[Bug 634886] [NEW] unread mails virtual folder is updated too quickly
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution As soon as I click on an unread mail in the unread mails virtual folder, it disappears from this folder. It is still available in the incoming folder of the appropriate account, so it is not lost. The correct behaviour is the one implemented in thunderbird 3.0, where the unread virtual folder is only updated each time you clik on it, or when you manually refresh it. The problem has been observed with evolution 2.30.3 under Maverick. ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- unread mails virtual folder is updated too quickly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634886 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 631032] Re: unable to connect to picasaweb
it was a '+' 2010/9/8 Adam Dingle a...@yorba.org Jeremy, I'm glad you can log in now. If the problem was that the password contained unusual characters, then unfortunately I'm unable to reproduce it here. I just tried setting my Picasa Web password to have Russian characters, but Google Accounts said I'm only allowed to use alphanumeric characters plus common punctuation. So then I changed it to be '%;;%;;', which should break any XML- related quoting failure, but I was able to log in just fine using Shotwell trunk. So: Jeremy, what non-alphanumeric characters were in your previous password? -- unable to connect to picasaweb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631032 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Theory is where you know everything, but nothing works; practice is where everything works, but nobody knows why. Here we combine theory with practice; nothing works and nobody knows why ! A.Einstein -- unable to connect to picasaweb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631032 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 631032] Re: unable to connect to picasaweb
I wondering ifI'm doing things the rigth way... I'm trying to use my google account to connect through shotwell. It is the way I do it under firefox... j...@gaston:~/Bureau$ SHOTWELL_LOG=1 SHOTWELL_LOG_FILE=:console: shotwell L 3971 2010-09-07 21:18:42 [MSG] main.vala:71: Verifying database ... L 3971 2010-09-07 21:18:42 [DBG] DatabaseTables.vala:291: Database schema version 8 created by app version 0.7.0 L 3971 2010-09-07 21:18:42 [DBG] DataCollection.vala:331: next step: LibraryPhoto.init (0/23795) L 3971 2010-09-07 21:18:42 [DBG] DataCollection.vala:331: next step: Event.init (11732/23795) L 3971 2010-09-07 21:18:42 [DBG] DataCollection.vala:331: next step: LibraryWindow (11893/23795) L 3971 2010-09-07 21:18:43 [DBG] DataCollection.vala:331: next step: done (23625/23795) L 3971 2010-09-07 21:18:43 [DBG] main.vala:183: 1,469170 seconds to Gtk.main() here are the logs...nothing too interesting -- unable to connect to picasaweb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631032 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 631032] Re: unable to connect to picasaweb
It tells me unrecognized user sorry for the missing information... -- unable to connect to picasaweb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631032 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 631032] Re: unable to connect to picasaweb
Lucas, you reminded well ! with simple ascii password, it worked ! -- unable to connect to picasaweb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631032 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 631032] [NEW] unable to connect to picasaweb
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: shotwell Using shotwell 0.7.1-0ubuntu2, I'm unable to connect to my picasa web albums account. It was the same under lucid with 0.5 and 0.6. I didn't find any log files for further information (I didn't look too much I have to say ! ), but stderr is not so much verbose... ** Affects: shotwell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- unable to connect to picasaweb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631032 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 85488] Re: some usb_devices fault if usb_suspend enabled
I guess so. Le mardi 03 août 2010 à 21:00 +, Clay Weber a écrit : Can we consider this bug closed? -- -- some usb_devices fault if usb_suspend enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85488 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 373979] Re: nfsv4 on Jaunty client causes nfs servers to spew time out errors
Hi I confirm the problem with a Jaunty 9.04 client and Hardy 8.04.2 server. My server locks up at least twice a day... I'm glad it is not a hardware problem !! -- nfsv4 on Jaunty client causes nfs servers to spew time out errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373979 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 335858] Re: rpc.idmapd does not see LDAP users (nfs4 server)
So the problem seems very similar to mine. If it's really the case, it is not due to LDAP, but only to NFSV4. It seems that nfs-kernel-server needs nfs-common to be started. And vice et versa. The solution found on Debian bug analysis is to restart nfs-common in rc.local so idmapd runs correctly, and users are correctly mapped. 2009/6/16 Mark Hannon markhan...@optusnet.com.au Hi Jeremy, The problem is that *all* files/directories on the NFS4 mount are owned by nobody:nogroup. Regards/Mark -Original Message- From: boun...@canonical.com [mailto:boun...@canonical.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Vies Sent: Monday, 15 June 2009 5:35 PM To: markhan...@optusnet.com.au Subject: [Bug 335858] Re: rpc.idmapd does not see LDAP users (nfs4 server) Hi, are users not defined in ldap also affected ? I've some similar bug (except I don't have users managed by ldap) with a server running 8.04 and a client running 9.04. It seems similar to Debian Bug#468177: nfs-common: idmapd fails mapping if started before server -- rpc.idmapd does not see LDAP users (nfs4 server) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335858 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- rpc.idmapd does not see LDAP users (nfs4 server) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335858 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Theory is where you know everything, but nothing works; practice is where everything works, but nobody knows why. Here we combine theory with practice; nothing works and nobody knows why ! A.Einstein -- rpc.idmapd does not see LDAP users (nfs4 server) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335858 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 335858] Re: rpc.idmapd does not see LDAP users (nfs4 server)
Hi, are users not defined in ldap also affected ? I've some similar bug (except I don't have users managed by ldap) with a server running 8.04 and a client running 9.04. It seems similar to Debian Bug#468177: nfs-common: idmapd fails mapping if started before server -- rpc.idmapd does not see LDAP users (nfs4 server) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335858 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 286133] Re: acpi-cpufreq does not recognize all frequencies for E8500 CPU
I think it is the expected behaviour of the ondemand governor used by Ubuntu to manage cpu frequency by default. If you want to use another policy, you should probably have a look at cpufrequtils package. -- acpi-cpufreq does not recognize all frequencies for E8500 CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286133 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 132403] Re: Cpu frequency scaling is limited to stock speeds
I've got a core2duo e7300. It runs normally at 2.66GHz (10*266). I've just changed FSB to 333. I use Ubuntu out of box settings, so I think it's ondemand. 2009/4/14 Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@canonical.com Can you provide details of your processor, your cpufreq driver and governor? On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 09:27:01AM -, Jeremy Vies wrote: Hi all, I've just tested this week-end with a Jaunty up-to-date. The frequency scaling worked, it was only the value displayed by the kernel that is wrong. In /proc/cpuinfo, I could read the stock value for cpu speed, whereas the bogomips was changed ! JV 2009/4/14 Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@canonical.com Testing with the latest pre-release of Jaunty 9.04 will also help us identify if this exists in the latest upcoming release. Refer to http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/jaunty/beta . Please let us know. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Incomplete -- Cpu frequency scaling is limited to stock speeds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132403 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Theory is where you know everything, but nothing works; practice is where everything works, but nobody knows why. Here we combine theory with practice; nothing works and nobody knows why ! A.Einstein -- Cpu frequency scaling is limited to stock speeds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132403 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Kernel Team, which is subscribed to linux-source-2.6.22 in ubuntu. -- -- Amit Kucheria, Kernel Engineer || a...@canonical.com -- -- Cpu frequency scaling is limited to stock speeds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132403 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Theory is where you know everything, but nothing works; practice is where everything works, but nobody knows why. Here we combine theory with practice; nothing works and nobody knows why ! A.Einstein -- Cpu frequency scaling is limited to stock speeds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132403 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 132403] Re: Cpu frequency scaling is limited to stock speeds
Hi all, I've just tested this week-end with a Jaunty up-to-date. The frequency scaling worked, it was only the value displayed by the kernel that is wrong. In /proc/cpuinfo, I could read the stock value for cpu speed, whereas the bogomips was changed ! JV 2009/4/14 Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@canonical.com Testing with the latest pre-release of Jaunty 9.04 will also help us identify if this exists in the latest upcoming release. Refer to http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/jaunty/beta . Please let us know. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Incomplete -- Cpu frequency scaling is limited to stock speeds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132403 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Theory is where you know everything, but nothing works; practice is where everything works, but nobody knows why. Here we combine theory with practice; nothing works and nobody knows why ! A.Einstein -- Cpu frequency scaling is limited to stock speeds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132403 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 132403] Re: Cpu frequency scaling is limited to stock speeds
ooops... you're right I didn't check the value changed according the cpu is under load or not !! it probably was always at full speed ... 2009/4/14 Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@canonical.com Hmm.. I don't see any changes to bogomips in my /proc/cpuinfo when I change the frequency from the frequency-applet Only my cpu MHz value changes. On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:34:08AM -, Jeremy Vies wrote: I've got a core2duo e7300. It runs normally at 2.66GHz (10*266). I've just changed FSB to 333. I use Ubuntu out of box settings, so I think it's ondemand. 2009/4/14 Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@canonical.com Can you provide details of your processor, your cpufreq driver and governor? On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 09:27:01AM -, Jeremy Vies wrote: Hi all, I've just tested this week-end with a Jaunty up-to-date. The frequency scaling worked, it was only the value displayed by the kernel that is wrong. In /proc/cpuinfo, I could read the stock value for cpu speed, whereas the bogomips was changed ! JV 2009/4/14 Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@canonical.com Testing with the latest pre-release of Jaunty 9.04 will also help us identify if this exists in the latest upcoming release. Refer to http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/jaunty/beta . Please let us know. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Incomplete -- Cpu frequency scaling is limited to stock speeds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132403 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Theory is where you know everything, but nothing works; practice is where everything works, but nobody knows why. Here we combine theory with practice; nothing works and nobody knows why ! A.Einstein -- Cpu frequency scaling is limited to stock speeds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132403 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Kernel Team, which is subscribed to linux-source-2.6.22 in ubuntu. -- -- Amit Kucheria, Kernel Engineer || a...@canonical.com -- -- Cpu frequency scaling is limited to stock speeds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132403 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Theory is where you know everything, but nothing works; practice is where everything works, but nobody knows why. Here we combine theory with practice; nothing works and nobody knows why ! A.Einstein -- Cpu frequency scaling is limited to stock speeds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132403 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Kernel Team, which is subscribed to linux-source-2.6.22 in ubuntu. -- -- Amit Kucheria, Kernel Engineer || a...@canonical.com -- -- Cpu frequency scaling is limited to stock speeds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132403 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Theory is where you know everything, but nothing works; practice is where everything works, but nobody knows why. Here we combine theory with practice; nothing works and nobody knows why ! A.Einstein -- Cpu frequency scaling is limited to stock speeds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132403 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 198771] Re: Brasero is still running with gnome_vfs
is it why brasero can't burn files accessed throw samba shares ??? in case it is, will a revision that uses gvfs be backported to hardy ? -- Brasero is still running with gnome_vfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198771 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 114025] Re: Problem with wine preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00000000-60000000
The proposed workaround (sudo sysctl -w vm.mmap_min_addr=0) worked for me. A little investigation made me found this new entry in sysctl.conf: # protect bottom 64k of memory from mmap to prevent NULL-dereference # attacks against potential future kernel security vulnerabilities. # (Added in kernel 2.6.23.) vm.mmap_min_addr = 65536 I guess it is part of the problem... -- Problem with wine preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range -6000 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114025 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 200338] Re: no sound hardy kernel 2.6.24-12
I had the same problem yesterday. Upgrading to Hardy made i386 kernel installed, but only the main part of kernel. I installed linux-i386 (to have additionnal drivers installed) and then sound worked. JV ps: (on my desktop with dmraid disks, the generic kernel does not boot...) 2008/3/24, IdleOne [EMAIL PROTECTED]: having same issues with my Acer Aspire 4315. systemprefssound lists no device but lspci list fine -- no sound hardy kernel 2.6.24-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200338 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- Theory is where you know everything, but nothing works; practice is where everything works, but nobody knows why. Here we combine theory with practice; nothing works and nobody knows why ! A.Einstein -- no sound hardy kernel 2.6.24-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 65048] Re: Ubuntu needs a NFS mount wizard
hi, in fact, gnome-vfs does not support zeroconf publications of NFS shares (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328107). It can display ftp or webdav, or ssh (sftp) shares, but can't display NFS ones. (of course it can show smb ones with smbclient) It's a pitty that with Gnome, the best automatic way to have shares between computers is to use samba (easy to share / easy to browse with ubuntu/gnome tools). ** Tags added: avahi gnome-vfs nautilus nfs ** Changed in: gnome-vfs (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = gnome-vfs -- Ubuntu needs a NFS mount wizard https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/65048 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103152] Re: Viewports/Cube - Doesn't obey Workspace Keyboard Shortcuts
I can confirm the bug on 2 computers(1 with nvidia, 1 with radeon). ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Viewports/Cube - Doesn't obey Workspace Keyboard Shortcuts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103152 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 96893] Re: [feisty] radeon agp mode defaults to 1
In your attachment, we can see that: [ 38.844000] [fglrx] Internal AGP support requested, but kernel AGP support active. [ 38.844000] [fglrx] Have to use kernel AGP support to avoid conflicts. [ 38.844000] [fglrx] AGP detected, AgpState = 0x1f000217 (hardware caps of chipset) [ 38.844000] agpgart: Found an AGP 2.0 compliant device at :00:00.0. [ 38.844000] agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at :00:00.0 into 4x mode [ 38.844000] agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at :01:00.0 into 4x mode [ 38.844000] [fglrx] AGP enabled, AgpCommand = 0x1f000314 (selected caps) So I think that your video card is working in AGP 4x. (by the way, if I remind well, AGP v2.0 does not support AGP 1x. It only works in 2x, 4x and 8x) -- [feisty] radeon agp mode defaults to 1 https://launchpad.net/bugs/96893 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 83231] Re: linux software RAID not working after herd 3 installation..
If you've put udevsettle in the udev script of initramfs-tools, you need to replace the line at the end of file each time the package udev is updated. 2007/3/28, James [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is disturbing. I was going to ask what happens if initramfs-tools is updated and the problem is not fixed. Just did an update on a working machine with the above work around and initramfs-tools was one of the packages updated. This triggered an update of the initrd. That computer no longer boots, instead giving the mdadm: No devices listed in conf file were found. again. -- linux software RAID not working after herd 3 installation.. https://launchpad.net/bugs/83231 -- linux software RAID not working after herd 3 installation.. https://launchpad.net/bugs/83231 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96893] Re: [feisty] radeon agp mode defaults to 1
Ok, so that's probably a problem in fglrx and not in xorg. Is your video card officially supported by the fglrx driver ? -- [feisty] radeon agp mode defaults to 1 https://launchpad.net/bugs/96893 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96763] Re: je ne comprend pas...
la description du bug doit être en Anglais... (bug description shall be in english...) la description n'est pas suffisante pour comprendre le bug. (description is not sufficient enought to understand the bug) -- je ne comprend pas... https://launchpad.net/bugs/96763 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96893] Re: [feisty] radeon agp mode defaults to 1
I got an IGP320M which is correctly set by kernel at AGP 4x. Can you send dmesg output ? -- [feisty] radeon agp mode defaults to 1 https://launchpad.net/bugs/96893 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 96893] Re: [feisty] radeon agp mode defaults to 1
It should be ok with fglrx. -- [feisty] radeon agp mode defaults to 1 https://launchpad.net/bugs/96893 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83231] Re: linux software RAID not working after herd 3 installation..
** Tags added: dmraid mdadm -- linux software RAID not working after herd 3 installation.. https://launchpad.net/bugs/83231 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83231] Re: linux software RAID not working after herd 3 installation..
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- linux software RAID not working after herd 3 installation.. https://launchpad.net/bugs/83231 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83231] Re: linux software RAID not working after herd 3 installation..
It's better as it is cleaner. For me the problem is from udev, so the correction should be in udev. udevsettle --timeout=10 waits for udev to end its works with a maximum of 10sec. So it should be shorter than the sleep 10 solution. -- linux software RAID not working after herd 3 installation.. https://launchpad.net/bugs/83231 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85640] Re: [Feisty] crypted root doesnt mount on start (cryptsetup)
We have some similar problem on bug #83231. I proposed them your solution based on udevsettle, and it works. I also tried to add the udevsettle --timeout XX at the end of /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/udev. May someone using cryptoroot try this ? if it works for you too, we have a global solution for both bugs. -- [Feisty] crypted root doesnt mount on start (cryptsetup) https://launchpad.net/bugs/85640 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83231] Re: linux software RAID not working after herd 3 installation..
the udevsettle --timeout 10 at the end of /usr/share/initramfs- tools/scripts/init-premount/udev works too. We have now several solutions to propose to udev and dmraid packagers. -- linux software RAID not working after herd 3 installation.. https://launchpad.net/bugs/83231 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83231] Re: linux software RAID not working after herd 3 installation..
I'm having the same problem on a dmraid root partition. I've had a look at bug #85640 about problem on crypted root partition. It seems their problem is due to the fact that /dev is not completely populated when it try to decrypt. I wonder if we don't have the same kind of problem here... They solved it by using udevsettle. In my opinion, it would be a nicer solution than a sleep. so I'll give it a try this evening. -- linux software RAID not working after herd 3 installation.. https://launchpad.net/bugs/83231 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83231] Re: linux software RAID not working after herd 3 installation..
The udevsettle works. I'll try (tomorrow) to add the udevsettle at the end of the udev populating script in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts /init-premount/udev. -- linux software RAID not working after herd 3 installation.. https://launchpad.net/bugs/83231 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 70552] tkcvs does not accept cvs status info containing date with tz
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tkcvs cvs status return a line with working revision like that: Working revision:1.1.1.1 2006-11-06 09:38:46 +0100 tkcvs crashes while reading this line with this error: unable to convert date-time string 2006-11-06 09:46:31 +0100 unable to convert date-time string 2006-11-06 09:46:31 +0100 while executing clock scan $date -gmt yes (procedure cvs_workdir_status line 52) invoked from within cvs_workdir_status (procedure directory_list line 80) invoked from within directory_list $filelist (procedure setup_dir line 196) invoked from within setup_dir (procedure change_dir line 11) invoked from within change_dir $file (procedure workdir_edit_file line 16) invoked from within workdir_edit_file [workdir_list_files] (command bound to event) ** Affects: tkcvs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- tkcvs does not accept cvs status info containing date with tz https://launchpad.net/bugs/70552 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54246] Re: DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15
I finally succeeded in booting my edgy on dmraid. (My problem was due to the missing lvm package on this install...) So I confirm that this rc13 package is enough to solve the bug. -- DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15 https://launchpad.net/bugs/54246 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 54246] Re: DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15
So I'm the last one for who it doesn't work ? Can we list on wich fakeraid chipset it works ? -- DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15 https://launchpad.net/bugs/54246 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 54246] Re: DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15
1.0.0.rc13 still doesn't work for me. By the way, I've a Silicon Image 3112 controller with 2 disks. Even with single option, so without usplash, I can't get enough traces about my root that is not mounted. I only have a waiting for filesystem or something like that. Is there is any option I can try to have more traces about my missing filesystem ? -- DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15 https://launchpad.net/bugs/54246 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54246] Re: DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15
I've tried the break=mount option. I got a busybox shell, but no keyboard to type in... so I can't get more information this way... -- DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15 https://launchpad.net/bugs/54246 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67695] ubuntu-desktop 1.30 is the only package that depends on libstdc++5
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntu-desktop apt-get remove --purge libstdc++5 implies the remove of ubuntu-desktop, but doesn't remove any other package. ** Affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- ubuntu-desktop 1.30 is the only package that depends on libstdc++5 https://launchpad.net/bugs/67695 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54246] Re: DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15
I'm not sure as I really don't know a lot about upstart, but it doesn't seem linked to. I'll try to have a tty under busybox so I can check what's going wrong. Does the package (rc13) solve the problem for people that don't boot on dmraid ? -- DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15 https://launchpad.net/bugs/54246 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 54246] Re: DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15
apt-get source dmraid does the same and download the needed -dev package for the build. 2006/10/20, Tormod Volden [EMAIL PROTECTED]: A hint for those trying to package newer upstream versions: Get the new upstream tar-ball, then try applying the most recent ubuntu-diff that you can find here: http://packages.ubuntu.com/edgy/admin/dmraid This way you don't have to reinvent the wheel :) -- DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15 https://launchpad.net/bugs/54246 -- DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15 https://launchpad.net/bugs/54246 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54246] Re: DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15
I tried to package latest dmraid from RedHat (i.e 1.0.0.rc13) with additional Ubuntu scripts for initramfs. May someone try it ? ** Attachment added: dmraid_0.9.9+1.0.0.rc13-0_i386.deb http://librarian.launchpad.net/4891009/dmraid_0.9.9%2B1.0.0.rc13-0_i386.deb -- DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15 https://launchpad.net/bugs/54246 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54246] Re: DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15
Even with the corrected scripts (that considers dmraid in /usr/sbin), the /dev/mapper devices are not correctly set at startup. As my / is on a such device, I can't have Edgy working correctly. I'll get back to Dapper in a while if no correction is provided soon... -- DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15 https://launchpad.net/bugs/54246 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54246] Re: DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15
Well... I didn't package the modifications... I directly added the scripts and modified them to use the right paths. The worth is that I didn't noted the errors reported during boot... I'll try to post more information lately. -- DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15 https://launchpad.net/bugs/54246 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54246] Re: DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15
I'm trying to have it working right now... It seems that the dmraid_1.0.0.rc11-1_i386.deb Olaf built have dmraid in /usr/sbin and not in /sbin as it should be... that's (probably) why the /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/dmraid script does not work.. and that's why /dev/mapper devices are not set on boot... So to improve this package, it should be rebuild with dmraid in /sbin and with both scripts in /usr/share/initramfs-tools. -- DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15 https://launchpad.net/bugs/54246 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54246] Re: DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15
Ok. I guess we are at the same point we were last spring on this bug : https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/22107 I'll try to add again /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local- top/dmraid and test it again so we can improve the 1.0.0-rc11 package. -- DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15 https://launchpad.net/bugs/54246 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54246] Re: DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15
Well... I'm not so sure it is ok. It worked only once. I upgrade some packages, and it didn't worked anymore then. Does it work correctly for someone ? I'll try some other tests. Maybe I've got another problem on my installation. -- DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15 https://launchpad.net/bugs/54246 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54246] Re: DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15
I also confirm that dmraid 1.0.0-rc11 makes it work !! As it is a regression since Dapper, I hope we can expect to have it uploaded for Edgy. -- DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15 https://launchpad.net/bugs/54246 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54246] Re: DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15
I build the latest dmraid (1.0.0-rc11), and tried it with my configuration without any success. (By the way, dmraid 1.0.0-rc11 does not build on gcc-4.1, but on gcc-4.0 it does.) ** Changed in: Ubuntu Sourcepackagename: None = dmraid -- DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15 https://launchpad.net/bugs/54246 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54246] Re: DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15
Does it work with this sanity check removed ? I'll try it asap on my machine. Is this check easy to find ? or maybe you can post a patch file on this bug so I will not have to look for this check. -- DMRAID stopped to work in kernels 2.6.15 https://launchpad.net/bugs/54246 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57091] Re: proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies=1 should be seriously considered to permit SYN flood defense...
Sorry, I didn't know that ftp was not a server program... My point of view is that it should not be activated by default, but should be easily configurable with a GUI, probably the same GUI that should configure the FW. I add the ubuntu network team and the ubuntu security team to the bug. -- proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies=1 should be seriously considered to permit SYN flood defense... https://launchpad.net/bugs/57091 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57103] Re: Raid on Motherboard not able to detect Non-Sata Hard disk
Can't you force the Bios not to have raid activated on the disk controller ? Your problem is quite similar to bug 22107 in the way that Ubuntu does not provide software raid controller for installation. -- Raid on Motherboard not able to detect Non-Sata Hard disk https://launchpad.net/bugs/57103 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 24361] Re: pcmcia Ralink RT2500 driver freezes laptop while working on batteries
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.15 (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info = Confirmed -- pcmcia Ralink RT2500 driver freezes laptop while working on batteries https://launchpad.net/bugs/24361 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57103] Re: Raid on Motherboard not able to detect Non-Sata Hard disk
Hi Mishra, isn't it the same bug as 22107 ? -- Raid on Motherboard not able to detect Non-Sata Hard disk https://launchpad.net/bugs/57103 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57091] Re: proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies=1 should be seriously considered to permit SYN flood defense...
Hi enyc, I think tcp_syncookies is considered as part of the FW mechanism of the kernel. As Dapper (and previous releases) does not provide any FW out of the box, it is normal that tcp_syncookies are not activated by default. Your bug repport should be put as a wish for next release, and maybe linked to bug about the missing FW in Ubuntu. -- proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies=1 should be seriously considered to permit SYN flood defense... https://launchpad.net/bugs/57091 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57096] Re: after Squid logrotate system hangs
Hi all, some parts of the FS seem corrupted. Have you some files in /var/lost+found ? Maybe you should try to reinstall the package that is buggy. (apt-get install --reinstall squid) If you have troubles with some other packages, you should think about a complete reinstallation of the system... -- after Squid logrotate system hangs https://launchpad.net/bugs/57096 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57091] Re: proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies=1 should be seriously considered to permit SYN flood defense...
For me syncookies is the same problem as FW is. As you said, as long as you don't start a network service, your computer is safe. If you start a SSH server or whatever, you have to protect your system from DoS or other attacks... (By the way, if your server is reachable from the internet, as soon as you open a network service, you will need some iptables rules to filter some attacks, as ssh scans for example.) -- proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies=1 should be seriously considered to permit SYN flood defense... https://launchpad.net/bugs/57091 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55197] Re: ethernet devices are not always detected in same order
It happened twice this week... ** Changed in: Ubuntu Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- ethernet devices are not always detected in same order https://launchpad.net/bugs/55197 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 56692] Re: Radeon Mobility 7500: poor 2D performance, abysmal 3D performance
Hi Mika, do you know what driver you are using ? vesa or radeon ? I do have a radeon mobility U1 (~ radeon 7000), and 2D performances are acceptable. I don't have any trouble when I move windows... -- Radeon Mobility 7500: poor 2D performance, abysmal 3D performance https://launchpad.net/bugs/56692 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 56692] Re: Radeon Mobility 7500: poor 2D performance, abysmal 3D performance
Have you looked at logs from Xorg server ? maybe some troubles are reported in it. (logs are in /var/log/Xorg.0.log) -- Radeon Mobility 7500: poor 2D performance, abysmal 3D performance https://launchpad.net/bugs/56692 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 56692] Re: Radeon Mobility 7500: poor 2D performance, abysmal 3D performance
I see a [resume] line by the end of the file. Does the problem happen after a suspend / resume ? Else, the log seems clean to me. -- Radeon Mobility 7500: poor 2D performance, abysmal 3D performance https://launchpad.net/bugs/56692 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55197] ethernet devices are not always detected in same order
Public bug reported: My physical ethernet devices are not always mapped on the same device /dev/ethX. My gigabit controller was eth1 : Aug 3 17:46:59 localhost kernel: [17179590.964000] skge 1.3 addr 0xe500 irq 217 chip Yukon-Lite rev 7 Aug 3 17:46:59 localhost kernel: [17179590.964000] skge eth1: addr 00:0e:a6:5c:89:51 and is now eth0 : Aug 4 17:05:57 localhost kernel: [17179592.128000] skge 1.3 addr 0xe500 irq 209 chip Yukon-Lite rev 7 Aug 4 17:05:57 localhost kernel: [17179592.128000] skge eth0: addr 00:0e:a6:5c:89:51 I can provide other traces, if you need. Here are the extract from lspci showing both interfaces: :00:04.0 Ethernet controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Ethernet Controller (rev a1) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. A7N8X Mainboard onboard nForce2 Ethernet Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- Latency: 0 (250ns min, 5000ns max) :01:04.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8001 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 13) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Marvell 88E8001 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Asus) Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- Latency: 32 (5750ns min, 7750ns max), Cache Line Size: 0x08 (32 bytes) Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 209 Region 0: Memory at e500 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Region 1: I/O ports at a000 [size=256] Expansion ROM at 5008 [disabled] [size=128K] Capabilities: [48] Power Management version 2 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+) Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=1 PME- Capabilities: [50] Vital Product Data ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- ethernet devices are not always detected in same order https://launchpad.net/bugs/55197 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 42833] Re: modified menu under Breezy are not correctly reinitialised under Dapper
I'm completely under Dapper since a while now. I solved my problem by removing all .gnome directories and by restoring some settings later. I can't reproduce the bug anymore... I guess that if I'm the onlyone who had this problem, you can close it now. -- modified menu under Breezy are not correctly reinitialised under Dapper https://launchpad.net/bugs/42833 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
