[Bug 230102]
I think this has been fixed. I changed browser.sessionstore.warnOnQuit to true, have all the other warnings set to true, and when I tried to close this private browsing window it warned me. I also have 'restore previous session' set (http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser.startup.page is 3). I didn't have this warning before, ever since it changed in like Firefox 4 or whatever. This is probably the new name for the bug, with more info: bug 550559 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230102 Title: No warning when closing multiple tabs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/230102/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1436595] Re: Images too bright
This is due to color management. I think I filed a bug report on the Gnome bugtracker with slightly different information, but regarding brightness jumping from 0 to ~5 out of 255: According to http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/black.php, with 6-bit dithering, usually "the darkest four shades (0, 1, 2, 3) all are displayed as black regardless of the monitor settings." Most models of my laptop didn't have LED backlights, and maybe the default color profile for my laptop model was intended for those non-LED backlights. Although my screen is 6-bit, shades 1~3 are still discernible. In any case, turning off color management fixed the problem for eog, and presumably for Firefox as well after a restart. ** Changed in: eog (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1436595 Title: Images too bright To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1759300] Re: Gnome Shell: Touchpad right click (bottom right) area does not work
Would it be possible to make 'area' mode the default if the touchpad doesn't support multi-finger input? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1759300 Title: Gnome Shell: Touchpad right click (bottom right) area does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gsettings-desktop-schemas/+bug/1759300/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 711061] Re: [MIR] openjpeg2
Regarding security: it seems that ffmpeg has retained jpeg-2000 support during this time. ffmpeg's configuration, ffmpeg version 3.4.2-2 Copyright (c) 2000-2018 the FFmpeg developers built with gcc 7 (Ubuntu 7.3.0-16ubuntu2) [...] --enable-libopenjpeg [...] ffplay will display a jpeg2000 image, although I get a lot of warnings about 'End mismatch '. Is ffmpeg not exposed to any potential security flaws that imagemagick would be? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711061 Title: [MIR] openjpeg2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjpeg2/+bug/711061/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447968] Re: ImageMagick is missing JPEG2000 support (needs to be built with openjpeg)
** Tags added: bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447968 Title: ImageMagick is missing JPEG2000 support (needs to be built with openjpeg) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/+bug/1447968/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 711061] Re: [MIR] openjpeg2
** Tags added: bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711061 Title: [MIR] openjpeg2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjpeg2/+bug/711061/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1744543] Re: Screen updating with Compiz or Wayland causes high-CPU kworker thread in recent kernels
** Description changed: Originally filed under compiz: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1744515. Testing indicates it affects Wayland as well. The automatically-included information for this reports notes that I'm using kernel 4.8, where this issue doesn't occur. When the screen updates in recent versions of the Linux kernel, including 4.13 and 4.15 while running Compiz or Wayland, it causes high CPU usage in a kworker thread. This was 30~40% of a CPU core on my system with 4.13 kernel, and is 65% with 4.15. This doesn't happen with Metacity or non-Wayland Gnome. Since Unity uses Compiz, it happens there as well. This seems unrelated to how much of the screen is being repainted, as the 'Show Repaint' plugin in Compiz can show that only a few pixels are being updated and the kworker load is the same. Updated test results, having upgraded to Bionic Beaver 18.04, with kernel 4.15.0-15-generic, -my Flashback compiz login no longer works, it just crashes back to the login screen, so I can't test it. -Unity uses compiz and still works for me, and still has this bug. -Wayland has this bug and doesn't use compiz. Other display managers remain the same. Metacity is the best in terms of not causing the kernel to waste CPU; 'Ubuntu with Gnome' is the second- best, only causing an extra 10~20% of CPU usage from gnome-shell, and no high-CPU kworker threads. When screen is updating under Wayland, one or two kworker threads use a combined 65% of a CPU core, with gnome-shell using an additional 8% CPU. This can be trivially triggered by running glxgears, the command 'ffmpeg -filter_complex color=orange:2x2 -f opengl -', or the command 'ffplay dummy -f lavfi -graph color=orange:2x2:60' which all should update a small part of the screen at a tiny CPU cost. For me glxgears uses 1.5%, while ffplay or ffmpeg use 7~12% to create a 2x2 pixel video, but all three programs cause an extra 65% CPU use from the kernel. My laptop's battery is completely dead so I have to keep it plugged in all the time, but this should be a concern to anyone with a laptop as it will affect battery life. The 18.04 kernel is not one for which bugs can be filed at kernel.org: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/admin-guide/reporting-bugs.html I already confirmed the bug upstream, I assume from Debian; can someone who can replicate this bug test the latest -rc kernel from kernel.org? NEW DATA POINT! I followed the instructions here to stop screen tearing in Metacity: http://dan.bodar.com/2018/02/26/stop-screen-tearing-on- ubuntu-by-changing-compositor/ However, after testing for this bug with compton running, I found that the bug does occur. Seeing 55% CPU from kworker. If I kill compton while glxgears is running, the kworker thread immediately disappears from 'top'. I'm guessing the kernel is trying too hard to match screen vsync (vertical sync). The command in the link is 'compton --backend glx --paint-on-overlay --vsync opengl-swc'. Leaving out '--backend glx' both stops the high CPU use from kworker and causes screen tearing, as shown by https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xkNy9gfKOg. + Screen tearing exists for Gnome+Ubuntu login option, which also does not + exhibit this bug. Regarding vsync connection as confirmed, changing bug + title accordingly. I can't fix the bug myself though. + ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: linux-generic 4.13.0.25.26 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-34.36-generic 4.8.11 Uname: Linux 4.8.0-34-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3.7 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: misaki 1685 F...m pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC0: misaki 1685 F pulseaudio CurrentDesktop: GNOME-Flashback:GNOME Date: Sun Jan 21 00:17:16 2018 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=ea8d7b22-9a3e-412e-af6a-8fc260a76a2c MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. N50Vn ProcFB: 0 nouveaufb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.8.0-34-generic root=UUID=b09dc720-93ec-4fdf-a42f-7ea19a9af555 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-4.8.0-34-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-4.8.0-34-generic N/A linux-firmware1.169.1 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to artful on 2018-01-09 (12 days ago) WpaSupplicantLog: dmi.bios.date: 03/05/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 211 dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.board.name: N50Vn dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.board.version: 1.0 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.chassis.version: 1.0 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr211:bd03/05/2009:svnASUSTeKComputerInc.:pnN50Vn:pvr1.0
[Bug 1766480] [NEW] Touchpad scroll and middle/right click not working as expected
Public bug reported: This could probably fixed through configuration, but it should work automatically. Testing Ubuntu 18.04 beta, the touchpad has no special regions for scrolling or anything. By default in Xorg-based Ubuntu, top right corner of touchpad is middle- click (mouse button 2), bottom right is right-click (mouse button 3), and right side is vertical scrolling. For a while the bottom edge defaulted to horizontal scrolling, but that changed in 17.10 or something. I'm aware that new touchpad interaction methods have developed, like dragging with two fingers anywhere on the touchpad to scroll or something. But people may not know this, or their touchpad might not support multitouch. (The Xorg-based settings for touchpad remain when switching back to Xorg like with the Metacity Flashback login option.) ** Affects: wayland (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: This could probably fixed through configuration, but it should work automatically. Testing Ubuntu 18.04 beta, the touchpad has no special regions for scrolling or anything. By default in Xorg-based Ubuntu, top right corner of touchpad is middle- click (mouse button 2), bottom right is right-click (mouse button 3), and right side is vertical scrolling. For a while the bottom edge defaulted to horizontal scrolling, but that changed in 17.10 or something. I'm aware that new touchpad interaction methods have developed, like dragging with two fingers anywhere on the touchpad to scroll or something. But people may not know this, or their touchpad might not support multitouch. + + (The Xorg-based settings for touchpad remain when switching back to Xorg + like with the Metacity Flashback login option.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766480 Title: Touchpad scroll and middle/right click not working as expected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wayland/+bug/1766480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1744543] Re: Screen updating with Compiz or Wayland causes high-CPU kworker thread in recent kernels
** Description changed: Originally filed under compiz: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1744515. Testing indicates it affects Wayland as well. The automatically-included information for this reports notes that I'm using kernel 4.8, where this issue doesn't occur. When the screen updates in recent versions of the Linux kernel, including 4.13 and 4.15 while running Compiz or Wayland, it causes high CPU usage in a kworker thread. This was 30~40% of a CPU core on my system with 4.13 kernel, and is 65% with 4.15. This doesn't happen with Metacity or non-Wayland Gnome. Since Unity uses Compiz, it happens there as well. This seems unrelated to how much of the screen is being repainted, as the 'Show Repaint' plugin in Compiz can show that only a few pixels are being updated and the kworker load is the same. Updated test results, having upgraded to Bionic Beaver 18.04, with kernel 4.15.0-15-generic, -my Flashback compiz login no longer works, it just crashes back to the login screen, so I can't test it. -Unity uses compiz and still works for me, and still has this bug. -Wayland has this bug and doesn't use compiz. Other display managers remain the same. Metacity is the best in terms of not causing the kernel to waste CPU; 'Ubuntu with Gnome' is the second- best, only causing an extra 10~20% of CPU usage from gnome-shell, and no high-CPU kworker threads. When screen is updating under Wayland, one or two kworker threads use a combined 65% of a CPU core, with gnome-shell using an additional 8% CPU. This can be trivially triggered by running glxgears, the command 'ffmpeg -filter_complex color=orange:2x2 -f opengl -', or the command 'ffplay dummy -f lavfi -graph color=orange:2x2:60' which all should update a small part of the screen at a tiny CPU cost. For me glxgears uses 1.5%, while ffplay or ffmpeg use 7~12% to create a 2x2 pixel video, but all three programs cause an extra 65% CPU use from the kernel. My laptop's battery is completely dead so I have to keep it plugged in all the time, but this should be a concern to anyone with a laptop as it will affect battery life. The 18.04 kernel is not one for which bugs can be filed at kernel.org: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/admin-guide/reporting-bugs.html I already confirmed the bug upstream, I assume from Debian; can someone who can replicate this bug test the latest -rc kernel from kernel.org? NEW DATA POINT! I followed the instructions here to stop screen tearing in Metacity: http://dan.bodar.com/2018/02/26/stop-screen-tearing-on- ubuntu-by-changing-compositor/ However, after testing for this bug with compton running, I found that the bug does occur. Seeing 55% CPU from kworker. If I kill compton while glxgears is running, the kworker thread immediately disappears from 'top'. I'm guessing the kernel is trying too hard to match screen vsync (vertical sync). + The command in the link is 'compton --backend glx --paint-on-overlay + --vsync opengl-swc'. Leaving out '--backend glx' both stops the high CPU + use from kworker and causes screen tearing, as shown by + https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xkNy9gfKOg. + ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: linux-generic 4.13.0.25.26 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-34.36-generic 4.8.11 Uname: Linux 4.8.0-34-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3.7 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: misaki 1685 F...m pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC0: misaki 1685 F pulseaudio CurrentDesktop: GNOME-Flashback:GNOME Date: Sun Jan 21 00:17:16 2018 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=ea8d7b22-9a3e-412e-af6a-8fc260a76a2c MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. N50Vn ProcFB: 0 nouveaufb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.8.0-34-generic root=UUID=b09dc720-93ec-4fdf-a42f-7ea19a9af555 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-4.8.0-34-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-4.8.0-34-generic N/A linux-firmware1.169.1 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to artful on 2018-01-09 (12 days ago) WpaSupplicantLog: dmi.bios.date: 03/05/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 211 dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.board.name: N50Vn dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.board.version: 1.0 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.chassis.version: 1.0 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr211:bd03/05/2009:svnASUSTeKComputerInc.:pnN50Vn:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:rnN50Vn:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:ct10:cvr1.0: dmi.product.name: N50Vn dmi.product.version: 1.0 dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. -- You received this bug notification
[Bug 1744543] Re: Screen updating with Compiz or Wayland causes high-CPU kworker thread in recent kernels
** Tags added: vsync ** Description changed: Originally filed under compiz: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1744515. Testing indicates it affects Wayland as well. The automatically-included information for this reports notes that I'm using kernel 4.8, where this issue doesn't occur. When the screen updates in recent versions of the Linux kernel, including 4.13 and 4.15 while running Compiz or Wayland, it causes high CPU usage in a kworker thread. This was 30~40% of a CPU core on my system with 4.13 kernel, and is 65% with 4.15. This doesn't happen with Metacity or non-Wayland Gnome. Since Unity uses Compiz, it happens there as well. This seems unrelated to how much of the screen is being repainted, as the 'Show Repaint' plugin in Compiz can show that only a few pixels are being updated and the kworker load is the same. Updated test results, having upgraded to Bionic Beaver 18.04, with kernel 4.15.0-15-generic, -my Flashback compiz login no longer works, it just crashes back to the login screen, so I can't test it. -Unity uses compiz and still works for me, and still has this bug. -Wayland has this bug and doesn't use compiz. Other display managers remain the same. Metacity is the best in terms of not causing the kernel to waste CPU; 'Ubuntu with Gnome' is the second- best, only causing an extra 10~20% of CPU usage from gnome-shell, and no high-CPU kworker threads. When screen is updating under Wayland, one or two kworker threads use a combined 65% of a CPU core, with gnome-shell using an additional 8% CPU. This can be trivially triggered by running glxgears, the command 'ffmpeg -filter_complex color=orange:2x2 -f opengl -', or the command 'ffplay dummy -f lavfi -graph color=orange:2x2:60' which all should update a small part of the screen at a tiny CPU cost. For me glxgears uses 1.5%, while ffplay or ffmpeg use 7~12% to create a 2x2 pixel video, but all three programs cause an extra 65% CPU use from the kernel. My laptop's battery is completely dead so I have to keep it plugged in all the time, but this should be a concern to anyone with a laptop as it will affect battery life. The 18.04 kernel is not one for which bugs can be filed at kernel.org: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/admin-guide/reporting-bugs.html I already confirmed the bug upstream, I assume from Debian; can someone who can replicate this bug test the latest -rc kernel from kernel.org? + NEW DATA POINT! I followed the instructions here to stop screen tearing + in Metacity: http://dan.bodar.com/2018/02/26/stop-screen-tearing-on- + ubuntu-by-changing-compositor/ + + However, after testing for this bug with compton running, I found that + the bug does occur. Seeing 55% CPU from kworker. If I kill compton while + glxgears is running, the kworker thread immediately disappears from + 'top'. + + I'm guessing the kernel is trying too hard to match screen vsync + (vertical sync). + ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: linux-generic 4.13.0.25.26 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-34.36-generic 4.8.11 Uname: Linux 4.8.0-34-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3.7 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: misaki 1685 F...m pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC0: misaki 1685 F pulseaudio CurrentDesktop: GNOME-Flashback:GNOME Date: Sun Jan 21 00:17:16 2018 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=ea8d7b22-9a3e-412e-af6a-8fc260a76a2c MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. N50Vn ProcFB: 0 nouveaufb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.8.0-34-generic root=UUID=b09dc720-93ec-4fdf-a42f-7ea19a9af555 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-4.8.0-34-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-4.8.0-34-generic N/A linux-firmware1.169.1 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to artful on 2018-01-09 (12 days ago) WpaSupplicantLog: dmi.bios.date: 03/05/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 211 dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.board.name: N50Vn dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.board.version: 1.0 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.chassis.version: 1.0 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr211:bd03/05/2009:svnASUSTeKComputerInc.:pnN50Vn:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:rnN50Vn:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:ct10:cvr1.0: dmi.product.name: N50Vn dmi.product.version: 1.0 dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744543 Title: Screen updating with Compiz or Wayland causes high-CPU kworker thread in recent kernels To manage
[Bug 1766479] [NEW] Resizing a window's left border to the right can cause it to scoot right
Public bug reported: Tested with 18.04 beta. Created a small window, ffmpeg or ffplay showing a 2x2 pixel video. When trying to move it, instead selected left border. Dragging right caused the window to scoot away faster than the pointer was moving, vanishing in less than a second. ** Affects: wayland (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766479 Title: Resizing a window's left border to the right can cause it to scoot right To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wayland/+bug/1766479/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1744543] Re: Screen updating with Compiz causes high-CPU kworker thread in 4.13 or earlier
** Tags added: battery ** Description changed: - This duplicates the information in - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1744515. Filing - this to get more exposure. + Originally filed under compiz: + https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1744515. Testing + indicates it affects Wayland as well. The automatically-included information for this reports notes that I'm - using kernel 4.8, where this issue doesn't occur. I don't have any other - kernels to test with. + using kernel 4.8, where this issue doesn't occur. When the screen updates in 4.13 while running Compiz, it causes high CPU usage in a kworker thread. This was 30~40% of a CPU core on my system. This doesn't happen with other window managers tested, like Metacity, or whatever non-Compiz Gnome and Ubuntu use (gnome-shell maybe, though that 15% CPU load more than Metacity when I checked). Since Unity uses Compiz, it happens there as well as with 'Ubuntu flashback Compiz'. This seems unrelated to how much of the screen is being repainted, as the 'Show Repaint' plugin in Compiz can show that only a few pixels are being updated and the kworker load is the same. + + Updated test results, having upgraded to Bionic Beaver 18.04, with + kernel 4.15.0-15-generic, + + -my Flashback compiz login no longer works, it just crashes back to the login screen, so I can't test it. + -Unity uses compiz and still works for me, and still has this bug. + -Wayland has this bug and doesn't use compiz. + + Other display managers remain the same. Metacity is the best in terms of + not causing the kernel to waste CPU; 'Ubuntu with Gnome' is the second- + best, only causing an extra 10~20% of CPU usage from gnome-shell, and no + high-CPU kworker threads. + + When screen is updating under Wayland, one or two kworker threads use a + combined 65% of a CPU core, with gnome-shell using an additional 8% CPU. + + This can be trivially triggered by running glxgears, the command 'ffmpeg + -filter_complex color=orange:2x2 -f opengl -', or the command 'ffplay + dummy -f lavfi -graph color=orange:2x2:60' which all should update a + small part of the screen at a tiny CPU cost. For me glxgears uses 1.5%, + while ffplay or ffmpeg use 7~12% to create a 2x2 pixel video, but both + cause ~70% CPU use from the kernel and other processes. + + My laptop's battery is completely dead so I have to keep it plugged in + all the time, but this should be a concern to anyone with a laptop as it + will affect battery life. + + The 18.04 is not one for which bugs can be filed at kernel.org: + https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/admin-guide/reporting-bugs.html + + I already confirmed the bug upstream, I assume from Debian; can someone + who can replicate this bug test the latest -rc kernel from kernel.org? + + ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: linux-generic 4.13.0.25.26 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-34.36-generic 4.8.11 Uname: Linux 4.8.0-34-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3.7 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: - USERPID ACCESS COMMAND - /dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: misaki 1685 F...m pulseaudio - /dev/snd/controlC0: misaki 1685 F pulseaudio + USERPID ACCESS COMMAND + /dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: misaki 1685 F...m pulseaudio + /dev/snd/controlC0: misaki 1685 F pulseaudio CurrentDesktop: GNOME-Flashback:GNOME Date: Sun Jan 21 00:17:16 2018 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=ea8d7b22-9a3e-412e-af6a-8fc260a76a2c MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. N50Vn ProcFB: 0 nouveaufb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.8.0-34-generic root=UUID=b09dc720-93ec-4fdf-a42f-7ea19a9af555 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: - linux-restricted-modules-4.8.0-34-generic N/A - linux-backports-modules-4.8.0-34-generic N/A - linux-firmware1.169.1 + linux-restricted-modules-4.8.0-34-generic N/A + linux-backports-modules-4.8.0-34-generic N/A + linux-firmware1.169.1 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to artful on 2018-01-09 (12 days ago) WpaSupplicantLog: - + dmi.bios.date: 03/05/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 211 dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.board.name: N50Vn dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.board.version: 1.0 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.chassis.version: 1.0 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr211:bd03/05/2009:svnASUSTeKComputerInc.:pnN50Vn:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:rnN50Vn:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:ct10:cvr1.0: dmi.product.name: N50Vn dmi.product.version: 1.0 dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. ** Tags added: bionic compiz wayland ** Description changed: Originally filed under compiz: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1744515
[Bug 1744515] Re: Compiz flashback has high-CPU kworker thread when screen updates
Confirmed to not be (just) a compiz bug because it also affects Wayland, which doesn't use compiz. Using Bionic beta with kernel 4.15.0-15-generic. This bug filed for Linux package, when I wasn't sure which project was responsible: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1744543 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744515 Title: Compiz flashback has high-CPU kworker thread when screen updates To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1744515/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1744543] Re: Screen updating with Compiz causes high-CPU kworker thread in 4.13 or earlier
Tested, and if anything the %CPU of kworker threads is even higher, often staying around 65% in 'top'. An easy way to get the screen to update is to run glxgears, which should run at screen refresh rate with very low CPU usage. ** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744543 Title: Screen updating with Compiz causes high-CPU kworker thread in 4.13 or earlier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1744543/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1744543] [NEW] Screen updating with Compiz causes high-CPU kworker thread in 4.13 or earlier
Public bug reported: This duplicates the information in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1744515. Filing this to get more exposure. The automatically-included information for this reports notes that I'm using kernel 4.8, where this issue doesn't occur. I don't have any other kernels to test with. When the screen updates in 4.13 while running Compiz, it causes high CPU usage in a kworker thread. This was 30~40% of a CPU core on my system. This doesn't happen with other window managers tested, like Metacity, or whatever non-Compiz Gnome and Ubuntu use (gnome-shell maybe, though that 15% CPU load more than Metacity when I checked). Since Unity uses Compiz, it happens there as well as with 'Ubuntu flashback Compiz'. This seems unrelated to how much of the screen is being repainted, as the 'Show Repaint' plugin in Compiz can show that only a few pixels are being updated and the kworker load is the same. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: linux-generic 4.13.0.25.26 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-34.36-generic 4.8.11 Uname: Linux 4.8.0-34-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3.7 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: misaki 1685 F...m pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC0: misaki 1685 F pulseaudio CurrentDesktop: GNOME-Flashback:GNOME Date: Sun Jan 21 00:17:16 2018 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=ea8d7b22-9a3e-412e-af6a-8fc260a76a2c MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. N50Vn ProcFB: 0 nouveaufb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.8.0-34-generic root=UUID=b09dc720-93ec-4fdf-a42f-7ea19a9af555 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-4.8.0-34-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-4.8.0-34-generic N/A linux-firmware1.169.1 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to artful on 2018-01-09 (12 days ago) WpaSupplicantLog: dmi.bios.date: 03/05/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 211 dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.board.name: N50Vn dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.board.version: 1.0 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.chassis.version: 1.0 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr211:bd03/05/2009:svnASUSTeKComputerInc.:pnN50Vn:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:rnN50Vn:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:ct10:cvr1.0: dmi.product.name: N50Vn dmi.product.version: 1.0 dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug artful -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744543 Title: Screen updating with Compiz causes high-CPU kworker thread in 4.13 or earlier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1744543/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1744515] Re: Compiz flashback has high-CPU kworker thread when screen updates
Problem does not happen when booting from linux kernel 4.8.0-34-generic; CPU usage is slightly higher than Metacity, no significant kworker threads. It does happen with updated kernel 4.13.0-25-generic (previously -21). When I went to recovery mode for 4.13.0-25, tried to select failsafeX graphics, then resumed normal boot, resolution was messed up and Compiz and Xorg were at 50~60% of a CPU instead of 5~8%. Unfortunately, did not note whether there was a high kworker thread. Hope this helps. I don't have any other kernels installed. Could someone please at least try to verify this? If they don't experience it, that's useful to know as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744515 Title: Compiz flashback has high-CPU kworker thread when screen updates To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1744515/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1744515] Re: Compiz flashback has high-CPU kworker thread when screen updates
The 'Show Repaint' plugin in compiz showed that most of the screen was not getting repainted. Disabling 'Framebuffer object' under OpenGL, in ccsm (CompizConfig Settings Manager), caused the whole screen to be repainted but CPU usage of compiz stayed the same. If Workarounds > 'Force full screen redraws (buffer swap) on repaint' was enabled, CPU usage without Framebuffer object was the same, but with both on, CPU usage of compiz was ~3% higher (from 13% to 16% with CPUs at lowest frequency). Kworker CPU usage doesn't seem to change when I switch CPUs from 1/3 frequency, to maximum frequency. Compiz drops about 1/3 when I do so (instead of 2/3). On highest frequency, the problem kworker thread uses three times the CPU of compiz. kworker CPU usage seems proportional to the frames-per-second recorded in the Benchmark plugin. When the ffplay window is reduced to 1 pixel height, so it shows only a constant blue line for audio frequencies, the Benchmark still shows ~55 fps. Toggling on or off the benchmark makes it fade with high fps (from 60 fps), which shows same high kworker usage. (Metacity has screen tearing.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744515 Title: Compiz flashback has high-CPU kworker thread when screen updates To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1744515/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1744515] Re: Compiz flashback has high-CPU kworker thread when screen updates
This also affects the 'Unity' login option, which uses compiz. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744515 Title: Compiz flashback has high-CPU kworker thread when screen updates To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1744515/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1744515] [NEW] Compiz flashback has high-CPU kworker thread when screen updates
Public bug reported: When the screen updates, there is one or two kworker threads with high CPU. This is 30~40% of a CPU as shown in top, on my old system with two CPU cores. This did not happen in 16.10. I recently upgraded a badly out-of-date 16.10 to 17.04 and then immediately to 17.10, so I don't know when it showed up. Examples of when it happens is when a video player like ffplay is running, even if it's just showing something very simple like the sound frequencies in a music file, or when I scroll up and down in this browser window. The size of the window is unimportant; the same kworker activity is shown whether the window is maximized or reduced to a small width and zero height. It goes away if the window is minimized. It doesn't happen in Metacity flashback, in "Ubuntu with Xorg", or with "Gnome with Xorg" from the login screen. For some reason I have duplicates of those last two options, that differ in that one of them has a blank circle for the icon. What are presumably the Wayland options don't let me login — if I try to select them, there's a white outline and the previous option stays selected with a filled background, and the selection menu stays there until I select an Xorg-based option. So I can't test those. '"Ubuntu with Xorg" and "Gnome with Xorg" did show gnome-shell with ~15% CPU usage of a core, which is probably unnecessary but completely unrelated to this bug. Metacity flashback in 17.10 showed the CPU usages I experienced in 16.10 with Compiz flashback, which is about 10% of total CPU from user and system while playing an audio file with frequency display in ffplay. This bug brings system CPU as shown in 'top' to 25%. If it helps, the active kworker thread seems to always be named 'kworker/u4:number', usually the same one or two threads. I tried enabling or disabling some compiz options related to screen drawing, but it didn't seem to do anything. I didn't disable the 'Composite' or 'OpenGL' plugins as they were required by too many others. This is filed under compiz because no other window manager leads to the problem, even though it isn't the compiz process with high CPU. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: compiz 1:0.9.13.1+17.10.20170901-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-21.24-generic 4.13.13 Uname: Linux 4.13.0-21-generic x86_64 .tmp.unity_support_test.0: ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3.7 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,composite,opengl,compiztoolbox,decor,imgpng,regex,gnomecompat,place,move,vpswitch,mousepoll,obs,wall,animation,shift,snap,resize,expo,session,ezoom,workarounds,staticswitcher,fade] CompositorRunning: compiz CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0' CompositorUnredirectFSW: true CurrentDesktop: GNOME-Flashback:GNOME Date: Sat Jan 20 16:04:52 2018 DistUpgraded: 2018-01-08 23:06:14,204 DEBUG Running PostInstallScript: './xorg_fix_proprietary.py' DistroCodename: artful DistroVariant: ubuntu GraphicsCard: NVIDIA Corporation G96M [GeForce 9650M GT] [10de:064c] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. G96M [GeForce 9650M GT] [1043:1912] GsettingsChanges: b'org.compiz.core' b'outputs' b"['1024x768+0+0', '1024x768+0+0']" b'org.compiz.core' b'hsize' b'2' b'org.compiz.core' b'active-plugins' b"['core', 'composite', 'opengl', 'compiztoolbox', 'showrepaint', 'imgjpeg', 'decor', 'imgpng', 'regex', 'gnomecompat', 'place', 'move', 'mousepoll', 'obs', 'ezoom', 'workarounds', 'dbus', 'text', 'wall', 'snap', 'resize', 'staticswitcher', 'session', 'fade', 'bench']" b'org.compiz.core' b'vsize' b'2' b'org.compiz.core' b'lower-window-button' b"'Disabled'" MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. N50Vn PackageArchitecture: all ProcKernelCmdLine: root=UUID=b09dc720-93ec-4fdf-a42f-7ea19a9af555 ro quiet splash SourcePackage: compiz UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to artful on 2018-01-09 (11 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 03/05/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 211 dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.board.name: N50Vn dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.board.version: 1.0 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.chassis.version: 1.0 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr211:bd03/05/2009:svnASUSTeKComputerInc.:pnN50Vn:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:rnN50Vn:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:ct10:cvr1.0: dmi.product.name: N50Vn dmi.product.version: 1.0 dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.13.1+17.10.20170901-0ubuntu1 version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.83-1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 17.2.4-0ubuntu1~17.10.2 version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 17.2.4-0ubuntu1~17.10.2 version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.19.5-0ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.10.5-1ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:7.10.0-1 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel
[Bug 1307144] Re: 'unredirect fullscreen windows' causes tearing
I am experiencing this bug on Ubuntu 15.10 Wily, using Nvidia drivers and Gnome (not Unity, if that's the name of the touchscreen-based interface). It appears that vlc must be spelled lowercase in order to be matched, but the default for Unredirect Match spells it Vlc. Totem works. firefox must also not be capitalized for it to match, but the default is for it to be capitalized. Using this video, linked in the previous bug +1051802 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCPkOpMHB7g It's possible to test whether a video is full-screen by enabling compiz effects, like Opacity (in which case the behaviour seems to be that if you try to initiate transparency while a window is fullscreen unredirected, it won't take effect until compositing turns on again, such as by moving the mouse to activate the menu in vlc) or, much easier, the Benchmark plugin, which shows a frames/sec overlay that disappears when a window goes fullscreen-unredirected. When playing the test video in Firefox, occasionally when pausing, it actually shows a frame mid-tear, with the middle out of synch with the top and bottom. This is a completely unrelated issue though, since it still happens when pixels are being redirected (benchmark is displayed) and no tearing is occurring during playback. Adding video players to the default matchings to exclude (! = not, for people like me who don't know programming languages) may have been the "fix" referenced in the previous bug report. The "impossible to fix" comment in that report seems accurate, it's probably an Nvidia bug. It is still a little mystifying whether some Compiz options have any effect, like the vsync-related ones in Workarounds, but vlc and firefox being capitalized is a bug. The description of Composite > Unredirect Match suggests that "you might want to exclude video players, for example, to avoid tearing", but is this only because of a bug in Nvidia (or other graphics providers' configuration options)? Not sure what the bug report submitter is using, but nvidia-settings has the option "Sync to Vblank", and "Allow Flipping". I found that turning off Allow Flipping leads to occasional tearing when recording video using the x11grab device in ffmpeg, and 'Sync to Vblank' limits the framerate of the glxgears test program, but the description of Sync to Vblank is this: "When enabled, OpenGL applications will swap buffers during the vertical retrace; this option is applied to OpenGL applications that are started after this option is set." I'm not sure if this is supposed to apply to video playback. When a video player is being unredirected, I find that there is tearing and no other options will prevent it. When output is not being unredirected, I find that the only option that affects tearing is "Allow Flipping" in nvidia-settings. When it's on, there is no tearing. When it's off, there is always tearing. The following options seem to have no effect: compiz: OpenGL plugin: Sync to VBlank Framebuffer object Vertex buffer object (this might just be a games thing, and I'm just testing video) Always use buffer swapping Workarounds plugin Legacy Fullscreen Support (not completed tested with all other options combinations though) Fix screen updates in XGL with fglrx Force synchronization between X and GLX Don't wait for video sync I didn't completely test these: Force complete redraw on initial damage Force full screen redraws (buffer swap) on repaint But they don't seem to prevent or cause tearing. They do show up when using the 'Show Repaint' plugin but require 'Vertex Buffer Object' option to be enabled. in nvidia-settings, "Sync to Vblank" has no effect on tearing during video playback regardless of any other settings, even after the video player is restarted. Ok, I guess maybe the answer to the question is that "vertical synch only works with buffers"? I have no idea what other ways exist to swap buffers other than flipping, but that may be the issue here. Turning on Allow Flipping might prevent tearing in fullscreen applications like games, when Compiz isn't getting involved. HOWEVER, I did most of that testing using totem. Tearing when unredirecting totem seems to be slightly worse than when it's redirected, and then swapped in by Compiz. With the nvidia-settings option "Allow Flipping" enabled, there is no tearing in totem with the default Compiz settings (where Totem is correctly capitalized), but there is tearing in vlc, which is incorrectly capitalized when it should be uncapitalized, as well as firefox with html5. But when compiz is handling vlc's output, there's no tearing even with "Allow Flipping" disabled. It appears no combination of options will cause tearing in vlc, other than unredirecting output (by incorrectly spelling vlc as Vlc, which also requires "Unredirect Fullscreen Windows" to be enabled, both of which are the default settings). ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you
[Bug 1307144] Re: 'unredirect fullscreen windows' causes tearing
When I first started testing, one way to confirm that a window was being unredirected was that Alt-Tab would not show a window switcher (I use Static Application Switcher). However, after I had tested different options and video players (particularly ones in Workarounds), this stopped being accurate and always worked. I tried changing all options back but could not replicate this behaviour. I had left Unredirect Fullscreen Windows to disabled for a long time, at random, when I was testing how options affected video playback in ways unrelated to tearing. In the past I experienced issues where eog, or eye of gnome, the image display program, would not display the application switcher when in fullscreen. This doesn't seem to be an issue for me but it seems like it might be related this particular option, unredirect fullscreen windows. I don't know why I had this issue with application switcher not showing up while in fullscreen video, after I had enabled Unredirect Fullscreen Windows but before I started messing with other settings, but if other people experience, or can replicate the same issue maybe they could comment on it or create a new bug report. At the moment, I have no strong reason to turn the option off, even though it causes tearing. In marginal cases, it seems it can be the difference between a video player dropping frames and being able to continue (when these players aren't excluded through matching). But if other programs or drivers are bugged to the point where they have tearing, and people dislike tearing, it may be better to have this option off by default. So: does "Allow Flipping" in nvidia-settings prevent tearing in games when this compiz option is at its default setting of on? *My testing result is that with both totem and vlc, when the fullscreen output isn't being redirected, even Allow Flipping doesn't prevent tearing. But when I changed vlc's video output method from XVideo, which works the best, to OpenGL, which is slightly slower, the tearing is almost, but not completely, eliminated. Sync to VBlank in nvidia- settings still doesn't seem to do anything, but turning Allow Flipping back on does bring tearing back to zero. The other output methods also don't eliminate tearing by themselves. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307144 Title: 'unredirect fullscreen windows' causes tearing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1307144/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1307144] Re: 'unredirect fullscreen windows' causes tearing
I'm sorry for triple-posting, but to summarize the end of my previous comment: "Allow Flipping" in nvidia-settings > OpenGL Settings does completely eliminate tearing for fullscreen, unredirected output for OpenGL GLX output in vlc. It does eliminate, or affect tearing for the XVideo output method. So it will probably help for OpenGL games. There is still a minor amount of tearing, maybe one frame in 30~100, even with OpenGL output and flipping enabled, when redirected by compiz (not fullscreen). It seems the only thing that prevents this is the "Force full screen redraws (buffer swap) on repaint" option... ok but actually, as shown by the "Show Repaint" plugin, that was because there was another vlc instance behind several other windows, that was paused and therefore causing repaints. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307144 Title: 'unredirect fullscreen windows' causes tearing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1307144/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1444839] [NEW] jpeg-2000 files cause Nautilus to crash
Public bug reported: Diagnosing this bug may be complicated by Bug #1443809. I am currently using a custom thumbnailer for jpeg-2000 files, but before I did so, I had created a number of jpeg-2000 files. While there were some cases where they caused a crash, I think the eventual result was that they all had 'failed thumbnails' created for them. Possibly eog created valid thumbnails for them. (I can't check to see what happened because I deleted my old thumbnails folder after upgrading.) With no custom thumbnailers, nautilus will crash upon encountering a jpeg-2000 file, with file suffix .jp2. As noted in Bug #1444790, it doesn't crash if the jpeg-2000 file has a different suffix; it just produces a 'failed thumbnail' in the thumbnails folder, which for current Ubuntu versions is ~/.cache/thumbnails/fail. If the file was created by copying an existing jpeg-2000 file in nautilus, nautilus still crashes but only after invoking eog to create a thumbnail, so after this is complete, navigating to that folder won't cause a crash. If the thumbnail check was performed because the jpeg-2000 file was renamed from an inappropriate suffix to .jp2, or because it was renamed by some other method while not looking at the directory containing that file (such as the command line, or maybe using the 'undo' function in nautilus though this would require 1) having a normal or failed thumbnail 2) renaming the file 3) deleting the thumbnail 4) nautilus would have to stop using the cached thumbnail, and I don't think it does), nautilus will crash without invoking eog for thumbnail creation, and so will continue to crash whenever that folder is viewed. A jpeg-2000 file can be generated using mogrify from imagemagick with the command 'mogrify -format jp2 image.jpg'. The advantages and disadvantages of jpeg-2000, compared to jpeg, are described here: http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/archives/317 The type of encoding used by jpeg-2000 is better for edges, while that used for jpeg is better for broad areas of smaller, but nonzero amounts of variation. There are definitely cases where jpeg-2000 is a better choice than jpeg for retaining what is viewed as a sufficient level of quality in an image, but users are unlikely to use it more if their applications don't support it very well. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: nautilus 1:3.10.1-0ubuntu15.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-30.40-generic 3.16.7-ckt3 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.3 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Wed Apr 15 22:52:39 2015 GsettingsChanges: b'org.gnome.nautilus.list-view' b'default-visible-columns' b['name', 'size', 'date_modified', 'date_accessed', 'type'] b'org.gnome.nautilus.list-view' b'default-column-order' b['name', 'size', 'date_modified', 'date_accessed', 'type', 'group', 'where', 'mime_type', 'owner', 'permissions'] SourcePackage: nautilus UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1444839 Title: jpeg-2000 files cause Nautilus to crash To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1444839/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1444881] [NEW] Autocomplete in 'open file' works wrong with folders
Public bug reported: This is related to what might also be a bug, where directories aren't displayed at the top when sorting files by name in the 'open file' dialogue. I think it used to work this way, but changed between Ubuntu 12.04 and 14.10. So the fastest way to open files is often by typing. When an autocompleted folder name is displayed and is the only possible result for a path starting with those characters, pressing tab will cause the autocompleted text to be entered, while pressing enter normally causes the autocompleted folder to be navigated to. If there is a file that starts starts with that folder's name in the same directory, the bug described in this report doesn't occur. But if no such file exists, then if all files in the autocompleted folder start with the same letters, then pressing tab while the autocompleted folder's name is highlighted will cause those common letters to appear. Pressing enter instead of tab at the first step will instead cause a file to be opened with the name of those common letters. The case where I encounter this bug is manual files for ffmpeg, which all start with 'ff' (and Ubuntu doesn't package ffmpeg which is why I'm opening them with gedit). Autocompletion includes the '/' used to denote folders. So, for example, in the folder /tmp/h, you have these files: i il iif/ iiif/ In the 'open files' dialogue, if you type '/tmp/h', an autocompleted '/' appears. The expected behaviour is that if you press enter, you'll navigate to /tmp/h and view the files it contains. What actually happens is it opens '/tmp/h/i' for editing. Immediately after presseing enter while the autocompleted '/' is displayed, it turns a normal colour (instead of having autocompletion highlighting), an autocompleted 'i' appears, and the open file dialogue closes, having selected 'i' to open. If there is also a file '/tmp/hi', then the '/' is not autocompleted, and pressing enter will just open the folder and display the letter 'i'. If, instead, there is a folder /tmp/h/uuu/ and a file /tmp/h/, and the folder uuu contains another folder u/ and a file , typing '/tmp/h/u' will cause an autocompleting 'uu' to be displayed (no '/' at the end), and pressing enter will just display the folder. If the file /tmp/h/ is removed or renamed to be shorter than uuu/, then instead of 'uu', 'uu/' will be autocompleted, and pressing enter will cause the folder /tmp/h/uuu/u/ to be opened, which is empty. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: gedit 3.10.4-0ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-30.40-generic 3.16.7-ckt3 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.3 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Thu Apr 16 01:32:26 2015 SourcePackage: gedit UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gedit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1444881 Title: Autocomplete in 'open file' works wrong with folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1444881/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1407644] Re: eog doesn't show WebP images
The bug for eog seems to be Bug #1318327. Should one of these bugs be marked as a duplicate and the other project added to the list of affected projects? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1407644 Title: eog doesn't show WebP images To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libwebp/+bug/1407644/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1444790] Re: crash if thumbnailer fails to produce output
After removing custom thumbnailers, copying a jp2 file using ctrl-C ctrl-V causes nautilus to crash about one time. gnome-thumbnailer tries to create a thumbnail, but it can take several seconds, and if nautilus is reopened and navigated to that folder again, it will crash again. However, after this has been completed, nautilus won't crash. (In fact, top reveals that it's eog that creates the new thumbnail if you use ctrl-C ctrl-V in nautilus.) If the new file name is obtained a different way, like using 'mv' on the command line, navigating to that folder in nautilus will cause a crash without attempting to generate a new thumbnail. So even if you wait several seconds, no thumbnail will exist for the file and nautilus will crash every time you navigate to that folder until you delete the file or rename it to a path for which it will have a valid thumbnail (meaning the file's mtime is correct). So this might only affect jpeg-2000 files, and not all files for which there is no valid output. Maybe with other files, the default thumbnail options (the ones not recorded in /usr/share/thumbnailers) consistently create at least a failed thumbnail, while this doesn't happen with jpeg-2000 files. But since nautilus is crashing before eog finishes creating a thumbnail (if using ctrl-C ctrl-V to copy), nautilus might be relying on a separate process from what it depends on for, say, obtaining a 'failed thumbnail' result for incomplete mp4 files, which don't cause a crash. One difference is that while gnome-thumbnailer has code for handling image formats as a fallback method, it isn't for video formats. I'm not sure if it's nautilus or gnome that's calling eog to create a thumbnail when ctrl-C ctrl-V is used. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1444790 Title: crash if thumbnailer fails to produce output To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1444790/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1318327] Re: Can't open .webp files
The bug for libwebp seems to be Bug #1407644. Should one of these bugs be marked as a duplicate and the other project added to the list of affected projects? I notice that ffmpeg (possibly with the right compile options) can open .webp files, and ffmpeg uses the GNU General Public License version 2+ though that particular decoder might not. eog also seems to use the GNU General Public License version 2+. The other bug report says that using a gdk-pixbuf loader is the right way to extend support, but in the meantime, could eog just use code from ffmpeg, or even ffmpeg directly? (Imagemagick, for example, uses ffmpeg to open video files.) It seems that having a poor solution may be better than having no solution, if there is currently no motivation to implement the 'correct' solution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318327 Title: Can't open .webp files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/eog/+bug/1318327/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1444790] Re: crash if thumbnailer fails to produce output
If you rename a jp2 file to jpg, it doesn't cause nautilus to crash. It just shows the 'generic image' icon that's also used if an image is larger than the limit set for previewing, and eog is unable to open it. If a jp2 file is renamed to have a non-image suffix, nautilus will be busy (100% cpu) for a second or two and then the image will use the 'generic icon', without nautilus crashing. With image suffixes, this doesn't occur. I also managed to replicate a bug that I avoided reporting earlier because I couldn't replicate it again. A png image has a 'corrupted' thumbnail, what is obviously the result of the file being read in an unfinished state. That is, gnome-thumbnailer or nautilus, or whatever is creating thumbnails, should be waiting until a file's modification time is 3 seconds in the past before trying to create a thumbnail for it, based on the code I looked at. This seems to work for video files, but not for images. When this happened before I verified that the difference between the modification time for the thumbnail (now in ~/.cache/thumbnails in Ubuntu, previously in ~/.thumbnails), and the time for the file as recorded in the thumbnail's PNG data and the same as for the actual file, was less than three seconds, being around 1 second. Maybe nautilus is not using this code though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1444790 Title: crash if thumbnailer fails to produce output To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1444790/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1444807] [NEW] jpeg-2000 images appear in a window of the wrong size
Public bug reported: jpeg-2000 images appear in a small window, the smallest allowed by eog, instead of at the size of the image (or some other large size if the image is larger than the screen). This happens for both jp2 images output from imagemagick's convert and mogrify, and from a reference image at http://opf-labs.org/format-corpus /jp2k-formats/ . Note that due to Bug #1444790, the reference .jp2 image on that site may cause nautilus to crash when viewing a directory it's saved in, but eog can display the image fine (and creates a thumbnail so viewing the directory won't cause another crash). eog can correctly display these images, and their image size shows up in exiftool or imagemagic's 'identify', so this information should also be available to eog when opening them. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: eog 3.12.2-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-30.40-generic 3.16.7-ckt3 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.3 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Wed Apr 15 20:00:46 2015 SourcePackage: eog UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: eog (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1444807 Title: jpeg-2000 images appear in a window of the wrong size To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1444807/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1444790] [NEW] crash if thumbnailer fails to produce output
Public bug reported: Step 1: Use a custom thumbnailer which doesn't always produce output. I'm personally using this one, since the default size (256x256) often produces a png thumbnail which takes more space than the original jpg image, and imagemagick's convert seems to have a bug for palette-png to grayscale conversion: [Thumbnailer Entry] TryExec=ffmpeg Exec=ffmpeg -i %i -vf scale='min(iw,128):min(ih,128):force_original_aspect_ratio=decrease',format=rgba|rgb24 -frames 1 -y -f image2 -c:v png %o MimeType=image/gif;image/jpeg;image/png;image/jp2;image/x-webp Step 2: navigate to a folder that the thumbnailer can't handle. For me, that was balloon.jp2 from http://opf-labs.org/format-corpus/jp2k- formats/ My version of ffmpeg says on the command line that Progression order RPCL is not implemented. [...] Output file is empty, nothing was encoded. Not having any file from the thumbnailer, or maybe having an empty, 0-byte file (ffmpeg does not produce a 0-byte output file from the command line), causes nautilus to freeze and crash. This happened multiple times. However, just now I checked and it didn't crash, and a thumbnail exists for the jp2 image, /sigh. But creating a copy of the jp2 image does lead to crashes. Ok, the reason is that eog creates a thumbnail when one doesn't exist and the system's default thumbnailers fail. Opening the image gallery in eog causes thumbnails to be created for all visible images. That is, when running eog from a terminal, opening the image gallery caused ffmpeg's output (with the error message) to be displayed in that terminal. But the thumbnail is still created, and eog must have done it. It's also possible nautilus crashes when the fallback gnome-thumbnailer fails to create a file, which I think is what happens when it tries to open a jpeg-2000 file. A few months ago I noted this bug: Another bug, crashes when trying to generate thumbnail for jpeg-2000 (jp2). Avoided if thumbnail is already created, maybe in some other cases too. Possibly just when thumbnail isn't created quickly enough (thumbnailer fails or something). ...but apparently I fixed it somehow, not sure. So it's totally fine that no thumbnail is created when the existing thumbnailer entries aren't sufficient. But nautilus shouldn't crash. When running nautilus from the command line, it says there was a segmentation fault, core dumped, with a crash file being generated in /var/crash (which I'm deleting). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: nautilus 1:3.10.1-0ubuntu15.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-30.40-generic 3.16.7-ckt3 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.3 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Wed Apr 15 20:48:20 2015 GsettingsChanges: b'org.gnome.nautilus.list-view' b'default-visible-columns' b['name', 'size', 'date_modified', 'date_accessed', 'type'] b'org.gnome.nautilus.list-view' b'default-column-order' b['name', 'size', 'date_modified', 'date_accessed', 'type', 'group', 'where', 'mime_type', 'owner', 'permissions'] SourcePackage: nautilus UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1444790 Title: crash if thumbnailer fails to produce output To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1444790/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443794] [NEW] Folders with large names cause icons to disappear
Public bug reported: if displayed path is too long, window expands. Might be related to font, if number of characters before inserting ellipsis is decided before font is rendered. the tools to the right of the path are pushed right, even if this pushes them off the rendered window. minimum is apparently 675 pixels, before borders from window manager. icons also expand into the new space, so the rightmost rows can end up off-screen. reset by using a path that avoids folders with names that are too long, either before or after the current folder. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: nautilus 1:3.10.1-0ubuntu15.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-30.40-generic 3.16.7-ckt3 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.2 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Tue Apr 14 00:34:47 2015 GsettingsChanges: b'org.gnome.nautilus.list-view' b'default-visible-columns' b['name', 'size', 'date_modified', 'date_accessed', 'type'] b'org.gnome.nautilus.list-view' b'default-column-order' b['name', 'size', 'date_modified', 'date_accessed', 'type', 'group', 'where', 'mime_type', 'owner', 'permissions'] SourcePackage: nautilus UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug utopic ** Attachment added: Screenshot from 2015-04-14 00:37:17.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443794/+attachment/4374731/+files/Screenshot%20from%202015-04-14%2000%3A37%3A17.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443794 Title: Folders with large names cause icons to disappear To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1443794/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 797485] Re: Status Bar Covers File Name at Bottom
I don't feel like commenting on the Bugzilla bug report, which states that . . . blockquoteWe will remove the floating bar after releasing 3.16, so probably this won't be need at all./blockquote . . . but this could be fixed by increasing the vertical scrollable size of the window when the last row is selected. The vertical size already increases based on the length of file names in the last row, this would just be an extension of that. The comment on Bugzilla also does not say what they are replacing the floating bar with. Being able to see the size of a file, without having file size always enabled at default zoom level, using just a single click is useful and it shouldn't go away. Alt-enter is not a replacement because it takes longer, and not everyone has a fast computer. The lag it takes to open the properties window also seems to scale with the number of items in the folder. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797485 Title: Status Bar Covers File Name at Bottom To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/797485/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443849] [NEW] Copying a line with full-width character at end adds a space
Public bug reported: If a full-width character, such as a Chinese character, starts at the last column of a line, it is moved to the start of the next line. The last column is then displayed as being empty. However, if that line is selected using the mouse and copied using shift-ctrl-C, or simply using middle-click paste, a space is added to the line at that location. A common place where this can occur is in filenames. I assume this is a bug in gnome-terminal, and not bash, but I'm not entirely sure. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: gnome-terminal 3.6.2-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-30.40-generic 3.16.7-ckt3 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.2 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Tue Apr 14 02:36:30 2015 SourcePackage: gnome-terminal UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443849 Title: Copying a line with full-width character at end adds a space To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1443849/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 952108] Re: [Precise] Nautilus: memory leak
I don't know if there are multiple memory leaks, but I am reporting on this one. The Bugzilla report is not relevant to my particular version as one comment on Bugzilla says this: Obviously also related to wcslen so correctly closed as NOTABUG in Nautilus because it is not a bug in Nautilus. wcslen is described as Get wide string length. Returns the length of the C wide string wcs. This is the number of wide characters between ... So while the Bugzilla report as marked as RESOLVED DUPLICATE, I am reporting a new issue. Steps to replicate: 1) Open a folder with many image files. 2) Change to list view. 3) zoom to maximum size, it's faster this way but still happens at normal size. 4) Scroll up and down. Result, nautilus will use more memory. The fact that it leaks memory faster at a higher zoom level indicates that it isn't related to the length of strings, but rather has to do with images somehow. This doesn't happen in icon view. What does happen in icon view, if you zoom to maximum size, is that nautilus temporary uses more memory while it caches higher-resolution thumbnails it generates, possibly only if the existing thumbnails aren't large enough. But most or all of this memory is freed when you reload the folder or navigate away. This doesn't happen with the memory from this leak. Memory usage does go down slightly, like for me it just went from ~830 MiB or something to 780 when I went from list view to icon view, but when I did this after zooming in icon view, it went from ~230 to ~60 MiB. When I was testing this before, it seemed like the memory didn't leak until you had scrolled far enough; just scrolling a bit, like half a page on normal zoom, didn't seem to cause a leak even when repeated. But using a high zoom makes it easy enough to replicate that details like that shouldn't matter. In fact, simply increasing the zoom level could cause a memory leak. I just did that, without scrolling, and watched memory usage go from ~780, where I was before, up to 975 MiB. After returning to normal zoom and refreshing, memory went down to ~914. After repeating the process, over 1 GiB. At normal size, in list view, scrolling down to the bottom of 342 images and then back up to the top causes Nautilus to use about 20 MiB more memory, each time you do it. In icon view, doing this has no noticeable effect. However, changing to list view, and then changing back to icon view, with no other actions taken, does cause memory to increase by about 6 MiB each time I do it. New thumbnail creation is probably happening because there is high CPU use; it's possible it's not caching thumbnails in list view., or caching a limited amount or number and not freeing memory after it decides a thumbnail is no longer cached. At largest zoom, each image was adding 1.3 MiB of memory to Nautilus when I pressed down once; same thing if I pressed 'home' and 'end' repeatedly. I'm using Nautilus 3.10.1, with Ubuntu 14.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/952108 Title: [Precise] Nautilus: memory leak To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/952108/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443809] [NEW] Failed thumbnail check not working properly
Public bug reported: This is related to the gnome-thumbnailer code which is part of Nautilus. However, I don't know enough about programming to fix it myself. If a failed thumbnail exists for a file, or specifically a universal resource identifier, Nautilus will not try to create a valid thumbnail for it, unless a non-failed thumbnail also exists for that URI/path. Steps to replicate: 1) Create a new, blank document named image.jpg 2) make sure the failed thumbnail has been created, such as by restarting nautilus with 'nautilus --quit' 3) navigate back to that folder, rename or delete the blank file, and rename another image to image.jpg. Result: no thumbnail will be created for the image. When I was checking the thumbnail code for an unrelated issue (256x256 thumbnails take up too much space as PNG, sometimes larger than original file), I also saw enough to be able to investigate this issue a little. In the code for Nautilus, or gnome-thumbnailer, that I looked at, it appeared that the code was doing a check to see if the failed thumbnail was valid. That is, if the modification time of the file as recorded in the PNG Chunk data does not match, it probably shouldn't count as a match for the file. But either it is incorrectly matching, or something else is wrong. While testing for an unrelated issue that seemed like it might no longer exist, I found that as Firefox saves an item by creating a placeholder and then saving the actual file using a .part suffix (unless changed in options probably), it leads to this bug. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: nautilus 1:3.10.1-0ubuntu15.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-30.40-generic 3.16.7-ckt3 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.2 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Tue Apr 14 00:40:58 2015 GsettingsChanges: b'org.gnome.nautilus.list-view' b'default-visible-columns' b['name', 'size', 'date_modified', 'date_accessed', 'type'] b'org.gnome.nautilus.list-view' b'default-column-order' b['name', 'size', 'date_modified', 'date_accessed', 'type', 'group', 'where', 'mime_type', 'owner', 'permissions'] SourcePackage: nautilus UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443809 Title: Failed thumbnail check not working properly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1443809/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443809] Re: Failed thumbnail check not working properly
** Also affects: gnome-desktop Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443809 Title: Failed thumbnail check not working properly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-desktop/+bug/1443809/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443809] Re: Failed thumbnail check not working properly
I may have misfiled this, but not quite sure which project is responsible. I also note that when adding gnome-desktop to the list of affected projects, it said gnome-desktop does not use Launchpad to track bugs. Nobody will be notified about this issue. Added a screenshot of an image not being thumbnailed. The relevant function seems to be gnome_desktop_thumbnail_factory_has_valid_failed_thumbnail () https://developer.gnome.org/gnome-desktop/stable/GnomeDesktopThumbnailFactory.html#gnome-desktop-thumbnail-factory-has-valid-failed-thumbnail This is old code because I don't know how to reference the latest code: http://sourcecodebrowser.com/gnome-desktop/2.32.0/gnome-desktop-thumbnail_8h.html#ab9946e6856418572e55147637a1493ab It includes this: pixbuf = gdk_pixbuf_new_from_file (path, NULL); g_free (path); if (pixbuf) { res = gnome_desktop_thumbnail_is_valid (pixbuf, uri, mtime); g_object_unref (pixbuf); } g_checksum_free (checksum); It mentions mtime, yet evidently that is not being checked if the process described in this report can cause a new thumbnail to fail to be generated. As implied in the original report, if there is a valid thumbnail and also a failed thumbnail for the same path to a file, if the valid thumbnail doesn't match the mtime of the actual file, a new thumbnail will be generated. So it seems to work unless no 'normal' thumbnail (whether normal or large-sized) already exists. ** Attachment added: Screenshot from 2015-04-14 01:15:35.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-desktop/+bug/1443809/+attachment/4374819/+files/Screenshot%20from%202015-04-14%2001%3A15%3A35.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443809 Title: Failed thumbnail check not working properly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-desktop/+bug/1443809/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443835] [NEW] 'Advance by one frame' doesn't work at video's end
Public bug reported: Using the 'advance by one frame' feature (default key 'e')doesn't work for around the last second of a video. It might instead affect a certain number of frames. If you play a file at normal speed until just before the end, 'e' will work one time. After that, it won't work until you rewind, or possibly if you press start and stop very fast without reaching the video's end. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: vlc 2.2.0-0ubuntu0.14.10.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-30.40-generic 3.16.7-ckt3 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.2 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Tue Apr 14 02:12:01 2015 SourcePackage: vlc UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: vlc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443835 Title: 'Advance by one frame' doesn't work at video's end To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1443835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443846] [NEW] 'Advance by one frame' no longer works at beginning of video
Public bug reported: This might be a totem issue, not a gstreamer one; the ubuntu-bug program asked what was happening and I selected video not playing correctly. After I upgraded from Ubuntu 12.04 to Ubuntu 14.10, with whatever gstreamer or totem changes were involved with that, 'advance by one frame' (the '.' key) didn't work as well. It will almost always not work at the very start of a video. Sometimes instead of one frame, it will advance around half a second. Other times, maybe related to seeking in the video after using it without first starting normal playback again, it will not work properly or will send you back to where you were in the video before you seeked to a different time. Occasionally, it will work at the start of a video, but very rarely if ever can you do this by pausing, seeking to the start of a video, and then pressing '.' . You used to be able to do this though. Right now, trying to seek near the start of a video, if it doesn't just send you back to wherever you were, usually skips several frames, like 6 frames or so, then starts normal behaviour of advancing 1 frame at a time. On a related note, the 'one frame back' key (the ',' key) is either broken by design or partly by accident. Pressing it usually either freezes the video, so you have to seek to a different location in order for the video to start playing normally, or it causes the video to seek to a totally separate time, and subsequently pressing '.' causes a frame to be shown which is at a completely separate time than what ',' was returning. When ',' works instead of freezing the video (possibly only before I upgraded to 14.10 several months ago), it seemed to usually seek to near the start of the video before returning frames, though the '.' key would sort of let you reset playback to where it was before. As a quick test, I just tried it on a webm/VP9 video, though I think the same thing happens with other videos: 1) Played for a few seconds, then pressed and held '.' . Result, video advances at the rate of keyboard sending '.' events. 2) Pressed and held ','. Result, video went back maybe a second, but then actually played backwards. 3) Pressed and held '.' again. Result, video played backwards instead of advancing forwards like the key should do. 4) With video paused, seeked forward by 15 sec, and pressed '.' again. Result, progress bar moved back to video start where it was before seeking, and video didn't advance as probably still trying to go backwards. 5) With video paused, seek forward by clicking. Unpause video. Result, it goes back to start and doesn't play. 6) With video on play but not playing, seeked forward again. Result, starts playing from beginning. 7) With video on play and playing, seeked to a different location. Result, video still on play but not playing. 8) Paused and then unpaused, video starts playing again. 9) Pressed and held '.' again, video slowly moves forward. 10) Pressed ',' , totem crashes. (don't remember this happening before) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: libgstreamer1.0-0 1.4.3-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-30.40-generic 3.16.7-ckt3 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.2 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Tue Apr 14 02:12:17 2015 SourcePackage: gstreamer1.0 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gstreamer1.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443846 Title: 'Advance by one frame' no longer works at beginning of video To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer1.0/+bug/1443846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443852] [NEW] Display bug for editing lines with full-width characters
Public bug reported: I'm not entirely sure this isn't a bug with bash, instead of gnome- terminal. Full-width character, followed by at least one full word with a space after it. Example: あa a With trailing space. Typing before the full-width character causes the 'あ' to be pushed to next line, with a blank space on previous line though if selected and copied it will actually produce a space. The 'あ' occupies two columns on the new line, but characters after the first a are only moved one column to the right. The first a, or the first character after the 'あ' including a space, is pushed two columns to the right, covering the second character after the 'あ'. A similar bug occurs when deleting characters before the 'あ', except no trailing space is required. A character is duplicated but might be first letter of first word on second line, or last letter of next word. Duplicating one letter as soon as 'あ' goes to previous line is easy to replicate; duplicating other letters as further characters before 'あ' are deleted might only happen after resetting the line using up arrow then down arrow, but actually just because of forward bug because displayed characters change after pressing up then down. Second word on line only seems to be affected if no other words after it. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: gnome-terminal 3.6.2-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-30.40-generic 3.16.7-ckt3 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.2 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Tue Apr 14 02:37:03 2015 SourcePackage: gnome-terminal UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443852 Title: Display bug for editing lines with full-width characters To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1443852/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443852] Re: Display bug for editing lines with full-width characters
The trailing space doesn't show up as excess whitespace is removed on launchpad, however it was necessary to replicate the bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443852 Title: Display bug for editing lines with full-width characters To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1443852/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443864] [NEW] Possible freeze and crash if loop for nonexisting file
Public bug reported: If vlc is trying to load a file, or multiple files that don't exist, CPU usage will increase while many error messages announcing this problem will appear. This can lead to a freeze and crash, and pressing 'hide future errors' might not help since CPU usage will still be high. Sometimes it's possible to fix this by quickly pressing the stop button, but this doesn't always work. Desired result: if a full loop of a playlist, or always if set to loop a single item, results in no items being found, VLC should wait for a bit before trying again. Pressing spacebar or any other key that normally pauses the video (as opposed to stopping it) should also cause it to stop trying to load more items. It doesn't seem to be easy to cause VLC to actually lock up... ok in fact, what just happened was that by trying to play a file that didn't exist several times, after I stopped trying my CPU usage was high despite that VLC was supposedly not trying to open anything as no error messages were showing up. Pressing the stop button repeatedly did not change this, despite that pressing it caused it to change to the 'button pressed' animation. Then after playing a video and then stopping it, CPU usage was back to 0. Locking up might only seem to happen when VLC has been trying to open non-existent files for a few seconds too long; the 'non-responsive' test in Compiz that causes unresponsive windows to darken can activate. Just now, with vlc running at 100% of a CPU despite that no error messages were turning up, I tried starting it (to play a non-existent file) and then immediately stopping it, yet despite continually trying to click on the stop button, it took probably 12 seconds to stop. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: vlc 2.2.0-0ubuntu0.14.10.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-30.40-generic 3.16.7-ckt3 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.2 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Tue Apr 14 02:46:27 2015 SourcePackage: vlc UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: vlc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443864 Title: Possible freeze and crash if loop for nonexisting file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1443864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443864] Re: Possible freeze and crash if loop for nonexisting file
If VLC is actively trying to open a new file, it can use all available CPUs, or at the very least two of them. After that, if it has an anomalously high CPU usage, it will only use 100% of one CPU. However, it seems that after a while this will stop even if no other videos are played; and in fact, playing an existing video does not actually cause the high CPU usage to stop; only after enough time has passed will it stop. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443864 Title: Possible freeze and crash if loop for nonexisting file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1443864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443886] Re: Scrollbar disappears in windows like gnome-terminal
gnome-terminal seems to have an additional bug though, maybe related to tabs, that makes the scroll bar not appear even when doing the steps described in this report. It might be as simple as after switching tabs, the scrollbar doesn't appear until you create a new line at the bottom of the terminal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443886 Title: Scrollbar disappears in windows like gnome-terminal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1443886/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443886] [NEW] Scrollbar disappears in windows like gnome-terminal
Public bug reported: Not sure if this is a Compiz bug, but it's related to windows management. The type of scroll bar used in gnome-terminal was also the same as that in Firefox before I upgraded my system to Ubuntu 14.10 at the same time I upgraded Firefox to version 34 or so (so either Firefox, or some other program changed how scrollbars look). Switching to windows that use 'thin scroll bar', only ~3 pixels wide with no arrows If done quickly, it works fine as long as the mouse cursor is pointing at the window being focused to. If done slowly, by pressing alt-tab and holding alt, the scroll bar will disappear or become faded. Faded scrollbar is when alt is held for a very short period of time, so the application switcher menu only shows up for ~0.1 sec. Using static application switcher in compiz. Window's shadow border also sometimes longer to appear if alt is held, but it doesn't seem consistent or related to scrollbar. The 'invisible' part is an overlay that's the same colour as the background. If scrolling up or down, when the line representing the current location moves past the 'invisible' part, it's erased, so that if the line representing the visible portion is returned to that area, the 'invisible' part is smaller. Nautilus, gedit, and gnome-terminal all seem to be affected by this bug. The line isn't totally invisible, but being able to see it could depend on having an LCD screen that provides high contrast near the white range at that viewing angle. All three of these applications are demonstrating the bug for me right now, but I'm not sure if they always do. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: compiz 1:0.9.12+14.10.20140918-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-30.40-generic 3.16.7-ckt3 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus.0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: '/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/0' .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: .proc.driver.nvidia.version: NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 331.113 Mon Dec 1 21:08:13 PST 2014 GCC version: gcc version 4.9.1 (Ubuntu 4.9.1-16ubuntu6) .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.2 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,composite,opengl,compiztoolbox,decor,imgpng,regex,gnomecompat,place,move,vpswitch,mousepoll,obs,wall,animation,shift,snap,resize,expo,session,ezoom,workarounds,staticswitcher,fade] CompositorRunning: compiz CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0' CompositorUnredirectFSW: true CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Tue Apr 14 03:45:07 2015 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: utopic DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: bbswitch, 0.7, 3.16.0-30-generic, x86_64: installed nvidia-331, 331.113, 3.16.0-30-generic, x86_64: installed nvidia-331-uvm, 331.113, 3.16.0-30-generic, x86_64: installed GraphicsCard: NVIDIA Corporation G96M [GeForce 9650M GT] [10de:064c] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:1912] MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. N50Vn PackageArchitecture: all ProcKernelCmdLine: root=UUID=b09dc720-93ec-4fdf-a42f-7ea19a9af555 ro quiet splash SourcePackage: compiz UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 03/05/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 211 dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.board.name: N50Vn dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.board.version: 1.0 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. dmi.chassis.version: 1.0 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr211:bd03/05/2009:svnASUSTeKComputerInc.:pnN50Vn:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:rnN50Vn:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKComputerInc.:ct10:cvr1.0: dmi.product.name: N50Vn dmi.product.version: 1.0 dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.12+14.10.20140918-0ubuntu1 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.56-1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 10.3.2-0ubuntu0.1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 10.3.2-0ubuntu0.1 version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers N/A version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.16.0-1ubuntu1.3 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.9.0-1ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:7.4.0-2ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.99.914-1~exp1ubuntu4.2 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.11-1ubuntu2 xserver.bootTime: Mon Apr 13 00:44:08 2015 xserver.configfile: /etc/X11/xorg.conf xserver.errors: Error loading keymap /var/lib/xkb/server-09D1F3CDBE4F6C8C6E82A68933E164F92A33A272.xkm xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log xserver.outputs: xserver.version: 2:1.16.0-1ubuntu1.3 ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64
[Bug 1443856] Re: Very short videos won't play
** Description changed: A very short video, such as 1 frame long, won't play in VLC. Nothing will show up, even if the video is paused. A 1-frame video can be useful for things like testing the performance of different encoding settings. While it's possible that VLC (maybe depending on vout display module) causes the appearance of a video to change slightly so it's not directly comparable to display by other software, the display of two VLC instances can generally be compared to each other. The 1-frame video can be converted to a different format, but sometimes this is lossy. A bit related, if a video is very slow, like 1 frame per second, it won't show up for a while in VLC. It's possible VLC is trying to buffer several frames before showing anything. Maybe also related, I noticed in ffmpeg, which VLC uses for decoding, that a filtergraph wasn't receiving frames until at least two frames had - a DTS that was before the PTS of the frame entering the filtergraph. So + a DTS that was after the PTS of the frame entering the filtergraph. So it's possible VLC is not receiving frames from libav (?). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: vlc 2.2.0-0ubuntu0.14.10.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-30.40-generic 3.16.7-ckt3 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.2 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Tue Apr 14 02:45:45 2015 SourcePackage: vlc UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443856 Title: Very short videos won't play To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1443856/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443856] [NEW] Very short videos won't play
Public bug reported: A very short video, such as 1 frame long, won't play in VLC. Nothing will show up, even if the video is paused. A 1-frame video can be useful for things like testing the performance of different encoding settings. While it's possible that VLC (maybe depending on vout display module) causes the appearance of a video to change slightly so it's not directly comparable to display by other software, the display of two VLC instances can generally be compared to each other. The 1-frame video can be converted to a different format, but sometimes this is lossy. A bit related, if a video is very slow, like 1 frame per second, it won't show up for a while in VLC. It's possible VLC is trying to buffer several frames before showing anything. Maybe also related, I noticed in ffmpeg, which VLC uses for decoding, that a filtergraph wasn't receiving frames until at least two frames had a DTS that was before the PTS of the frame entering the filtergraph. So it's possible VLC is not receiving frames from libav (?). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: vlc 2.2.0-0ubuntu0.14.10.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-30.40-generic 3.16.7-ckt3 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.2 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Tue Apr 14 02:45:45 2015 SourcePackage: vlc UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: vlc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443856 Title: Very short videos won't play To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1443856/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443879] [NEW] Find from typing selects hidden files
Public bug reported: I think this changed when I upgraded from Ubuntu 12.04 to 14.10. When searching by typing, which only searches in the current directory, hidden files are now selected. This would maybe be fine except that there's no feedback that a hidden file has been selected. Normally, if a file exists it's selected and nautilus will scroll to its location. If it's hidden, it seems like it doesn't scroll to its location. So if you want a file that does exist, but there's also a hidden file that begins the same way, there's no feedback that any file named what you want exists in that folder. As a practical example, gedit automatically saves the previous version of a file to name~ when one is saved, which is a hidden file. When sorted by modification date, that older file will come first, and automatically typing will not indicate that the desired, non-hidden file exists, although it can still be selected by scrolling after typing. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: nautilus 1:3.10.1-0ubuntu15.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-30.40-generic 3.16.7-ckt3 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.2 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Tue Apr 14 03:29:12 2015 GsettingsChanges: b'org.gnome.nautilus.list-view' b'default-visible-columns' b['name', 'size', 'date_modified', 'date_accessed', 'type'] b'org.gnome.nautilus.list-view' b'default-column-order' b['name', 'size', 'date_modified', 'date_accessed', 'type', 'group', 'where', 'mime_type', 'owner', 'permissions'] SourcePackage: nautilus UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443879 Title: Find from typing selects hidden files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1443879/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 495880] Re: File Roller cannot handle archive that doesn't encode filenames in UTF-8
The undocumented -O/-I option~ So unzip can handle different encodings, at least when I tested it. But it doesn't handle them automatically. p7zip doesn't work because, as noted in Bug #269482, it only handles UTF-8 and ASCII (or maybe ISO-8859). When I uninstalled p7zip and p7zip-full and looked at archives, some had the pattern of mojibake that I'm used to, and some had a new type. None of them were correct. So it's possible there is some automatic correction and this is why Bug #580961 for unzip has been marked as fixed. Automatic detection can probably usually be correct, but it could also sometimes be wrong. Either file-roller or unzip could probably improve their automatic detection, and in case certainty is low communicate this to users so they know there might be a problem. Two other bugs, #592109 and #1199239, refer to non-ASCII filenames encoded in UTF-8, which is likely to be the output from Unix-like systems. So non-UTF-8 encodings are probably from computers running Windows (?). Some open-source programs that do automatic detection of encodings include Firefox and, I think, gedit. Also maybe a bit similar to magic numbers used to determine file types..? This might be how those programs already do this, but I think the way to detect the proper encoding is to interpret the filenames as a certain type, and then look for characters, or character combinations, that are unlikely to appear in a normal filename, or that can't even be output on the file system type. For example, the character '', U+0082 control BREAK PERMITTED HERE, often appears in some languages when common encodings are interpreted as iso8859(-number?). Either file-roller or unzip could test various combinations to see what looks valid. This is worse than an archive file saying what encoding it uses, but basically it seems like some regions (like Japan) don't feel like using UTF-8. The zip format, which is probably worse than other formats in handling filenames, is probably still used because it encodes the contents of files separately, which means it's faster but gives worse compression than other archive formats. Maybe there are other reasons it's faster too. Having a unique file suffix for a certain set of compression options or quality means that people don't have to worry about which options to choose, and can't argue about which ones other people should use for that suffix. There is probably also a sort of stigma attached to having a poor compression ratio for many types of files, compared to other formats. (For example, some non-zip archive formats can compress a windows bmp file so that it's smaller than a png of the same image, especially if the image has repeating portions.) So either people can agree on a 'low-quality' archive suffix to use in cases where actual compression isn't important, that's also operating- system independent, or we will continue to encounter zips from different languages that don't tell you how to decode the file names. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495880 Title: File Roller cannot handle archive that doesn't encode filenames in UTF-8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/495880/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1444210] [NEW] Previewed files are not deleted
Public bug reported: It seems like this could be related to Bug #137308, where a user complained that previewed files were being deleted. file-roller, also known as Archive Manager, doesn't delete files that are previewed without extracting them to a known location first. These previews are stored in ~/.cache/.fr-random string. I believe the /tmp directory is cleared each time the system is restarted, but maybe the preview files aren't stored there for security reasons. eog seems to not store references to a file maybe by design; sometimes when you change a file on disk, eog will reload the file, but it doesn't always do so. So maybe can't rely on other applications that have the file 'open' to actually have a reference to the index node or whatever, and users will expect the preview not to be deleted immediately. Currently, it seems like some, and maybe all preview files are retained indefinitely, unless manually deleted. If a file is previewed more than once, multiple copies are created. Over time this can add up to a considerable amount of disk space. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: file-roller 3.10.2.1-0ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-30.40-generic 3.16.7-ckt3 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.2 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Tue Apr 14 17:05:57 2015 SourcePackage: file-roller UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1444210 Title: Previewed files are not deleted To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1444210/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 495880] Re: File Roller cannot handle archive that doesn't encode filenames in UTF-8
Along with the command-line version of unzip with the -O option, you can also use the convmv command to change filenames of previously extracted files. This works on an ext3 filesystem, but NTFS may give an error because filenames are invalid. ext3 says the encoding is invalid but still lets them be renamed to that. So for anyone who encounters this bug report and is concerned specifically with extracting filenames from shift-jis encoded archives, these are the commands you can use: (navigate to directory, and...) unzip -O shift-jis filename or convmv * -f utf8 -t iso8859-1 -r convmv * -f utf8 -t iso8859-1 --notest -r ; convmv -f shift-jis -t utf8 * --notest -r One of the other bug reports links to this, which lists solutions and problems: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=483290 One consideration might be if files in the same archive use different encoding types. It seems reasonable that they appeared that way to the archive's creator, and thus they shouldn't be interpreted separately, but it could lead to the wrong conversion method being selected. The patch linked in that bug report describes the options -O and -I, which aren't documented in unzip's manual pages, so it's possible that patch is already applied. But it still didn't detect 'proper' encodings for me when I tested file-roller, using unzip, on several archives after uninstalling p7zip. The patch also talks the current locale charset. Making assumptions about the encoding used on files could be correct for many people, most of the time, but will be incorrect for other people, and so is at best only a partial solution. I don't know what the patch does after that though. Just for reference, these are other Debian bugs mentioned in that report: Bug#197427: unzip: chinese filenames unwrapped on unix wrongly Bug#197428: unzip: zipinfo (and unzip) can't deal with chinese filenames like miniunzip can Bug#339021: unzip: incorrectly converts cyrillic file names from Windows-created ZIPs ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #483290 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=483290 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495880 Title: File Roller cannot handle archive that doesn't encode filenames in UTF-8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/495880/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443856] Re: Very short videos won't play
'Drop late frames' makes all frames other than the first one be dropped, because they're late, despite the video being only 1 fps and taking almost no CPU percent to play. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443856 Title: Very short videos won't play To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1443856/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443856] Re: Very short videos won't play
This video demonstrates the problem. The video starts at 0, as demonstrated by looking at the frames such as with ffprobe -select_streams 0 -show_frames timing.mp4 |less. But vlc starts video playback around 2, showing frame 0 at that time, and ends at the 6th frame (frame 5), not displaying the last four frames at all. As with bug #1443835, pressing 'e' to advance a frame doesn't work. Changing decoding and output options doesn't change this. Seeking to the middle of the video, though, does cause vlc to... 1) display frame 5 2) very briefly display frame 6 3) display frames 7, 8, and 9 for the normal time duration. This could be related to frames 8 and 9 having no decoding-time-stamp listed in ffprobe, so vlc or libav could decide to decode them simultaneously (instead of 1 sec apart), and then display the most recent frame in the buffer (since it's already 2 sec late) each time one of those frames is decoded. It isn't clear why this doesn't happen for normal playback though, without seeking. The video was generated with this command: ffmpeg -ss 4.5 -i '『-Project DIVA F-』 - Nostalgic [40_XMJzyQPE].webm' -vf fps=1,split[crop],lutyuv=val/1.2-10:val/2+64:val/2+64[bottom],[crop]crop=iw:ih/4:0:'mod(n,4)*ih/4',[bottom]overlay=0:'mod(n,4)*h' -hide_banner -t 10 timing.mp4 I note that avplay (I don't have ffplay) plays it better; it does display the first frame only briefly, and then turns black, but all the rest of the frames are displayed at the correct times. (Totem also works correctly.) So it seems like vlc should be getting frames earlier than it is. Since framerate can be variable, this wouldn't be based on a buffer of a certain length of time. ** Attachment added: timing.mp4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1443856/+attachment/4375581/+files/timing.mp4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443856 Title: Very short videos won't play To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1443856/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443856] Re: Very short videos won't play
If it helps, the OpenH264 codec by Cisco provided with Firefox does even worse; it stops after frame 1 (2nd frame) and then causes 100% CPU, I have to restart -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443856 Title: Very short videos won't play To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1443856/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1440254] Re: Recent update broke XVideo/XCB output for h264
Well I'm linking this unrelated thing just for the lulz http://pastebin.com/1htuH2jX But I have found that all the videos that appear to 'work' using the combination of VDPAU hardware decoding and xcb_xv as the vout display module only due so because the decoder profile is above the limits for the hardware's settings. Specifically, it appears my graphics card is rated in VDPAU up to h264 profile 4.2, while anything that is detected as being at level 5 or above will not use hardware acceleration with VDPAU. Other hardware acceleration options, like VA-API with X11, do attempt to decode videos above this level even if they're not fast enough to do so but they are also not affected by the bug that's the subject of this report. 'Ultrafast' output from x264 (using ffmpeg) is reported in vlc as being level 6. 'Format 18' in YouTube is reported as level 6 as well. The video sample reported as working attached to the original report shows up as level 51, meaning level 5.1, as it omits the decimal point for some reason. The larger YouTube videos that worked did so because they are level 5 or 5.1 as well. It's unclear whether the videos that are reported as being level 6 are shown as such incorrectly. I think I didn't bother to test all the options that the ultrafast preset in x264 uses, but I did notice that when playing a video output from the ultrafast preset, my 'GPU Utilization' as reported in the Nvidia X Server settings was high, whereas normally for VLC it isn't high. A quick summary, the hardware acceleration options in VLC mostly use the 'Video Engine Utilization', instead of the 'GPU Utilization'. In contrast, totem (which might be using ffmpeg plugins though) uses GPU Utilization, and no Video Engine Utilization at all. It might vary a bit depending on the options (the 'overlay output' and 'direct rendering' settings affect it too I think), but disabling hardware acceleration in VLC causes 'Video Engine Utilization' to go to zero, while GPU Utilization is unaffected and still significantly lower than totem. I think in this case, CPU use is higher than what totem uses but only a little. So vlc might be using the same options as totem when decoding and playing a video output from the ultrafast preset in x264, and it's possible this is a legitimate reason for it to be reported as level 6 in vlc's debug output. For videos that are reported as level 5, it's generally some predictable thing, like using more than 4096 macroblocks, or some combination of macroblocks and number of reference frames or framerate. None of these seem likely to apply to the 'ultrafast' preset or YouTube's format 18 (which are small videos, around 480x360, with a framerate of around 25) but it's possible the 'working' video attached to the original report is using a high number of reference frames. As a totally unrelated issue which should have its own bug report, there doesn't seem to be any way to avoid having VP9 videos display lots of bad frames when decoding is too slow, and it sort of seems like the VP9 decoder might only use one thread as CPU use does not go to maximum. Even with 'hurry up' for ffmpeg decoding, and 'drop late frames' and 'skip late frames' (even though it says it's for mpeg2 video) turned off, large-sized VP9/webm videos from YouTube still end up with problems when played on a slow computer, where frames degenerate into incorrectly-decoded output with no apparent visual relationship to the original video. ffmpeg's output of VP9 videos also sometimes has problems when viewed on vlc (in a different problem, the avconv fork of ffmpeg wasn't even able to copy VP9 videos into a new webm container without problems and repeated outputs having varying lengths) but I think that was an ffmpeg problem, not a vlc one. Ideally Google would help to fix bugs in software that doesn't deal with their codecs very well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440254 Title: Recent update broke XVideo/XCB output for h264 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1440254/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1440254] Re: Recent update broke XVideo/XCB output for h264
Just to explain the practical relevance, the only situation I could really think of where you would want to have multiple video streams playing at once in VLC is when you want to play multiple angles that were recorded of the same event at the same time. I discovered VLC did this by accident when combining a video that didn't have its original sound due to the copyrights being blocked by YouTube with a different video that did have sound. Instead of just playing one video stream in the main window, a second window opened with the video stream that started late. If you don't care about synchronization and resizing videos independently in the player, there would be no reason to do this. A home security system with multiple camera views, for example, could either combine videos into one or or just record them separately, and probably wouldn't be using VLC for live streaming of different angles. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440254 Title: Recent update broke XVideo/XCB output for h264 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1440254/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1440254] Re: Recent update broke XVideo/XCB output for h264
It's working again. It happened after I was changing a few things in the UI, and restarting if I wasn't sure the changes would be applied without it (like Always on top required a restart). It's possible it might have somehow been related to trying various output methods, and pressing stop button then restarting again after each one (required to use a new output device). I did this even with output methods I expected not to work, such as DirectFB video output and GNU/Linux framebuffer output. But if this is a way to fix the problem if it occurs, I don't know how to replicate it. I had previously tried restarting Xorg, then restarting my computer, which hadn't fixed it. As this bug is not confirmed to consistently affect even a single user, it's not a high-priority bug. I don't know if it could possibly be relevant that I disabled my syslog and kern.log by changing write permissions due to low disk space; it seemed like after that, a USB wireless device would take longer to start working. It might be waiting for logging to timeout or something, and not sure if this could somehow affect video rendering too. (Pausing the rsyslogd daemon causes more problems than just making the logs unwriteable.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440254 Title: Recent update broke XVideo/XCB output for h264 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1440254/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1436595] Re: Images too bright
While it isn't completely clear what the correct way to display images is, if eog is in fact currently displaying them correctly it would help to have an option to display them 'literally'. It doesn't seem like there is any way to do this. Exact comparisons are helpful to diagnose problems in other programs, or even for things like just understanding whether the rgb to yuv conversion is linear or follows some other equation, for someone who has encountered that situation without much knowledge about it. For example, suppose you want to compare whether Youtube's video player is displaying a video the same as your local player does. You could press F every time you switch to Youtube to cause it to go fullscreen, then switch to the other player while staring at the same spot. Or you could screenshot Youtube's display and compare to the screenshot. But if eog is the default image viewer and it displays it differently from how it originally appeared, you might make the wrong diagnosis and waste time. ** Attachment added: geq-255.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+attachment/4366261/+files/geq-255.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1436595 Title: Images too bright To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1440254] Re: Recent update broke XVideo/XCB output for h264
I wish I could say it was still working. But either it stopped working, or I confused X11 video output (XCB) for XVideo output (XCB) because it was late. XVideo output (XCB), or xcb_xv, is not working for me for most h264 videos, and the things I speculated about in my last comment did not affect this (including re-enabling logging and restarting rsyslogd). It's not directly related to video quality or the h264 'level' or profile. I can play a 3840x2160 h264 dash video from Youtube with no audio, but a 1280x720 h264 dash video from the same source, with a creation date in its metadata of just 7 minutes before the other video, won't play and gives the same errors in debug as in the original report. VP9 and VP8 work fine, h265 seems to work fine, mpeg4 (divx tag) works fine, apparently mpeg2 doesn't work either. Some files with the 'wmv' suffix don't work, with the same error. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440254 Title: Recent update broke XVideo/XCB output for h264 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1440254/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1440254] Re: Recent update broke XVideo/XCB output for h264
On a particular Youtube video, using the formats listed through youtube-dl -F video-ID, Formats 266 (2160p), 264 (1440p), 160 (144p), and 18 (360p with audio) are successfully opened by the xcb_xv vout display module. Formats 137 (1080p), 136 (720p), 135 (480p), 134 (360p), 133 (240p), and 22 (720p with audio and more keyframes) result in an error. With a different video, format 18 is the only h264 format that can be opened, out of 10 formats. Format 18 works for two other videos as well. Out of four videos with format 160 tested, two worked. So it's possible there is a consistent explanation for which videos can be displayed, and which ones can't, though it might not be entirely predictable. Most h264 files from Youtube that aren't format 18 can't be opened. Youtube does use different processes for some of its videos, resulting in different frames being showed from a 60-fps source video or not having a certain pattern of '~18 frames of motion followed by 12 frames of stillness', but the fact that 'newer' formats (as evidenced by the higher format number) worked in the first video tested could have been a coincidence. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440254 Title: Recent update broke XVideo/XCB output for h264 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1440254/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1440254] Re: Recent update broke XVideo/XCB output for h264
It's looking hardware-related, and I apologize for not being able to provide more detailed information about the source of the problem earlier. Right now at least, changing hardware-accelerated coding fixes the problem. I have an Nvidia GeForce 9650M GT GPU, with Nvidia driver version 331.113. The first and default option for hardware decoding is VDPAU, and selecting a different option (VA-API video decoder via DRM, or via X11) or disabling it lets all h264 videos be played with the XVideo XCB display module. This is still different from a week or two ago though. After testing, I found that VA-API video decoder via X11 was crashing on a windows media video file, or I wouldn't see it as a problem if VDPAU isn't working. It would be easier for me to report problems properly if I knew to what extent they could depend on hardware. I don't know if my bugs for hardware decoding, output modules etc. are hardware specific. I also found that videos that have a resolution change, through h264_mp4toannexb, cause VLC to crash if it's using hardware decoding. This is a different bug, and bugs are supposed to reported separately, but~ 'VA-API video decoder via DRM' only works in this case because it's failing to find a hardware decoding module. The others crash with a segmentation fault after the second video. If the second video has audio, it plays the audio and then crashes when it's finished with VDPAU (which doesn't display the video that accompanies the audio, possibly only because of the bug in the original report). If it's VA-API via X11, it crashes immediately at the second video before playing any audio from it. I would upload a sample video if requested. This is the output from ffmpeg with -f concat -auto_convert 1, which inserts the h264_mp4toannexb bitstream filter to H.264 streams in MP4 format. If this is done without the -auto_convert option, vlc simply stops playing the file, or rewinds it if on loop, without crashing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440254 Title: Recent update broke XVideo/XCB output for h264 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1440254/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1436595] Re: Images too bright
Some examples of how eog displays colours compared to imagemagick's display. These files were generated as follows, using ffmpeg: ffmpeg -filter_complex color=black:256x256,geq=X:240:128 -hide_banner -frames 1 geq.png ffmpeg -filter_complex color=black:256x256,geq=X:240:128 -hide_banner -frames 1 geq.jpg ffmpeg -filter_complex color=black:256x256,geq=X:200:128 -hide_banner -frames 1 geq-200.png ffmpeg -filter_complex color=black:256x256,geq=X:200:128 -hide_banner -frames 1 geq-200.jpg ffmpeg -filter_complex color=black:256x256,geq=X:128:128 -hide_banner -frames 1 geq-128.png convert geq-200.png -quality 100 geq-200.png.jpg convert geq-200.png geq-200-convert.png So these are images with a y (or is it y'?) value that ranges from 0 to 255, while the u value is at the mpeg range maximum for u of 240. The jpg and png images are different because the jpg images clip the y range when expanding it from 16~235 to 0~255, while the png images when converted to rgb allow the y values outside the normal range to affect the output colour. So the jpg output from convert is visually identical to the png it comes from, but on the edges u and v both have a gradient to produce those colours. Then I took a screenshot of how eog displays geq-200.png, as well as a screenshot of how imagemagick (display) displays png, and combined them in GIMP. The jpgs are displayed roughly the same in both programs, other than the differences due to clipping when expanding to jpeg range. Firefox displays the images output from ffmpeg the same way as imagemagick, but displays the png output from imagemagick's convert almost the same as eog does. This similarity is much higher than for the images I tested for the original bug report. I took a screenshot of Firefox's display of geq-200-convert.png, cropped it and placed it on top of a screenshot of eog's output of geq-200.png (which is displayed exactly the same as geq-200-convert.png by eog), used the difference filter and flattened the image. (flattening an image might be used incorrectly here, but it's what the option is called.) Then I used the threshold operation, from 1 to 255, so the vertical lines are where they differed. All but one of the lines disappear at threshold 2, the last disappears at threshold 5. ** Attachment added: geq.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+attachment/4366249/+files/geq.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1436595 Title: Images too bright To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1436595] Re: Images too bright
** Attachment added: geq-200.jpg https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+attachment/4366252/+files/geq-200.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1436595 Title: Images too bright To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1436595] Re: Images too bright
** Attachment added: geq-200-convert.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+attachment/4366256/+files/geq-200-convert.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1436595 Title: Images too bright To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1436595] Re: Images too bright
** Attachment added: comparison.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+attachment/4366255/+files/comparison.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1436595 Title: Images too bright To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1436595] Re: Images too bright
** Attachment added: geq-200.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+attachment/4366251/+files/geq-200.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1436595 Title: Images too bright To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1436595] Re: Images too bright
** Attachment added: geq-128.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+attachment/4366253/+files/geq-128.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1436595 Title: Images too bright To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1436595] Re: Images too bright
** Attachment added: eog-firefox diff-threshold.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+attachment/4366257/+files/eog-firefox%20diff-threshold.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1436595 Title: Images too bright To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1436595] Re: Images too bright
** Attachment added: geq.jpg https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+attachment/4366250/+files/geq.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1436595 Title: Images too bright To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1436595] Re: Images too bright
** Attachment added: geq-200.png.jpg https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+attachment/4366254/+files/geq-200.png.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1436595 Title: Images too bright To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1440254] Re: Recent update broke XVideo/XCB output for h264
** Attachment added: xcb_xv vout fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1440254/+attachment/4365499/+files/notworking_%E5%B0%8F%E5%BC%BA%20www%20%5B%E5%8B%95%E9%AD%84%E5%BD%B1%E9%9F%B3%5D%20%5BXMjgxMjEwNzUy%5D.mp4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440254 Title: Recent update broke XVideo/XCB output for h264 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1440254/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1440254] [NEW] Recent update broke XVideo/XCB output for h264
Public bug reported: The most recent VLC update seems to have broken h264 video playback using the XVideo output (XCB). This method is preferable to the default output method, which for me is VDPAU for h264 videos, because it can play multiple video streams at once, while VDPAU locks up in this case. This only happened to me today, and I think I updated to the latest version of VLC yesterday, although it had been available for several days. Debug output from 'vlc -vv' when opening a video that doesn't display: [7f49380547b8] core video output debug: Opening vout display wrapper [7f493c0020e8] core vout display debug: looking for vout display module matching xcb_xv: 15 candidates [7f493c0020e8] core vout display debug: no vout display modules matched [7f49380547b8] core video output error: video output creation failed [7f4938001ca8] core spu text debug: removing module freetype [7f49380be198] core scale debug: removing module yuvp [7f49380047e8] core scale debug: removing module swscale [7f4960c03978] core decoder error: failed to create video output [7f4960c03978] core decoder warning: can't get output picture [7f49640065e8] core input debug: Decoder wait done in 85 ms For a video that works, the reason why isn't clear from debug output: [7f494c000958] core video output debug: Opening vout display wrapper [7f4948057cc8] core vout display debug: looking for vout display module matching xcb_xv: 15 candidates [7f4948052918] core window debug: looking for vout window xid module matching qt4,any: 4 candidates [7f4948052918] qt4 window debug: requesting video window... [0258bab8] qt4 interface debug: Video was requested 0, 0 [7f4948052918] core window debug: using vout window xid module qt4 [7f4948057f68] core inhibit debug: looking for inhibit module matching any: 2 candidates [7f4948057f68] dbus_screensaver inhibit debug: found service org.freedesktop.ScreenSaver [7f4948057f68] core inhibit debug: using inhibit module dbus_screensaver [7f4948057cc8] xcb vout display debug: connected to X11.0 server [7f4948057cc8] xcb vout display debug: vendor : The X.Org Foundation [7f4948057cc8] xcb vout display debug: version: 1160 [7f4948057cc8] xcb vout display debug: using screen 0x251 [7f4948057cc8] xcb_xv vout display debug: using XVideo extension v2.2 [7f4948057cc8] xcb_xv vout display debug: using adaptor NV17 Video Texture [7f4948057cc8] xcb_xv vout display debug: using port 550 [7f4948057cc8] xcb_xv vout display debug: using image format 0x30323449 [7f4948057cc8] xcb_xv vout display debug: using X11 visual ID 0x21 (depth: 24) [7f4948057cc8] xcb_xv vout display debug: using X11 window 0x04a0 [7f4948057cc8] xcb_xv vout display debug: using X11 graphic context 0x04a2 [7f4948057cc8] core vout display debug: VoutDisplayEvent 'fullscreen' 0 This is with 'Accelerated video output (Overlay)' enabled in vlc's basic options, because without it the XVideo output (XCB) selection doesn't display anything at all. Turning hardware decoding, or 'Direct rendering' under advanced options, doesn't affect the result in this case. With two files that seem like they should be very similar, one works and the other doesn't. Both are .flv files, both were created in 2011 according to the original file metadata and have the same video resolution, but converting them to .mp4 doesn't change the result. The output from x264 using the ultrafast preset is displayed, but any slower presets cause the video to fail to be displayed. I tried setting turning off trellis and b-frames, or changing reference frames to 1, but these didn't affect the result. I have attached samples of videos, one that works with XVideo/XCB output and another that doesn't. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: vlc 2.2.0-0ubuntu0.14.10.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-30.40-generic 3.16.7-ckt3 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-30-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.2 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Fri Apr 3 15:57:25 2015 SourcePackage: vlc UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: vlc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug utopic ** Attachment added: xcb_xv vout succeeds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440254/+attachment/4365495/+files/working_%E9%87%91%E9%99%B5%E5%B0%8F%E5%BC%BA%20%5BXMzU3NjgzMzI4%5D.mp4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440254 Title: Recent update broke XVideo/XCB output for h264 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1440254/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1437550] [NEW] PNG image colours are off/wrong for XVideo output (XCB)
Public bug reported: I discovered this bug when testing a different package, eog: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595 When a PNG image is opened in VLC with Video output set to XVideo output (XCB), the colours are different than in other programs that display PNG files such as Firefox. avplay, and presumably ffplay, display pngs the same way as vlc does with using XVideo output (XCB). With a png that is a gradient from value 0 to 255 with one column of each value, vlc with Xvideo output (XCB) will have very slight apparent banding due to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateral_inhibition or some other related effect. A histogram shows that about every 8th value is shifted up or down by 1. Colours are different by a greater degree and in a systematic way, so you don't need to have a uniform graident or use a histogram to see the difference. With a PNG, XVideo output (XCB) also had a green line on the right border. With a video using the 'Sorensen video v.3' video codec, XVideo output (XCB) caused a green line to appear on the right side. I have no idea if this is a bug in vlc or in a different project (XVideo, or XCB?) that vlc has no control over. It seems likely that bugs will tend to accumulate in places where it's hard to tell what project is doing things wrong. With both still images (pngs and jpgs) and the Sorensen video v.3 codec, XVideo output (XCB) is the default output method if Accelerated video output (overlay, or Overlay video output is enabled. If it's disabled, then OpenGL GLX video output (XCB) is the default output method, which does not have any green lines, and renders images 'normally'. (That is, not the same as eog due to what seems like an eog bug as described in the linked bug report, but the same as several other programs.) The various options have their own drawbacks, or it would be easy to just select a better method if one was bugged. In case it helps, I am attaching my notes on video settings. I am using Ubuntu 14.10, and VLC version 2.2.0-pre2 Weatherwax, the witch. ** Affects: vlc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: vlc video settings.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1437550/+attachment/4358438/+files/vlc%20video%20settings.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1437550 Title: PNG image colours are off/wrong for XVideo output (XCB) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1437550/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1437550] Re: PNG image colours are off/wrong for XVideo output (XCB)
** Description changed: I discovered this bug when testing a different package, eog: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595 When a PNG image is opened in VLC with Video output set to XVideo output (XCB), the colours are different than in other programs that display PNG files such as Firefox. avplay, and presumably ffplay, display pngs the same way as vlc does - with using XVideo output (XCB). With a png that is a gradient from value - 0 to 255 with one column of each value, vlc with Xvideo output (XCB) - will have very slight apparent banding due to + using XVideo output (XCB). With a png that is a gradient from value 0 to + 255 with one column of each value, vlc with Xvideo output (XCB) will + have very slight apparent banding due to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateral_inhibition or some other related effect. A histogram shows that about every 8th value is shifted up or down by 1. Colours are different by a greater degree and in a systematic - way, so you don't need to have a uniform graident or use a histogram to + way, so you don't need to have a uniform gradient or use a histogram to see the difference. With a PNG, XVideo output (XCB) also had a green line on the right border. With a video using the 'Sorensen video v.3' video codec, XVideo output (XCB) caused a green line to appear on the right side. I have no idea if this is a bug in vlc or in a different project (XVideo, or XCB?) that vlc has no control over. It seems likely that bugs will tend to accumulate in places where it's hard to tell what project is doing things wrong. With both still images (pngs and jpgs) and the Sorensen video v.3 codec, XVideo output (XCB) is the default output method if Accelerated video output (overlay, or Overlay video output is enabled. If it's disabled, then OpenGL GLX video output (XCB) is the default output method, which does not have any green lines, and renders images 'normally'. (That is, not the same as eog due to what seems like an eog bug as described in the linked bug report, but the same as several other programs.) The various options have their own drawbacks, or it would be easy to just select a better method if one was bugged. In case it helps, I am attaching my notes on video settings. I am using Ubuntu 14.10, and VLC version 2.2.0-pre2 Weatherwax, the witch. ** Description changed: I discovered this bug when testing a different package, eog: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/1436595 When a PNG image is opened in VLC with Video output set to XVideo output (XCB), the colours are different than in other programs that display PNG files such as Firefox. avplay, and presumably ffplay, display pngs the same way as vlc does using XVideo output (XCB). With a png that is a gradient from value 0 to 255 with one column of each value, vlc with Xvideo output (XCB) will have very slight apparent banding due to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateral_inhibition or some other related effect. A histogram shows that about every 8th value is shifted up or down by 1. Colours are different by a greater degree and in a systematic way, so you don't need to have a uniform gradient or use a histogram to see the difference. With a PNG, XVideo output (XCB) also had a green line on the right border. With a video using the 'Sorensen video v.3' video codec, XVideo output (XCB) caused a green line to appear on the right side. I have no idea if this is a bug in vlc or in a different project (XVideo, or XCB?) that vlc has no control over. It seems likely that bugs will tend to accumulate in places where it's hard to tell what project is doing things wrong. With both still images (pngs and jpgs) and the Sorensen video v.3 codec, XVideo output (XCB) is the default output method if Accelerated video - output (overlay, or Overlay video output is enabled. If it's - disabled, then OpenGL GLX video output (XCB) is the default output - method, which does not have any green lines, and renders images - 'normally'. (That is, not the same as eog due to what seems like an eog - bug as described in the linked bug report, but the same as several other - programs.) + output (overlay), or Overlay video output in advanced options, is + enabled. If it's disabled, then OpenGL GLX video output (XCB) is the + default output method, which does not have any green lines, and renders + images 'normally'. (That is, not the same as eog due to what seems like + an eog bug as described in the linked bug report, but the same as + several other programs.) The various options have their own drawbacks, or it would be easy to just select a better method if one was bugged. In case it helps, I am attaching my notes on video settings. I am using Ubuntu 14.10, and VLC version 2.2.0-pre2 Weatherwax, the witch. -- You received this bug notification because you are a
[Bug 609348] Re: Network connections crash from overflow when unresponsive
Running that command gave this output: (process:27099): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed (granted authorization) dpkg-query: no packages found matching linux Nothing was happening so I stopped the process. I filed this under linux because I wasn't sure where else to file it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609348 Title: Network connections crash from overflow when unresponsive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/609348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1436595] [NEW] Images too bright
Public bug reported: Most images have their values shifted upwards when displayed in eog, and I don't think it is intentional. Reporting this as a bug is complicated because I am not sure if some programs, such as eog, change their display of an image based on screen settings for colorspace or gamma. I am not an expert on graphics, but something does seem to be wrong. So at least for my computer, eog seems to stretch out the range just above a 0 value. A very dark area will have a clear contrast between the totally black pixels, with a value of zero, and the ones just above it. In one image I tested, eog did not display any pixels with a value in the range of 1 to 5, as in the histogram of a screenshot of eog's display of the image. In comparison, a screenshot of Firefox's display of the same image had numerous pixels in the 1~5 range. The GIMP image editor displayed this image the same as Firefox, with the histogram showing that the pixels were being displayed without any adjustment. Basically, if a lot of different programs display things differently and inconsistently, some of them have to be wrong, and it seems likely that eog is. Due to inconsistencies, I'm not actually sure what is the correct, or the best way to display images, which might be different from the correct way. Programs used to test, convert, and display images: imagemagick ffmpeg (for conversion) and avplay (for display, since ffplay isn't provided on my distribution) eog Firefox vlc GIMP I thought Firefox was displaying non-stripped pngs the same as eog does, but it's actually slightly different. While gray areas are about the same as eog, red areas are slightly darker in Firefox. A description of how various programs display images: vlc seems to be the same as avplay, and both are different from either Firefox or eog. Dark red is a bit more like brown or orange, while contrast for luminosity or luminance (?) seems to be higher; I am just noting that it is different. This is for a png image. I thought eog was displaying all images the same way, until I encountered a png that worked differently. I thought eog was displaying this png without any adjustments, as it's slightly darker than how eog displays other pngs, but it's actually slightly darker with more intense colours than how other programs display the same image. But for all other images, eog seems to make them slightly brighter. Firefox displays jpgs without any adjustment, but most pngs are slightly brighter. As described, this is slightly different than how eog makes images brighter. If an image is converted with -strip action in imagemagick, Firefox shows the png without adjustments. A png output from ffmpeg is also displayed without adjustments. It seems to be related to the 'png:sRGB : intent=value' property but that would be a Firefox bug. It's relevant because it seems to adjust the display of images in a way that's similar to eog, though still different. If a stripped png is converted again without applying the -strip action again, Firefox will display it as adjusted; that is, brighter. This is also part of the evidence that the adjustment in Firefox, and therefore in eog, is a bug. GIMP displays images without an adjustment, so darker than eog for most images. The 'display' utility from imagemagick displays images the same as GIMP, without any apparent adjustments. So GIMP, display from imagemagick, and Firefox all display jpgs as slightly darker than eog, without mostly skipping over the range of values just above 0. GIMP and 'display' show most pngs as darker than eog, while Firefox displays some pngs as darker than eog while others are displayed similar but with slightly darker reds it seems. I think all the images I've looked at had 'colorspace: sRGB' in their properties when I looked at them with 'identify' from imagemagick or exiftool., so if that's somehow related it doesn't seem like programs should display images differently. They probably all had 'gamma: 0.45' in 'identify' (though this shows up as gamma: 2.2 in exiftool I think), so I don't think that should affect image display either. For the unusual png that eog displays differently, none of the ways I used to convert it caused the output to be displayed in eog the same as the original. These methods included 'convert' from imagemagick with and without the -strip action; convert with jpg output; ffmpeg with png output; and GIMP exporting as png with background color and gamma tested (so four GIMP outputs total). The reason for testing background color was that 'png:bKGD' is part of the output from 'identify' when the -strip action isn't used with 'convert', and non-stripped pngs are treated differently in Firefox so they could potentially also be treated differently in eog, but as it turned out they weren't treated differently in eog. In 'identify's output, the original png does have very slightly different numbers under Chromaticity, with five of eight numbers different by
[Bug 1319233] Re: audio stutters or stops playing after seeking
This might be related to timing. I'm just saying what I concluded from looking at debug before; when I looked at it more recently, it wasn't obvious which error messages related to audio were relevant or I didn't look at enough of the debug output. If a video is decoded quickly, audio won't stop playing. If it takes too long, there is an error message in debug and audio will stop working. So the way to replicate it, as suggested by the duplicate bug report, is to seek to the end of a long group-of-pictures in a video, just before a keyframe. While switching to ALSA audio output does prevent the problem, it seems to me that there is a small amount of static as audio starts playing again if using the PulseAudio Sound Server as ALSA's output. If using a hardware device, VLC can play files fine by itself, but conflicts with other attempts to use the output device. So if you leave VLC open, and try to play a web video, the video will freeze after a few seconds because it's waiting for audio to start. For me at least, when I start playing a Flash video in Firefox, in my Sound settings (Ubuntu), 'ALSA plug-in [plugin-container' starts up. Similarly, if Flash is already using the audio, VLC will give an error message in the UI (device busy) and audio won't play. I don't notice this burst of static when just using Pulseaudio as output, but it has problems with seeking as described in this bug report. I also only encountered this problem after upgrading, though for me it was from Ubuntu 12.04 to 14.10 and I'm not sure what my VLC settings were before, probably just default. I don't get stuttering, the audio just turns off, and only turns back on if another attempt to seek within the video is successful. The workaround is to pause the video just before seeking, and only start playing again once the video decoder has finished or almost finished catching up. But this isn't at all obvious; at first I thought that losing audio was due to problems with handling the VP9 or WebM codecs/formats. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319233 Title: audio stutters or stops playing after seeking To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1319233/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 997491] Re: E: The value 'oneiric' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as such a release is not available in the sources E: _cache-open() failed, please report.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 978821 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/978821 From http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=11403493 The APT::Default-Release identifier is within Synaptic config file at each home directory (for you and root). I have recreated this error by manually editing those files. Going to /root/.synaptic/synaptic.conf and changing the default distro to precise fixed it for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997491 Title: E: The value 'oneiric' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as such a release is not available in the sources E: _cache-open() failed, please report. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/997491/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 978821] Re: E: Значение «oneiric» недопустимо для APT::Default-Release, так как выпуск недоступен в источниках E: _cache-open() failed, please report.
From http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=11403493 The APT::Default-Release identifier is within Synaptic config file at each home directory (for you and root). I have recreated this error by manually editing those files. Going to /root/.synaptic/synaptic.conf and changing the default distro to precise fixed it for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/978821 Title: E: Значение «oneiric» недопустимо для APT::Default-Release, так как выпуск недоступен в источниках E: _cache-open() failed, please report. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/978821/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 868646] Re: Error when installing ubuntu 11.04 release
I am trying to install the ubuntu 11.04 release on my desktop. When I enter the sudo update-manager, password...i think it should open and start running the update. But for this case nope. Please help on this am stuck... I miss my Ubuntu machine...tired of windows. Jay -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868646 Title: Error when installing ubuntu 11.04 release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/868646/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 868646] [NEW] Error when installing ubuntu 11.04 release
Public bug reported: An unresolvable problem occurred while initializing the package information. Please report this bug against the 'update-manager' package and include the following error message: 'E:Encountered a section with no Package: header, E:Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/lists/us.archive.ubuntu .com_ubuntu_dists_natty_main_binary-i386_Packages, E:The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.' ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868646 Title: Error when installing ubuntu 11.04 release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/868646/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 609348] [NEW] Network connections crash from overflow when unresponsive
Public bug reported: OS: Lucid 10.04.1 LTS, upgraded from Karmic 9.10 If too much information is sent to an unresponsive network connection, the connection seems to 'fail' and stops working. The unresponsive network connection is usually the result of a proxy or NAT router restarting. Steps to duplicate in 10.04: 1) set up ping -f google.com -i 10 2) set up ping -f google.com -i 1 3) restart router Result: the flood ping with interval 10 will show one or two dropped packets while the router is restarting, and then will show no further errors. The flood ping with interval 1 will continue to show dropped packets after the router has restarted, as too much information is in the connection buffer or something. This also applies to IM connections (tested with Pidgin connected to MSN). If update information is sent while the router is restarting, the connection to the server 'stalls' and is only reset by the application after 15 minutes. If no information is sent while the router is restarting, the connection works fine immediately after the router has finished restarting and connected to ISP. Also tested this on 10.04 32-bit from a Live usb. First test with 10-sec interval stalled when restarting router, but with a 20-sec interval, there was only one missed packet and then resumed normal operation. Meanwhile the 1-sec interval ping completely stalled even after the router finished restarting. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: buffer connection overflow pidgin ping -- Network connections crash from overflow when unresponsive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609348 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 605148] Re: Application connections fail with overflow in Lucid 10.04
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 609348 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609348 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 609348 Network connections crash from overflow when unresponsive -- Application connections fail with overflow in Lucid 10.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 605148] [NEW] Application connections fail with overflow in Lucid 10.04
Public bug reported: OS: Lucid 10.04.1 LTS, upgraded from Karmic 9.10 If too much information is sent to an unresponsive network connection, the connection seems to 'fail' and stops working. The unresponsive network connection is usually the result of a proxy or NAT router restarting. Steps to duplicate in 10.04: 1) set up ping -f google.com -i 10 2) set up ping -f google.com -i 1 3) restart router Result: the flood ping with interval 10 will show one or two dropped packets while the router is restarting, and then will show no further errors. The flood ping with interval 1 will continue to show dropped packets after the router has restarted, as too much information is in the connection buffer or something. This also applies to IM connections (tested with Pidgin connected to MSN). If update information is sent while the router is restarting, the connection to the server 'stalls' and is only reset by the application after 15 minutes. If no information is sent while the router is restarting, the connection works fine immediately after the router has finished restarting and connected to ISP. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: buffer connection overflow pidgin ping -- Application connections fail with overflow in Lucid 10.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 605148] Re: Application connections fail with overflow in Lucid 10.04
Tested this on 10.04 32-bit from a Live usb. First test with 10-sec interval stalled when restarting router, but with a 20-sec interval, there was only one missed packet and then resumed normal operation. Meanwhile the 1-sec interval ping completely stalled even after the router finished restarting. -- Application connections fail with overflow in Lucid 10.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446889] Re: Linksys WUSB54GC v3 (ID 1737:0077) doesn't work
Well, it looks like it's recognized in some way at least if there's so much activity. The result I have in 'dmesg' when I plug it in for the first time is similar to the first dozen or so lines of your output. I assume you are using the generic kernel, not the server one? I don't have WPA or WPA2, mine is an unsecured connection. In one of the Ubuntuforums threads I noticed that there were two changes that were supposed to be necessary to get the rt3070 (?) driver to work: one of them was editing the source to add this particular device to the list of matching hardware, the other was to edit the source to change WPA and WPA2 from disabled to enabled. Possibly the wireless backports module only currently has the first change. I don't know how to show more test results. For the first time I plugged it in after restarting it showed the rt2870sta: module is from the staging directory, the quality is unknown, you have been warned. message from your results, and then further messages. If I plug it in again, this is the exact output in dmesg leading to connection to an unsecured wireless network (selecting a second network before the first showed as fully connected in the network manager icon in Gnome): ** Attachment added: Connection with Lucid using wireless backports and generic kernel http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48470754/dmesg%20output%20for%20successful%20connect.txt -- Linksys WUSB54GC v3 (ID 1737:0077) doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446889 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446889] Re: Linksys WUSB54GC v3 (ID 1737:0077) doesn't work
The Linksys WUSB54GC v3 (ID 1737:0077) now works after installing linux-backports-modules-wireless-lucid-generic and linux-backports- modules-headers-lucid-generic, yay! Blinking light and everything. I have not stress tested it to see if it has the same eventual lag and disconnect problems that my computer's built-in wireless card does with the ath9k driver and even another ralink-chipset external adapter sometimes had with Karmic, but so far (~10 minutes) I do not see any abnormally long pings. I believe it's necessary to install both of those packages together, but I am not sure. -- Linksys WUSB54GC v3 (ID 1737:0077) doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446889 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446889] Re: Linksys WUSB54GC v3 (ID 1737:0077) doesn't work
I am too afraid of breaking my computer, but which would we install to test? And is there a way to add it to repositories instead of downloading the file? I have just upgraded to Lucid and dmesg shows the same as before for the 1737:0077 Linksys device: [ 863.290142] usb 2-1: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 3 [ 863.458091] usb 2-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [ 863.624357] phy1: Selected rate control algorithm 'minstrel' [ 863.626394] Registered led device: rt2800usb-phy1::radio [ 863.626495] Registered led device: rt2800usb-phy1::assoc [ 863.626542] Registered led device: rt2800usb-phy1::quality [ 863.626912] usbcore: registered new interface driver rt2800usb [ 863.682964] rt2870sta: module is from the staging directory, the quality is unknown, you have been warned. [ 863.694399] rtusb init --- [ 863.694508] usbcore: registered new interface driver rt2870 [ 863.740379] udev: renamed network interface wlan1 to wlan2 [ 863.746992] rt2800usb 2-1:1.0: firmware: requesting rt2870.bin [ 864.381936] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan2: link is not ready -- Linksys WUSB54GC v3 (ID 1737:0077) doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446889 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs