[Bug 1738290] [NEW] Could not install bootloader at end of install, even after selecting manually
Public bug reported: Trying to install from a USB stick. Had Fedora 27 installed and working before. Is on an NVMe drive if that matters. I selected the default "delete everything, and repartition" option. Also told it to download updates and 3rd party things (like for MP3 and WiFi). And tried to select the two possible entries in the drop down list after it failed...those failed too (didn't try the USB stick entry). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: ubiquity 17.10.10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-16.19-generic 4.13.4 Uname: Linux 4.13.0-16-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.387 CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Thu Dec 14 14:14:25 2017 LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Release amd64 (20171018) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8 SourcePackage: ubiquity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug artful ** Description changed: Trying to install from a USB stick. Had Fedora 27 installed and working before. Is on an NVMe drive if that matters. I selected the default "delete everything, and repartition" option. Also told it to download - updates and 3rd party things (like for MP3 and WiFi). + updates and 3rd party things (like for MP3 and WiFi). And tried to + select the two possible entries in the drop down list after it + failed...those failed too (didn't try the USB stick entry). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: ubiquity 17.10.10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-16.19-generic 4.13.4 Uname: Linux 4.13.0-16-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.387 CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Thu Dec 14 14:14:25 2017 LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Release amd64 (20171018) ProcEnviron: - LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 - PATH=(custom, no user) - XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= - LANG=en_US.UTF-8 - LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8 + LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 + PATH=(custom, no user) + XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= + LANG=en_US.UTF-8 + LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8 SourcePackage: ubiquity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738290 Title: Could not install bootloader at end of install, even after selecting manually To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1738290/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1269092] [NEW] Aw Snap! from chromium-browser v31 because needs updated chromium-codecs-ffmpeg
Public bug reported: I'm on an ARM system, but I'm guessing this could happen on x86 or x64 too. I start with a stock raring (13.04) install that does not have the raring-updates debian package location in /etc/apt/sources.list. I install xubuntu-desktop and chromium-browser. The last package also installs a chromium-codecs-ffmpeg package. Without the updates I get version 25 of the browser. I want the latest stable (v31), but upgrading some packages breaks my graphics driver (hidden in a mesa library I heard). So I add the raring-updates location and only upgrade chromium-browser. This also grabbed the chromium language package, but it did not upgrade chromium-codecs-ffmpeg. Afterwards if I try to view google.com, about a second after the page loads I get an Aw Snap! and the chromium log has this. ... [24337:24337:0113/180942:VERBOSE1:ffmpeg_stubs.cc(467)] Couldn't load av_frame_unref, dlerror() says: [24337:24337:0113/180942:VERBOSE1:ffmpeg_stubs.cc(472)] Couldn't load av_frame_free, dlerror() says: /usr/lib/chromium-browser/libffmpegsumo.so: undefined symbol: av_frame_free [24337:24337:0113/180942:VERBOSE1:ffmpeg_stubs.cc(597)] Couldn't load av_buffer_create, dlerror() says: /usr/lib/chromium-browser/libffmpegsumo.so: undefined symbol: av_buffer_create [24337:24337:0113/180942:VERBOSE1:ffmpeg_stubs.cc(607)] Couldn't load av_buffer_get_opaque, dlerror() says: /usr/lib/chromium-browser/libffmpegsumo.so: undefined symbol: av_buffer_get_opaque [24337:24339:0113/180942:VERBOSE1:ipc_sync_channel.cc(385)] Canceling pending sends [24337:24337:0113/180942:VERBOSE1:ipc_sync_channel.cc(385)] Canceling pending sends ... But if I manually also upgrade chromium-codecs-ffmpeg to the latest version I can view google.com fine. I assume this means there is a missing dependency for the newer version of the ffmpeg codecs pack in the current chromium-browser package. I've tried to grab dependency information for chromium-browser below. $ apt-cache showpkg chromium-browser ... Dependencies: 31.0.1650.63-0ubuntu0.13.04.1~20131204.1 - gconf-service (0 (null)) libasound2 (2 1.0.16) libatk1.0-0 (2 1.12.4) libc6 (2 2.15) libcairo2 (2 1.6.0) libcomerr2 (2 1.01) libcups2 (2 1.4.0) libdbus-1-3 (2 1.2.14) libexpat1 (2 2.0.1) libfontconfig1 (2 2.9.0) libfreetype6 (2 2.3.9) libgcc1 (2 1:4.4.0) libgconf-2-4 (2 2.31.1) libgcrypt11 (2 1.4.5) libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 (2 2.22.0) libglib2.0-0 (2 2.35.9) libgnome-keyring0 (2 2.22.2) libgnutls26 (2 2.12.17-0) libgssapi-krb5-2 (2 1.6.dfsg.2) libgtk2.0-0 (2 2.24.0) libk5crypto3 (2 1.6.dfsg.2) libkrb5-3 (2 1.6.dfsg.2) libnspr4 (18 2:4.9-2~) libnspr4-0d (2 1.8.0.10) libnss3 (2 2:3.14.3) libpango1.0-0 (2 1.22.0) libstdc++6 (2 4.6) libudev1 (2 183) libx11-6 (2 2:1.4.99.1) libxcomposite1 (2 1:0.3-1) libxcursor1 (4 1.1.2) libxdamage1 (2 1:1.1) libxext6 (0 (null)) libxfixes3 (0 (null)) libxi6 (2 2:1.2.99.4) libxrender1 (0 (null)) libxss1 (0 (null)) libxtst6 (0 (null)) zlib1g (2 1:1.1.4) xdg-utils (0 (null)) chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-extra (18 0.6) chromium -codecs-ffmpeg (2 0.6) dpkg (2 1.15.6) webaccounts-chromium-extension (0 (null)) unity-chromium-extension (0 (null)) chromium-browser-l10n (0 (null)) chromium-browser-inspector (0 (null)) chromium-browser-inspector (0 (null)) I'm not sure how to read the values listed for the version required of chromium-codecs-ffmpeg (0.6?), but the package that I end up with after the upgrade looks to be version 31 like the browser proper, and I'd guess they should be in sync with each other. $ apt-cache showpkg chromium-codecs-ffmpeg Package: chromium-codecs-ffmpeg Versions: 31.0.1650.63-0ubuntu0.13.04.1~20131204.1 (/var/lib/apt/lists/ports.ubuntu.com_dists_raring-updates_universe_binary-armhf_Packages) (/var/lib/dpkg/status) Description Language: File: /var/lib/apt/lists/ports.ubuntu.com_dists_raring_universe_binary-armhf_Packages MD5: e9d73e814a08298b16cf36187c847fde Description Language: en File: /var/lib/apt/lists/ports.ubuntu.com_dists_raring_universe_i18n_Translation-en MD5: e9d73e814a08298b16cf36187c847fde 25.0.1364.160-0ubuntu3 (/var/lib/apt/lists/ports.ubuntu.com_dists_raring_universe_binary-armhf_Packages) Description Language: File: /var/lib/apt/lists/ports.ubuntu.com_dists_raring_universe_binary-armhf_Packages MD5: e9d73e814a08298b16cf36187c847fde Description Language: en File: /var/lib/apt/lists/ports.ubuntu.com_dists_raring_universe_i18n_Translation-en MD5: e9d73e814a08298b16cf36187c847fde Reverse Depends: chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-extra,chromium-codecs-ffmpeg chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-extra,chromium-codecs-ffmpeg chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-dbg,chromium-codecs-ffmpeg 31.0.1650.63-0ubuntu0.13.04.1~20131204.1 chromium-browser,chromium-codecs-ffmpeg 0.6 chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-extra,chromium-codecs-ffmpeg chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-extra,chromium-codecs-ffmpeg
[Bug 1248745] Re: chromedriver needs to be upgraded to v2 to work with current chromium-browser builds.
A coworker found a PPA to test this with and it let our test script run (that worked on an x86 similar system). Would be great to release it to regular folks too :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248745 Title: chromedriver needs to be upgraded to v2 to work with current chromium- browser builds. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1248745/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248745] Re: chromedriver needs to be upgraded to v2 to work with current chromium-browser builds.
How can I test this? We'd really like this to work. And was it correct that you changed chromium-browser, and not chromium- driver? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248745 Title: chromedriver needs to be upgraded to v2 to work with current chromium- browser builds. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1248745/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248745] Re: chromedriver needs to be upgraded to v2 to work with current chromium-browser builds.
I don't have it in front of me (at home...and this is on a work computer), but from what I remember the original chromedriver had version numbers that looked like the chromium build. With the current Ubuntu binary I saw v30... which roughly matches the current Chromium build version number on the same machine. Current x86 chromedriver2 builds have a version like 2.6. I downloaded my x86 files from http://chromedriver.storage.googleapis.com/index.html - found from http://chromedriver.googlecode.com , from https://code.google.com/p/selenium/downloads/list . There was a fork or new code base a few months back. This is separate from the Selenium version. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248745 Title: chromedriver needs to be upgraded to v2 to work with current chromium- browser builds. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1248745/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1069930] Re: chromium-browser package lacks chromedriver binary
Thanks for this, but I hit an issue that looks like https://code.google.com/p/chromedriver/issues/detail?id=471...and the response was ChromeDriver 1 does not work with Chrome 29. There is a ChromeDriver2 that needs to be packaged up. I assume a new bug should be added, but figured it might be helpful to tell the people that fixed this old version before. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069930 Title: chromium-browser package lacks chromedriver binary To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1069930/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248745] [NEW] chromedriver needs to be upgraded to v2 to work with current chromium-browser builds.
Public bug reported: While using selenium code that worked fine with chromedriver v2.3 and v30 Chrome on x86 (but trying to run on an armhf system) I hit an error that looks very similar to https://code.google.com/p/chromedriver/issues/detail?id=471 Exception: WebDriverException: Message: uUnknown command 'WaitForAllTabsToStopLoading'. Options: AcceptOrDismissAppModalDialog, ActionOnSSLBlockingPage, ActivateTab, AddBookmark, AddDomEventObserver, AppendTab, ApplyAccelerator, BringBrowserToFront, ClearEventQueue, CloseBrowserWindow, CloseTab, CreateNewAutomationProvider, DeleteCookie, DeleteCookieInBrowserContext, DoesAutomationObjectExist, DragAndDropFilePaths, ExecuteJavascript, ExecuteJavascriptInRenderView, GetActiveTabIndex, GetAppModalDialogMessage, GetBookmarkBarStatus, GetBookmarksAsJSON, GetBrowserInfo, GetBrowserWindowCount, GetChromeDriverAutomationVersion, GetCookies, GetCookiesInBrowserContext, GetDownloadDirectory, GetExtensionsInfo, GetIndicesFromTab, GetLocalStatePrefsInfo, GetMultiProfileInfo, GetNextEvent, GetPrefsInfo, GetProcessInfo, GetSecurityState, GetTabCount, GetTabIds, GetTabInfo, GetViews, GoBack, GoForward, InstallExtension, IsDownloadShelfVisible, IsFindInPageVisible, IsMenuCommandEnabled, IsPageActionVisible, I sTabIdValid, MaximizeView, NavigateToURL, OpenFindInPage, OpenNewBrowserWindow, OpenNewBrowserWindowWithNewProfile, OpenProfileWindow, OverrideGeoposition, RefreshPolicies, Reload, RemoveBookmark, RemoveEventObserver, ReparentBookmark, RunCommand, SendWebkitKeyEvent, SetBookmarkTitle, SetBookmarkURL, SetCookie, SetCookieInBrowserContext, SetDownloadShelfVisible, SetExtensionStateById, SetLocalStatePrefs, SetPrefs, SetViewBounds, SimulateAsanMemoryBug, TriggerBrowserActionById, TriggerPageActionById, UninstallExtensionById, UpdateExtensionsNow, WaitForBookmarkModelToLoad, WaitUntilNavigationCompletes, WebkitMouseButtonDown, WebkitMouseButtonUp, WebkitMouseClick, WebkitMouseDoubleClick, WebkitMouseDrag, WebkitMouseMove, AcceptCurrentFullscreenOrMouseLockRequest, AddOrEditSearchEngine, AddSavedPassword, CloseNotification, DenyCurrentFullscreenOrMouseLockRequest, DisablePlugin, EnablePlugin, FindInPage, GetAllNotifications, GetDownloadsInfo, GetFPS, GetHistoryInfo, GetInitialLoadTimes, GetNTPInfo, GetNavigationInfo, GetOmniboxInfo, GetPluginsInfo, GetSavedPasswords, GetSearchEngineInfo, GetV8HeapStats, ImportSettings, IsFullscreenBubbleDisplayed, IsFullscreenBubbleDisplayingButtons, IsFullscreenForBrowser, IsFullscreenForTab, IsFullscreenPermissionRequested, IsMouseLockPermissionRequested, IsMouseLocked, KillRendererProcess, LaunchApp, LoadSearchEngineInfo, OmniboxAcceptInput, OmniboxMovePopupSelection, PerformActionOnDownload, PerformActionOnInfobar, PerformActionOnSearchEngine, RemoveNTPMostVisitedThumbnail, RemoveSavedPassword, RestoreAllNTPMostVisitedThumbnails, SaveTabContents, SetAppLaunchType, SetOmniboxText, SetWindowDimensions, WaitForAllDownloadsToComplete, WaitForNotificationCount, The solution in the bug is ChromeDriver 1 does not work with Chrome 29. Which means for Chromium v29 and above chromedriver2 code must be used to make the chromium-chromedriver package. I'm trying to run on armhf, so can't use the packaged version from Google. I assume the new code could be grabbed from https://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/chromedriver/contributing (took a bit of poking around through invalid links to find). ** Affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248745 Title: chromedriver needs to be upgraded to v2 to work with current chromium- browser builds. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1248745/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1168642] Re: Please include ASIX AX88179 driver
Still happens with 13.10 even though ppa referenced above claims the drivers are in kernel 3.11 and the changes in the ppa are not needed on saucy salamander (fails to install when I tried too). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168642 Title: Please include ASIX AX88179 driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1168642/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1168642] Re: Please include ASIX AX88179 driver
Strike my statement above (can't find edit). Install didn't automatically enable the device. After a manual sudo ifconfig eth0 up and a sudo dhclient eth0 it seems to work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168642 Title: Please include ASIX AX88179 driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1168642/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1041911] Re: Integrity Failure Alternative CD Install Failure on 12.04, 12.04.1, 12.10.
The bug is likely the filename is too long for a FAT file system. I'd guess DD makes a different filesystem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041911 Title: Integrity Failure Alternative CD Install Failure on 12.04,12.04.1,12.10. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1041911/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 976509] Re: Can't install Ubuntu 12.04 beta 2 Alternative
Seems like it is related to making the USB bootable media on a Windows machine. znorris said in a forum thread that making the USB stick with DD let him install fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/976509 Title: Can't install Ubuntu 12.04 beta 2 Alternative To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/976509/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989270] [NEW] Installing on a fresh VirtualBox machine it crashed/stopped
Public bug reported: Apparently this component failed during install into a new VirtualBox virtual machine. Have turned on a lot of features that aren't defaults so might be one of those (3d acceleration, VT-x, PAE/NX, 2 CPU's not default of 1, USB 2.0 [EHCI] Controller) and have the extensions pack installed. The host OS is Windows 7 64 bit. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: ubiquity 2.10.16 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu5 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.315 Date: Thu Apr 26 14:55:50 2012 InstallCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash -- maybe-ubiquity LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 (20120425) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 TERM=linux PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SourcePackage: ubiquity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise ubiquity-2.10.16 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989270 Title: Installing on a fresh VirtualBox machine it crashed/stopped To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/989270/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989270] Re: Installing on a fresh VirtualBox machine it crashed/stopped
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989270 Title: Installing on a fresh VirtualBox machine it crashed/stopped To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/989270/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989270] Re: Installing on a fresh VirtualBox machine it crashed/stopped
Second try worked without problem. I've seen crashes/problems with VirtualBox before on a couple different machines I have it on, so might not be an Ubuntu problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989270 Title: Installing on a fresh VirtualBox machine it crashed/stopped To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/989270/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 864236] Re: software-properties-gtk crashed with DBusException in call_blocking(): com.ubuntu.SoftwareProperties.PermissionDeniedByPolicy: com.ubuntu.softwareproperties.applychanges
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 828850 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828850 Was taken here automatically while trying to change my server target after my initial change gave me an error after clicking the Check button to get the list of available updates again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/864236 Title: software-properties-gtk crashed with DBusException in call_blocking(): com.ubuntu.SoftwareProperties.PermissionDeniedByPolicy: com.ubuntu.softwareproperties.applychanges To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/864236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 891947] Re: Desktop not completely displayed after install
I'm still stuck using the less accelerated driver. I'd happily report this upstream if I knew where. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891947 Title: Desktop not completely displayed after install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/891947/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 891947] Re: Desktop not completely displayed after install
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891947 Title: Desktop not completely displayed after install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/891947/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885651] Re: fresh install of ubuntu-server fails to boot
I'm installing regular desktop Ubuntu, not server, x64 from USB as I've hit a CD media bug with this system a while ago (updated existing bug and not fixed). My motherboard does support EFI. For me to be able to boot from the USB media in my BIOS's boot menu I can't do a USB boot, I must do an EFI or it might be UEFI boot. Doing a USB I get a loop of Could not find kernel image vesamenu.c32 over and over. I haven't filed that one or added to an existing bug as I didn't find one the first time I looked and I'm dealing with other more important issues on the system where I can't see the whole screen (left top missing). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885651 Title: fresh install of ubuntu-server fails to boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/885651/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 891947] Re: Desktop not completely displayed after install
From USB stick (try out Ubuntu), sudo randr -q gives...
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1920 x 1200, maximum 8192 x 8192
DVI-I-1 connected 1920x1200+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
432mm x 324mm
1920x1200 60.0*+
1920x1080 60.0
1600x1200 60.0
1680x1050 60.0
1280x1024 75.0 60.0
1280x960 75.0
1024x768 75.1 60.0
800x60075.0 60.3
640x48075.0 60.0
720x40070.1
DVI-I-2 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
HDMI-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
I'll attach output from inside the broken install next. I tried to
install read-edid into my USB stick, but the package doesn't exist
according to apt-get and the software center. And I don't want to apt-
get update/upgrade in case that breaks everything.
According to the Xorg.0.log file the USB stick is using the NOUVEAU
driver ('Failed to load module nvidia (module does not exist, 0)'). I
think that is probably why it works and my installed version doesn't (it
installed the proprietary driver by default). That seems bad that the
Nvidia offered driver has problems (if true).
And Grub2's menu displays correctly at what I'm guessing is the default
screen resolution. The text is super tiny compared what what I used to
see back with 10.10, which I think was using 640x480.
** Attachment added: Working Xorg log (USB stick)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/891947/+attachment/2606542/+files/Xorg.0.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891947
Title:
Desktop not completely displayed after install
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/891947/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 891947] Re: Desktop not completely displayed after install
Randomness...I setup my system to automatically login, but it seems to boot up and let me start a terminal only to show the login prompt (that I can't see). I've worked around it, but that seems broken too and might stop others from even using their system. Inside broken install sudo xrandr -q gives... xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default Screen 0: minimum 320 x 175, current 1920 x 1200, maximum 1920 x 1200 default connected 1920x1200+0+0 0mm x 0mm 1920x1200 50.0* 1920x1080 51.0 52.0 53.0 54.0 55.0 56.0 57.0 1680x1050 58.0 59.0 1600x1200 60.0 1600x1024 61.0 1440x900 62.0 1400x1050 63.0 64.0 65.0 1360x768 66.0 67.0 1280x1024 68.0 69.0 70.0 1280x960 71.0 72.0 73.0 1280x720 74.0 75.0 76.0 1152x864 77.0 78.0 79.0 80.0 81.0 82.0 83.0 1024x768 84.0 85.0 86.0 87.0 88.0 89.0 960x72090.0 91.0 960x60092.0 960x54093.0 928x69694.0 95.0 896x67296.0 97.0 840x52598.0 99.0100.0101.0102.0 832x624 103.0 800x600 104.0105.0106.0107.0108.0109.0110.0 111.0112.0113.0 800x512 114.0 720x576 115.0 720x480 116.0117.0 720x450 118.0 720x400 119.0 700x525 120.0121.0122.0123.0 680x384 124.0125.0 640x512 126.0127.0128.0 640x480 129.0130.0131.0132.0133.0134.0135.0 640x400 136.0 640x350 137.0 576x432 138.0139.0140.0141.0142.0143.0144.0 512x384 145.0146.0147.0148.0149.0 416x312 150.0 400x300 151.0152.0153.0154.0155.0 360x200 156.0 320x240 157.0158.0159.0160.0 320x200 161.0 320x175 162.0 And sudo get-edid | parse-edid gives... parse-edid: parse-edid version 2.0.0 get-edid: get-edid version 2.0.0 Performing real mode VBE call Interrupt 0x10 ax=0x4f00 bx=0x0 cx=0x0 Function supported Call successful VBE version 300 VBE string at 0x11100 NVIDIA VBE/DDC service about to be called Report DDC capabilities Performing real mode VBE call Interrupt 0x10 ax=0x4f15 bx=0x0 cx=0x0 Function supported Call successful Monitor and video card combination does not support DDC1 transfers Monitor and video card combination supports DDC2 transfers 0 seconds per 128 byte EDID block transfer Screen is not blanked during DDC transfer Reading next EDID block VBE/DDC service about to be called Read EDID Performing real mode VBE call Interrupt 0x10 ax=0x4f15 bx=0x1 cx=0x0 Function supported Call successful parse-edid: EDID checksum passed. parse-edid: first bytes don't match EDID version 1 header parse-edid: do not trust output (if any). # EDID version 131 revision 1 Section Monitor Identifier @XA:1f14 VendorName @XA ModelName @XA:1f14 # DPMS capabilities: Active off:no Suspend:no Standby:no Mode37x68 # vfreq 714.533Hz, hfreq 72.168kHz DotClock113.52 HTimings37 37 195 1573 VTimings68 116 133 101 EndMode Mode85x68 # vfreq 632.173Hz, hfreq 63.849kHz DotClock103.50 HTimings85 85 115 1621 VTimings68 108 152 101 EndMode Mode150x68# vfreq 933.019Hz, hfreq 94.235kHz DotClock158.88 HTimings150 150 212 1686 VTimings68 100 134 101 EndMode Mode69x68 # vfreq 682.243Hz, hfreq 68.907kHz DotClock112.80 HTimings69 69 99 1637 VTimings68 68 68 101 EndMode EndSection ** Attachment added: Xorg log from broken install (nvidia driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/891947/+attachment/2606558/+files/Xorg.0.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891947 Title: Desktop not completely displayed after install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/891947/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 891947] Re: Desktop not completely displayed after install
Problem appears using Nvidia's driver, but not with NOUVEAU. Targeting that package for now. Also appears in post-release updates version aka nvidia-current-updates. ** Package changed: ubuntu = nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891947 Title: Desktop not completely displayed after install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/891947/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 891947] Re: Desktop not completely displayed after install
Installed copy is working using the Nouveau driver. Tried to switch by just disabling the post-release updates entry in the 3rd party drivers applet. Rebooted and same problem. This might be because I'd created an xorg.conf in the process of trying to fix my problem. It still listed the nvidia driver. After switching that line to nouveau, commenting out the options that seemed related to the proprietary driver, and manually removing the nvidia-current package using sudo apt-get remove nvidia-current it seems to be working as I'd expect (whole screen displayed). Not sure all above is required, but it works for me after doing that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891947 Title: Desktop not completely displayed after install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/891947/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 891947] Re: Desktop not completely displayed after install
Yep, I checked and the current driver version from Nvidia seemed to be installed. I'm not sure how to install the experimental version. And not sure how to switch to Nouveau (or if that could help). Command line instructions are preferred. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891947 Title: Desktop not completely displayed after install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/891947/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 891947] Re: Desktop not completely displayed after install
No change after installing post-release updates version and rebooting. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891947 Title: Desktop not completely displayed after install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/891947/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 891947] Re: Desktop not completely displayed after install
** Description changed: After installing my desktop is shifted to the left and up (can't see that part of the screen). That seems to indicate the wrong resolution or frequency to me. I'm using DVI output and a DVI to HDMI cable (monitor was sold as a monitor, not TV). 1920x1200 is default resolution and it looks like that is what is being displayed, but I think it is using 50.0 Hz (* marks it in xrandr -q output, and is only option for that resolution) instead of something closer to 60 or 59. - I've tried reinstalling, with no change. My screen works fine while - inside the installer environment or the try out Ubuntu option (whole - desktop displayed). I originally had my system working with an old - video card, but it broke after switching to a newer card (from Nvidia - 8800 GTX to Nvidia 260 216). More recently I replaced the 260 with an - Nvidia GTX 480. All of these have worked fine inside Windows 7. This - originally showed up in Ubuntu 10.10 with the latest Nvidia drivers (I - manually installed newer versions to match what CUDA 4.0 SDK wanted). - The fresh install was Ubuntu 11.10 and whatever default driver it - offers. + I've tried reinstalling, with no change. My screen works fine while inside the installer environment or the try out Ubuntu option (whole desktop displayed). I originally had my system working with an old video card, but it broke after switching to a newer card (from Nvidia 8800 GTX to Nvidia 260 216). More recently I replaced the 260 with an Nvidia GTX 480. All of these have worked fine inside Windows 7. This originally showed up in Ubuntu 10.10 with the latest Nvidia drivers (I manually installed newer versions to match what CUDA 4.0 SDK wanted). The fresh install was Ubuntu 11.10 and whatever default driver it offers. + -- + Screen's (LG - L246WP) native resolution is 1920x1200 Hori. Freq. 74.04kHz Vert. Freq. 59.95Hz according to the specification sheet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891947 Title: Desktop not completely displayed after install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/891947/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885651] Re: fresh install of ubuntu-server fails to boot
I've hit this fairly repeatedly (always hit a grub2 error) on my system after install. I'm doing a dual boot Windows 7 / Ubuntu 11.10 install where I delete the existing Ubuntu install. I've fixed it every time with instructions from the web that had me... Boot with install media and select try out Ubuntu Open a terminal Inside terminal run (first command needs to be tweaked to point at your install partition - /dev/sda5 part)... sudo mount /dev/sda5 /mnt sudo grub-install --root-directory=/mnt /dev/sda -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885651 Title: fresh install of ubuntu-server fails to boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/885651/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 891947] [NEW] Desktop not completely displayed after install
Public bug reported: After installing my desktop is shifted to the left and up (can't see that part of the screen). That seems to indicate the wrong resolution or frequency to me. I'm using DVI output and a DVI to HDMI cable (monitor was sold as a monitor, not TV). 1920x1200 is default resolution and it looks like that is what is being displayed, but I think it is using 50.0 Hz (* marks it in xrandr -q output, and is only option for that resolution) instead of something closer to 60 or 59. I've tried reinstalling, with no change. My screen works fine while inside the installer environment or the try out Ubuntu option (whole desktop displayed). I originally had my system working with an old video card, but it broke after switching to a newer card (from Nvidia 8800 GTX to Nvidia 260 216). More recently I replaced the 260 with an Nvidia GTX 480. All of these have worked fine inside Windows 7. This originally showed up in Ubuntu 10.10 with the latest Nvidia drivers (I manually installed newer versions to match what CUDA 4.0 SDK wanted). The fresh install was Ubuntu 11.10 and whatever default driver it offers. -- Screen's (LG - L246WP) native resolution is 1920x1200 Hori. Freq. 74.04kHz Vert. Freq. 59.95Hz according to the specification sheet. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: bot-comment ** Description changed: After installing my desktop is shifted to the left and up (can't see that part of the screen). That seems to indicate the wrong resolution or frequency to me. I'm using DVI output and a DVI to HDMI cable (monitor was sold as a monitor, not TV). 1920x1200 is default resolution and it looks like that is what is being displayed, but I think it is using 50.0 Hz (* marks it in xrandr -q output, and is only option for that resolution) instead of something closer to 60 or 59. - I've tried reinstalling, but my screen works fine while inside the - installer environment or the try out Ubuntu option (whole desktop - displayed). I originally had my system working with an old video card, - but it broke after switching to a newer card (from Nvidia 8800 GTX to - Nvidia 260 216). More recently I replaced the 260 with an Nvidia GTX - 480. All of these have worked fine inside Windows 7. This originally - showed up in Ubuntu 10.10 with the latest Nvidia drivers (I manually - installed newer versions to match what CUDA 4.0 SDK wanted). The fresh - install was Ubuntu 11.10 and whatever default driver it offers. + I've tried reinstalling, with no change. My screen works fine while + inside the installer environment or the try out Ubuntu option (whole + desktop displayed). I originally had my system working with an old + video card, but it broke after switching to a newer card (from Nvidia + 8800 GTX to Nvidia 260 216). More recently I replaced the 260 with an + Nvidia GTX 480. All of these have worked fine inside Windows 7. This + originally showed up in Ubuntu 10.10 with the latest Nvidia drivers (I + manually installed newer versions to match what CUDA 4.0 SDK wanted). + The fresh install was Ubuntu 11.10 and whatever default driver it + offers. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891947 Title: Desktop not completely displayed after install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/891947/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 816200] Re: can't link libmxml for 32 bit app on 64 bit system
Looks like I was wrong about this already working. But it is being worked on (here http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation and here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchCross). Feel free to close this or use it to justify the work :-). Also if others need to do this you can try to use a script to install the 32 bit versions of packages available here http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=474790. It worked for me when I ended up recreating the machine so went looking for a better solution than compile it for wrong bit size and install. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816200 Title: can't link libmxml for 32 bit app on 64 bit system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mxml/+bug/816200/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 816200] [NEW] can't link libmxml for 32 bit app on 64 bit system
Public bug reported: It appears the libmxml-dev package only installs the library for my running system. I need to compile a 32 bit application on my 64 bit system and the linker skips the installed libraries (.so and .a) as they're incompatible with my object files. I managed to manually get it to work by removing this install, downloading their copy, adding -m32 to my CFLAGS and LDFLAGS, then followed their install instructions (of course now 64 bit apps wouldn't work unless I rebuilt without -m32). I'm using 10.10 and was up to date on package updates. Was package libmsml-dev version 2.6-1. ** Affects: mxml (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816200 Title: can't link libmxml for 32 bit app on 64 bit system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mxml/+bug/816200/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 637718] Re: No option to install to unformated space in simple partisioning
I've hit this twice now. I dual boot Windows and shrunk my boot partition from inside it as I tend to trust MS tools manipulating their own partitions better. Both times I came into Ubuntu's installer and it acted as if there was no free space on the drive and that it had to shrink the existing boot partition. Working around this issue was annoying also because only after manually creating my partitions do I see a message about needing a swap partition. Then another round of delete and recreate... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637718 Title: No option to install to unformated space in simple partisioning -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 636711] Re: 10.10 can't mount squashfs file system
I hit this on a box I built myself. The same media has worked on two other systems so I trust it. I tried using it a few different times and tried to add a boot parameter of all_generic_ide at the suggestion from a Linux Mint bug I found by Google'ing for the text. Only got around it by installing from a USB stick. Intel P67 chipset (SandyBridge) using an Intel 3GB SATA port, not one of the 3rd party ports or 6GB SATA ports, for an HL-DT-ST BDDVDRW GGC-H20L ATA Device. Combo HDDVD/Blu-ray drive. BIOS is set to AHCI for SATA ports. CD-R disc. Tried booting as AHCI and UEFI to the drive in my BIOS. No difference. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636711 Title: 10.10 can't mount squashfs file system -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
