[Bug 1054414] Re: Tries to automount floppy drives
@ Adam Funk That is caused by the new udisks used in Quantal, and has nothing to do whether you have a floppy or not. It is told here that it will be fixed in the next Ubuntu 13.04 release. All Ubuntu Quantal derivatives or distro's using the same udisks have the same problem. We just have to be patient for some more months. Till than: try to blacklist your floppy; perhaps that stops it. Otherwise: downgrade to Precise until the 13.04 arrives. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054414 Title: Tries to automount floppy drives To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udisks2/+bug/1054414/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
BTW2 It is not an UBUNTU thingy, it is a Linuw thing. You won't get your floppy to work on Fedora are any other distro either. Exept for Puppy. At least the former ones. Though I must say that Udisks2 is not really what I what we (I) expected. It keeps my floppy occupied al the time, so also there a fix is needed. But Udisks2 seems to work. (more or less) Do not forget that this is Linux, and they have to write everything (almost everything) from scratch. Linux had come this far... And it will go on developing. Making your and mine floppy work if given time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
BTW. Did you read what Zeuthen wrote? You might be banned. And then what, will your floppy work then. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
Acceptaable or not, that won't help nobody. We just should make it work. Under Lucid we could make it work by downgrading. And I agree that many people still use floppys (I'm one of them) but it does not help anyone when you start making noise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 441835]
I do not agree with the choice of words from 'Wintermute', but I do agree that I fix should be released for the LTS. I know that this won't happen, but why not release the old udisks on the LTS. Under Lucid (LTS) one could downgrade udisks so it kept working. So why not downgrade udisks for the current LTS? On 15/11/2012 12:00, Wintermute wrote: > Tagging this as WORKFORME is not acceptable and simply not true. > Ubuntu 10.04 is LTS and use this non working version of udisk. > 12.04 is LTS too and also use this piece of crap that is the last 1.x version. > > Some might consider beyond them as to why some people still use floppies but > they do : in the professional world, a lot of appliances, industrial > equipments rely on floppies, like machinetools... > Overlooking floppies as not worth a debug is despising at best, irresponsible > at worst. > Please fix ASAP or cancel officially your last 1.x version so that the former > and working version (1.0.1-1build1) is not replaced by this buggy one on our > Ubuntu's. > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
I do not agree with the choice of words from 'Wintermute', but I do agree that I fix should be released for the LTS. I know that this won't happen, but why not release the old udisks on the LTS. Under Lucid (LTS) one could downgrade udisks so it kept working. So why not downgrade udisks for the current LTS? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
I do not agree with the choice of words from 'Wintermute', but I do agree that I fix should be released for the LTS. I know that this won't happen, but why not release the old udisks on the LTS. Under Lucid (LTS) one could downgrade udisks so it kept working. So why not dowwngrade udisks for the current LTS? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
I do not agree with the choice of words from 'Wintermute', but I do agree that I fix should be released for the LTS. I know that this won't happen, but why not release the old udisks on the LTS. Under Lucid (LTS) one could downgrade udisks so it kept working. So why not dowwngrade udisks for the current LTS? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
I do not agree with the choice of words from 'Wintermute', but I do agree that I fix should be released for the LTS. I know that this won't happen, but why not release the old udisks on the LTS. Under Lucid (LTS) one could downgrade udisks so it kept working. So why not dowwngrade udisks for the current LTS? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
I do not agree with the choice of words from 'Wintermute', but I do agree that I fix should be released for the LTS. I know that this won't happen, but why not release the old udisks on the LTS. Under Lucid (LTS) one could downgrade udisks so it kept working. So why not dowwngrade udisks for the current LTS? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
@ Martin. Alas I am a too "small" a Linux user to test-drive this. I can only report. Sorry. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] bug 441835
I was thinking about the same. I have received about 30 the same messages by now. Can someone stop this please? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
You might say: Your floppy will boot anyway, and that is true of course, but I need to be able to change the menu.lst file a few times a week. So: I need the access. ---+--- Also: Precise: no floppy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
Sorry for that 4 times the same... I kept getting an error whilst trying to post. Sorry! On 09/06/2012 14:49, bert07 wrote: > What is this about this bug? > > I think it was Martin who said rather a long while ago that he got tired > of this bug and he didn't know how to fix it; whatever he tried. > > But indeed: there are many a people using Linux that still need access to a > floppy. > I, for one. > > In Lucid you can fix the problem by downgrading "udisks", but that's it. > > What lies beyond Lucid does not seem to be able to access any floppy any > more. (Not only Ubuntu's.) > > Puppy still can, but for how long to come? > > I can understand that developers are getting tired of this bug, but still... > There are still people around the globe who need floppy access. > > E.G.: I instaal or test run many distro's. > Without my floppy boot back-up, I will get very often in lots of trouble > booting. > > I need that floppy access! > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
What is this about this bug? I think it was Martin who said rather a long while ago that he got tired of this bug and he didn't know how to fix it; whatever he tried. But indeed: there are many a people using Linux that still need access to a floppy. I, for one. In Lucid you can fix the problem by downgrading "udisks", but that's it. What lies beyond Lucid does not seem to be able to access any floppy any more. (Not only Ubuntu's.) Puppy still can, but for how long to come? I can understand that developers are getting tired of this bug, but still... There are still people around the globe who need floppy access. E.G.: I instaal or test run many distro's. Without my floppy boot back-up, I will get very often in lots of trouble booting. I need that floppy access! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
What is this about this bug? I think it was Martin who said rather a long while ago that he got tired of this bug and he didn't know how to fix it; whatever he tried. But indeed: there are many a people using Linux that still need access to a floppy. I, for one. In Lucid you can fix the problem by downgrading "udisks", but that's it. What lies beyond Lucid does not seem to be able to access any floppy any more. (Not only Ubuntu's.) Puppy still can, but for how long to come? I can understand that developers are getting tired of this bug, but still... There are still people around the globe who need floppy access. E.G.: I instaal or test run many distro's. Without my floppy boot back-up, I will get very often in lots of trouble booting. I need that floppy access! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
What is this about this bug? I think it was Martin who said rather a long while ago that he got tired of this bug and he didn't know how to fix it; whatever he tried. But indeed: there are many a people using Linux that still need access to a floppy. I, for one. In Lucid you can fix the problem by downgrading "udisks", but that's it. What lies beyond Lucid does not seem to be able to access any floppy any more. (Not only Ubuntu's.) Puppy still can, but for how long to come? I can understand that developers are getting tired of this bug, but still... There are still people around the globe who need floppy access. E.G.: I instaal or test run many distro's. Without my floppy boot back-up, I will get very often in lots of trouble booting. I need that floppy access! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
What is this about this bug? I think it was Martin who said rather a long while ago that he got tired of this bug and he didn't know how to fix it; whatever he tried. But indeed: there are many a people using Linux that still need access to a floppy. I, for one. In Lucid you can fix the problem by downgrading "udisks", but that's it. What lies beyond Lucid does not seem to be able to access any floppy any more. (Not only Ubuntu's.) Puppy still can, but for how long to come? I can understand that developers are getting tired of this bug, but still... There are still people around the globe who need floppy access. E.G.: I instaal or test run many distro's. Without my floppy boot back-up, I will get very often in lots of trouble booting. I need that floppy access! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 950295] Re: b43: missing firmware causes kernel panic
Same bug in Linux Mint 13 RC. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/950295 Title: b43: missing firmware causes kernel panic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/950295/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 441835]
On 20/04/2012 19:56, Zeuthen wrote: > (In reply to comment #21) >> What is the status here? Sister bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/338185 has been >> open >> for too long. > It's not really something I'm planning to spend time on in udisks since > a) I'm focusing on udisks2; and b) floppies are extremely rare nowadays. That is true, but in mu case they are still needed, en needed very often! > >> Is this still a problem with udisks2? > I doubt it's a problem with udisks2.. in fact, last I checked, all the > parts in the stack (kernel, udisks2, gvfs, nautilus) worked fine with > floppies, see > > http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/palimpsest-gvfs-udisks2-pc- > floppy.png > > But it's not something I check very often and in Fedora we never > automatically load floppy.ko even if the hardware is there. I'll check > Monday when I'm in the office - don't have any floppy drives or disks > here :-) > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 909871] Re: install failure b43 12.04 Precise Pangolin
Using the daily Ubuntu live from April 17th. Same problem as reported here. Also with Xubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/909871 Title: install failure b43 12.04 Precise Pangolin To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/b43-fwcutter/+bug/909871/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 821436] Re: it's not possible to install the bootloader at the specified partition after - install without the bootloader - the installer crashed
Second attachment ** Attachment added: "syslog" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/821436/+attachment/2699007/+files/syslog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821436 Title: it's not possible to install the bootloader at the specified partition after - install without the bootloader - the installer crashed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/821436/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 821436] Re: it's not possible to install the bootloader at the specified partition after - install without the bootloader - the installer crashed
Installing the latest openArtist dvd. Installation crash on writing the bootloader to a dedicated partition and afterwards trying to go on without bootloader. ** Attachment added: "partman" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/821436/+attachment/2699006/+files/partman -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821436 Title: it's not possible to install the bootloader at the specified partition after - install without the bootloader - the installer crashed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/821436/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 696334] Re: installation crashes
Tried Mint 12 RC, both 32bit and 64 bit. Ubiquity hangs at "Preparing to install Linux Mint", so I could install neither of the versions. My computer: [b]PC[/b]: Dell Inspiron 531 - [b]Motherboard[/b]: NVIDIA MCP61 chipset - [b]Sound[/b]: Realtec High Definition Audio ALC888 - [b]Display Adapter[/b]: ATI Radeon HD 2400 Pro - [b]Wired[/b]: NVIDIA nForce networking controller - [b]Wireless[/b]: Broadcom AirForce One 54g (ASUS WL-138g-V2) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696334 Title: installation crashes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linuxmint/+bug/696334/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
When I wrote: "If you should install one of them on harddisk, only 500 MB to 1GB partition is needed." I meant it to install it as a multi-boot system. Otherwise it has no sense. Sorry I didn't mention it in the post before. Bert. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
It is NOT a sollution (I know), but for those who REALLY need a floppy, I suggest you use Puppy, Quirky or Wary. The floppy still works on those. If you should install one of them on harddisk, only 500 MB to 1GB partition is needed. Your floppy will be accessible and you can copy any file from any partition you want to your floppy. Booting into Puppy, Quirky or Wary is very fast. You can also just use the live CD's or put them on a USB stick. But booting from harddisk is faster and it is always there when you need it, and also: you only need to make configurations once. It's not so handy as getting access to your floppy from your base Linux system, but it works, and that is what most of us need, isn't it? Bert. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
To all. Running Lucid GNOME 64-bit. After (kernel) updates a few weeks ago, the floppy works here and still does (checked it again before writing this). I have udisks 1.0.1-1build1 installed + I added "floppy" (without the quotes) to the /etc/modules file. (* I also need the floppy working under Linux!) Good luck and hopes for everyone. Bert. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
Xubuntu 10.10 On 11/04/2011 08:30, Martin Pitt wrote: > bert07 [2011-04-11 2:59 -]: >> Martin, how come it works under xubuntu and not under ubuntu? > Are you talking about Xubuntu 11.04? Xubuntu now also switched to > udisks and friends, so I'd be really surprised if it worked there. > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
Martin, how come it works under xubuntu and not under ubuntu? On 10/04/2011 20:19, Martin Pitt wrote: > ** Changed in: udisks (Ubuntu) > Assignee: Martin Pitt (pitti) => (unassigned) > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
Boys, boys... Stop this discussion. Main thing is: we still need the floppy. I still need the floppy. Make it work. -- Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
Running Lucid desktop amd64. I have the same problem. Downgrading usdisks helps, but is not really a solution. -- Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
Running Lucid desktop amd64. I have the same problem. Downgrading "udisks" helps, but is not really a solution. -- Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
Running Lucid desktop amd64. I have the same problem. Downgrading udisks helps, but is not really a solution. -- Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 340418] Re: iwl3945 slow down after some time to 100kbps, unload/load module return speed to 1.5mbps
All this 'slowlyness' of certain netcards started with kernel 2.6.25 or 2.6.26. I have the same problem since with my rt2500 (Belkin PCMCIA). In the beginning of this problem, I could work around it for Puppy, Ubuntu and Mandriva. But when it came to kernel 2.6.28 that work-around didn't work any more. As you can see (read) the problem is been around for a long time now. And I can see that this bug is in progress. But that doesn't help those who are 'infected' by this bug. For what it's worth, I'll note the work-around again here. Maybe it might ring a bell for the people working on this bug. ---+--- Add to /etc/rc.local ifconfig wlan0 up iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M fixed exit 0 ---+--- In Puppy, I had to use this as a batch-file, because the file /etc/rc.local did not exist. And as I said: since kernel 2.6.28 this doesn't work any more. -- iwl3945 slow down after some time to 100kbps, unload/load module return speed to 1.5mbps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 411705] Re: Have run update-grub2 and my other Linux-distros won't boot.
I fixed my problem by fixing the menu.lst files from Mandriva and PCLinuxOS. I ran update-grub afterwards, and now everything just works. -- Have run update-grub2 and my other Linux-distros won't boot. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411705 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 411705] Re: Have run update-grub2 and my other Linux-distros won't boot.
Running Lucid RC. In my opinion: this needs a fix rather fast! Otherwise other distributions shall keep failing to load. -- Have run update-grub2 and my other Linux-distros won't boot. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411705 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 411705] Re: Have run update-grub2 and my other Linux-distros won't boot.
Also see bug#533032. -- Have run update-grub2 and my other Linux-distros won't boot. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411705 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 533032] Re: Kernel panic at boot after upgrading from 9.10 to 10.04
Same here. Kernel panic when trying to log in Mandriva 2010 and PCLinuxOS 2010. Can this be (one of) the reason(s)? A disk is in both GRUB's referred to differently. GRUBGRUB2 /dev/sda1---(hd0,0)-(hd0,1) /dev/sdb1---(hd1,0)-(hd1,1) So, when GRUB2 passes on (let us say for sda1) (hd0,1), but once the kernel of a distro still using GRUB is loading, it expects (hd0,0) Does this make sense? -- Kernel panic at boot after upgrading from 9.10 to 10.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533032 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
"Even Alpha 2 was more stable than Windows." I do not agree. But it might depend on the hardware you have. On 09/04/2010 03:28, xbox360 20g wrote: -- Microsoft has a majority market share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
Okay. I agree that Vista was a huge mistake of Microsoft. Win 7 is (good fo us) better. I use several flavours of Linux and I do like it very much. Personally I prefer Gnome. Though in the early years there were many problems according hardware, these issues are mostly (not all) solved. The Linux community is working very hard. And especially that makes Linux very interesting for me. Everyone can get involved in Linux; you do not have to be a developer, one can just help by testing, get involved that way. And there are so many flavours that surely there must be one Linux for everyone somewhere. Microsoft has only the few versions it sells. Mind you, some people are working on a deriviate of Windows (ReactOs http://www.reactos.org/en/index.html) and I'm watching it's progression. Because every OS has his own ad- and disadvantages, one has to give every OS the benefit of the doubt. But, and this is my conclusion, Linux really gets better every day. On 08/04/2010 14:57, Allen Graham wrote: > Hello Freidrich ! First, all operating systems have bugs. > Probably Ubuntu is one of the best versions of Linux, but it is not, and > never will be, completely free of bugs. Most are minor. > Some O/S's are littered with bugs, many crucial and painful. For example > "Windows Vista". > On comparison Ubuntu is much safer and far more "bug-free" than Vista. > You will see advertisements in every media for Windows "7", all of the line > was done by numerical code. > Is "7" great ? Who knows, maybe. > If, yes IF, the Linux community wanted to ante up millions of dollars, > Euros, Pounds, Yen , Pesos etc to advertise Linux this whole situation would > change quickly. > IF, we all donated $50, or E50 etc, we could launch an ad campaign. > So, it's about money. > Base Linux O/S's are free. You can pay for support, customising etc. > So, your problem with one bug should be addressed in "Launchpad". > Tell me, is there something similar in Microsoft or Apple ? > Allengg > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Friedrich Strohmaier< > ubuntu_b...@bits-fritz.de> wrote: > > >> Fixing this bug needs fixing of other severe bugs! >> >> One of them: >> Bug #255008 is marked as "won't fix". There are a lot of duplicates and it >> is reported to affect lucid lynx as well (even if filed against intrepid >> ibex). >> >> Shure every one's bug is the most important (I'm no exception :o))), but >> this one affects basic keyboardmapping in X-environment. The keyboard up >> to now is the main interface to do things on a computer. Not properly >> working keyboard means not properly working ubuntu! >> >> I repeat in this place: >> Everyone with a xmodmap customized keyboard mapping doing a LTS upgrade >> will run in unusable keyboard! >> >> here my resume (which took me 2 days of searching): >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/255008/comments/129 >> >> If I did severe mistakes bringing this up - please point me out how to >> do better! :o)) >> >> > -- Microsoft has a majority market share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 340418] Re: iwl3945 slow down after some time to 100kbps, unload/load module return speed to 1.5mbps
Have any of you tried this. (Worked for my 2500rt on Ubuntu 08.10 and 09.04) Add to /etc/rc.local ifconfig wlan0 up iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M fixed exit 0 -- iwl3945 slow down after some time to 100kbps, unload/load module return speed to 1.5mbps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 410475] Re: gdmsetup crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()
The latest update with "gdm" in it, did not resolve anything here.
r...@bavo:~# gdmsetup
** (gdmsetup:3851): WARNING **: Error calling
GetValue('daemon/TimedLoginEnable'): Key not found
** (gdmsetup:3851): WARNING **: Error calling
GetValue('daemon/TimedLoginDelay'): Key not found
** (gdmsetup:3851): DEBUG: init delay=30
** (gdmsetup:3851): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: skipping shell /bin/false
** (gdmsetup:3851): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: Found current seat:
/org/freedesktop/ConsoleKit/Seat1
** (gdmsetup:3851): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: running 'ck-history --frequent
--seat='Seat1' --session-type='''
** (gdmsetup:3851): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: explicitly skipping user: nobody
** (gdmsetup:3851): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: user icon changed
** (gdmsetup:3851): DEBUG: adding monitor for '/home/bert/.face'
** (gdmsetup:3851): DEBUG: Getting list of sessions for user 1000
** (gdmsetup:3851): DEBUG: Found 0 sessions for user bert
** (gdmsetup:3851): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: history output: root 10
** (gdmsetup:3851): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: excluding user 'root'
** (gdmsetup:3851): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: history output: bert 9
** (gdmsetup:3851): WARNING **: Error calling
GetValue('daemon/AutomaticLoginEnable'): Key not found
** (gdmsetup:3851): WARNING **: Error calling
GetValue('daemon/TimedLoginEnable'): Key not found
** (gdmsetup:3851): WARNING **: Error calling GetValue('daemon/TimedLogin'):
Key not found
** (gdmsetup:3851): DEBUG: init user='(null)' auto=False
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
r...@bavo:~#
--
gdmsetup crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410475
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 410475] Re: gdmsetup crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()
I also found the following message in /var/log/auth.log Aug 10 17:34:34 bavo dbus-daemon: Rejected send message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.50" (uid=1000 pid=3362 comm="/usr/bin/indicator-messages-service) interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Introspectable" member="Introspect" error name="(unset)" requested_reply=0 destination=":1.75" (uid=1000 pid=3630 comm="gdmsetup)) -- gdmsetup crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410475 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 410475] Re: gdmsetup crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()
I also found the following messages in /var/log/messages Aug 10 17:34:34 bavo kernel: [ 42.469329] hda-intel: Too big adjustment 32 Aug 10 17:34:34 bavo kernel: [ 42.533457] hda-intel: Too big adjustment 32 Aug 10 17:34:34 bavo kernel: [ 42.549331] hda-intel: Too big adjustment 32 Aug 10 17:34:34 bavo kernel: [ 42.617465] hda-intel: Too big adjustment 32 Aug 10 17:34:34 bavo kernel: [ 42.640358] hda-intel: Too big adjustment 32 Aug 10 17:34:34 bavo kernel: [ 90.25] Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -151174583 ns) Aug 10 17:34:34 bavo kernel: [ 109.204275] gdmsetup[3374]: segfault at 0 ip 00cf4a98 sp bfe8b04c error 4 in libc-2.10.1.so[c82000+151000] -- gdmsetup crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410475 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 410475] Re: gdmsetup crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()
Running Ubuntu 9.10 on a i386 desktop.
Ran "gdmsetup" in the root terminal.
Got these messages.
** (gdmsetup:3505): WARNING **: Error calling
GetValue('daemon/TimedLoginEnable'): Key not found
** (gdmsetup:3505): WARNING **: Error calling
GetValue('daemon/TimedLoginDelay'): Key not found
** (gdmsetup:3505): DEBUG: init delay=30
** (gdmsetup:3505): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: skipping shell /bin/false
** (gdmsetup:3505): DEBUG: Failed to identify the current session: Unable to
lookup session information for process '3505'
** (gdmsetup:3505): WARNING **: Unable to find users: no seat-id found
** (gdmsetup:3505): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: explicitly skipping user: nobody
** (gdmsetup:3505): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: user icon changed
** (gdmsetup:3505): DEBUG: adding monitor for '/home/bert/.face'
** (gdmsetup:3505): DEBUG: Getting list of sessions for user 1000
** (gdmsetup:3505): DEBUG: Found 1 sessions for user bert
** (gdmsetup:3505): DEBUG: GdmUserManager: not adding session on other seat:
/org/freedesktop/ConsoleKit/Session2
A unlock window appears, but doesn't work.
--
gdmsetup crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410475
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
Amir E. Aharoni wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 20:04, bert07 wrote: > >> Amir E. Aharoni wrote: >> >>> MSDN and other Visual Studio-centric forums is a very large community. >>> However, no matter how hard Microsoft tries, it will never be half as >>> cool. >>> >>> >>> >> I must say: I didn't know about that site. >> > > OK - *now* i can be sure that Bug #1 will be solved soon. > Grin. > -- Microsoft has a majority market share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
shane fagan wrote: > I dont think its their fault entirely. The fact is they dont need a community > behind them like the FLOSS community. > We rely on the help of all corners of the community to make our software the > best, Microsoft dont. > Its very easy to say they arent cool but they dont need to be cool. > We need to be cool, we need to have the community. > To test, to develop, to test, to report bugs, to help in anyway we can. > Of course we do have help from companies like Novell, Red Hat and Canonical > but the community is what FLOSS runs on. > > To be a little bit cruel, one can say that with the community, there wouldn't be a Linux either. And of course Windows has its advantages. Almost all programs are written with Windows in mind. I never said Windows was bad. I do state that Linux has its own advantages. The community is one of them. -- Microsoft has a majority market share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
Amir E. Aharoni wrote: > MSDN and other Visual Studio-centric forums is a very large community. > However, no matter how hard Microsoft tries, it will never be half as > cool. > > I must say: I didn't know about that site. But it IS true that any Linux (or BSD) community is more alive than Windows itself. And they only have themselves to blame. -- Microsoft has a majority market share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
Aaargh more friends? Lol I am testing Windows7 as well, and it is not that bad (and better than Vista anyway). But Microsoft does not have any kind of community Linux has. Pray tell me, any Windows website that involves Windows users as much as we connect through Linux (or BSD).. I think you'll have to search for a long time. That's also so beautiful about Linux, we stick together. -- Microsoft has a majority market share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
The vendors finally start to notice the Linux community. Both vendors and community are working hard on getting hardware recognized under Linux. Before long evry one can install any Linux system without any problems on any system. (Mind you, it might still take up to 5, 6, 1o years. But when this happens, why would anybody still pay 500$ for a system he can have for free. Not only that: when one chooses for Linux, one gets a lot of new friends. Let Microsoft beat that! -- Microsoft has a majority market share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350223] Re: Cannot unmount
Okay. Brasero can write to a mounted disk. But the standard burner in Interprid could not. That was not Brasero. -- Cannot unmount https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350223] Re: Cannot unmount
One can not write to an ejected disk, can he? -- Cannot unmount https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350223] Re: Cannot unmount
In Interpid you cannot write an iso file to a mounted disk. You have to unmount it first. So: it HAS a function. And an important one. -- Cannot unmount https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350223] [NEW] Cannot unmount
Public bug reported: Using Jaunty beta for i386 desktop. When a cd-dvd is mounted, you can not unmount the drive (disk) by right clicking on the device, because the option is not in the menu. You can only eject, not unmount, which is quit a different action. ** Affects: gnome-mount (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Cannot unmount https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 326158] Re: Root terminal doesn't start
Question: Are there somewhere in the user account some hidden configuration files? I ask this because I also had some troubles with "tilda", and after I removed the ".tilda" folder, logged out, logged in again, made new configurations, the trouble seemed to have disappeared. Perhaps it might also work here? -- Root terminal doesn't start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326158 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 326158] Re: Root terminal doesn't start
See the "tilda bug" #349617 -- Root terminal doesn't start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326158 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 326158] Re: Root terminal doesn't start
Output: Failed to contact the GConf daemon; exiting. -- Root terminal doesn't start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326158 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347779] Re: Buffer overflow in kompozer-bin
Using Jaunty beta for desktop i386. I can confirm this problem. -- Buffer overflow in kompozer-bin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347779 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 326158] Re: Root terminal doesn't start
Using Jaunty beta for i386 desktop. The root terminal doesn't start and crashes; sometimes the crash comes immediately. When logged in as root, the root terminal works fine. Can it have something to do with "gksu"? -- Root terminal doesn't start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326158 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272318] Re: Install screen does not fit the screen
Installing Jaunty beta for i386 desktop. Again the partition screen (and those that follow) does not fit the screen. The slider also isn't there. For screens, see the first screens I uploaded for this bug. -- Install screen does not fit the screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 339045] Re: udevd-event exec of program "/sbin/" failed
After the latest update today, I didn't see the message no more. ** Attachment added: "rules.d etc-folder" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23831345/rules.d-etc_folder.tar -- udevd-event exec of program "/sbin/" failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 339045] Re: udevd-event exec of program "/sbin/" failed
** Attachment added: "rules.d lib-folder" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23831354/rules.d-lib_folder.tar -- udevd-event exec of program "/sbin/" failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338887] Re: xfce4-mixer-plugin crashed with SIGSEGV
The crash happened to me just logging into my user account in Xubuntu Jauntu i386. -- xfce4-mixer-plugin crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338887 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 339045] Re: udevd-event exec of program "/sbin/" failed
The same message also shows on Xubuntu Jaunty. -- udevd-event exec of program "/sbin/" failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 339045] Re: udevd-event exec of program "/sbin/" failed
I must correct my report a little. Sorry for that. The correct message is: udevd-event []: exec of program '/sbin/' failed My excuses for this. -- udevd-event exec of program "/sbin/" failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 339045] [NEW] udevd-event exec of program "/sbin/" failed
Public bug reported: Using Jaunty for desktop i386, the normal Ubuntu. This is the message I always see on boot-up when loading Jaunty. For at least two weeks now. I don't know if it was there before. I just did a fresh install two hours ago, and the message udevd-event [] exec of program "/sbin/" failed appeared again from the first boot on. Between the [] there always is a different number. I have no clue what so ever which files you would like me to upload, so I await your reaction. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- udevd-event exec of program "/sbin/" failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 153706] Re: Any user can reboot or shutdown computer when screen is locked
Correction: it is not System > Restart but System > Lock screen that also disappeared in Jaunty. And the previous mentioned. -- Any user can reboot or shutdown computer when screen is locked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 153706] Re: Any user can reboot or shutdown computer when screen is locked
I did forget to mention that I was talking about Jaunty. And indeed, I always logout, restart, shut down, from there, as I assume most people do. In case you wouldn't yet have seen it in Jaunty, the menu System > Shut down System > Log out System > Restart has disappeared. Most probably just because almost every one uses the "Switch users or shut down" thingy to "logout, restart, shut down". Of course, I might be wrong. -- Any user can reboot or shutdown computer when screen is locked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 153706] Re: Any user can reboot or shutdown computer when screen is locked
As I am (and I'm sure this is so for many systems) the sole user of my system, there is no need what so ever for these warning screens and certainly not for the delay question before shutting down or restarting. -- Any user can reboot or shutdown computer when screen is locked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 153706] Re: Any user can reboot or shutdown computer when screen is locked
I see that something has been done according to this bug, because since yesterday I get a very annoying screen whenever I want to restart or shut down my system. I'm NOT happy with this. Not happy at all. See also bug #195989. If I should need a warning screen whenever I wanted to start or close a program, or restart or close a system, I would have chosen for Vista. At least implement something that this can be turned off. Please? Or try to reconsider the solution you found for this bug. -- Any user can reboot or shutdown computer when screen is locked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 311531] Re: very slow network
For a long time now I have a connection problem with my laptop (Dell Inspiron 2200), using a Belkin Wireless G notebook PCMCIA Network Card. I get around it by editing /etc/rc.local and add --- ifconfig wlan0 up iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M fixed exit 0 --- It is not solely an Ubuntu problem, because I have the same problem with Mandriva One installed on the computer. Now, last week I installed Ubuntu 8.10 on somebody else's computer and I used a Belkin USB stick to connect at the time. The computer was also a Dell, from the Demension series. Same problem. The broadband connection did hardly reach the speed of a telephone line connection. Same work around. So because of both times using a Belkin removeble card, I was thinking that it might be caused by the Belkin drivers. On the other hand. I read here on the side that many people with many different cards experience the same problem. So it might even be a kernel problem. But only happening on laptops, because my desktop using the same Belkin USB Card, does not have that problem. It puzzles me. And along with me, many others. The work around is easy, but only for those who know it. It might even not work on everybody's machines. I don't know. But please, try to figure out what is going on with the wireless connection on laptops, and preferably find a sollution. -- very slow network https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311531 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178785] Re: Use icon with bird for launchers
It's been awhile. Any news on this? -- Use icon with bird for launchers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178785 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 313027] Re: MASTER: fglrx does not support xserver 1.6
I have a radeon hd 2400 pro and have the same problems. Jaunty can't run fglrx. If I do, it boots in a screen that is not readable, but the one thing I can make of it, is that it for some reason took a lower colour mode and a lower screen resolution. >From thereon I have to stop the computer because I can not read anything the >screen displays. To make my computer run again, I have to change the xorg.conf file and remove "Driver "fglrx"" in the section "Device". (Using another distro to get into the partition.) Also when running openSUSE although the still run the 2.6.27 kernel. But there the screen colour varies from almost yellow to green and sometimes even purple. (without fglrx). -- MASTER: fglrx does not support xserver 1.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333685] Re: alpha 4 20090223 i396 can not be installed
Sorry, but I do not have that cd of that day no more, so I can not do as you asked. Anyway, the later cd's all work fine. But to give you the info you asked for and what I can give: - "Tried to install without booting into the disk. Installation failed." Just booted the installation disk, and chose to install directly, instead of booting the live cd. (Disk jauntu i386 20090223) - "Tried to install after booting into the disk. Installation failed again." Booted the installation disk (jauntu i386 20090223) into the live version. Tried to install from there on. Also failed. The disk was the Ubuntu version. But as it seems not to happen again, I assume you can close the bug report. -- alpha 4 20090223 i396 can not be installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333685 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333685] [NEW] alpha 4 20090223 i396 can not be installed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity Tried to install without booting into the disk. Installation failed. Tried to install after booting into the disk. Installation failed again. Disk jauntu i386 20090223 ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- alpha 4 20090223 i396 can not be installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333685 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 313027] Re: MASTER: fglrx does not support xserver 1.6
I have a ATI radeon HD 2400 pro. I can do nothing but wait. Somewhere here it was said that the "fix date" target was the beta release of Ubuntu 09.04. It cannot come too soon. Though just disabling "fglrx" in "xorg.conf", and adding some info about your own preferences in the "corg.conf" file (e.g.: resolution of your working desktop, lets you keep on working. I will not file another bug report about this before the release of the first beta. You people know what's going on. But for working smoothly on a machine running an ATI card, this bug needs to be resolved rather fast. I do not mean to push. But Ubuntu 08.10 was released too soon too be a stable release. Hopefully the next release is not about "time", but about "ready" and "finished". In my opinion 08.10 had not been allowed to be released at that point. Hopefully 09.04 is what 08.10 should have been. -- MASTER: fglrx does not support xserver 1.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272318] Re: Install screen does not fit the screen
** Attachment added: "Rechts.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21587446/Rechts.png -- Install screen does not fit the screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272318] Re: Install screen does not fit the screen
Both resolutions are in 1152 x 864 -- Install screen does not fit the screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272318] Re: Install screen does not fit the screen
** Attachment added: "Links.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21587432/Links.png -- Install screen does not fit the screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 320729] Re: fglrx not installed
The screenshot is 1152 x 864, the previous resolution was 1024 x 728 -- fglrx not installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/320729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 320729] Re: fglrx not installed
** Attachment added: "Screenshot.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21587407/Screenshot.png -- fglrx not installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/320729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 320729] [NEW] fglrx not installed
Public bug reported: Fglrx did not install on Jaunty alpha3 amd64 desktop. When I tried to change the resolution, it did, but the bottom and the up-most panel bar stayed as if in the previous resolution. I'll upload some screenshots as soon as I can, because otherwise you won't understand, and I can't explain. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- fglrx not installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/320729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272318] Re: Install screen does not fit the screen
Installed jaunty alpha3 amd64. There has not been so much change for the partition screen in the installer. None, really. I would have thought that someone would have worked on it, so that the partition bar could fit the screen without a slider. Or perhaps the partition screen as it is now, might not really be such a good idea? Next alpha (4), I'll upload some screens from my machine. -- Install screen does not fit the screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178785] Re: Use icon with bird for launchers
Perhaps because Hardy (LTS) is going to be around yet for several years to come? -- Use icon with bird for launchers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178785 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305362] Re: Bittorrent disables internet connetion
Possible. But I never experienced this before on previous distro's with another Bittorrent client. Mind you: I only have that computer for about seven months and I do not often use Bittorrent for downloads (not on Linux anyway); just... I often tried to use it the last 4 weeks, and I never got a complete download. If you think it is something else than the Bittorrent clients, maybe you can inform the right people for this? -- Bittorrent disables internet connetion https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305362] Re: Bittorrent disables internet connetion
Oh yes, at the moment I'm using Ibex x86_64, but it first happened with Ibex desktop i386. -- Bittorrent disables internet connetion https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305362] Re: Bittorrent disables internet connetion
I'm okay with that. I might have been too hasty at that point. It also depends on what one means by "security". I felt that when ones Internet (wireless in this case) disappears, something was not so secure. Anyway. Feel free to contact me for more info. But I doubt I can give you more. -- Bittorrent disables internet connetion https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 255651] Re: floppy disk drive not detected (module not loaded) in Intrepid Alpha 4 kernel 2.6.27-2
Idem ditto. -- floppy disk drive not detected (module not loaded) in Intrepid Alpha 4 kernel 2.6.27-2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255651 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272318] Re: Install screen does not fit the screen
The screen fits the screen now, Still, the text under the bar is not displayed under the appropriate section of the bar. -- Install screen does not fit the screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272318] Re: Install screen does not fit the screen
Trying to install the daily build of Ubuntu from October 16th for i386. No change at all. -- Install screen does not fit the screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272318] Re: Install screen does not fit the screen
I've seen that there is a new daily build of Ubuntu (Oct 12d). I did'nt try that one. Maybe the problem is solved already. -- Install screen does not fit the screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272318] Re: Install screen does not fit the screen
Trying to install the daily build of Xubuntu from October 11th for i386. The window still does not fit the screen. Something else DID change. When I entered the partitioner (step 4) I chose "manual". The partitioner started scanning the disks and than died. I tries this installing directly without booting to the live cd and after booting into the live cd. Hung in both cases. Conclusion: Ubuntu (Xubuntu) can not be installed at this time. -- Install screen does not fit the screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272318] Re: Install screen does not fit the screen
Installed the beta dvd for i386 desktop. Nothing changed: still the same too large screens. I also tried installing a daily yesterday on my laptop (dell inspiron 2200 - 13 partitions) and also for that the screens were too large. No resizing possible. -- Install screen does not fit the screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272318] Re: Install screen does not fit the screen
Installing the desktop live cd (dvd) for i386 from September 28th. Nothing has changed: still the same too large windows. -- Install screen does not fit the screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272318] Re: Install screen does not fit the screen
As far as I can see: the window can be resized, but only larger. Not to fit the screen. -- Install screen does not fit the screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272318] Re: Install screen does not fit the screen
No, I did not happen in Ubuntu 8.04.1 LTS, but you are using a new screen for step 4 (partitioning), and this was the first alpha of 8.10 I tried (got a mail that more testers were needed). I do actually have 15 partitions on hda, and 13 partitions on hdb. I can not say at the moment that the window can be resizes, I need to start the cd again, and I already shut that computer down for today. I'll let you know tomorrow. I need some sleep as well (02.40 AM here). -- Install screen does not fit the screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272318] Re: Install screen does not fit the screen
I filed this bug previously under bug #38442, but Colin Watson asked me to file it anew. >>>bert07, could you file a new bug report about this, please? I know it's a >>>recurrence of basically the same thing, but this bug has got very long and >>>has many duplicates, and it would be easier to have a fresh start that talks >>>only about this new problem. -- Install screen does not fit the screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272318] Re: Install screen does not fit the screen
Resolution 1024 x 768 (4:3) 75 Mz ** Attachment added: "Right site" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17771544/installscreen_step4-2.png -- Install screen does not fit the screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272318] Re: Install screen does not fit the screen
Resolution 1024 x 768 (4:3) 75 Mz ** Attachment added: "Left side" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17771538/installscreen_step4-1.png -- Install screen does not fit the screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 38442] Re: Ubiquity dialogues too large for 800x600 display
It is filed as bug #272318 -- Ubiquity dialogues too large for 800x600 display https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/38442 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
