[Bug 1214722] [NEW] open-vm-dkms 2011.12.20-562307-0ubuntu1: open-vm-tools kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘d_alloc_root’] (bug 100344 also affects precise)
Public bug reported: As per reported in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm- tools/+bug/1000344, this also affects Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS (Precise Pangolin). If I understand the LTS policy correctly, this should be fixed for precise. As otherwise, the implication is that LTS users should upgrade off of the LTS release if they want a working package. I understand if this is considered a duplicate bug. However, as it describe the problem for precise/LTS, and on an assumption that the "Fix Released" status has moved anyone on, I'm taking that chance. ** Affects: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1214722 Title: open-vm-dkms 2011.12.20-562307-0ubuntu1: open-vm-tools kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘d_alloc_root’] (bug 100344 also affects precise) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/1214722/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1000344] Re: open-vm-dkms 2011.12.20-562307-0ubuntu1: open-vm-tools kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘d_alloc_root’]
This is still broken in LTS. I don't know the specific policies, but I assumed LTS would get these type of fixes? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000344 Title: open-vm-dkms 2011.12.20-562307-0ubuntu1: open-vm-tools kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘d_alloc_root’] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/1000344/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 901054] Re: branch over https tries POST on http
This affects version 2.4.1-1ubuntu1 of bzr. $ lsb_release -r Release:11.10 .bzr.log attached. ** Attachment added: ".bzr.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bzr/+bug/901054/+attachment/2622585/+files/.bzr.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/901054 Title: branch over https tries POST on http To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bzr/+bug/901054/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 901054] [NEW] branch over https tries POST on http
Public bug reported:
I am behind a firewall whereby I can punch through for https, and then
have to use a finicky windows domain integrated proxy for http. I elect
not to use that proxy as much as possible, and try to "prefer" https
when it is availab.e
I have tried to do this with a bzr branch, and have been met with this
error:
ubuntu:~/workarea$ bzr branch --verbose
https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/binutils/pkg-ubuntu
binutils-pkg-ubuntu
bzr: ERROR: Connection error: while sending POST
/~ubuntu-core-dev/binutils/pkg-ubuntu/.bzr/smart: [Errno 110] Connection timed
out
strace shows that there was an attempt to connect to the http, instead
of the https server:
afro-ubuntu:~$ sudo strace -fp 8432
Process 8432 attached - interrupt to quit
connect(6, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(80),
sin_addr=inet_addr("91.189.90.11")}, 16^C
Process 8432 detached
To me this is a bug. I've specified a https method, so I would expect
bzr not to stray. I don't have an ftp methoded URL to try, but I wonder
if this would happen for ftp as well.
** Affects: bzr (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/901054
Title:
branch over https tries POST on http
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bzr/+bug/901054/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 722443] [NEW] post-install incorrectly assumes full internet access
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: adobe-flashplugin I have what I would call a non-trivial networking setup of my maverick install, because of my office firewall setup. I use approx, and when at work, I target ftp servers through my approx.conf config. I've just tried to do an apt-get upgrade, and it is now stalled on installing/upgrading flashplugin-installer. The (I assume) post-install script is seemingly trying to wget a file named flashplugin_10.2.152.27.orig.tar.gz, And as you can see, as my install is not configured for http: Setting up flashplugin-installer (10.2.152.27ubuntu0.10.10.1) ... Downloading... --2011-02-21 14:11:08-- http://archive.canonical.com/pool/partner/a/adobe-flashplugin/adobe-flashplugin_10.2.152.27.orig.tar.gz Resolving archive.canonical.com... 91.189.88.33 Connecting to archive.canonical.com|91.189.88.33|:80... failed: Connection timed out. Retrying. --2011-02-21 14:14:23-- (try: 2) http://archive.canonical.com/pool/partner/a/adobe-flashplugin/adobe-flashplugin_10.2.152.27.orig.tar.gz Connecting to archive.canonical.com|91.189.88.33|:80... failed: Connection timed out. Retrying. ... --2011-02-21 15:13:36-- (try:20) http://archive.canonical.com/pool/partner/a/adobe-flashplugin/adobe-flashplugin_10.2.152.27.orig.tar.gz Connecting to archive.canonical.com|91.189.88.33|:80... failed: Connection timed out. Giving up. download failed The Flash plugin is NOT installed. Besides the annoyance of this installer breaking out of the apt installation system (usually one should safely assume that all dependencies are listed on the initial apt command, and that it is a complete list of what will be downloaded), I could not ctrl-c the install. And as you can see, it took more than an hour for the wget to finally give up and let my much larger, and more important, apt-get upgrade continue. Please consider another method to this install. As I recall, there are different prompt levels on a package install. Wouldn't it be better to prompt the user to give them the choice of a "web pull", and two options, one to a command-line to allow for manual download of the file, and the other to prompt for the location of the downloaded file. Thanks, Shaddy Description:Ubuntu 10.10 Release:10.10 ** Affects: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722443 Title: post-install incorrectly assumes full internet access -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237807] Re: Appears to be no way to uninstall extensions from within firefox
'Closing bug report until confirmed that he still sees this issue as he hasnt updated the info in about a year.' Are serious? About a year? I reported this in June this year, a mere three months ago. I'll jot that down to a honest mistake. I have tested this against Hardy. I am able to uninstall the extension from the regular Firefox Add-on window now. However, I still cannot just un-tick the package from the ubufox dialog, to uninstall. So whilst not a serious problem, there is an inconsistency in that I install the extension via the ubufox dialog, but uninstall via the Firefox Add-on dialog. -- Appears to be no way to uninstall extensions from within firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237807] [NEW] Appears to be no way to uninstall extensions from within firefox
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubufox I successfully installed mozilla-bookmarksftp by using the "Get Ubuntu Addons" link from with Firefox Add-ons window. And the subsequent Install/Remove Extensions window that opened up from that link. I used the add-on successfully a number of times (which of course, included firefox restarts). I then wanted to uninstall mozilla-bookmarksftp from the same Firefox Add-ons window. However, the Uninstall button is greyed out. So, I tried to Uninstall it via the same Install/Remove Extensions window. However, mozilla-bookmarksftp no longer appears at all in that list of extensions. As I read it that the "Get Ubuntu Addons" functionality is provided by ubufox, I believe it to be a bug that you cannot install via the Install/Remove Extensions window. ** Affects: ubufox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Appears to be no way to uninstall extensions from within firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
