[Bug 112948] Re: Ekiga hangs when using pulseaudio
I can confirm similar problems. After upgrading to 9.10 ekiga-sound stopped working on all our (8) computers. 100% CPU last. Video is working. You can hear about 1 second distorted sound, then no sound at all. -- Ekiga hangs when using pulseaudio https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112948] Re: Ekiga hangs when using pulseaudio
Additional - ekiga freezes by trying to cancel the call or opening the configuration-menu during the connection -- Ekiga hangs when using pulseaudio https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256767] Re: USB devices work, but constant syslog errors unable to enumerate USB device on port 5
I have similar bug, but the device (icy box multi card reader) doesn't work since 8.10 It worked flawlessly before and also works with all windows versions. The log is spammed with hub 2-0:1.0: unable to enumerate USB device on port 1 and sometimes mixed with lines usb 2-1: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 82 ... usb 2-1: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 10 (always different number). -- USB devices work, but constant syslog errors unable to enumerate USB device on port 5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256767 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 360667] Re: [8.10, Evolution] Summary and folder mismatch, even after a sync
I have exactly the same problem since switching to Jaunty. Removing folders.db as mentioned here http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550414 ( ~/.evolution$ find . -name folders.db | xargs rm $1 ) kills all 'undeletable' messages and recovers some of them that has been vanished. But the corruption returns from time to time. This evolution must be running backwards ;) ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #550414 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550414 -- [8.10, Evolution] Summary and folder mismatch, even after a sync https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 100116] Re: sshfs mounted drives do not show correct size and availability in df
The easy workaround is a download ( http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/sshfs ) and install jaunty packages (i.e. sudo gdebi sshfs_2.1-1_i386.deb) Please, will sometime somebody fix this stupid bug ? -- sshfs mounted drives do not show correct size and availability in df https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/100116 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256331] Re: 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support
@andy [...] as the version I have seems to have appeared out of nowhere That's technically impossible ;) All humans make mistakes. Ask your boss, the planet is amazingly big. Sure there is a lot of people smarter than you or me. So do a favor yourself, never publish driver blobs without the source code. (http://people.ubuntu.com/~apw/*) [...] though you also indicate it is buggy too? To cut a long story short, there is a missing break in the case statement. http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdevm=121693342716973w=4 -- 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256331] Re: 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 10:27 +, Andy Whitcroft wrote: As I said the source is unmodified from that in current mainline, so the source _is_ published. The plan here is to get some testing on these kernels, and if they work then propose the change for SRU to Intrepid. At that point the change would also be in our tree. These kernels are only intended to be temporary builds to get some testing to provide justification for this SRU nothing more. That said the patch is not secret so I've attached it. Yes, it is obvious that we are testing this driver. I didn't said you are inserting any secrets, I was talking about good habits. IOW I have to support my ubuntu customers, nothing more ;) Even in testing phase it is crucial to publish the source code. If you don't follow the driver development, don't have embedded system skills, you can by accident easily pick up some crazy patch and permanently lockdown the chipset. I could also just put compiled drivers in my attached files but I didn't, I think it si easy to grok why. Back to the subject, how did you get the code you attached? It is broken and if I'm looking there right, it doesn't seems to match head of any regular tree. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob_plain;f=drivers/net/r8169.c;hb=HEAD http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.27.y.git;a=blob;f=drivers/net/r8169.c;hb=HEAD http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-intrepid.git;a=blob;f=drivers/net/r8169.c;hb=HEAD BTW, if your colleges communicated the (buggy) patch below to the driver maintainer, http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu- hardy.git;a=commit;h=de4dc655d9eb5 the actual patch-set didn't missed the 2.6.27 window and didn't wasted your and my time. (Though I lerned a lot about linux driver development :) -- 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256331] Re: 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support
I have attempted to add this driver to the Inrepid LBM and built test packages for use with the Intrepid in kernel in -proposed. Nice to see somebody taking action. I couldn't find the source you used. Did you make any changes? There are also problems with the wireless rtl8187 driver for the ID 0bda:8198. I am lazy to fill/search another bugreport, could you take a look at the attached driver? At least 2 people reported no problems. Thanks Martin ** Attachment added: kernel28rc6-rtl8187.tbz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19968203/kernel-rtl8187.tbz -- 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256331] Re: 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support
i didn't make a source .deb for them. [...] Not a best practice for developing GPL software. Please always publish the source code beside any binary blob. A simple diff, tar cjf or git push costs you nothing. If something breaks, anybody should have the possibility to see what's going on. That's actually why I and bunch of others like linux ;-) -- 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295192] Re: with multiple-monitors, firefox menus/url history/tooltips shows up on wrong monitor
... 1. Have only a single monitor enabled. 2. Open firefox 3. Enable the secondary monitor. 4. Move the firefox window to the secondary monitor. 5. Open menus/tooltips/etc. They will show up on the primary monitor. 2+ more multi-monitor related long standing gnome disagrees with the x11 driver about the monitor order bugs: * Have only a single (the internal LVDS notebook) monitor enabled. * Have a drawer placed on the gnome panel. * Plug the second monitor, everything looks sane so far: #xrandr Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 800, maximum 2960 x 1850 VGA connected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 1680x1050 59.9 + 60.0 ... LVDS connected 1280x800+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 331mm x 207mm 1280x800 60.0*+ ... * Enable the secondary monitor (e.g. xrandr --output VGA --right-of LVDS --mode 1680x1050). [1] Both top and bottom gnome panels perform an immediately jump to the external secondary monitor. * Don't let it get you down, unlock and drag the panels back to the primary monitor. * Click on the drawer on primary monitor. [2] The the drawer content pops up on secondary monitor. [+] Almost every splash-window appears horizontal in the middle between both monitors. [+] Most OpenGL games smashes a 2 monitor geometry setting so badly, that the only option left is restart the x11 server. -- with multiple-monitors, firefox menus/url history/tooltips shows up on wrong monitor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295192 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 298098] Re: e.g. crash and remote code execution vulnerability
today: apt-show-versions firefox firefox/intrepid uptodate 3.0.4+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.1 ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- e.g. crash and remote code execution vulnerability https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298098 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 298098] [NEW] e.g. crash and remote code execution vulnerability
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 apt-show-versions firefox: firefox/intrepid uptodate 3.0.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu2 ( There is no sign for me whether is this fixed or not fixed in ubuntu. ) http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox30.html Fixed in Firefox 3.0.4 MFSA 2008-58 Parsing error in E4X default namespace MFSA 2008-57 -moz-binding property bypasses security checks on codebase principals MFSA 2008-56 nsXMLHttpRequest::NotifyEventListeners() same-origin violation MFSA 2008-55 Crash and remote code execution in nsFrameManager MFSA 2008-54 Buffer overflow in http-index-format parser MFSA 2008-53 XSS and JavaScript privilege escalation via session restore MFSA 2008-52 Crashes with evidence of memory corruption (rv:1.9.0.4/1.8.1.18) MFSA 2008-51 file: URIs inherit chrome privileges when opened from chrome MFSA 2008-47 Information stealing via local shortcut files ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Visibility changed to: Public -- e.g. crash and remote code execution vulnerability https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298098 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 298098] Re: e.g. crash and remote code execution vulnerability
Well, 3.0.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu2 is broken. The html code from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456896 crashes firefox immediately and safely ;) However the test shows that apt-show-versions seamonkey seamonkey/intrepid uptodate 1.1.12+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 is _not_ affected. -- e.g. crash and remote code execution vulnerability https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298098 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256331] Re: 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support
Thanks for the reports. Here is the updated and probably for the near future final driver. It works well on the most supported chipsets, some cards doesn't work with programs manipulating the MAC address (e.g. Xen). RealTek, the company that produce those network cards doesn't seem eater to help or provide documentation needed for developing solid linux drivers for their cards, so the development is extremely difficult. * download the attached package and (right mouse click) unpack it in your home directory * just doubleclick the install.sh program * report success or failure and dmesg | grep 'r81\|XID\|gcc' * enjoy Thanks Martin ** Attachment added: kernel3.tbz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18925525/kernel3.tbz ** Attachment removed: kernel2.tbz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18755243/kernel2.tbz -- 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 286681] Re: rtl8187 - scanning fails after first association
You are right. It took for some reason the ESSID from the first AP in the list and died until you cut the power. Weird, I can not reproduce this anymore. -- rtl8187 - scanning fails after first association https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 286681] [NEW] svn20081020t000444-0ubuntu1 broke association
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager This update makes the rtl8187 after first attempt to association confused. It stops listing APs until a reboot. reverting to network-manager-gnome 0.7~~svn20081015t194645-0ubuntu1 make it work again Thanks, Martin ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- svn20081020t000444-0ubuntu1 broke association https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 286681] Re: network-manager-gnome 0.7 svn20081020t000444-0ubuntu1 broke association
** Summary changed: - svn20081020t000444-0ubuntu1 broke association + network-manager-gnome 0.7 svn20081020t000444-0ubuntu1 broke association ** Description changed: Binary package hint: network-manager This update makes the rtl8187 after first attempt to association confused. It stops listing APs until a reboot. - reverting to network-manager-gnome 0.7~~svn20081015t194645-0ubuntu1 - make it work again + Reverting to network-manager-gnome 0.7~~svn20081015t194645-0ubuntu1 + make it work again. Thanks, Martin ** Tags added: network-manager -- network-manager-gnome 0.7 svn20081020t000444-0ubuntu1 broke association https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 286423] Re: [Intrepid] Network card sudeenly stopped working
Try synaptic, using the Force Version... feature and revert to network-manager-gnome_0.7~~svn20081015t194645-0ubuntu1 -- [Intrepid] Network card sudeenly stopped working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286423 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256331] Re: 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support
** Attachment removed: kernel.tbz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18672714/kernel.tbz -- 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256331] Re: 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support
Could you update to latest intrepid and try the attached driver? I am looking for the output of the following command (with this driver loaded) for different cards supported by the r8169 driver. In the kernel directory: make rep or dmesg | grep 'r81\|XID\|gcc' which is something like this [12063.361397] r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.3LK-NAPI loaded [12063.361431] r8169 :02:00.0: PCI INT A - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 16 [12063.361475] r8169 :02:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 [12063.361958] r8169 :02:00.0: Missing EEPROM signature: [12063.362737] eth0: RTL8102e at 0xc2042000, 00:1e:33:35:58:72, XID 34a0 IRQ 316 Thanks, Martin ** Attachment added: kernel2.tbz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18755243/kernel2.tbz -- 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256331] Re: 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support
As I know, the support for your card is scheduled for the 2.6.28 kernel release. If you will help, try this new driver, the procedure looks more difficult than it is: * download the attached package and (right mouse click) unpack it in your home directory * be sure the folder is called kernel * in the upper left menu locate and start the terminal program. Go in that kernel directory tipping: cd kernel * then compile the new driver: make * then replace the old with the new driver, that will ask you for your password: sudo make install That's it. After a reboot it should be working. If anything goes wrong please report. I am pretty sure the problems are easy to solve. * At least create and post a rep.txt file, again, that will ask you for password: dmesg rep.txt sudo -s lspci -vvnn rep.txt exit * Watch out for ubuntu updates that includes the world kernel. It will likely disable this new driver, so go ahead and rerun the cd kernel make sudo make install commands. ** Attachment added: kernel.tbz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18672714/kernel.tbz -- 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 76489] Re: network device, module r8169, fails with NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
Here is the current state of the kernel r8169 driver development, if you can follow my instructions, please post the rep.txt file and report success or failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/256331/comments/12 Thanks, Martin -- network device, module r8169, fails with NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/76489 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234314] Re: Ugly fonts in java app
Same here, try a simple Test java -jar rubykara.jar ( http://www.swisseduc.ch/informatik/karatojava/rubykara/classes/rubykara.jar ) 1) crappy java -version java version 1.6.0_0 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_0-b12) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.6.0_0-b12, mixed mode) ii openjdk-6-jdk 6b12~pre1-0ubuntu3 2) o.k. java -version java version 1.6.0_07 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_07-b06) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 10.0-b23, mixed mode) ii sun-java6-jdk 6-07-4ubuntu2 ** Attachment added: crappy http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18135685/crappy-rend.png -- Ugly fonts in java app https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234314 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234314] Re: Ugly fonts in java app
** Attachment added: ok http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18135688/ok-rend.png -- Ugly fonts in java app https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234314 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 263555] Re: [intrepid] 2.6.27 e1000e driver places Intel ICH8 and ICH9 gigE chipsets at risk
A small Button with the phrase Don't Panic on it ... http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/1/368 http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4a7703582836f55a1cbad0e2c1c6ebbee3f9b3a7 This patch is meant to prevent all future corruptions of the e1000e NVM (non volatile memory) after the driver is loaded. The registers stay locked until the machine is power cycled. Does this impose any user-visible behavior change? (such as not being able to set up wake-on-lan, change MAC address, whatever). no, because none of that is stored permanently in the eeprom unless you do writes with ethtool -E. Our policy for the driver is generally don't ever write to the eeprom. So all the normal paths (except for initial start on preproduction hardware and ethtool -E writes) do not write to the eeprom. Currently the driver will let you try to commit a change but with this patch it will never get written to NVM unless you reboot, load driver (the first time!) with WriteProtectNVM=0 and *then* do ethtool -E. -- [intrepid] 2.6.27 e1000e driver places Intel ICH8 and ICH9 gigE chipsets at risk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263555 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277304] [NEW] gparted messes up device entries (Intrepid)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gparted intrepid, no matter what kernel gparted 0.3.8-1ubuntu1 If you have 3 primary (sda1 - sda3) partitions and the sda4 is an extended partition, then starting gparted messes up device entries. Before: brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 0 2008-09-30 19:28 /dev/sda brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 1 2008-09-30 19:28 /dev/sda1 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 2 2008-09-30 19:28 /dev/sda2 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 3 2008-09-30 19:28 /dev/sda3 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 4 2008-09-30 19:28 /dev/sda4 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 5 2008-09-30 19:28 /dev/sda5 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 6 2008-09-30 19:28 /dev/sda6 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 7 2008-09-30 19:28 /dev/sda7 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 8 2008-09-30 19:28 /dev/sda8 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 9 2008-09-30 19:28 /dev/sda9 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 10 2008-09-30 19:28 /dev/sda10 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 11 2008-09-30 17:28 /dev/sda11 just after executing gparted: brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 0 2008-09-30 19:28 /dev/sda brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 1 2008-10-02 23:14 /dev/sda1 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 2 2008-10-02 23:14 /dev/sda2 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 3 2008-10-02 23:14 /dev/sda3 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 4 2008-10-02 23:14 /dev/sda4 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 6 2008-09-30 19:28 /dev/sda6 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 7 2008-10-02 23:14 /dev/sda7 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 8 2008-09-30 19:28 /dev/sda8 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 9 2008-10-02 23:14 /dev/sda9 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 10 2008-10-02 23:14 /dev/sda10 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 11 2008-09-30 17:28 /dev/sda11 as you can see, the sda5 device vanished. This makes a non-geek installation of intrepid on such a partition table not possible. Bogus error message: LC_ALL=C sudo gparted == libparted : 1.8.9 == Error informing the kernel about modifications to partition /dev/sda5 -- Device or resource busy. This means Linux won't know about any changes you made to /dev/sda5 until you reboot -- so you shouldn't mount it or use it in any way before rebooting. The kernel was unable to re-read the partition table on /dev/sda (Device or resource busy). This means Linux won't know anything about the modifications you made until you reboot. You should reboot your computer before doing anything with /dev/sda. ** Affects: gparted (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: gparted intrepid libparted udev -- gparted messes up device entries (Intrepid) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277304 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246269] Re: Switched from vesafb to uvesafb, but uvesafb can't work without v86d
Arrr ;-) Unfortunately the intel xorg driver doesn't seems to like it. It causes sometimes overlay and opengl lockups. Generally the coexistence with any frame-buffer makes the opengl system more unstable. Still in deep water here. (No wonder why without an intel network card you feel lucky these days...) -- Switched from vesafb to uvesafb, but uvesafb can't work without v86d https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256331] Re: 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support
The rtl8101e and rtl8102e support in the r8169 driver is broken. The chip is feeded with a wrong startup code. It works with the latest 2.6.27 kernel + patch: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdevm=121744114826864w=2 or better all of them: http://userweb.kernel.org/~romieu/r8169/2.6.27-rc6/ (That means, you must compile you own kernel) -- 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256331] Re: 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support
See the link ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Committed -- 2.6.26 kernel lacks realtek 8101 support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 274748] [NEW] enable CONFIG_IPWIRELESS
Public bug reported: This pcmcia card is widely used in some counties. fgrep IPWI /boot/config-2.6.27-4-generic # CONFIG_IPWIRELESS is not set Thanks ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: interpid ipwireless pcmcia -- enable CONFIG_IPWIRELESS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246269] Re: Switched from vesafb to uvesafb, but uvesafb can't work without v86d
@Bogdan: Than someone should resurrect that package? I suppose ubuntu has to ride the dead horse here about a 1/2 - 1 year (until the kernel mode setting driver arrives). https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/915resolution -- Switched from vesafb to uvesafb, but uvesafb can't work without v86d https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227434] Re: hardy kernel chokes on pentium T2390 and Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core
Sorry, too late. I don't use the ubuntu kernels anymore, so you can close this bug. I strongly recommend that ubuntu kernel developers also alternatively support vanilla kernel (like gentoo do) for their 'human' users. Thanks -- hardy kernel chokes on pentium T2390 and Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246269] Re: Switched from vesafb to uvesafb, but uvesafb can't work without v86d
( this workaround is similar as in comment #42 ) 1) install v86d 2) create /etc/modprobe.d/uvesafb options uvesafb mode_option=1280x800-32 mtrr=3 scroll=ywrap 4) append blacklist uvesafb to /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-framebuffer 3) append uvesafb to /etc/modules 4) run update-initramfs -u reboot [ 16.996674] uvesafb: Intel Corporation, Intel(r)Crestline Graphics Controller, Hardware Version 0.0, OEM: Intel(r)Crestline Graphics Chip Accelerated VGA BIOS, VBE v3.0 [ 17.019563] uvesafb: VBIOS/hardware supports DDC2 transfers [ 17.039816] uvesafb: monitor limits: vf = 75 Hz, hf = 83 kHz, clk = 150 MHz [ 17.040016] uvesafb: scrolling: redraw [ 17.201234] Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 128x48 [ 17.203656] uvesafb: framebuffer at 0x8000, mapped to 0xc20004c8, using 6144k, total 7616k [ 17.203717] fb0: VESA VGA frame buffer device -- Switched from vesafb to uvesafb, but uvesafb can't work without v86d https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246141] Re: no support for realtek rtl8187se
Caroline: The realtek driver has no licensing information with it ?? rtl8187se_linux_26.1022.0904.2008/rtl8185/license says clearly GPL v2 -- no support for realtek rtl8187se https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246269] Re: Switched from vesafb to uvesafb, but uvesafb can't work without v86d
Until somebody decides to fix the Intel fb driver ;-) you have to patch the VGA BIOS ( Read http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/uvesafb/faq.php ) e.g .for 1280x800: * wget 'https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/915resolution/0.5.3-1ubuntu1/+files/915resolution_0.5.3.orig.tar.gz' * tar xvzf 915resolution_0.5.3.orig.tar.gz cd 915resolution-0.5.3/ make * sudo cp -a 915resolution /sbin/ * read README.txt * sudo 915resolution -l gives me Intel chipset detected. However, 915resolution was unable to determine the chipset type. * for my chipset fgrep Chipset /var/log/Xorg.0.log (II) intel: Driver for Intel Integrated Graphics Chipsets: i810, Mobile Intel GM45 Express Chipset, (II) intel(0): Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) 965GM * forcing 915resolution -c G965 -l works Intel 800/900 Series VBIOS Hack : version 0.5.3 Chipset: G965 BIOS: TYPE 1 Mode Table Offset: $C + $268 Mode Table Entries: 36 Mode 30 : 640x480, 8 bits/pixel Mode 32 : 800x600, 8 bits/pixel Mode 34 : 1280x800, 8 bits/pixel Mode 38 : 1280x1024, 8 bits/pixel Mode 3a : 1600x1200, 8 bits/pixel Mode 3c : 1920x1440, 8 bits/pixel Mode 41 : 640x480, 16 bits/pixel Mode 43 : 800x600, 16 bits/pixel Mode 45 : 1280x800, 16 bits/pixel Mode 49 : 1280x1024, 16 bits/pixel Mode 4b : 1600x1200, 16 bits/pixel Mode 4d : 1920x1440, 16 bits/pixel Mode 50 : 640x480, 32 bits/pixel Mode 52 : 800x600, 32 bits/pixel Mode 54 : 1280x800, 32 bits/pixel Mode 58 : 1280x1024, 32 bits/pixel Mode 5a : 1600x1200, 32 bits/pixel Mode 5c : 1920x1440, 32 bits/pixel * insert /sbin/915resolution -c G965 54 1280 800 in the /etc/init.d/module-init-tools file just before the line # Loop over every line in /etc/modules. * be happy [ 17.371765] Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 160x50 [ 17.374929] uvesafb: framebuffer at 0x8000, mapped to 0xc20004c8, using 7616k, total 7616k cat /sys/class/graphics/fb0/virtual_size 1280,800 cat /sys/devices/platform/uvesafb.0/vbe_modes 1280x800-8, 0x0105 1280x800-16, 0x0117 1280x800-32, 0x0118 640x480-32, 0x0112 800x600-16, 0x0114 800x600-32, 0x0115 640x480-8, 0x0101 800x600-8, 0x0103 640x480-16, 0x0111 -- Switched from vesafb to uvesafb, but uvesafb can't work without v86d https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201711] Re: Apple fn key behavior isn't consistent with what's expected
Just createt a swallow-the-alu-pill tux mascot to see if that helps ;-) http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16318action=edit -- Apple fn key behavior isn't consistent with what's expected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201711 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227434] Re: hardy kernel chokes on pentium T2390 and RTL8101E
Just another maschine (here without the RTL8101E). All hardy kernels are similarly broken. Gutsy and any vanila kernels are working perfectly. [0.00] Linux version 2.6.22-14-server ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)) #1 SMP Tue Feb 12 03:10:53 [ 5.571] time.c: Detected 20.97 MHz processor. 8-(o) [ 5.594] Console: colour VGA+ 8x2 [ 5.594] console [tty0] enabled [ 5.538] Checking aperture... [ 5.544] CPU 0: aperture @ 4000 size 3 MB [ 5.549] Aperture too small (3 MB) [ 5.634] No AGP bridge found [ 5.639] Your BIOS doesn't leave a aperture memory hole [ 5.635] Please enable the IOMMU option in the BIOS setup [ 5.630] This costs you 6 MB of RAM [ 5.678] Mapping aperture over 656 KB of RAM @ 4000 [ 5.680] Memory: 4466k/4876k available (26k kernel code, 162k reserved, 10k data, 36k init) [ 5.689] SLUB: Genslabs=1, HWalign=6, Order=0-1, MinObjects=4, CPUs=2, Nodes=1 [ 5.773] Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 51.6 BogoMIPS (lpj=1418) [ 5.776] Security Framework initialized [ 5.772] SELinux: Disabled at boot. [ 5.778] AppArmor: AppArmor initialized [ 5.774] Failure registering capabilities with primary security module. [ 5.773] Dentry cache hash table entries: 548 (order: 1, 4934 bytes) [ 5.795] Inode-cache hash table entries: 224 (order: 9, 2912 bytes) [ 5.708] Mount-cache hash table entries: 26 [ 5.704] CPU: L1 I Cache: 6K (6 bytes/line), D cache 6K (6 bytes/line) [ 5.700] CPU: L2 Cache: 12K (6 bytes/line) [ 5.706] CPU 0/0 - Node 0 [ 5.701] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0 [ 5.707] CPU: Processor Core ID: 0 [ 5.715] SMP alternatives: switching to UP code [ 5.716] Early unpacking initramfs... done [ 5.997] ACPI: Core revision 2002 [ 5.997] ACPI: Looking for DSDT in initramfs... error, file /DSDT.aml not found. [ 5.027] Using local APIC timer interrupts. [ 5.011] APIC timer calibration result 1588 [ 5.012] Detected 1.58 MHz APIC timer. [ 5.014] SMP alternatives: switching to SMP code [ 5.016] Booting processor 1/2 APIC 0x1 [ 5.023] Initializing CPU#1 [ 5.125] Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 51.8 BogoMIPS (lpj=1439) [ 5.125] CPU: L1 I Cache: 6K (6 bytes/line), D cache 6K (6 bytes/line) [ 5.125] CPU: L2 Cache: 12K (6 bytes/line) [ 5.126] CPU 1/1 - Node 0 [ 5.126] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0 [ 5.126] CPU: Processor Core ID: 1 [ 5.135] AMD Athlon(tm) 6 X2 Dual Core Processor 50+ stepping 0 [0.00] Linux version 2.6.22-14-server ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)) #1 SMP Tue Feb 12 03:10:53 UTC 2008 (Ubuntu 2.6.22-14.52-server) [ 14.965094] Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 5211.88 BogoMIPS (lpj=26059430) [ 14.965099] CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line) [ 14.965101] CPU: L2 Cache: 1024K (64 bytes/line) [ 14.965103] CPU 1/1 - Node 0 [ 14.965104] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0 [ 14.965105] CPU: Processor Core ID: 1 [ 14.965197] AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5200+ stepping 03 ** Attachment added: dmesg http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14502514/dmesg-02.txt -- hardy kernel chokes on pentium T2390 and RTL8101E https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227434] Re: hardy kernel chokes on pentium T2390 and AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core
Sorry, look at the previous attachment, the first one was: Linux (none) 2.6.24-16-generic #1 SMP Thu Apr 10 12:47:45 UTC 2008 x86_64 unknown ** Attachment added: dmesg ok 2.6.22 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14502650/dmesg-03-ok.txt -- hardy kernel chokes on pentium T2390 and RTL8101E https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227434] Re: hardy kernel chokes on pentium T2390 and Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core
** Summary changed: - hardy kernel chokes on pentium T2390 and RTL8101E + hardy kernel chokes on pentium T2390 and Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core ** Tags added: athlon64 -- hardy kernel chokes on pentium T2390 and Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227434] [NEW] hardy kernel chokes on pentium T2390 and RTL8101E
Public bug reported: Not sure what's all broken, installing hardy on this http://de.computers.toshiba-europe.com/cgi- bin/ToshibaCSG/jsp/productPage.do?service=DEPRODUCT_ID=150760toshibaShop=false notebook exits in busybox. (acpi=off doesn't help) hardy : [ 7.922] CPU: After generic identify, caps: bfebfbff 2100 00e3d [ 7.923] monitor/mwait feature present. [ 7.927] using mwait in idle threads. [ 7.156] CPU: L1 I cache: 3K, L1 D cache: 3K [ 7.154] CPU: L2 cache: 12K [ 7.159] CPU 0/0 - Node 0 [ 7.154] using mwait in idle threads. [ 7.158] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0 [ 7.153] CPU: Processor Core ID: 0 [ 7.158] CPU0: Thermal monitoring handled by SMI [ 7.150] SMP alternatives: switching to UP code [ 7.169] Early unpacking initramfs... done [ 7.522] ACPI: Core revision 2002 [ 7.522] ACPI: Looking for DSDT in initramfs... error, file /DSDT.aml not found. [ 7.451] Using local APIC timer interrupts. [ 7.587] APIC timer calibration result 8145 [ 7.587] Detected 8.33 MHz APIC timer. [ 7.591] SMP alternatives: switching to SMP code [ 7.598] Booting processor 1/2 APIC 0x1 [ 7.503] Initializing CPU#1 [ 7.668] Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 32.3 BogoMIPS (lpj=7476) [ 7.669] CPU: L1 I cache: 3K, L1 D cache: 3K [ 7.669] CPU: L2 cache: 12K [ 7.669] CPU 1/1 - Node 0 [ 7.669] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0 [ 7.669] CPU: Processor Core ID: 1 [ 7.660] CPU1: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2) [ 7.672] Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU T29 @ 1.8GHz stepping 0d [ 7.675] Brought up 2 CPUs gutsy: [ 91.776563] CPU: After generic identify, caps: bfebfbff 2010 e39d 0001 [ 91.776569] monitor/mwait feature present. [ 91.776631] using mwait in idle threads. [ 91.776693] CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K [ 91.776796] CPU: L2 cache: 1024K [ 91.776855] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0 [ 91.776915] CPU: Processor Core ID: 0 [ 91.776975] CPU: After all inits, caps: bfebfbff 2010 3940 e39d 0001 [ 91.776984] Compat vDSO mapped to e000. [ 91.777055] Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. [ 91.792238] SMP alternatives: switching to UP code [ 91.792715] Early unpacking initramfs... done [ 92.098357] ACPI: Core revision 20070126 [ 92.098466] ACPI: Looking for DSDT in initramfs... error, file /DSDT.aml not found. [ 92.960881] CPU0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU T2390 @ 1.86GHz stepping 0d [ 92.961041] SMP alternatives: switching to SMP code [ 92.961197] Booting processor 1/1 eip 3000 [ 92.971364] Initializing CPU#1 [ 93.050032] Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 3724.46 BogoMIPS (lpj=7448925) [ 93.050039] CPU: After generic identify, caps: bfebfbff 2010 e39d 0001 [ 93.050044] monitor/mwait feature present. [ 93.050046] CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K [ 93.050048] CPU: L2 cache: 1024K [ 93.050050] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0 [ 93.050051] CPU: Processor Core ID: 1 [ 93.050053] CPU: After all inits, caps: bfebfbff 2010 3940 e39d 0001 [ 93.050455] CPU1: Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU T2390 @ 1.86GHz stepping 0d [ 93.051047] Total of 2 processors activated (7452.51 BogoMIPS). gutsy: RTL8101E doesn't work, but the wrong driver at least doesn't crash the kernel lspci(gutsy): 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8101E PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller (rev ff) (prog-if ff) !!! Unknown header type 7f 32 bit (hardy): [ 8.648] r86 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.2LK loaded [ 8.644] PCI: 00:0:0.0 has unsupported PM cap regs version (7) [ 8.645] ACPI: PCI Interrupt 00:0:0.0[A] - GSI 1 (level, low) - IRQ 1 [ 8.647] PCI: Setting latency timer of device 00:0:0.0 to 6 [ 8.649] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0001 [ 8.649] printing eip: c07ad4 *pde = [ 8.649] Oops: 00 [#1] SMP [ 8.640] Modules linked in: ahci ata_generic libata scsi_mod r86 uhci_hcd ehci_hcd usbcore thermal processor fan fbcon tileblit font bitblit softcursor fuse [ 8.655] [ 8.650] Pid: 18, comm: modprobe Not tainted (2.6.2-1-generic #1) [ 8.655] EIP: 06:[c07ad4] EFLAGS: CPU: 1 [ 8.651] EIP is at dev_driver_string+0x2/0x3 [ 8.656] EAX: 0004c EBX: 000e4 ECX: EDX: 0004c [ 8.651] ESI: f7d48 EDI: f8300 EBP: f7cc9c0 ESP: f7fc3d4 [ 8.657] DS: 07b ES: 07b FS: 0d8 GS: 03 SS: 06 [ 8.652] Process modprobe (pid: 18, ti=f7fc20 task=f7d00e0 task.ti=f7fc20) [ 8.657] Stack: f8a1e6 f8a34 f8a33 f8a33 f7fc3d9c c0f1c4 [ 8.660] f7c0f3 f7d48 f7d40 [ 8.664]f7cc9c4c f7fb58 c0f1d4 002e0 f7fc3dd4 c0f1c4 c0a0b1 f8a2de8 [ 8.668] Call Trace: [ 8.667] [f8a1e6] rtl86_init_one+0xc4/0xe9 [r86] [ 8.666] [c0a0b1] find_inode+0x3/0x6 [ 8.665] [c0a06] iput+0x3/0x7 [ 8.673] [c0d2c6b]
[Bug 227434] Re: hardy kernel chokes on pentium T2390 and RTL8101E
** Attachment added: dmesg http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14262867/notebook-32-hardy.txt -- hardy kernel chokes on pentium T2390 and RTL8101E https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 140511] Re: Belkin USB bluetooth device loads wrong module
yeah, in the future :-) It's sitting about 1 year in the kernel bugzila, but who knows, some day ... http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8294 -- Belkin USB bluetooth device loads wrong module https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140511 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 151585] Re: USB Devices unrecognised by virtualbox (/proc/bus/usb missing)
this 'deprecation' also breaks Gregs usbview 1.0-7 (gutsy) -- USB Devices unrecognised by virtualbox (/proc/bus/usb missing) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151585 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103400] Re: compiz freezes x server after screensaver kicks in
Here similar happen (on any computer and every time) Wenn recover from screensaver and after switching user there is nothing (=white screen) ctrl+alt+F1 killall compiz.real makes the screen accesible again. -- compiz freezes x server after screensaver kicks in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103400 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
