[Bug 2070095] Re: apt_news.py download forced unsandboxed

2024-07-04 Thread Dominic Raferd
# pro collect-logs

[info] A new version is available: 32.3.1~24.04
Please run:
sudo apt install ubuntu-pro-client
to get the latest bug fixes and new features.

# ls -hal /run/ubuntu-advantage/
total 8.0K
drwxr-xr-x  3 root root  100 Jul  4 12:28 .
drwxr-xr-x 36 root root 1.2K Jul  4 12:27 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 root root  399 Jul  3 16:00 aptnews.json
-rw-r--r--  1 root root   12 Jul  4 12:28 candidate-version
drwxr-xr-x  2 root root   40 Jul  4 09:47 notices

And after updating ubuntu-pro-client:
# pro collect-logs
#

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070095

Title:
  apt_news.py download forced unsandboxed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2070095/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2070095] Re: apt_news.py download forced unsandboxed

2024-06-22 Thread Dominic Raferd
I now think this relates to ubuntu-advantage-tools and/or ubuntu pro-
client. I do not have ubuntu-advantage-tools installed but I do have
ubuntu-pro-client and I have directory /etc/ubuntu-advantage which
contains uaclient.conf.

** Package changed: ubuntu => ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070095

Title:
  apt_news.py download forced unsandboxed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2070095/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2070095] [NEW] apt_news.py download forced unsandboxed

2024-06-22 Thread Dominic Raferd
Public bug reported:

I am not sure which package this relates to, but after a recent upgrade
from Ubuntu 22.04 to 24.04 LTS I have started seeing messages in syslog
like this:

17:29:03 python3[89]: 
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/uaclient/apt_news.py:207: Warning: W:Download is 
performed unsandboxed as root as file '/run/ubuntu-advantage/aptnews.json' 
couldn't be accessed by user '_apt'. - pkgAcquire::Run (13: Permission denied)
17:29:03 python3[89]: acq.run()

It seems to me that user _apt lacks write permission for anything in
/run, hence the problem. I realise the script is getting round the
problem by running unsandboxed instead but this message is ugly.

What I have installed that might be related (I do not have 
ubuntu-advantage-tools):
# dpkg-query --list|grep -E "^.i.*(news|-pro-|apt).*(amd64|all)"
ii  apt2.7.14build2 
   amd64commandline package manager
ii  apt-utils  2.7.14build2 
   amd64package management related utility programs
ii  libapt-pkg6.0t64:amd64 2.7.14build2 
   amd64package management runtime library
ii  motd-news-config   13ubuntu10   
   all  Configuration for motd-news shipped in base-files
ii  python-apt-common  2.7.7ubuntu1 
   all  Python interface to libapt-pkg (locales)
ii  python3-apt2.7.7ubuntu1 
   amd64Python 3 interface to libapt-pkg
ii  ubuntu-pro-client  32.3~24.04   
   amd64Management tools for Ubuntu Pro
ii  ubuntu-pro-client-l10n 32.3~24.04   
   amd64Translations for Ubuntu Pro Client

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070095

Title:
  apt_news.py download forced unsandboxed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2070095/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2069505] [NEW] package sa-compile 4.0.0-8ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: installed sa-compile package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2

2024-06-15 Thread Dominic Raferd
Public bug reported:

bug on upgrading from 22.04 to 24.04

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: sa-compile 4.0.0-8ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-112.122-generic 5.15.152
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-112-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CloudBuildName: server
CloudSerial: 20190813.1
Date: Sat Jun 15 16:18:15 2024
ErrorMessage: installed sa-compile package post-installation script subprocess 
returned error exit status 2
PackageArchitecture: all
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.12, Python 3.12.3, python3-minimal, 
3.12.3-0ubuntu1
PythonDetails: N/A
RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks.
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.22.6ubuntu6
 apt  2.7.14build2
SourcePackage: spamassassin
Title: package sa-compile 4.0.0-8ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: installed 
sa-compile package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit 
status 2
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-06-15 (0 days ago)
mtime.conffile..etc.init.d.apport: 2024-04-23T12:30:10

** Affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package cloud-image noble

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069505

Title:
  package sa-compile 4.0.0-8ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: installed
  sa-compile package post-installation script subprocess returned error
  exit status 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/2069505/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056153] Re: Removing the systemd-resolved package breaks DNSSEC validation

2024-06-09 Thread Dominic
This bug continues into Noble. I continue to add "options edns0 trust-
ad" to /etc/resolv.conf after removing systemd-resolved, but it would be
nice not having to do so.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056153

Title:
  Removing the systemd-resolved package breaks DNSSEC validation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2056153/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-08 Thread Dominic
Postfix already has a configuration page for SPF [0], albeit requiring a
package from universe. So although removing the SPF snippet from Exim
could be an option in the short-term, I do think in the long-term
Ubuntu's SPF support for Exim should be somewhat equivalent to that of
Postfix's.

Adding a fragile snippet to a docs would come with the same caveats as
including a fragile snippet in the stock Exim config, just with less
culpability.

Ultimately using Exim's native SPF facility, i.e. that of libspf2, is
the right approach in my mind.

[0] - https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Postfix/SPF

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-06 Thread Dominic
Option three would be to remove the spf section completely until a non-
broken sustainable solution is implemented, especially if libspf2 is
going to take some time to implement.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-04 Thread Dominic
Thank you, I would appreciate you reiterating the case for libspf2.

Aside from the fact that this implementation is looking (recurrently)
fragile, this Ubuntu delta, disabled by default, is probably not getting
enough attention to spot bugs. This bug has been open for three months
and only one other person said "me too".

We can't say if this is because few people enable it, or whether a lot
of people are yet to notice everything is "Received-SPF: none", but it's
a concern in itself.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Dominic
It was floated before but it's worth raising again. What are the chances
of bringing libspf2 to main and falling back into line with Debian?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Dominic
No, I was not invoking bash, I was using the code I quoted previously
and testing the scenarios at port 25.

An empty $sender_address variable would create a missing argument and
likely break spfquery.mail-spf-perl, I haven't tested that scenario yet.
$sender_host_address should always be present and sanitised by
definition.

condition = ${run{/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl \
   --ip $sender_host_address \
   --scope mfrom \
   --identity $sender_address} \
   {no}{${if eq {$runrc}{1}{yes}{no

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Dominic
Good find, I am still running my ${quote:}-less version at the moment so
I was able to test the scenarios in that bug report.

All three of the following senders were correctly rejected as spf fail
by my server (example.com hard fails all senders in its spf record):

MAIL FROM: "$PWD"@example.com
MAIL FROM: "x --help "@example.com
MAIL FROM: le...@example.com

RCPT TO: 
550-[SPF]  is not allowed to send mail
550 from example.com.

So whatever the reason it was allowing an spf fail to pass back then, it
no longer appears to be the case now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-01 Thread Dominic
Thinking more about this, wouldn't invoking /bin/bash actually increase
the attack potential, by allowing for backticks and $() to execute via
user-supplied data?

Also, it's not clear to me that ${quote} escapes backticks or $().

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056443] Re: CHECK_RCPT_SPF SPF check fails if inbound IP address is IPv6

2024-05-31 Thread Dominic
Closing this, as this will be fixed by bug #2056372

** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056443

Title:
  CHECK_RCPT_SPF SPF check fails if inbound IP address is IPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056443/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-30 Thread Dominic
I agree, I also do not know the potential risks of removing ${quote:}
from tainted variables, so this needs further research before
implementation. Or we go with yours.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2049977] Re: journalctl --follow --grep lists lines in wrong order

2024-05-30 Thread Dominic
It was a problem in mantic, fixed in noble.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049977

Title:
  journalctl --follow --grep lists lines in wrong order

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2049977/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-30 Thread Dominic
Hi Mitchell,

Your version works for me as well.

In the interim I have been successfully using the following
configuration. Would this be potentially useful, or are there issues
with removing ${quote:} from --ip and --identity?

condition = ${run{/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl \
   --ip $sender_host_address \
   --scope mfrom \
   --identity $sender_address} \
   {no}{${if eq {$runrc}{1}{yes}{no

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067057] Re: Unattended-upgrades order of restart caused failure to bind address

2024-05-24 Thread Dominic
Contents of unattended-upgrades log, to confirm unattended-upgrades
initiated the updates:

2024-05-24 06:27:37,661 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
2024-05-24 06:27:37,662 INFO Allowed origins are: o=Ubuntu,a=noble, 
o=Ubuntu,a=noble-security, o=UbuntuESMApps,a=noble-apps-security, 
o=UbuntuESM,a=noble-infra-security, o=Ubuntu,a=noble-updates, 
o=Ubuntu,a=noble-proposed, o=Ubuntu,a=noble-backports
2024-05-24 06:27:37,662 INFO Initial blacklist:
2024-05-24 06:27:37,662 INFO Initial whitelist (not strict):
2024-05-24 06:27:40,144 INFO Packages that will be upgraded: klibc-utils 
libklibc libssl3t64 openssl
2024-05-24 06:27:40,144 INFO Writing dpkg log to 
/var/log/unattended-upgrades/unattended-upgrades-dpkg.log
2024-05-24 06:27:57,367 INFO All upgrades installed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067057

Title:
  Unattended-upgrades order of restart caused failure to bind address

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/2067057/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067057] [NEW] Unattended-upgrades order of restart caused failure to bind address

2024-05-24 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported:

This morning, nginx wan't working, so I checked the journal. It appears
an overnight unattended-upgrades restarted a lot of services, including
systemd-networkd and nginx. Logs pasted at the end, I am running Ubuntu
24.04.

I bind nginx to specific IP addresses, because different daemons listen
on different addresses. When nginx was brought back up, it failed
because the requested IP address had not yet come back up.

It would appear unattended-upgrades attempted to restart a lot of
services at once, causing nginx to attempt to bind to an address which
had not yet come back up.

Could there be more careful ordering of execution to avoid such
problems?


May 24 06:27:54 alpha systemd[1]: Stopping packagekit.service - PackageKit 
Daemon...May 24 06:27:54 alpha systemd[1]: packagekit.service: Deactivated 
successfully.
May 24 06:27:54 alpha systemd[1]: Stopped packagekit.service - PackageKit 
Daemon.
May 24 06:27:54 alpha systemd[1]: exim4.service: Deactivated successfully.
May 24 06:27:54 alpha systemd[1]: Stopped exim4.service - exim Mail Transport 
Agent.
May 24 06:27:54 alpha systemd[1]: exim4.service: Consumed 15.241s CPU time, 
26.4M memory peak, 0B memory swap peak.
May 24 06:27:54 alpha systemd[1]: Starting exim4.service - exim Mail Transport 
Agent...
May 24 06:27:54 alpha systemd[1]: Starting packagekit.service - PackageKit 
Daemon...
May 24 06:27:54 alpha systemd[1]: Stopping php8.3-fpm.service - The PHP 8.3 
FastCGI Process Manager...
May 24 06:27:54 alpha systemd[1]: Stopping ssh.service - OpenBSD Secure Shell 
server...
May 24 06:27:54 alpha sshd[1427]: Received signal 15; terminating.
May 24 06:27:54 alpha systemd-journald[365]: Journal stopped
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: Stopping systemd-journald.service - Journal 
Service...
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd-journald[365]: Received SIGTERM from PID 1 
(systemd).
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: netplan-ovs-cleanup.service - OpenVSwitch 
configuration for cleanup was skipped because of an unmet condition check 
(ConditionFileIsExecutable=/usr/bin/ovs-vsctl).
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: systemd-networkd-wait-online.service: 
Deactivated successfully.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: Stopped systemd-networkd-wait-online.service 
- Wait for Network to be Configured.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: Stopping systemd-networkd-wait-online.service 
- Wait for Network to be Configured...
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: Stopping systemd-networkd.service - Network 
Configuration...
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: ssh.service: Deactivated successfully.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: Stopped ssh.service - OpenBSD Secure Shell 
server.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: Starting ssh.service - OpenBSD Secure Shell 
server...
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: nginx.service: Deactivated successfully.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: Stopped nginx.service - A high performance 
web server and a reverse proxy server.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: nginx.service: Consumed 6.168s CPU time, 
21.6M memory peak, 0B memory swap peak.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: Starting nginx.service - A high performance 
web server and a reverse proxy server...
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: Stopping systemd-timesyncd.service - Network 
Time Synchronization...
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: systemd-journald.service: Deactivated 
successfully.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: Stopped systemd-journald.service - Journal 
Service.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: systemd-journald.service: Consumed 49.437s 
CPU time, 173.6M memory peak, 0B memory swap peak.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: systemd-networkd.service: Deactivated 
successfully.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: Stopped systemd-networkd.service - Network 
Configuration.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: systemd-networkd.service: Consumed 3.016s CPU 
time, 3.6M memory peak, 0B memory swap peak.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: systemd-timesyncd.service: Deactivated 
successfully.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: Stopped systemd-timesyncd.service - Network 
Time Synchronization.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: systemd-timesyncd.service: Consumed 1.742s 
CPU time, 2.2M memory peak, 0B memory swap peak.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: Starting systemd-journald.service - Journal 
Service...
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: Starting systemd-networkd.service - Network 
Configuration...
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd-journald[224525]: Collecting audit messages is 
disabled.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: Starting systemd-timesyncd.service - Network 
Time Synchronization...
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: Started ssh.service - OpenBSD Secure Shell 
server.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: nginx.service: Control process exited, 
code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd[1]: nginx.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd-journald[224525]: Journal started
May 24 06:27:55 alpha systemd-journald[224525]: System Journal 

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-17 Thread Dominic
Re-marking as new since I've supplied all requested information.

** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-06 Thread Dominic
(and comment #6)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-06 Thread Dominic
No, you should be seeing a header. Are the steps you followed the same
as that which I wrote in comment #5 of this report?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-06 Thread Dominic
No errors in /var/log/exim4/mainlog, just normal mail flow logs.

I suspect some sort of error was introduced in the code for the #1998678
fix.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-04 Thread Dominic
Possibly related to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/1998678

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-03 Thread Dominic
It was a clean install of Noble, for some reason the spf check always
returns "none". It is very easily reproducible, as per my comment #5.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-02 Thread Dominic
Still an issue in noble / 24.04.

"Received-SPF: none" is reported in the headers of received mail for
senders known to have an spf record configured.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-02 Thread Dominic
Also, this should not be marked as "incomplete" as I have supplied all
the required information.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-15 Thread Dominic
I get the correct result when running spfquery.mail-spf-perl manually.

$ /usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl --ip 40.92.113.65 --scope mfrom --identity 
exam...@outlook.com
pass
outlook.com: Sender is authorized to use 'exam...@outlook.com' in 'mfrom' 
identity (mechanism 'include:spf.protection.outlook.com' matched)
outlook.com: Sender is authorized to use 'exam...@outlook.com' in 'mfrom' 
identity (mechanism 'include:spf.protection.outlook.com' matched)
Received-SPF: pass (outlook.com: Sender is authorized to use 
'exam...@outlook.com' in 'mfrom' identity (mechanism 
'include:spf.protection.outlook.com' matched)) receiver=alpha.cress.org.uk; 
identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="exam...@outlook.com"; client-ip=40.92.113.65

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-13 Thread Dominic
According to the exim4 changelog, the spf logic was modified in Aug
2023.

exim4 (4.96-17ubuntu1) mantic; urgency=medium

  * Merge with Debian unstable (LP: #2030098). Remaining changes:
 - Disable external SPF support to avoid Build-Depends on libspf2-dev
   (only available in universe). SPF can still be implemented via
   spf-tools-perl, as documented in exim4.conf.template. This reverts
   Vcs-Git commit 494f1fe, first released in 4.95~RC0-1.
   (LP #1952738)
   + d/control: drop Build-Depends on libspf2-dev.
   + d/EDITME.exim4-heavy.diff: disable support for libspf2.
   + d/d/c/a/30_exim4-config_check_rcpt: restore SPF logic based
 on spfquery.mail-spf-perl from spf-tools-perl, but without
 the previously supported helo detection.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-13 Thread Dominic
I'm using exim4-daemon-heavy.

$ apt list --installed | grep exim4

WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in
scripts.

exim4-base/mantic-updates,mantic-security,now 4.96-17ubuntu2.2 amd64 
[installed,automatic]
exim4-config/mantic-updates,mantic-security,now 4.96-17ubuntu2.2 all 
[installed,automatic]
exim4-daemon-heavy/mantic-updates,mantic-security,now 4.96-17ubuntu2.2 amd64 
[installed,automatic]
exim4/mantic-updates,mantic-security,now 4.96-17ubuntu2.2 all [installed]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-12 Thread Dominic
Also: `update-exim4.conf` and restart exim before sending mail to
yourself.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-12 Thread Dominic
exim4.conf.template is completely unmodified from stock mantic.

Bug can be replicated by:

1. Installing mantic
2. Installing exim4 and spf-tools-perl
3. `dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config` and make it accept mail
4. Adding CHECK_RCPT_SPF = true to /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.localmacros
5. Sending yourself an email from Gmail or Outlook and checking the spf header

That's all I did.

** Attachment added: "exim4.conf.localmacros"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+attachment/5755338/+files/exim4.conf.localmacros

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056443] Re: CHECK_RCPT_SPF SPF check fails if inbound IP address is IPv6

2024-03-11 Thread Dominic
Quite possibly related, although the way the error manifests is
different. If the other bug is fixed, then it's very possible this one
will be too.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056443

Title:
  CHECK_RCPT_SPF SPF check fails if inbound IP address is IPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056443/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-11 Thread Dominic
Hi Mitchell,

I am setting CHECK_RCPT_SPF = true in /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.localmacros
where local macros are typically set.

I have run `update-exim4.conf` and `systemctl restart exim4`.

Then I send myself an email from an outlook.com account, which has SPF
enabled, and the headers report:

Received-SPF: none

I am expecting to see:

Received-SPF: pass

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-07 Thread Dominic
Note: this bug relates to inbound IPv4 addresses. IPv6 addresses are
affected by a separate bug: #2056443

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056443] [NEW] CHECK_RCPT_SPF SPF check fails if inbound IP address is IPv6

2024-03-07 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported:

On mantic, when CHECK_RCPT_SPF = true and spf-tools-perl is installed,
Exim4 logs an error and fails the SPF check if the inbound IP address is
IPv6:

2024-03-07 11:58:35 H=mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com [2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c]
Warning: Unexpected error in SPF check.

** Affects: exim4 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056443

Title:
  CHECK_RCPT_SPF SPF check fails if inbound IP address is IPv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056443/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] [NEW] Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-06 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported:

As I understand it, enabling SPF validation in Exim4 simply requires
setting CHECK_RCPT_SPF to true and installing the spf-tools-perl
package.

However, in mantic, every email has this header, regardless of whether
the sender's domain has an SPF TXT record set:

Received-SPF: none

** Affects: exim4 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056153] [NEW] Removing the systemd-resolved package breaks DNSSEC validation

2024-03-05 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported:

Removing the systemd-resolved package breaks glibc DNSSEC validation,
because it removes an existing line from the new /etc/resolv.conf file.

This line should be retained so that packages like Exim can continue to
use the AD bit after systemd-resolved is removed.


ubuntu@instance:~$ grep -v '^#' /etc/resolv.conf

nameserver 127.0.0.53
options edns0 trust-ad
search vcn.oraclevcn.com


ubuntu@instance:~$ sudo apt remove systemd-resolved


ubuntu@instance:~$ grep -v '^#' /etc/resolv.conf

nameserver 169.254.169.254
search vcn.oraclevcn.com

** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056153

Title:
  Removing the systemd-resolved package breaks DNSSEC validation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2056153/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1823171] Re: systemd-resolve hides DS records in explicit queries

2024-02-25 Thread Dominic
DNSSEC isn't required to query a DS record. The reason your query
succeeded after you enabled DNSSEC is because systemd-resolved caches it
internally as a result of the DNSSEC lookup.

Once the DS query is cached, the bug will not manifest. Another way to
cache it is:

ubuntu@server:~$ dig ripe.net ds @127.0.0.53 +short

ubuntu@server:~$ dig ripe.net ds @127.0.0.54 +short
10186 13 2 BC15C85E16FE7C651EAAFCEE3B1F1C956217A5B70A536BFEF38C24A9 AB7B9A3F

ubuntu@server:~$ dig ripe.net ds @127.0.0.53 +short
10186 13 2 BC15C85E16FE7C651EAAFCEE3B1F1C956217A5B70A536BFEF38C24A9 AB7B9A3F

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1823171

Title:
  systemd-resolve hides DS records in explicit queries

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1823171/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1977764] [NEW] kernel modules "zstd" and "z3fold" missing.

2022-06-06 Thread Dominic Parry
Public bug reported:

The modules "zstd" and "z3fold" are missing despite being configured for
zswap in "/boot/firmware/cmdline.txt." Messages appear on boot display
that state they do not exist and so instead use compressor "lzo" and
pool "zbud".

Ubuntu version is 22.04 LTS flashed from the official image.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: linux-image-5.15.0-1008-raspi 5.15.0-1008.8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-1008.8-raspi 5.15.30
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-1008-raspi aarch64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
Architecture: arm64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Mon Jun  6 17:29:00 2022
ImageMediaBuild: 20220419
SourcePackage: linux-raspi
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: linux-raspi (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: arm64-image jammy raspi-image z3fold zstd zswap

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977764

Title:
  kernel modules "zstd" and "z3fold" missing.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1977764/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1974178] Re: Missing vhost_vsock kernel module in 5.15.0

2022-05-19 Thread Dominic Schwarz
"sudo apt install linux-modules-extra-raspi" worked and installed the
missing module.

Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974178

Title:
  Missing vhost_vsock kernel module in 5.15.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1974178/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1974178] [NEW] Missing vhost_vsock kernel module in 5.15.0

2022-05-19 Thread Dominic Schwarz
Public bug reported:

Hey All,

I am new to the container, lxc, lxd stuff and  I am at the end of my knowledge. 
I have a fresh setup with a Raspberry PI 4 installed with Ubuntu 22.04 arm64.
So far everything works fine for containers but I can't get any vm to launch. 

>     ~  lxc launch images:ubuntu/focal ubuntu --vm 
> 
> Creating ubuntu
> Error: Failed instance creation: Failed creating instance record: Instance 
> type "virtual-machine" is not supported on this server: vhost_vsock kernel 
> module not loaded

Seems like I am missing a kernel module, but I was not able to find or load it.
Already googled for it but was not able to find any matching problem with 
solution.

Additional Information:
>     ~  uname -r
> 5.15.0-1005-raspi

>     ~  dpkg -l | grep linux-image
> ii  linux-image-5.15.0-1005-raspi   5.15.0-1005.5 
>   arm64Linux kernel image for version 5.15.0 on ARMv8 SMP

>     ~  modprobe vhost_vsock
>  modprobe: FATAL: Module vhost_vsock not found in directory 
> /lib/modules/5.15.0-1005-raspi
>     ~  lsmod | grep vsock

** Affects: linux-raspi (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974178

Title:
  Missing vhost_vsock kernel module in 5.15.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1974178/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1618041] Re: Cannot login to Ubuntu One Single Sign-On Account to install Snaps

2022-02-17 Thread Dominic Bufton
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1616943 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616943

same here on brand new 20.04 LTS running in VM on HyoerV

SSO and Ubuntu One accounts work fine on webs, but Livepatch setup lets
me enter SSO initally, then prompts for local admin, before coming back
to SSO sign-in screen with incorrect email/password

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1618041

Title:
  Cannot login to Ubuntu One Single Sign-On Account to install Snaps

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1618041/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946833] Re: Merge bind9 from Debian unstable for 22.04

2022-02-10 Thread Dominic
It would be ideal if 9.18 could be included before the feature freeze.
Any news?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946833

Title:
  Merge bind9 from Debian unstable for 22.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1946833/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2022-01-17 Thread Dominic Pfromm
on 22.04 Daily Live from today everything works out of the Box on ASUS
C200 with Bay Trail

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871306

Title:
  [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in
  alsa-ucm-conf)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1871306/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-11-04 Thread Dominic Pfromm
Now I changed with my main Setup to 21.10 and after setting 
snd_intel_dspcfg.dsp_driver=2 the Sound is Pitched down and too slow. When I 
try to install firmware-sof-signed dpkg terminates with the error saying that 
the sof files are already installed by linux-firmware, but the required file 
intel/sof-tplg/sof-byt-max98090.tplg is not included in linux-firmware, or 
firmware-sof-signed.
After Installing https://github.com/thesofproject/sof-bin/ directly from github 
sound works perfectly without snd_intel_dspcfg.dsp_driver=2. 
So in 22.04 this should be included by default in linux-firmware.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871306

Title:
  [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in
  alsa-ucm-conf)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1871306/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946909] Re: Merge unbound from Debian unstable for 22.04

2021-10-23 Thread Dominic
Please ensure that whatever happens, Unbound on Ubuntu continues to be
compiled with the nghttp2 library. Unbound on Debian is currently not
compiled with nghttp2.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946909

Title:
  Merge unbound from Debian unstable for 22.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unbound/+bug/1946909/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-10-19 Thread Dominic Pfromm
In my readings without the snd_intel_dspcfg.dsp_driver=2 the system uses
sof mode which requires the package firmware-sof-signed. But I can not
do any testing about that from live system so I will do when I changed
permanent to 21.10 and provide the results.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871306

Title:
  [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in
  alsa-ucm-conf)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1871306/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-10-19 Thread Dominic Pfromm
** Attachment added: "alsainfo-inteldsp2.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm-conf/+bug/1871306/+attachment/5534257/+files/alsainfo-inteldsp2.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871306

Title:
  [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in
  alsa-ucm-conf)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1871306/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-10-19 Thread Dominic Pfromm
** Attachment added: "dmesg-inteldsp2.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm-conf/+bug/1871306/+attachment/5534256/+files/dmesg-inteldsp2.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871306

Title:
  [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in
  alsa-ucm-conf)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1871306/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-10-19 Thread Dominic Pfromm
Wow this solves the problem. Thanks for your fast and competent help.
For interest I will provide dmesg and alsainfo from 21.10 with dsp2

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871306

Title:
  [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in
  alsa-ucm-conf)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1871306/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-10-19 Thread Dominic Pfromm
** Attachment added: "dmesg.21.04.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm-conf/+bug/1871306/+attachment/5534213/+files/dmesg.21.04.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871306

Title:
  [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in
  alsa-ucm-conf)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1871306/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-10-19 Thread Dominic Pfromm
** Attachment added: "dmesg.21.10.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm-conf/+bug/1871306/+attachment/5534214/+files/dmesg.21.10.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871306

Title:
  [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in
  alsa-ucm-conf)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1871306/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-10-19 Thread Dominic Pfromm
Hey, thanks for your fast reply. When I do dmesg | grep 'journal -b0'
there is no result, or did I get something wrong?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871306

Title:
  [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in
  alsa-ucm-conf)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1871306/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-10-18 Thread Dominic Pfromm
Issue was fixed on Asus Chromebook C200 with Ubuntu 21.04. But on Ubuntu
21.10 the Card is not detected anymore.

Alsainfo 20.04:https://pastebin.com/raw/wXsT6w1r
Alsainfo 21.10 https://pastebin.com/raw/SWZNJ4AT

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871306

Title:
  [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in
  alsa-ucm-conf)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1871306/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871306] Re: [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in alsa-ucm-conf)

2021-10-18 Thread Dominic Pfromm
Issue has been fixed with 21.04 out of the Box, but is present again on
21.10. Chromebook C200.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871306

Title:
  [SRU] No sound from internal card chtmax98090 (missing UCM2 files in
  alsa-ucm-conf)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1871306/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1782709] Re: Updating systemd kills network on bionic

2021-08-30 Thread Dominic Raferd
I changed my networking setup to use netplan and the problem
disappeared.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782709

Title:
  Updating systemd kills network on bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1782709/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1927877] Re: DoH support is disabled

2021-06-21 Thread Dominic
The Debian MR has still not been actioned. Can we now consider enabling
DoH support in Ubuntu's Unbound package?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927877

Title:
  DoH support is disabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unbound/+bug/1927877/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930150] [NEW] package libpython3.9-minimal 3.9.5-1+focal1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/python3.9/typing.py', which is also in package libpython3.9-stdlib:amd64 3.9.5

2021-05-30 Thread Dominic Davis-Foster
Public bug reported:

This was encountered during an automated install of updates this
morning.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: libpython3.9-minimal 3.9.5-1+focal1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-50.56~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-50-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Sun May 30 07:04:26 2021
DuplicateSignature:
 package:libpython3.9-minimal:3.9.5-1+focal1
 Unpacking libpython3.9-stdlib:amd64 (3.9.5-3~20.04.1) over (3.9.5-1+focal1) ...
 dpkg: error processing archive 
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-P4IDTX/4-libpython3.9-stdlib_3.9.5-3~20.04.1_amd64.deb 
(--unpack):
  trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/python3.9/test/ann_module.py', which is also in 
package libpython3.9-testsuite 3.9.5-1+focal1
ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/python3.9/typing.py', which is also 
in package libpython3.9-stdlib:amd64 3.9.5-1+focal1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-07-05 (328 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: N/A
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
 apt  2.0.5
SourcePackage: python3.9
Title: package libpython3.9-minimal 3.9.5-1+focal1 failed to install/upgrade: 
trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/python3.9/typing.py', which is also in package 
libpython3.9-stdlib:amd64 3.9.5-1+focal1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: python3.9 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal package-conflict third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930150

Title:
  package libpython3.9-minimal 3.9.5-1+focal1 failed to install/upgrade:
  trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/python3.9/typing.py', which is also in
  package libpython3.9-stdlib:amd64 3.9.5-1+focal1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.9/+bug/1930150/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1927877] Re: DoH support is disabled

2021-05-12 Thread Dominic
I would support this, DNS-over-HTTPS is increasing in usage and its
omission is frustrating. I had to compile from source on Hirsute to
enable it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927877

Title:
  DoH support is disabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unbound/+bug/1927877/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1927877] Re: DoH support is disabled

2021-05-10 Thread Dominic
Thanks, I mostly copied the bug report from the Debian package. Is there
someone here that can nudge the package managers at Debian?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927877

Title:
  DoH support is disabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unbound/+bug/1927877/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1927877] [NEW] DoH support is disabled

2021-05-09 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported:

NLnetLabs has added DNS-over-HTTPS support to Unbound as of release
1.12.0. The current Ubuntu package delivering this release however has
no DoH support.

For DoH to work, Unbound simply would need to be compiled with the
nghttp2 library.

** Affects: unbound (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927877

Title:
  DoH support is disabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unbound/+bug/1927877/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1923264] Re: request-tracker4 is incompatible with mysql-server-8.0

2021-04-09 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #986707
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986707

** Also affects: request-tracker4 (Debian) via
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986707
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923264

Title:
  request-tracker4 is incompatible with mysql-server-8.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/request-tracker4/+bug/1923264/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1803391] Re: Systemd update installation hangs in unattended-upgrades InstallOnShutdown mode

2021-01-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
my problem is I think likely better covered by
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1782709

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1803391

Title:
  Systemd update installation hangs in unattended-upgrades
  InstallOnShutdown mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1803391/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1803391] Re: Systemd update installation hangs in unattended-upgrades InstallOnShutdown mode

2021-01-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
TTFN: 
To add to (and correct) my earlier comments: after the updating shown there, 
the machine had to be rebooted manually. Checking /var/log/apt/term.log it 
appears that the upgrade did complete successfully:

Log started: 2021-01-07  13:28:19
(Reading database ... 151099 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../libnss-systemd_237-3ubuntu10.43_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libnss-systemd:i386 (237-3ubuntu10.43) over (237-3ubuntu10.42) ...
Preparing to unpack .../libpam-systemd_237-3ubuntu10.43_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libpam-systemd:i386 (237-3ubuntu10.43) over (237-3ubuntu10.42) ...
Preparing to unpack .../systemd_237-3ubuntu10.43_i386.deb ...
Unpacking systemd (237-3ubuntu10.43) over (237-3ubuntu10.42) ...
Preparing to unpack .../libsystemd0_237-3ubuntu10.43_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libsystemd0:i386 (237-3ubuntu10.43) over (237-3ubuntu10.42) ...
Setting up libsystemd0:i386 (237-3ubuntu10.43) ...
Setting up systemd (237-3ubuntu10.43) ...
Setting up libnss-systemd:i386 (237-3ubuntu10.43) ...
Setting up libpam-systemd:i386 (237-3ubuntu10.43) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.27-3ubuntu1.4) ...
Processing triggers for man-db (2.8.3-2ubuntu0.1) ...
Processing triggers for dbus (1.12.2-1ubuntu1.2) ...
Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-21) ...
Log ended: 2021-01-07  13:29:10

... this even though the (ssh) interface died at the point where systemd
was being set up. The system now runs systemd 237-3ubuntu10.43. But
based on past experience I think the same thing will happen the next
time there is a version upgrade of systemd.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1803391

Title:
  Systemd update installation hangs in unattended-upgrades
  InstallOnShutdown mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1803391/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1803391] Re: Systemd update installation hangs in unattended-upgrades InstallOnShutdown mode

2021-01-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
I have this problem with Ubuntu 18.04 system set up with 'encrypted LVM'
(standard Ubuntu recipe as per the alternate installer). Whenever there
is systemd upgrade it hangs (whole machine crashes - other logins not
possible) and has to be manually rebooted (which is not ideal as the
machine is 1500 miles away). Note the installed version of systemd seems
to be 237-3ubuntu10.42, obviously I am unable to update it.

I have another machine also Ubuntu 18.04 system set up with 'encrypted
LVM' which has systemd 237-3ubuntu10.43 and does not have this problem.

Latest instance of this problem:
# apt upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
  libnss-systemd libpam-systemd libsystemd0 systemd
4 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 3,414 kB of archives.
After this operation, 7,168 B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Y
Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main i386 libnss-systemd 
i386 237-3ubuntu10.43 [111 kB]
Get:2 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main i386 libpam-systemd 
i386 237-3ubuntu10.43 [114 kB]
Get:3 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main i386 systemd i386 
237-3ubuntu10.43 [2,964 kB]
Get:4 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main i386 libsystemd0 
i386 237-3ubuntu10.43 [225 kB]
Fetched 3,414 kB in 1s (3,309 kB/s)
(Reading database ... 151099 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../libnss-systemd_237-3ubuntu10.43_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libnss-systemd:i386 (237-3ubuntu10.43) over (237-3ubuntu10.42) ...
Preparing to unpack .../libpam-systemd_237-3ubuntu10.43_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libpam-systemd:i386 (237-3ubuntu10.43) over (237-3ubuntu10.42) ...
Preparing to unpack .../systemd_237-3ubuntu10.43_i386.deb ...
Unpacking systemd (237-3ubuntu10.43) over (237-3ubuntu10.42) ...
Preparing to unpack .../libsystemd0_237-3ubuntu10.43_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libsystemd0:i386 (237-3ubuntu10.43) over (237-3ubuntu10.42) ...
Setting up libsystemd0:i386 (237-3ubuntu10.43) ...
Setting up systemd (237-3ubuntu10.43) ...

[system dies]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1803391

Title:
  Systemd update installation hangs in unattended-upgrades
  InstallOnShutdown mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1803391/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1903914] [NEW] Launching Oracle Sql Developer crashes due to openjdk

2020-11-11 Thread Dominic Welter
Public bug reported:

Oracle SQL Developer
 Copyright (c) 2005, 2020, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
#  SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x7f7dbe01443a, pid=47548, tid=47630
#
# JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (11.0.9+11) (build 
11.0.9+11-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04)
# Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (11.0.9+11-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04, mixed 
mode, tiered, compressed oops, g1 gc, linux-amd64)
# Problematic frame:
# V  [libjvm.so+0x8ae43a]
#
# Core dump will be written. Default location: Core dumps may be processed with 
"/usr/share/apport/apport %p %s %c %d %P %E" (or dumping to 
/home/dominic/Downloads/sqldeveloper/sqldeveloper/bin/core.47548)
#

** Affects: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Summary changed:

- Launching Oracle Sql Developer crash due to openjdk
+ Launching Oracle Sql Developer crashes due to openjdk

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903914

Title:
  Launching Oracle Sql Developer crashes due to openjdk

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-lts/+bug/1903914/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1902401] [NEW] touchpad not working

2020-10-31 Thread Dominic Trybus
Public bug reported:

Immediately after installing ubuntu 20.04 LTS on my new laptop from the
default Windows 10 in S installation, my touchpad on my Lenovo IdeaPad 3
15IIL05 stopped working.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: linux-image-5.4.0-52-generic 5.4.0-52.57
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-52.57-generic 5.4.65
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-52-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.10
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  dominic1211 F pulseaudio
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sat Oct 31 22:25:25 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-11-01 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
Lsusb:
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04f2:b6d9 Chicony Electronics Co., Ltd Integrated Camera
 Bus 001 Device 004: ID 8087:0aaa Intel Corp. 
 Bus 001 Device 002: ID 046d:c52f Logitech, Inc. Unifying Receiver
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
MachineType: LENOVO 81WE
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-52-generic 
root=UUID=facc9b9f-0d1e-408b-b048-4e9e209c09b3 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
RelatedPackageVersions:
 linux-restricted-modules-5.4.0-52-generic N/A
 linux-backports-modules-5.4.0-52-generic  N/A
 linux-firmware1.187.3
SourcePackage: linux
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 08/10/2020
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: EMCN40WW
dmi.board.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag
dmi.board.name: LNVNB161216
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: SDK0R32866 WIN
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: IdeaPad 3 15IIL05
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrEMCN40WW:bd08/10/2020:svnLENOVO:pn81WE:pvrIdeaPad315IIL05:rvnLENOVO:rnLNVNB161216:rvrSDK0R32866WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrIdeaPad315IIL05:
dmi.product.family: IdeaPad 3 15IIL05
dmi.product.name: 81WE
dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_81WE_BU_idea_FM_IdeaPad 3 15IIL05
dmi.product.version: IdeaPad 3 15IIL05
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

** Attachment added: "devices"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902401/+attachment/5429900/+files/devices

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902401

Title:
  touchpad not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1902401/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871794] Re: [Bluetooth] No audio output/input in HSP/HFP mode

2020-10-01 Thread Dominic Swaine
Affected by this also.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871794

Title:
  [Bluetooth] No audio output/input in HSP/HFP mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1871794/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1892569] [NEW] Font scaling not working correctly 20.04

2020-08-22 Thread dominic
Public bug reported:

During log in screen and after all text on desktop is enlarged. (no
accessibility settings are turned on)

During log in, text scaling can be reset by turning on and off the text
scaling accessibility option, however scaling after login is still
messed up.

After log in, manual reset of font scaling factor in gnome-tweak
software is needed.


Settings are not saved after reboot.

** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892569

Title:
  Font scaling not working correctly 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1892569/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1875950] Re: rsyslog log files failing to rotate

2020-05-02 Thread Dominic
VM reinstalled, logs are rotating now.

** Changed in: logrotate (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875950

Title:
  rsyslog log files failing to rotate

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logrotate/+bug/1875950/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1875950] Re: rsyslog log files failing to rotate

2020-04-29 Thread Dominic
My mistake, error does not appear with:

   sudo logrotate -d /etc/logrotate.conf

For some reason my logs are not being rotated though.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875950

Title:
  rsyslog log files failing to rotate

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logrotate/+bug/1875950/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1875950] [NEW] rsyslog log files failing to rotate

2020-04-29 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported:

In focal, /etc/logrotate.conf contains:

   su root adm

logrotate does not rotate files in /var/log:

   error: skipping "/var/log/syslog" because parent directory has insecure 
permissions
   (It's world writable or writable by group which is not "root") Set "su" 
directive
   in config file to tell logrotate which user/group should be used for 
rotation.

Parent directory permissions:

  drwxrwxr-x  9 root syslog 4096 Apr 29 17:17 log

** Affects: logrotate (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875950

Title:
  rsyslog log files failing to rotate

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logrotate/+bug/1875950/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1875495] [NEW] Additional notifications that there are updates available to install appear on screen even if previous notifications have not been dismissed,

2020-04-27 Thread Dominic Davis-Foster
Public bug reported:

Having left my computer logged in but locked for a few days, I came back
to it to find 9 dialog boxes notifying me that there are new updates to
install. I would have expected a new dialog to only appear if there is
not already a dialog present on the screen, otherwise a lot of these
dialogs could build up.


Ubuntu Release Info:
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS
Release:18.04

notify-osd version: 0.9.35+16.04.20160415-0ubuntu2

A screenshot showing the 9 dialogs is attached. These all originally
appeared on top of each other in the centre of the screen, but I moved
them to see how many there were.

I think this is actually a bug in either the Software or Software
Updater programs, but running `ubuntu-bug -w` and clicking the dialog
showed notify-osd as the program responsible for the window.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: notify-osd 0.9.35+16.04.20160415-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-23.24~18.04.1-generic 5.0.15
Uname: Linux 5.0.21+ x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.14
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity:Unity7:ubuntu
Date: Mon Apr 27 21:08:25 2020
DesktopSession: 'ubuntu'
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/notify-osd
GtkTheme: 'Ambiance'
IconTheme: 'ubuntu-mono-dark'
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-02-07 (80 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20190805)
MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.0.21+ 
root=UUID=97111647-8898-45cb-94b2-704f31e37b9c ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
RelatedPackageVersions:
 xserver-xorg N/A
 libgl1-mesa-glx  19.2.8-0ubuntu0~18.04.3
 libdrm2  2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.2
 xserver-xorg-video-intel N/A
 xserver-xorg-video-ati   N/A
SourcePackage: notify-osd
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 10/16/2019
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 2901
dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string
dmi.board.name: ROG STRIX B450-I GAMING
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Default string
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Default string
dmi.chassis.version: Default string
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr2901:bd10/16/2019:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnROGSTRIXB450-IGAMING:rvrRev1.xx:cvnDefaultstring:ct3:cvrDefaultstring:
dmi.product.family: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.product.name: System Product Name
dmi.product.sku: SKU
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer

** Affects: notify-osd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic

** Attachment added: "A screenshot showing the 9 dialogs."
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875495/+attachment/5362034/+files/Selection_005.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875495

Title:
  Additional notifications that there are updates available to install
  appear on screen even if previous notifications have not been
  dismissed,

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/notify-osd/+bug/1875495/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1853585] Re: Intel graphics card not detected and reverts to llvmpipe

2019-11-22 Thread Dominic Jaques
** Summary changed:

- Intel graphics card not detected, reverts to llvmpipe
+ Intel graphics card not detected and reverts to llvmpipe

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  Ubuntu 18.04 install (also seen on 16) is unable to detect integrated Intel 
graphics card (Intel Iris Plus). Using a Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 7390 the machine is 
unable to detect attached monitors, change resolutions, or adjust brightness.
  
  [Information]
- There is a dual boot Windows 10 partition, which can access the integrated 
graphics card without issue and connects to attached monitors on boot.
+ There is a dual boot Windows 10 partition, which can access the integrated 
graphics card without issue and connects to attached monitors on boot. 
Reinstallation following destruction of the W10 partition reveals the issue is 
unaffected by this duality. 
  
  $ lsb_release -rd
  Description:  Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS
  Release:  18.04
  
  % uname -o
  4.15.0-70-generic
  
  $ apt-cache policy xserver-xorg-video-intel
  xserver-xorg-video-intel:
    Installed: 2:2.99.917+git20171229-1
    Candidate: 2:2.99.917+git20171229-1
    Version table:
   *** 2:2.99.917+git20171229-1 500
  500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  
  $ lspci -v
  00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Device 8a52 (rev 07) 
(prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Dell Device 08b0
   Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 255
   Memory at 603d00 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
   Memory at 40 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
   I/O ports at 4000 [size=64]
   [virtual] Expansion ROM at 000c [disabled] [size=128K]
   Capabilities: 
  
  System Settings -> Details:
  Graphics llvmpipe (LLVM 8.0, 256 bits)
  
  [Attempted Fix]
  $ sudo apt-get purge nux-tools
  Fix for #1767468
  /etc/X11/Xsession.d/50_check_unity_support is not present.
  No changes observed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853585

Title:
  Intel graphics card not detected and reverts to llvmpipe

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1853585/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1853585] [NEW] Intel graphics card not detected, reverts to llvmpipe

2019-11-22 Thread Dominic Jaques
Public bug reported:

[Impact]
Ubuntu 18.04 install (also seen on 16) is unable to detect integrated Intel 
graphics card (Intel Iris Plus). Using a Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 7390 the machine is 
unable to detect attached monitors, change resolutions, or adjust brightness.

[Information]
There is a dual boot Windows 10 partition, which can access the integrated 
graphics card without issue and connects to attached monitors on boot.

$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS
Release:18.04

% uname -o
4.15.0-70-generic

$ apt-cache policy xserver-xorg-video-intel
xserver-xorg-video-intel:
  Installed: 2:2.99.917+git20171229-1
  Candidate: 2:2.99.917+git20171229-1
  Version table:
 *** 2:2.99.917+git20171229-1 500
500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

$ lspci -v
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Device 8a52 (rev 07) 
(prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Dell Device 08b0
 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 255
 Memory at 603d00 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
 Memory at 40 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
 I/O ports at 4000 [size=64]
 [virtual] Expansion ROM at 000c [disabled] [size=128K]
 Capabilities: 

System Settings -> Details:
Graphics llvmpipe (LLVM 8.0, 256 bits)

[Attempted Fix]
$ sudo apt-get purge nux-tools
Fix for #1767468
/etc/X11/Xsession.d/50_check_unity_support is not present.
No changes observed.

** Affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

+ [Impact]
+ Ubuntu install is unable to detect integrated Intel graphics card (Intel Iris 
Plus). Using a Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 7390 the machine is unable to detect attached 
monitors, change resolutions, or adjust brightness. 
+ 
+ [Information]
+ There is a dual boot Windows 10 partition, which can access the integrated 
graphics card without issue and connects to attached monitors on boot. 
+ 
  $ lsb_release -rd
  Description:  Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS
  Release:  18.04
  
  % uname -o
  4.15.0-70-generic
  
  $ apt-cache policy xserver-xorg-video-intel
  xserver-xorg-video-intel:
-   Installed: 2:2.99.917+git20171229-1
-   Candidate: 2:2.99.917+git20171229-1
-   Version table:
-  *** 2:2.99.917+git20171229-1 500
- 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages
- 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
+   Installed: 2:2.99.917+git20171229-1
+   Candidate: 2:2.99.917+git20171229-1
+   Version table:
+  *** 2:2.99.917+git20171229-1 500
+ 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages
+ 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  
  $ lspci -v
  00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Device 8a52 (rev 07) 
(prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
-   Subsystem: Dell Device 08b0
-   Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 255
-   Memory at 603d00 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
-   Memory at 40 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
-   I/O ports at 4000 [size=64]
-   [virtual] Expansion ROM at 000c [disabled] [size=128K]
-   Capabilities: 
- 
+  Subsystem: Dell Device 08b0
+  Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 255
+  Memory at 603d00 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
+  Memory at 40 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
+  I/O ports at 4000 [size=64]
+  [virtual] Expansion ROM at 000c [disabled] [size=128K]
+  Capabilities: 
  
  System Settings -> Details:
  Graphics llvmpipe (LLVM 8.0, 256 bits)
  
- Attempted fix:
- $ sudo apt-get purge nux-tools 
+ [Attempted Fix]
+ $ sudo apt-get purge nux-tools
  Fix for #1767468
- /etc/X11/Xsession.d/50_check_unity_support is not present. 
+ /etc/X11/Xsession.d/50_check_unity_support is not present.
  No changes observed.

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
- Ubuntu install is unable to detect integrated Intel graphics card (Intel Iris 
Plus). Using a Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 7390 the machine is unable to detect attached 
monitors, change resolutions, or adjust brightness. 
+ Ubuntu 18.04 install (also seen on 16) is unable to detect integrated Intel 
graphics card (Intel Iris Plus). Using a Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 7390 the machine is 
unable to detect attached monitors, change resolutions, or adjust brightness.
  
  [Information]
- There is a dual boot Windows 10 partition, which can access the integrated 
graphics card without issue and connects to attached monitors on boot. 
+ There is a dual boot Windows 10 partition, which can access the integrated 
graphics card without issue and connects to attached monitors on boot.
  
  $ lsb_release -rd
  Description:  Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS
  Release:  18.04
  
  % uname -o
  4.15.0-70-generic
  
  $ apt-cache policy xserver-xorg-video-intel
  xserver-xorg-video-intel:
    Installed: 2:2.99.917+git20171229-1
    Candidate: 2:2.99.917+git20171229-1
    Version table:
   *** 2:2.99.917+git20171229-1 500
  500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu 

[Bug 1853585] Re: Intel graphics card not detected, reverts to llvmpipe

2019-11-22 Thread Dominic Jaques
Related bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/+bug/1768610

Possible duplicate, but unclear:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1772366

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853585

Title:
  Intel graphics card not detected, reverts to llvmpipe

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1853585/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1767468] Re: Upgrade from 16.04 to 18.04, then uninstalling unity disables hardware acceleration

2019-11-22 Thread Dominic Jaques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1768610 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768610

I have witnessed a _related_ issue but it does not appear to be
precisely the same problem.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1853585

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767468

Title:
  Upgrade from 16.04 to 18.04, then uninstalling unity disables hardware
  acceleration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/+bug/1767468/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1853466] [NEW] I have installed the xserver-xorg-video-intel package but cannot detect monitor

2019-11-21 Thread Dominic Jaques
Public bug reported:

The monitor U2414H is not detected by Ubuntu, the graphics card
displayed in settings is llvmpipe (LLVM 8.0, 256 bits). I believe it
should be "Intel Iris Plus Graphics", which is what shows up in Windows
Device Manager (my device is set up to dual boot).

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-70.79-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-70-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
.tmp.unity_support_test.1:
 
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.9
Architecture: amd64
BootLog:
 
CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Thu Nov 21 15:03:21 2019
DistUpgraded: SystemError: E:Setting in Stop via TCSAFLUSH for stdin failed! - 
tcsetattr (5: Input/output error), W:Operation was interrupted before it could 
finish
DistroCodename: bionic
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus:
 backport-iwlwifi, 8042, 4.15.0-70-generic, x86_64: installed
 bcmwl, 6.30.223.271+bdcom, 4.15.0-70-generic, x86_64: installed
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation Device [8086:8a52] (rev 07) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:08b0]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-11-15 (6 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20190227)
MachineType: Dell Inc. XPS 13 7390 2-in-1
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.15.0-70-generic 
root=UUID=4540fdd6-b986-43c5-99ec-e2baa34ca219 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
Renderer: Software
SourcePackage: xorg
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2019-11-19 (2 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 09/17/2019
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 1.0.13
dmi.board.name: 06CDVY
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.board.version: A00
dmi.chassis.type: 31
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.0.13:bd09/17/2019:svnDellInc.:pnXPS1373902-in-1:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn06CDVY:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct31:cvr:
dmi.product.family: XPS
dmi.product.name: XPS 13 7390 2-in-1
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.13.1+18.04.20180302-0ubuntu1
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 19.0.8-0ubuntu0~18.04.3
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 19.0.8-0ubuntu0~18.04.3
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.3
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.10.5-1ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:18.0.1-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20171229-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.15-2
xserver.bootTime: Thu Nov 21 15:01:07 2019
xserver.configfile: default
xserver.errors:
 open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory
 open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory
 Screen 0 deleted because of no matching config section.
 AIGLX: reverting to software rendering
xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
xserver.outputs:
 
xserver.version: 2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.3

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853466

Title:
  I have installed the xserver-xorg-video-intel package but cannot
  detect monitor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1853466/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1849298] Re: unattended-upgrade is checking o=UbuntuESM, a=eoan-security when disabled in config

2019-10-22 Thread Dominic
I just realised it's enabled by /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/51ubuntu-advantage-
esm. Closing bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849298

Title:
  unattended-upgrade is checking o=UbuntuESM,a=eoan-security when
  disabled in config

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1849298/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1849298] Re: unattended-upgrade is checking o=UbuntuESM, a=eoan-security when disabled in config

2019-10-22 Thread Dominic
Not sure I can close the bug. Nevertheless it's confusing to have this
configuration in two places. Maybe deserves a review.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849298

Title:
  unattended-upgrade is checking o=UbuntuESM,a=eoan-security when
  disabled in config

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1849298/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1849298] [NEW] unattended-upgrade is checking o=UbuntuESM, a=eoan-security when disabled in config

2019-10-22 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported:

My /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades file looks like this:

Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed-Origins {
"${distro_id}:${distro_codename}";
"${distro_id}:${distro_codename}-security";
// Extended Security Maintenance; doesn't necessarily exist for
// every release and this system may not have it installed, but if
// available, the policy for updates is such that unattended-upgrades
// should also install from here by default.
//  "${distro_id}ESM:${distro_codename}";
//  "${distro_id}ESM:${distro_codename}-security";
"${distro_id}:${distro_codename}-updates";
"${distro_id}:${distro_codename}-proposed";
"${distro_id}:${distro_codename}-backports";
};

Nevertheless, the logs show that o=UbuntuESM,a=eoan-security is allowed
for updates despite not being enabled in config:

2019-10-22 08:10:46,075 INFO Initial blacklist :
2019-10-22 08:10:46,077 INFO Initial whitelist:
2019-10-22 08:10:46,077 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
2019-10-22 08:10:46,077 INFO Allowed origins are: o=Ubuntu,a=eoan, 
o=Ubuntu,a=eoan-security, o=Ubuntu,a=eoan-updates, o=Ubuntu,a=eoan-proposed, 
o=Ubuntu,a=eoan-backports, o=UbuntuESM,a=eoan-security

** Affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849298

Title:
  unattended-upgrade is checking o=UbuntuESM,a=eoan-security when
  disabled in config

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1849298/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1822351] Re: Nautilus does not open after updating to 19.04

2019-09-24 Thread Dominic Mayers via ubuntu-bugs
Also in case that helps, I experience the same bug. In addition, #2 did
not work for me. Immediately after executing "tracker reset -e" on a
shell, nautilus shows instantly after a click, but the problem comes
back at the next reboot.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1822351

Title:
  Nautilus does not open after updating to 19.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1822351/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1785573] Re: incrontab changes its contents, and fails, under certain conditions

2019-09-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
These points are not relevant here and are old: some of them are fixed
in version 0.12. If the OP still has concerns they should be taken up
with the incron maintainer at https://github.com/ar-/incron.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785573

Title:
  incrontab changes its contents, and fails, under certain conditions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/incron/+bug/1785573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1819977] Re: razor2 had unknown error during get_server_info

2019-03-19 Thread Dominic Raferd
Great workaround tip thanks @strredwolf.

You can use either 208.83.137.117 or 208.83.137.118, the current problem
is with 208.83.139.205.

To test, set the ip you want to test in /etc/hosts. Example:
208.83.139.205 discovery.razor.cloudmark.com

Then:
# echo "test" | spamassassin -D razor2 2>&1 | grep " csl"
...Razor Discovery Server discovery.razor.cloudmark.com had no valid csl 
servers...
OR
...Discovery Server discovery.razor.cloudmark.com replying with 
csl=c302.cloudmark.com...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1819977

Title:
  razor2 had unknown error during get_server_info

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/1819977/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1817466] Re: Ram usage increases gradually until it reaches 100% and a hard reset is needed.

2019-03-05 Thread Dominic
After switching back to gdm3 I have checked RAM usage repeatedly and the
problem has not recurred.  There is a gradual increase in RAM usage, but
it is no longer enough to freeze the display.  As a hypothesis, is it
possible that something about enabling lightdm could have solved the
problem even though I am now running gdm3?  I attach the output of
processes.txt anyway, this was after several hours use, with RAM having
slowly increased to about 70%.

** Attachment added: "processes.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1817466/+attachment/5243622/+files/processes.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817466

Title:
  Ram usage increases gradually until it reaches 100% and a hard reset
  is needed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1817466/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1817466] Re: Ram usage increases gradually until it reaches 100% and a hard reset is needed.

2019-02-24 Thread Dominic
I have switched to lightdm to avoid the bug, I will switch back this
evening to cause the problem again, RAM usage was measured by System
Monitor, CPU usage was not high, only RAM usage which slowly increased
until the display froze.  The issue has been reported by multiple users
in the forum (see link in my original message).  Currently running
default Ubuntu desktop with lightdm, RAM usage remains steady over
several hours usage.


On Mon, 2019-02-25 at 02:21 +, Daniel van Vugt wrote:
> Can you please provide a screenshot from what you are using to assess
> that RAM usage is "100%"?
> 
> Also, next time the problem happens please also run this command:
> 
>   ps auxw > processes.txt
> 
> and then send us the resulting file 'processes.txt'
> 
> ** Changed in: gdm3 (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Incomplete
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817466

Title:
  Ram usage increases gradually until it reaches 100% and a hard reset
  is needed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1817466/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1817466] [NEW] Ram usage increases gradually until it reaches 100% and a hard reset is needed.

2019-02-24 Thread Dominic
Public bug reported:

Running Ubuntu 18.04 on Dell Latitude-E5420 with 3.7 GB RAM Gnome 3.28.2. 
Updated from Ubuntu 16.04.  Applications freeze after about an hour continuous 
use, while applications are running RAM use increases gradually typically from 
about 55% to 100%.  
The solution is to use lightdm as the display manager.  Default Ubuntu DE 
appears to work fine with lightdm.
I tested other DEs with gdm3 and the same problem was present. The problem has 
been reported in forums
https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2390915  with a number of users 
reporting that the solution is to use lightdm,

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: gdm3 3.28.3-0ubuntu18.04.4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-43.46-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-43-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: lkp_Ubuntu_4_15_0_43_46_generic_47 wl
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.5
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sun Feb 24 14:21:52 2019
InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-09-27 (150 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20180731)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gdm3
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2019-01-29 (25 days ago)

** Affects: gdm3 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817466

Title:
  Ram usage increases gradually until it reaches 100% and a hard reset
  is needed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1817466/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1802334] Re: update tesseract-ocr to 4.0.0 stable

2019-02-04 Thread Dominic Raferd
Confirm that this needs doing, the beta version installed in Bionic
(18.04) is flawed, for instance running for orientation (--psm 0) gives
segmentation fault. Installing stable 4.0.0 (using ppa
https://launchpad.net/~alex-p/+archive/ubuntu/tesseract-ocr) gets rid of
this problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1802334

Title:
  update tesseract-ocr to 4.0.0 stable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tesseract/+bug/1802334/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1812366] [NEW] outdated version, please update

2019-01-18 Thread Dominic Raferd
Public bug reported:

This version (0.23.0-1) is now outdated and I believe this is why I
receive warning mails from letsencrypt like this:

Hello,

**Action is required to prevent your Let's Encrypt certificate renewals
from breaking.**

Your Let’s Encrypt client used ACME TLS-SNI-01 domain validation to
issue a certificate in the past 60 days.

TLS-SNI-01 validation is reaching end-of-life and will stop working on
**February 13th, 2019.**

You need to update your ACME client to use an alternative validation
method (HTTP-01, DNS-01 or TLS-ALPN-01) before this date or your
certificate renewals will break and existing certificates will start to
expire.

If you need help updating your ACME client, please open a new topic in
the Help category of the Let's Encrypt community forum:

  https://community.letsencrypt.org/c/help

Please answer all of the questions in the topic template so we can help
you.

For more information about the TLS-SNI-01 end-of-life please see our API
announcement:

https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/february-13-2019-end-of-life-for-
all-tls-sni-01-validation-support/74209

Thank you,
  Let's Encrypt Staff

** Affects: python-certbot (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812366

Title:
  outdated version, please update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-certbot/+bug/1812366/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1739936] Re: Screen flickering on Razer Blade Stealth (Late 2017) - [drm:intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun?

2018-12-01 Thread Dominic Lemire via ubuntu-bugs
I'm also on Stealth late 2016 (QHD). So far, I survived using
i915.enable_rc6=0 until that parameter was removed from newer kernels,
then I switched to using intel_idle.max_cstate=4. I still wish someone
would find the real root cause of this issue.

Today, I noticed the flickering stops completely when I do "rmmod nvme"
(booted into usb live ubuntu). Anyone knows how these 2 drivers can
possibly affect each-other?

The flickering also temporarily stops while I'm writing a disk image to
the nvme ssd.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1739936

Title:
  Screen flickering on Razer Blade Stealth (Late 2017) -
  [drm:intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe A
  FIFO underrun?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1739936/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1802090] Re: update overwrites sshd_config

2018-11-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
attached: /var/log/apt/term.log

** Attachment added: "term.log.gz"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1802090/+attachment/5210010/+files/term.log.gz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1802090

Title:
  update overwrites sshd_config

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1802090/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1802090] Re: update overwrites sshd_config

2018-11-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
The update to 18.04 was a long time ago, the problem occurred this
morning...

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 13:01, Marc Deslauriers <
marc.deslauri...@canonical.com> wrote:

> It looks like you upgraded from Ubuntu 16.04 to Ubuntu 18.04.
> >From the log file:
>
> Unpacking openssh-server (1:7.6p1-4) over (1:7.2p2-4ubuntu2.4) ...
>
> Then the upgrade asked you what to do with the modified conffile, again,
> from the log:
>
> Configuring openssh-server
> sshd_config: A new version (/tmp/filerMG8sJ) of configuration file
> /etc/ssh/sshd_config is available, but the
> version installed currently has been locally modified.
> What do you want to do about modified configuration file sshd_config?
>  install the package maintainer's
> version
> keep the local version currently installed
> show the differences between the versions
> show a side-by-side difference between the versions
> start a new shell to examine the situation
> 
> # nano /tmp/filerMG8sJ
> 
> Replacing config file /etc/ssh/sshd_config with new version
>
> At which point you edited the file and instructed the upgrade process to
> use the new package version.
>
> I'm not quite sure what you expect this bug to resolve, the package
> seems to be acting as it should.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1802090
>
> Title:
>   update overwrites sshd_config
>
> Status in openssh package in Ubuntu:
>   Incomplete
>
> Bug description:
>   The latest update for Bionic (18.04.1) either overwrote or modified my
>   /etc/ssh/sshd_config with the result that I could no longer access my
>   machine using ssh.
>
>   A specific
>   Port [x]
>   line was removed and replaced by:
>   #Port 22
>
>   This was the only change. It happened as part of an automated process
>   this morning  - presumably a security update.
>
>   Was this behaviour intended?!
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1802090/+subscriptions
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1802090

Title:
  update overwrites sshd_config

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1802090/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1802090] Re: update overwrites sshd_config

2018-11-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
It was an automatic update, file attached

** Attachment added: "apt-term.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1802090/+attachment/5209992/+files/apt-term.log.gz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1802090

Title:
  update overwrites sshd_config

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1802090/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1802090] [NEW] update overwrites sshd_config

2018-11-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
Public bug reported:

The latest update for Bionic (18.04.1) either overwrote or modified my
/etc/ssh/sshd_config with the result that I could no longer access my
machine using ssh.

A specific
Port [x]
line was removed and replaced by:
#Port 22

This was the only change. It happened as part of an automated process
this morning  - presumably a security update.

Was this behaviour intended?!

** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1802090

Title:
  update overwrites sshd_config

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1802090/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1796863] Re: Upgrade to version 3.4.2 for Bionic

2018-10-24 Thread Dominic Raferd
Yes please can we have this asap

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1796863

Title:
  Upgrade to version 3.4.2 for Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/1796863/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1796546] [NEW] wrong hard-coded socket location in amavisd-release

2018-10-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
Public bug reported:

In amavis 2.11 the utility amavisd-release has a hard-coded location for
amavisd's unix socket at line 90 as '/var/amavis/amavisd.sock' which is
not aligned with the location actually set in
/etc/amavis/conf.d/25-amavis_helpers where it is
"/var/lib/amavis/amavisd.sock".

This causes amavisd-release to fail when trying to release a quarantined
email for delivery.

Changing the hard-coded location in /usr/sbin/amavisd-release at line 90
to match the setting in /etc/amavis/conf.d/25-amavis_helpers fixes the
problem.

The previous version of amavis (2.10), used with Ubuntu 16.04, did not
have this problem I think. I believe it is new with the version
installed (using apt-get) with Ubuntu 18.04 (i.e. 2.11). I have not
tested intervening distros.

This bug is an incompatibility between the setting in debian package of
amavis 2.11 which has:

/etc/amavis/conf.d/25-amavis_helpers at line 25:
$unix_socketname = "/var/lib/amavis/amavisd.sock";
/usr/sbin/amavisd-release at line 90:
$socketname = '/var/amavis/amavisd.sock';

As directory /var/amavis does not exist, the only realistic solution is
to change the setting in amavisd-release.

The problem arises because in Debian (and hence Ubuntu), $MYHOME is
hard-coded to /var/lib/amavis whereas in the default installation, it is
/var/amavis. And amavisd-release does not seem to use the $MYHOME
setting.

** Affects: amavisd-new (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1796546

Title:
  wrong hard-coded socket location in amavisd-release

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amavisd-new/+bug/1796546/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1786195] Re: broken audio/muffled, no system audio

2018-09-10 Thread Dominic Anderson
The bug was not gone when using kernel 4.4

there was also an additional kernel between 4.4 and 4.15 that was
available. I tried that as well. same result.no fix.

Since then I backed up my system and did a completely fresh install of
18.04LTS and the issue is still not fixed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786195

Title:
  broken audio/muffled, no system audio

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786195/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1786195] Re: broken audio/muffled, no system audio

2018-09-10 Thread Dominic Anderson
The bug was not gone when using kernel 4.4

there was also an additional kernel between 4.4 and 4.15 that was
available. I tried that as well. same result.no fix.

Since then I backed up my system and did a completely fresh install of
18.04LTS and the issue is still not fixed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786195

Title:
  broken audio/muffled, no system audio

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786195/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1786195] Re: broken audio/muffled, no system audio

2018-08-09 Thread Dominic Anderson
"16.04 used kernel 4.4 and you are presently using kernel 4.15"

Have been running 18.04 for a week. Until earlier today issue was not
present, each day until now however, had been just fine. Is "4.15" the
same kernel used at install of "18.04"?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786195

Title:
  broken audio/muffled, no system audio

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786195/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1786195] Re: broken audio/muffled, no system audio

2018-08-09 Thread Dominic Anderson
uname -a
Linux novgorod-LinuxBook 4.4.146-0404146-generic #201808061143 SMP Mon Aug 6 
15:51:56 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786195

Title:
  broken audio/muffled, no system audio

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786195/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >