[Bug 1839544] Re: power setting "display off" maximum is 15 minutes, used to have several hour increment values
This should be a very simple thing to fix. And if I knew "C" I would fix it myself. but I don't, my knowledge base is in many other computer programming languages that date all the way back to the 1960's. While I still program computers, now-a-days they are primarily a tool to be used in solving other problems... In my opinion, the best long term fix would be to provide a "[ ] other" box with a way to allow entering the actual idle time desired -- then a user can set it to what ever their circumstances dictates. unfortunately, The concept of "keyboard idle" is not necessarily the best indication of an "unattended terminal". and the futuristic concept of tracking eyeball movements to see if anybody is actually looking at the screen, would probably not be acceptable to most humans. "15 min" of no keyboard/mouse movement is too short a time period, especially when the screen is being used to display reference material. "never" is too long, especially when you need to keep user specific background processes running - or I would simply logoff and log back on later. (One would hope that the user selectable "idle time" values are being translated internally to some form of seconds or minutes, and that they are not simply used to set a series of "bit switches", thus my suggestion to provide a text entry box.) I would also like to suggest that most folks use a computer to solve real world problems, and that computers exist primarily as a tool to be used, and not just as just programming exercises Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839544 Title: power setting "display off" maximum is 15 minutes, used to have several hour increment values To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1839544/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1839544] [NEW] power setting "display off" maximum is 15 minutes, used to have several hour increment values
Public bug reported: Just upgraded to Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS from Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. In the POWER settings for blanking the display, there used to be several options that allowed selecting a time interval of 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, etc. Under Ubuntu 18.04.2 there are only 9 selectable time values: i.e. 1 min, 2 min, 3 min, 4 min, 5 min, 8 min, 10 min, 12 min, 15 minutes, and never. This might be fine for a portable laptop running on batteries, but is not acceptable for a desktop system. The never option is not good, because then the monitor NEVER goes dark. My preferred time is to set this to 1-hour because of the length of conference calls. It is a real nuisance to have the screen blank on you while you are reading information displayed on the screen to a multi-person conference call... ...Especially if you lock your screen, requiring you to log back on. I suggest adding some of the time values back to the pull down list, or possibly adding a "other" fill-in value box where the user can specify in minutes when he wants the screen to blank when idle. I consider this to be a bug, and not a feature enhancement, because I used to be able to say "1 hour". ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839544 Title: power setting "display off" maximum is 15 minutes, used to have several hour increment values To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1839544/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658323] Re: multiple error messages do not stay on screen long enough - last one said data could not be downloaded, think real problem might be with ttf-mscorefonts-installer (download permissio
This is a duplicate of many of the "ttf-mscorefonts-installer" bugs: 1607535 1651923 1658323 etc... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658323 Title: multiple error messages do not stay on screen long enough - last one said data could not be downloaded, think real problem might be with ttf-mscorefonts-installer (download permission problem?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1658323/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1320428] Re: Firefox 29 fails (system hang) under Linux 3.11.0-24-generic, works under 3.11.0-20-generic
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1320428 Title: Firefox 29 fails (system hang) under Linux 3.11.0-24-generic, works under 3.11.0-20-generic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1320428/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658323] Re: multiple error messages do not stay on screen long enough - last one said data could not be downloaded, think real problem might be withttf-mscorefonts-installer (download permission
I Get additional messages now. The problem appears to be in ttf-mscorefonts-installer but I am unable to read full message because it is flashed on and off the screen to quickly. ** Summary changed: - mutiple error messages did not staw on screen last one was data could not be downloaded + multiple error messages do not stay on screen long enough - last one said data could not be downloaded, think real problem might be withttf-mscorefonts-installer (download permission problem?) ** Summary changed: - multiple error messages do not stay on screen long enough - last one said data could not be downloaded, think real problem might be withttf-mscorefonts-installer (download permission problem?) + multiple error messages do not stay on screen long enough - last one said data could not be downloaded, think real problem might be with ttf-mscorefonts-installer (download permission problem?) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658323 Title: multiple error messages do not stay on screen long enough - last one said data could not be downloaded, think real problem might be with ttf-mscorefonts-installer (download permission problem?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1658323/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658323] [NEW] mutiple error messages did not staw on screen last one was data could not be downloaded
Public bug reported: oops - in the title "STAW" should have been "STAY" - so much for my typing skills. --- I receive an error message that instructed me to re-run "Package Updater" I did as instructed and received a number of additional messages in a new window that was framed on the top in RED. The window did not stay open long enough for me to read it, let alone be able to copy it. a new window was then displayed with the following message: === Failure to download extra data files The following packages requested additional data downloads after package installation, but the data could not be downloaded or could not be processed. ttf-mscorefonts-installer The download will be attempted again later, or you can try the download again now. Running this command requires an active Internet connection. === I have no idea what package requested "ttf-mscorefonts-installer" but I'm willing to guess that it probably was "wine 2.0 rc-6" from the gnome 3.20 repository. I opened this problem against APPORT, because the error messages that were displayed after starting "package update" do not stay on the screen long enough to be read, and frequently are displayed in boxes that can not be copied or pasted into bug reports. hopefully, somebody more knowledgable than I, can re-route this bug report to a "more correct" area. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: apport 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-59.80-generic 4.4.35 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-59-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportLog: ERROR: apport (pid 24571) Sat Jan 21 07:49:13 2017: called for pid 18664, signal 3, core limit 0 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.5 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: GNOME Date: Sat Jan 21 08:54:51 2017 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-11 (986 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140417) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: apport UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug gnome3-ppa third-party-packages xenial ** Description changed: + oops - in the title "STAW" should have been "STAY" - so much for my typing skills. + --- + I receive an error message that instructed me to re-run "Package Updater" - I did as instructed and recived a number of additional message in a new - window that was framed on the top in RED. The window did not stay open - long enough for me to read it, let alone be able to copy it. + I did as instructed and received a number of additional messages in a + new window that was framed on the top in RED. The window did not stay + open long enough for me to read it, let alone be able to copy it. - a new windows was dipayed with the following message: + a new window was then displayed with the following message: === Failure to download extra data files The following packages requested additional data downloads after package installation, but the data could not be downloaded or could not be processed. ttf-mscorefonts-installer The download will be attempted again later, or you can try the download again now. Running this command requires an active Internet connection. === I have no idea what package requested "ttf-mscorefonts-installer" but - i'm willing to guess that it probably was "wine 2.0 rc-6" in the gnome - 3 stuff. + I'm willing to guess that it probably was "wine 2.0 rc-6" from the + gnome 3.20 repository. I opened this problem against APPORT, because the error messages that were displayed after starting "package update" do not stay on the screen long enough to be read, and frequently are displayed in boxes that can not be copied or pasted into bug reports. hopefully, somebody more knowledgable than I, can re-route this bug report to a "more correct" area. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: apport 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-59.80-generic 4.4.35 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-59-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportLog: ERROR: apport (pid 24571) Sat Jan 21 07:49:13 2017: called for pid 18664, signal 3, core limit 0 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.5 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: GNOME Date: Sat Jan 21 08:54:51 2017 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-11 (986 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140417) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: apport UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Bug 1548425] Re: update-manager crashed with AttributeError in check_hovering(): 'tuple' object has no attribute 'get_tags'
Like I said several months ago.. "This is still a problem in gnome 3.20 problem occurs daily. manual restart of update-manger allows update-manager to function..." -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1548425 Title: update-manager crashed with AttributeError in check_hovering(): 'tuple' object has no attribute 'get_tags' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1548425/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1646108] [NEW] Apport (ubuntu-bug) error messages
Public bug reported:
when creating a bug report about gedit the following messages were
displayed when I used UBUNTU-BUG:
bill@wb4alm-07:~$ ubuntu-bug gedit
/usr/share/apport/apport-gtk:16: PyGIWarning: Wnck was imported without
specifying a version first. Use gi.require_version('Wnck', '3.0') before import
to ensure that the right version gets loaded.
from gi.repository import GLib, Wnck, GdkX11, Gdk
later I tried to report this problem with ubuntu-bug
and received some additional messages.
bill@wb4alm-07:~$ ubuntu-bug ubuntu-bug
/usr/share/apport/apport-gtk:16: PyGIWarning: Wnck was imported without
specifying a version first.
Use gi.require_version('Wnck', '3.0') before import to ensure that the right
version gets loaded.
from gi.repository import GLib, Wnck, GdkX11, Gdk
dpkg-query: no packages found matching ubuntu-bug
Gtk-Message: GtkDialog mapped without a transient parent. This is discouraged.
==
Note: this results in a error message window that states
"The problem cannot be reported"
"The report belongs to a package that is not installed."
===
when you click on "OK" in the error message window, you get:
^CTraceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/apport/apport-gtk", line 594, in
app.run_argv()
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apport/ui.py", line 651, in run_argv
return self.run_report_bug()
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apport/ui.py", line 466, in
run_report_bug
if self.check_unreportable():
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apport/ui.py", line 1316, in
check_unreportable
self.report['UnreportableReason'])
File "/usr/share/apport/apport-gtk", line 403, in ui_info_message
self._ui_message_dialog(title, text, Gtk.MessageType.INFO)
File "/usr/share/apport/apport-gtk", line 395, in _ui_message_dialog
result = self.md.run()
KeyboardInterrupt
It took a while to discover that ubuntu-bug is part of APPORT (which I did not
know). Suggest that the other bug(s) about ubuntu-bug help files also be
fixed...
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: apport 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-51.72-generic 4.4.30
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-51-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportLog:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: GNOME
Date: Wed Nov 30 08:34:38 2016
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-11 (934 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140417)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: apport
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Affects: apport (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug gnome3-ppa third-party-packages xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646108
Title:
Apport (ubuntu-bug) error messages
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1646108/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1639201] Re: Can not resize GEDIT windows by moving window edge
I have confirmed that changing the theme fixed the problem in both "gedit" and in "files". I will use Greybird for the time being. Again, thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1639201 Title: Can not resize GEDIT windows by moving window edge To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1639201/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1639201] Re: Can not resize GEDIT windows by moving window edge
Thank YOU, Jeremy for the assistance. Had you not said "different theme" I would not have remembered to look in that direction to see exactly what was being used. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1639201 Title: Can not resize GEDIT windows by moving window edge To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1639201/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1639205] [NEW] PyGIWarning error message when using ubuntu-bug
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 16.04.1 GNOME 3.20 Ubuntu-bug ???
when using the "ubuntu-bug gedit" command to report a problem with gedit, the
following message was displayed in the terminal screen after completing the bug
report...
ubuntu-bug gedit
/usr/share/apport/apport-gtk:16: PyGIWarning: Wnck was imported without
specifying a version first. Use gi.require_version('Wnck', '3.0') before import
to ensure that the right version gets loaded.
from gi.repository import GLib, Wnck, GdkX11, Gdk
This error message will be displayed after any use of the ubuntu-bug
command.
(and "ubuntu-bug ubuntu-bug" should be a valid command. Took a while to
determine that ubuntu-bug is part of apport.)
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: apport 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-45.66-generic 4.4.21
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-45-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportLog:
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1
Architecture: amd64
CrashReports:
664:1000:116:0:2016-11-04 06:26:07.927235574 -0400:2016-11-04
06:26:07.927235574 -0400:/var/crash/_usr_bin_update-manager.1000.upload
640:1000:116:302125:2016-11-04 06:26:04.887287139 -0400:2016-11-04
06:26:07.931235472 -0400:/var/crash/_usr_bin_update-manager.1000.crash
600:109:116:0:2016-11-04 06:26:46.238292470 -0400:2016-09-14
06:35:54.449242309 -0400:/var/crash/_usr_bin_update-manager.1000.uploaded
CurrentDesktop: GNOME
Date: Fri Nov 4 06:45:10 2016
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-11 (908 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140417)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: apport
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Affects: apport (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug gnome3-ppa third-party-packages xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1639205
Title:
PyGIWarning error message when using ubuntu-bug
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1639205/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1638528] [NEW] update-manager crashed with AttributeError in check_hovering():_ResultTuple object has no attribute 'get_tags'
Public bug reported: I am running Ubunutu 16.04.1 LTS with Gnome 3.20 this bug has previously been reported as a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1548425 which I believe is also tagged as completed. 16.04.1 was installed in Sept 2016 as an upgrade from 14.04.2, and was not a "new" installation. Since the crash report screen will NOT allow me to cut & paste, I cannot transfer the information from it to this bug report. (and I know of no other way to get the information to you.) update-manager 1:16.04.4 architecture amd64 curent desktop GNOME Linux version 4.4.0-45-generic (buildd@lgw01-34) (gcc version 5.4.0 20150609) (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16,04.2() #66Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 19 14:12:37 UTC 2016 (Ubuntu 4.4.0-45.66-generic 4.4.21) As soon as I click on "continue" from that report, Software Updater will run normally... Please fix this as soon as you can in the gnome 3.20 system. Yes I am aware that it is a development system, but it contains fixes for my system that are super critical and allow me to run Ubuntu 16.04... ...and while I'm thinking about it, the crash report screen should be modified to allow "cut & paste" copy operations - would make life easier in some situations. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:16.04.17 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-45.66-generic 4.4.21 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-45-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1 Architecture: amd64 CrashDB: ubuntu CurrentDesktop: GNOME Date: Wed Nov 2 06:47:04 2016 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-11 (906 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140417) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader Symptom: dist-upgrade UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) VarLogDistupgradeTermlog: ** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1638528 Title: update-manager crashed with AttributeError in check_hovering():_ResultTuple object has no attribute 'get_tags' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1638528/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1548425] Re: update-manager crashed with AttributeError in check_hovering(): 'tuple' object has no attribute 'get_tags'
This is still a problem in gnome 3.20 problem occurs daily. manual restart of update-manger allows update-manager to function correctly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1548425 Title: update-manager crashed with AttributeError in check_hovering(): 'tuple' object has no attribute 'get_tags' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1548425/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1626068] Re: JEDIT causes an extra icon to be display in the left upper corner (line 2) which covers up "close" icon
Daniel, thank you for the comments. I'll see what I can discover. When I opened this bug, I also wondered if a "Ubuntu Patch" might be at fault. I switched to JEDIT when UBUNTU broke GEDIT --- I needed an editor that would operate "the same" on win-10 and on LINUX. (and yes, I prefer Linux.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626068 Title: JEDIT causes an extra icon to be display in the left upper corner (line 2) which covers up "close" icon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jedit/+bug/1626068/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1626068] Re: JEDIT causes an extra icon to be display in the left upper corner (line 2) which covers up "close" icon
fix typo: ...as I cannot close applications without first moving open windows around. sorry. /s/ Bill -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626068 Title: JEDIT causes an extra icon to be display in the left upper corner (line 2) which covers up "close" icon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jedit/+bug/1626068/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1626068] Re: JEDIT causes an extra icon to be display in the left upper corner (line 2) which covers up "close" icon
Is there anybody available to look at this? I am not a JAVA programmer, or I would look myself. This is really causing me productivity issues, as I cannot close applications without first moving opens around. environment is: jedit 5.3.0+dfsg-1 default-jre 2:1.8-56ubuntu2 Gnome 3.20 UBUNTU 16.04.1 Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626068 Title: JEDIT causes an extra icon to be display in the left upper corner (line 2) which covers up "close" icon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jedit/+bug/1626068/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1626068] [NEW] JEDIT causes an extra icon to be display in the left upper corner (line 2) which covers up "close" icon
Public bug reported: The JEDIT program runs extremely well, but it does cause an icon to be displayed in the upper left corner of the screen, just under the task bar. This icon is created and "fixed positioned" at that location anytime that JEDIT is running, regardless of where the actual jedit program window is positioned. (I, have a dual monitor setup, and it always is positioned at the point on screen 1, even if the app was started or moved to screen 2.) This extra icon covers up the close icon of what ever application is really positioned at the top left of screen 1. The icon does nothing, except prevent you from clicking on the "close icon" that is just below it. PLEASE NOTE this icon is NOT positioned over JEDIT's close icon, unless JEDIT's window just happens to be position at the top left. It is possible to move the covered up application's window just down, or just to the right so the covered-up close icon is now visible. You can now close that app... It has occurred to be that the JEDIT designer who added this "feature" meant to make it harder to close JEDIT in error, and that they only had a"small screen"... If this is what was desired, then the icon should have been position over the top left corner of JEDIT's window, rather than the Monitors screen. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: jedit 5.3.0+dfsg-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-38.57-generic 4.4.19 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-38-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: GNOME Date: Wed Sep 21 08:06:17 2016 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-11 (864 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140417) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: jedit UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: jedit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug gnome3-ppa third-party-packages xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626068 Title: JEDIT causes an extra icon to be display in the left upper corner (line 2) which covers up "close" icon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jedit/+bug/1626068/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1623147] [NEW] A "JEDIT" icon overlays the "X" icon on whatever other package is active.
Public bug reported: 1. Start JEDIT 2. Start any other application. Whatever application happens to be positioned in the left hand upper corner of the screen (i.e. second line, under the "task" bar) will have it's close icon (the "X") overlaid by a JEDIT icon, preventing you from closing the second application. This "JE" icon background is a "light gray" with the standard orange "JE". In the task bar, there are several other "JEDIT" icons, all colored the same - orange "JE" on a black background, one each for the internal JEDIT processes currently active. There does not appear to be any useful function provided by this icon, as clicking on it does nothing. - - - I am running UBUNTU 16.04.1 with GNOME 3.20 JEDIT 5.3.0 JAVA 1.8.0_91 the following JEDIT plugins are available, but are not active (ie. "loaded") BufferTabs 1.2.4 Character Map 1.3.3 Column Ruler 1.0.5 Common Controls 1.7.4 JDIFF Plugin 3.3.0 - - - I also have two monitors on a single NVIDIA card. It does not matter on which screen JEDIT is started, nor does it matter if the JEDIT window is moved to the other screen. This jedit icon is always positioned at the start of line 2 on the primary monitor, and it ALWAYS overlays the exit icon of any screen positioned there. To close the secondary application, it is necessary to move the window down or to the right so that the "X" icon is displayed. You can then click on it to close the second application. Clicking on this "extra" JEDIT icon does nothing... This is NOT a misplaced JEDIT application icon for any of JEDIT's internal processes, as each of those has its own "JE" icon in the upper "task" bar, all of which properly identify themselves with a mouse-over. - - - I am using JEDIT as my primary text editor, because GEDIT cannot be resized by grabbing one of the edges or corners, and because the work enhancing icons previously available in the now missing toolbar have been changed to menus and submenus coupled with right and left clicks and... The modifications made to GEDIT are now causing extreme slowdowns in the work that I do with my computer. - - - ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u91-b14-3ubuntu1~16.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-36.55-generic 4.4.16 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-36-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: GNOME Date: Tue Sep 13 13:49:48 2016 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-11 (856 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140417) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en PATH=(custom, user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openjdk-8 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1623147 Title: A "JEDIT" icon overlays the "X" icon on whatever other package is active. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-8/+bug/1623147/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616296] Re: package nemo (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/polkit-1/actions/org.nemo.root.policy', which is also in package nemo-data 3.0.6-1~xenial0
(Deleted comment that referenced nemo and nano at the same time. Sorry, I'm tired and got the two mixed up...!) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616296 Title: package nemo (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/polkit-1/actions/org.nemo.root.policy', which is also in package nemo-data 3.0.6-1~xenial0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nemo/+bug/1616296/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616296] [NEW] package nemo (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/polkit-1/actions/org.nemo.root.policy', which is also in package nemo-data 3.0.6-1~xenial0
Public bug reported: was running ubuntu 14.04.1, with gnome (cinnamon installed over gnome about year and half ago) graphics card is Nvidia Corp GF108 [GeForce GT620] rev a1 with the nvidia 304 driver Responded to upgrade manager prompt to upgrade to ubuntu 16/04.1 After checking found that most folks with Nvidia problems had them in June/July 2016, so figured problems had been resolved. (Boy, was I wrong!) Have spent the the last 5-days 8-10 hours a day, trying to recover from this badly packaged upgrade. It took two days to get "past" the inability to logon at all, and was finally able to make use of ctl- alt-F3 to get a terminal session during the logon loop problem of lightdm and Nvidia video drivers after trying damn near every NVIDIA video driver since 304. This was done using ppa:graphics-drivers and always doing a "sudo apt- get-purge nvida-*" before the "sudo apt-get install nvidia-xxx". Initially I tried nvidia-367 and it did not work. Eventually, however, the nvidia 367.35 did work with gdm3, but not with lightdm. I do not understand why Nemo is "not installed" as that was the software package that I used the most (other then "apt-get" and "dpkg") during my tty debugging sessions, once I could actually establish a tty session. Amongst many other changes that was made while trying to resolve the entire upgrade to Ubuntu 16.04.1 Gnome, was that I installed cinnamon 3 and then uninstalled it... ...this eliminated a lot of wierd error messages. (Sorry, don't remember what they were.) Eventually I installed gnome 3.20 using its special ppa and when that did not work, I did a new install of "gnome" and "gnome-shell". After I did yet another "sudo dpkg-reconfigure gdm3" and for the first time in 5-days I was able to logon with a Graphics Manager. Upon login, I received a message that the "nemo 2.8.6-2" installation had failed, and thus this ticket... If anybody wants to try and figure out what the original root cause for the ubuntu 16.04.1 gnome installation failure really was, please list what command output and or logs you would like to see and I will be glad to attach them to this ticket. While I am knowledgable and comfortable with Linux, I am not an expert. (I retired 10-years ago from a lifetime of supporting very large IBM Mainframes at multiple locations and networking them with many, many different minicomputer and microcomputer hardware systems and their respective operating systems in both workstation and server configurations.) ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: nemo (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-34.53-generic 4.4.15 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-34-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Aug 23 13:28:57 2016 DuplicateSignature: package:nemo:(not installed) Unpacking nemo (2.8.6-2) over (3.0.6-1~xenial0) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/nemo_2.8.6-2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/polkit-1/actions/org.nemo.root.policy', which is also in package nemo-data 3.0.6-1~xenial0 ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/polkit-1/actions/org.nemo.root.policy', which is also in package nemo-data 3.0.6-1~xenial0 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-11 (836 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140417) RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.1 apt 1.2.12~ubuntu16.04.1 SourcePackage: nemo Title: package nemo (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/polkit-1/actions/org.nemo.root.policy', which is also in package nemo-data 3.0.6-1~xenial0 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to xenial on 2016-08-19 (4 days ago) ** Affects: nemo (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package package-conflict xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616296 Title: package nemo (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/polkit-1/actions/org.nemo.root.policy', which is also in package nemo-data 3.0.6-1~xenial0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nemo/+bug/1616296/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1479040] Re: wineserver segfault with kernel 3.13.0-59-generic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1479093 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479093 Problem with wine resolved after kernel 3.13.0-61 installed. so this is a duplicate of 1479093 Thanks everyone for a fast fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479040 Title: wineserver segfault with kernel 3.13.0-59-generic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.6/+bug/1479040/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1479093] Re: Segfault in ld-2.19.so while starting Steam after upgrade to 3.13.0-59.98
This fix also takes care of segfaults in Wine that occurred under kernel 3.13.0.59 (Bug #1479040) Everything appears to be working just fine under Kernel 3.13.0.61. Thanks everybody!!! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479093 Title: Segfault in ld-2.19.so while starting Steam after upgrade to 3.13.0-59.98 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1479093/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1479040] Re: wineserver segfault with kernel 3.13.0-59-generic
After kernel 3.13.0-59-generic installed in UBUNTU 14.04.2 wine 1.6.2 (which is latest in ubuntu dist lib) fails with: Jul 29 08:58:34 wb4alm-07 kernel: [ 143.864739] wineserver[2956]: segfault at cf192d0 ip 0cf192d0 sp 9e13a1b0 error 14 in ld-2.19.so[7f8a0cf18000+23000] If I reboot using kernel 3.13.0-58-generic everything works... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479040 Title: wineserver segfault with kernel 3.13.0-59-generic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.6/+bug/1479040/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1268257] Re: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build, with only error: objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such file
While I am only 1 of 2593 people affected by this bug, (and other problems such as screen/system hangs caused by the driver) I have decided to replace my NVIDIA Display card with an older model NVIDA graphics adapter, and have regressed the nvidia-graphics-driver to the 304 version. In the past two weeks I have had ZERO problems, and in the past, I have had as many as three-four screen/system hangs EACH DAY. After posting this comment, I will be unsubscribing to this particular bug, and will be researching other variations of LINUX since UBUNTU is no longer really supporting their LTS model. I wish you all good luck! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1268257 Title: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build, with only error: objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nvidia-drivers-ubuntu/+bug/1268257/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1268257] Re: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build, with only error: objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such file
Since the fix is known, why not apply it to nvidia-331 and be done with this foolishness? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1268257 Title: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build, with only error: objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nvidia-drivers-ubuntu/+bug/1268257/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1268257] Re: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build, with only error: objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such file
Not sure about the previous message: Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) 8 hours ago Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 (Ubuntu): status: Fix Released → Triaged Changed in nvidia-graphics-drivers-331-updates (Ubuntu): status: Fix Released → Triaged as the update just applied (01 May 2015 0545 Eastern Time) to my machine failed with the exact same status as it has for a long time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1268257 Title: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build, with only error: objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nvidia-drivers-ubuntu/+bug/1268257/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1268257] Re: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build, with only error: objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such file
I wonder if I'll live long enough to see this bug actually fixed. Since version 340 has it fixed, why can't the fixed be retrofitted to version 331? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1268257 Title: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build, with only error: objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nvidia-drivers-ubuntu/+bug/1268257/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1387683] [NEW] nvidia-331-updates-uvm 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331-updates-uvm kernel module failed to build (still #10)
Public bug reported: I have followed all of the suggestions on removing, re-installing etc. I never have any problems re-installing. but the very next auto-update allways fails with this same error. This is around the 10th time I have had to report this problem, and everytime that it is flagged as a dup of some other problem, I follow those instructions to no avail. Is there ever going to be a fix? ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: nvidia-331-updates-uvm 331.38-0ubuntu7.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-37.64-generic 3.13.11.7 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-37-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.5 Architecture: amd64 DKMSKernelVersion: 3.13.0-39-generic Date: Thu Oct 30 09:59:18 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-11 (172 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140417) PackageVersion: 331.38-0ubuntu7.1 SourcePackage: nvidia-graphics-drivers-331-updates Title: nvidia-331-updates-uvm 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331-updates-uvm kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-331-updates (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387683 Title: nvidia-331-updates-uvm 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331-updates-uvm kernel module failed to build (still #10) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331-updates/+bug/1387683/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1387683] Re: nvidia-331-updates-uvm 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331-updates-uvm kernel module failed to build (still #10)
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) yes, the installation of 14.04 was a clean new install, and all auto-updates have been applied since then. Does anybody have any suggestions? If this continues I will have to find a better linux distribution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1387683 Title: nvidia-331-updates-uvm 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331-updates-uvm kernel module failed to build (still #10) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331-updates/+bug/1387683/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1380060] Re: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build
Why not re-release the 331 driver with the bug fixed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1380060 Title: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1380060/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1380060] [NEW] nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: failed again, again. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-37.64-generic 3.13.11.7 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-37-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.5 Architecture: amd64 DKMSKernelVersion: 3.13.0-37-generic Date: Sat Oct 11 07:30:33 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-11 (153 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140417) PackageVersion: 331.38-0ubuntu7.1 SourcePackage: nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 Title: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1380060 Title: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1380060/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1318252] Re: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu7: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build [nvidia.ko failed to build! but no reason why]
Same as usuall - only get message failed to build module, no other readson given. this has been occuring for MONTHS now. individual install of nvidia 331 always works, and always fails during packaged updated -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318252 Title: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu7: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build [nvidia.ko failed to build! but no reason why] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331-updates/+bug/1318252/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1268257] Re: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build, with no obvious error [objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such file]
This is the fifth (or more) update of the kernel, where i have to manuaaly delete and reinstall the Nvidia 331.38 driver. My card is a geforce 8600... and this problem has been occuring for a long, long time. Most of my past reports have been tag as duplicates of other reported bug, the last three or so were declared to be dups of this report (1268257), so i decided to tag it that way right off... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1268257 Title: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build, with no obvious error [objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such file] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1268257/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1268257] Re: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build, with no obvious error [objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such file]
Can't tell if the debug information captured bny my system has been uploaded and/or attached to this report. If you need it, you will have to tell me where to find it on my system, and I'll be glad to manually attach it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1268257 Title: nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build, with no obvious error [objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such file] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1268257/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1358457] [NEW] nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: Please verify that attached data is the same as a previous bug, BEFORE tagging it as a duplicate. Thank You. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-34.60-generic 3.13.11.4 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-34-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.3 Architecture: amd64 DKMSKernelVersion: 3.13.0-34-generic Date: Mon Aug 18 15:08:58 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-11 (99 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140417) PackageVersion: 331.38-0ubuntu7.1 SourcePackage: nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 Title: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358457 Title: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1358457/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1356485] [NEW] nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: DO NOT TAG AS A DUPLICATE UNTIL AFTER THE ATTACHED DEBUG INFORMATION HAS BEEN EVALUATED.Thank You. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-32.57-generic 3.13.11.4 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-32-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.3 Architecture: amd64 DKMSKernelVersion: 3.13.0-33-generic Date: Wed Aug 13 13:03:49 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-11 (94 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140417) PackageVersion: 331.38-0ubuntu7.1 SourcePackage: nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 Title: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356485 Title: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1356485/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1347933] [NEW] nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: Each individual update reports tis problem, even after nvidia has been installed by itself after the pakaged updates ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-30.55-generic 3.13.11.2 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.2 Architecture: amd64 DKMSKernelVersion: 3.13.0-32-generic Date: Wed Jul 23 17:18:45 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-11 (73 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140417) PackageVersion: 331.38-0ubuntu7 SourcePackage: nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 Title: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1347933 Title: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1347933/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1335357] [NEW] nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: Failed to install when processing list of upgrades ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-30.54-generic 3.13.11.2 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.2 Architecture: amd64 DKMSKernelVersion: 3.13.0-30-generic Date: Fri Jun 27 19:13:24 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-11 (47 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140417) PackageVersion: 331.38-0ubuntu7 SourcePackage: nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 Title: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335357 Title: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1335357/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1325426] Re: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build
Do not know what really triggered this problem - was applying latest series of updates including Kernel 3.13.0-29-generic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325426 Title: nvidia-331 331.38-0ubuntu7: nvidia-331 kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1325426/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1320428] Re: Firefox 29 fails (system hang) under Linux 3.11.0-24-generic, works under 3.11.0-20-generic
uname -r;lsb_release -a 3.13.0-27-generic No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Release:14.04 Codename: trusty The problem has gone away with the installation of Linux kernal 3.13.0-27-generic. This record can be closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1320428 Title: Firefox 29 fails (system hang) under Linux 3.11.0-24-generic, works under 3.11.0-20-generic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1320428/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1320428] [NEW] Firefox 29 fails (system hang) under Linux 3.11.0-24-generic, works under 3.11.0-20-generic
Public bug reported:
Note: attached system information captured under Linux 3.11.0-20-generic.
The actual hang occurs under Linux 3.11.0-24-generic.
I am assuming the actual bug has to do with this particular combination of
Kernal and Firefox.
tagged it as kernal, as the same version of firefox works under previous kernal
When the SYSTEM hangs, you lose all control. Only a power-switch reboot will
recover.
Hang NEVER occurs under Linux 3.11.0-20-generic and will ALWAYS hang when
firefox is started under Linux 3.11.0-24-generic
No differences after reinstalling the -24 system, and/or firefox using
Synaptic Package Manager.
Can assist in debugging, but am not an expert in linux.
- - - -
My system uses an NVIDIA GeForce 8600GTS video card.
ubuntu-drivers-common 1:0.2.91.4
xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.10-1ubuntu2
if I boot the system under the recently distributed 3.11.0-24-generic
and then start Firefox 29, (also recently distributed)
my system will lockup, and I will have to use the power button to
reboot.
if I boot the 3.11.0-20-generic kernal, then there is no problem.
hints anyone?
Firefox Release 29 fails (hangs) in this environment:
uname -r;lsb_release -a
3.11.0-24-generic
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
Release:14.04
Codename: trusty
memory: 4GB
Firefox Release 29 works in this environment:
uname -r;lsb_release -a
3.11.0-20-generic
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
Release:14.04
Codename: trusty
memory 4GB
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: firefox 29.0+build1-0ubuntu0.14.04.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-20.35-generic 3.11.10.6
Uname: Linux 3.11.0-20-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: hid_generic usbhid hid firewire_ohci forcedeth
firewire_core pata_acpi crc_itu_t sata_nv pata_amd floppy
AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
BuildID: 20140428193813
CRDA: Error: command ['iw', 'reg', 'get'] failed with exit code 1: nl80211 not
found.
Channel: Unavailable
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Sat May 17 01:41:49 2014
DefaultProfileIncompatibleExtensions:
English (GB) Language Pack - langpack-en...@firefox.mozilla.org
Default - {972ce4c6-7e08-4474-a285-3208198ce6fd}
DefaultProfilePrefSources: prefs.js
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/firefox/firefox
ForcedLayersAccel: False
IfupdownConfig:
# interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-11 (6 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140417)
IpRoute:
default via 192.168.7.99 dev eth0 proto static
192.168.7.99 dev eth0 proto static scope link
IwConfig:
eth0 no wireless extensions.
lono wireless extensions.
MostRecentCrashID: bp-3adbdd30-b995-477d-a458-ff34e2130425
PciNetwork:
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
PATH=(custom, user)
XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
Profile1PrefSources: prefs.js
Profiles:
Profile0 (Default) - LastVersion=29.0/20140428193813 (In use)
Profile1 - LastVersion=23.0/20130803192641 (Out of date)
RelatedPackageVersions:
rhythmbox-mozilla 3.0.2-0ubuntu2
totem-mozilla 3.10.1-1ubuntu4
RfKill:
RunningIncompatibleAddons: True
SourcePackage: firefox
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
WifiSyslog: May 16 14:49:33 wb4alm-07 kernel: [146307.851001] INFO: NMI handler
(arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace_handler) took too long to run: 6.116 msecs
dmi.bios.date: 06/21/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies, LTD
dmi.bios.version: ASUS P5N-D ACPI BIOS Revision 1401
dmi.board.name: P5N-D
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
dmi.board.version: 1.XX
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 123456789000
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologies,LTD:bvrASUSP5N-DACPIBIOSRevision1401:bd06/21/2010:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP5N-D:rvr1.XX:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion:
dmi.product.name: System Product Name
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer
** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1320428
Title:
Firefox 29 fails (system hang) under Linux 3.11.0-24-generic, works
under 3.11.0-20-generic
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1320428/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1320428] Re: Firefox 29 fails (system hang) under Linux 3.11.0-24-generic, works under 3.11.0-20-generic
Since the attached apport system info was from the Linux 3.11.0-20-generic boot (trusty amd64 apport-bug) how do I provide information on the 3.11.0-24-generic boot? The momment I try to start firefox, the system will hang! Thanks... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1320428 Title: Firefox 29 fails (system hang) under Linux 3.11.0-24-generic, works under 3.11.0-20-generic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1320428/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1290342] [NEW] Frequent System Hangs
Public bug reported: bill@WB4ALM-07:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 13.10 Release:13.10 bill@WB4ALM-07:~$apt-cache policy pkgname N: Unable to locate package pkgname I get frequent system hangs... ...sometime xorg restarts itself, many times it does not. Usually I have no keyboard or mouse clicks when it hangs. Sometimes I can move the cursor around the screen, but am unable to click on anything. If I have an active (95 chars by 45 lines) terminal, then it will usually resize the terminal to the default size (80 chars by 24 lines). It does not seem to matter what application software is running. I have seen the problem occur with firefox, system monitor, terminal sessions running REXX scripts, gedit, and th file manager. It does not seem to have an real pattern that I have been able to discover other than SIGABRT eventually showing up in various other routines such as GNOME. My display card is a dual display 8600GTS with 512M onboard. I have been using that card since I first started with Ubuntu 8-04 and 10-04 and it worked exceeding well until I upgraded to 12-04 (12-04, 12-10, 13-04, 14-10) When I first instralled the card I was able to support 4 monitors. One monitor on one port and the other three on the second port connected thru a Tripple-togo external adapter from Matrix. the two seperate sets of monitors were run as separate x-windows and I was very, very happy with that setup. under 12-04 and all successor versions, the seprate x-server mechanism has NOT functioned - resulting in my removal of the tripple-to-go adapter and its three monitors from this system. I now only run a single monitor, and am so severly plaged with XORG failures, that I can no longer use this system as part of my Ham Radio setup, as the system is too unstable to use in digital communications. Please note, ALL system failures have been transmitted to UBUNTU for the past four years. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: xorg 1:7.7+1ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-18.32-generic 3.11.10.4 Uname: Linux 3.11.0-18-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus.0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: '/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/0' .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: .proc.driver.nvidia.version: NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 304.88 Wed Mar 27 14:26:46 PDT 2013 GCC version: gcc version 4.8.1 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.1-10ubuntu9) .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins' CompositorRunning: None Date: Mon Mar 10 08:06:31 2014 DistUpgraded: 2013-10-21 11:14:52,695 DEBUG enabling apt cron job DistroCodename: saucy DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: nvidia-304, 304.88, 3.11.0-15-generic, x86_64: installed nvidia-304, 304.88, 3.11.0-17-generic, x86_64: installed nvidia-304, 304.88, 3.11.0-18-generic, x86_64: installed ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical GraphicsCard: NVIDIA Corporation G84 [GeForce 8600 GTS] [10de:0400] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: eVga.com. Corp. Device [3842:c773] InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-05-04 (310 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Release amd64 (20130424) MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name MarkForUpload: True ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.11.0-18-generic root=UUID=9687e09d-6ef0-45b9-a28c-617031682b72 ro quiet splash SourcePackage: xorg UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-21 (139 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 06/21/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies, LTD dmi.bios.version: ASUS P5N-D ACPI BIOS Revision 1401 dmi.board.name: P5N-D dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: 1.XX dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 123456789000 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologies,LTD:bvrASUSP5N-DACPIBIOSRevision1401:bd06/21/2010:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP5N-D:rvr1.XX:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: System Product Name dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.10+13.10.20131011-0ubuntu1 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs 20090808ubuntu36 version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.46-1ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 9.2.1-1ubuntu3 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 9.2.1-1ubuntu3 version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers N/A version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.14.5-1ubuntu2~saucy1 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.3-0ubuntu3.1 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:7.2.0-0ubuntu10 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.99.904-0ubuntu2.1
[Bug 1184451] Re: Ubuntu 13.10 random screen freeze while Normal OS activites
Like many others, I have been getting random screen freezes since July 2013. They are more frequent under 13.10, but I was also getting them under 13.04 I have a quad processor, and it seems that if one cpu approaches 100%, I am much more likely to see a screen freeze. Some of the freezes clear themselves in a time fram of 15 seconds to a couple of minutes. If more than two of the copu's go to 100% it is highly probably that a Hard reboot (with the power switch) will be required. (Could there be a kernal logic problem in signalling between the cpu's?) When the unfreeze occurs, I will see a screen flash and then the screen is rewritten and everything is fine for a while. If the unfreeze does not occur within a few minutes, I have found that a hard reboot with the power switch is necessary. Sometimes when the screen freezes, the cursor can be moved, but button clicks will no longer work, nor will the keyboard. My keyboard and trackball are both USB if that makes a difference, and my VIDEO card is a NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS using NVIDIA's 304.88 driver. I have had multiple monitors attached to my system in the past using my dual port card, but in the last 6 months have only had a ViewSonic VA1930wm at 1440x900 pixels. (In fact, prior to ubuntu 10.04, I was able to run them as separate x-screens, but that went away with Ubuntu 10.04) As a radio Amateur, I frequently run a program called FLDIGI to control one of my Radio Transmitters. When I had FLDIGI configured to use portaudio, everything was fine from Ubuntu 8.04 all the way to Ubuntu 10.04. With Ubuntu 10.04 I started to get some freezes using Portaudio and under Ubuntu 12.10 it was totally unusable - so I switched to PulseAudio (as recommended by the FLDIGI author), and as a result the freezes were less frequent until Ubuntu 13.10, when the freezes became quite frequent. I have no way to tell if the problen is X-server related, or if it is pulseAudio related, or if it has to do with signaling within the kernal. Sometimes when the system fixes itself, a problem analysis is created and I assume is transmitted to Ubuntu support. I know for a fact that NO report is generated when I have to hard boot the system. If the screen freezes and can not be fixed, then I will have to abandon Ubuntu and go to mint 13 or mint 14 like a lot of other Radio Amateurs have already done. It is just not acceptable when I am in the middle of a radio conversation with other Radio Hams to have the Ubuntu system freeze and cause my radio transmitter to suddenly stop sending data, but continue to transmit a signal, and then go suddenly off the air when the system is rebooted. Not only is it not polite to just disappear, it is a violation of the FCC's rules and regulations to not end the transmission with my call sign. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1184451 Title: Ubuntu 13.10 random screen freeze while Normal OS activites To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1184451/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1045602] Re: date and time in gnome-system-log is white text on white background
I installed Ubuntu 13.04 as a clean and default installation, and the timestamps WERE NOT displayed, unless one or more lines were highlighted. With all of the recent changes that have been made to make a 13.04 desktop look like a touch tablet or smart phone, I no longer know where to go to determine what theme is now in use on my system. Since the initial install, I have had to changed a large number of defaults in an attempt to make the entire system USABLE, but have not found an effective way to repair this particular issue. Since Canonical has not released a fix, it would appear to me that (1) their development machines are in a closed environment (i.e. not attached to the Internet) and (2) that they do not use the logs. Period. Otherwise, I feel that this issue would have been fixed well over a year ago!!! Unfortunately, there are many of us that do need to monitor the logs and fix outstanding problems - and need to make use of packages like fail2ban to minimize hacking attempts. This does require matching timestamps between logs and highlighting large blocks of log text just to find particular timestamp entrys is not exactly work efficent. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045602 Title: date and time in gnome-system-log is white text on white background To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-log/+bug/1045602/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1034156] Re: System Log will not launch
Yes, syslog will start in 13.04, but the time and date stamps are still invisable unless you actually select (highlight) one or more lines. This means that it still is not as usuable as it should be. /s/ Bill Turner, wb4alm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1034156 Title: System Log will not launch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/policykit-1/+bug/1034156/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885989] Re: white screen on second monitor when using two xsessions
I agree with Paul, I do not understand why this still has not been fixed. Multiple screen support worked in Ubuntu 10.04 and 10.10, and does not now work in Ubuntu 11.xx or Ubuntu 12.xx (I am currently on Ubuntu 12.10, would have prefered to stay on 12.04 LTS, but other issues with 12.04.1 forced me to upgrade to 12.10) Since I am accustomed to being able to run separate X screens, (one screen was a single 1024x768, and the other screen was a triple 1440x900) running on a dual head display card) --- being restricted to two SINGLE monitors running in twinview has severely affected my productivity. While I am a software and systems developer, I do not program in C, so I am not comfortable or knowlegable in how to patch files and recompile them under Linux --- and cannot afford to lose my system again for weeks on end like what happened with the upgrade to 12.04.1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885989 Title: white screen on second monitor when using two xsessions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/885989/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1093946] Re: Evince fails to open PDF files. worked prior to Ubuntu 12.10 upgrade [-WARNING **: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpoppler-glib.so.8: undefined symbol: cairo_mesh_pattern_begin_patch]
Dave, Restoring the original libcario module fixed evince --- now NX is unable to display text again. Not being real familiar with the internals of Linux, It never occurred to me to relate the loss of EVINCE with the fix of NX --- especially since they occurried weeks apart from each other. - - - - http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2081746highlight=nomachine I just went out and reread the fix description on NX and found that there are new updates to that report. Originally there were only comments 1 to 5. Now there are comments 6 to 12. apparently other people had the same trouble as I did --- and as I was badly burned by the last attempt to fix NX, I do not want to get burned again. Would you be so kind, as to review those comments and see if there is a recommended fix for NX? As I still consider myself a relatively newbee in Linux, I would appreciate the assistance.) If that is against the rules, then I understand and greatly appreciate the assistance that you have provided!!! /s/ Bill Turner, wb4alm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093946 Title: Evince fails to open PDF files. worked prior to Ubuntu 12.10 upgrade [-WARNING **: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpoppler-glib.so.8: undefined symbol: cairo_mesh_pattern_begin_patch] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1093946/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1093946] Re: Evince fails to open PDF files. worked prior to Ubuntu 12.10 upgrade
Good thought, never thought about trying to run evince in a terminal session... The answer is that it still fails and I get the following message: (evince:16765): EvinceDocument-WARNING **: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpoppler-glib.so.8: undefined symbol: cairo_mesh_pattern_begin_patch Segmentation fault (core dumped) I get the same message, no matter what PDF file I try to open. (Tried several) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093946 Title: Evince fails to open PDF files. worked prior to Ubuntu 12.10 upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1093946/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1093946] Re: Evince fails to open PDF files. worked prior to Ubuntu 12.10 upgrade [-WARNING **: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpoppler-glib.so.8: undefined symbol: cairo_mesh_pattern_begin_patch]
bill@WB4ALM-07:~$ dpkg -l \*libpoppler\* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ NameVersionArchitecture Description +++-===-==-==-=== ii libpoppler-glib20.6.4-1ubuntu3.4 amd64 PDF rendering library (GLib-based shared library) rc libpoppler-glib40.12.4-0ubuntu5.2 amd64 PDF rendering library (GLib-based shared library) ii libpoppler-glib8:amd64 0.20.4-0ubuntu1amd64 PDF rendering library (GLib-based shared library) rc libpoppler-qt4-3:amd64 0.18.4-1ubuntu2amd64 PDF rendering library (Qt 4 based shared library) rc libpoppler19:amd64 0.18.4-1ubuntu2amd64 PDF rendering library ii libpoppler2 0.6.4-1ubuntu3.4 amd64 PDF rendering library ii libpoppler28:amd64 0.20.4-0ubuntu1amd64 PDF rendering library rc libpoppler5 0.12.4-0ubuntu5.2 amd64 PDF rendering library bill@WB4ALM-07:~$ dpkg -l \*libcairo\* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ NameVersionArchitecture Description +++-===-==-==-=== un libcairo-devnone(no description available) ii libcairo-gobject2:amd64 1.12.2-1ubuntu2.2 amd64 The Cairo 2D vector graphics library (GObject library) ii libcairo-gobject2:i386 1.12.2-1ubuntu2.2 i386 The Cairo 2D vector graphics library (GObject library) ii libcairo-perl 1.100-0ubuntu1 amd64 Perl interface to the Cairo graphics library un libcairo-ruby none(no description available) un libcairo-ruby1.8none(no description available) ii libcairo-script-interpreter 1.12.2-1ubuntu2.2 amd64 The Cairo 2D vector graphics library (script interpreter) ii libcairo2:amd64 1.12.2-1ubuntu2.2 amd64 The Cairo 2D vector graphics library ii libcairo2:i386 1.12.2-1ubuntu2.2 i386 The Cairo 2D vector graphics library ii libcairo2-dev 1.12.2-1ubuntu2.2 amd64 Development files for the Cairo 2D graphics library un libcairo2-doc none(no description available) un libcairomm-1.0-0none(no description available) ii libcairomm-1.0-1:amd64 1.10.0-1ubuntu2amd64 C++ wrappers for Cairo (shared libraries) bill@WB4ALM-07:~$ I was on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and accidentally hit the upgrade button for 12.04.1 (wasn't prepared to do an upgrade at that time). I went ahead and let to do the install and immediately ran into a number of problems, including the fact that the system would not reboot when the installation was done. All reboot attempts resulted in a black screen. I was able to trace the problem to a missing command in GRUB (I had GRUB 1 with Ubuntu 10.04) After fixing that problem about a week later GRUB was automatically updated to GRUB2. Personally I do not like the UNITY interface, it requires far too many clicks and menu for be to get anything done. I added KDE per recommendations on several of the Ubuntu forums, and that worked for about a week until a MAJOR ubuntu update came thru and messed up KDE. So I uninstalled KDE and tried to use UNITY, but again found it not to my liking. About that time I received an announcement that gnome 3 was available (I do not remeber what the package was called.) I installed that, and started getting a working system again (Took almost 3-4 weeks!!!) After running with the GNOME3 (it always goes into FALLBACK mode, because it thinks my graphics card (EVA nvidia GeForce 9600GTS) is not 3d capable - which it is...) A suggestion was to upgrade once again to 12.10, which I did. Things have been kinda stable since, and have found workarounds for all of the little bugs (like having to run SYSLOG in a terminal screen to get it to work at all, and having to put up with the missing timestamps on each line 'cause they are displayed in white ink, on a white background) I currently log on with GNOME and most things work - except for evince. This is a major problem to me, as almost all of the documentation that I use are in PDF files... After some investigation I found
[Bug 1093946] Re: Evince fails to open PDF files. worked prior to Ubuntu 12.10 upgrade [-WARNING **: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpoppler-glib.so.8: undefined symbol: cairo_mesh_pattern_begin_patch]
bill@WB4ALM-07:~$ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade [sudo] password for bill: xxx Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. - - - - - sudo apt-get remove libpoppler-glib2 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: gcc-4.7-arm-linux-gnueabihf-base gir1.2-clutter-gst-2.0 gir1.2-gtkclutter-1.0 gir1.2-rest-0.7 gir1.2-tracker-0.14 gir1.2-zpj-0.0 gwibber libgwibber-gtk3 libzapojit-0.0-0 unoconv Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following packages will be REMOVED: libpoppler-glib2 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. After this operation, 225 kB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y (Reading database ... 1089809 files and directories currently installed.) Removing libpoppler-glib2 ... Processing triggers for libc-bin ... ldconfig deferred processing now taking place /sbin/ldconfig.real: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 is not a symbolic link bill@WB4ALM-07:~$ - - - - sudo apt-get autoremove Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: gcc-4.7-arm-linux-gnueabihf-base gir1.2-clutter-gst-2.0 gir1.2-gtkclutter-1.0 gir1.2-rest-0.7 gir1.2-tracker-0.14 gir1.2-zpj-0.0 gwibber libgwibber-gtk3 libzapojit-0.0-0 unoconv 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 10 to remove and 0 not upgraded. After this operation, 1,694 kB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y (Reading database ... 1089800 files and directories currently installed.) Removing gcc-4.7-arm-linux-gnueabihf-base ... Removing gir1.2-clutter-gst-2.0 ... Removing gir1.2-gtkclutter-1.0 ... Removing gir1.2-zpj-0.0 ... Removing gir1.2-rest-0.7 ... Removing gir1.2-tracker-0.14 ... Removing gwibber ... Removing libgwibber-gtk3 ... Removing libzapojit-0.0-0 ... Removing unoconv ... Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme ... Processing triggers for bamfdaemon ... Rebuilding /usr/share/applications/bamf.index... Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils ... Processing triggers for gnome-menus ... Processing triggers for libc-bin ... ldconfig deferred processing now taking place /sbin/ldconfig.real: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 is not a symbolic link Processing triggers for doc-base ... Processing 1 removed doc-base file... Registering documents with scrollkeeper... Processing triggers for man-db ... bill@WB4ALM-07:~$ - - - - - - - That message about libcairo.so.2 bothers me so... bill@WB4ALM-07:~$ locate libcairo.so.2 /home/bill/.mozilla/firefox/lna9hl72.default/extensions/vmwarev...@vmware.com/plugins/lib/libcairo.so.2 /home/bill/.mozilla/firefox/lna9hl72.default/extensions/vmwarev...@vmware.com/plugins/lib/libcairo.so.2/libcairo.so.2 /home/bill/Download/NoMachine/libcairo/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 /home/bill/Download/NoMachine/libcairo/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2.11000.2 /home/bill/src/VMware/Linux/VMserver_2.0.2/extracted_vmrc/plugins/lib/libcairo.so.2 /home/bill/src/VMware/Linux/VMserver_2.0.2/extracted_vmrc/plugins/lib/libcairo.so.2/libcairo.so.2 /home/bill/vmware/vmrc-workaround/plugins/lib/libcairo.so.2 /home/bill/vmware/vmrc-workaround/plugins/lib/libcairo.so.2/libcairo.so.2 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2.11200.2 /usr/lib/vmware/lib/libcairo.so.2 /usr/lib/vmware/lib/libcairo.so.2/libcairo.so.2 /usr/lib/vmware-installer/2.1.0/lib/lib/libcairo.so.2 /usr/lib/vmware-installer/2.1.0/lib/lib/libcairo.so.2/libcairo.so.2 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2.11000.2 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo_orig/libcairo.so.2 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo_orig/libcairo.so.2.11200.2 bill@WB4ALM-07:~$ - - - - ls -all /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 766024 Dec 9 09:48 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 According to my manual log for December 9th, the only thing I did was to fix NX which my wife uses to access her account on my Linux box via her Win7 desktop.. My notes say: **QUOTE** http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2081746highlight=nomachine Here are the steps I followed for my 64-bit install of Ubuntu 12.10. I suppose the workaround is the same for the 32-bit version, except you change the libcairo package and the file system paths accordingly: 1. Terminate your NX sessions 2. cd ~/Downloads 3. wget http://mirror.pnl.gov/ubuntu//pool/main/c/cairo/libcairo2_1.10.2-6.1ubuntu2_amd64.deb 4. mkdir libcairo 5. dpkg -x libcairo2_1.10.2-6.1ubuntu2_amd64.deb libcairo/ 6. sudo mkdir /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo_orig 7. sudo mv /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2* /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo_orig/ 8. sudo
[Bug 1093946] Re: Evince fails to open PDF files. worked prior to Ubuntu 12.10 upgrade [-WARNING **: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpoppler-glib.so.8: undefined symbol: cairo_mesh_pattern_begin_patch]
By the way, Dave, I am very appreciative of your assistance. I guess I owe you a cup of coffie, or a stein of something stronger -- which ever you prefer!!! /s/ Bill Turner, wb4alm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093946 Title: Evince fails to open PDF files. worked prior to Ubuntu 12.10 upgrade [-WARNING **: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpoppler-glib.so.8: undefined symbol: cairo_mesh_pattern_begin_patch] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1093946/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1093946] Re: Evince fails to open PDF files. worked prior to Ubuntu 12.10 upgrade [-WARNING **: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpoppler-glib.so.8: undefined symbol: cairo_mesh_pattern_begin_patch]
Dave, additional info My initial ubuntu distro was Ubuntu 8:04 LTS, which was upgraded to Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, which was upgraded to ubuntu 12.04, and then to 12.10 - - - - To get Gnome 3, I installed Ubuntu Gnome remix as outlined here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGNOME/ReleaseNotes/12.10 This did install a ppa: ppa:gnome3-team/gnome3 and Synaptic Package Manager shows the following PPA: LP-PPA-gnome3-team-gnome3/quantal - - - - /s/ Bill -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093946 Title: Evince fails to open PDF files. worked prior to Ubuntu 12.10 upgrade [-WARNING **: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpoppler-glib.so.8: undefined symbol: cairo_mesh_pattern_begin_patch] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1093946/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1093946] [NEW] Evince fails to open PDF files. worked prior to Ubuntu 12.10 upgrade
Public bug reported: Any time I try to view a PDF file, an icon is created in the task bar that says opening file but the file does not open. No errors are shown and I have not located any messages in any of the logs. This problem affects ALL pdf files, but the files are displayable using mupdf. According to the following, evince 3.6.0 is installed. apt-cache policy evince evince: Installed: 3.6.0-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 3.6.0-0ubuntu2 Version table: *** 3.6.0-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status I have attempted to purge and reinstall evince several times, even to the point of deleting the evince libraries in /usr/lib/ and /usr/share/ and /var/lib/dpkg/info/ The result is always the same. Sometimes after the failure, Ubuntu reports an internal error in evince - which I have told it to send a report to the developers. The report must be very small, as it takes less than a second to do so. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: evince 3.6.0-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-21.32-generic 3.5.7.1 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu9 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Dec 26 22:25:34 2012 MarkForUpload: True ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: evince UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-11-01 (55 days ago) ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal third-party-packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093946 Title: Evince fails to open PDF files. worked prior to Ubuntu 12.10 upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1093946/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1034156] Re: System Log will not launch
I have applied all outstanding updates for my Ubuntu 12.10 system as of 12:57 (noon) 5 Dec 2012... When system log is launched, no password prompt is made, no messages are displayed, etc. Therefore the bug has still not been fixed. (I can how ever run the program from a terminal session. - it jkust will not run when launched from the main menu.) /s/ Bill Turner, wb4alm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1034156 Title: System Log will not launch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/policykit-1/+bug/1034156/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1034156] Re: System Log will not launch
I do not understand assignment to wishlist... I have always been able to launch from menu, now I can't... ...therefore this is not a wishlist, but is a bug introduced with 12.04.1 and continued in 12.10 furthermore, the message in .xsession-errors: Refusing to render service to dead parents. indicates that something is just plain wrong! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1034156 Title: System Log will not launch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/policykit-1/+bug/1034156/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 957641] Re: unity does not display authentication window for pkexec, making gnome-system-log unusable from the Dash
Problem still exists in Ubuntu 12.10 when attemping to start gnome- system-log. Gnome-system-log will run from a terminal however. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/957641 Title: unity does not display authentication window for pkexec, making gnome- system-log unusable from the Dash To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/957641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532232] Re: [MASTER] Please update lightning extension to version 1.0 for use with Thunderbird 3
I assumed that after 5 months that most of the bugs in 10.04 LTS would have been fixed. Silly me. It appears that from comments above and in other reports that it is more important to get the next beta out the door, then it is to get an LTS version to operate properly, and without regressing previously installed software. Most of the newer systems are 64-bit based, and have been for a couple of years. Why then should I be forced to run 32-bit applications (or worse yet, a 32-bit operating system) just to keep working features? Is there an estimate for when the 64-bit calendar will be available? -- [MASTER] Please update lightning extension to version 1.0 for use with Thunderbird 3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563916] Re: [details.so] No prompt for [S]kip or [M]anual recovery on server boot
Recently, my system was upgraded accidently to Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. (I was unprepared to do the upgrade from 8.04LTS (had not finished my research), and I accidently pressed the upgrade button in error. By the time I realized what was happening, it was too late - and so had to finish the upgrade process.) When the 10.04 LTS system finally restarted, it hung during the reboot. In trying to discover what was going on, I pressed CTRL-C, thinking that at worst something would stop. Nothing happened. I started to press CTRL-C again and hit the F key instead. That is when I discovered that fsck had detected a filesystem error, and that I had just told it to FIX an unknown problem because a hidden prompt was waiting for input! This is NOT a good way to do things... (By the way, while I have only been using Linux for a couple of years, I have been in I.T. for over 45 years.) -- [details.so] No prompt for [S]kip or [M]anual recovery on server boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563916 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623681] [NEW] package python-serial 2.3-1 failed to install/upgrade:
Public bug reported: doing system prompted upgrade to 10.4 LTS from 8.4 LTS. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: python-serial 2.3-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.24-28.75-generic Uname: Linux 2.6.24-28-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Aug 24 20:00:05 2010 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: pyserial Title: package python-serial 2.3-1 failed to install/upgrade: ** Affects: pyserial (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid -- package python-serial 2.3-1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623681] Re: package python-serial 2.3-1 failed to install/upgrade:
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623681/+attachment/1516754/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623681/+attachment/1516755/+files/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623681/+attachment/1516756/+files/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeLspcitxt.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623681/+attachment/1516757/+files/VarLogDistupgradeLspcitxt.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623681/+attachment/1516758/+files/VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeSystemstatetargz.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623681/+attachment/1516759/+files/VarLogDistupgradeSystemstatetargz.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623681/+attachment/1516760/+files/VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz -- package python-serial 2.3-1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105088] Re: Thunderbird does not honor gnome-vfs paths
it is more than inefficient when you have a number of emails that need multiple attachments, especially when all individuals get a unique attachment and everybody gets a copy of a set of standard attachments. Having to copy the files to the desktop, rather than using SMB patch to the remote system(s) just complicates everything. I don't have the necessary expertise to provide a fix for this - but I m having difficultly understanding why this is so hard to fix it Most applications that I deal with seem to have no problem utilizing standard system resources, regardless of the Linux distribution or the exact desktop (Gnome/KDE) -- Thunderbird does not honor gnome-vfs paths https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105088 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251321] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in addWindowDamage()
Failed again. Had two windows open with OpenOffice.org 2.4 and was switching back and forth. Also had a number of other windows open. -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in addWindowDamage() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251321 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251321] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in addWindowDamage()
This is occurring several times a week now. I think it occurs when the system wants to start a screen saver, and (with my luck) I move the cursor... -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in addWindowDamage() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251321 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 251321] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in addWindowDamage()
Dimitrios Symeonidis wrote: Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue for you. Can you try with the latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance. I reported a series of problems with compiz between June 2008 thru Nov 2008, and after not hearing anything, even after spending time to create supplemental data, I quit reporting the problems, as it took far too much of my time. Within the past 2 months, the number of failures have been minimal. I am still running Ubuntu 8.04 as this is a production system, and Compiz is at 1:0.7.4.0ubuntu7 according to Synaptic Package Manager. /s/ Bill Turner, wb4alm -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in addWindowDamage() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251321 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251321] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in addWindowDamage()
This is an intermitent problem. since the bug report I have had two or three re-occurances. I am a systems level programmer (but not for Linux - yet) and have not been able to determine a cause and am not able to create a situation which will always cause the problem to reoccur. After reading your instuctions for generating a back trace, it does not seem possible/reasonable for me to run /usr/bin/compiz.real under the control of gdb for weeks (or months) waiting for a failure to occur again. do you have any other suggestions? /s/ Bill Turner, wb4alm -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in addWindowDamage() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251321 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189124] Re: [nvidia amd64] ripples crashed with SIGSEGV in gettimeofday()
Screen saver started running, wiggled mouse, error message was waiting for me. Also running amd64 and ubuntu 8.04. -- [nvidia amd64] ripples crashed with SIGSEGV in gettimeofday() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189124 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
