[Bug 1935850] Re: Dell XPS 17 (9710) PCI/internal sound card not detected

2021-09-17 Thread Garry Burch
5.13.0-16.16 can not be found on Muno

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1935850

Title:
  Dell XPS 17 (9710) PCI/internal sound card not detected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1935850/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1935850] Re: Dell XPS 17 (9710) PCI/internal sound card not detected

2021-08-30 Thread Garry Burch
KDE NEON 5.22
Kernel Version 5.11.0.27-generic

Issue still with dummy output

Dell 9710

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1935850

Title:
  Dell XPS 17 (9710) PCI/internal sound card not detected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1935850/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1417288] Re: unable to create snapshot

2021-05-12 Thread Garry Lawrence
This appears to have already been fixed for some cases. I was able to
snapshot a qcow2 volume on 21.04 (libvirt 7.0.0).

Upstream discussion (I think this is the relevant change):
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/97

** Bug watch added: gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues #97
   https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/97

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1417288

Title:
  unable to create snapshot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1417288/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1798369] Re: Reinstall Ubuntu (with preserving existing data) shows error message due to "Could not get lock /target/var/cache/apt/archives/lock"

2020-08-25 Thread Ronaldo Garry Müller
OK.
Thanks!
RGMüller

Em seg., 24 de ago. de 2020 às 17:40, Brian Murray <
1798...@bugs.launchpad.net> escreveu:

> ** Tags added: restore-new-distro
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1884686).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1798369
>
> Title:
>   Reinstall Ubuntu (with preserving existing data) shows error message
>   due to "Could not get lock /target/var/cache/apt/archives/lock"
>
> Status in APT:
>   New
> Status in ubiquity:
>   New
> Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
>   Invalid
> Status in ubiquity package in Ubuntu:
>   Confirmed
> Status in apt source package in Eoan:
>   Invalid
> Status in ubiquity source package in Eoan:
>   Won't Fix
>
> Bug description:
>   When trying to reinstall an existing Ubuntu cosmic installation using
>   latest 18.10 desktop images, the install shows an error dialog around
>   the end of the installation with an "Error restoring installed
>   applications". Looking at the syslog such a traceback can be seen:
>
>   apt_pkg.Error: E:Could not get lock
>   /target/var/cache/apt/archives/lock - open (11: Resource temporarily
>   unavailable), E:Unable to lock directory
>   /target/var/cache/apt/archives/
>
>   After reproducing this on a live session, after chrooting into /target
>   indeed any apt-get install operations result in the same lock-file
>   error. The whole syslog of the reinstall attached to the bug.
>
>   Test case:
>* Download latest cosmic image
>* Install cosmic on the whole disk (can be on a VM)
>* (optional) Boot into the system and leave a file in the home
> directory (to leave a trace, just in case)
>* Reboot and install cosmic using the first option in ubiquity:
> Reinstall Ubuntu
>* Finish configuration
>
>   The install itself doesn't fail, but around the end of the
>   installation process the error dialog appears. System is still
>   bootable but left with old packages.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/apt/+bug/1798369/+subscriptions
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1798369

Title:
  Reinstall Ubuntu (with preserving existing data) shows error message
  due to "Could not get lock /target/var/cache/apt/archives/lock"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apt/+bug/1798369/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1677398] Re: Apparmor prevents using storage pools and hostdev networks

2020-07-29 Thread Garry Lawrence
I finally had time to revisit this. It appears that not only did my
patch not connect to the remote libvirtd storage driver (as Christian
pointed out), but that the storage driver does not establish remote
connections at all. As such, I agree with Christian that my patch is a
dead-end and would also advise anyone finding this now to avoid applying
it, even temporarily.

Has there been any forward movement on the other proposed solution?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1677398

Title:
  Apparmor prevents using storage pools and hostdev networks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1677398/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1884686] [NEW] Problem when finishing instalation UBUNTU 20.04

2020-06-22 Thread Ronaldo Garry Müller
Public bug reported:

Installer reported an error when finishing instalation.
Could not install some software
RGMuller

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: ubiquity 20.04.15 [modified: 
lib/partman/automatically_partition/question]
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-26.30-generic 5.4.30
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-26-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckMismatches: 
./pool/restricted/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-390/libnvidia-gl-390_390.132-0ubuntu2_i386.deb
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CasperVersion: 1.445
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Mon Jun 22 21:30:16 2020
InstallCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed initrd=/casper/initrd quiet 
splash --- maybe-ubiquity
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=pt_BR.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8
 LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal ubiquity-20.04.15 ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884686

Title:
  Problem when finishing instalation UBUNTU 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1884686/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1677398] Re: Apparmor prevents using storage pools and hostdev networks

2020-05-26 Thread Garry Lawrence
Thanks for subscribing me; I'm a launchpad newbie and didn't realize
that wasn't automatic when I posted here. I'll try to answer your
questions to the best of my recollection.

#1
I can't remember exactly why I needed to drop the storage driver load; I think 
the local storage driver it started didn't have all the configuration I needed 
to resolve the disk paths (probably needed the pool config). If I remember 
correctly, after reading around the source code it looked like I could get it 
to connect to a remote storage driver automatically by eliminating the local 
one.

#2
I agree that we can't always know where libvirt.conf is, but here I allowed the 
default that was in use by my system to move forward. Other locations could be 
allowed, and a more general approach would be a good idea.

#3
I had inspected those structs using gdb when I was working on that patch, but 
don't have an example on-hand right now

My memory of why I was doing this is hazy at this point. I think I was
trying to grant each VM access to only its own disk layers (so adding to
the profile template does not accomplish this), and I needed virt-aa-
helper to traverse a qcow image's backing chain to grant read access to
the parents (which didn't work without resolving it's path).

I'll try to find time soon to look into the cause of the failure you
mention. My patch did work for me and I've been starting VMs with the
generated profiles, but it's very possible I broke something else. I
don't have a ton of experience with libvirt yet.

Sorry if this is obvious, but it's been a while since I was working on
this: what do you mean by "setting up a new storage context" in your
last comment?


This is somewhat off topic, but why does the AppArmor security driver use a 
helper binary (virt-aa-helper)? If it's mostly historical reasons, would there 
be motivation to move the logic from the helper in-process similarly to the 
SELinux driver in the future? It seems like that might simplify accessing 
information of the sort we're talking about here (e.g. pool configs, hostdev 
network info).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1677398

Title:
  Apparmor prevents using storage pools and hostdev networks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1677398/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1877859] [NEW] Release upgrade 18.4->20.4 fails

2020-05-10 Thread Garry
Public bug reported:

After update/upgrade to all most current packages under 18.04, rebooted,
then tried "do-release-upgrade"

root@dck:~# lsb_release  -rd
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS
Release:18.04

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:18.04.37
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-99.100-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-99-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.14
Architecture: amd64
CrashDB: ubuntu
Date: Sun May 10 14:10:04 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-07-17 (1393 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20160420.3)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2020-05-10 (0 days ago)

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic dist-upgrade

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877859

Title:
  Release upgrade 18.4->20.4 fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1877859/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1677398] Re: Apparmor prevents using storage pools and hostdev networks

2020-02-03 Thread Garry Lawrence
I've written a quick patch that seems to fix the storage pool side of
this issue, at least for dir/fs like pool types. It does connect to the
libvirtd socket; I saw that there was some concern with that approach
earlier, but this solution didn't require any changes to virt-aa-
helper's calling conventions. Are we still opposed to having virt-aa-
helper connect to libvirtd?

A couple notes about what is needed to use this, which might be obvious to 
those more experienced with libvirtd than myself:
* You may need to use a common file extension for the AppArmor profile to allow 
virt-aa-helper itself to inspect your image files.
* If you also need the AppArmor profile to allow read access to a backing file 
chain, your domain will need to have a driver element in the disk device 
definition, with the type attribute set appropriately.

** Patch added: "virt-aa-helper-support-pools.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1677398/+attachment/5325076/+files/virt-aa-helper-support-pools.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1677398

Title:
  Apparmor prevents using storage pools and hostdev networks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1677398/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1823753] Re: arm64: cma_alloc errors at boot

2019-05-30 Thread John Garry
Note: We have tested  https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/6/1221, which is now on 
linux-next *, and the hi162 RoCE driver single patch usage is diminished:
$cat cma.disco.dmesg | grep "cma: cma_alloc(cma" | sed -r 's/.*count 
([0-9]+)\,.*/\1/' | sort -n | uniq -c
129 2
3   4
206 8
32  16
2   24
4   32
256 33
39  64
2   128
2   1024

I think that we had ~11K x 1K CMA pages previously, without this
patchset.

* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-
next.git/log/kernel/dma?h=next-20190530

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1823753

Title:
  arm64: cma_alloc errors at boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1823753/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1711337] Re: Firefox crashes at start on armv7L after 55.0.1 update

2017-09-02 Thread Garry Trethewey
I also got the same problem on Raspberry Pi3 with Ubuntu Mate 16.04 as soon as 
I did the first update. 
https://ubuntu-mate.community/t/firefox-55-0-2-doesnt-start-crashes-on-ubuntu-mate-raspberrypi-3/14637
 has some workarounds, if anybody thinks to look there.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1711337

Title:
  Firefox crashes at start on armv7L after 55.0.1 update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1711337/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1700930] Re: Default action policy for "Security Updates" changed between 14.04 and 16.04

2017-09-02 Thread Garry Trethewey
Me too.  Workaround at https://ubuntu-mate.community/t/firefox-55-0-2
-doesnt-start-crashes-on-ubuntu-mate-raspberrypi-3/14637/4

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700930

Title:
  Default action policy for "Security Updates" changed between 14.04 and
  16.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1700930/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1711121] [NEW] package openvpn 2.4.0-4ubuntu1.3 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

2017-08-16 Thread Garry Lennox
Public bug reported:

happens every boot , been happening for some time now

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
Package: openvpn 2.4.0-4ubuntu1.3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-32.36-generic 4.10.17
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-32-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.4-0ubuntu4.5
AptOrdering:
 libgd3:i386: Install
 libgd3:amd64: Install
 NULL: ConfigurePending
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Aug 16 13:17:12 2017
DuplicateSignature:
 package:openvpn:2.4.0-4ubuntu1.3
 Setting up libgd3:i386 (2.2.4-2ubuntu0.2) ...
 dpkg: error processing package openvpn (--configure):
  package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should
ErrorMessage: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should  
reinstall it before attempting configuration
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-01-21 (206 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.10 "Yakkety Yak" - Release amd64 (20161012.2)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.18.10ubuntu2
 apt  1.4
SourcePackage: openvpn
Title: package openvpn 2.4.0-4ubuntu1.3 failed to install/upgrade: package is 
in a very bad inconsistent state; you should  reinstall it before attempting 
configuration
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to zesty on 2017-04-18 (120 days ago)

** Affects: openvpn (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package zesty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1711121

Title:
  package openvpn 2.4.0-4ubuntu1.3 failed to install/upgrade: package is
  in a very bad inconsistent state; you should  reinstall it before
  attempting configuration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn/+bug/1711121/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1707184] [NEW] package libsensors4 1:3.4.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/sensors.d/.placeholder', which is different from other instances of package libsensors4:i3

2017-07-28 Thread Garry Nelson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1704767 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1704767

Public bug reported:

Started to load updates, but never finished. This has happened several
times in the past.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: libsensors4 1:3.4.0-2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-87.110-generic 4.4.73
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-87-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Jul 27 11:09:17 2017
Dependencies:
 gcc-6-base 6.0.1-0ubuntu1
 libc6 2.23-0ubuntu9
 libgcc1 1:6.0.1-0ubuntu1
DuplicateSignature:
 package:libsensors4:1:3.4.0-2
 Unpacking libsensors4:i386 (1:3.4.0-2) ...
 dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libsensors4_1%3a3.4.0-2_i386.deb (--unpack):
  trying to overwrite shared '/etc/sensors.d/.placeholder', which is different 
from other instances of package libsensors4:i386
ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/sensors.d/.placeholder', which 
is different from other instances of package libsensors4:i386
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-05-10 (444 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160420.1)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.2
 apt  1.2.20
SourcePackage: lm-sensors
Title: package libsensors4 1:3.4.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to 
overwrite shared '/etc/sensors.d/.placeholder', which is different from other 
instances of package libsensors4:i386
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: lm-sensors (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package package-conflict xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707184

Title:
  package libsensors4 1:3.4.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to
  overwrite shared '/etc/sensors.d/.placeholder', which is different
  from other instances of package libsensors4:i386

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lm-sensors/+bug/1707184/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1704828] [NEW] Installer crashed at "Installing the 'grub2' package".

2017-07-17 Thread Garry Pavento
Public bug reported:

I was directed here automatically while attempting to install Ubuntu
17.04 Desktop, amd64, from a DVD in a SATA drive with a SATA to USB
connection.  The installation is to a SATA drive.

Cleared SATA drive before installing.

   fdisk -l /dev/sda reports 488397168 sectors
   dd count=10 if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda
   dd count=10 seek=488297168 if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda

UEFI install.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
Package: ubiquity 17.04.9
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-19.21-generic 4.10.8
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-19-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.4-0ubuntu4
Architecture: amd64
CasperVersion: 1.380
Date: Mon Jul 17 13:07:24 2017
InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz.efi file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed 
boot=casper only-ubiquity quiet splash ---
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Release amd64 (20170412)
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8
SourcePackage: grub-installer
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: grub-installer (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug ubiquity-17.04.9 ubuntu zesty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1704828

Title:
  Installer crashed at "Installing the 'grub2' package".

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1704828/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1704605] [NEW] package libc6:i386 2.23-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: package libc6:i386 is already installed and configured

2017-07-15 Thread Garry Rice
Public bug reported:

This bug happened with in an Ubuntu automatic update. I am not sure
which package it was trying to update/install when the bug occurred.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: libc6:i386 2.23-0ubuntu9
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-72.93-generic 4.4.49
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-72-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.5
AptdaemonVersion: 1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu14
Architecture: i386
CrashReports: 600:0:119:97658:2017-07-15 19:36:32.898907423 -0500:2017-07-15 
19:36:33.898907423 -0500:/var/crash/libc6:i386.0.crash
Date: Sat Jul 15 19:36:33 2017
Dependencies:
 gcc-6-base 6.0.1-0ubuntu1
 libc6 2.23-0ubuntu9
 libgcc1 1:6.0.1-0ubuntu1
DpkgTerminalLog:
 dpkg: error processing package libc6:i386 (--configure):
  package libc6:i386 is already installed and configured
ErrorMessage: package libc6:i386 is already installed and configured
InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-11-23 (601 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 15.04 "Vivid Vervet" - Release i386 (20150422.1)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.1
 apt  1.2.19
SourcePackage: dpkg
Title: package libc6:i386 2.23-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: package 
libc6:i386 is already installed and configured
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to xenial on 2016-09-28 (290 days ago)

** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: already-installed apport-package i386 xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1704605

Title:
  package libc6:i386 2.23-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: package
  libc6:i386 is already installed and configured

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1704605/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1701799] [NEW] package linux-image-4.4.0-83-generic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 128

2017-07-01 Thread Garry Nelson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1701085 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1701085

Public bug reported:

Won't complete update

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: linux-image-4.4.0-83-generic (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-81.104-generic 4.4.67
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-81-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.6
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  dutch  1838 F pulseaudio
 /dev/snd/controlC1:  dutch  1838 F pulseaudio
Date: Fri Jun 30 16:43:53 2017
ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 
128
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=43745bce-5ca3-47d8-b06b-da292160b525
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-05-10 (417 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160420.1)
MachineType: LENOVO 80L0
ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-81-generic.efi.signed 
root=UUID=5b9afc58-42b3-435a-b79c-05685f46c011 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No 
PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
RelatedPackageVersions: grub-pc N/A
SourcePackage: linux
Title: package linux-image-4.4.0-83-generic (not installed) failed to 
install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit 
status 128
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 03/26/2015
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: B0CN75WW
dmi.board.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag
dmi.board.name: Lenovo G50-80
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: 31900058 WIN
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: Lenovo G50-80
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrB0CN75WW:bd03/26/2015:svnLENOVO:pn80L0:pvrLenovoG50-80:rvnLENOVO:rnLenovoG50-80:rvr31900058WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrLenovoG50-80:
dmi.product.name: 80L0
dmi.product.version: Lenovo G50-80
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed


** Tags: amd64 apport-package xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1701799

Title:
  package linux-image-4.4.0-83-generic (not installed) failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error
  exit status 128

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1701799/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1420481] Re: package xymon-client 4.3.7-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2016-03-11 Thread Adrian Garry
My competence level nil. Need detailed instructions. At work in 10 mins
will return tomorrow.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1420481

Title:
  package xymon-client 4.3.7-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xymon/+bug/1420481/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1502215] Re: install crashed, hdd is ok dvd is ok, gpt disc, ???

2015-10-06 Thread garry palmer
I appreciate your efforts but the hdd is fine I installed windows for
now with no problems  I will try again in a few weeks. yours sincerely
Garry

 On Monday, 5 October 2015, 15:15, Phillip Susi  wrote:
   

 It looks like your hard drive was unplugged.  Check your SATA cable.


** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
      Status: Incomplete => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1502215

Title:
  install crashed,hdd is ok dvd is ok,gpt disc,???

Status in ubiquity package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  I have tried to install ubuntu onto a gpt disk without sucess, I will
  keep trying but the installer keeps crashing.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: ubiquity 2.18.7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9
  Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperVersion: 1.340
  Date: Tue Feb 10 16:47:29 2015
  InstallCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper 
initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash -- maybe-ubiquity
  LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140417)
  ProcEnviron:
  LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8
  TERM=linux
  PATH=(custom, no user)
  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
  LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
  SourcePackage: ubiquity
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1502215/+subscriptions

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1502215

Title:
  install crashed,hdd is ok dvd is ok,gpt disc,???

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1502215/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1502215] [NEW] install crashed,hdd is ok dvd is ok,gpt disc,???

2015-10-02 Thread garry palmer
Public bug reported:

I have tried to install ubuntu onto a gpt disk without sucess, I will
keep trying but the installer keeps crashing.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: ubiquity 2.18.7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
CasperVersion: 1.340
Date: Tue Feb 10 16:47:29 2015
InstallCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper 
initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash -- maybe-ubiquity
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140417)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8
 TERM=linux
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty ubiquity-2.18.7 ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1502215

Title:
  install crashed,hdd is ok dvd is ok,gpt disc,???

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1502215/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1493579] [NEW] package linux-image-3.19.0-28-generic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

2015-09-08 Thread Garry Schinder
Public bug reported:

14.04 Lubuntu on old Gateway M275.
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)   

No documented fix seems to FIX, the download says failed on several files, I 
have tried different servers, and no extra repositorie.
I like ubuntu, but until we get past this sort of thing that even causes IT 
people a bit of pain its not going to kill windows.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: linux-image-3.19.0-28-generic (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-25.26~14.04.1-generic 3.19.8-ckt2
Uname: Linux 3.19.0-25-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.12
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Sep  8 17:20:17 2015
DpkgTerminalLog:
 Preparing to unpack 
.../linux-image-3.19.0-28-generic_3.19.0-28.30~14.04.1_i386.deb ...
 This kernel does not support a non-PAE CPU.
 dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.19.0-28-generic_3.19.0-28.30~14.04.1_i386.deb
 (--unpack):
  subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
DuplicateSignature: package:linux-image-3.19.0-28-generic:(not 
installed):subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 
1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-08-31 (8 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 14.04.3 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Beta i386 (20150805)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.17.5ubuntu5.4
 apt  1.0.1ubuntu2.10
SourcePackage: linux-lts-vivid
Title: package linux-image-3.19.0-28-generic (not installed) failed to 
install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit 
status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: linux-lts-vivid (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 trusty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1493579

Title:
  package linux-image-3.19.0-28-generic (not installed) failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error
  exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-vivid/+bug/1493579/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1467189] [NEW] package libstdc++6:amd64 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04 failed to install/upgrade: package libstdc++6:amd64 is already installed and configured

2015-06-20 Thread garry bynum
Public bug reported:

everytime i log on i get the system issue prompt

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: libstdc++6:amd64 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-53.89-generic 3.13.11-ckt19
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-53-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.11
AptdaemonVersion: 1.1.1-1ubuntu5.1
Architecture: amd64
CrashReports:
 600:109:116:0:2015-06-20 08:09:27.797068341 -0400:2015-06-20 
08:09:27.797068341 -0400:/var/crash/onlyoffice-communityserver.0.uploaded
 640:0:116:163982:2015-06-20 08:09:18.241068124 -0400:2015-06-20 
08:09:26.425068319 -0400:/var/crash/onlyoffice-communityserver.0.crash
 600:0:116:148521:2015-06-20 08:10:48.369069576 -0400:2015-06-20 
08:10:49.369069576 -0400:/var/crash/libstdc++6:amd64.0.crash
 640:1000:116:1866682:2015-06-16 06:48:34.900188463 -0400:2015-06-16 
19:07:39.421214755 -0400:/var/crash/_usr_bin_nm-applet.1000.crash
 644:0:116:0:2015-06-20 08:09:25.405068303 -0400:2015-06-20 08:09:25.405068303 
-0400:/var/crash/onlyoffice-communityserver.0.upload
Date: Sat Jun 20 08:10:49 2015
Dependencies:
 gcc-4.8-base 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04
 gcc-4.9-base 4.9.1-0ubuntu1
 libc6 2.19-0ubuntu6.6
 libgcc1 1:4.9.1-0ubuntu1
 multiarch-support 2.19-0ubuntu6.6
DpkgTerminalLog:
 dpkg: error processing package libstdc++6:amd64 (--configure):
  package libstdc++6:amd64 is already installed and configured
DuplicateSignature: package:libstdc++6:amd64:4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04:package 
libstdc++6:amd64 is already installed and configured
ErrorMessage: package libstdc++6:amd64 is already installed and configured
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-26 (390 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140417)
SourcePackage: dpkg
Title: package libstdc++6:amd64 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04 failed to install/upgrade: 
package libstdc++6:amd64 is already installed and configured
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: already-installed amd64 apport-package trusty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467189

Title:
  package libstdc++6:amd64 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04 failed to
  install/upgrade: package libstdc++6:amd64 is already installed and
  configured

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1467189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1314556] Re: Unable to mount Android MTP device

2015-05-30 Thread Garry Cairns
Can I just check that all the people here reporting phone issues have
unlocked the phones? For example, if you need to enter a passcode or
draw a shape to use your phone, it also won't let a computer access it
until you enter the same code to unlock the phone. That's a feature of
the phone rather than a bug in Ubuntu (Ubuntu phones also do this). It
will also drop the connection as soon as your phone shuts its screen off
again after a period not being touched.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314556

Title:
  Unable to mount Android MTP device

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1314556/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1447767] Re: [XPS 13 9343, Intel Broadwell HDMI, Digital Out, HDMI] No sound at all

2015-04-27 Thread Garry Marliss
Thank you for the message.  I'm using a desktop and even a double cold 
boot didn't help.

Unfortunately, all suggestions have produced deep silence from my 
computer's audio system.,

Garry Marliss

On 04/27/2015 09:25 AM, Martin Babutzka wrote:
> Ok RESOLVED for me:
>
> In my case a single cold reboot worked. Thanks for the hint. But
> actually I am not using an XPS 13 but a totally different PC with Radeon
> 8750 HDMI. I joined this bug because I expected a generic problem with
> HDMI sound on Ubuntu 15.04.
>
> @Garry: Be aware that cold booting on a notebook should include a power
> off with detaching the power cord and a combined short removal of the
> notebook battery pack.
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447767

Title:
  [XPS 13 9343, Intel Broadwell HDMI, Digital Out, HDMI] No sound at all

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1447767/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1447767] Re: [XPS 13 9343, Intel Broadwell HDMI, Digital Out, HDMI] No sound at all

2015-04-26 Thread Garry Marliss
Thank you for your response.  I do not have an XPS and Ubuntu 15.4 dual 
boots with Windoz XP professional.  Incidentally, Windoz sound works as 
it should.

I tried two cold boots into Ubuntu, but unfortunately that did not fix 
the problem.

Tomorrow, I'll look into updating the BIOS.

Thank you again,

Garry Marliss


On 04/26/2015 09:12 PM, Francisco Cribari wrote:
> I found the solution here: http://bartongeorge.net/2015/04/09/4th-gen-
> dell-xps-13-developer-edition-available/ : "If dual booting with Windows
> 8.1 and kernel 4.0 or earlier you will need to cold boot twice into the
> OS for audio to work."
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447767

Title:
  [XPS 13 9343, Intel Broadwell HDMI, Digital Out, HDMI] No sound at all

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1447767/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1316294] [NEW] Want to disable "Restore System Configuration" button

2014-05-05 Thread Garry Trethewey
Public bug reported:

Hi
New install of ubuntu 14.04, then as per 
https://sites.google.com/site/easylinuxtipsproject/alternative convert to 
xubuntu.
   alacarte 3.10.0-1ubuntu2

Dunno if this is a bug or a feature, but I've just spent 4 hours setting
up a customised menu, and I'd love to disable the "Restore System
Configuration" button.

I'm worried that when I look at it again 6 months from now, having
forgotten, one stray click & I'm ruined.

So - is there some command line switch, or could I find somewhere in the
python program to disable?

Or is there a directory I can back up. I've googled lots, and found lots
of advice to change directories that don't exist. Seems the menu files
could be anywhere.


regards Garry

** Affects: alacarte (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316294

Title:
  Want to disable "Restore System Configuration" button

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alacarte/+bug/1316294/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 814332] Re: package wide-dhcpv6-server 20080615-10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2013-11-13 Thread garry woolfe
** Changed in: wide-dhcpv6 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/814332

Title:
  package wide-dhcpv6-server 20080615-10 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wide-dhcpv6/+bug/814332/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1204385] [NEW] crashes alot bugs 920196/932398

2013-07-24 Thread garry woolfe
Public bug reported:

920196 and 932398

** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: 1204385

** Tags added: 1204385

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1204385

Title:
  crashes alot bugs 920196/932398

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1204385/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1034609] Re: Palimpsest warns about misalignment of extended partition

2013-01-22 Thread Garry Trethewey
+1

WARNING: The partition is misaligned by  bytes. This may result in
very poor performance. Repartitioning is suggested.

On a 1TB SATA disk I used gparted to set up the following

Partition
100GB NTFS 
70TB Ext3
2TB swap
828GB extended

Used Disk Utility to delete all, then used Disk Utility to repartition,
got

Partition  
100GB NTFS   512
70TB Ext3  1024
2TB swap2048
828GB extended   512

any ideas?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1034609

Title:
  Palimpsest warns about misalignment of extended partition

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/1034609/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1028750] Re: sound decreases instantly/automatically

2012-07-24 Thread DAYNA GARRY
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028750

Title:
  sound decreases instantly/automatically

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer0.10/+bug/1028750/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1028750] [NEW] sound decreases instantly/automatically

2012-07-24 Thread DAYNA GARRY
Public bug reported:

volume will not increase with any torrent attempted to be downloaded.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: libgstreamer0.10-0 0.10.30-1build2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-28.50-generic 2.6.35.11
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Jul 25 00:45:59 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/totem
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gstreamer0.10

** Affects: gstreamer0.10 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028750

Title:
  sound decreases instantly/automatically

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer0.10/+bug/1028750/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 482870] Re: ibus causes application crash when using chinese py input method

2012-07-08 Thread Garry Bernardy
I personally not use iBUS 1.2 anymore, so there is no problem with me...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482870

Title:
  ibus causes application crash when using chinese py input method

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus/+bug/482870/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 992232] Re: no libreoffice-report-builder in precise

2012-07-08 Thread Garry
Apologies. I don't have the exact update but it was the last update from
the libreoffice-universe repo perhaps 3 days ago. I neglected to take
note of the update because I didn't pick up the bug for a couple of
days.

The Tools < Options crash is;
* not present in 3.6 but base is very unstable in 3.6 and the forms crash. 
(installed from PPA libreoffice-prereleases)
* is present in the libreoffice-universe repo version
* is present in 1:3.5.3-0ubuntu from main.
* is not present if installed directly from Libreoffice website. Base and 
report builder work out of the gate with this install - Ver 3.5.4. The only 
slight issue is I had to load 64bit Mysql connector from Open Office.

Each install had a fresh config folder.

libreoffice-gtk3 was not installed on any of the versions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992232

Title:
  no libreoffice-report-builder in precise

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/992232/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 992232] Re: no libreoffice-report-builder in precise

2012-07-08 Thread Garry
The update yesterday has introduced another interesting bug on my machine. When 
you go Tools < Options it crashes LO. Have depreciated versions, purged config 
files and repositories, tried various Betas and custom builds from various 
PPA's and just haven't been able to find a combo where everything works as 
advertised.
In exasperation went to Libreoffice web site and downloaded and installed from 
there and bingo... everything works (including report builder) except table 
filtering by date and I can live with that.
I am a huge fan of Ubuntu and LO, but 12.04 has been the worst Ubuntu 
experience since I started using in 2007 (I like the direction but the bugs 
seem never ending). Grumble over.

Lenovo T420

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992232

Title:
  no libreoffice-report-builder in precise

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/992232/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1016724] Re: Laptop brightness always reverts to maximum on 12.04

2012-06-23 Thread Garry Cairns
@jsalisbury tested with the kernel you linked to (amd64 version) and the
problem was still apparent.


** Tags removed: needs-upstream-testing
** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016724

Title:
  Laptop brightness always reverts to maximum on 12.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1016724/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1016724] Re: Laptop brightness always reverts to maximum on 12.04

2012-06-22 Thread Garry Cairns
apport-collect 1016724 generates the output below and then hangs so I'm
not sure I can change the marking to complete. @jsalisbury I've never
tried to manually change kernel before so I'll wait until I have more
free time (probably tomorrow) so I can research how to do it properly
and safely before I try. Thanks for your attention.

No packages found matching linux.
ERROR: hook /usr/share/apport/general-hooks/ubuntu.py crashed:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apport/report.py", line 718, in 
add_hooks_info
symb['add_info'](self, ui)
  File "/usr/share/apport/general-hooks/ubuntu.py", line 45, in add_info
match_error_messages(report)
  File "/usr/share/apport/general-hooks/ubuntu.py", line 129, in 
match_error_messages
if report['ProblemType'] == 'Package':
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/UserDict.py", line 23, in __getitem__
raise KeyError(key)
KeyError: 'ProblemType'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/apport/apport-gtk", line 499, in 
GLib.idle_add(lambda: self.collect_info(on_finished=self.ui_update_view))
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apport/ui.py", line 867, in 
collect_info
icthread.exc_raise()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apport/REThread.py", line 34, in run
self._retval = self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apport/ui.py", line 111, in 
thread_collect_info
if report['ProblemType'] == 'Crash' and \
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/UserDict.py", line 23, in __getitem__
raise KeyError(key)
KeyError: 'ProblemType'

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016724

Title:
  Laptop brightness always reverts to maximum on 12.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1016724/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1016724] [NEW] Laptop brightness always reverts to maximum on 12.04

2012-06-22 Thread Garry Cairns
Public bug reported:

Whenever I start my laptop the brightness is at maximum. If I turn it
down (I set it to minimum) it returns to maximum if I change user
account. To be clear, it will still be maximum if I then switch back to
the original user account. Very occasionally it has also reset to
maximum when I switch workspace, but I can't recreate this behaviour
consistently so I'm wary of saying it's the same problem.

My expected behaviour is that the brightness level should stay where I
set it, as it did in previous releases. Output of lsb_release -rd, lshw
and lspci are below, in that order.

lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Release:12.04

lshw
lappy
description: Portable Computer
product: Inspiron 1545 ()
vendor: Winbond Electronics
serial: F09PXJ1
width: 64 bits
capabilities: smbios-2.4 dmi-2.4 vsyscall32
configuration: boot=normal chassis=portable 
uuid=44454C4C-3000-1039-8050-C6C04F584A31
  *-core
   description: Motherboard
   product: 0G437N
   vendor: Winbond Electronics
   physical id: 0
   serial: .F09PXJ1.CN7016699C008K.
 *-firmware
  description: BIOS
  vendor: Winbond Electronics
  physical id: 0
  version: A10
  date: 07/17/2009
  size: 64KiB
  capacity: 15MiB
  capabilities: isa pci pcmcia pnp upgrade shadowing cdboot bootselect 
int13floppy720 int5printscreen int9keyboard int14serial int17printer int10video 
acpi usb agp smartbattery biosbootspecification netboot
 *-cpu
  description: CPU
  product: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T6500  @ 2.10GHz
  vendor: Intel Corp.
  physical id: 400
  bus info: cpu@0
  slot: Microprocessor
  size: 1200MHz
  capacity: 2100MHz
  width: 64 bits
  clock: 200MHz
  capabilities: x86-64 fpu fpu_exception wp vme de pse tsc msr pae mce 
cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss 
ht tm pbe syscall nx constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl 
aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 xsave 
lahf_lm cpufreq
  configuration: cores=2 enabledcores=2 threads=2
*-cache:0
 description: L1 cache
 physical id: 700
 size: 128KiB
 capacity: 128KiB
 capabilities: internal write-back data
*-cache:1
 description: L2 cache
 physical id: 701
 size: 2MiB
 capacity: 2MiB
 clock: 66MHz (15.0ns)
 capabilities: pipeline-burst internal varies unified
 *-memory
  description: System Memory
  physical id: 1000
  slot: System board or motherboard
  size: 4GiB
*-bank:0
 description: DIMM DDR Synchronous 800 MHz (1.2 ns)
 product: HYMP125S64CP8-S6
 vendor: Hynix Semiconductor (Hyundai Electronics)
 physical id: 0
 serial: 4261365D
 slot: DIMM_A
 size: 2GiB
 width: 64 bits
 clock: 800MHz (1.2ns)
*-bank:1
 description: DIMM DDR Synchronous 800 MHz (1.2 ns)
 product: HYMP125S64CP8-S6
 vendor: Hynix Semiconductor (Hyundai Electronics)
 physical id: 1
 serial: 4221396E
 slot: DIMM_B
 size: 2GiB
 width: 64 bits
 clock: 800MHz (1.2ns)
 *-pci
  description: Host bridge
  product: Mobile 4 Series Chipset Memory Controller Hub
  vendor: Intel Corporation
  physical id: 100
  bus info: pci@:00:00.0
  version: 07
  width: 32 bits
  clock: 33MHz
*-pci:0
 description: PCI bridge
 product: Mobile 4 Series Chipset PCI Express Graphics Port
 vendor: Intel Corporation
 physical id: 1
 bus info: pci@:00:01.0
 version: 07
 width: 32 bits
 clock: 33MHz
 capabilities: pci pm msi pciexpress normal_decode bus_master 
cap_list
 configuration: driver=pcieport
 resources: irq:40 ioport:d000(size=4096) memory:f6d0-f6ef 
ioport:e000(size=268435456)
   *-display
description: VGA compatible controller
product: RV710 [Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Series]
vendor: Hynix Semiconductor (Hyundai Electronics)
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@:01:00.0
version: 00
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pm pciexpress msi vga_controller bus_master 
cap_list rom
configuration: driver=fglrx_pci latency=0
resources: irq:49 memory:e000-efff 
ioport:de00(size=256) memory:f6df-f6df memory:f6d0-f

[Bug 992232] Re: no libreoffice-report-builder in precise

2012-06-18 Thread Garry
Also fixed for me.

Now if I can just figure out how to get the filtering on tables to work
with dates I'll be a happy camper! I can filter a date but not for a
range of dates, however another problem all together.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992232

Title:
  no libreoffice-report-builder in precise

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/992232/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1012025] Re: update-grub not reading UUID's properly

2012-06-13 Thread Garry Trethewey
Yep. And it boots ok.
thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012025

Title:
  update-grub not reading UUID's properly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1012025/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1012025] Re: update-grub not reading UUID's properly

2012-06-13 Thread Garry Trethewey
I think you could be right. For no good reason I'd commented out the line
#UUID=9d6412d7-0277-4b1e-b56e-76eb9fb7e898  /  ext3  errors=remount-ro 0  1
on the source partition, so the new one was the same.

Nothing else was effected, the old one still booted ok, so I didn't
notice.

The interesting thing is that it seems grub2 didn't find that line
(unless it did a grep /), so I spose it then just kept the old "linux
/boot/vml..."  line.

I don't spose we can really call this a bug then - software writers
can't be expected to cope with every unusual dumb thing that people
might do.

Thanks for your help.
Garry

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012025

Title:
  update-grub not reading UUID's properly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1012025/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1012025] Re: update-grub not reading UUID's properly

2012-06-13 Thread Garry Trethewey
Phillip

On  _no_  partitions did /etc/fstab mention /dev/sdc7, or its UUID.

sdc7 didn't exist til I made it with gparted about 10 mins before I
partimage-restored the 12.04 precise os.

to recap, 
The 'copy from' (the old) partition was sdc1, UUID 898
The 'copy to' (the new) partition was   sdc7, UUID changed to 000
sda7 was just a old natty narwhale OS that I tried reinstalling grub from.

Does that help?

I spose the big question is, where does grub2 get the uuid's for the 'search' 
line, vs where grub2 gets the uuid for the 'linux' line. Obviously 2 different 
places.
 
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root 9d6412d7-0277-4b1e-b56e-76eb9fb7e000
linux   /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-24-generic-pae 
root=UUID=9d6412d7-0277-4b1e-b56e-76eb9fb7e898 ro 

I've always used the old grub before, and never had this particular prob
in cloning &/or restoring OS partitions.

regards Garry

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012025

Title:
  update-grub not reading UUID's properly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1012025/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1012025] [NEW] update-grub not reading UUID's properly

2012-06-12 Thread Garry Trethewey
Public bug reported:

Bug report

update-grub not reading UUID's properly

Grub2
xubuntu 12.04

garry@welland-precise-xfce:~$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Release:12.04
grub2 1.99-21ubuntu3.1

What happened?

1) I did a partimage backup of xbunutu 12.04 off sdc1, then restored that 
backup to sdc7.
2) I changed sdc7's UUID from 898 to 000
3) Back in sdc1, and in another OS on sda7, I used both yannubutu-boot-repair 
and (update-grub + grub-install).
4) I couldn't boot my new sdc7. (actually booted, but to repair menu, which I 
couldn't understand.)
5) On both other OS's grub.cfg kept reading as follows (note last 3 chars of 
UUID) :-
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root 9d6412d7-0277-4b1e-b56e-76eb9fb7e000
linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-23-generic 
root=UUID=9d6412d7-0277-4b1e-b56e-76eb9fb7e898 ro quiet splash $vt_handoff

5) When I edited the starting grub menu to make linux898  ->
linux~~~000, and update-grub + grub-install, sdc7 booted ok. From there
I update-grub + grub-install again, all is OK now.


I struggle with bash, but I suspect /etc/grub.d/10_linux line 124
 linux ${rel_dirname}/${basename} root=${linux_root_device_thisversion} ro 
${args}
is the culprit.

garrytr...@gmail.com

** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012025

Title:
  update-grub not reading UUID's properly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1012025/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 476784] Re: Does not work. You did fix it, right?

2012-06-12 Thread Garry Leach
I asked a Linux expert to help me on this.  The following are the steps
I followed.

After checking many files, & running some programs, he identified that the 
problem was caused by the line/s above:
"update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for iceape-flashplugin."

He then asked me to edit "/var/lib/dpkg/info/flashplugin-
installer.prerm", & delete all packages that weren't installed,
including  iceape-flashplugin.

Then run: "sudo sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/flashplugin-installer.prerm
remove"

Then run re-install firefox (which by then was trated as a broken
package.

This removed adobe-flashplugin & Update manager is again working.

Regards Garry.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476784

Title:
  Does not work. You did fix it, right?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/476784/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 476784] Re: Does not work. You did fix it, right?

2012-06-08 Thread Garry Leach
I use Mythbuntu.  I had fallen behind in upgrading, because I was
reasonably happy with the stability of 10.10.  However, when the message
came that updates were no longer supported, I decided to upgrade,
progressively, through 11.04, 11.10 & 12.04.

Towards the end of the 11.04 upgrade process, the following was
reported:

"Could not install the upgrades

The upgrade has aborted. Your system could be in an unusable state. A
recovery will run now (dpkg --configure -a).

Upgrade complete

The upgrade has completed but there were errors during the upgrade
process."

Further to this, I identified that package adobe-flashplugin, ver.
10.0,22.87-1 is broken.

I manually tried to remove adobe "Completely", using Synaptic "broken
packages" function, but:

"E: adobe-flashplugin: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned
error exit status 2"

Update Manager requested I fix broken pkg indexes:

"sudo apt-get install -f"

"The following packages will be REMOVED:
  adobe-flashplugin
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
After this operation, 10.2 MB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Y"

"(Reading database ... 282241 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing adobe-flashplugin ...
update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for iceape-flashplugin.
update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for iceape-flashplugin.
dpkg: error processing adobe-flashplugin (--remove):
 subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2
postinst called with argument `abort-remove'
dpkg: error while cleaning up:
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 adobe-flashplugin
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)"

I am now unsure of the status of my PC.

Update Manager is locked, & Synaptic doesn't respond to doing anything
with adobe.

I don't know whether I will be able to reboot the system...

Regards, Garry.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476784

Title:
  Does not work. You did fix it, right?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/476784/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 991713] Re: [8086:4232] Wireless not connecting in 12.04 Intel Wifi Link 5100

2012-06-05 Thread Garry
I have the same bug. Wireless would not connect to 802.11N after upgrade
to 12.04.

WORKAROUND: I had to disable N mode with

options iwlwifi 11n_disable=1

in /etc/modprobe.d/disable11n.conf

I did a new install of 12.04 and it seemed to have fixed the problem,
however after a couple of days the issue returned and I had to revert to
the workaround.

Chili555 over at Ubuntu Forums seems to be the go to guy on this issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991713

Title:
  [8086:4232] Wireless not connecting in 12.04 Intel Wifi Link 5100

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/991713/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 919659] Re: Can't open/save document or spreadsheet with password, when mozilla profile has an absolute path

2012-05-07 Thread Garry Trethewey
I'm no expert, but here's my workaround
Going from ubuntu 10.04 to 12.04
Old file, made by OOO ver??, used by OOO ver?? and LO ver??, now LO writer v 
3.5.2.2 now rejecting password.

Until now I have used the default placement for firefox, ie
/home/garry/.mozilla/firefox/profiles.ini
which said
IsRelative=0
Path=/media/data/mozilla/firefox/Profiles/ubuntu.default

Now I have
/home/garry/.mozilla/(symlink to /media/data/mozilla/firefox)/profiles.ini
which says
IsRelative=1
Path=ubuntu.default

So now password works.
(why on earth LO depends on Ff, who knows?)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919659

Title:
  Can't open/save document or spreadsheet with password, when mozilla
  profile has an absolute path

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/919659/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 992232] Re: no libreoffice-report-builder in precise

2012-05-07 Thread Garry
Report builder 1.2.1 is installed in extension manager (locked) on my
build, however there seems to be dependencies issues with L0 3.5 and
above which won't let it work. I have tried the Oracle version with no
luck. The table filtering in Base is also broken... maybe a JAVA issue?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992232

Title:
  no libreoffice-report-builder in precise

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/992232/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 994872] Re: Report Builder does not open

2012-05-04 Thread Garry
Hi Christopher

The bug is not invalid. I downgraded to the release version and the bug
is still there. See my comment about changing to the PPA version to see
if the bug was fixed or changed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994872

Title:
  Report Builder does not open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/994872/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 994872] [NEW] Report Builder does not open

2012-05-04 Thread Garry
Public bug reported:

Duplicate of bug 779798, however in 12.04.
libreoffice: Installed: 1:3.5.3~rc2-0ubuntu1~ppa2. ( 
http://ppa.launchpad.net/libreoffice/ppa/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64)
This bug was in the release version of 12.04. Tried the PPA version to see if 
updating had any effect (and it does not)

** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994872

Title:
  Report Builder does not open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/994872/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 779798] Re: Report Builder does not open

2012-05-02 Thread Garry
Its back in 1:3.5 after the upgrade to Ubuntu 12.04 and don't seem to be
able to find a way around it.

When I try and open an existing report, I get the error, librptlo.so is
not installed. If I try to create a new report, nothing happens.

I also notice that filtering a database no longer works. May be related,
but can live with that for now if I can get the reports working.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779798

Title:
  Report Builder does not open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/779798/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 577545] Re: "gconf-sanity-check-2 exited with status 256" on log in

2012-03-18 Thread Garry Leach
Hi Jessie

Firstly, this bug does not seem to affect anything that I (as an end
user, like yourself) could detect.  Clearing the message seemed enough
to be able to proceed with booting & using the PC.

I have now moved on to 11.10.  This bug went away by 11.04.  I don't
know how 11.10 would go in an eeePC, although it is supposed to be
designed as an all-round OS...

I use a desktop PC, so I can't comment on your eeePC issues, but it
sounds awful for you.  One of my daughters has an original eeePC (the
small screen one).  We haven't tried to change the OS, as it just keeps
on going (the speaker has died).

My understanding is that the ASUS version of the OS was tailored to the
HW - one of the reasons I didn't like to try a different version of
Ubuntu.

In spite of my lack of IT training, I am a volunteer in a computer
recycling depot (in Australia).  We rebuild PCs if they are OK,
generally 5 year old, with Pentium 4 CPUs, using the Ubuntu OS.  We are
finding that drivers for the older hardware are not always supported in
later versions of Ubuntu (we are working with 10.04).

Have you thought about trying one of the lighter versions of Linux?  Or
and older version, particularly an LTS (long term support) version?

Regards, Garry.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577545

Title:
  "gconf-sanity-check-2 exited with status 256" on log in

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gconf/+bug/577545/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 920265] [NEW] ubuntu 11.10 oneiric failed to install, froze during install, then had no grub loader when restarted

2012-01-22 Thread garry goode
Public bug reported:

"
dpkg: warning: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 3 package 'dpkg':
 missing description
dpkg: warning: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 3 package 'dpkg':
 missing maintainer
dpkg: warning: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 3 package 'dpkg':
 missing architecture
Selecting previously deselected package base-files.
dpkg: regarding .../base-files_6.4ubuntu5_i386.deb containing base-files, 
pre-dependency problem:
 base-files pre-depends on awk
  awk is not installed.
dpkg: warning: ignoring pre-dependency problem!
(Reading database ... 0 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking base-files (from .../base-files_6.4ubuntu5_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package base-passwd.
Unpacking base-passwd (from .../base-passwd_3.5.23_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: base-passwd: dependency problems, but configuring anyway as you requested:
 base-passwd depends on libc6 (>= 2.8); however:
  Package libc6 is not installed.
Setting up base-passwd (3.5.23) ...
dpkg: base-files: dependency problems, but configuring anyway as you requested:
 base-files depends on awk; however:
  Package awk is not installed.
Setting up base-files (6.4ubuntu5) ...
dpkg: warning: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 51 package 'dpkg':
 missing description
dpkg: warning: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 51 package 'dpkg':
 missing maintainer
dpkg: warning: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 51 package 'dpkg':
 missing architecture
dpkg: regarding .../dpkg_1.16.0.3ubuntu5_i386.deb containing dpkg, 
pre-dependency problem:
 dpkg pre-depends on libbz2-1.0
  libbz2-1.0 is not installed.
dpkg: warning: ignoring pre-dependency problem!
dpkg: regarding .../dpkg_1.16.0.3ubuntu5_i386.deb containing dpkg, 
pre-dependency problem:
 dpkg pre-depends on libc6 (>= 2.11)
dpkg: warning: ignoring pre-dependency problem!
dpkg: regarding .../dpkg_1.16.0.3ubuntu5_i386.deb containing dpkg, 
pre-dependency problem:
 dpkg pre-depends on libselinux1 (>= 1.32)
dpkg: warning: ignoring pre-dependency problem!
dpkg: regarding .../dpkg_1.16.0.3ubuntu5_i386.deb containing dpkg, 
pre-dependency problem:
 dpkg pre-depends on zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4)
dpkg: warning: ignoring pre-dependency problem!
dpkg: regarding .../dpkg_1.16.0.3ubuntu5_i386.deb containing dpkg, 
pre-dependency problem:
 dpkg pre-depends on coreutils (>= 5.93-1)
dpkg: warning: ignoring pre-dependency problem!
dpkg: regarding .../dpkg_1.16.0.3ubuntu5_i386.deb containing dpkg, 
pre-dependency problem:
 dpkg pre-depends on xz-utils
  xz-utils is not installed.
dpkg: warning: ignoring pre-dependency problem!
(Reading database ... 117 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace dpkg 1.16.0.3ubuntu5 (using 
.../dpkg_1.16.0.3ubuntu5_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement dpkg ...
dpkg: dpkg: dependency problems, but configuring anyway as you requested:
 dpkg depends on libbz2-1.0; however:
  Package libbz2-1.0 is not installed.
 dpkg depends on libc6 (>= 2.11); however:
  Package libc6 is not installed.
 dpkg depends on libselinux1 (>= 1.32); however:
  Package libselinux1 is not installed.
 dpkg depends on zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4); however:
  Package zlib1g is not installed.
 dpkg depends on coreutils (>= 5.93-1); however:
  Package coreutils is not installed.
 dpkg depends on xz-utils; however:
  Package xz-utils is not installed.
Setting up dpkg (1.16.0.3ubuntu5) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libc6.
(Reading database ... 360 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libc6 (from .../libc6_2.13-20ubuntu5_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: libc6: dependency problems, but configuring anyway as you requested:
 libc6 depends on libc-bin (= 2.13-20ubuntu5); however:
  Package libc-bin is not installed.
 libc6 depends on libgcc1; however:
  Package libgcc1 is not installed.
 libc6 depends on tzdata; however:
  Package tzdata is not installed.
Setting up libc6 (2.13-20ubuntu5) ...
Selecting previously deselected package perl-base.
(Reading database ... 669 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking perl-base (from .../perl-base_5.12.4-4_i386.deb) ...
Setting up perl-base (5.12.4-4) ...
Selecting previously deselected package mawk.
(Reading database ... 1701 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking mawk (from .../mawk_1.3.3-15ubuntu2_i386.deb) ...
Setting up mawk (1.3.3-15ubuntu2) ...
Selecting previously deselected package debconf.
(Reading database ... 1720 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking debconf (from .../debconf_1.5.40ubuntu1_all.deb) ...
Setting up debconf (1.5.40ubuntu1) ...
Selecting previously deselected package adduser.
(Reading database ... 1902 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking adduser (from .../adduser_3.112+nmu1ubuntu5_all.deb) ...
Preparing to replace base-files 6.4ubuntu5 (using 
.../base-files_6.4ubuntu5_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement base-files ...
Preparing to replace base-passwd 3.5.23 (using .../base-passwd_3.5

[Bug 850106] Re: Fails to append sent mail to mbox in post-processing

2011-12-15 Thread Garry Leach
I am getting the error as reported in this bug.

I installed 11.10 on 29/11/11 & requested Evolution to be my mail package.
 
As soon as I sent some mail, I received the error message as reported in 850106.
 
I checked bugs, found #850106, & read that on 2011-10-25 it was confirmed that 
it was fixed in Evolution 3.2.0, & subsequently closed.

I would like #850106 to be re-opened.
 
My versions of Evolution packages are currently:
evolution   3.2.1-0ubuntu1
evolution-common3.2.1-0ubuntu1
evolution-couchdb   0.5.91-0ubuntu6
evolution-couchdb-backend   0.5.91-0ubuntu6
evolution-data-server   3.2.2-0ubuntu1
evolution-data-server-common3.2.2-0ubuntu1
evolution-exchange  3.2.0-0ubuntu2
evolution-indicator 0.2.20-0ubuntu3
evolution-plugins   3.2.1-0ubuntu1
evolution-webcal2.32.0-1build1

I send a lot of mail &, although I appreciate that this is not a serious
problem, it is annoying.

Regards, Garry Leach.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850106

Title:
  Fails to append sent mail to mbox in post-processing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/850106/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 792849] Re: Lenovo ThinkPad T420 random hardlocks with Sandy Bridge graphics

2011-12-05 Thread Garry
I've run chromium from day 1 and it still hard locked on 11.04. I have
not had a single hard lock on 11.10.

H/W path   Device Class  Description

  system 41785PA ()
/0bus41785PA
/0/1  processor  Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2410M CPU @ 2.
/0/1/2memory 64KiB L1 cache
/0/1/3memory 256KiB L2 cache
/0/1/4memory 3MiB L3 cache
/0/5  memory 4GiB System Memory
/0/5/0memory 4GiB SODIMM DDR3 Synchronous 1333 M
/0/5/1memory DIMM [empty]
/0/e  memory 128KiB BIOS
/0/100bridge 2nd Generation Core Processor Famil
/0/100/2  display2nd Generation Core Processor Famil
/0/100/16 communication  6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family
/0/100/19  eth0   network82579LM Gigabit Network Connection
/0/100/1a bus6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family
/0/100/1b multimedia 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family
/0/100/1c bridge 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family
/0/100/1c.1   bridge 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family
/0/100/1c.1/0  wlan0  networkCentrino Advanced-N 6205
/0/100/1c.3   bridge 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family
/0/100/1c.4   bridge 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family
/0/100/1c.4/0 genericRicoh Co Ltd
/0/100/1d bus6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family
/0/100/1f bridge QM67 Express Chipset Family LPC Con
/0/100/1f.2scsi0  storage6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family
/0/100/1f.2/0  /dev/sda   disk   300GB INTEL SSDSA2CW30
/0/100/1f.2/0/1/dev/sda1  volume 18GiB EXT4 volume
/0/100/1f.2/0/2/dev/sda2  volume 257GiB EXT4 volume
/0/100/1f.2/0/3/dev/sda3  volume 3814MiB Extended partition
/0/100/1f.2/0/3/5  /dev/sda5  volume 3814MiB Linux swap / Solaris partit
/0/100/1f.2/1  /dev/sdb   disk   200GB Hitachi HTS72202
/0/100/1f.2/1/1/dev/sdb1  volume 186GiB EXT4 volume
/0/100/1f.3   bus6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family
/1power  42T4791

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792849

Title:
  Lenovo ThinkPad T420 random hardlocks with Sandy Bridge graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/792849/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 681945] Re: Xorg.log flooded with specific Xalloc warning message about 0 size memory

2011-11-27 Thread Garry Leach
I am using 11.04.

I have had problems with displaying the Grub boot menu, plus getting a
warning from the monitor (Dell 24 inch) about matching the resolution.
After much "research" & some trial & error with changing Grub2's input
files (GFXMODE & VGA=), I now have the grub menu, but I do get an Ubuntu
error msg (about VGA=, which I realise is unrelated to this bug).

So I tried running in recovery mode & that is when I received the error
msg about memory.

I have an nVidia Corporation G96 [GeForce 9500 GT] (rev a1) chip on a
card, & "using" NVidia accelerated graphics driver (version 173),
although the Additional Drivers tool says that it is activated but not
in use (I have read that this msg is incorrect).  I previously had the
"version current" installed, but changed it when it also said that it
was not in use...

I also get a major failure when I try to return to the desktop (from a
console), using ctl/alt/F7; only the bottom half of the screen shows
anything, but it is gibberish.

Regards, Garry.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681945

Title:
  Xorg.log flooded with specific Xalloc warning message about 0 size
  memory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/681945/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 667071] Re: Folders opened by wrong application

2011-10-31 Thread Garry Leach
Hi Jack,

Thanks for pushing me to look at this again.

Yesterday, I went through the "open with other applications" a dozen
times, but I am sure that the "remember..." check box was not there.

it was this time!

And with the "remember this application for XYZ files" check box
pre-ticked!

This pre-ticking was the start of this bug earlier this year; I thought
that the plan was to remove the default tick, but I seem to remember a
discussion that the developers removed the "remember..." facility
completely...

Although I am confused now as to why or what, I will look out for the
tick in future!

Regards, Garry.

On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 01:03 +, John Hagerman wrote:
> On 11-10-30 04:28 PM, Garry Leach wrote:
> > Hi,use th

> >
> > I just did a little more testing.  It seems to remember the last used
> > application for .jpg&  .avi, but in an inconsistent way.
> >
> > If try to open a .jpg, it "opens" with movie player.
> >
> > If I change it to open with image viewer, it opens OK, but if I close
> > that window, then select another .jpg,  it "opens" with movie player.
> >
> > If I try to open a .avi, it fails to open (with an error message), but
> > has image viewer set as the default.
> >
> > Regards, Garry.
> >
> Right click on the file, click on "open with other application" and 
> choose the application you want to use. Check mark "Remember this 
> application." and all applications of that type will open with 
> that application.
> 
> Jack
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667071

Title:
  Folders opened by wrong application

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/667071/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 667071] Re: Folders opened by wrong application

2011-10-30 Thread Garry Leach
Hi,

I just did a little more testing.  It seems to remember the last used
application for .jpg & .avi, but in an inconsistent way.

If try to open a .jpg, it "opens" with movie player.

If I change it to open with image viewer, it opens OK, but if I close
that window, then select another .jpg,  it "opens" with movie player.

If I try to open a .avi, it fails to open (with an error message), but
has image viewer set as the default.

Regards, Garry.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667071

Title:
  Folders opened by wrong application

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/667071/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 667071] Re: Folders opened by wrong application

2011-10-30 Thread Garry Leach
Hi,

This may be a new bug, or just a nuisance...

I was a subscriber to the original bug; the workaround was OK.

I upgraded to 11.04, earlier this year.

Recently, something seems to have changed:

when I click on a photo (.jpg), I expect it to open with image viewer,
as it has "always" done (I have been using Ubuntu since 2005).

However, it now opens with movie player, showing a blank window, as the
file is not a movie.

I did have some short .avi videos mixed in with the set of photos, so I
suspect that one of these has triggered the open-with movie player.

However, now that there is no way to change the default application, I
seem to be stuck with having to individually use the open-with feature
whenever I want to look at photos.

Any suggestions?

Regards, Garry.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667071

Title:
  Folders opened by wrong application

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/667071/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 861799] Re: banshee using 100% cpu

2011-10-17 Thread Garry
Same issue. I had Banshee minimised to dock, put my hand down beside the laptop 
to pick up something and the fan was churning hot air at an alarming rate. 
Killed via system monitor. There seems to be no program combo I use that seems 
to create any issues (been playing with combos and watching the resources) The 
only thing I have noticed, is that the amount of processor resources seem to 
change markedly depending on the bit rate of the file being played (and not  in 
the uniform manner I expected)
At 88 kbps - 8%
At 145 kbps - 8%
At 256 kbps -50%
At 353 kbps - 24%
I can recreate this on multiple files quite easily. Doesn't seem to make a lot 
of sense. Don't know if it means anything or not.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/861799

Title:
  banshee using 100% cpu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/banshee/+bug/861799/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 792849] Re: Lenovo ThinkPad T420 random hardlocks with Sandy Bridge graphics

2011-10-14 Thread Garry
I can confirm that the problem is gone in 11.10 on the T420. I upgraded
early in the Beta phase because it was such an issue for me and have had
no lock ups since.

For what its worth I think its worth the upgrade to 11.10. I find it
much more polished and stable than 11.04.

Cheers

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792849

Title:
  Lenovo ThinkPad T420 random hardlocks with Sandy Bridge graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/792849/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 860987] Re: No ringtone in Skype

2011-10-08 Thread Garry
Now that's a head scratcher. It almost seems like a slightly different
problem. I have to think about it for a bit.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860987

Title:
  No ringtone in Skype

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/860987/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 860987] Re: No ringtone in Skype

2011-10-08 Thread Garry
Costello22... do you still have  'Allow Skype to automatically adjust my
mixer levels' turned off?  Mine still is.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860987

Title:
  No ringtone in Skype

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/860987/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 860987] Re: No ringtone in Skype

2011-10-07 Thread Garry
This mornings IA32 libs and multiarch update seems to have fixed the
issue for me.

Everything's ops normal.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860987

Title:
  No ringtone in Skype

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/860987/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 860987] Re: No ringtone in Skype

2011-10-07 Thread Garry
Now you mention it same here. I had it minimised in the dock, however if
I shut it down it reverts to being all broken.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860987

Title:
  No ringtone in Skype

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/860987/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 860987] Re: No ringtone in Skype

2011-10-05 Thread Garry
All. The update didn't seem to fix the problem. The good news is I have found a 
work around for my garbled input (at least for my system)
Go into Skype 'Options' < 'Sound Devices' and deselect 'Allow Skype to 
automatically adjust my mixer levels'.
Next go to the 'Sound Settings' and click on the 'Applications tab". From Skype 
make a test call. In the applications tab you will see two sliders come up. 
Move the top one about a third of the way to the left of the available travel. 
You should now have functional call out. It appears the input volume is too 
high with the default settings which is causing issues within Skype.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860987

Title:
  No ringtone in Skype

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/860987/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 860987] Re: No ringtone in Skype

2011-10-04 Thread Garry
Nice. Thanks gents.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860987

Title:
  No ringtone in Skype

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/860987/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 860987] Re: No ringtone in Skype

2011-10-04 Thread Garry
** Attachment added: "skype_20111005-0954.trace.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/860987/+attachment/2510997/+files/skype_20111005-0954.trace.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860987

Title:
  No ringtone in Skype

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/860987/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 860987] Re: No ringtone in Skype

2011-10-04 Thread Garry
After recent update mic stop working correctly in Skype. On a test call
its working but the sound stutters badly making it unusable.

A couple of Skype logs are attached for what its worth.

** Attachment added: "skype_20111005-0954.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/860987/+attachment/2510995/+files/skype_20111005-0954.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860987

Title:
  No ringtone in Skype

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/860987/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 863302] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in unity::switcher::SwitcherController::~SwitcherController()

2011-10-04 Thread Garry
I seem to get it using Libreoffice. No real rhyme nor reason I can tell.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863302

Title:
  compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in
  unity::switcher::SwitcherController::~SwitcherController()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/863302/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 862497] Re: thunderbird missing window decoration

2011-10-03 Thread Garry
I have the same problem with Intel graphics. Gnucash, Thunderbird and
sometimes Chromium, although if I go into "Preferences" < "Personal
Stuff" and then deselect and reselect "Use system title bar and borders"
the window boarder will come back in Chromium. From post #6 I see Gedit
was affected for this user, however Gedit is fine on my system.
Puzzling.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862497

Title:
  thunderbird missing window decoration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/862497/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 792849] Re: Lenovo ThinkPad T420 random hardlocks with Sandy Bridge graphics

2011-08-29 Thread Garry
Scratch the above. Restarted again to test (in classic no effects). As
Skype was starting after login ... complete hard lock.  I'm stumped.
Gotta be a Kernel issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792849

Title:
  Lenovo ThinkPad T420 random hardlocks with Sandy Bridge graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/792849/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 792849] Re: Lenovo ThinkPad T420 random hardlocks with Sandy Bridge graphics

2011-08-29 Thread Garry
Same issue with random hard locks.  Now running using Ubuntu Classic (No
effects) and have had no lock ups for 3 days.

Will see what 11.10 Beta 1 brings and may upgrade to that to see if the
problem goes away.

T420, 11.04, Kenel 2.6.38-11-generic, Gnome 2.32.1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792849

Title:
  Lenovo ThinkPad T420 random hardlocks with Sandy Bridge graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/792849/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 799452] Re: package man-db 2.5.9-4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script was killed by signal (Broken pipe)

2011-06-19 Thread garry barker
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799452

Title:
  package man-db 2.5.9-4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed
  post-installation script was killed by signal (Broken pipe)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/799452/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 799452] [NEW] package man-db 2.5.9-4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script was killed by signal (Broken pipe)

2011-06-19 Thread garry barker
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: man-db

got man-db on loding 11.04 asked to report it  do not know y

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: man-db 2.5.9-4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Jun 19 16:24:27 2011
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script was killed by 
signal (Broken pipe)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release i386 (20110427.1)
SourcePackage: man-db
Title: package man-db 2.5.9-4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed 
post-installation script was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: man-db (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799452

Title:
  package man-db 2.5.9-4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed
  post-installation script was killed by signal (Broken pipe)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/799452/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 781403] Re: Save & Save As does not save in both Firefox & Gedit

2011-06-03 Thread Garry Leach
Hi Sebastien,

Thanks for looking at this.

Less than 1 week after I submitted this bug report, I upgraded to 11.04,
& no longer have this problem.

Do you still want me to try & do something about this?  If so, I need
some guidance.

I appreciate that the following is probably not in your area.  Can you
suggest what I should do about it?

I do have a different problem  (#778864), so I thought that I would try
the backtrace suggestion in your post & load the debug tools.

However, when I used the terminal & followed the instruction, there were
errors with synaptic's reload:

W: Failed to fetch http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/dists/natty-updates/Release
Unable to find expected entry 'deb/binary-i386/Packages' in Release file
(Wrong sources.list entry or malformed file)

E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old
ones used instead.

I looked in synaptic & noticed that all 3 of the debs were on a single
entry.  Thinking that this was the problem, I re-entered them
individually, using the repository GUI.  Again I received error
messages.  Unfortunately, I moved on without saving these messages.

So I replaced the "$(lsb_release -cs)" with natty; the result is below.

Failed to fetch http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/dists/natty-updates/Release  Unable to 
find expected entry 'main/source/Sources' in Release file (Wrong sources.list 
entry or malformed file)
Failed to fetch http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/dists/natty-security/Release  Unable to 
find expected entry 'main/source/Sources' in Release file (Wrong sources.list 
entry or malformed file)
Failed to fetch http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/dists/natty-proposed/Release  Unable to 
find expected entry 'main/source/Sources' in Release file (Wrong sources.list 
entry or malformed file)
Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used 
instead.

I also looked at my problem package in synaptic.  The operational package has a 
different version to the debug package:
mythtv-common 2.0.24.0+ fixes 20110514 (etc)
mythtv-common-dbgsym  2.0.24.0+ fixes 20110416
So when I tried to install the  debug package, it failed.

Regards, Garry.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781403

Title:
  Save & Save As does not save in both Firefox & Gedit

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 681929] Re: Evolution Calendar alarms are not displayed

2011-06-01 Thread Garry Leach
I posted the following comment to #738982 on 29/05/11.  It is my
workaround for this problem.

Regards, Garry.

2 weeks ago, I upgraded to 11.04.

Again Calendar alarms would not work.

I checked file "/usr/lib/evolution/X.XX/evolution".  It had 2.32, but
the Evolution Alarm notifier in Start-up Applications was requesting to
run file "/usr/lib/evolution/2.30/evolution", which was the value used
in 10.10, i.e. prior to the upgrade.

If I have the only installation that has this problem (presumably that
is why this bug expired), what could there be about my installation that
does not allow these 2 elements to be co-ordinated?

Regards, Garry.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681929

Title:
  Evolution Calendar alarms are not displayed

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 738982] Re: Calendar alarm notifier would not notify any events

2011-05-28 Thread Garry Leach
2 weeks ago, I upgraded to 11.04.

Again Calendar alarms would not work.

I checked file "/usr/lib/evolution/X.XX/evolution".  It had 2.32, but
the Evolution Alarm notifier in Start-up Applications was requesting to
run file "/usr/lib/evolution/2.30/evolution", which was the value used
in 10.10, i.e. prior to the upgrade.

If I have the only installation that has this problem (presumably that
is why this bug expired), what could there be about my installation that
does not allow these 2 elements to be co-ordinated?

Regards, Garry.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738982

Title:
  Calendar alarm notifier would not notify any events

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 789687] [NEW] Save As within Firefox works intermittently

2011-05-28 Thread Garry Leach
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: firefox

1. Ubuntu 11.04
2. Firefox 4.0.1+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.3
3. I had used Firefox to get some information from the internet.  I clicked on 
"save as", expecting it to proceed from there.
4. The "save as" window opened, but it was blank white.
It had worked on one occasion a few minutes earlier today.  This document was 
mostly text with some formatting (a motherboard specification from ASUS).
The next window I selected was a photo of the motherboard.  This is the one 
that failed  to save.
As this had also happened yesterday, I decided to report the problem.
After triggering Apport & sending that information, the Launchpad login screen 
came up (as expected).
At this time, the Save As screen changed from blank to showing the previous 
folder to which I had saved, plus the folder contents (normal).
However, when I tried to change the file name, from the website's name to a 
more meaningful one, I couldn't delete or enter into that field.  I then 
clicked on the save button (to allow it to save to the folder & file name 
shown), but that had no effect.
The small window that gives details of a download then appeared, but it was 
white & empty.
I was able to close the download window & the Save As window.
Yesterday, I worked around the problem by copying the image from Firefox to 
LibreOffice Writer, & saving that file; this worked OK, but I would prefer to 
use the Save As function in Firefox.

I reported a problem (781403) with Save & Save As a few weeks ago, but
it went away.  I assumed that some fix had been made...  Apart from the
initial white screen, it's behaviour was not the same as in this report.

Regards, Garry.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: firefox 4.0.1+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-9.43-generic 2.6.38.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-9-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun May 29 07:30:54 2011
FirefoxPackages:
 firefox 4.0.1+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.11.04.3
 flashplugin-installer N/A
 adobe-flashplugin 10.3.181.14-0natty1
 icedtea-plugin N/A
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_AU:en
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 LC_MESSAGES=en_AU.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: firefox
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-14 (13 days ago)

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789687

Title:
  Save As within Firefox works intermittently

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 789687] Re: Save As within Firefox works intermittently

2011-05-28 Thread Garry Leach
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789687

Title:
  Save As within Firefox works intermittently

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 753047] Re: Ubuntu One address book not working in Evolution

2011-05-20 Thread Garry Williams
I too am having this issue now.  Sheesh, it seems if I'm trading one
desktopcouch problem for another!

When I run the above terminal commands I get this output:

dee@NicandDeeLinux:~$ killall -9 e-addressbook-factory
dee@NicandDeeLinux:~$ export COUCHDB_DEBUG_MESSAGES=1
dee@NicandDeeLinux:~$ /usr/lib/evolution/e-addressbook-factory
e-data-server-Message: adding type `EBookBackendWebdavFactory'
e-data-server-Message: adding type `EBookBackendGroupwiseFactory'
e-data-server-Message: adding type `EBookBackendVCFFactory'
e-data-server-Message: adding type `EBookBackendGoogleFactory'
e-data-server-Message: adding type `EBookBackendGalFactory'
e-data-server-Message: adding type `EBookBackendExchangeFactory'
e-data-server-Message: adding type `EBookBackendFileFactory'
e-data-server-Message: adding type `EBookBackendLDAPFactory'
Migrating cached backend data
Migrating local backend data
  rmdir /home/dee/.evolution
  FAILED: Directory not empty (contents follows)
  mail
Server is up and running...

After I open Evolution again, I click on U1 contacts, get the same error
message (invalid source) but the terminal just hangs at 'Server is up
and running...'.  Nothing happens after that.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753047

Title:
  Ubuntu One address book not working in Evolution

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 783728] Re: Contacts window froze after selecting a contact

2011-05-17 Thread Garry Leach
This morning, I tried to access contacts.  Presumably as I had not
cleared the contact's name yesterday, the same contact as yesterday was
in the summary window.  Again the window was not responding to open the
contact's detail pages.

When I clicked on "File", "open contact" & "V-card" were greyed-out.

Clicking on "clear the name of this contact" had no effect.

I forgot to mention yesterday that I received the following response
after trying to click on several spots, including "mail" & the "X" to
close the application.

"The window "Contacts - Evolution" is not responding.

Forcing this application to quit will cause you to lose any unsaved
changes."

After clicking on this, Evolution closed.  It reopened OK.

Otherwise, Evolution seems to be working - receiving mail, sending mail,
getting addresses from the address book.

Regards, Garry.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783728

Title:
  Contacts window froze after selecting a contact

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 783728] Re: Contacts window froze after selecting a contact

2011-05-16 Thread Garry Leach
I am also experiencing the problems similar to bug #773582 "Windows
blank to white after being resized larger".

Is it possible that #783728 could be a duplicate of #773582, with a
slightly different manifestation?

Regards, Garry.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783728

Title:
  Contacts window froze after selecting a contact

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 783728] Re: Contacts window froze after selecting a contact

2011-05-16 Thread Garry Leach
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783728

Title:
  Contacts window froze after selecting a contact

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 783728] [NEW] Contacts window froze after selecting a contact

2011-05-16 Thread Garry Leach
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: evolution

1.Ubuntu:  I upgraded to 11.04 on Sunday 15/04/2011.
2. evolution: Installed: 2.32.2-0ubuntu7

3. I wanted to access a particular contact.

4. From the Inbox window, I selected contacts, then typed a partial name in the 
search box.
That name & summary details came in the next window.

However, 
I could not open the contact's detailed set of windows/tabs.
I could not close the window.
The mouse & keyboard stilled worked, but could not be used to do anything on 
the window.  I was able to use ctl/alt/D to return to the desktop.

Eventually, I minimised the main window (I can't remember what changed to 
enable me to do this), then maximised it.  Both this window & the contacts 
window were greyed-out.
I was able to close the windows.
I then re-opened evolution & used "report a problem" to get the opportunity to 
report the bug.

Regards, Garry.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: evolution 2.32.2-0ubuntu7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-9.43-generic 2.6.38.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-9-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue May 17 08:19:03 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evolution
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_AU:en
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 LC_MESSAGES=en_AU.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: evolution
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-14 (2 days ago)

** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug apport-lpi i386 natty running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783728

Title:
  Contacts window froze after selecting a contact

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 781403] [NEW] Save & Save As does not save in both Firefox & Gedit

2011-05-11 Thread Garry Leach
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gedit

Ubuntu 10.10
Gedit 2.30.3-1ubuntu1
Firefox 3.6.17+build3+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.10.1

This error occurred in 2 different situations.

Firefox:
I had been browsing a website, found some useful information, then saved it 
(using save-as).  This worked OK.

I then selected another item, but when I tried to save it (again using
save-as), the name of the file darkened, but the save-as panel did not
close, nor did the file get saved.  I closed the panel & tried again,
but with no success.

Gedit:
In the meantime, Update manager popped up with some updates, so I allowed that 
to proceed.  There was a problem with installing mythtv-common (once again; 
already reported bug #778864), so I took a copy of the listed information, & 
copied it to Gedit, planning to save it if needed later, but this failed as for 
Firefox.

I haven't experienced this problem before.  I typically use the function
fairly often.

Regards, Garry.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: gedit 2.30.3-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-28.50-generic 2.6.35.11
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu May 12 07:25:13 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gedit
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_AU:en
 LANG=en_AU.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gedit

** Affects: gedit (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781403

Title:
  Save & Save As does not save in both Firefox & Gedit

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 781403] Re: Save & Save As does not save in both Firefox & Gedit

2011-05-11 Thread Garry Leach
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781403

Title:
  Save & Save As does not save in both Firefox & Gedit

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 754152] Re: Evolution unable to open CouchDB address book

2011-04-25 Thread Garry Williams
Sorry again Rodrigo, I didn't copy the full output.  Here you go:

dee@NicandDeeLinux:~$ apt-cache policy evolution-couchdb desktopcouch couchdb 
couchdb-bin
couchdb-bin:
  Installed: 1.0.1-0ubuntu15
  Candidate: 1.0.1-0ubuntu15
  Version table:
 *** 1.0.1-0ubuntu15 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
couchdb:
  Installed: 1.0.1-0ubuntu15
  Candidate: 1.0.1-0ubuntu15
  Version table:
 *** 1.0.1-0ubuntu15 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/universe i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
desktopcouch:
  Installed: 1.0.7-0ubuntu2
  Candidate: 1.0.7-0ubuntu2
  Version table:
 *** 1.0.7-0ubuntu2 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
evolution-couchdb:
  Installed: 0.5.3-0ubuntu2
  Candidate: 0.5.3-0ubuntu2
  Version table:
 *** 0.5.3-0ubuntu2 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
dee@NicandDeeLinux:~$

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754152

Title:
  Evolution unable to open CouchDB address book

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 754152] Re: Evolution unable to open CouchDB address book

2011-04-25 Thread Garry Williams
Sorry Rodrigo for the long delay!

After running the command on the terminal here was my output:

uchdb-bin
couchdb-bin:
  Installed: 1.0.1-0ubuntu15
  Candidate: 1.0.1-0ubuntu15
  Version table:
 *** 1.0.1-0ubuntu15 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
couchdb:
  Installed: 1.0.1-0ubuntu15
  Candidate: 1.0.1-0ubuntu15
  Version table:
 *** 1.0.1-0ubuntu15 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/universe i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
desktopcouch:
  Installed: 1.0.7-0ubuntu2
  Candidate: 1.0.7-0ubuntu2
  Version table:

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754152

Title:
  Evolution unable to open CouchDB address book

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 754152] Re: Evolution unable to open CouchDB address book

2011-04-20 Thread Garry Williams
I'm having a similar issue ever since upgrading to 11.04 Beta 2.  The
error message I receive is:

"Unable to open address book
This address book cannot be opened.  This either means that an incorrect URI 
was entered, or the server is unreachable.

Detailed error message: Timeout was reached"

After running $ /usr/lib/evolution/e-addressbook-factory the out put I
get is:

e-data-server-Message: adding type `EBookBackendWebdavFactory'
e-data-server-Message: adding type `EBookBackendGroupwiseFactory'
e-data-server-Message: adding type `EBookBackendVCFFactory'
e-data-server-Message: adding type `EBookBackendGoogleFactory'
e-data-server-Message: adding type `EBookBackendGalFactory'
e-data-server-Message: adding type `EBookBackendExchangeFactory'
e-data-server-Message: adding type `EBookBackendFileFactory'
e-data-server-Message: adding type `EBookBackendCouchDBFactory'
e-data-server-Message: adding type `EBookBackendLDAPFactory'
Migrating cached backend data
Migrating local backend data
  rmdir /home/dee/.evolution
  FAILED: Directory not empty (contents follows)
  mail
Server is up and running...


I've been having this issue for the past week and every troubleshooting 
technique I use seems to fail.  Any help would be appreciated.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754152

Title:
  Evolution unable to open CouchDB address book

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616287] Re: umountfs doesn't cleanly unmount / on reboot

2011-04-19 Thread Garry Leach
I have Mythbuntu 10.10 on one PC, & Ubuntu 10.10 on another.

I haven't noticed this bug on my Ubuntu PC (I don't think that I get any
close-down messages displayed).

On Mythbuntu PC, I upgraded to 10.10 (from 9.10, via 10.04)in in March
2011.

I have starting seeing this bug recently.  I don't regularly watch the
closing-down messages, because I close-down just before I go to bed each
night.

I have the OS + /home all on the same partition of an 80GB HDD.

I have 2 other HDD (320GB & 1TB); these are mounted on /mnt, & used for
all of my recorded TV, plus other videos.  I don't remember the age of
the 320GB HDD - this could be 3 years old.  The 1TB HDD is 1 year old.
They are about 50% full.

All HDDs are ext4.

The PC itself is from a new build 3 years ago.

I had been thinking that I needed to replace the 1TB HDD, due to what
seems to be disk errors, but this bug report seems to suggest that the
problem may be in Ubuntu.

I am getting various odd behaviours, but these are subject to a different bug 
report:
. pauses during playback
. exit to desktop from within playback (i.e. Myth frontend shuts itself down 
while paused or at the end of a recording, before I have a chance to delete the 
file).
. some others

Regards, Garry.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616287

Title:
  umountfs doesn't cleanly unmount / on reboot

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 752137] Re: bamfdaemon crashed with SIGABRT in dbus_g_connection_register_g_object()

2011-04-12 Thread Garry
Happened to me after latest upgrade this morning... system restarted.
Both times its happened I have been working with Libre Office. Ended up
with two Text Editor icons in the dock for the same open file. Shut the
file and both icons disappeared. Also Two Skype Icons, one of which is
unresponsive. All other dock icons respond as they should. Logout and
Login again gets everything up and running again.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752137

Title:
  bamfdaemon crashed with SIGABRT in
  dbus_g_connection_register_g_object()

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 747882] Re: Update failed during "tidy-up" stage; computer now broken

2011-04-01 Thread Garry Leach
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747882

Title:
  Update failed during "tidy-up" stage; computer now broken

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 747882] [NEW] Update failed during "tidy-up" stage; computer now broken

2011-04-01 Thread Garry Leach
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: update-manager

 Since the computer is broken (i.e. it won't boot), I can't access any
details.  I am sending this report from a different (Mythbuntu 10.10,
MythTV 0.24) HTPC.  I had copied the various error messages into a file
to attach to this report, but when I tried to load Update Manager to use
apport, the system went strange.

1. Ubuntu 10.10

2. I had updated all of the recently released updates.  The one that was
sent available to me around 08:00 April 1 (GMT + 11) - 7 packages, I
think - is the one that failed.

3. I expected the update manager to its its job & install the updates.

4. The download completed OK.

However, while handling package #3 (I think) - something about *lib*, it failed 
with messages something like:
"mounting /dev on /root/dev failed; no matching file or directory."
"mounting /proc on /root/proc failed; no matching file or directory."
"mounting /sys on /root/sys failed; no matching file or directory."

I can't remember the circumstances of the following messages.

Update Manager twice came up with the message " updates downloaded, but
not installed, at which time I clicked on the "install updates" button.

Any application that I opened after that just showed an empty screen, &
could not be closed.

I am not sure whether I was able to shut-down the system normally, or
whether I had to use the restart power button.

"target filesystem doesn't have requested /sbin/init; no init found.
Try passing init=bootarg

one message flashed too quickly for me to get all of the words.

manprobe (?) fatal   Could not open /lib/modules.

Bad magic number in /dev/sda3 (where I keep /home)
The superblock could not be read, or does not describe a correct ext2 file 
system (I am using
 ext4)

/home terminated with status 8.

On another boot, it gave the message that ? was not mounted, continue,
ignore, ?, manually fix.

[By the way, 10.10, was giving me that message on almost every boot for
a while, but then stopped giving it.  When I got that message, I used to
reboot.  After 1 or more tries, the system booted without that message.
I also used hibernate to shut-down sometimes; this message did not
appear when booting from hibernate.

This particular sda is about 5.5 years old.

I am retired, but work in a computer recycling depot as a volunteer.
Just last week, they changed their distro to 10.04 LTS, but have found
that the above problem comes up regularly on a rebuilt PC (i.e. with
older HDD); the boss told me how to use e2fsck to check & clean the
problem hdd.]

I had Ubuntu 10.04.1 on a live CD.  I tried to boot using that, but it
failed with complaints about sda.

I had mythbuntu 10.10 installed on a HDD.  I tried to boot using that,
but it also failed with complaints about sda.  When I removed sda, myth
booted OK.

So, I am in a mess, particularly as my latest /home back-up is nearly 6
months old.  I had a small disaster 6 weeks ago with my last attempt at
back-up (my fault; incorrect parameters), so was still cleaning up from
that before making a new backup.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: update-manager 1:0.142.22
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-28.49-generic 2.6.35.11
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Apr  2 09:21:47 2011
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_AU.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: update-manager

** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747882

Title:
  Update failed during "tidy-up" stage; computer now broken

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 743705] Re: package linux-image-2.6.31-23-generic 2.6.31-23.74 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2011-03-27 Thread Garry Cobbum
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743705

Title:
  package linux-image-2.6.31-23-generic 2.6.31-23.74 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 2

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 743705] [NEW] package linux-image-2.6.31-23-generic 2.6.31-23.74 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2011-03-27 Thread Garry Cobbum
Public bug reported:

Auto-installed via Update Manager.

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
ArecordDevices:
  List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
 card 0: SB [HDA ATI SB], device 0: HDA Generic [HDA Generic]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  gcobbum2112 F pulseaudio
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'SB'/'HDA ATI SB at 0xfe024000 irq 16'
   Mixer name   : 'Realtek ID 892'
   Components   : 'HDA:10ec0892,1458a102,00100302'
   Controls  : 4
   Simple ctrls  : 3
Card1.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:1 'HDMI'/'HDA ATI HDMI at 0xfdffc000 irq 19'
   Mixer name   : 'ATI RS690/780 HDMI'
   Components   : 'HDA:1002791a,00791a00,0010'
   Controls  : 4
   Simple ctrls  : 1
Card1.Amixer.values:
 Simple mixer control 'IEC958',0
   Capabilities: pswitch pswitch-joined
   Playback channels: Mono
   Mono: Playback [off]
Date: Sun Mar 27 11:43:34 2011
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 2
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=dc88abb1-8659-4d85-9cdb-721bc4266435
IwConfig:
 lono wireless extensions.
 
 eth1  no wireless extensions.
MachineType: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. GA-880GM-UD2H
Package: linux-image-2.6.31-23-generic 2.6.31-23.74
ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=86853408-102d-48f8-8ed2-807ef824e0cb ro quiet splash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-22.73-generic
RelatedPackageVersions:
 linux-backports-modules-2.6.31-22-generic N/A
 linux-firmware 1.26
RfKill:
 
SourcePackage: linux
Title: package linux-image-2.6.31-23-generic 2.6.31-23.74 failed to 
install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error 
exit status 2
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-22-generic i686
WpaSupplicantLog:
 
dmi.bios.date: 03/24/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: Award Software International, Inc.
dmi.bios.version: F4
dmi.board.name: GA-880GM-UD2H
dmi.board.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
dmi.board.version: x.x
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAwardSoftwareInternational,Inc.:bvrF4:bd03/24/2010:svnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:pnGA-880GM-UD2H:pvr:rvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:rnGA-880GM-UD2H:rvrx.x:cvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:ct3:cvr:
dmi.product.name: GA-880GM-UD2H
dmi.sys.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743705

Title:
  package linux-image-2.6.31-23-generic 2.6.31-23.74 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 2

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 738982] Re: Calendar alarm notifier would not notify any events

2011-03-20 Thread Garry Leach
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738982

Title:
  Calendar alarm notifier would not notify any events

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 738982] [NEW] Calendar alarm notifier would not notify any events

2011-03-20 Thread Garry Leach
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: evolution

Note: I have finally resolved this.  However, there may be an inherent
bug that needs attention.

Ubuntu 10.10
Evolution 2.30.3-1ubuntu7.3

I regularly add alarms to calendar events.  Ever since I changed to
10.10 over 4 months ago, these have not displayed.

My change to 10.10 was via a fresh install, as my 10.04 system had never
worked well (I still get that 254 notification - minor problem).  To do
this, I backed up my /home files, & Evolution settings, & restored these
after I had installed 10.10.

Today, I discovered that the Evolution Alarm notifier in Start-up
Applications was requesting to run file
"/usr/lib/evolution/2.28/evolution".  However, when I checked in my
system, the file there was" /usr/lib/evolution/2.30/evolution".  Editing
the Start-up Application resolved the problem.

However, clearly for 4 months or more, the Start-up application would
have been failing, but there was no indication to me that this was
happening.  This the bug that I would like you to consider.

Thanks, Garry.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: evolution 2.30.3-1ubuntu7.3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-28.49-generic 2.6.35.11
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Mar 21 08:25:25 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evolution
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_AU:en
 LANG=en_AU.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: evolution
XsessionErrors:
 (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1527): GLib-CRITICAL **: 
g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed
 (nautilus:1531): GConf-CRITICAL **: gconf_value_free: assertion `value != 
NULL' failed
 (evolution-alarm-notify:1660): Gtk-WARNING **: No object called: snooze-time
 (evolution-alarm-notify:1660): Gtk-WARNING **: No object called: snooze-time

** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738982

Title:
  Calendar alarm notifier would not notify any events

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 735067] [NEW] Cannot changed lastfm login

2011-03-14 Thread Garry Smith
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: banshee

The lastfm extension, will not let me changed the username or password,
it just says Try again or Finish logging me in. If I click either button
nothing happens.  The program sometimes crashes when clicking either
button.  Is their a way to go back to change the username and password
in case I have enter either wrong?

Ubuntu 10.10  Banshee 1.8.0

** Affects: banshee (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735067

Title:
  Cannot changed lastfm login

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 707346] Re: Window/toolbar overlap in vertically stacked monitor configuration

2011-03-07 Thread Garry Blackmore
Similar occurs with the primary monitor set to the lower screen, with
ATI graphics card (open drivers).

Two monitors connected by VGA, one 1440x900 (top) the other 1600x900
(bottom, primary). Gnome panel only on lower monitor.

When maximising a window on the lower monitor, the bottom of the window
will stop where it meets the lower panel. The top of the window
continues under the top panel (but does not go all the way to the upper
monitor), obscuring the titlebar and window control buttons. Maximising
windows on the upper monitor works as expected, not intruding onto the
lower monitor.

Ubuntu 10.10 (amd64),
metacity 1:2.30.2-1ubuntu3,
gnome-panel 1:2.30.2-1ubuntu3

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707346

Title:
  Window/toolbar overlap in vertically stacked monitor configuration

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 554172] Re: system services using "console output" not starting at boot

2011-02-14 Thread Garry Roseman
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Clint Byrum  wrote:

>
> Right now the issue that was reported originally is definitely fixed from
> the point of view of many of those who reported they were affected


I took Ubuntu 10.04 off my little home network because of this bug after
suffering with it for too long and trying all "fixes".  I don't know if the
bug would still persist on my machines with the latest Ubuntu but a flaw in
the startup code is not something I would tolerate for long.  (I came to
Ubuntu from NetBSD --- you know it's reputation for quality --- and moved on
from Ubuntu to Archlinux which has worked out well for me).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172

Title:
  system services using "console output" not starting at boot

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   >