[Bug 1863894] Re: /etc/bash.bashrc invokes groups command which is slow in large environments
** Description changed: /etc/bash.bashrc runs groups(1) whenever a new shell is started. This command calls getgrgid(3) on every group of which the user is a member. In an environment where FreeIPA is used to allow users to log into their computers using their Active Directory accounts, I have seen each call to getgrid(3) take over ten seconds. My Active Directory user is a member of 30 groups and it is not uncommon for users to be a member of 50 or more groups. This results in enormous delays when logging in to a system with SSH, launching a terminal emulator or even creating a new tab in an existing terminal emulator. The code from /etc/bash.bashrc wants to find out whether the user is a member of the 'sudo' or 'admin' groups in order to display a hint to the user. # sudo hint if [ ! -e "$HOME/.sudo_as_admin_successful" ] && [ ! -e "$HOME/.hushlogin" ] ; then - case " $(groups) " in *\ admin\ *|*\ sudo\ *) - if [ -x /usr/bin/sudo ]; then - cat <<-EOF - To run a command as administrator (user "root"), use "sudo ". - See "man sudo_root" for details. - - EOF - fi - esac + case " $(groups) " in *\ admin\ *|*\ sudo\ *) + if [ -x /usr/bin/sudo ]; then + cat <<-EOF + To run a command as administrator (user "root"), use "sudo ". + See "man sudo_root" for details. + + EOF + fi + esac fi This can be rewritten to avoid calling getgrgid(3) for every group that the user is a member of by doing something like this (untested): # sudo hint if [[ -x /usr/bin/sudo ]]; then - if [[ ! -e $HOME/.sudo_as_admin_successful && ! -e $HOME/.hushlogin ]]; then - sudo_gid=$(getent group sudo | cut -d: -f3) - admin_gid=$(getent group admin | cut -d: -f3) - for gid in $(id -G); do - if [[ $gid -eq $sudo_gid || $gid -eq $admin_gid ]]; then - cat <<-EOF - To run a command as administrator (user "root"), use "sudo ". - See "man sudo_root" for details. - EOF - break - fi - done - fi + if [[ ! -e $HOME/.sudo_as_admin_successful && ! -e $HOME/.hushlogin ]]; then + sudo_gid=$(getent group sudo | cut -d: -f3) + admin_gid=$(getent group admin | cut -d: -f3) + for gid in $(id -G); do + if [[ $gid -eq $sudo_gid || $gid -eq $admin_gid ]]; then + cat <<-EOF + To run a command as administrator (user "root"), use "sudo ". + See "man sudo_root" for details. + EOF + break + fi + done + fi fi As an aside: the reason that getgrid(3) is so slow is because it must fetch the members of each group. There is no quick way to do this in Active Directory: a recursive search for group members must be performed, followed by a lookups to retrieve each of their their POSIX UIDs, and then more lookup to retrieve their POSIX username. Even when the 'ignore_group_members' sssd(8) option is enabled, which causes getgrid(3) to report that a group has no members, calling getgrid(3) on 30-40 groups still takes a few seconds. And this option is not the default. It's also not uncommon to have groups with spaces in their names, which causes groups(1) to produce ambiguous output. For these reasons it is best to avoid the use of groups(1) in scripts where more performant and robust alternatives are available. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863894 Title: /etc/bash.bashrc invokes groups command which is slow in large environments To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1863894/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1863894] [NEW] /etc/bash.bashrc invokes groups command which is slow in large environments
Public bug reported: /etc/bash.bashrc runs groups(1) whenever a new shell is started. This command calls getgrgid(3) on every group of which the user is a member. In an environment where FreeIPA is used to allow users to log into their computers using their Active Directory accounts, I have seen each call to getgrid(3) take over ten seconds. My Active Directory user is a member of 30 groups and it is not uncommon for users to be a member of 50 or more groups. This results in enormous delays when logging in to a system with SSH, launching a terminal emulator or even creating a new tab in an existing terminal emulator. The code from /etc/bash.bashrc wants to find out whether the user is a member of the 'sudo' or 'admin' groups in order to display a hint to the user. # sudo hint if [ ! -e "$HOME/.sudo_as_admin_successful" ] && [ ! -e "$HOME/.hushlogin" ] ; then case " $(groups) " in *\ admin\ *|*\ sudo\ *) if [ -x /usr/bin/sudo ]; then cat <<-EOF To run a command as administrator (user "root"), use "sudo ". See "man sudo_root" for details. EOF fi esac fi This can be rewritten to avoid calling getgrgid(3) for every group that the user is a member of by doing something like this (untested): # sudo hint if [[ -x /usr/bin/sudo ]]; then if [[ ! -e $HOME/.sudo_as_admin_successful && ! -e $HOME/.hushlogin ]]; then sudo_gid=$(getent group sudo | cut -d: -f3) admin_gid=$(getent group admin | cut -d: -f3) for gid in $(id -G); do if [[ $gid -eq $sudo_gid || $gid -eq $admin_gid ]]; then cat <<-EOF To run a command as administrator (user "root"), use "sudo ". See "man sudo_root" for details. EOF break fi done fi fi As an aside: the reason that getgrid(3) is so slow is because it must fetch the members of each group. There is no quick way to do this in Active Directory: a recursive search for group members must be performed, followed by a lookups to retrieve each of their their POSIX UIDs, and then more lookup to retrieve their POSIX username. Even when the 'ignore_group_members' sssd(8) option is enabled, which causes getgrid(3) to report that a group has no members, calling getgrid(3) on 30-40 groups still takes a few seconds. And this option is not the default. It's also not uncommon to have groups with spaces in their names, which causes groups(1) to produce ambiguous output. For these reasons it is best to avoid the use of groups(1) in scripts where more performant and robust alternatives are available. ** Affects: bash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863894 Title: /etc/bash.bashrc invokes groups command which is slow in large environments To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1863894/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 943881]
(In reply to comment #4) Is this a duplicate of bug #48414? I think so. My understanding of the original report is: * There is no way to authenticate when printing using CUPS on the network [to a printer with AuthInfoRequired username,password in its printers.conf entry] * Whereas, in OpenOffice.org 1.2, there is a pop-up window requesting authentication [when attempting to print to such a printer] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943881 Title: [Upstream] Unable to print to password protected (cups) printer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/943881/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free
The logo is now licensed under MPL 2, according to http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla- central/source/browser/branding/official/LICENSE. The upstream bug was https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541761. ** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #541761 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541761 ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118 Title: Some Firefox components are non-free To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/83118/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526659] Re: nmbd fails to start at boot time
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 523868 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523868 Duplicate of bug 462169? -- nmbd fails to start at boot time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526659 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 526659] Re: nmbd fails to start at boot time
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 523868 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523868 Duplicate of bug 462169? -- nmbd fails to start at boot time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526659 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303458] Re: segfault in pam_smbpass.so
Just ran into this *again*. It needs to be fixed in *all* currently supported Ubuntu releases, not just the current one... -- segfault in pam_smbpass.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303458 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free
No it wasn't. The 'firefox' package which contains non-free content still exists in main. ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Some Firefox components are non-free https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 365485] [NEW] Aborted upgrade process left laptop in totally fucked state
Public bug reported: While upgrading a laptop from Ubuntu 8.10 to 9.04, the user noticed that openoffice.org-writer had taken about 15 minutes to be unpacked. Investigating futher I noticed that the dpkg process was in the uninterruptible sleep state (D). Examining the kernel message buffer with dmesg I saw that several OOPSes had occurred (I'll try to attach the output once I get the laptop up and running again). At this point I decided to reboot; that was a bad idea... The laptop would no longer boot up. Instead of X starting at the end of the bootup process, there was simply a blank screen. After a few moments I realised that the system was simply sitting on a blank virtual console, and was able to switch to another tty and log in. At this point, I ran startx, but the system froze completely with a black screen and a mouse pointer. I had to hard-reboot; this time, I ran 'update-manager -d' to try to resume the upgrade, but got an error saying that pygtk could not be imported. I doubt the exact cause of this problem will ever be identified, even if it is possible for it to be fixed. Instead, I file this bug to draw your attention to the fact that the present upgrade process is very unreliable. If an upgrade is interrupted, it must not leave the system in a totally unusable state! As a Debian user it is extremely disappointing to see that you have taken the traditional and very reliable 'dist-upgrade' process, and replaced it with some weird, fragile upgrade script that requires working python and X installations. It is also frustrating that there is basically no end-user documentation for the upgrade process. The user gets a funny icon in their notification area, which they click on to trigger the upgrade script... but where are they presented with the release notes, including upgrade and recovery procedures? I'm talking about a document like Debian's: http://www.debian.org/releases/lenny/i386/release-notes/ch- upgrading.en.html. It is also very frustrating to see that the fragility of the ugprade process has not improved since I reported bug #108276 for the Feisty upgrade process, two years ago. ** Affects: upgrade-system (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Aborted upgrade process left laptop in totally fucked state https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 365485] Re: Aborted upgrade process left laptop in totally fucked state
Some particularly amusing leftovers from the upgrade script were: * existence of a mysterious '/usr/shareFeisty' directory; * the permissions of /dev/null were reset such that only root may write to it * screwed up ttf-uralic package that complained it could not be removed because its fonts had already been de-registered * failure to configure ubuntu-standard package because atd package would not configure; this was because /etc/init.d/atd start failed; but it did not print out why. Strace revealed that it was trying to connect to /dev/log, but the connection was refused. After I manually started sysklogd, I could read the real error message in syslog: apparantly atd did not have permission to access /var/sppol/cron/atjobs. This directory is now owned by user/group bin(!), as was /var/spool/cron... what the hell? ** Attachment added: dmesg output http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25884938/oops -- Aborted upgrade process left laptop in totally fucked state https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 365485] Re: Aborted upgrade process left laptop in totally fucked state
Jesus, I'm sorry I don't have a magical built-in knowledge of which package to file bugs such as this against. I'm sorry for naively typing in 'upgrade' into the unhelpful package search box and picking a package that sounded relevant to the problem at hand! -- Aborted upgrade process left laptop in totally fucked state https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 365485] Re: Aborted upgrade process left laptop in totally fucked state
The difference is that on Debian, I can always resume an upgrade done with apt-get (or aptitude) dist-upgrade. Even though the dpkg process had gotten wedged in state D, the (first) reboot was a normal one; after I rebooted, I fully expected 'dpkg --configure -a' to resume where it left off, as it did. Now although it turns out that I can do that on Ubuntu too, I had no way of knowing that; all I had to go on was that the upgrade was started from a mysterious icon in the notification area that no longer appears; after some research I found out that this was update-manager, but since that requires pygtk and X, I was not able to run it. For all I knew, this upgrade script did important things in addition to a dist-upgrade, things that wouldn't be done if the script was not used... The problem here is basically the fragility of the upgrade process caused by relying on the update-manager script. From the PoV of an experienced Debian user, it seems like a pretty, but fragile front-end to running 'aptitude dist-upgrade'. And since it does not present any upgrade documentation to the user, the user is powerless to fix their system when an upgrade is aborted for whatever reaso. I have now got the system to a working state by doing the old 'dpkg --configure --pending' followed by a few invocations of 'aptitude dist-upgrade' punctuated by fixing the issues I listed above. Working enough to download an install CD, anyway, and do a fresh install. :) As for /usr/shareFeisty, I assumed that was an artifact of buggy maintainer scripts, rather than filesystem corruption; although, since I didn't run fsck before re-installing, I can't rule that out. -- Aborted upgrade process left laptop in totally fucked state https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 365485] Re: Aborted upgrade process left laptop in totally fucked state
The difference is that on Debian, I can always resume an upgrade done with apt-get (or aptitude) dist-upgrade. Even though the dpkg process had gotten wedged in state D, the (first) reboot was a normal one; after I rebooted, I fully expected 'dpkg --configure -a' to resume where it left off, as it did. Now although it turns out that I can do that on Ubuntu too, I had no way of knowing that; all I had to go on was that the upgrade was started from a mysterious icon in the notification area that no longer appears; after some research I found out that this was update-manager, but since that requires pygtk and X, I was not able to run it. For all I knew, this upgrade script did important things in addition to a dist-upgrade, things that wouldn't be done if the script was not used... The problem here is basically the fragility of the upgrade process caused by relying on the update-manager script. From the PoV of an experienced Debian user, it seems like a pretty, but fragile front-end to running 'aptitude dist-upgrade'. And since it does not present any upgrade documentation to the user, the user is powerless to fix their system when an upgrade is aborted for whatever reaso. I have now got the system to a working state by doing the old 'dpkg --configure --pending' followed by a few invocations of 'aptitude dist-upgrade' punctuated by fixing the issues I listed above. Working enough to download an install CD, anyway, and do a fresh install. :) As for /usr/shareFeisty, I assumed that was an artifact of buggy maintainer scripts, rather than filesystem corruption; although, since I didn't run fsck before re-installing, I can't rule that out. -- Aborted upgrade process left laptop in totally fucked state https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 365485] Re: Aborted upgrade process left laptop in totally fucked state
The difference is that on Debian, I can always resume an upgrade done with apt-get (or aptitude) dist-upgrade. Even though the dpkg process had gotten wedged in state D, the (first) reboot was a normal one; after I rebooted, I fully expected 'dpkg --configure -a' to resume where it left off, as it did. Now although it turns out that I can do that on Ubuntu too, I had no way of knowing that; all I had to go on was that the upgrade was started from a mysterious icon in the notification area that no longer appears; after some research I found out that this was update-manager, but since that requires pygtk and X, I was not able to run it. For all I knew, this upgrade script did important things in addition to a dist-upgrade, things that wouldn't be done if the script was not used... The problem here is basically the fragility of the upgrade process caused by relying on the update-manager script. From the PoV of an experienced Debian user, it seems like a pretty, but fragile front-end to running 'aptitude dist-upgrade'. And since it does not present any upgrade documentation to the user, the user is powerless to fix their system when an upgrade is aborted for whatever reaso. I have now got the system to a working state by doing the old 'dpkg --configure --pending' followed by a few invocations of 'aptitude dist-upgrade' punctuated by fixing the issues I listed above. Working enough to download an install CD, anyway, and do a fresh install. :) As for /usr/shareFeisty, I assumed that was an artifact of buggy maintainer scripts, rather than filesystem corruption; although, since I didn't run fsck before re-installing, I can't rule that out. -- Aborted upgrade process left laptop in totally fucked state https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 361066] [NEW] Difficult to share external hard drives
Public bug reported: A user found it hard to share files on an external hard drive. Although it is not clear which package to file the bug against, I guess samba is a reasonable starting point. The user wanted to share files on an external usb hard drive. nautilus- share made that part easy, except that when I tried to access the share, I got a not-very-helpful generic error message from nautilus. So I tried to use smbclient directly, and got only NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME errors, even though 'smbclient -L' revealed the share existing normally. After checking the samba log on the user's laptop it appeared that the shared path (/media/USB-DISK) did not exist! But it certainly did. Eventually I realised that the problem was that the 'nobody' user could not access /media/USB-DISK because hal's default policy is to mount disks so that they are only readable by the mounting user. So the next step was to add the mount options 'fmask=111,dmask=000' to the volume, which was ok to do in nautilus, and then remount the disk. But I still got NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME errors on the client. I thought that maybe I would have to restart samba to persuade it to try and look in /media/USB-DISK again, but that didn't work--and then, the share disappeared from the output of smblcient -L entirely! At this point I ran 'net usershare list' on the server and got the following output: info_fn: file /var/lib/samba/usershares/blah is not a well formed usershare file. info_fn: Error was Path not allowed. Hm, not very clear. At this point I gave up and began to write this bug report. Meanwhile, my user rebooted, and then examined the share properties in nautilus. Now, they got an error saying that the share would not work because 'usershare owner only' needed to be set to false. After changing the option and restarting samba, I was then able to access the share. Phew! So I think there are a couple of different bugs here: 1. Unclear error messages from samba if it is unable to access a shared directory 2. No warning from nautilus-share if samba can't access a shared directory 3. nautilus-share did not recognise that the situation had changed and did not present the useful message until the user had restarted ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Difficult to share external hard drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361066 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 361066] [NEW] Difficult to share external hard drives
Public bug reported: A user found it hard to share files on an external hard drive. Although it is not clear which package to file the bug against, I guess samba is a reasonable starting point. The user wanted to share files on an external usb hard drive. nautilus- share made that part easy, except that when I tried to access the share, I got a not-very-helpful generic error message from nautilus. So I tried to use smbclient directly, and got only NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME errors, even though 'smbclient -L' revealed the share existing normally. After checking the samba log on the user's laptop it appeared that the shared path (/media/USB-DISK) did not exist! But it certainly did. Eventually I realised that the problem was that the 'nobody' user could not access /media/USB-DISK because hal's default policy is to mount disks so that they are only readable by the mounting user. So the next step was to add the mount options 'fmask=111,dmask=000' to the volume, which was ok to do in nautilus, and then remount the disk. But I still got NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME errors on the client. I thought that maybe I would have to restart samba to persuade it to try and look in /media/USB-DISK again, but that didn't work--and then, the share disappeared from the output of smblcient -L entirely! At this point I ran 'net usershare list' on the server and got the following output: info_fn: file /var/lib/samba/usershares/blah is not a well formed usershare file. info_fn: Error was Path not allowed. Hm, not very clear. At this point I gave up and began to write this bug report. Meanwhile, my user rebooted, and then examined the share properties in nautilus. Now, they got an error saying that the share would not work because 'usershare owner only' needed to be set to false. After changing the option and restarting samba, I was then able to access the share. Phew! So I think there are a couple of different bugs here: 1. Unclear error messages from samba if it is unable to access a shared directory 2. No warning from nautilus-share if samba can't access a shared directory 3. nautilus-share did not recognise that the situation had changed and did not present the useful message until the user had restarted ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Difficult to share external hard drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361066 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352357] [NEW] CD mounted and opened when trying to burn a CD
Public bug reported: When trying to burn an ISO image I right-clicked on it and selected 'Write to disc'. Then I got asked to insert a CD, so I put in a DVD-RW disc. Then I pressed burn, got an unknown error (I forget the exact message but it was not helpful). At the same time, Nautilus opened the contents of the DVD-RW, which may have been what caused the burn process to fail. Nautilus shouldn't mount CDs that it is trying to simultaneously burn data to. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- CD mounted and opened when trying to burn a CD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 271258] Re: gspca's module fails on 2.6.27-3-generic on Intrepid
On the Aspire 5670 at my workplace this prevents Intrepid from booting at all. The problem is increased by the hiding of kernel messages during the boot-up process--the system simply appears to freeze. Perhaps the severity should be increased? -- gspca's module fails on 2.6.27-3-generic on Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271258 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303458] Re: segfault in pam_smbpass.so
I found that the corrupted secrets.tdb prevented samba from starting: [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] smbd/server.c:main(1213) smbd version 3.2.3 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2008 [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_wrap_log(886) tdb(/var/lib/samba/secrets.tdb): transaction_read: failed at off=1601070448 len=24 [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_wrap_log(886) tdb(/var/lib/samba/secrets.tdb): transaction_read: failed at off=1601070448 len=24 [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_wrap_log(886) tdb(/var/lib/samba/secrets.tdb): transaction_read: failed at off=1601070448 len=24 [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_wrap_log(886) tdb(/var/lib/samba/secrets.tdb): transaction_read: failed at off=1601070448 len=24 [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_wrap_log(886) tdb(/var/lib/samba/secrets.tdb): transaction_read: failed at off=1650750572 len=24 [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] passdb/machine_sid.c:pdb_generate_sam_sid(166) pdb_generate_sam_sid: Failed to store generated machine SID. [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1663) PANIC (pid 28036): could not generate a machine SID [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/util.c:log_stack_trace(1767) BACKTRACE: 6 stack frames: #0 /usr/sbin/smbd(log_stack_trace+0x2d) [0xb7bc542c] #1 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x80) [0xb7bc5589] #2 /usr/sbin/smbd(get_global_sam_sid+0x6f3) [0xb7acc257] #3 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x9f7) [0xb7a65530] #4 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe5) [0xb757f685] #5 /usr/sbin/smbd [0xb7a62af1] [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1668) smb_panic(): calling panic action [/usr/share/samba/panic-action 28036] [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1676) smb_panic(): action returned status 0 [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/fault.c:dump_core(201) dumping core in /var/log/samba/cores/smbd I deleted secrets.tdb and the segfault went away. That was OK for me because I had also purged libpam-smbpass and I am using security = share for now anyway. :) -- segfault in pam_smbpass.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303458 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 303458] Re: segfault in pam_smbpass.so
I found that the corrupted secrets.tdb prevented samba from starting: [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] smbd/server.c:main(1213) smbd version 3.2.3 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2008 [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_wrap_log(886) tdb(/var/lib/samba/secrets.tdb): transaction_read: failed at off=1601070448 len=24 [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_wrap_log(886) tdb(/var/lib/samba/secrets.tdb): transaction_read: failed at off=1601070448 len=24 [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_wrap_log(886) tdb(/var/lib/samba/secrets.tdb): transaction_read: failed at off=1601070448 len=24 [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_wrap_log(886) tdb(/var/lib/samba/secrets.tdb): transaction_read: failed at off=1601070448 len=24 [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_wrap_log(886) tdb(/var/lib/samba/secrets.tdb): transaction_read: failed at off=1650750572 len=24 [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] passdb/machine_sid.c:pdb_generate_sam_sid(166) pdb_generate_sam_sid: Failed to store generated machine SID. [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1663) PANIC (pid 28036): could not generate a machine SID [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/util.c:log_stack_trace(1767) BACKTRACE: 6 stack frames: #0 /usr/sbin/smbd(log_stack_trace+0x2d) [0xb7bc542c] #1 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x80) [0xb7bc5589] #2 /usr/sbin/smbd(get_global_sam_sid+0x6f3) [0xb7acc257] #3 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x9f7) [0xb7a65530] #4 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe5) [0xb757f685] #5 /usr/sbin/smbd [0xb7a62af1] [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1668) smb_panic(): calling panic action [/usr/share/samba/panic-action 28036] [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1676) smb_panic(): action returned status 0 [2009/03/27 12:16:44, 0] lib/fault.c:dump_core(201) dumping core in /var/log/samba/cores/smbd I deleted secrets.tdb and the segfault went away. That was OK for me because I had also purged libpam-smbpass and I am using security = share for now anyway. :) -- segfault in pam_smbpass.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303458 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303458] Re: segfault in pam_smbpass.so
Can we *please* get some triage on this bug? It has now made three laptops where I work inoperable to those who do not know to disable the pam_smpass module. -- segfault in pam_smbpass.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303458 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 303458] Re: segfault in pam_smbpass.so
Can we *please* get some triage on this bug? It has now made three laptops where I work inoperable to those who do not know to disable the pam_smpass module. -- segfault in pam_smbpass.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303458 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 46278] Re: Confusing error message when saving file
Can someone please mark this as not invalid? The bug is still present! -- Confusing error message when saving file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46278 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303458] Re: segfault in pam_smbpass.so
I see the same log messages in secrets.tdb on my affected machines as well. -- segfault in pam_smbpass.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303458 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 303458] Re: segfault in pam_smbpass.so
I see the same log messages in secrets.tdb on my affected machines as well. -- segfault in pam_smbpass.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303458 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318468] [NEW] Crashes when I open a particular document
Public bug reported: When I open a particular document, openoffice.org closes without any warning a few seconds later. But for some reason this does not trigger the regular crash reporting system... the program just disappears. If I run oowriter from a terminal, I see the following messages: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'webdav_ucp::DAVException' Fatal exception: Signal 6 Stack: /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_sal.so.3[0xb70d5d4b] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_sal.so.3[0xb70d5e84] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_sal.so.3[0xb70d5efe] [0xb7f0c420] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(abort+0x101)[0xb66b3a01] /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6(_ZN9__gnu_cxx27__verbose_terminate_handlerEv+0x150)[0xb68c1480] /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6[0xb68bed05] /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6[0xb68bed42] /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6[0xb68bee6a] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libucpdav1.so[0xad9d21d5] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libucpdav1.so[0xad9d4c7e] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libucpdav1.so[0xad9c5628] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libucpdav1.so[0xad9cc97c] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libucpdav1.so[0xad9ccb61] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_sal.so.3[0xb70d59b7] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_sal.so.3[0xb70d5ee7] [0xb7f0c420] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libucpdav1.so[0xad9ad8e0] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libucpdav1.so[0xad9af931] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libucbhelper4gcc3.so[0xb73a67b5] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libucbhelper4gcc3.so(_ZN9ucbhelper7Content19openWriteableStreamEv+0x2e8)[0xb73b06d8] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libcomphelp4gcc3.so[0xb74a3ce8] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libcomphelp4gcc3.so(_ZN10comphelper15MediaDescriptor14addInputStreamEv+0x2fb)[0xb74a5d2b] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libsw680li.so[0xaef27521] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libsw680li.so[0xaef263ca] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libsw680li.so[0xaef2a562] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_sal.so.3[0xb70cd87d] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0[0xb68fe4fb] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(clone+0x5e)[0xb675de5e] $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 Release:8.04 $ apt-cache policy openoffice.org openoffice.org: Installed: 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2.1 Candidate: 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2.1 Version table: *** 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2.1 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-updates/main Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com hardy-security/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Crashes when I open a particular document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303458] Re: segfault in pam_smbpass.so
Should this be merged with #302092? -- segfault in pam_smbpass.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303458 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 302092] Re: logging in immediately logs out again
This has now happened on two of my laptops! -- logging in immediately logs out again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 302092] Re: logging in immediately logs out again
This has now happened on a second of my laptops! -- logging in immediately logs out again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303458] Re: segfault in pam_smbpass.so
Should this be merged with #302092? -- segfault in pam_smbpass.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303458 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 145716] Re: panel launchers break on upgrade
According to packages.ubuntu.com, the 'thunderbird' package still does not contain /usr/bin/mozilla-thunderbird; neither has this been fixed in hardy; hence reopening. ** Changed in: mozilla-thunderbird (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- panel launchers break on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 312738] [NEW] Can't send emails via openoffice.org after upgrade
Public bug reported: In Ubuntu 7.10 and earlier, thunderbird was shipped with an executable '/usr/bin/mozilla-thunderbird'. In 8.04, this was changed to only be '/usr/bin/thunderbird'. This caused openoffice.org to no longer be able to send emails. This was a very important feature that my Dad used--which he spent six months thinking that he had broken himself--that stopped working when upgrading to 8.04. The problem is that his openoffice.org preferences still referred to 'mozilla-thunderbird' and were not updated to 'thunderbird' during the upgrade. ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Can't send emails via openoffice.org after upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 145716] Re: panel launchers break on upgrade
A simple fix would be to ship a '/usr/bin/mozilla-thunderbird' symlink that points at /usr/bin/thunderbird. -- panel launchers break on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 50406] Re: Two instances of ntpd are launched, only one is stopped by the init script
Seems to be fixed in hardy. ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Two instances of ntpd are launched, only one is stopped by the init script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50406 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109031] Re: custom rules file ignored
The bug is still present! ** Changed in: udev (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- custom rules file ignored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 282362] Re: Never quits when stracing openoffice
** Summary changed: - Never quits when stracing openeffice + Never quits when stracing openoffice -- Never quits when stracing openoffice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 145716] Re: panel launchers break on upgrade
The same applies to mozilla-firefiox - firefox. Should I file a separate bug against that package, or can this bug be marked as 'found' in it? -- panel launchers break on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301996] Re: will not print using black toner
I tested 2.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu2 from intrepid-updates and it worked fine. Thanks! -- will not print using black toner https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 302092] Re: logging in immediately logs out again
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 13:30 +, Thierry Carrez wrote: That confirms that failure came from existing data in /var/lib/samba... I haven't had a change to test this yet but when I do, I will make a backup of /var/lib/samba so that the fault can be traced exactly. Is the system on which you had the error a hardy system that was upgraded ? If yes, did it start failing just after the upgrade ? If not, did it start failing as soon as you installed libpam-smbpass ? In my case, the system was upgraded from hardy. I don't believe the failure started until a few days after and I don't think they would have installed libpam-smbpass manually. -- Sam Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- logging in immediately logs out again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 302092] Re: logging in immediately logs out again
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 13:30 +, Thierry Carrez wrote: That confirms that failure came from existing data in /var/lib/samba... I haven't had a change to test this yet but when I do, I will make a backup of /var/lib/samba so that the fault can be traced exactly. Is the system on which you had the error a hardy system that was upgraded ? If yes, did it start failing just after the upgrade ? If not, did it start failing as soon as you installed libpam-smbpass ? In my case, the system was upgraded from hardy. I don't believe the failure started until a few days after and I don't think they would have installed libpam-smbpass manually. -- Sam Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- logging in immediately logs out again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 302092] Re: logging in immediately logs out again
Indeed, that is how I worked around the problem. The system is running Intrepid. samba, samba-common and libpam-smbpass are all at version 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3. $ find /var/lib/samba/ -ls 27669504 drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Nov 1 22:57 /var/lib/samba/ 27669904 -rw--- 1 root root 696 Jul 6 17:38 /var/lib/samba/ntforms.tdb 27669694 -rw--- 1 root root 4096 Jul 6 17:38 /var/lib/samba/group_mapping.tdb.upgraded 3662964 80 -rw--- 1 root root77824 Nov 1 22:57 /var/lib/samba/group_mapping.ldb 27669884 -rw--- 1 root root 4096 Jul 6 17:38 /var/lib/samba/ntdrivers.tdb 27669514 drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Oct 30 17:52 /var/lib/samba/printers 27634914 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 10 15:12 /var/lib/samba/printers/COLOR 27635154 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 10 15:12 /var/lib/samba/printers/W32PPC 27634934 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 10 15:12 /var/lib/samba/printers/W32ALPHA 27669624 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jun 30 16:56 /var/lib/samba/printers/WIN40 27635164 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 10 15:12 /var/lib/samba/printers/x64 27634924 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 10 15:12 /var/lib/samba/printers/IA64 27669614 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jun 30 16:56 /var/lib/samba/printers/W32X86 27634944 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 10 15:12 /var/lib/samba/printers/W32MIPS 27634974 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Aug 9 21:26 /var/lib/samba/winbindd_idmap.tdb 2766975 36 -rw--- 1 root root36864 Nov 25 10:13 /var/lib/samba/registry.tdb 27669678 -rw--- 1 root root 8192 Nov 25 16:06 /var/lib/samba/secrets.tdb 27669764 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 6 17:38 /var/lib/samba/perfmon 27669704 -rw--- 1 root root 4096 Oct 30 17:31 /var/lib/samba/account_policy.tdb 2766947 20 -rw--- 1 root root20480 Nov 25 15:25 /var/lib/samba/share_info.tdb 2766989 20 -rw--- 1 root root20480 Nov 25 10:13 /var/lib/samba/ntprinters.tdb 2766968 12 -rw--- 1 root root12288 Nov 25 16:06 /var/lib/samba/passdb.tdb 27669714 drwxrwx--T 2 root sambashare 4096 Nov 17 14:33 /var/lib/samba/usershares 27634894 -rw-r--r-- 1 theuser theuser102 Nov 17 14:33 /var/lib/samba/usershares/somefile -- logging in immediately logs out again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 302092] Re: logging in immediately logs out again
Indeed, that is how I worked around the problem. The system is running Intrepid. samba, samba-common and libpam-smbpass are all at version 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3. $ find /var/lib/samba/ -ls 27669504 drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Nov 1 22:57 /var/lib/samba/ 27669904 -rw--- 1 root root 696 Jul 6 17:38 /var/lib/samba/ntforms.tdb 27669694 -rw--- 1 root root 4096 Jul 6 17:38 /var/lib/samba/group_mapping.tdb.upgraded 3662964 80 -rw--- 1 root root77824 Nov 1 22:57 /var/lib/samba/group_mapping.ldb 27669884 -rw--- 1 root root 4096 Jul 6 17:38 /var/lib/samba/ntdrivers.tdb 27669514 drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Oct 30 17:52 /var/lib/samba/printers 27634914 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 10 15:12 /var/lib/samba/printers/COLOR 27635154 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 10 15:12 /var/lib/samba/printers/W32PPC 27634934 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 10 15:12 /var/lib/samba/printers/W32ALPHA 27669624 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jun 30 16:56 /var/lib/samba/printers/WIN40 27635164 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 10 15:12 /var/lib/samba/printers/x64 27634924 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 10 15:12 /var/lib/samba/printers/IA64 27669614 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jun 30 16:56 /var/lib/samba/printers/W32X86 27634944 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 10 15:12 /var/lib/samba/printers/W32MIPS 27634974 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Aug 9 21:26 /var/lib/samba/winbindd_idmap.tdb 2766975 36 -rw--- 1 root root36864 Nov 25 10:13 /var/lib/samba/registry.tdb 27669678 -rw--- 1 root root 8192 Nov 25 16:06 /var/lib/samba/secrets.tdb 27669764 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 6 17:38 /var/lib/samba/perfmon 27669704 -rw--- 1 root root 4096 Oct 30 17:31 /var/lib/samba/account_policy.tdb 2766947 20 -rw--- 1 root root20480 Nov 25 15:25 /var/lib/samba/share_info.tdb 2766989 20 -rw--- 1 root root20480 Nov 25 10:13 /var/lib/samba/ntprinters.tdb 2766968 12 -rw--- 1 root root12288 Nov 25 16:06 /var/lib/samba/passdb.tdb 27669714 drwxrwx--T 2 root sambashare 4096 Nov 17 14:33 /var/lib/samba/usershares 27634894 -rw-r--r-- 1 theuser theuser102 Nov 17 14:33 /var/lib/samba/usershares/somefile -- logging in immediately logs out again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 302092] [NEW] logging in immediately logs out again
Public bug reported: Logging in via GDM, or login results in the user immediately being logged out again without any error being displayed. I booted up in safe mode, and from a root shell ran login(8). If I logged in there, I saw a segmentation fault error. This does not appear if I boot up normally. I finally noticed many of the following kernel messages being logged: kernel: login[8182]: segfault at 0 ip b7c45abb sp bfc5e9c0 error 4 in pam_smbpass.so[b7be9000+12a000] debsums says the checksums of the files in libpam-smbpass are fine. ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- logging in immediately logs out again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 301997] [NEW] Chooses wrong driver for Xerox Phaser 6110
Public bug reported: When adding a Xerox Phaser 6110 to cups, the default driver is the foomatic 'recommended' driver, which does not work. The user has to manually choose the Splix driver in order to get the printer to print anything. ** Affects: cups (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Chooses wrong driver for Xerox Phaser 6110 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301997 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301996] [NEW] will not print using black toner
Public bug reported: When printing using splix 2.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu2 (in intrepid) to a Xerox Phaser 6110, the image comes out using colour toner. I can't tell whether it's trying to create black by combining cyan yellow and magenta because I am out of magenta and yellow toner; hence the image only comes out in cyan. If I downgrade to the package in hardy (1.1.1-0ubuntu1) then I can print in black and white just fine. ** Affects: splix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- will not print using black toner https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301996] Re: will not print using black toner
I don't see an updated package for intrepid yet, but maybe it hasn't been built/pushed to mirrors yet. Anyway, thanks for the fix! :) -- will not print using black toner https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 302092] [NEW] logging in immediately logs out again
Public bug reported: Logging in via GDM, or login results in the user immediately being logged out again without any error being displayed. I booted up in safe mode, and from a root shell ran login(8). If I logged in there, I saw a segmentation fault error. This does not appear if I boot up normally. I finally noticed many of the following kernel messages being logged: kernel: login[8182]: segfault at 0 ip b7c45abb sp bfc5e9c0 error 4 in pam_smbpass.so[b7be9000+12a000] debsums says the checksums of the files in libpam-smbpass are fine. ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- logging in immediately logs out again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 10550] Re: DVDs with restrictive permissions are unreadable for normal user
Whatever screwed up process Adobe used to master the CD for Flash 8 also has this problem. The files are not readable unless the user knows how to remount the CD with the correct magical mount options. What's worse is that Wine simply says file not found rather than access denied when asked to run the installer, making even the diagnosis of the problem harder than it should be. -- DVDs with restrictive permissions are unreadable for normal user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10550 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 39075] Re: No handler for control sequence `device-control-string' defined
This happens without compiz too. -- No handler for control sequence `device-control-string' defined https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/39075 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272144] Re: The e-mail document button does not work
This still affects 8.04, rendering it impossible for non-expert users to send mail via openoffice (as reported in #282364) -- The e-mail document button does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 145716] Re: panel launchers break on upgrade
Presumably yes, unless you renamed all the executables back (which would break upgrades from 8.08 to 8.10, etc). -- panel launchers break on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 282364] Re: Openoffice sends emails with 'mozilla-thunderbird' which does not exist!
8.04/1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2 -- Openoffice sends emails with 'mozilla-thunderbird' which does not exist! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 282362] [NEW] Never quits when stracing openeffice
Public bug reported: I was trying to diagnose why the file - send - as email option in openoffice did not work. I atteched to openoffice with strace. When I hit Ctrl+C to close strace, it prints out that it has detached, but then hangs rather than exiting. ** Affects: strace (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Never quits when stracing openeffice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 282364] [NEW] Openoffice sends emails with 'mozilla-thunderbird' which does not exist!
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org My Dad asked me for help to diagnose why he could no longer email documents with openoffice. He was using the 'File - Send - E-Mail as Microsoft Excel' option, but Thunderbird never launched with the attachment ready for sending. I found out by using strace that Openoffice was launching the following program to email its documents: /usr/lib/openoffice/program/senddoc --mailclient mozilla-thunderbird --attach /tmp/sv4m0.tmp/sv4mb.tmp/document.xls Running this in a terminal yeilded the following error: /usr/lib/openoffice/program/senddoc: 412: mozilla-thunderbird: not found First bug: the script did *not* exit with a status indicating failure. Therefore there was no way for Openoffice to find out that the emailing failed, and hence no way for it to display the message to the end user. Second bug: Openoffice has 'mozilla-thunderbird' in its preferences which does not exist on the Ubuntu system; only /usr/bin/thunderbird exists. This is *not* user-error as my Dad has never touched this setting. ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Openoffice sends emails with 'mozilla-thunderbird' which does not exist! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 185470] Re: iwl3945 not functioning : microcode error
This is actually not that bug. It is http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1650. ** Changed in: linux Bugwatch: Bughost.org tracker #1593 = Intel Wireless Linux Bugzilla #1650 Status: In Progress = Unknown -- iwl3945 not functioning : microcode error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185470 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 229063] Re: New IWL driver often loses connection.
This is not a duplicate of bug #185470. If it was, the wireless device would be totally inoperable. It might be http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1620 or http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1593 however. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 185470 iwl3945 not functioning : microcode error -- New IWL driver often loses connection. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229063 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237667] [NEW] No feedback given to user when enabling network printing
Public bug reported: When enabling 'show printers shared by other systems', the apply/revert buttons grey out but there is no indication to the user that the operation was successful. In order for the printer list to be updated with remote printers, system-config-printer must be restarted. ** Affects: system-config-printer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- No feedback given to user when enabling network printing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200210] Re: no sound after suspend with snd_hda_intel since 2.6.24-7's alsa-update to 1.0.16
This is fixed for me with Debian's 2.6.24-rc4 kernel. -- no sound after suspend with snd_hda_intel since 2.6.24-7's alsa-update to 1.0.16 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200210 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200210] Re: no sound after suspend with snd_hda_intel since 2.6.24-7's alsa-update to 1.0.16
Reported to Debian at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481613. I can't link this bug to that location because of bug #6777. -- no sound after suspend with snd_hda_intel since 2.6.24-7's alsa-update to 1.0.16 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200210 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 146692] Re: Hardy will not boot on Samsung Q45 laptops
** Summary changed: - Gutsy will not boot on Samsung Q45 laptops + Hardy will not boot on Samsung Q45 laptops ** Description changed: Neither Tribe 5, nor the new Beta, work from the Live CD on Samsung Q45 laptops. In both cases the boot process hangs on the Loading ACPI Modules line during boot. + + This is caused by Ubuntu kernel commit + 69ed7d7e1807eb9071d85861062cf23db71c2910 -- Hardy will not boot on Samsung Q45 laptops https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146692 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200210] Re: no sound after suspend with snd_hda_intel since 2.6.24-7's alsa-update to 1.0.16
** Bug watch added: ALSA Bug Tracker #3947 http://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=3947 ** Also affects: alsa-driver via http://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=3947 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- no sound after suspend with snd_hda_intel since 2.6.24-7's alsa-update to 1.0.16 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200210 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 146692] Re: Gutsy will not boot on Samsung Q45 laptops
** Also affects: linux via http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10448 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Gutsy will not boot on Samsung Q45 laptops https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146692 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216221] Re: Samsung Q70 - error while modprobing video
Do you have any special boot parameters enabled to get this traceback? I believe this is a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/146692 (the Q45 and Q70 are the same internally). But my system locks up without logging anything. -- Samsung Q70 - error while modprobing video https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216221 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 146692] Re: Gutsy will not boot on Samsung Q45 laptops
Similar bug with a backtrace: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source /linux-meta/+bug/216221 -- Gutsy will not boot on Samsung Q45 laptops https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146692 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 146692] Re: Gutsy will not boot on Samsung Q45 laptops
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- source-2.6.20/+bug/64308 may be related to this bug. I've also filed a bug upstream at http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10448. -- Gutsy will not boot on Samsung Q45 laptops https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146692 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216436] Re: [regression] Brightness hotkeys don't work anymore
Well, the keycodes will be set up by default once Ubuntu updates to the next release of hal-info. The next stage is to get HAL to perform some action when the brightnessup and brightnessdown keys are pressed... be that running xbacklight or something else. -- [regression] Brightness hotkeys don't work anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216436] Re: [regression] Brightness hotkeys don't work anymore
I booted the Hardy Beta livecd and the brightness keys don't work. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- [regression] Brightness hotkeys don't work anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216436] Re: [regression] Brightness hotkeys don't work anymore
I have the same problem. I believe that keycode are defined in ./usr/include/linux/input.h'. Can you run 'setkeycodes e008 225' and 'setkeycodes e008 224' and then press the buttons and see what happens? On my system this silences the kernel messages, but does not cause the laptop brightness to actually change. However if I run 'lshal -m' while pressing them, I can see that HAL picks up the events... I guess it just does not know what to do with them. How about for you? ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #475851 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=475851 ** Also affects: linux via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=475851 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- [regression] Brightness hotkeys don't work anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131646] Re: TVout is interfering with screen resolution on Intel graphics
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #475320 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=475320 ** Also affects: debian via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=475320 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- TVout is interfering with screen resolution on Intel graphics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131646 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152978] Re: fuse: mountpoint is not empty syncing over ssh
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #522424 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=522424 ** Also affects: tomboy via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=522424 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- fuse: mountpoint is not empty syncing over ssh https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152978 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105545] Re: HUAWEI E220 no longer works in Feisty
** Also affects: linux-source-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- HUAWEI E220 no longer works in Feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105545 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105545] Re: HUAWEI E220 no longer works in Feisty
On Gutsy, /dev/ttyUSB0 and /dev/ttyUSB1 do not even appear. -- HUAWEI E220 no longer works in Feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105545 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105545] Re: HUAWEI E220 no longer works in Feisty
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #470360 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=470360 ** Also affects: hal-info (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=470360 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- HUAWEI E220 no longer works in Feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105545 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197803] Re: huawei e220 hardy alpha 5 is not working
Dupe of #195357? -- huawei e220 hardy alpha 5 is not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83118] Re: Some Firefox components are non-free
I guess there has still been no progress on this issue. What a disappointment. -- Some Firefox components are non-free https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83118 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104525] Re: default ntp.conf should use pool.ntp.org servers
Consider also that NTP servers that serve the wrong time are ejected from the pool. -- default ntp.conf should use pool.ntp.org servers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104525 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178441] Re: Can't connect to SFTP server
It seems that this is a problem when connecting to servers using challenge/response authentication. Note that my server is configured to prompt the user for a one time password (with pam_otpw.so) before regular password authentication. If I disable OTPW then I can connect as normal. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = New -- Can't connect to SFTP server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178441 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92725] Re: gpg passphrase cached by evolution
Upstream seems content to keep Evolution doing passphrase caching for now. However, once e-d-s is modified to use gpg2, it will no longer be able to do so. This is because gpg2 will *only* request passphrases via the gpg-agent; there is no longer any facility to input a passphrase directly into gpg2. Aside from that though: I think the bug is still valid. Evolution should not handle sensitive information like passphrases itself: it is a large and complex piece of software. It is better to farm out handling of a user's passphrase to the gpg agent. -- gpg passphrase cached by evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92725 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92725] Re: gpg passphrase cached by evolution
I think this should be kept open until passphrase caching is removed from Evolution entirely. -- gpg passphrase cached by evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92725 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181047] chews 100% of the cpu
Public bug reported: I noticed that nautilus was consuming 100% of the CPU on one of my systems. Strace revealed that it was repeatedly writing to a log file: write(10, 44:35.4805 (USER): debug log dum..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, R): debug log dumped due to sign..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, umped due to signal 11\n0x8177510..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, gnal 11\n0x8177510 2008/01/06 16:..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 10 2008/01/06 16:45:00.1946 (USE..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 6:45:07.1718 (USER): debug log d..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, SER): debug log dumped due to si..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, dumped due to signal 11\n0x81775..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, signal 11\n0x8177510 2008/01/06 1..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 7510 2008/01/06 16:45:32.2303 (U..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 16:45:38.2322 (USER): debug log..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, (USER): debug log dumped due to ..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, og dumped due to signal 11\n0x817..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, o signal 11\n0x8177510 2008/01/06..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 177510 2008/01/06 16:46:02.9146 ..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 06 16:46:08.9526 (USER): debug l..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 2 (USER): debug log dumped due t..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, log dumped due to signal 11\n0x8..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, to signal 11\n0x8177510 2008/01/..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, x8177510 2008/01/06 16:46:33.618..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 1/06 16:46:39.6310 (USER): debug..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 443 (USER): debug log dumped due..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, ug log dumped due to signal 11\n0..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, ue to signal 11\n0x8177510 2008/0..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, \n0x8177510 2008/01/06 16:47:04.1..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, /01/06 16:47:10.1970 (USER): deb..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, .2160 (USER): debug log dumped d..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, ebug log dumped due to signal 11..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, due to signal 11\n0x8177510 2008..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 11\n0x8177510 2008/01/06 16:47:34..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 08/01/06 16:47:40.4326 (USER): d..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 46.4599 (USER): debug log dumped..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, debug log dumped due to signal ..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, ed due to signal 11\n0x8177510 20..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, l 11\n0x8177510 2008/01/06 16:48:..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 2008/01/06 16:48:10.6632 (USER):..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 8:16.6870 (USER): debug log dump..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, ): debug log dumped due to signa..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, mped due to signal 11\n0x8177510 ..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, nal 11\n0x8177510 2008/01/06 16:4..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 0 2008/01/06 16:48:40.8921 (USER..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, :48:46.8930 (USER): debug log du..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, ER): debug log dumped due to sig..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, dumped due to signal 11\n0x817751..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, ignal 11\n0x8177510 2008/01/06 16..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 510 2008/01/06 16:49:12.1367 (US..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 16:49:18.1799 (USER): debug log ..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, USER): debug log dumped due to s..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, g dumped due to signal 11\n0x8177..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, signal 11\n0x8177510 2008/01/06 ..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 77510 2008/01/06 16:49:43.0788 (..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 6 16:49:49.4549 (USER): debug lo..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, (USER): debug log dumped due to..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, log dumped due to signal 11\n0x81..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, to signal 11\n0x8177510 2008/01/0..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 8177510 2008/01/06 16:50:15.3372..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, /06 16:50:21.7911 (USER): debug ..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 30 (USER): debug log dumped due ..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, g log dumped due to signal 11\n0x..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, e to signal 11\n0x8177510 2008/01..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 0x8177510 2008/01/06 16:50:46.91..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 01/06 16:50:53.2039 (USER): debu..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 4312 (USER): debug log dumped du..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, bug log dumped due to signal 11\n..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, due to signal 11\n0x8177510 2008/..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 1\n0x8177510 2008/01/06 16:51:18, 4096) = 4096 write(10, 8/01/06 16:51:25.2036 (USER): de..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 1.2458 (USER): debug log dumped ..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, debug log dumped due to signal 1..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, d due to signal 11\n0x8177510 200..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 11\n0x8177510 2008/01/06 16:51:4..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 008/01/06 16:51:56.4142 (USER): ..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, :02.5025 (USER): debug log dumpe..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, : debug log dumped due to signal..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, ped due to signal 11\n0x8177510 2..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, al 11\n0x8177510 2008/01/06 16:52..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 2008/01/06 16:52:27.6386 (USER)..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, 52:33.9347 (USER): debug log dum..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, R): debug log dumped due to sign..., 4096) = 4096 write(10, umped due to signal 11\n0x8177510..., 4096) = 4096
[Bug 181047] Re: chews 100% of the cpu
Killing nautilus seemed to cause the rest of the user's processes to disappear, so it looks like they had already logged off, and the nautilus process hung around because of this error. -- chews 100% of the cpu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181047 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178437] Re: Unable to print
7.10, evince is at 2.20.1-0ubuntu1. -- Unable to print https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178437 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178437] Unable to print
Public bug reported: I don't seem to be able to print the PDF at http://animescores.com/SheetMusic/Thanatos.pdf with evince. I press Print in the dialog box but nothing happens. I noticed that this message was printed to the console when the print dialog box was opened: ** (evince:20119): WARNING **: File is empty ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Unable to print https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178437 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178437] Re: Unable to print
Well, just after I submitted this bug report, the printer whirred into life and printed the document! So it appears that it just took ages for Evince to send the document to the spooler. I guess the bug is that there is no feedback given to the user about what Evince is doing while it submits a print job. -- Unable to print https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178437 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178441] Can't connect to SFTP server
Public bug reported: I don't seem to be able to connect to a particular SSH server. I enter its details in the 'connect to server' dialog box, but after pressing Connect, nothing happens. This server is configured to ask for an OTPW password... when connecting on the command line, the conversation looks like this: $ ssh host Password 036: Password: Linux host 2.6.18-5-686 #1 SMP Wed Sep 26 17:54:59 UTC 2007 i686 ... etc. If nautilus is getting confused by the password prompt then the user should be shown some kind of message to indicate this condition... as it is, the window never opens, double clicking on the network share icon on the desktop does nothing, etc. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Can't connect to SFTP server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178441 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 145716] Re: panel launchers break on upgrade
Looks like it. The following panel launchers stopped working on my parents' system after the upgrade: [Desktop Entry] Version=1.0 Encoding=UTF-8 Name=Thunderbird Mail Client Comment=Read and write your email Exec=mozilla-thunderbird Terminal=false MultipleArgs=false Type=Application Icon=mozilla-thunderbird.xpm Categories=Application;Network -- panel launchers break on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 69800] Re: Please package original icons from source
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #448029 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=448029 ** Also affects: sensors-applet (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=448029 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Please package original icons from source https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/69800 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 69800] Re: Please package original icons from source
Thank you very much! I will probably have a change to update the Debian package tomorrow; from there it will filter into Ubuntu whenever the next synchronisation from Debian - Ubuntu takes place. -- Please package original icons from source https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/69800 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 46278] Re: Confusing error message when saving file
This is still present in gutsy. Please don't close bugs like this without taking the time to see if they are still reproducable! This is *very* annoying and makes me much less inclined to bother reporting bugs in the future. See http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html for more information. ** Changed in: xsane (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- Confusing error message when saving file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46278 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 41335] Re: DVD playing is not working correctly with totem-gstreamer
Ubuntu and DVD playback Well, I guess there are really three issues here. First, Canonical feels they cannot ship libdvdcss because doing so would be illegal in various countries due to their implementations of the WIPO Copyright Treaty[0]. For instance, the United States has the Digital Millennium Copyright Act; various European countries have implemented the European Union Copyright Directive[1] which has the same effect in the United Kingdom, Spain, the Czech Republic, Finland and France. [0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WIPO_Copyright_Treaty [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Copyright_Directive I presume that Canonical does this based on sound legal advice; they would probably only consider changing this policy if somehow the UK's Copyright and Related Rights Regulations (2003) is overturned or amended to legalise the production and distribution of devices or software that permit the circumvention of DRM, and if the same happened in the US and the other countries listed. As this is a legal problem and not a technical problem, this bug tracker is probably not the appropriate forum to discuss it. Ideally this bug would be marked FORWARDED to the bug trackers of the parliaments of the countries where this legal minefield exists. The second problem will be easier to fix; it is the fact that GStreamer itself has incomplete support for DVD playback. The major stumbling block in this area is the support for DVD menus, and the fact that the GStreamer developers do not seem to be willing or able to work on this area themselves. The third problem is totem-gstreamer's incomplete support for DVD playback via the GStreamer API. The impression I get from upstream is that this will not be worked on until the DVD playback functionality of GStreamer itself is finished. IMO, this is a shame as Totem could currently be usefully improved to work with the functionality that GStreamer currently provides. For instance, when the user tries to play a DVD, Totem could construct a playlist consisting of dvd://1, dvd://2, and so on, one entry for each chapter on the DVD. DVD menu support would still be missing, but that is not a huge problem (some may even call it a benefit). I started to work on this myself, but I discontinued the effort because I got the impression that such a patch wouldn't be accepted by upstream anyway. -- DVD playing is not working correctly with totem-gstreamer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/41335 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 69800] Re: Please package original icons from source
Hi Phil,
First of all, thanks for considering to release the icons under an
additional license.
From my point of view (I produce the packages of sensors-applet that end
up in Debian), an unambigous statement that the icons are additionally
licensed under a Debian-compatible license would be great. For the sake
of simplicity, it would be better if you chose the same terms as the
rest of sensors applet (that is, GPL version 2 or higher); but if you
would prefer to say with the Creative Commons licenses, the CC BY-SA 3.0
license is also Debian-compatible.
The following text should do it, delete text from the portion in
{braces} as applicable:
I, as the author of the icons used by the GNOME Sensors Applet, state
that they are licensed under {the GNU General Public License, version 2
or any later version/the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
license}.
If you have some way to digitally sign the statement (with PGP for
instance) it would help, but it's not really necessary.
Note that as Cesare said, this doesn't prevent the original license (CC
BY-SA 2.5) from continuing to apply.
Thanks again!
--
Please package original icons from source
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/69800
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 69800] Re: Please package original icons from source
It would be better to get the author of the icons to relicense them under the GPL or CC 3.0 licenses or similar. I tried but got no response. -- Please package original icons from source https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/69800 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122314] Re: cannot read from linux-gate.so.1
Related to #74691? -- cannot read from linux-gate.so.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122314 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 121443] Re: onboard intel g33 graphics not working in feisty/gutsy
Is there an amd64 version of that kernel available anywhere? :) -- onboard intel g33 graphics not working in feisty/gutsy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121443 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54135] Re: when php5 is enabled mod_python cacls md5 wrong
This was also remarked here: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/4220 -- when php5 is enabled mod_python cacls md5 wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109031] Re: custom rules file ignored
Is it safe to do this remotely? I am now in another part of the country from this system (which is used by my parents so I don't want to screw it up). Though I suppose I can reboot it and it will be fine. BTW, is it possible that this is caused because the tty devices are created by the copy of udev that exists on the initramfs? I noticed that my custom rules files aren't included there... -- custom rules file ignored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109031] Re: custom rules file ignored
I'll try adding last_rule to the options field. Is it comma or whitespace separated? It doesn't seem to be documented in udev(7). -- custom rules file ignored https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104924] Re: pymsnt fails challenge request from MSN on amd64
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #428555 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=428555 ** Also affects: pymsnt (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=428555 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- pymsnt fails challenge request from MSN on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119817] Does not offer to open Excel spreadsheets with Openoffice.org
Public bug reported: When trying top open an attached Excel spreadsheet, the only program listed as capable of opening the attachment is Gnumeric, which does not display the file correctly. Openoffice.org is not listed. In order to open the attachment with Openoffice.org's spreadsheet, the user has to select 'other' in the program choice list, then find their way to /usr/bin, then know to pick 'oospread' which is rather cryptic... :) ** Affects: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Does not offer to open Excel spreadsheets with Openoffice.org https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119817 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 116974] Phantom printers detected
Public bug reported: According to the CUPS web interface: New Printers Found: * Add This Printer HP DeskJet 950C (HP DeskJet 950C USB MY09R162J0JM HPLIP) * Add This Printer CANON (Parallel Port #1) * Add This Printer EPSON (Parallel Port #1) But none of these printers exist! In fact, a Deskget 950C does exist, but it is already configured and working under Printers, and I only have one of them. ** Affects: cupsys (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Phantom printers detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116974 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
