[Bug 1270445] Re: slow NFS4 without "NEED_GSSD=yes"
I had this problem upon upgrade to 13.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1270445 Title: slow NFS4 without "NEED_GSSD=yes" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1270445/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1273897] [NEW] please integrate r561 from googlecl
Public bug reported: While googlecl hasn't seen a new release in a while, it has some additional bugfixes in svn. It would be nice to integrate at least r561: http://code.google.com/p/googlecl/source/detail?spec=svn561&r=561 with tiny diff http://code.google.com/p/googlecl/source/diff?spec=svn561&r=561&format=side&path=/trunk/src/googlecl/picasa/service.py into the Ubuntu/Debian package. This fixes a bug that prevents uploading multiple images to Picasa/Google+ from working correctly. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: googlecl 0.9.13-1.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-34.49-generic 3.8.13.12 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-34-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8.5 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Jan 29 00:52:02 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-01-05 (1119 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007) MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: googlecl UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-05-29 (244 days ago) ** Affects: googlecl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1273897 Title: please integrate r561 from googlecl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/googlecl/+bug/1273897/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 777211] Re: synaptic corrupts package lists behind restricted connection
This seems like a security hole - couldn't a malicious provider inject bad packages through manipulation of the returned package list? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777211 Title: synaptic corrupts package lists behind restricted connection -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 421261] Re: xterm background colour used to be black, now white
Hi, is anyone working on this? It's really annoying 8-). I ran uxterm under strace and it appears to only look for UXTerm and _NOT_ UXTerm-color resources. Since x11-common is responsible for making it use -color, I looked for uxterm opening that file in the strace, but it appears to ignore that file. If I manually xrdb -override that file, it works as expected. In conclusion, the root bug seems to be that uxterm does not (or no longer) consults /etc/X11/Xresources/x11-common Could this be a regression in Xt? Can this be fixed, maybe? Or is this an unintended side-effect of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570447 ? Thanks, Martin ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #570447 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570447 -- xterm background colour used to be black, now white https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421261 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 168360] Re: Connectors between groups act weird
I must have been unclear. Not the transformation of the objects is a problem, but the transformation of ANY of the parent (enclosing) objects. This includes any group the objects are in and presumable a transformation of the whole document as you describe as well. To undo the problem you are seeing (which cannot be solved by grouping/ungrouping), try using the XML editor and removing any transform-attributes on the layer/root nodes. Martin -- Connectors between groups act weird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/168360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 168360] Re: Connectors between groups act weird
So apparently transforms of parent objects are not taken into account. So if you put two objects inside a group and then move or scale the group, the connectors inside get wacko (if they need to be recomputed). By ungrouping and regrouping the items, the parent transform gets reset (ungrouping applied the group's transform to the individual objects and the re-grouped group has again an identity transform). Unfortunately, I am not an inkscape hacker, but hopefully this should give precise enough information to have this long-standing bug fixed? Martin -- Connectors between groups act weird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/168360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 289365] Re: ∞Your browser has been up dated and needs to be restarted.
This problem just started appearing for me after the update today mst...@martinoptiplex755:~$ apt-cache policy firefox firefox: Installed: 3.0.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.1 Candidate: 3.0.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.1 Version table: *** 3.0.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.1 0 500 http://security.ubuntu.com intrepid-security/main Packages 500 http://mirror.switch.ch intrepid-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status mst...@martinoptiplex755:~$ lsb_release -r Release:8.10 Any plans to fix this problem? Martin -- ∞Your browser has been updated and needs to be restarted. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289365 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273912] Re: CUPS not printing images
This problem still exists for me. cups version 1.3.9-2 -- CUPS not printing images https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273912 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223199] [NEW] fglrx does not load
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-restricted-modules After rebooting my system, X, configured to use fglrx, is very slow. After some debugging, it looks like the fglrx kernel module was not loaded. Trying to manually modprobe is results in: "Could not open '/lib/modules/2.6.24-16-generic/volatile/fglrx.ko" In order to try to troubleshoot this, I ran "sudo depmod" and tried modprobe again (with -v): "install /sbin/lrm-video fglrx" "FATAL: Error running install command for fglrx" looking at /sbin/lrm-video, it just runs modprobe --ignore-install, so tried that myself: "FATAL: Module fglrx not found" Weird... so I try reinstalling the package (apt-get remove --purge, apt-get install) AHA! now "modprobe fglrx" works. Let's see what happens after a restart... Again... no fglrx loaded. Trying to modprobe it: "FATAL: Could not open '/lib/modules/2.6.24-16-generic/volatile/fglrx.ko': No such file or directory" What's going on? It looks like there's a bug in linux-restricted- modules that makes the fglrx driver disappear after a reboot. Looking further into it, /lib/linux-restricted-modules/2.6.24-16-generic/ contains a bunch of modules, but only a few of them show up in /lib/modules/2.6.24-16-generic/volatile'. After a fresh package reinstall all of them are there but after a reboot, only some of them are. How come? Thanks, Martin ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- fglrx does not load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223199 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223199] Re: fglrx does not load
Ok, now I feel slightly stupid. Turns out, before hardy heron, I had to use the ATI supplied driver, since the Ubuntu fglrx driver was too old for my gfx card. So I had disabled the fglrx driver in /etc/default /linux-restricted-modules So there is still a (somewhat lesser) bug in that a new install of the linux-restricted-modules package will enable the fglrx (or presumably any) driver, even if it is blacklisted in the config file. I think the package should check upon install the blacklist settings and not make modules available that will magically disappear after a reboot. Instead, it should print out a message: "disabling module XXX" and not set it up with the kernel. That would make debugging a whole lot easier and it would make the behavior more consistent (ie. no more disappearing modules after a reboot). Thanks, Martin -- fglrx does not load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223199 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152720] doesn't integrate with update-java-alternatives, bad "java"-alternatives priority
Public bug reported: I jave both sun-java6-bin installed as well as j2se1.4. Why? Because I need Java 6 for developmnent work, but I also want a java plugin on amd64, which I am hoping that blackdown is providing. As it turns out, j2se1.4 is not integrated with update-java-alternatives, so I can't use that to switch the default. Even worse, it's using update-alternatives with an astronomically high priority (1411 vs 62 etc...), so that it takes precedence over java6. ** Affects: j2se1.4-i586 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- doesn't integrate with update-java-alternatives, bad "java"-alternatives priority https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152720 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 150066] no group created for new user
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools Hello, I added a new user (Desktop-user). This user did not get a new group, nor was it added to the "users" group. Instead, it was added to an existing user's group. To be more concrete: The primary user, created when first installing the system, was "mstoll" who also had hos own group "mstoll" (uid: 1000, gid: 1000). When I later added another user "shaile", no new group was created. Instead, shaile was added to group "mstoll" (gid 1000). uid is 1001 as expected. This might be related to bug #83373 and bug #71394. If not careful, this allows new users to access potentially private files from a previous user! ** Affects: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Visibility changed to: Public -- no group created for new user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150066 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 150054] ati restricted suggested for radeon 2600 - does not work (X crashes - vesa at least worked)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: restricted-manager-core I have a Dell Optiplex 755. I added a Radone 2600 XT 512 MB (MSI board) afterwards. After installing gutsy gibbon, it was suggested (by restricted-manager-core?) that I install the restricted drivers to get full 3d capability (before, I guess, it was just using VESA with 1024x768 res). After I did that, X wouldn't start any more. Turns out, only the most recent 8.41 driver (not in Ubuntu - yet?) supports the 2x00 series. Hence, maybe the restricted-manager should not suggest using the ATI drivers for the 2x00 series card? ** Affects: restricted-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ati restricted suggested for radeon 2600 - does not work (X crashes - vesa at least worked) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150054 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 37237] Re: doesn't work with kino 8.0
I don't have much time right now to look into this, but the version in dapper is 0.3.5-1.1build1 On debian unstable, with kino 0.92-1 and kinoplus 0.3.5-3, it seems to work (although there are a bunch of gnome-related assertion that fail, the package does load and shows up in the gui). Martin On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 08:41:10PM -, Duncan Lithgow wrote: > What version of kinoplus is used in Dapper? Does anything in this thread > help: > http://www.kinodv.org/dcforum/dcforum?az=show_topic&forum=101&topic_id=1874&mesg_id=1874&page= > > You'd get more attention if you file the bug at the Kino bug tracker and > then link it to this one (I can do that if you just paste the link > here). Hope something there helps. > > -- > doesn't work with kino 8.0 > https://launchpad.net/bugs/37237 -- doesn't work with kino 8.0 https://launchpad.net/bugs/37237 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 37237] Re: doesn't work with kino 8.0
I am running dapper with dapper-updates, and the problem still exists: >>> Rejecting plugin /usr/lib/kino-gtk2/libkinoplus.so : /usr/lib/kino- gtk2/libkinoplus.so: undefined symbol: gnome_file_entry_set_directory_entry -- doesn't work with kino 8.0 https://launchpad.net/bugs/37237 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
