[Bug 427687] Re: Kernel 2.6.31-10-powerpc - Oops with b43 after txpower off
This is not an issue for me anymore with 10.04 (the beta), and as I'm guessing there will be no effort spent on fixing it for 9.10 the bug might just as well be closed. :-) -- Kernel 2.6.31-10-powerpc - Oops with b43 after txpower off https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427687 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 513932] Re: [i945gme] Keyboard not working after upgrade to Lucid
This also affects my old iBook G4 (ppc with radon mobility), so I don't think the i945gme-part in the bug name is particularly relevant. -- [i945gme] Keyboard not working after upgrade to Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513932 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532114] Re: [lucid] keyboard doesn't work on 12" G4 PowerBook
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 513932 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513932 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 513932 [i945gme] Keyboard not working after upgrade to Lucid -- [lucid] keyboard doesn't work on 12" G4 PowerBook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532114 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532114] Re: [lucid] keyboard doesn't work on 12" G4 PowerBook
I'm having the same problem on my old 12" iBook G4. I installed xserver-xorg-input-kbd_1.4.0-1_powerpc.deb from debian sid and added Option "AllowEmptyInput" "off" to my xorg.conf as the instructions in the bug description suggests, and that does indeed make the keyboard work again. This was not necessary in karmic though. udev issue? -- [lucid] keyboard doesn't work on 12" G4 PowerBook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532114 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 440229] Re: do-release-upgrade does not work behind proxy
"Same here"..
After setting the http_proxy environment variable, I can use wget and
similar and reach sites on the internet.. But running "do-release-
upgrade -d" or running "update-manader -d" and clicking the "Upgrade"
fails. The first only shows "Checking for a new ubuntu release" forever
until I break (^C). The second needs to be killed.
Feels like https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager-
core/+bug/162996 never was fixed..
u...@lab03:~$ export http_proxy="http://1.2.3.4:8080";
u...@lab03:~$ sudo echo $http_proxy
http://1.2.3.4:8080
u...@lab03:~$ sudo do-release-upgrade -d
Checking for a new ubuntu release
^CTraceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/do-release-upgrade", line 61, in
fetcher.run()
File
"/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/DistUpgradeFetcherCore.py",
line 236, in run
if not self.fetchDistUpgrader():
File
"/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/DistUpgradeFetcherCore.py",
line 203, in fetchDistUpgrader
uri = self._expandUri(self.new_dist.upgradeToolSig)
File
"/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/DistUpgradeFetcherCore.py",
line 178, in _expandUri
new_uri = self.mirror_from_sources_list(uri, self.DEFAULT_MIRROR)
File
"/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/DistUpgradeFetcherCore.py",
line 164, in mirror_from_sources_list
if url_downloadable(mirror_uri, self._debug):
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/utils.py", line 77,
in url_downloadable
c.request("HEAD", path)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/httplib.py", line 874, in request
self._send_request(method, url, body, headers)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/httplib.py", line 911, in _send_request
self.endheaders()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/httplib.py", line 868, in endheaders
self._send_output()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/httplib.py", line 740, in _send_output
self.send(msg)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/httplib.py", line 699, in send
self.connect()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/httplib.py", line 683, in connect
self.timeout)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/socket.py", line 505, in create_connection
sock.connect(sa)
File "", line 1, in connect
KeyboardInterrupt
--
do-release-upgrade does not work behind proxy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440229
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432222] Re: mountall fails, broken (powerpc?) gcc?
Attached file generated by "gcc -E -fPIE -Os test.c > test.i" Whatever the problem is, it should at the very least be shared by the system building the powerpc packages. Either that, or my test case is broken. :) ** Attachment added: "test.i" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32342890/test.i -- mountall fails, broken (powerpc?) gcc? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432222] Re: mountall fails, broken (powerpc?) gcc?
A typical run of a slightly modified test case ("extended" printf) gives:
a (@0xbfc22160) in extern_func: 123456789
a (@0xbfc22150) in intern_func: -1077796448
where the address is off by the same nicely even amount every run.
--
mountall fails, broken (powerpc?) gcc?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432222] Re: mountall fails, broken (powerpc?) gcc?
.o as requested, produced by gcc -c -fPIE -Os test.c Linking and running: gcc test.o -o gcc-test && ./gcc-test a in extern_func: 123456789 a in intern_func: -1074204592 ** Attachment added: "gcc -c -fPIE -Os test.c" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32340419/test.o -- mountall fails, broken (powerpc?) gcc? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432222] Re: mountall fails, broken (powerpc?) gcc?
Is the test case attached in comment #8 insufficient? According to the gcc documentation ( in particular, http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Nested-Functions.html ), the code should be valid as long as the call to the nested function is executed before the outer function exits. I take it this functionality isn't actually used much, but to me anyway it seems like a bug.. (I should also confirm that mountall 0.1.7 fixes the issue for me, thanks.) -- mountall fails, broken (powerpc?) gcc? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432222] Re: mountall fails, broken (powerpc?) gcc?
Thanks, I failed to figure out how to assign the bug to several packages. :-) Yes, I just confirmed that compiling mountall with -O2 fixes the issue here, or I should say, produces a working binary. So that would be a solution I guess, if it could be incorporated into the official package. The underlying issue still seems to be gcc though. Regarding the patch, "to my defense" I wasn't really expecting it to be applied "officially" anyway as it doesn't really seem like a proper fix to me. -- mountall fails, broken (powerpc?) gcc? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432222] Re: mountall fails, broken (powerpc?) gcc?
** Description changed: Binary package hint: mountall My system (ibook running karmic) is not booting since the "general breakage" in the last couple of days. Installing the latest upgrades does not help. + + Edit: This seems to be due to a gcc bug, see comment #8 The boot seems to stop at mountall, whose output contains (perhaps unrelated) some garbled paths that I haven't been able to track down the source of. The "garbled pattern" is different between the boots, so it's obviously reading from some uninitialized memory somewhere. I attach a log of the output of mountall (obtained by inserting "bash" into /etc/init/mountall.conf and running mountall --debug &> .. as described in another bug), and my fstab. I just refuse to believe that I have to actually reinstall.. ;-) Installed versions of upstart and mountall: ii mountall 0.1.6 filesystem mounting tool ii upstart 0.6.3-3 event-based init daemon kernel is: Linux ibook 2.6.31-10-powerpc #34-Ubuntu Tue Sep 15 23:53:36 UTC 2009 ppc GNU/Linux fstab and mountall log attached. -- mountall fails, broken (powerpc?) gcc? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432222] Re: mountall fails, broken (powerpc?) gcc?
As this really seems to be a problem with gcc, I'm "reassigning" this. ** Package changed: mountall (Ubuntu) => gcc-4.4 (Ubuntu) -- mountall fails, broken (powerpc?) gcc? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432222] Re: boot fails, mountall likely culprit
Yes, maybe it is a compiler issue. I tried to write a small test case that isolates the problem, and I think that I have succeeded. It needs to be (like mountall) compiled with both -fPIE and -Os to actually show the problem, so my guess is that something important is being optimized away. This is the output from the "problematic system": da...@ibook:~$ uname -a Linux ibook 2.6.31-10-powerpc #34-Ubuntu Tue Sep 15 23:53:36 UTC 2009 ppc GNU/Linux da...@ibook:~$ gcc --version | head -n1 gcc (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu1) 4.4.1 da...@ibook:~$ gcc -fPIE -Os test.c -o gcc-test && ./gcc-test a in extern_func: 123456789 a in intern_func: -1077763264 This is the output from an x86 system running debian, showing the "expected" output: da...@fww:~$ uname -a Linux fww 2.6.26-2-686 #1 SMP Fri Aug 14 01:27:18 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux da...@fww:~$ gcc --version | head -n 1 gcc (Debian 4.3.2-1.1) 4.3.2 da...@fww:~$ gcc -fPIE -Os test.c -o gcc-test && ./gcc-test a in extern_func: 123456789 a in intern_func: 123456789 As you can see the compilers aren't exactly comparable, but nevertheless it seems to point at a real problem with gcc. Test app is attached. As said, this seems to happen only if the flags -fPIE and -Os are specified. ** Attachment added: "Test case showing broken(?) powerpc gcc" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32145646/test.c ** Summary changed: - boot fails, mountall likely culprit + mountall fails, broken (powerpc?) gcc? -- mountall fails, broken (powerpc?) gcc? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432222] Re: boot fails, mountall likely culprit
Sorry for all the spam, but I have confirmed that this approach does not work unless the variables are made static. I'll also attach a cleaner patch while I'm at it. ** Attachment added: "mountall-0.1.6.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32007384/mountall-0.1.6.patch ** Attachment removed: "mountall-0.1.6.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32005611/mountall-0.1.6.patch -- boot fails, mountall likely culprit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432222] Re: boot fails, mountall likely culprit
Ok, I have it running. As I'm not quite sure what the C standard says here I don't know if I just replaced one kludge for another or if there's an obscure compiler issue involved on ppc, but with the attached patch, my ubuntu starts once again for the first time in a couple of days. (And there's probably no reason to make the variable static either) ** Attachment added: "mountall-0.1.6.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32005478/mountall-0.1.6.patch ** Attachment removed: "mountall-0.1.6.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32005478/mountall-0.1.6.patch -- boot fails, mountall likely culprit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432222] Re: boot fails, mountall likely culprit
And now diffed in the correct order.. ;-) ** Attachment added: "mountall-0.1.6.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32005611/mountall-0.1.6.patch -- boot fails, mountall likely culprit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432222] Re: boot fails, mountall likely culprit
** Description changed: Binary package hint: mountall My system (ibook running karmic) is not booting since the "general breakage" in the last couple of days. Installing the latest upgrades does not help. The boot seems to stop at mountall, whose output contains (perhaps unrelated) some garbled paths that I haven't been able to track down the source of. The "garbled pattern" is different between the boots, so it's obviously reading from some unitialized memory somewhere. I attach a log of the output of mountall (obtained by inserting "bash" - into /etc/init.d/mountall.conf and running mountall --debug &> .. as + into /etc/init/mountall.conf and running mountall --debug &> .. as described in another bug), and my fstab. I just refuse to believe that I have to actually reinstall.. ;-) Installed versions of upstart and mountall: ii mountall 0.1.6 filesystem mounting tool ii upstart 0.6.3-3 event-based init daemon kernel is: Linux ibook 2.6.31-10-powerpc #34-Ubuntu Tue Sep 15 23:53:36 UTC 2009 ppc GNU/Linux fstab and mountall log attached. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: mountall My system (ibook running karmic) is not booting since the "general breakage" in the last couple of days. Installing the latest upgrades does not help. The boot seems to stop at mountall, whose output contains (perhaps unrelated) some garbled paths that I haven't been able to track down the source of. The "garbled pattern" is different between the boots, so it's - obviously reading from some unitialized memory somewhere. + obviously reading from some uninitialized memory somewhere. I attach a log of the output of mountall (obtained by inserting "bash" into /etc/init/mountall.conf and running mountall --debug &> .. as described in another bug), and my fstab. I just refuse to believe that I have to actually reinstall.. ;-) Installed versions of upstart and mountall: ii mountall 0.1.6 filesystem mounting tool ii upstart 0.6.3-3 event-based init daemon kernel is: Linux ibook 2.6.31-10-powerpc #34-Ubuntu Tue Sep 15 23:53:36 UTC 2009 ppc GNU/Linux fstab and mountall log attached. -- boot fails, mountall likely culprit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432222] Re: boot fails, mountall likely culprit
** Attachment added: "mountall.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31995368/mountall.log -- boot fails, mountall likely culprit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432222] Re: boot fails, mountall likely culprit
** Attachment added: "fstab" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31995365/fstab -- boot fails, mountall likely culprit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432222] [NEW] boot fails, mountall likely culprit
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountall My system (ibook running karmic) is not booting since the "general breakage" in the last couple of days. Installing the latest upgrades does not help. The boot seems to stop at mountall, whose output contains (perhaps unrelated) some garbled paths that I haven't been able to track down the source of. The "garbled pattern" is different between the boots, so it's obviously reading from some unitialized memory somewhere. I attach a log of the output of mountall (obtained by inserting "bash" into /etc/init.d/mountall.conf and running mountall --debug &> .. as described in another bug), and my fstab. I just refuse to believe that I have to actually reinstall.. ;-) Installed versions of upstart and mountall: ii mountall 0.1.6 filesystem mounting tool ii upstart 0.6.3-3 event-based init daemon kernel is: Linux ibook 2.6.31-10-powerpc #34-Ubuntu Tue Sep 15 23:53:36 UTC 2009 ppc GNU/Linux fstab and mountall log attached. ** Affects: mountall (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- boot fails, mountall likely culprit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 427687] Re: Kernel 2.6.31-10-powerpc - Oops with b43 after txpower off
Still present in: Linux ibook 2.6.31-10-powerpc #32-Ubuntu Fri Sep 11 03:31:47 UTC 2009 ppc GNU/Linux The bug is not present in an "old" Jaunty kernel (karmic userspace): Linux ibook 2.6.28-6-powerpc #20-Ubuntu Fri Apr 17 08:30:40 UTC 2009 ppc GNU/Linux , nor is it present in a 2.6.30 kernel from debian (still karmic userspace) installed from: linux-image-2.6.30-1-powerpc_2.6.30-6_powerpc.deb That is, executing "iwconfig wlan0 txpower off" with the first one results in the aforementioned Oops, while it with the two latter ones results in the expected behavior (no Oops, subsequent calls to iwconfig wlan0 reporting txpower to be off) -- Kernel 2.6.31-10-powerpc - Oops with b43 after txpower off https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427687 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 427687] Re: Kernel 2.6.31-10-powerpc - Oops with b43 after txpower off
** Attachment added: "dmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31636329/dmesg.txt -- Kernel 2.6.31-10-powerpc - Oops with b43 after txpower off https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427687 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 427687] Re: Kernel 2.6.31-10-powerpc - Oops with b43 after txpower off
** Attachment added: "lspci-vnvn.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31636255/lspci-vnvn.txt -- Kernel 2.6.31-10-powerpc - Oops with b43 after txpower off https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427687 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 427687] Re: Kernel 2.6.31-10-powerpc - Oops with b43 after txpower off
** Attachment added: "oops.jpg" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31636215/oops.jpg -- Kernel 2.6.31-10-powerpc - Oops with b43 after txpower off https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427687 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 427687] [NEW] Kernel 2.6.31-10-powerpc - Oops with b43 after txpower off
Public bug reported: After upgrading from 9.04 to the 9.10 development branch on an iBook G4 today, disabling the wireless from NetworkManager causes an Oops. X and other apps are still somewhat responsive, but remote ssh sessions and local terminal sessions completely freezes. The same (I assume) issue can be triggered by executing: iwconfig wlan0 txpower off This results in the attached Oops printout and a frozen system. System information: da...@ibook:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu karmic (development branch) Release:9.10 da...@ibook:~$ uname -a Linux ibook 2.6.31-10-powerpc #31-Ubuntu Thu Sep 10 18:40:14 UTC 2009 ppc GNU/Linux ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Kernel 2.6.31-10-powerpc - Oops with b43 after txpower off https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427687 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345542] Re: linux-image-2.6.28-5-powerpc has ioremap fault with radeon drm module
I installed the new kernel from linux- image-2.6.30-1-powerpc_2.6.30-1.1_powerpc.deb on my ibook G4, but it greets me with a kernel BUG/Oops and a panic early during the boot process so I can't really try it out. -- linux-image-2.6.28-5-powerpc has ioremap fault with radeon drm module https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345542 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345542] Re: linux-image-2.6.28-5-powerpc has ioremap fault with radeon drm module
I don't have anything new to come with, but just so that it doesn't get lost: As I stated in Bug #354677 (a duplicate of this one), a temporary work around that works for me is to add Option "BusType" "PCI" to the Device section in /etc/X11/xorg.conf . I am assuming this comes with a slight performance penalty, but at least it works. -- linux-image-2.6.28-5-powerpc has ioremap fault with radeon drm module https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345542 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 345542] Re: linux-image-2.6.28-5-powerpc has ioremap fault with radeon drm module
As one of those affected, I'm using a 32 bit kernel (old ibook G4). -- linux-image-2.6.28-5-powerpc has ioremap fault with radeon drm module https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345542 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354677] Re: No or broken 3d-acceleration with Jaunty on ibook/powerpc
I should have done this before reporting the bug of course, but as I had vague memories of acceleration working when trying out an earlier live- cd version of ubuntu "long ago", I downloaded the 5.04 Live CD and tried it out. And it did indeed have working 3D-acceleration. Comparing the logs seemed to point at the difference lying in 5.04 falling back on pci for the dri, so I added: Option "BusType" "PCI" to my xorg.conf. With this option added, 3D-acceleration (including compiz which I'm using at the moment) seems to work just fine, and glxgears (the beloved benchmarking tool ;) ) reports fps about 10 times higher than before. So. Bug closed? (is there even any use in reporting possibly ppc-specific bugs?) -- No or broken 3d-acceleration with Jaunty on ibook/powerpc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354677] Re: No or broken 3d-acceleration with Jaunty on ibook/powerpc
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24764536/Xorg.0.log -- No or broken 3d-acceleration with Jaunty on ibook/powerpc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354677] [NEW] No or broken 3d-acceleration with Jaunty on ibook/powerpc
Public bug reported: Powerpc port of Jaunty, installed with the beta-iso and updated today 2009-04-03, seemingly fails to initialize proper 3D-acceleration. glxgears runs with low fps (around 60), and also with a blue tint. Compiz-manager aborts with: Software rasterizer detected, abortingaborting and using fallback: /usr/bin/metacity 2D and xv seems to work fine. I have also attempted setting UseFBDev to false in Xorg.conf with no difference. Possibly relevant section from Xorg.0.log: (II) RADEON(0): [DRI] installation complete (II) RADEON(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel (II) RADEON(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0xf2ce2000 at 0x48021000 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] Closed DRM master. (WW) RADEON(0): Direct rendering disabled (II) RADEON(0): Render acceleration enabled for R200 type cards. glxinfo, however, claims that direct rendering is enabled. And from /var/log/syslog: Apr 3 20:08:47 ibook kernel: [ 1608.954840] radeonfb :00:10.0: Invalid ROM contents Apr 3 20:08:47 ibook kernel: [ 1608.955042] radeonfb :00:10.0: Invalid ROM contents .. Apr 3 20:08:47 ibook kernel: [ 1609.206954] agpgart-uninorth :00:0b.0: putting AGP V2 device into 4x mode Apr 3 20:08:47 ibook kernel: [ 1609.206972] radeonfb :00:10.0: putting AGP V2 device into 4x mode Apr 3 20:08:48 ibook kernel: [ 1609.418221] __ioremap(): phys addr 0x0 is RAM lr f2ae9d10 Apr 3 20:08:48 ibook kernel: [ 1609.418234] __ioremap(): phys addr 0x101000 is RAM lr f2ae9d10 Apr 3 20:08:48 ibook kernel: [ 1609.418239] __ioremap(): phys addr 0x102000 is RAM lr f2ae9d10 Apr 3 20:08:48 ibook kernel: [ 1609.418247] [drm:radeon_do_init_cp] *ERROR* could not find ioremap agp regions! lspci -vvnn gives: :00:10.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: ATI Technologies Inc M9+ 5C63 [Radeon Mobility 9200 (AGP)] [1002:5c63] (rev 01) Subsystem: ATI Technologies Inc M9+ 5C63 [Radeon Mobility 9200 (AGP)] [1002:5c63] Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR- Kernel driver in use: radeonfb uname -a: Linux ibook 2.6.28-6-powerpc #16-Ubuntu Wed Apr 1 07:52:37 UTC 2009 ppc GNU/Linux lsb_release -rd: Description:Ubuntu jaunty (development branch) Release:9.04 ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- No or broken 3d-acceleration with Jaunty on ibook/powerpc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 77464] Re: usb printer not detected to add printer
I had the same problem - it wouldn't detect my printer after upgrading to feisty. Doing the add user to group thing fixed the problem. I didn't, however, need to do the foomatic thing. Perhaps it was already installed... -- usb printer not detected to add printer https://launchpad.net/bugs/77464 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
