[Bug 1958984] Re: libyaml-cpp.so.0.7: undefined reference to `std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator >::_M_create(unsigned long&, unsigned long)@GLIBCXX_3.4.21'
Ok. This would appear to be a ld bug. In a partially built tree, I get: > /usr/bin/c++ -g -O2 > -ffile-prefix-map=/home/chris/Canonical/Mir/mir/main/cmake-build-debug=. > -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects > -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -pthread -g -Wall > -fno-strict-aliasing -pedantic -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wextra -fPIC -Werror > -Wno-mismatched-tags -Wno-psabi -g -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -flto=auto > -ffat-lto-objects -flto=auto -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--no-undefined > examples/miral-system-compositor/CMakeFiles/miral-system-compositor.dir/system_compositor_main.cpp.o > -o bin/miral-system-compositor.bin lib/libmiral.so.4 lib/libmircommon.so.8 > lib/libmircookie.so.2 -lnettle > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_date_time.so.1.74.0 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_program_options.so.1.74.0 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_filesystem.so.1.74.0 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_iostreams.so.1.74.0 -ldl > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxkbcommon.so lib/libmircore.so.1 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_system.so.1.74.0 > -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu > -Wl,-rpath-link,/home/chris/Canonical/Mir/mir/main/cmake-build-debug/lib /usr/bin/ld: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libyaml-cpp.so.0.7: undefined reference to `std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator >::_M_create(unsigned long&, unsigned long)@GLIBCXX_3.4.21' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status This symbol, with correct version, is defined in libstdc++.so.6: objdump -T -C /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 | rg "std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator >::_M_create" 00146910 w DF .text 005c GLIBCXX_3.4.21 std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator >::_M_create(unsigned long&, unsigned long) Adding -fuse-ld=gold or -fuse-ld=lld to the command line results in a successful link. It doesn't seem to be a problem of the /usr/bin/c++ driver failing to add libstdc++ to the link args, as manually adding -lstdc++ to the end of the command doesn't change the output. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958984 Title: libyaml-cpp.so.0.7: undefined reference to `std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator >::_M_create(unsigned long&, unsigned long)@GLIBCXX_3.4.21' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-defaults/+bug/1958984/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1958594] Re: Boot error: libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_exit to work
Are you guaranteed to be able to know the set of architecture(s) of libgcc_s needed? That's what's prevented me from suggesting a patch like that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958594 Title: Boot error: libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_exit to work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1958594/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1957094] Re: on-demand mode doesn't work with nvidia-390
For the nvidia-settings upload, the new wording looks somewhat strange: ++ " in on-demand mode (only if nvidia version >= 450; " ++ "otherwise, the behavior will approach to " ++ "performance mode). This option is applied after " ++ "a system restart."); Perhaps better wording would be something along the lines of “(only using nvidia driver versions >= 450. On earlier drivers this behaves the same as performance mode)”? Also: is this a translatable string? Alternatively: how hard would it be to *detect* the driver version, as ubuntu-drivers-common does, and grey out the option? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957094 Title: on-demand mode doesn't work with nvidia-390 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1957094/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1957094] Re: on-demand mode doesn't work with nvidia-390
Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-drivers-common into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers- common/1:0.9.0~0.20.04.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957094 Title: on-demand mode doesn't work with nvidia-390 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1957094/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1957094] Re: on-demand mode doesn't work with nvidia-390
I've accepted this, but have amended the test plan to try and ensure this doesn't change the behaviour on the -450 series drivers. I'm not entirely sure what the "" check should be. @Alberto, @Jeremy: Could you please replace that part of the test-plan with the steps required to check that on-demand still works for -450? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957094 Title: on-demand mode doesn't work with nvidia-390 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1957094/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1957094] Re: on-demand mode doesn't work with nvidia-390
Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-drivers-common into impish-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-common/1:0.9.2.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu Impish) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-impish ** Description changed: [Impact] * In any Ubuntu series, if user using a old GPU (which supported by nvidia-390 only) then issuing glxinfo will get "Error: couldn't find RGB GLX visual or fbconfig". Which mean the Xorg doesn't load dri driver correctly. [Test Plan] * install nvidia-390 on nvidia-390 supported system. * prime-select on-demand * reboot * glxinfo * after applying this patch, it will fall back to "ON" mode after reboot. + * install nvidia-450 on nvidia-450 supported system. + * prime-select on-demand + * + [Where problems could occur] * Since nvidia-390 doesn't support on-demand mode (RTD3 either). If a user stays in on-demand mode with 390 without problem, the after upgrading u-d-c and reboot. The mode will fall back to "ON" mode. * From my point of view, it's fine because nvidia-390 doesn't support RTD3. Thus, the nvidia will always stay in "Active" stage no matter which mode it is. * While there is no way to inform the user about this change, changing to the only supported default will avoid breaking GLX. - --- The regression from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu- drivers-common/+bug/1942789. It impacts Jammy and Impish so far. [Steps to reproduce] 1. Find a GPU supports nvidia-390 2. ubuntu-drivers install nvidia:390 3. prime-select on-demand 4. glxinfo [Expected result] Shows intel or nvidia drives monitor [Actual result] Error: couldn't find RGB GLX visual or fbconfig Since we are all agree "on-demand" mode as default mode. Pre-talk with Alberto, on-demand doesn't support with nvidia-390 (no matter RTD3). We could consider to make it as performance mode and leave a note on nvidia-settings. I'll prepare some test packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957094 Title: on-demand mode doesn't work with nvidia-390 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1957094/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1955471] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for update-manager has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955471 Title: ubuntu-security-status shouldn't display information about ESM for Apps To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1955471/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1958620] Re: Flickering white/black screen once KMS comes up
There is no scanout hardware connected to the AMD GPU, so if there is any involvement by amdgpu it is purely by making i915 misbehave. This is also not a GNOME bug - the display corrupts as soon as the KMS driver is loaded, which, since I've got an encrypted rootfs, is early in the initramfs. The same behaviour is observed regardless of the kernel commandline options, too, so it's not plymouth doing something weird, or vthandoff. It also happens with break=mount. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958620 Title: Flickering white/black screen once KMS comes up To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1958620/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1958806] [NEW] Fails to include libgcc, resulting in cryptsetup failures
Public bug reported: I recently rebooted my laptop, and couldn't unlock my (cryptsetup- managed) root filesystem; after entering my passphrase, the plymouth prompt would always say “unable to unlock /dev/nvme0n1p3_crypt”. Dropping to text mode, I can see that cryptsetup is failing with a message like: "libgcc_s: missing library, needed for pthread_exit”. Indeed, in the recovery console cryptsetup will immediately crash with that message. I note that initramfs-tools already has some logic for detecting when libgcc_s is needed but isn't in DT_NEEDED, but this seems to have gone out of date. Adding an initramfs hook to manually add libgcc_s to the initramfs results in a bootable system again. I don't reboot this laptop often, so I unfortunately can't narrow down *when* this started failing better than “sometime in the last 2 months”. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: initramfs-tools 0.140ubuntu10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-20.20-generic 5.13.14 Uname: Linux 5.13.0-20-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu75 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Mon Jan 24 12:08:34 2022 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-06-26 (211 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10.0 2021.05.28 amd64 "bcachefs" (20210622) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: initramfs-tools UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2021-10-28 (87 days ago) ** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy wayland-session -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958806 Title: Fails to include libgcc, resulting in cryptsetup failures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1958806/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1958620] [NEW] Flickering white/black screen once KMS comes up
Public bug reported: This looks like a regression from the 5.13.0-20-generic kernel to the 5.15.0-17-generic kernel. The display works fine under efifb, but as soon as the DRM drivers are loaded and KMS kicks in the display is replaced by black with flickering white (apparently when what would be on the output changes). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: linux-image-5.15.0-17-generic 5.15.0-17.17 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-20.20-generic 5.13.14 Uname: Linux 5.13.0-20-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu75 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: chris 7134 F pipewire-media- /dev/snd/seq:chris 7133 F pipewire CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Fri Jan 21 17:07:08 2022 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-06-26 (208 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10.0 2021.05.28 amd64 "bcachefs" (20210622) MachineType: Dell Inc. XPS 15 9575 ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-5.13.0-20-generic root=UUID=ff90803a-eedd-429b-bb78-b713f7c661d6 ro quiet splash PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon. RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-5.13.0-20-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-5.13.0-20-generic N/A linux-firmware 1.204 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2021-10-28 (84 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 07/07/2019 dmi.bios.release: 1.7 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: 1.7.1 dmi.board.name: 0C32VW dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.board.version: A00 dmi.chassis.type: 31 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.7.1:bd07/07/2019:br1.7:svnDellInc.:pnXPS159575:pvr:sku080D:rvnDellInc.:rn0C32VW:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct31:cvr: dmi.product.family: XPS dmi.product.name: XPS 15 9575 dmi.product.sku: 080D dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy wayland-session -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958620 Title: Flickering white/black screen once KMS comes up To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1958620/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1927192] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gdb has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192 Title: gdb ftbfs on armhf, testsuite timeouts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gdb/+bug/1927192/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1958235] Re: auto-synced transition to 0.29.0.gfm.2-1 left various packages behind broken
Huh. Looks like cmark-gfm has already migrated out of jammy-proposed. I don't think we can roll back anymore, and will need to go forward instead. I think the way forward would be to upload a 0.29.0.gfm.2.really.0.29.0.gfm.0-like package containing the old package, to build a working libcmark-gfm0, and *then* upload (or sync) a package with a proper transition. Maybe the unbreaking package should be versioned 0.29.0.gfm.2-1ubuntu.really.0.29.0.gfm.0 so that versioning can stay in sync with a fixed Debian package? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958235 Title: auto-synced transition to 0.29.0.gfm.2-1 left various packages behind broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cmark-gfm/+bug/1958235/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1952421] Re: Issue on sshd finds correct private key for a certificate when using ssh-agent
For SRU verification we require that the actual package from the -proposed archive is tested. This is to avoid the chance that the patch is mis-applied in the package uploaded to the archive, or that the archive build environment differs in a way that affects the patch. We'll also need this to be verified for Hirsute and Impish before we can release it for Focal, to ensure that upgrades do not regress this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952421 Title: Issue on sshd finds correct private key for a certificate when using ssh-agent To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1952421/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1876034] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for command-not-found has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876034 Title: apt update crashes with "KeyError: 'suite'" in cnf-update-db if index compression is enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/1876034/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1876034] Re: apt update crashes with "KeyError: 'suite'" in cnf-update-db if index compression is enabled
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-hirsute ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876034 Title: apt update crashes with "KeyError: 'suite'" in cnf-update-db if index compression is enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/1876034/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1954710] Re: Please temporarily pull php-composer-xdebug-handler 2.0.2-1
Removing packages from jammy-proposed: php-composer-xdebug-handler 2.0.2-1 in jammy php-composer-xdebug-handler 2.0.2-1 in jammy amd64 php-composer-xdebug-handler 2.0.2-1 in jammy arm64 php-composer-xdebug-handler 2.0.2-1 in jammy armhf php-composer-xdebug-handler 2.0.2-1 in jammy i386 php-composer-xdebug-handler 2.0.2-1 in jammy ppc64el php-composer-xdebug-handler 2.0.2-1 in jammy riscv64 php-composer-xdebug-handler 2.0.2-1 in jammy s390x Comment: Temporarily removed to bootstrap new composer version; LP: #1954710 Remove [y|N]? y 1 package successfully removed. ** Changed in: php-composer-xdebug-handler (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954710 Title: Please temporarily pull php-composer-xdebug-handler 2.0.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php-composer-xdebug-handler/+bug/1954710/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1942789] Re: On-demand and RTD3 need to be separated
So, I think the next step here is to work out how to answer the question “what happens with -390”, and to commit to *testing* what happens with -390 as a part of the test plan. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942789 Title: On-demand and RTD3 need to be separated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1942789/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948713] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for debootstrap has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948713 Title: focal: backport patch to allow mk-sbuild within Docker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debootstrap/+bug/1948713/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948764] Re: Fail to pass suspend/resume test
I think we're talking past each other again. I believe you when you say that this update will not cause a regression for users of the Xilinx desktop image who have not edited the configuration in /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config The issue we, on the SRU team, are concerned about are the two caveats there: 1) Users of the *Xilinx desktop image*, and 2) Who haven't edited the configuration. The xf86-video-armsoc-endlessm package is in the Ubuntu archive, not just the Xilinx images, and the guarantees we try to provide for packages in the archive is that updates will not break anything that currently works. My understanding is that, currently, a user of a Xilinx board could have built their own images from packages in the Ubuntu archive and not include the metapackage containing the /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config configuration, and this would work. Also, a user of the Xilinx image who chose to edit /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config and remove “needs_root_rights = yes” would currently have a working system. My understanding is that this update would result in both of the above cases failing to work. *This* is what we are concerned about. It's possible that we need a dedicated policy for volatile hardware- enablement packages like this, both so that we can process them more quickly for you and so that users are made aware that these specific packages do not have the usual stability guarantees associated with the Ubuntu archive. If that seems like a good idea, the next step on that would probably be to start a discussion on ubuntu-devel@. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948764 Title: Fail to pass suspend/resume test To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xf86-video-armsoc-endlessm/+bug/1948764/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1954678] Please test proposed package
Hello Gauthier, or anyone else affected, Accepted walinuxagent into impish-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/2.2.46-0ubuntu3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954678 Title: Build for more platforms To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1954678/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1954678] Re: Build for more platforms
Hello Gauthier, or anyone else affected, Accepted walinuxagent into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/2.2.46-0ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Impish) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954678 Title: Build for more platforms To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1954678/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1927192] Re: gdb ftbfs on armhf, testsuite timeouts
The gdb upload looks fine; I presume it wants to be marked block- proposed, though? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192 Title: gdb ftbfs on armhf, testsuite timeouts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gdb/+bug/1927192/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1927192] Re: gdb ftbfs on armhf, testsuite timeouts
Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected, Accepted gdb into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdb/9.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192 Title: gdb ftbfs on armhf, testsuite timeouts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gdb/+bug/1927192/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1953577] [NEW] Files missing copyright headers
Public bug reported: The only copyright recorded in the python-scramp source is the LICENCE file. It would be nice to have headers in the source files, too. ** Affects: python-scramp (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New ** Changed in: python-scramp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953577 Title: Files missing copyright headers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-scramp/+bug/1953577/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1953576] [NEW] Should use Expat license in debian/copyright
Public bug reported: DEP-5 recommends recording the license as Expat (when it matches, which python-scramp's does) rather than MIT, which is ambiguous. ** Affects: python-scramp (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New ** Changed in: python-scramp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953576 Title: Should use Expat license in debian/copyright To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-scramp/+bug/1953576/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1832998] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for pure-ftpd has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832998 Title: Pure-FTPd Breaks with OpenSSL v1.1.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pure-ftpd/+bug/1832998/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1800544] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nvme-cli has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1800544 Title: nvme-cli drops bash completion file in wrong location To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvme-cli/+bug/1800544/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1733301] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libayatana-indicator has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1733301 Title: indicator-applet-complete 1.18.0 icon scaling To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libayatana-indicator/+bug/1733301/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1882998] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for openvdb has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882998 Title: Cannot import openvdb 6.2 on Focal due to jemalloc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jemalloc/+bug/1882998/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1883174] Re: [SRU]Some (or all) desktop icons are missing
Marking the development task as invalid - gnome-shell-extension-desktop- icons no longer exists in impish and beyond. ** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883174 Title: [SRU]Some (or all) desktop icons are missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons/+bug/1883174/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1883174] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-shell-extension- desktop-icons has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883174 Title: [SRU]Some (or all) desktop icons are missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons/+bug/1883174/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1951470] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for qtwebkit-opensource- src has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951470 Title: webkit javascript segmentation fault To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1951470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1951310] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for lintian has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951310 Title: add Jammy as a known release to lintian To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/1951310/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948764] Re: Fail to pass suspend/resume test
It seems to me that there's no reason why a user of this package couldn't have either: a) changed the configuration in /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config to not require root - my understanding is that with the current package that would work, or b) Built a custom image using this package that did not contain the /etc/X11/Xwrapper.conf If either of those are plausible, then when they pull updates and upgrade to this new package, their systems will break. Is there any ballpark estimate for how hard it would be to fix the suspend issue *without* regressing the run-as-not-root case? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948764 Title: Fail to pass suspend/resume test To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xf86-video-armsoc-endlessm/+bug/1948764/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1942685] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for pulseaudio has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942685 Title: pulseaudio crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransClose() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pulseaudio/+bug/1942685/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1942685] Re: pulseaudio crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransClose()
Checking https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/877172e07ed9f86b0674cd458a5aaf24b37fb01e I see that there are no reports of this for 1:15.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu2.1 in Impish and, reassuringly, no reports of this for 1:15.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu3 in Jammy, either. I think that's sufficient to mark this as verified. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-impish ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-impish -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942685 Title: pulseaudio crashed with SIGSEGV in _IceTransClose() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pulseaudio/+bug/1942685/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1951667] Re: [SRU] pulseaudio: restore hdmi audio be active output after resume
Hello Hui, or anyone else affected, Accepted pulseaudio into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.13 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951667 Title: [SRU] pulseaudio: restore hdmi audio be active output after resume To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1951667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949553] Please test proposed package
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected, Accepted libdrm into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/2.4.107-8ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949553 Title: Backport packages for 20.04.4 HWE stack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1949553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949553] Re: Backport packages for 20.04.4 HWE stack
Well, that's a compelling reason. ** Changed in: libdrm (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949553 Title: Backport packages for 20.04.4 HWE stack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1949553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1952083] Re: Add support for Beige Goby
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected, Accepted mesa into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952083 Title: Add support for Beige Goby To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1952083/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1951033] Re: 20.04 SRU
Expanding on (5): we've had problems in the past with glibc and graphical snaps on core due to the way the host's userspace drivers are mapped into the snap environment, and so are loaded with the snap's glibc. We should check that runs successfully with the core20 built from focal-proposed, on mesa-supported hardware, an NVIDIA system, (and maybe an AMD system with the proprietary stack installed? I don't know how supported we claim that is). We *might* want to test running using the focal-proposed core20 on all supported drivers and all supported releases (so, 18.04, 20.04, 21.10). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951033 Title: 20.04 SRU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1951033/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949553] Re: Backport packages for 20.04.4 HWE stack
@Timo: I notice the libdrm backport drops the valgrind integration. I know it's disabled in (at least) impish, but is there any particular reason for it to be disabled in the focal backport? It seems pretty unlikely that anyone would notice, but the diff required to keep the valgrind annotations enabled also looks small, so maybe we should? ** Changed in: libdrm (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949553 Title: Backport packages for 20.04.4 HWE stack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1949553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949553] Re: Backport packages for 20.04.4 HWE stack
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected, Accepted xorg-server into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg- server/2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949553 Title: Backport packages for 20.04.4 HWE stack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1949553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1947820] Re: [SRU] Backport xorg-server 1.20.13 to focal
Hello Bin, or anyone else affected, Accepted xorg-server into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg- server/2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947820 Title: [SRU] Backport xorg-server 1.20.13 to focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1947820/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1942195] Re: Installing Samba unexpectedly adds many unknown local users to sambashare group
Hello Richard, or anyone else affected, Accepted samba into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.24 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942195 Title: Installing Samba unexpectedly adds many unknown local users to sambashare group To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1942195/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1942195] Re: Installing Samba unexpectedly adds many unknown local users to sambashare group
Hello Richard, or anyone else affected, Accepted samba into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/2:4.13.14+dfsg-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942195 Title: Installing Samba unexpectedly adds many unknown local users to sambashare group To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1942195/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1942195] Re: Installing Samba unexpectedly adds many unknown local users to sambashare group
Hello Richard, or anyone else affected, Accepted samba into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/2:4.13.14+dfsg-0ubuntu0.21.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942195 Title: Installing Samba unexpectedly adds many unknown local users to sambashare group To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1942195/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1942195] Re: Installing Samba unexpectedly adds many unknown local users to sambashare group
Hello Richard, or anyone else affected, Accepted samba into impish-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/2:4.13.14+dfsg-0ubuntu0.21.10.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Impish) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-impish -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942195 Title: Installing Samba unexpectedly adds many unknown local users to sambashare group To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1942195/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1896251] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for rsync has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896251 Title: rsync --delete-missing-args fails with "error: protocol incompatibility" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+bug/1896251/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940485] Re: thermald often limits CPU frequency while on AC
Aha! Launchpad was OOPSing when I tried to upload the gzipped tarball, but I've successfully uploaded the files as a zstd-compressed tarball. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940485 Title: thermald often limits CPU frequency while on AC To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1940485/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940485] Re: thermald often limits CPU frequency while on AC
** Attachment added: "thermald debug script output" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1940485/+attachment/5539066/+files/try-again.tar.zstd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940485 Title: thermald often limits CPU frequency while on AC To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1940485/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1923352] Re: speedtest-cli crashed with ValueError in get_config(): invalid literal for int() with base 10: ''
Hello Brian, or anyone else affected, Accepted speedtest-cli into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/speedtest- cli/2.0.0-1ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: speedtest-cli (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923352 Title: speedtest-cli crashed with ValueError in get_config(): invalid literal for int() with base 10: '' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/speedtest-cli/+bug/1923352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1944666] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for octavia has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944666 Title: listener provisioning status in ERROR when port is 1025 and allowed_cidr is explicitly set to 0.0.0.0/0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1944666/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1913024] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ovn has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913024 Title: RBAC Permissions too strict for Chassis_Private table To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1913024/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1914988] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ovn has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914988 Title: IGMP Snooping does not work with RBAC enabled ovn-controllers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1914988/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1917475] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ovn has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917475 Title: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1917475/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1937075] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ovn has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937075 Title: ovn-ctl: ovsdb-server startup might sometimes get stuck and not upgrade clustered database To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovn/+bug/1937075/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943266] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ovn has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943266 Title: Duplicated ARP responses from ovnmetadata namespaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovn/+bug/1943266/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1877524] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for blueman has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877524 Title: blueman-tray error /home/username/.cache/blueman-tray-1000 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blueman/+bug/1877524/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1919026] Re: cinnamon-settings-users: User dialog holds if user creates a user that already exists
** Changed in: cinnamon (Ubuntu Impish) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1919026 Title: cinnamon-settings-users: User dialog holds if user creates a user that already exists To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon/+bug/1919026/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946096] Re: Support manual firmware upgrading for Foxconn and Quectel modems.
Ok. For clarity, my understanding of these patches are that they do the following things: 1) Add a feature to ModemManager to support uploading firmware to these modems 2) Increase a timeout that was found to be insufficient when doing a firmware update 3) Add a bunch of mappings from SIM->Carrier And then in response to potential concerns: (1) is a straight feature addition, and the associated code will only be called if an external component connects to modemmanager requesting a firmware upload. This is not expected to change any existing behaviours. (2) is low-risk It's not clear to me whether (3) is expected to change existing behaviours at all. Is this understanding correct? Assuming (3) is not expected to change existing behaviour this looks like it would be acceptable under the hardware-enablement SRU policy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946096 Title: Support manual firmware upgrading for Foxconn and Quectel modems. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1946096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946686] Re: Fix zfs_get_data access to files with wrong generation causing panics
Hello Andrew, or anyone else affected, Accepted zfs-linux into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs- linux/0.8.3-1ubuntu12.14 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946686 Title: Fix zfs_get_data access to files with wrong generation causing panics To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1946686/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1939177] Re: Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS kernel 5.11.0-25 zfs send | receive broken
For some reason this doesn't seem to have the normal SRU verification tags, but this appears to be verified to me. Releasing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939177 Title: Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS kernel 5.11.0-25 zfs send | receive broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1939177/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1939177] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for zfs-linux has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939177 Title: Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS kernel 5.11.0-25 zfs send | receive broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1939177/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1662620] Re: "ip addr add" permits illegal labels
Hm. It's not clear what the actual user impact of this is? Reading from the original description, it seems that if a user uses an invalid label to set one address and *also* uses a valid label to set another address *then* tools can be confused? “Our parser is actually more lenient than the manpage states” on its own is definitely not SRU-worthy, but if it breaks other tools then maybe? On the other hand, from the bug it looks like if you *don't* mix valid and invalid labels then everything actually works? So this would potentially be breaking currently working setups? I think we need more information before determining whether this should be accepted as an SRU. ** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Triaged => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1662620 Title: "ip addr add" permits illegal labels To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1662620/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1928244] Re: pahole: FAILED unresolved symbol cubictcp_state with linux 5.13
Hello Andrea, or anyone else affected, Accepted dwarves-dfsg into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dwarves- dfsg/1.21-0ubuntu1~18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: dwarves-dfsg (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928244 Title: pahole: FAILED unresolved symbol cubictcp_state with linux 5.13 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dwarves-dfsg/+bug/1928244/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1912811] Re: Update dwarves-dfsg in focal to version 1.21 from impish
Hello Seth, or anyone else affected, Accepted dwarves-dfsg into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dwarves- dfsg/1.21-0ubuntu1~18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: dwarves-dfsg (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags removed: verification-done ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912811 Title: Update dwarves-dfsg in focal to version 1.21 from impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dwarves-dfsg/+bug/1912811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1782984] Re: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost' failed with multiple applications
Has anyone tried PCManFM or Inkscape on focal? It seems that this update doesn't fix GNOME Shell on focal, but *maybe* that's because Shell is hitting a different bug? If this can be verified to fix PCManFM, Inkscape, or something on focal we can release it and open a new bug for GNOME Shell on Focal. If this *doesn't* fix something on focal, we need to work out why - maybe it needs more changes backported, like bionic did? If FCManFM & Inkscape don't hang on focal *without* this update then I think we can release the bionic update and close the focal task. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782984 Title: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost' failed with multiple applications To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libx11/+bug/1782984/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1912811] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for dwarves-dfsg has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912811 Title: Update dwarves-dfsg in focal to version 1.21 from impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dwarves-dfsg/+bug/1912811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1947501] Re: update-manager should not remove deb-packaged Firefox on flavors
Hello Norbert, or anyone else affected, Accepted update-manager into impish-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update- manager/1:21.10.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu Impish) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-impish -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947501 Title: update-manager should not remove deb-packaged Firefox on flavors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1947501/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943542] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for xlnx-kria-firmware has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943542 Title: [SRU] Create package for focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xlnx-kria-firmware/+bug/1943542/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1944417] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for zfs-linux has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944417 Title: Add support for 5.14 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1944417/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1933938] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for linux-firmware has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933938 Title: Missing CNVi firmware for Intel AX211/AX201/9560/9462 on ADL-S/ADL-P To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1933938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945227] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for linux-firmware has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945227 Title: drm/amdgpu: Add support for Yellow Carp To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/1945227/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945438] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for linux-firmware has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945438 Title: Update ADL-P dmc firmware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/1945438/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945565] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for linux-firmware has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945565 Title: [SRU] Revert amdgpu/renoir firmware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1945565/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945227] Re: drm/amdgpu: Add support for Yellow Carp
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected, Accepted mesa into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945227 Title: drm/amdgpu: Add support for Yellow Carp To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/1945227/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1942181] Re: Add support for AlderLake CPUs
Hello Colin, or anyone else affected, Accepted thermald into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/2.4.3-1ubuntu3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: thermald (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942181 Title: Add support for AlderLake CPUs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1942181/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940079] Re: Strongswan doesn't support TPM 2.0 through the TSS2 interface
Hello Jim, or anyone else affected, Accepted strongswan into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/5.9.1-1ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: strongswan (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940079 Title: Strongswan doesn't support TPM 2.0 through the TSS2 interface To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/1940079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940079] Re: Strongswan doesn't support TPM 2.0 through the TSS2 interface
Hello Jim, or anyone else affected, Accepted strongswan into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/5.8.2-1ubuntu3.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: strongswan (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940079 Title: Strongswan doesn't support TPM 2.0 through the TSS2 interface To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/1940079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1912118] Re: assertion failure in message_part_finish when searching large folder
Hello Dave, or anyone else affected, Accepted dovecot into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/1:2.3.7.2-1ubuntu3.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912118 Title: assertion failure in message_part_finish when searching large folder To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/1912118/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1898601] Re: 'ubuntu-drivers --gpgpu install' installs a lot of unnecessary packages, including a full desktop environment on Ubuntu Server
I see there is a new upload of ubuntu-drivers-common fixing this bug in bionic-unapproved. The last version sat in bionic-proposed for 105 days without being verified for release into bionic-updates. The package in bionic-unapproved looks fine to accept, but is there someone in charge of organising testing for it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898601 Title: 'ubuntu-drivers --gpgpu install' installs a lot of unnecessary packages, including a full desktop environment on Ubuntu Server To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-common/+bug/1898601/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1934895] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for openjdk-17 has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934895 Title: Improve understandability of package versions for JDK Early Access To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-17/+bug/1934895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943701] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for openjdk-17 has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943701 Title: SRU: backport the first OpenJDK 17 release to 21.04, 20.04 LTS and 18.04 LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-17/+bug/1943701/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1942733] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for udisks2 has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942733 Title: Disk Capacity shows "Unknown" when installing OS on eMMC To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1942733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1935778] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for llvm-toolchain-12 has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1935778 Title: [SRU] Request LLVM 12.0.1 backport to focal/updates To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-12/+bug/1935778/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1887943] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for memcached has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887943 Title: [SRU] TLS is not enabled for memcached>=1.5.13 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memcached/+bug/1887943/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1853164] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853164 Title: systemd: /etc/dhcp/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/resolved error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1853164/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1914740] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914740 Title: IPs are not assigned for Hipersockets in DHCP mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1914740/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1934147] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934147 Title: systemd leaks abandoned session scopes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1934147/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1934221] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934221 Title: systemd-resolve segfault To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1934221/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1934981] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934981 Title: systemctl suspend-then-hibernate attempts hybrid-sleep instead To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1934981/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1937238] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937238 Title: systemd-time-wait-sync.service stuck in "activating" state after boot, blocks timers from starting To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1937238/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1935051] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1935051 Title: systemd pid 1 memory leak To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1935051/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1942899] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942899 Title: Revert Add ACCEL_LOCATION=base property for Dell clamshell models To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1942899/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1939255] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939255 Title: dhclient triggers systemd-resolved start limit when processing more than 5 interfaces at once To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1939255/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1782984] Re: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost' failed with multiple applications
That seems like we should be able to extract a verification from the errors.ubuntu.com results. Is it possible to query crashes with a specific dependency version? Seeing no crash reports with libx11 2:1.6.9-2ubuntu1.3 would suggest this is fixed. On the other hand, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libx11/+bug/1782984/comments/110 suggests that this may *not* be fixed in focal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782984 Title: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost' failed with multiple applications To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libx11/+bug/1782984/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943481] Re: libvirtd crashes when creating network interface pools in 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.13
Hello Paul, or anyone else affected, Accepted libvirt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/6.0.0-0ubuntu8.14 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943481 Title: libvirtd crashes when creating network interface pools in 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.13 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1943481/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940485] Re: thermald often limits CPU frequency while on AC
I've run that debugging script. Unfortunately, Launchpad currently OOPSes when I try to attach the output to the bug. I'll keep trying every now and then. The throttling did not occur during that test, and doesn't seem to have occurred while running the build of thermald from git, but this does not necessarily mean the bug doesn't still occur. I'll continue running the build of thermald from git. Should I catch it in the bug-state, I'll re-collect the output of that script. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940485 Title: thermald often limits CPU frequency while on AC To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1940485/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1914740] Re: IPs are not assigned for Hipersockets in DHCP mode
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected, Accepted systemd into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/247.3-3ubuntu3.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914740 Title: IPs are not assigned for Hipersockets in DHCP mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1914740/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
