[Bug 695842] Re: Cannot install on HP Proliant DL385 G7 - dual RAID controllers
Same for the Maverick test. Note that CentOS 5.4 installs fine using both controllers as well as using LVM and MD. ** Attachment added: 2raid_nomdlvm_Maverick.tar https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/695842/+attachment/1792687/+files/2raid_nomdlvm_Maverick.tar -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695842 Title: Cannot install on HP Proliant DL385 G7 - dual RAID controllers -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 695842] Re: Cannot install - unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied
Upon further testing with scenarios with permutations on the following: - installation to disks involving one or two controllers - inclusion of LVM - inclusion of MD (software RAID) my hypothesis is that the installer is simply getting confused by the dual controllers. Some observations: a) When installing to disk involving one or both controllers and a combination of LVM and MD then package installation fails. b) When installing to disk involving both controllers and no LVM nor MD then package installation succeeds but the system does not boot (which I presume is because GRUB installation failed). c) When installing to disk involving a single controller (2 test installs; RAID 0 and RAID 6) and no LVM nor MD then both package and GRUB installation succeeds. Still, the installer detects controllers in wrong order and complains. I am working on getting the partman syslog installer logs to the last scenario. Other info: The PCI ids for the controllers 03:00.0 RAID bus controller [0104]: Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array G6 controllers [103c:323a] (rev 01) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:3245] 0c:00.0 RAID bus controller [0104]: Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array G6 controllers [103c:323a] (rev 01) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:3243] ** Summary changed: - Cannot install - unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied + Cannot install on HP Proliant DL385 G7 - dual RAID controllers -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695842 Title: Cannot install on HP Proliant DL385 G7 - dual RAID controllers -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 695842] Re: Cannot install on HP Proliant DL385 G7 - dual RAID controllers
Also forthcoming is a repetition of scenario (c) above but with Maverick. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695842 Title: Cannot install on HP Proliant DL385 G7 - dual RAID controllers -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154086] Re: Installing to HDD with previous ubuntu fails to create fresh LVM claiming group already in use
I've also hit this ('partman-lvm/device_remove_lvm' not having effect).
However, it doesn't manifest itself on KVM guests.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154086
Title:
Installing to HDD with previous ubuntu fails to create fresh LVM claiming
group already in use
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 695842] Re: Cannot install - unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied
** Attachment added: syslog https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/695842/+attachment/1780025/+files/syslog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695842 Title: Cannot install - unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 695766] [NEW] [Lucid] Cannot install - unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: debian-installer The installation of Lucid is futile on a HP Proliant DL385 G7 system (uncertified). Other releases have not been tested at this time. Logs (syslog and partman) generated during install time (using just one of the two available RAID controllers) have been attached. Apport information from the affected system is forthcoming (live CD). ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695766 Title: [Lucid] Cannot install - unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 695766] Re: [Lucid] Cannot install - unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied
** Attachment added: syslog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695766/+attachment/1779843/+files/syslog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695766 Title: [Lucid] Cannot install - unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 695766] Re: [Lucid] Cannot install - unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied
** Attachment added: partman https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/695766/+attachment/1779844/+files/partman -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695766 Title: [Lucid] Cannot install - unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 695766] Re: [Lucid] Cannot install - unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied
The end of syslog contains the following lines: Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: Selecting previously deselected package base-files. Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: (Reading database ... 0 files and directories currently installed.) Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: dpkg: regarding .../base-files_5.0.0ubuntu20.10.04.2_amd64.deb containing base-files, pre-dependency problem: Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: base-files pre-depends on awk Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: awk is not installed. Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: dpkg: warning: ignoring pre-dependency problem! Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: Unpacking base-files (from .../base-files_5.0.0ubuntu20.10.04.2_amd64.deb) ... Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute new pre-installation script: Permission denied Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/base-files_5.0.0ubuntu20.10.04.2_amd64.deb (--install): Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 2 Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: Selecting previously deselected package base-passwd. Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: Unpacking base-passwd (from .../base-passwd_3.5.22_amd64.deb) ... Dec 28 13:12:22 kernel: [ 1058.913707] JBD: barrier-based sync failed on md0-8 - disabling barriers Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: dpkg: base-passwd: dependency problems, but configuring anyway as you requested: Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: base-passwd depends on libc6 (= 2.8); however: Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: Package libc6 is not installed. Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: Setting up base-passwd (3.5.22) ... Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: dpkg: error processing base-passwd (--install): Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: Errors were encountered while processing: Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: /var/cache/apt/archives/base-files_5.0.0ubuntu20.10.04.2_amd64.deb Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: base-passwd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695766 Title: [Lucid] Cannot install - unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 695766] Re: [Lucid] Cannot install - unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied
** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695766 Title: [Lucid] Cannot install - unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 695842] Re: Cannot install - unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied
The syslog file contains the following lines: Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: Selecting previously deselected package base-files. Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: (Reading database ... 0 files and directories currently installed.) Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: dpkg: regarding .../base-files_5.0.0ubuntu20.10.04.2_amd64.deb containing base-files, pre-dependency problem: Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: base-files pre-depends on awk Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: awk is not installed. Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: dpkg: warning: ignoring pre-dependency problem! Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: Unpacking base-files (from .../base-files_5.0.0ubuntu20.10.04.2_amd64.deb) ... Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute new pre-installation script: Permission denied Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/base-files_5.0.0ubuntu20.10.04.2_amd64.deb (--install): Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 2 Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: Selecting previously deselected package base-passwd. Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: Unpacking base-passwd (from .../base-passwd_3.5.22_amd64.deb) ... Dec 28 13:12:22 kernel: [ 1058.913707] JBD: barrier-based sync failed on md0-8 - disabling barriers Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: dpkg: base-passwd: dependency problems, but configuring anyway as you requested: Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: base-passwd depends on libc6 (= 2.8); however: Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: Package libc6 is not installed. Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: Setting up base-passwd (3.5.22) ... Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: dpkg: error processing base-passwd (--install): Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: Errors were encountered while processing: Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: /var/cache/apt/archives/base-files_5.0.0ubuntu20.10.04.2_amd64.deb Dec 28 13:12:23 debootstrap: base-passwd ** Summary changed: - report for Bug #695766 + Cannot install - unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied ** Description changed: Binary package hint: debian-installer - please merge with Bug #695766; I was unable to run + The installation of Lucid is futile on a HP Proliant DL385 G7 system + (uncertified). Other releases have not been tested at this time. - apport-collect -p debian-installer 695766 - - got: - You are not the reporter or subscriber of this problem report, or the report is a duplicate or already closed. - - Please create a new report using apport-bug. + Logs (syslog and partman) generated during install time (using just one + of the two available RAID controllers) have been attached. Apport + information from the affected system is forthcoming (live CD). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: debian-installer (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.39-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Dec 30 22:44:53 2010 DeviceMapperTables: - Error: command ['dmsetup', 'table'] failed with exit code 1: /dev/mapper/control: open failed: Permission denied - Failure to communicate with kernel device-mapper driver. - Command failed + Error: command ['dmsetup', 'table'] failed with exit code 1: /dev/mapper/control: open failed: Permission denied + Failure to communicate with kernel device-mapper driver. + Command failed DmraidDevices: Error: command ['dmraid', '-r'] failed with exit code 1: ERROR: you must be root DmraidSets: Error: command ['dmraid', '-s'] failed with exit code 1: ERROR: you must be root LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100816.1) MachineType: HP ProLiant DL385 G7 MemoryUsage: - total used free sharedbuffers cached - Mem: 330125241916960 31095564 0 113132 704396 - -/+ buffers/cache:1099432 31913092 - Swap:0 0 0 + total used free sharedbuffers cached + Mem: 330125241916960 31095564 0 113132 704396 + -/+ buffers/cache:1099432 31913092 + Swap:0 0 0 ProcCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/hostname.seed boot=casper persistent iso-scan/filename=/hostname-10.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso splash ProcEnviron: - LANG=en_US.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + LANG=en_US.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: debian-installer dmi.bios.date: 06/15/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: HP dmi.bios.version: A18 dmi.chassis.type: 23 dmi.chassis.vendor: HP dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnHP:bvrA18:bd06/15/2010:svnHP:pnProLiantDL385G7:pvr:cvnHP:ct23:cvr: dmi.product.name: ProLiant DL385 G7 dmi.sys.vendor: HP -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of
[Bug 695842] Re: Cannot install - unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied
** Attachment added: partman https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/695842/+attachment/1780026/+files/partman -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695842 Title: Cannot install - unable to execute installed post-installation script: Permission denied -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 692647] Re: Network bridge does not come up upon boot
It appears the lag of a few seconds is enough to prevent other network- required services from starting. I have tried with openvpn and dhcp3-server. So I need to resort to the same rc.local [1] I had when the bridge wasn't coming up at all pre-Lucid. I have tested this on Maverick only. [1]: ifconfig eth0 up brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 ifconfig br0 up ip address add 10.153.107.61/24 brd + dev br0 ip route add default via 10.153.107.1 service openvpn restart ** Changed in: bridge-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New ** Summary changed: - Network bridge does not come up upon boot + Network bridge too slow to come up upon boot - affecting other services ** Description changed: Binary package hint: bridge-utils - On a fresh (vmbuilder) install of Maverick (server 64-bit) I cannot get - a vanilla bridge to come up upon boot using the standard configuration - method (via /etc/network/interfaces [1]). A manual restart of the - networking service gets it to work: - - $ sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart - - I have resorted to putting the above command in /etc/rc.local and that - works for now. I would, however, also need to start any network- - required services there as well. - - I mentioned this issue in bug #687631 but this is a more basic issue and - it requires a bug of it's own. + On a fresh (vmbuilder) install of Maverick (server 64-bit) a vanilla + bridge does come up upon boot using the standard configuration method + (via /etc/network/interfaces [1]) but it takes too long and this delay + prevents other network services from starting. I have resorted to + putting commands in /etc/rc.local and that works for now. [1] auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual auto br0 iface br0 inet static - bridge_ports eth0 - address 10.153.107.93 - netmask 255.255.255.0 - network 10.153.107.0 - broadcast 10.153.107.255 - gateway 10.153.107.1 - --- + bridge_ports eth0 + address 10.153.107.93 + netmask 255.255.255.0 + network 10.153.107.0 + broadcast 10.153.107.255 + gateway 10.153.107.1 + --- Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100427.1) Package: bridge-utils 1.4-5ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcEnviron: - SHELL=/bin/zsh - PATH=(custom, user) - LANG=en_US.utf8 + SHELL=/bin/zsh + PATH=(custom, user) + LANG=en_US.utf8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-23.41-generic 2.6.35.7 Tags: maverick Uname: Linux 2.6.35-23-generic x86_64 UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout libvirtd lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692647 Title: Network bridge too slow to come up upon boot - affecting other services -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 692647] Re: Network bridge does not come up upon boot
It appears the lag of a few seconds is enough to prevent other network- required services from starting. I have tried with openvpn and dhcp3-server. So I need to resort to the same rc.local [1] I had when the bridge wasn't coming up at all pre-Lucid. I have tested this on Maverick only. [1]: ifconfig eth0 up brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 ifconfig br0 up ip address add 10.153.107.61/24 brd + dev br0 ip route add default via 10.153.107.1 service openvpn restart ** Changed in: bridge-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New ** Summary changed: - Network bridge does not come up upon boot + Network bridge too slow to come up upon boot - affecting other services ** Description changed: Binary package hint: bridge-utils - On a fresh (vmbuilder) install of Maverick (server 64-bit) I cannot get - a vanilla bridge to come up upon boot using the standard configuration - method (via /etc/network/interfaces [1]). A manual restart of the - networking service gets it to work: - - $ sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart - - I have resorted to putting the above command in /etc/rc.local and that - works for now. I would, however, also need to start any network- - required services there as well. - - I mentioned this issue in bug #687631 but this is a more basic issue and - it requires a bug of it's own. + On a fresh (vmbuilder) install of Maverick (server 64-bit) a vanilla + bridge does come up upon boot using the standard configuration method + (via /etc/network/interfaces [1]) but it takes too long and this delay + prevents other network services from starting. I have resorted to + putting commands in /etc/rc.local and that works for now. [1] auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual auto br0 iface br0 inet static - bridge_ports eth0 - address 10.153.107.93 - netmask 255.255.255.0 - network 10.153.107.0 - broadcast 10.153.107.255 - gateway 10.153.107.1 - --- + bridge_ports eth0 + address 10.153.107.93 + netmask 255.255.255.0 + network 10.153.107.0 + broadcast 10.153.107.255 + gateway 10.153.107.1 + --- Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100427.1) Package: bridge-utils 1.4-5ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcEnviron: - SHELL=/bin/zsh - PATH=(custom, user) - LANG=en_US.utf8 + SHELL=/bin/zsh + PATH=(custom, user) + LANG=en_US.utf8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-23.41-generic 2.6.35.7 Tags: maverick Uname: Linux 2.6.35-23-generic x86_64 UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout libvirtd lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692647 Title: Network bridge too slow to come up upon boot - affecting other services -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 692647] [NEW] Network bridge does not come up upon boot
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bridge-utils On a fresh (vmbuilder) install of Maverick (server 64-bit) I cannot get a vanilla bridge to come up upon boot using the standard configuration method (via /etc/network/interfaces [1]). A manual restart of the networking service gets it to work: $ sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart I have resorted to putting the above command in /etc/rc.local and that works for now. I would, however, also need to start any network- required services there as well. I mentioned this issue in bug #687631 but this is a more basic issue and it requires a bug of it's own. [1] auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual auto br0 iface br0 inet static bridge_ports eth0 address 10.153.107.93 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 10.153.107.0 broadcast 10.153.107.255 gateway 10.153.107.1 ** Affects: bridge-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692647 Title: Network bridge does not come up upon boot -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 692647] Re: Network bridge does not come up upon boot
Weird. Either there was a recent update or there was a wicked delay for the bridge to come up because it's working now (with a delay of around 5 seconds). I will try it again soon on my similarly plagued Karmic machine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692647 Title: Network bridge does not come up upon boot -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 692587] [NEW] Cannot update crontab PATH variable via PAM
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cron In Lucid I cannot update the PATH variable via PAM using: ~/.pam_environment /etc/security/pam_env.conf Seems that cron supports the pam_env module but leaves out the capacity to alter PATH. Can we please pull in this feature? Also, only the Maverick crontab man page refers to this stuff: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/maverick/man5/crontab.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/lucid/man5/crontab.5.html ** Affects: cron (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692587 Title: Cannot update crontab PATH variable via PAM -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 692647] [NEW] Network bridge does not come up upon boot
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bridge-utils On a fresh (vmbuilder) install of Maverick (server 64-bit) I cannot get a vanilla bridge to come up upon boot using the standard configuration method (via /etc/network/interfaces [1]). A manual restart of the networking service gets it to work: $ sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart I have resorted to putting the above command in /etc/rc.local and that works for now. I would, however, also need to start any network- required services there as well. I mentioned this issue in bug #687631 but this is a more basic issue and it requires a bug of it's own. [1] auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual auto br0 iface br0 inet static bridge_ports eth0 address 10.153.107.93 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 10.153.107.0 broadcast 10.153.107.255 gateway 10.153.107.1 ** Affects: bridge-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692647 Title: Network bridge does not come up upon boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 692647] Re: Network bridge does not come up upon boot
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: Binary package hint: bridge-utils On a fresh (vmbuilder) install of Maverick (server 64-bit) I cannot get a vanilla bridge to come up upon boot using the standard configuration method (via /etc/network/interfaces [1]). A manual restart of the networking service gets it to work: $ sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart I have resorted to putting the above command in /etc/rc.local and that works for now. I would, however, also need to start any network- required services there as well. I mentioned this issue in bug #687631 but this is a more basic issue and it requires a bug of it's own. [1] auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual auto br0 iface br0 inet static bridge_ports eth0 address 10.153.107.93 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 10.153.107.0 broadcast 10.153.107.255 gateway 10.153.107.1 + --- + Architecture: amd64 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 + EcryptfsInUse: Yes + InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100427.1) + Package: bridge-utils 1.4-5ubuntu2 + PackageArchitecture: amd64 + ProcEnviron: + SHELL=/bin/zsh + PATH=(custom, user) + LANG=en_US.utf8 + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-23.41-generic 2.6.35.7 + Tags: maverick + Uname: Linux 2.6.35-23-generic x86_64 + UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout libvirtd lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/692647/+attachment/1771633/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692647 Title: Network bridge does not come up upon boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 692647] Re: Network bridge does not come up upon boot
Weird. Either there was a recent update or there was a wicked delay for the bridge to come up because it's working now (with a delay of around 5 seconds). I will try it again soon on my similarly plagued Karmic machine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692647 Title: Network bridge does not come up upon boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 690138] Re: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10
I tried to confirm but everything went well. From my logs: - Setting up tomcat6 (6.0.28-2ubuntu1) ... Creating config file /etc/default/tomcat6 with new version Adding system user `tomcat6' (UID 105) ... Adding new user `tomcat6' (UID 105) with group `tomcat6' ... Not creating home directory `/usr/share/tomcat6'. * Starting Tomcat servlet engine tomcat6 [ OK ] - Strange. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690138 Title: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 690138] Re: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10
You seem to be running Lucid. Huh? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690138 Title: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 690138] Re: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10
** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690138 Title: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 687631] Re: bridge is configured too late (for openvpn and openntpd at least)
On a fresh (vmbuilder) install Maverick (server 64-bit) I can't even get a vanilla bridge to come up via /etc/network/interfaces [1]. A manual restart of the networking service gets it to work however: $ sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart Should I open a new bug or should we change focus of the current one? [1] auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual auto br0 iface br0 inet static bridge_ports eth0 address 10.153.107.93 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 10.153.107.0 broadcast 10.153.107.255 gateway 10.153.107.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bridge-utils in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687631 Title: bridge is configured too late (for openvpn and openntpd at least) -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 690138] Re: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10
I tried to confirm but everything went well. From my logs: - Setting up tomcat6 (6.0.28-2ubuntu1) ... Creating config file /etc/default/tomcat6 with new version Adding system user `tomcat6' (UID 105) ... Adding new user `tomcat6' (UID 105) with group `tomcat6' ... Not creating home directory `/usr/share/tomcat6'. * Starting Tomcat servlet engine tomcat6 [ OK ] - Strange. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690138 Title: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 690138] Re: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10
You seem to be running Lucid. Huh? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690138 Title: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 690138] Re: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10
** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690138 Title: tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 687631] Re: bridge is configured too late (for openvpn and openntpd at least)
On a fresh (vmbuilder) install Maverick (server 64-bit) I can't even get a vanilla bridge to come up via /etc/network/interfaces [1]. A manual restart of the networking service gets it to work however: $ sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart Should I open a new bug or should we change focus of the current one? [1] auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual auto br0 iface br0 inet static bridge_ports eth0 address 10.153.107.93 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 10.153.107.0 broadcast 10.153.107.255 gateway 10.153.107.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687631 Title: bridge is configured too late (for openvpn and openntpd at least) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 688703] [NEW] [lucid] netxen_nic driver and ethernet bonding broken at boot time
Public bug reported: A HP Proliant DL360 G6 system running Lucid 64-bit (only certified by Canonical for 9.04 64bit and 10.10 32bit [1]) is using a dual-port netxen_nic-based ethernet device. When ethernet bonding is configured via /etc/network/interfaces [2] the bonded device appears to exist [5] but does not work. Upon restarting the networking service [3] the device works as expected. The bonded device also works when configured manually [4]. This used to work with Hardy. Apport information from the affected system is forthcoming. --- [1] http://webapps.ubuntu.com/certification/make/HP/servers [2] auto bond0 iface bond0 inet static address 10.2.10.70 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 10.2.255.255 gateway 10.2.10.254 slaves eth0 eth1 bond-mode 1 bond-miimon 100 [3] sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart [4] $ sudo modprobe -r bonding $ sudo modprobe bonding mode=active-backup miimon=100 $ sudo ifconfig bond0 10.2.10.70 netmask 255.255.0.0 $ sudo ifenslave bond0 eth0 eth1 $ ifconfig bond0 $ cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0 [5] $ dmesg | grep bonding [ 6.403320] bonding: Warning: either miimon or arp_interval and arp_ip_target module parameters must be specified, otherwise bonding will not detect link failures! see bonding.txt for details. [ 6.405552] bonding: bond0: doing slave updates when interface is down. [ 6.40] bonding: bond0: Adding slave eth0. [ 6.405557] bonding bond0: master_dev is not up in bond_enslave [ 7.192670] bonding: bond0: enslaving eth0 as an active interface with an up link. [ 7.194312] bonding: bond0: doing slave updates when interface is down. [ 7.194315] bonding: bond0: Adding slave eth1. [ 7.194317] bonding bond0: master_dev is not up in bond_enslave [ 7.721406] bonding: bond0: enslaving eth1 as an active interface with an up link. [ 7.722009] bonding: bond0: setting mode to active-backup (1). [ 7.722029] bonding: bond0: Setting MII monitoring interval to 100. $ ifconfig bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr f4:ce:46:af:58:40 inet addr:10.2.10.70 Bcast:10.1.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 inet6 addr: fe80::f6ce:46ff:feaf:5840/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:216 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:14159 (14.1 KB) eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr f4:ce:46:af:58:40 UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:216 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:14159 (14.1 KB) Interrupt:62 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr f4:ce:46:af:58:40 UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B) Interrupt:66 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:77 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:77 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:7050 (7.0 KB) TX bytes:7050 (7.0 KB) ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: A HP Proliant DL360 G6 system running Lucid 64-bit (only certified by Canonical for 9.04 64bit and 10.10 32bit [1]) is using a dual-port netxen_nic-based ethernet device. When ethernet bonding is configured via /etc/network/interfaces [2] the bonded device appears to exist [5] but does not work. Upon restarting the networking service [3] the device works as expected. The bonded device also works when configured manually [4]. This used to work with Hardy. Apport information from the affected system is forthcoming. - - + --- [1] http://webapps.ubuntu.com/certification/make/HP/servers [2] auto bond0 iface bond0 inet static address 10.2.10.70 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 10.2.255.255 gateway 10.2.10.254 slaves eth0 eth1 bond-mode 1 bond-miimon 100 [3] sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart [4] $ sudo modprobe -r bonding $ sudo modprobe bonding mode=active-backup miimon=100 $ sudo ifconfig bond0 10.2.10.70 netmask 255.255.0.0 $ sudo ifenslave bond0 eth0 eth1 $ ifconfig bond0 $ cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0 [5] $ dmesg | grep bonding [ 6.403320] bonding: Warning: either miimon or arp_interval and arp_ip_target module parameters must be specified, otherwise bonding will not detect link failures! see bonding.txt for details. [ 6.405552] bonding: bond0: doing slave updates when interface is down. [ 6.40] bonding: bond0: Adding slave eth0. [ 6.405557]
[Bug 676094] Re: Missing pid file check in tomcat6 init script causes failed startup
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 632554 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 632554 tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running. * You can subscribe to bug 632554 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat6/+bug/632554/+subscribe -- Missing pid file check in tomcat6 init script causes failed startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 676094] Re: Missing pid file check in tomcat6 init script causes failed startup
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 632554 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 632554 tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running. * You can subscribe to bug 632554 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat6/+bug/632554/+subscribe -- Missing pid file check in tomcat6 init script causes failed startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 673642] [NEW] it's slow
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vim it's slow ** Affects: vim (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- it's slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 673642] Re: it's slow
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: Binary package hint: vim it's slow + --- + Architecture: amd64 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 + EcryptfsInUse: Yes + InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100427.1) + Package: vim 2:7.2.330-1ubuntu4 + PackageArchitecture: amd64 + ProcEnviron: + SHELL=/bin/zsh + PATH=(custom, user) + LANG=en_US.utf8 + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-23.36-generic 2.6.35.7 + Tags: maverick + Uname: Linux 2.6.35-23-generic x86_64 + UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout libvirtd lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/673642/+attachment/1729288/+files/Dependencies.txt -- it's slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 673642] Re: it's slow
** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- it's slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 671001] [NEW] [lucid] system locks up (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b)
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Linux hostname10 2.6.32-24-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 20 14:21:58 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux This system is experiencing regular lockups and is only accessible via IPMI (screenshots attached). It is a physical host under heavy load (couchdb) with some swapping occurring. The I/O is taking place on the XFS filesystem. The output to 'lspci -vvnnk' is also attached (lspci.txt) and a full report (apport-collect) should be forthcoming. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [lucid] system locks up (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 671001] Re: [lucid] system locks up (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b)
** Attachment added: lscpi.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/671001/+attachment/1722965/+files/lscpi.txt -- [lucid] system locks up (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 671001] Re: [lucid] system locks up (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b)
** Attachment added: 10.20.133.151.jpg https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/671001/+attachment/1722968/+files/10.20.133.151.jpg -- [lucid] system locks up (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 671001] Re: [lucid] system locks up (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b)
** Attachment added: 10.20.133.151-2.jpg https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/671001/+attachment/1722970/+files/10.20.133.151-2.jpg -- [lucid] system locks up (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 671001] Re: [lucid] system locks up (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b)
** Attachment added: 10.20.133.151-1.jpg https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/671001/+attachment/1722969/+files/10.20.133.151-1.jpg -- [lucid] system locks up (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 671001] Re: [lucid] system locks up (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b)
** Attachment added: 10.20.133.151-3.jpg https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/671001/+attachment/1722971/+files/10.20.133.151-3.jpg -- [lucid] system locks up (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 664264] [NEW] GID is not defined upon user GDM login
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bash The GID variable is not defined upon user GDM login for the bash shell. I've tested this on Ubuntu releases 9.04 to 10.10 and the behaviour is the same. I've tested the Zsh shell and I don't see this (GID is defined). I believe that this variable should be assigned a value when the user logs in without having to manually cook something in initialization files (id -g). ** Affects: bash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- GID is not defined upon user GDM login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/664264 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563216] Re: Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control
I don't see any mention of umask in the sshd_config man page after installing 10.10 RC. -- Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563216 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 563216] Re: Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control
OK, it's in the sftp-server man page. -- Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563216 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 563216] Re: Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control
I don't see any mention of umask in the sshd_config man page after installing 10.10 RC. -- Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563216 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563216] Re: Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control
OK, it's in the sftp-server man page. -- Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563216 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 513848] Re: [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
Installed. Looks normal. I didn't test any specific load however. $ apt-cache policy linux-image-virtual linux-image-virtual: Installed: 2.6.31.22.35 Candidate: 2.6.31.22.35 Version table: *** 2.6.31.22.35 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com karmic-updates/main Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com karmic-security/main Packages I noticed that this change is actually from the 2.6.31-22.66 sources. -- [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 513848] Re: [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
$ apt-cache policy linux-image-generic linux-image-generic: Installed: (none) Candidate: 2.6.31.22.35 Version table: 2.6.31.22.35 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com karmic-updates/main Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com karmic-security/main Packages A customer was producing the load for me. I don't have the ability to do reproduce it accurately myself. Yes, I have -proposed enabled. But my understanding is that this -proposed fix is actually found in the -security upload. Only the sources for the -proposed package is available. -- [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 625284] [NEW] 5 second delay between print jobs
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cups In Ubuntu 9.10 and 10.04 (CUPS 1.3 and 1.4) when sending multiple print jobs there is a 5 second delay due to CUPS waiting for confirmation that the previous job was completed. This is fine but the documentation says that when using the AppSocket (JetDirect) protocol this behaviour can be disabled by using the 'waiteof' option appended to the device URI: $ lpadmin -p printername -u allow:all -E -v socket://192.168.0.1:9100?waiteof=false This backchannel wait time is supposed to be removed from CUPS version 1.4.4 (Ubuntu 10.10). Would it be possible to backport this change to 9.10 and 10.04? References: http://www.cups.org/documentation.php/network.html http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.printing.cups.general/26025/focus=26041 https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=23316 http://forums.novell.com/novell-product-support-forums/suse-linux-enterprise-server-sles/sles-configure-administer/415237-cups-1-4-4-a.html ** Affects: cups (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- 5 second delay between print jobs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625284 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 621185] [NEW] Network module atl1c 1.0.1.0-NAPI not available in Lucid
Public bug reported: Network module atl1c 1.0.1.0-NAPI is not available in Lucid. Acer Aspire D260 netbooks require the atl1c network module. The version of the module in Lucid 10.04.0 (1.0.0.1-NAPI) does not support the onboard card [1]. There is a newer version (1.0.0.2-NAPI) in linux- backports-modules-wireless-2.6.32-21-generic which does but results in unstable behaviour. I have tested extensively with version 1.0.1.0-NAPI, which is available in linux-next and I am happy with the behaviour. [1] 04:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Atheros Communications AR8152 v1.1 Fast Ethernet [1969:2060] (rev c1) ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: Fix Released ** Affects: linux-backports-modules-2.6.32 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: Won't Fix ** Affects: linux-backports-modules-2.6.32 (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Wishlist Status: Fix Committed -- Network module atl1c 1.0.1.0-NAPI not available in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
I tested this and confirmed that the entire test ISO was properly downloaded. -- PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
I tested this and confirmed that the entire test ISO was properly downloaded. -- PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 408417] Re: No option to log in remotely via XDMCP
This is a critical piece of functionality that has been removed from Ubuntu without any advance notice or warning. Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidLynx/ReleaseNotes -- No option to log in remotely via XDMCP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408417 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 408417] Re: No option to log in remotely via XDMCP
Please stop insinuating that this is a Ubuntu problem. It's not. Ubuntu does not write/maintain GDM. -- No option to log in remotely via XDMCP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408417 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 408417] Re: No option to log in remotely via XDMCP
Another option (not using XDMCP) is to use neatx-server (Google) in combination with NoMachine's free NX clients (for Linux or Windows). -- No option to log in remotely via XDMCP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408417 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
@R. Jones Go to https://launchpad.net/~zulcss/+archive/ppa and follow instructions under Adding this PPA to your system. Install php5 5.3.2-1ubuntu4.3 I tested this myself and the results were unsatisfactory (Apache error after about 10% download of the test ISO file). Can you confirm the same? -- PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
@R. Jones Go to https://launchpad.net/~zulcss/+archive/ppa and follow instructions under Adding this PPA to your system. Install php5 5.3.2-1ubuntu4.3 I tested this myself and the results were unsatisfactory (Apache error after about 10% download of the test ISO file). Can you confirm the same? -- PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 597337] [NEW] lsb_release should show history of release upgrades
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: lsb Currently (Lucid), lsb_release only shows information about current system status. It would be nice (wishlist) if we could keep track of the last fresh install and all intervening release upgrades. Current output to lsb_release -a (omitting ugly LSB Version output): --- Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Release:10.04 Codename: lucid --- Suggested output: --- Distributor ID: Ubuntu Release history: jaunty, karmic-dev, karmic, lucid-dev, lucid Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Release:10.04 Codename: lucid --- Not sure if we can break 'release-dev' into parts: release-alpha1 release-beta and so on. Also not sure if this can create confusion if users upgrade manually (editing sources.list and then 'apt-get dist-upgrade'). ** Affects: lsb (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Binary package hint: lsb Currently (Lucid), lsb_release only shows information about current system status. It would be nice (wishlist) if we could keep track of the last fresh install and all intervening release upgrades. Current output to lsb_release -a (omitting ugly LSB Version output): --- Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Release:10.04 Codename: lucid --- Suggested output: --- Distributor ID: Ubuntu Release history: jaunty, karmic-dev, karmic, lucid-dev, lucid Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Release:10.04 Codename: lucid --- Not sure if we can break 'release-dev' into parts: release-alpha1 release-beta and so on. Also not sure if this can create confusion if users upgrade manually (editing sources.list and then 'apt-get dist-upgrade'). - - --- -- lsb_release should show history of release upgrades https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597337 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
This turned out to be a duplicate of http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44522 Submitted: 2008-03-24 18:21 UTC ** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #44522 http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44522 -- PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
Yes, we are doing just that. -- PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
This turned out to be a duplicate of http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44522 Submitted: 2008-03-24 18:21 UTC ** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #44522 http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44522 -- PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
Yes, we are doing just that. -- PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
I sent this bug upstream. http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52102 ** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #52102 http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52102 -- PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
I sent this bug upstream. http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52102 ** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #52102 http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52102 -- PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
I have confirmed this. A 64-bit Lucid Apache server hosting a file of size 4697126912 bytes and a client (happens to be Lucid also) downloading the file via the above test.php script only gets 402159616 bytes ** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 564920] Re: PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
I have confirmed this. A 64-bit Lucid Apache server hosting a file of size 4697126912 bytes and a client (happens to be Lucid also) downloading the file via the above test.php script only gets 402159616 bytes ** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 545647] Re: grub-pc upgrade crashing in stack.pm
I can confirm this. What other information is required? -- grub-pc upgrade crashing in stack.pm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583767] [NEW] [ Lucid ] installing emacs23-common displays many warnings (The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger support - Ignoring install-info called fr
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: emacs23
$ sudo aptitude install emacs23-nox
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information
Initialising package states... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
emacs23-bin-common{a} emacs23-common{a} emacs23-nox emacsen-common{a}
0 packages upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
Need to get 23.9MB of archives. After unpacking 77.5MB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] y
Writing extended state information... Done
Get:1 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main emacsen-common
1.4.19ubuntu1 [19.0kB]
Get:2 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main emacs23-common
23.1+1-4ubuntu7 [20.6MB]
Get:3 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main emacs23-bin-common
23.1+1-4ubuntu7 [192kB]
Get:4 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main emacs23-nox
23.1+1-4ubuntu7 [3,045kB]
Fetched 23.9MB in 21s (1,118kB/s)
Selecting previously deselected package emacsen-common.
(Reading database ... 50693 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking emacsen-common (from .../emacsen-common_1.4.19ubuntu1_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package emacs23-common.
Unpacking emacs23-common (from .../emacs23-common_23.1+1-4ubuntu7_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package emacs23-bin-common.
Unpacking emacs23-bin-common (from
.../emacs23-bin-common_23.1+1-4ubuntu7_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package emacs23-nox.
Unpacking emacs23-nox (from .../emacs23-nox_23.1+1-4ubuntu7_amd64.deb) ...
Processing triggers for install-info ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme ...
Setting up emacsen-common (1.4.19ubuntu1) ...
emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs
Setting up emacs23-common (23.1+1-4ubuntu7) ...
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger
support
Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script
The package emacs23-common should be
[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings
** Summary changed: - tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user + tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings -- tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
** Summary changed: - tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings + tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user -- tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 511150] Re: Problems with calls when VPN tunnel is active
Is this also broken in 10.04? -- Problems with calls when VPN tunnel is active https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511150 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings
** Summary changed: - tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user + tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings -- tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
** Summary changed: - tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings + tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user -- tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 556113] Re: Virt-manager unable to display guest consoles when connecting to a host user who is using the zsh shell
I made a PPA based on Soren's comment (#5) and all seems to work. -- Virt-manager unable to display guest consoles when connecting to a host user who is using the zsh shell https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556113 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 562153] Re: the package pure-ftpd-ldap doesn't install pureftpd.schema
You need to convert the schema to LDIF format and then add it to the server. -- the package pure-ftpd-ldap doesn't install pureftpd.schema https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 556113] Re: Virt-manager unable to display guest consoles when connecting to a host user who is using the zsh shell
Creating a new user on the host with the default bash shell and authenticating via this user allows guest consoles to be viewed. ** Summary changed: - Virt-manager unable to display console when using the zsh shell + Virt-manager unable to display guest consoles when connecting to a host user who is using the zsh shell -- Virt-manager unable to display guest consoles when connecting to a host user who is using the zsh shell https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556113 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 556113] Re: Virt-manager unable to display guest consoles when connecting to a host user who is using the zsh shell
It looks like the command being passed to zsh is nc -q 0 127.0.0.1 5905 whereas it should really be just nc with arguments -q 0 127.0.0.1 5905 -- Virt-manager unable to display guest consoles when connecting to a host user who is using the zsh shell https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556113 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 556113] Re: Virt-manager unable to display console when using the zsh shell
** Summary changed: - Virt-manager unable to display console. + Virt-manager unable to display console when using the zsh shell -- Virt-manager unable to display console when using the zsh shell https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556113 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
Sorry about that. Confirmed. -- tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
Sorry about that. Confirmed. -- tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453145] Re: [lucid] /etc/apt/preferences is not updated during upgrade to lucid
Same problem on Lucid. ** Summary changed: - [karmic] /etc/apt/preferences is not updated during upgrade to karmic + [lucid] /etc/apt/preferences is not updated during upgrade to lucid ** Summary changed: - [lucid] /etc/apt/preferences is not updated during upgrade to lucid + [karmic] /etc/apt/preferences is not updated during upgrade to karmic -- [karmic] /etc/apt/preferences is not updated during upgrade to karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453145 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552221] Re: Volume Control gnome-volume-control-applet entry is removed from Startup Applications gnome-session-properties after release-upgrade to Lucid
I upgraded today and I lost the volume applet. I started a Lucid upgrade this morning at 8:50 EDT albeit with the beta2 DVD. An hour later I mopped up with a network upgrade. -- Volume Control gnome-volume-control-applet entry is removed from Startup Applications gnome-session-properties after release-upgrade to Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552221] Re: Volume control icon not present after upgrade to Lucid when app indicator applet has been removed by hand in Karmic
I don't recall ever removing the indicator applet. -- Volume control icon not present after upgrade to Lucid when app indicator applet has been removed by hand in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552221] Re: Volume control icon not present after upgrade to Lucid when app indicator applet has been removed by hand in Karmic
@Milan, how do I add the notification applet? All I see is the notification area under the 'Add to Panel...' facility. -- Volume control icon not present after upgrade to Lucid when app indicator applet has been removed by hand in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552221] Re: Volume control icon not present after upgrade to Lucid when app indicator applet has been removed by hand in Karmic
OK, I installed the indicator applet and I got the knob, plus an envelope. -- Volume control icon not present after upgrade to Lucid when app indicator applet has been removed by hand in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 561575] Re: [needs-packaging] Olympus Digital Voice Recorder user-space driver (odvr)
PPA available: odvr - 0.1.5-iacobs3 https://edge.launchpad.net/~iacobs/+archive/m0n5t3r -- [needs-packaging] Olympus Digital Voice Recorder user-space driver (odvr) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557300] Re: tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
I just tested this on a fresh Hardy install (tomcat55) and it also does not work: == # dpkg-statoverride --add ubuntu ubuntu 755 /etc/tomcat5.5 # dpkg-statoverride --list ubuntu ubuntu 755 /etc/tomcat5.5 # aptitude install tomcat5.5 # ls -ld /etc/tomcat5.5/ drwxr-x--- 4 tomcat55 adm 4096 2010-04-09 17:23 /etc/tomcat5.5/ == Here is the same with a fresh Intrepid (tomcat6) install: == # dpkg-statoverride --add ubuntu ubuntu 755 /etc/tomcat6 # dpkg-statoverride --list ubuntu ubuntu 755 /etc/tomcat6 # apt-cache madison tomcat6 tomcat6 | 6.0.18-0ubuntu3.3 | http://archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-updates/main Packages tomcat6 | 6.0.18-0ubuntu3.3 | http://security.ubuntu.com intrepid-security/main Packages tomcat6 | 6.0.18-0ubuntu3 | http://archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages # aptitude install tomcat6=6.0.18-0ubuntu3 # ls -ld /etc/tomcat6/ drwxr-xr-x 3 ubuntu ubuntu 4096 2010-04-09 17:43 /etc/tomcat6/ == Then, still on Intrepid: == # aptitude purge tomcat6 # dpkg-statoverride --list ubuntu ubuntu 755 /etc/tomcat6 # aptitude install tomcat6=6.0.18-0ubuntu3.3 # ls -ld /etc/tomcat6/ drwxr-xr-x 4 ubuntu ubuntu 4096 2010-04-09 18:04 /etc/tomcat6/ == So I'm not sure how to interpret this. Anyone? -- tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 551855] [NEW] [hardy] Support for NC522SFP Gb network card is broken
Public bug reported: In Ubuntu 8.04 the module netxen_nic exists but does not work. It can be loaded manually but that's all. This affects, at least, the following HP/NetXen Gigabit network controller: NC522SFP 103c:705b NC522SFP Dual Port 10GbE Server Adapter http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/networking/nc522sfp/index.html It has been proven to work, at least, in Ubuntu 9.10. Attached is a compressed tarball (info.tar.gz) containing the following files: dmesg-910.txt lspci-910.txt (includes several invocations of lspci) system-910.txt lshw-910.txt dmesg-804.txt modinfo-804.txt Please provide support for the above card in Ubuntu 8.04. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [hardy] Support for NC522SFP Gb network card is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551855 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 551855] Re: [hardy] Support for NC522SFP Gb network card is broken
** Attachment added: info.tar.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42515638/info.tar.gz -- [hardy] Support for NC522SFP Gb network card is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551855 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 513848] Re: [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
Spoke to tgabi. The kernel is reporting fine. -- [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 513848] Re: [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 513848] Re: [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
Here are new screenshots for Jaunty and Karmic. Each test ran for a good 25 minutes. I've also added a Karmic screenshot for 'top' showing (some of) the threads associated with the single Java process. In addition, I have copied my recent post (2010-03-10) to kernel- t...@lists.ubuntu.com : Can anyone tell me whether the Karmic kernel has implemented a different way of what it considers a process (as opposed to threads)? I have a situation where CPU load is zero on Karmic but considerably higher in Jaunty and earlier. The scenario is a single java process with many threads. The system has 4 cores and only one java process should logically produce a negligible CPU load but why was this not the case with earlier kernels? Has something changed in Karmic that would explain what I'm seeing? -- [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 513848] Re: [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
** Attachment added: dstat+top+jconsole-904-A_80p.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40877627/dstat%2Btop%2Bjconsole-904-A_80p.png -- [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 513848] Re: [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
** Attachment added: dstat+top+jconsole-910-A_80p.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40877638/dstat%2Btop%2Bjconsole-910-A_80p.png -- [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 513848] Re: [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
I wish I could have gotten a higher CPU usage out of the Karmic test. Nonetheless, I believe I have a very valid case for discussion. -- [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 513848] Re: [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
** Attachment added: top_threads-910-A.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40877640/top_threads-910-A.png -- [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 503008] Re: Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
I may be able to build a package for you from the Intrepid sources. This gives the following version which has provided me the parameter in question: dovecot-imapd 1:1.1.4-0ubuntu1.3 I'll test this on my side and let you know if it will work. -- Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 503008] Re: Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
I may be able to build a package for you from the Intrepid sources. This gives the following version which has provided me the parameter in question: dovecot-imapd 1:1.1.4-0ubuntu1.3 I'll test this on my side and let you know if it will work. -- Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 503008] Re: Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
I've only managed to use this parameter with Ubuntu 8.04 . Otherwise, the error above is thrown. -- Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 503008] Re: Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
Hmmm, the default shipped with 8.10 is dovecot-imapd 1:1.1.4-0ubuntu1.3 but an updated 8.04 has dovecot-imapd 1:1.2.9-1ubuntu3 Why does this parameter work with the older version? And @Gaylord, why aren't you running the latest available with 8.04 anyway? -- Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 503008] Re: Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
Strange. I built a Hardy virtual machine and 1.2.9 was installed. Indeed, the archives do say 1.0.10. I'll have to determine what happened with my VM. At any rate, if the error is thrown then that version doesn't support the parameter. -- Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
