[Bug 774978] Re: xserver crashes in RecordAReply when XRecord is enabled in syndaemon
hi there, we are in 2016 and the bug is still here got this bug with Chrome, Firefox closing tabs ( in Mint 17.3 ), even with Font Manager I use a Radeon hd 5570 graphic card - 4gb RAM - Intel Quad Core Duo cpu. on another machine running on 60bit architecture using the same desktop configuration (but i7 cpu) I can't replicate this bug - can be this problem related only for 32bit architecture ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774978 Title: xserver crashes in RecordAReply when XRecord is enabled in syndaemon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-synaptics/+bug/774978/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 602809] Re: add Mouse Click Debounce Feature?
this is true got an RAT7 (Mad Catz) and right click sometime give 2 or 3 click events a lot of peoples(and I really mean A LOT) using expensive devices (mice) are deep into this problem fundamentally incredible is the fact that all guru's talk about bad hardware on the linux side, leaving the problem unsolved - on windows they all use the same trick for all devices (using autohotkey). spending many hours over the internet to find a linux easy solution, I found that the ultimate solution is to patch the evdev driver. how many peoples will rebuild evdev is my question ? - very few is my response - people use Ubuntu / Mint for ease of use - geeks use Arch < those guys know what to do but many Ubuntu users will leave the problem unsolved .. therefore please add this patch into evdev mainline. Thanks in advance ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602809 Title: add Mouse Click Debounce Feature? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evdev/+bug/602809/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1301160] Re: Gtk-message: Failed to load module unity-gtk-module
14 July 2014 - the bug is still present from terminal almost any app complain about : Failed to load module unity-gtk-module -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1301160 Title: Gtk-message: Failed to load module unity-gtk-module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1301160/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1316197] [NEW] cant compile version from SVN
Public bug reported:
after I've installed all dependencies when I come to make the package
I've got this message :
make
Making all in src
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/sq4/00-Space/DEVEL/BUILDS/SVN/font-manager/src'
make all-am
make[2]: Entering directory
`/home/sq4/00-Space/DEVEL/BUILDS/SVN/font-manager/src'
rm -f font_manager_vala.stamp echo stamp font_manager_vala.stamp-t
CDPATH=${ZSH_VERSION+.}: cd . /usr/bin/valac --pkg gmodule-2.0 --pkg
glib-2.0 --pkg gio-2.0 --pkg gtk+-3.0 --pkg gee-0.8 --pkg json-glib-1.0 --pkg
Gucharmap-2.90 --pkg libxml-2.0 --pkg pango --pkg sqlite3 --target-glib 2.38
--gresources
/home/sq4/00-Space/DEVEL/BUILDS/SVN/font-manager/resources/FontManagerGResource.xml
-C Main.vala Common/About.vala Common/ArchiveManager.vala
Common/Collections.vala Common/Components.vala Common/Constants.vala
Common/Database.vala Common/FontInfo.vala Common/Library.vala Common/Utils.vala
Filters/Category.vala Filters/Collection.vala Filters/Filter.vala
Filters/SearchResult.vala Filters/Unsorted.vala FontConfig/Accept.vala
FontConfig/Config.vala FontConfig/Directories.vala FontConfig/Enums.vala
FontConfig/Family.vala FontConfig/Families.vala FontConfig/Font.vala
FontConfig/Properties.vala FontConfig/Reject.vala FontConfig/Selections.vala
FontConfig/XmlWriter.vala Glue/Glue.vala Json/Cacheable.vala
Json/JsonWriter.vala Models/CategoryModel.va
la Models/CollectionModel.vala Models/FontModel.vala UX/MainWindow.vala
UX/CharacterMap.vala UX/GtkUtils.vala UX/Controls/CollectionControls.vala
UX/Controls/CompareControls.vala UX/Controls/FontListControls.vala
UX/Controls/PreviewControls.vala UX/Controls/TitleBar.vala
UX/Controls/ModeSelector.vala UX/Dialogs/Migration.vala
UX/Dialogs/NotImplemented.vala UX/Dialogs/FileSelector.vala
UX/Sidebar/SideBar.vala UX/Sidebar/MainSideBar.vala
UX/Sidebar/CharacterMapSideBar.vala UX/Trees/CollectionTree.vala
UX/Trees/CategoryTree.vala UX/Trees/FontList.vala UX/Trees/FontListTree.vala
UX/Widgets/FontScale.vala UX/Widgets/AdjustablePreview.vala
UX/Widgets/CellRendererPill.vala UX/Widgets/TextViews.vala
UX/Widgets/MultiDNDTreeView.vala UX/Widgets/ThinPaned.vala
UX/Views/Compare.vala UX/Views/FontPreview.vala UX/Views/CharacterTable.vala
UX/Views/Browse.vala
error: Package `Gio-2.0' not found in specified Vala API directories or
GObject-Introspection GIR directories
error: Package `cairo-1.0' not found in specified Vala API directories or
GObject-Introspection GIR directories
error: Package `xlib-2.0' not found in specified Vala API directories or
GObject-Introspection GIR directories
error: Package `GObject-2.0' not found in specified Vala API directories or
GObject-Introspection GIR directories
error: Package `cairo-1.0' not found in specified Vala API directories or
GObject-Introspection GIR directories
error: Package `GModule-2.0' not found in specified Vala API directories or
GObject-Introspection GIR directories
error: Package `Gio-2.0' not found in specified Vala API directories or
GObject-Introspection GIR directories
error: Package `GObject-2.0' not found in specified Vala API directories or
GObject-Introspection GIR directories
Compilation failed: 8 error(s), 0 warning(s)
make[2]: *** [font_manager_vala.stamp] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/sq4/00-Space/DEVEL/BUILDS/SVN/font-manager/src'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/sq4/00-Space/DEVEL/BUILDS/SVN/font-manager/src'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
** Affects: font-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316197
Title:
cant compile version from SVN
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/font-manager/+bug/1316197/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1316197] Re: cant compile version from SVN
This bug can be closed as invalid.
It is not a bug.
This version is not in the repositories yet.
It is not even a released version...
---
I can agree with that
but
can we get a solution for a working Font Manager ?
this is a must for designers and your Font Manager is ...as far as I've
tested, the best of breed.
I don't really know why distributions (I mean big names here) won't
sustain(financially or with manpower) such project which is a 'sine qua
non' for the linux ecosystem
on my view this project has the same relevance as Cairo or Pango ...
the problem with the version from Saucy repository is that for a fresh
linux install it works - once you put some fonts inside Font Manager crash
after loading the main ui ...
until the next version will come (at least for Ubuntu's row) can we get
some tips or how-to's about how to make it work again ? - this would be
gold
today It was ok - on my fonts folder were about 150 fonts
using Font Manager (file-manager from Saucy repository) I've installed some
more fonts from another folder - then at the next start File Manager
Crashed
this is what I get :
font-manager --version
INFO: Verified /home/sq4/.fonts.conf
INFO: Font Manager is now starting
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/font-manager, line 98, in module
main()
File /usr/bin/font-manager, line 89, in main
Main()
File /usr/share/font-manager/main.py, line 98, in __init__
self.objects.load_core()
File /usr/share/font-manager/main.py, line 425, in load_core
self.data['FontManager'] = core.get_manager(self.data['MainWindow'])
File /usr/share/font-manager/core/__init__.py, line 791, in get_manager
MANAGER = FontManager(PROGRESS_CALLBACK, parent)
File /usr/share/font-manager/core/__init__.py, line 177, in __init__
core.fonts.Sort(self, self.progress, self.parent)
File /usr/share/font-manager/core/fonts.py, line 308, in __init__
self._sort()
File /usr/share/font-manager/core/fonts.py, line 438, in _sort
rows = self.table.get('*', 'family={0}'.format(name))
File /usr/share/font-manager/core/database.py, line 255, in get
raise sqlite3.ProgrammingError(self.db.error)
sqlite3.ProgrammingError: near Call: syntax error
=== a tip about how to fix this would be gold for many linux based
designers ..
thanks in advance for any help - and thank you and Alessio for keeping the
project alive
2014-05-05 19:18 GMT+03:00 Jerry Casiano 1316...@bugs.launchpad.net:
This bug can be closed as invalid.
It is not a bug.
This version is not in the repositories yet.
It is not even a released version...
--
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316197
Title:
cant compile version from SVN
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/font-manager/+bug/1316197/+subscriptions
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316197
Title:
cant compile version from SVN
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/font-manager/+bug/1316197/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 82205] Re: [apport] gtk-window-decorator crashed with SIGSEGV in cairo_set_source_rgba()
Daniel - it's an old bug - we can close or we can let this bug open since my first report ...few years passed - the first repost was against Compiz before version 9 that mean another codebase 2012/8/25 Daniel van Vugt daniel.van.v...@canonical.com: Daniel, This bug is Fix Released. If you continue to experience graphical bugs, please run: ubuntu-bug compiz to log a new one. ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Assignee: Daniel (deaspo29) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82205 Title: [apport] gtk-window-decorator crashed with SIGSEGV in cairo_set_source_rgba() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/82205/+subscriptions -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82205 Title: [apport] gtk-window-decorator crashed with SIGSEGV in cairo_set_source_rgba() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/82205/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 646798] Re: eog window size exceeds screen height
It still happens in my 64bit install of Precise with Unity (so, Compiz is used), as you can see on the screenshot. ** Attachment added: Eye of GNOME window too big https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/646798/+attachment/3212282/+files/eog_bug_precise.png the previous text is a copy / paste from a message of MartinMario ✆ 646...@bugs.launchpad.net he send this message to the list on 4 July that mean Gnome 3 2012/7/29 Robert Roth evf...@gmail.com: Question in upstream bug: This bug was reported against a version which is not supported any more. Developers are no longer working on this version so there will not be any bug fixes for it. Can you please check again if the issue you reported here still happens in a recent version of GNOME and update this report by adding a comment and adjusting the 'Version' field? Again thank you for reporting this and sorry that it could not be fixed for the version you originally used here. Without feedback this report will be closed as INCOMPLETE after 6 weeks. Please someone who is experiencing this bug, confirm this upstream on a more recent version of EOG if this still exists. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (695896). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646798 Title: eog window size exceeds screen height To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/eog/+bug/646798/+subscriptions -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646798 Title: eog window size exceeds screen height To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/eog/+bug/646798/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 646798] Re: eog window size exceeds screen height
...hmm I was thinking that for GNOME 3 technology they will improve the toolkit, at least the basic functionality of the window layers ;) Should be trivial to fix such problem in a windows 32/64 environment but seems that is impossible with GNU tools ;) now I'm really curios if EOG developers can fix this long standing bug, which really make me to stop using EOG. 2012/7/4 Chris Wilson afrowi...@gmail.com: ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Status: Incomplete = Confirmed ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Milestone: None = quantal-7-photo -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (695896). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646798 Title: eog window size exceeds screen height To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/eog/+bug/646798/+subscriptions -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646798 Title: eog window size exceeds screen height To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/eog/+bug/646798/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 809452] Re: about:support fails on oneiric
I have to open again this bug - in Natty today Firefox 5 auto upgrade to Firefox 6 then gray blank window on terminal : sorin@sorinn:~$ firefox Can't find symbol 'glXBindTexImageEXT' Can't find symbol 'glXReleaseTexImageEXT' -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809452 Title: about:support fails on oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/809452/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390879] Re: Nautilus can't show files in trash
Confirmed for Natty gvfs-ls trash:/// list the files, Nautilus Trash won't show any .. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390879 Title: Nautilus can't show files in trash -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446566] Re: Compiz not starting automatically on login
I will subscribe to this bug for Natty - Ubuntu Classic everything work ok after compiz --replace but then it will be no window decorator - so also I have to use fusion icon OR displex indicator to specify metacity as window decorator. - still don't know why the visual effects functionality is dropped out from Appearance Window - we suppose that any superior Ubuntu version will act as an evolution not as an involution as in this case. - I think is not a good policy to trow everything on Unity and to let out other (big) user-base wishes ..and I mean Ubuntu Classic lovers. They are still a majority ..at least Unity usability problems will be fixed. This is not good for marketing - please fix this that button and please keep with the large user base not with minority. I hope it will not be the case of too much critical thinking or too much debates for just put that functionality back - Visual Effects - on the same place on Appearance Window. Ubuntu Classic will still stand long time after 11.4 ..peoples don't switch to Unity just because ..they need good reasons and time for accommodation. Thanks for listening -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446566 Title: Compiz not starting automatically on login -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 646798] Re: eog window size exceeds screen height
this bug is gone in Natty with compiz downgraded back to 0.8.6 and no Unity and no Ubuntu Desktop ..just Ubuntu base BWT ..in this configuration work as fast as 10.10 ..but with Unity hmm slow (in a high speed machine) 2011/5/28 Bug Watch Updater 646...@bugs.launchpad.net: ** Changed in: eog Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of a duplicate bug (695896). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646798 Title: eog window size exceeds screen height To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/eog/+bug/646798/+subscribe -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646798 Title: eog window size exceeds screen height -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 695896] [NEW] eog go off-screen
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: eog but if the image height is bigger than the height of the screen eog will go off-screen ..eog window top is aligned to the top of the screen but the down side of window fall off-screen. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: eog 2.32.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-24.42-generic 2.6.35.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-24-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Dec 31 12:33:33 2010 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/eog InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: eog ** Affects: eog (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695896 Title: eog go off-screen -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 695896] Re: eog go off-screen
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695896 Title: eog go off-screen -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 615920] [NEW] Firefox 4 beta 2 crash on logout
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox Ubuntu 10.4 Firefox 4 beta 2 nothing happen at logout but the crash tool report the Firefox crash on the next login ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: firefox 3.6.8+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Aug 10 23:31:57 2010 FirefoxPackages: firefox 3.6.8+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 firefox-gnome-support N/A firefox-branding 3.6.8+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 abroswer N/A abrowser-branding N/A InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- Firefox 4 beta 2 crash on logout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 615920] Re: Firefox 4 beta 2 crash on logout
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53431072/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53431073/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53431074/profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53431075/profiles.ini.txt -- Firefox 4 beta 2 crash on logout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 615920] Re: Firefox 4 beta 2 crash on logout
K, no problem I will use then a daily build (if such build exist... if not I will compile source) .. 2010/8/11 Chris Coulson chris.coul...@canonical.com: That's quite an old version. Could you try the latest daily and reopen if it still occurs. Thanks ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Package changed: firefox (Ubuntu) = ubuntu ** Also affects: ubuntu-mozilla-ppa-bugs Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu-mozilla-ppa-bugs Status: New = Invalid -- Firefox 4 beta 2 crash on logout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615920 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- Firefox 4 beta 2 crash on logout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 615920] Re: Firefox 4 beta 2 crash on logout
;) I don't have time to update on a daily basis(and there are probably thousands like me). if Ubuntu crash reporter tool don't catch the crash and make the automatic report ...I can never guess it was a crash. But I will follow the development closer - being a GUI guy I have also some questions regarding the FF4 Linux UI. 2010/8/11 Chris Coulson chris.coul...@canonical.com: Were you not already using our daily builds? I just assumed you were, seeing as you reported a bug here -- Firefox 4 beta 2 crash on logout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615920 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- Firefox 4 beta 2 crash on logout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 537262] Re: plymouth pid missing from OMITPIDS and terminated by sendsigs - PLEASE NO MORE CONFIRMATIONS/COMMENTS
man - you have to understand - they report to developers after each Plymouth upgrade because developers need feedback - also there is an automated crash report tool. if developers don't need this information again then they can update crash reporting tool to be insensitive to this err. message. Is simple - Developers don't need advocates for what they know better. 2010/3/19 MaskedDriver brifrey...@gmail.com: Listen, people. The devs know there is a problem. It is set for High Priority, and is due to be fixed by Beta2. Please stop yep me tooing on here please. They'll fix it. Stay calm. Take a deep breath, and just wait. No more comments. -- plymouth pid missing from OMITPIDS and terminated by sendsigs - PLEASE NO MORE CONFIRMATIONS/COMMENTS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537262 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- plymouth pid missing from OMITPIDS and terminated by sendsigs - PLEASE NO MORE CONFIRMATIONS/COMMENTS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537262 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 537262] Re: plymouth pid missing from OMITPIDS and terminated by sendsigs - PLEASE NO MORE CONFIRMATIONS/COMMENTS
same as Shadow Panther - plymounth crash no more - but after Ubuntu points I got the command line login after sudo reboot - Ubuntu boot normally 2010/3/18 Shadow Panther panther...@gmail.com: No more crash reports after update, but plymouthd still seems to fall back to text (Ubuntu and four dots) mode on my GeForce 9500 GT. Current version of NVidia drivers is installed and working. -- plymouth pid missing from OMITPIDS and terminated by sendsigs - PLEASE NO MORE CONFIRMATIONS/COMMENTS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537262 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- plymouth pid missing from OMITPIDS and terminated by sendsigs - PLEASE NO MORE CONFIRMATIONS/COMMENTS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537262 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 537262] Re: plymouth pid missing from OMITPIDS and terminated by sendsigs
my system boot normally 2 or 3 times and then boot on command line so 3 to 1 after a command line boot sudo reboot solve the problem next reboot will boot normally in graphic mode. 2010/3/17 LordStenka lordste...@gmail.com: get plymouth update 16, randomly my system no boot, or crash. -- plymouth pid missing from OMITPIDS and terminated by sendsigs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537262 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- plymouth pid missing from OMITPIDS and terminated by sendsigs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537262 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 539709] Re: does not terminate at computer shutdown
I got this mesage after boot then, Plymouth crash message come second -- does not terminate at computer shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539709 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 537633] [NEW] does not terminate at computer shutdown
Public bug reported: well I do the normal upgrade today - then after restart - apport show me this error (this does not affect my activities in the Gnome session ) I use Lucid Linx up to date ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 CurrentDmesg: [ 17.980747] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through [ 17.982071] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through [ 17.982078] sdb: sdb1 Date: Thu Mar 11 22:20:08 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 ExecutablePath: /sbin/plymouthd InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name Package: plymouth 0.8.0~-12 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-2.6.32-16-generic root=UUID=0915ea1d-f0b7-4f7e-8036-2126739cf304 ro quiet splash ProcCmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-2.6.32-16-generic root=UUID=0915ea1d-f0b7-4f7e-8036-2126739cf304 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) ProcFB: 0 radeondrmfb 1 VGA16 VGA ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.25-generic SourcePackage: plymouth Title: does not terminate at computer shutdown Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic i686 dmi.bios.date: 05/07/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 0505 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: P5KPL-SE dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: x.0x dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0505:bd05/07/2009:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP5KPL-SE:rvrx.0x:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: System Product Name dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid shutdown-hang -- does not terminate at computer shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 537633] Re: does not terminate at computer shutdown
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40822738/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40822739/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40822740/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40822741/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: ProcAttrCurrent.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40822742/ProcAttrCurrent.gz ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40822743/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40822744/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40822745/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40822746/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40822747/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40822748/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40822749/UdevLog.txt -- does not terminate at computer shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 529246] Re: software-center crashed with TypeError in __init__()
software center did not crash ...just trow the error -- software-center crashed with TypeError in __init__() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529246 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526265] Re: package libx264-85 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libx264.so.85', which is also in package libx264-83 2:0.85.1442+svn20100219-git781d300~ppa1
...in addition : so...@sorin:~$ sudo aptitude remove libx264-85 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Writing extended state information... Done The following packages are BROKEN: libavcodec-extra-52 The following partially installed packages will be configured: gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg vlc vlc-nox vlc-plugin-pulse 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libavcodec-extra-52: Depends: libx264-85 but it is not installable The following actions will resolve these dependencies: Install the following packages: libx264-85 [2:0.85.1442.1+git781d30-1 (lucid)] Score is 39 Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] q Abandoning all efforts to resolve these dependencies. Abort. so...@sorin:~$ sudo aptitude remove libavcodec-extra-52 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done The following packages are BROKEN: gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg libavformat52 libquicktime1 vlc-nox The following packages will be REMOVED: libavcodec-extra-52 The following partially installed packages will be configured: vlc vlc-plugin-pulse 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 11.2MB will be freed. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libavformat52: Depends: libavcodec52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-5ubuntu2) but it is not installable or libavcodec-extra-52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-5ubuntu2) but it is not installable Depends: libavcodec52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-99) but it is not installable or libavcodec-extra-52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-99) but it is not installable gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg: Depends: libavcodec52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-3) but it is not installable or libavcodec-extra-52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-3) but it is not installable vlc-nox: Depends: libavcodec52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-3) but it is not installable or libavcodec-extra-52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-3) but it is not installable libquicktime1: Depends: libavcodec52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-3) but it is not installable or libavcodec-extra-52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-3) but it is not installable The following actions will resolve these dependencies: Install the following packages: libavcodec52 [4:0.5+svn20090706-5ubuntu2 (lucid, now)] Leave the following dependencies unresolved: ubuntu-restricted-extras recommends libavcodec-extra-52 Score is -159 Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] q Abandoning all efforts to resolve these dependencies. Abort. so...@sorin:~$ sudo apt-get remove libavcodec-extra-52 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these: The following packages have unmet dependencies: gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg: Depends: libavcodec52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-3) but it is not going to be installed or libavcodec-extra-52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-3) but it is not going to be installed libavformat52: Depends: libavcodec52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-5ubuntu2) but it is not going to be installed or libavcodec-extra-52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-5ubuntu2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libavcodec52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-99) but it is not going to be installed or libavcodec-extra-52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-99) but it is not going to be installed libquicktime1: Depends: libavcodec52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-3) but it is not going to be installed or libavcodec-extra-52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-3) but it is not going to be installed vlc-nox: Depends: libavcodec52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-3) but it is not going to be installed or libavcodec-extra-52 (= 4:0.5+svn20090706-3) but it is not going to be installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution). so...@sorin:~$ sudo apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libx264-85 The following NEW packages will be installed: libx264-85 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 5 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/279kB of archives. After this operation, 672kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Y (Reading database ... 203037 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libx264-85 (from
[Bug 526265] [NEW] package libx264-85 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libx264.so.85', which is also in package libx264-83 2:0.85.1442+svn20100219-git781d300~pp
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: x264 this bug come just upgrading Lucid Lynx in 2e February 2010 with aptitude ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Feb 23 09:37:00 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libx264.so.85', which is also in package libx264-83 2:0.85.1442+svn20100219-git781d300~ppa1~lucid1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) Package: libx264-85 (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-14.20-generic SourcePackage: x264 Title: package libx264-85 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libx264.so.85', which is also in package libx264-83 2:0.85.1442+svn20100219-git781d300~ppa1~lucid1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-14-generic i686 ** Affects: x264 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid -- package libx264-85 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libx264.so.85', which is also in package libx264-83 2:0.85.1442+svn20100219-git781d300~ppa1~lucid1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526265 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526265] Re: package libx264-85 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libx264.so.85', which is also in package libx264-83 2:0.85.1442+svn20100219-git781d300~ppa1
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39594415/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39594416/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39594417/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39594418/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package libx264-85 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libx264.so.85', which is also in package libx264-83 2:0.85.1442+svn20100219-git781d300~ppa1~lucid1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526265 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526265] Re: package libx264-85 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libx264.so.85', which is also in package libx264-83 2:0.85.1442+svn20100219-git781d300~ppa1
trying to see what's next with my usual upgrade I get the folowing so...@sorin:~$ sudo apt-get install -f Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libx264-85 The following NEW packages will be installed: libx264-85 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 5 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/279kB of archives. After this operation, 672kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Y (Reading database ... 203037 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libx264-85 (from .../libx264-85_2%3a0.85.1442.1+git781d30-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libx264-85_2%3a0.85.1442.1+git781d30-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libx264.so.85', which is also in package libx264-83 2:0.85.1442+svn20100219-git781d300~ppa1~lucid1 dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libx264-85_2%3a0.85.1442.1+git781d30-1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) so...@sorin:~$ maybe this is helpful -- package libx264-85 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libx264.so.85', which is also in package libx264-83 2:0.85.1442+svn20100219-git781d300~ppa1~lucid1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526265 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 104309] Re: nautilus crashes when thumbnailing an svg with a pattern
sadly - this bug willt not be stopped until someone with a good soul will not cover this problem in a serious manner (from start to end) anyone just think what's the problem but noone know exactly. when this will happen Linux will be ready for the masses. 2010/2/18 ziocane mrc...@libero.it: Hi everybody! I have the same problem with ubuntu 9.10 64 bit. Inkscape version is 0.47. My svg with gradient background doesn't works, and nautilus freeze. After that I deleted the backgrund and BANG! It works! last weeks I tried deleting .gnome2 - .nautilus, reinstall everything... So, what have I to do to have my svg with background? Thank you -- nautilus crashes when thumbnailing an svg with a pattern https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104309 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- nautilus crashes when thumbnailing an svg with a pattern https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104309 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 417462] Re: Jockey-gtk is throwing up a box saying you are not authorised to perform this action
It's not fixed in Karmic ..I installed Karmic today and Jokey trow me : You are not authorized to perform this action. On other computers with the same video card as mine it's working. I have ATI Radeon 2600 HD. Jokey and Network Manager in combination with Policykit are the the second enemy of Ubuntu right now on my humble opinion. ...and I speak from the ground, I'm an active Ubuntu evangelist I install Ubuntu on a daily basis - as far as I see the ATI drivers problem seems to be gone - but policykit + printer drivers + Network Manager (DSL in special) and sometime + Jokey ..they are the most frequently problem. Hope to see a global solution soon for Policykit - Ubuntu need to progress in order to reach audience, and also in order to keep peoples who spent a lot of time on promoting Ubuntu. -- Jockey-gtk is throwing up a box saying you are not authorised to perform this action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417462 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 405667] Re: gnome-keyring-daemon crashed with signal 5 in g_thread_join()
yep - I have to subscribe - for each boot, same bunch of problems - Karmic alpha 4 -- gnome-keyring-daemon crashed with signal 5 in g_thread_join() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 410570] Re: NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()
seems to be related to pilicykit / consolekit - something gows wrong with rights doe the new changes in Karmic - I hope they will solve that around launch date - seems like the new technologies regarding rights administration is still a hard stone for Linux. 2009/8/14 Slug71 jean_...@hotmail.com: Affected by this too. Did a fresh install of Karmic 64b Alpha 4 and all updates applied. -- NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410570 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410570 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 410570] Re: NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()
after last upgrade of network manager in Karmic - my nm-appler work ok only one time - after upgrade. Then, start until now, at each boot I got Network Manager is not running and when I wanna edit connections no connection are shown for my DSL -- NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410570 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 269010] Re: nm-system-settings crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()
Until 7 August ..all OK with my network. Then after upgrade - network Manager won't work at all ( upgrade was for Karmic - on 7/8 August ) my connection is DSL - so, fortunatelly I can connect using pppoeconf utility. But the point is ..network manager is unusable and this is bad. This kind of problems should be history now.. For example I use Karmic Koala now and this bug is alive again. What should I do to repair my problem ? ..my Apport submit this bug - maybe is useful to see the command line responses .. - i...@sq2:~$ nm-applet ** (nm-applet:4917): WARNING **: WARN request_name(): Could not acquire the session service as it is already taken. Return: 3 ** (nm-applet:4917): WARNING **: WARN constructor(): Couldn't initialize the D-Bus manager. i...@sq2:~$ killall nm-applet i...@sq2:~$ nm-applet ** (nm-applet:4993): WARNING **: Could not retrieve dbus connections: The name org.freedesktop.NetworkManagerSystemSettings was not provided by any .service files. -- I'll wait for an useble answer (this bug force me to stay and to work under XP) -- nm-system-settings crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 404351] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in exit()
right after Desktop is loaded this crash occur. Nothing too visible for the user. I have radeon driver for an Radeon HD2600 PCIe. Sometime when I open folders from my desktop, last 3 lines of icons on the bottom side of the screen got a duplicate shadow which disappear when I drag a rectangle with mouse around the problematic area. My kernel is 2.6.31-5 -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in exit() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404351 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192457] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV
for me crashed when I press F5 for refresh Desktop ;) -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192457 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 329146] Re: nautilus unable to start on login
I have this bug after an recent upgrade of samba and vlc main packages (with the related libraries) - searching over the net I found this bug under different instances so is not related to Brasero (I removed brasero with config files and some related libraries - restart ). After cat /var/log/messages | grep nautilus I get the following ... : Jul 10 15:16:46 SQ2 kernel: [ 1741.254289] nautilus[10512]: segfault at b4d9bd50 ip b4d9bd50 sp bfd5dd7c error 4 in SYSV (deleted)[b4e8f000+6] Jul 10 15:18:11 SQ2 kernel: [ 1826.371974] nautilus[11591]: segfault at b4fa0d50 ip b4fa0d50 sp bf8689ac error 4 in SYSV (deleted)[b50bb000+6] Jul 10 18:14:11 SQ2 kernel: [ 2773.002205] nautilus[7218]: segfault at b6328d50 ip b6328d50 sp bf9c026c error 4 Jul 10 18:22:33 SQ2 kernel: [ 3275.234963] nautilus[10036]: segfault at b61a5d50 ip b61a5d50 sp bfb473fc error 4 Jul 10 18:22:44 SQ2 kernel: [ 3285.594691] nautilus[9971]: segfault at b4ee3d50 ip b4ee3d50 sp bf8a68bc error 4 in SYSV (deleted)[b4fca000+6] Jul 10 19:17:03 SQ2 kernel: [ 2176.735920] nautilus[12599]: segfault at b630fd50 ip b630fd50 sp bfcaf55c error 4 Jul 10 19:49:02 SQ2 kernel: [ 4095.376448] nautilus[14180]: segfault at b4f28d50 ip b4f28d50 sp bf9f2a0c error 4 in SYSV (deleted)[b5043000+6] Jul 11 17:17:59 SQ2 kernel: [ 2457.685645] nautilus[8702]: segfault at b4ecad50 ip b4ecad50 sp bfc96cbc error 4 in SYSV (deleted)[b4fe4000+6] Jul 11 17:21:15 SQ2 kernel: [ 2653.436199] nautilus[9847]: segfault at b501ad50 ip b501ad50 sp bffe17fc error 4 in 4c73fe0c47614734b17d736dbde7580a-x86.cache-2[b513f000+1000] Jul 11 17:48:02 SQ2 kernel: [ 1573.491976] nautilus[7782]: segfault at b4ed3d50 ip b4ed3d50 sp bf96e98c error 4 in SYSV (deleted)[b4fed000+6] Jul 11 17:49:24 SQ2 kernel: [ 1655.944604] nautilus[8348]: segfault at b5048d50 ip b5048d50 sp bfee983c error 4 in SYSV (deleted)[b5162000+6] Jul 11 22:30:37 SQ2 kernel: [ 757.018356] nautilus[5077]: segfault at b6236d50 ip b6236d50 sp bfcc2d7c error 4 -- nautilus unable to start on login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329146 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 149539] Re: tracker-search-tool crashed with SIGFPE
I just don't use tracker anymore ..too much troubles - not crashes but not showing results + CPU eating, etc so the bug is closed ...forever somewhat for me, so if this bug is closed is OK for me, I hope for other peoples - Beagle is just a fine tool. 2009/4/20 Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com: We are closing this bug report as it lacks the information, described in the previous comments, we need to investigate the problem further. However, please reopen it if you can give us the missing information and don't hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. ** Changed in: cairo (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- tracker-search-tool crashed with SIGFPE https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149539 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- tracker-search-tool crashed with SIGFPE https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149539 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 282582] Re: [0.9.4] Integrated video interface
I can confirm baytuni words, but ls command in vlc folder show me : total 88 drwxr-xr-x 4 sorin sorin 4096 2008-09-16 22:39 . drwxr-xr-x 298 sorin sorin 20480 2009-04-18 21:01 .. drwxr-xr-x 2 sorin sorin 4096 2008-06-22 00:16 cache -rw-r--r-- 1 sorin sorin 254 2008-07-05 19:17 README drwxr-xr-x 2 sorin sorin 4096 2008-10-24 14:55 skins2 -rw-r--r-- 1 sorin sorin 47620 2008-09-14 01:16 vlcrc Jaunty up-to-date, catalyst 9.4 from AMD ATI website. Also I tried VLC 1.0 for Intrepid -but without chance under Jaunty (due different libs maybe) -- [0.9.4] Integrated video interface https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 118840] Re: [apport] id crashed with SIGSEGV
from my side ..that problem is gone. I forgot about it from ..7.10 I think - now I am prepared for 9.4. can we consider this bug closed then ? 2009/2/22 Matti Viljanen matti.vilja...@wippies.com: The bug just dissappeared for me at some point... I had all forgotten about this! Nothing special about my installation... If I remember correctly, I was using 7.10 alpha version. At least the locale was Finnish UTF-8. I remember seeing the bug even when using the live CD, and after installation and updates of that time, too. I silently blame the early alphas for the bug. I wish I had time to grab the 7.10 CD and put it to test... Mabye later this week... -- [apport] id crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118840 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- [apport] id crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118840 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 253076] Re: No X with current kernel (downgrade fixes it)
UPDATE - Problem Solved. I put the radeonhd video driver and voila ..it works. But the problem is ..in the court of update-manager === Update Manager must know to choose the right driver - Else, thousand of complains will put the internet optical fiber on fire around the globe right in the first day after Ibex launch ( I think the this situation is specific for all HD Radeon Cards ). I have an Radeon HD 2600 Pro with 512Mb RAM - so the Update Manager must know in some way to put the right video driver automatically. So no downgrade on my case - just the right driver. 2008/10/12 greggler [EMAIL PROTECTED] just installed the daily build from 10/11 and the screen is still black. i dont think the status should say fix released. for the record, i had no problems with several intrepid alpha releases and then updated to alpha 5 and the problem started. i am using an aopen minipc model mp945. -- No X with current kernel (downgrade fixes it) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253076 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- No X with current kernel (downgrade fixes it) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253076 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258381] Re: Blank screen when using usplash and kernel = 2.6.25
UPDATE - Problem Solved ( at least for me )... I put radeonhd video driver instead of Update-Manager chosen driver. It works. But the problem is still HOT because the Update-Manager ( during upgrade process ) don't recognize my RadeonHD so he chose for me a wrong driver then the blank screen and the rest If this will be not solved ...a lot of Ubuntu Hardy machines (with RadeonHD) ..upgrading to Ibex will have the same problem. -- Blank screen when using usplash and kernel = 2.6.25 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258381 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253076] Re: No X with current kernel (downgrade fixes it)
An other day - an other upgrade ( 117 packages including Xorg ) but the result was the same blank screen. -- No X with current kernel (downgrade fixes it) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253076 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 46520] Re: Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer.
it's merely a problem regarding - next upgrade always do some regressions where is supposed to be plain ground and clean states - I mean is so hard to quantify every good step forward ( then the next step to be a real progress ) - instead of reinventing the wheel each time ? following development of Ubuntu for few years I have the bad impression that every step is reinvented ( ? MS money here ?? ). So we have now better kernels ( better drivers ), tabs on Nautilus but I can't set my video card to put 75 / 85 Mhz on my screen not 60Mhz - amximum for now ( I can do that in 7.10 ), and STILL I can't clearly know where the Grub will stay. Also we see no measure is taken agains Grub default instalation AND Grub User Experience ( is so hard to detect hard drives and to make a noob friendly - step by step ( explanations... ) guide ), no problem I'll do a Blueprint for that. I'll make this problem public on forums and blogs. Maybe someone will see that and help us to help Ubuntu to become human friendly. Sorry devs.( if some dev. read this ) but as a friend of Ubuntu I think that something serious is to be done - to broke a glass on this case. Like your dutty - but not for money, I work for Ubuntu too. I install desktops for my friends and their friends all for free ( ...time here ), I recomend - and install servers sometime ( as in the city-hall of Nasaud - Romania ), and In general I do my own war with local zealots from PC shops, magazines. 2008/10/10 Sam Brightman [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm pretty sure my system has PATA and SATA controllers integrated on same chip but I don't use the SATA at all and still get this problem. -- Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46520 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46520 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253076] Re: No X with current kernel (downgrade fixes it)
I have 2.6.27 - problem is still here I do an upgrade from Hardy to Ibex 2 days ago everything goes fine ...but after the splash for boot loader was gone the black screen step up and won't die. Please see my last comment on https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/258381 - xserver errors attached. So I do a lot of 'tricks' to get back my Gnome but no any chance ( recovery mode, xfix ..etc ). Yesterday I do an upgrade from CLI, (some 38 packages was on the upgrade list) and today I observed I can't use Ctrl + Alt + F2 to get my CLI interface. A blank screen with an clipping cursor is all I got. The single place where I can give commands to Ubuntu now is the root console (recovery mode). My machine : Intel CoreDuo 2 (6mb internal cache), Gygabyte Chipset, PCI Expres X16, ATI RADEON HD 2600 Pro 512Mb RAM, 2GB RAM memory. the question is if I can recover my installation without reinstalling Ubuntu from CD ( I have a lot of usable things on /opt - htdocs for example - but I don't have enough space to copy for save all my needed stuff - I can start apache and and I can dump out my databases but there are a lot of other things and too little space so save them all - I know it's a beta software but I can't imagine I can't start Ubuntu in a way or other... ). Any help appreciated. -- No X with current kernel (downgrade fixes it) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253076 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 46520] Re: Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer.
well seems to be chronic ... 2008/10/9 Doug Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have confirmed that the same behaviour is seen in Intrepid (20081009 / AMD64 Server). My workstation has the following hardware -- which differs in chipset than the original with the disks listed in physical order: MB: Abit KV8Pro PATA1: 1x 80GB and 1x 120GB disks PATA2: 1x DVD drive SATA: 2x 120GB disks I have attached the output of some commands (uname, lspci, dmesg, fdisk) from Intrepid, as well as from Gentoo and GParted Live for comparison. It seems that in Ubuntu, Grub is seeing the correct order for the disks, but the order the the kernel provides to it during the install is incorrect. This probably only affects systems that have integrated PATA and SATA controllers provided by a single chip with both types being used. My guess is that Ubuntu is the only one (of theses three atleast) that is solely relying on the new 'libata' module. The others still have /proc/ide populated. Let me know if there is any thing else I can provide for you. ** Attachment added: Not fixed in Intrepid (20081009) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18376640/output.zip -- Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46520 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46520 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258381] Re: Blank screen when using usplash and kernel = 2.6.25
hmm - just upgraded from Hardy to Ibex - upgrade OK - after reboot - just a blank screen after bootloader. attached my .xsession log. dpkg tell me all ok, `xfix` can not do anything, xorg.conf is 'dpkg- reconfigure'it, `resume` send me back to the blank screen, sudo /etc/init.d/gdm restart - put me back to the black screen figure.. I have 2.6.27-6 generic kernel some directions from here ?? thanks in advance. ** Attachment added: .xsession-errors http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18381346/.xsession-errors -- Blank screen when using usplash and kernel = 2.6.25 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258381 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 46520] Re: Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer.
right now I can't my testing machine is down, in pieces ..next week maybe - my main machine is for my daily production ( Hardy ) and I can't afford any risk. 2008/9/15 Mackenzie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK, well I don't have anything other than laptops at my current place, so I can't test it on Intrepid. Besides the part where on my mom's computer the bug's gone. Can someone test it on Intrepid? -- Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46520 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46520 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 46520] Re: Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer.
Sam - to ensure - I will never get into this situation ( yep I was in your situation too - my Ubuntu install wrote on MBR over XP loader - so I can't boot any OS ). If you have XP - U can recover XP boot with a bootable win98 floppy with : fixmbr command afer the floppy boot is complete OR from your Windows CD ( details here : http://amazingrando.wordpress.com/2007/04/05/fixmbr-is-your-friend/ ) on the linux side : I'm afraid you have to reinstall Ubuntu from an Ubuntu Hardy CD if you want to protect your data on linux partitions for further troubles - do partitions as I do - a boot partition ( first ), a swap partition ( second ), a root partition ( third ), and finally a home partition. so you need to mark them at the manual partitioning phase, like that: 1 = /boot 2 = /swap 3 = /root 4 = /home my /boot has 500mb my /swap has 2000mb my /root has 65% from rest of space my /home has 35% from rest of space if you have doal boot - U have to put Grub over XP loader where XP is installed ( on the partition where XP is located ). Grub will recognize XP loader and will offer you as a boot option. Also if you have a /home partition your data is safe ...even if your linux is gone - you can install other linux and after boot your data will be there ... 2008/9/14 Sam Brightman [EMAIL PROTECTED] As I said above, upgrading from Gutsy to Hardy left me with a machine that would not boot. -- Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46520 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46520 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 46520] Re: Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer.
nope HARDY is OK - For me - but this is not a general rule - I'm not the comparison element, so the this bug should be investigated because seem to be critical Morgan - the point is that an kernel upgrade ( so an Ubuntu upgrade ) will rewrite your boot menu, even is customized - your problem can be from menu.lst too ( but sure ..can be from the wrong MBR location as you suggest here ) My menu.lst was customized but an recent upgrade rewrite my menu.lst so for next boot I can't see my XP installation on grub list so I need to repair my menu.lst by hand. This is a potential bug too - because on the upgrade proces not tell me in clear terms about what configuration will change ( I was asked to choose between the producer config file or to keep actual file [but no reference about what file] ) 2008/9/13 Mackenzie Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are you still experiencing this with Hardy? I had it on Dapper and Edgy, but not anymore. ** Changed in: grub-installer (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46520 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46520 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
man (emsenn) - your report was the coolest I think from the last 1000 ;) so ..some peoples think that MAC OS is a theme for XP .. this is great - I have a good story now when I'll be an old man. - thanks - 2008/8/11 emsenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Help. I'm writing in from Ohio, in the United States. I recently attended a cookout with an Acer Aspire One with Ubuntu by my side. When asked what it was, I said it was a notebook with Ubuntu, which is a type of Linux, which is an operating system. The general reply was that their computers ran Dell operating systems. Please send men in Human-themed suits to aid these poor people who didn't even realize that there were other options beside Windows (honest - they thought Mac's were just Windows boxes with prettier cases.) Please... I don't know how much longer I can last with my efficient computers and lack of viruses. -- Microsoft has a majority market share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- Microsoft has a majority market share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 174302] Re: package gimp-plugin-registry because a plugin is also in package gimp-lqr-plugin
hmm - since I fill that raport - I don't know exactly - I wanna make some *.deb I think but I can't install ... now is late to aks me to remember - surely the package did not exist ( right now but it was there) - anyway I use now GIMP 2.5.2. So other problems - other bugs - we can close this discussion this bug this thread. 2008/8/1, Pascal De Vuyst [EMAIL PROTECTED]: There is no gimp-lqr-plugin package in the Ubuntu archives either, where did you get it? ** Changed in: gimp-plugin-registry (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Pascal De Vuyst (pascal-devuyst) Status: New = Incomplete -- package gimp-plugin-registry because a plugin is also in package gimp-lqr-plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174302 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- package gimp-plugin-registry because a plugin is also in package gimp-lqr-plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174302 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 128419] Re: python2.5 crashed with SIGSEGV
nope I can't confirm this issue on Hardy ..can be closed 2008/7/26 Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue for you? Can you try if that's still an issue on hardy? ** Changed in: dbus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium Status: New = Incomplete -- python2.5 crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128419 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- python2.5 crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 128419] Re: python2.5 crashed with SIGSEGV
..at least from my side 2008/7/27 SorinN [EMAIL PROTECTED]: nope I can't confirm this issue on Hardy ..can be closed 2008/7/26 Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue for you? Can you try if that's still an issue on hardy? ** Changed in: dbus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium Status: New = Incomplete -- python2.5 crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128419 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- python2.5 crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 46520] Re: Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer.
Yep - too few developers for millions of users ...I hope I'll enjoy soon the helpers brigade. I can't see a better situation nearby... 2008/5/2 Sam Brightman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: marked as new, assigned to nobody. same old story. i hate writing on bugs just to complain but this is scandalous and i hope comments will at least make someone listen/ask for more information. i am yet to experience the joy of this bug on hardy, as i tried to use the upgrader. my machine is now unbootable. maybe it's not even worth trying the install from scratch if this problem still exists. : -- Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46520 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46520 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 104309] Re: nautilus crashes when thumbnailing an svg with a pattern
yep - I can confirm - it's OK now - so that bug can be closed from my point of view. 2008/4/23, Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]: the example works correctly on hardy -- nautilus crashes when thumbnailing an svg with a pattern https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104309 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- Nemes Ioan Sorin -- nautilus crashes when thumbnailing an svg with a pattern https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104309 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212454] [NEW] Firefox 3 reopen last opened tabs miltipied by 3 to 5
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 I observed from Firefox 3 beta 4 - when I close multiple tabs - when reopen session Firefox multiply tabs by 3 or by 5 sometime. can be because extensions ? ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Apr 5 22:12:28 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: firefox-3.0 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.24-12-generic i686 ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- Firefox 3 reopen last opened tabs miltipied by 3 to 5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212454 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212454] Re: Firefox 3 reopen last opened tabs miltipied by 3 to 5
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13137689/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13137690/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13137691/profiles.ini.txt -- Firefox 3 reopen last opened tabs miltipied by 3 to 5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212454 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194249] Re: [fglrx] atieventsd crashed with SIGSEGV in _XSend()
I have to confirm this bug - it allways occur when the linux restricted modules OR fglrx is upgraded. If is an known behavior on those circumstances - this crash report can be put away - and apport reports killed before sending annoyng data. It never occur again for me after booting with upgraded drivers. -- [fglrx] atieventsd crashed with SIGSEGV in _XSend() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194249 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 203317] Re: gnome-panel needs a nice background image
U right, mine is a quck dirty. Generally we need a better solution with some more options regarding theme applied to WM and gnome-panel - today situation is more like a very quick solution [ to choose a file than set as BG for Gnome Panel - it can be a transparent PNG indeed ], we need something integrated with Themes Preferences, so the BG transparency could be set in some kind of individual mode - shared from Compiz OR from Metacity - depend on your WM engine. xl_cheese wrote: This method isn't very good. The panel buttons disappear. The best way is to include a pixmap in the gtkrc for the panel background. I noticed in the Gnome 2.24 objectives is to include themeing of the panel which I assume becomes part of the gtk engine and gtkrc. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 03:28:26 + Subject: [Bug 203317] Re: gnome-panel needs a nice background image this feature exist from ages in Gnome Panel. Right click on gnome-panel Properties Background Background Image ..then select the right image (that you can do yourself in 3 minutes in Inkscape or Gimp OR you can download a proper image from the net). Voila !. -- gnome-panel needs a nice background image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Artwork Team, which is subscribed to human-theme in ubuntu. _ Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser! http://biggestloser.msn.com/ -- gnome-panel needs a nice background image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203113] Re: Shutdown while screen is locked
then how we can stop the computer ?? after I do Ctrl + Backspace 5 from 7 times my computer freeze - I need to restart then (it's an FGLRX known bug). So if Poewr button is disabled, how I can safe-shutdown ?. in Romanian : Cosmin - si cum oprim atunci 'magaoaia ?', daca nu vad nimik pe ecran - totul e inghetat SI BUTONUL POWER E DEZACTIVAT ...atunci adios SAFE- SHUTDOWN, tre' sa-l scot din priza si e mai rau. -- Shutdown while screen is locked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203113 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203113] Re: Shutdown while screen is locked
Sorry, It's my fault I should read with care ... ;) Np, You right. When you lock your screen you must have total controll. Else any 'friend' OR an mosquito accidentally crashing too hard on your power button - can damage your work. And we don't like to think about. Power Button must be locked too. -- Shutdown while screen is locked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203113 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203398] Re: Edward Kuah
this is the most interesant BUG I ever saw. finally I can't understand if is a BUG or a FEATURE or SOMETHING ELSE (:), because I don't understand in WHAT / WHICH / WHEN / WHERE ...consist this bug so please be explicit mr. Kuah. -- Edward Kuah https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203398 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203317] Re: gnome-panel needs a nice background image
this feature exist from ages in Gnome Panel. Right click on gnome-panel Properties Background Background Image ..then select the right image (that you can do yourself in 3 minutes in Inkscape or Gimp OR you can download a proper image from the net). Voila !. -- gnome-panel needs a nice background image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201966] Re: Could not find compatible GRE between version 1.9b3 and 1.9b3.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 201938 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201938 This false bug is because xulrunner and firefox has not the same version on your upgrade time. So you upgrade when on repos was only xulruner present. After firefox come in repos too - after upgrade all works again. Solution1 : wait for new firefox on repos. Solution2 : search for firefox 3 beta 4 on they site - download - extract it on a folder under your home dir. For example on ~/firefox, then make a link from firefox file inside the folder to Desktop. This will not break, any previous Firefox instalation. Ucan keep this solution until new Firefox === with Xullruner version will touch the repos. Then you delete ~/firefox OR U can keep it for other problems like that. The big solution - to avoid unnecessary reports - will be to put those packages on repos when they are ready - not one now and other after 5 hours, OR to hide xulrunner until firefox is ready too. -- Could not find compatible GRE between version 1.9b3 and 1.9b3. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201966 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200338] Re: no sound hardy kernel 2.6.24-12
Temporary solution: revert to kernel 2.6.24-11 -- no sound hardy kernel 2.6.24-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200338] Re: no sound hardy kernel 2.6.24-12
for everyone with ME TOO or SAME HERE, at boot sequence choose kernel 2.6.24-11 instead of 2.6.24-12. Do not report anymore this big - it's a known problem for now - they work on it. .. ;) if someone will not end close this thread - in few hours - this thread will cover London - New York distance. -- no sound hardy kernel 2.6.24-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194963] Re: fglrx needs to use 24bit mode, and supports composite now
Confirm To WORK superb !. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ fglrxinfo display: :0.0 screen: 0 OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc. OpenGL renderer string: ATI RADEON 9600 Series OpenGL version string: 2.1.7281 Release All OK: Compiz, Emerald, FGLRX 3D Acceleration. -- fglrx needs to use 24bit mode, and supports composite now https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194963 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 111674] Re: can't change resolution on compaq nw8240, ati driver
I can confirm this bug with ATI 9600 XT and fglrx 8.02, Hardy up to date. After last upgrades - I can not set 1152x864x75. Nor from gconf, and xorg.conf is useless too. it start every time at 1280x1024x60. I need to use resapplet after each boot to set the correct resolution. -- can't change resolution on compaq nw8240, ati driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111674 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123449] Re: fglrx does not work
problem solved with the last FGLRX. this thread can be CLOSED now. -- fglrx does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187446] Re: package sun-java5-bin 1.5.0-14-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
yes a bug where to accept this licente ? I can't see any window created for that. I accept once - was a pop up window - when I install 1.5.0-14 but now for any upgrade I have this error. Note that I don't see any question ( on pop window OR terminal to ask me about accepting something or not ). So I'm affraid mr. Matthias - it's a bug. -- package sun-java5-bin 1.5.0-14-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187446 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 192310] Re: package openoffice.org-hyphenation-en-us None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/openoffice.org-hyphenation-en-us.list] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/myspe
OK Mikael, no problem form me.
But what I said wrong ?? to deserve such a reply =
2. If you're not prepared to face packaging bugs, please don't use
Hardy.
??
We discuss about something here - we don't kill anyone. If we wrong -
please tell us in 3 words - guys the real meaning of those procedures
are X. Not Y. Over. All peoples understand - we are all mature I supose.
This must be the way IF someone do something wrong.
The benefit === no one upset.
Else this method can put away some (maybe good) peoples. Point.
Also this is a large discussion about
reporting system - how it works - how can be better.
But because is off topic now and is not a 5 letter story- I will send
you a proposal(regarding reporting system - because U see, a lot of
peoples thing too different about a simple thing[packaging bugs for
example], so maybe is better to know all(reporters) at least a minimum
of 3 rules, with things desired by dev. team what they expect / what
they don't need to see, etc ) using your personal e-mail.
If you will find there something useful, maybe we change in better a
millimeter of this problem, else ...no one was sent in Mars because of a
single mail.
{ Final here }.
Mikael Nilsson wrote:
Sorin, Noel.
1. Please take this discussion to the forums, or file a bug against dpkg
2. If you're not prepared to face packaging bugs, please don't use
Hardy.
3. What you see is the packaging system *working*. The purpose of the
errors is to make sure no such issues exist in a *released* version of
the system (while retaining system sanity). See point 2 above.
End Of Thread
/Mikael
tis 2008-03-04 klockan 21:08 + skrev Noel J. Bergman:
find a method to see if is the same file with the same content
That would be one thing, which could result in a warning, rather tha a
fatal error. Another option would be to reduce the far too many
dependencies on these OpenOffice packages. I don't use OpenOffice, and
was really surprised when I decided to remove the offending packages
just how deep the dependencies have gotten. And, lastly, it shouldn't
be the case that an error with some largely insignificant package
prevents users from installing other, certainly more critical, and
totally unrelated packages, unless the users happen to have deeper
skills than the average user.
--
package openoffice.org-hyphenation-en-us None [modified:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/openoffice.org-hyphenation-en-us.list] failed to
install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/myspell/dicts/hyph_en_US.dic',
which is also in package openoffice.org-hyphenation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192310
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188725] Re: [hardy + fglrx]Ati mobility radeon gives a black screen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 194963 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194963 by far, dcherryholmes - is not a FGLRX problem. is a Compiz Problem. Paths are wrong. So take a look in /usr/bin/compiz ( sudo gedit /usr/lib/compiz ) at first block, You will see : COMPIZ_BIN_PATH=/usr/local/bin/ # For window decorators and compiz PLUGIN_PATH=/usr/local/lib/compiz/ GLXINFO=/usr/bin/glxinfo KWIN=/usr/bin/kwin METACITY=/usr/bin/metacity COMPIZ_NAME=compiz # Final name for compiz (compiz.real) The correct Block must be contain the correct paths ( without word 'local' and in the last row, compiz is compiz.real): COMPIZ_BIN_PATH=/usr/bin/ # For window decorators and compiz PLUGIN_PATH=/usr/lib/compiz/ GLXINFO=/usr/bin/glxinfo KWIN=/usr/bin/kwin METACITY=/usr/bin/metacity COMPIZ_NAME=compiz.real # Final name for compiz (compiz.real) Down there ( somewhere around line 58 ), you must have this block : # Driver whitelist WHITELIST=nvidia intel ati radeon i810 fglrx # blacklist based on the pci ids # See http://wiki.compiz-fusion.org/Hardware/Blacklist for details #T= 1002:5954 1002:5854 1002:5955 # ati rs480 #T=$T 1002:4153 # ATI Rv350 #T=$T 1002:3152 1002:3150 1002:5462 1002:5653 # ati X300 X600,X600 X700 T= BLACKLIST_PCIIDS=$T unset T COMPIZ_OPTIONS=--ignore-desktop-hints --replace COMPIZ_PLUGINS= ENV= If your block is not the same, change with mine. Now it should work. -- [hardy + fglrx]Ati mobility radeon gives a black screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188725 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 192310] Re: package openoffice.org-hyphenation-en-us None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/openoffice.org-hyphenation-en-us.list] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/myspe
Ok Duncan, first is not my text - it's the proposal that bug report tool offer me. I think was OK on his way. Second - It's about a Metabug ( yes ...which is also in package ***... is a metabug which require a final resolution, I'll speak about that later on this mail), so I'm not reporting about my problem. I'm not asking for help ...regarding your solution, I can do that without fill in bug reports - but this is not the proper solution. Imagine mr. Duncan you tell that to a beginner - he will ask you beck probably what is ...kernel. So my report is there in hope is be useful for something. Now about the metabug - is present from first Ubuntu. Maybe a packager does something wrong. But is not OK for peoples to see this bug too often. And this is happening almost each week for a package or 2. Is not an Open Office error. Is a decision to take = so if the same package is there = we should interrupt the upgrade process ? - what if our program take count on the library presence and continue upgrade process ( if is THE SAME library what's the real problem ? - do not copy the file but give to installer option TRUE when he check paths and libraries - so the upgrade process can continue). OR if is the same file - OVERWRITE THE FILE and GO ON ( you can check the file version using checksum, numbering system, file length, etc ) - BUT NOT BROKE A PROCESS BECAUSE ONE OF THE NECESSARY FILES IS ALREADY THERE. This is my message and please take count on that. About the specific part of the bug - I can delete the file from it's location and from dpkg index so after that Upgrade will work OK - no necessary to upgrade my kernel ( which may work or not ...). Regards, Sorin Duncan Lithgow wrote: Please trim your text before posting. I saw a similar problem, I booted with an older kernel, ran upgrade again and it works fine now. -- package openoffice.org-hyphenation-en-us None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/openoffice.org-hyphenation-en-us.list] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/myspell/dicts/hyph_en_US.dic', which is also in package openoffice.org-hyphenation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192310 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 192310] Re: package openoffice.org-hyphenation-en-us None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/openoffice.org-hyphenation-en-us.list] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/myspe
ok Steve, U tell us ...Silently overwriting files is not a sound practice, because the files are almost always not the same, so overwriting them would make for even worse bugs. I agree is not a good practice to silently kill non convenient output -but- and is a BIG but which in many cases is not considered .. is to obvious, let's talk a bit about this bug on the last 2 months ... in 99% of last cases ( as on my experience ) was the same file name and version. If you read carefully what I wrote there about file control ( there are few methods - including parsing file content [as brute force] ) you can realize that must be not so hard to find a method to see if is the same file with the same content - OR not. Now - if is the same file - the same content - I don't see the reason to not overwrite. So I not recommend that as a best practice - but if we have an evidence - why we should stuck on the problem instead of going forward. Now the second point. If is not the same file - User can choose what to do. OR if we don't consider here so smart users - then a rule (or more) must be defined ( regarding the same filename = to keep the bigger version / to keep the larger file / or some... ). Enfin - this can be good for both parts - for the distro and for the independent programmer. If you made a program distributed by others you will enjoy idea to put a RULE file on your package - that can be interpreted by the mister Update Manager - to see what he can do in any case. It's about a simple file where - case 1 - do that, case 2 - overwrite, case 3 - delete older file put the newest, case 4 - phone home ...etc. That's the point - not to ignore this bug ( is too often repeated, search bug reports from the last 2 years ...). So please consider a possible solution eventually ONLY for the case where we have SAME VERSION - SAME NAME - SAME CONTENT ( generally python scripts from different sources put the same files in site). An we just walk forward a bit. ..On my opinion of course. Anyway, that's my message - from time to time is good to go somewhere on a higher point to see what's here down - just to not forget the big picture. Steve Langasek wrote: Folks, This bug is not about kernel issues, and it's been fixed in hardy. Please try to upgrade to the most recent version of the affected packages; there should be no need to follow up to this bug report unless you are still having problems upgrading the named package. Sorin, you are mistaken about this not being an OpenOffice.org bug. It is; the packaging system's behavior when two packages have conflicting files is not spurious, it is a carefully considered design decision which is crucial to the reliability of the running system. File overlaps unfortunately do happen from time to time in development releases, but these are always bugs in the packages in question that need to be resolved before we release - and we have a report that helps us identify file conflicts so we can do exactly that. Silently overwriting files is not a sound practice, because the files are almost always not the same, so overwriting them would make for even worse bugs. -- package openoffice.org-hyphenation-en-us None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/openoffice.org-hyphenation-en-us.list] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/myspell/dicts/hyph_en_US.dic', which is also in package openoffice.org-hyphenation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192310 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 118605] Re: [fglrx] freezes upon Logout or Switch user
Also in Hardy - same hardware - other OS version - the same old bug. Today I must reboot using power button. this come from ATI / AMD delivered driver ? with opensource driver all seems to be OK ( but no Google Earth, Games, Compiz ..and others ). -- [fglrx] freezes upon Logout or Switch user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
In addition to Mark... Well it was a time when I was tired by reporting bugs and receiving back messages like - your report has multiple keypoints inside - please make a detailed report for each one and send him to the corresponding team ... Pretty annoying yeah ? - maybe 5 from 100 will follow the recommended way. Because I don't like to renounce, In I tried to adapt to their (imperfect in my mind) model and guess what. We adapt both. Yes - in time I learn Linux (becoming a linux geek) and they learn from their inevitable(for a new baby born) mistakes(communicational + other nature). So I can see the empathy working here - they work hard to adapt and improve communication with users ( bug reporting, patching, wish lists, etc ) - and we realize that the things are in change pretty fast, and we are a part of this process. My tired face is not automatically set from now one when I see a problem - instead I know if I report that problem - if is a true problem - they will solve that as soon as they can. Now Ubuntu is a Linux territory where the battle for the future of computing is on it's big fires. Bugs, flame wars, frustrations, brilliant but unseen ideas - all are here (it's a place where Natural Selection Live) and is normal for an concept who want to change in better a part of this world. After my first steps I understand they know about imperfections - but any problem has it's own time, and things are changing fast here. For example : I prepared some screen shoots and some txt files to report 2 nasty bugs form me ( after each login - a pop up with language EN_US did not exist ... and a bug regarding fglrx and impossibility to set a default screen resolution ..from gconf OR xorg.conf - because always Ubuntu choose the biggest resolution for me and was nasty ...). Before I was able to send my reports - after a daily upgrade I see they where fixed. So mr. Adrian or other like - solution is not to blame or to numbering ( time wasted activities ) - solution is to help if you can OR to wait for a better future coming in a batter day (hoping until then that a brave soul will win all nasty battles for you). About M$ bug - don't forget M$ has over 70.000 employees - and they do What ?. Innovations ? - ah yes Innovations - they all like to talk about that(all time if I remember well)- but I'm waiting on the last 100 years or some too see some really new ...(I think I'm a bit blind here or my memory lost some RAM, sorry this is my fault) - Better software ? ..please tell me one or 2 pieces. Hardware yes - I read an old Morse code message talking about M$ hiQ PC components (mouses, keyboards, audio systems) - and I believe that. But about software - they never listen final client, simply M$ user - because - in their vision not the client should make rules for the future - only M$ rules, M$ standards, world can be a M$ world or can not be at all... Or according to my vision - peoples / clients / users must dictate Software Future not a people or 2, from some dark office. The first affirmation is the Ubuntu way. Maybe not perfect yet - but it's an idea that's OK to die for. I remember I wrote mails / sign petitions few years as a webdesigner to complain about IE big problems. No M$ ear hear. When Firefox rise, what we see ? - a Galactic Revolution. All M$ peoples that can carry a gun( even some womans ..it's a legend now), start to work on IE 19 / 24 to erase the enemy. Or this is not a sign of a big, respectable company(and I know what i say). I was nothing until Firefox, then automatically M$ hear my voice ... loud and clear an we become instantly friends - we change our phone numbers, and we call each other by nicknames (Don' ask me now for Bill phone nr. - I promise him to keep this number secret [ free only for IE users ..but their number decrease as the seconds gone ..I don't remember to see any one here ...from the last week ]). So in 3 words - I prefer to die on the light side - with all their imperfections - instead of being a gray slave for a dark master. Certainly, here I feel I'm in life. I have bugs - yes, but I have freedom also. Dark side slaves (still)had bugs, But they had walls around also. Which is better ?. Think about liberation now ... Well that said - back to killing / reporting bugs / writing blueprints / make wish lists / drink coffee /..and so - cigar pause is over. ;) Mark Shuttleworth wrote: Adrian R Goalby wrote: I get the impression (whether right or wrong) that nothing is fixed in Ubuntu, it just inherits fixes from upstream, Debian or security alerts. A quick look in the bug database suggests there are 155,000 bugs ever reported against Ubuntu, and 46,000 marked fixed. That's from a team of 30 full time engineers and about 100 committed volunteers, an amazing effort by people who care about Ubuntu. We do try to work closely with both upstream and Debian. In a collaborative ecosystem like the free
Re: [Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
he still has his right points. we advanced in manny points - on other points - we are in the past. we need to change some structural concepts. Nautilus for example [take a look at pathFinder on Mac OR to Dolphin on KDE4 to see where the modern file managers go..]. Gnome simplicity does not mean 'hi integration of functionalities' ..yet. [ Also Nautilus take sometime 5-7-8 seconds to open a small folder. Nautilus open quick a big ntfs partition and slow a desktop folder.] Gnome in general must offer advanced functionalities - then let user to choose from - not to offer some 'ready made'layouts by a group which think for the masses. So gnome must be more, more configurable. By default Gnome UI design is not 'user driven' but 'Gnome devs. driven'. there are different functional needs for different groups of users, we need to give them all - then they choose what they need and hide the rest. This is a thinking level that Gnome / Ubuntu / linux in general must reach in order to touch the normal user (for enterprise level situation is different). Also - Printing system - is much better than in the past 2 years but still not completely integrated into desktop - here are a lot of new drivers too. On Hardy for example I have 3 icons for print (Gnome Control Center) - Printing, Printing and Default Printer. This is confusing for an average user (an XP user for example). Why not a single icon ( Printers / Faxes / Scanners ) with an UI where user can choose step by step all things he / she need. Multimedia. Wrong Players. I use compiz now in my Hardy up to date. The only player which can play well almost any multimedia file (music or video) with compiz enabled or not. Totem the default player is less usable. Other video player does not work OK with compiz, only MPlayer - until you do some Pro settings. But simply users don't know to do those settings. They expect to click and play. So I can't understand why the wxVLC is not default video player in Ubuntu. Rhythmbox default music player - is poor compared with the death Listen or with Exaile. Why no one can see that - and reinvent Listen ?. I use a beta version 0.6 - not on the repos' which work perfect. Why this version is not on the repositories ? Screen and Graphics is broken on Hardy, Videocard detection - broken, language settings are broken, keyboard detection and sound are broken too, device detection are in someway strange and worst than into Gutsy (on Gutsy all of these work OK). A lot of things - now in alpha stage - must be fixed JUST to work as in Gutsy, until the final release so ...too lite space for new functionalities / features that will add Ubuntu on the 50% of world desktops. I just started a big list of needed changes on structure / UI / fundamental metaphors / + mockups. Finally I am curious if this huge effort will count somewhere in the devel land. ..we will see, anyway I keep the fight but I have a moderate opinion, because a lot of things are ...just not OK. houstonbofh wrote: wyo wrote: It's now almost 2 year since I've written something about this bug here (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1/comments/62) and it's now about 1 year since I've lost fait that this bug will be solved before I die. Yet it's time to make a review if anything has changed regarding this bug. To draw a resume: Ubuntu has nothing achived in this last year. I guess you see what you want to see... I am sure my perception is slightly biased as well, but I still have some points to counter. 1) Have you tried printing lately? With Gutsy, cups made a huge gain. Now most HP and Xerox printers are auto-detected, even on the LAN, and installed with no searching. See me do thins with my laptop has prompted a few Wins at client sites with me saying nothing. 2) If your screen is ugly, you have a problem. My screen looks better than most Windows screens, and fonts render correctly in everything. No, nothing has been compiled. This is all with packages in repositories. 3) This year I have been able to engage business to a level I never have before, in considering Linux desktops for non-technical users. I have several Proof of Concepts out that should convert into roll-outs. And I have been selling Ubuntu Guest PCs quite well for some time now. 4) Drivers have changed quite a bit as well. Along with the CUPS stuff above, nVidia drivers are auto-detected, and installed by clicking a bubble that pops up. Several NICs work this way too. Trying to view a file without a codec prompts you on what codec to install and how. Now this has not yet translated to a 50% market share, but it has made the platform much more viable for people that don't care about computers. And showing how easy my life is without Windows is the best advertising. Do you know how impressive it is to print out my invoice at the client site on their printer without looking for a disk or asking
[Bug 192992] Re: [hardy] pycentral crashed with ValueError in parse_versions()
confirm this bug (Just uploaded report data). And confirm David solution. It works. -- [hardy] pycentral crashed with ValueError in parse_versions() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192992 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190619] Re: error after upgrading to distinct package: bash: complete: kpdf: no completion specification
I forgot to say - Hardy Alpha - up to date -- error after upgrading to distinct package: bash: complete: kpdf: no completion specification https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190619] Re: error after upgrading to distinct package: bash: complete: kpdf: no completion specification
Same error here -- error after upgrading to distinct package: bash: complete: kpdf: no completion specification https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 185308] Re: cannot set custom icons anymore
Hardy UP TO DATE. Bug still present. -- cannot set custom icons anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 185769] Re: Broken icon handling in Nautilus 2.21.6 in Hardy
Nautilus 2.21.90 On Properties dialog still no selector for custom icons. -- Broken icon handling in Nautilus 2.21.6 in Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185769 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 151102] Re: [needs-packaging] sk1 vector graphics editor (supports Corel Draw files)
Subscribe ! sk1 it's a must for Ubuntu ( there are only Mandriva .rpm packages ). It is a big step forward for Linux prepress. Finally we can drop Corel Draw (because of Uniconv ). Take a look http://sk1project.org/modules.php?name=news -- [needs-packaging] sk1 vector graphics editor (supports Corel Draw files) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151102 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189668] Re: Audio files must be opened by totem by default
As in many other situation you can right click on the music file and - play with [ ... list ... players ] / or Add to [ ... player ...] playlist Ideally is to set default actions for any file from something like Preferred Applications like - ON CLICK = play in Listen/Exaile/etc.. ON DOUBLECLICK = Enqueue on Listen/Exaile/etc ...ON MOUSEOVER = Preview audio / video[on a miniwindow] ON RIGHTCLICK = Show contextual menu ... ETC. This way once all actions can be set for entire system ...all OK. No time or nerves wasted. You install a new player ? - no problem - go to update filetype actions. This must be - something very general - system wide - that can set filetype options for a lot of circumstances(not just open with). User driven process. Not every new installed app. automatically register itself as default. Set and forget. -- Audio files must be opened by totem by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189668 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 185769] Re: Broken icon handling in Nautilus 2.21.6 in Hardy
Thanks smoku, that was really helpful - indeed I need to hack index.theme ;) -- Broken icon handling in Nautilus 2.21.6 in Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185769 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 185769] Re: Broken icon handling in Nautilus 2.21.6 in Hardy
Same bug here - all gone - some links to external Home folder does not
work - Couldn't display /opt/lampp/htdocs - There is no application
installed for this file type
so what we can do ?
this patch:
Index: libnautilus-private/nautilus-metafile.c
===
--- libnautilus-private/nautilus-metafile.c (revision 13644)
+++ libnautilus-private/nautilus-metafile.c (working copy)
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@
} else if (*p == '/') {
*e++ = '%';
*e++ = '2';
- *e++ = 'f';
+ *e++ = 'F';
} else {
*e++ = *p;
}
what we can do with peoples that dont know to recompile their nautilus to get
back old functionalities ?
please someone upload a patched build.
btw smoku where I can get those Vista Icons ? I use NuoveXT which is
great but I need Vista icons for someone else
--
Broken icon handling in Nautilus 2.21.6 in Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185769
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 183112] Re: package mono-gac 1.2.6+dfsg-5 ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus pos t-installation script a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 3
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 182130 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182130 Exact the same observation - trying to upgrade I obtain this bug. -- package mono-gac 1.2.6+dfsg-5ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus post-installation script a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 165016] Re: update-manager errors on upgrade process
It it not an dist-upgrade is a simple upgrade.
I consider this one a metabug - because is present since Ubuntu 6 ( then
I saw him first time ).
Now it's here in Hardy. And it's a showstopper bug. A non geek can not
deal with. And stop. That's why I consider this one as a META bug.
Also is not a specific for a specific software package - I meet this bug
on a lot of upgrades - here is about how Update Manager can deal with a
duplicate file which try to overwrite an existing file. Overwrite or Not
(some decisions mus be taken here [ keeping count on numbering system or
not { lower number can be overwritten by the upper number ...etc } ])
--
update-manager errors on upgrade process
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/165016
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 180409] Re: bugs in fglrx - blank screen - artifacts
nope I think is not hard to follow. but I'll broke this one on pieces if you say so ... -- bugs in fglrx - blank screen - artifacts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180409 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182611] package libflickrnet2.1.5-cil None failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: This is in someway strange - this library did not exist on my Ubuntu installation - But DPKG did not notice that - somewhere must be something that can tell to DPKG that this lib are removed. Also Fix Broken Packages from Synaptic can not repair that. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Jan 13 18:21:51 2008 Dependencies: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: libflickrnet2.1.5-cil None PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: libflickrnet Title: package libflickrnet2.1.5-cil None failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux sorin 2.6.24-3-generic #1 SMP Thu Jan 3 23:30:29 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: libflickrnet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package libflickrnet2.1.5-cil None failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182611] Re: package libflickrnet2.1.5-cil None failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11318945/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package libflickrnet2.1.5-cil None failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182621] package compiz-core None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/compiz-core.list] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/etc/xdg/compiz/compiz-manager', which is also in package xorg-dri
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz The same old metabug : Overwriting other libs E: /var/cache/apt/archives/compiz- core_1%3a0.6.99+git20080102-0ubuntu4_i386.deb: trying to overwrite `/etc/xdg/compiz/compiz-manager', which is also in package xorg-driver- fglrx I have to say that I've removed + purged all old fglrx AND compiz related files and configurations ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Jan 13 19:04:34 2008 Dependencies: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite `/etc/xdg/compiz/compiz-manager', which is also in package xorg-driver-fglrx NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: compiz-core None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/compiz-core.list] PackageArchitecture: i386 SourcePackage: compiz Title: package compiz-core None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/compiz-core.list] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/etc/xdg/compiz/compiz-manager', which is also in package xorg-driver-fglrx Uname: Linux sorin 2.6.24-3-generic #1 SMP Thu Jan 3 23:30:29 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package compiz-core None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/compiz-core.list] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/etc/xdg/compiz/compiz-manager', which is also in package xorg-driver-fglrx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182621] Re: package compiz-core None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/compiz-core.list] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/etc/xdg/compiz/compiz-manager', which is also in package xorg
** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11319172/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package compiz-core None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/compiz-core.list] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/etc/xdg/compiz/compiz-manager', which is also in package xorg-driver-fglrx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182408] package libflickrnet2.1.5-cil 25277-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: I have to report this bug - knowing that it was already reported because I am not sure (there is not a way to be sure that my collected data about this bug will be added to an earlier report ... ) that my traces will come here on other way. so my fundamental question is not about 'this' particular bug - but about its expansion in space and time - someone must kill this 'overwrite problem' forever somewhere on the main code - not just patches for particularly packages - I mean there must be a way / a decision which can properly fix this problem. Else I fee the progress will be slow, very slow, this bug is here from ancient times. Too much deja vu - so I'm asking you to send this message to decisional power (regarding Ubuntu development) and to sustain this point on benefit of all. Thank you. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Jan 12 23:50:59 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: libflickrnet2.1.5-cil 25277-5 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: libflickrnet Title: package libflickrnet2.1.5-cil 25277-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux sorin 2.6.24-3-generic #1 SMP Thu Jan 3 23:30:29 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: libflickrnet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package libflickrnet2.1.5-cil 25277-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182408 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182408] Re: package libflickrnet2.1.5-cil 25277-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11312455/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11312456/DpkgTerminalLog.gz ** Description changed: I have to report this bug - knowing that it was already reported because I am not sure (there is not a way to be sure that my collected data about this bug will be added to an earlier report ... ) that my traces will come here on other way. so my fundamental question is not about 'this' particular bug - but about its expansion in space and time - someone must kill this 'overwrite problem' forever somewhere on the main code - not just patches for particularly packages - I mean there must be a way / a - decision to which can properly fix this problem. Else I fee the progress + decision which can properly fix this problem. Else I fee the progress will be slow, very slow, this bug is here from ancient times. Too much deja vu - so I'm asking you to send this message to decisional power (regarding Ubuntu development) and to sustain this point on benefit of all. Thank you. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Jan 12 23:50:59 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: libflickrnet2.1.5-cil 25277-5 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: libflickrnet Title: package libflickrnet2.1.5-cil 25277-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux sorin 2.6.24-3-generic #1 SMP Thu Jan 3 23:30:29 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux -- package libflickrnet2.1.5-cil 25277-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182408 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182416] bugs in fglrx - blank screen - artifacts
Public bug reported: This bug was sorted by Apport for the bad kernel version - so I will put here a link to my real report https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-restricted- modules-2.6.8.1/+bug/180409 Please read there my comments for 2.6.24 [ I dont have 2.6.8.1 ]. ** Affects: restricted-manager Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: restricted-manager Importance: Undecided Status: New -- bugs in fglrx - blank screen - artifacts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182416 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 180409] Re: bugs in fglrx - blank screen - artifacts
A new Day - A new Experience - I manually installed ATI fglrx driver from AMD website - I mean ati-driver-installer-8.443.1-x86.x86_64 because I don't need the artifacts on my screen from fglrx coming from Hardy repositories (this is a known problem - no fglrx from repo' - no artifacts - and I still wondering on that). Please see my attachments with screenshoots. The problem is when Ubuntu must do an upgrade. Update-manager see 8.443.1-1 lower than 1:7.1.0-7-11+2.6.24.4(from repo). So my Ubuntu want to upgrade to a lower version. Is pretty unbelievable why Synaptic could not see the difference - because of the numbering system. Please do a numbering conversion patch - because now this problem hold on place a lot of other upgrades such as Compiz upgrades or other upgrades related to fglrx packages. Thank you. -- bugs in fglrx - blank screen - artifacts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180409 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 180409] Re: bugs in fglrx - blank screen - artifacts
** Also affects: restricted-manager Importance: Undecided Status: New -- bugs in fglrx - blank screen - artifacts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180409 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
