[Bug 727594] Re: [i915gm] GPU lockup (ESR: 0x00000001 IPEHR: 0x02000004)
I think the fig ppa has fixed the issue for me... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/727594 Title: [i915gm] GPU lockup (ESR: 0x0001 IPEHR: 0x0204) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 767599] [NEW] package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 767498 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767498 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apport Received message while running update manager... ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 ApportLog: Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Apr 20 15:58:43 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release i386 (20101007) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: apport Title: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-01 (19 days ago) ** Affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767599 Title: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 767599] Re: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 767498 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767498 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767599 Title: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 767868] [NEW] package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 767829 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767829 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apport while running updates ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 ApportLog: Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Apr 20 19:31:23 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release i386 (20101007) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: apport Title: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-01 (19 days ago) ** Affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767868 Title: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 767868] Re: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 767829 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767829 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767868 Title: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 754583] Re: UIFe: Launcher - update launcher reveal interaction to make it more accessible to first time users
Perhaps a better solution would be to disable the trigger on the first 50pixels (or whatever) of the left edge when a window is maximized. This way the launcher would never be triggered when a user was actually aiming for the left most toolbar button in a maximized window. I don't believe we need a visual indicator when the launcher is hidden, that seems to defeat the purpose and adds ugly screen clutter. As far as alerts go, I seem to recall there was discussion that the icon of the app needing attention would pop out from the left edge when the launcher was hidden. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754583 Title: UIFe: Launcher - update launcher reveal interaction to make it more accessible to first time users -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 761321] Re: Application Menu in Dashboard highlights menu item with black highlight and black text; making it unreadable.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 761251 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761251 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 761251 Category drop-down in Apps/Files places has improper highlight text color * You can subscribe to bug 761251 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/761251/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761321 Title: Application Menu in Dashboard highlights menu item with black highlight and black text; making it unreadable. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 754583] Re: UIFe: Launcher - update launcher reveal interaction to make it more accessible to first time users
Matt, throwing the mouse at the left edge, even with any necessary-but- short delay is still less time/work for the user than the currently inefficient method. Also, having to resort to the keyboard to overcome this issue is not a valid workaround, imo. A user should not have to resort to bandaids in their workflow. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754583 Title: UIFe: Launcher - update launcher reveal interaction to make it more accessible to first time users -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 754583] Re: UIFe: Launcher - update launcher reveal interaction to make it more accessible to first time users
I think 'LEFT OF SCREEN' REVEAL is a boost to efficiency and will greatly improve the desktop experience. If a user wants to open an app via the launcher, they can aim directly for where that icon will be when the launcher slides into view. As it is now, a user must move the cursor to the top left of the screen and then down to the desired icon. This requires unnecessary mouse travel, particularly when the icon they're aiming for could be at the other end of the screen. Allowing app icons to 'pop out' when attention is needed is, also, a big improvement over change of color in the BFB (given that provides absolutely NO clue to which app needs the attention). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754583 Title: UIFe: Launcher - update launcher reveal interaction to make it more accessible to first time users -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748848] [NEW] compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in intel_region_data()
Public bug reported: crashed while running update manager ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: libnux-0.9-0 0.9.38-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic i686 Architecture: i386 CrashCounter: 1 Date: Sun Apr 3 01:56:28 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/compiz InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release i386 (20101007) ProcCmdline: compiz ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0x10145c6: rep movsl %ds:(%esi),%es:(%edi) PC (0x010145c6) ok source %ds:(%esi) (0x09edce7b) ok destination %es:(%edi) (0x007b) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)! SegvReason: writing NULL VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: nux StacktraceTop: ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 ?? () intel_region_data () from /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so intel_miptree_image_data () from /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so intel_finalize_mipmap_tree () from /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in intel_region_data() UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-01 (1 days ago) UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare ** Affects: nux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash i386 natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748848 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in intel_region_data() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748848] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in intel_region_data()
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748848 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in intel_region_data() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748822] [NEW] [i915g] GPU lockup (ESR: 0x00000001 IPEHR: 0x7d8e0001)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel I often seem to see crashes such as this after clicking Check in update manager, as it is downloading the latest information - while the progress bar is animated. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Chipset: i915g Date: Sat Apr 2 11:30:08 2011 DistroCodename: natty DistroVariant: ubuntu DuplicateSignature: (ESR: 0x0001 IPEHR: 0x7d8e0001) ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apport-gpu-error-intel.py InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release i386 (20101007) InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7 MachineType: Dell Inc. OptiPlex GX280 ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/apport/apport-gpu-error-intel.py ProcEnviron: ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-7-generic root=UUID=fc41bb4f-39cc-4c4d-b52a-22ad9f3f0212 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: xserver-xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu1 libdrm2 2.4.23-1ubuntu6 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu6 SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-intel Title: [i915g] GPU lockup (ESR: 0x0001 IPEHR: 0x7d8e0001) UdevDb: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-01 (1 days ago) UserGroups: dmi.bios.date: 02/09/2005 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A04 dmi.board.name: 0G8310 dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA04:bd02/09/2005:svnDellInc.:pnOptiPlexGX280:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0G8310:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct3:cvr: dmi.product.name: OptiPlex GX280 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 7.10.1-0ubuntu3 version.xserver-xorg: xserver-xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu1 ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash freeze i386 natty need-duplicate-check ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748822 Title: [i915g] GPU lockup (ESR: 0x0001 IPEHR: 0x7d8e0001) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 748822] Re: [i915g] GPU lockup (ESR: 0x00000001 IPEHR: 0x7d8e0001)
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748822 Title: [i915g] GPU lockup (ESR: 0x0001 IPEHR: 0x7d8e0001) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73023] Re: Round orange emblems have lack usability
Personally, I prefer the style of Jef's emblem icon set over the current set to a rather sizable degree. They make use of an immediately more recognizable image for each emblem and seem more integrated and modern compared to other included graphics in the Distro. Eric's 'colored' update is an improvement on the originals BUT many of them are too simplistically stylized to properly indicate their meaning, imo. For example. if I were not to read the descriptions beneath (and when in use, keep in mind that these emblems don't have a text description) the multimedia emblem looks like a ladder to me, the Certified almost looks like a clock, the Package looks like a t-shirt, and the art emblem draws to mind a flukeworm rather than a paint brush! I would really be happy with a more photo-realistic direction in this area. I, also, think the circle behind the emblem tends to make the images appear oversized. When combined with the object on which they are placed it tends to create a rather unbalanced feeling, imo. Rather than using a shape to tie them all together perhaps an overall 'color tint' could be used to indicate their function instead. John -- Round orange emblems have lack usability https://launchpad.net/bugs/73023 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61341] Re: [Edgy] Missing progress bar indicator
I have seen this exact issue in Edgy, as well, but it occurred when using the default theme. I installed Edgy on a system with an i815 onboard graphics chips. X was set to a 24-bit display by default and the above issue was noted. After reducing to a 16bit display the issue resolved itself. I'm unclear on wether this would be considered a theme problem or an X/driver bug. -- [Edgy] Missing progress bar indicator https://launchpad.net/bugs/61341 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
