[Bug 390012] [NEW] [Kubuntu 9.04] Cannot extract audio from CD as ordinary user

2009-06-20 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

Fresh install of Kubuntu 9.04 with the default user 'emgaron'. "groups"
for that user reports:

emgaron adm dialout cdrom plugdev lpadmin admin sambashare

The machine is a HP Kayak XM600 which has and Adaptec 29160 U160 SCSI
controller. Attached to that controller are two U160 HDs and (on the
narrow channel) a Plextor PX-40TS SCSI CDROM and a Plextor PX-W1210S CD-
RW.

When I put an audio CD into the PX-W1210S, I can extract audio files from an 
audio CD as a normal user without problems. If I do the same using the PX-40TS, 
K3B just hangs at the first file. A cancel only works if I force the ejection 
of the CD with "eject /dev/sr1".
If I start K3B as root (sudo k3b --cddarip /dev/sr1), the extraction *does* 
work.

Both dev files for the CDROMs seem to have identical permissions:
~$ ls -l /dev/cdrom*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2009-06-20 21:40 /dev/cdrom -> sr0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2009-06-20 21:40 /dev/cdrom1 -> sr1
~$ ls -l /dev/sr[01]
brw-rw+ 1 root cdrom 11, 0 2009-06-20 21:40 /dev/sr0
brw-rw+ 1 root cdrom 11, 1 2009-06-20 21:40 /dev/sr1

To be sure, I also installed grip and tried the same thing with grip -
with identical results. Extracting audio from sr0 (PX-W1210S) works as
ordinary user, whereas the same from sr1 (PX-40TS) only works as root.

As the same setup has worked fine earlier under SuSE 9.3 before I
installed Kubuntu on it, I think there must be some subtle bug
somewhere. Given that it affects both k3b and grip, it does not seem to
be related to the app. Hence, I'm not sure which package to assign this
to.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[Kubuntu 9.04] Cannot extract audio from CD as ordinary user
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 378706] Re: Jaunty PPC alternate CD fails to create user account

2009-07-11 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
I have seen this happening once on my iMac DV (400MHz G3 slot-loader). The user 
account was not created, but I was able to create it manually when booting from 
the "alternate" CD in "rescue" mode. I could then get a shell while using the 
installed system as / and subsequently use "adduser" to create a user. I also 
had to use rescue mode to make sure that account was added to the sudoers file.
The same install showed the problem with the root account as described above. I 
found that this was due to the entry for "root" missing completely from 
/etc/passwd. Adding it manually resolved this.

Also, I only ran into this when I installed the machine before I had
replaced the PRAM battery (i.e. it was forgetting its date, time and
settings each time I booted). After I had replaced the battery, reset
the NVRAM and reset the hardware clock (actually using hwclock
--systohc), a second fresh install of 9.04 from the alternate CD
correctly created both user account and "root" entry.

-- 
Jaunty PPC alternate CD fails to create user account
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] [NEW] 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-11 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-r128

Fresh install on an Apple iMac DV (400MHz slot-loader). Before
installing, I have replaced the PRAM battery, reset the NVRAM and made
sure that the hardware clock was set correctly and kept correctly across
power downs.

I then proceeded to install 9.04 from the alternate CD for PPC. The
install went fine and after the first boot, gdm came up with the login
screen. On closer inspection, however, X was started in PseudoColor 8bit
mode - which is very annoying and almost unusable in some cases. Hence,
I tried to manually configure X to display 24bit TrueColor or at least
16bit (after having installed all updates). I came across the following
issues:

1) The "out-of-the-box" xorg.conf file is empty. I have no experience with 9.04 
yet, so I don't know whether it's supposed to be that way.
2) After adding the information from one of the many xorg.conf files that can 
be found for Ubuntu on PPC (which includes the r128 driver), X failed with "no 
device found" (see attached Xorg.0.log-r128-no_device). This despite all 
evidence pointing to this iMac having an ATI Rage 128 (see lspci.txt)
3) I then removed the "Driver" instruction to let X choose the driver itself. 
This resulted in another failure to run X, this time with an error about 
"modified mode" (see Xorg.0.log-no_driver-modified_mode). In fact, I got this 
error for all colour depth settings except for 8bit - which is just what I want 
to get rid of.

I will now proceed and install 8.04 from alternate to see whether the
machine will then show different behaviour. The original MacOS 9
installation on that box *did* run in TrueColor mode, so I assume that
the hardware is fine.

** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-r128 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] Re: 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-11 Thread Thomas Ribbrock

** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log-r128-no_device"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28913893/Xorg.0.log-r128-no_device

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] Re: 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-11 Thread Thomas Ribbrock

** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log-no_driver-modified_mode"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28913901/Xorg.0.log-no_driver-modified_mode

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] Re: 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-11 Thread Thomas Ribbrock

** Attachment added: "lspci.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28913899/lspci.txt

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] Re: 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-11 Thread Thomas Ribbrock

** Attachment added: "xorg.conf-r128"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28913902/xorg.conf-r128

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] Re: 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-11 Thread Thomas Ribbrock

** Attachment added: "xorg.conf-no_driver"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28913910/xorg.conf-no_driver

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] Re: 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-11 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Just finished installing 8.04. As described in
http://forums.macrumors.com/archive/index.php/t-662667.html the initial
X configuration does not produce a working X, however, with the
xorg.conf given on that page X works just fine at 1024x768 with 24bit.
So, the hardware is fine - just the xserver/driver in 9.04 seems to have
problems.

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] Re: 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-13 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
** Tags added: apple ati imac rage xorg

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 22976] Re: Live CD boots to a black screen on Blueberry G3 iMac

2009-07-13 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
I wonder whether in Intrepid this is related to the bug report I filed a
few days ago (I could not find this one then):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204 . As far as I remember, I have
already tried playing with "DefaultFbBpp" to no avail, but I'll re-
check, just to be sure.

-- 
Live CD boots to a black screen on Blueberry G3 iMac
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22976
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 22976] Re: Live CD boots to a black screen on Blueberry G3 iMac

2009-07-14 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Ok, I've re-installed 9.04PPC on my iMac and tried this again.
"DefaultFbBpp" does *not* work. If I add this statement to the screen
section, X fails with this error:

(II) FBDEV(0): using default device
(II) Running in FRAMEBUFFER Mode
(--) FBDEV(0): Depth 24, (**) framebuffer bpp 32
(==) FBDEV(0): RGB weight 888
(==) FBDEV(0): Default visual is TrueColor
(==) FBDEV(0): Using gamma correction (1.0, 1.0, 1.0)
(II) FBDEV(0): hardware: OFfb ATY,Rage12 (video memory: 600kB)
(II) FBDEV(0): checking modes against framebuffer device...
(II) FBDEV(0):  mode "1024x768" test failed
(II) FBDEV(0):  mode "800x600" test failed
(II) FBDEV(0):  mode "640x480" test failed
(II) FBDEV(0): checking modes against monitor...
(--) FBDEV(0): Virtual size is 800x600 (pitch 800)
(**) FBDEV(0):  Built-in mode "current": 100.0 MHz, 119.0 kHz, 186.0 Hz
(II) FBDEV(0): Modeline "current"x0.0  100.00  800 816 824 840  600 616 624 640 
-hsy
nc -vsync -csync (119.0 kHz)
(==) FBDEV(0): DPI set to (96, 96)
(II) Loading sub module "fb"
(II) LoadModule: "fb"
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules//libfb.so
(II) Module fb: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 1.6.0, module version = 1.0.0
ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.4
(**) FBDEV(0): using shadow framebuffer
(II) Loading sub module "shadow"
(II) LoadModule: "shadow"
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules//libshadow.so
(II) Module shadow: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 1.6.0, module version = 1.1.0
ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.4
(==) Depth 24 pixmap format is 32 bpp
(EE) FBDEV(0): FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO succeeded but modified mode
(EE) FBDEV(0): mode initialization failed

-- 
Live CD boots to a black screen on Blueberry G3 iMac
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22976
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400864] Re: 9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Result of running strace against startx

** Attachment added: "X.strace"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29203121/X.strace

-- 
9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400864] [NEW] 9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-r128

Ubuntu 9.04PPC "out-of-the-box" fresh install on an iMac DV 400MHz (G3,
slot-loader):

As the default installation results in 8bit only display (256 colours,
PseudoColor mode), I have tried to force the usage of the r128 driver
using a minimal xorg.conf (see attachments). This fails, as the r128
driver fails to detect the card (see attached Xorg.0.log). I could not
see any difference between including the "disable 'dri'" statement and
leaving it out - in the log, it looks like this statement is actually
ignored/overridden by the X server.

If I run strace against "startx" (strace -fo xserver.trace startx), I
can see that the driver accesses the AGP bus and both PCI busses (see
also attached output of "lspci -vvnn").

Under 8.04, the same driver works fine on the same hardware.

Note: This bugreport supersedes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-
video-r128/+bug/398204 !

** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-r128 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apple ati imac ppc rage xorg

-- 
9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400864] Re: 9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock

** Attachment added: "xorg.conf"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29203060/xorg.conf

-- 
9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400864] Re: 9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Logfile when trying to start X with r128 driver

** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29203097/Xorg.0.log

-- 
9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400864] Re: 9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Output of lspci -vvnn

** Attachment added: "lspci_vvnn.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29203133/lspci_vvnn.txt

-- 
9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400875] Re: 9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock

** Attachment added: "xorg.conf"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29203657/xorg.conf

-- 
9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400875] Re: 9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Logfile with error message

** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29203660/Xorg.0.log

-- 
9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400875] Re: 9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
fbset output

** Attachment added: "fbset_iv.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29203666/fbset_iv.txt

-- 
9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400875] [NEW] 9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-fbdev

Ubuntu 9.04PPC "out-of-the-box" fresh install on an iMac DV 400MHz (G3,
slot-loader):

After the install, xorg.conf stays empty. Hence, X tries to figure out
the correct settings and driver automatically. On my iMac, X fails to
detect the built-in ATI Rage 128 card (see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-
video-r128/+bug/400864 ) and subsequently tries to use the fbdev driver.
When doing so, X does start, however, only 256 colours are used (8bit
PseudoColor mode). I tried to investigate the cause for this and tried
several things:

1) Create a minimal xorg.conf (the attached version contains some
commented out lines from experimenting) with "DefaultDepth 24" in the
Screen section. This results in an error message "FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO
succeeded but modified mode" (see attached Xorg.0.log).

2) I tried the same thing using "DefaultFbBpp 32" instead of
"DefaultDepth 24". The result was the same.

3) I noticed in the log file that apparently the modes are checked
against the fbdev set-up. The default frame-buffer set-up as listed by
"fbset -i -v" is attached as well. It can be seen from this output and
Xorg.0.log that the frame buffer seems to have 8bit only and only some
600KB of video memory. Hence, I tried modifying these settings with
fbset - to no avail. I also tried adding a "VideoRam" statement to
xorg.conf - also to no avail. I was not able to change any settings.

In the end, I am still not able to run anything but 8bit graphics using
the fbdev driver. My impression is that this is due to the frame buffer
being in the wrong mode itself, but this seemingly cannot be changed
easily.

The same hardware works fine with 24bit under 8.04, using the r128
driver.

** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-fbdev (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apple ati fbdev imac ppc rage xorg

-- 
9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] Re: 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
On closer inspection, I noticed that this bug report touches separate,
most likely independent issues (X with fbdev vs. X with r128 driver).
Hence, I decided to replace this bug report with separate ones to make
it easier to focus on one single issue:

1) r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-r128/+bug/400864
2) fbdev wrongly configured in X : 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-fbdev/+bug/400875

This bug report is therefore obsolete. I shall try to close it myself -
if that fails, please close it for me.

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] Re: 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
This bug report has been superseeded by
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-r128/+bug/400864
and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-fbdev/+bug/400875

** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-r128 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-r128 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Thomas Ribbrock (emgaron+ubuntu)

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400875] Re: 9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
For completeness: dmesg

** Attachment added: "dmesg"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29204401/dmesg

-- 
9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400864] Re: 9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
For completeness: dmesg

** Attachment added: "dmesg"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29204400/dmesg

-- 
9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400864] Re: 9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac

2009-07-18 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Partial SOLUTION:

xorg.conf must contain the line

BusID   "PCI:0:16:0"

in the "Device" section - this will detect the ATI Rage. I had not tried this 
as I assumed that the lspci (hex-)value should be correct, but apparently, xorg 
expects decimal.
Hence, the installer needs to somehow come up with this.

Unfortunately, the r128 driver now crashes. I will open a new bug for
*that* problem.

-- 
9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 289422] Re: 8.10: Application to override monitor selection missing

2009-03-13 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 211364 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211364

This bug is not a duplicate of #211364 - that report is specifically
written with regard to Kubuntu/KDE, whereas this report is true for both
Kubuntu *and* Ubuntu, Gnome and KDE.

-- 
8.10: Application to override monitor selection missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289422
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 289422] Re: 8.10: Application to override monitor selection missing

2009-04-07 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
>From my original bug report (see above):

"In Kubuntu 8.04, it was possible to hard-set/override the monitor
selection via System Settings -> Display. Under Kubuntu 8.10RC, this
setting is no longer present (same goes for Ubuntu 8.10RC, by the way).
Apparently, there is no way to set what monitor you are using."

I *am* talking about "System settings" -> "General" -> "Display" (as far
as Kubuntu is concerned - as I said, Ubuntu 8.10 has the same problem).

In Kubuntu 8.04, this same utility was still called "Monitor & Display"
and had a "Hardware" tab in which you could manually select the monitor
you have.

In 8.10 and 9.04, this option has been removed and as far as I can see
nothing has been provided to replace it. This means that in these
versions, the user does not have the option to override the *definition*
of the monitor. If the system recognises my monitor as "800x600" (or
does not recognise it at all), "800x600" is all I get - contrary to
8.04, I cannot override this and tell the system "but my monitor REALLY
*can* do 1600x1200!" The only way to do so is to manually edit
xorg.conf, which is something I did not have to do in *years* with any
distribution - and also something which cannot be expected of a novice
user who happens to have an older monitor or is using a KVM-switch that
fails to propagate the DDC signals properly. The latter is precisely
what I have at home and at work: With some KVM, autodetection works,
with others, it does not - and if it does not, neither Kubuntu (8.10 and
9.04) nor Ubuntu 8.10 (have not tested 9.04 yet) offer me the option to
manually define my monitor using a proper GUI. Other systems (tested:
Opensuse 11, Kubuntu 8.04 and Ubuntu 8.04) do.

In my eyes, this is a usability regression in comparison with 8.04 and
therefore a bug.

** Summary changed:

- 8.10: Application to override monitor selection missing
+ 8.10/9.04: Application to override monitor selection missing

-- 
8.10/9.04: Application to override monitor selection missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289422
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384967] [NEW] Kubuntu 9.04: Sound only partially working on HP Kayak XM600

2009-06-08 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

On my HP Kayak XM600, sound is only working partially after having
installed Kubuntu 9.04. So far, I have seen two scenarios:

Upgrade from Kubuntu 8.10 (where sound - I think - was working. Not 100% sure) 
to 9.04:
- No system sounds (i.e. no sound for Login/Logout, error messages, beep, 
etc.). When going to System Settings -> Notifications -> KDE System 
Notifications and tried to play any of the sounds there, nothing happened.
- No sound in amarok
- Something like "ogg123 FILE.ogg" did work (so the hardware is ok)
- The mixer in KMix was correctly shown, no odd settings there
- System Settings -> Multimedia showed "Sound Fusion CS46xx (CS46xx)" at the 
top of the list. Clicking on "Test" did result in a sound being played. The 
other two entries ("Sound Fusion CS46xx (CS46xx - Rear)" and "PulseAudio" did 
not do anything).
- I tried installing the phonon-gstreamer backend and use that instead of the 
xine-backend, but that did not change anything.

As I could not get sound to work, I decided to wipe that machine
completely and perform a fresh install of Kubuntu 9.04 (including fresh
user account). After that, sound still was not working - no system
sounds, no sound in amarok, but the mixer was still ok and "ogg123 ..."
still worked. Basically the same as after the upgrade.

Based on some comments in the forums, I installed the "pulseaudio"
package (which did not get installed automatically). I then went to
System Settings -> Multimedia and put the "PulseAudio" entry to the top.
To be sure, I logged out and even rebooted. After I log in, I still do
not get any system sounds, however, amarok seems to be able to play now.
The sounds in System Settings -> Notifications -> KDE System
Notifications behave very oddly: If I press the play button, nothing
happens. If I press it again, the sound is played once. If I continue,
every second button press will result in the sound being played. If I
press the button in rapid succession, the sounds get played several
times simultaneously. The latter does not surprise me that much, but the
fact that I have to click twice to get any reaction seems odd. In normal
use, the system sounds/notification still don't work.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
ArecordDevices:
 E: core-util.c: Home directory /home/emgaron not ours.
  List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
 card 0: CS46xx [Sound Fusion CS46xx], device 0: CS46xx [CS46xx]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  emgaron3111 F knotify4
  emgaron3201 F pulseaudio
  emgaron3207 F kmix
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'CS46xx'/'Sound Fusion CS46xx at 0xe920/0xe900, irq 17'
   Mixer name   : 'Cirrus Logic CS4297A rev 4'
   Components   : 'AC97a:43525914'
   Controls  : 45
   Simple ctrls  : 26
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: alsa-base 1.0.18.dfsg-1ubuntu8
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: alsa-driver
Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686

** Affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
Kubuntu 9.04: Sound only partially working on HP Kayak XM600
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384967
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384967] Re: Kubuntu 9.04: Sound only partially working on HP Kayak XM600

2009-06-08 Thread Thomas Ribbrock

** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664941/AlsaDevices.txt

** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664944/AplayDevices.txt

** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664945/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Amixer.values.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664947/Card0.Amixer.values.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664949/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt"
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664951/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664953/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664954/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664956/PciMultimedia.txt

-- 
Kubuntu 9.04: Sound only partially working on HP Kayak XM600
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384967
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 46516] Re: NFSv4 mounts often missing after boot

2007-09-28 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
I just wanted to add that I have this exact same problem with NFSv3
mounts on Feisty. *None* of the mounts listed in /etc/fstab get mounted
during boot - I had to add additional mount commands to /etc/rc.local to
get them mounted.

Example line from /etc/fstab:
192.168.1.1:/export/src /usr/local/src nfs 
nouser,wsize=8192,rsize=8192,atime,auto,rw,nodev,noexec,suid 0 0

This share will not get mounted during boot. It will, however, get mounted by 
the following command in rc.local:
mount /usr/local/src
which means that the fstab entry *as such* works.

The client is Kubuntu 7.04 'Feisty' AMD64 (nfs-common is installed and
all updates are applied) and the server runs OpenBSD 3.8 on Sparc64.
I've been using the same server set-up (OpenBSD on Sparc) for years now
with varying Linux clients (Red Hat, Fedora, Mandrake, SuSE, Aurora) and
never had any issues, so I tend to assume that the server is ok... :-)

-- 
NFSv4 mounts often missing after boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46516
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 245417] [NEW] Make subject of status mail configurable

2008-07-04 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

unattended-upgrades has a nice feature which sends a status report via
mail to a configurable address. That's great if you have several
workstations running Ubuntu and want to keep track of things. However,
the subject of these mails is fixed, making it difficult to determine
which workstation has sent the mail. Hence my suggestion: If you get a
chance, please make the subject configurable - that way, each
workstation can use a unique subject (e.g. with the hostname in it),
making it a lot easier to scan through a list of status messages.

** Affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Make subject of status mail configurable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245417
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 245422] [NEW] Make log/status mail contain info about "kept back" packages

2008-07-04 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: unattended-upgrades

In some cases, unattended-upgrades will not execute all available
upgrades (e.g. if apt holds back a package due to some other package
needing to be installed additionally). Unfortunately, neither the *.log
files nor the status mail of unattended-upgrades contains any
information about this - you have to log in on the workstation in
question and run "apt-get upgrade" manually to get this information. It
would be great if unattended-upgrades could supply this information
itself (especially in the mail) - that way keeping an eye on what's
going on is a lot easier for an admin with several of these
workstations.

** Affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Make log/status mail contain info about "kept back" packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245422
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 252319] [NEW] gcompris installation only partially functional on Kubuntu

2008-07-27 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gcompris

Fresh install of Kubuntu 8.04 with all updates applied:

I have installed gcompris-8.4.4-1.1ubuntu1 which pulled in the
corresponding gcompris-data package. As I wanted to have the sound as
well, I've installed gcompris-sound-de, gcompris-sound-en and gcompris-
sound-nl as well. The first thing I noticed was that gcompris would
insist on using English written text, even when switched to Dutch or
German. I then proceeded to install language-support-de, -nl and -en
(8.04+20080214), which did not resolve this problem. After some
investigation, I found that the corresponding "gcompris.mo" files are
not part of the gcompris package, nor are they part of the language
packages I installed - they are actually part of the "language-pack-
gnome-XX" packages - but these do not get installed automatically on a
Kubuntu system. I think this should be fixed, as not having the
gcompris.mo files installed severely hampers the usability on a non-
English (or multilinugal) system.

Secondly, even after installing all that I found that (at least) one of the 
reading games still does not work:
"Reading Activities" -> "Click on a letter" - no sound is produced for the 
letters the user is supposed to click on, making this game unusable (tried in 
German and Dutch so far).

** Affects: gcompris (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
gcompris installation only partially functional on Kubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252319
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 252319] Re: gcompris installation only partially functional on Kubuntu

2008-07-27 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Additional info:

"Click on a letter" does not work for English (UK), either. I ran strace on 
gcompris while trying this and found that gcompris does indeed find the correct 
ogg vorbis file for the welcome message of the game 
("/usr/share/gcompris/boards/voices/en/misc/click_on_letter.ogg") and the first 
letter (in this case it was 
"/usr/share/gcompris/boards/voices/en/alphabet/U0061.ogg"), but for some odd 
reasons, the sound is not played.
Playing those files with ogg123 from the command line does work fine.

I also just discovered that while the background music and the initial
"Welcome" do work, none of the other sound effects seem to work. For
example, "Discovery activities" -> "Sound activities" -> "Melody" and
"Discovery activities" -> "Memory activities" -> "Railway" do not work,
either. However, "Discovery activities" -> "Memory activities" -> "Audio
memory game" works.

-- 
gcompris installation only partially functional on Kubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252319
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 252319] gcompris problems with locale and sound on Kubuntu

2008-07-27 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
SOLUTION:

Some googling gave me the idea that some gstreamer plugins might be
needed. I discovered that "gstreamer0.10-plugins-good" is sufficient -
all games described above are now working. Hence, the whole issue comes
down to dependency/packaging problems:

- Under Kubuntu, either gcompris needs to pull in the necessary
"language-pack-gnome-XX" or the "gcompris.mo" files need to be packaged
differently. Otherwise, the locales do not work in gcompris.

- Either gcompris or the "gcompris-sound-XX" packages need to pull in
"gstreamer0.10-plugins-good". Otherwise, sound will not work for all
games in gcompris.

I will change the subject to make this more easily findable.

-- 
gcompris installation only partially functional on Kubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252319
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138691] Re: system hangs at shutdown

2008-06-25 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Case (1) seems to chime with what I mentioned in comment #53 (
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-
manager/+bug/138691/comments/53 ) about having the dbus shutdown script
(K20dbus) in rc0.d as well. However, I did not verify at the time
whether that has any ill side effects.

Case (2) is apparently what we experienced here. We do not have any VPN 
involved, but we do have NFS. The one thing I noticed: At home, I have an 
OpenBSD NFS server and currently (among others...) one Kubuntu 8.04 and one 
Kubuntu 7.10 workstation hanging off it, with several directories mounted 
statically (i.e. via fstab) from the NFS server. Neither of those shows the 
problems we observed at work. My guess is that it is not simply NFS, but in 
some way also the NIS+automounter set-up we have here.
Also, umountnfs did not time out in our set-up - at least not within 24h (I 
tried...)

-- 
system hangs at shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138691
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 232160] Re: OpenOffice.org automatic detection of file lock requirement does not work - WITH SOLUTION

2008-06-18 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
I tested the  new package yesterday with FILE_LOCKING set to "auto" in
/etc/openoffice/soffice.sh - and now it is indeed working as expected on
our NFS directories. Thank you!

-- 
OpenOffice.org automatic detection of file lock requirement does not work - 
WITH SOLUTION
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232160
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138691] Re: system hangs at shutdown

2008-05-13 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
"reboot=b" didn't make any change on "Machine 3" (Asus M2A-VM). I did,
however, find a few more things on both desktop machines (as the laptop
is still on 7.10, I'll focus on the two 8.04 machines):

- Adding some extra wait time in /etc/init.d/kdm after stopping kdm and before 
calling usplash_down did not make any change
- If I use "shutdown -P now" remotely (i.e. via a ssh session as root (root 
account *is* enabled)), the machines seems to shut down properly all the time
- If I use "sudo shutdown -P now" from a Konsole, the machine hangs on shutdown 
as described
- If I do an "su -" first in Konsole to become 'root', a subsequent "shutdown 
-P now" will successfully shut down the machine
- When the machine hangs, I can actually use "Ctrl-Alt-Del" to get the shutdown 
process to continue. The first message I see then is "Main rc0 process killed". 
Also, I get a message about "shutting down kdm... ...kdm is not running". 
However, in this case, the machine will not shut down all the way, instead, I 
end up with a black screen with a white blinking cursor in the top left corner.

For completeness, as X seems to play some kind of role:
- "Machine 2" (Asus P5L-1394) has an nVidia 7300LE VGA card
- "Machine 3" (Asus M2A-VM) has an ATI Radeon RS690/Radeon X1200 Series VGA 
card (onboard)

-- 
system hangs at shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138691
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138691] Re: system hangs at shutdown

2008-05-13 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Another piece for the puzzle: Apparently, if I shut down all network
related services (NIS, NTP, NFS/automounter) prior to initiating
shutdown from within KDE, the machines are much more likely to
successfully shut down. No idea why.

-- 
system hangs at shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138691
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138691] Re: system hangs at shutdown

2008-05-13 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
A long row of boot/shut-down cycles with varying parameters got me a bit
closer to the solution:

All the machines we use have static NFS mounts for some additional directories 
in /usr/local plus automounted home directories (also via NFS). I haven't 
experimented with the home directories yet (all tests were run using a local 
user), but I discovered this:
If I manually unmount the static NFS mounts prior to shutting down, the 
shutdown will succeed. Further investigation showed that the shutdown actually 
hangs in umountnfs.sh (/etc/rc0.d/S31umountnfs.sh) right at the "umount" 
command. Hence, something has happened previously during the shutdown process 
that prevents the "umount" from succeeding.

I went even further and added a custom script to /etc/rc0.d to investigate at 
which point "umount" would fail to work. Unmounting of the static NFS shares 
worked fine until after sendsignals (/etc/rc0.d/S20sendsignals) has been run, 
i.e. I can add a script at S19 or any of the K... levels that unmounts the 
NFS shares and it will succeed. If I add it as S21... or higher, it will hang 
at "umount", just like the umountnfs.sh script does. It looks like 
"sendsignals" kills something that is vital to unmounting the NFS shares 
(NetworkManager?!).
However, this does not explain why there is a difference between initiating 
shutdown from within KDE/kdm and running "shutdown -P now" from the console. 
For that, I have no idea whatsoever...


Now that I can design a workaround for this, I will have a look at the 
automounted directories...

-- 
system hangs at shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138691
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138691] Re: system hangs at shutdown - WORKING "WORKAROUND"

2008-05-13 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
SOLVED!

Finally, I got the whole thing working. In the end, the solution was
simple: Disable/remove NetworkManager! Boot times actually seem shorter
and shutdown works. NIS now comes right up (as opposed to with a delay
with NetworkManager operating). To disable NetworkManager without
removing it, do the following:

1) Make CERTAIN that your standard network interface is configured
properly in /etc/network/interfaces. "systemsettings" was no help in
doing so - I had to edit the file manually. In my case, there already
was an entry for "eth0" - I just needed to add/uncomment the actual
configuration. The complete entry looks like this:

  # The primary network interface
  auto eth0
  iface eth0 inet dhcp

Once this is done, the interface will be enabled during boot-up, despite
NetworkManager being disabled.

2) Disable NetworkManager
Create two files in /etc/default:
echo "exit" > /etc/default/NetworkManager
echo "exit" > /etc/default/NetworkManagerDispatcher

3) Reboot

If everything went well, you should now have a working, NetworkManager-
free network interface.

DOWNSIDES:
There are probably some potential downsides to disabling NetworkManager, 
especially if you want your machine to automatically switch between e.g. 
ethernet and wireless - as far as I understand that's precisely what 
NetworkManager was invented for. Hence, this situation does need "real" fixing 
at some point. However, if you have a workstation with a static network 
interface (in our case, even the laptops are used that way), there's no need 
for such functionality - just getting the interface up at boot time is 
sufficient.
Another downside is that the knetworkmanager icon does no longer work to 
indicate the status of the network connection. "knetstats" seems to do the job 
nicely, however.
As we don't need NetworkManager's functionality, there might be potential 
downsides that I have missed - YMMV, as always.


To the developers: If you need some additional input to try and debug the 
underlying NetworkManager problem, please let me know and I'll rig up a box 
that uses NetworkManager to test.

-- 
system hangs at shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138691
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138691] Re: system hangs at shutdown

2008-05-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Well, one thing I found very valuable when debugging my version of this problem 
(apparently, there are several causes resulting in the same or at least very 
similar behaviour) is this:
In /etc/default/rcS, make sure that "VERBOSE" is set to "yes" (default is no). 
That way, some of the scripts in /etc/init.d will be, well. more verbose - only 
after making this change did I doscover that the shutdown did *not* hang at 
"Sending...KILL... processes" (which comes from /etc/init.d/sendsignals), but 
rather later in /etc/init.d/unmountnfs.sh. Unfortunately, there are several 
scripts running after 'sendsignals' that do not print any output to the screen, 
unless VERBOSE is yes. In the end, I even added 'echo' statements to some 
scripts in /etc/init.d just to find out where *exactly* the shutdown hung.

I would like to suggest that everybody who experiences this kind of
problem tries to look into this - the more precise we can pinpoint the
exact location where the shutdown process hangs, the greater the chance
that the developers can actually solve this.

To the developers: I forgot to mention that - just before removing 
NetworkManger - I also found a way to get rid of its error messages at shutdown 
without removing it.I copied "K20dbus" from /etc/rc1.d to /etc/rc0.d, figuring 
that if dbus needed shutdown for single user, it would also need shutdown for 
shutdown... After that modification, NetworkManager did no longer spew that 
bunch of warnings and error messages that the original poster described. It 
did, however, not solve the problem with the hang.
Of course, I'm used to a fully blown Sys V compatible runlevel mechanism (as 
used e.g. by Red Hat, SuSE, Mandrake) rather than what (K)ubuntu does, so I 
might well have overlooked something here.

-- 
system hangs at shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138691
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 220504] Re: Firefox doesn't know what apps to use to open any type of downloaded files

2008-05-19 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
I can confirm that installing firefox-gnome-support did fill firefox'
application list here as well. I find this very odd as I run Kubuntu
8.04 and hence to not quite expect to have to install something wiht
"gnome" in its title just to make another progam work.

However, while the application list is now populated, it has no effect
whatsoever - firefox still does not let me see PDF files and - even
worse - will crash if I try several times.

-- 
Firefox doesn't know what apps to use to open any type of downloaded files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220504
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 232160] [NEW] OpenOffice.org automatic detection of file lock requirement does not work - WITH SOLUTION

2008-05-20 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: openoffice.org

When switching from SuSE 10.0/OpenOffice 2.0 to Kubuntu 8.04/OpenOffice 2.4 I 
noticed that file locking no longer worked - two users were able to open the 
same document at the same time and save changes, with the last save winning. As 
this is a very undesirable situation I went to investigate. I found that 
(K)Ubuntu uses custom scripts to start OpenOffice and that these scripts 
contain some code to automatically determine whether $HOME or the edited file 
is located on a NFS (or Samba) share depending on the setting of FILE_LOCKING 
in 
/etc/openoffice/soffice.sh. FILE_LOCKING defaults to "auto' so the auto 
detection code is used.

Unfortunately, this code does not work - file locking is never enabled,
despite the fact that we use NFS-mounted home directories. Having a
closer look at /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice revealed the
problematic part:


[...current version of the script...]
if [ -z "$SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING" ]; then
case "$FILE_LOCKING" in
auto)
if ! file_or_home_on_nfs "$@"; then
# file locking now enabled by default
SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING=1
export SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING
fi
[...]

The second if statement is never evaluated successfully, no matter what
"file_or_home_on_nfs" returns. Hence, SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING is never
set and thus file locking never enabled. I've modified the code as
follows:

[...WORKING version...]
if [ -z "$SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING" ]; then
case "$FILE_LOCKING" in
auto)
file_or_home_on_nfs "$@"
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
# file locking now enabled by default
SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING=1
export SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING
fi
[...]

This version works and correctly sets SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING to "1".
This is most likely not the most elegant variant, but at least it works.
I have noticed that there are more if statements like this in the same
file (e.g. "if ! working_opengl_support; then" a bit further on) and I
have not checked the other scripts in that directory, so there might be
similar bugs waiting...

WORKAROUND:
For those who need file locking to be working before the developers have 
released a fix:
Set FILE_LOCKING to "yes" in /etc/openoffice/soffice.sh to force file locking 
on all the time (on all types of file systems).


Version Information:
> lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 8.04
Release:8.04

> apt-cache policy openoffice.org
openoffice.org:
  Installed: 1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6
  Candidate: 1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6
  Version table:
 *** 1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6 0

** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
OpenOffice.org automatic detection of file lock requirement does not work - 
WITH SOLUTION
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232160
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138691] Re: system hangs at shutdown

2008-05-08 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
We currently have three machines at work that show this behaviour: On
shutdown, the system will hang with output resembling what the original
poster described in his bug report (Netmanager lines etc.). Every now
and then, this output is followed by "Sending all processes the KILL
signal", but none of the machines will shut down any further. This is
the single-biggest showstopper that prevents us from rolling out
(K)ubuntu at the moment. What I have been able to gather so far is this:

Machine 1: An Acer TM8104WLMib Laptop with Kubuntu 7.10 i386 installed
from the alternate disk, with all updates. I tried adding "acpi=off" to
the boot options, but that results in the network interfaces not being
recognised and didn't seem to help anyway. This machine *will* shut down
if I choose "console login" (hence shutting down X first) and the issue
"shutdown -h now" from the command line.

Machine 2: Desktop with Asus P5L-1394 motherboard and an Intel PD925.
Kubuntu 8.04 i386 without any updates, installed automatically via
preseeded network-install, using the alternate CD as starting point, but
with a complete mirror (via apt-mirror) of "dists" and "pool".
Originally, this machine had Kubuntu 7.10 and needed to be installed
using a second NIC, as the onboard NIC (Attansic L1) was not recognised
by the install kernel. In that case, the shutdown problem vanished when
I removed the second NIC. It returned, however, when I installed 8.04
using the onboard NIC only (fortunately, 8.04's install kernel *does*
support the chipset).

Machine 3: Desktop with Asus M2A-VM motherboard and an AMD Athlon X2. Kubuntu 
8.04 i386 installed automatically via preseeded network-install, using the 
alternate CD as starting point, but with a complete mirror (via apt-mirror) of 
"dists" and "pool" (like machine 2). All updates including the latest 
"proposed" ones are installed (to check what was said by Adolfo above). Still 
having the shutdown problem. I tried adding "irqpoll apci=off" to the boot 
options, but that did not change anything. Again, if I choose "console login" 
and press Ctrl-Alt-Delete, the machine will shut down properly, though not 
power off. Using "normal" shutdown it hangs in the manner described above.
I have also tried to boot this machine with the Kubuntu 8.04 i386 Desktop Live 
CD and in that case, the machine *will* shut down properly (after having 
displayed the "Remove CD" message)

-- 
system hangs at shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138691
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138691] Re: system hangs at shutdown

2008-05-08 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
I have done some more experimenting with "Machine 3" from my previous
message. Results:

- If I boot the machine, the press Ctrl-Alt-Del at the login screen (i.e. 
without logging in) and choose shutdown, the machine *will* shut down properly
- If I boot the machine and log in, then choose "Turn off" via the KDE Menu, 
the machine will hang as described
- If I remove "quiet splash" from the boot options, the machine *will* shut 
down properly, even if I do log in. I can still see the Networkmanager/dbus 
error messages described above during the shutdown process, though.

Given these results, my guess is that X does also play a part in this -
rather annoying - bug...

-- 
system hangs at shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138691
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138691] Re: system hangs at shutdown

2008-05-08 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Looks like I spoke too soon - apparently, removing "quest splash" does
not always help. The machine just hung again, despite this change. Maybe
some race condition?

-- 
system hangs at shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138691
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 289422] [NEW] 8.10: Application to override monitor selection missing

2008-10-26 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

In Kubuntu 8.04, it was possible to hard-set/override the monitor
selection via System Settings -> Display. Under Kubuntu 8.10RC, this
setting is no longer present (same goes for Ubuntu 8.10RC, by the way).
Apparently, there is no way to set what monitor you are using. Given
that this severely hampers the usability of (K)Ubuntu, I regard this as
a bug.

There are many situations where the autodetection does not work - older
monitors, for example,  or - more often - the use of KVMs. At work, all
our machines hang off KVMs and for many machines we were forced to hard-
set the monitor selection (Kubuntu 8.04), as autodetection fails when
the KVM is switched to "the other PC". At home, I face the same problem:
I just installed Ubuntu 8.10RC - and was not able to get anything but
800x600, as I cannot tell Ubuntu what monitor I'm using... Again, the
machine is connected via a KVM. In these cases, you *have* to be able to
configure the monitor yourself.

I am aware that I could change xorg.conf directly, but having to do so
is *very* disappointing for a distribution like (K)Ubuntu and will pose
a problem for less experienced users.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Summary changed:

- 8,10: Application to override monitor selection missing
+ 8.10: Application to override monitor selection missing

-- 
8.10: Application to override monitor selection missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289422
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 270838] [NEW] KDE System Settings: Several config windows too big to be usable

2008-09-16 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: kde-systemsettings

Several of the configuration dialogues that can be accessed via "System
Settings" are far too big and do not scale when the window is resized.
One of the worst offenders is "Regional & Language" - this screen is so
big, that it does not even display fullscreen on 1280x1024 without
having to use scrollbars, which makes using this configuration screen
very cumbersome. Most of the other configuration screens require
fullscreen on 1280x1024 just to avoid scrollbars. None of the screens
seem to scale properly when resizing the window.

Strangely enough, as far as I can see, the *same* screens scale
perfectly when used with the original "kcontrol" (KDE Control Centre)
command. "Regional & Accessibility" for example works just fine in a
*much* smaller window - no scrollbars necessary. Unfortunately, kcontrol
does not seem to be part of the default menu.

lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1
Release:8.04

apt-cache policy kde-systemsettings
kde-systemsettings:
  Installed: 0.0svn20070312-0ubuntu5

** Affects: kde-systemsettings (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
KDE System Settings: Several config windows too big to be usable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270838
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Almost
Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kde-systemsettings in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 54454] Re: ubuntu/gnome printing system is not able to print on more than 1 page in some cases

2008-09-18 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
I can confirm this bug for Kubuntu 8.04.1 and firefox-3.0  (3.0.1+build1
+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.3). In all cases, the print preview only shows
one page and no matter whether I print to file or to an actual printer,
I only get one page.

>From what I can see so far, this problem is most likely to occur if the
webpage in question uses frames. Two examples:

http://www.marktplaats.nl/
http://www.hyperelliptic.org/tanja/conf/ECC08/

Pages without frames seem to work a lot better for printing.

You *can* work around it sometimes by selecting "Each frame on separate
pages" in the Options tab of the print dialogue, but it's still very
annoying.

-- 
ubuntu/gnome printing system is not able to print on more than 1 page in some 
cases
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54454
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384967] [NEW] Kubuntu 9.04: Sound only partially working on HP Kayak XM600

2009-06-08 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

On my HP Kayak XM600, sound is only working partially after having
installed Kubuntu 9.04. So far, I have seen two scenarios:

Upgrade from Kubuntu 8.10 (where sound - I think - was working. Not 100% sure) 
to 9.04:
- No system sounds (i.e. no sound for Login/Logout, error messages, beep, 
etc.). When going to System Settings -> Notifications -> KDE System 
Notifications and tried to play any of the sounds there, nothing happened.
- No sound in amarok
- Something like "ogg123 FILE.ogg" did work (so the hardware is ok)
- The mixer in KMix was correctly shown, no odd settings there
- System Settings -> Multimedia showed "Sound Fusion CS46xx (CS46xx)" at the 
top of the list. Clicking on "Test" did result in a sound being played. The 
other two entries ("Sound Fusion CS46xx (CS46xx - Rear)" and "PulseAudio" did 
not do anything).
- I tried installing the phonon-gstreamer backend and use that instead of the 
xine-backend, but that did not change anything.

As I could not get sound to work, I decided to wipe that machine
completely and perform a fresh install of Kubuntu 9.04 (including fresh
user account). After that, sound still was not working - no system
sounds, no sound in amarok, but the mixer was still ok and "ogg123 ..."
still worked. Basically the same as after the upgrade.

Based on some comments in the forums, I installed the "pulseaudio"
package (which did not get installed automatically). I then went to
System Settings -> Multimedia and put the "PulseAudio" entry to the top.
To be sure, I logged out and even rebooted. After I log in, I still do
not get any system sounds, however, amarok seems to be able to play now.
The sounds in System Settings -> Notifications -> KDE System
Notifications behave very oddly: If I press the play button, nothing
happens. If I press it again, the sound is played once. If I continue,
every second button press will result in the sound being played. If I
press the button in rapid succession, the sounds get played several
times simultaneously. The latter does not surprise me that much, but the
fact that I have to click twice to get any reaction seems odd. In normal
use, the system sounds/notification still don't work.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
ArecordDevices:
 E: core-util.c: Home directory /home/emgaron not ours.
  List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
 card 0: CS46xx [Sound Fusion CS46xx], device 0: CS46xx [CS46xx]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  emgaron3111 F knotify4
  emgaron3201 F pulseaudio
  emgaron3207 F kmix
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'CS46xx'/'Sound Fusion CS46xx at 0xe920/0xe900, irq 17'
   Mixer name   : 'Cirrus Logic CS4297A rev 4'
   Components   : 'AC97a:43525914'
   Controls  : 45
   Simple ctrls  : 26
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: alsa-base 1.0.18.dfsg-1ubuntu8
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: alsa-driver
Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686

** Affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
Kubuntu 9.04: Sound only partially working on HP Kayak XM600
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384967
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384967] Re: Kubuntu 9.04: Sound only partially working on HP Kayak XM600

2009-06-08 Thread Thomas Ribbrock

** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664941/AlsaDevices.txt

** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664944/AplayDevices.txt

** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664945/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Amixer.values.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664947/Card0.Amixer.values.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664949/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt"
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664951/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664953/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664954/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664956/PciMultimedia.txt

-- 
Kubuntu 9.04: Sound only partially working on HP Kayak XM600
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384967
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138691] Re: system hangs at shutdown

2008-06-25 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Case (1) seems to chime with what I mentioned in comment #53 (
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-
manager/+bug/138691/comments/53 ) about having the dbus shutdown script
(K20dbus) in rc0.d as well. However, I did not verify at the time
whether that has any ill side effects.

Case (2) is apparently what we experienced here. We do not have any VPN 
involved, but we do have NFS. The one thing I noticed: At home, I have an 
OpenBSD NFS server and currently (among others...) one Kubuntu 8.04 and one 
Kubuntu 7.10 workstation hanging off it, with several directories mounted 
statically (i.e. via fstab) from the NFS server. Neither of those shows the 
problems we observed at work. My guess is that it is not simply NFS, but in 
some way also the NIS+automounter set-up we have here.
Also, umountnfs did not time out in our set-up - at least not within 24h (I 
tried...)

-- 
system hangs at shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138691
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 252319] [NEW] gcompris installation only partially functional on Kubuntu

2008-07-27 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gcompris

Fresh install of Kubuntu 8.04 with all updates applied:

I have installed gcompris-8.4.4-1.1ubuntu1 which pulled in the
corresponding gcompris-data package. As I wanted to have the sound as
well, I've installed gcompris-sound-de, gcompris-sound-en and gcompris-
sound-nl as well. The first thing I noticed was that gcompris would
insist on using English written text, even when switched to Dutch or
German. I then proceeded to install language-support-de, -nl and -en
(8.04+20080214), which did not resolve this problem. After some
investigation, I found that the corresponding "gcompris.mo" files are
not part of the gcompris package, nor are they part of the language
packages I installed - they are actually part of the "language-pack-
gnome-XX" packages - but these do not get installed automatically on a
Kubuntu system. I think this should be fixed, as not having the
gcompris.mo files installed severely hampers the usability on a non-
English (or multilinugal) system.

Secondly, even after installing all that I found that (at least) one of the 
reading games still does not work:
"Reading Activities" -> "Click on a letter" - no sound is produced for the 
letters the user is supposed to click on, making this game unusable (tried in 
German and Dutch so far).

** Affects: gcompris (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
gcompris installation only partially functional on Kubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252319
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 252319] Re: gcompris installation only partially functional on Kubuntu

2008-07-27 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Additional info:

"Click on a letter" does not work for English (UK), either. I ran strace on 
gcompris while trying this and found that gcompris does indeed find the correct 
ogg vorbis file for the welcome message of the game 
("/usr/share/gcompris/boards/voices/en/misc/click_on_letter.ogg") and the first 
letter (in this case it was 
"/usr/share/gcompris/boards/voices/en/alphabet/U0061.ogg"), but for some odd 
reasons, the sound is not played.
Playing those files with ogg123 from the command line does work fine.

I also just discovered that while the background music and the initial
"Welcome" do work, none of the other sound effects seem to work. For
example, "Discovery activities" -> "Sound activities" -> "Melody" and
"Discovery activities" -> "Memory activities" -> "Railway" do not work,
either. However, "Discovery activities" -> "Memory activities" -> "Audio
memory game" works.

-- 
gcompris installation only partially functional on Kubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252319
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 252319] gcompris problems with locale and sound on Kubuntu

2008-07-27 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
SOLUTION:

Some googling gave me the idea that some gstreamer plugins might be
needed. I discovered that "gstreamer0.10-plugins-good" is sufficient -
all games described above are now working. Hence, the whole issue comes
down to dependency/packaging problems:

- Under Kubuntu, either gcompris needs to pull in the necessary
"language-pack-gnome-XX" or the "gcompris.mo" files need to be packaged
differently. Otherwise, the locales do not work in gcompris.

- Either gcompris or the "gcompris-sound-XX" packages need to pull in
"gstreamer0.10-plugins-good". Otherwise, sound will not work for all
games in gcompris.

I will change the subject to make this more easily findable.

-- 
gcompris installation only partially functional on Kubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252319
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 245417] [NEW] Make subject of status mail configurable

2008-07-04 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

unattended-upgrades has a nice feature which sends a status report via
mail to a configurable address. That's great if you have several
workstations running Ubuntu and want to keep track of things. However,
the subject of these mails is fixed, making it difficult to determine
which workstation has sent the mail. Hence my suggestion: If you get a
chance, please make the subject configurable - that way, each
workstation can use a unique subject (e.g. with the hostname in it),
making it a lot easier to scan through a list of status messages.

** Affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Make subject of status mail configurable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245417
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 245422] [NEW] Make log/status mail contain info about "kept back" packages

2008-07-04 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: unattended-upgrades

In some cases, unattended-upgrades will not execute all available
upgrades (e.g. if apt holds back a package due to some other package
needing to be installed additionally). Unfortunately, neither the *.log
files nor the status mail of unattended-upgrades contains any
information about this - you have to log in on the workstation in
question and run "apt-get upgrade" manually to get this information. It
would be great if unattended-upgrades could supply this information
itself (especially in the mail) - that way keeping an eye on what's
going on is a lot easier for an admin with several of these
workstations.

** Affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Make log/status mail contain info about "kept back" packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245422
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 270838] [NEW] KDE System Settings: Several config windows too big to be usable

2008-09-16 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: kde-systemsettings

Several of the configuration dialogues that can be accessed via "System
Settings" are far too big and do not scale when the window is resized.
One of the worst offenders is "Regional & Language" - this screen is so
big, that it does not even display fullscreen on 1280x1024 without
having to use scrollbars, which makes using this configuration screen
very cumbersome. Most of the other configuration screens require
fullscreen on 1280x1024 just to avoid scrollbars. None of the screens
seem to scale properly when resizing the window.

Strangely enough, as far as I can see, the *same* screens scale
perfectly when used with the original "kcontrol" (KDE Control Centre)
command. "Regional & Accessibility" for example works just fine in a
*much* smaller window - no scrollbars necessary. Unfortunately, kcontrol
does not seem to be part of the default menu.

lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1
Release:8.04

apt-cache policy kde-systemsettings
kde-systemsettings:
  Installed: 0.0svn20070312-0ubuntu5

** Affects: kde-systemsettings (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
KDE System Settings: Several config windows too big to be usable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270838
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Almost
Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kde-systemsettings in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 54454] Re: ubuntu/gnome printing system is not able to print on more than 1 page in some cases

2008-09-18 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
I can confirm this bug for Kubuntu 8.04.1 and firefox-3.0  (3.0.1+build1
+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.3). In all cases, the print preview only shows
one page and no matter whether I print to file or to an actual printer,
I only get one page.

>From what I can see so far, this problem is most likely to occur if the
webpage in question uses frames. Two examples:

http://www.marktplaats.nl/
http://www.hyperelliptic.org/tanja/conf/ECC08/

Pages without frames seem to work a lot better for printing.

You *can* work around it sometimes by selecting "Each frame on separate
pages" in the Options tab of the print dialogue, but it's still very
annoying.

-- 
ubuntu/gnome printing system is not able to print on more than 1 page in some 
cases
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54454
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 289422] [NEW] 8.10: Application to override monitor selection missing

2008-10-26 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

In Kubuntu 8.04, it was possible to hard-set/override the monitor
selection via System Settings -> Display. Under Kubuntu 8.10RC, this
setting is no longer present (same goes for Ubuntu 8.10RC, by the way).
Apparently, there is no way to set what monitor you are using. Given
that this severely hampers the usability of (K)Ubuntu, I regard this as
a bug.

There are many situations where the autodetection does not work - older
monitors, for example,  or - more often - the use of KVMs. At work, all
our machines hang off KVMs and for many machines we were forced to hard-
set the monitor selection (Kubuntu 8.04), as autodetection fails when
the KVM is switched to "the other PC". At home, I face the same problem:
I just installed Ubuntu 8.10RC - and was not able to get anything but
800x600, as I cannot tell Ubuntu what monitor I'm using... Again, the
machine is connected via a KVM. In these cases, you *have* to be able to
configure the monitor yourself.

I am aware that I could change xorg.conf directly, but having to do so
is *very* disappointing for a distribution like (K)Ubuntu and will pose
a problem for less experienced users.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Summary changed:

- 8,10: Application to override monitor selection missing
+ 8.10: Application to override monitor selection missing

-- 
8.10: Application to override monitor selection missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289422
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 46516] Re: NFSv4 mounts often missing after boot

2007-09-28 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
I just wanted to add that I have this exact same problem with NFSv3
mounts on Feisty. *None* of the mounts listed in /etc/fstab get mounted
during boot - I had to add additional mount commands to /etc/rc.local to
get them mounted.

Example line from /etc/fstab:
192.168.1.1:/export/src /usr/local/src nfs 
nouser,wsize=8192,rsize=8192,atime,auto,rw,nodev,noexec,suid 0 0

This share will not get mounted during boot. It will, however, get mounted by 
the following command in rc.local:
mount /usr/local/src
which means that the fstab entry *as such* works.

The client is Kubuntu 7.04 'Feisty' AMD64 (nfs-common is installed and
all updates are applied) and the server runs OpenBSD 3.8 on Sparc64.
I've been using the same server set-up (OpenBSD on Sparc) for years now
with varying Linux clients (Red Hat, Fedora, Mandrake, SuSE, Aurora) and
never had any issues, so I tend to assume that the server is ok... :-)

-- 
NFSv4 mounts often missing after boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46516
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138691] Re: system hangs at shutdown

2008-05-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Well, one thing I found very valuable when debugging my version of this problem 
(apparently, there are several causes resulting in the same or at least very 
similar behaviour) is this:
In /etc/default/rcS, make sure that "VERBOSE" is set to "yes" (default is no). 
That way, some of the scripts in /etc/init.d will be, well. more verbose - only 
after making this change did I doscover that the shutdown did *not* hang at 
"Sending...KILL... processes" (which comes from /etc/init.d/sendsignals), but 
rather later in /etc/init.d/unmountnfs.sh. Unfortunately, there are several 
scripts running after 'sendsignals' that do not print any output to the screen, 
unless VERBOSE is yes. In the end, I even added 'echo' statements to some 
scripts in /etc/init.d just to find out where *exactly* the shutdown hung.

I would like to suggest that everybody who experiences this kind of
problem tries to look into this - the more precise we can pinpoint the
exact location where the shutdown process hangs, the greater the chance
that the developers can actually solve this.

To the developers: I forgot to mention that - just before removing 
NetworkManger - I also found a way to get rid of its error messages at shutdown 
without removing it.I copied "K20dbus" from /etc/rc1.d to /etc/rc0.d, figuring 
that if dbus needed shutdown for single user, it would also need shutdown for 
shutdown... After that modification, NetworkManager did no longer spew that 
bunch of warnings and error messages that the original poster described. It 
did, however, not solve the problem with the hang.
Of course, I'm used to a fully blown Sys V compatible runlevel mechanism (as 
used e.g. by Red Hat, SuSE, Mandrake) rather than what (K)ubuntu does, so I 
might well have overlooked something here.

-- 
system hangs at shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138691
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 220504] Re: Firefox doesn't know what apps to use to open any type of downloaded files

2008-05-19 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
I can confirm that installing firefox-gnome-support did fill firefox'
application list here as well. I find this very odd as I run Kubuntu
8.04 and hence to not quite expect to have to install something wiht
"gnome" in its title just to make another progam work.

However, while the application list is now populated, it has no effect
whatsoever - firefox still does not let me see PDF files and - even
worse - will crash if I try several times.

-- 
Firefox doesn't know what apps to use to open any type of downloaded files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220504
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 232160] [NEW] OpenOffice.org automatic detection of file lock requirement does not work - WITH SOLUTION

2008-05-20 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: openoffice.org

When switching from SuSE 10.0/OpenOffice 2.0 to Kubuntu 8.04/OpenOffice 2.4 I 
noticed that file locking no longer worked - two users were able to open the 
same document at the same time and save changes, with the last save winning. As 
this is a very undesirable situation I went to investigate. I found that 
(K)Ubuntu uses custom scripts to start OpenOffice and that these scripts 
contain some code to automatically determine whether $HOME or the edited file 
is located on a NFS (or Samba) share depending on the setting of FILE_LOCKING 
in 
/etc/openoffice/soffice.sh. FILE_LOCKING defaults to "auto' so the auto 
detection code is used.

Unfortunately, this code does not work - file locking is never enabled,
despite the fact that we use NFS-mounted home directories. Having a
closer look at /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice revealed the
problematic part:


[...current version of the script...]
if [ -z "$SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING" ]; then
case "$FILE_LOCKING" in
auto)
if ! file_or_home_on_nfs "$@"; then
# file locking now enabled by default
SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING=1
export SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING
fi
[...]

The second if statement is never evaluated successfully, no matter what
"file_or_home_on_nfs" returns. Hence, SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING is never
set and thus file locking never enabled. I've modified the code as
follows:

[...WORKING version...]
if [ -z "$SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING" ]; then
case "$FILE_LOCKING" in
auto)
file_or_home_on_nfs "$@"
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
# file locking now enabled by default
SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING=1
export SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING
fi
[...]

This version works and correctly sets SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING to "1".
This is most likely not the most elegant variant, but at least it works.
I have noticed that there are more if statements like this in the same
file (e.g. "if ! working_opengl_support; then" a bit further on) and I
have not checked the other scripts in that directory, so there might be
similar bugs waiting...

WORKAROUND:
For those who need file locking to be working before the developers have 
released a fix:
Set FILE_LOCKING to "yes" in /etc/openoffice/soffice.sh to force file locking 
on all the time (on all types of file systems).


Version Information:
> lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 8.04
Release:8.04

> apt-cache policy openoffice.org
openoffice.org:
  Installed: 1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6
  Candidate: 1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6
  Version table:
 *** 1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6 0

** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
OpenOffice.org automatic detection of file lock requirement does not work - 
WITH SOLUTION
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232160
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138691] Re: system hangs at shutdown

2008-05-08 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
We currently have three machines at work that show this behaviour: On
shutdown, the system will hang with output resembling what the original
poster described in his bug report (Netmanager lines etc.). Every now
and then, this output is followed by "Sending all processes the KILL
signal", but none of the machines will shut down any further. This is
the single-biggest showstopper that prevents us from rolling out
(K)ubuntu at the moment. What I have been able to gather so far is this:

Machine 1: An Acer TM8104WLMib Laptop with Kubuntu 7.10 i386 installed
from the alternate disk, with all updates. I tried adding "acpi=off" to
the boot options, but that results in the network interfaces not being
recognised and didn't seem to help anyway. This machine *will* shut down
if I choose "console login" (hence shutting down X first) and the issue
"shutdown -h now" from the command line.

Machine 2: Desktop with Asus P5L-1394 motherboard and an Intel PD925.
Kubuntu 8.04 i386 without any updates, installed automatically via
preseeded network-install, using the alternate CD as starting point, but
with a complete mirror (via apt-mirror) of "dists" and "pool".
Originally, this machine had Kubuntu 7.10 and needed to be installed
using a second NIC, as the onboard NIC (Attansic L1) was not recognised
by the install kernel. In that case, the shutdown problem vanished when
I removed the second NIC. It returned, however, when I installed 8.04
using the onboard NIC only (fortunately, 8.04's install kernel *does*
support the chipset).

Machine 3: Desktop with Asus M2A-VM motherboard and an AMD Athlon X2. Kubuntu 
8.04 i386 installed automatically via preseeded network-install, using the 
alternate CD as starting point, but with a complete mirror (via apt-mirror) of 
"dists" and "pool" (like machine 2). All updates including the latest 
"proposed" ones are installed (to check what was said by Adolfo above). Still 
having the shutdown problem. I tried adding "irqpoll apci=off" to the boot 
options, but that did not change anything. Again, if I choose "console login" 
and press Ctrl-Alt-Delete, the machine will shut down properly, though not 
power off. Using "normal" shutdown it hangs in the manner described above.
I have also tried to boot this machine with the Kubuntu 8.04 i386 Desktop Live 
CD and in that case, the machine *will* shut down properly (after having 
displayed the "Remove CD" message)

-- 
system hangs at shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138691
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138691] Re: system hangs at shutdown

2008-05-08 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
I have done some more experimenting with "Machine 3" from my previous
message. Results:

- If I boot the machine, the press Ctrl-Alt-Del at the login screen (i.e. 
without logging in) and choose shutdown, the machine *will* shut down properly
- If I boot the machine and log in, then choose "Turn off" via the KDE Menu, 
the machine will hang as described
- If I remove "quiet splash" from the boot options, the machine *will* shut 
down properly, even if I do log in. I can still see the Networkmanager/dbus 
error messages described above during the shutdown process, though.

Given these results, my guess is that X does also play a part in this -
rather annoying - bug...

-- 
system hangs at shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138691
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138691] Re: system hangs at shutdown

2008-05-08 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Looks like I spoke too soon - apparently, removing "quest splash" does
not always help. The machine just hung again, despite this change. Maybe
some race condition?

-- 
system hangs at shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138691
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 232160] Re: OpenOffice.org automatic detection of file lock requirement does not work - WITH SOLUTION

2008-06-18 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
I tested the  new package yesterday with FILE_LOCKING set to "auto" in
/etc/openoffice/soffice.sh - and now it is indeed working as expected on
our NFS directories. Thank you!

-- 
OpenOffice.org automatic detection of file lock requirement does not work - 
WITH SOLUTION
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232160
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138691] Re: system hangs at shutdown

2008-05-13 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
"reboot=b" didn't make any change on "Machine 3" (Asus M2A-VM). I did,
however, find a few more things on both desktop machines (as the laptop
is still on 7.10, I'll focus on the two 8.04 machines):

- Adding some extra wait time in /etc/init.d/kdm after stopping kdm and before 
calling usplash_down did not make any change
- If I use "shutdown -P now" remotely (i.e. via a ssh session as root (root 
account *is* enabled)), the machines seems to shut down properly all the time
- If I use "sudo shutdown -P now" from a Konsole, the machine hangs on shutdown 
as described
- If I do an "su -" first in Konsole to become 'root', a subsequent "shutdown 
-P now" will successfully shut down the machine
- When the machine hangs, I can actually use "Ctrl-Alt-Del" to get the shutdown 
process to continue. The first message I see then is "Main rc0 process killed". 
Also, I get a message about "shutting down kdm... ...kdm is not running". 
However, in this case, the machine will not shut down all the way, instead, I 
end up with a black screen with a white blinking cursor in the top left corner.

For completeness, as X seems to play some kind of role:
- "Machine 2" (Asus P5L-1394) has an nVidia 7300LE VGA card
- "Machine 3" (Asus M2A-VM) has an ATI Radeon RS690/Radeon X1200 Series VGA 
card (onboard)

-- 
system hangs at shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138691
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138691] Re: system hangs at shutdown

2008-05-13 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Another piece for the puzzle: Apparently, if I shut down all network
related services (NIS, NTP, NFS/automounter) prior to initiating
shutdown from within KDE, the machines are much more likely to
successfully shut down. No idea why.

-- 
system hangs at shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138691
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138691] Re: system hangs at shutdown

2008-05-13 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
A long row of boot/shut-down cycles with varying parameters got me a bit
closer to the solution:

All the machines we use have static NFS mounts for some additional directories 
in /usr/local plus automounted home directories (also via NFS). I haven't 
experimented with the home directories yet (all tests were run using a local 
user), but I discovered this:
If I manually unmount the static NFS mounts prior to shutting down, the 
shutdown will succeed. Further investigation showed that the shutdown actually 
hangs in umountnfs.sh (/etc/rc0.d/S31umountnfs.sh) right at the "umount" 
command. Hence, something has happened previously during the shutdown process 
that prevents the "umount" from succeeding.

I went even further and added a custom script to /etc/rc0.d to investigate at 
which point "umount" would fail to work. Unmounting of the static NFS shares 
worked fine until after sendsignals (/etc/rc0.d/S20sendsignals) has been run, 
i.e. I can add a script at S19 or any of the K... levels that unmounts the 
NFS shares and it will succeed. If I add it as S21... or higher, it will hang 
at "umount", just like the umountnfs.sh script does. It looks like 
"sendsignals" kills something that is vital to unmounting the NFS shares 
(NetworkManager?!).
However, this does not explain why there is a difference between initiating 
shutdown from within KDE/kdm and running "shutdown -P now" from the console. 
For that, I have no idea whatsoever...


Now that I can design a workaround for this, I will have a look at the 
automounted directories...

-- 
system hangs at shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138691
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138691] Re: system hangs at shutdown - WORKING "WORKAROUND"

2008-05-13 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
SOLVED!

Finally, I got the whole thing working. In the end, the solution was
simple: Disable/remove NetworkManager! Boot times actually seem shorter
and shutdown works. NIS now comes right up (as opposed to with a delay
with NetworkManager operating). To disable NetworkManager without
removing it, do the following:

1) Make CERTAIN that your standard network interface is configured
properly in /etc/network/interfaces. "systemsettings" was no help in
doing so - I had to edit the file manually. In my case, there already
was an entry for "eth0" - I just needed to add/uncomment the actual
configuration. The complete entry looks like this:

  # The primary network interface
  auto eth0
  iface eth0 inet dhcp

Once this is done, the interface will be enabled during boot-up, despite
NetworkManager being disabled.

2) Disable NetworkManager
Create two files in /etc/default:
echo "exit" > /etc/default/NetworkManager
echo "exit" > /etc/default/NetworkManagerDispatcher

3) Reboot

If everything went well, you should now have a working, NetworkManager-
free network interface.

DOWNSIDES:
There are probably some potential downsides to disabling NetworkManager, 
especially if you want your machine to automatically switch between e.g. 
ethernet and wireless - as far as I understand that's precisely what 
NetworkManager was invented for. Hence, this situation does need "real" fixing 
at some point. However, if you have a workstation with a static network 
interface (in our case, even the laptops are used that way), there's no need 
for such functionality - just getting the interface up at boot time is 
sufficient.
Another downside is that the knetworkmanager icon does no longer work to 
indicate the status of the network connection. "knetstats" seems to do the job 
nicely, however.
As we don't need NetworkManager's functionality, there might be potential 
downsides that I have missed - YMMV, as always.


To the developers: If you need some additional input to try and debug the 
underlying NetworkManager problem, please let me know and I'll rig up a box 
that uses NetworkManager to test.

-- 
system hangs at shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138691
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384967] [NEW] Kubuntu 9.04: Sound only partially working on HP Kayak XM600

2009-06-08 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

On my HP Kayak XM600, sound is only working partially after having
installed Kubuntu 9.04. So far, I have seen two scenarios:

Upgrade from Kubuntu 8.10 (where sound - I think - was working. Not 100% sure) 
to 9.04:
- No system sounds (i.e. no sound for Login/Logout, error messages, beep, 
etc.). When going to System Settings -> Notifications -> KDE System 
Notifications and tried to play any of the sounds there, nothing happened.
- No sound in amarok
- Something like "ogg123 FILE.ogg" did work (so the hardware is ok)
- The mixer in KMix was correctly shown, no odd settings there
- System Settings -> Multimedia showed "Sound Fusion CS46xx (CS46xx)" at the 
top of the list. Clicking on "Test" did result in a sound being played. The 
other two entries ("Sound Fusion CS46xx (CS46xx - Rear)" and "PulseAudio" did 
not do anything).
- I tried installing the phonon-gstreamer backend and use that instead of the 
xine-backend, but that did not change anything.

As I could not get sound to work, I decided to wipe that machine
completely and perform a fresh install of Kubuntu 9.04 (including fresh
user account). After that, sound still was not working - no system
sounds, no sound in amarok, but the mixer was still ok and "ogg123 ..."
still worked. Basically the same as after the upgrade.

Based on some comments in the forums, I installed the "pulseaudio"
package (which did not get installed automatically). I then went to
System Settings -> Multimedia and put the "PulseAudio" entry to the top.
To be sure, I logged out and even rebooted. After I log in, I still do
not get any system sounds, however, amarok seems to be able to play now.
The sounds in System Settings -> Notifications -> KDE System
Notifications behave very oddly: If I press the play button, nothing
happens. If I press it again, the sound is played once. If I continue,
every second button press will result in the sound being played. If I
press the button in rapid succession, the sounds get played several
times simultaneously. The latter does not surprise me that much, but the
fact that I have to click twice to get any reaction seems odd. In normal
use, the system sounds/notification still don't work.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
ArecordDevices:
 E: core-util.c: Home directory /home/emgaron not ours.
  List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
 card 0: CS46xx [Sound Fusion CS46xx], device 0: CS46xx [CS46xx]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  emgaron3111 F knotify4
  emgaron3201 F pulseaudio
  emgaron3207 F kmix
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'CS46xx'/'Sound Fusion CS46xx at 0xe920/0xe900, irq 17'
   Mixer name   : 'Cirrus Logic CS4297A rev 4'
   Components   : 'AC97a:43525914'
   Controls  : 45
   Simple ctrls  : 26
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: alsa-base 1.0.18.dfsg-1ubuntu8
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: alsa-driver
Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686

** Affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
Kubuntu 9.04: Sound only partially working on HP Kayak XM600
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384967
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384967] Re: Kubuntu 9.04: Sound only partially working on HP Kayak XM600

2009-06-08 Thread Thomas Ribbrock

** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664941/AlsaDevices.txt

** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664944/AplayDevices.txt

** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664945/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Amixer.values.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664947/Card0.Amixer.values.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664949/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt"
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664951/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664953/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664954/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27664956/PciMultimedia.txt

-- 
Kubuntu 9.04: Sound only partially working on HP Kayak XM600
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384967
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 378706] Re: Jaunty PPC alternate CD fails to create user account

2009-07-11 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
I have seen this happening once on my iMac DV (400MHz G3 slot-loader). The user 
account was not created, but I was able to create it manually when booting from 
the "alternate" CD in "rescue" mode. I could then get a shell while using the 
installed system as / and subsequently use "adduser" to create a user. I also 
had to use rescue mode to make sure that account was added to the sudoers file.
The same install showed the problem with the root account as described above. I 
found that this was due to the entry for "root" missing completely from 
/etc/passwd. Adding it manually resolved this.

Also, I only ran into this when I installed the machine before I had
replaced the PRAM battery (i.e. it was forgetting its date, time and
settings each time I booted). After I had replaced the battery, reset
the NVRAM and reset the hardware clock (actually using hwclock
--systohc), a second fresh install of 9.04 from the alternate CD
correctly created both user account and "root" entry.

-- 
Jaunty PPC alternate CD fails to create user account
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] [NEW] 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-11 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-r128

Fresh install on an Apple iMac DV (400MHz slot-loader). Before
installing, I have replaced the PRAM battery, reset the NVRAM and made
sure that the hardware clock was set correctly and kept correctly across
power downs.

I then proceeded to install 9.04 from the alternate CD for PPC. The
install went fine and after the first boot, gdm came up with the login
screen. On closer inspection, however, X was started in PseudoColor 8bit
mode - which is very annoying and almost unusable in some cases. Hence,
I tried to manually configure X to display 24bit TrueColor or at least
16bit (after having installed all updates). I came across the following
issues:

1) The "out-of-the-box" xorg.conf file is empty. I have no experience with 9.04 
yet, so I don't know whether it's supposed to be that way.
2) After adding the information from one of the many xorg.conf files that can 
be found for Ubuntu on PPC (which includes the r128 driver), X failed with "no 
device found" (see attached Xorg.0.log-r128-no_device). This despite all 
evidence pointing to this iMac having an ATI Rage 128 (see lspci.txt)
3) I then removed the "Driver" instruction to let X choose the driver itself. 
This resulted in another failure to run X, this time with an error about 
"modified mode" (see Xorg.0.log-no_driver-modified_mode). In fact, I got this 
error for all colour depth settings except for 8bit - which is just what I want 
to get rid of.

I will now proceed and install 8.04 from alternate to see whether the
machine will then show different behaviour. The original MacOS 9
installation on that box *did* run in TrueColor mode, so I assume that
the hardware is fine.

** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-r128 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] Re: 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-11 Thread Thomas Ribbrock

** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log-r128-no_device"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28913893/Xorg.0.log-r128-no_device

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] Re: 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-11 Thread Thomas Ribbrock

** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log-no_driver-modified_mode"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28913901/Xorg.0.log-no_driver-modified_mode

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] Re: 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-11 Thread Thomas Ribbrock

** Attachment added: "lspci.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28913899/lspci.txt

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] Re: 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-11 Thread Thomas Ribbrock

** Attachment added: "xorg.conf-r128"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28913902/xorg.conf-r128

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] Re: 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-11 Thread Thomas Ribbrock

** Attachment added: "xorg.conf-no_driver"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28913910/xorg.conf-no_driver

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] Re: 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-11 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Just finished installing 8.04. As described in
http://forums.macrumors.com/archive/index.php/t-662667.html the initial
X configuration does not produce a working X, however, with the
xorg.conf given on that page X works just fine at 1024x768 with 24bit.
So, the hardware is fine - just the xserver/driver in 9.04 seems to have
problems.

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] Re: 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-13 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
** Tags added: apple ati imac rage xorg

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 22976] Re: Live CD boots to a black screen on Blueberry G3 iMac

2009-07-13 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
I wonder whether in Intrepid this is related to the bug report I filed a
few days ago (I could not find this one then):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204 . As far as I remember, I have
already tried playing with "DefaultFbBpp" to no avail, but I'll re-
check, just to be sure.

-- 
Live CD boots to a black screen on Blueberry G3 iMac
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22976
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 22976] Re: Live CD boots to a black screen on Blueberry G3 iMac

2009-07-14 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Ok, I've re-installed 9.04PPC on my iMac and tried this again.
"DefaultFbBpp" does *not* work. If I add this statement to the screen
section, X fails with this error:

(II) FBDEV(0): using default device
(II) Running in FRAMEBUFFER Mode
(--) FBDEV(0): Depth 24, (**) framebuffer bpp 32
(==) FBDEV(0): RGB weight 888
(==) FBDEV(0): Default visual is TrueColor
(==) FBDEV(0): Using gamma correction (1.0, 1.0, 1.0)
(II) FBDEV(0): hardware: OFfb ATY,Rage12 (video memory: 600kB)
(II) FBDEV(0): checking modes against framebuffer device...
(II) FBDEV(0):  mode "1024x768" test failed
(II) FBDEV(0):  mode "800x600" test failed
(II) FBDEV(0):  mode "640x480" test failed
(II) FBDEV(0): checking modes against monitor...
(--) FBDEV(0): Virtual size is 800x600 (pitch 800)
(**) FBDEV(0):  Built-in mode "current": 100.0 MHz, 119.0 kHz, 186.0 Hz
(II) FBDEV(0): Modeline "current"x0.0  100.00  800 816 824 840  600 616 624 640 
-hsy
nc -vsync -csync (119.0 kHz)
(==) FBDEV(0): DPI set to (96, 96)
(II) Loading sub module "fb"
(II) LoadModule: "fb"
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules//libfb.so
(II) Module fb: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 1.6.0, module version = 1.0.0
ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.4
(**) FBDEV(0): using shadow framebuffer
(II) Loading sub module "shadow"
(II) LoadModule: "shadow"
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules//libshadow.so
(II) Module shadow: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 1.6.0, module version = 1.1.0
ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.4
(==) Depth 24 pixmap format is 32 bpp
(EE) FBDEV(0): FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO succeeded but modified mode
(EE) FBDEV(0): mode initialization failed

-- 
Live CD boots to a black screen on Blueberry G3 iMac
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22976
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400864] Re: 9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Result of running strace against startx

** Attachment added: "X.strace"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29203121/X.strace

-- 
9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400864] [NEW] 9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-r128

Ubuntu 9.04PPC "out-of-the-box" fresh install on an iMac DV 400MHz (G3,
slot-loader):

As the default installation results in 8bit only display (256 colours,
PseudoColor mode), I have tried to force the usage of the r128 driver
using a minimal xorg.conf (see attachments). This fails, as the r128
driver fails to detect the card (see attached Xorg.0.log). I could not
see any difference between including the "disable 'dri'" statement and
leaving it out - in the log, it looks like this statement is actually
ignored/overridden by the X server.

If I run strace against "startx" (strace -fo xserver.trace startx), I
can see that the driver accesses the AGP bus and both PCI busses (see
also attached output of "lspci -vvnn").

Under 8.04, the same driver works fine on the same hardware.

Note: This bugreport supersedes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-
video-r128/+bug/398204 !

** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-r128 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apple ati imac ppc rage xorg

-- 
9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400864] Re: 9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock

** Attachment added: "xorg.conf"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29203060/xorg.conf

-- 
9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400864] Re: 9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Logfile when trying to start X with r128 driver

** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29203097/Xorg.0.log

-- 
9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400864] Re: 9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Output of lspci -vvnn

** Attachment added: "lspci_vvnn.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29203133/lspci_vvnn.txt

-- 
9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400875] Re: 9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock

** Attachment added: "xorg.conf"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29203657/xorg.conf

-- 
9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400875] Re: 9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Logfile with error message

** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29203660/Xorg.0.log

-- 
9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400875] Re: 9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
fbset output

** Attachment added: "fbset_iv.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29203666/fbset_iv.txt

-- 
9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400875] [NEW] 9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-fbdev

Ubuntu 9.04PPC "out-of-the-box" fresh install on an iMac DV 400MHz (G3,
slot-loader):

After the install, xorg.conf stays empty. Hence, X tries to figure out
the correct settings and driver automatically. On my iMac, X fails to
detect the built-in ATI Rage 128 card (see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-
video-r128/+bug/400864 ) and subsequently tries to use the fbdev driver.
When doing so, X does start, however, only 256 colours are used (8bit
PseudoColor mode). I tried to investigate the cause for this and tried
several things:

1) Create a minimal xorg.conf (the attached version contains some
commented out lines from experimenting) with "DefaultDepth 24" in the
Screen section. This results in an error message "FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO
succeeded but modified mode" (see attached Xorg.0.log).

2) I tried the same thing using "DefaultFbBpp 32" instead of
"DefaultDepth 24". The result was the same.

3) I noticed in the log file that apparently the modes are checked
against the fbdev set-up. The default frame-buffer set-up as listed by
"fbset -i -v" is attached as well. It can be seen from this output and
Xorg.0.log that the frame buffer seems to have 8bit only and only some
600KB of video memory. Hence, I tried modifying these settings with
fbset - to no avail. I also tried adding a "VideoRam" statement to
xorg.conf - also to no avail. I was not able to change any settings.

In the end, I am still not able to run anything but 8bit graphics using
the fbdev driver. My impression is that this is due to the frame buffer
being in the wrong mode itself, but this seemingly cannot be changed
easily.

The same hardware works fine with 24bit under 8.04, using the r128
driver.

** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-fbdev (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apple ati fbdev imac ppc rage xorg

-- 
9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] Re: 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
On closer inspection, I noticed that this bug report touches separate,
most likely independent issues (X with fbdev vs. X with r128 driver).
Hence, I decided to replace this bug report with separate ones to make
it easier to focus on one single issue:

1) r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-r128/+bug/400864
2) fbdev wrongly configured in X : 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-fbdev/+bug/400875

This bug report is therefore obsolete. I shall try to close it myself -
if that fails, please close it for me.

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 398204] Re: 9.04 PPC: X only partially functional

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
This bug report has been superseeded by
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-r128/+bug/400864
and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-fbdev/+bug/400875

** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-r128 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-r128 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Thomas Ribbrock (emgaron+ubuntu)

-- 
9.04 PPC: X only partially functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400875] Re: 9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
For completeness: dmesg

** Attachment added: "dmesg"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29204401/dmesg

-- 
9.04 PPC: fbdev wrongly configured in X
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 400864] Re: 9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
For completeness: dmesg

** Attachment added: "dmesg"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29204400/dmesg

-- 
9.04 PPC: r128 does not detect ATI Rage 128 on G3 iMac
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   3   4   >