Re: [Bug 147449] Re: Java add-on works less well on Firefox than MSIE.
I no longer own a computer running any Ubuntu, nor do I see that changing soon. Please remove me from the email list for this bug. On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Daniel T Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is this symptom still reproducible in 8.10? > > ** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu) > Status: New => Incomplete > > -- > Java add-on works less well on Firefox than MSIE. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147449 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Java add-on works less well on Firefox than MSIE. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 147449] Re: Java add-on works less well on Firefox than MSIE.
You obviously have a different version of something than I do. The website still has all the errors listed in my error report i.e. steps 7-10, So either tell me please how to get the same version you have or you must revert to my version to see the errors. http://www.americansolutions.com/Organize/ChatRoom.aspx On 10/16/07, James Stansell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I went to the site and was able to get into the chat window. (I think > they might have rearranged their navigation a little bit.) > > I was not able to reproduce any of the issues reported. That is I had > no problems at all with steps 7-10. > > I'm running ubuntu 7.04 (feisty fawn) with the exception of having sun- > java6-plugin 6-03-0ubuntu2 (from ubuntu 7.10 - gutsy gibbon) installed. > > The applet reported this in my Java Console: > > Sun Microsystems Inc. 1.6.0_03 > Linux 2.6.20-16-generic > Applet 8.0 > Release rel-8000 > > -- > Java add-on works less well on Firefox than MSIE. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147449 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Java add-on works less well on Firefox than MSIE. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 147449] Re: Java add-on works less well on Firefox than MSIE.
Now that I'm on Ubuntu 7.x (how do I tell if I'm on 7.04 or 7.10 with all the automatic updates?) the bug is still present on the website listed. All you have to do is enter a long string requiring word wrap. It does wrap but leaves out a significant part of the text. You mention your Java Console but like most Ubuntu folk do so while keeping the secret from ordinary users of how to obtain that information for themselves. So far the only advantage I see to Ubuntu is it's free and good for most but not all (see this bug) webpage useage so it's a good modern terminal program. It doesn't appear to be very good for development as its version of Dos (the terminal) is so arcane that only the secret clan of developers have a clue of what commands to use. WinE doesn't support enough stuff. For example I tried installing a driver for a Netgear wireless device and after several rounds where I learned to do undocumented stuff required to complete online Ubuntu documentation for that device, it still doesn't work as it can't find the hardware. The help users should demand just isn't there. As noted, how can one even tell what version is running? I've read something some time ago about support for MS.net but where is it? It seems regarding this new version of Java you have, the Synaptic Package Manager is just a restricted library which doesn't allow specifying the latest release of a package so users must guess how to do it in terminal mode and your version of DOS is not at all intuitive so any guess is likely to be wrong. The so-called user group in PDX at least will chat on stuff like passing out free copies of Ubuntu but for real help good luck. On 10/16/07, James Stansell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I went to the site and was able to get into the chat window. (I think > they might have rearranged their navigation a little bit.) > > I was not able to reproduce any of the issues reported. That is I had > no problems at all with steps 7-10. > > I'm running ubuntu 7.04 (feisty fawn) with the exception of having sun- > java6-plugin 6-03-0ubuntu2 (from ubuntu 7.10 - gutsy gibbon) installed. > > The applet reported this in my Java Console: > > Sun Microsystems Inc. 1.6.0_03 > Linux 2.6.20-16-generic > Applet 8.0 > Release rel-8000 > > -- > Java add-on works less well on Firefox than MSIE. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147449 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Java add-on works less well on Firefox than MSIE. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 147449] Re: Java add-on works less well on Firefox than MSIE.
In addition to changing the navigation, the chat room is virtually unused currently so you wouldn't see any chat scroll up wrongly. Shoulda responded sooner! Maybe you can find another website where it fails. BTW, please pass on my annoyance at the "crappity sap" Ubuntu names. On 10/16/07, James Stansell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I went to the site and was able to get into the chat window. (I think > they might have rearranged their navigation a little bit.) > > I was not able to reproduce any of the issues reported. That is I had > no problems at all with steps 7-10. > > I'm running ubuntu 7.04 (feisty fawn) with the exception of having sun- > java6-plugin 6-03-0ubuntu2 (from ubuntu 7.10 - gutsy gibbon) installed. > > The applet reported this in my Java Console: > > Sun Microsystems Inc. 1.6.0_03 > Linux 2.6.20-16-generic > Applet 8.0 > Release rel-8000 > > -- > Java add-on works less well on Firefox than MSIE. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147449 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Java add-on works less well on Firefox than MSIE. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 147449] Re: Java add-on works less well on Firefox than MSIE.
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9611447/Dependencies.txt -- Java add-on works less well on Firefox than MSIE. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 147449] Java add-on works less well on Firefox than MSIE.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox Step 1: Address http://americansolutions.com Step 2: Click on button at bottom right: .Skip to americansolutions.com Step 3: On right of map click Chat button "more". Step 4: Enter a random user name such as "test". Step 5: Optionally open the expand button to get a new window. Step 6: Wait until chat fills the screen. Step 7: Observe word wrap doesn't work properly so long entries are cut off. Step 8: Observe no scroll up or scroll down icon on side of chat window. Step 9: Observe when chat window is full, no new chat appears in window. Step 10: Observe occasional overwrites on screen. None of steps 7-10 exist on MS IE. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Sep 30 16:01:18 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 Package: firefox 2.0.0.6+1-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: i386 SourcePackage: firefox Uname: Linux kirk-ubuntu 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Sun Sep 23 19:50:39 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Java add-on works less well on Firefox than MSIE. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 124931] Re: Radio stream stops unexpectedly
This bug is still active. Here's another radio station where Ubuntu fails compared to WinXP. http://www.kpdq.com/ On 7/12/07, John Vivirito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Marking incomplete as we are waiting for feedback on testing this bug. > > Can you also provide a couple more links that this happens on. > > > > ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) > > Assignee: (unassigned) => Mozilla Bugs > >Status: New => Incomplete > > > > -- > > Radio stream stops unexpectedly > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124931 > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > > of the bug. > > > -- Radio stream stops unexpectedly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124931 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 125283] Re: No "No Updates" Choice
Turning off updates in 7 so I get no updates until 8 seems like an appropriate balance between the risk of being damaged by a security violation and the risk of being damaged by a security update. If you think otherwise, quantify. Kirk On 7/23/07, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 05:07:43PM -, Kirk Fraser wrote: > > Again, I think the risk of not updating between Ubuntu 7 and Ubuntu 8 is > not > > significant. Therefore, perhaps you should quantify the risk if you are > > going to continue claiming it is "major." How many hours can U 7 be > > expected to run bug free with and without updates? I think that should > be > > the deciding factor for the general population of users, even though I > > understand developers must constantly update for a variety of reasons. > > its not about upgrading from 7 to 8 ... its about getting security > updates (e.g. you might read that as 7.x.x.0 to 7.x.x.1 > > - Alexander > > -- > No "No Updates" Choice > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125283 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- No "No Updates" Choice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 125283] Re: No "No Updates" Choice
Again, I think the risk of not updating between Ubuntu 7 and Ubuntu 8 is not significant. Therefore, perhaps you should quantify the risk if you are going to continue claiming it is "major." How many hours can U 7 be expected to run bug free with and without updates? I think that should be the deciding factor for the general population of users, even though I understand developers must constantly update for a variety of reasons. Kirk On 7/23/07, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:22:29PM -, Kirk Fraser wrote: > > John, > > > > > What exactly do you mean Suse has this feature? > > > > I was at a Christian Game Developer's Conference in Portland last week > and > > saw one fellow who was running Suse on his laptop. I mentioned this > thread > > regarding Ubuntu updates. He said Suse is almost exactly the same as > Ubuntu > > and it allowed him to disable updates. He didn't show me how it was > done, > > so I assume it was part of the Suse setup. > > > > That is exactly what I mean as I have zero personal experience with > Suse. I > > also have no idea what you mean by "repos" -- for me the term is > associated > > with collection agencies. In my opinion there should be a way to > separate > > ones' system from being part of the Ubuntu developer's testbed. I would > be > > happy to live with the original install of Ubuntu 7 until Ubuntu 8 is > > released. > > > > I moved from Ubuntu 6 to Ubuntu 7 when 6 was getting too buggy although > I'm > > not sure if the loss of features was due to updates or a virus. U7 has > > acquired one bug I noticed due to updates. I simply want a guarantee of > no > > new bugs due to updates. Stopping updates is a guarantee. On the other > > hand, the "expense" of feature loss vs. the "expense" of so much email > > discussion about it is leading me to an "I don't care anymore" position > on > > the issue. > > Again, not updating your system when security updates are released > causes major security risk. > > - Alexander > > -- > No "No Updates" Choice > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125283 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- No "No Updates" Choice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 125283] Re: No "No Updates" Choice
John, > What exactly do you mean Suse has this feature? I was at a Christian Game Developer's Conference in Portland last week and saw one fellow who was running Suse on his laptop. I mentioned this thread regarding Ubuntu updates. He said Suse is almost exactly the same as Ubuntu and it allowed him to disable updates. He didn't show me how it was done, so I assume it was part of the Suse setup. That is exactly what I mean as I have zero personal experience with Suse. I also have no idea what you mean by "repos" -- for me the term is associated with collection agencies. In my opinion there should be a way to separate ones' system from being part of the Ubuntu developer's testbed. I would be happy to live with the original install of Ubuntu 7 until Ubuntu 8 is released. I moved from Ubuntu 6 to Ubuntu 7 when 6 was getting too buggy although I'm not sure if the loss of features was due to updates or a virus. U7 has acquired one bug I noticed due to updates. I simply want a guarantee of no new bugs due to updates. Stopping updates is a guarantee. On the other hand, the "expense" of feature loss vs. the "expense" of so much email discussion about it is leading me to an "I don't care anymore" position on the issue. Kirk On 7/23/07, John Vivirito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kirk maybe suse does have it but Ubuntu is no where near the same as > Suse. We merge features and apps from Debian. Disabling 3rd party repos > and backport repos is ablet o be done in Ubuntu. What exactly do you > mean Suse has this feature? Ubuntu doesnt support packages/apps in 3rd > party repos at all that is up to 3rd party repo maintainers (if that is > what you meant. > > -- > No "No Updates" Choice > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125283 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- No "No Updates" Choice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 125283] Re: No "No Updates" Choice
I was told Suse has this feature. On 7/21/07, John Vivirito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > he shouldnt be disabling them as my comment was > > "if you are getting others than disable 3rd party repos as well as > backport repos." > > -- > No "No Updates" Choice > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125283 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- No "No Updates" Choice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 124931] Re: Radio stream stops unexpectedly
I haven't previously tried listening to other radio stations so I don't have a definite before and after experience on Ubuntu with any other. The example provided KEX works on Windows but quit working on Ubuntu. Here's one that does work on Ubuntu. http://asx.abacast.com/blazers-kxl2-32.asx Therefore it may be an update to the KEX stream as easily as a UBUNTU update. On 7/12/07, John Vivirito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marking incomplete as we are waiting for feedback on testing this bug. > Can you also provide a couple more links that this happens on. > > ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) > Assignee: (unassigned) => Mozilla Bugs >Status: New => Incomplete > > -- > Radio stream stops unexpectedly > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124931 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Radio stream stops unexpectedly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124931 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 125283] Re: No "No Updates" Choice
Thanks for the suggestion. How do I disable repos? On 7/11/07, John Vivirito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Point of a stable release is it doesnt get anything but security > updates. if you are getting others than disable 3rd party repos as well > as backport repos. > > -- > No "No Updates" Choice > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125283 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- No "No Updates" Choice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 125283] Re: No "No Updates" Choice
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8415288/Dependencies.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- No "No Updates" Choice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 125283] No "No Updates" Choice
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox The problem with frequent updates in BOTH Ubuntu and Windows is the programmers fail to do a complete test suite on all compatible software so they introduce glitches that are not present in the standard release. There should be a button where the user can select "no updates" for most updates and only allow the major releases like a Win Service Pack 2 or equivalent through as an update where the update writers have done adequate homework. Perhaps there should be a 3 choice box where the user can choose "no updates ever", "all updates as available", and "major updates only". In addition, although Window's update rollback feature has at times been brittle, I see no update rollback feature at all in Ubuntu or Firefox. If that were available., I would try to remove the bug in my last bug report that way. Ubuntu 6 is a security risk -- I could detect a virus by its effects on Firefox and my gmail service. Ubuntu 7 is much better but how can I have confidence it won't get worse with the current update as it did with its newfound inability to play a commercial radio stream from 1190KEX.com as previously reported? Maybe you guys should get a little more free of the Microsoft model and start sending users a description of the update showing exactly what was fixed and why along with the source snippets to inspect and approve or disapprove if they want before downloading it. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Jul 11 09:44:42 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 Package: firefox 2.0.0.4+1-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: i386 SourcePackage: firefox Uname: Linux kirk-ubuntu 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Thu Jun 7 20:19:32 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- No "No Updates" Choice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124931] Re: Radio stream stops unexpectedly
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8350696/Dependencies.txt -- Radio stream stops unexpectedly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124931 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124931] Radio stream stops unexpectedly
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox This website used to deliver radio programs in Ubuntu 7 http://www.1190kex.com/pages/listen/index.php Steps: 1. Open Firefox 2. Enter http://www.1190kex.com/pages/listen/index.php 3. Scroll up to click on Click Here To Listen... 4. A Popup plays a video commercial correctly 5. Popup says it's starting audio stream then "Stopped." 6. None of the audio stream plays. That error keeps happening. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Jul 9 11:38:47 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 Package: firefox 2.0.0.4+1-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: i386 SourcePackage: firefox Uname: Linux kirk-ubuntu 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Thu Jun 7 20:19:32 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Radio stream stops unexpectedly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124931 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 117667] Re: Time slider isn't working on Blender tutorial videos
"epiphany galeon konqueror" doesn't exist in Ubuntu's Synaptic Package Manager. Thus it is not available or supported in Ubuntu. Now if you could get them to free up the package manager to allow user input of new packages like that, it would be great. The problem appears to be a difference between the Ubuntu 6.06 where the video playback slider works and 7.04 where it doesn't. I don't know how you guys decide which piece of software needs a fix -- Ubuntu to regain lost function or FireFox to support the Ubuntu system change. Should I report the bug to Ubuntu also? On 6/14/07, John Vivirito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thank you for the testcase, > Can you test in epiphany galeon konqueror, I will try to reproduce > this with other browsers as well as firefox in the next few days. > > ** Tags added: mt-needtester > > ** Tags removed: mt-needtestcase > > -- > Time slider isn't working on Blender tutorial videos > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117667 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Time slider isn't working on Blender tutorial videos https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 117667] Re: Time slider isn't working on Blender tutorial videos
1. Go to http://www.blender.org/tutorials-help/video-tutorials/ 2. Pick any category such as Getting started. 3, Click on any Mirror 1 icon. 4. Wait for video to load and start playing in Mozilla Firefox. 5. Click on playback time slider near bottom of window. 6. Attempt to move the slider & control the playback. 7. No movement happens. > Is it the same in any browser? Tell me what browsers do you want me to test in Ubuntu? On 6/13/07, John Vivirito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you please provide a set of step by step instructions on how to reproduce > this issue, also can you please try to explain your bug a little better like > how does this relate to firefox? > Is it the same in any browser? > > ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) >Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info > > ** Tags added: mt-needtestcase > > -- > Time slider isn't working on Blender tutorial videos > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117667 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Time slider isn't working on Blender tutorial videos https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117667] Time slider isn't working on Blender tutorial videos
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox The Blender.org video tutorials were working well under Ubuntu 6.06 but now under 7.04 the time slider fails. Even though the new video driver add-in process was much much much better in 7.04, there is still no direct link to it that I can find to try the second set of drivers. But I happened to see a list in Help under Multimedia Codecs and installed ffmpeg seperately but to no avail on this problem. I'm hopeful other problems with Ubuntu's syntaxic package manager have disappeared such as only offering obsolete software packages that don't work with other packages preventing the operation of various Sourceforge projects. ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Time slider isn't working on Blender tutorial videos https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
