[Bug 2066986] [NEW] Crash on exit

2024-05-23 Thread Timothy Groves
Public bug reported:




```
GNU Image Manipulation Program version 2.10.36
git-describe: GIMP_2_10_36
Build: unknown rev 0 for linux
# C compiler #
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none:amdgcn-amdhsa
OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 
13.2.0-23ubuntu3' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-13/README.Bugs 
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --prefix=/usr 
--with-gcc-major-version-only --program-suffix=-13 
--program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id 
--libexecdir=/usr/libexec --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix 
--libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug 
--enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new 
--enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-vtable-verify 
--enable-plugin --enable-default-pie --with-system-zlib 
--enable-libphobos-checking=release --with-target-system-zlib=auto 
--enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-multiarch --disable-werror --enable-cet 
--with-arch-32=i686 --with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 
--enable-multilib --with-tune=generic 
--enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr
 --enable-offload-defaulted --without-cuda-driver --enable-checking=release 
--build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.2.0 (Ubuntu 13.2.0-23ubuntu3) 

# Libraries #
using babl version 0.1.108 (compiled against version 0.1.108)
using GEGL version 0.4.48 (compiled against version 0.4.48)
using GLib version 2.80.0 (compiled against version 2.80.0)
using GdkPixbuf version 2.42.10 (compiled against version 2.42.10)
using GTK+ version 2.24.33 (compiled against version 2.24.33)
using Pango version 1.52.1 (compiled against version 1.52.1)
using Fontconfig version 2.15.0 (compiled against version 2.15.0)
using Cairo version 1.18.0 (compiled against version 1.18.0)

```
> fatal error: Segmentation fault

Stack trace:
```
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgimpbase-2.0.so.0(gimp_stack_trace_print+0x496)[0x73334159f2c6]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(+0xecb41)[0x5e976867fb41]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(+0xecf1c)[0x5e976867ff1c]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(+0xecf75)[0x5e976867ff75]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x45320)[0x733340645320]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0(+0x97968)[0x733341697968]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0(gtk_button_set_label+0x5d)[0x7333416989ed]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x261fa)[0x733340bf21fa]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_object_set_valist+0x1e6)[0x733340bf54b6]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_object_set+0xbd)[0x733340bf592d]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(+0x13f445)[0x5e97686d2445]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_closure_invoke+0x14a)[0x733340be12fa]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x4490c)[0x733340c1090c]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x35591)[0x733340c01591]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit_valist+0x41)[0x733340c017c1]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit+0x93)[0x733340c01883]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(gimp_container_remove+0xf3)[0x5e97689781b3]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(+0x465f3c)[0x5e97689f8f3c]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(gimp_container_clear+0x64)[0x5e9768977cf4]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(+0x3e5fa5)[0x5e9768978fa5]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_object_unref+0x7e)[0x733340bf03fe]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(+0x13d2de)[0x5e97686d02de]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x1f137)[0x733340beb137]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0(+0x3c4e3)[0x733340abf4e3]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x2132b)[0x733340bed32b]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_object_run_dispose+0x34)[0x733340bf06c4]
/usr/bin/gimp-2.10(+0x13ed5f)[0x5e97686d1d5f]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_closure_invoke+0x14a)[0x733340be12fa]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x4490c)[0x733340c1090c]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x35591)[0x733340c01591]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit_valist+0x41)[0x733340c017c1]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit+0x93)[0x733340c01883]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_closure_invoke+0x14a)[0x733340be12fa]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x4490c)[0x733340c1090c]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(+0x35591)[0x733340c01591]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit_valist+0x41)[0x733340c017c1]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit+0x93)[0x733340c01883]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0(+0x97b99)[0x733341697b99]

[Bug 1970957] Re: suspend problem

2022-06-05 Thread Timothy Kunau
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 1st, Intel® Core™ i7-6600U CPU @ 2.60GHz × 4 ,
with Mesa Intel® HD Graphics 520 (SKL GT2), does not resume after
suspending or closing the lid.

Various suggested tweaks to the login XDM, etc. don't appear to work.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970957

Title:
  suspend problem

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1970957/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1970686] [NEW] package mcollective-plugins-nettest 0.0.0~git20120507.df2fa81-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: installed mcollective-plugins-nettest package post-installation script subprocess

2022-04-27 Thread Timothy Hill
Public bug reported:

I'm once again attempting to install Ubuntu.

Once again it crashed.

Once again I'm posting this to you:

I'm trying to do a "clean installation of Ubuntu 22.04LTS

I generally fail to be able to get Boinc-manager running under Ubuntu.

Because of this I always fall back to using some other operating system
- I'm currently using Zorin 16 64-bit, but usual end up using Linux Mint
debian edition - which sometimes fails because it gets some piece of
software I can't remove from my display, given that I am NOT even able
to get BOINC to run on Ubuntu anything so far - it ran for years on my
old computer (ASUS with an AMD processor with 8 cores running
4ghz/core), but my caretaker opted to take it to the dump when I wasn't
able to get it to restart at some point because I mucked up its BIOS
inadvertently...

I'm NOT a programmer, but AM a bicyclist (person who regularly rides a
bicycle?) and am geriatric (78 years old).  I am in a retirement
facility in Port Townsend, WA, which is an area that is 'proud' of the
fact it's home to 'thousands' of "Rain gardens", many of which have
signs to that effect sitting in them next to lawns,etc...

My e.mail address is  if you need to get hold of me.

Thanks and Later,

-Tim-
(TBI = Traumatic Brain Injured - this would be because 20 years ago I managed 
to hit a herd of deer on my bicycle going through a corner at about 35mph 
(downhill corner that had several cars parked on the side of the (recently 
paved rural) road in Oregon, which put me into a hospital for about a year 
under the "Oregon Health Plan", which was terminated by the Federal Government 
because it was apparently an incursion on an area they hold to be Federal 
rather than "State" - subsequently I was taken over by the VA, which pays my 
rent in here in 'my' retirement facility, thankfully)

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: mcollective-plugins-nettest 0.0.0~git20120507.df2fa81-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-27.28-generic 5.15.30
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-27-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
Date: Wed Apr 27 19:12:53 2022
ErrorMessage: installed mcollective-plugins-nettest package post-installation 
script subprocess returned error exit status 1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-28 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 (20220419)
PackageArchitecture: all
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.10, Python 3.10.4, python3-minimal, 
3.10.4-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: N/A
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.21.1ubuntu2
 apt  2.4.5
SourcePackage: mcollective-plugins
Title: package mcollective-plugins-nettest 0.0.0~git20120507.df2fa81-0ubuntu2 
failed to install/upgrade: installed mcollective-plugins-nettest package 
post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: mcollective-plugins (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package jammy need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970686

Title:
  package mcollective-plugins-nettest 0.0.0~git20120507.df2fa81-0ubuntu2
  failed to install/upgrade: installed mcollective-plugins-nettest
  package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status
  1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mcollective-plugins/+bug/1970686/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940900] Re: Grub failed boot detection - invalid enviroment block

2022-02-08 Thread Timothy Quinn
Same issue here. Was a machine that I had not touched for several
months. Booted it and after updating, got this error.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940900

Title:
  Grub failed boot detection - invalid enviroment block

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1940900/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1955996] Re: gnome-shell uses excessive memory

2021-12-30 Thread Timothy Krause
I'm trying logging in with 'Ubuntu on Xorg'.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955996

Title:
  gnome-shell uses excessive memory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1955996/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1955996] [NEW] gnome-shell uses excessive memory

2021-12-29 Thread Timothy Krause
Public bug reported:

I leave my computer running for days at a time. I noticed that gnome-
shell was using something like 8-gigs of memory. I just kill the process
on a regular basis.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
Package: gnome-shell 40.5-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-22.22-generic 5.13.19
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-22-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu71
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Wed Dec 29 10:20:23 2021
DisplayManager: gdm3
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-01-22 (706 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 40.5-1ubuntu3~21.10.1
SourcePackage: gnome-shell
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to impish on 2021-10-19 (70 days ago)

** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug impish

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955996

Title:
  gnome-shell uses excessive memory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1955996/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1955355] [NEW] printer driver hangs when searching

2021-12-19 Thread Timothy Evans
Public bug reported:

I installed a print driver and chose the wrong printer. If I open
properties and click on change, it pops up a message saying 'searching
for drivers' but hangs.  I have to close the pop-up with X and it asks
if I want to force close. The only way to change the driver is remove
and start from scratch.

 Installed: 1.5.12-0ubuntu1.1
  Candidate: 1.5.12-0ubuntu1.1
  Version table:
 *** 1.5.12-0ubuntu1.1 500
500 http://mirror.cs.pitt.edu/ubuntu/archive focal-updates/main amd64 
Packages
500 http://mirror.cs.pitt.edu/ubuntu/archive focal-updates/main i386 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 1.5.12-0ubuntu1 500
500 http://mirror.cs.pitt.edu/ubuntu/archive focal/main amd64 Packages
500 http://mirror.cs.pitt.edu/ubuntu/archive focal/main i386 Packages

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955355

Title:
  printer driver hangs when searching

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1955355/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1940749] Re: Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices

2021-08-22 Thread Timothy Brockway
Doug, I was informed by another user that he didn't see any other bug
reports related to storage not populating.  So I went ahead and submitted a
report since it didn't work on both machines.  As for that bug 1841037 - I
was unaware of that bug until now.  Other users have also concurred with
what I found so I let it be.  With all of that being said if this is indeed
a duplicate then that should be noted appropriately so users aren't chasing
around the same issue twice.  I just checked the bug report 1841037 and the
difference between 1841037 and mine is nothing actually populated in the
Storage window for me which would be because I only have the nvme drive and
I also noticed that a warning was thrown by hardinfo regarding the
/cpu/procinfo "Flags" field being in excess of 896 characters.  So I guess
it's up to you and your colleagues who are working out the bugs to decide
if this is indeed a duplicate.  By all means identify it as such if you
feel it's appropriate.

Sincerely,
Tim Brockway

On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 5:00 PM Doug Smythies <1940...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:

> Since you discovered that it is nvme drives that are not found, doesn't
> that make this bug report a duplicate of bug #1841037? And read therein
> that an update release is coming.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940749
>
> Title:
>   Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices
>
> Status in hardinfo package in Ubuntu:
>   Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
>   I installed Hardinfo on my Dell Inspiron 3501 running Ubuntu 20.04.  I
>   installed hardinfo:
>
>   sudo apt-get install -y hardinfo
>
>   When I select 'Storage' in the GUI nothing populates.  The pane/window
>   is totally blank.  I have run hardinfo in the command line and I am
>   receiving the following error:
>
>   Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 896 bytes
>   while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
>
>   Upon further inspection the 'Flags' field in /proc/cpuinfo is
>   populated with a large quantity of strings and characters.  Therefore
>   this error is to be expected in my opinion.
>
>   I just ran:
>
>   sudo apt-get install --reinstall hardinfo
>
>   This did not fix the issue with 'storage'.  I have checked the other
>   "sections" of the GUI and all other portions of the output seem to be
>   functioning normally.  I have also posted the link of the forum in
>   which I first reported the issue to the askubuntu community, where I
>   have detailed all the steps I have taken so far to attempt to fix the
>   issue.
>
>
> https://askubuntu.com/questions/1359220/hardinfo-doesnt-display-anything-in-the-storage-section?noredirect=1#comment2328347_1359220
>   ---
>   ProblemType: Bug
>   ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
>   Architecture: amd64
>   CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
>   CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
>   DistributionChannelDescriptor:
># This is the distribution channel descriptor for the OEM CDs
># For more information see
> http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributionChannelDescriptor
>canonical-oem-somerville-focal-amd64-20200502-85
>   DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
>   InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-07-02 (50 days ago)
>   InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 "Focal" - Build amd64 LIVE Binary
> 20200502-05:58
>   Package: hardinfo 0.5.1+git20180227-2
>   PackageArchitecture: amd64
>   ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.10.0-1044.46-oem 5.10.46
>   Tags:  focal
>   Uname: Linux 5.10.0-1044-oem x86_64
>   UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
>   UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo
>   _MarkForUpload: True
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardinfo/+bug/1940749/+subscriptions
>
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940749

Title:
  Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardinfo/+bug/1940749/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1940749] Re: Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices

2021-08-22 Thread Timothy Brockway
Hello Chris Guiver, I ran the apport command and sent the data, I hope it
helped.

Sincerely,
Tim Brockway

On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 12:20 AM Chris Guiver <1940...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:

> Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
> Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command only once, as it
> will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:
>
> apport-collect 1940749
>
> When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-
> bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this
> functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940749
>
> Title:
>   Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices
>
> Status in hardinfo package in Ubuntu:
>   New
>
> Bug description:
>   I installed Hardinfo on my Dell Inspiron 3501 running Ubuntu 20.04.  I
>   installed hardinfo:
>
>   sudo apt-get install -y hardinfo
>
>   When I select 'Storage' in the GUI nothing populates.  The pane/window
>   is totally blank.  I have run hardinfo in the command line and I am
>   receiving the following error:
>
>   Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 896 bytes
>   while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
>
>   Upon further inspection the 'Flags' field in /proc/cpuinfo is
>   populated with a large quantity of strings and characters.  Therefore
>   this error is to be expected in my opinion.
>
>   I just ran:
>
>   sudo apt-get install --reinstall hardinfo
>
>   This did not fix the issue with 'storage'.  I have checked the other
>   "sections" of the GUI and all other portions of the output seem to be
>   functioning normally.  I have also posted the link of the forum in
>   which I first reported the issue to the askubuntu community, where I
>   have detailed all the steps I have taken so far to attempt to fix the
>   issue.
>
>   https://askubuntu.com/questions/1359220/hardinfo-doesnt-display-
>   anything-in-the-storage-section?noredirect=1#comment2328347_1359220
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardinfo/+bug/1940749/+subscriptions
>
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940749

Title:
  Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardinfo/+bug/1940749/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940749] ProcEnviron.txt

2021-08-22 Thread Timothy Brockway
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940749/+attachment/5519768/+files/ProcEnviron.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940749

Title:
  Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardinfo/+bug/1940749/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940749] Re: Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices

2021-08-22 Thread Timothy Brockway
apport information

** Tags added: apport-collected focal

** Description changed:

  I installed Hardinfo on my Dell Inspiron 3501 running Ubuntu 20.04.  I
  installed hardinfo:
  
  sudo apt-get install -y hardinfo
  
  When I select 'Storage' in the GUI nothing populates.  The pane/window
  is totally blank.  I have run hardinfo in the command line and I am
  receiving the following error:
  
  Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 896 bytes
  while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
  
  Upon further inspection the 'Flags' field in /proc/cpuinfo is populated
  with a large quantity of strings and characters.  Therefore this error
  is to be expected in my opinion.
  
  I just ran:
  
  sudo apt-get install --reinstall hardinfo
  
  This did not fix the issue with 'storage'.  I have checked the other
  "sections" of the GUI and all other portions of the output seem to be
  functioning normally.  I have also posted the link of the forum in which
  I first reported the issue to the askubuntu community, where I have
  detailed all the steps I have taken so far to attempt to fix the issue.
  
- https://askubuntu.com/questions/1359220/hardinfo-doesnt-display-
- anything-in-the-storage-section?noredirect=1#comment2328347_1359220
+ 
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1359220/hardinfo-doesnt-display-anything-in-the-storage-section?noredirect=1#comment2328347_1359220
+ --- 
+ ProblemType: Bug
+ ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
+ Architecture: amd64
+ CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
+ CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
+ DistributionChannelDescriptor:
+  # This is the distribution channel descriptor for the OEM CDs
+  # For more information see 
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributionChannelDescriptor
+  canonical-oem-somerville-focal-amd64-20200502-85
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
+ InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-07-02 (50 days ago)
+ InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 "Focal" - Build amd64 LIVE Binary 
20200502-05:58
+ Package: hardinfo 0.5.1+git20180227-2
+ PackageArchitecture: amd64
+ ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.10.0-1044.46-oem 5.10.46
+ Tags:  focal
+ Uname: Linux 5.10.0-1044-oem x86_64
+ UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
+ UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo
+ _MarkForUpload: True

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940749/+attachment/5519766/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940749

Title:
  Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardinfo/+bug/1940749/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940749] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2021-08-22 Thread Timothy Brockway
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940749/+attachment/5519767/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940749

Title:
  Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardinfo/+bug/1940749/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1940749] Re: Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices

2021-08-21 Thread Timothy Brockway
Hello Ian,

I posted an update in the bug report which states the following:
HardInfo is a small application that displays information about your
hardware and operating system. Currently it knows about PCI, ISA PnP, USB,
IDE, SCSI, Serial and parallel port devices. The Processor is Intel(R)
Pentium(R) Gold 7505 @ 2.00GHz x 4 and the Storage device is an SSD, BC711
NVMe SK hynix(128GB). I suspect hardinfo doesn't recognize the SSD and it
doesn't like the extended flags in /proc/cpuinfo Otherwise hardinfo seems
to function normally. Please let me know if anyone has an SSD that is being
recognized and I will keep digging. Thank you

Let me know if this is inaccurate.  Sincerely,
Tim

On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 4:10 PM Ian Bruntlett <1940...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I tried this on my lenovo T420 laptop, running Ubuntu 20.04.3.
>
> The flags entry in /proc/cpuinfo is 100 characters long.
>
> I ran hardinfo (0.6-alpha) and checked the "Storage" pane and displayed
> this (correct) info:-
>
> -SCSI Disks-
> ATA CT1000MX500SSD1
> HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GT33N
>
> HTH,
>
>
> Ian
>
> --
> -- ACCU - Professionalism in programming - http://www.accu.org
> -- My writing - https://sites.google.com/site/ianbruntlett/
> -- Free Software page -
> https://sites.google.com/site/ianbruntlett/home/free-software
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940749
>
> Title:
>   Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices
>
> Status in hardinfo package in Ubuntu:
>   New
>
> Bug description:
>   I installed Hardinfo on my Dell Inspiron 3501 running Ubuntu 20.04.  I
>   installed hardinfo:
>
>   sudo apt-get install -y hardinfo
>
>   When I select 'Storage' in the GUI nothing populates.  The pane/window
>   is totally blank.  I have run hardinfo in the command line and I am
>   receiving the following error:
>
>   Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 896 bytes
>   while reading /proc/cpuinfo.
>
>   Upon further inspection the 'Flags' field in /proc/cpuinfo is
>   populated with a large quantity of strings and characters.  Therefore
>   this error is to be expected in my opinion.
>
>   I just ran:
>
>   sudo apt-get install --reinstall hardinfo
>
>   This did not fix the issue with 'storage'.  I have checked the other
>   "sections" of the GUI and all other portions of the output seem to be
>   functioning normally.  I have also posted the link of the forum in
>   which I first reported the issue to the askubuntu community, where I
>   have detailed all the steps I have taken so far to attempt to fix the
>   issue.
>
>   https://askubuntu.com/questions/1359220/hardinfo-doesnt-display-
>   anything-in-the-storage-section?noredirect=1#comment2328347_1359220
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardinfo/+bug/1940749/+subscriptions
>
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940749

Title:
  Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardinfo/+bug/1940749/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940749] Re: Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices

2021-08-21 Thread Timothy Brockway
This is my flags list:  Is it possible that this is causing the issue
with Storage?  I am not sure how to fix this because we purchased these
Dell computers pre-installed with ubuntu 20.04.

flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe
syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc art arch_perfmon pebs bts
rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc cpuid aperfmperf tsc_known_freq pni
pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 sdbg fma cx16 xtpr
pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave
avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch cpuid_fault epb cat_l2
invpcid_single cdp_l2 ssbd ibrs ibpb stibp ibrs_enhanced tpr_shadow vnmi
flexpriority ept vpid ept_ad fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2
erms invpcid rdt_a avx512f avx512dq rdseed adx smap avx512ifma
clflushopt clwb intel_pt avx512cd sha_ni avx512bw avx512vl xsaveopt
xsavec xgetbv1 xsaves split_lock_detect dtherm ida arat pln pts hwp
hwp_notify hwp_act_window hwp_epp hwp_pkg_req avx512vbmi umip pku ospke
avx512_vbmi2 gfni vaes vpclmulqdq avx512_vnni avx512_bitalg
avx512_vpopcntdq rdpid movdiri movdir64b fsrm avx512_vp2intersect
md_clear flush_l1d arch_capabilities

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940749

Title:
  Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardinfo/+bug/1940749/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940749] Re: Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices

2021-08-21 Thread Timothy Brockway
I also installed hardinfo on my wife's Dell Inspiron 3501 running Ubuntu
20.04. I ran:

sudo apt-get install -y hardinfo

when I checked 'Storage' the pane/window is completely blank as well.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940749

Title:
  Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardinfo/+bug/1940749/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940749] [NEW] Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices

2021-08-21 Thread Timothy Brockway
Public bug reported:

I installed Hardinfo on my Dell Inspiron 3501 running Ubuntu 20.04.  I
installed hardinfo:

sudo apt-get install -y hardinfo

When I select 'Storage' in the GUI nothing populates.  The pane/window
is totally blank.  I have run hardinfo in the command line and I am
receiving the following error:

Warning: truncated a line (probably flags list) longer than 896 bytes
while reading /proc/cpuinfo.

Upon further inspection the 'Flags' field in /proc/cpuinfo is populated
with a large quantity of strings and characters.  Therefore this error
is to be expected in my opinion.

I just ran:

sudo apt-get install --reinstall hardinfo

This did not fix the issue with 'storage'.  I have checked the other
"sections" of the GUI and all other portions of the output seem to be
functioning normally.  I have also posted the link of the forum in which
I first reported the issue to the askubuntu community, where I have
detailed all the steps I have taken so far to attempt to fix the issue.

https://askubuntu.com/questions/1359220/hardinfo-doesnt-display-
anything-in-the-storage-section?noredirect=1#comment2328347_1359220

** Affects: hardinfo (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940749

Title:
  Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardinfo/+bug/1940749/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1937019] [NEW] FIDO2 tokens not supported on this build

2021-07-21 Thread Timothy Allen
Public bug reported:

I'm trying to test systemd-cryptenroll with FIDO2 keys in the new
systemd version 248 on impish.

Running "systemd-cryptenroll --fido2-device=list" results in the
message:

FIDO2 tokens not supported on this build.

Would it be possible to build systemd with FIDO support in time for the
impish release?

** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: systemd (Debian)
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #991129
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991129

** Also affects: systemd (Debian) via
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991129
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937019

Title:
  FIDO2 tokens not supported on this build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1937019/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1936257] [NEW] package mysql-server-8.0 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-07-14 Thread Timothy Piggott
Public bug reported:

lsb_release:
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS
Release:20.04

apt-cache policy mysql
mysql-server:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 8.0.25-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
  Version table:
 8.0.25-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 500
500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/main amd64 
Packages
500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/main i386 Packages
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/main amd64 Packages
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/main i386 Packages
 8.0.19-0ubuntu5 500
500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages
500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main i386 Packages


Have been having issues with installing Apache, MySQL, PHPMyAdmin and
PHP since yesterday. It has only now given me an error but I cannot show
the stack trace as I just restarted my computer. MySQL I was unable to
log in. PHP wasn't getting served in Apache and PHPMyAdmin was also not
working.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: mysql-server-8.0 (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-59.66~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-59-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Tue Jul 13 17:34:25 2021
ErrorMessage: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script 
subprocess returned error exit status 1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-06-23 (21 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.10, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.18, python-is-python2, 2.7.17-4
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
 apt  2.0.6
SourcePackage: mysql-8.0
Title: package mysql-server-8.0 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: 
installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned 
error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936257

Title:
  package mysql-server-8.0 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
  installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/1936257/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1934183] [NEW] ARMHF Firefox crashes when receiving passwords via Firefox Sync

2021-06-30 Thread Timothy Baldwin
Public bug reported:

Also tested on 20.04.2 LTS (GNU/Linux 5.10.34+ aarch64) on AWS.

1. Install ARMHF Firefox package (ARM64 and x8-64 packages work correctly).
2. Create new profile
3. Sign into Firefox Sync (with at least one password saved in sync account)
4. Within a few minutes Firefox crashes with a Segmentation Fault.

If started with a synced profile, it is stable until a password is added
or changed in the sync account by another instance of Firefox, after
which it shortly crashes.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
Package: firefox 89.0.2+build1-0ubuntu0.21.04.1
Uname: Linux 4.14.213-teb6 armv7l
AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65.1
Architecture: armhf
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  tim1338 F pulseaudio
BuildID: 20210622155641
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
Channel: Unavailable
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Wed Jun 30 13:33:23 2021
ForcedLayersAccel: False
IfupdownConfig:
 # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
 # Include files from /etc/network/interfaces.d:
 source-directory /etc/network/interfaces.d
IpRoute:
 default via 10.211.92.1 dev wlan0 proto static metric 600 
 10.211.92.0/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 10.211.92.19 metric 600 
 169.254.0.0/16 dev wlan0 scope link metric 1000
Lspci:
 
PciNetwork:
 
Profile0Extensions: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
Profile0IncompatibleExtensions: Unavailable (corrupt or non-existant 
compatibility.ini or extensions.sqlite)
Profile0Locales: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
Profile0PrefErrors: Unexpected character ',' before close parenthesis @ 
/usr/lib/firefox/omni.ja:greprefs.js:355
Profile0PrefSources: prefs.js
Profile0Themes: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
Profile1Extensions: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
Profile1IncompatibleExtensions: Unavailable (corrupt or non-existant 
compatibility.ini or extensions.sqlite)
Profile1Locales: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
Profile1PrefErrors: Unexpected character ',' before close parenthesis @ 
/usr/lib/firefox/omni.ja:greprefs.js:355
Profile1PrefSources: prefs.js
Profile1Themes: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
Profiles:
 Profile1 - LastVersion=89.0.2/20210622155641
 Profile0 - LastVersion=89.0.2/20210622155641
RunningIncompatibleAddons: False
SourcePackage: firefox
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to hirsute on 2021-06-12 (18 days ago)

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug armhf hirsute

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934183

Title:
  ARMHF Firefox crashes when receiving passwords via Firefox Sync

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1934183/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1926225] Re: Maxima fails to start with error message "The assertion realpath(s, o) on line 471 of main.c in function mbin failed: Invalid argument Aborted (core dumped)"

2021-06-12 Thread Timothy Krause
I tried to compile the source code and it's broken too.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926225

Title:
  Maxima fails to start with error message "The assertion realpath(s,o)
  on line 471 of main.c in function mbin failed: Invalid argument
  Aborted (core dumped)"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maxima/+bug/1926225/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1927725] Re: PID file no longer created

2021-05-07 Thread Timothy Allen
There seems to have been some issue during the upgrade that blocked the
creation of the PID file. Manually killing the exim process and re-
starting it seems to have fixed the issue.

Apologies for the noise!

** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927725

Title:
  PID file no longer created

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/exim/+bug/1927725/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1927725] [NEW] PID file no longer created

2021-05-07 Thread Timothy Allen
Public bug reported:

Since the latest release, no PID file is created in /run/exim4/exim.pid
when Exim is run.

No local configuration changes have been made between the working and
non-working versions. The command line arguments are '/usr/sbin/exim4
-bd -q30m', and there are no PID-related configuration arguments set.

Setting SMTPLISTENEROPTIONS='-oP /run/exim4/exim.pid' in
/etc/default/exim produces the correct command-line arguments, but also
does not create the specified PID file.

I presume this is related to the fix for CVE-2020-28014: 'An attacker
who obtained the privileges of the "exim" user can abuse the -oP
override_pid_file_path option to create (or overwrite) an arbitrary
file, as root'.

If this new behaviour is intentional, then the documentation may need
updating.

This is on Ubuntu 20.04, exim version 4.93-13ubuntu1.5. Version
4.93-13ubuntu1.1 (released in May 2020) works correctly.

Thanks!

** Affects: exim
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Affects: exim4 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Bug watch added: bugs.exim.org/ #2738
   http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2738

** Also affects: exim via
   http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2738
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927725

Title:
  PID file no longer created

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/exim/+bug/1927725/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1923455] Re: fonts not rendering properly after update

2021-04-24 Thread Timothy Groves
Well, after a flurry of updates to mesa, vulkan and the amd graphics
driver, the problem has gone away.  This can be closed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923455

Title:
  fonts not rendering properly after update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1923455/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1923455] [NEW] fonts not rendering properly after update

2021-04-12 Thread Timothy Groves
Public bug reported:

After a recent update, many fonts are no longer rendering properly.
Only four characters will render for any text object.

The problem is widespread, and appears to affect gtk programs, but gtk
was not among the packages updated.  As a control, I updated a laptop
that I hadn't used in about a week, and no problems occurred on that
computer.

The biggest difference between the two computers is the presence of a
Radeon graphics card in the affected machine (the laptop is using
Intel).  And graphics drivers are among the updated packages on the
affected machine.

Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS
Release:20.04
Codename:   focal
Linux Thor 5.4.0-70-generic #78-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 19 13:29:52 UTC 2021 x86_64 
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Extracted from /var/log/dpkg.log:
2021-04-11 08:23:51 upgrade libapt-pkg6.0:amd64 2.0.4 2.0.5
2021-04-11 08:23:52 upgrade apt:amd64 2.0.4 2.0.5
2021-04-11 08:23:54 upgrade apt-utils:amd64 2.0.4 2.0.5
2021-04-11 08:23:54 upgrade alsa-ucm-conf:all 1.2.2-1ubuntu0.5 1.2.2-1ubuntu0.6
2021-04-11 08:23:54 upgrade libdrm-common:all 
2.4.104+git2103311700.6d8216~oibaf~f 2.4.105+git2104091700.991e95~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:23:54 upgrade libdrm2:i386 2.4.104+git2103311700.6d8216~oibaf~f 
2.4.105+git2104091700.991e95~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:23:54 upgrade libdrm2:amd64 2.4.104+git2103311700.6d8216~oibaf~f 
2.4.105+git2104091700.991e95~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:23:54 upgrade libdrm-amdgpu1:amd64 
2.4.104+git2103311700.6d8216~oibaf~f 2.4.105+git2104091700.991e95~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:23:55 upgrade libdrm-amdgpu1:i386 
2.4.104+git2103311700.6d8216~oibaf~f 2.4.105+git2104091700.991e95~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:23:55 upgrade libdrm-intel1:amd64 
2.4.104+git2103311700.6d8216~oibaf~f 2.4.105+git2104091700.991e95~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:23:55 upgrade libdrm-intel1:i386 
2.4.104+git2103311700.6d8216~oibaf~f 2.4.105+git2104091700.991e95~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:23:55 upgrade libdrm-nouveau2:i386 
2.4.104+git2103311700.6d8216~oibaf~f 2.4.105+git2104091700.991e95~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:23:55 upgrade libdrm-nouveau2:amd64 
2.4.104+git2103311700.6d8216~oibaf~f 2.4.105+git2104091700.991e95~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:23:55 upgrade libdrm-radeon1:amd64 
2.4.104+git2103311700.6d8216~oibaf~f 2.4.105+git2104091700.991e95~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:23:55 upgrade libdrm-radeon1:i386 
2.4.104+git2103311700.6d8216~oibaf~f 2.4.105+git2104091700.991e95~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:23:56 upgrade libegl-mesa0:amd64 
21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:23:56 upgrade libgbm1:amd64 21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 
21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:23:56 upgrade libllvm12:amd64 1:12.0.0~++rc3-1~exp1~oibaf~f 
1:12.0.0~++rc5-1~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:23:58 upgrade libllvm12:i386 1:12.0.0~++rc3-1~exp1~oibaf~f 
1:12.0.0~++rc5-1~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:24:01 upgrade libgl1-mesa-dri:i386 
21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:24:02 upgrade libgl1-mesa-dri:amd64 
21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:24:03 upgrade libosmesa6:i386 21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 
21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:24:04 upgrade libosmesa6:amd64 21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 
21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:24:04 upgrade libglx-mesa0:i386 21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 
21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:24:04 upgrade libglx-mesa0:amd64 
21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:24:05 upgrade libglapi-mesa:amd64 
21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:24:05 upgrade libglapi-mesa:i386 
21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:24:05 upgrade libgl1-mesa-dev:amd64 
21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:24:05 upgrade libgl1-mesa-glx:i386 
21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:24:05 upgrade libxatracker2:amd64 
21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:24:06 upgrade mesa-va-drivers:i386 
21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:24:06 upgrade mesa-va-drivers:amd64 
21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:24:07 upgrade mesa-vdpau-drivers:i386 
21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:24:07 upgrade mesa-vdpau-drivers:amd64 
21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:24:08 upgrade mesa-vulkan-drivers:i386 
21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:24:09 upgrade mesa-vulkan-drivers:amd64 
21.1~git2103270600.b95c62~oibaf~f 21.1~git2104110600.ba8737~oibaf~f
2021-04-11 08:24:09 upgrade syncthing:amd64 1.14.0 1.15.1

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: 

[Bug 1914961] [NEW] Contains literal path: /usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}

2021-02-07 Thread Timothy Baldwin
Public bug reported:

The libnss3 package contains a directory named
"/usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}", which is probably a mistake.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
Package: libnss3 2:3.55-1ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-41.46-lowlatency 5.8.18
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-41-lowlatency x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50.5
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Sun Feb  7 12:27:15 2021
SourcePackage: nss
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to groovy on 2020-11-20 (78 days ago)

** Affects: nss (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug groovy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914961

Title:
  Contains literal path: /usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nss/+bug/1914961/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1884103] Re: Null pointer derefernce when iterating trees

2021-01-16 Thread Timothy Baldwin
** Changed in: python-pygit2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884103

Title:
  Null pointer derefernce when iterating trees

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pygit2/+bug/1884103/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1854573] WifiSyslog.txt

2021-01-16 Thread Timothy Baldwin
apport information

** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573/+attachment/5453684/+files/WifiSyslog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573

Title:
  Seccomp check skipped for syscall -1 in straced process and
  PTRACE_SYSEMU broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1854573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1854573] ProcInterrupts.txt

2021-01-16 Thread Timothy Baldwin
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573/+attachment/5453681/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573

Title:
  Seccomp check skipped for syscall -1 in straced process and
  PTRACE_SYSEMU broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1854573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1854573] ProcModules.txt

2021-01-16 Thread Timothy Baldwin
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573/+attachment/5453682/+files/ProcModules.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573

Title:
  Seccomp check skipped for syscall -1 in straced process and
  PTRACE_SYSEMU broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1854573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1854573] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2021-01-16 Thread Timothy Baldwin
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573/+attachment/5453680/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573

Title:
  Seccomp check skipped for syscall -1 in straced process and
  PTRACE_SYSEMU broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1854573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1854573] acpidump.txt

2021-01-16 Thread Timothy Baldwin
apport information

** Attachment added: "acpidump.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573/+attachment/5453685/+files/acpidump.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573

Title:
  Seccomp check skipped for syscall -1 in straced process and
  PTRACE_SYSEMU broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1854573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1854573] Lspci.txt

2021-01-16 Thread Timothy Baldwin
apport information

** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573/+attachment/5453679/+files/Lspci.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573

Title:
  Seccomp check skipped for syscall -1 in straced process and
  PTRACE_SYSEMU broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1854573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1854573] UdevDb.txt

2021-01-16 Thread Timothy Baldwin
apport information

** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573/+attachment/5453683/+files/UdevDb.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573

Title:
  Seccomp check skipped for syscall -1 in straced process and
  PTRACE_SYSEMU broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1854573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1854573] Dependencies.txt

2021-01-16 Thread Timothy Baldwin
apport information

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573/+attachment/5453678/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573

Title:
  Seccomp check skipped for syscall -1 in straced process and
  PTRACE_SYSEMU broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1854573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1854573] CurrentDmesg.txt

2021-01-16 Thread Timothy Baldwin
apport information

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573/+attachment/5453677/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573

Title:
  Seccomp check skipped for syscall -1 in straced process and
  PTRACE_SYSEMU broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1854573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1854573] Re: Seccomp check skipped for syscall -1 in straced process and PTRACE_SYSEMU broken

2021-01-16 Thread Timothy Baldwin
apport information

** Tags added: apport-collected focal

** Description changed:

  If system call number -1 is called and the process is being traced with
  PTRACE_SYSCALL, for example by strace, the seccomp check is skipped and
  -ENOSYS is returned unconditionally (unless altered by the tracer),
  rather than carrying out action specified in the seccomp filter.
  
  The consequence of this is that it is not possible to reliably strace a
  seccomp based implementation of a foreign system call interface in which
  r7/x8 is permitted to be -1 on entry to a system call.
  
  I have traced this bug to commit
  f086f67485c5c126bcec4b0e96ac7319a2e59ab8 which attempts to implement
  PTRACE_SYSEMU.
  
  Contrary to x86-64 and the man ptrace page which states "For
  PTRACE_SYSEMU, continue and stop on entry to the next system call, which
  will not be executed.", on PTRACE_SYSEMU skips the current system call
  and stops on entry to the next system call.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
  Package: linux-image-5.3.0-1007-aws 5.3.0-1007.8
  ProcVersionSignature: User Name 5.3.0-1007.8-aws 5.3.7
  Uname: Linux 5.3.0-1007-aws aarch64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu8.2
  Architecture: arm64
  Date: Sat Nov 30 13:38:28 2019
  Ec2AMI: ami-0e88d70910be26319
  Ec2AMIManifest: (unknown)
  Ec2AvailabilityZone: eu-west-1b
  Ec2InstanceType: a1.medium
  Ec2Kernel: unavailable
  Ec2Ramdisk: unavailable
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=C.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: linux-aws
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to eoan on 2019-11-09 (21 days ago)
+ --- 
+ ProblemType: Bug
+ AlsaDevices: Error: command ['ls', '-l', '/dev/snd/'] failed with exit code 
2: ls: cannot access '/dev/snd/': No such file or directory
+ AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay'
+ ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.14
+ Architecture: arm64
+ ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'arecord'
+ CRDA: N/A
+ CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
+ Ec2AMI: ami-035df3cfe31bdea3b
+ Ec2AMIManifest: (unknown)
+ Ec2AvailabilityZone: eu-west-1c
+ Ec2InstanceType: t4g.nano
+ Ec2Kernel: unavailable
+ Ec2Ramdisk: unavailable
+ IwConfig: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'iwconfig'
+ Lspci-vt:
+  -[:00]-+-00.0  Amazon.com, Inc. Device 0200
+ +-01.0  Amazon.com, Inc. Device 8250
+ +-04.0  Amazon.com, Inc. Device 8061
+ \-05.0  Amazon.com, Inc. Elastic Network Adapter (ENA)
+ Lsusb: Error: command ['lsusb'] failed with exit code 1:
+ Lsusb-t:
+  
+ Lsusb-v: Error: command ['lsusb', '-v'] failed with exit code 1:
+ MachineType: Amazon EC2 t4g.nano
+ Package: linux-aws 5.4.0.1035.36
+ PackageArchitecture: arm64
+ PciMultimedia:
+  
+ ProcEnviron:
+  TERM=xterm-256color
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  LANG=C.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
+ ProcFB:
+  
+ ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-1035-aws 
root=UUID=fe13e7d5-0777-4e3b-9eaf-85a58e21fa9f ro console=ttyS0 
nvme_core.io_timeout=4294967295
+ ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-1035.37-aws 5.4.78
+ RelatedPackageVersions:
+  linux-restricted-modules-5.4.0-1035-aws N/A
+  linux-backports-modules-5.4.0-1035-aws  N/A
+  linux-firmware  N/A
+ RfKill: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'rfkill'
+ Tags:  focal ec2-images
+ Uname: Linux 5.4.0-1035-aws aarch64
+ UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
+ UserGroups: N/A
+ _MarkForUpload: True
+ dmi.bios.date: 11/1/2018
+ dmi.bios.vendor: Amazon EC2
+ dmi.bios.version: 1.0
+ dmi.board.asset.tag: i-05c89f713a209b22c
+ dmi.board.vendor: Amazon EC2
+ dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Amazon EC2
+ dmi.chassis.type: 1
+ dmi.chassis.vendor: Amazon EC2
+ dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmazonEC2:bvr1.0:bd11/1/2018:svnAmazonEC2:pnt4g.nano:pvr:rvnAmazonEC2:rn:rvr:cvnAmazonEC2:ct1:cvr:
+ dmi.product.name: t4g.nano
+ dmi.sys.vendor: Amazon EC2

** Attachment added: "AudioDevicesInUse.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573/+attachment/5453676/+files/AudioDevicesInUse.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573

Title:
  Seccomp check skipped for syscall -1 in straced process and
  PTRACE_SYSEMU broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1854573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908435] Re: Ubuntu Installation Failure With Formatted Disk

2020-12-21 Thread Timothy Quinn
I was able to get ubuntu installed successfully using ZFS by doing an
offline minimal installation both `Download Updates` and `Third Party
Software` disabled. The installation was successful and Ubuntu booted
ok. I have now switched my production desktop over to the new
installation.

I suspect the majority of the failures were due to `Third Party
Software` option (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-
cdimage/+bug/1871268).

As its possible that I got a false positive on the bug, I suggest that
you close this ticket until I get time to do some playing around to see
if drive formatting is actually an issue with current builds of
ubiquity.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908435

Title:
  Ubuntu Installation Failure With Formatted Disk

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1908435/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908435] Re: Ubuntu Installation Failure With Formatted Disk

2020-12-16 Thread Timothy Quinn
Update, my last 'successful' install failed because it looks like
gparted did not completely nuke the drive and the installation did not
boot up after it completed. At boot, I got the Busybox screen with no
clear errors. When I pulled up the drive in Ubuntu live cd, the
partitions were very odd sda1, sda2, sda5, sda6, sda7 and no sda3, or
sda4. I used 'disks' utility to wipe all partitions and used `df` to
verify that there were no partitions left on the disk and am now trying
20.04.1 install again...

This is another failure mode of Ubuntu installer not really wiping the
drive before before starting install; a 'successful' installation that
does not boot.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908435

Title:
  Ubuntu Installation Failure With Formatted Disk

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1908435/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908435] [NEW] Ubuntu Installation Failure With Formatted Disk

2020-12-16 Thread Timothy Quinn
Public bug reported:

Ubuntu Installer fails when trying to install on a Drive that is
previously formatted by Ubuntu installer.

I know this issue has been around for a long time but is there a way
that the installer can detect a formatted drive automatically and if the
usecase is to wipe the drive anyway, automatically format the drive
before running any code that may fail due to the existing drive
formatting?

I can imagine this issue can be a real roadblock for newbies as when it
fails as there are virtually no hints of why it is failing.

Background: 
Today, I was installing Ubuntu 20.04 on an new computer I used a DVD I burned 
back in May of this year. The installer failed and it appears to have already 
formatted the drive at that point.

I had assumed that the DVD may have been damaged so I downloaded 20.04.1
and burned a new DVD. When I installed, it failed again before I got to
the final "install" button. I did let the system send the bug report up
to the server at the time (about 13:00 EST). I have seen this issue
before and it was related to the drive formatting causing the installer
to bail so I used Ubuntu Live and gparted to delete any data on the
drive. When I re-installed, it installed successfully.

During all the above installations, I used the `Wipe drive and use ZFS`
option.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: drive format installer

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908435

Title:
  Ubuntu Installation Failure With Formatted Disk

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1908435/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1877668] Re: KDESVN Context Menu issue

2020-12-16 Thread Timothy Quinn
This issue was resolved by installing `kde-plasma-desktop` which put in
all the necessary libraries to get KDE apps working much better. This
installation also fixed KFind and other KDE apps that I use.

Note `kde-plasma-desktop` is huge and after installing and before
restarting the computer run `sudo apt update`. If you don't run this
update, may brick gnome on reboot making it a very tricky to get back up
and running.

I made this mistake the first time I installed 20.04 by rebooting
without an `apt update`. My Gnome was pooched and I had to do a revert
to a ZVN snapshot, which is never ideal as the revert will not fix files
under your home which were modified by kde library installation leaving
gnome working but in a sad place. If this happens, you would need to
hand revert files in home that were modified during kde libs install.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877668

Title:
  KDESVN Context Menu issue

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdesvn/+bug/1877668/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1906555] [NEW] Aarch64 Ubuntu 18.04 version is incompatible with the version of the Erlang dependancy.

2020-12-02 Thread Timothy Moores
Public bug reported:

When Elixir is installed using apt on 18.04, Elixir 1.3.3 is installed
along with Erlang OTP version 20 as a dependency. Erlang OTP version 20
is too modern for Elixir 1.3.3 to work and so the package doesn't work.

** Affects: elixir-lang (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906555

Title:
  Aarch64 Ubuntu 18.04 version is incompatible with the version of the
  Erlang dependancy.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elixir-lang/+bug/1906555/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1901962] Re: There’s a bug that causes artifact to build up on panel icons over time, causing them to become illegible. The bug has been in evidence since I started using Ubuntu Budgie in 18.

2020-10-29 Thread Timothy Williams
You asked me to submit the bug through the command line in the user forum.
I did as requested as soon as I saw the message. This isn't a new issue.
This is only follow-up from the old issue I reported on the user forum. I
tested for presence of the problem and it appears to be fixed.

Tim



Methodology used for testing for the bug. Ignore if irrelevant:
I removed the kludge of a panel restart startup item that masks the bug
effects and logged in again. I then repeatedly generated events in my
calendar to cause the notification area icon to display, connected to
different strength WiFi networks, launched & closed various apps with
notification tray icons. All of these would previously elicit notification
area artifacts from the bug. None of these actions elicit the bug artifact
anymore. As far as I can tell it's fixed.

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020, 1:00 AM fossfreedom <1901...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:

> This was fix and released by report #1898427
>
> Note. You have that installed but you need to reboot since that was
> installed.
>
> If this is still occurring after a reboot then there isn't anything more
> we can do since it is looks like a new upstream issue ... the code is
> identical to upstream.
>
>
> ** Changed in: budgie-desktop (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901962
>
> Title:
>   There’s a bug that causes artifact to build up on panel icons over
>   time, causing them to become illegible. The bug has been in evidence
>   since I started using Ubuntu Budgie in 18.04 and has persisted in
>   20.04.
>
> Status in budgie-desktop package in Ubuntu:
>   Incomplete
>
> Bug description:
>   I was told to do this:fossfreedom Ubuntu Budgie Team Member
>   September 15
>   I have a fix now for 20.04 but I need a bug report to fix against! (also
> @Gabb1995 since you have reported this at 19.10 as well) Please can you run
> in a terminal: ubuntu-bug budgie-desktop This will create a bug report -
> once I have uploaded the fix you will be pinged by a Canonical team member…
>
>   This is in reference to: https://discourse.ubuntubudgie.org/t/panel-
>   artifact-and-kludge-to-fix-it/4053
>
>   ProblemType: Bug
>   DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
>   Package: budgie-desktop 10.5.1-6ubuntu0.1
>   ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-48.52-generic 5.4.60
>   Uname: Linux 5.4.0-48-generic x86_64
>   ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.10
>   Architecture: amd64
>   CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
>   CurrentDesktop: Budgie:GNOME
>   Date: Wed Oct 28 19:18:15 2020
>   InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-12-16 (317 days ago)
>   InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Budgie 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64
> (20191017)
>   PackageArchitecture: all
>   SourcePackage: budgie-desktop
>   UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/+bug/1901962/+subscriptions
>


** Changed in: budgie-desktop (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901962

Title:
  There’s a bug that causes artifact to build up on panel icons over
  time, causing them to become illegible. The bug has been in evidence
  since I started using Ubuntu Budgie in 18.04 and has persisted in
  20.04.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/+bug/1901962/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1901962] [NEW] There’s a bug that causes artifact to build up on panel icons over time, causing them to become illegible. The bug has been in evidence since I started using Ubuntu Budgie in 18.04

2020-10-28 Thread Timothy Williams
Public bug reported:

I was told to do this:  fossfreedom Ubuntu Budgie Team Member
September 15
I have a fix now for 20.04 but I need a bug report to fix against! (also 
@Gabb1995 since you have reported this at 19.10 as well) Please can you run in 
a terminal: ubuntu-bug budgie-desktop This will create a bug report - once I 
have uploaded the fix you will be pinged by a Canonical team member…

This is in reference to: https://discourse.ubuntubudgie.org/t/panel-
artifact-and-kludge-to-fix-it/4053

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: budgie-desktop 10.5.1-6ubuntu0.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-48.52-generic 5.4.60
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-48-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.10
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: Budgie:GNOME
Date: Wed Oct 28 19:18:15 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-12-16 (317 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Budgie 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: budgie-desktop
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: budgie-desktop (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901962

Title:
  There’s a bug that causes artifact to build up on panel icons over
  time, causing them to become illegible. The bug has been in evidence
  since I started using Ubuntu Budgie in 18.04 and has persisted in
  20.04.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/+bug/1901962/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1576559] Re: Refused to switch profile to headset_head_unit: Not connected

2020-08-12 Thread Timothy Clarke
For those approaching the issue from afresh it looks like HSP/HFP shares
functionality with bluetooth modems rather than solely audio. As such
there's a disagreement between pulseaudio who are only interested in the
audio parts, ofono who deals with the modem parts and the bluetooth
stack (bluez) who connect the to the hardware.

The issue came about as support was dropped (assuming someone else would
pick it up) as pulse audio and bluez went to later versions. It hasn't
been resolved because no one wants to ether deal with the other part, or
have another abstraction layer to switch between modem and audio
functionality

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576559

Title:
  Refused to switch profile to headset_head_unit: Not connected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pulseaudio/+bug/1576559/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1890508] [NEW] Installation of Ubuntu 20.04

2020-08-05 Thread Timothy Malahy
Public bug reported:

I'm not sure. I attempted to install it and it just had issues and
didn't get anywhere.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: ubiquity 20.04.15
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-26.30-generic 5.4.30
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-26-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.445
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Wed Aug  5 19:20:53 2020
InstallCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed initrd=/casper/initrd quiet 
splash --- maybe-ubiquity
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal ubiquity-20.04.15 ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890508

Title:
  Installation of Ubuntu 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1890508/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1884146] [NEW] .desktop file isn't valid

2020-06-18 Thread Timothy Krause
Public bug reported:

The .desktop file that kate writes to ~/.local/share/applications
produces errors when run through desktop-file-validate. The other side
effect of this is that kate doesn't show up in the applications menu
search but the desktop file does. Clicking on the desktop file just
opens a text editor with desktop file as a source.

** Affects: kate (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884146

Title:
  .desktop file isn't valid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kate/+bug/1884146/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1884103] [NEW] Null pointer derefernce when iterating trees

2020-06-18 Thread Timothy Baldwin
Public bug reported:

Reproduce with:

git init t
cd t
mkdir x
touch x/y
git add x/y
git write-tree
python3 -c 'import pygit2; repo = pygit2.Repository("."); 
next(iter(repo["7904c9b632eaca0cd04c4a30f4b50c994d434c9a"] / "x"))'

Fixed in upstream commit ccf4df153c68d4af7d3d0f4f4f9104afc6f38d43

** Affects: python-pygit2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884103

Title:
  Null pointer derefernce when iterating trees

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pygit2/+bug/1884103/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1883418] [NEW] location services not working

2020-06-14 Thread Timothy Knickerbocker
Public bug reported:

I have allowed access on websites that I am trying to use and made sure
that location services are enabled in settings, but the site does not
have access to my location. Have tried google maps just to test, also
doesn't have access to my location. I have also tested on a windows
machine from the same router and it is working as expected. Seems to be
an Ubuntu issue.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:20.04.19
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-37.41-generic 5.4.41
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-37-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.2
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CrashDB: ubuntu
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sun Jun 14 04:10:32 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-06-10 (3 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
Symptom: release-upgrade
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883418

Title:
  location services not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1883418/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1876598] Re: octave does not link to openblas

2020-05-09 Thread Timothy Robertson
I can confirm that the issue is not present in the Octave Flatpak,
either.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876598

Title:
  octave does not link to openblas

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openblas/+bug/1876598/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1877668] [NEW] KDESVN Context Menu issue

2020-05-08 Thread Timothy Quinn
Public bug reported:

With KdeSVN 2.1.0 on Ubuntu 20.04, the context menu is not staying up
when the user right clicks an item and instead eaither closes or
sometimes automatically selects the first option in the context menu.
The only way to use the context menu at present is to right click and
hold and drag to the item to select.

This was not the behavior with kdesvn on 18.04.

** Affects: kdesvn (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877668

Title:
  KDESVN Context Menu issue

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdesvn/+bug/1877668/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1866999] Re: gnome-calendar does not sync with Google Calendar

2020-05-08 Thread Timothy E. Hall
Same issue here. What is the best way o can help get this resolved?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866999

Title:
  gnome-calendar does not sync with Google Calendar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-calendar/+bug/1866999/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1568459] Re: unison incompatible with older ubuntu/debian versions

2020-04-29 Thread Timothy Allen
Just as a note on recompiling, I have tried to build a statically-linked
binary on Ubuntu 19.10 (with OCaml 4.05.0) and run it on 20.04; it
yields the same errors as the dynamically-linked 19.10 binary when run
on 20.04:

Unison failed: Uncaught exception Failure("input_value: ill-formed message")
Raised at file "/tmp/unison-2.48.4/lwt/lwt.ml", line 135, characters 6-13
Called from file "list.ml", line 85, characters 12-15
Called from file "/tmp/unison-2.48.4/lwt/lwt.ml", line 31, characters 2-37
Called from file "/tmp/unison-2.48.4/lwt/lwt.ml" (inlined), line 83, characters 
17-46
Called from file "/tmp/unison-2.48.4/lwt/generic/lwt_unix_impl.ml", line 55, 
characters 6-23
Called from file "/tmp/unison-2.48.4/lwt/generic/lwt_unix_impl.ml", line 147, 
characters 6-40
Called from file "/tmp/unison-2.48.4/main.ml", line 202, characters 6-24
Called from file "/tmp/unison-2.48.4/main.ml", line 131, characters 4-9

Perhaps someone more experienced with OCaml can add some insight.

I have added this information to the upstream bug report at
. We may need to open a
new bug, though, since this doesn't appear to be a packaging issue.

** Bug watch added: github.com/bcpierce00/unison/issues #334
   https://github.com/bcpierce00/unison/issues/334

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568459

Title:
  unison incompatible with older ubuntu/debian versions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unison/+bug/1568459/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1725649] Re: Fullscreen games lose "fullscreen" after an Alt+Tab

2020-04-25 Thread Timothy Robertson
Bug is present in 20.04. Tested with Stellaris in fullscreen mode.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725649

Title:
  Fullscreen games lose "fullscreen" after an Alt+Tab

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1725649/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1863803] [NEW] Installer crashed

2020-02-18 Thread Timothy McKenna
Public bug reported:

Near the end of the install the Installer crashes.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: ubiquity 18.04.14.14
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-28.30~18.04.1-generic 5.3.13
Uname: Linux 5.3.0-28-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.9
Architecture: amd64
CasperVersion: 1.394.3
Date: Tue Feb 18 15:01:57 2020
InstallCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper 
initrd=/casper/initrd quiet splash --- maybe-ubiquity
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20200203.1)
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic ubiquity-18.04.14.14 ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863803

Title:
  Installer crashed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1863803/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1863663] [NEW] installer crashed

2020-02-17 Thread Timothy McKenna
Public bug reported:

near the end of the install I get a screen saying that the installer
crashed.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: ubiquity 18.04.14.14
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-28.30~18.04.1-generic 5.3.13
Uname: Linux 5.3.0-28-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.9
Architecture: amd64
CasperVersion: 1.394.3
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Mon Feb 17 11:54:47 2020
InstallCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper 
initrd=/casper/initrd quiet splash --- maybe-ubiquity
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20200203.1)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic ubiquity-18.04.14.14 ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863663

Title:
  installer crashed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1863663/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1854573] Re: Seccomp check skipped for syscall -1 in straced process and PTRACE_SYSEMU broken

2020-02-02 Thread Timothy Baldwin
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573

Title:
  Seccomp check skipped for syscall -1 in straced process and
  PTRACE_SYSEMU broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1854573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1860042] Re: openCL application gives error after update

2020-01-29 Thread Timothy Krause
The eoan-proposed repository didn't work for me. This is what apt-cache
says:

mesa-opencl-icd:
  Installed: 19.2.8-0ubuntu0~19.10.1
  Candidate: 19.2.8-0ubuntu0~19.10.1
  Version table:
 *** 19.2.8-0ubuntu0~19.10.1 500
500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu eoan-proposed/universe amd64 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 19.2.8-0ubuntu0~19.10.1~ppa1 500
500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-x-swat/updates/ubuntu eoan/main 
amd64 Packages
 19.2.1-1ubuntu1 500
500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu eoan/universe amd64 Packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860042

Title:
  openCL application gives error after update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libclc/+bug/1860042/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1860042] Re: openCL application gives error after update

2020-01-26 Thread Timothy Krause
I fixed it myself. I'm going to try to get a merge request.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860042

Title:
  openCL application gives error after update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1860042/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1860042] Re: openCL application gives error after update

2020-01-23 Thread Timothy Krause
I've upgraded to Ubuntu 19.10 and used the PPA that you recommended and the
error is still there. I could give you a patch with the changes that I made
to
ac_rtld.c that fixed the problem for my computer.


On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:35 AM Timo Aaltonen  wrote:

> could you test with a newer mesa from this ppa
>
> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/ubuntu/updates
>
> it's got latest bugfix release of the series, 19.2.8, and it's now
> pending as a distro update as well
>
> ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860042
>
> Title:
>   openCL application gives error after update
>
> Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
>   Incomplete
>
> Bug description:
>   My OpenCL program was working normally until a software update.
>
>   The program prints out:
>
>   ac_rtld error: !s->is_rx
>   LLVM failed to upload shader
>
>   when clEnqueueNDRangeKernel is called.
>
>   I've downloaded the source for mesa and traced the problem to the
>   gallium radeon driver. The first error message is from
>
>   mesa-19.2.1/src/amd/common/ac_rtld.c
>
>   and the second error message is from
>
>   mesa-19.2.1/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_compute.c
>
>   ProblemType: Bug
>   DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
>   Package: libllvm9 1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1
>   ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-74.84-lowlatency 4.15.18
>   Uname: Linux 4.15.0-74-lowlatency x86_64
>   ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.9
>   Architecture: amd64
>   CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
>   Date: Thu Jan 16 14:35:15 2020
>   InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-04-28 (628 days ago)
>   InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64
> (20180426)
>   SourcePackage: mesa-opencl-icd
>   UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1860042/+subscriptions
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860042

Title:
  openCL application gives error after update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1860042/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1860042] Re: openCL application gives error after update

2020-01-20 Thread Timothy Krause
** Description changed:

  My OpenCL program was working normally until a software update.
  
  The program prints out:
  
  ac_rtld error: !s->is_rx
  LLVM failed to upload shader
  
  when clEnqueueNDRangeKernel is called.
  
  I've downloaded the source for mesa and traced the problem to the
- gallium radeon driver.
+ gallium radeon driver. The first error message is from
+ 
+ mesa-19.2.1/src/amd/common/ac_rtld.c
+ 
+ and the second error message is from
+ 
+ mesa-19.2.1/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_shader.c
+ 
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: libllvm9 1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-74.84-lowlatency 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-74-lowlatency x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.9
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Jan 16 14:35:15 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-04-28 (628 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
  SourcePackage: mesa-opencl-icd
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Description changed:

  My OpenCL program was working normally until a software update.
  
  The program prints out:
  
  ac_rtld error: !s->is_rx
  LLVM failed to upload shader
  
  when clEnqueueNDRangeKernel is called.
  
  I've downloaded the source for mesa and traced the problem to the
  gallium radeon driver. The first error message is from
  
  mesa-19.2.1/src/amd/common/ac_rtld.c
  
  and the second error message is from
  
- mesa-19.2.1/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_shader.c
- 
+ mesa-19.2.1/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_compute.c
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: libllvm9 1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-74.84-lowlatency 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-74-lowlatency x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.9
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Jan 16 14:35:15 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-04-28 (628 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
  SourcePackage: mesa-opencl-icd
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860042

Title:
  openCL application gives error after update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1860042/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1860042] Re: openCL application gives error after update

2020-01-19 Thread Timothy Krause
** Description changed:

  My OpenCL program was working normally until a software update. The log file 
(/var/log/apt/history.log) contains:
  Start-Date: 2020-01-16  12:48:13
  Commandline: aptdaemon role='role-commit-packages' sender=':1.131'
  Install: libllvm9:amd64 (1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1, automatic), 
libclang-common-9-dev:
  amd64 (1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1, automatic)
  Upgrade: libdrm-nouveau2:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 
2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1
  ), libclc-amdgcn:amd64 (0.2.0+git20190306-1~ubuntu18.04.1, 
0.2.0+git20190827-1~u
  buntu18.04.1), libclc-dev:amd64 (0.2.0+git20190306-1~ubuntu18.04.1, 
0.2.0+git201
  90827-1~ubuntu18.04.1), libclc-r600:amd64 (0.2.0+git20190306-1~ubuntu18.04.1, 
0.
  2.0+git20190827-1~ubuntu18.04.1), libdrm-amdgpu1:amd64 
(2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1,
   2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1), libdrm2:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 
2.4.99-1ubunt
  u1~18.04.1), libdrm-intel1:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 
2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04
  .1), libdrm-radeon1:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1), 
li
  bdrm-dev:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1), 
libdrm-common
  :amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1)
  End-Date: 2020-01-16  12:48:35
  
  The program prints out:
  
  ac_rtld error: !s->is_rx
  LLVM failed to upload shader
  
  when clEnqueueNDRangeKernel is called.
  
- It could be in any one of the packages that were upgraded or installed.
- I chose libllvm9 because of the error message.
+ I've downloaded the source for mesa and traced the problem to the
+ gallium radeon driver.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: libllvm9 1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-74.84-lowlatency 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-74-lowlatency x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.9
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Jan 16 14:35:15 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-04-28 (628 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
  SourcePackage: llvm-toolchain-9
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Description changed:

- My OpenCL program was working normally until a software update. The log file 
(/var/log/apt/history.log) contains:
- Start-Date: 2020-01-16  12:48:13
- Commandline: aptdaemon role='role-commit-packages' sender=':1.131'
- Install: libllvm9:amd64 (1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1, automatic), 
libclang-common-9-dev:
- amd64 (1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1, automatic)
- Upgrade: libdrm-nouveau2:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 
2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1
- ), libclc-amdgcn:amd64 (0.2.0+git20190306-1~ubuntu18.04.1, 
0.2.0+git20190827-1~u
- buntu18.04.1), libclc-dev:amd64 (0.2.0+git20190306-1~ubuntu18.04.1, 
0.2.0+git201
- 90827-1~ubuntu18.04.1), libclc-r600:amd64 (0.2.0+git20190306-1~ubuntu18.04.1, 
0.
- 2.0+git20190827-1~ubuntu18.04.1), libdrm-amdgpu1:amd64 
(2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1,
-  2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1), libdrm2:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 
2.4.99-1ubunt
- u1~18.04.1), libdrm-intel1:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 
2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04
- .1), libdrm-radeon1:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1), 
li
- bdrm-dev:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1), 
libdrm-common
- :amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1)
- End-Date: 2020-01-16  12:48:35
+ My OpenCL program was working normally until a software update.
  
  The program prints out:
  
  ac_rtld error: !s->is_rx
  LLVM failed to upload shader
  
  when clEnqueueNDRangeKernel is called.
  
  I've downloaded the source for mesa and traced the problem to the
  gallium radeon driver.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: libllvm9 1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-74.84-lowlatency 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-74-lowlatency x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.9
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Jan 16 14:35:15 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-04-28 (628 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
- SourcePackage: llvm-toolchain-9
+ SourcePackage: mesa-opencl-icd
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860042

Title:
  openCL application gives error after update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1860042/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1860042] Re: openCL application gives error after update

2020-01-18 Thread Timothy Krause
** Package changed: llvm-toolchain-9 (Ubuntu) => mesa (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860042

Title:
  openCL application gives error after update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1860042/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1860199] [NEW] OpenCL programs give error messages

2020-01-17 Thread Timothy Krause
Public bug reported:

OpenCL programs print

ac_rtld error: !s->is_rx
LLVM failed to upload shader

when calling clEnqueueNDRangeKernel.

lsb_release -rd displays:

Description:Ubuntu 19.10
Release:19.10

apt-cache policy mesa-opencl-icd displays:

mesa-opencl-icd:
  Installed: 19.2.1-1ubuntu1
  Candidate: 19.2.1-1ubuntu1
  Version table:
 *** 19.2.1-1ubuntu1 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu eoan/universe amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
Package: mesa-opencl-icd 19.2.1-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-18.19-generic 5.3.1
Uname: Linux 5.3.0-18-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperVersion: 1.427
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri Jan 17 23:09:17 2020
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: eoan
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GraphicsCard:
 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Wani [Radeon R5/R6/R7 Graphics] 
[1002:9874] (rev e1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Wani [Radeon R5/R6/R7 Graphics] 
[103c:82fe]
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
MachineType: HP HP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0xx
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=C.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/hostname.seed 
quiet splash ---
SourcePackage: mesa
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 10/30/2017
dmi.bios.vendor: AMI
dmi.bios.version: F.20
dmi.board.asset.tag: CNV7500FYH
dmi.board.name: 82FE
dmi.board.vendor: HP
dmi.board.version: 11
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: CNV7500FYH
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAMI:bvrF.20:bd10/30/2017:svnHP:pnHPPavilionDesktopPC570-p0xx:pvr:rvnHP:rn82FE:rvr11:cvnHP:ct3:cvr:
dmi.product.family: 103C_53311M HP Pavilion
dmi.product.name: HP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0xx
dmi.product.sku: Z5P18AA#ABL
dmi.sys.vendor: HP
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.99-1ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 19.2.1-1ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.5+git20191008-0ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.0.1-1ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20190815-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1

** Affects: mesa (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug eoan ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860199

Title:
  OpenCL programs give error messages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1860199/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1739805]

2020-01-17 Thread Timothy Lee
(In reply to haarp from comment #34)
> Where are the settings to be found? I can't find anything new in the Power
> Manager's setting screen. I ended up manually adding them with the settings
> editor.

With the patch applied, on the General tab of Xfce Power Manager, there should 
be a "Brightness step count" field and an "Exponential" checkbox next to it.
 
> The exponential feature is really comfortable to use. However there's one
> caveat. It starts too slow, so that the first 3 of 10 steps have pretty much
> no effect at all. Is there a way to weigh it a little more towards the later
> steps?

I believe the effect of exponential steps is very much dependent on the
characteristics of the LCD backlight.  For my last two laptops, there
are very visible differences between every step on the scale.  Perhaps
you can try reducing the number of steps to 6?

Enlarging the step sizes towards the lower end complicates the maths
quite a bit, and may not suit everyone.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1739805

Title:
  Backlight tuning has not enough steps

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-power-manager/+bug/1739805/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1860042] Re: openCL application gives error after update

2020-01-17 Thread Timothy Krause
** Description changed:

  My OpenCL program was working normally until a software update. The log file 
(/var/log/apt/history.log) contains:
  Start-Date: 2020-01-16  12:48:13
  Commandline: aptdaemon role='role-commit-packages' sender=':1.131'
  Install: libllvm9:amd64 (1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1, automatic), 
libclang-common-9-dev:
  amd64 (1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1, automatic)
  Upgrade: libdrm-nouveau2:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 
2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1
  ), libclc-amdgcn:amd64 (0.2.0+git20190306-1~ubuntu18.04.1, 
0.2.0+git20190827-1~u
  buntu18.04.1), libclc-dev:amd64 (0.2.0+git20190306-1~ubuntu18.04.1, 
0.2.0+git201
  90827-1~ubuntu18.04.1), libclc-r600:amd64 (0.2.0+git20190306-1~ubuntu18.04.1, 
0.
  2.0+git20190827-1~ubuntu18.04.1), libdrm-amdgpu1:amd64 
(2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1,
   2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1), libdrm2:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 
2.4.99-1ubunt
  u1~18.04.1), libdrm-intel1:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 
2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04
  .1), libdrm-radeon1:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1), 
li
  bdrm-dev:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1), 
libdrm-common
  :amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1)
  End-Date: 2020-01-16  12:48:35
  
- The program just prints out:
+ The program prints out:
  
  ac_rtld error: !s->is_rx
  LLVM failed to upload shader
  
  when clEnqueueNDRangeKernel is called.
  
  It could be in any one of the packages that were upgraded or installed.
  I chose libllvm9 because of the error message.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: libllvm9 1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-74.84-lowlatency 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-74-lowlatency x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.9
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Jan 16 14:35:15 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-04-28 (628 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
  SourcePackage: llvm-toolchain-9
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860042

Title:
  openCL application gives error after update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-9/+bug/1860042/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1860042] Re: openCL application gives error after update

2020-01-17 Thread Timothy Krause
** Description changed:

- My OpenCL program was working normally until a software update. The log file 
contains:
+ My OpenCL program was working normally until a software update. The log file 
(/var/log/apt/history.log) contains:
  Start-Date: 2020-01-16  12:48:13
  Commandline: aptdaemon role='role-commit-packages' sender=':1.131'
  Install: libllvm9:amd64 (1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1, automatic), 
libclang-common-9-dev:
  amd64 (1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1, automatic)
  Upgrade: libdrm-nouveau2:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 
2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1
  ), libclc-amdgcn:amd64 (0.2.0+git20190306-1~ubuntu18.04.1, 
0.2.0+git20190827-1~u
  buntu18.04.1), libclc-dev:amd64 (0.2.0+git20190306-1~ubuntu18.04.1, 
0.2.0+git201
  90827-1~ubuntu18.04.1), libclc-r600:amd64 (0.2.0+git20190306-1~ubuntu18.04.1, 
0.
  2.0+git20190827-1~ubuntu18.04.1), libdrm-amdgpu1:amd64 
(2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1,
-  2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1), libdrm2:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 
2.4.99-1ubunt
+  2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1), libdrm2:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 
2.4.99-1ubunt
  u1~18.04.1), libdrm-intel1:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 
2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04
  .1), libdrm-radeon1:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1), 
li
  bdrm-dev:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1), 
libdrm-common
  :amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1)
  End-Date: 2020-01-16  12:48:35
  
- The program just prints out 'LLVM failed to upload shader
- ac_rtld error: !s->is_rx'.
+ The program just prints out:
+ 
+ ac_rtld error: !s->is_rx
+ LLVM failed to upload shader
+ 
+ when clEnqueueNDRangeKernel is called.
+ 
+ It could be in any one of the packages that were upgraded or installed.
+ I chose libllvm9 because of the error message.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: libllvm9 1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-74.84-lowlatency 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-74-lowlatency x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.9
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Jan 16 14:35:15 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-04-28 (628 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
  SourcePackage: llvm-toolchain-9
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860042

Title:
  openCL application gives error after update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-9/+bug/1860042/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1860042] Re: openCL application gives error after update

2020-01-16 Thread Timothy Krause
** Summary changed:

- openCL application gives error
+ openCL application gives error after update

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860042

Title:
  openCL application gives error after update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-9/+bug/1860042/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1860042] [NEW] openCL application gives error

2020-01-16 Thread Timothy Krause
Public bug reported:

My OpenCL program was working normally until a software update. The log file 
contains:
Start-Date: 2020-01-16  12:48:13
Commandline: aptdaemon role='role-commit-packages' sender=':1.131'
Install: libllvm9:amd64 (1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1, automatic), libclang-common-9-dev:
amd64 (1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1, automatic)
Upgrade: libdrm-nouveau2:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1
), libclc-amdgcn:amd64 (0.2.0+git20190306-1~ubuntu18.04.1, 0.2.0+git20190827-1~u
buntu18.04.1), libclc-dev:amd64 (0.2.0+git20190306-1~ubuntu18.04.1, 0.2.0+git201
90827-1~ubuntu18.04.1), libclc-r600:amd64 (0.2.0+git20190306-1~ubuntu18.04.1, 0.
2.0+git20190827-1~ubuntu18.04.1), libdrm-amdgpu1:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1,
 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1), libdrm2:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 2.4.99-1ubunt
u1~18.04.1), libdrm-intel1:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04
.1), libdrm-radeon1:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1), li
bdrm-dev:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1), libdrm-common
:amd64 (2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1, 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1)
End-Date: 2020-01-16  12:48:35

The program just prints out 'LLVM failed to upload shader
ac_rtld error: !s->is_rx'.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: libllvm9 1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-74.84-lowlatency 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-74-lowlatency x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.9
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Thu Jan 16 14:35:15 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-04-28 (628 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
SourcePackage: llvm-toolchain-9
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: llvm-toolchain-9 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860042

Title:
  openCL application gives error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-9/+bug/1860042/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1858285] Re: SSH not honoring use of ~/.ssh/authorized_keys

2020-01-04 Thread Timothy Yates
Update, possible workaround.  Still a bug that needs permanently fixed
as other distros honor ~/.ssh/authorized_keys properly with settings in
/etc/ssh/sshd_config

use a directive within the ~/.ssh/config file but seems it requires both
private and public keys to be present/exchanged for the required hosts.

host short_hostname
hostname IPaddr_or_FQDN
user username
port 22 or other port if not 22
identityfile /home/username/.ssh/private_key_filename

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858285

Title:
  SSH not honoring use of ~/.ssh/authorized_keys

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1858285/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1858285] Re: SSH not honoring use of ~/.ssh/authorized_keys

2020-01-04 Thread Timothy Yates
mistyped, it's a problem in 17.10 as well so the same problem has
persisted for a few releases.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858285

Title:
  SSH not honoring use of ~/.ssh/authorized_keys

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1858285/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1858285] Re: SSH not honoring use of ~/.ssh/authorized_keys

2020-01-04 Thread Timothy Yates
Also, i just tested this on Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful" as well so it seems to
not be a problem for 19.10.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858285

Title:
  SSH not honoring use of ~/.ssh/authorized_keys

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1858285/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1858285] [NEW] SSH not honoring use of ~/.ssh/authorized_keys

2020-01-04 Thread Timothy Yates
Public bug reported:

Have tested this successfully on other distros, used the same steps to
updating /etc/ssh/sshd_config but SSH will not honor the use of
~/.ssh/authorized_keys.

Simple test

mkdir -m 700 ~/.ssh
cd ~/.ssh
ssh-keygen -t rsa -b 4096
press enter to accept the defaults and empty passphrase
cp id_rsa.pub authorized_keys

ssh localhost /bin/date
works

mv id-rsa $(hostname -s)
mv id-rsa.pub $(hostname -s).pub
ssh localhost /bin/date
**fails.  this works on CentOS, RHEL

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
Package: openssh-server 1:8.0p1-6build1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-1014.16-raspi2 5.3.10
Uname: Linux 5.3.0-1014-raspi2 aarch64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu8.2
Architecture: arm64
Date: Sat Jan  4 12:42:58 2020
ExecutablePath: /usr/sbin/sshd
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=C.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
SourcePackage: openssh
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug arm64 eoan

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858285

Title:
  SSH not honoring use of ~/.ssh/authorized_keys

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1858285/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1739805]

2019-12-19 Thread Timothy Lee
Created attachment 9307
Adjustable brightness steps with support for exponential step sizes

I've updated the patch against latest master, with whitespace fixes.

The slider on the pop-up menu now also obeys uses the same steps as the
brightness buttons (allowing for rounding errors).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1739805

Title:
  Backlight tuning has not enough steps

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-power-manager/+bug/1739805/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1739805]

2019-12-02 Thread Timothy Lee
Sorry, I completely missed the slider on the pop-up menu.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1739805

Title:
  Backlight tuning has not enough steps

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-power-manager/+bug/1739805/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1854574] [NEW] Seccomp generated SIGSYS has wrong return address if x0 = -513

2019-11-30 Thread Timothy Baldwin
Public bug reported:

The seccomp man page states the for signals generated by
SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, "The program counter will be as though the system call
happened (i.e., the program counter will not point to the system call
instruction)."

However if x0 (first argument and return value) contains the value -513
(-ERESTARTNOINTR), or if SA_RESTART is enabled on the signal handler and
x0 contains -512 (-ERESTARTSYS) the saved program counter value points
to the system call instruction.

I can reproduce this bug on upstream AArch32 kernels, but not on current
x86-64 kernels.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
Package: linux-image-5.3.0-1007-aws 5.3.0-1007.8
ProcVersionSignature: User Name 5.3.0-1007.8-aws 5.3.7
Uname: Linux 5.3.0-1007-aws aarch64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu8.2
Architecture: arm64
Date: Sat Nov 30 14:10:31 2019
Ec2AMI: ami-0e88d70910be26319
Ec2AMIManifest: (unknown)
Ec2AvailabilityZone: eu-west-1b
Ec2InstanceType: a1.medium
Ec2Kernel: unavailable
Ec2Ramdisk: unavailable
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=C.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: linux-aws
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to eoan on 2019-11-09 (21 days ago)

** Affects: linux-aws (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug arm64 ec2-images eoan

** Attachment added: "sigsys_test.c"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854574/+attachment/5308878/+files/sigsys_test.c

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854574

Title:
  Seccomp generated SIGSYS has wrong return address if x0 = -513

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-aws/+bug/1854574/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1854573] [NEW] Seccomp check skipped for syscall -1 in straced process and PTRACE_SYSEMU broken

2019-11-30 Thread Timothy Baldwin
Public bug reported:

If system call number -1 is called and the process is being traced with
PTRACE_SYSCALL, for example by strace, the seccomp check is skipped and
-ENOSYS is returned unconditionally (unless altered by the tracer),
rather than carrying out action specified in the seccomp filter.

The consequence of this is that it is not possible to reliably strace a
seccomp based implementation of a foreign system call interface in which
r7/x8 is permitted to be -1 on entry to a system call.

I have traced this bug to commit
f086f67485c5c126bcec4b0e96ac7319a2e59ab8 which attempts to implement
PTRACE_SYSEMU.

Contrary to x86-64 and the man ptrace page which states "For
PTRACE_SYSEMU, continue and stop on entry to the next system call, which
will not be executed.", on PTRACE_SYSEMU skips the current system call
and stops on entry to the next system call.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
Package: linux-image-5.3.0-1007-aws 5.3.0-1007.8
ProcVersionSignature: User Name 5.3.0-1007.8-aws 5.3.7
Uname: Linux 5.3.0-1007-aws aarch64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu8.2
Architecture: arm64
Date: Sat Nov 30 13:38:28 2019
Ec2AMI: ami-0e88d70910be26319
Ec2AMIManifest: (unknown)
Ec2AvailabilityZone: eu-west-1b
Ec2InstanceType: a1.medium
Ec2Kernel: unavailable
Ec2Ramdisk: unavailable
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=C.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: linux-aws
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to eoan on 2019-11-09 (21 days ago)

** Affects: linux-aws (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug arm64 ec2-images eoan

** Attachment added: "Test case for skipped syscall"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573/+attachment/5308874/+files/sigsys_skip_test.c

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573

Title:
  Seccomp check skipped for syscall -1 in straced process and
  PTRACE_SYSEMU broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-aws/+bug/1854573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1854573] Re: Seccomp check skipped for syscall -1 in straced process and PTRACE_SYSEMU broken

2019-11-30 Thread Timothy Baldwin
** Attachment added: "Test case for skipped syscall"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-aws/+bug/1854573/+attachment/5308877/+files/sysemu_test.c

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854573

Title:
  Seccomp check skipped for syscall -1 in straced process and
  PTRACE_SYSEMU broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-aws/+bug/1854573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1822394] Re: [Dell BIOSes dated 27 Mar 2019] laptop keyboard & touchpad not working at gdm screen after boot

2019-08-07 Thread Timothy Williams
Apologies, comment #32 is incorrect, this worked a couple times but the
problem is still present intermittently. I have since downgraded to BIOS
v1.2.0 to avoid the issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1822394

Title:
  [Dell BIOSes dated 27 Mar 2019] laptop keyboard & touchpad not working
  at gdm screen after boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libinput/+bug/1822394/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1822394] Re: [Dell BIOSes dated 27 Mar 2019] laptop keyboard & touchpad not working at gdm screen after boot

2019-07-31 Thread Timothy Williams
I believe I have a workaround provided by a kernel engineer I was
discussing the issue with.

Adding the following to the kernel boot options resulted in the keyboard
and touchpad working without issue:

  i8042.nomux=1 i8042.reset

It appears that Dell uses i8042 to emulate a ps/2 interface rather than
using USB for the built-in keyboard and touchpad.

The following stackexchange link provided more info:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/28736/what-does-
the-i8042-nomux-1-kernel-option-do-during-booting-of-ubuntu

I've attached a new dmesg output from a successful boot using these boot
options[0]

[0] boot_i8042_options_keyboard_usable_dmesg.log

** Attachment added: "dmesg i8042 boot options keyboard usable"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1822394/+attachment/5280162/+files/boot_i8042_options_keyboard_usable_dmesg.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1822394

Title:
  [Dell BIOSes dated 27 Mar 2019] laptop keyboard & touchpad not working
  at gdm screen after boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libinput/+bug/1822394/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1822394] Re: [Dell BIOSes dated 27 Mar 2019] laptop keyboard & touchpad not working at gdm screen after boot

2019-07-31 Thread Timothy Williams
I can confirm I have encountered this issue with BIOS v. 1.6.1 from 21
Jul 2019

Device - Dell XPS 15 9575 Intel Core i7-8705G
BIOS - version 1.6.1
OS - Fedora 30
Kernel - kernel-5.1.19-300

Additional info:
- I have an encrypted root partition. During boot, I am able to usethe keyboard 
for <1 second at the screen where I enter the password for the root partition. 
Then the keyboard is disabled.
- I tested this with a previously installed kernel 5.0.9-301 and I was able to 
use the keyboard to enter the password for the root partition, but once I 
arrive at the login screen for fedora the keyboard/touchpad is unusable (cannot 
even switch TTYs)
- Using the grub boot menu option "fedora rescue" which is installed by default 
with fedora, I am able to use the keyboard to login without issue.

I'm happy to share any additional information that is requested. I don't
see any specific errors in dmesg that stand out here, but I've provided
a dmesg from a boot when the keyboard would not function [0]. I will
also upload a dmesg from a functional boot[1].

[0] boot_k509_keyable_unusable_dmesg.log
[1] boot_rescue_keyboard_usable_dmesg.log

** Attachment added: "dmesg kernel-509-301 bios 1.6.1 keyboard unusable"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1822394/+attachment/5280155/+files/boot_k509_keyable_unusable_dmesg.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1822394

Title:
  [Dell BIOSes dated 27 Mar 2019] laptop keyboard & touchpad not working
  at gdm screen after boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libinput/+bug/1822394/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1822394] Re: [Dell BIOSes dated 27 Mar 2019] laptop keyboard & touchpad not working at gdm screen after boot

2019-07-31 Thread Timothy Williams
** Attachment added: "dmesg fedora rescue bios 1.6.1 keyboard usable"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1822394/+attachment/5280156/+files/boot_rescue_keyboard_usable_dmesg.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1822394

Title:
  [Dell BIOSes dated 27 Mar 2019] laptop keyboard & touchpad not working
  at gdm screen after boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libinput/+bug/1822394/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 133133]

2019-07-01 Thread Timothy-holt123
It does absolutely nothing for me in Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit. It has
been broken for me for several months. Using latest version (FF43). Why
doesn't it work anymore for me?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133133

Title:
  "Open containing folder" is only working if nautilus is present

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/133133/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1739805]

2019-06-19 Thread Timothy Lee
Created attachment 8653
Adjustable brightness steps with support for exponential step sizes

Fixed compilation problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1739805

Title:
  Backlight tuning has not enough steps

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-power-manager/+bug/1739805/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1739805]

2019-06-19 Thread Timothy Lee
Created attachment 8652
Adjustable brightness steps with support for exponential step sizes

Rebased to latest master as of 2019-06-19.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1739805

Title:
  Backlight tuning has not enough steps

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-power-manager/+bug/1739805/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1831343] [NEW] [bionic] Full GNOME Session crash shortly after login

2019-06-01 Thread Timothy Burke
Public bug reported:

>From /var/log/syslog

Jun  1 10:52:50 armadillo gnome-session[1187]: gnome-session-binary[1187]: 
WARNING: Application 'org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.Color.desktop' failed to 
register before timeout
Jun  1 10:52:50 armadillo gnome-session-binary[1187]: WARNING: Application 
'org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.Color.desktop' failed to register before timeout
Jun  1 10:52:50 armadillo gnome-session-binary[1187]: Unrecoverable failure in 
required component org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.Color.desktop
Jun  1 10:52:50 armadillo gnome-session[1187]: gnome-session-binary[1187]: 
CRITICAL: We failed, but the fail whale is dead. Sorry
Jun  1 10:52:50 armadillo gnome-session-binary[1187]: CRITICAL: We failed, but 
the fail whale is dead. Sorry

Version 3.28.1-0ubuntu3

Has happened on multiple different installs on two different PCs (Dell
Latitude e6430 and Thinkpad x131e)

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: gnome-session-bin 3.28.1-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-20.21~18.04.1-generic 4.18.20
Uname: Linux 4.18.0-20-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.6
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sat Jun  1 11:43:05 2019
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gnome-session/gnome-session-binary
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-05-31 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20190210)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
 PATH=(custom, user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-session
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gnome-session (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic

** Description changed:

  From /var/log/syslog
  
  Jun  1 10:52:50 armadillo gnome-session[1187]: gnome-session-binary[1187]: 
WARNING: Application 'org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.Color.desktop' failed to 
register before timeout
  Jun  1 10:52:50 armadillo gnome-session-binary[1187]: WARNING: Application 
'org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.Color.desktop' failed to register before timeout
  Jun  1 10:52:50 armadillo gnome-session-binary[1187]: Unrecoverable failure 
in required component org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.Color.desktop
  Jun  1 10:52:50 armadillo gnome-session[1187]: gnome-session-binary[1187]: 
CRITICAL: We failed, but the fail whale is dead. Sorry
  Jun  1 10:52:50 armadillo gnome-session-binary[1187]: CRITICAL: We failed, 
but the fail whale is dead. Sorry
  
  Version 3.28.1-0ubuntu3
+ 
+ Has happened on multiple different installs on two different PCs (Dell
+ Latitude e6430 and Thinkpad x131e)
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: gnome-session-bin 3.28.1-0ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-20.21~18.04.1-generic 4.18.20
  Uname: Linux 4.18.0-20-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.6
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sat Jun  1 11:43:05 2019
  ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gnome-session/gnome-session-binary
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-05-31 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20190210)
  ProcEnviron:
-  LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
-  PATH=(custom, user)
-  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
-  LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
+  PATH=(custom, user)
+  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
+  LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-session
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831343

Title:
  [bionic] Full GNOME Session crash shortly after login

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/1831343/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1767808] Re: "drm timed out" with driver i915 + Intel Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics with Kernel 4.15

2019-05-27 Thread Timothy Noel Garner
okay I install

Ukuu 18.9

then i had it install
Linux kernel v5.1

Disabled
video=SVIDEO-1:d
in grub

restated the computer
and now like a champ it is working.

napalmfred@pop-os:~$ neofetch 
 /napalmfred@pop-os 
 /- 
  ///*767 OS: Pop!_OS 19.04 x86_64 
//7676767676*//   Host: Inspiron 1525 
   /76767//7676767//  Kernel: 5.1.0-050100-generic 
  /767676///*76767/// Uptime: 12 mins 
 ///767676///76767.///7676*///Packages: 1865 (dpkg) 
/767676//76767///767676   Shell: bash 5.0.3 
//7676767676776767/   Resolution: 1280x800 
///76767676//7676//   DE: GNOME 3.32.1 
,7676,///767///   WM: GNOME Shell 
/*7676///76   WM Theme: Pop 
///7676   Theme: Pop-slim-dark [GTK2/3] 
 ///7676///767Icons: Pop [GTK2/3] 
  //' Terminal: gnome-terminal 
   //.7676767676767676767,//  CPU: Pentium T4200 (2) @ 2.000GHz 
/767676767676767676767/   GPU: Intel Mobile GM965/GL960 
  /// Memory: 1588MiB / 5948MiB 
 /
 /

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767808

Title:
  "drm timed out" with driver i915 + Intel Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated
  Graphics with Kernel 4.15

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1767808/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1823815] [NEW] outdated version/votca bug #179 fix available, package update requested

2019-04-08 Thread Timothy D Thatcher
Public bug reported:

https://github.com/votca/csg/issues/179

A change in the behavior of /bin/dash broke some perl components of
votca-csg, as per the thread in the link above.

The issue seems to have been resolved in the new 1.5x releases of the
votca package that's available in disco, but the updated package has not
made it to bionic. There is a workaround, but it's not a particularly
great one, and the result is that the 1.4 package as it stands has
broken components in bionic due to this bug. I'm not sure I'm asking in
the right place, here, but if there's anyone who can offer some guidance
or help me figure out the right place/person to ask to get this package
(and its associated packages?) updated for bionic, I'd appreciate it
greatly. Thanks.

main package:
votca-csg/bionic 1.4.1-1build1 amd64
  VOTCA's coarse-graining engine

** Affects: votca-csg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1823815

Title:
  outdated version/votca bug #179 fix available, package update
  requested

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/votca-csg/+bug/1823815/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1814252] [NEW] package grub-pc 2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2019-02-01 Thread Timothy Chu
Public bug reported:

A error occur when install grub-pc

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04
Package: grub-pc 2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu10
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-12.13-generic 4.18.17
Uname: Linux 4.18.0-12-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu19
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Feb  1 19:20:20 2019
ErrorMessage: installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess 
returned error exit status 1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-12-08 (55 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.10 "Cosmic Cuttlefish" - Release amd64 (20181017.3)
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-4.18.0-12-generic 
root=UUID=25b94c1c-8aba-4a36-8b43-af9964615720 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.7, Python 3.7.2, python3-minimal, 3.7.2-1
PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.15+, python-minimal, 2.7.15-3
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.2ubuntu2
 apt  1.8.0~beta1
SourcePackage: grub2
Title: package grub-pc 2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: 
installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error 
exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package disco

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814252

Title:
  package grub-pc 2.02+dfsg1-5ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned
  error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1814252/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1783964] Re: Please make CONFIG_PWM_LPSS_PCI and CONFIG_PWM_LPSS_PLATFORM built in to make brightness adjustment working on various BayTrail/CherryTrail-based devices

2018-11-25 Thread Timothy Jones via ubuntu-bugs
Hello guys,

I'm kind of new regarding kernel patching. I've Asus T102HA and saw some
other blogs about how to control the backlight brightness. I tried to
message to people and asked for help but I got no response. Would you
guys help me how to fix the backlight brightness step by step?
Currently, I tried to install linux mint 19 mate edition and
Crunchbangplusplus versions. Both are working but couldn't set the
brightness to lower setting.

Thank you.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1783964

Title:
  Please make CONFIG_PWM_LPSS_PCI and CONFIG_PWM_LPSS_PLATFORM built in
  to make brightness adjustment working on various BayTrail/CherryTrail-
  based devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1783964/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1800951] Re: Me-TV on 18.10

2018-10-31 Thread Timothy Wolfson
** Description changed:

  Me-Tv with an ATI TV Wonder 600 worked fine on Lubuntu 18.04. On 18.10 I
- get a "failed to lock channel" error. DMESG conforms that the DVB-T
+ get a "failed to lock channel" error. DMESG confirms that the DVB-T
  device is recognized and loaded. Me-TV tries to scan for channels but no
  luck. Nothing has changed on my setup except for the clean install
  upgrade to 18.10. I reloaded the firmware and re-installed the Me-TV deb
  after the upgrade to 18.10.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1800951

Title:
  Me-TV on 18.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/me-tv/+bug/1800951/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1800951] [NEW] Me-TV on 18.10

2018-10-31 Thread Timothy Wolfson
Public bug reported:

Me-Tv with an ATI TV Wonder 600 worked fine on Lubuntu 18.04. On 18.10 I
get a "failed to lock channel" error. DMESG conforms that the DVB-T
device is recognized and loaded. Me-TV tries to scan for channels but no
luck. Nothing has changed on my setup except for the clean install
upgrade to 18.10. I reloaded the firmware and re-installed the Me-TV deb
after the upgrade to 18.10.

** Affects: me-tv (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1800951

Title:
  Me-TV on 18.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/me-tv/+bug/1800951/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1783972] [NEW] libglew-dev does not include cmake config files

2018-07-27 Thread Timothy Smith
Public bug reported:

libglew-dev does not include the cmake files required in
/usr/lib/cmake/glew

CopyImportedTargetProperties.cmake
glew-config.cmake
glew-targets.cmake
glew-targets-release.cmake

These allow the GLEW library to be found by CMake's find_package()
function when used in config mode.

(Apologies for assigning this bug to the wrong package. It is claimed
that https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/libglew-dev is not part of
Ubuntu)

** Affects: glew (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1783972

Title:
  libglew-dev does not include cmake config files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glew/+bug/1783972/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1783323] [NEW] package util-linux 2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: package util-linux is already installed and configured

2018-07-24 Thread Timothy Hennigar
Public bug reported:

none . new to this

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: util-linux 2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-20.21-generic 4.15.17
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-20-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7
AptdaemonVersion: 1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu19
Architecture: amd64
CrashReports: 600:0:117:252164:2018-07-24 08:07:20.20799 -0400:2018-07-24 
08:07:21.20799 -0400:/var/crash/util-linux.0.crash
Date: Tue Jul 24 08:07:20 2018
DpkgTerminalLog:
 Preparing to unpack .../util-linux_2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.1_amd64.deb ...
 Unpacking util-linux (2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.1) over (2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3) ...
  Log started: 2018-07-24  08:07:20
 dpkg: error processing package util-linux (--configure):
  package util-linux is already installed and configured
DuplicateSignature:
 package:util-linux:2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.1
 Unpacking util-linux (2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.1) over (2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3) ...
  Log started: 2018-07-24  08:07:20
 dpkg: error processing package util-linux (--configure):
  package util-linux is already installed and configured
ErrorMessage: package util-linux is already installed and configured
InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-07-23 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.6, Python 3.6.5, python3-minimal, 3.6.5-3
PythonDetails: /root/Error: command ['which', 'python'] failed with exit code 
1:, Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: "/root/Error: command ['which', 
'python'] failed with exit code 1:": "/root/Error: command ['which', 'python'] 
failed with exit code 1:", unpackaged
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.0.5ubuntu2
 apt  1.6.1
SourcePackage: dpkg
Title: package util-linux 2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
package util-linux is already installed and configured
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: already-installed amd64 apport-package bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1783323

Title:
  package util-linux 2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade:
  package util-linux is already installed and configured

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1783323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1782459] [NEW] Upgrade to Chef 13.8.7 package from upstream

2018-07-18 Thread Timothy Smith
Public bug reported:

Chef 12 is currently end of life and many cookbook maintainers including
Chef are dropping support for Chef 12 in their cookbooks. This makes it
very difficult to use the Chef release included in Ubuntu with modern
codebases. Debian sid currently has Chef 13.8.7, which isn't current,
but is still a supported release. It would be great to pull in the
latest Chef package for the next Ubuntu release.

** Affects: chef (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782459

Title:
  Upgrade to Chef 13.8.7 package from upstream

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chef/+bug/1782459/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1777925] [NEW] package gnome-menus 3.13.3-11ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: triggers looping, abandoned

2018-06-20 Thread Timothy Quinn
Public bug reported:

installation error.

I'm new to linux so my knowledge of attaching additional information is
limited.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: gnome-menus 3.13.3-11ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-128.154-generic 4.4.131
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-128-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.2
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Jun 20 14:03:44 2018
Dependencies:
 
DistributionChannelDescriptor:
 # This is a distribution channel descriptor
 # For more information see http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributionChannelDescriptor
 canonical-oem-somerville-xenial-amd64-20160624-2
ErrorMessage: triggers looping, abandoned
InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-06-10 (10 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 "Xenial" - Build amd64 LIVE Binary 
20160624-10:47
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.6, Python 3.6.5, python3-minimal, 3.6.5-3
PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.15rc1, python-minimal, 
2.7.15~rc1-1
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.0.5ubuntu2
 apt  1.6.1
SourcePackage: gnome-menus
Title: package gnome-menus 3.13.3-11ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: triggers 
looping, abandoned
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-06-20 (0 days ago)

** Affects: gnome-menus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1777925

Title:
  package gnome-menus 3.13.3-11ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  triggers looping, abandoned

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-menus/+bug/1777925/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1770883] [NEW] Shift key does not work for first character of password

2018-05-12 Thread Timothy Ma
Public bug reported:

Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

gnome-shell 3.28.1-0ubuntu2

Repro:
1. Cold boot OR resume from standby OR lock (e.g. super + L) and wait for 
screen to fade
2. Use mouse to reveal password input
3. (optional, can happen whether or not you do this) Right click password box 
and select "Show Text"
4. Press SHIFT + (any key)

Expected result: 
Character corresponding to SHIFT + key is inputted into the password box.

Actual result: 
Character corresponding to key (without SHIFT) is inputted into the password 
box.

Other notes: 
If any key is pressed prior to inputting password then the SHIFT + key works 
properly. E.g. if I press enter to reveal the password input, or if I press 
SHIFT an extra time before step 4 of the repro.

** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Summary changed:

- Shift key sometimes does not work for first character of password
+ Shift key does not work for first character of password

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770883

Title:
  Shift key does not work for first character of password

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1770883/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1767402] Re: hash mismatch or wrong accept-license key trying to install virtualbox-ext-pack 5.2.10

2018-05-07 Thread Timothy Pratley
great! thank you @zebul666

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767402

Title:
  hash mismatch or wrong accept-license key trying to install
  virtualbox-ext-pack 5.2.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox-ext-pack/+bug/1767402/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1767402] Re: hash mismatch or wrong accept-license key trying to install virtualbox-ext-pack 5.2.10

2018-05-07 Thread Timothy Pratley
Ah I found this: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/138188/easily-
unpack-deb-edit-postinst-and-repack-deb :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767402

Title:
  hash mismatch or wrong accept-license key trying to install
  virtualbox-ext-pack 5.2.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox-ext-pack/+bug/1767402/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1767402] Re: hash mismatch or wrong accept-license key trying to install virtualbox-ext-pack 5.2.10

2018-05-07 Thread Timothy Pratley
Hi, thanks for the solution. How do I edit the "postinst file of the
package"?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767402

Title:
  hash mismatch or wrong accept-license key trying to install
  virtualbox-ext-pack 5.2.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox-ext-pack/+bug/1767402/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1769413] [NEW] package boinc-app-seti-graphics 8.00~svn3701-1 failed to install/upgrade: installed boinc-app-seti-graphics package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2018-05-05 Thread Timothy Lyanguzov
Public bug reported:

update-boinc-applinks is missing. The installation script of boinc-app-
seti-graphics fails running the update-boinc-applinks

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: boinc-app-seti-graphics 8.00~svn3701-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-20.21-generic 4.15.17
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-20-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7
AptOrdering:
 freeglut3:amd64: Install
 NULL: ConfigurePending
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun May  6 13:19:16 2018
ErrorMessage: installed boinc-app-seti-graphics package post-installation 
script subprocess returned error exit status 127
InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-05-20 (1081 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 15.04 "Vivid Vervet" - Release amd64 (20150422)
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.6, Python 3.6.5, python3-minimal, 3.6.5-3
PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.15rc1, python-minimal, 
2.7.15~rc1-1
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.0.5ubuntu2
 apt  1.6.1
SourcePackage: boinc-app-seti
Title: package boinc-app-seti-graphics 8.00~svn3701-1 failed to 
install/upgrade: installed boinc-app-seti-graphics package post-installation 
script subprocess returned error exit status 127
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-05-06 (0 days ago)

** Affects: boinc-app-seti (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1769413

Title:
  package boinc-app-seti-graphics 8.00~svn3701-1 failed to
  install/upgrade: installed boinc-app-seti-graphics package post-
  installation script subprocess returned error exit status 127

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc-app-seti/+bug/1769413/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >