Re: [Bug 273294] Re: Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location
I gave up on that Itunes wannabe a long time ago. On 05/27/2012 03:15 PM, vtec wrote: I can confirm reappearence of this problem in 12.04 both 32-bit and 64-bit, both clean install and upgrade. For me it is about accessing WebDAV rather then SMB. It is working flawlessly in 11.10 but in 12.04 you can only get a sound for a second and then silence. Both Rhythmbox and Banshee are affected but Totem does work properly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273294 Title: Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-vfs/+bug/273294/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 919763] [NEW] package samba4 4.0.0~alpha17~git20110807.dfsg1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: I know nothing more at this time. I don't yet know if the upgrade failed. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: samba4 4.0.0~alpha17~git20110807.dfsg1-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: hostname 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Jan 21 13:09:34 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 SourcePackage: samba4 Title: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha17~git20110807.dfsg1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2012-01-21 (0 days ago) ** Affects: samba4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919763 Title: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha17~git20110807.dfsg1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/919763/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 919763] Re: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha17~git20110807.dfsg1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919763 Title: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha17~git20110807.dfsg1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/919763/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 795726] Re: package python-ubuntuone-storageprotocol 1.6.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: package python-ubuntuone-storageprotocol is already installed and configured
Thank you for your reply. I have the system running with all updates installed and am in the process of running a memory test. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795726 Title: package python-ubuntuone-storageprotocol 1.6.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: package python-ubuntuone-storageprotocol is already installed and configured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/795726/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 795726] [NEW] package python-ubuntuone-storageprotocol 1.6.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: package python-ubuntuone-storageprotocol is already installed and configured
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dpkg Cannot install updates after new fresh install ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: python-ubuntuone-storageprotocol 1.6.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jun 10 16:36:17 2011 ErrorMessage: package python-ubuntuone-storageprotocol is already installed and configured InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110427.1) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: dpkg Title: package python-ubuntuone-storageprotocol 1.6.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: package python-ubuntuone-storageprotocol is already installed and configured UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-06-10 (0 days ago) ** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795726 Title: package python-ubuntuone-storageprotocol 1.6.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: package python-ubuntuone-storageprotocol is already installed and configured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/795726/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 795726] Re: package python-ubuntuone-storageprotocol 1.6.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: package python-ubuntuone-storageprotocol is already installed and configured
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795726 Title: package python-ubuntuone-storageprotocol 1.6.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: package python-ubuntuone-storageprotocol is already installed and configured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/795726/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 795789] Re: package libreoffice-common 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package libreoffice-common is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-i
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795789 Title: package libreoffice-common 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package libreoffice-common is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed') To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/795789/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 795789] [NEW] package libreoffice-common 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package libreoffice-common is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libreoffice fails at boot and fails when trying to upgrade ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: libreoffice-common 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jun 10 16:36:17 2011 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: package libreoffice-common is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed') InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110427.1) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: package libreoffice-common 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package libreoffice-common is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed') UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-06-10 (0 days ago) ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795789 Title: package libreoffice-common 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package libreoffice-common is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed') To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/795789/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 777719] Re: No indicator present, after configuration...
Pretty much the same scenario. Indicator-weather is running as a process and was successfully configured. However, it doesn't appear in the 11.04 panel (running Unity). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19 Title: No indicator present, after configuration... -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 326151] Re: No DVI Output from Geforce 6600 Under Hardy
This is no longer an issue for me. Currently using 10.10 64 bit. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326151 Title: No DVI Output from Geforce 6600 Under Hardy -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 767286] [NEW] type 'exceptions.SystemError': E:I wasn't able to locate file for the libzbar0 package. This might mean you need to manually fix this package.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: aptdaemon
New 11.04 installation 64 bit.
ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: aptdaemon 0.41+bzr646-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Annotation: Applying software changes failed
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Apr 20 11:28:30 2011
DesktopFile: /usr/share/aptdaemon/aptdaemon.desktop
ExecutablePath: /usr/sbin/aptd
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Beta amd64 (20110413)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: aptdaemon
Title: type 'exceptions.SystemError': E:I wasn't able to locate file for the
libzbar0 package. This might mean you need to manually fix this package.
TransactionDepends: [[], [], [], [], [], [], []]
TransactionErrorCode: error-unknown
TransactionKwargs: {}
TransactionLocale: en_US.UTF8
TransactionOutput:
TransactionPackages: [[dbus.String(u'ubuntu-restricted-extras')], [], [], [],
[], []]
TransactionRole: role-commit-packages
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-crash natty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767286
Title:
type 'exceptions.SystemError': E:I wasn't able to locate file for
the libzbar0 package. This might mean you need to manually fix this
package.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 767286] Re: type 'exceptions.SystemError': E:I wasn't able to locate file for the libzbar0 package. This might mean you need to manually fix this package.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767286 Title: type 'exceptions.SystemError': E:I wasn't able to locate file for the libzbar0 package. This might mean you need to manually fix this package. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 741710] [NEW] package nscd 2.13-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Attempting to update Natty 32 bit running in Virtual Box ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: nscd 2.13-0ubuntu9 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.38-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Mar 24 09:25:03 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Alpha i386 (20110318) SourcePackage: eglibc Title: package nscd 2.13-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-24 (0 days ago) ** Affects: eglibc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741710 Title: package nscd 2.13-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 741710] Re: package nscd 2.13-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741710 Title: package nscd 2.13-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273294] Re: Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location
OK, now I'm working! Ubik's 64 bit deb AND the removal of gstreamer0.10-gnomevfs did it for me. Thanks all, especially Ubik. -- Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273294] Re: Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location
I installed your 64 bit deb Ubik but all I get are import errors. -- Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 273294] Re: Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location
Good work but not much good for us 64 bit folks. On 05/22/2010 06:00 PM, Ubik wrote: Hi, I have already built a deb package with the patch metioned by Leon Breedt(see some posts above). If you want you can download it here: http://blog.ezrodlo.pl/archeo/rhythmbox_0.12.8.1_i386.deb md5sum: 2cca01170785799ce3a95d519b4a2f05 rhythmbox_0.12.8.1_i386.deb I bult it on 32bit Lucid with this procedure: http://hadret.com/2008/07/14/rhythmbox-lastfm-debian/ patch: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48042490/rhythmbox-ignore-missing- processing-attributes.diff Deb file was prepared on a fresh 10.04 install. Later I moved it to my laptop and it works for me. Enjoy -- Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 273294] Re: Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location
No it doesn't. On 05/07/2010 02:24 PM, Ubik wrote: Downgrade to Karmic. It works there. -- Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273294] Re: Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location
Still not working for me in Lucid 32 bit as of today. -- Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 410887] Re: alsa-mixer.c: Your kernel driver is broken: it reports a volume range from 18.00 dB to 18.00 dB which makes no sense
I have random system freezes and this is the only error that I find. Audio seems to work just fine. -- alsa-mixer.c: Your kernel driver is broken: it reports a volume range from 18.00 dB to 18.00 dB which makes no sense https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410887 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273294] Re: Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location
Still does not work for me. 9.10 64 bit, no gstreamer0.10-gnomevfs installed. Think I'll just remove rhythmbox since VLC and movie player have no issues playing network shares. Rhythmbox is not worth fooling with. -- Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273294] Re: Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location
I upgraded as well and gstreamer0.10-gnomevfs is NOT enabled on my system and I still cannot access network shares. -- Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273294] Re: Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location
This is not a paper cut because it is not a general usability issue, but rather a bug affecting a relatively small user population. I disagree. Rhythmbox is touted as the default music player in Ubuntu and it doesn't function properly. -- Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194638] Re: Compiz gets into a state where going fullscreen in apps causes an X11 BadAlloc error
It also happens to me. Jaunty with a Nividia 8400GS video card 512MB, 4 gig of system ram and a 1670X1050 resolution. Only does it when I run emerald. -- Compiz gets into a state where going fullscreen in apps causes an X11 BadAlloc error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194638 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 374101] Re: Brasero hangs at Normalizing tracks
From terminal this is the log I get: (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium-monitor.c:436: Polling for drives (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium-monitor.c:446: Found 1 drives (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium-monitor.c:449: Probing /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/storage_model_DVDRW_LH_18A1P (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-drive.c:960: Drive caps are 639 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-drive.c:981: Drive /dev/sr0 has bus,target,lun = 6 0 0 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-drive.c:831: Contents changed (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-drive.c:831: Contents changed (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-drive.c:846: Medium inserted (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:2983: Trying to open device /dev/sr0 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:3004: Open () succeeded (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:3019: Device ready (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:2877: Initializing information for medium in DVDRW LH-18A1P (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:2330: Retrieving media profile (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1458: Retrieving media available speeds (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1286: Retrieving speed (Get Performance) (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At scsi-get-performance.c:127: Unaligned data (8) setting to max (2048) (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At scsi-get-performance.c:202: Sizes mismatch asked 8 / received 72 Re-issuing the command with received size (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At scsi-get-performance.c:127: Unaligned data (72) setting to max (2048) (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1301: Successfully retrieved a header: size 72, address 0x8436b98 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1305: Updated header size = 72 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1318: Got 4 descriptor(s) (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1332: Descriptor n° 0, address = 0x8436ba0 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1339: RD = 1411 / WRT = 7056 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1332: Descriptor n° 1, address = 0x8436bb0 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1339: RD = 1411 / WRT = 5645 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1332: Descriptor n° 2, address = 0x8436bc0 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1339: RD = 1411 / WRT = 4234 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1332: Descriptor n° 3, address = 0x8436bd0 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1339: RD = 1411 / WRT = 2822 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1348: Maximum Speed (mmc3) 7056 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:2254: Retrieving media status (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:2218: Empty media (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:2224: First open track 1 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1879: Retrieving NWA and leadout information (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1805: Setting write mode page (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At scsi-mode-sense.c:125: Getting page size (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At scsi-mode-sense.c:159: Getting page (size = 60) (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1821: Former write type 1 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1822: Former track mode 4 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1823: Former data block type 8 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1948: Next Writable Address is 0 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1955: Free blocks 359847 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1972: Leadout: start = 0 size = 359847 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:924: Checking simulate (CD TAO) (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:960: Checking simulate (CD SAO) (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:1085: Tested simulation 1 1, burnfree 1 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-medium.c:2928: media is CD W blank (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-volume.c:103: Found volume /dev/sr0 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-volume.c:103: Found volume /dev/sr0 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-volume.c:103: Found volume /dev/sr0 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-volume.c:103: Found volume /dev/sr0 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-volume.c:103: Found volume /dev/sr0 (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At brasero-volume.c:198: Mount point is (null) (brasero:28349): BraseroMedia-DEBUG: At
[Bug 321899] Re: brasero 0.9.1 doesn't burn anything - cannot create tmp file
I haven't received a fix. I'm using Serpentine for audio CD's as of now. -- brasero 0.9.1 doesn't burn anything - cannot create tmp file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321899 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273294] Re: Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location
Nothing mentioned so far works for me. I'll continue to use VLC to play media off my server. Shame, I liked Rhythmbox but it appears to be broken for good. This has been an issue for a long time now. -- Rhythmbox can not use smb:// as library location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 386721] Re: package nullmailer 1:1.04-1.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27870846/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27870847/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package nullmailer 1:1.04-1.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 386721] [NEW] package nullmailer 1:1.04-1.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nullmailer Not sure what happened. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: nullmailer 1:1.04-1.1 SourcePackage: nullmailer Title: package nullmailer 1:1.04-1.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 ** Affects: nullmailer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 -- package nullmailer 1:1.04-1.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 156615] Re: sound notification does not allow to specify a custom wav file
The problem is still present with Jaunty and Thunderbird 2.0.0.21. It did work for me at one time but it has stopped working for unknown reasons. I am using the exact same wav file in exactly the same location as when it worked. ** Attachment added: Screenshot-Thunderbird Preferences.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27374828/Screenshot-Thunderbird%20Preferences.png -- sound notification does not allow to specify a custom wav file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/156615 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 326151] Re: No DVI Output from Geforce 6600 Under Hardy
I did try the Nvidia 173 driver but it made no difference. I finally decided to upgrade to 8.10 and that installed the 177 driver. This finally solved my problem. Here is my new xorg.conf; # xorg.conf (X.Org X Window System server configuration file) # # This file was generated by dexconf, the Debian X Configuration tool, using # values from the debconf database. # # Edit this file with caution, and see the xorg.conf manual page. # (Type man xorg.conf at the shell prompt.) # # This file is automatically updated on xserver-xorg package upgrades *only* # if it has not been modified since the last upgrade of the xserver-xorg # package. # # If you have edited this file but would like it to be automatically updated # again, run the following command: # sudo dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg Section Screen Identifier Default Screen Monitor Configured Monitor Device Configured Video Device Option AddARGBGLXVisuals True Defaultdepth24 EndSection Section Device Identifier Configured Video Device Driver nvidia EndSection # commented out by update-manager, HAL is now used #Section InputDevice # Identifier Generic Keyboard # Driver kbd # Option XkbRules xorg # Option XkbModel pc105 # Option XkbLayout us #EndSection # commented out by update-manager, HAL is now used #Section InputDevice # Identifier Configured Mouse # Driver mouse # Option CorePointer #EndSection Section ServerLayout Identifier Default Layout screen Default Screen EndSection Section Monitor Identifier Configured Monitor EndSection Section Extensions Option Composite Enable EndSection ** Description changed: During my upgrade from Gutsy to Hardy (with all current updates) I lost output from the DVI on my Nvidia Geforce 6600. As soon as X starts, the screen goes black. The system continues to boot normally. My VGA output works normally. I am running the Nvidia accelerated driver. If I disable the the accelerated driver I do get DVI output but an unacceptable resolution that I can't seem to modify in any way. Attached is my xorg.conf and xorg.0.log + + This is now Solved for me by upgrade to 8.10 -- No DVI Output from Geforce 6600 Under Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326151 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 326151] Re: No DVI Output from Geforce 6600 Under Hardy
I am not using Nvidia 173, rather 169. I am considering 173.14.12 to see if it fixes the issue. -- No DVI Output from Geforce 6600 Under Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326151 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 326151] Re: No DVI Output from Geforce 6600 Under Hardy
Here is my xorg.conf. I add the line Option UseDisplayDevice DFP to the Screen section in an effort to force DVI output. Nvidia-settings is using auto-config and only shows CRT-0, no DVI. If I attempt to detect displays in nvidia-settings, it finds my TV-0 (s-video) but not the DVI. ** Attachment added: xorg.conf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22043117/xorg.conf -- No DVI Output from Geforce 6600 Under Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326151 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 326151] Re: No DVI Output from Geforce 6600 Under Hardy
** Attachment added: xorg.0.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22042819/xorg.0.log -- No DVI Output from Geforce 6600 Under Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326151 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 326151] [NEW] No DVI Output from Geforce 6600 Under Hardy
Public bug reported: During my upgrade from Gutsy to Hardy (with all current updates) I lost output from the DVI on my Nvidia Geforce 6600. As soon as X starts, the screen goes black. The system continues to boot normally. My VGA output works normally. I am running the Nvidia accelerated driver. If I disable the the accelerated driver I do get DVI output but an unacceptable resolution that I can't seem to modify in any way. Attached is my xorg.conf and xorg.0.log ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- No DVI Output from Geforce 6600 Under Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326151 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188540] Re: firefox-3.0 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()
Happened in ebay 3 times trying to navigate site. Has not been an issue until kernal 2.6.24.15. -- firefox-3.0 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
