[Bug 1071277] Re: Banshee doesn't remember volume setting
Any chance this fix can be sent upstream to the Banshee devs, as this bug is not unique to Ubuntu (it affects Banshee 2.6 on all Linux distros)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071277 Title: Banshee doesn't remember volume setting To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/banshee/+bug/1071277/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 841476] [NEW] Slashes in ID3 tags not properly displayed
Public bug reported: I have a collection of songs by the old rock group AC/DC. According to official convention, the band name is spelled with the slash. All of my songs have ID3v1, ID3v2.3, and APEv2 tags, and in all tags, the artist name is spelled AC/DC. However, when listed in Banshee, it displays the song artist as AC; DC, which is clearly wrong. Even though my tags are all correct and correctly display everywhere else within Ubuntu and elsewhere, I have attempted to correct the tags in Banshee (right-click -- Edit Track Information by changing AC; DC to AC/DC. The changed tracks will then display correctly for a few seconds, and then revert back to AC; DC. Operating System: Linux Mint 11 Katya (based on Ubuntu 11.04) Banshee: v2.0.0 ** Affects: banshee (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841476 Title: Slashes in ID3 tags not properly displayed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/841476/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 728161] Re: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73JH
I noticed that this bug is marked as Incomplete. Is there still information one of us needs to provide? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728161 Title: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73JH To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/728161/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 713278] Re: Touchpad Hotkey not working on Asus V6
I'm running Linux Mint 11 Katya, which is based on Ubuntu 11.04 Natty. I just tried the trick in reply #5, adding the hotkey to gnome- keybinding-properties, and the Fn+F9 combination finally works to enable and disable the touchpad on my Asus G73JH laptop. I did not have to edit or alter /etc/acpi/asus-touchpad.sh at all. What I find interesting is that the hotkey event handler /etc/acpi/events/asus-touchpad does not appear to work at all, even though it has the proper hotkey definition according to acpi_listen. As far as I could tell, the hotkey was not being trapped at all. With Ubuntu 10.10, I had the opposite issue: The hotkey event handler worked, properly passing control to asus-touchpad.sh, but the sh script itself would hang at the first xinput command. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713278 Title: Touchpad Hotkey not working on Asus V6 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 211631] Re: Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown)
On a functional level perhaps it is worth considering whether Network Manager, on stopping, should simply leave the interfaces as currently configured instead of taking them down. I can make the argument that Network Manager is a tool to make it easy for the user to control network interfaces, but Network Manager is not the owner of those interfaces, the system and user are. If the user makes a connection using Network Manger and then disables NM, why shouldn't the interface stay up until the user or a shutdown sequence takes it down? Good point. However, an argument could also be made that if a user uses Network Manager to set up and establish the network connections, the user expects Network Manager to own and manage those connections. A logical extension of this expectation is that, when Network Manager is shut down, it takes its connections with it. If the user wants a more permanent connection, then the user should set up the connection manually. At least, that's the way I would expect things to work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 Title: Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown) -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 211631] Re: Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown)
On a functional level perhaps it is worth considering whether Network Manager, on stopping, should simply leave the interfaces as currently configured instead of taking them down. I can make the argument that Network Manager is a tool to make it easy for the user to control network interfaces, but Network Manager is not the owner of those interfaces, the system and user are. If the user makes a connection using Network Manger and then disables NM, why shouldn't the interface stay up until the user or a shutdown sequence takes it down? Good point. However, an argument could also be made that if a user uses Network Manager to set up and establish the network connections, the user expects Network Manager to own and manage those connections. A logical extension of this expectation is that, when Network Manager is shut down, it takes its connections with it. If the user wants a more permanent connection, then the user should set up the connection manually. At least, that's the way I would expect things to work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 Title: Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 728161] Re: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73JH
I just recently upgraded to Linux Mint 11 RC (Katya), which is based on Ubuntu 11.04. I can confirm Alek's solution in Reply#13 works for enabling the subwoofer. Audio from the laptop speakers now sounds great. There is a catch, however: With snd-hda-intel set as model=basic, the subwoofer works, but the front speakers no longer mute when headphones are plugged in. With snd-hda-intel set as model=auto, model=laptop (or laptop-amic), the speakers mute properly when headphones are plugged in, but the subwoofer stops working again. I will play around with some of the other snd-hda-intel options to see what they do. One thing that's interesting to note: With model=auto set, the following options show up under Output:Connector within Sound Preferences: Analog Headphones, Analog Speakers, Analog Output. However, these settings are a bit goofy. Looking at ALSAMIXER while changing these settings, I can see that Analog Speakers has both Headphone and Speaker volumes set at 96 (default) - however, the speakers do mute when headphones are plugged in though ALSAMIXER does not reflect this. Analog Headphones properly mutes the speakers as shown in ALSAMIXER. Now, here's the weird part: Analog Output sets Speaker volume to 0 and leaves Headphone at 96. If I adjust the speaker volume, then change output mode to something else and back to Analog Output, Speaker volume reverts to 0 again, even if alsactl store 0 was issued before changing output modes. This leads me to believe the volume levels are hard-coded somewhere. Does anyone know where these are set? This might fix the speaker muting issue with snd-hda-intel model=basic option set. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728161 Title: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73JH -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 768506] Re: CIFS VFS Server is slowing down shutdown
It gets worse than that! It would seem that /etc/init.d/umountnfs.sh is not completing execution, hanging somewhere after evaluating /etc/mtab for nfs/cifs mounts, but before the variable $DIRS itself can be evaluated and acted upon! I ended up taking matters into my own hands and modified umountnfs.sh by adding a line to explicitly unmount my network share, immediately after the mtab evaluation, as so: exec 90 /etc/mtab umount //192.168.1.100/MyNET\ Shares/ DIRS= As a result, shutdown only takes a few seconds and no longer hangs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768506 Title: CIFS VFS Server is slowing down shutdown -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 772992] Re: quick-lounge-applet makes gnome-panel segfault on Ubuntu Natty
This has also been reported upstream to the Gnome guys. See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636943 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #636943 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636943 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772992 Title: quick-lounge-applet makes gnome-panel segfault on Ubuntu Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 772992] Re: quick-lounge-applet makes gnome-panel segfault on Ubuntu Natty
I am having exactly the same problem with Linux Mint 11 Katya. Installing the quick-lounge-applet goes fine, but as soon as I try to add it to the gnome panel, gnome panel (2.32.1) disappears, a strange shadow shows up in its place, and it goes into an endless relaunch/crash cycle. Something about the latest Gnome Panel used in the Ubuntu Natty Gnome desktop (and, by extension, Mint Katya) seems to have broken compatibility with quick-lounge-applet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772992 Title: quick-lounge-applet makes gnome-panel segfault on Ubuntu Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 728161] Re: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73JH
Here you go! ** Attachment added: Requested ALSA-Info https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/728161/+attachment/1908955/+files/alsa-info.txt.pJJXPCQGNX -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728161 Title: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73JH -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 728161] Re: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73JH
I installed the package and rebooted, then tried playing something over the speakers, but nothing seems to have changed. I looked in ALSAMIXER settings, and nothing looks different there either. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728161 Title: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73JH -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 728161] Re: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73JH
Is that something I need to fix myself, a result of misconfiguration? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728161 Title: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73JH -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 728161] Re: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73JH
Here's the requested ALSA-INFO output. ** Attachment added: alsa-info.txt.vJd9nOKCQ6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/728161/+attachment/1883618/+files/alsa-info.txt.vJd9nOKCQ6 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728161 Title: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73JH -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 673051] Re: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73Jw
Although I don't think the difference between the JW and the JH affect the audio subsystem in any way (the only major difference between the two is the GPU, which is on a different daughtercard for the same mainboard, I believe), I'll file mine as a separate bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673051 Title: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73Jw -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 728161] [NEW] Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73JH
Public bug reported: This issue is nearly identical to that reported in Bug#673051, but on a different ASUS laptop model. Like the ASUS G73JW, the ASUS G73JH has a built-in subwoofer. This subwoofer works perfectly under Windows, but does not work at all under Ubuntu Linux 10.10. As a result, sound coming from the laptop speakers sounds thin and tinny on Ubuntu, instead of the rich, full sound under Windows. Linux Distribution: Ubuntu x86 Desktop, 10.10 Linux kernel: 2.6.35-27-generic-pae ALSA version: 1.0.23+dfsg-1ubuntu4 nonfree kernel modules: fglrx_pci (Catalyst 10.11) $ sudo lspci -vv output (for default audio device): 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset High Defini tion Audio (rev 06) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device 1373 Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Step ping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 50 Region 0: Memory at d3e0 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=55mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3ho t+,D3cold+) Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME- Capabilities: [60] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+ Address: fee8800c Data: 41b1 Capabilities: [70] Express (v1) Root Complex Integrated Endpoint, MSI 00 DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s 64ns, L1 1us ExtTag- RBE- FLReset+ DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported- RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop- MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq- AuxPwr+ TransPend- LnkCap: Port #0, Speed unknown, Width x0, ASPM unknown, Latency L0 64ns, L1 1us ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot- LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; Disabled- Retrain- CommClk- ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt- LnkSta: Speed unknown, Width x0, TrErr- Train- SlotClk- DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt- Capabilities: [100 v1] Virtual Channel Caps: LPEVC=0 RefClk=100ns PATEntryBits=1 Arb:Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128- Ctrl: ArbSelect=Fixed Status: InProgress- VC0:Caps: PATOffset=00 MaxTimeSlots=1 RejSnoopTrans- Arb:Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128- TWRR128- WRR256- Ctrl: Enable+ ID=0 ArbSelect=Fixed TC/VC=01 Status: NegoPending- InProgress- VC1:Caps: PATOffset=00 MaxTimeSlots=1 RejSnoopTrans- Arb:Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128- TWRR128- WRR256- Ctrl: Enable+ ID=2 ArbSelect=Fixed TC/VC=04 Status: NegoPending- InProgress- Capabilities: [130 v1] Root Complex Link Desc: PortNumber=0f ComponentID=00 EltType=Config Link0: Desc: TargetPort=00 TargetComponent=00 AssocRCRB- LinkType=MemMapped LinkValid+ Addr: fed1c000 Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel ** Affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728161 Title: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73JH -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 673051] Re: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73Jw
New bug filed, Bug#728161 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673051 Title: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73Jw -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 673051] Re: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73Jw
I am an ASUS J73JH owner running Ubuntu 10.10 (2.6.35-25-generic-pae kernel), and my issue is the same as the JW owners here: There is no output from the subwoofer whatsoever. I just wanted to point this out before anyone got to thinking things are working for the JH. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673051 Title: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73Jw -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 673051] Re: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73Jw
Sorry, that should be I am an ASUS G73JH owner... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673051 Title: Laptop subwoofer is not functional on ASUS G73Jw -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 382703] Re: Home Folder has 3 different names
What about just calling it My Home? Sure, it's a bit Windows-esque, but it's a concept the widest audience is already familiar with, does away with the question of using User Name vs. username, has no translation issues, still lends a personal feel to the desktop experience, and can be consistently applied across the board. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382703 Title: Home Folder has 3 different names -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 476625] Re: Grub2 affected when os-prober incorrectly identifies Windows and Recovery partitions
I have a fix for the problem. This affects those with Windows Vista partitions being mis-identified as Windows Recovery Environment. The problem is that os-prober is using /usr/lib/os- probes/mounted/20microsoft to read specific attributes of the identified Windows drive. One of these attributes is checking for W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .R.e.c.o.v.e.r.y. .E.n.v.i.r.o.n.m.e.n.t within C:\boot\BCD. In Vista and Windows 7, the BCD file will have that entry. Windows 7 users avoid this problem because os-prober checks for W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .7 first, then checks for Windows Recovery Environment. It doesn't even look for a Vista entry, it just assumes the drive is a Vista drive if all other checks fail. The solution, therefore, is to specifically check for W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .V.i.s.t.a *before* checking for Windows Recovery Environment, and after checking for Windows 7. Ideally, the presence of Windows Recovery Environment should be the last thing checked. I don't know if this is the ultimate solution, and I don't have an actual Windows Recovery partition to check this against, but the attached file works for me. Simply replace /usr/lib/os- probes/mounted/20microsoft with the attached file and re-run update- grub.?field.comment=I have a fix for the problem. This affects those with Windows Vista partitions being mis-identified as Windows Recovery Environment. The problem is that os-prober is using /usr/lib/os- probes/mounted/20microsoft to read specific attributes of the identified Windows drive. One of these attributes is checking for W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .R.e.c.o.v.e.r.y. .E.n.v.i.r.o.n.m.e.n.t within C:\boot\BCD. In Vista and Windows 7, the BCD file will have that entry. Windows 7 users avoid this problem because os-prober checks for W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .7 first, then checks for Windows Recovery Environment. It doesn't even look for a Vista entry, it just assumes the drive is a Vista drive if all other checks fail. The solution, therefore, is to specifically check for W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .V.i.s.t.a *before* checking for Windows Recovery Environment, and after checking for Windows 7. Ideally, the presence of Windows Recovery Environment should be the last thing checked. I don't know if this is the ultimate solution, and I don't have an actual Windows Recovery partition to check this against, but the attached file works for me. Simply replace /usr/lib/os- probes/mounted/20microsoft with the attached file and re-run update- grub. ** Attachment added: Replacement 20microsoft file for os-prober http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50937366/20microsoft -- Grub2 affected when os-prober incorrectly identifies Windows and Recovery partitions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476625 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 476625] Re: Grub2 affected when os-prober incorrectly identifies Windows and Recovery partitions
I had installed one of the later beta releases of Ubuntu 10.04 (latest version available in early April), and my Vista partition was identified correctly. Then, just yesterday, I finally noticed Update Manager trying to get my attention, so I updated. Now, my Vista partition is mis- identified as Windows Recovery Environment. I do not have a recovery partition on this laptop. My boot priority also got changed (I had it set to boot Windows by default). I like Grub2, but it really should allow me to manually make changes without having to rely on obscure scripts to autodetect things and lock me out of the process. That just isn't the Linux way. Menu.lst really needs to come back. -- Grub2 affected when os-prober incorrectly identifies Windows and Recovery partitions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476625 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 503780] Re: OpenAL Soft doesn't work with PulseAudio (Ubuntu's default sound system)
just add a file to your home folder name .alsoftrc and inside put drivers=pulse this fixed the problem for me and proves that the default behaviour is wrong and needs to be fixed! This actually *broke* openAL for me! What I did: Edited ~/.openalrc and added the line drivers=pulse (the existing drivers line is commented out). Launched gmplayer, set audio preference to OpenAL. Restarted gmplayer. Loaded an MP3 file. Pressed Play. Observed PulseAudio Manager opened a new sink named Playback Stream, with gmplayer as owner. Observed gmplayer froze completely. No response from UI whatsoever. No sound from gmplayer. Killed the sink using PulseAudio Manager. This unfroze gmplayer. Pressed Play again, and observed the same indications again. Killed the sink, then changed gmplayer's audio prefs to use Pulse directly. Pressed Play again, and gmplayer played normally. This is with libopenal.so.1.10.622 $ ls /usr/lib/libopenal* libopenal.so.1 libopenal.so.1.10.622 -- OpenAL Soft doesn't work with PulseAudio (Ubuntu's default sound system) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 512615] Re: fonts are incorrectly rendered due to not using system cairo
This is affecting me as well, to such a degree that viewing websites for more than a few minutes in FF3.6 actually strains and hurts my eyes! I am actually going to use Google Chrome until this is fixed. This should be elevated to the highest severity possible. This may not be a showstopper as far as program stability goes; but it is a definite showstopper in that it can actually cause bodily injury trying to use it! -- fonts are incorrectly rendered due to not using system cairo https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512615 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459647] Re: Cannot change mouse cursor theme when compiz is enabled
Any word on this issue? Any workarounds? Anything? This may be of low importance, but it is very annoying nonetheless - the sort of thing that makes Windows users point and laugh. -- Cannot change mouse cursor theme when compiz is enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 67826] Re: Boot starts with: setting mode nnn x nnn failed
I don't think this is a driver problem either. If I'm not mistaken, the nVidia (or whatever) drivers aren't even loaded at this point, which means it's still using the standard VESA driver until X loads up. It's also interesting that this is affecting everyone with 1440x900 screens, which is a 16:10 (8:5) resolution; however, the screenmode we are being told has failed is a 4:3 resolution, as is the fallback 1024x768 (which is a standard SVGA resolution I had never heard of 1152x864 before this issue came up). -Original Message- From: Gabe Gorelick Subject: [Bug 67826] Re: Boot starts with: setting mode nnn x nnn failed Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:19:25 - @kris, I agree this doesn't look like a driver issue, especially since I still get this without using the nVidia driver. Can anyone confirm this on non-nVidia hardware? -- Boot starts with: setting mode nnn x nnn failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67826 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381201] Re: snd-hda-intel powersave option and CLICK from speakers
I had this problem, but I managed to fix it by a rather different approach than the workarounds already posted here. I have an HP Pavilion dv9830 laptop, and noticed that the light in my keyboard media strip's mute button would turn from blue (supposed to indicate not-muted) to orange (supposed to indicate muted) about 15 seconds after the last sound has played. The next sound played after that would turn the light blue again, but would also make a loud pop sound when the light changes, and I'd notice the first half-second or so of the sound would be clipped off. Now, although this mute button light works as it should in Windows, it has never worked properly in Ubuntu. In fact, if I mute the sound either through the button or through the speaker icon in my notifications area, the sound mutes, but the light stays blue. This leads me to believe that the light turning orange in Ubuntu is actually indicating that the sound card is being powered off. So, I went into /etc/pulse/default.pa, found the following line: load-module module-suspend-on-idle and commented it out. I then restarted Pulseaudio (killall -9 pulseaudio, and let it respawn), and now the light stays blue, and there's no more popping or clicking when a sample is played. I don't think the popping/clicking when the sound card is being woken up is a bug. At least, it's not a software bug, and it's nothing that Ubuntu can control or fix. It is a hardware issue caused by powering up the sound circuitry. Therefore, I believe the best way to resolve this issue is not to remove the powersave feature, as it can be an important feature for netbooks and laptops. Rather, the way to resolve this issue is to add an option to PA Prefs to enable or disable Powersave mode and to set the delay time; and have this option disabled by default. -- snd-hda-intel powersave option and CLICK from speakers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381201 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 398496] Re: Account locked: Unknown reason. Logging into the Yahoo! website may fix this.
I've also been bitten by this bug recently. When I attempt to connect with Pidgin 2.6.3, I get the Account Locked: Unknown Reason error, but I am able to log in through Yahoo's web services without a problem. Despite successfully logging into all my Yahoo services on the web, I still get the Account Locked error in Pidgin. I have a secondary Yahoo account that can connect in Pidgin without a problem. -- Account locked: Unknown reason. Logging into the Yahoo! website may fix this. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398496 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 394500] Re: [Karmic] processes holding /dev/dsp* or /dev/snd/pcm* cause pulseaudio: card not found - Null Output / Dummy Output
I am also affected by this bug. Everything was fine until I activated the restricted driver for my modem. Upon reboot, no sound, and no sound hardware registered in alsamixer or pulseaudio. Issuing 'sudo alsa force-reload' restored sound and placed my sound hardware back in pulseaudio's hardware tab. cat /proc/asound/card*/codec* | grep Codec: Codec: Realtek ALC268 Codec: Motorola Si3054 lspci -v: 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 30cc Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 31 Memory at f840 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: access denied Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel sudo alsa force-reload: lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon file system /home/briandoe/.gvfs Output information may be incomplete. Terminating processes: 1140lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon file system /home/briandoe/.gvfs Output information may be incomplete. 1864lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon file system /home/briandoe/.gvfs Output information may be incomplete. 4171lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon file system /home/briandoe/.gvfs Output information may be incomplete. 4198lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon file system /home/briandoe/.gvfs Output information may be incomplete. (with SIGKILL:) 4240lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon file system /home/briandoe/.gvfs Output information may be incomplete. (failed: processes still using sound devices: 4285(pulseaudio)). lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon file system /home/briandoe/.gvfs Output information may be incomplete. /sbin/alsa: Warning: Processes using sound devices: 4285(pulseaudio). Unloading ALSA sound driver modules: snd-hda-codec-si3054 snd-hda-codec-realtek snd-hda-intel snd-hda-codec snd-hwdep snd-pcm-oss snd-mixer-oss snd-pcm snd-seq-dummy snd-seq-oss snd-seq-midi snd-rawmidi snd-seq-midi-event snd-seq snd-timer snd-seq-device snd-page-alloc (failed: modules still loaded: snd-hda-codec-si3054 snd-hda-codec-realtek snd-hda-intel snd-hda-codec snd-hwdep snd-pcm snd-timer snd-page-alloc). Loading ALSA sound driver modules: snd-hda-codec-si3054 snd-hda-codec-realtek snd-hda-intel snd-hda-codec snd-hwdep snd-pcm-oss snd-mixer-oss snd-pcm snd-seq-dummy snd-seq-oss snd-seq-midi snd-rawmidi snd-seq-midi-event snd-seq snd-timer snd-seq-device snd-page-alloc. -- [Karmic] processes holding /dev/dsp* or /dev/snd/pcm* cause pulseaudio: card not found - Null Output / Dummy Output https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394500 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210854] Re: when un-muting with headphones connected, the sound comes out from the speakers
I am affected by this bug as well. HP Pavilion dv9370us Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackelope Linux Prue 2.6.28-15-generic #52-Ubuntu SMP Wed Sep 9 10:49:34 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux Relevant output from lspci: 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03) If I boot with headphones plugged in, sound comes from both headphones and front speakers. Unplugging and replugging headphones corrects this problem. If I mute audio, and then unmute audio with headphones plugged in, sound comes from both headphones and front speakers. Again, unplugging and replugging headphones corrects this problem. Is there any additional information needed? -- when un-muting with headphones connected, the sound comes out from the speakers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210854 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 382703] Re: Home Folder has 3 different names
I don't know if it's too late to add my own two cents -- if so, then it's free. :p When I first switched to Linux two years ago, the idea of the home directory kinda threw me as well, but then Windows Vista ran with the concept. Now, I don't have a lot of good things to say about Vista, but one thing I feel they did get right was changing the structure of its users' personal folders, so now it closely resembles how Ubuntu does it. I also like how Vista addressed the naming of this folder, to a degree. This is how I feel Ubuntu should handle the current Home Folder naming mess: From a filesystem standpoint, the users' home folders should remain named their login name. On Nautilus, in Gnome's Places menu (and other desktop managers that handle shortcuts), and anywhere else where the user's home folder is referenced in a GUI, it should be listed as the user's full first and last names, if both are available -- otherwise fall back to the user's login name. My reason for using the full name approach when available is simple: Being called by your real name is more personal. Being called by whatever screen name you've been arbitrarily assigned by your administrator (or have given yourself in order to prevent spaces in your login name) is just not as personal. To me, it seems cold and abstract. So, in summary (since I have a tendency to ramble): Home references in shell/cli: value of $USER Home references in GUI (Nautilus, Places, etc.): First Name + Last Name, if BOTH are available; otherwise fall back to value of $USER. -- Home Folder has 3 different names https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382703 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information / new update-manager behaviour is annoying
I can certainly agree with and appreciate that. It is true that the notification area in the average Ubuntu installation is nowhere near as cluttered as the system tray in the average Windows installation, and it is better to solve a problem *before* it becomes a problem rather than after. I'd like to think that Ubuntu users are a cut above Windows users, and that we don't simply ignore icons we don't understand. With that said, however, I also understand that when a Windows user chooses to (or is persuaded to) try out Linux, Ubuntu is usually the distro of choice - and for good reason. While a cluttered notification area is not very ideal, forcing windows to pop up uncommanded in the user's face is truly bad form - the sort of thing I thought GNU/Linux was above. The average Windows convert would likely panic, thinking that he or she had contracted a virus; and the average Linux user would start having Windows flashbacks. I realize I'm preaching to the choir here, and that the people who *really* need to hear this are no longer listening, but... If Ubuntu is going to continue to serve as the bridge between the Windows and Linux communities, then we really need to set better examples than this, and not give in to the Windows way of doing things. -Original Message- From: Chauncellor Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:13:25 - Loïc Martin: I believe that, while it was certainly a plus for them to clean up the notification dialogue, the end goal was to make updates more noticeable and present for the average user that would probably just ignore the icon in the tray. Nine out of ten Windows machines that I fix have a swamp of icons in the tray, and the customers that I handle almost always don't know what any of them do. While there is certainly a lesser amount of icons in Ubuntu, it would still probably be ignored just as much. -- [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information / new update-manager behaviour is annoying https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369110] Re: gmdb2 (mdb viewer) crash on Jaunty
I had the same problem with gmdb2 as the OP. Using the patch Lirk pointed to fixed it for me as well. This really needs to be updated in the repos! -- gmdb2 (mdb viewer) crash on Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369110 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information
-Original Message- From: Vincenzo Ciancia Subject: Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:59:50 - I am in all ways against automatic updates because I think the user must be aware of when something delicate is happening. E.g. in the last week before submitting a thesis, if the system is upgraded and for some reason broken, you sure that I will come and kill some of you :) You are all lukcy that I am not supposed to submit any more theses. I can see your point; however, this can happen even to those who manually approve each and every update. It happened to me a couple of months ago where I approved a kernel update, and the update crashed X and kept it from being able to start. Granted, I was subscribed to Proposed updates and so expected that sort of thing to happen, but it can still happen to anyone whether the update was automated or not. At least with manual updates, if something goes wrong, you've got a better idea where to look for the cause. At any rate, I don't think it's really going to be a big issue, if only the security updates are automated. I've had automatic updates enabled on my file server for more than a year, and it hasn't crashed yet - and before you say, well, yes, but that's a server, I do have gdm and ubuntu-desktop packages installed. No, we should not do something potentially harmful by default. What if an user does not know this and finds a 6000 euros internet bill at the end of the month? Sure that'll be experience but I don't think they will use linux anymore. Anything that may make automatic connections should require user authorization. How to make this seamless is a possible space for decision. The same could be said for Windows. Since Windows XP SP2, automatic security updates are turned on by default, and users have to specifically opt out of it to turn it off. Someone transitioning from a recent version of Windows should be used to that behavior. Perhaps, instead of automatically enabling automatic updates, it can be one of the questions asked during Ubuntu installation. -- [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information
Regarding automatic updates: I'm with Martin on this one; I believe it should be turned on by default. If you are on a pay-per-use Internet plan or a plan that places a cap on your usage, you can simply go in and turn off the automatic updates. After all, if Canonical is so concerned about the security of its users' installations that it feels the situation warrants interrupting the user with uncommanded popups, then having the system automatically update itself without user intervention should be right up its alley. I'm curious to know how update manager displays itself if the system needs to be rebooted after an update, and the user has already closed the window... Regarding forking Ubuntu: Does anyone know if Mint has/will have this improvement? -Original Message- From: Stanislaw Pitucha virap...@gmail.com Reply-to: Bug 332945 332...@bugs.launchpad.net To: brian...@att.net Subject: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:05:56 - @Martin: No - there are two problems with automatic [anything]: 1. I may be using the application that is being upgraded - and may cause it to crash / misbehave. 2. An automatic download at the wrong time might be very costly for the user. For example on my 3G connection it costs me the same to download the first 3GB of data in a month and to download every 60MB after that. That means any program starting an update at a random time, may end up costing me a lot of real money (without a warning). An openoffice update at a wrong time could really hit me. @Vincenzo Ciancia: ... the popup is not going away unless you make your own fork of ubuntu. Pidgin was forked for less annoying changes... With ubuntu it's even easier - a PPA with a fixed package is enough. If the option of going back to no-popup version is disabled in Karmic, I'm definitely making such package - I still consider the popup behaviour in whatever form to be broken / a bug. -- [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information
I know this is probably no consolation for a lot of us in the short term, but there IS an option here: Like any other free open-source software, source code for all of what makes up Gnome is available. If Gnome is taking a turn in an undesirable direction, there's no reason why Gnome can't fork. It's not like we're entirely powerless here. -Original Message- From: Chauncellor brettcornw...@gmail.com Reply-to: Bug 332945 332...@bugs.launchpad.net To: brian...@att.net Subject: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:22:25 - mb_webguy: Perhaps you should take a look at bug number 1 :). While Linux might not care, Ubuntu does. Really, I'm just scared to death of Gnome 2.30/3.0 modeling too much after Mac - meaning having nothing of real productive value in the GUI (good lord, if there's a dock, I swear I'll kill myself). If this happens, I believe for the first time I'll be considering switching over to KDE. I've always loved GNOME for the two+ years I've used it, and I'd hate for it to get spoiled. Don't get me wrong, I'm welcome to changes in GNOME, but if there isn't a good substitute for the notification area, which seems to be the ultimate victim, I'm afraid I wouldn't be the only one ditching it. I digress, though. ddumont, even though I agree with you, I feel that aggression won't get us anywhere. MPT knows that the majority of us hate it already. At this point in time, I'm just pleading for an option. Give us an option to keep the notification tray if we end up not liking the alternative presented, and please give us the option of having our updates showing up in there. -- [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information
True. I believe the correct term would be fascism; but we are getting way off topic. FWIW, I noticed that the behavior of the update window seems to have changed since I first installed Jaunty. Instead of opening as a popup/popunder, it is opening minimized in my task panel. Though this is not as annoying as having the window get in my face every time it wants attention, it is still annoying, and to me seems to violate the principle of the reason for all this change to begin with. Now, instead of an innocuous icon sitting in my notification tray, I have a minimized window sitting on my task panel. They didn't really clean up the notification area; they just simply moved them somewhere else! -Original Message- On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 13:55 +, Toralv wrote: I think it's rather communistic of those responsible for this change to impose their personal preference on everybody. Hrm. You don't seem to understand the concept of communism and are making the common mistake of calling what you characterize as a dictatorship as communism. But the discussion of that is OT for this thread. -- [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 280625] Re: Applications use the PC speaker beep for alerts altough a sound file is set up in sound settings
** Also affects: gnome-desktop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Applications use the PC speaker beep for alerts altough a sound file is set up in sound settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280625 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 280625] Re: Applications use the PC speaker beep for alerts altough a sound file is set up in sound settings
Nominating for Gnome-Desktop, since this issue appears to be system-wide throughout Gnome. With Play Alert Sound enabled in Preferences - Sound, ALL applications that generate an alert causes the system beep to be used instead of the user-defined alert sound, even if the chosen sound is valid. This is the 21st century. The ONLY time system beep should ever be used is when the normal sound system (OSS, ALSA, whatever) has completely failed and the system has no other means of indicating alerts. -- Applications use the PC speaker beep for alerts altough a sound file is set up in sound settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280625 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 331589] Re: Extremely loud and intrusive system beep with (some?) HD Audio devices
There are indeed three separate but possibly related problems intertwined in this ticket: 1. PCSpeaker audio too loud. I haven't noticed this problem myself, specifically. My laptop's PCSpeaker output is routed through my sound card anyway, possibly a BIOS function. Something interesting to note here, though: PCSpeaker output is *always* through my laptop speakers, whether I have headphones plugged in or not (HDA Intel). However, I do have a volume control setting for Beep on my mixer. It is currently muted (which has no effect on its output through my speakers), but unmuting it and turning the volume up results in it being output through my headphones as well. 2. Beeps at system shutdown. I can confirm this one. The beeps in question are the alert beeps that normally happen when one issues a shutdown command in console. I have always heard the series of beeps whenever I issue a shutdown command within a terminal window, from TTY, or over SSH if I remotely shut down another computer. These are also distinct from the system beep in lieu of alert sound bug, as these beeps are of a much higher pitch. It's important to note that these beeps have *never* been triggered by a shutdown from desktop; only from a shell shutdown. It is only with Jaunty that the beeps are now accompanying a shutdown from desktop. 3. System beep in lieu of alert sound setting in Gnome Sound Preferences. This is a separate bug from #2, and may or may not be related. I have had this bug for as long as I can remember (I joined the Linux community with Feisty). Gnome Desktop seems to have never honored my alert sound settings. Now, what is TRULY interesting here is that, although Gnome does not honor it, some non-GTK programs do - namely Second Life. Backspacing too far within the SL client causes your chosen alert sound to play. So, this is clearly a Gnome bug. As for the Compiz situation: I do not understand why it has a system beep setting. It seems to me that, if Compiz is going to be an official part of Ubuntu, then it should be integrated far better than it is now. This means forcing Compiz to honor all Gnome settings, rather than forcing users to set window decorators, mouse pointers, and system beeps in two different places. -- Extremely loud and intrusive system beep with (some?) HD Audio devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331589 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366784] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 - PrintScreen Key does not start gnome-screenshot
I had this problem as well. However, when I went into Preferences in CCSM and reset all settings back to default, PrtSc worked again. I then went through and individually changed each Compiz plugin settings back to the way I wanted them, which includes the Desktop Cube, and PrtSc still works. I haven't tried rebooting yet to make sure everything still works afterward, but based on what I experienced here, it seems maybe older Compiz profiles saved on Intrepid and before might be the cause of the problem. -- Ubuntu 9.04 - PrintScreen Key does not start gnome-screenshot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366784 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376364] [NEW] Evolution stops connecting to internet
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution After an indeterminable period of time after being launched, Evolution will no longer communicate with the Internet. Internet connection is fine, all other applications can access it without any problems, but Evolution will hang trying to load images or upload/download new messages. This behavior appears most likely to happen after importing messages, after creating new message-filtering rules, or simply after being left open for a few hours. The only remedy is to shut down and restart Evolution. It is important to note that Evolution itself does NOT appear to be hung at any time. It just simply acts like it cannot find an internet connection and waits indefinitely for one to appear. Evolution does respond appropriately to user cancellation of image downloading or connection attempts to POP3 servers. Affects: Evolution 2.26.1 on Ubuntu 9.04 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evolution NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: evolution 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: evolution Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Evolution stops connecting to internet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376364] Re: Evolution stops connecting to internet
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26703924/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26703925/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26703926/ProcStatus.txt -- Evolution stops connecting to internet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376364] Re: Evolution stops connecting to internet
I found another way to reliably duplicate this bug: With a message showing in the preview panel, simply click on another message before the images in the current message have finished loading. Evolution will never talk to a network again until you restart it. -- Evolution stops connecting to internet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376364] Re: Evolution stops connecting to internet
Wasn't easy, because any time I tried to browse for or do a search using Evolution as a keyword, the site would roll over and die, giving me a blank page... so I don't know if a bug report already existed, but I filed one anyways: Bug # 582586 ( http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582586 ). I also filed one against Evolution's slow image downloading: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582591 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #582586 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582586 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #582591 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582591 -- Evolution stops connecting to internet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267495] Re: Dell Precision M90 hotkeys not working
I just wanted to add that updating to Jaunty fixed my problem. All HP media and Quikplay buttons work properly again. -- Dell Precision M90 hotkeys not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267495 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73835] Re: evolution slow to display images
I would like to re-open the bug based on image-loading performance with Evolution 2.26.1 with Jaunty. The image rendering itself isn't a problem; it's the fact that Evolution only retrieves one single image at a time. When you consider the overhead of contacting the remote server, waiting for a response, then closing the connection after an image is downloaded only to repeat all of that again for each and every image, it makes for excruciatingly-slow overall image loading. For comparison's sake (since I have just completed migration from Thunderbird to Evolution and have the same e-mails in both clients), I compared the time it took Thunderbird (2.0.0.21) to completely render an e-mail message full of images with how long it took Evolution to render the same e-mail: Thunderbird: 1.5 seconds Evolution: 18 seconds Clearly, this kind of performance gap between a professional-class client and a personal/SOHO client is unacceptable and indicative of a major problem. Evolution is a wonderful e-mail client except for its painful image-loading algorithms. -- evolution slow to display images https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information
Jonathan Marsden wrote: I'm slightly bewildered that so many here apparently feel that bothering to read the Jaunty Release Notes and doing what they suggest, to restore the old approach, is impossibly difficult... or something? I'm pretty sure most of us are aware of how to bring back the old behavior - at least for the moment. The problem is, it is an unsupported hack. How long will that capability be there until it is taken away? How will executing that hack affect future updates, or the upgrade to Karmic when that comes around? Besides, this isn't about us. Most of us here can work our way around these petty niggles that annoy us. It's the new users - particularly those who have never seen the old behavior and therefore have nothing to which to compare the new behavior; who thinks the new behavior is too intrusive and in your face for their comfort and, having not seen the old behavior, think that's just how Ubuntu is. It is for these people that we are running this BS flag up the flagpole. -- [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: bdoe: If you are still having this problem, I suggest subscribing to the http://www.ubuntu.com/usn feed, and then reporting a bug the next time a package you have installed shows up there without Update Manager opening within a day. We'd take that very seriously. I'm absolutely certain now that the window did pop as it was supposed to, but I had dismissed it without seeing what it was. This goes back to one of my major complaints about this new notification method: Once dismissed, the window was gone for good, and I had no further reminders of the updates. The window popped again for me today, with new updates. This time, I heeded it. Unfortunately, I had to stop everything I was doing so that I could service the update window - this in lieu of dismissing the window again and forgetting about the updates. I stand by my assertion that there was absolutely nothing wrong with the old method of popping an icon in the notification tray, and would like to see it re-implemented. If needed, have the icon pop along with an accompanying OSD-notification that New Updates are Ready to Install, flash the icon until the OSD goes away, then leave the icon persistent until the updates are installed. I don't see how this could have ever been considered broken to begin with. -- [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: bdoe: If there are security updates waiting in the archive and Update Manager doesn't open within a day, please report a separate bug about that. However -- and I apologize in advance if this affects your sleep -- it has never been true that if there's no icon up there indicating important security updates, then my system is truly secure. A vulnerability may be found and exploited by bad guys before being found by good guys; once it is identified by good guys, it may be hours before it is fixed in a way that the developers are confident won't break anything else; after that, Launchpad may take up to an hour to rebuild the fixed package (depending on the complexity of the package); after that, there may sometimes be an embargo of hours or days agreed with other OS vendors; after it is released from embargo, it will be between 0 and 60 minutes before the new package is published in the Ubuntu archive; and after that, it will be between 0 and 24 hours until your computer next checks for security updates. This is all true regardless of whether that last step involves a notification area icon or the updates window itself. I can't file a bug report on something I don't know exists. Like I stated, I may well have simply closed the window in a fit of desktop-cleaning, without realizing what the window was. I will probably never know, because once the window is closed, there is no further indication that I need to update my system unless I manually invoke Update Manager or another security update comes along (assuming I don't once again dismiss the window after it pops up and annoys me). With the notification icon (aka. old behavior), there is nothing I can do to dismiss the icon short of updating my system; nor would I have any reason to dismiss the icon prematurely, since it is completely unobtrusive. As for your point about my system never being truly secure: I understand that. I was being facetious. but the FOSS community has generally been far more responsive to discovering and patching security flaws than certain monoliths (*cough*Microsoft*cough*) who have gone on record for leaving major security flaws unaddressed for about nine months or so ( /http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2007/01/internet_explorer_unsafe_for_2.html)/... -- [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information
Is this still up for discussion, or are we expected to just eat this one (in reference to the Confirmed - Won't Fix status)? There is NOTHING MORE ANNOYING, bar none, than having windows pop up uncommanded. Having windows open surreptitiously underneath everything I'm doing is sneaky, underhanded, and not likely to be noticed for days. The notification icon did its job, and it did it well. This new change does not serve the Ubuntu userbase well at all. Here's the reason I am here posting this right now: I went searching for an existing bug report in hopes of determining why I hadn't seen an update notification since I installed Jaunty a week ago. I became quite concerned when I manually launched Update Manager and noticed a slew of Security Updates in there. Why wasn't I informed of this? I asked myself. Why did I have to go manually LOOKING for these updates? There was no notification of the IMPORTANT SECURITY UPDATES. None. If a window had popped up at some point of time over the past week, I probably closed it without realizing what it was. Since I got no further notification of important updates, I figure this new behaviour assumes that if I dismiss the popup/popunder window that comes up, then I don't care about the update, because there is no persistent notification. No icons, no indication of any kind that my system could be vulnerable to attack because of uninstalled security updates - security updates uninstalled because I was not aware that there were any to install. Please bring back the notification icon. If for no other reason, so it can keep my volume control applet icon and network-manager icon company up there. They do get lonely. And I would sleep better at night knowing that, if there's no icon up there indicating important security updates, then my system is truly secure. -- [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105918] Re: Thunderbird 'Create filter from message' should use 'To' instead of 'From'
Here you go: ** Attachment added: msgFilterRules.dat http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25912220/msgFilterRules.dat -- Thunderbird 'Create filter from message' should use 'To' instead of 'From' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105918] Re: Thunderbird 'Create filter from message' should use 'To' instead of 'From'
Yep. It seems that if I touch the auto-created filter in any way (ie. to change the address, destination folder, and so on), the filter breaks. -- Thunderbird 'Create filter from message' should use 'To' instead of 'From' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105918] Re: Thunderbird 'Create filter from message' should use 'To' instead of 'From'
I'm waking this back up because I am experiencing this as well. For my situation, using Thunderbird 2.0.0.21, I tried creating a filter for all Launchpad messages to send them to another folder. I right-clicked on the Reply-To address, but when the filter comes up, it shows From. The filter works, but it just seems that there should be a way to discern From from Reply-To or Sender (which also shows From in the created filter). Let me know if you need more information. -- Thunderbird 'Create filter from message' should use 'To' instead of 'From' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105918] Re: Thunderbird 'Create filter from message' should use 'To' instead of 'From'
I take that back... The resultant filter does NOT work. -- Thunderbird 'Create filter from message' should use 'To' instead of 'From' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 337019] Re: [Intrepid] screen goes black after upgrading to kernel 2.6.27-13-generic
Michele: Try wicd. On topic: I'm not at all sure why the nVidia 180 driver worked where the older ones failed, but this brings up another concern: Since I have already been bitten by the -13 bug and worked around it by installing the 180 driver, will any future kernel updates work with this driver, or am I in for another wild ride? -- [Intrepid] screen goes black after upgrading to kernel 2.6.27-13-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 337019] Re: screen goes black after upgrading to kernel 2.6.27-13-generic
This is a showstopper, since the nVidia 180 drivers are never suggested for update with the .12 kernel, and it's nearly impossible to do so with the .13 kernel, without booting into safe mode and running xfix first. Even then, the nVidia 180 drivers need to be updated through Synaptic or APT before Jockey will pick it up and make it available. There's no known workaround for ATI users as of yet. -- screen goes black after upgrading to kernel 2.6.27-13-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 321474] Re: [Intrepid] Update kernel to Linux 2.6.27.13
Numerous people in the Ubuntu forums (myself included) reporting showstopping problems after updating to 2.6.27.13. Specifically, X fails to create a desktop, so users see nothing but a black screen after the usplash goes away. This seems to specifically affect nVidia users. Workaround: Boot into safe mode (or older kernel), install nvidia- glx-180 and nvidia-180-kernel-source. Reboot. Go into Hardware Manager, activate nVidia 180.11 driver, and reboot into updated kernel. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1084959 -- [Intrepid] Update kernel to Linux 2.6.27.13 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321474 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315809] Re: [Jaunty] Sound card outputs start muted after recent updates to use pulseaudio
Confirmed on my HP Pavilion dv9830 laptop. Symbolic link in /etc/rcS.d/ is missing. Be sure to check inside /etc/init.d/alsa-utils for the correct filename to use for the link (the comments near the top of the file will give you instructions on how to remove the autosave/autoload features, so just kinda follow it in reverse). When I created a symlink in /etc/rcS.d/ , everything worked again. The fact that audio seems to be muted in the first place appears to be a regression of the bug that afflicted Hardy Heron. -- [Jaunty] Sound card outputs start muted after recent updates to use pulseaudio https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315809 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267495] Re: Dell Precision M90 hotkeys not working
No such luck with the HP Pavilions. -- Dell Precision M90 hotkeys not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267495 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267495] Re: Dell Precision M90 hotkeys not working
Just a bump to add that, while I cannot get anything within Gnome to recognize the missing keys (specifically the two QuickPlay keys on my HP Pavilion laptop), and xev doesn't even flinch when either of those keys are touched, I have managed to get xorg to log the events: In Xorg.0.log: (WW) AT Translated Set 2 keyboard: unable to handle keycode 387 (WW) AT Translated Set 2 keyboard: unable to handle keycode 389 (WW) AT Translated Set 2 keyboard: unable to handle keycode 465 (I have no idea what generated the keycode 465 event, but the 387 and 389 events correspond to my QuickPlay keys). Please let me know if there's anything else I need to do/post that can help squash this bug. -- Dell Precision M90 hotkeys not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267495 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296475] Re: Laptop speakers do not mute when i plug in headphones
I have a similar issue. Laptop speakers are muted when I plug in headphones, however: - If headphones are plugged in and I mute audio, laptop speakers become unmuted when I unmute audio, so sound outputs from both speakers and headphones; - If headphones are plugged in when computer is started up, sound outputs through both laptop speakers and headphones until I unplug the headphones and plug them back in. -- Laptop speakers do not mute when i plug in headphones https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296475 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267495] Re: Dell media keys not working
Confirmed this as a problem on HP Pavilion laptops with media keys as well (dv9730us). Buttons worked fine under Hardy, but neither of the Quickplay buttons register at all on Intrepid (xev shows no response to those keys). The rest of the media keys register and work fine. -- Dell media keys not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267495 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237786] Re: Hyperlinks within PDF files do not work properly in evince
I figured out it may have to do with how the PDF file was created. In the attachment, none of the links are activated - meaning, the mouse pointer does not change when I hover over the link, and the link is not clickable. I re-created page 3 of the first attachment using OpenOffice's Export to PDF function. With the resulting document, the links work; however, it only pops up an error stating Failed to execute child process firefox (No such file or directory). I don't know how to change the command for launching the browser from within Evince, so I had to create a symlink to firefox-2 in usr/bin/ to make it work. ** Attachment added: it210_course_syllabus.pdf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17125682/it210_course_syllabus.pdf -- Hyperlinks within PDF files do not work properly in evince https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 262071] Re: gstreamer-properties crashes with segmentation fault when testing video plugins
** Attachment added: GDB output file http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17130474/gdb-gstreamer-properties.txt -- gstreamer-properties crashes with segmentation fault when testing video plugins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 262071] [NEW] gstreamer-properties crashes with segmentation fault when testing video plugins
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-media Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron (64-bit Desktop) gnome-media: Installed: 2.22.0-0ubuntu3 Candidate: 2.22.0-0ubuntu3 Version table: *** 2.22.0-0ubuntu3 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status When running gstreamer-properties, I got the following output: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gstreamer-properties gstreamer-properties-Message: Skipping unavailable plugin 'artsdsink' gstreamer-properties-Message: Skipping unavailable plugin 'v4lmjpegsrc' gstreamer-properties-Message: Skipping unavailable plugin 'qcamsrc' gstreamer-properties-Message: Skipping unavailable plugin 'esdmon' Segmentation fault The segmentation fault occurs whenever I click Test for either video source or video sink settings. Sometimes a window containing the test video will appear for a split second before the segfault. Once in a while, I am able to test both functions without a crash, but only rarely. I get the best chance to avoid a crash if I issue a rm -rf ~/.gstreamer-0.10 first, but not always. This may be related, but not sure since I don't know if gstreamer is used for this or not, but - in the game Second Life, whenever I attempt to view streaming media, the program crashes with no useable error codes in the program logs. Attached is the output of gdb. ** Affects: gnome-media (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gstreamer-properties crashes with segmentation fault when testing video plugins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 207883] Re: (gnome-sound-properties:16528): Gnome-WARNING **: error caching sample -1!
This problem has not been addressed. I'm having it as well. I seem to recall with Feisty I could use OGG files. Not so in Hardy. -- (gnome-sound-properties:16528): Gnome-WARNING **: error caching sample -1! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207883 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
