[Bug 356232] Re: /etc/init.d/hotkey-setup: 47: Syntax error: ; ; unexpected (expecting fi)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 356157 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356157 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 356157 package hotkey-setup 0.1-23ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- /etc/init.d/hotkey-setup: 47: Syntax error: ;; unexpected (expecting fi) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 356226] Re: package hotkey-setup 0.1-23ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 356157 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356157 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 356157 package hotkey-setup 0.1-23ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- package hotkey-setup 0.1-23ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 356157] Re: package hotkey-setup 0.1-23ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
folks, please stop commenting that it affects you to. It will affect *everyone*. If you feel the need to register that it affects you (which you don't, imho), there is a link at the top of the page which says This bug doesn't affect me (change). Click change :) -- package hotkey-setup 0.1-23ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356157 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 339555] Re: compiz slowmotion after Jaunty upgrade
Timo: I can reproduce slowness on 965 from a fresh user and a beta live CD, so it shouldn't be the sync-to-vblank setting. Loic: tested apw's kernel on my 965 laptop, no obvious improvements (but also no further regressions) ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- compiz slowmotion after Jaunty upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339555 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332034] Re: error on jaunty upgrade
I would have set the XKBOPTIONS though, via the GNOME keyboard settings. -- error on jaunty upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332034 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 339555] Re: compiz slowmotion after Jaunty upgrade
I am able to get normal levels of speed by switching from EXA to UXA for rendering acceleration, however, this does not appear to be sufficiently stable/bugfree for us to consider for Jaunty -- compiz slowmotion after Jaunty upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339555 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 339555] Re: compiz slowmotion after Jaunty upgrade
While I can't be sure that it's the same root cause, I am also seeing a regression from 8.10 to 9.04 in the performance of compiz effects. In my case it seems to be particularly closely tied to system activity - the busier the system is the worse the effects get (which stands to reason, but the effect is very pronounced. flipping workspaces is enough to slow the effects down). -- compiz slowmotion after Jaunty upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339555 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352547] [NEW] blank CD prompt should not always appear
Public bug reported: I just downloaded an ISO to my (9.04) desktop. I right clicked on it and chose the option to burn it to CD. I then inserted a blank CD. Nautilus popped up the dialog asking me what I wanted to do with the blank CD. the burn still worked, this is simply a wishlist suggesting that the blank CD dialog should be skipped if the user has already started a CD- writing task. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New ** Package changed: ubuntu = nautilus (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- blank CD prompt should not always appear https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352547 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352656] [NEW] ignores GNOME preferred terminal application setting
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz If a user uses System-Preferences-Keyboard Shortcuts to configure a hotkey for launching a terminal, it will unconditionally launch GNOME Terminal, regardless of the setting in System-Preferences-Preferred Applications. ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ignores GNOME preferred terminal application setting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218655] Re: Inserting disc opens CD/DVD Creator when Write to Disc is already open
Upstream bug was a dupe, repointing at the master ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #526039 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=526039 ** Changed in: nautilus Status: New = Unknown ** Changed in: nautilus Bugwatch: GNOME Bug Tracker #554827 = GNOME Bug Tracker #526039 -- Inserting disc opens CD/DVD Creator when Write to Disc is already open https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 294233] Re: running gnome-open 'mailto:u...@acme.com' open thunderbird mail to ///u...@acme.com
Pedro: Yep, looks to be fine here now with Thunderbird. ** Changed in: libgnome (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- running gnome-open 'mailto:u...@acme.com' open thunderbird mail to ///u...@acme.com https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338344] Re: Node controller apache2 dependency satisfied by an incompatible mpm
(a consultation with a packaging maven suggests that the explicit conflict and explicit dependency are both valid and indeed using both is not incorrect) -- Node controller apache2 dependency satisfied by an incompatible mpm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291184] Re: Mouse scrolling does not work in vim, mutt etc.
Thanks Jordan, I've pushed your patch into trunk, so if a fixed VTE makes it into jaunty then at least we will be able to take advantage of it there. I would suggest posting your patch on the original GNOME bugzilla bug about this, alongside the patch that adds the alt scroll option. ** Changed in: terminator Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed ** Changed in: terminator Assignee: (unassigned) = Jordan Callicoat (monkeesage) -- Mouse scrolling does not work in vim, mutt etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291184 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291184] Re: Mouse scrolling does not work in vim, mutt etc.
(I've set this to Fix Committed for Terminator, but obviously the fix won't become active until a suitable VTE is in use, but that is outside the scope of this project, so from our point of view it's as fixed as it can be). ** Also affects: vte Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: vte (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: vte Status: New = Invalid -- Mouse scrolling does not work in vim, mutt etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291184 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348483] Re: Does not scale to high-DPI screens
** Also affects: onboard Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: onboard Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: onboard Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris Jones (tortoise) -- Does not scale to high-DPI screens https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291184] Re: Mouse scrolling does not work in vim, mutt etc.
Jordan: Thanks for the investigative work. I've pointed out your vte patch to Kees who uploaded the first vte patch and we'll see what can be done to get this into Jaunty before it's released. -- Mouse scrolling does not work in vim, mutt etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291184 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347220] Re: package python-coherence 0.6.2-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Changed in: coherence (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- package python-coherence 0.6.2-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328035] Re: X server crash: *** glibc detected *** free(): in valid next size (fast)
Matt: if it is screensaver related, it's probably not because of some 3D parts - I have a blank screen and am seeing this, although I've yet to find a log of it (perhaps just because of a lack of retention of Xorg logs for very long, which is something I filed separately a while ago as Bug #274870 ). It's odd that it doesn't happen more repeatably though, activating the screensaver happens every time I suspend, but I only get a crash on resume every couple of days. -- X server crash: *** glibc detected *** free(): in valid next size (fast) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328035 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338344] Re: Node controller sometimes crashes
I'm less sure now that this relates to disk space. Due to unrelated hardware issues I've moved the NC to the same machine as the CC/CLC and this is still happening. I've nuked all of the images I had, switched from xen to kvm and uploaded the ttylinux image and the machine has 50GB spare, so this should have worked correctly (and the file in /var/lib/eucalyptus/bukkits is the right size). Still, when I try to run an instance, the image is immediately removed and the NC appears to restart. What more debugging information can I provide so we can figure out what's going on? -- Node controller sometimes crashes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338344] Re: Node controller sometimes crashes
Daniel: That does appear to be the case here, yes, itk was installed. I didn't explicitly choose to install that, so apt must have settled on it when attempting to satisfy the apache dependency. Soren: Presumably we could avoid this by either having eucalyptus-nc explicitly conflict with apache2-mpm-itk, or explicitly depend on apache2-mpm-prefork|apache2-mpm-worker ? (I wonder if the latter might be the best option since those are the two that are explicitly configured by eucalyptus to only run a single child) ** Summary changed: - Node controller sometimes crashes + Node controller apache2 dependency satisfied by an incompatible mpm -- Node controller apache2 dependency satisfied by an incompatible mpm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347220] Re: package python-coherence 0.6.2-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24249846/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24249847/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package python-coherence 0.6.2-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347220] [NEW] package python-coherence 0.6.2-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: While upgrading a jaunty machine this morning: Setting up python-coherence (0.6.2-1) ... file does not exist: /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/coherence/web/static/MochiKit.js pycentral: pycentral pkginstall: error byte-compiling files (158) pycentral pkginstall: error byte-compiling files (158) dpkg: error processing python-coherence (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: python-coherence ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Package: python-coherence 0.6.2-1 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: coherence Title: package python-coherence 0.6.2-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 ** Affects: coherence (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 -- package python-coherence 0.6.2-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345899] [NEW] should the full licence be included?
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ec2-ami-tools I'm not hugely familiar with debian/ubuntu packaging policy, but should the full text of the licence be included in the copyright file? At the moment there is a minimal amount of legalese and a URL to the full licence. ** Affects: ec2-ami-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- should the full licence be included? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345899 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ec2-ami-tools in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 272749] Re: Set window manager URGENT hint on bell.
I have added this feature to Terminator. It's committed to trunk as revision 703. ** Changed in: terminator Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris Jones (cmsj) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- Set window manager URGENT hint on bell. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272749 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345899] [NEW] should the full licence be included?
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ec2-ami-tools I'm not hugely familiar with debian/ubuntu packaging policy, but should the full text of the licence be included in the copyright file? At the moment there is a minimal amount of legalese and a URL to the full licence. ** Affects: ec2-ami-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- should the full licence be included? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345899 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34617] Re: 2.6.15.-19 (Flight 5 or later) breaks hibernation on HP/Compaqs (eg. nw8240)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 34587 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34587 ** Branch unlinked: lp:terminator -- 2.6.15.-19 (Flight 5 or later) breaks hibernation on HP/Compaqs (eg. nw8240) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34617 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272749] Re: Set window manager URGENT hint on bell.
afaics this is fix released for vte in jaunty -- Set window manager URGENT hint on bell. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272749 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 341710] Re: admin user cannot configure a user without an email address
Dmitrii: exactly :) -- admin user cannot configure a user without an email address https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341710 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 344976] [NEW] Installation without disks produces a strange question
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: debian-installer I attempted to install yesterday's jaunty daily server on a Sun X4150. Due to some strange vendor confusion, the machine has a SATA controller, but has SAS disks in it. Obviously this means the disks do not work. The kernel indeed confirms that it can find no disks. d-i did not produce an obvious error hinting at that fact, instead it suggested that there were disks with mounted partitions, and showed an empty list. Attached is a screenshot. ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Installation without disks produces a strange question https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 344976] Re: Installation without disks produces a strange question
** Attachment added: Screenshot of d-i being slightly confused http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24055928/partitionwut.png -- Installation without disks produces a strange question https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338344] Re: Node controller doesn't report failed image downloads
** Summary changed: - Node controller doesn't create nodes + Node controller doesn't report failed image downloads ** Description changed: This is the log from the node controller. It clearly sees that it is supposed to be spawning an instance, and at least starts grabbing the - images, but almost immediately just rm -rf's them. What additional - information would be useful to debug this? + images, but almost immediately just rm -rf's them. + + It transpires that this is due to the images being incomplete in Walrus + (ran out of disk space while uploading them). This suggests that some + internal verification is taking place and rejecting the images. The NC + should really log this fact, and if possible send a message back to the + CC so it knows the instance setup failed (atm the instance shows as + pending until some timeout is reached, when it is shown as terminated). [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCAINFO ] doRunInstance() invoked (id=i-3ECC080E cores=1 disk=1 memory=128 [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCAINFO ] image=emi-94A3140C at http://curium.cloud:8773/services/Walrus/hardy-i386-rootfs/hardy-i386-rootfs.manifest.xml [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCAINFO ] krnel=eki-C8501449 at http://curium.cloud:8773/services/Walrus/hardy-i386-kernel/vmlinuz-2.6.24-23-xen.manifest.xml [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCAINFO ] rmdsk=eri-09BA1527 at http://curium.cloud:8773/services/Walrus/hardy-i386-initrd/initrd.img-2.6.24-23-xen.manifest.xml [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCAINFO ] vlan=10 priMAC=d0:0d:3E:CC:08:0E pubMAC=d0:0d:3E:CC:08:0E [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCAINFO ] network started for instance i-3ECC080E [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCAINFO ] retrieving images for instance i-3ECC080E... [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCAINFO ] walrus_request(): downloading /opt/instances/admin/i-3ECC080E/root-digest [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCAINFO ] from http://curium.cloud:8773/services/Walrus/hardy-i386-rootfs/hardy-i386-rootfs.manifest.xml [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCADEBUG ] walrus_request(): writing GET output to /opt/instances/admin/i-3ECC080E/root-digest [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] NC is looking for configuration in //etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] NC is looking for configuration in //etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] sem_alloc(): cleaning up old semaphore eucalyptus-nc-xen-semaphore [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] sem_alloc(): cleaning up old semaphore eucalyptus-nc-inst-semaphore [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] sem_alloc(): cleaning up old semaphore eucalyptus-storage-semaphore [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] SC is looking for configuration in //etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] euca_init_cert(): using file //var/lib/eucalyptus/keys/node-cert.pem [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] euca_init_cert(): using file //var/lib/eucalyptus/keys/node-pk.pem [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] looking for existing Xen domains [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] checking the integrity of instances directory (/opt/instances) [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] vrun(): [rm -rf /opt/instances/admin/i-3ECC080E] ** Summary changed: - Node controller doesn't report failed image downloads + Node controller doesn't report invalid image downloads -- Node controller doesn't report invalid image downloads https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 341710] [NEW] admin user cannot configure a user without an email address
Public bug reported: I created some test users for myself on a local Eucalyptus instance and I seemed to be unable to do so without it emailing user details to me. As an admin I would expect to be able to create and activate users myself - it may not always be useful/appropriate to involve them in the process. (I guess this is a wishlist item really) ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- admin user cannot configure a user without an email address https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341710 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 341714] [NEW] handle disk space constraints more explicitly
Public bug reported: During some of my testing I have been operating with fairly low amounts of disk space and in various situations I have run out of space without Eucalyptus obviously logging that (e.g. uploading images, unpacking images, preparing images). I don't have exact logs of the exact situations I have hit this in, unfortunately, but I believe it was that an image upload failed, and then subsequently image unpacking failed. (and I appreciate that running something like Eucalyptus in an environment with small disks is somewhat unreasonable) ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- handle disk space constraints more explicitly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 294233] Re: running gnome-open 'mailto:u...@acme.com' open thunderbird mail to ///u...@acme.com
Just to keep things from being hidden, I'm attaching my proposed patch to this bug (previously it was on Bug #291847) ** Attachment added: Patch to avoid passing mailto URIs through GFile http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23716031/unfail-mailto.diff -- running gnome-open 'mailto:u...@acme.com' open thunderbird mail to ///u...@acme.com https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 36739] Re: MASTER Misbehaves in all sorts of ways when upgraded while running
I think it's fair to say that the lightbulb notification is not working well enough. It's good for people who notice this sort of thing, but it's not something that's immediately obvious, and it doesn't scream for attention if it's initially ignored. IMHO there are two options for making this experience more user friendly: 1) Running firefox instances notice that they have been upgraded (either by monitoring their chrome directory, or being fed some signal. The former seems more robust in a multi-user world) and display very stern warnings to the user that they really really should click a button which causes firefox to restart itself as it would have if it had been upgraded via its own internal mechanism. Obviously the chrome for this would need to be made resistant somehow, so it wasn't wiped out when the upgrade happens. This is either an upstream issue, or something we would have to do. Do they ever have to care about this instance in Windows? If firefox can be deployed as a system-wide app rather than per-user, they must do. 2) Firefox updates should only be applied while restarting the computer (obviously the infrastructure for doing this does not yet exist, but I think I've seen some talk about doing more updates in this way, when they are fundamentally incompatible with being performed while people are logged in). This would require no effort from upstream, but would require a pretty large change in the way Ubuntu updates work. -- MASTER Misbehaves in all sorts of ways when upgraded while running https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36739 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338674] [NEW] uses a sub-optimal definition of a word
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wdiff Quoth the man page: A word is anything between whitespace. This may be mostly true in natural english, but is often deeply untrue in other text files. An ideal option would be to be able to specify on the command line, a series of characters to be considered as word delimiters. ** Affects: wdiff (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- uses a sub-optimal definition of a word https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338674 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338764] [NEW] missing /var/run/eucalyptus
Public bug reported: After applying the latest jaunty updates I rebooted and now eucalyptus- nc will not start. looking through the httpd-nc_error_log this seems to be because /var/run/eucalyptus did not exist. Creating it and chowning eucalyptus:eucalyptus allows the NC to start. Perhaps the postinst of eucalyptus-common should be creating it? ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- missing /var/run/eucalyptus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338764 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338344] Re: Node controller doesn't create nodes
After applying some manual changes suggested by grze, and switching to testing with KVM, I still have the same problem: [Fri Mar 6 14:52:08 2009][004767][EUCAINFO ] doRunInstance() invoked (id=i-36BA0714 cores=1 disk=1 memory=128 [Fri Mar 6 14:52:08 2009][004767][EUCAINFO ] image=emi-94A3140C at http://curium.cloud:8773/services/Walrus/hardy-i386-rootfs/hardy-i386-rootfs.manifest.xml [Fri Mar 6 14:52:08 2009][004767][EUCAINFO ] krnel=eki-C8501449 at http://curium.cloud:8773/services/Walrus/hardy-i386-kernel/vmlinuz-2.6.24-23-xen.manifest.xml [Fri Mar 6 14:52:08 2009][004767][EUCAINFO ] rmdsk=eri-09BA1527 at http://curium.cloud:8773/services/Walrus/hardy-i386-initrd/initrd.img-2.6.24-23-xen.manifest.xml [Fri Mar 6 14:52:08 2009][004767][EUCAINFO ] vlan=10 priMAC=d0:0d:36:BA:07:14 pubMAC=d0:0d:36:BA:07:14 [Fri Mar 6 14:52:08 2009][004767][EUCAINFO ] network started for instance i-36BA0714 [Fri Mar 6 14:52:08 2009][004767][EUCAINFO ] retrieving images for instance i-36BA0714... [Fri Mar 6 14:52:08 2009][004767][EUCAINFO ] walrus_request(): downloading /opt/instances/admin/i-36BA0714/disk-digest [Fri Mar 6 14:52:08 2009][004767][EUCAINFO ] from http://curium.cloud:8773/services/Walrus/hardy-i386-rootfs/hardy-i386-rootfs.manifest.xml [Fri Mar 6 14:52:08 2009][004767][EUCADEBUG ] walrus_request(): writing GET output to /opt/instances/admin/i-36BA0714/disk-digest [Fri Mar 6 14:52:10 2009][004772][EUCAINFO ] NC is looking for configuration in //etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf [Fri Mar 6 14:52:10 2009][004772][EUCAINFO ] NC is looking for configuration in //etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf [Fri Mar 6 14:52:10 2009][004772][EUCAINFO ] sem_alloc(): cleaning up old semaphore eucalyptus-nc-xen-semaphore [Fri Mar 6 14:52:10 2009][004772][EUCAINFO ] sem_alloc(): cleaning up old semaphore eucalyptus-nc-inst-semaphore [Fri Mar 6 14:52:10 2009][004772][EUCAINFO ] sem_alloc(): cleaning up old semaphore eucalyptus-storage-semaphore [Fri Mar 6 14:52:10 2009][004772][EUCAINFO ] SC is looking for configuration in //etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf [Fri Mar 6 14:52:10 2009][004772][EUCAINFO ] euca_init_cert(): using file //var/lib/eucalyptus/keys/node-cert.pem [Fri Mar 6 14:52:10 2009][004772][EUCAINFO ] euca_init_cert(): using file //var/lib/eucalyptus/keys/node-pk.pem [Fri Mar 6 14:52:10 2009][004772][EUCAINFO ] looking for existing KVM domains [Fri Mar 6 14:52:11 2009][004772][EUCAINFO ] no currently running Xen domains to adopt [Fri Mar 6 14:52:11 2009][004772][EUCAINFO ] checking the integrity of instances directory (/opt/instances) [Fri Mar 6 14:52:11 2009][004772][EUCAINFO ] vrun(): [rm -rf /opt/instances/admin/i-36BA0714] -- Node controller doesn't create nodes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338158] Re: g-k-d hangs, consumes CPU then segfaults
** Attachment added: trace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23508502/trace.txt -- g-k-d hangs, consumes CPU then segfaults https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338158 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338158] [NEW] g-k-d hangs, consumes CPU then segfaults
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-keyring Machine upgraded from Intrepid to Jaunty I have a keyring that should be unlocked at login. Attempting to use it (e.g. for ssh) causes me to be prompted for the keyring password, then the key password. It then provides authentication for a few ssh sessions, but after a while hits 100% CPU. Trying to use it after that causes it to segfault. Attaching some output from running it with gdb and debugging symbols installed. I have stripped my key/passphrase. ** Affects: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- g-k-d hangs, consumes CPU then segfaults https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338158 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 164682] Re: Ejecting an ipod should tell the ipod to disconnect, like rhythmbox
AFAIK the essential thing when unmount an ipod is that it waits to be ejected as well. Nautilus/rhythmbox/banshee/etc. know to do this, presumably because of its hal properties. I assume the drive mount applet does not pay attention to this kind of thing. If one manually umounts the ipod, it continues to claim that it is connected, but eject(1) on the partition causes it to change its display and tell the user it's ok to disconnect. -- Ejecting an ipod should tell the ipod to disconnect, like rhythmbox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164682 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338344] [NEW] Node controller doesn't create nodes
Public bug reported: This is the log from the node controller. It clearly sees that it is supposed to be spawning an instance, and at least starts grabbing the images, but almost immediately just rm -rf's them. What additional information would be useful to debug this? [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCAINFO ] doRunInstance() invoked (id=i-3ECC080E cores=1 disk=1 memory=128 [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCAINFO ] image=emi-94A3140C at http://curium.cloud:8773/services/Walrus/hardy-i386-rootfs/hardy-i386-rootfs.manifest.xml [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCAINFO ] krnel=eki-C8501449 at http://curium.cloud:8773/services/Walrus/hardy-i386-kernel/vmlinuz-2.6.24-23-xen.manifest.xml [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCAINFO ] rmdsk=eri-09BA1527 at http://curium.cloud:8773/services/Walrus/hardy-i386-initrd/initrd.img-2.6.24-23-xen.manifest.xml [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCAINFO ] vlan=10 priMAC=d0:0d:3E:CC:08:0E pubMAC=d0:0d:3E:CC:08:0E [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCAINFO ] network started for instance i-3ECC080E [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCAINFO ] retrieving images for instance i-3ECC080E... [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCAINFO ] walrus_request(): downloading /opt/instances/admin/i-3ECC080E/root-digest [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCAINFO ] from http://curium.cloud:8773/services/Walrus/hardy-i386-rootfs/hardy-i386-rootfs.manifest.xml [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006011][EUCADEBUG ] walrus_request(): writing GET output to /opt/instances/admin/i-3ECC080E/root-digest [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] NC is looking for configuration in //etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] NC is looking for configuration in //etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] sem_alloc(): cleaning up old semaphore eucalyptus-nc-xen-semaphore [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] sem_alloc(): cleaning up old semaphore eucalyptus-nc-inst-semaphore [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] sem_alloc(): cleaning up old semaphore eucalyptus-storage-semaphore [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] SC is looking for configuration in //etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] euca_init_cert(): using file //var/lib/eucalyptus/keys/node-cert.pem [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] euca_init_cert(): using file //var/lib/eucalyptus/keys/node-pk.pem [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] looking for existing Xen domains [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] checking the integrity of instances directory (/opt/instances) [Thu Mar 5 14:49:10 2009][006037][EUCAINFO ] vrun(): [rm -rf /opt/instances/admin/i-3ECC080E] ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Node controller doesn't create nodes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 164682] Re: Ejecting an ipod should tell the ipod to disconnect, like rhythmbox
The Disk Mounter does indeed only offer an Eject option, so it seems that this is fixed. I seem to remember the old applet used to allow the user to specify specific devices, mountpoints and icons, but the new one seems to be entirely related to HAL, so I suspect this bug couldn't really occur anymore. ** Changed in: gnome-mount (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- Ejecting an ipod should tell the ipod to disconnect, like rhythmbox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164682 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 334804] [NEW] dpkg error when upgrading
Public bug reported: I went to apply updates this morning to get the latest bug fixes and got: r...@muntries-cloud:~# apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be upgraded: app-install-data eucalyptus-common eucalyptus-nc grub-common libapache2-mod-axis2c libaxis2c0 libhal-storage1 libhal1 ubuntu-minimal ubuntu-standard 10 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 8511kB of archives. After this operation, 422kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Get: 1 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main ubuntu-minimal 1.138 [27.9kB] Get: 2 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main ubuntu-standard 1.138 [27.9kB] Get: 3 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main app-install-data 0.7.3 [7165kB] Get: 4 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main libhal1 0.5.12~rc1+git20090204-0ubuntu3 [96.9kB] Get: 5 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main libhal-storage1 0.5.12~rc1+git20090204-0ubuntu3 [23.9kB] Get: 6 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe libaxis2c0 1.5.0-0ubuntu5 [451kB] Get: 7 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe eucalyptus-common 1.5~bzr198-0ubuntu4 [343kB] Get: 8 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe libapache2-mod-axis2c 1.5.0-0ubuntu5 [30.0kB] Get: 9 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe eucalyptus-nc 1.5~bzr198-0ubuntu4 [245kB] Get: 10 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main grub-common 1.96+20080724-12ubuntu2 [101kB] Fetched 8511kB in 2s (3002kB/s) (Reading database ... 134801 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace ubuntu-minimal 1.137 (using .../ubuntu-minimal_1.138_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement ubuntu-minimal ... Preparing to replace ubuntu-standard 1.137 (using .../ubuntu-standard_1.138_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement ubuntu-standard ... Preparing to replace app-install-data 0.7.2 (using .../app-install-data_0.7.3_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement app-install-data ... Preparing to replace libhal1 0.5.12~rc1+git20090204-0ubuntu2 (using .../libhal1_0.5.12~rc1+git20090204-0ubuntu3_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libhal1 ... Preparing to replace libhal-storage1 0.5.12~rc1+git20090204-0ubuntu2 (using .../libhal-storage1_0.5.12~rc1+git20090204-0ubuntu3_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libhal-storage1 ... Preparing to replace libaxis2c0 1.5.0-0ubuntu3 (using .../libaxis2c0_1.5.0-0ubuntu5_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libaxis2c0 ... Preparing to replace eucalyptus-common 1.5~bzr198-0ubuntu3 (using .../eucalyptus-common_1.5~bzr198-0ubuntu4_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement eucalyptus-common ... Preparing to replace libapache2-mod-axis2c 1.5.0-0ubuntu3 (using .../libapache2-mod-axis2c_1.5.0-0ubuntu5_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libapache2-mod-axis2c ... Preparing to replace eucalyptus-nc 1.5~bzr198-0ubuntu3 (using .../eucalyptus-nc_1.5~bzr198-0ubuntu4_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement eucalyptus-nc ... Restarting Eucalyptus services: NC. Preparing to replace grub-common 1.96+20080724-12ubuntu1 (using .../grub-common_1.96+20080724-12ubuntu2_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement grub-common ... Setting up ubuntu-minimal (1.138) ... Setting up ubuntu-standard (1.138) ... Setting up app-install-data (0.7.3) ... Setting up libhal1 (0.5.12~rc1+git20090204-0ubuntu3) ... Setting up libhal-storage1 (0.5.12~rc1+git20090204-0ubuntu3) ... Setting up libaxis2c0 (1.5.0-0ubuntu5) ... Setting up eucalyptus-common (1.5~bzr198-0ubuntu4) ... Starting Eucalyptus services: (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address 0.0.0.0:8775 no listening sockets available, shutting down Unable to open logs Failed to start the NC! invoke-rc.d: initscript eucalyptus, action start failed. dpkg: error processing eucalyptus-common (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Setting up libapache2-mod-axis2c (1.5.0-0ubuntu5) ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of eucalyptus-nc: eucalyptus-nc depends on eucalyptus-common; however: Package eucalyptus-common is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing eucalyptus-nc (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Setting up grub-common (1.96+20080724-12ubuntu2) ... No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup error from a previous failure. Processing triggers for libc6 ... ldconfig deferred processing now taking place Errors were encountered while processing: eucalyptus-common eucalyptus-nc E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) r...@muntries-cloud:~# which suggests that the upgrade didn't stop Eucalyptus before doing the upgrade. I'm not sure how packages indicate that this is necessary, but it seems to be possible (in that other listening daemons stop/upgrade/start cleanly) ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- dpkg error when upgrading
[Bug 334982] [NEW] segfaulting with eucalyptus
Public bug reported: the children of apache are segfaulting when eucalyptus talks to them. upstream appears to be aware: [16:07] @grze_ Ng: if you are using the jaunty package there is something up w/ the package setup that is causing the children to die on sig 11 [16:07] Ng grze_: yep, I am [16:07] @grze_ Ng: we are working on it -- sorry about that :( I don't have a great deal of useful debugging output for this. I tried stracing apache and its children and the only thing which immediately jumped out was a call to capget() with a NULL parameter, but this didn't appear to immediately cause the segfault. ** Affects: axis2c (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- segfaulting with eucalyptus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334982 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 245437] Re: wrong aspect ratio for 1680x1050 wide screen
Without wishing to seem overly pedantic, 1680x1050, 1365x768 (and other increasingly common resolutions like 1440x900 and 1280x800) are 16:10, not 16:9. My laptop is 16:10 and has always shown the usplash image squashed vertically (I have never made any attempt to configure usplash, and I'm pretty sure that one generally shouldn't assume people will). I'll test out the jaunty upload and see how it looks :) (IME uplash always gets things right on 4:3 screens and 16:9 screens, but I've not tested it beyond 1920x1080) -- wrong aspect ratio for 1680x1050 wide screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245437 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332094] Re: Jaunty: notifications overlap top panel
I see this too on a 1440x900 display with a single top panel (28px high), running compiz (in jaunty) ** Changed in: notify-osd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- Jaunty: notifications overlap top panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332094] Re: Jaunty: notifications overlap top panel
the bubbles appear to be offset about 5-10px from the top of the screen, but it's not obviously half way down the panel or anything like that. -- Jaunty: notifications overlap top panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328164] Re: [jaunty] Launchpad changelog URLs with epochs are not correctly linked
** Summary changed: - [jaunty] Wrong URL generation in update-manager's link to changelog at Launchpad + [jaunty] Launchpad changelog URLs with epochs are not correctly linked -- [jaunty] Launchpad changelog URLs with epochs are not correctly linked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328164 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333512] Re: Does not make installing Java unlimited strength crypto easy
I'm also not sure if the check for the unlimited strength JCE is actually working properly, in that I have it installed, but the init script's check fails. -- Does not make installing Java unlimited strength crypto easy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333512 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 334501] [NEW] Cloud controller startup time
Public bug reported: It seems like the cloud controller portion of Eucalyptus takes some time to initialise itself even on modern server hardware. While this may not directly be a bug, it can be confusing - I have been restarting it and reading logs to try and work out why it wasn't starting, when all I actually needed to do was wait (I don't have timing data for the first run to know if that was longer, but it reproducibly takes around 45 seconds to finish loading and listen on port 8443 on an HP DL385G2. I did wonder if some of this was down to error messages about not being able to load http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/persistence_1_0.xsd but it doesn't get any quicker if I nullroute java.sun.com (the machine in question is behind a firewall that would silently eat outbound packets to internet hosts). I think it might be useful to have the init script's start action mention that it might be a minute or two until the service is fully started. ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Cloud controller startup time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334501 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332094] Re: Jaunty: notifications overlap top panel
Kai: If it's just part of the general gnome session initialisation, is there any way to guarantee that? What you say suggests that it also won't update the position it places the bubbles if panels are moved later. Perhaps it should be periodically checking? -- Jaunty: notifications overlap top panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332053] Re: intrepid-jaunty upgrade did not complete (python related)
I'm pretty sure it's python-nevow. I just installed the package again:
Setting up python-nevow (0.9.31-4) ...
Compiling /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/nevow/context.py ...
SyntaxError: ('invalid syntax',
('/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/nevow/context.py', 37, 12, 'def
with(self, tag):\n'))
pycentral: pycentral pkginstall: error byte-compiling files (175)
pycentral pkginstall: error byte-compiling files (175)
This is failing while compiling py2.6 bytecode.
Still, there is a more general issue that pycentral errors can break
upgrades.
** Changed in: nevow (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: update-manager = nevow
** Summary changed:
- intrepid-jaunty upgrade did not complete (python related)
+ Unable to install in jaunty
--
Unable to install in jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332053
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333748] Re: [G45] reproducible Xorg crash running glean/makeCurrent (EXA and UXA)
It looks like this is in the intel driver, so re-assigning it to that ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: xorg-server = xserver-xorg-video-intel -- [G45] reproducible Xorg crash running glean/makeCurrent (EXA and UXA) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 326769] Re: Emulation of middle button and scroll wheel is broken.
I've seen the xinput property names change, although it was upgrading from Intrepid to Jaunty, where they each gained an extra leading Evdev . I set scrollwheel emulation with a script though, so I just updated the xinput commands to use the new property names. I'm not sure if the name change was intended or not, so I'm not sure if this is a bug or not, if you see what I mean. -- Emulation of middle button and scroll wheel is broken. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326769 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157345] Re: show printers shared by other systems should be on by default
After a quick discussion about this with Pitti, he expressed his general support for such a thing, but that specifically he would like to see bug #314408 fixed first, thus bringing compliance with https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DefaultNetworkServices -- show printers shared by other systems should be on by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157345 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333239] [NEW] libapache2-mod-axis2c should provide a mods-available stub
Public bug reported: Normally Apache modules provide .load files in /etc/apache2/mods-available/ so that the command a2enmod can be used to enable them (which symlinks to mods-enabled). It also seems to be somewhat common for postinsts to do this for the user. ** Affects: axis2c (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- libapache2-mod-axis2c should provide a mods-available stub https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333239 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333333] [NEW] eucalyptus-cc postinst fails without node controllers defined
Public bug reported: When installing eucalyptus-cc, -cloud, -common and -gl I am left with -cc and -cloud unconfigured because of: Setting up eucalyptus-cc (1.5~bzr198-0ubuntu1) ... Restarting Eucalyptus services: NODES is empty in configuration file! invoke-rc.d: initscript eucalyptus, action reload failed. dpkg: error processing eucalyptus-cc (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- eucalyptus-cc postinst fails without node controllers defined https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333333] Re: eucalyptus-cc postinst fails
Editing /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf and giving it a hostname for the node controller in the NODES= section allows this to complete. I suppose the ideal scenario would be for eucalyptus to start with no node controllers configured, but failing that, perhaps this should be prompted for with debconf? ** Summary changed: - eucalyptus-cc postinst fails + eucalyptus-cc postinst fails without node controllers defined -- eucalyptus-cc postinst fails without node controllers defined https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333341] [NEW] eucalyptus-cc postinst fails with apache refusing to run as root
Public bug reported: After installing eucalyptus-cloud, -cc, -gl and -common, and configuring eucalyptus to see node controllers, its postinst is still unable to complete, giving the following error: Setting up eucalyptus-cc (1.5~bzr198-0ubuntu1) ... Restarting Eucalyptus services: Syntax error on line 15 of /etc/eucalyptus/httpd-cc.conf: Error:\tApache has not been designed to serve pages while\n\trunning as root. There are known race conditions that\n\twill allow any local user to read any file on the system.\n\tIf you still desire to serve pages as root then\n\tadd -DBIG_SECURITY_HOLE to the CFLAGS env variable\n\tand then rebuild the server.\n\tIt is strongly suggested that you instead modify the User\n\tdirective in your httpd.conf file to list a non-root\n\tuser.\n Failed to start the CC! invoke-rc.d: initscript eucalyptus, action reload failed. dpkg: error processing eucalyptus-cc (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Presumably this is to be fixed by use of sudo? ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- eucalyptus-cc postinst fails with apache refusing to run as root https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/41 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333341] Re: eucalyptus-cc postinst fails with apache refusing to run as root
This particular version of Eucalyptus shouldn't need apache to run as root, so this is presumably just an anachronism in the config file. -- eucalyptus-cc postinst fails with apache refusing to run as root https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/41 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333333] Re: eucalyptus-cc postinst fails without node controllers defined
per discussions with Soren - this is actually just the init script performing sanity checks on the init script. It should print a warning instead of forcibly exiting when NODES is empty. -- eucalyptus-cc postinst fails without node controllers defined https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333512] [NEW] Does not make installing Java unlimited strength crypto easy
Public bug reported: When starting Eucalyptus for the first time, it asks you: Your java installation misses unlimited strength crypto policy. Read more http://eucalyptus.cs.ucsb.edu/wiki/EucalyptusAdministratorGuide Install involves modifying jre/lib/security, you can install by hand or we can install it for you. The link it provides is not directly informative about this. Are we unable to package the crypto JARs for some reason? If so, could we at least have a page on wiki.ubuntu.com with explicit instructions for Ubuntu users, and display that link? I would also suggest that it not offer to do things for the user, if for no other reason than it means it will be offered during the initial package install. Printing appropriate information when the init script is started would seem sufficient. ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Does not make installing Java unlimited strength crypto easy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333512 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 319823] Re: problem contacting mirror admin team and gaining official status for Ignum releases mirror
Tomas: Thanks, the changes look good, and I've set Launchpad to probe and list it. -- problem contacting mirror admin team and gaining official status for Ignum releases mirror https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319823 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 322709] Re: Please enable Show printers shared by other systems by default
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 157345 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157345 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 157345 show printers shared by other systems should be on by default -- Please enable Show printers shared by other systems by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322709 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157345] Re: show printers shared by other systems should be on by default
Till: Is there any argument against enabling this option by default? -- show printers shared by other systems should be on by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157345 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332034] [NEW] error on jaunty upgrade
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: console-setup While upgrading an Intrepid laptop to Jaunty just now I received a debconf error: The configuration file /etc/default/console-setup specifies a keyboard layout and variant that are not supported by the configuration program. Because of that, no questions about the keyboard layout will be asked and your current configuration will be preserved. I have not knowingly edited that file at any point that I can remember, and I have attached it to this bug. ** Affects: console-setup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- error on jaunty upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332034 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332034] Re: error on jaunty upgrade
** Attachment added: console-setup http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22908777/console-setup -- error on jaunty upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332034 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332053] [NEW] intrepid-jaunty upgrade did not complete (python related)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager I ran update-manager -c -d this morning to upgrade my Intrepid laptop to Jaunty. It got very near the end of setting up all the packages and then started failing on some python packages. Various logs attached, as it requested. Is this because I have python2.4 installed? ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- intrepid-jaunty upgrade did not complete (python related) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332053 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332053] Re: intrepid-jaunty upgrade did not complete (python related)
** Attachment added: main.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22910258/main.log -- intrepid-jaunty upgrade did not complete (python related) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332053 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332053] Re: intrepid-jaunty upgrade did not complete (python related)
** Attachment added: apt.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22910266/apt.log -- intrepid-jaunty upgrade did not complete (python related) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332053 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332053] Re: intrepid-jaunty upgrade did not complete (python related)
** Attachment added: apt-term.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22910339/apt-term.log -- intrepid-jaunty upgrade did not complete (python related) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332053 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332053] Re: intrepid-jaunty upgrade did not complete (python related)
** Attachment added: term.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22910396/term.log -- intrepid-jaunty upgrade did not complete (python related) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332053 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332053] Re: intrepid-jaunty upgrade did not complete (python related)
** Attachment added: xorg_fix_intrepid.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22910397/xorg_fix_intrepid.log -- intrepid-jaunty upgrade did not complete (python related) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332053 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332053] Re: intrepid-jaunty upgrade did not complete (python related)
I'm pretty sure this is actually a problem with python-nevow - removing that package allowed dpkg --configure -a to complete -- intrepid-jaunty upgrade did not complete (python related) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332053 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152038] Re: unreadable file form upload submits as empty file
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #479429 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479429 ** Also affects: firefox via https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479429 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- unreadable file form upload submits as empty file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 322468] Re: Brightness function broken by 2.6.27-11-generic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 311716 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311716 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 311716 The slider brightness Applet has value inverted after the last update (2.6.27-11) -- Brightness function broken by 2.6.27-11-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 311716] Re: The slider brightness Applet has value inverted after the last update (2.6.27-11)
Unless there should actually be a separate bug, it seems that the most recent comments indicate that brightness control is broken on some machines, regressing from -9. I can also confirm that on my Thinkpad X300. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- The slider brightness Applet has value inverted after the last update (2.6.27-11) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 320874] Re: [asus] /sys/devices/virtual/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness has it backwards
is this a duplicate of bug #311716 ? -- [asus] /sys/devices/virtual/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness has it backwards https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/320874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 322994] Re: Cannot adjust video brightness on Gateway M-6827
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 311716 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311716 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 311716 The slider brightness Applet has value inverted after the last update (2.6.27-11) -- Cannot adjust video brightness on Gateway M-6827 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322994 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 325233] Re: acpi brightness setting doesn't work
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 311716 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311716 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 311716 The slider brightness Applet has value inverted after the last update (2.6.27-11) -- acpi brightness setting doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 316503] Re: hp dv9000 laptop lcd brightness not working
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- hp dv9000 laptop lcd brightness not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316503 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 327661] Re: brightness controls on Lenovo Thinkpad x61 broken in linux-image-generic 2.6.27-11.27
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 311716 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311716 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 311716 The slider brightness Applet has value inverted after the last update (2.6.27-11) -- brightness controls on Lenovo Thinkpad x61 broken in linux-image-generic 2.6.27-11.27 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327661 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315922] Re: 2.6.27-11 makes brightness not work [2.6.28-4.10 also affected]
should this be marked as a duplicate of bug #311716 ? -- 2.6.27-11 makes brightness not work [2.6.28-4.10 also affected] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315922 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 310549] Re: Incorrect works brightness keys in GNOME after a kernel upgrade to 2.6.27-11
is this perhaps a duplicate of bug #311716 ? -- Incorrect works brightness keys in GNOME after a kernel upgrade to 2.6.27-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310549 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291847] Re: xdg-open mangles mailto: urls to ///f...@bar.com
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #571441 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571441 ** Also affects: xdg-utils via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571441 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- xdg-open mangles mailto: urls to ///f...@bar.com https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291847 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 325667] Re: Updated version for Jaunty
0.6.0 is in jaunty now ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- Updated version for Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328093] [NEW] [jaunty] upgrade to 0.6.0 leaves a non-working libvirtd
Public bug reported: Intrepid and later versions of libvirtd run as the group libvirtd. The 0.6.0 upload in jaunty wants to run as libvirt, but does not do any transition work in pre/postinst. The resulting behavious is that the libvirtd init script claims success in starting the daemon, but actually syslog shows that it exits almost immediately when it is unable to find its group. ** Affects: libvirt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- [jaunty] upgrade to 0.6.0 leaves a non-working libvirtd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328093 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328093] Re: [jaunty] upgrade to 0.6.0 leaves a non-working libvirtd
Confirming as we've seen this on two machines ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [jaunty] upgrade to 0.6.0 leaves a non-working libvirtd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328093 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291847] Re: xdg-open mangles mailto: urls to ///f...@bar.com
xdg-open is a very simple shell script which appears to do nothing to modify the URL parameter before passing it to the chosen desktop handler (so gnome-open for Ubuntu). Indeed, running: gnome-open mailto:c...@tenshu.net will produce the same prefixed /// (xdg-email also calls gnome-open) gnome-open is even shorter than xdg-open, albeit in C. It appears to be doing the canonicalisation with calls to GIO. It seems as though passing a mailto: URI to a GIO function that creates a GFile (e.g. g_file_new_for_commandline_arg() which gnome-open uses) may be slightly destructive, to quote GIO's ChangeLog. On the (admittedly somewhat arbitrary and potentially spurious) basis that something called GFile has no business dealing with things that aren't files, I've attached a naive patch to make gnome-open not feed mailto URIs through GFile. ** Attachment added: Simple patch to avoid passing mailto URIs through GFile. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22538982/unfail-mailto.diff ** Changed in: xdg-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Also affects: libgnome (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- xdg-open mangles mailto: urls to ///f...@bar.com https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291847 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291847] Re: xdg-open mangles mailto: urls to ///f...@bar.com
(if this is not to be fixed in gnome-open, but GFile then this bug should be moved to glib2 rather than libgnome. I've invalidated the xdg- utils task because that seems like an entirely worse place to fix it than gnome-open) -- xdg-open mangles mailto: urls to ///f...@bar.com https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291847 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 312777] Re: f-spot duplicate detection doesn't work
I think this upstream bug seems to be the most relevant. Florian: Moving software out of the default install affects millions of people and will do nothing to improve its quality. Please try to keep your input constructive and generally in the spirit of the Ubuntu project. Thanks! ** Changed in: f-spot Importance: Undecided = Unknown Bugwatch: None = GNOME Bug Tracker #169646 Status: New = Unknown -- f-spot duplicate detection doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 144505] Re: [gutsy] very unhelpful linewrapping
I am indeed unable to reproduce this with the gedit in Intrepid. -- [gutsy] very unhelpful linewrapping https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144505 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 324096] [NEW] Does not completely respect -t
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntu-vm-builder When running ubuntu-vm-builder on a machine with a very constrained /tmp I set up a separate partition with plenty of space (20G) and passed its mount point to ubuntu-vm-builder with -t. It installed a disk image, but then ran out of space when it was using qemu-img to convert the image. Attached is the output of running u-vm-b ** Affects: ubuntu-vm-builder (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Does not completely respect -t https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 324096] Re: Does not completely respect -t
** Attachment added: output of ubuntu-vm-builder http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21885155/lala -- Does not completely respect -t https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 324102] [NEW] unclear error message
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntu-vm-builder After a failed run, re-running ubuntu-vmbuilder just gives me the error message: 2009-02-01 22:25:30,834 INFO Cleaning up ubuntu-kvm already exists This actually just seems to mean that there's a directory with that name in $PWD, even though -t was specified in the failed ubuntu-vm-builder call, so that's where everything should be, and they should have been cleaned up after the failed run anyway. ** Affects: ubuntu-vm-builder (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- unclear error message https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324102 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 324096] Re: Does not completely respect -t
It's possible that this was actually /opt/tmp which ran out of space, but the errors didn't say, so it's kind of hard to tell. If that is the case, then this bug should actually be ubuntu-vm-builder needs to be more explicit with its errors -- Does not completely respect -t https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 324096] Re: Does not completely respect -t
This actually seems to be because the output image is written to $PWD, so is just an unhelpful error (maybe suggest using -d?) -- Does not completely respect -t https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239458] Re: Getting upgrade prerequisites for system upgrade failed
testing with --proposed on a sparc64 dapper machine it is now able to upgrade the machine. -- Getting upgrade prerequisites for system upgrade failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239458 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 322482] Re: distribution upgrade via update-manager fails over remote GDM
It seems like it would be sensible to simply not allow upgrades to be done in that manner. It's far too likely to go wrong. -- distribution upgrade via update-manager fails over remote GDM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322482 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
