Re: [Bug 289946] Re: Using the Live CD - ALL VERSIONS- Defaults to getting on the internet.
Oh there a person breaths... Actually the plain grey plug to plug logo is FINE - except I dunno. I'd like to see a more relevant symbol that represents an active internet connection. Much like the ahem - microsoft foreground computer screen and the background computer screen. That is a symbol type that everyone knows what it is and it's dynamically relevant. With - not so much flashing because that can be distracting - but glowing slowly on and off - when data is coming down of going up the connection. And I'd like to ELECT to establish an internet connection, rather than it be on *silently and inconspiciously* by default. I think not only for me, I'd feel better if that was an obvious choice, rather than an automated feature. On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Hi Shane, thanks for making this bug report so long ago, and I'm sorry that it has gone without a response since then. Marking the Status as Triaged, as the original report has all of the information necessary to evaluate the feature request on its merits. Since it is a feature request, setting Importance to Wishlist. ** Changed in: casper (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: casper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- Using the Live CD - ALL VERSIONS- Defaults to getting on the internet. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289946 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “casper” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: Yeah been using Ubi for a long time and occasionally - I need to use a LIVE CD on a Windows system That's fine. BUT when I run Ubi, I usually run it firewalled and the same with Windoze... But what horrifies me a little bit, is that the Ubi live CD's upon booting, the OS has the internet connections ON and running - by default. Why? because I am usually backing up my carefully debugged and nasty free systems at the same time - and the last thing I want to happen is to be hacked - when the original data sets and backup drives are on the system at the same time. But this DEFAULT internet on setting ought to be switched off - because it's so damned passive and it's easy to overlook, even for me, and it's potentially a real trap for the novice. I feel that the internet connection must be turned off by default and a firewall with reasonably good and secure settings, ought to be enabled by default on start up as well. I also feel that a notice to enable the internet connection ought to be flashed on screen.. AND I also want to see a FLASHING internet logo - as in your internet connection is ACTIVE and sending and receiving traffic. This passive dead screen logo has to go and make it flash in interesting colors... like bright orange and green or something. Regards Shane To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/289946/+subscribe -- Using the Live CD - ALL VERSIONS- Defaults to getting on the internet. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289946 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 289946] Re: Using the Live CD - ALL VERSIONS- Defaults to getting on the internet.
ALSO - rather than just ask people to WINGE about important things and NOT so important things, Give them a manual and software and teach them or teach themselves with online classes (downloadable) on HOW to program and fix problems themselves. The reasons why I hate forums is that they tend to be populated by silly people and there is not much in the way of establishing a connection between LEARNING HOW and forum participation. The I don't know how it's broken please fix it for me that's fine much of the time but I'd rather be given a crash course in HOW to program, and how to fix, rather than just stuck. On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Hi Shane, thanks for making this bug report so long ago, and I'm sorry that it has gone without a response since then. Marking the Status as Triaged, as the original report has all of the information necessary to evaluate the feature request on its merits. Since it is a feature request, setting Importance to Wishlist. ** Changed in: casper (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: casper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- Using the Live CD - ALL VERSIONS- Defaults to getting on the internet. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289946 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “casper” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: Yeah been using Ubi for a long time and occasionally - I need to use a LIVE CD on a Windows system That's fine. BUT when I run Ubi, I usually run it firewalled and the same with Windoze... But what horrifies me a little bit, is that the Ubi live CD's upon booting, the OS has the internet connections ON and running - by default. Why? because I am usually backing up my carefully debugged and nasty free systems at the same time - and the last thing I want to happen is to be hacked - when the original data sets and backup drives are on the system at the same time. But this DEFAULT internet on setting ought to be switched off - because it's so damned passive and it's easy to overlook, even for me, and it's potentially a real trap for the novice. I feel that the internet connection must be turned off by default and a firewall with reasonably good and secure settings, ought to be enabled by default on start up as well. I also feel that a notice to enable the internet connection ought to be flashed on screen.. AND I also want to see a FLASHING internet logo - as in your internet connection is ACTIVE and sending and receiving traffic. This passive dead screen logo has to go and make it flash in interesting colors... like bright orange and green or something. Regards Shane To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/289946/+subscribe -- Using the Live CD - ALL VERSIONS- Defaults to getting on the internet. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289946 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 619164] Re: package courier-mta 0.61.2-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619164/+attachment/1495100/+files/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619164/+attachment/1495101/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619164/+attachment/1495102/+files/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619164/+attachment/1495103/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package courier-mta 0.61.2-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619164 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 619177] [NEW] Recent Documents List = It's a Dud.
Public bug reported: The recent documents list has FOUR bad faults. 1. It's too small 2. It's not user configurable as far as size or anything else goes I prefer to have a recently used list of 50 to 200 documents. 3. It also in not a first in first out listing; meaning a) It fills up with the first 8 (or so) documents opened and neglects the next 50 documents opened after that; and b) It should be rolling, showing documents from 42 to 50, and then 43 to 51, then 44 to 52 etc... instead of only showing the first 8. 4. And it should show ALL filed opened - not the retards version of Windows 95, that only showed Microsoft product files in the file finder. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Recent Documents List = It's a Dud. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 619177] Re: Recent Documents List = It's a Dud.
Fuck off idiot. And stick your opinions up your arse. On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Leo Arias y...@elopio.net wrote: Thank you for taking the time to make Ubuntu better. Since what you submitted is not really a bug, or a problem, but rather an idea to improve Ubuntu, you are invited to post your idea in Ubuntu Brainstorm at http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/ where it can be discussed, voted by the community and reviewed by developers. Thanks for taking the time to share your opinion ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Invalid -- Recent Documents List = It's a Dud. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619177 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: The recent documents list has FOUR bad faults. 1. It's too small 2. It's not user configurable as far as size or anything else goes I prefer to have a recently used list of 50 to 200 documents. 3. It also in not a first in first out listing; meaning a) It fills up with the first 8 (or so) documents opened and neglects the next 50 documents opened after that; and b) It should be rolling, showing documents from 42 to 50, and then 43 to 51, then 44 to 52 etc... instead of only showing the first 8. 4. And it should show ALL filed opened - not the retards version of Windows 95, that only showed Microsoft product files in the file finder. To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/619177/+subscribe -- Recent Documents List = It's a Dud. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 619177] Re: Recent Documents List = It's a Dud.
You stupid cunt. On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Leo Arias y...@elopio.net wrote: Thank you for taking the time to make Ubuntu better. Since what you submitted is not really a bug, or a problem, but rather an idea to improve Ubuntu, you are invited to post your idea in Ubuntu Brainstorm at http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/ where it can be discussed, voted by the community and reviewed by developers. Thanks for taking the time to share your opinion ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Invalid -- Recent Documents List = It's a Dud. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619177 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: The recent documents list has FOUR bad faults. 1. It's too small 2. It's not user configurable as far as size or anything else goes I prefer to have a recently used list of 50 to 200 documents. 3. It also in not a first in first out listing; meaning a) It fills up with the first 8 (or so) documents opened and neglects the next 50 documents opened after that; and b) It should be rolling, showing documents from 42 to 50, and then 43 to 51, then 44 to 52 etc... instead of only showing the first 8. 4. And it should show ALL filed opened - not the retards version of Windows 95, that only showed Microsoft product files in the file finder. To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/619177/+subscribe -- Recent Documents List = It's a Dud. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 619177] Re: Recent Documents List = It's a Dud.
I think people should be able to elect to fuck off the commentarrds who cruise forums. Leo Arias - if you came up to me with your smarmy opinionated bullshit I'd beat you up and throw you outside - wanker. -- Recent Documents List = It's a Dud. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 619177] Re: Recent Documents List = It's a Dud.
Yeah you might be a volunteer Leo - but you are a stupid irritating volunteer Leo. -- Recent Documents List = It's a Dud. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 531651] [NEW] package libcups2-dev 1.4.1-5ubuntu2.4 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cups I think it came about as a result of using Janitor as I recall Janitor targeting this file (amongst many others) for removal - and the process ground to a halt in a grey screen that did not resolve it's self after 10 minutes. Dunno. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 CupsErrorLog: E [04/Mar/2010:08:20:59 +1100] Unable to remove temporary file /var/spool/cups/tmp/.hplip - Is a directory Date: Thu Mar 4 09:10:48 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ErrorMessage: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal. Lpstat: device for Canon-i550: usb://Canon/i550 Lsusb: Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 002: ID 15ca:00c3 Textech International Ltd. Mini Optical Mouse Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub MachineType: Hewlett-Packard Presario 2100 Package: libcups2-dev 1.4.1-5ubuntu2.4 Papersize: a4 PccardctlIdent: Socket 0: no product info available PccardctlStatus: Socket 0: 3.3V 32-bit PC Card PpdFiles: Canon-i550: Canon i560 - CUPS+Gutenprint v5.2.4 ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=0b936661-9c32-405f-b2c0-24719756aff1 ro quiet splash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-19.56-generic SourcePackage: cups Title: package libcups2-dev 1.4.1-5ubuntu2.4 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal. Uname: Linux 2.6.31-19-generic i686 dmi.bios.date: 12/17/2002 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd. dmi.bios.version: KA.M1.34 dmi.board.name: 0024 dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.board.version: PQ1A75 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.chassis.version: N/A dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvrKA.M1.34:bd12/17/2002:svnHewlett-Packard:pnPresario2100:pvrKA.M1.34:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn0024:rvrPQ1A75:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvrN/A: dmi.product.name: Presario 2100 dmi.product.version: KA.M1.34 dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard ** Affects: cups (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 -- package libcups2-dev 1.4.1-5ubuntu2.4 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531651 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 531651] Re: package libcups2-dev 1.4.1-5ubuntu2.4 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal.
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40106721/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40106722/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40106723/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40106724/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40106725/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40106726/DpkgTerminalLog.txt ** Attachment added: Locale.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40106727/Locale.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40106728/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: PrintingPackages.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40106729/PrintingPackages.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40106730/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40106731/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40106732/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40106733/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40106734/UdevLog.txt -- package libcups2-dev 1.4.1-5ubuntu2.4 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531651 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 531651] Re: package libcups2-dev 1.4.1-5ubuntu2.4 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal.
Me thinks Janitor needs to be refined before being set loose on the public again. -- package libcups2-dev 1.4.1-5ubuntu2.4 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531651 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 521510] [NEW] Firefox doing the usual Firefox is shit 250meg memory hog doing nothing bullshit.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.5 The usual crap i.e. Do Google: Firefox is shit for a search, and it's 3 web pages open, 280Meg of ram, and bogging my entire system to an almost halt while it thrashes the disk memory, doing fucking nothing. for like an hour or so. I now think I only tend to use it out of habit - where as chrome - just does not give me grievance like this. But my computer is working for me., not the other way around., and Firefox fucks up so badly and so consistently that I tend to usually have a kill function at the ready to wipe it and it's bullshit out, when it starts up it's typical system hogging antics... By the way it runs you'd think that Microsoft has employed people to deliberately fuck the program up with regular crashes etc ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Feb 14 08:04:30 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: firefox-3.5 3.5.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.10.1 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-19.56-generic SourcePackage: firefox-3.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-19-generic i686 ** Affects: firefox-3.5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Firefox doing the usual Firefox is shit 250meg memory hog doing nothing bullshit. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521510 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 521510] Re: Firefox doing the usual Firefox is shit 250meg memory hog doing nothing bullshit.
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39153189/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39153190/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39153191/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39153192/profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39153193/profiles.ini.txt -- Firefox doing the usual Firefox is shit 250meg memory hog doing nothing bullshit. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521510 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 521570] [NEW] Same Old Same Old Firefox crashing
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.5 It's the same old firefox issue. It's not a ubuntu issue cause even windope users are saying the same thing. Google - Firefox is shit ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Feb 14 08:04:42 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: firefox-3.5 3.5.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.10.1 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-19.56-generic SourcePackage: firefox-3.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-19-generic i686 ** Affects: firefox-3.5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Same Old Same Old Firefox crashing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521570 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 521570] Re: Same Old Same Old Firefox crashing
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39157997/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39157998/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39157999/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39158000/profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39158001/profiles.ini.txt -- Same Old Same Old Firefox crashing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521570 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 521572] [NEW] Firefox is still shit
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.5 I am curious as to why a FOLT (Nigerian Scammer spelling) with firefox, and the report being generated from the Firefox toolbar, is going to the Ubu Crew. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Feb 14 08:04:30 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: firefox-3.5 3.5.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.10.1 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-19.56-generic SourcePackage: firefox-3.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-19-generic i686 ** Affects: firefox-3.5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Firefox is still shit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521572 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 521572] Re: Firefox is still shit
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39158052/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39158053/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39158054/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39158055/profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39158056/profiles.ini.txt -- Firefox is still shit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521572 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 521572] Re: Firefox is still
Go fuck yourself. Micah Gersten wrote: Thank you for your bug report. To maintain a respectful atmosphere, please follow the code of conduct - http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct/ . Bug reports are handled by humans, the majority of whom are volunteers, so please bear this in mind. Please answer these questions: 1. Is this reproducible? 2. If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug? Be as detailed as possible. This will help us to find and resolve the problem. ** Summary changed: - Firefox is still shit + Firefox is still ** Changed in: firefox-3.5 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Firefox is still https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521572 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 521510] Re: Firefox doing the usual Firefox is shit 250meg memory hog doing nothing bullshit.
Yeah OK you can get your rocks off with your smarmy pedantic shit head attitude - that is untill one day you get into face to face customer service and one day - someone will drag you across the counter and smash your face it. Personally I have better things to do than be a stupid fuck who has nothing better to do with his otherwise worthless life, other than to run around waggling his finger at people. So like I said, Fuck off idiot. Micah Gersten wrote: Thank you for your bug report. To maintain a respectful atmosphere, please follow the code of conduct - http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct/ . Bug reports are handled by humans, the majority of whom are volunteers, so please bear this in mind. Please clean up your bug report so that it does not include profanity. We would be happy to look into any issues you might be having. Please remember that bug reports are not the proper place for rants. ** Changed in: firefox-3.5 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Firefox doing the usual Firefox is shit 250meg memory hog doing nothing bullshit. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521510 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 521510] Re: Firefox doing the usual Firefox is shit 250meg memory hog doing nothing bullshit.
Ooo power trip. I bet you hide in the closet and suck your own cock too. Micah Gersten wrote: Closing since the reporter is not willing to work with us. ** Changed in: firefox-3.5 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid ** Summary changed: - Firefox doing the usual Firefox is shit 250meg memory hog doing nothing bullshit. + Invalid -- Invalid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521510 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 521572] Re: Firefox is still
LOL - you really are that fucking stupid aren't you. LOL The fuckwit with the GOD complex in the forums is a LOSER. All hail Micah Gersten - and kiss his sweaty hairy fat jewish ass Sure. LOL Micah Gersten wrote: Closing since the reporter is not willing to work with us. ** Changed in: firefox-3.5 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- Firefox is still https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521572 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348881] Re: The Synaptic Package Manager only shows Open Office V 1.2 - Open Office is now up to version 3.1
** Visibility changed to: Public -- The Synaptic Package Manager only shows Open Office V 1.2 - Open Office is now up to version 3.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348881 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348881] Re: The Synaptic Package Manager only shows Open Office V 1.2 - Open Office is now up to version 3.1
Perhaps I was not clear enough - well reading it now, it's obvious I was not very clear at all. I have UBU Version 8.04. It came with Open Office V 1.2.3 While I have done some updates and additions, the opportunity to update OO (nor Ubuntu) via the Symantic Package manager has not been presented. And I am thinking... this is not good - OO is up to version 3+ and I am stuck with the very old version with less useful features. Then I read your reply and thought about what you had said and figured that I had written up the issue all wrong. I have found and issue that may solve it. I have found though some alterations to System, Administration, Software Sources - I am not sure if these are connected, but I have just found a package in the Synaptic Package Manager called Ubuntu Desktop that apparently has a lot to do with all the upgrades. I will give this a try and then see how it goes. -- The Synaptic Package Manager only shows Open Office V 1.2 - Open Office is now up to version 3.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348881 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
