[Bug 1276032] Re: Please merge nagios-plugins 1.5-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
** Changed in: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1276032 Title: Please merge nagios-plugins 1.5-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1276032/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1276032] Re: Please merge nagios-plugins 1.5-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
nagios-plugins (1.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Update Licensing text from upstream README * Switch over to packaging ti git-buildpackage * [1a95a53] Update Vcs-headers * [e0ee45e] Use check_ldap instead of check_ldaps for the check_ldaps* command definitions * [9bc7a29] Add 11_check_http_arguments.dpatch to fix argument processing of check_http * [219a55a] Add 12_check_ssh_read_socket.dpatch to fix socket read failure (Closes: #734811) * [0cc66f5] Fix typo in package description (Closes: #734513), thanks Pascal De Vuyst * [ec51a84] Just missed a typo to fix in debian/control * [de62798] Changing upstream URLs to monitoring-plugins.org * [1a03f82] Fix URL in the watch file * [201bd0e] Adding 13_check_proc_parent_process.dpatch (Closes: 626913), Thanks Anton Lofgren * [e5fc80f] Build again against libradiusclient-ng-dev, this Reopens: #721621 - libfreeradius-client-dev is actually not supported by upstream - check_radius -- Jan Wagner Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:14:38 +0200 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1276032 Title: Please merge nagios-plugins 1.5-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1276032/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1276032] [NEW] Please merge nagios-plugins 1.5-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please merge nagios-plugins 1.5-2 (main) from debian unstable (main). There are several bugs fixed there. ** Affects: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: In Progress ** Changed in: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1276032 Title: Please merge nagios-plugins 1.5-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1276032/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1275495] Re: check_radius missing
The problematic change is in 1.5-1ubuntu2. You should build-depend again on libradius1-dev! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1275495 Title: check_radius missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1275495/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1275495] [NEW] check_radius missing
Public bug reported: Since the source package nagios-plugins 1.5 check_raid is missing from the binary package (nagios-plugins-standards). ** Affects: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: nagios-plugins (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nagios-plugins (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1275495 Title: check_radius missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1275495/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 870448] Re: check_http fails to decode chunked encoding before performing string checks
Upstream bug is now https://github.com/monitoring-plugins/monitoring- plugins/issues/1122 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870448 Title: check_http fails to decode chunked encoding before performing string checks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nagios-plugins/+bug/870448/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 155699] Re: nagios Plugin check_imap fails with SSL3
Upstream this bug is https://github.com/monitoring-plugins/monitoring- plugins/issues/993 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155699 Title: nagios Plugin check_imap fails with SSL3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/155699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1061154] Re: pgsql.cfg includes a check_pgsql_4 command, but check_pgsql does not actually take the -4 argument
I would love to link this to the upstream issue, unfortunately launchpad doesn't love github bugtracker. Here we go: https://github.com/monitoring-plugins/monitoring- plugins/issues/1230 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1061154 Title: pgsql.cfg includes a check_pgsql_4 command, but check_pgsql does not actually take the -4 argument To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1061154/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1244438] Re: EOL notification system required for HWE kernels in LTSs
Am 30.01.14 20:31, schrieb Robie Basak: > It might also be worth considering what users already use to monitor > their machines for updates, and to provide alerts by patching those > mechanisms. For example, we might SRU a patch to the check_apt nagios > plugin to pick up the EOL kernel state and present it as a warning or > failure. Depending on such an implementation (for example adding those feature with a switch) we may include this patch in Debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1244438 Title: EOL notification system required for HWE kernels in LTSs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/1244438/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1031680] Re: check_apt always report 0 critical updates
Anyways ... please fill pull requests over there in https://github.com /monitoring-plugins/monitoring-plugins, the upstream has changed it's name. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031680 Title: check_apt always report 0 critical updates To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nagios-plugins/+bug/1031680/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1257241] Re: check_ssh plugin invoked with incorrect parameters
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1244713 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1244713 This is a duplicate of #1244713, thanks for checking there is no open bug report already about the issue. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1244713 invalid syntax for check_ssh plugin -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1257241 Title: check_ssh plugin invoked with incorrect parameters To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1257241/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1246741] Re: check_disk returns 0MB in use for zfs filesystem
you maybe want to recreate that in the corresponsing zfs/kernel package. ** Changed in: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246741 Title: check_disk returns 0MB in use for zfs filesystem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1246741/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1246741] Re: check_disk returns 0MB in use for zfs filesystem
I guess the 32k from 'df' is something like 0%? I can't see anything wrong from your output for the first view! ** Changed in: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246741 Title: check_disk returns 0MB in use for zfs filesystem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1246741/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1244713] Re: invalid syntax for check_ssh plugin
> Wow, that was quick, good job guys =) Until now, in Ubuntu nothing happened. This fix only exist in Debian and needs to be merged and pushed into 13.10. The Status changed to "Fix Rleased" cause lanchpad detected the referenced Debian bug is marked as fixed. Anyways ... the question is: Why didn't got the package fixed _before_ the release of 13.10 as the nagios-plugins 1.4.16-3 was uploaded to Debian on 23th Aug, with just only bugfixes (one fixing a bug reported in Ubuntu). This is a sign for a very bad release strategy in my eyes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1244713 Title: invalid syntax for check_ssh plugin To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1244713/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318703] Re: nagios check_smtp expects integer instead of double
This is fixed in version 1.5 of nagios-plugins ** Changed in: nagios-plugins Importance: Unknown => Undecided ** Changed in: nagios-plugins Status: Unknown => New ** Changed in: nagios-plugins Remote watch: SourceForge.net Tracker #2555775 => None ** Changed in: nagios-plugins Importance: Undecided => Unknown ** Changed in: nagios-plugins Status: New => Unknown ** Changed in: nagios-plugins Remote watch: None => SourceForge.net Tracker #2555775 ** Changed in: nagios-plugins Importance: Unknown => Undecided ** Changed in: nagios-plugins Status: Unknown => New ** Changed in: nagios-plugins Remote watch: SourceForge.net Tracker #2555775 => None ** Changed in: nagios-plugins Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318703 Title: nagios check_smtp expects integer instead of double To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nagios-plugins/+bug/318703/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1244713] Re: invalid syntax for check_ssh plugin
Please be so kind and merge 1.4.16-3 from Debian, which fixes this issue (beside some small other once): nagios-plugins (1.4.16-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Fixed check_squid* command definitions * Add double threshold to check_smtp (LP: #318703) - 12_check_smtp_double_threshold.dpatch * Remove the additional argument from check_ssh and check_proc (Closes: #717229, 720580) You can fetch the package from http://snapshot.debian.org/package /nagios-plugins/1.4.16-3/ ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #717229 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717229 ** Also affects: nagios-plugins (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717229 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1244713 Title: invalid syntax for check_ssh plugin To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1244713/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1053322] Re: Icinga: Could not stat() command file
> I do not see how this bug can be marked as invalid, as it is indeed very > valid. I experience the same thing. > Please explain why this would be invalid before closing the bug again. Cause nobody is reading documentations and comments of this bug? For more infos, see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icinga/+bug/1053322/comments/1 ** Changed in: icinga (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1053322 Title: Icinga: Could not stat() command file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icinga/+bug/1053322/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1203757] Re: "nagios-plugin" plugin check_icmp missing suid-bit after update
** Changed in: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203757 Title: "nagios-plugin" plugin check_icmp missing suid-bit after update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1203757/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1203757] [NEW] "nagios-plugin" plugin check_icmp missing suid-bit after update
Am 22.07.2013 15:59, schrieb Bugrepoter: > update of the nagios-plugins removes the suid-bit from check_icmp. This Sorry, this binaries don't have suid set. I guess you did change that on your own. Maybe you should have a look into /usr/share/doc/nagios-plugins-basic/README.Debian.gz: plugins needing root privilege the check_dhcp, check_icmp and maybe others plugins require root privileges to run, because of the low-level packet mangling that they perform. but, in the interest of the "safe default", these plugins will not be installed with the suid bit set. there are two recommended ways about overriding this on your system: - set the suid bit with dpkg-statoverride: # dpkg-statoverride --update --add root nagios 4750 $plugin where $plugin is the specific plugin you want to grant such privileges. - use sudo to grant the permissions and modify your plugin config of these two, the first is recommended because it's the simplest and has the same effect as the second. > breaks all host checks, since the nagios user can't ping any host > without it. The default configuration is to use check_ping for the host check. Cheers, Jan. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203757 Title: "nagios-plugin" plugin check_icmp missing suid-bit after update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1203757/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1153934] Re: Some radio streams which used to play OK don't play after updating to rhythmbox 2.98 or higher due a gvfs bug
Am 22.07.2013 17:21, schrieb Colan Schwartz: > + WORKAROUND: Run the command "sudo killall gvfsd-http" after playing a > + station. Privileged permissions are not needed, it just workes without as long as you kill the processe(s) with the same user who runs rhythmbox! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1153934 Title: Some radio streams which used to play OK don't play after updating to rhythmbox 2.98 or higher due a gvfs bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/1153934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318703] Re: nagios check_smtp expects integer instead of double
pending pull request: https://github.com/nagios-plugins/nagios- plugins/pull/58 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318703 Title: nagios check_smtp expects integer instead of double To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nagios-plugins/+bug/318703/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1031680] Re: check_apt always report 0 critical updates
Also an option is to port check_apt to use libapt-pkg[1]. This has the advantage that libapt-pkg is providing a stable api and we don't need to parse output of apt-get/aptitude. The easiest way to get changes into upstream is to send pull requests[2]. [1] http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/libapt-pkg4.12 [2] https://github.com/nagios-plugins/nagios-plugins -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031680 Title: check_apt always report 0 critical updates To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nagios-plugins/+bug/1031680/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1031680] Re: check_apt always report 0 critical updates
Sorry guys .. this ist _NOT_ a security issue (at least no one of nagios-plugins). Opening a but upstream might a good idea, but upstream doesn't work on debian systems. So it's up to you guys to present (useful and senseful) patches which might be adopted upstream. If anybody want to rely on apt-check, you should spin off a separate plugin and try to incorporate that into the nagios-plugins-contrib package! Anyways ... nagios-plugins-contrib also provides check_packages, maybe you give it a go. Cheers, Jan (with Debian Nagios-Plugins Maintainers hat on). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031680 Title: check_apt always report 0 critical updates To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nagios-plugins/+bug/1031680/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1031680] Re: check_apt always report 0 critical updates
** Information type changed from Public Security to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031680 Title: check_apt always report 0 critical updates To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nagios-plugins/+bug/1031680/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1182247] Re: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error
** Changed in: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182247 Title: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1182247/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1182247] Re: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error
Am 21.05.2013 09:55, schrieb Robie Basak: > Please could you check the latest upstream version of > nagios-plugins sorry, but which "latest upstream version" are you talking about?!? Recent upstream version is 1.4.16, same as in Ubuntu and Debian! Anyways .. I would have a look into the options "--debug" and "--interface" (which needs an argument). For me it smells like local configurations problem. Cheers, Jan. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182247 Title: check_ide_smart fails with i/o error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1182247/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1153934] Re: Some radio streams which used to play OK don't play after updating to rhythmbox 2.98
Got rhytmbox working correct again after disabling the last-fm plugin. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1153934 Title: Some radio streams which used to play OK don't play after updating to rhythmbox 2.98 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/1153934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1173510] Re: gvfsd-http crash rhythmbox streamming
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1153934 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1153934 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1153934 Some radio streams which used to play OK don't play after updating to rhythmbox 2.98 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173510 Title: gvfsd-http crash rhythmbox streamming To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1173510/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1097848] Re: nagios-plugins 1.4.15-5ubuntu4 FTBFS on amd64 in raring
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #701406 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701406 ** Also affects: nagios-plugins (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701406 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097848 Title: nagios-plugins 1.4.15-5ubuntu4 FTBFS on amd64 in raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nagios-plugins/+bug/1097848/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1054495] Re: AirPrint doesn't work on iOS 6 device
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #700961 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700961 ** Also affects: cups (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700961 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054495 Title: AirPrint doesn't work on iOS 6 device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1054495/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1098337] Re: IPPlan does not install
As (former) debian maintainer of this package, I would recommand to remove this package from ubuntu ... there is a open RFA[1] and it looks like nobody is willing to adopt the package which will lead into orphaning the package in debian. The project seems dead also upstream. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/647269 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #647269 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647269 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #618388 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618388 ** Also affects: ipplan (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618388 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098337 Title: IPPlan does not install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipplan/+bug/1098337/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1082767] Re: Configure-time ps command truncates command names
This is a kernel limitation ... ** Package changed: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu) => linux-meta (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Status: New => Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082767 Title: Configure-time ps command truncates command names To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1082767/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1082767] Re: Configure-time ps command truncates command names
Am 16.12.12 01:31, schrieb Gerald Combs: > That's because "/sbin/getty" is shorter than 15 characters, which > means that /proc//status isn't truncating it. that's true, but this is the same for "apache2" as you reported first: $ LANG=C /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_procs -C apache2 PROCS OK: 7 processes with command name 'apache2' > ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #513460 > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513460 okay ... so you know this won't get fixed (from debian side and this seems likely in ubuntu too). anyways ... it's not a problem in nagios-plugins but in linux-meta. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082767 Title: Configure-time ps command truncates command names To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1082767/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1082767] Re: Configure-time ps command truncates command names
sorry ... can't reproduce your problem ... at least on quantal: root@ubuntu:~# LANG=C /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_procs -C getty PROCS OK: 6 Prozesse with command name 'getty' root@ubuntu:~# ps aux|grep getty root 1004 0.0 0.0 4632 844 tty4 Ss+ 20:33 0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty4 root 1008 0.0 0.0 4632 856 tty5 Ss+ 20:33 0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty5 root 1023 0.0 0.0 4632 848 tty2 Ss+ 20:33 0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty2 root 1025 0.0 0.0 4632 856 tty3 Ss+ 20:33 0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty3 root 1029 0.0 0.0 4632 848 tty6 Ss+ 20:33 0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty6 root 1492 0.0 0.0 4632 852 tty1 Ss+ 20:33 0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty1 root 13428 0.0 0.0 5636 816 pts/0S+ 22:13 0:00 grep getty looks like you messed your local environment -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082767 Title: Configure-time ps command truncates command names To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1082767/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1082767] Re: Configure-time ps command truncates command names
reassigning to binary package -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082767 Title: Configure-time ps command truncates command names To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1082767/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1086151] Re: Nagios utils.pm has wrong default path to rpcinfo
** Patch added: "commited change from debian scm" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1086151/+attachment/3460892/+files/rpcinfo.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086151 Title: Nagios utils.pm has wrong default path to rpcinfo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1086151/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1086151] Re: Nagios utils.pm has wrong default path to rpcinfo
** No longer affects: nagios-plugins (Debian) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086151 Title: Nagios utils.pm has wrong default path to rpcinfo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1086151/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1086984] [NEW] Should Drop php-suhosin from Ubuntu
Am 05.12.2012 21:38, schrieb Clint Byrum: > problems caused by incomplete 5.4 support. After contacting both the > php5 and php-suhosin maintainers in Debian, it seems like this package Did you? Anyways ... removing it from Ubuntu seems the only valid option for now, as upstream stated (with my own words): * don't use patches from anybody else except upstream * only use released versions (no scm snapshots) * he just created php-suhosin for himself and published the code, we shouldn't expect anything So it looks like there will be no solution to get php-suhosin working with a recent PHP version soon nor will this software be maintainable for longterm in a distribution (in the actual situation). Just my 2 php-suhosin packager cents. Cheers, Jan. -- Never write mail to , you have been warned! -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h r+++ y --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086984 Title: Should Drop php-suhosin from Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php-suhosin/+bug/1086984/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1086151] Re: Nagios utils.pm has wrong default path to rpcinfo
** Also affects: nagios-plugins (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nagios-plugins (Debian) Assignee: (unassigned) => cyco (ubuntu-cyconet) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086151 Title: Nagios utils.pm has wrong default path to rpcinfo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1086151/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1078177] Re: typo in /etc/default/nagios3
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #693124 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693124 ** Also affects: nagios3 (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693124 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078177 Title: typo in /etc/default/nagios3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1078177/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1078177] Re: typo in /etc/default/nagios3
On 11/13/2012 10:08 AM, Robie Basak wrote: > Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make > Ubuntu better. > > This typo is present in Debian too, and Ubuntu currently doesn't make > any changes over the Debian package. So this bug would be best fixed > directly in Debian, and then Ubuntu will pick up the fix automatically. > > Would you mind filing a bug with Debian please? not needed ... this is fixed in debian packaging vcs (77c9d0ef43ca87e6439abc4d035a71e4f66bfd0d) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078177 Title: typo in /etc/default/nagios3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1078177/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1053322] Re: Icinga: Could not stat() command file
> After enabling 'check_external_commands=1' we tried to do some commands in > the interface, this however failed with the error: Error: Could not stat() > command file '/var/lib/icinga/rw/icinga.cmd'! > > To get this working we had to do: > service icinga stop > dpkg-statoverride --update --add nagios www-data 2710 /var/lib/icinga/rw/ > dpkg-statoverride --update --add nagios nagios 751 /var/lib/icinga/ > service icinga start what about reading the shipped documentation (/usr/share/doc/icinga- common/README.Debian) ? ** Changed in: icinga (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1053322 Title: Icinga: Could not stat() command file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icinga/+bug/1053322/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 995984] Re: check_ssh incorrectly refusing -6 switch even though Usage announces it
This issue occures only, if has no valid -record, so this is no check_ssh issue. ** Changed in: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995984 Title: check_ssh incorrectly refusing -6 switch even though Usage announces it To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/995984/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 995984] Re: check_ssh incorrectly refusing -6 switch even though Usage announces it
** Also affects: nagios-plugins (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995984 Title: check_ssh incorrectly refusing -6 switch even though Usage announces it To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/995984/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 837085] Re: hardened build option lost in debian/control
On Wednesday 07 September 2011 14:52:29 you wrote: > The code wasn't actually vulnerable; GCC couldn't check whenever it was. > I've fixed this in both master and maint-1.4.15. The fix is so trivial > it can be safely applied to any version of the Nagios-Plugins too. > > See commit entitled "Make GCC happy" here: > > http://nagiosplug.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=nagiosplug/nagiosplu > g;a=summary I also pushed 1.4.15-5 into unstable some minutes ago which have this fix incorporated. Feel free to catch that for 11.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/837085 Title: hardened build option lost in debian/control To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/837085/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 837085] Re: hardened build option lost in debian/control
On Tuesday 30 August 2011 02:21:54 you wrote: > per kees in #ubuntu-devel: > > smoser: it looks like it's more than just adding it back in, since > they appear to have added vulnerable code now, too. > smoser: so you'll need to fix at least the one flaw that the compiler > flags found are there any more specific infos about the problem? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/837085 Title: hardened build option lost in debian/control To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/837085/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 693979] Re: doesn't include check_snmp or many other commands
there are nagios-plugins which has the binaries ** Changed in: icinga (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693979 Title: doesn't include check_snmp or many other commands -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297747] Re: Doesn't follow other plugin package conventions
was fixed with 1.1.1-6 ** Changed in: nagios-snmp-plugins (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297747 Title: Doesn't follow other plugin package conventions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 699670] Re: package nagvis 1:1.4.6-1 failed to install/upgrade: subproces installed post-installation script gaf een foutwaarde 1 terug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 686755 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686755 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 686755 package nagvis 1:1.4.6-1 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/699670 Title: package nagvis 1:1.4.6-1 failed to install/upgrade: subproces installed post-installation script gaf een foutwaarde 1 terug -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 728328] Re: nagios plugins depend on samba
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728328 Title: nagios plugins depend on samba -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 728328] [NEW] nagios plugins depend on samba
On Thursday 03 March 2011 10:49:54 you wrote: > *** This bug is a security vulnerability *** *lol* I can't see a vulnerability by installing samba packages, but anyhow. > Public security bug reported: > > Binary package hint: nagios-plugins > > I have an internet server. I like to keep as little as possible > installed. A package as "SAMBA' I simply do NOT want installed on my > server. It has no place there. > > Now to get nagios to check my disk-free-status, I installed "nagios- > plugins". This depends on "samba-common" and samba-common-bin. It > stopped short of starting the samba server. What about installing just "nagios-plugin-basic"? "nagios-plugins" is also depending[1] on "nagios-plugins-standard" which have (at least) on Ubuntu couple of depencies[2], also on "smbclient". > So, to monitor samba stuff, I imagine that having the samba tools > installed is required. But for my use this is not neccesary at all. This > sort of "attitude" causes software bloat. We/ubuntu should be careful in > what dependencies to mark as required. > > Either split the nagios-plugins package into a nagios-plugins-samba, or > remove the dependency. In the latter case, you can make things "neat" by > editing the script that requires samba to print a nice: "you need to > install samba" if it isn't found. In debian we have moved a bunch of dependencies to recommands with 1.4.14-2, which gives you the possibilty to get rid of those packages by deinstalling them or avoiding automatically installing recommanded packages. Anyhow ... the ubuntu package has this changes reverted for an unknown reason. Just my 2 cents, Jan. [1] http://packages.ubuntu.com/natty/nagios-plugins [2] http://packages.ubuntu.com/natty/nagios-plugins-standard -- Never write mail to , you have been warned! -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h r+++ y --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728328 Title: nagios plugins depend on samba -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 693979] Re: doesn't include check_snmp or many other commands
Maybe a look into http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=check_snmp&mode=&arch=any helps? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693979 Title: doesn't include check_snmp or many other commands -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315507] Re: [jaunty] php5-odbc module broken
bug in php5 ** Changed in: php-suhosin (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315507 Title: [jaunty] php5-odbc module broken -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 657937] Re: release update to maverick removes libc6-i686
On Monday 11 October 2010 15:48:46 ubu...@cyconet.org wrote: > > Can you please give me the output of: > > $ ls -al /lib/tls > > and > > $ md5sum /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > > w...@testground:~$ ls -al /lib/tls > total 1344 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root4096 2010-10-10 23:17 . > drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 16384 2010-10-11 09:56 .. > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root4096 2010-10-10 23:17 i686 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1241392 2008-09-25 09:59 libc.so.6 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root9592 2008-09-25 09:59 libdl.so.2 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 85010 2008-09-25 09:59 libpthread.so.0 > w...@testground:~$ md5sum /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > 129a1271a32a5d6e8643c997a786de12 /lib/tls/libc.so.6 Looks like 'rm /lib/tls/*.so.*' resolvs my problem. Maybe you want to close the ticket. Thanks! -- release update to maverick removes libc6-i686 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 657937] Re: release update to maverick removes libc6-i686
On Monday 11 October 2010 14:57:06 Michael Vogt wrote: > The package libc6-i686 is no longer available in maverick. This in I did recognize that. > itself should not be a problem. The system should be able to fallback to > the "normal" one. > > Can you please give me the output of: > $ ls -al /lib/tls > and > $ md5sum /lib/tls/libc.so.6 w...@testground:~$ ls -al /lib/tls total 1344 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root4096 2010-10-10 23:17 . drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 16384 2010-10-11 09:56 .. drwxr-xr-x 3 root root4096 2010-10-10 23:17 i686 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1241392 2008-09-25 09:59 libc.so.6 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root9592 2008-09-25 09:59 libdl.so.2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 85010 2008-09-25 09:59 libpthread.so.0 w...@testground:~$ md5sum /lib/tls/libc.so.6 129a1271a32a5d6e8643c997a786de12 /lib/tls/libc.so.6 With kind regards, Jan. -- release update to maverick removes libc6-i686 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657937] Re: release update to maverick removes libc6-i686
** Description changed: Binary package hint: update-manager I just did a release update from 10.04 to 10.10 for fun, but it is removing libc6-i686, which does result in a system which is a bit uncomfortable ... :) r...@testground:/home/waja# do-release-upgrade -d Checking for a new ubuntu release Done Upgrade tool signature Done Upgrade tool - Done downloading + Done downloading extracting 'maverick.tar.gz' - authenticate 'maverick.tar.gz' against 'maverick.tar.gz.gpg' + authenticate 'maverick.tar.gz' against 'maverick.tar.gz.gpg' tar: Removing leading `/' from member names Reading cache Checking package manager Continue running under SSH? - This session appears to be running under ssh. It is not recommended - to perform a upgrade over ssh currently because in case of failure it - is harder to recover. + This session appears to be running under ssh. It is not recommended + to perform a upgrade over ssh currently because in case of failure it + is harder to recover. - If you continue, an additional ssh daemon will be started at port - '1022'. - Do you want to continue? + If you continue, an additional ssh daemon will be started at port + '1022'. + Do you want to continue? Continue [yN] y Starting additional sshd - To make recovery in case of failure easier, an additional sshd will - be started on port '1022'. If anything goes wrong with the running - ssh you can still connect to the additional one. - + To make recovery in case of failure easier, an additional sshd will + be started on port '1022'. If anything goes wrong with the running + ssh you can still connect to the additional one. Reading package lists... Done - Building dependency tree + Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done - Building data structures... Done - Reading package lists... Done - Building dependency tree + Building data structures... Done + Reading package lists... Done + Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done - Building data structures... Done + Building data structures... Done Updating repository information WARNING: Failed to read mirror file Third party sources disabled - Some third party entries in your sources.list were disabled. You can - re-enable them after the upgrade with the 'software-properties' tool - or your package manager. + Some third party entries in your sources.list were disabled. You can + re-enable them after the upgrade with the 'software-properties' tool + or your package manager. - 100% [Working] 0s + 100% [Working] 0s Checking package manager - Reading package lists... Done - Building dependency tree + Reading package lists... Done + Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done - Building data structures... Done + Building data structures... Done Calculating the changes Calculating the changes Do you want to start the upgrade? + 9 installed packages are no longer supported by Canonical. You can + still get support from the community. - 9 installed packages are no longer supported by Canonical. You can - still get support from the community. + 37 packages are going to be removed. 250 new packages are going to be + installed. 1509 packages are going to be upgraded. - 37 packages are going to be removed. 250 new packages are going to be - installed. 1509 packages are going to be upgraded. + You have to download a total of 1173M. This download will take about + 19 minutes with your connection. - You have to download a total of 1173M. This download will take about - 19 minutes with your connection. + Fetching and installing the upgrade can take several hours. Once the + download has finished, the process cannot be cancelled. - Fetching and installing the upgrade can take several hours. Once the - download has finished, the process cannot be cancelled. - - Continue [yN] Details [d]d - Continue [yN] Details [d]y + Continue [yN] Details [d]d + Continue [yN] Details [d]y Fetching - [100%] 1168kB/s 0s 2s + [100%] 1168kB/s 0s 2s Upgrading Extracting templates from packages: 100% Preconfiguring packages ... Extracting templates from packages: 100% Preconfiguring packages ... Extracting templates from packages: 100% Preconfiguring packages ... dpkg: libc6-i686: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you requested: - ubuntu-minimal depends on libc6-i686. + ubuntu-minimal depends on libc6-i686. (Reading database ... 321267 files and directories currently installed.) Removing libc6-i686 ... /bin/sh: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by /bin/sh) /bin/sh: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.11' not found (required by /bin/sh) dpkg: error processing libc6-i686 (--remove): - subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 + subprocess installed post-removal script returned error ex
[Bug 657937] Re: release update to maverick removes libc6-i686
** Attachment added: "system_state.tar.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/657937/+attachment/1682829/+files/system_state.tar.gz -- release update to maverick removes libc6-i686 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657937] Re: release update to maverick removes libc6-i686
** Attachment added: "main.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/657937/+attachment/1682828/+files/main.log -- release update to maverick removes libc6-i686 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657937] Re: release update to maverick removes libc6-i686
** Attachment added: "history.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/657937/+attachment/1682827/+files/history.log -- release update to maverick removes libc6-i686 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657937] Re: release update to maverick removes libc6-i686
** Attachment added: "apt.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/657937/+attachment/1682826/+files/apt.log -- release update to maverick removes libc6-i686 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657937] Re: release update to maverick removes libc6-i686
** Attachment added: "apt-term.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657937/+attachment/1682825/+files/apt-term.log -- release update to maverick removes libc6-i686 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657937] [NEW] release update to maverick removes libc6-i686
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager I just did a release update from 10.04 to 10.10 for fun, but it is removing libc6-i686, which does result in a system which is a bit uncomfortable ... :) r...@testground:/home/waja# do-release-upgrade -d Checking for a new ubuntu release Done Upgrade tool signature Done Upgrade tool Done downloading extracting 'maverick.tar.gz' authenticate 'maverick.tar.gz' against 'maverick.tar.gz.gpg' tar: Removing leading `/' from member names Reading cache Checking package manager Continue running under SSH? This session appears to be running under ssh. It is not recommended to perform a upgrade over ssh currently because in case of failure it is harder to recover. If you continue, an additional ssh daemon will be started at port '1022'. Do you want to continue? Continue [yN] y Starting additional sshd To make recovery in case of failure easier, an additional sshd will be started on port '1022'. If anything goes wrong with the running ssh you can still connect to the additional one. Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Building data structures... Done Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Building data structures... Done Updating repository information WARNING: Failed to read mirror file Third party sources disabled Some third party entries in your sources.list were disabled. You can re-enable them after the upgrade with the 'software-properties' tool or your package manager. 100% [Working] 0s Checking package manager Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Building data structures... Done Calculating the changes Calculating the changes Do you want to start the upgrade? 9 installed packages are no longer supported by Canonical. You can still get support from the community. 37 packages are going to be removed. 250 new packages are going to be installed. 1509 packages are going to be upgraded. You have to download a total of 1173M. This download will take about 19 minutes with your connection. Fetching and installing the upgrade can take several hours. Once the download has finished, the process cannot be cancelled. Continue [yN] Details [d]d Continue [yN] Details [d]y Fetching [100%] 1168kB/s 0s 2s Upgrading Extracting templates from packages: 100% Preconfiguring packages ... Extracting templates from packages: 100% Preconfiguring packages ... Extracting templates from packages: 100% Preconfiguring packages ... dpkg: libc6-i686: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you requested: ubuntu-minimal depends on libc6-i686. (Reading database ... 321267 files and directories currently installed.) Removing libc6-i686 ... /bin/sh: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by /bin/sh) /bin/sh: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.11' not found (required by /bin/sh) dpkg: error processing libc6-i686 (--remove): subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 sh: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by sh) sh: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.11' not found (required by sh) sh: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by sh) sh: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.11' not found (required by sh) /usr/bin/python: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by /usr/bin/python) /usr/bin/python: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by /lib/i686/cmov/libssl.so.0.9.8) /usr/bin/python: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by /lib/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.0.9.8) /usr/bin/python: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by /lib/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.0.9.8) /usr/bi
[Bug 621380] Re: bad output from check_linux_raid with RAID0 and linear volumes
Bug#579049: fixed in nagios-plugins 1.4.15-2 which was uploaded just some moments ago ** Also affects: nagios-plugins (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579049 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- bad output from check_linux_raid with RAID0 and linear volumes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 634679] Re: package openvas-server 2.0.3-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 634247 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634247 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 634247 package openvas-server 2.0.3-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10 * You can subscribe to bug 634247 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvas-server/+bug/634247/+subscribe -- package openvas-server 2.0.3-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634679 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 496093] Re: [lucid] rt2860 frequently fails to connect to mixed mode WPA/WPA2 secured wireless networks
On Saturday, 5. June 2010, you wrote: > I've uploaded a test package with the 2.6.34 upstream version of the > driver: > > http://people.canonical.com/~cndougla/bugs/496093/ > > Please test it out. I can confirm, that linux-backports-modules-wireless-2.6.32-22- generic_2.6.32-22.16~rt28x0_i386.deb works perfectly with linux- image-2.6.32-22-generic. Many thanks! With kind regards, Jan. -- Never write mail to , you have been warned! -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h r+++ y --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- -- [lucid] rt2860 frequently fails to connect to mixed mode WPA/WPA2 secured wireless networks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496093 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 562146] Re: Integrate nagios users with system ones
Sorry ... using system users within nagios is in my eyes a security problem, but maybe I'm wrong. Jan, with his debian nagios maintainers hat on. -- Integrate nagios users with system ones https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562146 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 562146] Re: Integrate nagios users with system ones
Do you guys really think, that using system users would be a good idea? Do you like to login to the nagios webinterface as root? -- Integrate nagios users with system ones https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562146 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 565781] Re: FFE: ipplan incompatible with php 5.3
Hmmm ... just the upstream changes: $ diff -Nur /tmp/ipplan/CHANGELOG /tmp/ipplan.new/CHANGELOG --- /tmp/ipplan/CHANGELOG 2009-07-17 00:15:11.0 +0200 +++ /tmp/ipplan.new/CHANGELOG 2009-08-17 23:43:43.0 +0200 @@ -1,4 +1,11 @@ -ipplan v4.92 +ipplan v4.92a + +Aug 3, 2009 + added: new config variable for template directory (CONFIG_DIR) + Jan Wagner + added: Italian translation + contributed by Calligaris Andrea + added: PHP 5.3 compatibility Jul 17, 2009 fixed: when creating multiple contiguous subnets while -- FFE: ipplan incompatible with php 5.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 565781] Re: FFE: ipplan incompatible with php 5.3
** Summary changed: - ipplan incompatible with php 5.3 + FFE: ipplan incompatible with php 5.3 -- FFE: ipplan incompatible with php 5.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 565781] Re: ipplan incompatible with php 5.3
There is another version between 4.92-1 and 4.92a-1, just uncritical and minor changes: ipplan (4.92-2) unstable; urgency=low * Updating standards version to 3.8.4 - Add README.source * Migrate Vcs-Fields over to scm.uncompleted.org * Add 1.0 to debian/source/format * Fix typo in README.Debian -- ipplan incompatible with php 5.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 565781] Re: ipplan incompatible with php 5.3
** Also affects: ipplan (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ipplan (Debian) Status: New => Fix Released -- ipplan incompatible with php 5.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 565781] Re: ipplan incompatible with php 5.3
Hi there, I have uploaded a new package to debian unstable some minutes ago: ipplan (4.92a-1) unstable; urgency=low * New Upstream Release - PHP 5.3 compatibility (LP: #565781) * Add trailing trunk/ at Vcs-Svn-field * Update 10_custom_templates.dpatch due upstream changes The changes from 4.92 are minor, so I would recommand to sync from unstable, if you are willing to fix this in lucid. Cheers, Jan. ** Changed in: ipplan (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- ipplan incompatible with php 5.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 515436] Re: Inactive dnsbl
Hi Andreas, at first, I have nothing todo with ubuntu I'm just the maintainer of the package in the Debian distribution, where the package is used by Ubuntu without any changes. So I can nothing do for you within ubuntu. Anyways ... back to the problem. Jaunty doesn't need to be fixed, it is fixed allready. (see http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=policyd- weight) So you problem is just hardy. I wouldn't say, this little problem qualifies for an update for a allready released distribution, but thats just my personal opinion. In debian we did decided[1] not to update the package for stable. With kind regards, Jan. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=471645 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #471645 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=471645 -- Inactive dnsbl https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 515436] Re: Inactive dnsbl
That could easiely solved with /etc/default/policyd-weight. Installing without reading documentation and understanding, what the software is doing, is nothing we can fix as (debian) distribution. Speaking as debian maintainer of the package, Jan. -- Inactive dnsbl https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 511981] Re: openvas-adduser script requires gettext
Okay I commited the fix into debian maintainers vcs. -- openvas-adduser script requires gettext https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511981 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 515436] Re: Inactive dnsbl
looking into http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.14.17-5/changelog indicates, that this was fixed since 0.1.14.17-4 (in debian and ubuntu) which is shipped sincejaunty . maybe you have a /etc/default/policyd-weight with modifications? -- Inactive dnsbl https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 515436] Re: Inactive dnsbl
which distibution are you using? -- Inactive dnsbl https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 511981] Re: openvas-adduser script requires gettext
hi there, could you please try to remove gettext and just keeping gettext-base, this should ship all needed files for running openvas-adduser. Please give feedback, so i'm able to fix that within the next debian version (which gets hopefully imported by ubuntu). Thanks, Jan. -- openvas-adduser script requires gettext https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511981 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 486790] Re: openvas-server is missing openvas-nvt-sync script
The script will just fetch the plugins, but some scripts require the nes-plugins, which are provided by openvas-plugins-base and are binary packages. So just grabbing the openvas-nvt-sync script will not fully solve your problem. -- openvas-server is missing openvas-nvt-sync script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486790 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 498715] Re: segfault when changing brighness
Sorry, somehow forgot to include that. I'm on Ubuntu Karmic 64bit. $lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 9.10 Release:9.10 $apt-cache policy xfce4-power-manager xfce4-power-manager: Installed: 0.8.4-1ubuntu1 Candidate: 0.8.4-1ubuntu1 Version table: *** 0.8.4-1ubuntu1 0 500 http://au.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- segfault when changing brighness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 498715] Re: segfault when changing brighness
** Attachment added: "gdb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36988864/gdb.txt -- segfault when changing brighness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 498715] [NEW] segfault when changing brighness
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xfce4-power-manager Bug description: When I start my laptop usually the screen brightness is set to minimum. I have xfce4-power-manager running in e17. However trying to increase the screen brightness using the function keys fails. Running xfce4-power-manager --no-daemon in a terminal gives the following output: (xfce4-power-manager:2106): xfce4-power-manager-WARNING **: could not map keysym 1008ffa8 to keycode and pressing one of the brightness function keys results in a segfault . However after setting the brightness manually via: echo 7 >/sys/class/backlight/sony/brightness xfce4-power-manager works fine and setting the brightness works. Backtrace attached. ** Affects: xfce4-power-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- segfault when changing brighness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 240644] Re: [regression] eps file blank in evince 2.24, renders correctly in 2.22
I'm also experiencing this bug with several of my eps files. This seems to be happening mostly with eps files generated with matplotlib. Once the same files are converted to pdf or are included inside latex documents (both ps or pdf output) they display fine. I've filed a bug upstream (bug 604037 on bugzilla.gnome.org). Ubuntu Karmic evince --version GNOME Document Viewer 2.28.1 -- [regression] eps file blank in evince 2.24, renders correctly in 2.22 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/240644 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 486997] Re: ps-watcher package bad default ps-prog
could you please tell us, which distribution you are using? -- ps-watcher package bad default ps-prog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486997 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 486997] Re: ps-watcher package bad default ps-prog
Could you please document, what is your exact error? What are the symptoms of it? Maybe you got a error message? -- ps-watcher package bad default ps-prog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486997 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348983] Re: [jaunty] PyTables does not work for Python 2.6
I also would like this bug resolved as I use pytables quite a bit and have to keep using python2.5 due to this bug. Ubuntu Karmic 9.1 here. -- [jaunty] PyTables does not work for Python 2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453263] Re: evolution-addressbook-export fails with Segmentation fault
** Attachment added: "gdb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35119289/gdb.txt -- evolution-addressbook-export fails with Segmentation fault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453263] Re: evolution-addressbook-export fails with Segmentation fault
I can confirm this bug. After an upgrade to Karmic evolution-addressbook-export segfaults. However I only see a segfault when calling evolution-addressbook-export with an addressbook parameter. output: └─(08:58 $)─> evolution-addressbook-export file:///[pathtoaddressbook] (evolution-addressbook-export:21167): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.22.2/gobject/gtype.c:2458: initialization assertion failed, use IA__g_type_init() prior to this function (evolution-addressbook-export:21167): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (evolution-addressbook-export:21167): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed Segmentation fault (core dumped) -- evolution-addressbook-export fails with Segmentation fault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 449360] Re: automatic proxy configuration doesn't work
I can confirm this bug. Gnome proxy settings are set to automatic proxy configuration (a pac file location). Starting epiphany from the CLI results in a message: *** PAC found, but no active PAC runner! Falling back to direct... and obviously no page is loading as my network does not allow direct connections. Automatic proxy configuration in firefox works fine. Ubuntu Version: Karmic Koala epiphany --version GNOME Web Browser 2.28.0 Using webkit engine (epiphany-webkit). I've also tried installing mozjs or various additional webkit packages, but this did not help. ** Changed in: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- automatic proxy configuration doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 393669] Re: dpkg segfaults when installing/upgrading sbcl-doc
This bug should be investigated by dpkg maintainers. ** Project changed: sbcl => dpkg ** Changed in: dpkg Status: Won't Fix => New -- dpkg segfaults when installing/upgrading sbcl-doc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393669 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315507] Re: Unable to remove Suhosin patch
Ondřej, to clearly pointing out ... you are talking about the php5 package and/or any php5 extention, which causes the Canaries. Suhosin makes the problem just visible. Please correct me, if I'm wrong. With kind regards, Jan. -- Unable to remove Suhosin patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315507] Re: Unable to remove Suhosin patch
Hi, sorry ... from my side (Debian Maintainer), I cant reproduce the problem. You neither provided logs (suhosin logs to syslog) nor any example php scripts to verify your problem. Until I don't have any reproducible facts, I can't anything for you. Anyways .. maybe the guys from Ubuntu can fix a bug which is unreproducible. With kind regards, Jan. -- Unable to remove Suhosin patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315507] Re: Unable to remove Suhosin patch
> The problem is that adding anything suhosin related to the php.ini file does not seem to work. Which php.ini file do you use and do you use libapache2-mod-php5 or cgi? What about the following: # echo "suhosin.simulation = on" >> /etc/php5/conf.d/suhosin.ini Restarting the webserver and you will be fine. With kind regards, Jan. -- Unable to remove Suhosin patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328716] Re: ebox can't install on Jaunty alpha 4
I strongly disagree. At first, if dbus is needed by ebox, it SHOULD on it. Anyhow ... installing dbus doesn't fix the problem here: r...@ebox:~# dpkg -l | grep ebox r...@ebox:~# dpkg -l | grep dbus ii dbus 1.2.12-0ubuntu2 simple interprocess messaging system ii libdbus-1-3 1.2.12-0ubuntu2 simple interprocess messaging system ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.80-3 simple interprocess messaging system (GLib-b r...@ebox:~# ps aux|grep dbus 118 3630 0.0 0.2 2668 552 ?Ss 08:50 0:00 /bin/dbus-daemon --system root 3860 0.0 0.2 3332 784 pts/0R+ 08:50 0:00 grep dbus r...@ebox:~# aptitude install ebox [...] Setting up ebox (0.12.4-0ubuntu1) ... Creating the eboxlogs database Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - 1: Failed to get connection to session: Failed to execute dbus-launch to autolaunch D-Bus session) at /usr/share/perl5/EBox/GConfModule.pm line 47. invoke-rc.d: initscript ebox, action "apache" failed. [...] ** Attachment added: "Installation Log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26964192/ebox.log -- ebox can't install on Jaunty alpha 4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338704] Re: description missing in nagios config
Thanks for you bugreport, but I cant find the file you mentioned: /tmp$ dpkg-source -x nagios-plugins_1.4.12-4ubuntu2.dsc gpg: Signature made Wed 19 Nov 2008 06:42:40 PM CET using DSA key ID FA14013B gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found dpkg-source: extracting nagios-plugins in nagios-plugins-1.4.12 dpkg-source: info: unpacking nagios-plugins_1.4.12.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: info: applying nagios-plugins_1.4.12-4ubuntu2.diff.gz /tmp$ cd nagios-plugins-1.4.12/ /tmp/nagios-plugins-1.4.12$ find . -name windows.cfg /tmp/nagios-plugins-1.4.12$ Where did you find this file? Thanks and with kind regards, Jan. ** Changed in: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- description missing in nagios config https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338704 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328716] Re: ebox can't install on Jaunty alpha 4
same here ... seems broken since ages. -- ebox can't install on Jaunty alpha 4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318703] Re: nagios check_smtp expects integer instead of double
Hi, upstream stated the following: "The proper fix would rather be using the nagios thresholds functions. OTOH it's more likely that we put time toward implementing the new thresholds format than fixing plugins that were never converted to the old one. Feel free to attach a working patch if you wish - we'll consider it anyway. Otherwise a quick fix would rather be fixing the documentation." Please provide further informations to launchpad and the upstreambug too. Thanks, Jan. -- nagios check_smtp expects integer instead of double https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318703 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297747] Re: Doesn't follow other plugin package conventions
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #513872 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513872 ** Also affects: nagios-snmp-plugins (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513872 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Doesn't follow other plugin package conventions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297747 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297747] Re: Doesn't follow other plugin package conventions
Hi Scott, just a statement from my (debian maintainer) side. The name is just a result of upstream package name (which I just did take over). Installing the check command templates not into /usr/share/nagios-plugins/ but to /usr/share/nagios-snmp-plugins/ is just normal, since they are related to an other source package. The only problem is the use of /usr/share/nagios-plugins/dpkg/functions shipped by nagios-plugins-basic , I will fix it by depend on nagios-plugins-basic or maybe copy over the file into the package itself with the next version of the debian package. With kind regards, Jan. -- Doesn't follow other plugin package conventions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297747 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247968] Re: there was a problem when tryiny to instal ispCP in Ubuntu
Anyhow ... packages <= 0.1.14-beta-6 did write the mentioned directory into /tmp/ ... so it should no problem unless you updates directly from one release to another ... it was just a problem when using hardy when it was not released and the package was upgraded to this package version. So I think its okay to close the bug, cause the issue was just "temporary" in hardy while it was not released. -- there was a problem when tryiny to instal ispCP in Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247968 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
