[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8
Personally, I have given up on that and moved to using sdkman (https://sdkman.io) for handling Java variants, this so far seems the best / most reliable way to get different Java versions (including 8.x series) to work on recent Linux distributions. Java packaging in Debian- based distributions always has been weird, and JavaFX and the changes related to the way it's supposed to be distributed don't make things easier here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799946 Title: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjfx/+bug/1799946/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8
> Although that works, its quite an hack. Can't we have something like > openjdk-8-jfx, > openjdk-8-jfx-source, openjdk-11-jfx, ... It should possibly "just" be consistent. JavaFX *always* depends upon a particular JDK. Either make different versions of openjfx available for different openjdks (if there are different openjdk packages), or add *just* one openjdk and one openjfx package where it's easy to, say, downgrade openjd from 11 to 8 and be sure the installed openjfx package will either have a broken dependency or be downgraded as well. Current approach to handle this seems pretty much worst of both worlds. :| -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799946 Title: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjfx/+bug/1799946/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8
Hmmm, ok, I am unsure how Oracle and OpenJDK/JFX relate to each other, and whether the Open* variants will continue to see any community updates. The whole post-Java8-world still is a difficult thing to handle. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799946 Title: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjfx/+bug/1799946/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8
Yes, but the suggested approach ("Would it be possible to supply an
openjfx-8 package, similar to the openjdk-{8,11}-{jdk,jre}?") would both
fix this problem and make versioning of the openjdk- and openjfx-
packages (which, despite being separate packages, are pretty closely
tied to each other) immensely more concise. ;)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799946
Title:
OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjfx/+bug/1799946/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1799946] Re: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8
Stumbled into this problem here as well both with a couple of internal Java applications and some FLOSS apps such as mediathekview (https://mediathekview.de/) in Germany. Currently, Java 11 -> Java 8 downgrade or even installing both in parallel on any Ubuntu/Debian system works well, however for that to work with JavaFX applications it would be required to also be able to install different versions of openjfx - such as openjfx-11 for openjdk-11 and openjfx-8 for openjdk-8. Right now, the only working solution using the package repository is manually downgrading and pinning openjfx libs, which unfortunately also will prevent any option to provide updates to the openjfx-8 versions if ever needed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799946 Title: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjfx/+bug/1799946/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1813465] Re: Shadow Issues on some Gnome Themes
Added myself to the list. Same issue here, fresh install of 18.10 with vanilla-gnome-default-settings and arc theme. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813465 Title: Shadow Issues on some Gnome Themes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-themes-extra/+bug/1813465/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1572661] Re: Ubuntu Gnome Bug -evolution translation
Works for me (de_DE) with the packages in -proposed. Thanks. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572661 Title: Ubuntu Gnome Bug -evolution translation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1572661/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1538402] Re: gnome-photos crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()
Apport did report this bug for me. It occurs repeatedly, my system seems up-to-date. What other information do you need to track this down? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538402 Title: gnome-photos crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-photos/+bug/1538402/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989609] Re: package cyrus-common-2.4 2.4.12-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75
Not so far. :( So far I just left the server running at its current version and am scheduling a full re-install / move to new hardware with copying post boxes on an IMAP level. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989609 Title: package cyrus-common-2.4 2.4.12-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-imapd-2.4/+bug/989609/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1113395] Re: mount.cifs on 13.04 fails to mount a samba share with 13: Permission Denied
+1 for sec=lanman, thanks for the workaround. Server in our case is smbd off Debian Unstable using guest-only access. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1113395 Title: mount.cifs on 13.04 fails to mount a samba share with 13: Permission Denied To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cifs-utils/+bug/1113395/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557890] Re: transfer lockup connecting to a NetApp/CIFS share
I am unsure what to do with this one. Haven't tested and can't reproduce this as we don't run this device anymore. Right now, using a "plain" NetApp FAS-2020, OnTap 7.4 and a 3.8.0 kernel off Ubuntu 13.04, this is no longer a problem. As far as I am concerned, this one could be closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557890 Title: transfer lockup connecting to a NetApp/CIFS share To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/557890/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989609] Re: package cyrus-common-2.4 2.4.12-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75
Added myself to the list as I ended up with similar things. None of the workarounds worked, nevertheless. My system, however, is a bit older, already used to go through a migration step-wise from 6.06 across some intermediates to 10.04 (there's an enormously large mail spool on that drive so so far I hesitated to reinstall this one). db_dump / db_load failed complaining that the 4.7 files aren't compatible with a 5.1 environment (which seems berkelydb I guess); using db4.7_dump ends complaining that the data may be corrupted being moved without cleaning LSNs (whatever that means, I'm not a berkelydb expert). Ultimately, after playing with this for a while, I decided to restore the 10.04 VMWare snapshot and try again later... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989609 Title: package cyrus-common-2.4 2.4.12-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-imapd-2.4/+bug/989609/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1163128] [NEW] GTK3 application themes broken with xubuntu 13.04 themes
Public bug reported: Starting someday around mid March 2013, GTK+ 3.0 based applications started looking ugly on Xubuntu 13.04 applications with "stock" Xubuntu themes. Attached a sample for that (gthumb). Reproducibly happens on two different machines (laptop, netbook, both running Xubuntu 13.04 installed from a daily build), and only with GTK + 3.0 applications (evince, gthumb, lightdm-gtk-greeter) with GreyDay and Grey/BlueBird themes. ** Affects: xubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: gtk3 themes ui xubuntu ** Attachment added: "gthumb screenshot" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1163128/+attachment/3613578/+files/screen.png ** Package changed: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu) => ubuntu ** Package changed: ubuntu => xubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1163128 Title: GTK3 application themes broken with xubuntu 13.04 themes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xubuntu-default-settings/+bug/1163128/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773524] Re: [Toshiba Tecra R850] SD card reader doesn't work
Seeing something akin to this on a Toshiba Tecra M11, installed 11.10 yesterday. Kernel seems to be up to date: Linux node428 3.0.0-14-generic-pae #23-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 21 22:07:10 UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux Device seems a bit different though: 01:00.0 SD Host controller: Ricoh Co Ltd MMC/SD Host Controller (rev 01) 01:00.1 System peripheral: Ricoh Co Ltd Memory Stick Host Controller (rev 01) 01:00.2 System peripheral: Ricoh Co Ltd Device e852 (rev 01) Adding to this, it seems the device supports ejecting the card via software control, and as far as I have seen now, I got the card to remain loaded only once, seeing this in dmesg... [ 1561.064650] mmc0: Controller never released inhibit bit(s). [ 1561.064659] sdhci: === REGISTER DUMP (mmc0)=== [ 1561.064668] sdhci: Sys addr: 0x | Version: 0x0400 [ 1561.064676] sdhci: Blk size: 0x | Blk cnt: 0x [ 1561.064684] sdhci: Argument: 0x | Trn mode: 0x [ 1561.064692] sdhci: Present: 0x01ff0001 | Host ctl: 0x0001 [ 1561.064700] sdhci: Power:0x000f | Blk gap: 0x [ 1561.064707] sdhci: Wake-up: 0x | Clock:0x4007 [ 1561.064715] sdhci: Timeout: 0x | Int stat: 0x [ 1561.064723] sdhci: Int enab: 0x00ff00c3 | Sig enab: 0x00ff00c3 [ 1561.064731] sdhci: AC12 err: 0x | Slot int: 0x [ 1561.064739] sdhci: Caps: 0x01e032b2 | Caps_1: 0x [ 1561.064747] sdhci: Cmd: 0x371a | Max curr: 0x0040 [ 1561.064752] sdhci: Host ctl2: 0x [ 1561.064755] sdhci: === [ 2628.760076] usb 1-1.6: USB disconnect, device number 5 ... and now being not even able to correctly insert the card anymore as the mechanism "ejecting" the card seems in some way open so the card won't stay in place...? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773524 Title: [Toshiba Tecra R850] SD card reader doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/773524/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 652151] Re: software-center crashed with IOError in _open()
@Michael Vogt: Thanks, the chown - solution does indeed fix things. -- software-center crashed with IOError in _open() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652151 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347487] Re: starting virtual machine in virtualbox-ose freezes system
Looking at things, problem still persists, both using virtualbox-ose and the virtualbox.org builds in latest Lucid kernel. Anything to be done about that? -- starting virtual machine in virtualbox-ose freezes system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 458336] Re: old_style landscapes not rendered correctly
Confirmed this issue on several different machines (including net-/notebooks with intel onboard gfx, two radeon machines - one with stock xorg ATI driver, one with the proprietary ones, and one with an older GeForce and nvidia binary drivers). -- old_style landscapes not rendered correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458336 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 536714] Re: package tex-common 2.06 failed to install/upgrade: exit status 1 - Kein Paket gefunden, das auf texlive-base passt.
Resolved this the same way Philip Muškovac suggested. -- package tex-common 2.06 failed to install/upgrade: exit status 1 - Kein Paket gefunden, das auf texlive-base passt. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557890] Re: transfer lockup connecting to a NetApp/CIFS share
Well, at the very least I fail to reproduce this connecting to a CIFS share provided by a Windows 2003 Server machine, but I'm not using CIFS that much asides connecting to the N3300. Looking at my experiments I did yesterday, this at the very least seems to be the same in 9.04 and 9.10. -- transfer lockup connecting to a NetApp/CIFS share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557890 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557890] Re: transfer lockup connecting to a NetApp/CIFS share
** Attachment added: "CifsVersion.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43414482/CifsVersion.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43414483/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "SambaInstalledVersions.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43414484/SambaInstalledVersions.txt -- transfer lockup connecting to a NetApp/CIFS share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557890 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557890] [NEW] transfer lockup connecting to a NetApp/CIFS share
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Mounting a CIFS share off an IBM N3300 filer (== NetApp FAS 2020), I experienced some file managers, applications, ... to more or less regularly lock up / don't do anything while trying to browse folders. Looking more into this, it seems the problem is more basic. The thing is mounted using cifs: //192.168.1.252/data on /opt/filer type cifs (rw,mand) Looking at dmesg, these errors do appear more or less frequently when trying to read off the filer: [ 3757.049058] CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 11642 [ 3763.068762] CIFS VFS: Bad protocol string signature header 4 [ 3763.068788] CIFS VFS: bad smb detected. The Mid=11646 [ 3763.068794] Bad SMB: : dump of 48 bytes of data at 0xf46e8000 [ 3763.068825] 0040 0004 0032 80018800 @ . . . . . . . 2 . . . . . . . [ 3763.068855] 1e680040 . . . . . . . . . . . . @ . h . [ 3763.068885] 2d7e0800 0400020a 0200 3800 . . ~ - . . . . . . . . . 8 . . [ 3778.069085] CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 11646 [ 3784.087139] CIFS VFS: Bad protocol string signature header 4 [ 3784.087161] CIFS VFS: bad smb detected. The Mid=11650 [ 3784.087165] Bad SMB: : dump of 48 bytes of data at 0xf46e9500 [ 3784.087171] 0040 0004 0032 80018800 @ . . . . . . . 2 . . . . . . . [ 3784.087195] 1e680040 . . . . . . . . . . . . @ . h . [ 3784.087202] 2d820800 0400020a 0200 3800 . . . - . . . . . . . . . 8 . . [ 3799.084053] CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 11650 [ 3805.102848] CIFS VFS: Bad protocol string signature header 4 [ 3805.102852] CIFS VFS: bad smb detected. The Mid=11654 [ 3805.102873] Bad SMB: : dump of 48 bytes of data at 0xf46e8540 [ 3805.102879] 0040 0004 0032 80018800 @ . . . . . . . 2 . . . . . . . [ 3805.102903] 1e680040 . . . . . . . . . . . . @ . h . [ 3805.102909] 2d860800 0400020a 0200 3800 . . . - . . . . . . . . . 8 . . [ 3820.100062] CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 11654 [ 3826.119095] CIFS VFS: Bad protocol string signature header 4 [ 3826.119100] CIFS VFS: bad smb detected. The Mid=11658 [ 3826.119120] Bad SMB: : dump of 48 bytes of data at 0xf46e8fc0 [ 3826.119127] 0040 0004 0032 80018800 @ . . . . . . . 2 . . . . . . . [ 3826.119151] 1e680040 . . . . . . . . . . . . @ . h . [ 3826.119157] 2d8a0800 0400020a 0200 3800 . . . - . . . . . . . . . 8 . . It happens once in a while copying things off the filer using the shell, and it happens almost reliably when browsing to the share using any visual file manager. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: smbfs 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic-pae 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic-pae i686 Architecture: i386 CIFSMounts: Error: command ['mount', '|', 'grep', 'cifs'] failed with exit code 1: mount: only root can do that Date: Thu Apr 8 09:09:58 2010 InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100224.1) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=de_DE.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SambaClientRegression: No SourcePackage: samba ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- transfer lockup connecting to a NetApp/CIFS share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557890 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557255] Re: lucid: localization (de_DE) missing?
Hi there; debian#570122 indeed seems to be the cause here too, with the exception that in the first thunar window opened, only the top-level (window) menus are German. As far as the context menus are concerned, locales are ignored in the first window instance as well. And, the "first instance" of course only works while invoking thunar using commandline or in example from Xubuntus "places" menu. While opening "Home" using the desktop icon, locales are ignored immediately - desktop icons are "first thunar instance" then? Strange, on desktop icons however, context menus do use the "right" locale... -- lucid: localization (de_DE) missing? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557255] Re: lucid: localization (de_DE) missing?
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43343890/Dependencies.txt -- lucid: localization (de_DE) missing? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557255] [NEW] lucid: localization (de_DE) missing?
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: thunar Running an up-to-date lucid installation, I experience thunar displaying English menu and dialog texts despite having my locale / language environment explicitely set to de...@utf8 (German chosen during gdm login). Installed all language-pack-*-de packages I managed to find, no result. Looking at locale, things seem as expected: k...@n428:~$ locale LANG=de_DE.utf8 LC_CTYPE="de_DE.utf8" LC_NUMERIC="de_DE.utf8" LC_TIME="de_DE.utf8" LC_COLLATE="de_DE.utf8" LC_MONETARY="de_DE.utf8" LC_MESSAGES="de_DE.utf8" LC_PAPER="de_DE.utf8" LC_NAME="de_DE.utf8" LC_ADDRESS="de_DE.utf8" LC_TELEPHONE="de_DE.utf8" LC_MEASUREMENT="de_DE.utf8" LC_IDENTIFICATION="de_DE.utf8" LC_ALL= ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: thunar 1.0.1-3ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic-pae 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic-pae i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Apr 7 14:11:37 2010 InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100224.1) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=de_DE.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: thunar ** Affects: thunar (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- lucid: localization (de_DE) missing? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347487] Re: starting virtual machine in virtualbox-ose freezes system
This problem still exists in lucid-prereleases with the virtualbox on my Tecra A8 (most up-to-date BIOS). -- starting virtual machine in virtualbox-ose freezes system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 531719] Re: Eclipse crashes on content assist
Are there any workarounds known for that so far? -- Eclipse crashes on content assist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528324] Re: eclipse crashed with signal 5 in _XError()
Adding myself, same here (vanilla Eclipse, JDK 1.6.0_18). -- eclipse crashed with signal 5 in _XError() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 443004] Re: Eclipse GTK is not working correct - especially buttons
Adding to that, however, it _seems_ to be a GNOME related problem. Using XFCE/Xubuntu desktop (also GTK+-based) on my platform doesn't expose this issue, no matter whether or not GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS=1 is set. Can anyone confirm this, or is this just my system? -- Eclipse GTK is not working correct - especially buttons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 443004] Re: Eclipse GTK is not working correct - especially buttons
Same problem here, using stock packages off eclipse.org. Having plugins installable via Eclipse Update Center rather than apt package management seems the most common use case related to using Eclipse, so I see the GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS solution to deal with this. :( -- Eclipse GTK is not working correct - especially buttons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347487] Re: starting virtual machine in virtualbox-ose freezes system
I am not sure whether this really is related to virtualbox or might be a kernel issue: In my environment, I managed to boot up any VM reliably after, in the VM configuration, disabling "VT-x/AMD-V" support (which is not really what one wants on a Core2 Duo that actually supports VT). However: - Switching VT-x/AMD-V on and trying to boot the VM reliably ends up in a complete system lockup (frozen UI, SysRq keys not working anymore, machine not ping'able via LAN anymore). - Switching off VT-x/AMD-V, the virtual machine comes up and seems to work as expected. So, overally, this is a workaround to at least get VMs in virtualbox-ose running again. - System: up-to-date jaunty build - Kernel: Linux n428 2.6.28-11-generic #38-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 27 09:00:52 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux -- starting virtual machine in virtualbox-ose freezes system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347487] [NEW] starting virtual machine in virtualbox-ose freezes system
Public bug reported: Installed a jaunty testbed system on my machine (Tecra A8 notebook, Core2 Duo CPU, 2GB RAM). Tried both Sun VirtualBox and virtualbox-ose off the package repository, with the same result: Starting virtualbox works well, vbox* modules also seem loaded. However as soon as I try starting a virtual machine (no matter whether a newly created one or an existing one restored from backup), the virtual machine window appears and then the whole system immediately locks up inasmuch as that the GUI doesn't respond anymore, no mouse/keyboard interactions are possible anymore, and switching to any vt using ctrl+alt+f also doesn't work anymore. Couldn't so far get closer to this, unfortunately... system: Linux n428 2.6.28-11-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 20 19:40:40 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- starting virtual machine in virtualbox-ose freezes system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347487] Re: starting virtual machine in virtualbox-ose freezes system
** Attachment added: "lspci.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24285058/lspci.log -- starting virtual machine in virtualbox-ose freezes system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347487] Re: starting virtual machine in virtualbox-ose freezes system
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24285103/dmesg.log -- starting virtual machine in virtualbox-ose freezes system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 257602] Re: iwl3945 driver: unexpected IRQ trap?
Uninstalling linux-backports-modules did eliminate all the iwl3945 related messages, no matter whether or not booting with pci=nomsi. Good. :) Thanks and best regards, Kristian -- iwl3945 driver: unexpected IRQ trap? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 257602] Re: iwl3945 driver: unexpected IRQ trap?
Adding the "pci=nomsi" did provide quite some improvement so far: Machine seems more performant even after being up all day, and the log entries periodically dumped to dmesg have reduced to the following lines: [...] [21834.120984] PM: Writing back config space on device :02:00.0 at offset 1 (was 12, writing 16) [21834.121116] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [21834.121148] ACPI: PCI interrupt for device :02:00.0 disabled [...] I am unsure whether this is really a "problem" or just a logical consequence of RF being disabled on my machine - should I still try dumping the backport modules and see whether it completely goes away? Cheers, Kristian -- iwl3945 driver: unexpected IRQ trap? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 257602] Re: iwl3945 driver: unexpected IRQ trap?
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16768656/dmesg.log -- iwl3945 driver: unexpected IRQ trap? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 257602] Re: iwl3945 driver: unexpected IRQ trap?
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16768625/lspci-vvnn.log -- iwl3945 driver: unexpected IRQ trap? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 257602] Re: iwl3945 driver: unexpected IRQ trap?
Sorry, should have been more verbose initially. To provide the information required: - Architecture: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8:00:56] ~> uname -a Linux n428 2.6.24-20-generic #1 SMP Mon Jul 28 13:49:52 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux - Backport modules: Yes, they are installed, according ii linux-backports-modu 2.6.24-20.23 - the rest: see attached. :) ** Attachment added: "dmesg.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16768618/dmesg.log -- iwl3945 driver: unexpected IRQ trap? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 257602] [NEW] iwl3945 driver: unexpected IRQ trap?
Public bug reported: System: Hardy 8.04.1, Toshiba Tecra A8 Notebook, intel 3945 WLAN disabled per hardware switch. Trying to figure out why, lately, Hardy grows slow and hardly responsive after a day of working, I found my dmesg output filling up with messages like this: [...] [30471.141177] PM: Writing back config space on device :02:00.0 at offset 1 (was 12, writing 16) [30471.141505] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [30471.141542] ACPI: PCI interrupt for device :02:00.0 disabled [30488.478690] irq 220, desc: c0418c80, depth: 0, count: 0, unhandled: 0 [30488.478716] ->handle_irq(): c01687c0, handle_bad_irq+0x0/0x290 [30488.478744] ->chip(): c03f48e0, no_irq_chip+0x0/0x40 [30488.478755] ->action(): [30488.478775] IRQ_DISABLED set [30488.478777] IRQ_MASKED set [30488.478780] unexpected IRQ trap at vector dc [30621.799385] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :02:00.0[A] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 [30621.799636] PM: Writing back config space on device :02:00.0 at offset 1 (was 12, writing 16) [30621.799962] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [30621.73] ACPI: PCI interrupt for device :02:00.0 disabled [30788.279147] irq 220, desc: c0418c80, depth: 0, count: 0, unhandled: 0 [30788.279170] ->handle_irq(): c01687c0, handle_bad_irq+0x0/0x290 [30788.279178] ->chip(): c03f48e0, no_irq_chip+0x0/0x40 [30788.279201] ->action(): [30788.279203] IRQ_DISABLED set [30788.279204] IRQ_MASKED set [30788.279205] unexpected IRQ trap at vector dc [31088.079608] irq 220, desc: c0418c80, depth: 0, count: 0, unhandled: 0 [31088.079633] ->handle_irq(): c01687c0, handle_bad_irq+0x0/0x290 [31088.079640] ->chip(): c03f48e0, no_irq_chip+0x0/0x40 [31088.079645] ->action(): [31088.079665] IRQ_DISABLED set [31088.079667] IRQ_MASKED set [31088.079668] unexpected IRQ trap at vector dc [...] Not sure whether this is the reason for the system slowing down but at least it doesn't look that good, does it? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- iwl3945 driver: unexpected IRQ trap? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227922] Re: Stellarium, white screen with last libqt4
Also stumbled across this, two different machines upgraded to hardy just recently. Downgrading qt4 so far, seems likely to remove quite a bunch of other packages currently in use. Any chance of a better solution to that, here, before hardy+1? -- Stellarium, white screen with last libqt4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227922 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200582] Re: hardy alpha6 installer: "cleaning" /usr/local mount?!
Haven't seen this happening with recent beta installers anymore. Considering it done - thanks guys! -- hardy alpha6 installer: "cleaning" /usr/local mount?! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209888] Re: firefox 2 extensions installed in profile break after starting ffox 3 (by accident)
workaround does its job, thanks for having a look at this. Overally this makes dealing with FF 3.x a lot more painless. ;) -- firefox 2 extensions installed in profile break after starting ffox 3 (by accident) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209888 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209888] [NEW] launching 3.x: profile rendered useless.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 - upgraded to current hardy build - launched firefox 3.0 for the first time - gone through the "checking for plugin updates" section - found that some plugins I don't yet want to go with do not so far offer any ff 3.x compliant versions - installed and launched firefox-2 again. Situation, afterwards: Firefox 2.x starts up using the old profile. All addons are found while looking into the Addon Manager, but none of them does actually work anymore, the UI is "plain Firefox 2" without any extensions. Any attempts trying to get the old profile back to life failed so far. Cleaned the profile and started anew manually reinstalling all the extensions. Was able to reproduce this by accidentially starting the "wrong" version of firefox (3.x), resulting in the same outcome. Not terribly bad, but amazingly annoying. ;) ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- launching 3.x: profile rendered useless. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209888 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200582] [NEW] hardy alpha6 installer: "cleaning" /usr/local mount?!
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity First installment of hardy-6 actually makes me use my backup for the first time in ages: Trying to have my old "/usr/local" partition already configured to be mounted while in the installer, installation seemed to "hang" a few moments showing a message resembling "cleaning conflicting operating system files", and indeed it took me a while to see the installer was actually "cleaning up" my /usr/local, which included removing files I manually put there, most notably /usr/local/data which is a place where I keep most of my not-user-specific files which are to survive reinstallations. Apart from whether or not putting anything vital to /usr/local is a good idea: Should the installer really bother trying to "clean" and remove files off /usr/local even while mounting this partition during the installation? I doubt this is a good idea, given the overall understanding of /usr/local being the "local" hierarchy... At least, without pointing this out during install, this is a good way to trash some files... ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- hardy alpha6 installer: "cleaning" /usr/local mount?! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63418] Re: CPU soft lockup during boot if ipw3945 kill switch is on
fix confirmed for recent feisty kernels > 2.6.20-10 on my machine. good work everyone! :) -- CPU soft lockup during boot if ipw3945 kill switch is on https://launchpad.net/bugs/63418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 66900] Re: APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
removing myself from the list. For the Tecra A8, a new BIOS (3.30) has been released in early 2007 which seems to have fixed the problem. Thanks anyhow. :) -- APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) https://launchpad.net/bugs/66900 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63418] Re: CPU soft lockup during boot if ipw3945 kill switch is on
@Duncan: Are you sure? By this morning when I tried to install 2.6.20-10-generic, I had to see that linux-modules-restricted for right this kernel wasn't yet available, and both the ipw3945 will not work without it and (as far as I remember my machine) the error doesn't show up without having linux-modules-restricted installed... -- CPU soft lockup during boot if ipw3945 kill switch is on https://launchpad.net/bugs/63418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 65342] Re: [UNMETDEPS] maxdb-7.5.00 has unmet dependencies
Broken on any post-dapper version; neither edgy nor current feisty are capable of running any version of MaxDB (the "official" MySQL.com builds also fail, but the bug report - http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=25087 - has not at all been dealt with so far). -- [UNMETDEPS] maxdb-7.5.00 has unmet dependencies https://launchpad.net/bugs/65342 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 66900] Re: APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
Adding myself to the list as I see the same problem on a Toshiba Tecra A8: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz stepping: 6 cpu MHz : 1000.000 cache size : 4096 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 2 fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 10 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips: 3994.84 processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz stepping: 6 cpu MHz : 1000.000 cache size : 4096 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 1 cpu cores : 2 fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 10 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips: 3990.09 Not sure whether it is the same issue but at least the phenomenon is the same (log file filling up with "APIC error on CPUx"). Seems to start only if the system is put to some load, though (launching Eclipse, VMWare or a database server). Removing the ohci1394 module doesn't help, either: [...] [17183117.352000] APIC error on CPU1: 40(40) [17183117.352000] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) [17183117.448000] APIC error on CPU1: 40(40) [17183117.448000] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) [17183131.544000] ieee1394: Node removed: ID:BUS[0-00:1023] GUID[39a62cac] [17183195.636000] APIC error on CPU1: 40(40) [17183195.636000] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) [17183195.708000] APIC error on CPU1: 40(40) [17183195.708000] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) [...] I don't know whether this is really causing any trouble or just being an "aesthetic" thing, but I would like to have getting it fixed anyhow. Kernel is 2.6.17-10-generic from Edgy. Thanks, Kristian -- APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) https://launchpad.net/bugs/66900 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63418] Re: CPU soft lockup during bootup
Not sure whether this is still of relevance; I've noticed the "soft lockup detected" message on my Toshiba Tecra A8 a couple of times this morning, leaving the machine unable to boot at all. It's a completely new install, first time Linux installation on that very machine, so I can't say whether or not it used to be different before. However, two things: - The notebook also is equipped with an ipw3945 based NIC, but obviously whether or not the "kill switch" is enabled doesn't matter much - at least the "BUG:" message appeared both having WLAN enabled and disabled, and the machine also managed to boot up cleanly most of the time both having WLAN dis- or enabled. - Not sure whether this is anyhow related to that issue, I see my kernel log being flooded with messages like this [17184770.548000] APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) [17184770.548000] APIC error on CPU1: 40(40) Kernel is Edgy 2.6.17-10-generic. Cheers, Kris -- CPU soft lockup during bootup https://launchpad.net/bugs/63418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 53333] Re: Database instance restart error
For what I have found out so far, MaxDB 7.5.00.* (same as 7.6.00.*) do per default rely upon LD_ASSUME_KERNEL in order to avoid some threading related issues (feel free to use the MaxDB mailing list archive or read here - http://www.mysqltalk.org/sap-db-not-working-on-redhat-phoebe-the- solution-vt71534.html - to see a few hints on that). Basically, it boils down to the following, comparing Dapper (where it works) and Edgy (where it doesn't work). Used stock installations in both cases, and the error is the same no matter whether using MaxDB 7.5.00 or 7.6.00: - box #1 (Ubuntu 6.06): #> LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 x_server update 12916 XSERVER Found other running x_server with version 'X32/LINUX 7.5.0Build 038-121-133-420' 12926 XSERVER Version after update 'X32/LINUX 7.5.0Build 038-121-133-420' - box #2 (Ubuntu 6.10): #> LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 x_server status x_server: error while loading shared libraries: libdl.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.something seems to be used by default in pre-built MaxDB packages found at the MaxDB download site, so it is not working so far. Unfortunately, with MaxDB in Ubuntu-universe being broken because of unmet dependencies, there is no MaxDB on Edgy at the moment. :/ Cheers, Kristian -- Database instance restart error https://launchpad.net/bugs/5 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34752] Re: [atmel] breezy->dapper wifi lost: signal power to 0
My unlabeled Atmel based card eth1: Atmel at76c50x. Version 0.98. MAC ... doesn't work out of the box running Dapper and 2.6.15-26-k7. Same thing using the dapper firmware and a custom build of Edgy 2.6.17 kernel so maybe it's a firmware rather than a kernel issue? -- [atmel] breezy->dapper wifi lost: signal power to 0 https://launchpad.net/bugs/34752 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
