[Bug 2073997] Re: netplan: routing autopkgtest fails on armhf

2024-07-25 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Also affects: netplan
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: netplan
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073997

Title:
  netplan: routing autopkgtest fails on armhf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2073997/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073997] Re: netplan: routing autopkgtest fails on armhf

2024-07-25 Thread Lukas Märdian
I thought we would have fixed that by having the 'vrf' module available
on the autopkgtest hosts, but it seems to be flaky.

Also, an upstream fix is pending:
https://github.com/canonical/netplan/commit/586694b6beb32e36be868dff0c88cc116bf2ed8b

** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)

** Tags removed: rls-oo-incoming

** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073997

Title:
  netplan: routing autopkgtest fails on armhf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2073997/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2074060] Re: Sync tftp-hpa 5.2+20240610-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-07-25 Thread Lukas Märdian
Does it correctly pick up the "-fno-omit-frame-pointer" from dpkg-
buildflags nowadays?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074060

Title:
  Sync tftp-hpa 5.2+20240610-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tftp-hpa/+bug/2074060/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2070807] Re: [MIR] highway

2024-07-23 Thread Lukas Märdian
Review for Source Package: highway

[Summary]
highway (libhwy) is a SIMD optimization library, implementing algorithms for
efficient, parallel operations in multiple domains, such as image processing,
compression, video analysis, sorting, cryptography... It is well maintained and
well tested. A primary  usecase is its usage in jpeg-xl (libjxl).

MIR team ACK

This does need a security review, so I'll assign ubuntu-security

List of specific binary packages to be promoted to main: libhwy1t64
Specific binary packages built, but NOT to be promoted to main: 

Notes:
#0 - This looks good overall on security topics, but it can be used for
 acceleration of cryptographic operations, so I rather like to have the
 security team skim through it.

Required TODOs: 

Recommended TODOs:
#1 - The package should get a team bug subscriber before being promoted
#2 - consider improving the .symbols file, 
"symbols-file-contains-debian-revision"
 => see "Packaging red flags" below
#3 - Please fix the autopkgtest on armhf (but I consider this normal
 proposed-migration, i.e. ongoing maintenance work by the owning team,
 therefore non-blocking for the MIR)


[Rationale, Duplication and Ownership]
- There is no other package in main providing the same functionality.
- A team is committed to own long term maintenance of this package.
- The rationale given in the report seems valid and useful for Ubuntu

[Dependencies]
OK:
- no other Dependencies to MIR due to this
  - SRCPKG checked with `check-mir`
  - all dependencies can be found in `seeded-in-ubuntu` (already in main)
  - none of the (potentially auto-generated) dependencies (Depends
and Recommends) that are present after build are not in main
- no -dev/-debug/-doc packages that need exclusion
- No dependencies in main that are only superficially tested requiring
  more tests now.

Problems: None

[Embedded sources and static linking]
OK:
- no embedded source present
- no static linking
- does not have unexpected Built-Using entries
- not a go package, no extra constraints to consider in that regard
- not a rust package, no extra constraints to consider in that regard

Problems:
- Some additional software in hwy/contrib/, but seems to be part of the upstream
  project, e.g. see: 
https://opensource.googleblog.com/2022/06/Vectorized%20and%20performance%20portable%20Quicksort.html

[Security]
OK:
- history of CVEs does not look concerning
- does not run a daemon as root
- does not use webkit1,2
- does not use lib*v8 directly
- does not parse data formats from an untrusted source.
- does not expose any external endpoint (port/socket/... or similar)
- does not process arbitrary web content
- does not use centralized online accounts
- does not integrate arbitrary javascript into the desktop
- does not deal with system authentication (eg, pam), etc)
- does not deal with security attestation (secure boot, tpm, signatures)
- makes appropriate use of established risk mitigation features

Problems:
- can deal with cryptography SIMD acceleration

[Common blockers]
OK:
- does not FTBFS currently
- does have a test suite that runs at build time
  - test suite fails will fail the build upon error.
- does have a non-trivial test suite that runs as autopkgtest
- This does not need special HW for build or test
- no new python2 dependency

Problems:
- autopkgtest failure on armhf

[Packaging red flags]
OK:
- Ubuntu does carry a delta, but it is reasonable and maintenance under
  control (Closes: #1076436)
- symbols tracking is in place.
- debian/watch is present and looks ok (if needed, e.g. non-native)
- Upstream update history is good
- Debian/Ubuntu update history is good
- the current release is packaged
- promoting this does not seem to cause issues for MOTUs that so far
  maintained the package
- no massive Lintian warnings
- debian/rules is rather clean
- It is not on the lto-disabled list

Problems:
- lintian warning about 
https://udd.debian.org/lintian-tag.cgi?tag=symbols-file-contains-debian-revision
  => consider improving the .symbols file, 
https://wiki.debian.org/UsingSymbolsFiles#C.2B-.2B-_libraries

[Upstream red flags]
OK:
- no Errors/warnings during the build
- no incautious use of malloc/sprintf (as far as we can check it)
- no use of sudo, gksu, pkexec, or LD_LIBRARY_PATH (usage is OK inside tests)
- no use of user nobody
- no use of setuid / setgid
- no important open bugs (crashers, etc) in Debian or Ubuntu
- no dependency on webkit, qtwebkit or libseed
- not part of the UI for extra checks
- no translation present, but none needed for this case (user visible)?

Problems: None

** Changed in: highway (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Lukas Märdian (slyon) => Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070807

Title:
  [MIR] highway

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs

[Bug 2073155] Re: Can't rename a wifi interface while also connecting it to a network

2024-07-22 Thread Lukas Märdian
This seems to be a historical limitation. As Netplan originally wrote an
instantiated netplan-wpa@.service unit, identified by the interface
name.

We might be able to work around this today, using the new custom
"netplan-wpa-*.service" units and some runtime detection of the
interface name, using helpers like "_netplan_enumerate_interfaces()".

Alternatively, we could at least accept the "match" stanza right now,
when a "set-name" is configured, so we will only every need to match a
single interface in wpa_supplicant.conf (using the "-i IFACE"
parameter). Would the latter be sufficient for your usecase?

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: netplan
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: netplan
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073155

Title:
  Can't rename a wifi interface while also connecting it to a network

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2073155/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2026194] Re: When clicking on some maximized or tiled windows, focus on roughly the lower quarter falls to the window behind

2024-07-22 Thread Lukas Gottschall
@Nibl Thank you for your assistance.
I can confirm that my bug is indeed 2064177.
I have updated the report with additional details @2064177.

The issue of "mouse clicks falling through to the window behind" has been 
resolved with version 46.2-1.
However, the workaround "pkill -HUP mutter-x11-fram" for fixing the resize bug 
still applies.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2026194

Title:
  When clicking on some maximized or tiled windows, focus on roughly the
  lower quarter falls to the window behind

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/2026194/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064177] Re: Window borders and shadows missing from GTK3 dialogs (if autologin is enabled and Xorg is used)

2024-07-22 Thread Lukas Gottschall
I compiled mutter-15 and am running mutter-x11-frames (version 15), but
I am also unable to resize Xwayland applications.

Restarting mutter-x11-frames with pkill resolves the issue temporarily.

There are no related outputs in journalctl:
journalctl -xe | grep mutter

I have configured a bash script as a Startup Application in Ubuntu.
If the sleep duration is less than 5 seconds, the bug persists:

#!/bin/bash
$(sleep 5 && pkill -HUP mutter-x11-fram) &

sudo apt list --installed | grep mutter

gir1.2-mutter-14/now 46.2-1ubuntu0.24.04.1 amd64  [Installiert,lokal]
libmutter-14-0/now 46.2-1ubuntu0.24.04.1 amd64  [Installiert,lokal]
mutter-common-bin/now 46.2-1ubuntu0.24.04.1 amd64  [Installiert,lokal]
mutter-common/now 46.2-1ubuntu0.24.04.1 all  [Installiert,lokal]


Ubuntu 24.04 LTS (Upgrade from 22.04 LTS)
Displaymanager: Wayland
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Nvidia drivers tested: 550.90.07 & 550.100
CUDA Version: 12.4 
Language: German
Autologin: Enabled

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064177

Title:
  Window borders and shadows missing from GTK3 dialogs (if autologin is
  enabled and Xorg is used)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gtk/+bug/2064177/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2071747] Re: netplan causes unresponsive system with certain nsswitch config

2024-07-22 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Tags added: foundations-todo

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071747

Title:
  netplan causes unresponsive system with certain nsswitch config

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2071747/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2026194] Re: When clicking on some maximized or tiled windows, focus on roughly the lower quarter falls to the window behind

2024-07-21 Thread Lukas Gottschall
Improve my bug report:

I still can't resize Xwayland apps like:
VS Code, Skype & Chrome

Restarting mutter-x11-frames with pkill resolves the issue temporarily.

There are no related outputs in journalctl:
journalctl -xe | grep mutter

I have configured a bash script as a Startup Application in Ubuntu.
If the sleep duration is less than 5 seconds, the bug persists:
 
#!/bin/bash
$(sleep 5 && pkill -HUP mutter-x11-fram) &


Installed Mutter packages:
sudo apt list --installed | grep mutter

gir1.2-mutter-14/now 46.2-1ubuntu0.24.04.1 amd64  [Installed, local]
libmutter-14-0/now 46.2-1ubuntu0.24.04.1 amd64  [Installed, local]
mutter-common-bin/now 46.2-1ubuntu0.24.04.1 amd64  [Installed, local]
mutter-common/now 46.2-1ubuntu0.24.04.1 all  [Installed, local]

System Information:
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS (upgraded from 22.04 LTS)
Display Manager: Wayland
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Tested NVIDIA drivers: 550.100
CUDA Version: 12.4

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2026194

Title:
  When clicking on some maximized or tiled windows, focus on roughly the
  lower quarter falls to the window behind

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/2026194/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2049924] Re: WireGuard broken on Noble ppc64el

2024-07-18 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: Confirmed

** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: Invalid

** Summary changed:

- WireGuard broken on Noble ppc64el
+ WireGuard broken on ppc64el Noble++

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049924

Title:
  WireGuard broken on ppc64el Noble++

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/2049924/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073369] Re: zsh completion not found

2024-07-18 Thread Lukas Rettler
Hi Nick

Thank you for helping out.

I hope the issue description is now ready for the SRU process.

** Description changed:

- on ubuntu/novel we get the following issue
+ [ Impact ] 
+  * Binary package hint: kubectx
+  * pkg version: 0.9.5-1ubuntu0.1
+  * ubuntu: novel
  
+  * the command completion in zsh is not working for kubectx and kubens
+  * Error msg:
  compinit:527: no such file or directory: 
/usr/share/zsh/vendor-completions/_kubectx.zsh
  compinit:527: no such file or directory: 
/usr/share/zsh/vendor-completions/_kubens.zsh
  
- a look into the debian/kubectx.links and the completion shows that the
- links are not correct
+ [ Test Plan ]
  
- 
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubectx/tree/debian/kubectx.links?h=ubuntu/noble
+  * install kubectx on ubuntu/nobel
+  * install zsh
+  * verify kubectx completion works
+  * follow the link /usr/share/kubectx/completion/_kubectx.zsh
+  * the link should point to the existing file
+ 
+ [ Where problems could occur ]
+ 
+  * I don't see any risks on this.
+ 
+ [ Other Info ]
+  
+  * looking into the debian/kubectx.links and the completion shows that the 
links are not correct
+* 
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubectx/tree/debian/kubectx.links?h=ubuntu/noble
  $ cat debian/kubectx.links
  usr/share/kubectx/completion/kubectx.bash 
usr/share/bash-completion/completions/kubectx.bash
  usr/share/kubectx/completion/kubectx.fish 
usr/share/fish/vendor_completions.d/kubectx.fish
  usr/share/kubectx/completion/kubectx.zsh 
usr/share/zsh/vendor-completions/_kubectx.zsh  <<< WRONG
  
  usr/share/kubectx/completion/kubens.bash 
usr/share/bash-completion/completions/kubens.bash
  usr/share/kubectx/completion/kubens.fish 
usr/share/fish/vendor_completions.d/kubens.fish
  usr/share/kubectx/completion/kubens.zsh 
usr/share/zsh/vendor-completions/_kubens.zsh  <<< WRONG
  
  $ ls -1 completion
  kubectx.bash
  kubectx.fish
  _kubectx.zsh
  kubens.bash
  kubens.fish
  _kubens.zsh
- 
- Patch is attached ;)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073369

Title:
  zsh completion not found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubectx/+bug/2073369/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073369] Re: zsh completion not found

2024-07-17 Thread Lukas Rettler
** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~lukasrettler/ubuntu/+source/kubectx/+git/kubectx/+merge/469568

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073369

Title:
  zsh completion not found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubectx/+bug/2073369/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2024258] Re: Performance degradation archiving DB with large numbers of FK related records

2024-07-17 Thread Lukas Märdian
rebased on top of the pending nova upload. re-uploaded as a combined fix
on focal in 21.2.4-0ubuntu2.10

I dropped the security debdiff from 21.2.4-0ubuntu2.8 as those are
already included in focal-updates.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024258

Title:
  Performance degradation archiving DB with large numbers of FK related
  records

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2024258/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073369] [NEW] zsh completion not found

2024-07-17 Thread Lukas Rettler
Public bug reported:

on ubuntu/novel we get the following issue

compinit:527: no such file or directory: 
/usr/share/zsh/vendor-completions/_kubectx.zsh
compinit:527: no such file or directory: 
/usr/share/zsh/vendor-completions/_kubens.zsh

a look into the debian/kubectx.links and the completion shows that the
links are not correct

https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubectx/tree/debian/kubectx.links?h=ubuntu/noble
$ cat debian/kubectx.links
usr/share/kubectx/completion/kubectx.bash 
usr/share/bash-completion/completions/kubectx.bash
usr/share/kubectx/completion/kubectx.fish 
usr/share/fish/vendor_completions.d/kubectx.fish
usr/share/kubectx/completion/kubectx.zsh 
usr/share/zsh/vendor-completions/_kubectx.zsh  <<< WRONG

usr/share/kubectx/completion/kubens.bash 
usr/share/bash-completion/completions/kubens.bash
usr/share/kubectx/completion/kubens.fish 
usr/share/fish/vendor_completions.d/kubens.fish
usr/share/kubectx/completion/kubens.zsh 
usr/share/zsh/vendor-completions/_kubens.zsh  <<< WRONG

$ ls -1 completion
kubectx.bash
kubectx.fish
_kubectx.zsh
kubens.bash
kubens.fish
_kubens.zsh

Patch is attached ;)

** Affects: kubectx (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Patch added: "patch"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073369/+attachment/5797978/+files/patch

** Description changed:

  on ubuntu/novel we get the following issue
  
  compinit:527: no such file or directory: 
/usr/share/zsh/vendor-completions/_kubectx.zsh
  compinit:527: no such file or directory: 
/usr/share/zsh/vendor-completions/_kubens.zsh
  
  a look into the debian/kubectx.links and the completion shows that the
  links are not correct
  
  
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubectx/tree/debian/kubectx.links?h=ubuntu/noble
- $ cat debian/kubectx.links 
+ $ cat debian/kubectx.links
  usr/share/kubectx/completion/kubectx.bash 
usr/share/bash-completion/completions/kubectx.bash
  usr/share/kubectx/completion/kubectx.fish 
usr/share/fish/vendor_completions.d/kubectx.fish
- usr/share/kubectx/completion/_kubectx.zsh 
usr/share/zsh/vendor-completions/kubectx.zsh  <<< WRONG
+ usr/share/kubectx/completion/kubectx.zsh 
usr/share/zsh/vendor-completions/_kubectx.zsh  <<< WRONG
  
  usr/share/kubectx/completion/kubens.bash 
usr/share/bash-completion/completions/kubens.bash
  usr/share/kubectx/completion/kubens.fish 
usr/share/fish/vendor_completions.d/kubens.fish
- usr/share/kubectx/completion/_kubens.zsh 
usr/share/zsh/vendor-completions/kubens.zsh  <<< WRONG
+ usr/share/kubectx/completion/kubens.zsh 
usr/share/zsh/vendor-completions/_kubens.zsh  <<< WRONG
  
- 
- $ ls -1 completion
+ $ ls -1 completion
  kubectx.bash
  kubectx.fish
  _kubectx.zsh
  kubens.bash
  kubens.fish
  _kubens.zsh
  
- 
  Patch is attached ;)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073369

Title:
  zsh completion not found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubectx/+bug/2073369/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2071747] Re: netplan causes unresponsive system with certain nsswitch config

2024-07-16 Thread Lukas Märdian
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1999178
   netplan generator causes deadlock during systemd daemon-reload

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071747

Title:
  netplan causes unresponsive system with certain nsswitch config

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2071747/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2071949] Re: [SRU] Missing frame pointers on Noble

2024-07-16 Thread Lukas Märdian
The issue is already fixed in Oracular, as of 1:1.31-3

https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-netfilter-team/pkg-
ipvsadm/-/commit/d066b671dc63fa8db402d0f8bc7d2ab3b655a30c

** Changed in: ipvsadm (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071949

Title:
  [SRU] Missing frame pointers on Noble

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipvsadm/+bug/2071949/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056102] Re: wiredtiger fails to build from source in noble due to the test coredump

2024-07-16 Thread Lukas Märdian
This code was dropped upstream:
https://github.com/wiredtiger/wiredtiger/pull/6026

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056102

Title:
  wiredtiger fails to build from source in noble due to the test
  coredump

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wiredtiger/+bug/2056102/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2024258] Re: Performance degradation archiving DB with large numbers of FK related records

2024-07-16 Thread Lukas Märdian
Same story with Focal. Both sponsored.

https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1_text=nova
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1_text=nova

I'm now unsubscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024258

Title:
  Performance degradation archiving DB with large numbers of FK related
  records

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2024258/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2024258] Re: Performance degradation archiving DB with large numbers of FK related records

2024-07-16 Thread Lukas Märdian
I can confirm the patch is included in Noble, via new upstream snapshot
in 3:27.1.0+git2023071215.f7ce4df5-0ubuntu1

Also, the backported patch matches the upstream logic of
https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/commit/697fa3c000696da559e52b664c04cbd8d261c037

Backported changes are documented in the patch header.

Builds fine and passes its build-time tests.

LGTM.

I've rebased on top of the most recent security fixes
(3:25.2.1-0ubuntu2.4) and fixed the version string to be
"3:25.2.1-0ubuntu2.5".

(Please see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_packaging
for future reference)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024258

Title:
  Performance degradation archiving DB with large numbers of FK related
  records

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2024258/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2038811] Re: NetworkManager crashes when updating wpa-eap connections

2024-07-15 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Tags removed: foundations-todo

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038811

Title:
  NetworkManager crashes when updating wpa-eap connections

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2038811/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2045096] Re: Error in network definition: Invalid MAC address 'random'

2024-07-10 Thread Lukas Märdian
Fixed in 1.0

** Changed in: netplan
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045096

Title:
  Error in network definition: Invalid MAC address 'random'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2045096/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063973] Re: network-online.target is reached before netplan-configured interfaces are online

2024-07-10 Thread Lukas Märdian
More improvements landing via
https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/482

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063973

Title:
  network-online.target is reached before netplan-configured interfaces
  are online

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2063973/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1718227] Re: replacement of ifupdown with netplan needs integration for /etc/network/if{up, down}.d scripts

2024-07-10 Thread Lukas Märdian
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076087

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1076087
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076087

** Changed in: firehol (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: firehol (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718227

Title:
  replacement of ifupdown with netplan needs integration for
  /etc/network/if{up,down}.d scripts

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aiccu/+bug/1718227/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1718227] Re: replacement of ifupdown with netplan needs integration for /etc/network/if{up, down}.d scripts

2024-07-10 Thread Lukas Märdian
The shorewall-init scripts transitioned into src:shorewall

** Also affects: firehol (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: ntpsec (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: shorewall (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: shorewall-init (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718227

Title:
  replacement of ifupdown with netplan needs integration for
  /etc/network/if{up,down}.d scripts

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aiccu/+bug/1718227/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1718227] Re: replacement of ifupdown with netplan needs integration for /etc/network/if{up, down}.d scripts

2024-07-10 Thread Lukas Märdian
For ethtool the if-up.d script is actual integration of hardware
settings from ifupdown, i.e. it is parsing ifupdown settings in order to
get them applied to the device via ethtool.

https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-
team/ethtool/-/blob/master/debian/ethtool.if-up?ref_type=heads

This is not relevant for Netplan/systemd-networkd as it can control such
ethtool settings itself (e.g. via .link files).

** Changed in: ethtool (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718227

Title:
  replacement of ifupdown with netplan needs integration for
  /etc/network/if{up,down}.d scripts

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aiccu/+bug/1718227/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1718227] Re: replacement of ifupdown with netplan needs integration for /etc/network/if{up, down}.d scripts

2024-07-10 Thread Lukas Märdian
For ethtool the if-up.d script is actual integration of hardware
settings from ifupdown, i.e. it is parsing ifupdown settings in order to
get them applied to the device via ethtool.

https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-
team/ethtool/-/blob/master/debian/ethtool.if-up?ref_type=heads

This is not relevant for Netplan/systemd-networkd as it can control such
ethtool settings itself (e.g. via .link files).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718227

Title:
  replacement of ifupdown with netplan needs integration for
  /etc/network/if{up,down}.d scripts

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aiccu/+bug/1718227/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1980663] Re: [MIR] false-positives, do not promote

2024-07-09 Thread Lukas Märdian
dpkg-dev (in main) Recommends "fakeroot". But fakeroot FTBFS on
armhf/oracular, therefore component-mismatches tries to pull in
"pseudo", which Provides: fakeroot.

** Also affects: pseudo (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: pseudo (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980663

Title:
  [MIR] false-positives, do not promote

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/esmtp/+bug/1980663/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2071396] Re: [MIR] libdisplay-info

2024-07-09 Thread Lukas Märdian
an/rules is rather clean
- It is not on the lto-disabled list

Problems:
- Ubuntu does carry a delta
  => try upstreaming the tests and debhelper changes
- the current release is not packaged: We have v0.2.0 as of mid-June
- Upstream update history is sporadic (only 3 releases so far, new project)
- Debian/Ubuntu update history is sporadic

[Upstream red flags]
OK:
- no Errors during the build
- no incautious use of malloc/sprintf (as far as we can check it)
- no use of sudo, gksu, pkexec, or LD_LIBRARY_PATH
- no use of user nobody
- no use of setuid / setgid
- no important open bugs (crashers, etc) in Debian or Ubuntu
- no dependency on webkit, qtwebkit or libseed
- not part of the UI for extra checks
- no translation present, but none needed for this case (user visible)?

Problems:
- Warnings during build:
../gtf.c:116:12: warning: ‘pixel_freq’ may be used uninitialized 
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
../gtf.c:114:40: warning: ‘h_blank_pixels’ may be used uninitialized 
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
../gtf.c:113:44: warning: ‘total_pixels’ may be used uninitialized 
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
../gtf.c:112:22: warning: ‘v_sync_bp’ may be used uninitialized 
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
../di-edid-decode/edid.c:500:51: warning: ‘hratio’ may be used uninitialized 
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
../di-edid-decode/edid.c:500:61: warning: ‘vratio’ may be used uninitialized 
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]

** Changed in: libdisplay-info (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Lukas Märdian (slyon) => Jeremy Bícha (jbicha)

** Changed in: libdisplay-info (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071396

Title:
  [MIR] libdisplay-info

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdisplay-info/+bug/2071396/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1664818] Re: Not possible to render pre-up, pre-down, post-up, or post-down snippets

2024-07-09 Thread Lukas Märdian
The website/FAQ was updated according to comment #11

https://netplan.io/faq#use-pre-up%2C-post-up%2C-etc.-hook-scripts

** Changed in: netplan
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1664818

Title:
  Not possible to render pre-up, pre-down, post-up, or post-down
  snippets

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1664818/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2070434] Re: Configurate a IPv6 only and IPv4 disabled networking by netplan

2024-07-08 Thread Lukas Märdian
I'm closing this ticket in favour of the support request (question)
linked from the comment above.

** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070434

Title:
  Configurate a IPv6 only and IPv4 disabled networking by netplan

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2070434/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2041727] Re: "netplan apply" produces ovsdb-server.service WARNING even when openvswitch-switch not installed

2024-07-08 Thread Lukas Märdian
Released as of Netplan v1.0

** Changed in: netplan
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Importance: Low
   Status: Triaged

** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2041727

Title:
  "netplan apply" produces ovsdb-server.service WARNING even when
  openvswitch-switch not installed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2041727/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2072486] Re: netplan-ovs-cleanup.service is marked world-inaccessible

2024-07-08 Thread Lukas Märdian
This warning doesn't seem to cause any harm.

But it should probably be document that nobody should put secret data
into .service units (e.g. through Netplan's OVS integration), because
that would still be world readable by calling "systemctl cat
UNIT_NAME.service".

We should update Netplan's threat model about that
https://netplan.readthedocs.io/en/stable/security/

** Tags added: docs documentation

** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Tags added: foundations-todo

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072486

Title:
  netplan-ovs-cleanup.service is marked world-inaccessible

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2072486/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2071747] Re: netplan causes unresponsive system with certain nsswitch config

2024-07-08 Thread Lukas Märdian
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1999178 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1999178

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1999178
   netplan generator causes deadlock during systemd daemon-reload

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071747

Title:
  netplan causes unresponsive system with certain nsswitch config

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2071747/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2070434] Re: Configurate a IPv6 only and IPv4 disabled networking by netplan

2024-07-08 Thread Lukas Märdian
Related to
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+question/816875

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070434

Title:
  Configurate a IPv6 only and IPv4 disabled networking by netplan

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2070434/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1999178] Re: netplan generator causes deadlock during systemd daemon-reload

2024-07-08 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1999178

Title:
  netplan generator causes deadlock during systemd daemon-reload

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1999178/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1987842] Re: wireguard: netdev file can leak private key

2024-07-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
fixed in 1.0.1 upstream

** Changed in: netplan
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987842

Title:
  wireguard: netdev file can leak private key

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1987842/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2020409] Re: can't move mellanox interface to switchdev when SR-IOV disable

2024-07-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
released as 1.0.1

** Changed in: netplan
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2020409

Title:
  can't move mellanox interface to switchdev when SR-IOV disable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2020409/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2055148] Re: NetworkManager connections with an explicit DoT (DNS over TLS) are not supported with Netplan

2024-07-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
fixed in https://github.com/canonical/netplan/releases/tag/1.0.1

** Changed in: netplan
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055148

Title:
  NetworkManager connections with an explicit DoT (DNS over TLS) are not
  supported with Netplan

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2055148/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066344] Re: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256

2024-07-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
upstream bug filed: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/33619

** Bug watch added: github.com/systemd/systemd/issues #33619
   https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/33619

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066344

Title:
  netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066344/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2071363] Re: netplan apply triggers udev add events for every network interface

2024-07-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
systemd-udevd does not apply ethtool changes, that are defined in a
.link file, on a CHANGE uevent anymore, as of systemd v265.

It still seems to apply those changes for ADD, BIND & MOVE udev actions,
though. Going with a MOVE action seems more senstible here, as that
should cover all the cases Netplan needs and avoid triggering the above
mentioned cloud-init rule, running on ADD uevents.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071363

Title:
  netplan apply triggers udev add events for every network interface

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2071363/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2071722] Re: Maintenance seems to have stalled

2024-07-02 Thread Lukas Märdian
I noticed that the build-system is pretty outdated while working on
this: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tftp-
hpa/5.2+20150808-1.4ubuntu3

Also, test coverage is bad.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071722

Title:
  Maintenance seems to have stalled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tftp-hpa/+bug/2071722/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2071722] [NEW] Maintenance seems to have stalled

2024-07-02 Thread Lukas Märdian
Public bug reported:

The last non-NMU for tftp-hpa in Debian was in 2015.

There seems to be some recent upstream activity, though (and a pending
5.3) release: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/tftp/tftp-
hpa.git/log/

As the owning team in Ubuntu "main", please consider helping to better
maintain this package or replacing it in main my something else.

Note This bug was raised to the MIR discussions around:
https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues/55

** Affects: tftp-hpa (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071722

Title:
  Maintenance seems to have stalled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tftp-hpa/+bug/2071722/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2071363] Re: netplan apply triggers udev add events for every network interface

2024-06-27 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Tags added: foundations-todo

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071363

Title:
  netplan apply triggers udev add events for every network interface

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2071363/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2071363] Re: netplan apply triggers udev add events for every network interface

2024-06-27 Thread Lukas Märdian
Might be related to https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/479 (parts
of it landed in the oracular package already)

** Tags added: fr-8086

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071363

Title:
  netplan apply triggers udev add events for every network interface

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2071363/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2038648] Re: package sosreport 4.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed sosreport package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-06-25 Thread Lukas Märdian
After working my way through bug #2054395, I'm also sponsoring this,
even tough Bionic is end-of-standard-support already. I'll leave it to
the SRU team to accept or reject it.

The change generally LGTM. I forward-ported the debdiff from comment #27
on top of the most recent 4.5.3ubuntu0.18.04.1 version in Bionic,
resolving conflicts in d/changelog.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038648

Title:
  package sosreport 4.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed sosreport package post-installation script subprocess
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2038648/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054395] Re: [sru] sos upstream 4.7.2

2024-06-25 Thread Lukas Märdian
After some brief discussion on IRC today, we agreed to move
python3-boto3 from Suggests to Recommends (instead of Depends), as it's
considered to be an optional dependency.

Remarks from comments #43 and #50 seem to be addressed (for oracular), I
can confirm that the changes match the upstream 4.7.2 sources.

Uploading to oracular.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054395

Title:
  [sru] sos upstream 4.7.2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-pro/+bug/2054395/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2069308] Re: MIR xdg-terminal-exec

2024-06-25 Thread Lukas Märdian
tion present, but none needed for this case (user visible)?

Problems: None

** Changed in: xdg-terminal-exec (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: xdg-terminal-exec (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Lukas Märdian (slyon) => Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069308

Title:
  MIR xdg-terminal-exec

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-terminal-exec/+bug/2069308/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066700] Re: systemd-networkd is inactive by default since ubuntu 23.10?

2024-06-24 Thread Lukas Märdian
To differentiate an Ubuntu server system from an Ubuntu desktop system
you should check with seeds/meta-package you have installed.

e.g.:
$ dpkg -l | grep "ubuntu-desktop-minimal" # or "ubuntu-server-minimal"

This is generated through the Ubuntu seeds and could be the
authoritative way to check the type of system you're using.


PS: I'm closing this bug as "Invalid", as stated in comment #2 networkd is only 
enabled on Ubuntu server systems, NetworkManager only on Ubuntu desktop systems 
(by default), so I guess we're seeing the expeted behavior here.

Please comment & re-open if you feel otherwise.

** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066700

Title:
  systemd-networkd is inactive by default since ubuntu 23.10?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066700/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066700] Re: systemd-networkd is inactive by default since ubuntu 23.10?

2024-06-24 Thread Lukas Märdian
More recently the Desktop enablement configuration moved to
/usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066700

Title:
  systemd-networkd is inactive by default since ubuntu 23.10?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066700/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2069495] Re: Netplan generator causes systemd, apt and unlock hangs on 24.04

2024-06-24 Thread Lukas Märdian
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1999178 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1999178

Thanks for reporting this issue! I'm marking this as a duplicate of bug
#1999178

Let's try to keep the discussion in one place.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1999178
   netplan generator causes deadlock during systemd daemon-reload

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069495

Title:
  Netplan generator causes systemd, apt and unlock hangs on 24.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2069495/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2069308] Re: MIR xdg-terminal-exec

2024-06-18 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: xdg-terminal-exec (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069308

Title:
  MIR xdg-terminal-exec

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-terminal-exec/+bug/2069308/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066344] Re: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256

2024-06-18 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066344

Title:
  netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066344/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066272] Re: [MIR] libpanel

2024-06-18 Thread Lukas Märdian
- no important open bugs (crashers, etc) in Debian or Ubuntu
- no dependency on webkit, qtwebkit or libseed
- part of the UI, no .desktop file needed (it's an UI library)
- translation present

Problems: None

** Changed in: libpanel (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Lukas Märdian (slyon) => Jeremy Bícha (jbicha)

** Changed in: libpanel (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066272

Title:
  [MIR] libpanel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpanel/+bug/2066272/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066344] Re: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256

2024-06-06 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066344

Title:
  netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066344/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066344] Re: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256

2024-06-06 Thread Lukas Märdian
See: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/netplan.io/-/merge_requests/15

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066344

Title:
  netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066344/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066344] Re: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256

2024-06-06 Thread Lukas Märdian
It's a change in behaviour in systemd-udevd AFAIU (at this point), which
Netplan probably should adapt to. But I'm not yet sure _how_ it needs to
adapt.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066344

Title:
  netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066344/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1987842] Re: wireguard: netdev file can leak private key

2024-06-05 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987842

Title:
  wireguard: netdev file can leak private key

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1987842/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066272] Re: [MIR] libpanel

2024-06-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
At first glance, this looks like it does not need security-review. I'll
do a full MIR review later.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066272

Title:
  [MIR] libpanel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpanel/+bug/2066272/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063260] Re: ovn-ic: systemd service does not use ovn_ctl_opts

2024-06-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
Sponsored a "maysync1" upload that will be replaced by the next Debian
upload: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovn/24.03.2-2maysync1

** Changed in: ovn (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063260

Title:
  ovn-ic: systemd service does not use ovn_ctl_opts

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovn/+bug/2063260/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063260] Re: ovn-ic: systemd service does not use ovn_ctl_opts

2024-06-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
Will be landing in Debian via https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-
team/third-party/ovn/-/commit/d082e0ee08e0672d544b57110846b92f413f77c9

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063260

Title:
  ovn-ic: systemd service does not use ovn_ctl_opts

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovn/+bug/2063260/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2061637] Re: [SRU] xx-svn-review crashed with ModuleNotFoundError

2024-06-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
I can see all debdiffs landed in the unapproved queues. Marking the bug
status accordingly and unsubscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors.

** Changed in: xxdiff (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

** Changed in: xxdiff (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

** Changed in: xxdiff (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061637

Title:
  [SRU] xx-svn-review crashed with ModuleNotFoundError

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xxdiff/+bug/2061637/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2061668] Re: [SRU] evtx_filter_records.py crashed with ModuleNotFoundError in Noble

2024-06-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
This doesn't seem to introduce a component-mismatch, so adding the new
runtime dependeny should be fine IMO.

LGTM. Sponsored the SRU for Noble, Mantic, Jammy, Focal

** Changed in: python-evtx (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: python-evtx (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: python-evtx (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: python-evtx (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061668

Title:
  [SRU] evtx_filter_records.py crashed with ModuleNotFoundError in Noble

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-evtx/+bug/2061668/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1957168] Re: [SRU] fwbuilder crashes in Noble when trying to create almost any type of new object

2024-06-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
I'll unsubscribe ~ubuntu-sponsors for now. Feel free to re-subscribe
once a debdiff for Focal is prepared ad well.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957168

Title:
  [SRU] fwbuilder crashes in Noble when trying to create almost any type
  of new object

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwbuilder/+bug/1957168/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1957168] Re: [SRU] fwbuilder crashes in Noble when trying to create almost any type of new object

2024-06-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
Sponsored Mantic, too: 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/mantic/+queue?queue_state=1_text=fwbuilder
And Jammy, as well 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1_text=fwbuilder

** Changed in: fwbuilder (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

** Changed in: fwbuilder (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957168

Title:
  [SRU] fwbuilder crashes in Noble when trying to create almost any type
  of new object

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwbuilder/+bug/1957168/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1957168] Re: [SRU] fwbuilder crashes in Noble when trying to create almost any type of new object

2024-06-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
Thanks, the Noble patch matches upstream and looks good to me.

Sponsored, with a modified version string, initially. But you were
actually right, as we have the same revision in multiple Ubuntu series,
so I re-uploaded with your proposed version string.

https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+queue?queue_state=1_text=fwbuilder

** Changed in: fwbuilder (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957168

Title:
  [SRU] fwbuilder crashes in Noble when trying to create almost any type
  of new object

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwbuilder/+bug/1957168/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058914] Re: [FFe] python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7

2024-06-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
The work landed in Oracular.
I unsubscribed ~ubuntu-sponsors, as the SRU work got orphaned according to 
comment #11.

Please re-subscribe ~ubuntu-sponsors should you need SRU-sponsorship in
the future.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058914

Title:
  [FFe] python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8  7

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/+bug/2058914/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067544] Re: [BPO] package-notes/13 from oracular

2024-06-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: package-notes (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067544

Title:
  [BPO] package-notes/13 from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/package-notes/+bug/2067544/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067544] Re: [BPO] package-notes/13 from oracular

2024-06-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
Thanks, lgtm. Sponsored.

I guess we now need somebody from the [backporters] team to review &
approve the upload.

[backporters] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-backporters/+members

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067544

Title:
  [BPO] package-notes/13 from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/package-notes/+bug/2067544/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067373] Re: [MIR] provd

2024-06-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
entralized online accounts (Ubuntu Pro)
- does deal with system authentication (gdm setup, active directory)
- does deal with cryptography (password hashes)
- this high risk application could make more use of mitigation features
  (dropping permissions, using temporary environments, restricted users/groups,
  seccomp, systemd isolation features, apparmor, ...)

[Common blockers]
OK:
- does not FTBFS currently
- does have a test suite that runs at build time
  - test suite fails will fail the build upon error.
- does have a non-trivial test suite that runs as autopkgtest
- This does not need special HW for build or test
- no new python2 dependency
- Go package, but using dh-golang

Problems:
- running "go test" unit tests as autopkgtest. Maybe some integration tests
  using the "ubuntu-desktop-init" snap would be helpful, too.

[Packaging red flags]
OK:
- Ubuntu does not carry a delta (Ubuntu native package)
- symbols tracking not applicable for this kind of code.
- debian/watch is not present but also not needed (e.g. native)
- Upstream update history is sporadic – its a native package after all
- promoting this does not seem to cause issues for MOTUs that so far
  maintained the package
- no massive Lintian warnings
- debian/rules is rather clean
- It is not on the lto-disabled list

Problems:
- Debian/Ubuntu update history is sporadic (not a lot of history, being a new 
package)
- the current release is not packaged, upstream (GitHub) contains 0.1.4, should 
be an easy upgrade from 0.1.2
- lintian warnings:
I: provd source: missing-built-using-field-for-golang-package (in section for 
provd) [debian/control:18]
I: provd source: unused-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-3 
[debian/copyright:353]
Nitpicks:
I: provd: spelling-error-in-binary acccessed accessed [usr/libexec/provd]
I: provd: spelling-error-in-binary compatibile compatible [usr/libexec/provd]
I: provd: spelling-error-in-binary divison division [usr/libexec/provd]
I: provd: spelling-error-in-binary standar standard [usr/libexec/provd]
I: provd: spelling-error-in-binary standart standard [usr/libexec/provd]

[Upstream red flags]
OK:
- no Errors during the build
- no incautious use of malloc/sprintf (the language has no direct MM)
  => some "unsafe" code in internal/services/user/password_hash.go
- no use of user nobody
- no important open bugs (crashers, etc) in Debian or Ubuntu
- no dependency on webkit, qtwebkit or libseed
- not part of the UI for extra checks
- no translation present, but none needed for this case

Problems:
- use of sudo, gksu, pkexec, or LD_LIBRARY_PATH
  => sprovd/sprovd.go wraps "sudo pro attach"

- use of setuid / setgid in /usr/libexec/sprovd
  => prefer systemd to set those flags, or give rationale why it's done another 
way

- Warnings during the build:
go: warning: "./..." matched no packages
?   github.com/canonical/ubuntu-desktop-provision/provd [no test files]

# github.com/linuxdeepin/go-gir/gobject-2.0
fix_gobject.c: In function ‘_g_type_param_value_array’:
fix_gobject.c:74:13: warning: Deprecated pre-processor symbol
   74 | GType _g_type_param_value_array()   { return 
G_TYPE_PARAM_VALUE_ARRAY; }
  | ^~~

** Changed in: provd (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Lukas Märdian (slyon) => Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067373

Title:
  [MIR] provd

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/provd/+bug/2067373/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067373] Re: [MIR] provd

2024-06-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
There are several MIR TODOs for the desktop team in comment #1, but I'm
already assigning it to the security team, as I think both topics can be
worked on in parallel.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067373

Title:
  [MIR] provd

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/provd/+bug/2067373/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066344] Re: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256

2024-05-29 Thread Lukas Märdian
See: https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/479

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066344

Title:
  netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066344/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066344] Re: netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256

2024-05-22 Thread Lukas Märdian
Having a closer look, this sounds like a real regression in systemd-udev.
Please double-check that "ReceiveChecksumOffload=" (inside a .link) file
is working properly with systemd v256

Netplan's tests seem to work otherwise, except when the new systemd is pulled 
in.
It fails for Netplan's sd-networkd & NetworkManager backends, because both make 
use of
systemd-udev .link files. There's no special handling for NetworkManager here.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066344

Title:
  netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066344/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066344] [NEW] netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256

2024-05-22 Thread Lukas Märdian
Public bug reported:

Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/1071220:

[,
]

** Affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: netplan.io (Debian)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: update-excuse

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1071220
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071220

** Changed in: netplan.io (Debian)
 Remote watch: None => Debian Bug tracker #1071220

** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Tags added: update-excuse

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066344

Title:
  netplan.io: autopkgtest fails with systemd 256

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2066344/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059287] Re: Test failures in noble-proposed (all-proposed)

2024-05-15 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Tags added: update-excuse

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059287

Title:
  Test failures in noble-proposed (all-proposed)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/request-tracker4/+bug/2059287/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059287] Re: Test failures in noble-proposed (all-proposed)

2024-05-15 Thread Lukas Märdian
Actually, there is a proper upstream fix here:
https://github.com/bestpractical/rt/commit/8b574915649a424370aff12282360bed08623c47
(part of v5.0.6)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059287

Title:
  Test failures in noble-proposed (all-proposed)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/request-tracker4/+bug/2059287/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059287] Re: Test failures in noble-proposed (all-proposed)

2024-05-15 Thread Lukas Märdian
The same issue happens with gnupg2 2.4 from Debian experimental, see
https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/request-tracker5/unstable/amd64/

I think the tests need to be adoped to account for the additional
"Failure during GnuPG gpg-exit: Failed to gpg-exit" output from GPG 2.4.

** Changed in: request-tracker5 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: request-tracker5 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059287

Title:
  Test failures in noble-proposed (all-proposed)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/request-tracker4/+bug/2059287/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058743] Re: systemd local DNS tests failing with timeout

2024-05-08 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Tags removed: rls-jj-incoming

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058743

Title:
  systemd local DNS tests failing with timeout

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/2058743/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2039083] Re: "optional: true" flag introduces problem it's meant to fix in certain circumstances

2024-05-08 Thread Lukas Märdian
Yes, it's supposed to be fixed via bug #2060311

Netplan now generates a systemd-networkd-wait-
online.service.d/10-netplan.conf override config to explicitly list any
configured Network interface, thus making the system wait on all of
them.

If an interface is marked "optional: true" it will not be listed and the
system will not block on it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039083

Title:
  "optional: true" flag introduces problem it's meant to fix in certain
  circumstances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2039083/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1862481] Re: Cannot set accept-ra to 2, it keeps reseting it to 0

2024-05-06 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Tags added: docs documentation

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862481

Title:
  Cannot set accept-ra to 2, it keeps reseting it to 0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1862481/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064877] Re: Resume from Standby vmnet1/8 connected instead of Wired LAN

2024-05-06 Thread Lukas Märdian
Would you mind sharing your Netplan configuration from
/etc/netplan/*.yaml ? Feel free to redact sensitive information that
could be contained.

This sounds like it could be related to the NetworkManager-Netplan
integration getting confused about the ordering of the connection
profiles.

** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: network-manager (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Tags added: foundations-todo

** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064877

Title:
  Resume from Standby vmnet1/8 connected instead of Wired LAN

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2064877/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064093] Re: if-up.d files do not have effect on ubuntu 24.04 LTS

2024-04-29 Thread Lukas Märdian
You filed the bug report against NetworkManager. But the "up.d" hook is
called differently in NM, see https://netplan.io/faq#use-pre-up-post-up-
etc-hook-scripts

If this is about /etc/network/if-up.d then it should be targeted towards
the "ifupdown" package. I'm adding a corresponding bug task.

** Also affects: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064093

Title:
  if-up.d files do not have effect on ubuntu 24.04 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/2064093/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063331] Re: systemd-networkd-wait-online.service runs into a timeout during boot

2024-04-29 Thread Lukas Märdian
This is to be fixed in the installer, not Netplan.

** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063331

Title:
  systemd-networkd-wait-online.service runs into a timeout during boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2063331/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063973] Re: network-online.target is reached before netplan-configured interfaces are online

2024-04-29 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Tags added: foundations-todo network-online-ordering

** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063973

Title:
  network-online.target is reached before netplan-configured interfaces
  are online

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2063973/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063443] Re: krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false

2024-04-26 Thread Lukas Grässlin
Let me mark it as invalid as I also already opened a bug ticket at the
debian bug tracker as we have the same results there as well. Probably
doesn't make sense to double track bugtickets then in this case, thanks!

** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063443

Title:
  krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/2063443/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063443] Re: krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false

2024-04-25 Thread Lukas Grässlin
** Description changed:

  We have a scenario where we need to disable reverse lookups for
  canonicalization in Kerberos as the customer's PTR records are not
  consistent and lead to wrongly requested SPNs otherwise (see
  https://web.mit.edu/kerberos/krb5-latest/doc/admin/princ_dns.html#reverse-
  dns-mismatches)
  
- Therfore we have set "rdns = false" in /etc/krb5.conf as follows:
+ Therefore we have set "rdns = false" in /etc/krb5.conf as follows:
  
  # cat /etc/krb5.conf
  
  [libdefaults]
  udp_preference_limit = 0
  default_realm = EMEA.EXAMPLE.COM
  rdns = false
  
  However this setting seems to get ignored for some reason. I tried to do
- some debugging and comparison as we don't have the same issue for
+ some debugging and comparisons as we don't have the same issue for
  example on a RHEL8 (using krb5-libs-1.18.2-26.el8_9.x86_64) machine.
  
  On those RHEL machines the setting seems to do exactly what it's
  supposed to, in fact I can reproduce the issue we have on Ubuntu on RHEL
  as well if I remove the "rdns = false" line from the configuration.
  
  Kerberos authentication (in our test we use a simple ldapsearch with
  GSSAPI auth) fails then randomly as it sometimes gets a wrong SPN due to
  using a wrong PTR for canonicalization.
  
  On our Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (with libkrb5-3:amd64 1.19.2-2ubuntu0.3) however
- the setting does not seem to have any effect.
+ the setting does not seem to have any effect. I then re-did the same
+ test with Debian oldstable, stable and sid as well, all with the exact
+ same result.
  
- I actually run a tcpdump while trying to do a Kerberos auth with the
+ I actually ran a tcpdump while trying to do a Kerberos auth with the
  "rdns = false" setting in place and I can still see the reverse lookup
- being performed in the tcpdump (anonymized some things so don't get
+ being performed in the tcpdump (I anonymized some things so don't get
  confused about the IPs):
  
  10:47:58.382684 IP 1.2.3.4.55001 > 123.123.123.123.53: 12962+ [1au] A? 
domaincontroller01.emea.example.com. (55)
  10:47:58.382809 IP 1.2.3.4.37669 > 123.123.123.123.53: 38376+ [1au] ? 
domaincontroller01.emea.example.com. (55)
  10:47:58.412041 IP 123.123.123.123.53 > 1.2.3.4.37669: 38376* 0/1/1 (143)
- 10:47:58.412564 IP 123.123.123.123.53 > 1.2.3.4.55001: 12962* 1/9/10 A 
10.145.214.16 (602)
- 10:47:58.442326 IP 1.2.3.4.51232 > 123.123.123.123.53: 16995+ [1au] PTR? 
16.214.145.10.in-addr.arpa. (55)
+ 10:47:58.412564 IP 123.123.123.123.53 > 1.2.3.4.55001: 12962* 1/9/10 A 
5.6.7.8 (602)
+ 10:47:58.442326 IP 1.2.3.4.51232 > 123.123.123.123.53: 16995+ [1au] PTR? 
8.7.6.5.in-addr.arpa. (55)
  10:47:58.471669 IP 123.123.123.123.53 > 1.2.3.4.51232: 16995 2/2/3 PTR 
emea.example.com., PTR DOMAINCONTROLLER.emea.example.com. (238)
  
  As you see there it does the PTR lookup and retrieves two entries
  (emea.example.com and DOMAINCONTROLLER.emea.example.com)
  
  If I do the same test on the RHEL8 machine I can actually see in tcpdump
  that with the "rdns = false" setting the reverse lookup is correctly NOT
  performed.
  
  I am a bit puzzled why this is the case as I have not seen other people
- reporting it even though in a quick test I was also able to get the same
- wrong result with Debian stable.
+ reporting it (maybe everyone else has their reverse DNS under control
+ ;)) even though as said in a quick test I was also able to get the same
+ wrong result with multiple Debian releases and the mentioned Ubuntu
+ release.
  
  The only thing I've found in the past where this exact issue was
- mentioned as many years ago:
+ mentioned was many years ago:
  https://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/krb5-bugs/2011-June/008684.html
  
  However this has been fixed ever since. I have not done yet any actual
  code comparison with the version that RHEL uses, also I'm not sure if
- the issue is even there or (as in that recent bug linked above) might
- come from some glibc issue?
+ the issue actually really exists in libkrb5 itself or if it might be a
+ sideeffect from some other lib.
  
  How to reproduce on your own:
  Even if you don't have erroneous reverse DNS entries you could still try to 
reproduce it by just looking at tcpdump and checking if you see reverse lookups 
performed with and without the option.
- 
- I attached the apport for libkrb5 but let me know if something else is
- needed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063443

Title:
  krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/2063443/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063443] Re: krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false

2024-04-25 Thread Lukas Grässlin
** No longer affects: kerberos

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063443

Title:
  krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/2063443/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063443] Re: krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false

2024-04-25 Thread Lukas Grässlin
** Description changed:

  We have a scenario where we need to disable reverse lookups for
  canonicalization in Kerberos as the customer's PTR records are not
- consistent and lead to wrongly requested SPNs otherwise.
+ consistent and lead to wrongly requested SPNs otherwise (see
+ https://web.mit.edu/kerberos/krb5-latest/doc/admin/princ_dns.html#reverse-
+ dns-mismatches)
  
  Therfore we have set "rdns = false" in /etc/krb5.conf as follows:
  
  # cat /etc/krb5.conf
  
  [libdefaults]
  udp_preference_limit = 0
  default_realm = EMEA.EXAMPLE.COM
  rdns = false
  
  However this setting seems to get ignored for some reason. I tried to do
  some debugging and comparison as we don't have the same issue for
  example on a RHEL8 (using krb5-libs-1.18.2-26.el8_9.x86_64) machine.
  
  On those RHEL machines the setting seems to do exactly what it's
  supposed to, in fact I can reproduce the issue we have on Ubuntu on RHEL
  as well if I remove the "rdns = false" line from the configuration.
  
  Kerberos authentication (in our test we use a simple ldapsearch with
  GSSAPI auth) fails then randomly as it sometimes gets a wrong SPN due to
  using a wrong PTR for canonicalization.
  
  On our Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (with libkrb5-3:amd64 1.19.2-2ubuntu0.3) however
  the setting does not seem to have any effect.
  
  I actually run a tcpdump while trying to do a Kerberos auth with the
  "rdns = false" setting in place and I can still see the reverse lookup
  being performed in the tcpdump (anonymized some things so don't get
  confused about the IPs):
  
  10:47:58.382684 IP 1.2.3.4.55001 > 123.123.123.123.53: 12962+ [1au] A? 
domaincontroller01.emea.example.com. (55)
  10:47:58.382809 IP 1.2.3.4.37669 > 123.123.123.123.53: 38376+ [1au] ? 
domaincontroller01.emea.example.com. (55)
  10:47:58.412041 IP 123.123.123.123.53 > 1.2.3.4.37669: 38376* 0/1/1 (143)
  10:47:58.412564 IP 123.123.123.123.53 > 1.2.3.4.55001: 12962* 1/9/10 A 
10.145.214.16 (602)
  10:47:58.442326 IP 1.2.3.4.51232 > 123.123.123.123.53: 16995+ [1au] PTR? 
16.214.145.10.in-addr.arpa. (55)
  10:47:58.471669 IP 123.123.123.123.53 > 1.2.3.4.51232: 16995 2/2/3 PTR 
emea.example.com., PTR DOMAINCONTROLLER.emea.example.com. (238)
  
- 
- As you see there it does the PTR lookup and retrieves two entries 
(emea.example.com and DOMAINCONTROLLER.emea.example.com)
+ As you see there it does the PTR lookup and retrieves two entries
+ (emea.example.com and DOMAINCONTROLLER.emea.example.com)
  
  If I do the same test on the RHEL8 machine I can actually see in tcpdump
  that with the "rdns = false" setting the reverse lookup is correctly NOT
  performed.
  
  I am a bit puzzled why this is the case as I have not seen other people
  reporting it even though in a quick test I was also able to get the same
  wrong result with Debian stable.
  
  The only thing I've found in the past where this exact issue was
  mentioned as many years ago:
  https://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/krb5-bugs/2011-June/008684.html
  
  However this has been fixed ever since. I have not done yet any actual
  code comparison with the version that RHEL uses, also I'm not sure if
  the issue is even there or (as in that recent bug linked above) might
  come from some glibc issue?
  
  How to reproduce on your own:
  Even if you don't have erroneous reverse DNS entries you could still try to 
reproduce it by just looking at tcpdump and checking if you see reverse lookups 
performed with and without the option.
  
  I attached the apport for libkrb5 but let me know if something else is
  needed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063443

Title:
  krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kerberos/+bug/2063443/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063443] Re: krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false

2024-04-25 Thread Lukas Grässlin
** Project changed: launchpad => kerberos

** Also affects: krb5 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063443

Title:
  krb5.conf seems to ignore rdns = false

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kerberos/+bug/2063443/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060311] Re: Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd-wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image

2024-04-24 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: netplan
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311

Title:
  Setting "optional: true" to overcome he timeout "Job systemd-networkd-
  wait-online" does no longer work with latest noble image

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2060311/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063204] Re: Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml

2024-04-23 Thread Lukas Märdian
Arguably, the "/usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml" should be
shipped by the network-manager package, instead of ubuntu-settings...

The community flavors using Calamares, might be covered by this PR:
https://github.com/calamares/calamares/pull/2284

** Also affects: ubuntu-settings (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: network-manager (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063204

Title:
  Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in
  addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2063204/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056331] Re: [SRU] fix suspend/resume when there are no input devices

2024-04-23 Thread Lukas Märdian
Thanks! The rebased patches do still apply cleanly and build fine.

- I fixed the Mantic debdiff SRU version "2:21.1.7-3ubuntu3" -> 
"2:21.1.7-3ubuntu2.10"
- I fixed the Jammy debdiff d/changelog to reference this bug report

Re-sponsoring for Mantic & Jammy and unsubcribing ~ubuntu-sponsors.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056331

Title:
  [SRU] fix suspend/resume when there are no input devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/2056331/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2036467] Re: Resizing cloud-images occasionally fails due to superblock checksum mismatch in resize2fs

2024-04-23 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Also affects: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Critical
 Assignee: Matthew Ruffell (mruffell)
   Status: In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036467

Title:
  Resizing cloud-images occasionally fails due to superblock checksum
  mismatch in resize2fs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2036467/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063204] Re: Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml

2024-04-23 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Description changed:

  The /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml, generated by livecd-rootfs, 
shouldn't exist any more IIUC.
  That functionality was moved into src:ubuntu-settings and shipped as 
/usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml
  
  This is according to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-
  settings/23.10.1
  
  The duplicated "renderer: NetworkManager" doesn't cause any harm in the
  live-session, AFAICT.
+ 
+ The /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml file is carried over into
+ the installed system (target).
+ 
+ After "apt install --reinstall ubuntu-settings" the file gets deleted.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063204

Title:
  Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in
  addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2063204/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063204] Re: Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml

2024-04-23 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Tags added: iso-testing

** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063204

Title:
  Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in
  addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2063204/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063204] [NEW] Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml

2024-04-23 Thread Lukas Märdian
Public bug reported:

The /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml, generated by livecd-rootfs, 
shouldn't exist any more IIUC.
That functionality was moved into src:ubuntu-settings and shipped as 
/usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml

This is according to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-
settings/23.10.1

The duplicated "renderer: NetworkManager" doesn't cause any harm in the
live-session, AFAICT.

** Affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063204

Title:
  Desktop-Live ships /etc/netplan/01-network-manager-all.yaml in
  addition to /usr/lib/netplan/00-network-manager-all.yaml

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2063204/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1970773] Re: Verify YAML configuration after package upgrades

2024-04-23 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Tags added: foundations-todo

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970773

Title:
  Verify YAML configuration after package upgrades

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/1970773/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2055012] Re: When I upgraded from 22.04 to 24.04, DNS resolution went wrong.

2024-04-22 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055012

Title:
  When I upgraded from 22.04 to 24.04, DNS resolution went wrong.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/2055012/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2045096] Re: Error in network definition: Invalid MAC address 'random'

2024-04-22 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045096

Title:
  Error in network definition: Invalid MAC address 'random'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2045096/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060778] Re: netplan, multiple dhcp route with metric failure

2024-04-22 Thread Lukas Märdian
Thanks for the additional details!

In this case the output of "resolvectl" after "netplan apply" and after
resume (no "netplan apply") might be useful. In addition to debug-logs
of your systemd-resolved


$ sudo systemctl edit systemd-resolved

Adding:
```
[Service]
Environment=SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug
```

$ sudo systemctl daemon-reload
$ sudo systemctl restart systemd-resolved # (or reboot)

Afterwards:
$ journalctl -u systemd-resolved # (for a full "netplan apply", suspend, resume 
cycle)

** Changed in: netplan
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

** Summary changed:

- netplan, multiple dhcp route with metric failure
+ systemd-resolved switches primary interface for name resolution after 
suspend/resume cycle

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060778

Title:
  systemd-resolved switches primary interface for name resolution after
  suspend/resume cycle

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2060778/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2020409] Re: can't move mellanox interface to switchdev when SR-IOV disable

2024-04-22 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Tags added: sru-next

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2020409

Title:
  can't move mellanox interface to switchdev when SR-IOV disable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2020409/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >