesting. I assume that makes this bug report redundant and annoying. -- tooltips are black on dark grey https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264183 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 264183] [NEW] tooltips are black on dark grey
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org I am using 8.10. With the NewHuman theme. This is upgraded from a previous install, but I believe I have the new defaults used. Tooltips in openoffice.org are black on dark grey (instead of white on dark grey). Is this a bug in NewHuman? because I now notice it in a file input in Firefox. ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- tooltips are black on dark grey https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264183 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 264183] Re: tooltips are black on dark grey
** Attachment added: Screenshot http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17253785/OO.png -- tooltips are black on dark grey https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264183 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
