[Bug 676828] Re: Contacts does not show up in empathy contact list
Just an update re #25 and #32. The Telepathy PPA updates appear to be causing some strangeness for me (some GoogleTalk contacts were always shown as offline when they were online) so, since this is now fixed for the base LTS version, I suggest people revert back to this. I used ubuntu-tweak to make this painless (as per http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/29584/safely-remove-ppas-and-roll-back- to-stable-versions-in-ubuntu). Otherwise, you need to find the full set of packages installed from the PPA, check the versions in official repos and do manual re-installs to these specific versions (a PITA). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676828 Title: Contacts does not show up in empathy contact list To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/676828/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 676828] Re: Contacts does not show up in empathy contact list
Just to note that upgrading to the latest Lucid telepathy PPA fixes this (see this Ubuntu forums thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1594248). So this suggests that, if it is the GTalk protocol change in comment #24, the telepathy guys have already fixed it. Other workaround is obviously to switch to Pidgin. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676828 Title: Contacts does not show up in empathy contact list To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/676828/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577958] Re: VisualVM cannot load profiler (64 bit)
This appears all tied off now, but just to say there was a typo in my comment #10: I meant bug #657048, which documents the fix that is supposed to address this bug as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577958 Title: VisualVM cannot load profiler (64 bit) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/577958/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 323091] Re: gedit and nautilus cannot modify file on SMB/CIFS share (file is busy)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 34813 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34813 Re the VirtualBox shared folders aspect of this problem. So there are two problems here, both stemming from gedit and Nautilus renaming open files as part of their overwrite process: -- the Samba filesystem doesn't support this properly -- the VirtualBox vboxsf filesystem doesn't support this properly #34813 only covers the Samba root cause. The vboxsf one is in the Debian bug (can't find an Ubuntu equivalent): http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594162 I've raised a VirtualBox bug to cover this issue: http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/9203 So, ideally, we should have a separate Ubuntu bug for this other root cause (vboxsf doesn't support open file overwrite). What's the normal procedure for things like this? Does someone want me to create this bug (or an admin do so themselves)?? Or can one link to the Debian bug as another bug this is a duplicate of (I think not)? Let me know and I'm happy to help ** Bug watch added: Virtualbox Trac #9203 http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/9203 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323091 Title: gedit and nautilus cannot modify file on SMB/CIFS share (file is busy) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/323091/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579667] Re: flashplugin-installer doesn't retrieve needed package "adobe-flashplugin_10.0.45.2.orig.tar.gz"
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 556293 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556293 Since noone responded, marked as duplicate of #556293 as in previous post #4 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 556293 apt/aptitude need to take global proxy settings into account -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579667 Title: flashplugin-installer doesn't retrieve needed package "adobe- flashplugin_10.0.45.2.orig.tar.gz" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/579667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577958] Re: VisualVM cannot load profiler (64 bit)
Attach screenshot of the errors as well if that's useful. The /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/lib/visualvm/profiler3/lib/deployed/jdk16/linux-amd64 folder is empty (as is the jdk15 one). Is this perhaps an x64 issue with no 64-bit libraries available? (Perhaps someone can test on x32?) ** Attachment added: "Screenshot of error msg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/577958/+attachment/1841251/+files/JFluid_Error.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577958 Title: VisualVM cannot load profiler (64 bit) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657048] Re: visualvm fails to launch because it can't find jdk: "Cannot find java. Please use the --jdkhome switch"
The correct fix depends on a full understanding of how jvisualvm actually works. The --jdkhome option appears to control only the JVM that VisualVM runs in, not the JVM which it monitors for Java instances. I can run the Sun VisualVM with the Sun JVM as jdkhome, and still see/monitor Java programs launched using OpenJDK. Equally, I can run the Sun VisualVM with the OpenJDK JVM as jdkhome, and monitor Java programs launched using Sun or OpenJDK JVMs. Is the fact I can monitor both because: a) OpenJDK, as a 'fork' of the Sun JDK, retains run-time compatibility in some way? b) The VisualVM uses standardised JRE/JDK APIs which all JDKs should support (so I could also view stuff launched using, say, IBM's JVM)? I assume (b), which would mean that my suggested fix is 'correct', because there is no reason to ever want to run one JDK-supplier's VisualVM using another supplier's JVM. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657048 Title: visualvm fails to launch because it can't find jdk: "Cannot find java. Please use the --jdkhome switch" -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657048] Re: visualvm fails to launch because it can't find jdk: "Cannot find java. Please use the --jdkhome switch"
See my comments (and earlier ones from others) in bug #577958. I suspect that DBooth did an upgrade to Lucid like me. This would mean you'd have the Sun JDK and the Lucid version of the visualvm package which won't detect the Sun JDK properly if the OpenJDK JDK is not installed (due to the script issues discussed earlier here). There are actually 3 alternatives: (i) Switch to the OpenJDK fully. Install the OpenJDK JDK (package default-jdk, which sorts out update-alternatives for you). Then jvisualvm will work OK (you'll be running the OpenJDK one), but you get the Fluid errors like in bug #577958. (ii) As specified in bug #577958, you can switch to the proper Sun jvisualvm by running /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/bin/jvisualvm explicitly, or changing the /usr/bin/jvisualvm symlink to permanently point to this. (iii) Do what DBooth did, which runs the OpenJDK jvisualvm, but with the Sun JDK backend. With this, you get the *same* Fluid error as #577958 (but, as with my comments there, this doesn't seem to affect the ability to link to running/launched Java apps.). One possible fix for *this* bug is therefore to ensure that a Sun JDK package ensures that an update-alternatives entry for jvisualvm exists to automatically do (ii) above, so that you're either running the full Sun suite or the full OpenJDK suite (and built into update-java- alternatives as well). And then you wouldn't have to worry about all the checking in the OpenJDK jvisualvm script. Of course, this might not be considered valid if the devs want to allow the case of running the OpenJDK jvisualvm frontend with a Sun JDK backend. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657048 Title: visualvm fails to launch because it can't find jdk: "Cannot find java. Please use the --jdkhome switch" -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577958] Re: VisualVM cannot load profiler (64 bit)
Ah, sorry, an update. The visualvm package is used for the common launch script for either JDK (and is recommended from the sun-java6-jdk package, hence I presumably had it pre-upgrade but it updated as part of the Lucid upgrade). The symlink issue is part of bug #657408, and I'll update it there with an x-ref to this one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577958 Title: VisualVM cannot load profiler (64 bit) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577958] Re: VisualVM cannot load profiler (64 bit)
Same issues here but with an upgrade to Lucid, so that I kept my Sun Java JDK installation from Karmic (the upgrade appears to have automatically added the partner repo that Ekr had to do manually, which makes sense). Somehow I had the OpenJDK visualvm package installed (presumably by the upgrade process), even though the OpenJDK JRE or JDK wasn't installed We need to be clear about the issue though because I had slightly different symptoms (maybe Ekr can clarify). With the standard OpenJDK installation and its visualvm (packages default-jdk and visualvm), jvisualvm starts up for me with the Fluid error. However, I can still then look at running or launched Java apps. I presume the Fluid stuff is just doing the calibration like the Sun one does. Ekr's workaround is to switch to the Sun jvisualvm and JDK, and so isn't actually working round the OpenJDK jvisualvm bug as such (i.e. it's really switching apps, not working round the bug). I can confirm his issue with the Sun install not changing the jvisualvm symlink. I assume that this should be a separate bug then (**but can a dev please confirm that this is what they'd prefer and what project it should be under; sorry, I'm a bit of a noob!**). Since there are update- alternatives entries for java, javac, javadoc, rmiregistry, etc. (but not for jvisualvm), I assume the correct fix is for a jvisualvm update- alternatives to be added and incorporated into the Sun package install process. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577958 Title: VisualVM cannot load profiler (64 bit) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579667] Re: flashplugin-installer doesn't retrieve needed package "adobe-flashplugin_10.0.45.2.orig.tar.gz"
Sorry for the multiple updates but resolved this one; my bad. It's a symptom of bug #556293 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/556293). http_proxy is not getting set properly for a sudo environment (via Apply System Wide from System-->Preferences-->Network Proxy). So wget fails when run as sudo under the apt-get. Confirmed via solution as in that bug: sudo into a new shell, set http_proxy and then do an apt-get install flashplugin-nonfree. So i'd suggest this can be marked as a duplicate of 556293, unless anyone is having this problem whilst NOT behind a proxy -- flashplugin-installer doesn't retrieve needed package "adobe-flashplugin_10.0.45.2.orig.tar.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579667] Re: flashplugin-installer doesn't retrieve needed package "adobe-flashplugin_10.0.45.2.orig.tar.gz"
To be clear, I can wget the exact file it requires from the cmd line so, if the installer is using wget under the covers (as I assume it is), it's somehow losing the proxy details. (Maybe others can confirm that the problem only occurs behind a proxy server) Also, even though it fails, the packages are both marked as installed, which is not ideal. -- flashplugin-installer doesn't retrieve needed package "adobe-flashplugin_10.0.45.2.orig.tar.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579667] Re: flashplugin-installer doesn't retrieve needed package "adobe-flashplugin_10.0.45.2.orig.tar.gz"
Same problem. I'm behind a proxy, but apt-get works for everything else and, for example, I can wget from the cmd line; http_proxy is set correctly in the environment variables. -- flashplugin-installer doesn't retrieve needed package "adobe-flashplugin_10.0.45.2.orig.tar.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 424971] Re: Java browser plug-in does not work
Oops, sorry for multiple posts. To clarify, looks like the libjavaplugin.so version is somehow broken (or has an incorrect name; I remember some forum post about similar issues where they'd had to rename libjavaplugin.so to something else). I didn't need *both* the entries, only to replace libjavaplugin.so with libjpnp2.so (just re-checked by removing the libjavaplugin.so symlinks). And, to be crystal clear, the original symlinks were indirect, via /etc/alternatives/firefox-javaplugin.so and /etc/alternatives/mozilla- javaplugin.so (just in case anyone else is trying to reproduce my 'fix'). -- Java browser plug-in does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424971 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 424971] Re: Java browser plug-in does not work
Could this also be related to Bug #291135 (since that was supposed to move from libjavaplugin.oji to the apparently newer libnpjp2.so)? Or, at the very least, it would seem that a fix for that should fix this, at least for the configuration I have. -- Java browser plug-in does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424971 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 424971] Re: Java browser plug-in does not work
Same problem on Jaunty 32-bit. sun-java6-plugin installs, Sun Java the default Java (in update- alternatives), but Firefox 3.6.8 about:plugins shows no plugin installed. Unlike BjA, the fix for me was to symlink the separate libnpjp2.so in /usr/lib/firefox/plugins *and* /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins. In my build, only libjavaplugin.so was there, correctly symlinked to the /usr/lib/jvm path. Is this something that's broken with the recent upgrade of Firefox to 3.6 on older Ubuntu releases (such as Jaunty)?? ls -al /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins [includes only /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so -> /etc/alternatives/mozilla-javaplugin.so] ls -al /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins [includes only /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so -> /etc/alternatives/mozilla-javaplugin.so] cd /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins sudo ln -s /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/jre/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so cd /usr/lib/firefox/plugins sudo ln -s /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/jre/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so [Test Java plugin] firefox http://www.java.com/en/download/installed.jsp -- Java browser plug-in does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424971 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376233] Re: dvi render blurry
For what it's worth, I can confirm this problem in Jaunty as well. I also upgraded from Intrepid, but had the problem originally there as well. (Actually, I think Intrepid was an upgrade from an initial Hardy install as well.) Does anyone experience this bug on a fresh install of Jaunty or a later release? It's not 100% clear if all posters here have an upgraded distro. -- dvi render blurry https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351763] Re: [RS482] Kubuntu: Display flickers after suspend-to-ram
Sorry, late tonight :-( By Intrepid upgrade I, of course, mean upgrade *from* Intrepid (to Jaunty). (sigh) -- [RS482] Kubuntu: Display flickers after suspend-to-ram https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351763 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351763] Re: [RS482] Kubuntu: Display flickers after suspend-to-ram
Looks like not just Kubuntu. Have identical problem on standard Gnome Ubuntu, same model (Acer Aspire 5100 with Radeon Xpress 200M). Occurred immediately following Intrepid upgrade. -- [RS482] Kubuntu: Display flickers after suspend-to-ram https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351763 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351763] Re: [RS482] Kubuntu: Display flickers after suspend-to-ram
Just to be clear: for me, it's not just a flicker but flickering with ghosted images of bits of desktop. Makes Ubuntu totally unusable. Still occurs if log off and back on with a safe terminal. -- [RS482] Kubuntu: Display flickers after suspend-to-ram https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351763 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 164301] Re: Bugs behind proxy server with/without authentication
OK, as per Sebastien's comment, have raised a bug on Pidgin (#9552): http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/9552 Delayed since Pidgin's development server kept crashing on me. Included all the pertinent detail from here. Let's see if anyone picks this up... ** Bug watch added: Pidgin Trac #9552 http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/9552 -- Bugs behind proxy server with/without authentication https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164301 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 72872] Re: Users do not have permission to open files in DVDs burnt in a Mac
Just to add that common sense would suggest that any permissions are purely to enable them to be reconstructed when copying/restoring from the media (and not to actually affect access on the disc, since this becomes meaningless on other physical machines and can easily be bypassed). But, as I said, I'm no expert on the original intentions of these various standards and their implementations. It's not so clear cut when you think about the grey area of removable HDDs (one could argue that CD/DVD enforced permissions make sense in scenarios where this is control over physical access to the media e.g. disc can't leave a certain room with one PC, where you may *want* to enforce permissions). Sorry, perhaps a little philosophical, but just stressing the point that a clear understanding/statement of the technical requirements (and their interpretation by Linux/Ubuntu) is needed. -- Users do not have permission to open files in DVDs burnt in a Mac https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 72872] Re: Users do not have permission to open files in DVDs burnt in a Mac
I'm not an expert on CD/DVD file systems, but it seems to me that we need to nail down the real technical issues here (and whether this is actually a bug -- see below). From my (limited) understanding: -- CDs/DVDs are typically burnt with ISO 9660 filesystems and most OSs support (some aspects of) the Joliet and Rock Ridge extensions -- the Rock Ridge extensions include UNIX file permission details -- Mac OS X, in some circumstances, burns an HFS Plus (Mac OS Extended) / ISO 9660 hybrid format. See http://support.apple.com/kb/TA21176?viewlocale=en_US : "With Mac OS X 10.2.8 or earlier, DVD-R discs burned in the Finder are Mac OS Extended format (HFS Plus). With Mac OS X 10.3 or later, they are a HFS Plus/ISO 9660 hybrid format, which can be read by most computer systems, including Microsoft Windows. The disc contains these filesystems: HFS+, ISO-9660 with Rock Ridge, and Joliet with Rock Ridge." I don't know/understand the full details of Linux Rock Ridge support, but doesn't this bug depend on an understanding of this? Either: a) the disc is Rock Ridge with permissions which Linux is *correctly* honouring (i.e. not a bug; this assumes that this is how Rock Ridge is supposed to work, both in general and on Linux) b) as (a) but Linux should not honour them in certain cases and this represents one of those cases (i.e. an incorrect/incomplete support of the Rock Ridge standards; question is what's specific about these discs to cause this not to work) c) the disc has permissions reflected in some other way (e.g. the hybrid mentioned earlier) and Linux is correctly honouring them (e.g. as per HFS Plus or whatever). *Possibly* no bug, unless it's taken that this honouring is non-sensical in this case (e.g. for Mac OS X specific permissions when you're not reading it on OS X) d) Linux is incorrectly interpreting some file system data as implying permissions when it doesn't (so issue is a deeper file system interpretation and standards support one, and question as in (b) applies) e) something else (OK, I copped out here!) Hope this might help others progress this. Unfortunately, I don't have/remember which disc caused me this problem originally -- Users do not have permission to open files in DVDs burnt in a Mac https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 72872] Re: Insert CD -- mounts with all file permissions -rwx------
But is this really just a wishlist item? Surely this is a classic "will completely flummox a non-technical user" type problem which goes against the core Ubuntu philosophy. The *importance* is obviously related to the proportion of CDs/DVDs that may have this problem (doesn't seem that clear yet), but I don't see how this can be wishlist only? Any comments from bug maintainer(s)? -- Insert CD -- mounts with all file permissions -rwx-- https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 72872] Re: Insert CD -- mounts with all file permissions -rwx------
Yeah, I appear to be having this problem as well (but have no idea if the CD was burnt on a Mac). Standard /etc/fstab entry, but CD mounts with all files permissions 700, and with userid and group 501 and dialout on all files. Very annoying. -- Insert CD -- mounts with all file permissions -rwx-- https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220135] Re: Hard lock booting/logging out/restarting [Q965]
Confirming on another Optiplex 745 under Hardy, latest kernel 2.6.24.19 and intel driver package 2:2.2.1-1ubuntu13.4. Note that, for Dells at least, the specific motherboard version seems to make a difference (as for the reboot problem in bug 115011 - see my comments there). With my m/board code 0KW628, it hard locks. A colleague also has an Optiplex 745, but with m/board code 0WK833 and he has no problems (still same chipset and onboard graphics as far as I can see). Don't know if that might help with diagnosis. Also can confirm workaround using i810 driver (logon screen is wrong resolution - only see top left quarter - but then fine once logged in). I assume only potential issues are reduced graphics performance. P.S. I haven't tried the older Hardy intel driver version 2:2.2.1-ubuntu12; don't know if that might be a (better?) workaround but presume may break other stuff. P.P.S. Off topic but, AFAIK, the intel driver is just a more modern version of the i810 one (is it a fork?)? What are the differences / release strategies? Are they managed by separate development teams? Web links? -- Hard lock booting/logging out/restarting [Q965] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 115011] Re: Ubuntu 7.04 hangs on reboot on Dell 745
Confirming on another Optiplex 745 under Hardy, latest kernel 2.6.24.19. Re Ben's comment #9, I have motherboard code 0KW628 (assuming this is the board's Product Name from dmidecode). A colleague has an Optiplex 745 with code 0WK833 which doesn't have this problem, so doesn't look like it's restricted to Ben's two codes. Hope that's of use. Also worked round with reboot=b kernel option, despite the following still appearing in dmesg: [ 33.626818] iTCO_vendor_support: vendor-support=0 [ 33.642078] iTCO_wdt: Intel TCO WatchDog Timer Driver v1.02 (26-Jul-2007) [ 33.642125] iTCO_wdt: failed to reset NO_REBOOT flag, reboot disabled by hardware [ 33.642131] iTCO_wdt: No card detected -- Ubuntu 7.04 hangs on reboot on Dell 745 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 232467] Re: rtc module not working for hwclock with Dell Optiplex 745
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 39959 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/39959 Now works for me after Hardy upgrade. Appears that Ubuntu doesn't now use rtc modules (rtc or genrtc) as lsmod | grep rtc returns nothing. Since problem also captured in bug 39959, attempting to close this bug (if I have the privilege as the poster...). ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 39959 Could hwclock.sh fall back to using --directisa -- rtc module not working for hwclock with Dell Optiplex 745 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232467 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 232467] Re: rtc module not working for hwclock with Dell Optiplex 745
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 39959 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/39959 OK, can't close so marking as duplicate of 39959. -- rtc module not working for hwclock with Dell Optiplex 745 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232467 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 39959] Re: Could hwclock.sh fall back to using --directisa
See my comments in [url=https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util- linux/+bug/21295/]bug 21295[/url]. Now works for me after Hardy upgrade (Dell Optiplex 745). Appears that Ubuntu doesn't use the rtc modules (rtc or genrtc) any more in my case, since lsmod | grep rtc returns nothing. -- Could hwclock.sh fall back to using --directisa https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/39959 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 16345] Re: hwclock -r fails on Dell Precision 670 due to rtc driver, use genrtc instead?
Works for me now on Hardy (kernel 2.6.24-19). Appears that Ubuntu doesn't use any rtc modules now (lsmod | grep rtc shows nothing). So no need to re-open. -- hwclock -r fails on Dell Precision 670 due to rtc driver, use genrtc instead? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/16345 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 164301] Re: Bugs behind proxy server with/without authentication
Doh - meant "file transfers *fail*" in second paragraph. -- Bugs behind proxy server with/without authentication https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164301 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 164301] Re: Bugs behind proxy server with/without authentication
I'm having similar problems (Gutsy, Pidgin 2.2.1) but possibly different root cause (devs - please advise if you'd prefer a new bug). Basically, both Yahoo buddy icon gets and file transfers file behind a proxy server because: I have to set "No proxy" for the basic port 5050 connection, and Pidgin isn't honouring the global (Gnome) HTTP proxy connections for its separate port 80 connections for file transfers and buddy icon uploads/downloads. It's strange because the debug window shows that it *is* honouring the Gnome HTTP proxy settings for the address.yahoo.com connection, but not the filetransfer.msg.yahoo.com (which it appears to use for both buddy icon and other file transfers). Extracts of debug log below confirming this (ist:3128 is the Squid proxy I'm using). OK main connection with no proxy: (10:46:01) proxy: Attempting connection to 66.163.181.187 (10:46:01) proxy: Connecting to scs.msg.yahoo.com:5050 with no proxy (10:46:01) proxy: Connection in progress (10:46:01) proxy: Connected to scs.msg.yahoo.com:5050. No Gnome proxy settings used for filetransfer connections (hence they fail - first one for buddy icons, second for actual file transfer): (10:46:01) dns: Got response for 'filetransfer.msg.yahoo.com' (10:46:01) dnsquery: IP resolved for filetransfer.msg.yahoo.com (10:46:01) proxy: Attempting connection to 209.191.110.214 (10:46:01) proxy: Connecting to filetransfer.msg.yahoo.com:80 with no proxy (10:46:01) proxy: Connection in progress (10:46:04) proxy: Connected to filetransfer.msg.yahoo.com:80. (10:46:04) proxy: Error connecting to filetransfer.msg.yahoo.com:80 (No route to host). (10:46:04) proxy: Connection attempt failed: No route to host (10:46:04) yahoo: Buddy icon upload failed: No route to host (10:55:59) proxy: Attempting connection to 209.191.110.214 (10:55:59) proxy: Connecting to filetransfer.msg.yahoo.com:80 with no proxy (10:55:59) proxy: Connection in progress [never completes] Note separate bug #52801 advocating *not* using the global proxy settings: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/52801 If this is an issue as well then presumably the best fix is to add an option to the Yahoo settings to be able to set separate proxy settings for the main (port 5050) connection and the HTTP connections. Otherwise, it should honour the global Gnome HTTP proxy settings I guess. Apologies if this pollutes what looks a slightly different bug for others (as mentioned earlier, can put in another bug if advised), but this seems a prime root cause problem for all Yahoo proxy related problems. -- Bugs behind proxy server with/without authentication https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164301 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 232467] Re: rtc module not working for hwclock with Dell Optiplex 745
And meant Gutsy, not Feisty (think I had the problem originally on Feisty, and it remained after upgrade to Gutsy). Not having a good day :-( -- rtc module not working for hwclock with Dell Optiplex 745 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232467 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 232467] Re: rtc module not working for hwclock with Dell Optiplex 745
Doh - meant "16345 poster" in first line. -- rtc module not working for hwclock with Dell Optiplex 745 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232467 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 232467] [NEW] rtc module not working for hwclock with Dell Optiplex 745
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.22 Rather than re-opening bug #16345, opening a new bug (since was fixed for 26658 poster in 2.6.15...) - I left some comments in #16345 originally... https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.15/+bug/16345 Exactly the same problem as #16345 with Feisty (fully updated), 2.6.22 kernel and a Dell Optiplex 745 desktop machine. hwclock will not work with the default /dev/rtc. It works with the --directisa option, or by replacing rtc with genrtc manually. I would suspect other Dell desktops may have the same issue? uname -r 2.6.22-14-386 lsmod | grep rtc rtc13208 0 hwclock --show --debug hwclock from util-linux-ng 2.13 Using /dev interface to clock. Last drift adjustment done at 1211365653 seconds after 1969 Last calibration done at 1211365653 seconds after 1969 Hardware clock is on UTC time Assuming hardware clock is kept in UTC time. Waiting for clock tick... select() to /dev/rtc to wait for clock tick timed out ...got clock tick sudo hwclock --show --directisa Wed 21 May 2008 12:18:28 BST -0.221688 seconds sudo modprobe -r rtc sudo modprobe genrtc lsmod | grep rtc genrtc 8808 0 hwclock --show Wed 21 May 2008 12:19:26 BST -0.063319 seconds Let me know if I can provide further diagnostics. Thanks. ** Affects: linux-source-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- rtc module not working for hwclock with Dell Optiplex 745 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232467 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 198558] Re: hwclock does not work
I think this is a duplicate of #39959: hwclock won't work without directisa option for some systems (including my Dell Optiplex 745 desktop with Feisty). https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/39959 This also suggests a workaround (add directisa option manually to hwclock.sh script). -- hwclock does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198558 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 16345] Re: hwclock -r fails on Dell Precision 670 due to rtc driver, use genrtc instead?
I still have this problem on a Dell Optiplex 745 with the latest kernel (2.6.22): uname -r 2.6.22-14-386 sudo hwclock -r select() to /dev/rtc to wait for clock tick timed out Works with --directisa option as mentioned elsewhere: sudo hwclock -r --directisa --utc Wed 02 Apr 2008 11:21:40 BST -0.855465 seconds So should this bug be re-opened?? P.S. I've seen elsewhere about adding the directisa option to HWCLOCKPARS in /etc/init.d/hwclock.sh (and I guess hwclockfirst.sh as well). Is this a sensible workaround to do? When are these run (every boot or e.g. only when using NTP?)? I don't seem to have any issues with my time being wrong as is. -- hwclock -r fails on Dell Precision 670 due to rtc driver, use genrtc instead? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/16345 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122560] Re: no sound with 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller
Just in case it's useful for anyone else, note that I had this problem (on a desktop Dell Optiplex 745) after upgrade to 7.10. Looks like (at least for me), it *was* fixed in the 2.6.22 kernel, but the problem in the forum entry below stopped it working: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=571878 The snd_hda_intel kernel module didn't exist: installed linux-ubuntu- modules-`uname-r` package and rebooted - all sound magically restored. Using Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 02) soundcard (as from lspci). Cheers, Stuart -- no sound with 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 91427] Re: ALC883 hda_codec bug
Sorry, forgot to specify - I originally had the bug on normal Ubuntu Feisty release (not Kubuntu as original poster). Cheers, Rigsby -- ALC883 hda_codec bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91427 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 91427] Re: ALC883 hda_codec bug
Maybe I can help move this along. I had this bug, also on an Acer Aspire 5100 laptop. I can confirm that the problem no longer occurs with Gutsy (well, at least no more hda_codec msgs in dmesg). Note that I don't think these were the root cause messages. I had one at boot up (could see via Ctrl-Alt-F1 whilst booting) which doesn't appear in dmesg. Can't remember exact msg but was some kind of timeout trying to contact a sound related module or similar. Anyway, believe now fixed in Gutsy. Think I wrote down the original boot error somewhere. If I can dig it up, I'll post it... Cheers, Rigsby -- ALC883 hda_codec bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91427 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 151145] Re: Evince print fails with Postscript driver
And the Word original Cheers, Stuart ** Attachment added: "nktovey_moscow_2004.doc" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10845950/nktovey_moscow_2004.doc -- Evince print fails with Postscript driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151145 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 151145] Re: Evince print fails with Postscript driver
I've had similar problems with Gutsy (and pretty sure the same problems on Feisty). The last time this occurred was printing a PDF converted from a Word file via OpenOffice. Hung processing on the printer (and in the queue) until socket timed out, no matter what print client used (Evince, Acrobat). Eventually got it to print from OpenOffice but this had failed previously (perhaps OpenOffice always worked but I had clogged up the queue or something?). In some cases, prints off 1 or 2 pages before hanging (in CUPS, can see it processing 1 page, 2 pages, etc. *very* slowly before the timeout). My suspicion would be that it's some specific syntax within the PDF file that then translates into dodgy PostScript or similar. Having said that, had the same issues using a PostScript driver and a Gutenprint one (to an HP Laserjet 2300). Still appears to apply to only certain PDF files (have printed others OK, including ones converted to PDF via OpenOffice). If it helps, attach PDF formats of file that caused problems (c. 300KB) and will attach Word version in separate post... Cheers, Stuart ** Attachment added: "Offending document example (PDF from OpenOffice)" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10845941/nktovey_moscow_2004.pdf -- Evince print fails with Postscript driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151145 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 33696] Re: Packages not authenticated
Presume it's OK to add comments to this bug since still Incomplete. I also get this problem when behind a proxy i.e. all packages shown as unauthenticated. I think a Synaptic Reload (apt-get update) sometimes corrects the problem but appreciate that the cmd given will avoid any proxy issues. But doesn't this mean there should be a fix to Synaptic (and/or apt-get) to ensure this when a proxy is being used? Since a Synaptic Reload worked for me, perhaps it is already fixed in Synaptic and it was me doing an apt-get update at the cmd line which broke it (I definitely did this at least once) Any info. appreciated. -- Packages not authenticated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 114365] Re: random desktop hangs while using mouse
Just to add that 99.9% sure I still have this problem as well (i.e. since the 41301 fix). Hasn't reoccurred for a bit but, if it does, I'll post the log info for the Kernel team. For info, I'm running 64-bit Feisty on an Acer Aspire 5101AWLMi laptop, with a USB MS Trackball Optical (have never not used this mouse, so don't know if problem would occur just with touchpad, as other posters have mentioned). Standard Feisty install with the usual multimedia add-ons (am using ATI proprietary graphics drivers). Exact same symptoms and definitely different to (now closed) 41301 - Alt-Tab becomes unusable, cursor stuck in whatever operation was underway (generally a resize) and had to virtual console and kill nautilus to fix. -- random desktop hangs while using mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114365 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs