[Bug 1090956]
The keyboard is also not recognized when booted to runlevel 3. This would seem to confirm that this is indeed a kernel bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090956 Title: Wireless keyboard not properly configured in Vizio CA24-01 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evdev/+bug/1090956/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1090956] Re: Wireless keyboard not properly configured
Just posting here to say that this is still a bug in 13.04 beta. Seeing as we are this close to release date, I think it is safe to assume that this bug will still be present after 13.04 goes live. ** Summary changed: - Wireless keyboard not properly configured + Wireless keyboard not properly configured in Vizio CA24-01 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090956 Title: Wireless keyboard not properly configured in Vizio CA24-01 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1090956/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1090956] Re: Wireless keyboard not properly configured in Vizio CA24-01
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #63530 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63530 ** Also affects: evdev via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63530 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090956 Title: Wireless keyboard not properly configured in Vizio CA24-01 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evdev/+bug/1090956/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1090956] Re: Wireless keyboard not properly configured
I'm not following the reasoning here, Fabio? Does that mean that since the bug is not ubuntu-specific, it should not be listed as affecting that distro? It was my understanding that since it affected BOTH distros, I'd mark it as affecting _both of them_... I'm confused as to why this is invalid, but just wondering where do I go from here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090956 Title: Wireless keyboard not properly configured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1090956/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1090956] Re: Wireless keyboard not properly configured
** Attachment added: proc.bus.input.devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1090956/+attachment/3461481/+files/proc.bus.input.devices ** Also affects: fedora Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: kernel-bug -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090956 Title: Wireless keyboard not properly configured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1090956/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705353] Re: usb-creator doesn't accept iso file
Is there a reason why usb-creator is limited to only create Ubuntu images as opposed to images from ANY random iso file? There are not really a bunch of alternatives to this on Ubuntu, and forcing someone to choose only between Debian/Ubuntu specifications for the possible isos the program will accept is somewhat 'evil' in my opinion... ** Changed in: usb-creator (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705353 Title: usb-creator doesn't accept iso file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/705353/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705353] Re: usb-creator doesn't accept iso file
For what it's worth, the error outputed to the Terminal if an unrecognized iso is selected is now: isoinfo: Unable to find Joliet SVD There's quite a few comments about this on Google. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705353 Title: usb-creator doesn't accept iso file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/705353/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 948257] Re: Doesn't tell what's wrong when fails to add an ISO image
** Changed in: usb-creator (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948257 Title: Doesn't tell what's wrong when fails to add an ISO image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/948257/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 962279] Re: I am not able to view the calendar or create google calendar items.
A quick me too here to say this is still happening in 12.04 :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/962279 Title: I am not able to view the calendar or create google calendar items. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/962279/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 544436] Re: In applications [Deluge, Guayadeque] menu bar is missing
a fix for this seems to be issuing the command: $export UBUNTU_MENUPROXY=0 before loading the app, in a terminal. source: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/12/missing-menus-in-ubuntu-apps-try-this Seems to still affect Guayadeque in Ubuntu Precise. DISCLAIMER: If it matters, I am currently on Gnome-shell seeing this problem, and haven't yet confirmed if the behavior is the same in Unity - although I don't particularly see any reason why it *should* differ... ** Changed in: light-themes (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544436 Title: In applications [Deluge,Guayadeque] menu bar is missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/544436/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 544436] Re: In applications [Deluge, Guayadeque] menu bar is missing
Actually, I think I am wrong here. This is obviously due to Unity's Global Menu behaviour, I suspect... So the question is, is there a reason why Unity's settings are messing with Gnome-shell? And why does it only affect some -read a few- applications, and not (most) others? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544436 Title: In applications [Deluge,Guayadeque] menu bar is missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/544436/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 881512] Re: dash transparency sometimes shows desktop instead of underlying window
I'm not quite sure that is the problem, Sebastien. I was under the impression that my videocard was at least powerful enough to handle this sort of rendering. Maybe I am wrong? I wonder if someone else with my graphics card is experiencing the same issue, or maybe someone with a different card as well, to help further the discussion. As a reminder to all, my graphics card is: tiede@laptop:~$ lspci -vvnn |grep Graphics 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a42] (rev 07) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) 00:02.1 Display controller [0380]: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a43] (rev 07) tiede@laptop:~$ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881512 Title: dash transparency sometimes shows desktop instead of underlying window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/881512/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886120] [NEW] unity leaves trails when moving window if shaded
Public bug reported: When moving a shaded window, a trail is left behind the operation completes. Furthermore, even when the window is shaded, a thin rectangular box remains delimiting where the window was before. It does not seem to affect operational behavior, however, so this is a very low priority bug. Nonetheless, I was unable to find a prior bug report for that particular instance on LP, so filling that void... See attached screenshot for clarification. ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886120 Title: unity leaves trails when moving window if shaded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/886120/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886120] Re: unity leaves trails when moving window if shaded
** Attachment added: moving a shaded window leaves trails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886120/+attachment/2585204/+files/Screenshot%20at%202011-11-04%2009%3A36%3A21.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886120 Title: unity leaves trails when moving window if shaded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/886120/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886120] Re: unity leaves trails when moving window if shaded
** Attachment added: box left behind after shading a window https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/886120/+attachment/2585205/+files/Screenshot%20at%202011-11-04%2009%3A40%3A45.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886120 Title: unity leaves trails when moving window if shaded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/886120/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886120] Re: unity leaves trails when moving window if shaded
** Also affects: unity Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886120 Title: unity leaves trails when moving window if shaded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/886120/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 706458] Re: Clicking on open application in unity should minimize that application
After comment #31, I believe this should be reinstated as a bug. Not just an opinion. Why? Not only does it break with users' expectations, it can actually be counter-productive, and impractical. I should not have to fear minimizing an application while on a touch-screen device! There is no excuse for having the user worry about accidentally closing a window whenever they are trying to minimize it, no matter how careful they try to be, just because. Things should not be this way. No matter how you look at it. This is WRONG. If what we are looking for is productivity above all, than that behavior flies in the face of what we aim to achieve. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706458 Title: Clicking on open application in unity should minimize that application To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/706458/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 757886] Re: No button to clean recent used files
This bug is marked as incomplete, but no further request for information has been asked. Reassigning this bug as Confirmed until such demands are clearly expressed, so we may satisfy them. ** Changed in: unity Status: Incomplete = Confirmed ** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/757886 Title: No button to clean recent used files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/757886/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 832004] Re: Alt Tab behavior is needlessly inconsistent and difficult
Confused as to why Didier Roche marked this as incomplete... No further information is requested (!?!)... Clarify? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832004 Title: Alt Tab behavior is needlessly inconsistent and difficult To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/832004/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 881463] [NEW] highlight in alt-tab can be confusing
Public bug reported: When using alt-tab to switch between windows, it may lead to a situation where the user doesn't know which tab is currently selected, because there are many different highlights depending on WHICH application is opened, not their states. This can lead to a condition where the user expects an application to be in focus when it might not be true. See attached screenshot for clarification Observe that a quick glance of the Terminal Icon could lead one to interpret it as having focus. Only the title being placed underneath the window gives it away. But when a user is fast-switching to another window, they rely more on quick visual clues than complete analysis of everything presented to them. Also, why is eog's icon highlighted in YELLOW(!) here? ** Affects: unity Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: alt-tab highlight highlighting -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881463 Title: highlight in alt-tab can be confusing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/881463/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 881463] Re: highlight in alt-tab can be confusing
** Attachment added: This attachment should clarify the issue being presented in the bug report https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881463/+attachment/2571805/+files/example.png ** Also affects: unity Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: - When using alt-tab to switch between windows, it may lead to a situation where the user doesn't know which tab is currently selected, because there are many different highlights depending on WHICH application is opened, not there states. + When using alt-tab to switch between windows, it may lead to a situation where the user doesn't know which tab is currently selected, because there are many different highlights depending on WHICH application is opened, not their states. This can lead to a condition where the user expects an application to be in focus when it might not be true. See attached screenshot for clarification Observe that a quick glance of the Terminal Icon could lead one to interpret it as having focus. Only the title being placed underneath the window gives it away. But when a user is fast-switching to another window, they rely more on quick visual clues than complete analysis of everything presented to them. Also, why is eog's icon highlighted in YELLOW(!) here? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881463 Title: highlight in alt-tab can be confusing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/881463/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 840954] Re: Panel appearance change is confusing and adds no information
Is there a reason why this is marked incomplete? It's my understanding that if something is marked incomplete there should be a request for more info, so we can make it complete. Simply marking an entry as incomplete without specifying what's missing defeats the purpose of that status. Other status changes exist to reflect what the actual problem is. Reopening this as Confirmed ** Changed in: unity Status: Incomplete = Confirmed ** Changed in: unity Status: Confirmed = Opinion ** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840954 Title: Panel appearance change is confusing and adds no information To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/840954/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 801351] Re: Cannot summon dash when Firefox is in fullscreen
Just commenting that this happens not just with firefox and chrome, but with all applications that have a fullscreen option with F11. However, I also observed that while the dash itself is not summoned, the current window loses focus, and it would appear that keystrokes are sent elsewhere as well. This made me suspect that maybe the dash was being summoned in the background. However, trying to blindly open an app by tapping it's name after pressing ALT+F2 results in nothing at all... So my theory is not completely right. So I decided to see what is happening behind the full screen window, and set it to a low transparency in compiz. I can confirm now that the dash is indeed summoned, but it remains in the background. Keystrokes do not go for it neither, so I am not sure what window has focus in that situation... ** Summary changed: - Cannot summon dash when Firefox is in fullscreen + Dash remains in background when launched if an application is in fullscreen mode -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801351 Title: Dash remains in background when launched if an application is in fullscreen mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/801351/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 801351] Re: Cannot summon dash when Firefox is in fullscreen
I'm not sure how else to explain it. So I made a video. I hope it helps: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cpm-c1bes8 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801351 Title: Cannot summon dash when Firefox is in fullscreen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/801351/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 801351] [NEW] Cannot summon dash when Firefox is in fullscreen
Public bug reported: If one switches firefox to full screen mode, mouse dwelling on the leftmost corner of the screen, Alt+F2 and Super all fail to show the unity dash board/bar. Switching firefox back to windowed mode fixes the issue. Expected behavior: The dash should be able to be summoned regardless of a particular window's state. Reproducible:100% using: Linux Laptop 2.6.37-02063706-generic #201103281005 SMP Mon Mar 28 10:10:47 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux (uname -a output) The 2.37 kernel is there to workaround the overheating bug currently affecting kernels 2.38+ However, the same bug shows up if I switch to those later kernels. First time around, this bug was reported without using apport. Fixing this here. Wish i could delete the other one... ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: unity 3.8.14-0ubuntu1~natty1 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-02063706-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,mousepoll,vpswitch,regex,animation,snap,expo,move,compiztoolbox,place,grid,imgpng,gnomecompat,wall,ezoom,workarounds,staticswitcher,resize,fade,unitymtgrabhandles,scale,session,unityshell] CompositorRunning: compiz DRM.card0.DP.1: status: disconnected enabled: disabled dpms: Off modes: edid-base64: DRM.card0.DP.2: status: disconnected enabled: disabled dpms: Off modes: edid-base64: DRM.card0.HDMI.A.1: status: disconnected enabled: disabled dpms: Off modes: edid-base64: DRM.card0.LVDS.1: status: connected enabled: enabled dpms: On modes: 1366x768 edid-base64: AP///wAw5OABAAASAQOAIhN4Ck6FnltVlSYaUFQBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBPhxWoFAAFjAwIDUAWMIQAAAZ/gBMRyBEaXNwbGF5CiAg/ABMUDE1NldIMi1UTEQxAFQ= DRM.card0.VGA.1: status: disconnected enabled: disabled dpms: Off modes: edid-base64: Date: Thu Jun 23 17:07:53 2011 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: natty DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: bcmwl, 5.100.82.38+bdcom, 2.6.38-8-generic, x86_64: installed bcmwl, 5.100.82.38+bdcom, 2.6.37-02063706-generic, x86_64: installed GraphicsCard: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a42] (rev 07) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:3072] Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:3072] InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110427.1) InstallationMedia_: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110427.1) InstallationMedia__: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110427.1) MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP ProBook 4510s ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.37-02063706-generic root=UUID=dd8e5aa2-0be4-41d9-8750-753932d0b089 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 Renderer: Unknown SourcePackage: unity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 04/03/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.bios.version: 68PZI Ver. F.03 dmi.board.name: 3072 dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.board.version: KBC Version 24.0B dmi.chassis.asset.tag: CNU919271S dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvr68PZIVer.F.03:bd04/03/2009:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPProBook4510s:pvrF.03:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn3072:rvrKBCVersion24.0B:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvr: dmi.product.name: HP ProBook 4510s dmi.product.version: F.03 dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.4+bzr20110606-0ubuntu1~natty1 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs 20090808ubuntu13 version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.23-1ubuntu6 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 7.10.2-0ubuntu2 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 7.10.2-0ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg: xserver-xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu3 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.14.0-0ubuntu4 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu7.1 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:0.0.16+git20110107+b795ca6e-0ubuntu7 ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug compiz-0.9 natty running-unity ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801351 Title: Cannot summon dash when Firefox is in fullscreen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/801351/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 801351] Re: Cannot summon dash when Firefox is in fullscreen
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801351 Title: Cannot summon dash when Firefox is in fullscreen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/801351/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 797790] [NEW] Gnome control center should depend on menu
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-control-center Within gnome-control-center, clicking on the Hardware lister does nothing. Launching gnome-control-center from the terminal, we see that the problem is because it couldn't find su-to-root which is available in the package menu. Therefore, it would make sense if it was to require that package to be installed. ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797790 Title: Gnome control center should depend on menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/797790/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 797790] Re: Gnome control center should depend on menu
** Attachment added: gcc.lshw-gtk.err https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797790/+attachment/2170086/+files/gcc.lshw-gtk.err ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-control-center Within gnome-control-center, clicking on the Hardware lister does nothing. Launching gnome-control-center from the terminal, we see that the problem is because it couldn't find su-to-root which is available in the package menu. - Therefore, it would make sense if it was to require that package be installed. + Therefore, it would make sense if it was to require that package to be installed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797790 Title: Gnome control center should depend on menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/797790/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 774721] [NEW] package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 139
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper During upgrade from maverick to natty. Was not using flash or even web browsing at the time. So no steps to reproduce are currently available. Unless this is an upgrade-related bug? ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-28.50-generic 2.6.35.11 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun May 1 04:45:04 2011 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 139 SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper Title: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 139 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-30 (0 days ago) ** Affects: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774721 Title: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 139 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 774721] Re: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 139
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774721 Title: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 139 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 774721] Re: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 139
Apparently, it's segfaulting somewhere: tiede@upgrading :~$ sudo dpkg --configure -a Paramétrage de nspluginwrapper (1.2.2-0ubuntu9) ... plugin dirs: :/var/lib/flashplugin-installer/ Auto-update plugins from /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins Looking for plugins in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins Segmentation fault dpkg : erreur de traitement de nspluginwrapper (--configure) : le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 139 dpkg : des problèmes de dépendances empêchent la configuration de flashplugin-installer : flashplugin-installer dépend de nspluginwrapper (= 0.9.91.4-2ubuntu1) ; cependant : Le paquet nspluginwrapper n'est pas encore configuré. dpkg : erreur de traitement de flashplugin-installer (--configure) : problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré dpkg : des problèmes de dépendances empêchent la configuration de flashplugin-nonfree : flashplugin-nonfree dépend de flashplugin-installer ; cependant : Le paquet flashplugin-installer n'est pas encore configuré. dpkg : erreur de traitement de flashplugin-nonfree (--configure) : problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré dpkg : des problèmes de dépendances empêchent la configuration de acroread : acroread dépend de nspluginwrapper ; cependant : Le paquet nspluginwrapper n'est pas encore configuré. dpkg : erreur de traitement de acroread (--configure) : problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré Des erreurs ont été rencontrées pendant l'exécution : nspluginwrapper flashplugin-installer flashplugin-nonfree acroread I apologize, my pc is in french... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774721 Title: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 139 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 774748] Re: package nspluginwrapper (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 134
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 773020 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773020 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 773020 segfault in post-install script * You can subscribe to bug 773020 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/773020/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774748 Title: package nspluginwrapper (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 134 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 774721] Re: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 139
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 773020 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773020 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 773020 segfault in post-install script * You can subscribe to bug 773020 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/773020/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774721 Title: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 139 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 774724] Re: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 139
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 773020 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773020 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 773020 segfault in post-install script * You can subscribe to bug 773020 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/773020/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774724 Title: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 139 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 774539] Re: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 773020 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773020 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 773020 segfault in post-install script * You can subscribe to bug 773020 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/773020/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774539 Title: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 774153] Re: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 773020 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773020 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 773020 segfault in post-install script * You can subscribe to bug 773020 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/773020/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774153 Title: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 774481] Re: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 773020 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773020 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 773020 segfault in post-install script * You can subscribe to bug 773020 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/773020/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774481 Title: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 774151] Re: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 773020 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773020 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 773020 nspluginwrapper segfaults in post-install script * You can subscribe to bug 773020 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/773020/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774151 Title: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773020] Re: nspluginwrapper segfaults in post-install script
just to point it's not just upgrades. Purging and reinstalling it results in the same behavior: (sorry example is in french) tiede@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get purge nspluginwrapper [sudo] password for tiede: Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances Lecture des informations d'état... Fait Le paquet nspluginwrapper n'est pas installé, et ne peut donc être supprimé 0 mis à jour, 0 nouvellement installés, 0 à enlever et 0 non mis à jour. tiede@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get install nspluginwrapper Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances Lecture des informations d'état... Fait Les NOUVEAUX paquets suivants seront installés : nspluginwrapper 0 mis à jour, 1 nouvellement installés, 0 à enlever et 0 non mis à jour. Il est nécessaire de prendre 0 o/175 ko dans les archives. Après cette opération, 582 ko d'espace disque supplémentaires seront utilisés. Sélection du paquet nspluginwrapper précédemment désélectionné. (Lecture de la base de données... 472703 fichiers et répertoires déjà installés.) Dépaquetage de nspluginwrapper (à partir de .../nspluginwrapper_1.2.2-0ubuntu9_amd64.deb) ... Traitement des actions différées (« triggers ») pour « man-db »... Paramétrage de nspluginwrapper (1.2.2-0ubuntu9) ... plugin dirs: Auto-update plugins from /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins Looking for plugins in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins Segmentation fault dpkg : erreur de traitement de nspluginwrapper (--configure) : le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 139 Des erreurs ont été rencontrées pendant l'exécution : nspluginwrapper E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) tiede@ubuntu:~$ ** Summary changed: - segfault in post-install script + nspluginwrapper segfaults in post-install script -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773020 Title: nspluginwrapper segfaults in post-install script -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773899] Re: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 773020 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773020 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 773020 nspluginwrapper segfaults in post-install script * You can subscribe to bug 773020 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/773020/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773899 Title: package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773020] Re: nspluginwrapper segfaults in post-install script
Workaround for those affected by this issue: There seems to be a conflict with the Google Talk Plugin, causing this behavior. To resolve the issue, this should work sudo apt-get purge google-talkplugin at the end, nspluginwrapper will be automatically configured. **workaround taken from bug#773899, which is a duplicate report of this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773020 Title: nspluginwrapper segfaults in post-install script -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 676153] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
** Visibility changed to: Public -- npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 435216] Re: empathy crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
I am not sure if the fix is there... I noticed this bug today, by clicking on the notification area applet while using a chat window. Apparently, the indicator applet was warning me about a new IM message, which in itself was strange, since I had the IM window focused, and it is my understanding that this would make the messages not new anymore... Thinking maybe I must have missed something, I clicked on the applet, selected the conversation (which was already opened, mind you), and banm! crash. I have not yet been able to reproduce it. Current empathy version: 2.30.2 -- empathy crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435216 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 562057] Re: telepathy-butterfly crashed with ValueError in __parse_command()
I will add that information here at once! The same thing happened to me while using a wireless network requiring authentication after connecting... NOTE: ===personal email adresses where removed=== these where replaced with the nugget ***private*** ** Attachment added: debug_info.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53489082/debug_info.txt ** Changed in: telepathy-butterfly (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- telepathy-butterfly crashed with ValueError in __parse_command() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562057 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 562057] Re: telepathy-butterfly crashed with ValueError in __parse_command()
with information now added, I am changing the status to New again, as per Launchpad rules... -- telepathy-butterfly crashed with ValueError in __parse_command() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562057 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 445074] Re: telepathy-butterfly crashed with KeyError in parse()
Hmmm... Seeing as this affecting me now, I don't think this should be invalid... Problem is, all information I have on the crash is through apport, and I don't even know how to reproduce it; It happened while I was doing something else, totally unrelated to telepathy... It does happen from time to time though, so if I see a pattern in there, I will surely update this report. For now, I am (tentatively) resetting the status to New. If I don't have any further info in a week or two, I will fix my mess... :) ** Changed in: telepathy-butterfly (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- telepathy-butterfly crashed with KeyError in parse() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445074 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 606510] Re: pidgin_control.py crashed with SIGSEGV in PyObject_SetAttrString()
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52052374/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52052375/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52052376/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52052377/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52052378/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52052379/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52052380/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52052381/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- pidgin_control.py crashed with SIGSEGV in PyObject_SetAttrString() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606510 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 606510] Re: pidgin_control.py crashed with SIGSEGV in PyObject_SetAttrString()
looking at the debugging info, I can tell this is not related to the icon theme change, so please disregard that bit... -- pidgin_control.py crashed with SIGSEGV in PyObject_SetAttrString() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606510 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 260469] Re: Unwanted universal access icon appears in sys-tray, cannot be removed
This is not a bug per se. (at least the fact that it is there isn't...) What needs to be done is make it easier to remove it, or state how to do it more clearly. But for anyone that needs to remove this icon, all you need to do is go to: System-Preferences-Keyboard, go to the Accessibility tab and untick the first option (Accessibility features can be toggled with keyboard shortcut). What we need is an easier (i.e more user-friendly/intuitive) way of making this. This would then be more of a wishlist item than a bug, in my opinion. -- Unwanted universal access icon appears in sys-tray, cannot be removed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260469 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579046] Re: [gm45] emerald hangs after lucid upgrade
Found a workaround that makes it apparent that this bug is related to gnome-appearance-properties... ** Package changed: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) = gnome-control- center (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel Status: New = Confirmed -- [gm45] emerald hangs after lucid upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579046] Re: [gm45] emerald hangs after lucid upgrade
sorry i messed up all the tagging and whatnots, I just learned (right now) how to add another package to a bug report... Did not mean to change it thusly... Anyways, as I said a moment ago, I have found a workaround that lets me think that the bug is at least partly related with gnome-appearance- properties. I was able to make everything work normally (i.e emerald works and compiz effects work) albeit temporarily, by doing this. 1. Open up a terminal 2. Type emerald ---nothing happens as emerald just hangs. 3. kill metacity (killall metacity in another terminal would work fine). 4. Launch gnome-appearance-properties (System-Preferences-Appearance) 5. Select the Effects tab and click on Extra. --- a window pops informing that it is looking for drivers. A short while later, the desktop flickers and everything is normal, with emerald happily humming. Notes: The previous workaround will NOT work if emerald is not hanging in the background. As if Appearances cannot launch it on its own. The previous workaround will NOT work if metacity composite is enabled. (but I believe this is already a known bug)... Finally, the workaround is only temporary, as it does not endure after the session is closed. Meaning it must be done each time we log in. (currently, I am using Alt+F2 to run the commands instead of a terminal, so i don't have to worry about closing anything.) On another note, this seems to be settings-specific, as another account on the same computer seems to work with metacity just fine without using the aforementioned workaround. -- [gm45] emerald hangs after lucid upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579046] Re: emerald hangs after lucid upgrade
** Tags added: regression-potential -- emerald hangs after lucid upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579046] [NEW] emerald hangs after lucid upgrade
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel This bug is also manifested in other ways, but this is by far the most noticeable. It probably is not a DRI issue, since update5 fixed the disabled DRI from update3. I am not quite sure what exactly is wrong, but ever since I upgraded from Karmic to Lucid, desktop effects took a dive, and the system reverted to using metacity. (in other words, this could be seen as a regression, since it worked fine it Karmic) compiz --replace flickers for about half a second and tries to do something, but I am left with no window borders, and then the screen reverts back to metacity about another half-second or so later. This is what pointed me to check directly with emerald. emerald --replace does not do anything, it just hangs there. No output, no information whatsoever, no trace of anything in the logs. Running emerald by itself with no other WM already running results in the same behavior, so I can't blame metacity for this. Arguably, this could also be a bug against emerald, since it does not do anything but that's a judgment I don't feel qualified to make. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.9.1-3ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: amd64 CheckboxSubmission: 9dd458ed6872a10e9468e88d81f07dba CheckboxSystem: 7b2e8f62efb0ed074fb65a9cb4a3d5c0 Date: Tue May 11 19:22:19 2010 DkmsStatus: bcmwl, 5.60.48.36+bdcom, 2.6.32-21-generic, x86_64: built bcmwl, 5.60.48.36+bdcom, 2.6.32-22-generic, x86_64: installed bcmwl, 5.60.48.36+bdcom, 2.6.31-21-generic, x86_64: built MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP ProBook 4510s ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=9859a7f0-ce42-4079-bafa-e8a62bebb5aa ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=fr_FR:fr:en_GB:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=fr_FR.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-intel dmi.bios.date: 04/03/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.bios.version: 68PZI Ver. F.03 dmi.board.name: 3072 dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.board.version: KBC Version 24.0B dmi.chassis.asset.tag: CNU919271S dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvr68PZIVer.F.03:bd04/03/2009:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPProBook4510s:pvrF.03:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn3072:rvrKBCVersion24.0B:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvr: dmi.product.name: HP ProBook 4510s dmi.product.version: F.03 dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard system: distro: Ubuntu codename: lucid architecture: x86_64 kernel: 2.6.32-22-generic ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug emerald hang lucid regression -- emerald hangs after lucid upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579046] Re: emerald hangs after lucid upgrade
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300804/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300805/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300806/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: GdmLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300807/GdmLog.txt ** Attachment added: GdmLog1.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300808/GdmLog1.txt ** Attachment added: GdmLog2.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300809/GdmLog2.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300810/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300811/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: PciDisplay.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300812/PciDisplay.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300813/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300814/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300815/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300816/RelatedPackageVersions.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300817/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300818/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgConf.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300819/XorgConf.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300820/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300821/XorgLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300822/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: glxinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300823/glxinfo.txt ** Attachment added: monitors.xml.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300824/monitors.xml.txt ** Attachment added: setxkbmap.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300825/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300826/xdpyinfo.txt ** Attachment added: xkbcomp.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48300827/xkbcomp.txt -- emerald hangs after lucid upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 575601] Re: gwibber crashed with ValueError in render()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 546392 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546392 ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47847577/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47847578/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47847579/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Traceback.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47847580/Traceback.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- gwibber crashed with ValueError in render() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575601 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 43857] Re: wifi-radar: IOError exit when run aas normal user
I thought this was a fixed issue... I am afraid it is back again.
wifi-radar crashed while i was in user mode and forgot to sudo to it:
u...@ubuntu:~$ wifi-radar
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/sbin/wifi-radar, line 3392, in module
fileLogHandler =
logging.handlers.RotatingFileHandler(confFile.get_opt('DEFAULT.logfile'),
maxBytes=64*1024, backupCount=5)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/logging/handlers.py, line 107, in __init__
BaseRotatingHandler.__init__(self, filename, mode, encoding, delay)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/logging/handlers.py, line 59, in __init__
logging.FileHandler.__init__(self, filename, mode, encoding, delay)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/logging/__init__.py, line 819, in __init__
StreamHandler.__init__(self, self._open())
File /usr/lib/python2.6/logging/__init__.py, line 838, in _open
stream = open(self.baseFilename, self.mode)
IOError: [Errno 13] Permission non accordée: '/var/log/wifi-radar.log'
NOTE:Permission non accordée is french for Access denied.
--
wifi-radar: IOError exit when run aas normal user
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43857
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278745] Re: telepathy-butterfly crashed with gaierror in query()
I am reopening this bug as it seems more people are willing to supply the missing information. I am not sure if Pedro V. is asking this because of known updates within the version of telepathy on the ppa, but just to be on the safe side, someone please try the same with the telepathy version from the team ppa located at https://edge.launchpad.net/~telepathy/+archive/ppa ** Changed in: pymsn (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- telepathy-butterfly crashed with gaierror in query() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278745 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 482705] Re: After Update from 9.04 to 9.1 0 journaux système non trouvés
Over 4 months, and nothing? Sheesh! This is a mere technical bug, nothing too serious... why is nothing said about it? Is is even going to be fixed in lucid? -- After Update from 9.04 to 9.10 journaux système non trouvés https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482705 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 513920] Re: Gnome Screensaver does not fade out when unlocking
I am not an Average user, I suppose, but this bug IS happening on a pretty much vanilla installation, with changes unrelated to gnome-screensaver. Even the mention of compiz is to help identify the problem, and does not introduce it... I do believe a single developer stumbling upon this might be readily able to fix it in a few hours, so I am volunteering it as a Paper Cut. If it is rather more complicated than I originally thought, I do apologize... ** Also affects: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Gnome Screensaver does not fade out when unlocking https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 513920] [NEW] Gnome Screensaver does not fade out when unlocking
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-screensaver Gnome screensaver does not always fade out when coming back to the desktop. By this I mean, if gnome-screensaver is running, and i enter my password, it is accepted, but I don't get to see the desktop. setting general transparency to less than 95% (using compiz), I can see that all activities are still being recorded underneath the screensaver, and I can kill it by using Alt+F2 and then typing killall gnome-screensaver. Otherwise, whatever screensaver was being displayed on the screen still remains there, until the computer shutdown. Trying to refresh the image by switching to a terminal (Ctrl+Alt+F1) and then back to X (Ctrl+Atl+F7) does NOT help. If I set cube in compiz, and unroll the desktop, then I can see that ONLY the desktop is affected, but the skydome is normal/clear. Also, although the mouse does work (somewhat - edges don't actually activate anymore at that time) the cursor is not seen, and mouse position is only implied by it's consequences (i.e, right-clicking, opening a menu, hovering over an interactive area,...) This most often happen when resuming from stand-by, but not always then. However, it seems that if it happens once, it keeps happening until the computer is rebooted. This is happening on a HP ProBook 4510s, running Karmic with all the latest updates installed. lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 9.10 Release:9.10 apt-cache policy gnome-screensaver gnome-screensaver: Installé : 2.28.0-0ubuntu3.3 Candidat : 2.28.0-0ubuntu3.3 Table de version : *** 2.28.0-0ubuntu3.3 0 500 http://ftp.usf.edu karmic-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.28.0-0ubuntu3.1 0 500 http://ftp.usf.edu karmic-security/main Packages 2.28.0-0ubuntu3 0 500 http://ftp.usf.edu karmic/main Packages ** Affects: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Gnome Screensaver does not fade out when unlocking https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 482705] Re: After Update from 9.04 to 9.1 0 journaux système non trouvés
It is now about two months since this bug report came out... anyone has an idea what to do to fix it? I want to point out that it is my understanding that all of us affected users are using the French version of Ubuntu. Could the change in local be causing this. I am asking because I know of at least one instance where a bug is introduced by a locale change: PyOpenGL crashes when the local is not English... -- After Update from 9.04 to 9.10 journaux système non trouvés https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482705 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 482705] Re: After Update from 9.04 to 9.1 0 journaux système non trouvés
I forgot to mention, is there a reason why this is marked incomplete? what exactly is missing in this bug report? -- After Update from 9.04 to 9.10 journaux système non trouvés https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482705 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 490463] Re: PyOpenGL fails to load correctly when locale is not English
I want to mark this as anything else than New undecided, but I have no input from anyone else. If you use OpenGL and you have your computer setup in two different language modes, would you mind testing it out and report if it happens to you as well, whosoever reads this. I don't want to make this an important issue if I am the only one affected, no matter how annoying it is for me... :) -- PyOpenGL fails to load correctly when locale is not English https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 490463] [NEW] PyOpenGL fails to load correctly when locale is not English
Public bug reported: When PyOpenGL is run in Ubuntu with the language set to French(France), it crashes when loading GL The same exact code works perfectly fine if the language is changed to English(USA) See attached. ** Affects: pyopengl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- PyOpenGL fails to load correctly when locale is not English https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 490463] Re: PyOpenGL fails to load correctly when locale is not English
** Attachment added: The oputput says it all. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36265016/open.gl -- PyOpenGL fails to load correctly when locale is not English https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 490463] Re: PyOpenGL fails to load correctly when locale is not English
Oops, I didn't think the uploader would change the file type according to extension... Uploading again! Again, the only thing I am doing is: from OpenGL import GL ** Attachment added: The output is Copy/Paste straight from PyCrust http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36265069/pyopengl.debug -- PyOpenGL fails to load correctly when locale is not English https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 452000] Re: kerneloops stop runlevel arguments (0 1 6) do not match LSB Default-Stop values (1)
I am noticing the same problem on Karmic too, after a regular upgrade. What does it mean? Paramétrage de kerneloops-daemon (0.12+git20090217-1ubuntu4.1) ... Installation de la nouvelle version du fichier de configuration /etc/init.d/kerneloops ... update-rc.d: warning: kerneloops stop runlevel arguments (0 1 6) do not match LSB Default-Stop values (1) should I be worried? -- kerneloops stop runlevel arguments (0 1 6) do not match LSB Default-Stop values (1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452000 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 452000] Re: kerneloops stop runlevel arguments (0 1 6) do not match LSB Default-Stop values (1)
Forgot to add that this is on the 64-bit of ubuntu, so this pretty much means this is arch independent... ** Changed in: kerneloops (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- kerneloops stop runlevel arguments (0 1 6) do not match LSB Default-Stop values (1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452000 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367484] Re: usb storage(LG KU380) didn't mount automatically
The same exact bug is noticed here too. I've looked everywhere for a workaround, and am currently following a lead on disabling ehci_hcd (or ohci_hcd or even uhci_hcd, depending on the case) and loading it manually. will update here if it turns out to be good and reliable. Either case, i think it's safe to now mark this as confirmed... ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Confirmed -- usb storage(LG KU380) didn't mount automatically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367484 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367484] Re: usb storage(LG KU380) didn't mount automatically
This bug should be filed against usb-storage, since it's the crashing module (as noted in the other report...) maybe on should be the duplicate of the other? output of dmesg after unloading/reloading the culprit driver (sudo rmmod usb_storage sudo modprobe usb-storage): m...@tuxed:~$ dmesg [15895.587509] Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... [15895.587765] [ cut here ] [15895.587772] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/fs/proc/generic.c:551 proc_register+0x10b/0x1e0() [15895.587778] proc_dir_entry 'scsi/usb-storage' already registered [15895.587783] Modules linked in: usb_storage(+) ppp_deflate zlib_deflate bsd_comp ppp_async crc_ccitt cdc_acm binfmt_misc ppdev input_polldev video output nls_iso8859_1 nls_cp437 vfat fat sisfb lp parport joydev snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi snd_rawmidi snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_timer snd_seq_device sis_agp pcmcia psmouse snd soundcore amd64_agp k8temp shpchp serio_raw i2c_sis96x snd_page_alloc led_class agpgart ndiswrapper yenta_socket rsrc_nonstatic pcmcia_core pcspkr sis900 mii vesafb fbcon tileblit font bitblit softcursor [last unloaded: usb_storage] [15895.587926] Pid: 12832, comm: modprobe Tainted: PW 2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu [15895.587932] Call Trace: [15895.587944] [c0139ab0] warn_slowpath+0x60/0x80 [15895.587956] [c02c66c2] ? idr_get_empty_slot+0xe2/0x270 [15895.587964] [c02c695f] ? ida_get_new_above+0x10f/0x1c0 [15895.587972] [c02c695f] ? ida_get_new_above+0x10f/0x1c0 [15895.587979] [c02c6b3d] ? idr_pre_get+0x3d/0x70 [15895.587988] [c01ff7fb] proc_register+0x10b/0x1e0 [15895.587997] [c01ffaa3] proc_mkdir_mode+0x33/0x50 [15895.588043] [c01ffacf] proc_mkdir+0xf/0x20 [15895.588053] [c0370e56] scsi_proc_hostdir_add+0x46/0x80 [15895.588061] [c0365108] scsi_host_alloc+0x2b8/0x2d0 [15895.588069] [c0368a90] ? scsi_error_handler+0x0/0x120 [15895.588087] [f80f51c7] storage_probe+0x47/0x860 [usb_storage] [15895.588097] [c020c036] ? sysfs_addrm_finish+0x36/0xf0 [15895.588104] [c020b7e3] ? sysfs_add_one+0x13/0x50 [15895.588112] [c020b87b] ? sysfs_addrm_start+0x5b/0xa0 [15895.588119] [c0501a4b] ? mutex_lock+0xb/0x20 [15895.588127] [c03bb2f4] ? usb_autopm_do_device+0x64/0xf0 [15895.588139] [c03bb942] usb_probe_interface+0xa2/0x130 [15895.588147] [c020c692] ? sysfs_create_link+0x12/0x20 [15895.588161] [c034f096] really_probe+0xe6/0x180 [15895.588168] [c03bada1] ? usb_match_id+0x41/0x60 [15895.588184] [c034f16e] driver_probe_device+0x3e/0x50 [15895.588195] [c034f209] __driver_attach+0x89/0x90 [15895.588205] [c034e943] bus_for_each_dev+0x53/0x80 [15895.588215] [c034eec9] driver_attach+0x19/0x20 [15895.588222] [c034f180] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0x90 [15895.588228] [c034e317] bus_add_driver+0x1c7/0x240 [15895.588247] [c034f3a9] driver_register+0x69/0x140 [15895.588258] [c02c0020] ? as_init_queue+0x60/0xd0 [15895.588275] [c03bbc0c] usb_register_driver+0x7c/0x100 [15895.588282] [c020b280] ? sysfs_ilookup_test+0x0/0x20 [15895.588294] [f8024000] ? usb_stor_init+0x0/0x4d [usb_storage] [15895.588308] [f8024000] ? usb_stor_init+0x0/0x4d [usb_storage] [15895.588320] [f8024027] usb_stor_init+0x27/0x4d [usb_storage] [15895.588330] [c010111e] _stext+0x2e/0x170 [15895.588340] [c01a908c] ? __vunmap+0x9c/0xe0 [15895.588347] [c01a908c] ? __vunmap+0x9c/0xe0 [15895.588368] [c01a9121] ? vfree+0x21/0x30 [15895.588377] [c0163f3a] ? load_module+0x103a/0x1040 [15895.588425] [c0163fc8] sys_init_module+0x88/0x1b0 [15895.588433] [c0103f6b] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x2f [15895.588439] ---[ end trace e077c578041c60d5 ]--- [15895.601620] usb-storage: probe of 2-2:1.0 failed with error -5 [15895.601682] usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage [15895.601690] USB Mass Storage support registered. -- usb storage(LG KU380) didn't mount automatically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367484 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367484] Re: usb storage(LG KU380) didn't mount automatically
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #13496 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13496 ** Also affects: linux via http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13496 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- usb storage(LG KU380) didn't mount automatically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367484 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 375419] Re: Huawei E620 USB Modem's micro usb drive doesn't work in jaunty, but works in hardy
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 367484 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367484 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 367484 usb storage(LG KU380) didn't mount automatically -- Huawei E620 USB Modem's micro usb drive doesn't work in jaunty, but works in hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381013] Re: Computer unresponsive after Alt+SysRq+K command
Well, the silence here has been deafening. Undeniably... But I have good news! (no, I did not just save 15% off my car insurance ...) But after the last few batches of updates, everything is well again... Incidently, something disabled my don't zap workaround! Kinda fishy... but the computer behaves as expected now, so who am i to complain? -- Computer unresponsive after Alt+SysRq+K command https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381013 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381013] Re: Computer unresponsive after Alt+SysRq+K command
This issue has resolved itself after the latest updates... ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Fix Released -- Computer unresponsive after Alt+SysRq+K command https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381013 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381013] Re: Computer unresponsive after Alt+SysRq+K command
hmm... The silence on this is deafening... I am not sure what to interpret this silence as... Is it a need for more info? I'll provide anything... really... (I just discovered that Ctrl+Alt+Backspace does NOT work on gdm, and that ain't cool...) Isn't X technically started by the time gdm is displayed anyways? I am little befuddled by this... Anywho, for the sake of covering up my bases, here are some more outputs: lshal sudo lshw... ** Attachment added: lshal http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27683558/lshal -- Computer unresponsive after Alt+SysRq+K command https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381013 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381013] Re: Computer unresponsive after Alt+SysRq+K command
** Attachment added: lshw http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27683680/lshw -- Computer unresponsive after Alt+SysRq+K command https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381013 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381013] Re: Computer unresponsive after Alt+SysRq+K command
** Attachment added: lshw http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27683564/lshw ** Attachment removed: lshw http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27683564/lshw -- Computer unresponsive after Alt+SysRq+K command https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381013 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 155532] Re: nautilus information sidebar right-aligns text when background in use
I'm sorry Corry Maccarrone, but have you modified anything in Nautilus to get that to work? I have upgraded to Jaunty recently, and my system is fairly standard. However, the issue is still present. Are you sure the background you're using is not the default one? If it is, the problem does not appear... The misalignment only happens when the sidepane's background is user-modified. The attachment is from Jaunty. With all the updates applied. ** Attachment added: infopane.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27275079/infopane.png -- nautilus information sidebar right-aligns text when background in use https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155532 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381722] [NEW] gnome-panel drawer does not autohide when a submenu item is clicked
Public bug reported: This bug is found in this version... ti...@tuxed:~$ apt-cache policy gnome-panel gnome-panel: Installé : 1:2.26.0-0ubuntu7 Candidat : 1:2.26.0-0ubuntu7 Table de version : *** 1:2.26.0-0ubuntu7 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ti...@tuxed:~$ When a drawer is added to a panel and it's behavior set to autohide, one expects it to autohide when an item within it is clicked. However, this does not always happen. I have found a way that makes it 100% NOT act as expected. Steps to reproduce: 1.Right-Click panel and select Add panel applet 2.Add Drawer applet onto the panel 3.Open Drawer, Right-click and select add item 4.Add a menu to the drawer. Ex(Preferences, System, Administration...) 5.Right-click on the drawer icon and select properties. 6.Set drawer to autohide automatically. 7.Click drawer, browse to an item in the menu just added and select it (click) Expected behavior: The selected item launches and the drawer collapses (autohides). Actual behavior: The submenu collapses, leaving the drawer open and in the way. To close it, the hide buttons must be used, or the drawer button must be clicked. Incidently, clicking the drawer button does not hide the drawer 100% of the time in this case, and you must resort to the hide handle/button for that occur. Not sure if this should be filed as a separate bug, but it seems to be just about the same... ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-panel drawer does not autohide when a submenu item is clicked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381722 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381013] Re: Computer unresponsive after Alt+SysRq+K command
** Attachment added: output of lscpi -vvnn http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27209130/lspci -- Computer unresponsive after Alt+SysRq+K command https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381013 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381013] [NEW] Computer unresponsive after Alt+SysRq+K command
Public bug reported: I am not sure which package this should be filed against... I just upgraded to Jaunty a couple of days ago and stumbled upon the Ctrl+Alt+Backspace removal feature... So now, I am trying to use AltGr+SysRq+K to restart X, just testing, mind you, to feel confident that I'll have a way out if/whenever things go awry. However, no matter how many times I try it, or when I try it, same thing always happens: It logs me out of gnome, and restarts X, which restarts gdm (or at least it prompts me for a password) At that point in time, my laptop stops responding, as far as the keyboard and the mouse are concerned. I can't even use Ctrl+Alt+F[1-8] to check/change anything. I know Ctrl+Alt+Backspace and AltGr+SysRq+k are different, because after reenabling Ctrl+Alt+Backspace with ServerFlag DontZap False, i can break out of X and log in again normally, but the same does not happen if I try to use Alt+SysRq+K... This is 100% reproducible on my laptop, an Acer Aspire 3003WLMi. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Computer unresponsive after Alt+SysRq+K command https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381013 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 307748] Re: package hddtemp 0.3-beta15-44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
here is the output with a fresh Jaunty upgrade. It's just about the same... ** Attachment added: hddtemp_debug http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26967080/hddtemp_debug -- package hddtemp 0.3-beta15-44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355503] Re: package hddtemp 0.3-beta15-45 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 307748 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307748 This bug is a duplicate of bug 307748. All comments should be directed to that bug report. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 307748 package hddtemp 0.3-beta15-44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- package hddtemp 0.3-beta15-45 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355503 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 341666] Re: package hddtemp 0.3-beta15-44 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso post-installation script ha restituito un codice di errore 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 307748 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307748 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug is a duplicate of bug #307748. Please report all future comments to that bug report. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 307748 package hddtemp 0.3-beta15-44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- package hddtemp 0.3-beta15-44 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso post-installation script ha restituito un codice di errore 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341666 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 343278] Re: package hddtemp 0.3-beta15-44 failed to install/upgrade: underprocess post-installation script gav felkod 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 307748 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307748 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug is a duplicate of bug #307748. All future comments should be directed to that report. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 307748 package hddtemp 0.3-beta15-44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- package hddtemp 0.3-beta15-44 failed to install/upgrade: underprocess post-installation script gav felkod 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343278 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370506] Re: package hddtemp 0.3-beta15-44 failed to install/upgrade: aliprosessi post-installation script palautti virhetilakoodin 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 307748 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307748 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular situation has already been reported in bug #307748. Therefore, all future comments should be directed there. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 307748 package hddtemp 0.3-beta15-44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- package hddtemp 0.3-beta15-44 failed to install/upgrade: aliprosessi post-installation script palautti virhetilakoodin 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370506 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 307748] Re: package hddtemp 0.3-beta15-44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Required info provided. Found five duplicates. Tentatively marking this bug as confirmed. ** Changed in: hddtemp (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- package hddtemp 0.3-beta15-44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 224019] Re: text doesn't show up on http://cotcum.org
I have recently checked the website mentioned using firefox 3.0.10 and it seems that everything is just fine now... Marking this as invalid. If someone else is experiencing this, feel free to reopen this, and attach a screenshot, mentioning which firefox version is being used, and whether any plugins are affecting it's rendering. ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- text doesn't show up on http://cotcum.org https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 359518] Re: acroread failed to update in 8.10
hmm... Ditto here. Crashed on install. I see the report is confirmed. Is there a fix coming soon? I am about to try to uninstall and reinstall acroread and see what happens... it worked. sort of. I'd like to warn qrwe that this method will effectively remove acroread-debian-files acroread-dictionary-de acroread-l10n-de al of which are not depend on acroread, but will not be reinstalled unless explicitly stated. Furthermore, Package acroread-debian-files is not available, but is referred to by another package. So, package acroread-debian-files has no installation candidate as of yet... Oh boy! Same thing goes for the other files. It seems the update is not completely ready... Will check back tomorrow, I guess. -- acroread failed to update in 8.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359518 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 264769] Re: Intrepid - SIS video snow/fuzz
Hmmm. I am a little perturbed by your saying Dennis... Are you sure it was working when you did that? and how long is a while? in my laptop, it doesn't work. Now it looks like it does for the first few minutes or so sometimes, but whenever the laptop gets hot, the lines start appearing. And the hotter the laptop, the more lines/fuzzy snow are on the display... Is that what happened to you maybe and your laptop was not hot and therefore you did not notice it, or was it genuinely working for a while? -- Intrepid - SIS video snow/fuzz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264769 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 116802] Re: automatic filters for thumbs.db and desktop.ini files
It's February 2009, and this bug is finally triaged... Am I to expect a release candidate soon? Or am we waiting for Jaunty+1? Needless to say, the error is still very much present... -- automatic filters for thumbs.db and desktop.ini files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116802 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 264769] Re: Intrepid - SIS video snow/fuzz
i don't know if that's related, but i had a BUNCH of problems following my upgrade to intrepid from hardy: Snowy/fuzzy X; soundcard not detected; wireless not working, Ctrl+Alt+* (* replaced at will F[1-9], Backspace...) not working. Alt+F[1-9] replacing Ctrl+Alt+F[1-9], being the ones i remember now... anyways, googled a bit for two days and found deeply buried somewhere a reference to installing linux-generic turns out, it wasn't installed. Everything's been fine ever since, including the snow issue. Maybe it's worth checking out... -- Intrepid - SIS video snow/fuzz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264769 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261520] [NEW] avant-window-navigator stack applet should close on click
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: avant-window-navigator Currently, if you click on an item in a stack, the stack stays open, until focus is changed (if ever) to the new window. This makes the user doubt whether he properly selected the item he wanted and delays feedback. Also, if focus is not lost by the stack applet, it stays open, contrarily to the expected behavior, i.e close once wanted object is chosen. ** Affects: avant-window-navigator (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- avant-window-navigator stack applet should close on click https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261520 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218322] Re: video playback artifacts when composite manager is enabled
I am posting to say that the same has just started to happen on my system. I just noticed it today, although my last major update was about a week ago, when I also installed the new banshee-1 player. The problem appears as stated above, on either banshee-1 (which I was using when I noticed it) totem, and vlc. I have metacity composite enabled. Cannot deal with compiz. I have the dreaded Sis card. If I disable compiz, then everything works fine. This problem doesn't seem to affect Mplayer though, which displays videos sharply whether composite is enabled or not. Is there a difference in the way mplayer draws video vs totem/vlc/banshee-1? Attached, fine my lspci ** Attachment added: lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16352179/lspci.txt -- video playback artifacts when composite manager is enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218322] Re: video playback artifacts when composite manager is enabled
I am reopening this bug as requested by Sebatien, since I provided the missing info... ** Changed in: metacity (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- video playback artifacts when composite manager is enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 35316] Re: these windows do not support save current setup message questionable
hmmm... June 2008, and this issue is still present. Will it ever be resolved upstream? Anyway, I think this has some importance. Especially since I am left currently with no viable option. In my case, I am using stalonetray. It works quite well and I don't want to part with it. After receiving this message, I tried a simple killall stalonetray and saving the session. I also disabled the stalonetray entry in the current session tab and unticked the stalonetray box in the Startup Programs tab. At first, I was happy. Saving the session and logging out did not prompt that warning. So I reanabled it and made sure NOT to press the save-session button... No dice, once I try to logout, the message is there again... Although I never told it to try to save the session... This is most annoying. I do hope it gets some attention... In the mean time, anybody knows a noob-friendly work-around or a way to fix this issue. (even if it just makes it silent, that'll be fine. At least my laptop would shut off as expected)... -- these windows do not support save current setup message questionable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35316 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195266] Re: Nautilus does not update trashcan icon
I don't know what happened, but the trash icon issue seemed to be fixed about a month or so ago. Now, I am sad to say that the problem is showing its ugly head again. I wish I knew what specific update brought back the issue, but I am afraid I cannot recall... Thanks for trying anyways... Hopefully a proper fix will come out for this regression. -- Nautilus does not update trashcan icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195266 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195266] Re: Nautilus does not update trashcan icon
Sorry for double posting, but I just noticed that the status of this bug report is Fix Released. That particular fix no longer works. Somebody, please re-open this bug as the issue is STILL current under up-to-date hardy. -- Nautilus does not update trashcan icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195266 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195266] Re: Nautilus does not update trashcan icon
Re-opening this bug since the fix no longer works ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Nautilus does not update trashcan icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195266 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 238335] [NEW] Too many obsolete panel directories in ~/.gconf/apps
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel Old (obsolete) gnome panel entries in gconf-editor never get deleted. If a user has more than the original two panels at one time, then decides to delete a few of them (say they had 5 customized panels, and bringing it down to 1), the system warns the user that all the settings will be lost. Which is what they want. But all the deleted panel entries are still located in /apps/panel/toplevels. Furthermore, opening ~/.gconf/apps/panel will list all those previous entries. They're not loaded when the user starts gnome, but they are nonetheless present in that location. This situation can get a little overwhelming when a user is used to deleting panels and creating new ones frequently (since that's easier than to remove every single item on the panel individually). For example, I currently have 15 different toplevels which settings I can change in gconf-editor, although i only have 2 panels total on my desktop (panels 5 and 15). All the others, 1-4 + 6 - 14 are obsolete. Every time I massively delete/add new panels, I find myself having to hunt down the toplevels listings and playing with the settings to see which panels are the ones I actually have available. This turn, I only had to do this 15 times... What will I do when the number of entries get to 50? 100? 150? This situation is just one major headache waiting to happen. NOTE: Let me clarify, saying that I _never_ had 15 panels at once at any one time on my desktop. Old and obsolete panel entries are not overwritten by new ones, which would curb the growth time of the problem at the very least; they are still there, taking up space, and new ones need to be created. I'll end this with a question: At the beginning, notice that i said that the system warns you that all your settings for whichever panel you are trying to delete will be lost/removed. That prompt makes the user falsely assume that the panel entries are indeed deleted. If so, why are they still in ~/.gconf/apps/panel ? ** Affects: gconf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: gconf-editor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: gconf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: gconf-editor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Too many obsolete panel directories in ~/.gconf/apps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238335 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
