[Bug 264287] Re: zoom keys dont work in my microsoft natural keyboard 4000
Hi folks, I don't know if anyone associated with this bug still cares, but for those who have one of these MS keyboards with the slider control (labeled 'Zoom'), it seems the slider is actually recognized as joystick buttons, using the autoloaded joydev.ko kernel module (at least this is the case with my model 1031 'Digital Media Pro Keyboard). Mine is recognized as having 41 buttons (don't know where this comes from, but okay) and when I push the slider up button 25 is reported as pressed, and button 26 when pushed down (this is in Jaunty KDE Keyboard Mouse - Joystick under System Settings). I'm not really sure what the state of actual joystick support is in KDE or X desktop usage in general, but thought this might give someone an idea. Cheers, Jesse -- zoom keys dont work in my microsoft natural keyboard 4000 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264287 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350278] Re: kopete-cryptography has broken dependency on libkleo4
This exists in the current Karmic build as well: $ sudo apt-get install kopete-cryptography Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: kopete-cryptography: Depends: libkleo4 (= 4:4.2.2-0ubuntu1) but 4:4.2.98-0ubuntu1 is to be installed E: Broken packages -- kopete-cryptography has broken dependency on libkleo4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350278 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376858] Re: strace: malloc(): memory corruption (fast): 0x00000000026452c0
I get this too running warzone2100 under strace; I left this comment on Bug #367625 as well. -- strace: malloc(): memory corruption (fast): 0x026452c0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376858 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367625] Re: Memory corruption in strace
I get this as well running warzone2100 under strace (64bit user/64bit kernel) ** Attachment added: strace.abort http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28002415/strace.abort -- Memory corruption in strace https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367625 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220142] Re: Yelp:ERROR:(yelp-document.c:275):yelp_document_cancel_page: assertion failed: (document != NULL YELP_IS_DOCUMENT (document))
Nope this seems fixed with -0ubuntu3. -- Yelp:ERROR:(yelp-document.c:275):yelp_document_cancel_page: assertion failed: (document != NULL YELP_IS_DOCUMENT (document)) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220142] Re: Yelp:ERROR:(yelp-document.c:275):yelp_document_cancel_page: assertion failed: (document != NULL YELP_IS_DOCUMENT (document))
yelp 2.25.1-0ubuntu2 seems to be afflicted with this bug when clicking on Connecting to the internet (Ubuntu help center welcome page) - this is consistently reproducible here. Jaunty, current as of approximately two hours ago. -- Yelp:ERROR:(yelp-document.c:275):yelp_document_cancel_page: assertion failed: (document != NULL YELP_IS_DOCUMENT (document)) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
Hi Leann, Sorry again for taking so long to get back; unfortunately this laptop's home is about an hour and a half from where I live, so I can only work on it when I get the chance to get back here. Anyway... I have tried the latest kernel available in Intrepid now, the Jaunty Live CD (built 20090221), and building the latest drivers from w.k.o...all yield the same result with no apparent change. If there's anything else you can think of I'm open to ideas! I will be here until about 2:30pm EST today then I'll have to return home. Thanks! -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
Reverting to the last available 2.6.24 kernel from Hardy brings this back to a much more usable state, so it looks like maybe this could be a regression in 2.6.27 (not sure of the exact package revision...whatever the latest image is that's available in Intrepid)? -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
Hi Leann, Sadly, this now seems worse than ever with 2.6.27 under Intrepid...it has now become difficult for the card to even associate with either AP. I'd like to reiterate that switching to a VC has the greatest effect on this- that is, while switched to X's vt/i.e., while actually looking at X, wifi network access is unusably slow. Switching to a VC while, for example, a page is loading in Firefox, results in network access becoming perfectly normal... when I come back to X, the page has loaded fine. If I had a terminal window open with a ping running against my LAN's router, the ping times are horrible if I'm in X (most packets lost, ones that made it are several hundred ms or greater), but again if I switch to a VC, when I come back, the ping times from when I went to a VC are normal, about 2ms. Thanks a lot for keeping this open and sorry for having taken so long to report back on this! ** Attachment added: dmesg.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20750516/dmesg.log -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
** Attachment added: lspci http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20750546/lspci -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
** Attachment added: /var/log/messages http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20750559/messages -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20750567/Xorg.0.log -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
By the way, I forgot to mention (though it may be obvious by the logs) that I'm using the b43 driver with the newer style firmware (410.2160) as per http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/b43 -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
Leann Ogasawara wrote: Leann, I apologize for letting this fall through the cracks; it has been awhile since I reported this. This is a parent's laptop and I have since moved away so testing this hardware combination now has become very impractical; for this I apologize as well. However, IIRC, when I installed Hardy on it to see if it would be an improvement over Gutsy, there was a significant improvement, though not entirely optimal. I /do/ have to return at some point in the near future to pick up more belongings so I will have the opportunity to test it further when I am there. I have asked how the laptop is working and they've responded it is working very well (primarily used for web surfing) so that is probably a good sign as well :) Thank you for your diligence in sifting through these old bugs. Cheers, Jesse -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223505] Re: update information is outdated displayed while Check has been performed lately
I confirm this with 8.04, also for several weeks now, though it also seems to only display intermittently (i.e., doesn't always display). -- update information is outdated displayed while Check has been performed lately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223505 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227776] Re: [hardy] fullscreen games run in maximized window mode if desktop effects are enabled
I have this problem, only intermittently: running Warzone2100 full- screen works fine each start here, but at unpredictable times the game suddenly becomes windowed. I hadn't ever made the connection to it happening when the game resolution is set the same as the desktop resolution, but probably only because I've always run Warzone at that resolution. I have a GeForce as well, a 5500OC, and run compiz (usually I just run metacity when I want to run Warzone). -- [hardy] fullscreen games run in maximized window mode if desktop effects are enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227776 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212226] Re: Hardy: Kernel Oopses in sound driver
Here as well...mine looks as though it stops when it tries to create the device nodes... for me this was introduced with 2.6.24-14 ** Attachment added: oops-backtrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13135237/oops-backtrace.txt -- Hardy: Kernel Oopses in sound driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195229] Re: emerald crashed with SIGSEGV in main_arena()
This has been rock solid for me since, so with that and the fact that this is apparently a dup, this can probably be closed. Thanks -- emerald crashed with SIGSEGV in main_arena() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195229 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195229] Re: emerald crashed with SIGSEGV in main_arena()
I guess I spoke too soon ;) ...0.7.2-0ubuntu2 has been fine for ten days but has just crashed for me. Is this more of an emerald or gtk+ problem? ** Attachment added: 0.7.2 Stacktrace http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12969196/Stacktrace.txt -- emerald crashed with SIGSEGV in main_arena() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195229 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208605] [NEW] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in gdk_threads_dispatch()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 208523 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208523 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel gnome-panel crashes when switching virtual desktops. This bears *some* similarity to bug #207693 but I didn't think it was quite the same thing (as it or any of the others I could find). It has been difficult for me to reproduce consistently but it only happens when I use the hotkey Ctrl-Alt-[Left|Right] to change virtual desktops. Another user in the aforementioned bug report states they can reproduce the bug if the mouse cursor is over the pager window when switching desktops; so far I cannot confirm this. I am using the current compiz and emerald. In case any of it might be relevant, my panel has firefox, thunderbird, pidgin, force-quit, and terminal launcher buttons and the applets: sensors, emifreq cpu frequency scaler, network monitor, three separators, user switcher, systray (containing pidgin), volume levels, stock date time, and logout. nm-applet also crashes or at least quits every time the panel crashes. This was also logged at the time: gnome-panel[16607]: segfault at 80 rip 7fa7c7b79518 rsp 7fffd161dfd0 error 6 ProblemType: Crash Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Mar 28 21:16:37 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-panel NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: gnome-panel 1:2.22.0-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcCmdline: gnome-panel --sm-client-id default1 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash Signal: 11 SourcePackage: gnome-panel StacktraceTop: gdk_threads_dispatch (data=0x124f140) g_timeout_dispatch (source=0xe45320, callback=0, IA__g_main_context_dispatch (context=0x6cb9c0) g_main_context_iterate (context=0x6cb9c0, block=0, IA__g_main_context_iteration (context=0x6cb9c0, Title: gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in gdk_threads_dispatch() Uname: Linux 2.6.24-12-generic x86_64 UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip fax floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev scanner tape video ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash -- gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in gdk_threads_dispatch() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208605] Re: gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in gdk_threads_dispatch()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 208523 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208523 ** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12957279/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12957280/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12957281/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12957282/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12957283/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12957284/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12957285/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12957286/ThreadStacktrace.txt -- gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in gdk_threads_dispatch() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 184907] Re: Totem can't handle ffdemux_flv
I can confirm this with the latest Totem (Hardy) trying the above URL and with any video I've tried so far on YouTube. ** Message: don't know how to handle video/x-flv ** Message: Error: Element doesn't implement handling of this stream. Please file a bug. gstffmpegdemux.c(1372): gst_ffmpegdemux_sink_activate_push (): /play/decodebin1/ffdemux_flv1: failed to activate sinkpad in pull mode, push mode not implemented yet (and a dialog box containing the same message as the OP's) Is it as simple as adding a mimetype to a file somewhere? -- Totem can't handle ffdemux_flv https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184907 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195229] Re: emerald crashed with SIGSEGV in main_arena()
I just did a fresh install of hardy yesterday so I will retest to see if I can get it to crash again (I think when I used emerald last week it seemed to be more stable) -- emerald crashed with SIGSEGV in main_arena() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195229 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 197669] Re: Could not open resource for reading YouTube+TotemPythonPlugin
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 07:03 +, fuoco wrote: ** Message: Error: Stream contains no data. gsttypefindelement.c(742): gst_type_find_element_activate (): /play/decodebin0/typefind: Can't typefind empty stream H...well when I try to open that same link in Firefox (and the same link minus everything after the ampersand) I get no data either. If I search for that video on Youtube (O2AEaQJuKDY) via their search page, I find one result, which I can only assume is the video you're trying to view. It then works, but the URL at that point is very different from the one reported in the error. Errors out with 'Stream contains no data'; Firefox displays a blank page; wget reports 'ERROR 410: Gone' (see http://diveintomark.org/archives/2003/03/27/http_error_410_gone - I had to look it up) http://www.youtube.com/get_video?video_id=O2AEaQJuKDYt=OEgsToPDskL0fFVOpKG_7LDiU9gKnvw_ Works in Firefox: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2AEaQJuKDY Apparently these search URLs have a limited lifetime or something... -- Could not open resource for reading YouTube+TotemPythonPlugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197669 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 197669] Re: Could not open resource for reading YouTube+TotemPythonPlugin
I am wondering if this has something to do with some videos requiring confirmation of sufficient age to view, i.e., 18+ videos. I haven't done any conclusive testing of this but it just occurred to me today... -- Could not open resource for reading YouTube+TotemPythonPlugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197669 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192559] Re: alsa update breaks kernel ABI
Confirmed; not sure how related this is but it happened to me as well -- alsa update breaks kernel ABI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192559 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149460] Re: Successful rotation to nonexistent face
Fix confirmed...mostly. Here is my setup now: Installation based on Hardy Alpha 4 Compiz set up with horizontal virtual size set to n ...let's say n=2 I can switch to desktop #1 using the binding for desktop #3, but only if I switch to #2 first. If I try to switch to 3 from 1, it behaves as expected (i.e., does nothing) I have tested this with other values for horiz. virtual size...it behaves the same way. IOW, I can always switch to the first desktop by using the keybinding for the number of desktops I actually have defined, plus one (n+1), as long as I am currently viewing the last desktop (n) -- Successful rotation to nonexistent face https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149460 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 179185] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__gtk_widget_get_toplevel()
So far I'm not seeing this anymore either. The 'Drive' and 'Volume' tabs have reappeared for me as well with this update. -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__gtk_widget_get_toplevel() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197669] Re: Could not open resource for reading YouTube+TotemPythonPlugin
This is now broken again for me with a slightly different error: ** (totem:13249): DEBUG: Init of Python module ** (totem:13249): DEBUG: Registering Python plugin instance: YouTube+TotemPythonPlugin ** (totem:13249): DEBUG: Creating object of type YouTube+TotemPythonPlugin ** (totem:13249): DEBUG: Creating Python plugin instance ** Message: Error: Could not open resource for reading. gstgnomevfssrc.c(841): gst_gnome_vfs_src_start (): /play/source: Could not open vfs file http://www.youtube.com/get_video?video_id=v4bUsRlAmsEt=OEgsToPDskK9Onq66QrnVK6kFD5JZ4ib; for reading: Generic error (2) -- Could not open resource for reading YouTube+TotemPythonPlugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197669 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197669] Re: Could not open resource for reading YouTube+TotemPythonPlugin
This seems to work here after updating this morning. -- Could not open resource for reading YouTube+TotemPythonPlugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197669 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197669] Re: Could not open resource for reading YouTube+TotemPythonPlugin
Confirmed -- Could not open resource for reading YouTube+TotemPythonPlugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197669 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 153610] Re: applet.py crashed with IOError in module()
Confirmed with 0.7.81+svn1976-0ubuntu2 -- applet.py crashed with IOError in module() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153610 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195229] Re: emerald crashed with SIGSEGV in main_arena()
Okay I don't know if it's necessarily related but it just crashed again, though in a different spot (which it doesn't identify) but the last call it does is gdk_gc_new_with_values (). I haven't uploaded this new crash report via apport but will save it in case it needs to be. I'm attaching the backtrace from this crash. ** Attachment added: Stacktrace-2.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12231799/Stacktrace-2.txt -- emerald crashed with SIGSEGV in main_arena() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195229 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160814] Re: FATAL: Error inserting gspca. Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter
This module loaded fine for me in hardy until updating today or yesterday (hadn't used it since before yesterday). I get the same Unknown symbols in my log. -- FATAL: Error inserting gspca. Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191291] Re: mythfrontend.real crashed with SIGSEGV in memcpy()
Confirmed; this no longer crashes here. Thanks! -- mythfrontend.real crashed with SIGSEGV in memcpy() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191291 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195229] [NEW] emerald crashed with SIGSEGV in main_arena()
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: emerald I was scrolling through the xorg logfile using less in the gnome- terminal when emerald abruptly died (though I don't believe the two are related; emerald has died several times before with no apparent rhyme or reason; the only reason I hadn't reported the bug previously was because the debugging symbols for emerald were not complete so the backtrace was useless) I am using the 'Blueray' v0.3 theme. Modifications I've made via Emerald themer 0.5.2 are: change the window shadows to a more cyan-ish color, change the titlebar text font to 'Swift' 12 point (I am uncertain what package this font is part of if it is not part of a default installation). I believe emerald died unpredictably before these alterations and with other themes as well, however. Windows open at the time: Firefox 3b3, one gnome-terminal, evolution mail, pidgin ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 CrashCounter: 1 Date: Sun Feb 24 17:14:51 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/emerald NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: emerald 0.5.2+git20080205-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: emerald --replace ProcCwd: /home/genecide ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 Signal: 11 SourcePackage: emerald StacktraceTop: main_arena () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 IA__gdk_gc_new_with_values (drawable=0x8287d60, values=0x0, IA__gdk_gc_new (drawable=0x8287dc0) update_switcher_window (win=0x825b348, event_filter_func (gdkxevent=0xbf8cfb18, event=0x8081b70, Title: emerald crashed with SIGSEGV in main_arena() Uname: Linux headhunter 2.6.24-8-generic #1 SMP Thu Feb 14 20:40:45 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin mythtv netdev plugdev powerdev pulse pulse-access pulse-rt sambashare scanner vboxusers video ** Affects: emerald (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash need-i386-retrace -- emerald crashed with SIGSEGV in main_arena() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195229 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195229] Re: emerald crashed with SIGSEGV in main_arena()
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12176197/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12176198/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12176199/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12176200/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12176201/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12176202/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12176203/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12176204/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- emerald crashed with SIGSEGV in main_arena() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195229 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 149460] Re: Successful rotation to nonexistent face
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 17:33 +, Pedro Villavicencio wrote: reproducible with the live environment of the Desktop CD of the development release - Hardy Heron. It would help us greatly if you could test with it so we can work on getting it fixed in the next release of Confirmed on the i386 Live CD from Feb 14. To reproduce in the live environment, you must (as far as I know) download the ccsm (Compiz Config Settings Manager) and enable Desktop Cube and Rotate Cube plugins. In the Rotate Cube configuration, enable keybinding for a desktop face that doesn't actually exist (I picked #12) and then use that keybinding. The desktop will spin wildly getting to that face (or face 12 at least). This doesn't seem to affect the ability to rotate back to a valid face, though. -- Successful rotation to nonexistent face https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149460 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182425] Re: Strange blue theme after upgrade to Hardy
Confirmed on Hardy/i386 Live CD from Feb 14th -- Strange blue theme after upgrade to Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182425 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 149460] Re: Successful rotation to nonexistent face
It doesn't rotate to a non-existant face, it rotates to one of your currently available faces. I have cube setup with 2 viewports (so it works like a piece of paper) and hitting the Rotate to viewport 12 keybinding spun the whole thing around a few times but landed on viewport 2. Travis, Okay, I thought since it successfully switched when asked to that perhaps it was actually trying to switch to an imaginary one. Thanks for the reply. -- Successful rotation to nonexistent face https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149460 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 183685] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
My backtrace is not identical, but stops in the same function. It happens for me consistently using the 'feh' image viewer with default settings. workaroundsRemoveFromFullscreenList (w=0x8cd9cb8) workaroundsHandleEvent (d=0x8085510, event=0xbfbcea48) vpswitchHandleEvent (d=0x8085510, event=0xbfbcea48) resizeHandleEvent (d=0x8085510, event=0xbfbcea48) shiftHandleEvent (d=0x8085510, event=0xbfbcea48) I will open a new bug if a dev thinks it would make sense. -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183685 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191291] Re: mythfrontend.real crashed with SIGSEGV in memcpy()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- mythfrontend.real crashed with SIGSEGV in memcpy() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191291 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191291] Re: mythfrontend.real crashed with SIGSEGV in memcpy()
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11898680/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11898681/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11898682/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11898683/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11898684/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11898685/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11898686/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11898687/ThreadStacktrace.txt -- mythfrontend.real crashed with SIGSEGV in memcpy() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191291 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191291] [NEW] mythfrontend.real crashed with SIGSEGV in memcpy()
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mythtv Attempted to use MythPhone to call another computer on the lan (also using MythPhone; both computers use the same current Hardy MythTV packages). Almost immediately after the call was connected, the frontend process died. The receiving computer's frontend kept running as if the caller was still connected. Neither computer is set to register to a SIP server Both computers' microphone device is set to /dev/dsp Both computers' Webcam device is set to /dev/video0 with transmit and capture resolution set to 352x288, 30fps, 400Kbps. The sender's webcam is a Z-Star Microelectronics Corp ZC0303 WebCam 0ac8:303b (vender is Vimicro) using the gspca.ko module (zc0301.ko is not correct for this device despite the similar name) The receiver's webcam is the Virtual Video Device (vivi.ko) since it lacks a real webcam Both devices function without incident using other applications (e.g., Ekiga) ProblemType: Crash Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Feb 12 10:58:18 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/mythfrontend.real NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ath_hal Package: mythtv-frontend 0.20.99+trunk15849-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/mythfrontend.real --logfile /var/log/mythtv/mythfrontend.log ProcCwd: /home/genecide ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash Signal: 11 SourcePackage: mythtv StacktraceTop: memcpy () from /lib/libc.so.6 PhoneUIBox::TransmitLocalWebcamImage () PhoneUIBox::customEvent () QObject::event () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 QWidget::event () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 Title: mythfrontend.real crashed with SIGSEGV in memcpy() Uname: Linux mythtv-livingroom 2.6.24-7-generic #1 SMP Thu Feb 7 00:56:31 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin mythtv netdev plugdev powerdev sambashare scanner video ** Affects: mythtv (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash -- mythfrontend.real crashed with SIGSEGV in memcpy() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191291 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 184403] Re: pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock()
Hasn't crashed for me since then I believe... -- pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184403 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178714] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_widget_get_toplevel()
Firefox crashed for me in the same function. I see a few other bugs that have as well so I'm not sure if I should submit a new bug or if it's a dupe so I've attached the backtrace. I was changing the fonts in Appearance Preferences, which seemed to instigate the crash. I won't submit the bug report via the Apport util yet but have backed up the /var/crash report from it just in case it is a new bug. ** Attachment added: firefox-stacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11571052/firefox-stacktrace.txt -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_widget_get_toplevel() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 184403] Re: pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock()
Confirmed... My backtrace isn't quite the same but it dies in the same place. -- pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184403 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122673] Re: gnome-mount crashed with SIGSEGV in g_datalist_id_set_data_full()
Confirmed (with Hardy) -- gnome-mount crashed with SIGSEGV in g_datalist_id_set_data_full() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122673 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 123231] Re: evolution-data-server-1.12 crashed with signal 5 in g_logv()
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 15:31 +, hggdh wrote: @all: does this still happen on Hardy E-D-S 2.21.5.1? Upstream patch for bug 179132 may have resolved it. hggdh, This hasn't happened for me now for what seems like a few weeks. Cheers, Jesse -- evolution-data-server-1.12 crashed with signal 5 in g_logv() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123231 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181144] Re: xfce battery indicator is wrong
I was going to chime in when I first saw this bug report, as I have the same problem, but decided not to when I saw the bug had been triaged already. However ;) I confirm this problem on my laptop even with 2.6.24-3-386. -- xfce battery indicator is wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182901] Request newer drm + mesa pulls from upstream
Public bug reported: I am requesting newer drm + mesa pulls from upstream. I have a Radeon XPress 200M (5955) and sometime early to mid last year, I experienced a problem with certain OpenGL-based programs (which I then reported as a bug upstream: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11384 - the link has screenshots depicting the problem). This bug was resolved, and I can confirm is still resolved in current git pulls (I use gentoo with git mesa+drm on another partition on this same laptop). Hardy seems to use an older version, however, that still exhibits this bug. With this bug many OpenGL programs are also painstakingly slow (and some simply do not run at all). ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Request newer drm + mesa pulls from upstream https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 141418] Re: klauncher crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()
I have this bug as well, as described by Martin Gustafsson. -- klauncher crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
I have now tried building a few kernels: 2.6.22-14 as-is (i.e., no configuration changes; should be more or less exactly the same as the shipped Gutsy kernel?): a few hours later I was able to try it: no perceptible difference 2.6.22-14 fat-trimmed (i.e., only the necessary device drivers for the laptop, processor as P4/Celeron instead of 386, minimal extras such as filesystem drivers, etc): no perceptible difference I then decided to try vanilla 2.6.24-rc2 sources with the new b43 driver and firmware, with the same fat-trimmed .config from the previous try: was really hopeful here, but much to my chagrin, the results were exactly the same One thing I've been seeing some of lately is people finding that disabling the tickless timer seems to fix a lot of problems, so I tried it (nohz=off along with highres=off): same results Cheers -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
Just seeing this also: when the screen saver kicks in (currently configured as 'lattice') or playing back a 1080i video with kaffine/xine backend, the throughput also seems to dramatically increase. -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
** Attachment added: xorg.conf, ditto to last attachment http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10310891/xorg.conf -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log on fresh Gutsy install, using different firmware http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10310889/Xorg.0.log -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
I have since tried using a Gutsy final live CD to see if it locked up the laptop hard a few seconds after X starts like the installed copy and it hadn't, so I backed up the contents and installed a fresh copy of Gutsy (prior install was an upgrade from Feisty). I can now confirm this bug occurs with the bcm43xx driver as well, albeit (sometimes) not quite as extreme - it sometimes manages to eke out about 10kbytes/sec. The same circumstances appear to have the same effects as well; e.g., switching to a vc while a download is in progress allows it to operate normally - switch back to X and the download has finished or progressed much more quickly. I have also tried extracting firmware for the Broadcom driver from a few different locations - the one suggested by the GUI for Broadcom restricted wifi drivers (which is what I've been using all along), and the bcmwl5.sys from my other Presario (which uses a 4318 instead of the 4311 rev 1 this laptop uses) and at the moment, while far from perfect, the latter is quite an improvement - downloading a large video from my Myth backend, for example, downloads at an average of 60-80kbytes/sec. Again, if I switch to a vc, (or watch this video using mplayer as it is downloading - hmmm), the transfer speed increases dramatically. This may of course be a fluke and possibly revert at any time, but at the moment appears to be a step in the right direction. -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
** Attachment added: dmesg http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10310893/dmesg -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
The laptop ships with Vista Basic, which does not seem to suffer from this problem. I haven't filed a bug report against the kernel; I will build a kernel and see if I have different results. On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 18:36 +, unggnu wrote: Does the same problem happen under Windows? Have you made a bug report against 2.6.22 kernel? Try to compile your own kernel if 2.6.22 with the Broadcom module and the needed firmware if the Gutsy one still doesn't work for you. -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132627] Re: GSynaptics couldn't initialize.
Durmant, If you are still having this problem would you please attach your xorg.conf and Xorg.0.log? Seiti, xorg.conf should exist in /etc/X11 Search for a section that looks like this (or add it if it doesn't exist): Section InputDevice Identifier Synaptics Touchpad Driver synaptics Option SendCoreEventstrue Option Device/dev/psaux Option Protocol auto-dev Option HorizScrollDelta 0 Option SHMConfig true# -- and add this line to it EndSection -- GSynaptics couldn't initialize. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132627 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158095] Adjusting volume level crashes PySol
Public bug reported: When closing the Sound Settings window using the OK button, PySol quits abnormally with the following error: Internal error. Please report this bug: type 'exceptions.AssertionError' Changed volume levels _are_ saved to disk, however. Steps to reproduce: 1. Open the Sound Settings window via: Option Sounds 2. Click the OK button pysol 4.82.1-4.1ubuntu6 python 2.5.1-1ubuntu2 This link describes the exact same symptom: http://merkel.debian.org/~dancer/apt-listbugs/db-h/53/229353.report ** Affects: pysol (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Adjusting volume level crashes PySol https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158095 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158095] Re: Adjusting volume level crashes PySol
dAniel, This fix works for me. Thanks! Cheers, Jesse -- Adjusting volume level crashes PySol https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158095 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117892] Re: i810/intel xorg drivers hang Inspiron 1100
I am not 100% certain this is the same bug, however, I have a Compaq Presario C550/C552US running Gutsy w/2.6.22-14. It uses an i945GM and has the exact same problem (as described in the first post - box hard locks right after gdm starts and the busy cursor displays for a moment before locking up). My only workaround so far has been to use 2.6.20-15 from Feisty, and use the i810 server instead of the intel server. Interestingly, in 2.6.22-14, if I boot into recovery/single mode and start the X server by hand (startx) _as root_ instead of my user via gdm, all is fine (though it seems to have an adverse effect on the wifi for some reason). The IgnoreEDID flag had no effect for me (I suppose I expected to see some feedback from X that this flag was set but I did not). Cheers, Jesse -- i810/intel xorg drivers hang Inspiron 1100 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
Okay I tried: acpi=noirq - no apparent effect irqpoll - Seemed to have a positive impact at first (took until the 24th ping packet to get anything - all rtt's were ~ 1ms after that; but that delay may well have been the wifi driver not being warmed up yet despite stating it was associated and had received an address. I switched that gnome-terminal to full screen (F11) and took a look at dmesg's output, came out of fullscreen, attempted again and this time it was back to its latent self again. I tried a second cold boot (power cycle) with this kernel option again and it seemed to have no effect this time (poor latency) pci=nomsi - no apparent effect pci=routeirq - no apparent effect noapic - no apparent effect -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
Public bug reported: This is my post from the forums (I have reported this as a bug now because I believe I have found a partial solution): http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=579941 Subj: Networking (wifi) latent/unusable in X but fine in a vc? I have a rather strange problem. I have a Compaq C550 laptop (C552US) with integrated WiFi. I have upgraded from Feisty to Gutsy. I am using ndiswrapper. The computer boots up, the WiFi card associates with my AP and receives an address. Any network access is unusably slow. Pinging either of my APs, I can see that most packets are dropped and those that are returned have a very long rtt (mostly 1-2sec+). However, here's the kicker: if I switch to a vc (using Ctrl+Alt+F#; not logging out or killing X), network access is slick as it should be, with no or minimal dropped packets. [EDIT: Incoming traffic is fine as well; e.g., if I ping this machine from another the latency is normal). A bit of a longshot, but I thought perhaps somehow the video card was assigned overlapping resources (io, irq, etc) with the WiFi card - it is not. Please note I am still using the 2.6.20-15 kernel from Feisty. I wanted to use the 2.6.22-14 as shipped with Gutsy so I could try the in-kernel bcm43xx driver, but unfortunately that has an even nastier still problem: the machine locks up hard at a somewhat random time after the gdm login screen [edit: using either the i810 or intel X server] (usually after logging in). The WiFi is an internal miniPCI Broadcom 4311 (according to lspci, rev 01) Video is i945GM. I have also tried removing as many unnecessary kernel modules as possible and tried with and without the 915resolution util. Cheers, Jesse EDIT: I got this working. I can confirm this appears to be a conflict of sorts with the intel X server; I thought for sure I had tried this but apparently not: using the legacy i810 server instead solves this problem for me. There doesn't appear to be any remotely pertinent information in any system logs, X startup log, etc. drm module version is 1.1.0 20060810 i915 module version is 1.6.0 20060119 ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
Yes I had tried removing the module earlier thinking the same thing; no effect. Nope no mouse; just the integrated touchpad. #57355 sounds similar to this at first but on reading further it sounds more and more like it was just a problem with earlier in-kernel broadcom drivers. I was afraid it would come to a wall because of the use of the Windows driver. I would certainly like to see if the problem persists using the bcm43xx drivers instead but unfortunately this card will not work with them in 2.6.20-15. -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
** Attachment added: ioports http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10075048/ioports -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
** Attachment added: iomem http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10075047/iomem -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
** Attachment added: dmesg.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10074932/dmesg.log -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
** Attachment added: lspci http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10074906/lspci -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
** Attachment added: xorg.conf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10074905/xorg.conf -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log with DRI enabled http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10074903/Xorg.0.log -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
** Attachment added: interrupts http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10074949/interrupts -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
I'd also like to just add a little more fuel: If I, for example, attempt to visit a site in Firefox, it will sit unsuccessfully attempting to push packets out. However, if I switch to a vc and return to X the site will have loaded (consistently reproducible). -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154647] Re: Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log with DRI disabled http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10074904/Xorg.0.log-nodri -- Possible severe conflict between intel X server and Broadcom wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152654] Re: Xorg (i810) crashes on startup after upgrade to Gutsy
** Attachment added: X log file when started normally (gdm) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10058360/Xorg.0.log -- Xorg (i810) crashes on startup after upgrade to Gutsy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152654] Re: Xorg (i810) crashes on startup after upgrade to Gutsy
I have a similar problem with a Compaq C550. The laptop hardlocks at a somewhat random time after arriving at the gdm login screen (usually once logged in). This is rather inconclusive, but the problem also seems to be accelerated by keyboard or touchpad input. Interestingly, if the laptop is booted in single-user mode (=recovery mode at grub boot screen) and the X server started by hand (startx as root), it never locks up. This only occurs using the current 2.6.22-14 kernel. When booting Gutsy with the Feisty 2.6.20-15 kernel, the problem does not appear (drm module - X server?) Contrary to Petri's fortune, specifying either the i810 or intel server in xorg.conf does not seem to make a difference. Mode of /dev/dri/card0 is 0666 Card IDs: 00:02.0 0300: 8086:27a2 (rev 03) 00:02.1 0380: 8086:27a6 (rev 03) C552US, Celeron M 520 1.6 ** Attachment added: xorg.conf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10058347/xorg.conf -- Xorg (i810) crashes on startup after upgrade to Gutsy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135050] Re: strigidaemon crashed with SIGSEGV in Strigi::AnalyzerConfiguration::indexType()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 134049 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134049 (In lieu of posting a report as a comment to bug #134049): I confirm that this crashes when attempting to perform a manual index. It occurred one time upon bootup once the the KDE session had finished loading as well. -- strigidaemon crashed with SIGSEGV in Strigi::AnalyzerConfiguration::indexType() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135050 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149460] Successful rotation to nonexistent face
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz Description: Rotating to a nonexistent/unallocated face using the Desktop Cube is successful (i.e., the cube consists of only four faces, but switching to face 12 with the 'Rotate to Face 12' hotkey attempts to anyway) Expected: Attempts to switch to a cube face that doesn't exist should be ignored Steps to reproduce: Test case has Desktop Cube with four faces Enable 'Rotate Cube' plugin Using the hotkey, attempt to switch to a cube face that doesn't exist (default is Ctrl+F#; e.g., Ctrl+F12 for face 12) This also appears to produce a fully transparent borderless window in the upper left corner of the screen on top of the cube, occupying about 40% of the width and height of a 1680x1050 desktop. Contents shown through this window have a slightly distorted perspective. This can be observed when rotating the cube with the mouse (also when rotating to specific face using the hotkey, though it is more difficult to see because of the speed of changing faces). System: Kubuntu Gutsy Tribe 5, 2.6.22-12-generic, x86 nVidia GeForce FX 5500OC, proprietary nvidia driver 100.14.19 Compiz 0.6.0+git20071004-0ubuntu1 Packages updated Oct 5 2007 at 10:30am ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Successful rotation to nonexistent face https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149460 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149460] Re: Successful rotation to nonexistent face
Edit: The second part of this bug is erroneous; I had inadvertently enabled two outputs in the General Options Display Settings: one that was 1680x1050, one that was 640x480, both at +0+0. Cheers, Jesse Burt -- Successful rotation to nonexistent face https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149460 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
