[Bug 1229580] [NEW] No .a file in libpcsclite-dev package
Public bug reported: libpcsclite-dev is missing an .a file, needed to create statically linked binaries. Is is missing in Ubuntu 12.04.3 as well as the latest on launchpad, libpcsclite-dev_1.8.6-3ubuntu1b1_amd64.deb. patch attached for 12.04. ** Affects: pcsc-lite (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: pcsclite-static.diff https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1229580/+attachment/3837668/+files/pcsclite-static.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1229580 Title: No .a file in libpcsclite-dev package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcsc-lite/+bug/1229580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1229580] Re: No .a file in libpcsclite-dev package
The code I'm working on is targeted for an embedded system using buildroot. During development and debugging it is easier to compile it for the host system which is running Ubuntu. The embedded system is for various reasons using statically linked binaries and it would be nice to compile it more or less the same way. In the general case developers might want to create static binaries due to running under a chroot, no possibility to install packages/.so files on customers machines or 32/64 bit mismatch between shipped binary and host system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1229580 Title: No .a file in libpcsclite-dev package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcsc-lite/+bug/1229580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 823085] Re: command-not-found uses more resources than necessary
This bug should probably be closed since the change has been merged now -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823085 Title: command-not-found uses more resources than necessary To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/823085/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 823085] [NEW] command-not-found uses more resources than necessary
Public bug reported: When CommandNotFound.py calls SourcesList is there a lot of information parsed that is never used. Attached is a small patch that will reduce the execution time with ~35-45% depending on hardware. Tested on an i5-2410M and an Atom 330 with natty 64 bit installed. I used: time /usr/lib/command-not-found cab as a test case. ** Affects: command-not-found (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823085 Title: command-not-found uses more resources than necessary To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/823085/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 823085] Re: command-not-found uses more resources than necessary
** Patch added: command-not-found.diff https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823085/+attachment/2263330/+files/command-not-found.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823085 Title: command-not-found uses more resources than necessary To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/command-not-found/+bug/823085/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
