[Bug 1761739] Re: Submits a message to a remote server even when "No, don't send any info" is selected

2018-10-24 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
The fact that you claim to not log or store the IP address is beside my
point, which is that the IP address is _transferred_ out of the machine
even when the user said no to submitting any information.  If consent is
your legal basis for submitting information to Ubuntu, it is not valid
for transferring the 'I do not want information to be submitted' message
over HTTP, independent of what story you provide on what you do with the
personal information once it arrive.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1761739

Title:
  Submits a message to a remote server even when "No, don't send any
  info" is selected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-initial-setup/+bug/1761739/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1761739] Re: Submits a message to a remote server even when "No, don't send any info" is selected

2018-10-19 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Of course IP information is sent.  Any HTTP connection will pass on the
IP address of the other end during establishment of its TCP/IP
connection.  The fact that HTTP is used over TCP is enough to send the
IP address. It could be avoided by enforcing the use of Tor or similar,
but that is purely academic given that most people are not using a
service to hide their IP address.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1761739

Title:
  Submits a message to a remote server even when "No, don't send any
  info" is selected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-initial-setup/+bug/1761739/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1761739] Re: Submits a message to a remote server even when "No, don't send any info" is selected

2018-10-19 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Note, with the current privacy regulations, if Canonical uses consent as
the base for submitting this information for collection, I am quite sure
it would be against the law to send IP address to a Canonical server
when consent is missing.   Sending IP address provides time, location
and the fact that a given version of Ubuntu is being installed to
Ubuntu, and every network sniffing entity on the way like NSA and GCHQ.
This set of information is by definition personal information, and by
combining the IP address with other sources it is often possible to
identify the individual uniquely (for example if the user uses Facebook,
log into her email etc). As consent is obviously missing if the user
declined to submit the information about his machine, Canonical would
have to come up with another basis for the collection.  It would be hard
to argue it is vital for the operation of the service provided, one of
the other options for data collection.  It is probably a good idea to
check out the GDPR provisions available, to reduce the chance of a large
fine.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1761739

Title:
  Submits a message to a remote server even when "No, don't send any
  info" is selected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-initial-setup/+bug/1761739/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1685528] Re: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] zfs-initramfs Script Change

2017-04-24 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Richard Laager]
> I will take a look.

If you are not already aware of it, it is useful to know about the
summary page and related links,
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=pkg-zfsonlinux-devel%40lists.alioth.debian.org
 >.

> I have been subscribed to the mailing list for some time. I have joined
> the IRC room now.

Welcome. :)

> Are you saying it was discussed in one of these places?

At least I am happy with the amount of information flowing in these
channels.  All commits are automatically send to the list, for those
with time and interest to review, and all bug reports and discussions
are sent there too.  But most important, everyone in the group seem to
welcome contributions from interested and skilled people.  The team is
short on man-power, as is most teams of course, but everyone is doing as
good as we can.

My main problem is personal, I lack the required spare time to
contribute technically, and so far has mostly helped by guiding the
package through the NEW queue and commiting a few translations. :)

> /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/zfs was significantly changed in
> Zesty from what it is in Xenial:
> 1 file changed, 936 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)

Aha.  I misunderstood what to look for in git.   I do not know anything
about that file, unfortunately. :)

-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1685528

Title:
  ZFS initramfs mounts dataset explicitly set not to be mounted, causing
  boot process to fail

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1685528/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1685528] Re: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] zfs-initramfs Script Change

2017-04-23 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Richard Laager]
> Who completely replaced the zfs-initramfs script?

You can find out who commited what in the Debian package by looking in
the package maintenance git repository available from
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-zfsonlinux/zfs.git >.

There is also the pkg-zfsonlinux-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org mailing
list and the #debian-zfs IRC channel on irc.debian.org.  I believe we
would all be very happy to see more people there.  This is where the
package maintenance is being coordinated and discussed in Debian.

> Was there a particular reason for this massive change, and was it
> discussed anywhere?

As far as I can see from the git repository, there was no 'change',
there was an 'addition', where to fix BTS report #848157 a file was
added to /usr/share/initramfs-tools/conf.d/.

-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1685528

Title:
  ZFS initramfs mounts dataset explicitly set not to be mounted, causing
  boot process to fail

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1685528/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1469753] Re: No man page, inconsistent files, application doesn't work

2016-09-25 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Hi.  I use this package a lot and find it super useful.  It do not work
with all DVDs, but most of the ones I have tested.  The problem you
report about failing DVDs with overlap in the data structures is
reported to Debian as https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818117 .  It only affect a minority of my DVD
collection.

I agree it would be useful with a manual page.

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #818117
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818117

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1469753

Title:
  No man page, inconsistent files, application doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-dvdvideo/+bug/1469753/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1462697] Re: oggCut Aborted (core dumped)

2015-09-24 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I tested this in Debian Jessie using oggvideotools version 0.8a-4, and
could not reproduce it:

% youtube-dl -x -f 172/171/43/webm/ogg -o myVideo.%(ext)s 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhNUlAudx8E
[youtube] nhNUlAudx8E: Downloading webpage
[youtube] nhNUlAudx8E: Extracting video information
[youtube] nhNUlAudx8E: Downloading DASH manifest
[download] Destination: myVideo.webm
[download] 100% of 5.91MiB in 00:03
[avconv] Destination: myVideo.ogg
Deleting original file myVideo.webm (pass -k to keep)
% oggCut -s 1000 -e 21000 myVideo.ogg out.ogv
Stream No: 0(0xa9014554)
Vorbis Stream:
with 2 channel(s)
and  44100 kHz sample rate
and  128000 data rate

%

Is the problem solved?  The resulting out.ogv file seem to play audio,
at least.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1462697

Title:
  oggCut Aborted (core dumped)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oggvideotools/+bug/1462697/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 371903] Re: sysvinit: correctly wait for backgrounded tasks with CONCURRENCY=shell

2014-01-29 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
The shell concurrency is obsolete and have been removed from sysv-rc.
This patch no longer applies, and I suspect the bug report should be
closed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371903

Title:
  sysvinit: correctly wait for backgrounded tasks with CONCURRENCY=shell

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/371903/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1231734] Re: SELinux Flags Not Passed

2014-01-29 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I tried to reproduce this bug by running make SELINUX_DEF=-DDEBUG
sulogin, and the -DDEBUG flag was used during built.  Do you still see
this problem?  If not, I suspect it has been solved in the mean time.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1231734

Title:
  SELinux Flags Not Passed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/1231734/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 345564] Re: bug in chrpath option parsing

2013-11-23 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
This issue was fixed in version 0.14.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345564

Title:
  bug in chrpath option parsing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chrpath/+bug/345564/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 571925] Re: package jwchat 1.0final-5 failed to install/upgrade:

2013-09-24 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I just uploaded a fix for this to Debian unstable (#710688) in version
1.0+dfsg-1.2.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571925

Title:
  package jwchat 1.0final-5 failed to install/upgrade:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jwchat/+bug/571925/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1208976] [NEW] Wireless card stopped working after last kernel upgrade on thinkpad x1 carbon laptop

2013-08-06 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Public bug reported:

Seems to be related to the btusb module, see error messages at the end
of attached dmesg output. Works fine with kernel version 3.8.0-26.38 .

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: linux-image-3.8.0-27-generic 3.8.0-27.40
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-27.40-generic 3.8.13.4
Uname: Linux 3.8.0-27-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8.1
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/by-path', 
'/dev/snd/controlC29', '/dev/snd/seq', '/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 
1:
CRDA: Error: command ['iw', 'reg', 'get'] failed with exit code 1: nl80211 not 
found.
Date: Tue Aug  6 21:35:37 2013
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=be6e1a5d-4b39-44b1-9894-6e318fe7e3a8
IwConfig:
 wwan0 no wireless extensions.
 
 eth0  no wireless extensions.
 
 lono wireless extensions.
MachineType: LENOVO 3460D4G
MarkForUpload: True
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US:en
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.8.0-27-generic 
root=/dev/mapper/hostname--vg-root ro splash quiet vt.handoff=7
RelatedPackageVersions:
 linux-restricted-modules-3.8.0-27-generic N/A
 linux-backports-modules-3.8.0-27-generic  N/A
 linux-firmware1.106
SourcePackage: linux
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 02/04/2013
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: G6ET93WW (2.53 )
dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available
dmi.board.name: 3460D4G
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: Win8 Pro DPK TPG
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrG6ET93WW(2.53):bd02/04/2013:svnLENOVO:pn3460D4G:pvrThinkPadX1Carbon:rvnLENOVO:rn3460D4G:rvrWin8ProDPKTPG:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
dmi.product.name: 3460D4G
dmi.product.version: ThinkPad X1 Carbon
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug raring

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208976

Title:
  Wireless card stopped working after last kernel upgrade on thinkpad x1
  carbon laptop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1208976/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1160188] Re: ATH9K wireless signal weak

2013-07-29 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
My problem seem to be the one reported as
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56301 and the suggested
workaround is to run iw dev wlan0 set power_save off.  I'm testing it
now, and the wifi have not died yet.  But I am not sure how to trigger
the problem, and it might still show up.

** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #56301
   http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56301

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1160188

Title:
  ATH9K wireless signal weak

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1160188/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1160188] Re: ATH9K wireless signal weak

2013-07-27 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
On one of my Packard Bell EasyNote LV, the wireless network stop working
some minutes after boot.   Only a reboot get it working again.  I tried
to use the 3.11 rc2 kernel, but it reintroduced the black screen of
death and thus was not a very good alternative.  The machine need
acpi_backlight=vendor in raring to not turn off the screen completely,
and this setting no longer work with v3.11.

One of the other ones have not had this problem, but it might be caused
by it running an earlier raring kernel.  I'm testing it again with the
latest kernel version now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1160188

Title:
  ATH9K wireless signal weak

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1160188/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1160188] Re: ATH9K wireless signal weak

2013-07-27 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I booted the 3.11 kernel (uname said 3.11.0-031100rc2-generic) and used the 
Packard Bell EasyNote LV a bit, after
booting it with i915.invert_brightness=1 instead of using the 
acpi_backlight=vendor setting, but with this kernel too the network card 
stopped working after some minutes.  I am not sure, but believe it took a bit 
longer than earlier before it locked up.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1160188

Title:
  ATH9K wireless signal weak

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1160188/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1160188] Re: ATH9K wireless signal weak

2013-07-26 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Any hope of having this problem fixed in an official kernel in raring?  It seem 
to affect Packard Bell EasyNote LV,
http://www.linlap.com/packard_bell_easynote_lv .  The network connection seem 
to fall out after a few minutes.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1160188

Title:
  ATH9K wireless signal weak

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1160188/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1184297] Re: Secure boot failed, claiming boot is against security policy

2013-07-10 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Is there anything I can do to help debug this issue?  I left the
installer to do its job automatically, and thus do not know what I could
have done differently.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1184297

Title:
  Secure boot failed, claiming boot is against security policy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1184297/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 765438] Re: On startup, the backlight is off on laptop

2013-06-05 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I believe this problem also affect Packard Bell EasyNote LV.  It need
i915.invert_brightness=1 to avoid the black screen of death when
installing Ubuntu and when booting the installed system.  With the
setting in place, one can log into Gnome, but when one log into KDE, the
screen is turned off again.

See http://www.linlap.com/packard_bell_easynote_lv for my notes about
Linux on this machine.  I've reported the problem to the kernel
developers and as Debian bugs http://bugs.debian.org/710938 and
http://bugs.debian.org/711237 .

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #710938
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710938

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #711237
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711237

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765438

Title:
  On startup, the backlight is off on laptop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/765438/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1184297] Re: Secure boot failed, claiming boot is against security policy

2013-05-29 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Steve Langasek]
 So http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/24869.html explains why you needed to
 pull the hard drive.

Yeah.  This really suck!

 It does not explain why you would get an error about security
 policy.  Can you attach the output of the following three commands
 on the affected machine:
 
 sudo efibootmgr -v
 od -tx1 
 /sys/firmware/efi/efivars/SecureBoot-8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c 
 od -tx1 
 /sys/firmware/efi/efivars/SecureBootEnforce-59d1c24f-50f1-401a-b101-f33e0daed443
  
 
 It is also potentially useful to have the contents of these files attached:
 /sys/firmware/efi/efivars/KEK-8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c
 /sys/firmware/efi/efivars/db-d719b2cb-3d3a-4596-a3bc-dad00e67656f

Sure.

root@mariwan-EasyNote-LV11HC:~# efibootmgr -v
BootCurrent: 
Timeout: 2 seconds
BootOrder: 
Boot* HDD1: 
HD(1,800,5f000,da6c4276-2f04-4eab-a3e2-4c2be0e3aa63)File(\EFI\ubuntu\grubx64.efi)RC
Boot0001* Atheros Boot Agent
BIOS(80,0,95){..
Boot0004* MATSHITA DVD-RAM UJ8E1
BIOS(3,500,da)-...A..#...
Boot0005* ST500LT012-9WS142 
BIOS(2,500,1f)-...A..2...
root@mariwan-EasyNote-LV11HC:~# od -tx1 
/sys/firmware/efi/efivars/SecureBoot-8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c
000 17 00 00 00 00
005
root@mariwan-EasyNote-LV11HC:~# od -tx1 
/sys/firmware/efi/efivars/SecureBootEnforce-59d1c24f-50f1-401a-b101-f33e0daed443
000 17 00 00 00 00
005
root@mariwan-EasyNote-LV11HC:~#

-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen


** Attachment added: KEK-8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1184297/+attachment/3689540/+files/KEK-8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c

** Attachment added: db-d719b2cb-3d3a-4596-a3bc-dad00e67656f
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1184297/+attachment/3689541/+files/db-d719b2cb-3d3a-4596-a3bc-dad00e67656f

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1184297

Title:
  Secure boot failed, claiming boot is against security policy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim/+bug/1184297/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1184297] [NEW] Secure boot failed, claiming boot is against security policy

2013-05-26 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Public bug reported:

I've struggled to install Linux on a Packard Bell EasyNote LV11HC,
without having to accept the Windows 8 license, and my progress is
documented in http://www.linlap.com/packard_bell_easynote_lv .  Had to
pull the hard drive and install to a USB stick to be able to get into
the firmware menu and enable the F12 boot menu. After finally being able
to install Ubuntu 13.04 on the hard drive, the UEFI firmware refused to
boot the hard drive, claiming it was against the security policy.  I was
able to boot Ubuntu by powering on again and using F12 to pick the hard
drive.

No idea what is wrong, but can help with debugging the next few days
before I switch to legacy BIOS and put it into production.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: shim 0~20120906.bcd0a4e8-0ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-22.33-generic 3.8.11
Uname: Linux 3.8.0-22-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun May 26 11:14:38 2013
Dependencies:
 
InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-05-26 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Release amd64 (20130424)
MarkForUpload: True
SourcePackage: shim
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: shim (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug raring

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1184297

Title:
  Secure boot failed, claiming boot is against security policy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim/+bug/1184297/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1184297] Re: Secure boot failed, claiming boot is against security policy

2013-05-26 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
After booting using F12,  the machine suddenly started booting directly
from HD without any manual intervention needed.  I did install scim in
the mean time, but given that scim-signed already was installed, I doubt
it had any effect on this.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1184297

Title:
  Secure boot failed, claiming boot is against security policy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim/+bug/1184297/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 849222] Re: Some programs dont seem to run while signed in under XRDP

2013-05-24 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I've so far only seen this with programs requiring 3D support.  VNC do
not provide it, and xrdp clients do not get it.  Examples include
celestia and stellarium.   I do not know if this is the case for ubuntu
system monitor.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/849222

Title:
  Some programs dont seem to run while signed in under XRDP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xrdp/+bug/849222/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 914461] Re: common-session should not create a local user when using sssd

2013-05-04 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Smal typo in my comment above.  if you do not want to use libpam-
mkhome should read if you do want to use libpam-mkhome

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914461

Title:
  common-session should not create a local user when using sssd

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/914461/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 914461] Re: common-session should not create a local user when using sssd

2013-05-04 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
This bug seem to be misclassified.  If I understand it correctly, it is
a request for not using libpam-sss and libpam-mklocaluser together if
you want to use libpam-mkhome instead of libpam-mklocaluser.  And while
that seem correct enough - if you do not want to use libpam-mkhome,
please do so.  But it is hardly a bug in libpam-mklocaluser that it do
not fit a use case it isn't intended for.

** Package changed: libpam-mklocaluser (Ubuntu) = ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914461

Title:
  common-session should not create a local user when using sssd

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/914461/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 501284] Re: Evince doesn't open PDF file (3D model) exported by SolidWorks 2009 with 3D option enabled.

2013-03-13 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_3D , the 3D content
in PDFs is U3D.  The specification seem to be available for everyone.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501284

Title:
  Evince doesn't open PDF file  (3D model) exported by SolidWorks 2009
  with 3D option enabled.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/501284/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 661024] Re: etckeeper fail to work when installed during installation

2010-12-15 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
For us at the university of Oslo, a fix in Maverick only have to show up
with PXE installations, so no new media is needed to make us happy.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661024

Title:
  etckeeper fail to work when installed during installation

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 661024] Re: etckeeper fail to work when installed during installation

2010-12-15 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
For us at the university of Oslo, a fix in Maverick only have to show up
with PXE installations, so no new media is needed to make us happy.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661024

Title:
  etckeeper fail to work when installed during installation

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 478975] Re: memory leak in krb5-auth-dialog?

2010-12-02 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I just got an email from Guido Günther, upstream for this package, that the 
memory leaks are fixed in version 0.16,
which is available in Debian Squeeze.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478975

Title:
  memory leak in krb5-auth-dialog?

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 478975] Re: memory leak in krb5-auth-dialog?

2010-12-01 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I noticed this too, using krb5-auth-dialog version 0.15-1 on Kubuntu
Maverik.  The process had 750 MB virtual memory space (most of it
swapped out).  Only a fraction was paged in, thought.

-- 
memory leak in krb5-auth-dialog?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478975
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592682] Re: [i855gm] Kernel crashes on Dell Latitude D505 when X loads after installation

2010-11-23 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I can confirm that this bug is no longer present in Maverik.  Would be
great if the fix also show up in Lucid.

-- 
[i855gm] Kernel crashes on Dell Latitude D505 when X loads after installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592682
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 676969] [NEW] sssd: unable to work due to incorrect module path in libldb

2010-11-18 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: libldb0

With the help of the developers on #freeipa, I was just able to figure
out why sssd fail to work in Ubuntu/Maverik.

The module path of the library changed since Lucid, and sssd is not able
to find its memberof module.  See URL:  http://bugs.debian.org/599644 
for details.

The problem is easy to spot like this:

  % strings /usr/lib/libldb.so.0.9.13|grep usr
  /usr/modules/ldb
  %
The path should be /usr/lib/ldb/ instead.

The bug has been fixed in Debian, but should be fixed in Ubuntu/Lucid
too.  All programs using libldb and modules will end up failing to find
their modules until this bug is fixed.

** Affects: ldb (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
sssd: unable to work due to incorrect module path in libldb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676969
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 661024] Re: etckeeper fail to work when installed during installation

2010-11-03 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Any hope of having this fixed in Maverik?

-- 
etckeeper fail to work when installed during installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661024
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 661024] Re: etckeeper fail to work when installed during installation

2010-11-03 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Any hope of having this fixed in Maverik?

-- 
etckeeper fail to work when installed during installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661024
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 89356] Re: Lines with string unknown in second and/or third column should be removed from /lib/discover/pci.lst

2010-10-20 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
The discover-data package no longer have the *.lst files for discover
v1, so this bug report is irrelevant.

-- 
Lines with string unknown in second and/or third column should be removed 
from /lib/discover/pci.lst 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 661024] [NEW] etckeeper fail to work when installed during installation

2010-10-15 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: etckeeper

I just tested to install maverick here at the University of Oslo, where we have 
customized the installation to install a few extra packages.  One of the 
packages is etckeeper, which is installed very early in the installation 
process (in post-base-installer),
to get a record of every change in /etc/.

This worked just fine in lucid, but in maverick this breaks the installer.  The 
reason is that bzr, the default VCS for etckeeper in Ubuntu, now refuses to 
commit changes before a name and email address has been configured.  This used 
to work, but
now fail.

A fix would be for etckeeper to run bzr whoami 'Enoch Root
r...@hostname' or something similar to get the configuration to show
up in ~root/.bazaar/bazaar.conf when initializing the repository.
Another fix would be for bzr to accept anonymous commits like it did
in Lucid.

** Affects: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
etckeeper fail to work when installed during installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661024
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 459281] Re: krb5-auth-dialog opens 50+ notification windows.

2010-09-14 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
We see them too here at the University of Oslo, and it make krb-auth-
dialog very annoying when left running over the night.

I discussed this with upstream, and he do not experience the problem on Debian. 
 He suspected it was
caused by some changed done to the notification system in Ubuntu.

-- 
krb5-auth-dialog opens 50+ notification windows.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459281
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 557398] Re: needs a /usr/share/pam-configs/sss

2010-07-26 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
** Changed in: sssd (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
needs a /usr/share/pam-configs/sss
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592682] [NEW] Kernel crashes on Dell Latitude D505 when X loads after installation

2010-06-11 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel

Initially, I had no idea what was going on.  The installation went
smooth, but after booting the graphical progress bar (the colored dots)
show up, and after a few seconds the machine is dead.

After using recovery mode to modify /etc/init/kdm.conf to not start kdm,
I was able to get into the machine and see what is going on, and I have
so far figured out that the kernel crashes when kdm starts X.  Starting
X manually show this information:

r...@pxe-test-pre:~# X

X.Org X Server 1.7.6
Release Date: 2010-03-17
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.24-25-server i686 Ubuntu
Current Operating System: Linux pxe-test-pre 2.6.32-22-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP 
Thu Jun 3 22:02:19 UTC 2010 i686
Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-2.6.32-22-generic 
root=/dev/mapper/pxe--test--pre-root ro quiet splash
Build Date: 23 April 2010  05:11:50PM
xorg-server 2:1.7.6-2ubuntu7 (Bryce Harrington br...@ubuntu.com)
Current version of pixman: 0.16.4
Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Fri Jun 11 15:51:34 2010
(==) Using config directory: /usr/lib/X11/xorg.conf.d

After this, the network connection dies (I am logged in via ssh), and
the screen on the laptop is black.

This is the lspci info about the video card:

r...@pxe-test-pre:~# lspci -nn|grep Graph
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 82852/855GM 
Integrated Graphics Device [8086:3582] (rev 02)
00:02.1 Display controller [0380]: Intel Corporation 82852/855GM Integrated 
Graphics Device [8086:3582] (rev 02)
r...@pxe-test-pre:~#

** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Kernel crashes on Dell Latitude D505 when X loads after installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592682
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 592682] Re: Kernel crashes on Dell Latitude D505 when X loads after installation

2010-06-11 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen

** Attachment added: info collected by ubuntu-bug
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50134760/apport.xserver-xorg-video-intel.J8jOR2.apport

-- 
Kernel crashes on Dell Latitude D505 when X loads after installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592682
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 557398] Re: needs a /usr/share/pam-configs/sss

2010-06-10 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
This is fixed in the Debian package, both version 1.0.5 and 1.2.0.

-- 
needs a /usr/share/pam-configs/sss
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 576079] [NEW] typo in debian/rules make sssd.api.conf fail to install

2010-05-05 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: sssd

I discovered this while preparing sssd for Debian.  The install rule for
sssd.api.conf is wrong in the Ubuntu package.

The line 
   install -D -m640 $(CURDIR)/server/config/etc/sssd.api.conf 
$(CURDIR)/debian/sss/etc/sssd/sssd/sssd.api.conf

should probably look something like this instead:

   install -D -m640 $(CURDIR)/server/config/etc/sssd.api.conf
$(CURDIR)/debian/sssd/etc/sssd/sssd.api.conf

Notice the typo debian/sss/ changed to debian/sssd/.  Also, it would be
the only file in /etc/sssd/sssd/, so I suspect it should be moved up one
level to /etc/sssd/.

** Affects: sssd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
typo in debian/rules make sssd.api.conf fail to install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576079
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 557398] Re: needs a /usr/share/pam-configs/sss

2010-04-30 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I hope this can be fixed in an lucid update, to get it into the new
stable release soon.

Btw, should the session entry for pam-configs have Session-Interactive-Only: 
yes?  I doubt it
make sense to activate sss for cron jobs, and thus should use this flag.

Steve, what would be your proposal for the password section of the pam-configs 
entry?  Should both
be sufficient?   What should the priority be?  Should sss be first, or last in 
the auth stack?

-- 
needs a /usr/share/pam-configs/sss
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 294977] Re: not clear how to configure with pam-auth-update

2010-04-28 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I tested the configuration from the patch in comment #2 on lucid, and it seem 
to work just fine.
I'm testing with libpam-ldapd and libnss-ldapd.

-- 
not clear how to configure with pam-auth-update
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294977
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 569697] [NEW] munin plugin do not work with xen hosts

2010-04-25 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: virt-goodies

The munin plugin fail to work on a xen host, even though 'virsh list'
list the virtual machines just fine.

I tried adding this in /etc/munin/plugin-conf.d/libvirt, but it did not
fix it.

  [libvirt]
  env.uri xen:///

The problem is also reported URL: http://bugs.debian.org/572044 .

Happy hacking,
-- 
Petter Reinholdtsen

** Affects: virt-goodies (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
munin plugin do not work with xen hosts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569697
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416305] Re: please invert shell prompt and profile.d sections in /etc/profile

2010-04-08 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
The /etc/profile.d/ feature is not in Debian.  Why do you need to
coordinate with Debian on how it is implemented?

What that is said, I believe the /etc/profile.d/ part should be executed
after the umask call, at the very end of the file.

-- 
please invert shell prompt and profile.d sections in /etc/profile
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416305
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 504940] Re: Installing Jove also installs sendmail

2010-03-22 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
jove have a boot script that emails edits in progress during shutdown.  I 
suspect this is why it
pull in a mail server.

-- 
Installing Jove also installs sendmail
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504940
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 385410] Re: vmware2libvirt fails when converting vmx file created under windows

2010-03-18 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I believe this issue was fixed in version 0.4.

-- 
vmware2libvirt fails when converting vmx file created under windows
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 523119] [NEW] Missing dependency on uuid-runtime

2010-02-17 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: virt-goodies

When trying to run vmware2libvirt, I ran into this crash:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/vmware2libvirt, line 232, in module
/disk''' + get_network(vmx,  bridge) + '''
  File /usr/bin/vmware2libvirt, line 92, in get_new_uuid
raise V2LError('uuidgen' exited with error:  + out)
__main__.V2LError: 'uuidgen' exited with error: [Errno 2] No such file or 
directory

When I looked into it, the problem was that the uuidgen program was missing.  
Installing the uuid-runtime package
solved the problem.  The virt-goodies package should depend on it to get 
vmware2libvirt working out of the box.

** Affects: virt-goodies (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Missing dependency on uuid-runtime
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523119
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 385410] Re: vmware2libvirt fails when converting vmx file created under windows

2010-02-17 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I ran into this problem too, and can confirm that the fix from Jamin W.
Collins work.

Here is the diff.

--- /tmp/vmware2libvirt 2010-02-17 11:21:15.0 +0100
+++ /usr/bin/vmware2libvirt 2010-02-17 11:21:31.0 +0100
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
 for line in vmx:
 if pat.search(line):
 # extract value without quotes
-value = pat.sub('', line)[1:-2]
+value = pat.sub( '', line.replace(\r,))[1:-2]

 if value == :
 raise V2LError(Bad value for ' + key + ')

-- 
vmware2libvirt fails when converting vmx file created under windows
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 496798] Re: lintian should not complain about upstart jobs not looking like init scripts

2009-12-28 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Raphael Geissert]
 Jos, would be great if you could provide a test too (take a look at t/tests/).
 
 But taking a look at the implementation:
 Once upstart-job is included in Debian and made the default it will
 return the LSB headers when called with a special argument (I don't
 remeber the details right now). As such, not all the tests should be
 skipped.
 I'm not sure if the update-rc.d call needs to be dropped either.
 
 I'm CC'ing Petter Reinholdtsen as he might remeber the details better.

The insserv bug for this support was #547235.  The argument is
lsb-header, and update-rc.d still need to be called for the
upstart-job symlink.

We are still waiting for the upstart part of the implementation.  CC
to Michael who was going to implement it.

Happy hacking,
-- 
Petter Reinholdtsen

-- 
lintian should not complain about upstart jobs not looking like init scripts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496798
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs