[Bug 1769036] [NEW] package libcilkrts5:amd64 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
Public bug reported: ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: libcilkrts5:amd64 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-122.146-generic 4.4.117 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-122-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.16 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu May 3 17:21:39 2018 Dependencies: gcc-5-base 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9 gcc-6-base 6.0.1-0ubuntu1 libc6 2.23-0ubuntu10 libgcc1 1:6.0.1-0ubuntu1 libstdc++6 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9 DpkgHistoryLog: Start-Date: 2018-05-03 17:21:03 Commandline: aptdaemon role='role-commit-packages' sender=':1.96' Install: linux-headers-4.4.0-122:amd64 (4.4.0-122.146, automatic), linux-image-4.4.0-122-generic:amd64 (4.4.0-122.146, automatic), linux-signed-image-4.4.0-122-generic:amd64 (4.4.0-122.146, automatic), linux-image-extra-4.4.0-122-generic:amd64 (4.4.0-122.146, automatic), linux-headers-4.4.0-122-generic:amd64 (4.4.0-122.146, automatic) Upgrade: linux-headers-generic:amd64 (4.4.0.121.127, 4.4.0.122.128), linux-libc-dev:amd64 (4.4.0-121.145, 4.4.0-122.146), ifupdown:amd64 (0.8.10ubuntu1.2, 0.8.10ubuntu1.3), linux-image-generic:amd64 (4.4.0.121.127, 4.4.0.122.128), linux-signed-image-generic:amd64 (4.4.0.121.127, 4.4.0.122.128), linux-signed-generic:amd64 (4.4.0.121.127, 4.4.0.122.128), linux-generic:amd64 (4.4.0.121.127, 4.4.0.122.128) DuplicateSignature: package:libcilkrts5:amd64:5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9 Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-19) ... ureadahead will be reprofiled on next reboot dpkg: error processing package libcilkrts5:amd64 (--configure): package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should ErrorMessage: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-03-06 (58 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160719) RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.4 apt 1.2.26 SourcePackage: gcc-5 Title: package libcilkrts5:amd64 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gcc-5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package need-duplicate-check xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1769036 Title: package libcilkrts5:amd64 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-5/+bug/1769036/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1643334] Re: root-ca-cert.crt could not be used
I am having this problem on a corporate network with an internal CA. we cannot view any internal sites because there appears to be *no* way to get webbrowser-app to accept our internal CA, even while all other browsers on a system accept it. We are using version 0.23+16.04.20161028-0ubuntu2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1643334 Title: root-ca-cert.crt could not be used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webbrowser-app/+bug/1643334/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 943663] Re: [needs-packaging] Request for libreoffice-help-tr Package
Thank you for your quick response. turkish help is currently at 44% completion. That does not yet warrant it to be packaged. Please help improving the translations upstream and when the translation is at 80% it will get packed I am one of the tr-localizators of LibreOffice. And, yes, thats the reason why i wished it to be packaged. I and my friends are working hard to increase the pct of the help contents. However, working on a updated version of LibreOffice will be better to translatecompare and understand the help strings. It will be better to find a way to install TDF's deb packages. (There is no Linux distro serving LibreOffice 3.5 help files for tr even no for 3.4x, even only Pardus serves help files but it will not update due to EOL) BTW, i respect to your critera, but i see that, Galician is at %54pct Slovak is at %58 and Hindi is only %12 and they are packaged, is there something i miss? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943663 Title: [needs-packaging] Request for libreoffice-help-tr Package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/943663/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 943663] [NEW] Request for libreoffice-help-tr Package
Public bug reported: Hello, Turkish help package of LibreOffice is missing in the repos. [1- http://packages.ubuntu.com/oneiric/libreoffice-l10n-tr] It will be very nice to have Turkish embed help for LibreOffice. [2- https://translations.documentfoundation.org/tr/] TDF's (.deb)help packages cannto be installed due to the dependencies [3-http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/stable/3.5.0/deb/x86/LibO_3.5 .0_Linux_x86_helppack-deb_tr.tar.gz] 1-I am using 11.10 Oneric 2-LibreOffice 3.5 3- Having Turkish embed help in LibreOffice 4- Unfortunately l10n package has no tr-help Best regards, Zeki ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-packaging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943663 Title: Request for libreoffice-help-tr Package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/943663/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 905128] Re: Unity 3D test failed when attaching external monitor
screenshot just attached. ** Attachment added: problem1.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/905128/+attachment/2641895/+files/problem1.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905128 Title: Unity 3D test failed when attaching external monitor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/905128/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 905128] Re: Unity 3D test failed when attaching external monitor
I could access the 'Monitor Preferences' application to perhaps try different display settings. The above line (in paragraph 6 of Bug Description, after connecting the external monitor / broken display) should read I could not access the 'Monitor Preferences' application to perhaps try different display settings. regards - gsn -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905128 Title: Unity 3D test failed when attaching external monitor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/905128/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 905128] [NEW] Unity 3D test failed when attaching external monitor
Public bug reported: Installed Oneiric Ocelot on an Alpha 32 bit laptop with 16gB memory, Omega 3D Video controller, 4gB Video memory and Omicron screen display with a 640 X 480 native display resolution. Display during installation and post- installation operations went OK. Monitor preferences were adjustable. Then started the system tests. Connected an Epsilon external monitor to the VGA port of the laptop. This resulted in a broken display, which is shown in the attachment problem1.png I could access the 'Monitor Preferences' application to perhaps try different display settings. Power cycled the laptop. The problem persisted. Disconnected the external monitor and power cycled the laptop. The operations were normal in the single monitor mode. Connected the Epsilon monitor to a Zeta 32bit desktop, running Oneiric Ocelot, with Video controller and memory similar to the laptop. The display was OK. No problems were seen with Unity 2D or Nattie Narwhal either.The external monitor could be connected OK. In addition to problem1.png, I have attached the following logs. syslog dmesg kern.log Xorg.0.log messages gconfd.log Note: 1. In the screen capture image, it may be noticed that the width of the offending wide, narrow and dark grey rectangle equals the width of the 'Monitor Preferences' application. So a horizontal shift somewhere in the driver code may rectify the problem. 2. problem may be related to Bug # 830949 ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905128 Title: Unity 3D test failed when attaching external monitor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/905128/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577189] Re: iwl3945 microcode SW error detected under heavy net load
I have just updated to 2.6.32-25-generic #44-Ubuntu SMP Fri Sep 17 20:26:08 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux Of course the problem is still the same. ;) -- iwl3945 microcode SW error detected under heavy net load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577189] Re: iwl3945 microcode SW error detected under heavy net load
Same here after a couple of minutes with heavy load. Thinkpad T60 with Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG [Golan]: [13881.504070] No probe response from AP 00:15:0c:2b:44:c0 after 500ms, disconnecting. [13882.124079] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms. [13882.124089] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110). [13882.624075] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_SCAN_CMD: time out after 500ms. [13883.124070] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms. [13883.124080] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110). [13883.624067] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms. [13883.624077] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110). [13884.124061] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_TX_PWR_TABLE_CMD: time out after 500ms. [13884.624092] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms. [13884.624102] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110). [13885.124071] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms. [13885.124081] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110). [13885.124090] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:15:0c:2b:44:c0 (try 1) [13885.324916] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:15:0c:2b:44:c0 (try 2) [13885.524064] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:15:0c:2b:44:c0 (try 3) [13885.724068] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:15:0c:2b:44:c0 timed out [13886.224069] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms. [13886.224080] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110). [13895.132078] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms. [13895.132088] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110). [13895.632070] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_SCAN_CMD: time out after 500ms. [13896.132072] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms. [13896.132089] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110). [13896.632068] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms. [13896.632078] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110). [13897.132073] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_TX_PWR_TABLE_CMD: time out after 500ms. [13901.132084] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms. [13901.132094] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110). [13901.634147] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_SCAN_CMD: time out after 500ms. [13902.132775] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms. [13902.132786] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110). [13902.633757] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms. [13902.633767] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110). [13903.135636] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_TX_PWR_TABLE_CMD: time out after 500ms. [13907.132066] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms. [13907.132077] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110). [13907.634030] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_SCAN_CMD: time out after 500ms. [13908.133842] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms. [13908.133853] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110). [13908.632065] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms. [13908.632075] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110). [13909.132054] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_TX_PWR_TABLE_CMD: time out after 500ms. [13913.132067] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms. [13913.132077] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110). [13913.632074] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_SCAN_CMD: time out after 500ms. [13914.132254] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms. [13914.132264] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110). [13914.132276] iwl3945 :03:00.0: No space for Tx [13914.132282] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: enqueue_hcmd failed: -28 [13914.132288] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-28). [13914.132304] iwl3945 :03:00.0: No space for Tx [13914.132309] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_TX_PWR_TABLE_CMD: enqueue_hcmd failed: -28 [13918.637076] iwl3945 :03:00.0: No space for Tx [13918.637086] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: enqueue_hcmd failed: -28 [13918.637093] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-28). [13918.637133] iwl3945 :03:00.0: No space for Tx [13918.637141] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_SCAN_CMD: enqueue_hcmd failed: -28 [13918.637158] iwl3945 :03:00.0: No space for Tx [13918.637164] iwl3945 :03:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: enqueue_hcmd failed: -28 [13918.637170] iwl3945
[Bug 577189] Re: iwl3945 microcode SW error detected under heavy net load
I forgot: It's Lucid with 2.6.32-24-generic #43-Ubuntu SMP Thu Sep 16 14:17:33 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux at this moment. -- iwl3945 microcode SW error detected under heavy net load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 431091] Re: libstdc++5 removal breaks non-ubuntu applications
I did not run into this until now because Karmic had other deal breakers for me. Now that those are gone in Lucid here is an even bigger one. From the time passed it looks like this is not going to get fixed? There is a real world out there and it is not purple. Some of us have to use software that is one or more of proprietary, binary, and old. No recompile possible. The suggested fix is possible, but that is besides the point. One reason for a comprehensive package management system is to not have to do things like this. Why should I jump through the hoops setup by Mr. Kitterman and Mr. Young when it would have taken one of them less time to package the library instead? After all, libstdc++5 is still in debian testing (eventually to be squeeze) and unstable. Why remove it and not simply leave it in? It breaks nothing but makes live easier for dozens and probably hundreds of people. Do something nice and don't be like the Redmond guys. -- libstdc++5 removal breaks non-ubuntu applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431091 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 508516] Re: wakeup from sleep fails on toshiba nb305
nohz=off highress=off works for me too. -- wakeup from sleep fails on toshiba nb305 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508516 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 570827] [NEW] sound plays when logging in even after selecting no sound in the 'login screen settings'
Public bug reported: summary says it all, hardware is Dell Lattitude D620 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: login 1:4.1.4.2-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Apr 27 09:53:56 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Release Candidate amd64 (20100419.1) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: shadow ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- sound plays when logging in even after selecting no sound in the 'login screen settings' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570827 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 570827] Re: sound plays when logging in even after selecting no sound in the 'login screen settings'
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45754751/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: LoginDefs.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45754752/LoginDefs.txt -- sound plays when logging in even after selecting no sound in the 'login screen settings' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570827 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 536840] Re: Ubuntu Lucid Live-CD doesn't boot
live CD for lucid RC is no longer a problem on my Dell Latitude D620 laptop (see #20). -- Ubuntu Lucid Live-CD doesn't boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536840 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 559570] Re: ubuntu-10.04-beta2-desktop-amd64.iso fails Latitude D620 laptop
install does work with lucid RC ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = New -- ubuntu-10.04-beta2-desktop-amd64.iso fails Latitude D620 laptop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559570 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429015] Re: python-visual seg faults even in simple test cases
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 457688 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457688 This bug is still present in Lucid beta2 (64bit). See new bug #560297 for details. Tested on computer with ati graphics, but hardware acceleration not installed. -- python-visual seg faults even in simple test cases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429015 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 536840] Re: Ubuntu Lucid Live-CD doesn't boot
similar problems here with Latitude D620 laptop (has nvidia graphics). Using lucid beta 2. See bug #559570. -- Ubuntu Lucid Live-CD doesn't boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536840 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 559570] [NEW] ubuntu-10.04-beta2-desktop-amd64.iso fails Latitude D620 laptop
Public bug reported: get to boot menu after pressing key, try ubuntu without installing fails. Eventually vertical strips appear on screen. check cd for defects fails. Eventually vertical strips appear on screen. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ubuntu-10.04-beta2-desktop-amd64.iso fails Latitude D620 laptop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559570 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 559570] Re: ubuntu-10.04-beta2-desktop-amd64.iso fails Latitude D620 laptop
installing from ubuntu-10.04-beta2-alternate-amd64.iso succeeded, but it fails to boot as well. The Latitude D620 laptop has nvidia graphics, so possibly this related to the new nvidia graphics driver. -- ubuntu-10.04-beta2-desktop-amd64.iso fails Latitude D620 laptop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559570 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429015] Re: python-visual seg faults even in simple test cases
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 457688 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457688 This bug is certainly NOT a duplicate of 457688. What kind of testing did you do that makes you 'believe' that? -- python-visual seg faults even in simple test cases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429015 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429015] Re: python-visual seg faults even in simple test cases
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 457688 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457688 I originally filed this bug against 9.04, which predates bug #457688, which first appeared in 9.10. So without any testing I can say for certain this bug is different. None of the reports mention the graphics that are used and hence are quite irrelevant to this bug. This bug never occurred with nvidia graphics enabled. It is of course possible that the problems described here are fixed in Lucid if you get visual to run in the first place, but in this case my bet would be that this is not because of the fix for bug #457688 but rather because of changes elsewhere in Lucid. I'll try to test Lucid if I get around to it but I make no promises. As you noticed I tested this rather exhaustively last summer trying to get 9.10 fixed, but I can't justify putting that much time into this again without receiving any useful feedback. I run several computer labs at a university and they all run debian now because of this bug and #457688. -- python-visual seg faults even in simple test cases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429015 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397263] Re: Please sync slurm-llnl 2.0.9-1 from Debian unstable (main)
SLURM version 2.1.0 with lots of new features was released on 1/5/2010. Since the next ubuntu version is supposed to be a long term release including the latest version seems crucial. -- Please sync slurm-llnl 2.0.9-1 from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 457688] Re: libboost-python1.38 issues with __doc__ property in Python = 2.6.3
** Changed in: boost1.38 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- libboost-python1.38 issues with __doc__ property in Python = 2.6.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457688 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 443183] [NEW] launchpad link report a bug does not work, redirects to info page instead
Public bug reported: from the bug summary web page for a particular package in ubuntu I expect a link named 'report a bug' to actually let me report a bug. Instead the link redirects to a info page instead. It took me 10 minutes to figure out to actually submit the report I wanted to report. And no, your instructions did not help me / apply to my case. This is not a ubuntu bug per se but a configuration bug of launchpad for ubuntu. It prevents users from reporting bugs. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- launchpad link report a bug does not work, redirects to info page instead https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443183 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 408663] Re: python2.6 (python-visual) crashed with SIGSEGV in __cxa_allocate_exception()
I tried again with karmic beta . same result: seg fault. suggested solution: Go back to previous version. There is absolutely no point in shipping a package which does nothing but crash. -- python2.6 (python-visual) crashed with SIGSEGV in __cxa_allocate_exception() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408663 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429015] [NEW] python-visual seg faults even in simple test cases
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: python-visual
Test case 1:
Observed outcome
~ $python
Python 2.6.2 (release26-maint, Apr 19 2009, 01:58:18)
[GCC 4.3.3] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
from visual import *
v = vector('x')
Segmentation fault
Expected outcome (output from 8.04.3)
u...@test:~$ python
Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jul 31 2008, 17:31:22)
[GCC 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
from visual import *
v = vector('x')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
ValueError: Vectors must be constructed from sequences of 2 or 3 float members.
Test case 2:
Observed outcome
~ $python
Python 2.6.2 (release26-maint, Apr 19 2009, 01:58:18)
[GCC 4.3.3] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
from visual import *
v=vector(1,2,3)
for i in v:
... print i
...
1.0
2.0
3.0
Segmentation fault
Expected outcome (output from 8.04.3)
u...@test:~$ python
Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jul 31 2008, 17:31:22)
[GCC 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
from visual import *
v=vector(1,2,3)
for i in v:
... print i
...
1.0
2.0
3.0
Ubuntu releases tested:
Error occurs on 9.04 32bit, 9.04 64bit,, 8.10 64bit
Error does not occur on 8.04 32bit, 8.04 64bit
Not tested 8.10 32bit
How to reproduce:
Clean install from CD
aptitude update
aptitude safe-upgrade (this step is optional, has no effect on outcome,
positive or negative)
aptitude install python-visual
(Important! Do not activate proprietary graphics driver.)
run test as shown above
What happens if one activates proprietary graphics driver (For these
tests I used the menu option to install the drivers):
No change with ATI/AMD graphics cards. Errors (seg faults) occur exactly
the same as without the proprietary graphics driver.
With Nvidia graphics cards test 1 and 2 do not seg fault.
Reproducibility (hardware tested):
6 different computers (2xnvidia graphics, 4x ATI/AMD graphics) 1 Dell, 1
Dell laptop, 1 Lenovo laptop, 3 different custom builds.
A third test case has slightly different behavior:
Test case 3:
Observed outcome
~ $python
Python 2.6.2 (release26-maint, Apr 19 2009, 01:58:18)
[GCC 4.3.3] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
from visual import *
quit()
Segmentation fault
Expected outcome:
~ $python
Python 2.6.2 (release26-maint, Apr 19 2009, 01:58:18)
[GCC 4.3.3] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
from visual import *
quit()
~ $
Test case 3 works on 8.04.3 AND 8.10, but fails on 9.04. Unlike test
case 1 and 2 installing proprietary graphics drivers on systems with
nvidia graphics does not change the negative outcome.
This last error is less severe than the first two, because it happens
when exciting the python interpreter. Still it is very annoying.
Additional remarks:
Same behavior for new upstream version (5.12_release), compiled from
source.
python-visual is used heavily with novice programmers and a seg fault
instead of an error message for a simple syntax error is deadly.
python-visual on debian lenny works on all tested hardware.
** Affects: python-visual (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
python-visual seg faults even in simple test cases
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429015
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 408663] Re: python2.6 (python-visual) crashed with SIGSEGV in __cxa_allocate_exception()
Please consider raising importance from medium to high. Not having this package working is a deal breaker in many educational environments. -- python2.6 (python-visual) crashed with SIGSEGV in __cxa_allocate_exception() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408663 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397263] [NEW] please sync to new version in debian sid
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: slurm-llnl new upstream version slurm-llnl-2.0.2 ** Affects: slurm-llnl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- please sync to new version in debian sid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390495] [NEW] Multiple live CDs on same USB stick boots filesystem on incorrect partition
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: casper I wanted to create a multiboot Ubuntu live usb stick so that I can demo the various Ubuntu flavors easily. I partitioned a usb stick and put Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty live CD on one of the primary partitions on it which boots fine using grub, either using the chainloader command or directly booting the kernel and initrd on the partition. I then tried another Ubuntu-based distro (Linux Mint 7 in my case, but I think this problem manifests with the official distros as well) in a larger numbered partition (both physically and logically), but while the kernel boots and the correct splash image was displayed, when the desktop finally comes up it is Jaunty desktop from the first partition, instead of the Linux Mint desktop. ** Affects: casper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Multiple live CDs on same USB stick boots filesystem on incorrect partition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390495 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 271518] Re: slurm sbatch command fails
slurmd runs as root. I did not modify the installations and I used a slurm config file created at the slurm website. The same setup works for me on debian and (as I tried recently) on Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex alpha as well. Here is some details, but this bug is specific to Ubuntu Hardy Heron. # scontrol show config | grep SlurmdLog SlurmdLogFile = (null) even so the logfile exists: # ls /var/run/slurm-llnl/ slurmd slurmd.log slurmd.pid Here is the SlurmdLog of a failed job: [Oct 23 11:43:11] setup for a batch_job [Oct 23 11:43:11] entering batch_job_create [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Message thread started pid = 21069 [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] eio: handling events for 1 objects [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Called _msg_socket_readable [Oct 23 11:43:11] debug3: _rpc_batch_job: return from _forkexec_slurmstepd [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Entered job_manager for 412.4294967294 pid=21069 [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] alloc LLLP [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] task affinity plugin loaded [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] mpi type = (null) [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Entering _setup_normal_io [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] eio: handling events for 1 objects [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Called _msg_socket_readable [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Uncached user/gid: gs/100 [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] eio: handling events for 1 objects [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Called _msg_socket_readable [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] stdin file name = /dev/null [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] stdout file name = /home/gs/calc/tubes/cnt-4.0/tt1/slurm-412.out [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] stderr file name = /home/gs/calc/tubes/cnt-4.0/tt1/slurm-412.out [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] eio: handling events for 1 objects [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Called _msg_socket_readable [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] eio: handling events for 1 objects [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Called _msg_socket_readable [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Leaving _setup_normal_io [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] debug level = 2 [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Before call to spank_init() [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] spank: opening plugin stack /etc/slurm-llnl/plugstack.conf [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] After call to spank_init() [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] num tasks on this node = 1 [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] New fdpair[0] = 12, fdpair[1] = 13 [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] eio: handling events for 1 objects [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Called _msg_socket_readable [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Uncached user/gid: gs/100 [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] eio: handling events for 1 objects [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Called _msg_socket_readable [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Couldn't find SLURM_RLIMIT_CPU in environment [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Couldn't find SLURM_RLIMIT_FSIZE in environment [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Couldn't find SLURM_RLIMIT_DATA in environment [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Couldn't find SLURM_RLIMIT_STACK in environment [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Couldn't find SLURM_RLIMIT_CORE in environment [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Couldn't find SLURM_RLIMIT_RSS in environment [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Couldn't find SLURM_RLIMIT_NPROC in environment [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Couldn't find SLURM_RLIMIT_NOFILE in environment [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Couldn't find SLURM_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in environment [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Couldn't find SLURM_RLIMIT_AS in environment [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] task 0 (21074) started Oct 23 11:43:11 [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] eio: handling events for 1 objects [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Called _msg_socket_readable [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] eio: handling events for 1 objects [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Called _msg_socket_readable [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Unblocking 412.4294967294 task 0, writefd = 13 [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] affinity task_pre_launch: 412.4294967294, task 0 [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Using sched_affinity for tasks [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] execve(): /var/run/slurm-llnl/slurmd/job00412/script: Permission denied [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] task 0 (21074) exited status 0x0d00 Oct 23 11:43:11 [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] affinity task_post_term: 412.4294967294, task 0 [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Aggregated 1 task exit messages [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] sending task exit msg for 1 tasks [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Before call to spank_fini() [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] After call to spank_fini() [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] job 412 completed with slurm_rc = 0, job_rc = 3328 [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] sending REQUEST_COMPLETE_BATCH_SCRIPT [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] auth plugin for Munge (Chris Dunlap, LLNL) loaded [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] eio: handling events for 1 objects [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Called _msg_socket_readable [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] false, shutdown [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] Message thread exited [Oct 23 11:43:11] [412] done with job [Oct 23 11:43:11] debug3: in the service_connection [Oct 23 11:43:11] debug2: got this type of message 6010 [Oct 23 11:43:11] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_TERMINATE_JOB [Oct 23 11:43:11] debug: _rpc_terminate_job, uid = 64030 [Oct 23 11:43:11] debug: task_slurmd_release_resources: 412 [Oct 23 11:43:11] debug3: release LLLP job [412.*] [Oct 23 11:43:11] debug3: job state 412: ctime:081023114311 expires:69123116 [Oct
[Bug 271518] [NEW] slurm sbatch command fails
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: slurm-llnl version used is ubuntu 8.04 (hardy), architecture is amd64 source package is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/slurm-llnl/1.2.20-1 $sbatch jobscript leads to the following error (reported in slurm-jobnumber.out) slurmd[hostname]: error: execve(): /var/run/slurm- llnl/slurmd/job7/script: Permission denied using srun, $srun jobscript the job runs fine if the executable bit is set for jobscript. If the executable bit is not set for jobscript, the job fails with the error slurmd[hostname]: error: execve(): jobscript: Permission denied The executable bit of jobscript has no influence on whether sbatch fails. It looks to me that /var/run/slurm-llnl/slurmd/job7/script gets created without the executable bit set leading to the error. ** Affects: slurm-llnl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- slurm sbatch command fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271518 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
