[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
I had a chat with David Sugar (I believe he is a staff member from Canonical). He suggests us to form a dedicated team to set up and maintain the 389 directory server. I have just done that and now we have got a new team called Ubuntu 389 Directory Server Team https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-389-directory-server I have added: Timothy Pearson (the Ubuntu packager) David Sugar (Canonical staff(?), also a REVU reviewer) Michele Baldessari (Debian 389 maintainer) to this team. Also this team now has a centralized ppa. So it would be nice if we can port Timothy's ppa to the team ppa, with the correct name changes etc. At the same time, Michele can make sure that this ppa compiles in the Debian testing suite and get 389 accepted in Debian as well. In this way, the team ppa will centralize the development of both Ubuntu and Debian port at once. I have just applied for an email list for this team and it is waiting for approval. David, would you be able to approve the team email list? Cheers, kcleung P.S. Apart from the package name changes, we should transfer the maintainer of the packages from Timothy Pearson to Ubuntu 389 Directory Server Team so that this project is now managed by the whole team. Quoting Timothy Pearson kb9...@pearsoncomputing.net: Hi Michele, I sent you an Email--hopefully I can help with your packaging. You're right, it does not make sense to be maintaining two separate versions. Thanks! Tim -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Blueprint karmic-fedora-directory-server-inclusion] Fedora Directory Server Inclusion in Karmic
Blueprint changed by Leung, Kai-Cheung: Assignee: Timothy Pearson = Ubuntu 389 Directory Server Team -- Fedora Directory Server Inclusion in Karmic https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/karmic-fedora-directory-server-inclusion -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
We have formed the Ubuntu 389 directory server team and this project now becomes team-managed ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: Timothy Pearson (kb9vqf) = Ubuntu 389 Directory Server Team (ubuntu-389-directory-server) -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Blueprint karmic-fedora-directory-server-inclusion] Fedora Directory Server Inclusion in Karmic
Blueprint changed by Leung, Kai-Cheung: Definition Status: Superseded = Obsolete -- Fedora Directory Server Inclusion in Karmic https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fedora/+spec/karmic-fedora-directory-server-inclusion -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
I had a chat with David Sugar (I believe he is a staff member from Canonical). He suggests us to form a dedicated team to set up and maintain the 389 directory server. I have just done that and now we have got a new team called Ubuntu 389 Directory Server Team https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-389-directory-server I have added: Timothy Pearson (the Ubuntu packager) David Sugar (Canonical staff(?), also a REVU reviewer) Michele Baldessari (Debian 389 maintainer) to this team. Also this team now has a centralized ppa. So it would be nice if we can port Timothy's ppa to the team ppa, with the correct name changes etc. At the same time, Michele can make sure that this ppa compiles in the Debian testing suite and get 389 accepted in Debian as well. In this way, the team ppa will centralize the development of both Ubuntu and Debian port at once. I have just applied for an email list for this team and it is waiting for approval. David, would you be able to approve the team email list? Cheers, kcleung P.S. Apart from the package name changes, we should transfer the maintainer of the packages from Timothy Pearson to Ubuntu 389 Directory Server Team so that this project is now managed by the whole team. Quoting Timothy Pearson kb9...@pearsoncomputing.net: Hi Michele, I sent you an Email--hopefully I can help with your packaging. You're right, it does not make sense to be maintaining two separate versions. Thanks! Tim -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
We have formed the Ubuntu 389 directory server team and this project now becomes team-managed ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: Timothy Pearson (kb9vqf) = Ubuntu 389 Directory Server Team (ubuntu-389-directory-server) -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
That's great! Please make coordination with David sugar and make good use of the Ubuntu 389 server project team PPA. You are also now one of the administrators so should have enough privilege to manipulate the team PPA. After launchpad approves our team email list, communication will be easier. But by the mean time, just say everything on this bug list Quoting Timothy Pearson kb9...@pearsoncomputing.net: I am currently working with upstream Debian on this...hopefully things will progress rapidly now. -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu 389 Directory Server Team, which is a bug assignee. Status in Ubuntu: In Progress Status in Debian GNU/Linux: New Bug description: It would be great if we could get native Ubuntu/Debian builds for Fedora Directory Server, now that all the components of it are reported to be open sourced. http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Main_Page Blair -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Blueprint karmic-fedora-directory-server-inclusion] Fedora Directory Server Inclusion in Karmic
You are now subscribed to the blueprint karmic-fedora-directory-server- inclusion - Fedora Directory Server Inclusion in Karmic. -- https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/karmic-fedora-directory-server-inclusion -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
Graeme: The reason why fedora-directory-server_1.2.0-2.dsc doesn't build on your jaunty system is because it relies on many libraries (such as libsvrcore-dev) which are also along Tim's upload. So you really need to test build these libraries first, then after they are built, include Tim's PPA: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/kb9vqf/389directoryserver/ubuntu karmic main as an alternate source (OTHERMIRROR in .pbuilderrc) in your jaunty pbuilder environment. Don't worry, Grame, I've tried and it builds perfectly. I hope the REVU team can approve the packages as soon so possible so that it can get into Karmic Alpha 3 REVU: Would you please review the Fedora Directory Server packages as soon as possible so that it can get into Karmic Alpha 3? Ubuntu-Release: Our Fedora Directory Server packages are ready and it would be great to introduce Fedora Directory Server into Karmic. Sysadmins find FDS really helpful in managing resource accesses for large corporate networks -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
Graeme: The reason why fedora-directory-server_1.2.0-2.dsc doesn't build on your jaunty system is because it relies on many libraries (such as libsvrcore-dev) which are also along Tim's upload. So you really need to test build these libraries first, then after they are built, include Tim's PPA: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/kb9vqf/389directoryserver/ubuntu karmic main as an alternate source (OTHERMIRROR in .pbuilderrc) in your jaunty pbuilder environment. Don't worry, Grame, I've tried and it builds perfectly. I hope the REVU team can approve the packages as soon so possible so that it can get into Karmic Alpha 3 REVU: Would you please review the Fedora Directory Server packages as soon as possible so that it can get into Karmic Alpha 3? Ubuntu-Release: Our Fedora Directory Server packages are ready and it would be great to introduce Fedora Directory Server into Karmic. Sysadmins find FDS really helpful in managing resource accesses for large corporate networks -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Blueprint karmic-fedora-directory-server-inclusion] Fedora Directory Server Inclusion in Karmic
You are now subscribed to the blueprint karmic-fedora-directory-server- inclusion - Fedora Directory Server Inclusion in Karmic. -- https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/karmic-fedora-directory-server-inclusion -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
Dear Ubuntu-server and Ubuntu-desktop: If you are also a REVU reviewer, would you please have a quick look at the new Fedora Directory Server package for ubuntu? Blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/fedora-directory-server- inclusion The Fedora Directory server is the most advanced directory server in Linux. Its functionalty supersedes LDAP and makes the sysadmin's life much easier when managing computer resource / access for large networks. The absence of FDS in Ubuntu was (and still is) a major factor discouraging Ubuntu uptake. This package is sitting in REVU and needs urgent review in order to make it to 9.10 (Karmic). It is much better to introduce FDS in Karmic than directly to the next LTS! -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 303320] Re: [needs-packaging] lxubuntu-desktop
Thank you very much Team lubuntu-desktop. Finally you have brought lxde to the realm of Ubuntu and provide the real OS for older computers, as xubuntu becomes more and more bloated. ** Changed in: lxde-common (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: lxde-common (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Lubuntu (lubuntu-desktop) -- [needs-packaging] lxubuntu-desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
Dear Ubuntu-server and Ubuntu-desktop: If you are also a REVU reviewer, would you please have a quick look at the new Fedora Directory Server package for ubuntu? Blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/fedora-directory-server- inclusion The Fedora Directory server is the most advanced directory server in Linux. Its functionalty supersedes LDAP and makes the sysadmin's life much easier when managing computer resource / access for large networks. The absence of FDS in Ubuntu was (and still is) a major factor discouraging Ubuntu uptake. This package is sitting in REVU and needs urgent review in order to make it to 9.10 (Karmic). It is much better to introduce FDS in Karmic than directly to the next LTS! -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
Hi Tim, FDS 1.2.0 is already out, would you please update your port to 1.2.0? Also the next ubuntu LTS release is 10.4, which Canonical doesn't like introduce new features in, so if we want FDS to make it into the next LTS release, we need to get it into 9.10. Therefore we need to submit to revu.ubuntuwire.net very soon. -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 344642] Re: MIR - include aria2
I mean to have aria2 in the *default installation*, alongside with wget. aria2 supercedes wget because it allows multithreaded segmented downloads, which can potentially speed up download by 5-10 times. And the size of aria2 is very small anyway. Yes we install wget by default for scripts, but we should encourage these scripts to be converted to aria2, by installing aria2 *alongside wget* by default. (as mentioned by J Scott Gwin) Quoting Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com: Adding a full MB CD for this does not seem adequate to me, and having it installed by default would be the only real reason to put it into main. We ship wget by default which suits 99% of use cases (for the few users who use command line tools for web retrieval in the first place). Since wget is also used by a lot of scripts, we probably have to install it by default anyway, thus the size impact of aria2 would be even bigger. So again, what is to be gained from having aria2 in main, but not in a default installation? -- MIR - include aria2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344642 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- MIR - include aria2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317059] Re: USB Startup disk of Ubuntu 8.10 alternate: option recover a broken system does not work
I am now using Jaunty alpha-6. The alternate images in jaunty also has the same problem as it insists me to insert a CDROM, although the (desktop) live CD works fine If the script is not designed for non-liveCD, (or non-liveCD are only designed to be only in the CDROM form), ***please say so in the program*** Otherwise, we should modify either the usb-creator or the alternate and server installers to enable installation from non-CDROM removable media ** Changed in: usb-creator (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- USB Startup disk of Ubuntu 8.10 alternate: option recover a broken system does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317059 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317059] Re: USB Startup disk of Ubuntu 8.10 alternate: option recover a broken system does not work
** Changed in: usb-creator (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Installer Team (ubuntu-installer) -- USB Startup disk of Ubuntu 8.10 alternate: option recover a broken system does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317059 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 344642] Re: MIR - include aria2
** Changed in: aria2 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- MIR - include aria2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 344642] Re: MIR - include aria2
1. Availability: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/a/aria2/ for all architectures 2. Rationale: Aria2 supports multithreaded segmented download, thus greatly speed up download. Also it has support for http(s), ftp and bittorrent protocol and allow downloading of a file using multiple protocols at the same time http://aria2.sourceforge.net/ aria2 actually supercedes wget and users should be encourage to use aria2 instead of wget. by including aria2 into main, we can encourage users to use aria2 instead of wget. 3. Security no CVE or secunia entries found for aria2 no binaries run at root or suid/sgids, no daemons Network activity: download of the above protocol only download data, but does not process files 4. QA package always work out of the box - no debconf questions asked - no significant bugs in debian or ubuntu (other than no IPv6 support) - upstream updates approximately eveery 6 month-1 year - good debianand ubuntu support - the universe package was automatically ported from debian 5. UI: - text-only 6. standards compliance: complies to FHS, Debian policy and debian library packageing guide lintian check shows no error or warnings 7. Dependencies: libc-ares2 library for asyncronous name resolves dep: libc6 (= 2.4) GNU C Library: Shared libraries also a virtual package provided by libc6-udeb dep: libgcc1 (= 1:4.1.1) GCC support library dep: libgcrypt11 (= 1.4.0) LGPL Crypto library - runtime library dep: libgnutls26 (= 2.4.0-0) the GNU TLS library - runtime library dep: libsqlite3-0 (= 3.6.10) SQLite 3 shared library dep: libstdc++6 (= 4.2.1) The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 dep: libxml2 (= 2.6.27) GNOME XML library dep: zlib1g (= 1:1.1.4) compression library - runtime all in main except libc-ares2. I will file a separate MIR report for libc-ares2 shortly. This should be eassy because libc-ares2 only depends on libc6. 8. Maintenance simple package needs very little maintenance. Currently looked after by Ubuntu MOTU developers, because it is automatically synced from debian Quoting Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com: Hm, there are certainly several download tools in the universe, but what would be gained with including it in main? Do you want to maintain it? Please create a complete main inclusion report if you want to pursue this. ** Changed in: aria2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- MIR - include aria2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344642 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- MIR - include aria2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345831] [NEW] MIR - c-ares
Public bug reported: 1. availability: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/c/c-ares/ amd64 and i386 2. Rationale: build dependency of aria2 (libc-ares2), which I have already file a MIR report against 3. Security http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=c-ares http://secunia.com/advisories/product/14462/ it is a library, no daemons, suid/sgids etc. 4. QA: directly synced from debian 5. UI standards: N/A 6. standards compliance: Lintian shows: W: c-ares source: debian-rules-ignores-make-clean-error line 60 E: c-ares source: not-binnmuable-any-depends-any libc-ares-dev - libc-ares2 W: c-ares source: changelog-should-mention-nmu W: c-ares source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.5.2-4 W: c-ares source: patch-system-but-direct-changes-in-diff .pc/.version 7. dependencies: libc6 - in main 8. maintenance: very little, can look after itself ** Affects: c-ares (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- MIR - c-ares https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345831 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 344642] [NEW] MIR - include aria2
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: aria2 like wget, aria2 is a command-line-based download tool, but also supports multithreaded- and segmented downloads with resuming support, thus greatly decreases download time. aria2 is a good replacement tool for wget and should be included in main. ** Affects: aria2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: mir -- MIR - include aria2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 342915] [NEW] Please update wine to 1.1.17
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wine wine 1.1.17 has already been released, please update the antiquated wine-1.0.1 to wine 1.1.17 ** Affects: wine (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please update wine to 1.1.17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342915 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 335779] [NEW] taoframework library location not updated after package is installed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libtaoframework-sdl1.2-cil I have just installed libtaoframework-sdl1.2-cil package However when I run a mono program which need this package, the program can't locate Tao.sdl a...@q6600:~/Desktop/bve$ mono OpenBve.exe ** (OpenBve.exe:8056): WARNING **: The following assembly referenced from /home/abc/Desktop/bve/OpenBve.exe could not be loaded: Assembly: Tao.Sdl(assemblyref_index=5) Version:1.2.13.0 Public Key: 9c7a200e36c0094e The assembly was not found in the Global Assembly Cache, a path listed in the MONO_PATH environment variable, or in the location of the executing assembly (/home/abc/Desktop/bve/). ** (OpenBve.exe:8056): WARNING **: Could not load file or assembly 'Tao.Sdl, Version=1.2.13.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=9c7a200e36c0094e' or one of its dependencies. Stacktrace: Native stacktrace: mono [0x529d21] mono [0x43f99d] /lib/libpthread.so.0 [0x7febca1880f0] mono(mono_class_from_typeref+0x121) [0x4c1ea1] mono(mono_class_get_full+0x115) [0x4c0a95] mono [0x4b2fe9] mono(mono_metadata_parse_type_full+0x10b) [0x4b230b] mono(mono_metadata_parse_mh_full+0x19a) [0x4b265a] mono(mono_method_get_header+0x1e4) [0x4b5224] mono [0x4f5b70] mono [0x5087e4] mono [0x513a6c] mono [0x515258] mono [0x515b0a] mono(mono_runtime_exec_main+0xc6) [0x45a9d6] mono(mono_runtime_run_main+0x184) [0x45afa4] mono(mono_main+0x590) [0x417000] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6) [0x7febc9ba0466] mono [0x4164c9] Debug info from gdb: (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7febcae69710 (LWP 8056)] [New Thread 0x41d61950 (LWP 8058)] [New Thread 0x41b60950 (LWP 8057)] (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) 0x7febca186f4b in read () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 3 Thread 0x41b60950 (LWP 8057) 0x7febca187851 in nanosleep () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 2 Thread 0x41d61950 (LWP 8058) 0x7febca1842d9 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 1 Thread 0x7febcae69710 (LWP 8056) 0x7febca186f4b in read () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 Thread 3 (Thread 0x41b60950 (LWP 8057)): #0 0x7febca187851 in nanosleep () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x004c56e2 in ?? () #2 0x7febca1803ea in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #3 0x7febc9c68c6d in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6 #4 0x in ?? () Thread 2 (Thread 0x41d61950 (LWP 8058)): #0 0x7febca1842d9 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x004c8565 in ?? () #2 0x004ca81b in ?? () #3 0x004db96e in ?? () #4 0x00470b93 in ?? () #5 0x0048d41b in ?? () #6 0x004d9d33 in ?? () #7 0x004f1582 in ?? () #8 0x7febca1803ea in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #9 0x7febc9c68c6d in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6 #10 0x in ?? () Thread 1 (Thread 0x7febcae69710 (LWP 8056)): #0 0x7febca186f4b in read () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x7febca60956e in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #2 0x7febca609a56 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #3 0x7febca60a4cb in g_spawn_sync () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #4 0x7febca60a988 in g_spawn_command_line_sync () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #5 0x00529dc8 in ?? () #6 0x0043f99d in ?? () #7 signal handler called #8 0x004c1ea1 in mono_class_from_typeref () #9 0x004c0a95 in mono_class_get_full () #10 0x004b2fe9 in ?? () #11 0x004b230b in mono_metadata_parse_type_full () #12 0x004b265a in mono_metadata_parse_mh_full () #13 0x004b5224 in mono_method_get_header () #14 0x004f5b70 in ?? () #15 0x005087e4 in ?? () #16 0x00513a6c in ?? () #17 0x00515258 in ?? () #18 0x00515b0a in ?? () #19 0x0045a9d6 in mono_runtime_exec_main () #20 0x0045afa4 in mono_runtime_run_main () #21 0x00417000 in mono_main () #22 0x7febc9ba0466 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 #23 0x004164c9 in ?? () #24 0x7fffd2e892f8 in ?? () #25 0x001c in ?? () #26 0x0002 in ?? () #27 0x7fffd2e8a70c in ?? () #28 0x7fffd2e8a711 in ?? () #29 0x in ?? () #0 0x7febca186f4b in read () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 = Got a SIGSEGV while
[Bug 335779] Re: taoframework library location not updated after package is installed
actually this bug affects all libtaoframework packages -- taoframework library location not updated after package is installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335779 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 312544] Jaunty pre-freeze Freeze Exception Request: lilypond
I nearly finish packaging the new lilypond release 2.12.1, but Jaunty only has 2.10.33 (see bug 312544) Lilypond 2.12 contains many new features http://www.lilypond.org and I really like jaunty to have the updated version. How can I upload the updated version and request any necessary freeze exceptions? Thanks! Kai-Cheung Leung -- Please update Lilypond to 2.12 in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312544 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 312544] [NEW] Please update Lilypond to 2.12 in Jaunty
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: lilypond Lilypond 2.12 is already released and it is a major stable update since 2.10. http://www.lilypond.org Please update lilypond to 2.12 in Jaunty. ** Affects: lilypond (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-updating -- Please update Lilypond to 2.12 in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312544 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 311014] [NEW] files are linked to the wrong directory
Public bug reported: I have installed linux-headers-386-2.6.25.2.3 for intrepid. all files are linked back to itself. For instance, the file Makefile is linked to ../linux-headers-2.6.25-2/Makefile whereas it should have been linked to: ../linux-ports-headers-2.6.25-2/Makefile instead. This makes the header file unusable. ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- files are linked to the wrong directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311014 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 303323] Re: Please update LXDE to 0.4.8.6 and move to main
Oops, sorry.. I've misread the webpage and 0.3.2.1 is indeed the newest version. However for LXDE to become an official Jaunty (or Jaunty+1) flavour, I guess LXDE must be included into the main, together with the lxubuntu-desktop metapackage which depends on everything that makes a standalone operating system (have to pull the x.org backend together with lightweight desktop apps, such as gnumeric, abiword, a lightweight counterpart of evince, the browser kazekahase etc..) So should we change the title of this to something like: please move LXDE to main? Thanks! Quoting fabrice_sp [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. LXDE 4.8.6 is a packaging af a lot of components that have lower versions. For example, lxde-common in Ubuntu is already at the latest version (0.3.2.1). Can you please indicate which packages has to be updated? Thanks. ** Changed in: lxde-common (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Please update LXDE to 0.4.8.6 and move to main https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303323 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Please update LXDE to 0.4.8.6 and move to main https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303323 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303320] [NEW] lxubuntu-desktop
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: lxde LXDE is an ultralightweight desktop, lighter than ubuntu and is suitable for pre-P3 computers as well as Apple G3 and G4 series. We really need to have a comprehensive and self-standing lxubuntu- desktop package which pulls *all* packages necessary for the X-windows backend as well as LXDE desktop together with useful tools such as abiword, gnumeric and kazekahase. It would be worthwhile to spin off a desktop Live CD, which is *part of the ubuntu proper* rather than a spinoff of a previous Ubuntu version Here I would also request LXDE to be included into the main repository (I will file a separate bug report) ** Affects: lxde-common (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-packaging -- lxubuntu-desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303323] [NEW] Please update LXDE to 0.4.8.6 and move to main
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: lxde-common LXDE 0.4.8.6 is already released http://www.lxde.org Please update to this version. Also it would be nice if we can have a lxubuntu flavour with Ubuntu proper, rather than spin off from a previous verison of Ubuntu (like U-Lite) But for this to happen, lxde-related package must first be included in main ** Affects: lxde-common (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-updating ** Description changed: Binary package hint: lxde-common - LXDE 0.5.8.6 is already released + LXDE 0.4.8.6 is already released http://www.lxde.org Please update to this version. Also it would be nice if we can have a lxubuntu flavour with Ubuntu proper, rather than spin off from a previous verison of Ubuntu (like U-Lite) But for this to happen, lxde-related package must first be included in main -- Please update LXDE to 0.4.8.6 and move to main https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303323 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 303320] [NEW] lxubuntu-desktop
As mentioned in my last email, the problem with U-lite (or Ubuntu lite) is that it is not part of the Ubuntu package system and it does *not* sync with Ubuntu. We really need to get the lxubuntu-desktop meta package working and rather than working on a previous stable release, we need to work with Jaunty and get the meta package into Jaunty... Quoting PCMan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: There is already UbuntuLite which supports LXDE. But it's not yet a installable desktop CD. Maybe you guys can work together on this. On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Launchpad Bug Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You have been subscribed to a public bug by Leung, Kai-Cheung (kcleung-users): Binary package hint: lxde LXDE is an ultralightweight desktop, lighter than ubuntu and is suitable for pre-P3 computers as well as Apple G3 and G4 series. We really need to have a comprehensive and self-standing lxubuntu- desktop package which pulls *all* packages necessary for the X-windows backend as well as LXDE desktop together with useful tools such as abiword, gnumeric and kazekahase. It would be worthwhile to spin off a desktop Live CD, which is *part of the ubuntu proper* rather than a spinoff of a previous Ubuntu version Here I would also request LXDE to be included into the main repository (I will file a separate bug report) ** Affects: lxde-common (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-packaging -- lxubuntu-desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of LXDE, which is a direct subscriber. -- lxubuntu-desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303320 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- lxubuntu-desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 299224] [NEW] [needs-packaging] package Nexenta kernel as a multiverse alternative
Public bug reported: Dtrace is a very powerful tool in profiling performance for applications across the user and kernel space, yet its CDDL license is incompartible to the Linux GPL license, thus cannot be included in the Linux kernel and as a result, I cannot use dtrace without switching from Ununtu to one of the OS under Sun. (Systemtap is at this stage cannot do what I want, so it is not yet a real alternative) Therefore we should package the kernel of Nexenta. Nexenta is a Ubuntu- based distribution that uses the SunOS kernel. However the compiler of Nexenta is too old (gcc 4.0). We should package the Nexenta SunOS kernel (I think CDDL license) as a multiverse package and compile this kernel with whatever toolchain currently used Ubuntu. Then users can feel free to use dtrace (and zfs etc) without needing to switch distro ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [needs-packaging] package Nexenta kernel as a multiverse alternative https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299224 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 284086] [NEW] Please update openoffice.org to 3.0
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org The final version of openoffice.org is already released http://www.openoffice.org Please update intrepid to openoffice.org 3.0, otherwise we will have to wait for another 1/2 year. ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please update openoffice.org to 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284086 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 278069] Re: hal permission problems preventing jobs to be printed
My printer is Brother MFC 8820D and it is also a USB printer Quoting Orestes Mas [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Updating: The fact one printer works and the other doesn't is irrellevant, as these printers use different backends (hp and hal). The problematic printer is the one using the HAL backend. After some googling I've found the suggestion of doing a chmod 700 /usr/lib/cups/backend/hal (and the same to the usb backend), and restart cups. Doing so clears the Permission denied message, but printer still doesn't work: it eats any document send to it without printing nothing. At least for me. -- hal permission problems preventing jobs to be printed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278069 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- hal permission problems preventing jobs to be printed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278069 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278069] [NEW] hal permission problems preventing jobs to be printed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: hal-cups-utils I tried to print, but the system says that the printer is not connected (although it is actually connected). The output of lpstat is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lpstat -p printer MFC8820D idle， Unable to open device hal:///org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/usb_device_4f9_143_000K3J172737_if0_printer_noserial: Permission denied [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ The output of lsusb is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsusb Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 004 Device 002: ID 046d:c00e Logitech, Inc. M-BJ58/M-BJ69 Optical Wheel Mouse Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04f9:0143 Brother Industries, Ltd MFC-8820D Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ I am using Ubuntu Intrepid beta the version of hals-cups-utils is 0.6.17+git20080728-0ubuntu2 ** Affects: hal-cups-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- hal permission problems preventing jobs to be printed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278069 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234857] Re: please update yate to 2.0.0-alpha2
Yate 2.0 final has been released, please update the ubuntu package to yate-2.0.0 -- please update yate to 2.0.0-alpha2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 257103] [NEW] please provide a backport to hardy
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: convirt convirt should be backported to hardy to make ubuntu-xen-desktop package installable. I successfully backported convirt to hardy. It only requires a recompilation in hardy *without* modifications. However how can I upload my hardy backport? ** Affects: convirt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- please provide a backport to hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257103 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195558] Re: [needs-packaging] brl-cad 7.10.4
lack of time due to commitment to research project ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: Leung, Kai-Cheung (kcleung-users) = (unassigned) -- [needs-packaging] brl-cad 7.10.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195558 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256348] [NEW] please transfer jabref from multiverse to universe
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: jabref Since jabref itself is under GPL and it is no longer dependent on the non-free sun-java (thanks to openjdk), therefore it does not need to be in multiverse anymore and should be transferred to universe ** Affects: jabref (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- please transfer jabref from multiverse to universe https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256348 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256267] [NEW] please update to 0.9.1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: convirt convirt 0.9.1 has already been released in July http://xenman.sourceforge.net/ Please update the Ubuntu/debian packages to this updated version ** Affects: convirt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- please update to 0.9.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 253185] [NEW] should backport OpenMP 3.0 to gcc-4.3.1 for Intrepid
Hi, I am now trying to navigate the gcc sourcecode. Is the openmp-3.0 stuff built into gfortran, gcc and g++, outside the libgomp subdirectory? So when I try to merge openmp stuff into gcc-4.3.1 source file, which part of the current gcc svn should I look at? I am a bit lost Obviously the the current trunk is 4.4 and I shouldn't merge everything at the trunk to our gcc-4.3 source. Alternatively, I can use gcc-snapshot. By definition, it is a snapshot of the trunk (future 4.4). Am I correct? If I use this snapshot and compile my own programs, then if my programs links to other libraries (standard libraries as well as some specific libraries), do I have to recompile ALL these libraries using gcc-snapshot as well? This is my initial motivation for thinking about backporting openmp 3.0 to gcc-4.3.1 Kai-Cheung Quoting Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Leung, Kai-Cheung schrieb: However how easy / difficult if we merge openmp-3.0 into ubuntu intrepid gcc-4.3.1 without using redhat diff? yoe, not me ;) I didn't look how difficult it is, but given our feature freeze date approaching, you have to be quick. As an alternative, us the gcc-snapshot package for experimental work. Matthias -- should backport OpenMP 3.0 to gcc-4.3.1 for Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253185 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- should backport OpenMP 3.0 to gcc-4.3.1 for Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 253185] [NEW] should backport OpenMP 3.0 to gcc-4.3.1 for Intrepid
Quoting Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Leung, Kai-Cheung schrieb: Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gcc-4.3 gcc implementation of the new openmp-3.0 standard has been merged into the svn trunk in June http://gcc.gnu.org/ openmp-3.0 contains quite a number of new features and redhat has already backported openmp-3.0 to 4.3.1. To make openmp-3.0 into Intrepid, which would help many multi-core machines, should we also backport openmpi-3.0 to gcc-4.3.1 in Intrepid? Can we just lift Redhat's diff into our one? No, the diff contains more than the openmp backport. -- should backport OpenMP 3.0 to gcc-4.3.1 for Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253185 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. However how easy / difficult if we merge openmp-3.0 into ubuntu intrepid gcc-4.3.1 without using redhat diff? -- should backport OpenMP 3.0 to gcc-4.3.1 for Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253185] [NEW] should backport OpenMP 3.0 to gcc-4.3.1 for Intrepid
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gcc-4.3 gcc implementation of the new openmp-3.0 standard has been merged into the svn trunk in June http://gcc.gnu.org/ openmp-3.0 contains quite a number of new features and redhat has already backported openmp-3.0 to 4.3.1. To make openmp-3.0 into Intrepid, which would help many multi-core machines, should we also backport openmpi-3.0 to gcc-4.3.1 in Intrepid? Can we just lift Redhat's diff into our one? http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/source/SRPMS//gcc-4.3.1-5.src.rpm ** Affects: gcc-4.3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- should backport OpenMP 3.0 to gcc-4.3.1 for Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 245958] [NEW] please backport 1.6.2 to Hardy
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: virtualbox-ose Hardy only has virtualbox 1.5.x but 1.6.2 is rolled out already. Is it possible to backport virtualbox-1.6.2 (and all associated packages / kernel modules) to Hardy (or better, put into hardy-updates) so that Hardy LTS useres can still read images created by other updated computers? ** Affects: virtualbox-ose (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- please backport 1.6.2 to Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245958 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 16704] Re: [Intrepid] Need to integrate brother-mfc sane backend
Hardy still does not have Brother sane-backend support (e.g. my copier MFC-8820D) Will brother sane-backend make it to Intrepid either as a part of sane- backends package or as its own package? -- Need to integrate brother-mfc sane backend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/16704 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234857] [NEW] please update yate to 2.0.0-alpha2
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yate Yate 2.0.0-alpha2 has already been released, with many new feature/improvements http://yate.null.ro/pmwiki/ Please update yate to 2.0.0, or at least make 2.0.0-alpha as an alternative package to sit alongside the stable version so that people can try the new features. ** Affects: yate (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- please update yate to 2.0.0-alpha2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 225426] Re: please sync mono from Debian (mono (1.9.1+dfsg-1))
Mono in Debian is already updated to 1.9.1 mono (1.9.1+dfsg-1) http://packages.debian.org/source/lenny/mono Please sync Ubuntu mono *now*. -- [wishlist]please update mono to 1.9.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225426 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226673] [NEW] Please sync octave3.0 1:3.0.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: octave3.0 octave3.0 (1:3.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=low * Add library path at the beginning of the loadpath (work-around for #477556). Not closing the bug, as this is only fixing the symptoms, not the cause. -- Thomas Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:38:27 +0200 octave3.0 (1:3.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release * Drop dpatches (applied upstream): + 50_drop-lo-manpages.dpatch + 50_dont_downcase_font_names.dpatch + 50_clean-doc.dpatch * debian/rules (clean): Ensure that make distclean is run -- Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:33:41 +0200 ** Affects: octave3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please sync octave3.0 1:3.0.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226673 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217940] Re: swfdec-mozilla does not install plugin in right location
** Changed in: swfdec-mozilla (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- swfdec-mozilla does not install plugin in right location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217940 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195558] Re: brl-cad 7.10.4
I plan to package brlcad-7.12.2. I've looked at the source code. However it has bundled with a number of external libraries in src/other/ which some do not have existing Ubuntu packages, such as openNURBS. When I package brlcad, should I leave the default setting of the source code alone and let it use the internal library code or should I package all the libraries and fiddle with debian/RULE to make the make file use the system library? -- brl-cad 7.10.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195558 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 225426] [NEW] please update mono to 1.9.1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mono Mono 1.9.1 has already been released, which now has good support for C# 3.0, LINQ and .NET 3.5. http://www.go-mono.com/archive/1.9/ These new features are all crucial for running modern C# / .NET programs on Linux and therefore promoting Linux uptake as a whole. Therefore please update mono to 1.9.1 as soon as possible. ** Affects: mono (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- please update mono to 1.9.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225426 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 202174] Re: Please update to version 2.6
I am glad to hear that. However are our package ready to be loaded on to interpid? Quoting Ryan Pavlik [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have it on word from folks in irc on #ubuntu-devel that we're going to try to get it in 8.04.1 - the first hardy update in 3 months, when the cd's are re-spun. The current CD's include the old AbiWord. -- Please update to version 2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202174 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Please update to version 2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202174] Re: Please update to version 2.6
I think the primary reason for merging the source is that the plugin source package *needs* the abiword *source package*, *not* just libraries/header file in order to builld. This is the primary reason why the sources were originally merged. -- Please update to version 2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 206787] Re: hal doesn't install
Same problem in hal - 0.5.11~rc2-1ubuntu5 still can't install / upgrade hal in ubuntu hardy 8.04 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo dpkg --configure -a Setting up hal (0.5.11~rc2-1ubuntu5) ... * Reloading system message bus config... [ OK ] * Starting Hardware abstraction layer haldinvoke-rc.d: initscript hal, action start failed. dpkg: error processing hal (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 ** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- hal doesn't install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206787 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 206787] Re: hal doesn't install
Same problem in hal - 0.5.11~rc2-1ubuntu5 still can't install / upgrade hal in ubuntu hardy 8.04 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo dpkg --configure -a Setting up hal (0.5.11~rc2-1ubuntu5) ... * Reloading system message bus config... [ OK ] * Starting Hardware abstraction layer haldinvoke-rc.d: initscript hal, action start failed. dpkg: error processing hal (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- hal doesn't install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206787 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210514] [NEW] Please update OpenOffice.org to 2.4
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org The final version of OpenOffice.org 2.4 has already been released http://www.openoffice.org Please update the OpenOffice.org from 2.4-rc2 to 2.4. Would an exception to freezes be granted? ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please update OpenOffice.org to 2.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210514 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209076] [NEW] automount fails to recognize CD/DVDs in hfsplus format
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kubuntu-kde4-desktop When I insert hfsplus-formatted DVDs created by OS X machines, the system fails to recognize the format. This is the dmesg output: [ 125.476535] UDF-fs: No VRS found [ 125.612017] ISO 9660 Extensions: Microsoft Joliet Level 3 [ 125.757437] ISO 9660 Extensions: RRIP_1991A [ 294.296538] end_request: I/O error, dev fd0, sector 0 [ 294.320515] end_request: I/O error, dev fd0, sector 0 [ 299.959764] UDF-fs: No VRS found [ 300.078609] ISOFS: Unable to identify CD-ROM format. [ 302.076811] UDF-fs: No VRS found [ 302.166111] ISOFS: Unable to identify CD-ROM format. [ 302.879629] UDF-fs: No VRS found [ 302.969721] ISOFS: Unable to identify CD-ROM format. [ 303.233826] UDF-fs: No VRS found [ 303.323173] ISOFS: Unable to identify CD-ROM format. [ 303.526472] UDF-fs: No VRS found [ 303.615558] ISOFS: Unable to identify CD-ROM format. [ 305.166401] UDF-fs: No VRS found [ 305.255735] ISOFS: Unable to identify CD-ROM format. However I can mount the DVD manually by issuing: sudo mount -t hfsplus /dev/hdb /mnt/hfsplus Wouldn't it be easy to make automount be able to recognize hfsplus- formatted tracks. This feature is important since OS X is another major system and Ubuntu should be able to pick up this format automatically ** Affects: kubuntu-kde4-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- automount fails to recognize CD/DVDs in hfsplus format https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209076 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205418] Re: many libraries and programs in KDE4 missing - should include the metapackage kde4 as dependency
You are right, Harald, the dependency bugs are in the individual KDE4 packages, not in kubuntu-kde4-meta. Moreover, the most recent konqueror-kde4 and systemsettings-kde4 have already fixed the problems by including the missing dependent core library packages. ** Changed in: kubuntu-kde4-meta (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- many libraries and programs in KDE4 missing - should include the metapackage kde4 as dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205418] [NEW] many libraries and programs in KDE4 missing - should include the metapackage kde4 as dependency
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kubuntu-kde4-desktop After installing Kubuntu-kde4 beta from livecd (and in fact on the livecd as well), I found that many programs are missing. Also in many menus, konqueror complains that many shared libraries are missing. and I fixed it by installing the basic kde4 packages included in the metapackages kde4 The liveCD at the current stage looks unusable and scares beginner away. To solve this problem, the metapackage kde4 should *definitely* be included as a dependency of kubuntu-kde4-desktop so that it will work out-of-the-box. ** Affects: kubuntu-kde4-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- many libraries and programs in KDE4 missing - should include the metapackage kde4 as dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202986] Re: Many KDE4 applications (such as Kwrite and Kate) does not show the select IM menu on right click, thus can't select and use scim
I have already installed scim-bridge-client-qt4 0.4.14-1ubuntu2 locale: en_NZ.UTF-8 I didn't do anything to activate chinese input support. The scim keyboard automatically appears at the right side of the bottom toolbar. For some applciations, such as konqueror, where select IM is available, I just pick SCIM. Here is the output of im-switch -l: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ im-switch -l Your input method setup under en_NZ locale as below. === No private /home/abc/.xinput.d/en_NZ or /home/abc/.xinput.d/all_ALL is defined. === The system wide default is pointed by /etc/alternatives/xinput-all_ALL . xinput-all_ALL - status is auto. link currently points to default skim - priority 0 default - priority 10 default-xim - priority 0 none - priority 0 Current `best' version is default. === The available input method configuration files are: /usr/bin/find: /home/abc/.xinput.d: No such file or directory default default-xim none scim scim-bridge scim-chewing scim-immodule scim-pinyin skim th-xim === [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ -- Many KDE4 applications (such as Kwrite and Kate) does not show the select IM menu on right click, thus can't select and use scim https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202986 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202986] [NEW] Many KDE4 applications (such as Kwrite and Kate) does not show the select IM menu on right click, thus can't select and use scim
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: scim-bridge After installing scim-bridge-qt 0.4.14-1ubuntu2 successfully, I am able to select the SCIM in the URL field of Konqueror 4. However in some Konqueror webpages and many KDE4.0.2 applications such as Kate and Kwrite, I can't choose select IM and select scim, and this bars me from inputting Chinese using scim. ** Affects: kdebase-kde4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: scim-bridge (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: kdebase-kde4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Many KDE4 applications (such as Kwrite and Kate) does not show the select IM menu on right click, thus can't select and use scim https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202986 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200331] many KDE applications (such as Kate) does not have the select IM function (was Re: scim-bridge does not launch x11 frontend, breaking CJK input in KDE4 (supposedly fixed in upstream 0.4
Thanks a lot for uploading the 0.4.14-1ubuntu2, it now works perfectly. In Konqueror 4.0.2, the right click button on some fields has a select IM menu which allow me to specify scim. However many other KDE4 apps such as Kate and Kwrite and even some fields in some webpages in Konqueror does not allow me to select IM and I can therefore cannot use Chinese input. So is this a bug in scim-bridge? If so, we need to fix it quickly before Kubuntu 8.04 release or CJK-input in KDE4 will remain unusable. -- scim-bridge does not launch x11 frontend, breaking CJK input in KDE4 (supposedly fixed in upstream 0.4.15 which you haven't packaged yet) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200331] [NEW] scim-bridge does not launch x11 frontend (fixed in upstream 0.4.15 which you haven't packaged yet)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: scim-bridge I've tried install scim-bridge-client-qt4_0.4.14 for my KDE4 (kubuntu- kde4 Hardy alpha 6) installation since scim-bridge-qt4 is currently the only mean to get CJK input in KDE4. However it doesn't launch the x11 frontend properly. This problem is fixed in the upstream scim- bridge-0.4.15 already. Please sync the debian/ubuntu package with the upstream source or KDE4 will have *no* proper CJK input mechanisms. ** Affects: scim-bridge (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- scim-bridge does not launch x11 frontend (fixed in upstream 0.4.15 which you haven't packaged yet) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200331] Re: scim-bridge does not launch x11 frontend, breaking CJK input in KDE4 (supposedly fixed in upstream 0.4.15 which you haven't packaged yet)
** Summary changed: - scim-bridge does not launch x11 frontend (fixed in upstream 0.4.15 which you haven't packaged yet) + scim-bridge does not launch x11 frontend, breaking CJK input in KDE4 (supposedly fixed in upstream 0.4.15 which you haven't packaged yet) -- scim-bridge does not launch x11 frontend, breaking CJK input in KDE4 (supposedly fixed in upstream 0.4.15 which you haven't packaged yet) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106949] Re: pbuilder-uml (0.161ubuntu2) depends on rootstrap(= 0.3.9-1) and user-mode-linux which are notr installable in feisty
rootstrap also does not exist in Ubuntu Hardy 5 ** Changed in: pbuilder (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- pbuilder-uml (0.161ubuntu2) depends on rootstrap(= 0.3.9-1) and user-mode-linux which are notr installable in feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106949] Re: pbuilder-uml (0.161ubuntu2) depends on rootstrap(= 0.3.9-1) and user-mode-linux which are notr installable in feisty
John, are there any way for you (or the rest of the pbuilder packaging team) to take over the maintenance of rootstrap? From recent rootstrap post, the maintainer seems not very interested in getting rootstrap included in ubuntu, yet without rootstrap, pbuilder-uml will not run. So getting rootstrap included is the first step in including pbuilder- uml -- pbuilder-uml (0.161ubuntu2) depends on rootstrap(= 0.3.9-1) and user-mode-linux which are notr installable in feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194509] Re: should include icedtea-java7-jre as an alternative dependency to allow inclusion and building into purely free distribution such as gobuntu
this is the resultant diff.gz file based on 2.3.1-1 ** Attachment added: jabref_2.3.1-1.diff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12157939/jabref_2.3.1-1.diff.gz -- should include icedtea-java7-jre as an alternative dependency to allow inclusion and building into purely free distribution such as gobuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194509 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194509] Re: should include icedtea-java7-jre as an alternative dependency to allow inclusion and building into purely free distribution such as gobuntu
** Attachment added: this diff file shows the difference beteen the orig 2.3.1-1 control file and the version I modified http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12157910/control.diff -- should include icedtea-java7-jre as an alternative dependency to allow inclusion and building into purely free distribution such as gobuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194509 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 194509] Re: should include icedtea-java7-jre as an alternative dependency to allow inclusion and building into purely free distribution such as gobuntu
Yes, icedtea *IS* the free JRE you talked about and yes, icedtea is *not* in non-free / multiverse. So for the time being (for hardy) would you please please please *ignore* what happens in debian and use my patch to set jabref to be built on icedtea-java7-jdk (I've already tested it and it works perfectly). Then we can move jabref *out* of the multiverse section and then quickly persuade the maintainers of the metapackage texlive and texlive-latex3 to include jabref into their dependencies (or at least recommended package) Otherwise *no-one* will know your package and use jabref. By the way, although icedtea is not yet in main, it is already in universe and it is therefore 100% free (in Debian/gobuntu standard) and in my opinion we really should switch to it *now*. Quoting gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: A few short thoughts from my point of view as the Debian maintainer of JabRef: 1) I'd love to see JabRef run with a free JRE and then being included in Debian and Ubuntu proper (and not in non-free/multiverse anymore). 2) For the time being I cannot change this on the Debian side, as long as icedtea is not in Debian. 3) If Ubuntu decides to make the switch earlier that's perfectly fine with me, I'm even glad because it provides the possibility for tests; it's just something that needs to happen by patching JabRef's version in Ubuntu, and I can't help there. Thanks for your initiative and your work! Cheers, gregor -- should include icedtea-java7-jre as an alternative dependency to allow inclusion and building into purely free distribution such as gobuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194509 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. ** Changed in: jabref (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- should include icedtea-java7-jre as an alternative dependency to allow inclusion and building into purely free distribution such as gobuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194509 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194509] [NEW] should include icedtea-java7-jre as an alternative dependency to allow inclusion and building into purely free distribution such as gobuntu
Public bug reported: At this stage, jabref depends on the non-free sun-java, which is in multiverse and prevents jabref to be built on a completely-free system, thus cannot be included by default in ubuntu, or at least the Linux latex metapackage. Now I have included icedtea-java7-jre as an alternative dependency. I have also included icedtea-java7-jdk as the build-dependency of jabref. I have read your email list and realized that there are some resistance in our group to change this situation, citing that this file is derived from Debian and debian does not have icedtea etc. However in my opinion, if we want jabref to be built and installed by default (which I think it should) and therefore be visible to everyone who uses ubuntu / kubuntu / xubuntu, we have to take the initiative and switch to the now- free icedtea environment. I have tested my patch and it both builds and runs perfectly on my xubuntu hardy alpha 4 laptop. ** Affects: jabref (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Emmet Hikory (persia) Status: In Progress -- should include icedtea-java7-jre as an alternative dependency to allow inclusion and building into purely free distribution such as gobuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194509 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 25966] Re: NEW PACKAGE: Printer drivers for Brother needed
Once the entire brother system is completed and verified to be working properly, are there any ways to move them to restricted before the release of Hardy? In this way it can be included in default installation and possibly mitigate a lot of headaches -- NEW PACKAGE: Printer drivers for Brother needed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25966 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194509] Re: should include icedtea-java7-jre as an alternative dependency to allow inclusion and building into purely free distribution such as gobuntu
I have already uploaded the updated package to REVU http://revu.tauware.de/ However it will not get reviewed in the immediate future due to the feature freeze. Are there any ways around this delay and get this package accepted in other ways so that it can be released in Hardy? ** Changed in: jabref (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- should include icedtea-java7-jre as an alternative dependency to allow inclusion and building into purely free distribution such as gobuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194509 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194509] Re: should include icedtea-java7-jre as an alternative dependency to allow inclusion and building into purely free distribution such as gobuntu
Sorry for pounding on you. I didn't realize that you are *not* the ubuntu maintainer. May I make the change for you? I can upload my changed package to REVU where it can be reviewed. Quoting gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:09:45 +1300, Kai-Cheung Leung wrote: Now the free icedtea is already included in ubuntu (current in the *free* universe), and therefore Ubuntu has already made the switch you talked about and it would definitely make jabref more popular in ubuntu if it doesn't depend on non-free JRE (such as sun-java6) anymore. Agreed. I know that icedtea is not yet in Debian, but why can't we just apply my changes to the two lines in the control file and upload the resultant package now? It already builds and runs perfectly in my box. What are the other obstacles? * icedtea is in Ubuntu. * icedtea is not yet in Debian. * I'm the maintainer of JabRef in Debian. * I'm not the maintainer of JabRef in Ubuntu (well, my name is still there because Ubuntu just takes the package from Debian) * I have not access to Ubuntu resources, cannot upload or change anything on the Ubuntu side. * Adding icedtea to the package in Debian is inappropriate. * Conclusion: someone has to make the changes to the package in Ubuntu. I'm sorry that I don't know enough about Ubuntu to be able to tell you the correct procedure or who's responsible; but Ubuntu _does_ change packages from Debian to make them fit better, so you just have to find something who _can_ do that. BTW: I think it's better to communicate via launchpad to make our thoughts available for everybody. Best regards, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `-Hailing frequencies open, Captain. -- should include icedtea-java7-jre as an alternative dependency to allow inclusion and building into purely free distribution such as gobuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194509 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194509] Re: should include icedtea-java7-jre as an alternative dependency to allow inclusion and building into purely free distribution such as gobuntu
** Changed in: jabref (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Leung, Kai-Cheung (kcleung-users) -- should include icedtea-java7-jre as an alternative dependency to allow inclusion and building into purely free distribution such as gobuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194509 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195558] Re: brl-cad 7.10.4
** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) = Leung, Kai-Cheung (kcleung-users) ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Confirmed -- brl-cad 7.10.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195558 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195558] [NEW] brl-cad 7.10.4
Public bug reported: The 3D CSG CAD software BRL-CAD http://brlcad.org/ is a powerful 3D CAD software and it is under the LGPL license. It should be packaged as soon as possible and included in the Ubuntu system. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-packaging -- brl-cad 7.10.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195558 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195558] Re: brl-cad 7.10.4
** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthias Klose (doko) -- brl-cad 7.10.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195558 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106949] Re: pbuilder-uml (0.161ubuntu2) depends on rootstrap(= 0.3.9-1) and user-mode-linux which are notr installable in feisty
If refusal to include rootstrap is a problem, then would it be possible for rootstrap to be included (or maintained) by the pbuilder team instead? Then the pbuilder team can do the packaging and uploading etc., which is necessary for the pbuilder-uml to work -- pbuilder-uml (0.161ubuntu2) depends on rootstrap(= 0.3.9-1) and user-mode-linux which are notr installable in feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191773] [NEW] cannot install - wrong dependency for ruby
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kazehakase When I try to install kazehakase_0.5.0-0ubuntu1, apt-get says: The following packages have unmet dependencies: kazehakase: Depends: ruby ( 1.9.0) but 4.1 is to be installed E: Broken packages In Ubuntu Hardy, the version of ruby is 4.1, not 1.8, although the package ruby itself depends on the package ruby1.8 Please fix this dependency, otherwise it is uninstallable in Hardy ** Affects: kazehakase (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- cannot install - wrong dependency for ruby https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 25966] Re: Printer drivers for Brother needed
Brother MFC-8820D Where can I get your test packages? Currently my laptop is installed with Xubuntu Hardy Alpha 4 -- Printer drivers for Brother needed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25966 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 163276] Re: [needs-packaging]multiget
the original author has already submitted the new package to REVU http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=multiget Please review this package as soon as possible so that it can enter Hardy. -- [needs-packaging]multiget https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/163276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
